البحث نهائي2013 - pdfmachine from broadgun software, http ... · ƑŞŧœŤƃŒ...

168
ƑŞŧœŤƃŒ žƒſťřƃŒ Ƒż ŇŒťƕŒ ŧƒƍűř ƏƄŵ ŖŧƒŕŤƃŒ ŗƆŲƈƕŒ ƅŒťŤřŪŒ ŧśŊ The Effect of Using Expert Systems for Developing External Auditing Performance ƇƒŕƃœºººűƃŒ ťŒťŵō ŔŶŮƆ ŧƒƋŨ ťƆšƆ ƁƒƍťƃŒ ƍ ƅƃœŪƃŒ ƅŧƂŊ ťƆšƆ ŻŒŧŬō ŧŨ ƍŕŒ žšŪŒ ŻœŽŵ ŖŧƍřƂťƃŒ Śšŕ ŗŕŪœšƆƃŒ Ƒż ƑƆƄŶƃŒ ŚšŕƃŒ ŗƀƄš žœŪƆ ¾œƆƂřŪƙ ¾œººººƆŵƕŒ ŗƒƄƂ ŗŕŪœšƆƃŒ ƅŪſ ƇœºººƆŵ ŗŶƆœºººŞ ΔϴΑήόϟ 2013

Upload: others

Post on 01-Sep-2019

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • The Effect of Using Expert Systems for Developing External Auditing Performance

    2013

    id15923484 pdfMachine by Broadgun Software - a great PDF writer! - a great PDF creator! - http://www.pdfmachine.com http://www.broadgun.com

  • SPSS

  • The Effect of Using Expert Systems for Developing External Auditing Performance

    Prepared : Mosab m Dweik and Mohammad Al salem

    Soupier visor : Dr .Afaf Abu Zer

    Abstract

    This Study aimed to know "The Effect of using the expert systems to

    develop the performance of external audit". This study relied on the sources

    of data, both Primary, which was built from making a questionnaire on a

    sample, and Secondary, which was built from some books and previous

    studies in the same field.

    The study population consists from all workers in external audit

    bureaus in Amman, but because of the difficulties to reach all population in

    the study, the researchers will take a randomly sample and distribute a

    questionnaire on 60 audits, although they exclude 5 of them because of the

    lack of suitability for the statistical analysis procedures, but they take the

    other 55 study. All samples' answers will be systemized on the computer

    later on and will be analyzed by the Statistical Analysis System (SPSS).

  • The results are:

    - There is a statistical sign on the level (a 0.05) for using the experts

    systems in external audit in Jordan.

    - There is a statistical sign on the level (a 0.05) for using the experts'

    software in external audit in Jordan.

    - There is a statistical sign on the level (a 0.05) between using the

    experts systems and improving the efficiency of the activities

    implementation in external audit.

    - There is a statistical sign on the level (a 0.05) between using the

    experts systems and improving the performance of the activities

    implementation in external audit.

    - There is a statistical sign on the level (a 0.05) between using the

    experts' software and improving the efficiency of the activities

    implementation in external audit.

    - There is a statistical sign on the level (a 0.05) between using the

    experts' software and improving the performance of the activities

    implementation in external audit.

  • Depending on the above results, the researchers had put some

    recommendations:

    - There is an obvious effect from using the expert systems on improving the

    performance in external audit.

    - The necessity of making sure that all workers got the enough training on

    the expert systems in order to hit the aim.

    - The necessity of having a special department for the expert systems to

    develop the performance of the external audit.

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

    a=0.05

    a=0.05

    a0.05

    a0.05

    a0.05

    a0.05

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10

  • 11

  • 12

  • 13

  • 14

    ( sharma,2011,p.2

    luger,2009,p.2

  • 15

    ( automation of intelligent behavior)

    turban et al ,2005,p.540

  • 16

    (

    tuthill,1991,p.4

    beerel,1993,p.9 ( tuthill

    ((Russell and nerving ,2010,p.1)

  • 17

  • 18

    (Negneivtsky,2005,p.29)

  • 19

    (Sharma,2011

    &Negnevitsky,2005)

  • 20

    LISp

    SHR DRILL DENDRAL PROLOG MYCIN

    PROSPECTOR

  • 21

    (Turban et al ,2005,p.544

    (Russell and Norving , 2010,p.55)

  • 22

    (Turban et al , 2005 ,p.s544)

    (Laudon &Laudon,2010,p.456)

  • 23

    (Negnevitsky,2005,p.143)

  • 24

    (Negnevitsky,2005,p.14)

    (Alasgarova &

    Muradkhanli,2008,p297)

  • 25

    (Foltin,1994,p.29)

  • 26

    (Laudon &

    Laudon,2010,p.46)

    Negnevitsky,2005,p.60)

    Foltin&Smith,1994 p.48

  • 27

    Yoon et al.,1995, p.90)

    Knowledge Base

    Inference Engine )

  • 28

    Foltin , 1994,p.29

    User Interface

    key Board Monitor

    ScannerAudio Devices (

    Knowledge Engineer

    Explanation Facilities

  • 29

    Knowledge Acquisition Faciliti

    Devlopmenet Team

    Expert System

    (Alasgarova & Muradkhanli ,2008 , p.298; Negnevitsky ,2005 , p.65

    end user

  • 30

    Expert Domain

  • 31

    Knowledge Engineer)

  • 32

    Shell Expert System

    Knowledge (Code

  • 33

    Programmer

    LISP PROLOGOPSS

    C

    Project Manager

  • 34

    Foltin&Smith,1994 p.48

    Expert Domain

  • 35

    Knowledge Engineer)

    Shell Expert System

    Knowledge Code

  • 36

    Programmer

    LISP PROLOGOPSS

    C

  • 37

    Project Manager

    Romeny & steinbart , 2009 , p.684(

  • 38

    Foltin &

    Smith , 1994,p.47

  • 39

    Turban et al ,2005,pp.633-640

    Marakas ,2003,p.224

  • 40

  • 41

    (Common

    Sense)

  • 42

    B

    B

  • 43

    B

    marakas ,2003,p.224)

    B

    B

    (cost_benefit analysis)

  • 44

    B

    (hardware) (software)

    B

  • 45

    (maracas,2003,p.224)

  • 46

    Romney & Steinbart, 2009, P.733

    Developing System In-house

    Hardware Software

  • 47

    Outsourcing

    Purchasing prewritten Expert system

  • 48

  • 49

  • 50

    facts data

    IF

    THEN rules IF

    then Negnevitsky, 2005,

    P.61

  • 51

  • 52

    system maintenance

  • 53

    System Upgrading

    System Evaluation

  • 54

    expert

    system shell

    Expert system shell

    p.84 smith etal

    ,1991,

  • 55

    2005 162

  • 56

    fuzzy Expert System

    problem-solving control system

    411. p2010,fazlollahtabar etal

  • 57

    frame-based expert systems

    Hybrid Expert systems

    Turban et al,2005,p.567

    Rule-based Expert systems

    Turban et al,2005,p.601

    IF-Then

    (If)Then

  • 58

    Turban et al,2005,p.521

    If premise then conclusion

    conclusion If premise

    If premise or else then conclusion

    complex rules

    IF

    OR AND

    Expertise Coding

  • 59

    Marakas, 2003, P.224

  • 60

    Turban

    et al,2005, P.547

    Expert Domain End Users

    Yoon et al, 1995, P.84

  • 61

    Transaction Processing System

    Decision Support Systems

    Excutive

    Support systems

    Laudon & laudon, 2010, P.75-81

  • 62

  • 63

    Negnevitsky, 2005, P.73

  • 64

    Turban et al, 2011, P.561; laudon & laudon, 2010,

    P.458; maracas, 2003, P.226; Qureshi, 1998, P.8; Foltin, 1994, P.32 and

    smith et al, 1991, P.84

  • 65

    Canned Software

  • 66

  • 67

    Turban et al, 2005, P.564;

    maracas, 2003, P.228 and Qureshi et al, 1994, P.10

  • 68

    Bock et al, 2010, P.95

    knowledge

    Codifiability

  • 69

    Romney

    & Steinbart, 2009, P.739

    Yoon et al, 1995, P.83Bock

    Expert System Shell

    Turbon, 2005, P.565

  • 70

    Coats, 1988, P.82

  • 71

  • 72

    Boynton & Johnson, 2006, P.6

  • 73

    Price Waterhouse Coopers

    Hwang et al, 2004,

    P.24

  • 74

    Abdolmohammadi,

    1991, P.5336

    Structured Tasks

  • 75

    semi Structured Tasks

    Unstructured Tasks

  • 76

    Baldwin et al, 2006, P.80

  • 77

    GAAS

    Brown & Murphy, 1992, P.188

    Determining Materiality Levels

    Risk assessment

    GAAS

    SAS

  • 78

    Hwang et al, 2004, P.23

    Messier et al,

    2006, P.81

    Inherent Risk

    Control Risk

    Detection Risk

  • 79

    AICPA

  • 80

  • 81

    Boynton & Johnson, 2006, P.251

  • 82

    Standard Unqualified Audit Report

  • 83

    Unqualified Audit

    Report with Explanatory Paragraph or Modified Wording

    Qualified Opinion Report

  • 84

    Adverse Opinion Report

    Disclaimer of Opinion Report

  • 85

    Baldwin et al, 2006,

    P.81

  • 86

    Bock et al, 2010, P.95

  • 87

    Internal Revenue Services

    Finkenaur, 1990, P.157

    AICPA

    McDuffie et al, 1994,

    P.74

  • 88

    rule-oriented Malone, 1993, P.54

    Bostan, 2009, P.110

    Laudon & Laudon, 2010, P.36

  • 89

    Murphy & Yetmar, 1996, P.14

    Baldwin ea al, 2006, P.79

    O'leaty & Watkins, 1989, P.3

    Messier Hansen

    Massier & Hansen, 1987, P.94

    Electronic Data Processing

  • 90

    Abdolmohammadi

    Abdolmohammadi, 1987, P.173

  • 91

    Messier Abdolmohammadi

    McDuffie & Smith, 2006, P.93

    Alasgarona & Moradkhanli,

    2008; Baldwin et al, 2006; Mcduffie & Murphy 2006; changchit &

    Holsapple 2004; Hwang et al, 2004; Murpy & Yetmar, 1996; Foltin, 1994;

    Murphy & brown, 1992; Brown & Murphy, 1990; Messier & Hansen, 1987

    and Abdolmohammadi, 1987

  • 92

    Neural Networks

    Risk Advisor

    Rule-based Expert System

    Inherent Risk Analysis

    Risk Assessment

  • 93

    Sarbanes-Oxley

    TICOM

    PascalARISC

    Internal Control Analyzer

    C&L Control Risk Assessor

  • 94

    Internal Control

    Expert

    FR-Score

    Flow Eval

    LISP

    ICE Hybrid Expert System

    Rule-based frame-based

  • 95

    Engagement Administration System

    EASY

    PROLOG

    EXPERTEST

  • 96

    Audit Planning Advisor

    EY Decision Support

  • 97

    Audit Planner

  • 98

    Fuzzy Expert Systems

    Neural Networks

    Going Concern

    Expert GCX

    Facts

  • 99

    LISP

    Hybrid Expert Systems

    Going Concern AdvisorGCA

    AUDPORT

  • 100

    Auditor

  • 101

    EDP-EXPERT

    CFILE

    Exper Tax

    LISP

    Frame-based

  • 102

    Expert Auditor

    SAS

  • 103

    Yoon et al, 1995, P.83

    Massier & Hansen, 1987, P.103

    Knowledge Acquisition

  • 104

    Expert System Shell

  • 105

    Inductive Methods

    Rules

  • 106

  • 107

    Hwang et al, 2004;

    Baldwin-Morgan, 1993 and Murphy & Brown, 1992

  • 108

  • 109

  • 110

    a

  • 111

  • 112

  • 113

  • 114

  • 115

  • 116

  • 117

  • 118

  • 119

  • 120

  • 121

    1 - Anderson et al (2003). The Effect of Client vs. Decision Aid as a

    source of Explanations upon Auditors Sufficiency Judgments: A

    Research Note.

  • 122

    2-Comunale & Sexton (2005). A Fuzzy Logic Approach Approach to

    Assessing Materiality

    Fuzzy Logic

  • 123

    3- Changchit & Holsapple (2004). The Development of an Expert

    Systems for Managerial Evaluation of Internal Controls

    4- Baldwin et al (2006). Opportunities for Artificial Intelligence

    Development in the accounting Domain: The case of Auditing

  • 124

    5-Bostan (2009). possibilities of using Expert systems in Accounting

    function of campaines.

    EXSYS

  • 125

    6 - Alasgarova & Muradkhanli (2008). Expert Systems For Decision

    Making Problem In Economics.

  • 126

  • 127

    SPSS

    SPSS

  • 128

    (Statistical Package for

    Social Sciences SPSS)

    95.14

  • 129

    (Statistical

    Package for Social Sciences SPSS)

    (Statistical Package for Social

    Sciences SPSS)

  • 130

    (Standard Multiple Regression Analysis )

    (Simple Regression Analysis )

  • 131

  • 132

    (Factual Data

  • 133

    education

    education

    DoctorateMasterBSc

    Fre

    quen

    cy

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    5

    15

    35

  • 134

    experiance

    experiance

    5 and more3 to less than 5 yea1- less than 3 year

    Fre

    quen

    cy

    30

    20

    10

    0

    10

    27

    18

  • 135

    you have

    you have

    Noyes

    Fre

    quen

    cy

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    17

    38

  • 136

    4.1667 1.08543 4.1333 7.40798 3.9000 .84486

    4.650 .62146

    3.9667 .92786

    4.0000 .50855

    3.6000 .77013

    4.3000 .53498

    4.633 .54667

    3.9667 .92786

  • 137

    4.0000 .50855

    3.6000 .77013 4.3000 .53498 4.633 .54667

    4.644 .54641

    3.621 .655 0.522

    3.222 0.692

    3.352 0.615

    .902

    3.632 .815

    3.366 .688

    3.255 0.499

    3.211 0.498

    3.200 0.454

    3.1020.584

    3.299 0.400

  • 138

    3.287 0.484

    3.199 0.440 3.117 0.474

  • 139

    (Multiple Regression)

    (Multiple Regression)

    FBeta

    SIG

    R R

    (SIG)

    (SIG)

  • 140

    (Multiple Regression)

    (Multiple Regression)

    FBeta

    SIG

    R R

    (SIG)

    (SIG)

  • 141

    ,-

    (Simple Regression)

    (Simple Regression)

    FBetaSIG

    R R

    (SIG)

    (SIG)

  • 142

    ,-

    (Simple Regression)

    (Simple Regression)

    FBetaSIG

    R R

    (SIG)

    (SIG)

  • 143

    ,-

    (Simple Regression)

    (Simple Regression)

    FBeta

    SIG

    R R

    (SIG)

    (SIG)

  • 144

    ,-

    (Simple Regression)

    (Simple Regression)

    FBetaSIG

    R R

    (SIG)

    (SIG)

  • 145

  • 146

    (SPSS)

  • 147

  • 148

  • 149

  • 150

    Alasgarova , A. and Muradkhanli , L. (2008). Expert Systems For Decision Making Problem In Economics. International Jornal "Informaition Technologies and Knowledge " , Vol. 2, 297 299. Anderson , John C., Moreno , Kimberly K. and Mueller , Jennifer M. (2003). The Effect of Client vs. Decision Aid as a source of Explanations upon Auditors Sufficiency Judgments: A Research Note. Behavioral Research in Accounting , Vol. (15) ,pp1-11. Baldwin , Amelia A. , Brown , Carol E. & Trinkle , Brad S. (2006).. Opportunities for Artificial Intelligence Development in the accounting Domain: The case of Auditing. Intelligent Systems in Accounting , Finance & Management , Vol. (14) , pp 77-86. Bostan , Ionlen , Epure , Danut Tiberius , panait , Anghel & Iancu , Elena (2009). possibilities of using Expert systems in Accounting function of campaines , Metaluraia Internatonal , Vol. (XIV) , Num 9 , Special Issue , pp.109 112. Changchit , Chuleeporn & Holsapple , Clyde W. (2004). The Development of an Expert Systems for Managerial Evaluation of Internal Controls , Intelligent Systems In Accounting , Finance & Management , Vol. (12) , pp 103 120. Comunale , Christie L. and Sexton , Thomas R.. A Fuzzy Logic Approach Approach to Assessing Materiality. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting , Vol. (2) , pp 1-15.

  • 151

  • 152

  • 153

  • 154

  • 155

  • 156

    PWC TAG