+ 3d elevation program (3dep) november 2013 the nati onal map

+

3D Elevation Program (3DEP) November 2013

The National Map

+ 2Terrestrial ElevationNational Elevation Dataset (NED)

USGS – NED status August 2013

+Lidar Improves Data Quality

Ten meter resolution

Courtesy of NRCS

Two meter resolution

3

National Elevation Dataset (left). Example on right shows detailed agricultural practices that allow NRCS to provide better services to farmers with fewer field visits.

+ Click to edit the outline text format

Second Outline Level Third Outline Level

Fourth Outline Level Fifth Outline Level Sixth Outline Level Seventh Outline Level Eighth Outline Level

Ninth Outline LevelClick to edit Master text styles

National Enhanced Elevation Assessment

4

Example Business Uses from NEEA study completed in 2012

Precision Farming Land Navigation and Safety

Geologic Resources and Hazards Mitigation

Natural Resource Conservation

Infrastructure Management Flood Risk Mitigation

+ Click to edit the outline text format




5

Rank Conservative Potential

1 Flood Risk Management $295M $502M2 Infrastructure and Construction Management $206M $942M3 Natural Resources Conservation $159M $335M4 Agriculture and Precision Farming $122M $2,011M5 Water Supply and Quality $85M $156M6 Wildfire Management, Planning and Response $76M $159M

7Geologic Resource Assessment and Hazard Mitigation

$52M $1,067M

8 Forest Resources Management $44M $62M9 River and Stream Resource Management $38M $87M

10 Aviation Navigation and Safety $35M $56M

:20 Land Navigation and Safety $0.2M $7,125M

Total for all Business Uses (1 – 27) $1.2B $13B

Benefits

Terrestrial Elevation Annual Benefits if Business Needs could

be met (results of NEEA study)

+Data Quality Level Choices

Bathymetric LiDAR requirements assessed for three Quality Levels to include Low, Standard and High. Standard Quality Level (3-5 meter post spacing; RMSEz ~ 20 cm)

Note – USGS LiDAR base acquisition specification version 13 is for QL3 data

6

+

Click to edit the outline text format




Terrestrial Elevation Recommended Program Initiative - 3DEP

High quality lidar in conterminous US and Hawaii, ifsar in Alaska $146 million/year for 8

years Benefit to cost – 4.7:1 Total benefits - $690

million/year Publically accessible Partnership approach New products and

services Lidar point cloud 1 meter DEMs Other derived data

Operational in January 2015

Complete one cycle of data collection by 2023

7

Click to edit the outline text format Second Outline

Level Third Outline

Level Fourth Outline Level

Fifth Outline Level

Sixth Outline Level

Seventh Outline Level

Eighth Outline Level


Second level

Third level

Fourth level

Fifth level

+CA NEEA activities Survey: 24 responses representing 12 state

agencies and 4 county governments

Aggregate into broader business areas

Workshop to reach consensus for highest quality need for each 1-degree cell to meet all agency needs


Level Third Outline


Fifth Outline Level

Sixth Outline Level




Second level

Third level

Fourth level

Fifth level

+Flood Risk Management

Sea level rise

Regional hydrological processes

Levee integrity

Flood risk mapping

9


Level Third Outline


Fifth Outline Level

Sixth Outline Level




Second level

Third level

Fourth level

Fifth level

+Wildfire Management, Planning, and Response

Fire behavior modeling

Damage assessment

Post-fire litigation

Estimated benefits: 16M

10


Level Third Outline


Fifth Outline Level

Sixth Outline Level




Second level

Third level

Fourth level

Fifth level

+Coastal Zone management

Improved monitoring

Improved modeling--Climate, sediment transport, tsunami behavior

Restoration and fish passages

11


Level Third Outline


Fifth Outline Level

Sixth Outline Level




Second level

Third level

Fourth level

Fifth level

+Infrastructure and Construction Management

Road, culvert, bridge design

Transportation planning: high speed rail

Hydraulic modeling

12


Level Third Outline


Fifth Outline Level

Sixth Outline Level




Second level

Third level

Fourth level

Fifth level

+Forest Resource Management

Vegetation mapping

Habitat analysis

Change detection

13


Level Third Outline


Fifth Outline Level

Sixth Outline Level




Second level

Third level

Fourth level

Fifth level

+River and Stream Resource Management

Water conveyance

Fish passage

NHD stewardship

14


Level Third Outline


Fifth Outline Level

Sixth Outline Level




Second level

Third level

Fourth level

Fifth level

+Geologic Resource Assessment and Hazard Mitigation

15

Geologic mapping

Seismic, tsunami, landslide hazard mapping and zonation

+California LiDAR Estimated

Costs, 163,695 mi2

Quality Level $/mi2 Total Costs

QL1 LiDAR $547.30 $89,590,274

QL2 LiDAR $334.48 $54,752,704

QL3 LiDAR $252.67 $41,360,816

+





2012 Inventory Update 17

Data that “meet or partially meet” 3DEP specifications

Meet Partially

MeetDo Not Meet

Quality* QL2 or better

QL3 QL4 or lower

AND OR

Current-ness

Less than or equal to 8 years

old

Older than 8 years

AND OR

Avail-ability

Publicly availableNot

publicly available

* Except Alaska where data meet 3DEP specifications at QL5 or better

+





2012 Inventory Analysis

Data that meet or partially meet 3DEP specifications are available or in progress for 26.4% of the nation (includes AK, HI, PR & VI)

Bar chart depicts the amount of new data coverage that meets or partially meets 3DEP specifications by year since 2005

18

What Have We Learned So Far?

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Of the data collected in 2012, 7% was repeat coverage; this equates to 0.4% of the nation’s area

Repeat coverage may include replacement of lower quality or older data, pre- and post-disaster coverage, collection for change detection, etc.

+





FY13, FY14 Program Funding IncreasesUSGS – National Geospatial Program +$7.2M (Hurricane Sandy Supplemental) +$9M for 3DEP (FY14 President’s budget) +$750k for ecosystem data (FY14 President’s budget) +$1M for Alaska mapping initiative (FY14 President’s budget) +$300k for emergency response system improvements

(Hurricane Sandy Supplemental)

USGS – Coastal and Marine Geology Program

+$0.55M for CoNED (Hurricane Sandy Supplemental) +$2M for coastal elevation (FY14 President’s budget)

NPS +$500K for ifsar (FY14 President’s budget)

NOAA +$10 M for coastal topobathy lidar (Hurricane Sandy

Supplemental) +$1.9M for GRAV-D to produce a new national vertical datum

(Hurricane Sandy Supplemental) +$7.9 M for coastal topobathy lidar data collection (FY14

President’s budget) +$3.0M for GRAV-D to produce a new national vertical datum

(FY14 President’s budget)

Multiple Federal Agencies +Alaska partnership funds

$50M+ is spent across Federal programs annually

19

3DEP direct funding, and other increases supporting 3DEP goals

+





3DEP Acquisition Planning

Revise the acquisition approach with input from the 3DEP Executive Forum and NDEP

Establish a Broad Agency Announcement or other contract mechanism to streamline partnership development

Work with state and local partners to facilitate move to new planning strategy

Trial run of some steps (compiling agency requirements and plans against criteria) in FY14

Initiate 3 year planning in FY14

Implement new approach for FY15 (beginning in April, 2014)

20

Next Steps for the Federal long-term program

+





Managed Workflow Terrestrial Elevation Source Data and Product

Management Modernization

Managed Database

Staged products Project-based DEMs

Lidar Point Clouds Ifsar DSMs

Metadata

Other Data Package• Deliverable• Deliverable• Metadata

Project Package• Source DEM• Lidar Point Cloud • Intensity Image• Breaklines• Metadata

Delivery Via Portable

Media

Real-Time Access

Via Web Service

Delivery Via Download

Ifsar Project Package• Source DEM• DSM• Intensity Image• Breaklines• Metadata

Lidar Project

Derived Products Pre-generated and Staged

or On Demand

Contour

Hillshade

Legacy Hydro Flattened DEMs1/9, 1/3, 1, 2 Arc second

Coordination

Contract

QA/QC

Receive

Outreach

Accept

PlanningDelivery Services

Legacy NED Data• 1/9 arc second

DEMs• 1/3 arc second

DEMs• 1, 2 arc second

DEMs• MetadataLegacy Projects– source DEMs, Lidar point cloud, and Metadata

Create 3DEP

Products

Hydro Flattened 1 meter DEMs

1/3, 1, 2 arc second

Future Products• Hydro Enforced 1

meter DEMs• Product TBD• Product TBD• Product TBD• Product TBD

Spot Elevation5 meter DEMs

Alaska

Ifsar Project

21

+





3DEP Key Milestones

Requirements and program recommendations – Complete

Governance coordinated under NDEP

Establish Executive Forum – In Progress

10M in the President’s fy14 budget

Implementation plan – Final plan to be released early 2014

Issue new 3DEP data acquisition specifications – early 2014

Infrastructure and production systems modernization

Lidar and ifsar products and services – In progress and on schedule for October, 2014

New 3DEP products and services – Planned for January, 2015

22

+





3DEP Acquisition Planning

Areas with the highest net benefits as identified through the NEEA requirements study

Areas included in a federal, state or regional partner acquisition plan

Areas of no existing coverage

Areas with existing coverage that do not meet Quality Level 3 specification

Areas with coverage greater than 8-years old

Areas with significant topographic change

Areas subject to serious and significant hazards (earthquakes, landslides, volcanic activity, coastal flooding, sea level rise)

Striving toward economies of scale: fewer but larger collections

23

Prioritization Criteria

+Next Steps for California

Identify lead state agency and interagency working group

Continue to build inventory, repository, infrastructure

Refine state-agency requirements, add program costs and determine real $$ benefits to program

Roll that up to reflect needs and benefits across state agencies

Consider adding business needs from county/regional requirements (potential huge source of funding!)

Identify and align state sources of funding

Prioritize acquisition in a cost-effective fashion

All of this = An Elevation Plan for California

24

+





3DEP Resources

NEEA Report

3DEP webpage

USGS Fact Sheets

NEEA at a glance

3D Elevation Program

Resources in work

State information sheets

Journal articles

25

http://nationalmap.gov/3DEP

+





26

+





Questions?? 27

Pacific Region NGP staff:

Carol Ostergren

US Geological Survey Pacific Region

National Geospatial Program

3020 State University Drive East, Suite 3005

Sacramento, CA 95819

916-278-9510 (office); 916-278-9546 (fax)

[email protected]

Drew Decker

USGS Geospatial Liaison for Pacific Region

NSDI Partnership Office, U.S. Geological Survey

4165 Spruance Road, Suite 200

San Diego, CA 92101

619-225-6430

619-417-2879 cell

619-225-6101 fax

[email protected]

+ 3d elevation program (3dep) november 2013 the nati onal map

Documents