© 2012. all rights reserved. front range roundtable front range roundtable q2-13 meeting may 31,...

21
© 2012. All rights reserved. Front Range Roundtable Front Range Roundtable Q2- 13 Meeting May 31, 2012 Facilitated by:

Upload: oswin-justin-james

Post on 16-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: © 2012. All rights reserved. Front Range Roundtable Front Range Roundtable Q2-13 Meeting May 31, 2012 Facilitated by:

© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable

Front Range Roundtable Q2-13 MeetingMay 31, 2012

Facilitated by:

Page 2: © 2012. All rights reserved. Front Range Roundtable Front Range Roundtable Q2-13 Meeting May 31, 2012 Facilitated by:

© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable

VisionRound-table

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

32 47 17 9 33114

52

619

49 35 41

215

27

150

51 44

161238

Colorado’s Fire SeasonsThousands of acres of wildfire per year (Total = 1.9 million acres of wildfire since 1995)

Sources: 1995 – 2010: Rocky Mountain Area and Coordination Center Annual Activity Report (2001-2004); Wildland Fire Activity by Cause, Combining Federal and Non-federal Agencies Within Each State (www.fs.fed.us/r2/fire/oo_annual_report.pdf); 2011 – 2012: http://www.nifc.gov/fireInfo/fireInfo_statistics.html

Includes Hayman fire:$200 million of costs from

the Hayman Fire alone, which accounted for one-

fifth of all acres burned that year (138k acres)

Includes Buffalo Creek fire: 12k

acres

Includes Bobcat Gulch fire: 11k

acres Includes Fourmile fire: 6k acres

Five years of implementation

FRFTP formed

2

Includes Waldo (18k acres) and High Park (87k

acres)

Page 3: © 2012. All rights reserved. Front Range Roundtable Front Range Roundtable Q2-13 Meeting May 31, 2012 Facilitated by:

© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable

Front Range Forests

3

• 4.2 million acres of forest in the Front Range

•1.4 million in need of ecological restoration and fire risk mitigation

“Lower Montane”: Dry Ponderosa pine and Dry Douglas fir

“Upper Montane”: Mesic Ponderosa Pine and Mixed Conifer

“Subalpine”: Lodgepole Pine and Spruce Fir

3

Page 4: © 2012. All rights reserved. Front Range Roundtable Front Range Roundtable Q2-13 Meeting May 31, 2012 Facilitated by:

© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable

Definitions of Front Range life zones

1 Elevations noted are rough estimates – actual elevation limits depend on latitude, aspect, and other local factors; elevations generally lower in northern Front Range and on north-facing slopes, higher in southern Front Range and on south-facing slopes (e.g., Upper limit of Lower Montane ~7,500’ in Larimer vs. ~8,500’ in El Paso)2 May include: Ponderosa Pine, Douglas-fir (up to ~8,000’), Aspen, Blue Spruce, Limber Pine, Engelmann Spruce, Sub-alpine FirNote: Riparian zones are included and considered in each life zone in which they are found

General elevations1

>~11,500’

~9,000-9,500’ to ~11,500’

~8,000’ to ~9,000-9,500’

~6,000’ to ~8,000’

~5,500’ to ~6,000’

Sub-alpine

Upper Montane

Lower Montane

Lower Ecotone

Alpine

Dominant overstory composition

Associated vegetation types

• Mountain-mahogany• Scrub Oak

• No trees

• Lodgepole Pine• Spruce/Fir

• Mesic Ponderosa Pine

• Mesic Mixed Conifer2

• Dry Ponderosa Pine

• Dry Douglas-fir

• Transition to Ponderosa Pine

• Grassland• Mountain-mahogany• Scrub Oak

• Some permanent meadows

Front Range life zones

• Grassy slopes and boulder fields

• Sedges, mat and cushion plants, dwarf willows

• Bogs, meadows, ponds, rich in wildflowers

Example communities

• None

• Winter Park• Ward

• Boulder• Golden

• Evergreen• Monument

• Estes Park• Granby

4

Page 5: © 2012. All rights reserved. Front Range Roundtable Front Range Roundtable Q2-13 Meeting May 31, 2012 Facilitated by:

© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable

The Lower Montane is the Roundtable’s highest priority ecosystem for landscape-scale ecological restoration.

1 Elevations noted are rough estimates – actual elevation limits depend on latitude, aspect, and other local factors2 Historical Range of Variability in terms of vegetation characteristics; fuel composition; fire frequency, severity and pattern; and other associated disturbances

General elevations1

>~11,500’

~9,000-9,500’ to ~11,500’

~8,000’ to ~9,000-9,500’

~6,000’ to ~8,000’

~5,500’ to ~6,000’

Sub-alpine

Upper Montane

Lower Montane

Lower Ecotone

Alpine

High

Mixed

Low

Difference from HRV2?

Risk of ignition / fire

spreadHRV2 well

understood?Front Range ecosystems

5

Page 6: © 2012. All rights reserved. Front Range Roundtable Front Range Roundtable Q2-13 Meeting May 31, 2012 Facilitated by:

© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable 6

Historical photos show how forest treatments in the Lower Montane restore forest structures

Page 7: © 2012. All rights reserved. Front Range Roundtable Front Range Roundtable Q2-13 Meeting May 31, 2012 Facilitated by:

© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable

• 4.2 million acres of forests6 (53% of all land types7) including 2 million acres of habitat for 31 species of concern5

• 80% of Front Range forests have recreation opportunities5 attracting some of Colorado’s 28 million overnight visitors spending $10 billion annually, making tourism the second- highest employment sector in the state, with 143,000 jobs3

• $5 million per year of available biomass from forest treatments12

• 1,246 essential water supply infrastructures (intakes4, reservoirs, transbasin diversions)

• 4.2 million acres of forest watersheds important for drinking water (65% at risk for post-fire erosion)5

• 1,775 miles of roads8

• 1,573 miles of transmission lines

• 664 miles of gas pipeline9

• 122 communications towers10

1. Federal Register (as of January 4, 2001)2. 2005 Census (ESRI)3. SERGoM (Spatially Explicit Regional Growth Model)

version `12 June 2008 (Theobald) 100m

Front Range Lives and Resources Remain at Risk

People

• 881 communities1

• 2 million people (more than 40% of Colorado’s population)2

• More than 700,000 homes3

Water and safetyNatural and economic resources

4. CDPHE, 20095. Colorado State Forest Service and The Nature

Conservancy. 2009. Colorado Statewide Forest Assessment (in preparation).

6. LANDFIRE, 2006 (Includes PJ and shrubs)

11. “State spending on tourism a hot potato for lawmakers,” Rocky Mountain News, January 12, 2009.

12. 166,000 bdt/y (Jefferson County Biomass Facility Feasibility Study, McNeil Technologies Inc , January 2005 ) * $30

7. ESRI, 20078. TIGER: USCB. 20069. Ventyx, December 200910. FAA, 2009

7

Page 8: © 2012. All rights reserved. Front Range Roundtable Front Range Roundtable Q2-13 Meeting May 31, 2012 Facilitated by:

© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable

The Front Range Roundtable

Overlap of goals

Fire Risk Mitigation Goals

Ecological Restoration Goals

~400,000 acres

~400,000 acres

~700,000 acres

The Front Range roundtable has reached consensus that 1.5 million acres of Front Range forests require treatments to reduce fire risk and/or achieve ecological restoration.

Vision

The Front Range Roundtable was formed to “serve as a focal point for diverse stakeholder input into efforts to reduce wildland fire risks and improve forest health through sustained fuels treatment along the Colorado Front Range.”

Mission

8

Page 9: © 2012. All rights reserved. Front Range Roundtable Front Range Roundtable Q2-13 Meeting May 31, 2012 Facilitated by:

© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable

Source: Map by USFS-ARP

2009 Map of Priorities: Accomplishments vs. 2006 Recommendations

Notes on methods

1.Data collected back to 2004 to our best available knowledge (received for treated acres separately from planned acres as shown)

2.Excludes private land treated without the assistance of the CSFS

3.Excludes county lands treated in Park, Teller, Douglas, El Paso, and Grand.

4.Some of these areas have been treated with prescribed or natural burn and may not require additional near-term treatment. Some of these areas have been treated mechanically but still require prescribed or natural burn to achieve restoration.

5.Different databases are used between units/agencies. Data is comparable within a unit, but not between units. This should be resolved for 2009 and future years.

9

Page 10: © 2012. All rights reserved. Front Range Roundtable Front Range Roundtable Q2-13 Meeting May 31, 2012 Facilitated by:

© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable

Treatment Accomplishments by County as of 2008 vs. 2006 Roundtable Recommendations

Front Range Roundtable

county

Roundtable priority areas as

of 2006

Acres treated anywhere in

County (2004-2008)

Acres treated in Roundtable

priority areas

% of priority acres treated (as

of 2008)

% of treatments outside

Roundtable priorities

Boulder 150,245 12,844 12,844 9% 0%

Clear Creek 63,133 246 100 0% 59%

Douglas 181,303 12,480 8,975 5% 28%

El Paso 138,681 5,658 744 1% 87%

Gilpin 44,453 787 478 1% 39%

Grand 56,563 20,042 4,479 8% 78%

Jefferson 227,805 22,336 22,336 10% 0%

Larimer 226,460 23,425 7,671 3% 67%

Park 194,431 10,191 8,922 5% 12%

Teller 143,850 21,880 13,573 9% 38% TOTAL 1,426,925 129,888 80,122 6% 38%

Data underlying the monitoring map on the prior slide:

10

Page 11: © 2012. All rights reserved. Front Range Roundtable Front Range Roundtable Q2-13 Meeting May 31, 2012 Facilitated by:

© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable

Progress Towards the Roundtable VisionDirect Roundtable Successes

1. Launched the self-sustaining Woodland Park Healthy Forest Initiative (WPHFI) with seed funds of $75,000 provided by Roundtable members and partners, which the WPHFI leveraged into an additional $175,000 in other funding

2. Helped submit a winning proposal to the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program (CFLRP) for an additional $1 million for Front Range National Forests in FY10, $3.4 million in FY11 and $3.1 million in FY12 (with the possibility of further allocations).

Partners’ successes consistent with recommendations

3. Long term stewardships contracts: Arapaho-Roosevelt and Pike-San Isabel (3,000 acres/yr for 10 years)

4. Increased federal funding for on the ground treatments: $1.8 mm more in 2008 than in 2006; $1 million in 2009 ARRA funds

5. Biomass utilization: bioheating in Gilpin, Boulder, and Park counties; planned in El Paso; 22 slash sites for private landowners across Front Range

6. CWPPs: 75 Front Range CWPPs approved (out of 151 completed in Colorado)

7. Policies: Passage of state legislation authorizing the creation of local Forest Improvement Districts

11

Page 12: © 2012. All rights reserved. Front Range Roundtable Front Range Roundtable Q2-13 Meeting May 31, 2012 Facilitated by:

© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable

1. Identify new state and local funding sources for treatments on state and private land.

2. Increase forest treatment incentives for private landowners.

3. Advocate for additional federal funding for Front Range forest treatments.

4. Increase appropriate application of prescribed fire and wildland fire use as a management tool.

5. Increase utilization of woody biomass for facility heating.

6. Increase contract sizes and durations with stewardship contracts on federal land.

7. Change local policy to limit the growth of fire risk in the Wildland-Urban Interface.

8. Promote the development of Community Wildfire Protection Plans for Front Range communities-at-risk.

9. Adopt a clear and common framework for prioritizing treatments.

10. Convene follow-on Roundtable to ensure implementation of recommended initiatives.

Scorecard of Roundtable’s Vision

Set clear priorities and ensure progress against common goals

Ensure local leadership and planning

Reduce the cost of forest treatments

Increase funding for forest treatments

Roundtable Goals (2006) Recommended initiatives

Source: Most initiatives were rated by a poll at the September 18, 2009 Quarterly Roundtable meeting of 37 attendees from 24 organizations representing 11 stakeholder groups. Ratings for initiatives 3, 5, and 6 were increased by one level at the December 2, 2010 Executive Team meeting. Ratings for initiatives 3, 5, and 6 were raised on level at the March 4, 2011 Roundtable meeting; 2012 assessment made at Q4-12 meeting Nov. 30, 2012.

2011

B

B

Y

B

Y

B

R

Y

B

Y

R

20102009

R

Y

Y

B

Y

R

B

B B

B

Y

B

G

B

R

B

G

R

R

G

Y

Significant progress made

Initial progress madeNeeds attention

B Some progress made

R

12

2012

Y

Y

B

R

Y

G

G

R

Y

G

Page 13: © 2012. All rights reserved. Front Range Roundtable Front Range Roundtable Q2-13 Meeting May 31, 2012 Facilitated by:

© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable

Roundtable Organization

1. The Front Range Roundtable is not itself a legal entity but an informal volunteer coalition with CUSP acting as fiscal agent. 2. Partner groups are separate from the Front Range Roundtable and have their own organizational structures and initiatives. 3. Project leader and fiscal agent for the CFLRP Monitoring Teams

Members

Executive Team

Facilitator

Community Protection (CP)

Team

Front Range Fuels Treatment Partnership (FRFTP)2

Northern Front Range Mountain Pine Beetle Working Group (NFRMPBWG)2

Colorado Watershed Wildfire Protection Working Group (CWWPWG)2

GuestsLandscape Restoration (LR)

Team

Biomass Utilization and

Slash Sites (BUSS) Team

Roundtable PartnersMixed teams

Coalition for the Upper South Platte (CUSP)—Fiscal Agent)1

Funders

Boulder County National Forest FoundationClear Creek County USFS-ARDouglas County USFS-PikeGilpin County CSFSEl Paso County CSU/CFRIJefferson County TNCLarimer County West Range ReclamationPark County RMRSTeller County Denver Water

NRCS

Colorado Forest Restoration

Institute (CFRI) 3

13

Wildlife Team

Page 14: © 2012. All rights reserved. Front Range Roundtable Front Range Roundtable Q2-13 Meeting May 31, 2012 Facilitated by:

© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable

Executive Team Structure and Change Process

Current Executive Team Membership

Size: At least 6 or no more than 9 members4

Process for changing membership:

Only when there is a change in the leadership of

the organization shown

1. Three seats are dedicated permanently to these leadership positions from these organizations shown2. Two seats are dedicated to these stakeholder groups shown with the representing organization rotating each year, as desired3. One seat is dedicated for the fiscal agent of the Roundtable, one seat is for each of the two main working teams: the Community Protection Team and the Landscape

Restoration Team. One or two seats are open to additional or other stakeholder groups with the stakeholder type and/or representing organization rotating each year as desired among: Conservation, County Commissioner, Energy, Insurance, Local Government, Planning, Private, Recreation, Science / Academic, State Government, Timber, or Water

4. Membership size can very depending on the decisions of the Executive team and Roundtable needs / number of applicants

Dedicated to certain organizations1

Dedicated to certain stakeholder groups2

Open to other stakeholder groups3

Term ends (or renews) Dec.

2013

14

Terms end (or renew) May 2013

USFS-AR Supervisor

Glenn Casamassa

USFS-PSI Supervisor

Jerri Marr

CSFS State Forester (Acting)

Joe Duda

Conserva-tion NGO

Paige Lewis, The Nature

Conservancy

County Commis-

sioner

Cindy Domenico,

Boulder County

County Commis-sioner

Sallie ClarkEl Paso County

Treasurer

Carol Ekarius,

Coalition for the Upper

South Platte

Landscape Restoration

Team Liaison

Pam Motley, West Range Reclamation

Community Protection

Team Liaison

Megan Davis,

Boulder County

Terms end (or renew) at end of June 2013

Page 15: © 2012. All rights reserved. Front Range Roundtable Front Range Roundtable Q2-13 Meeting May 31, 2012 Facilitated by:

© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable

Front Range Roundtable Roles1. Propose strategic, organizational, and operational priorities for the Roundtable’s consideration

at Quarterly meetings2. In between Quarterly meetings, make decisions on behalf of the Roundtable as needed3. Approve agendas for Roundtable Quarterly meetings (proposed by Facilitator)4. Meet once each quarter between Quarterly Roundtable meetings

Executive Team

Working Teams

Facilitator1. Schedule, arrange, and facilitate Roundtable Quarterly meetings, Executive Team meetings,

and working team meetings2. Support working teams in achieving their goals by providing organizational, administrative, and

logistical support (e.g., keeping work plans) —not content or legwork3. Act as the central point of contact for all Roundtable internal and external communications

(e.g., email distribution list, website maintenance)

1. Execute on the Roundtable’s strategic goals, according to work plans developed jointly by the teams

2. Present progress updates at Quarterly Roundtable meetings3. Attend working team meetings as scheduled, typically two calls per month with some in

person meetings as determined by the team

Members1. Attend quarterly Roundtable meetings and, when required, approve or change proposals by

the Executive Team2. Share relevant announcements and updates to Quarterly Roundtable meetings; productively

contribute to discussions, honoring the obligation to dissent when necessary3. Volunteer for working teams if able and/or want to see something done by the Roundtable

15

Page 16: © 2012. All rights reserved. Front Range Roundtable Front Range Roundtable Q2-13 Meeting May 31, 2012 Facilitated by:

© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable

Front Range Roundtable Participants Through the YearsLast updated Mar. 2013: Since 2006, 438 people from 150 organizations have participated in the Roundtable (210 active subscribers to email list; to join, see www.frontrangeroundtable.org “Join Us”)

16

Org Type Organization TotalCommunity Cal-Wood Education Center 1

CL FIRES 1Coal Creek Community 1Crystal Lakes 3Glacier View Meadows 3Red Feather Lakes 4Tourism and recreation program 1Town of Gold Hill 1

Conservation ARP Foundation 1Choose Outdoors 1Coalition for the Upper South Platte 6Conservation Districts, Colorado Geological Survey 1For the Forest 1Forest Health Task Force 1Indian Peaks Forest Alliance (IPFA) 3National Forest Foundation 3Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory 1Southern Rockies Conservation Alliance 2The Conservation Cooperative 1The Nature Conservancy 6The Wilderness Society 2Western Rivers Institute 1

County agency Boulder County 10Clear Creek County 1Colorado Counties Inc. 1Colorado State Forest Service 1Douglas County 7El Paso County 3El Paso County Community Services Department 1Gilpin County 1Grand County 1Jefferson Conservation District 1Jefferson County 3Larimer County 2Park County 1Park County Planning 1

County gov't Boulder County 4Clear Creek County 3Douglas County 1El Paso County 7Gilpin County 2Grand County 4Jefferson County 1Jefferson County 2Jefferson County Board of Commissioners 1Larimer County 3Park County 1Teller County 3

Org Type Organization TotalFederal agency Bureau of Land Management 7

National Park Service 5Natural Resources Conservation Service 6US Bureau of Land Management 1US Bureau of Reclamation 1US Fish & Wildlife Service 4US Forest Service 15US Forest Service, ARP 20US Forest Service, Boulder 4US Forest Service, Canyon Lakes 1US Forest Service, Golden 1US Forest Service, NRS 1US Forest Service, Pikes Peak 2US Forest Service, PSICC 17US Forest Service, R2 12US Forest Service, RMRS 11US Forest Service-Ouray 1US Forest Service-Region 2 2US Geological Survey 6

Federal gov't Office of Ed Perlmutter 1Office of Representative Mike Coffman 1Office of Senator Mark Udall 2Office of Senator Michael Bennet 2Office of U.S. Senator Mark Udall 1Office of US Senator Bennet 1Rocky Mountain Research Station 1Senate Majority Policy Office 1Senator Mark Udall's Office 1US Forest Service, ARP 1

Fire Protection District Boulder Fire Department 1

Boulder Mountain Fire District 1Boulder Mountain Fire Protection District 1Boulder Rural Fire Department 1Boulder Rural Police Department 1Coal Creek Canyon Fire Protection District 1Colorado Springs Fire Department 2Gold Hill Fire Protection District 2Lefthand Fire Protection District 3Nederland Fire 1Nederland Fire Protection District 1Nederland Fire, Timberland Fire 1Sugarloaf Fire Protection District 1Sunshine Fire Protection District 3

Org Type Organization TotalForest products Anchor Point Fire Management 1

Colorado Renewable Resource Cooperative 5Colorado State Tree Farm Committee 1Colorado Timber Industry Association 3Environmental Energy Partners 4Environmental Forestry Services, LLC 1Forest Energy Colorado 1New Range Power 1Slash Solutions LLC 1West Range Reclamation 3West Range Reclamation, LLC 1Xcel Energy 1

Gov't association Colorado Counties Inc. 1Colorado Municipal League 1County Sheriffs of Colorado 1

InsuranceRocky Mountain Insurance Information Association 3

Local agency Boulder County 1Boulder OEM 1City of Boulder 1Park County 1

Local gov't Boulder County 1Boulder County Sheriff's Office 1City of Boulder 1City of Fort Collins 2City of Greeley 3City of Woodland Park 1Northwest Colorado Council of Governments 1Town of Nederland 4

Planning American Planning Association 1Colorado Chapter American Planning Association 1

Private Bear Creek Development Co. 1Beh Management Consulting, Inc. 7Bihn Systems 1Blue Knight Group 3CDJ Consulting 1Colorado Forest Management, LLC 1Confluence Energy 1Critical MAS 1Fire & Life Safety Educators of Colorado 1Habitat Management Inc. 1JW Associates 1NRE 1Our Future Summit 1Peterson Design 2Private citizen 7Private landowner, Larimer County 1Private landowner, Teller County 1Unknown 1Volunteer 1Walsh Environmental 1

Org Type Organization TotalRecreation American Alpine Club 1

Colorado Mountain Club 2Science / Academic Center of the American West 2

Colorado State University 27CU Institute of Behavioral Sciences 1Rocky Mountain Tree-Ring Research 3University of Colorado at Boulder 2University of Colorado at Denver 1

State agencyColorado Air Pollution Control Division 1Colorado Department of Health & Environment 2Colorado Department of Natural Resources 2Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment 1Colorado Department of Public Safety 1Colorado Division of Emergency Management 2Colorado Division of Parks and Wildlife 1Colorado Division of Wildlife 2Colorado Office of Economic Development 1Colorado Renewable Resource Cooperative 1Colorado State Forest Service 19Colorado State Forest Service 2Colorado State Parks 3Governor's Energy Office 1US Forest Service, ARP 1

State gov'tCoalition for the Upper South Platte 1Colorado General Assembly 2Office of Senator Mark Udall 1US Forest Service, ARP 1

WaterAmerican Water Works Association 2City of Aurora 1Colorado Springs Utilities 4Denver Water 1Jefferson Conservation District 1Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District 1

Grand Total 438

Page 17: © 2012. All rights reserved. Front Range Roundtable Front Range Roundtable Q2-13 Meeting May 31, 2012 Facilitated by:

© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable

Front Range Roundtable 2013-2015 Goals

Community Protection (CP) Team [draft goals]

Biomass Utilization and Slash Sites (BUSS) Team

6. Share information on a monthly basis and by email about biomass utilization developments across the Front Range (via monthly calls)

Landscape Restoration (LR) Team

7. Serve as the Front Range CFLR project multi-party monitoring group8. Develop an adaptive management process and recommendations 9. Revise the June 2011 CFLR monitoring plan (through addendums until funding identified for a re-write)

Executive Team1. Annually fundraise at least $50,0002. Plan and execute quarterly Roundtable meetings and agendas3. Respond to letter of support requests as needed

17

4. The community protection team will serve as a communication, networking, and information exchange among professionals working on community wildfire protection, wildfire mitigation, and private landowner education.

5. Increase stakeholder involvement in the Community Protection Team and devote one of the four larger Roundtable meetings each year to community protection issues.

Wildlife Team10. By Spring 2014, recommend a wildlife monitoring plan for the CFLRP by prioritizing an abridged list of species to

monitor, hypothesizing expected post-treatment population trends for each target species, and proposing data collection and monitoring methods for each target species, with budgets

14. Work with a community to develop a project plan and attract funding for a turn-key project in a priority landscapes15. Update the Front Range 10-County map of completed treatments

40 Year Treatment Plan 11. Goal still to be defined (starting with review of USFS long terms treatment plans at May 31 meeting; then possibly refine priority acres, based on feasibility [slope, access], other consideration of other forest types, such as mixed conifer)

Prescribed Fire Initiative

Policy Initiative

Implementation initiatives

12. Goal still to be defined (starting with checking in with prescribed fire council)

13. Goal still to be defined (Community Protection team will brainstorm ideas)

= Top priority = If capacity allows

Page 18: © 2012. All rights reserved. Front Range Roundtable Front Range Roundtable Q2-13 Meeting May 31, 2012 Facilitated by:

© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable

Fundraising Update

18

Income Expenses

Entity Requested Received Approved Agreement Item

Aurora Water $1,000.00 $1,000.00 Contractor expense to date 14,700.32BLM $500.00 Non-personnel (shipping, copying) 17.43Boulder County $2,500.00 $2,500.00 Total 14717.75Clear Creek County $1,000.00 $1,000.00Colo Mtn Club $500.00Colo State Forest Svc $5,000.00 $5,000.00Colo Spgs Utilities $1,000.00 $1,000.00CTIA $200.00 CUSP INKIND ContributionDenver Water $2,500.00 $2,500.00 Staff Expenses 3141.28DNR $200.00Douglas County $2,500.00 $2,500.00El Paso County $2,500.00Environ Energy Partners $200.00Forest Energy Colorado $500.00Gilpin County $250.00Grand County $1,000.00Jefferson County $2,500.00Larimer County $500.00Park County $1,000.00 $1,000.00Southern Rockies Con Alliance $500.00Teller County $1,000.00 $1,000.00TNC $3,181.43 $3,181.43USFWS $2,999.00 $2,999.00USFS--Including RMRS $20,965.00 $20,965.00Total $53,995.43 $23,680.43 $20,965.00

Page 19: © 2012. All rights reserved. Front Range Roundtable Front Range Roundtable Q2-13 Meeting May 31, 2012 Facilitated by:

© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable

Budget Update—Expenses (Page 1 of 2)

19

• The NFF grant ended in January for the LR team: $10k from March 2012 to January 2013

• CSU has been funding the LR team and the Wildlife team since February:

• CUSP is the fiscal agent for all other Roundtable activities and associated monies (see next page)

Month-year Full name Role Sum of Total Time Average of Billing rate Sum of Total billing2013, 02. February Gali Beh Principal 8:45 $55.00 $481.25 Terra Lenihan Associate 6:15 $40.00 $250.002013, 02. February Total 15:00 $49.29 $731.252013, 03. March Gali Beh Principal 20:15 $55.00 $1,113.75 Terra Lenihan Associate 13:45 $40.00 $550.002013, 03. March Total 34:00 $50.00 $1,663.752013, 04. April Gali Beh Principal 18:45 $55.00 $1,031.25 Terra Lenihan Associate 14:15 $40.00 $570.002013, 04. April Total 33:00 $49.26 $1,601.25Grand Total 82:00 $49.51 $3,996.25

Page 20: © 2012. All rights reserved. Front Range Roundtable Front Range Roundtable Q2-13 Meeting May 31, 2012 Facilitated by:

© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable

Budget Update—Expenses (Page 2 of 2)

20

• CUSP is the fiscal agent for all other Roundtable activities and associated moniesMonth-year Full name Role Sum of Total Time Average of Billing rate Sum of Total billing2012, 07. July Gali Beh Principal 7:00 $50.00 $350.00 Chris Beh Office Manager 0:15 $35.00 $8.752012, 07. July Total 7:15 $49.17 $358.752012, 08. August Gali Beh Principal 33:45 $50.00 $1,687.502012, 08. August Total 33:45 $50.00 $1,687.502012, 09. September Gali Beh Principal 12:00 $50.00 $600.002012, 09. September Total 12:00 $50.00 $600.002012, 10. October Gali Beh Principal 47:45 $50.00 $2,387.50 David Duggan Analyst 1:15 $35.00 $43.752012, 10. October Total 49:00 $49.53 $2,431.252012, 11. November Gali Beh Principal 32:30 $50.00 $1,625.00 Terra Lenihan Associate 28:30 $35.00 $997.502012, 11. November Total 61:00 $43.53 $2,622.502012, 12. December Gali Beh Principal 7:15 $50.00 $362.50 Terra Lenihan Associate 16:00 $35.00 $560.002012, 12. December Total 23:15 $44.50 $922.502013, 01. January Gali Beh Principal 9:45 $50.00 $487.50 Terra Lenihan Associate 5:30 $35.00 $192.502013, 01. January Total 15:15 $45.80 $680.002013, 02. February Gali Beh Principal 16:15 $55.00 $893.75 Terra Lenihan Associate 21:45 $40.00 $870.002013, 02. February Total 38:00 $50.00 $1,763.752013, 03. March Gali Beh Principal 20:00 $55.00 $1,100.00 Terra Lenihan Associate 8:15 $40.00 $330.002013, 03. March Total 28:15 $50.34 $1,430.002013, 04. April Gali Beh Principal 10:15 $55.00 $563.75 David Duggan Analyst 0:45 $40.00 $30.00 Terra Lenihan Associate 5:30 $40.00 $220.002013, 04. April Total 16:30 $49.60 $813.75Grand Total 284:15 $47.85 $13,310.00

$24k from July 2012 to April

2013

Page 21: © 2012. All rights reserved. Front Range Roundtable Front Range Roundtable Q2-13 Meeting May 31, 2012 Facilitated by:

© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable

Next Steps from March 8 Roundtable Meeting

21

1. John Ring: Help on the teacher training / outreach initiative led by Shawna Crocker

2. Carol Ekarius: Work with Mike McHugh to plan two summer field trips for elected officials to Waldo and High Park fire sites (Shawna Crocker offered to coordinate using CSU's vans which can seat 12 passengers each); 5/9 update: just for elected officials, not as part of the RT mtg

3. Peter Brown: Look into planning a science / education symposium, perhaps in partnership with the Colorado Forest Collaboratives group led by Lisa Dale, perhaps in partnership with the CFLR Coalition or the NFF's CFLR webinars. Activities may include: writing a letter to CFRI and others to coordinate a science synthesis; 5/9 update:

4. Rob Addington: Work with Mike Babler to speak with the state Prescribed Fire Council to get ideas about the Roundtable can participate in promoting the increased use of prescribed fire

5. Hal Gibbs:1. Work with Mark Martin & Craig Jones on thinking through the future of the BUSS team (biomass

utilization and slash site); ask Mike Smith how the Roundtable can best stay up to date on biomass utilization opportunities, challenges, progress and needs

2. Work with data providers and a GIS expert on updating the 2009 Roundtable map of where forest treatments have taken place, in relation to where the Roundtable recommended that forests be treated for forest restoration and/or fire risk mitigation