§ 4.7 - 4.8 adams’ method; webster’s method adams’ method the idea: we will use the...

13
§ 4.7 - 4.8 Adams’ § 4.7 - 4.8 Adams’ Method; Method; Webster’s Method Webster’s Method

Upload: rosa-craig

Post on 29-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: § 4.7 - 4.8 Adams’ Method; Webster’s Method Adams’ Method  The Idea: We will use the Jefferson’s concept of modified divisors, but instead of rounding

§ 4.7 - 4.8 Adams’ Method; § 4.7 - 4.8 Adams’ Method; Webster’s MethodWebster’s Method

Page 2: § 4.7 - 4.8 Adams’ Method; Webster’s Method Adams’ Method  The Idea: We will use the Jefferson’s concept of modified divisors, but instead of rounding

Adams’ MethodAdams’ Method

The Idea: We will use the Jefferson’s concept of modified divisors, but instead of rounding the modified quotas down we will round them up.

Page 3: § 4.7 - 4.8 Adams’ Method; Webster’s Method Adams’ Method  The Idea: We will use the Jefferson’s concept of modified divisors, but instead of rounding

PLANET ANDORIA

EARTH TELLAR

VULCAN

TOTAL

POPULATIONin billions

16.2 16.1 28.3 8.9 69.5

STD. QUOTA

32.4 32.2 56.6 17.8 139

MODIFIED QUOTAPOP. D

FINAL APPORTIONMENT

Example: THE PLANETS OF ANDORIA, EARTH, TELLAR AND VULCAN HAVE DECIDED TO FORM A UNITED FEDERATION OF PLANETS. THE RULING BODY OF THIS GOVERNMENT WILL BE THE 139 MEMBER FEDERATION COUNCIL. APPORTION THE SEATS USING ADAM’S METHOD.

Page 4: § 4.7 - 4.8 Adams’ Method; Webster’s Method Adams’ Method  The Idea: We will use the Jefferson’s concept of modified divisors, but instead of rounding

PLANET ANDORIA

EARTH TELLAR

VULCAN

TOTAL

POPULATIONin billions

16.2 16.1 28.3 8.9 69.5

STD. QUOTA

32.4 32.2 56.6 17.8 139

MODIFIED QUOTAPOP. .5060

32.02 31.82 55.93 17.59 137.35

FINAL APPORTIONMENT

33 32 56 18 139

Example: THE PLANETS OF ANDORIA, EARTH, TELLAR AND VULCAN HAVE DECIDED TO FORM A UNITED FEDERATION OF PLANETS. THE RULING BODY OF THIS GOVERNMENT WILL BE THE 139 MEMBER FEDERATION COUNCIL. APPORTION THE SEATS USING ADAM’S METHOD.

Page 5: § 4.7 - 4.8 Adams’ Method; Webster’s Method Adams’ Method  The Idea: We will use the Jefferson’s concept of modified divisors, but instead of rounding

Adams’ MethodAdams’ Method

Step 1. Find a modified divisor D such that when each state’s modified quota is rounded upward (this number is the upper modified quota) the total is the exact number of seats to be apportioned.

Step 2. Apportion to each state its modified upper quota.

Page 6: § 4.7 - 4.8 Adams’ Method; Webster’s Method Adams’ Method  The Idea: We will use the Jefferson’s concept of modified divisors, but instead of rounding

Adams’ Method: Finding Adams’ Method: Finding the Modified Divisorthe Modified Divisor

Start: Guess D ( D < SD ).

End

Make D larger.

Make D smaller

Computation:1. Divide State Populations by D.

2. Round 2. Round Numbers Numbers Up.Up.

3. Add numbers. Let total = T.

T < M

T = M

T > M

Page 7: § 4.7 - 4.8 Adams’ Method; Webster’s Method Adams’ Method  The Idea: We will use the Jefferson’s concept of modified divisors, but instead of rounding

Webster’s MethodWebster’s Method

The Idea: We will use an approach similar to both Jefferson’s and Adams’ methods, but we will round the modified quotas conventionally.

Page 8: § 4.7 - 4.8 Adams’ Method; Webster’s Method Adams’ Method  The Idea: We will use the Jefferson’s concept of modified divisors, but instead of rounding

PLANET ANDORIA

EARTH TELLAR

VULCAN

TOTAL

POPULATIONin billions

16.2 16.1 28.3 8.9 69.5

STD. QUOTA

32.4 32.2 56.6 17.8 139

MODIFIED QUOTAPOP. D

FINAL APPORTIONMENT

Example: THE PLANETS OF ANDORIA, EARTH, TELLAR AND VULCAN HAVE DECIDED TO FORM A UNITED FEDERATION OF PLANETS. THE RULING BODY OF THIS GOVERNMENT WILL BE THE 139 MEMBER FEDERATION COUNCIL. APPORTION THE SEATS USING WEBSTER’S METHOD.

Page 9: § 4.7 - 4.8 Adams’ Method; Webster’s Method Adams’ Method  The Idea: We will use the Jefferson’s concept of modified divisors, but instead of rounding

PLANET ANDORIA

EARTH TELLAR

VULCAN

TOTAL

POPULATIONin billions

16.2 16.1 28.3 8.9 69.5

STD. QUOTA

32.4 32.2 56.6 17.8 139

MODIFIED QUOTAPOP. 0.5

32.4 32.2 56.6 17.8 139

FINAL APPORTIONMENT

32 32 57 18 139

Example: THE PLANETS OF ANDORIA, EARTH, TELLAR AND VULCAN HAVE DECIDED TO FORM A UNITED FEDERATION OF PLANETS. THE RULING BODY OF THIS GOVERNMENT WILL BE THE 139 MEMBER FEDERATION COUNCIL. APPORTION THE SEATS USING WEBSTER’S METHOD.

Page 10: § 4.7 - 4.8 Adams’ Method; Webster’s Method Adams’ Method  The Idea: We will use the Jefferson’s concept of modified divisors, but instead of rounding

Webster’s MethodWebster’s Method

Step 1. Find a modified divisor D such that when each state’s modified quota is rounded conventionally (this number is the modified quota) the total is the exact number of seats to be apportioned.

Step 2. Apportion to each state its modified quota.

Page 11: § 4.7 - 4.8 Adams’ Method; Webster’s Method Adams’ Method  The Idea: We will use the Jefferson’s concept of modified divisors, but instead of rounding

Webster’s Method: Finding Webster’s Method: Finding the Modified Divisorthe Modified Divisor

Start: Guess D ( D < SD ).

End

Make D larger.

Make D smaller

Computation:1. Divide State Populations by D.2. Round 2. Round Numbers Numbers ConventioConventionally.nally.

3. Add numbers. Let total = T.

T < M

T = M

T > M

Page 12: § 4.7 - 4.8 Adams’ Method; Webster’s Method Adams’ Method  The Idea: We will use the Jefferson’s concept of modified divisors, but instead of rounding

A Final Comment: The A Final Comment: The Balinsky-Young Balinsky-Young

Impossibility TheoremImpossibility Theorem Like Jefferson’s Method, the methods of both Adams and Webster are free of paradox. Unfortunately, they both also imitate Jefferson’s Method in that they violate the quota rule.

In 1980, Michel Balinski and H. Peyton Young provided mathematical proof that any apportionment method that does not produce paradox violates the quota rule and that any method that satisfies the quota rule must produce a paradox.

Page 13: § 4.7 - 4.8 Adams’ Method; Webster’s Method Adams’ Method  The Idea: We will use the Jefferson’s concept of modified divisors, but instead of rounding

A Final Comment: The A Final Comment: The Balinsky-Young Balinsky-Young

Impossibility TheoremImpossibility Theorem In other words, ‘fairness’ and proportional representation are incompatible ideas.