© 2007 morrison & foerster llp all rights reserved bias from a juror’s perspective...

67
© 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

Upload: pauline-whitehead

Post on 15-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

© 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved

Bias From AJuror’s Perspective

(revisited)Rick Bergstrom

Morrison & Foerster LLP

January 26, 2007

Page 2: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

Overview

• Discrimination

• Sexual Harassment

• Retaliation/Whistleblower

Page 3: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

Example re: Punitive Damages

If a company is found to be negligent, that company should pay punitive damages.

1% 2%8%

63%

26%

Disagree strongly Disagree Neither Agree Agree strongly0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Page 4: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

Data Background

• Gathered over 3 year period• Throughout U.S.• 50% Men / 50% Women• 50% C / 20% H / 20% AA / 10% A• 50% Over 40 / 50% Under 40• Education: High School and College • Approx. 10,000 participants

Page 5: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

Discrimination

Page 6: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

There should be less

government regulation.

Agree or Disagree?

Page 7: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

And The Terminator Says?

Page 8: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

23%

62%

11%4%

0%

Disagree strongly Disagree Neither Agree Agree strongly0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

There should be less government regulation.

Page 9: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

Which of the following statements best describesyour feelings?

29%

71%

It is more important to follow the "letter of the law"than the "spirit of the law":

It is more important to see that "justice is done"than to follow the "letter of the law":

Page 10: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

White and minority employees are treated

equally in the workplace.

Agree or Disagree?

Page 11: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

White and minority employees are treated equallyin the workplace.

37%41%

12% 10%

0%

Disagree strongly Disagree Neither Agree Agree strongly0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Page 12: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

Discrimination in the workplace has becomemore subtle.

Yes89%

No11%

Page 13: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

The organization is negligent if it does not properly

document an employee’s performance problems.

Yes or No?

Page 14: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

The organization is negligent if it does not properly document an employee's performance problems.

Yes91%

No9%

Page 15: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

Sexual Harassment

Page 16: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

Sexual harassment is a common occurrence in

the workplace.

Yes or No?

Page 17: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

Sexual harassment is a common occurrence in the workplace.

Yes72%

No28%

Page 18: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

Sexual harassment has become more subtle.

Yes79%

No21%

Page 19: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

Do women report sexual harassment to their employers if it has

occurred?

Yes or No?

Page 20: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

Do women report sexual harassment to theiremployers if it has occurred?

Yes17%

No83%

Page 21: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

Some people try to tolerate a certain amount of joking and offensive behavior at work in order to

fit in with others.

Yes94%

No6%

Page 22: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

I would be suspicious of a woman who claimed she was sexually harassed at work if she waited several months to report the

incident.

Yes or No?

Page 23: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

I would be suspicious of a woman who claimed she was sexually harassed at work if she waited several months to

report the incidents.

Yes22%

No78%

Page 24: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

If an employee does not complain about sexual harassment,there is nothing the company can do about it.

Yes69%

No31%

Page 25: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

Most organizations say they strictly enforce their policies regarding harassment in the

workplace, but they really don’t.

Agree or Disagree?

Page 26: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

Most organizations say they strictly enforce their policiesregarding harassment in the workplace, but really don't.

0%

15%19%

62%

4%

Disagree strongly Disagree Neither Agree Agree strongly0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Page 27: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

Most organizations investigate allegations against employees

more thoroughly than those made against a supervisor.

Agree or Disagree?

Page 28: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

Most organizations investigate allegations against employees more thoroughly than those made against a supervisor.

9% 10% 11%

59%

11%

Disagree strongly Disagree Neither Agree Agree strongly0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Page 29: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

In a sexual harassment lawsuit, the most importantinformation about what happened usually comes from the

people who worked with the person bringing the suit.

4%

24%20%

48%

4%

Disagree strongly Disagree Neither Agree Agree strongly0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Page 30: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

In a dispute between the employee and a big organization,who would you tend to believe?

Employee88%

Big Organization12%

Page 31: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

In a dispute between an employee and his/her supervisor,who would you tend to believe?

Employee57%

Supervisor43%

Page 32: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

A company should terminate a supervisor who physically

touches an employee in a sexual manner?

Yes or No?

Page 33: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

A company should terminate a supervisor who physicallytouches an employee in a sexual manner.

Yes96%

No4%

Page 34: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

Any supervisor who makes reference to an employee about

oral sex should be fired.

Yes or No?

Page 35: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

Any supervisor who makes references to an employeeabout oral sex should be fired.

Yes70%

No30%

Page 36: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

It would be extremely difficult to keep working for a supervisor whom you filed a sexual harassment

complaint against .

Yes96%

No4%

Page 37: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

Key Sexual Harassment Issues For Jurors

• Was a supervisor involved?• Was the conduct verbal or physical?• Did plaintiff say stop?• Did plaintiff participate or initiate any acts?• Did plaintiff report the issue?• Was a prompt investigation conducted?• Was plaintiff kept informed?

Page 38: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

Retaliation/

Whistleblower

Page 39: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

4%0% 0%

42%

54%

Disagree strongly Disagree Neither Agree Agree strongly0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

It is very important for people tostand up for what they believe in.

Page 40: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

It is common for a supervisor to retaliate against an employee

who participates in an investigation of claims of

unlawful conduct.

Agree or Disagree?

Page 41: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

It is common for a supervisor to retaliate against an employee who participates in an investigation of claims

of unlawful conduct.

0%

16%

28%

46%

10%

Disagree strongly Disagree Neither Agree Agree strongly0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Page 42: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007
Page 43: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007
Page 44: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007
Page 45: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007
Page 46: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007
Page 47: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007
Page 48: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007
Page 49: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007
Page 50: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

Avoiding an employees who has complained of misconduct can

be considered retaliation.

Agree or Disagree?

Page 51: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007
Page 52: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

No longer being invited to social events after work can be considered retaliation by

co-workers.

Agree or disagree?

Page 53: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007
Page 54: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007
Page 55: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007
Page 56: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007
Page 57: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007
Page 58: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007
Page 59: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007
Page 60: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007
Page 61: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007
Page 62: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

If an employee mentions informally to any supervisor that he/she is being harassed by co-workers, that supervisor has no

obligation to report it to the company.

Agree or Disagree?

Page 63: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007
Page 64: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

If an employee mentions they are being harassed by co-workers to

a supervisor and asks that nothing be done, the supervisor

should do nothing.

Agree or Disagree?

Page 65: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007
Page 66: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

Retaliation Themes

• Expect that it will happen following complaint (or at least assume people will think it is happening).

• Screen for it in reviews, promotions, transfers, terminations, and layoffs (material events).

• Train managers to report any complaints or concerns.

• Follow-up with whistleblower and co-workers.

Page 67: © 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Bias From A Juror’s Perspective (revisited) Rick Bergstrom Morrison & Foerster LLP January 26, 2007

The End