digital.library.unt.edu/67531/metadc164421/m2/1/high_res_d/nd_00397.pdfdigital.library.unt.edu
TRANSCRIPT
A STUDY OF THE VALUE OF SELECTED CURIOSITY TESTS
FOR PREDICTING ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT
IN FIRST AND SECOND-GRADES
APPROVED:
Graduate Committee:
Major Professor
Minor Professor
Committee Member
Committee Member
Dean of the School of Education
Dean of tPre Graduate School
A STUDY OF THE VALUE OF SELECTED CURIOSITY TESTS
FOR PREDICTING ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT
IN FIRST AND SECOND-GRADES
DISSERTATION
Presented to the Graduate Council of the
North Texas State University in Partial
Fulfillment of the Requirements
For the Degree of
DOCTOR OF EDUCATION
By
Jack Adkisson, B. A., B. D., M. R, E.
Denton, Texas
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page LIST OF TABLES v
Chapter
I. INTRODUCTION 1
Background of the Present Study-Significance of the Present Study General Statement of the Problem Purpose of the Present Study Statement of the Hypotheses Definition of Terras Discussion of Terms Used in the Study Preview of the Organization of the Study
II. REVIEW OF RELATED RESEARCH lb
Berlyne's Empirical Studies of Curiosity Questioning Affects Thinking Processes Summary
III. PROCEDURES 27
Limitations Basic Assumptions Instruments Experimental Treatment Procedures for Collecting Data Procedures for Analysis of Data
IV. FINDINGS kZ
Question One, Data Related to Hypotheses 1, 2, and 5
Question Two, Data Related to Hypotheses 3» 7> and 8
Question Three, Data Related to . Hypotheses 9 and 10
V. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, IMPLICATIONS ' AND RECOMMENDATIONS H I
Summary-Conclusions Implications Re commendat i on s
iii
APPENDICES Page
Appendix A, Battery A Tests 129
Appendix B, Battery B Tests . . 1^6
Appendix C, Thinking Operations Skills 16'+
Appendix D, Permission to Use Experimental
Materials of Maw and Maw 166
Appendix K, The Pilot Program . 167
Appendix P, Manual: "Stimulating Children to Think". 169
Appendix G, Figure: A Conceptual Model of Curiosity Power Relationships 17?
Appendix H, Tables XXXIX-XXXXII, Additional Data on Experimental Program 1?8
Appendix I, Tables XXXXIII-XXXXVI, Scores by Students on Otis-Lennon, Combined Tests of Curiosity, and Stanford Achievement Tests 190
BIBLIOGRAPHY 262
LIST OP TABLES
Table Page
I. Curiosity Tests and Their Behavioral Correlates as Defined by Maw and Maw 29
II. Diagram of Research Design 35
III. Comparison of Stanford Achievement
Sub Tests 37
IV. Zero-Order Coefficients of Correlation . . . . 38
V. Means, Standard Deviations, Fisher's t Value, and Level of Significance between Experimental and Control Group Scores on the Otis-Lennon Mental Ability Test, KTementary I for First-Grade- . ' kk
VI. Means, Standard Deviations, Fisher's t_ Value, and Level of Significance between Experimental and Control Group Scores on the Otis-Lennon Mental Ability Test, Elementary I for Second-Grade. 7 . . . . ^5
VII. Correlations between Measures of Academic Achievement and Selected Measures of Ability in First-Grade Students . . . . . ^8
VIII. Summary of Correlations Abstracted from Table VII Showing Marked Relationships between Measures of Ability of First-Grade Students 51
IX. Correlations between Measures of Academic Achievement and Selected Measures of Ability in First-Grade Group I Students after the Administration of the Experimental Program . 53
Table
X. Summary of Correlations Abstracted from Table IX Showing Marked Relationships betxfeen Measures of Academic Achievement and Selected Measures of Ability in First-Grade Group I Students After the Administration of the Experimental Program 55
XI. Correlations between Measures of Academic Achievement and Selected Measures of Ability in First-Grade Group II Students After the Administration of the Experimental Program . . . . . . . . . 57
XII. Summary of Correlations Abstracted from Table XI Showing Marked Relationships between Measures of Academic Achievement and Selected Measures of Ability in First-Grade Group II Students After the Administration of the Experimental Program 59
XIII. Correlations between Measures of Academic Achievement and Selected Measures of Ability in Second-Grade Students . . . . . 61
XIV. Summary of Correlations Abstracted from Table XIII Showing Marked Relationships between Measures of Academic Achievement and Selected Measures of Ability of Second-Grade Students . . . . . 6'+
XV. Correlations between Measures of Academic Achievement and Selected Measures of Ability in Second-Grade Group I Students After the Administration of the Experimental Program 66
XVI. Summary of Correlations Abstracted from Table XV Showing Marked Relationships between Measures of Academic Achievement and Selected Measures of Ability in Second-Grade Group I Students After the Administration of the Experimental Program . . . . . . . . . 68
Table
XVII.
Page
XVIII.
XIX.
XX.
XXI.
XXII.
XXIII.
XXIV.
XXV.
Correlations between Measures of Academic Achievement and Selected Measures of Ability in Second-Grade Group II Students After the Administration of the Experimental "Program 69
Summary of Correlations Abstracted from Table XVII Showing Marked Relation-ships between Measures of Academic Achievement and Selected Measures of Ability in Second-Grade Group II Students After the Administration of the Experimental Program.
Mean Gain or Loss for First-Grade Experi-mental and Control Groups for Each Seven Week Period of the Investigation.
Mean Gain or Loss for Second-Grade Experi-mental and Control Groups for Each Seven Week Period of the Investi-gation
Hypotheses, Group, and Computed t_ Value Relating to Mean Gains in Curiosity during the First Seven Weeks and the Second Seven Weeks of the Investi-gation.
Mean Gain, Fisher's t_ Value, and Level of Confidence Pertaining to the Difference between the Experimental Groups in Curiosity .. . . . . . . .
Summary of Tally Sheets Showing Average Number of Sessions and Average Number of Thinking Operation Stimulus Cards Used by Each Teacher per Session during the Investigation
Mean Gain in Reading Comprehension for First-Grade Experimental and Control Groups for Each Seven Week Period of the Investigation . . .
72
73
7^
76
77
Mean Gain in Reading Comprehension for Second-Grade Experimental and Control Groups for Each Seven Week Period of the Investigation . . . .
78
79
80
vii
Table
XXVI.
Page
XXVII.
XXVIII.
XXIX.
XXX.
XXXI.
XXXII.
XXXIII.
XXXIV.
Hypotheses, Group, and. Computed t_ Value Relating to Mean Gains in Reading Comprehension during the First Seven Weeks and the Second Seven Weeks of the Investigation . . . . . . . . . .
Mean Gain, Fisher's t_ Value, and Level of Confidence Pertaining to the Difference between the Experimental •-Groups in Reading Comprehension . . .
Coefficients of Correlation between the Total Measure of Academic Achievement and Selected Measures of Ability in First-Grade Students Together with Standard Errors of Estimate
82
83
Intercorrelations between a Measure of Academic Achievement and Selected Measures of Ability for First-Grade Students. . . . . . . .
Coefficients of Multiple Correlation between a Measure of Total Academic Achievement and Combinations of Selected Measures of Ability for First-Grade Students. . . . . . ,
86
89
92
Standard Errors of Estimate for Total Academic Achievement Scores of Firat-Grade Students Predicted from Best Combinations of Selected Measures of Ability . 95
Coefficients of Correlation between the Total Measure of Academic Achievement and Selected Measures of Ability in Second-Grade Students Together with Standard Errors of Estimate . . . . .
Intercorrelations between a Measure of Academic Achievement and Selected Measures of Ability for Second-Grade Students..
99
102
Coefficients of Multiple Correlation between a Measure of Total Academic Achievement and Combinations of Selected Measures of Ability for Second-Grade Students. 105
viii
Table Page
XXXV. Standard Errors of Estimate for Total Academic Achievement Scores of Second-Grade Students Predicted from Best Combinations of Selected Measures of Ability .108
XXXVI. Summary of Findings Related to Question 1, Relationship of Total Achievement and Total CTC 120
XXXVII. Summary of Findings Related to Question 2 Relevant to Cariosity 121
XXXVIII. Summary of Findings Related to Question 2 Relevant to Reading Comprehension . . . 122
XXXIX* Variables, Group, Mean Gain, Computed t Value Relating to Mean Gain in Ability and Achievement of First-Grade Students during the First Seven Weeks and the Second Seven Weeks of the Investigation 178
XXXX. Variables, Group, Mean Gain, Computed t_ Value Relating to Mean Gain in Ability and Achievement of Second-Grade Students during the First Seven Weeks and the Second Seven Weeks of the Investigation 180
XXXXI. Variable, Possible Score, Mean, Standard Deviation of Each Test for First and Second-Grade Groups I and II. . . . . . 182'
XXXXII. Variables, Groups, Mean Gain, Standard Deviation, Computed Value Relating to Mean Gain in Ability, and Achieve-ment of First-Grade and Second-Grade Students in Combined Experimental Groups and in Combined Control Groups during the Investigation. 186
XXXXIII. Scores Made by First-Grade Students on the Otis-Lennon Mental Ability Test, the Combined Tests of Curiosity, and the Stanford Achievement Tests. . . . . 190
Table
XXXXIV.
XXXXV.
XXXXVI.
Scores Made by Second-Grade Students on the Otis-Lennon Mental Ability Test, the Combined Tests of Curiosityand the Stanford Achievement Tests. . . ,
Scores Made by First-Grade Students on the Otis-Lennon Mental Ability Test, the Combin ed~ Te s ts of Curiosity, and the Stanford Achievement Tests. . . ,
Scores Made by Second-Grade Students on the Otis-Lennon Mental Ability Test, the Combined Tests~of Curiosity, and the Stanford Achievement Tests. . . ,
Page
20?
222
2^2
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
Background of the Present Study-
Following Berlyne• s (.1) publication of Conflict,
Arousal, and Curiosity in i960, interest in the area of
human curiosity increased. Maw and Maw (7) obtained a
research contract with the United States Office of Edu-
cation, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, to
study measures of curiosity. The Maw and Maw study, 196^,
was entitled, "An Exploratory Study into the Measurement of
Curiosity in Elementary School Children." Certain paper
and pencil tests of curiosity for fifth-grade children were
devised, validated, and tested for reliability by the Maws.
Mays used the Maw and Maw tests in 1969 in an experi-
mental study at North Texas State University. She suggested!
Instruments for measuring curiosity in subjects younger aid older than the fifth-graders for whom the Maws designed their paper-and-pencil tests are needed. Such instruments would permit the study of curiosity at all age levels (8, p. 78).
Bradley and Adkisson devised downward extensions of some of
the Maw and Maw tests for the purpose of this study since no
curiosity tests had been devised for first and. second-grade
students and no studies had been made to determine their
value in predicting academic achievement.
Significance of the Present Study
With the increase of world population and the concomitant
relationship of this population becoming more accessible to
new problems, ideas, and philosophies, it would seem that the
ability to think curiously, comprehensively, and intellec-
tually is of great necessity for culture in the present world.
Teachers who are aware of the need of improving these thought
processes may become viewed as ones who are the major con-
tributors to the educational experiences of children.
There is a need for children to be given a program util-
izing curious questioning through the categories of selected
thinking operations. If one recognizes what appears to be
happening in school classrooms, the emphasis is on factual
knowledge, memorization of data, repetition, and drill.
The end result of the exclusive use of convergent
thinking is that intellectual curiosity is seldom encouraged,
utilized, or developed. Indeed, intellectual curiosity may
be suppressed while the striving for factual information Is
encouraged. Cogswell' emphasizes the need for a program of
divergent thinking:
A course in the art or science of thinking would seem to be so necessary and valuable for individuals in particular and society in general that it should be an absolute requirement for every student. But how many schools offer such a course? I do not know one (3, p. 60).
Taba states, "The development of thinking is an objective to
which we pay lip service, but which we do not practice" (12,
p. 215).
Baths recognizes that an emphasis upon thinking activities
will encourage thinking and result in a decrease in what may
be termed "immature" behavior. He suggests that his theory
be put to the test (10, p. viii). Consequently, this study
is not only supported by Raths who stated:
Children may be given many opportunities over a period of one semester to think and then an assessment of their behaviors can be carried out a second time (10, p. viii),
but by Bradley and Earp (2), Maw and Maw (7), and Mays (8).
Their concerted opinions were in essence: The time has
come for children to be taught how to think, to acquire from
their teachers a type of program that promotes their thought
processes, and to use their innate curiosity as an anchor
point between what one is able to use as a.process (thought
skill) and what one has as a move to be curious, a willing-
ness to learn (exploratory type of behavior).
Recognizing the instructional dilemma, the need was to
(1) investigate the value of curiosity test scores for pre-
dicting educational achievement of first and second-grade
children; (2) prepare materials for teachers using the ques-
tioning procedures suggested by Bradley and Earp with the
categories expanded to twelve of the fifteen categories
delineated by -Raths; (3) determine the extent to which
thinking operations as categories of questioning affect
curiosity, achievement, and intelligence test scores.
General Statement of the Problem
This investigation was concerned with the problem of
determining the value of selected curiosity tests for pre-
dicting academic achievement in first and second-grades.
Purpose of the Present Study
In order to assess the value, the relationship of
selected curiosity test scores with Stanford Achievement
Test (5, 6) scores was determined for the purpose of ascer-
taining the best predictors of a student's ability to
achieve academically.
More specifically, answers were sought to the following
questions:
1. Will curiosity test scores indicate a student's
ability to achieve academically?
2. If the answer to-question one is in the affirmative,
will the questioning procedures of Bradley and Earp concom-
itantly increase the curiosity and reading comprehension
scores?
3. What are the best predictors of academic achieve-
ment when a combination of test scores is utilized?
Statement of the Hypotheses
The present study tested the hypotheses that curiosity
test scores are useful in predicting a student's ability
and that the questioning procedures of Bradley and Earp
will increase curiosity as well as achievement test scores.
Specifically, the following hypotheses were tested:
1. There will be a significant relationship between
academic achievement as measured by Stanford Achievement
Tests, Primary I (Y) for the first-grade, and each of the
following measures of ability:
X^ Intellectual ability as determined by Otis-
Lennon Mental Ability Test (9).
X2 Self Judgment of Curiosity as determined by
Combined Tests of Curiosity (CTC).
X3 Story Memory of Evidence as determined by CTC.
Xif. Persistence as determined by CTC.
X5 Desire to Know as determined by CTC.
X5 Desire for the Incongruous as'determined by CTC.
X7 total ability of curiosity as determined by CTC.
2. There will be a significant relationship between
academic achievement as measured by the Stanford Achieve-
Tests,- Primary I (I) and each of the following measures
of ability after administration of the experimental program:*
"The seventeen weeks program constitutes as its basis the questioning procedures suggested by Bradley and Earp (2, pp. 65-72) with the categories expanded to twelve of the fifteen delineated by Raths** (10, pp. 5-23).
Louis E. Raths (Ph.D., The Ohio State University), theorist on thought processes and their application in actual classroom settings, is Coordinator of Curriculum and Instruction, and Distinguished Service Professor at Newark State College.
X-|_ intellectual ability as determined by the
Otis-Lennon Mental Ability Test.
Xg Self Judgment of Curiosity as determined by CTC.
Xj Story Memory of Evidence as determined by CTC.
Xi± Persistence as determined by CTC.
Desire to Know as determined by CTC.
X^ Desire for the Incongruous as determined by CTC,
X? total ability of curiosity as determined by CTC.
3. There will be a significant difference between the
increase in the mean test scores of the first-grade experi-
mental group and the mean test scores of the first-grade
control group.
There will be a significant relationship between
academic achievement as measured by the Stanford Achieve-
ment Tests, Primary II (I) for second-grade, and each of
the following measures of ability:
XX intellectual ability as determined by Otis-
Lennon Mental Ability Test.
X2 Self Judgment of Curiosity as determined by CTC.
X-j Story Memory of Evidence as determined by CTC.
X4 Persistence as determined by CTC.
X5 Desire to Know as determined by CTC.
X6 Desire for the Incongruous as determined by CTC.
Xy total ability of curiosity as determined by CTC.
5. There will be a significant relationship between
academic achievement as measured by the Stanford Achievement
Tests, Primary II (Y) for second-grade, and each of the
following measures of ability after administration of the
experimental program:
Xx intellectual ability as determined by the Otis-
Lennon Mental Ability Test. K j m & v u e x g & F t s v i • At— mrniiinu junrii—IT
x2 Self Judgment of Curiosity as determined by CTC.
Xj Story Memory of Evidence as determined by CTC.
X^ Persistence as determined by the CTC.
X5 Desire to Know as determined by the CTC.
X^ Desire for the Incongruous as determined by CTC.
X? total ability of curiosity as determined by CTC.
6. There will be a significant difference between the
increase in the mean test scores of the second-grade exper-
imental group and the mean test scores of the second-grade
control group.
7. There will be no significant difference between the
increase in the mean test scores of first-grade Group I,
Experimental, and first-grade Group II, Experimental.
8. There will be no significant difference between the
increase in the mean test scores of second-grade Group I,
Experimental, and second-grade Group II, Experimental.
9. There will be a significant relationship between
academic achievement as measured by the Stanford Achieve-
ment Tests, Primary I (Y), and a combination of the
following measures of ability:
8
X- intellectual ability as determined by the
Otls-Lennon Mental Ability Test,
X2 Self Judgment of Curiosity as determined by CTC.
X3 Story Memory of Evidence as determined by CTC.
X^ Persistence as determined by CTC.
X 5 Desire to Know as determined by CTC.
Xg Desire for the Incongruous as determined by CTC.
Xr, total ability of curiosity as determined by CTC.
10. There will be a significant relationship between
academio achievement as measured by the Stanford Achievement
Tests, Primary II (I) and a combination of the following
measures of ability:
Xx intellectual ability as determined by the
Otis-Lennon Mental Ability Test.
X2 Self Judgment of Curiosity as determined by CTC.
X-j Story Memory of Evidence as determined by CTC.
X^ Persistence as determined by CTC.
X^ Desire to Know as determined by CTC.
X6 Desire for the Incongruous as determined by CTC.
Xr, total ability of curiosity as determined by CTC.
Definition of Terms
For the purposes of this investigation the following
definitions have been formulated:
Curiosity..— An intrinsic energy initiated by environ-
mental stimuli which moves by the means of inquiry into the
unknown, bringing forth behavioral investigative acts of
exploration, manipulation, observation, and comparison
which through cognitive conflict results in interpretation,
solution, confirmation, and creative production. See
Appendix G for figure depicting curiosity power relation-
ships.
Question.— "Any intellectual exercise calling for a
response; this would include both problems and projects"
(11, p. 2).
Thinking Operations.— A complex coordination and
integration of skills used in a continuous process through
developmental stages associated with inquiry and decision
making. See Appendix C for definition of each skill as
used in this study: applying facts and principles in new
situations, assuming, classifying, collecting and organiz-
ing (ordering) data, comparing, criticizing, hypothesizing,
imagining, interpreting, observing, recalling, summarizing.
Discussion of Terms Used in the Study
Constituting the term curiosity is a cluster of words
which are closely related and are at times used as being
synonymous with curiosity. Such words as attention, crea-
tivity, discovery, interest, motivation, problem solving,
and purpose are often thought of in conjunction with curious
moves.
The Maws, after examining all the information avail-
able, concluded that curiosity is demonstrated by an ele-
10
1. reacts positively to new, strange, incongruous, or mysterious elements in the environment by moving toward them or "by manipulating them.
2. exhibits a need or a desire to know more about himself and/or his environment.
3» scans his surroundings seeking new experiences.
k, persists in examining and exploring stimuli to know more about them (?, p. 2).
Curiosity is a compelling drive to know the peculiar,
incongruous, and mysterious. Curiosity causes a person to
question the obvious, reject the accepted, and believe only
that which has been personally explored and examined. Curi-
osity steers the helm of creativity, sustains the growing
edge of interest, and channels the process of thinking.
"It is a motive which directs,- channels, and sustains pur-
posive, problem-solving behavior so that persistence in
inquiry increases the likelihood that divergent thinking
will lead to discovery" (8, p. 8).
Berlyne rationalized the difference between curious
thinking and creative thinking as being the fact that curi-
ous thinking puts the individual in permanent possession of
new knowledge, and creative or productive thinking calls up
remembered knowledge to guide the handling of new or current
problems (1, p. 265).
Dewey hypothesized that curiosity becomes intellectual
in the degree it is transformed into interest in problems
which persist through questioning, and it becomes a positive
intellectual force when alertness for answers is maintained
11
(^, p. 23). The ability to continue the state of doubt and
to carry on systematic and protracted inquiry are the two
essentials of thinking (4-, p. 13). Thus, thinking can be
regarded as a disposition—a complex coordination and inte-
gration of specific activities (2, p. 1*0.
In this chapter the background, significance, general
statement of the problem including the purpose, statement of
the hypotheses, and the definition of terms used were pre-
sented. The following brief preview of chapter organization
is presented as an aid to the reader who may wish to refer
to a particular section of this study for specific informa-
tion.
Preview of the Organization of the Study
Chapter II reviews the research in curiosity, question-
ing, thinking, and non-intellective self report variables as
predictors of achievement relevant to this study. Included
in Chapter III are limitations, basic assumptions, descrip-
tion of the sample, description of the meastires employed,
research design, procedures for collection of data, and the
procedures for analysis of data. The findings of this pres-
ent research relevant to each hypothesis are found in Chap-
ter IV. A review and summary of the findings are found in
Chapter V with resultant conclusions, implications, and
recommendations for further study.
CHAPTER BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Berlyne, D. E., Conflict, Arousal, and Curiosity, New-York, McGraw-Hill Book Co., ino.,'1960.
2. Bradley, R. C. and N. Wesley Earp, Exemplar3 of the Teacher*s Cognitive Domain, Dubuque, Iowa, Win. Cf Brown Co.", Inc., 196?.
3. Cogswell, Coralie, "Students Need a Course in Thinking," Today's Education, Vol. LVIII, (November, 19^9)» 60.
Dewey, John, How We Think, Boston, D. C. Heath and Co., 1911.
5. Kelly, Truman L., Richard Madden, Erie P. Gardner, Herbert C. Rudman, Stanford Achievement Test, Directions for Administering," Primary' I_ Battery", New York, Harcourt, Brace, arid World, Inc., I9I&.
6. Kelly, Truman L., Richard Madden, Eric P. Gardner, Her-bert C. Rudman, Stanford Achievement Test, Directions for Administering, Primary"II Battery" New York, Har-court, Brace, and World, Inc., \9bk,
7. Maw, Wallace H. and Ethel W. Maw, "An Exploratory Investi-gation into the Measurement of Curiosity in Elementary School Children," Washington, U. S. Office of Educa-tion, 196^.
8. Mays, Sue Cox, "Curiosity in the Reading Encounter, An Experimental Study of the Effect of Questioning on Curiosity and Reading Comprehension," unpublished doctoral dissertation, School of Education, North Texas State University, Denton, Texas, 1969.
9. Otis, Arthur S. and Roger T. Lennon, Otls-Lennon Mental Ability Test, Manual for Adminl strati on, Elementary I_ Level, New York, Harcourt^ Brace, and"~WorId, Inc., 1967.
10. Raths, Louis E., Arthur Jonas, Arnold Rothstein, Selma Wassermann, Teaching for Thinking, Theory and Applica-tion, Columbus, Ohio,""Charles E. Merrill "Publishing Co., 1967.
11. Sanders, Norris M., Classroom Questions—What Kinds? New York, Harper and Row Publishing ~^rr~
13
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF RELATED RESEARCH
There are numerous articles in the current literature
related to curiosity, questioning, and thinking operations.
This review is to present the research related to this study.
The "background and general statement of the problem were
given in Chapter I including considerable research in the
area of the significance of the pi-oblem. Terms were defined
and research was cited in reference to curiosity and curious
thinking. This chapter will be devoted to elaborating on the
literature previously mentioned in Chapter I and other signif-
icant research as it relates to this present study.
Berlyne's Empirical Studies of Curiosity
The principle empirical studies of curiosity were re-
viewed by Berlyne in his provocative work entitled Conflict,
Arousal, and Curiosity (1). In this work Berlyne developed
a theory of human curiosity which differentiated between
what he called perceptual and epistemic curiosity. Percep-
tual curiosity was used to refer "to states of high arousal
that can be relieved by specific exploration and in which,
therefore, specific exploratory responses are likely to
occur" (1, p. 195). Epistemic curiosity was used to refer
15
to "responses through which knowledge Is acquired"
(X, p. 80).
Knowledge is certain highly specialized information-
gathering and information-storing processes which are
dependent on symbolic processes. Knowledge consists of
habits. A habit is a psychological disposition which has
been learned and has become knowledge through symbolic re-
sponses. Sequences of symbolic responses constitute think-
ing, through which knowledge exerts its influence on overt
behavior (1, pp. 262-265).
Behavior (epistemic) falls into three main classes:
(1) observation, which includes observing anything from
scandal to scientific experiments; (2) thinking, which is to
put the individual in permanent possession of new knowledge;
(3) consultation, which includes writing letters, reading,
and asking questions (1, pp. 262-265).
When incompatible responses, emerge and conflict is
engendered by them, Berlyne calls this conflict conceptual
conflict (1, p. 283). Conflict from a variety of sources
keeps epistemic curiosity alive, keeps it moving and deter-
mines which direction it will turn at each option (1, p. 290).
Conflict in the form of questioning intensifies curiosity
whether the subject raises the question or whether it comes
from others (1, p. 296). In the present study students were
encouraged to adopt, accept, and make a practice of applying
the questioning attitude in daily classroom routines.
16
Maw and Maw Formulated Curiosity Tests
Maw and Maw in their review of the literature observed:
In the scholarly and comprehensive bibliography of more than 50 items in Berlyne's Conflict, Arousal, and Curiosity, there is not a single reference to classroom behavior. In fact, with the exception of the works of Piaget, one reference dated 1930 j an(i three articles reporting on the vision of infants, children are not mentioned specifically in the bibliography. Yet, if curiosity is to be maintained and even increased, it must be done with school-age children (1^, p. 2).
Maw and Maw (1^) hypothesized that if curiosity ware to
be maintained and developed, adequate measures must be
devised. It was the purpose of their study to explore the
possibilities of developing paper and pencil tests to meas-
ure curiosity in elementary school children. The investi-
gation was conducted in thirty-eight fifth-grade classrooms
in New Castle County, Delaware. In designing the measuring
instruments, characteristics of high and low curiosity
children had to be considered. On the basis of the three
studies composing the investigation, high curiosity children
as compared to low curiosity children are those who
1. ask more and better questions, 2. select more outgoing, adventurous activities, 3. have more general information about the world
in which they live, 4. can recall more specific facts, 5. relate more frequently to the unbalanced and
unfamiliar, 6. persist longer at problem solving, and 7. are more alert to verbal absurdities {!**•, p. 119).
As a result of paper and pencil tests the Maws found
the following to be true:
17
1. Paper and pencil tests can be used to measure
curiosity in groups of children with a measurable degree of
accuracy, but cannot identify curiosity with a high degree
of accuracy in any given child.
2. Curiosity can be measured by using test items simi-
lar to those used for measuring breadth of knowledge.
3. High curiosity children are more persistent than low
curiosity children.
k, Curiosity may be a unique factor and, therefore, is
mult i-dimen s i onal (1^, pp. 117-119).
Questioning Increases Curiosity
Mays (16) used the Maw and Maw tests in 19&9 in 0X1
experimental study at North Texas State University. All of the
fifth-grade class sections from two elementary schools in a
suburban district, being six in number, participated in the
research study. There were 171 children who participated.
Three forms of the Maw and Maw tests were used, and three forms
of the "Heading Comprehension Test" of the Iowa Tests of Basic
Skills were used. Gains in curiosity and reading compre-
hension were computed for experimental and control groups
after seven weeks of questioning procedures during the
reading encounter. The questions followed the categories
advocated by Bradley and Earp (6, pp. 65-72).
The gains were analyzed by means of the two-tailed t_
test. The findings indicated that the use of selected
questioning procedures increased the curiosity levels of the
18
subjects who participated in the study and facilitated
their growth in reading comprehension (16, p. 7 0 ) . Thatcher
found in an earlier study that
the act of exploring (curiosity) is itself a move from the known in the direction of the less known and the unknown. A large number of exposures to the infor-mation and opinions found in present day reading matter may lead, potentially, to some types of creative response (24, p. 2 3 7 ) .
This current investigation followed the questioning
procedure advocated by Bradley and Earp (6, pp. 65-72).
Mays found that of the four categories delineated by Bradley
and Sarp, "type three and type four questions—-predicting
consequences and interpretation and inference making skills
did produce a significant increase in curiosity" (16, p. 7 0 ) .
Although the questioning procedure of this present study
followed the Bradley and Sarp suggestion, the categories
were expanded to twelve of the fifteen delineated by Hatha
(19, pp. 5-23), and was not exclusively limited to the read-
ing encounter since it included all the sub tests in the
Stanford Achievement battery for first and second grades.
If questioning increases curiosity, then there is the
possibility that a lack of questioning as stimulation in the
educational encounter could stifle or kill curious moves.
Holt dogmatically declares*
We kill, not only their curiosity, but their feeling that it is a good and admirable thing to be curious, so that by the age of ten most of them will not ask questions, and will show a good deal of scorn for the few who do (9, p. 168).
19
Many educators believe that education for the youngster
can be likened to fitting a child to a mold—patterns are
established and he is expected to fit the pattern. Bradley
must have observed this phenomenon when he admonished "for a
student to be truly curious, it is necessary that he be
relieved of the pressures of teacher-dominated experiences'*
(*+, p. 9). "Berlyne1s theory proposed that, epistemic
curiosity, which instigates a search for knowledge, increases
with the number of previous gratifications (successful out-
comes) of the drive in similar situations" (17» p. 11).
Questioning Affects Thinking Processes
Stimulating thinking. —Marchman defined critical think-
ing "as the ability to select, appraise, and draw conclusions
from evidence bearing upon the social scene" (13, p. 363),
He confessed to the belief that the best way to attain a
given objective in teaching is to plan for it where necessary
and if possible to devise instructional materials that are
intended to achieve it (13, P. 363).
In the light of Marchman's contention, a thinking
operations stimulus kit was devised and produced for the
current investigation, using stimuli from the happenings in
the everyday life of first and second-grade children.
Another basis for the stimulus kit was a later study by
Berlyne on which Neal commented that
new discovery techniques rely heavily on stimulating independent discovery facts and development of individual judgment. Accordingly, he (Berlyne) does not view the
20
student as either passive or absorbed, but rather as one whose curiosity has to be cultivated so that he will discover knowledge through his own activities (18, p. 635).
Berlyne's concepts, as cited by Neal, make a study
given by Durkin pertinent. Durkin found, as reported by
Russell, that "the greatest pressure to read seemed to be
the child's own curiosity plus a combination of the influ-
ence of parents and older siblings (usually mothers and
sisters)" (21, p. 191).
The thinking operations stimulus kit devised for this
current study was constructed on the basis of the child*s
curiosity within social experiences. The stimulus kit was
so constituted even though Hunkins found no significant
difference between control and experimental groups. He had
"sought to determine whether a dominant use in social
studies text-type materials of analysis and evaluation
questions defined by Bloom's taxonomy (3) would effectively
stimulate the development of sixth-grade pupils' critical
thinking" (10, p. 697).
Thinking tasks limited.--"In many classrooms, the
variety of thinking tasks required of students is limited
and may often be restricted to nothing more than recalling
memorized information" (12, p. 302). Specifically, "the
development of thinking is an objective to which we pay lip
service, but which we do not practice" (22, p. 215).
Teaching strategy.--A teaching strategy that relies
heavily upon asking questions on the premise that thinking
21
is learned, and is learned developmentally, is given in Taba's
Teacher*s Handbook for Elementary Social Studies (23). The
teaching strategy consists of sequentially ordered questions
designed to elicit specific sequences of overt activity from
the students. Advancement to higher levels of thinking depends
upon what questions are asked; what the teacher gave or sought
and at which point in the proceedings; at which points elab-
oration and extension of ideas were permitted, encouraged, or
by-passed; and whether or not there were summaries of ideas
and information before inferences of higher order x\rere sought.
Labeling stifles.—Research by Taba has found that
the fast students, especially the highly verbal ones, often make leaps in their predictions for which they cannot supply the connecting causal links....The pre-dictions of the slower and less verbal students tend to be on the more immediate and concrete level. In fact, they fill in the concrete links. In this way the heterogeneity of ability in a class becomes com-plementary and can be used advantageously (23, p. 115)*
Bradley has indicated that homogeneous grouping with labels
tends to stifle curiosity and thus affect thinking proc-
esses {^, p. ^50).
Thinking Processes May Involve Non-Intellective Variables
Self esteem.—Coopersmith states "self esteem is a
better predictor of a child's future success in school than
intelligence" (7» p. 28). Binder, Jones, and Strowig found
in two studies that self expections and self concept of
ability seemed to be associated with scholastic achieve-
ment (2, p. 366). Smith, after nine years of study,
22
concluded, that "personality tests used in combination with
traditional achievement tests may prove to be a substantial
improvement over current methods of predicting academic
success" (20, p. 7).
Personality.--Kingston and Miite found that interpre-
tation of characters in a story is influenced by person-
ality and self concept variables (11, p. 116.) "The reader's
personality and past learnings determine, distort, or alter
his understanding of what he reads » (11, p. 109).
Self rating instruments.—Maw and Maw discovered while
developing the paper and pencil tests of curiosity used as
prognostic variables in the present study, that a student is
possibly not more curious than he considers himself to be
curious (1^, p. 3^). "The success of self rating instru-
ments with children has been attributed to the fact that the
problems of children are so close to their lives that they
can scarcely refrain from answering what applies to them"
(15, p. k62).
Increasing self esteem,—In the survey of the liter-
ature, no studies were found in which attempts were made to
modify a student's self rating of curiosity through a par-
ticular program used to stimulate thinking. Binder (2) j
developed an instrument to measure an individual's expec-
tations for his behavior in the role as student, but no
program is reported in which the score may be increased.
23
Behavior change.—Raths cites evidence to indicate that
certain behaviors of children change after introduction of
a program which has been structured to emphasize think-
ing (19} p. 23). Berlyne in his continuum of epistemic
curiosity includes
thinking as sequences of symbolic responses through which knowledge exerts its influence on overt behavior. Trie intervention of symbolic processes between external stimuli and overt responses and the interaction between external stimuli and symbolic processes are what give behavior guided by knowledge its special character-istics: its rationality, its flexibility, its stamp of voluntary and conscious control (1, p. 26k).
The twelve thinking operations used in this study are iden-
tifiable within the three main classes of epistemic curiosity
as described by Berlyne (1, p. 265).
Summary
Berlyne developed a theory of human curiosity in which
he differentiated between perceptual and epistemic curiosity,
Epistemic curiosity was used to refer to responses through
which knowledge is acquired. In order to test curiosity as
defined by Berlyne, Maw and Maw devised instruments for the
measurement of curiosity in which groups could be identified
as being high or low in curiosity.
Mays used the Maw and Maw tests and the questioning
procedures advocated by Bradley and Sarp to find that read-
ing comprehension and curiosity could be increased. Mays'
study was significant to the degree that the student is
passive, as Neal contends (18, p. 635), and needs a
Zk
stimulating environment in which curiosity can be cultivated.
Taba found, when such a program of stimulation was provided
that advancement was made to higher levels of thinking.
Advancement depended upon what questions were asked; what the
teacher gave or sought and at which point in the proceed-
ings; at which points elaboration and extension of ideas
were permitted, encouraged, or by-passed; and whether or not
there were summaries of ideas and information before infer-
ences of higher order were sought.
Curious thinking involves the non-intellective variable
of self concept. Miile developing instruments for the
measurement of curiosity, Maw and Maw discovered the non-
intellective variable that a student is possibly riot more
curious than he considers himself to be curious.
Mays' investigation indicated that curiosity scores
could be increased, but no studies have been made in the
area of predicting achievement through the use of curiosity
scores.
CHAPTER BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Berlyne, D. E., Conflict, Arousal, and Curiosity, New York, McGraw-Hill Book Co., "inc., i960.
2. Binder, Dorothy M., John G. Jones, R. WTay Strow!g, "Non-Intellective Self-Report Variables as Predictors of Scholastic Achievement,"The Journal of Educational Research, Vol. LXIII, (April, "19707," 36^366". "
3. Bloom, Benjamin S., editor, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, New York, David McKay CompanyInc., 195&.
Bradley, R. C., "Do Current Reading Practices Stifle Curi-osity?" The Reading Teacher, Vol. XXII, (February, 1969), WP-F52.
5. Bradley, R. C., "How to Take the Pun Out of Reading," Educational Marketing and Research, La Jolla, Calif., 19697
6. Bradley, R. C. and N. Wesley Earp, Exemplars of the Teacher*s Cognitive Domain, Dubuque, Iowa, Ma. C." Brown Co., inc.", 19^7.
7. Coopersmith, Stanley and Jan Silverman, "How to Ehhance Pupil Self Esteem," Today's Education, Vol. LIX, (April, 1970), 28-29. '
8. Guilford, J. P., "The Structure of the Intellect," Psy-chological Bulletin, Vol. LIII, (July, 1956), 267-293.
9. Holt, John, How Children Learn. New York, Pitman Pub-lishing Corporation, I9S7T
10. Hunkins, Francis P., "Analysis and Evaluation Questions: Their Effects Upon Critical Thinking," Educational Leadership. Vol. XXVII, (April, 1970), 97-70^ "
11. Kingston, Albert J. and William F. White, "The Relation-ship of Reader's Self Concepts and Personality Components to Semantic Meanings Perceived in the Protagonist of a Reading Selection," Reading Research Quarterly, Vol. II, (Spring, 1970), 107-116". ~
12. Manson, Gary and Ambrose A. Clegg, Jr., "Classroom Questions! Keys to Children's Thinking?" Peabody Journal of Education, Vol. XXXXVII, (March, 19707, 302-307.
26
13. Marchman, George Frederick, "Teaching Critical Thinking and the Use of Evidence," The Quarterly Journal of Speech, Vol. XXXI, (February," 19^5). 362-35B.
14. Maw, Wallace H. and Ethel W. Maw, "An Exploratory Inves-tigation into the Measurement of Curiosity in Elemen-tary School Children," Washington, U.S. Office of Education, 196^.
15. Maw, Wallace H. and Ethel W., "Self-appraisal of Curi-osity," The Journal of Educational Research, Vol. LXI, (July-August, 195By,~¥62-2"5"5T
16. Mays, Sue Cox, "Curiosity in the Reading Encounter, An Experimental Study of the Effect of Questioning on Curiosity and Reading Comprehension," unpublished doctoral dissertation, School of Education, North Texas State University, Denton, Texas, 1969.
17. McGuire, Carson and Thomas Rowland, "Curiosity in the Educational Encounter, A Representation of Daniel E. Berlyne," Ed. 013 987 ERIC Microfilm.
18. Neal, Elizabeth, "A Review of Epistemic Curiosity and Behavior," Educational Leadership, Vol. XXVII, (March 1970), 633-OTl.
19. Raths, Louis E., Arthur Jonas, Arnold Rothstein, Selma Wasserman, Teaching for Thinking, Theory and Appli-cation, Columbus, Ohio, Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co., 1967.
20. "Research Clues," Today's Education, Vol. LIX, (March, 1970), 7.
21. Russell, David H., Children Learn to Read, Boston, Ginn and Company, I96I.
22. Taba, Hilda, Carriculum Development, Theory and Practice, New York, Harcourt, Brace, and World, inc.7"19&27
23. Taba, Hilda, Teacher*s Handbook for Elementary Social Studies, Palo Alto, Addison-Wesley"Publishing Co., Inc., 19 £"7.
2Ur. Thatcher, David A.,. "Reading Instruction, Creativity, and. Problem-Solving," The Reading Teacher, Vol. XXI, (Decem-ber, 1967) , 235-2^0, ~25o7~297.
CHAPTER III
PROCEDURES
In Chapter I the background, significance, general
statement of the problem including the purpose, statement
of the hypotheses, and the definition of terms used in the
present study were given. The research specifically related
to this study was given in Chapter II, This present chapter
is concerned with procedures clustered around the collection
of data.
Limitations
This investigation was restricted to first and second-
grade level students attending two separate team teaching
schools in North Texas. "The rotation group design tended
to minimize the influence of uncontrolled factors. The
following factors may have influenced the results obtained •
in the conduct of this investigation:
1, The time length of thinking operations stimulation
was seven weeks,
2, The nature of the population, the teaching staff,
and the setting may have restricted the interpretation to
the population used in this investigation,
3, The length of tests and number of test items was of
necessity imposed, since the attention span for learning
27
28
purposes is relatively short for first and second-grade
children.
The data pertaining to learning achievement and
ability may have been limited by the reliability and valid-
ity of the instruments used in measurement.
Basic Assumptions
Major assumptions which were entertained in this study
are as follows:
1. The teachers did adequately and explicitly carry out
the instructions in the manual and in-service tutorship
provided by the investigator.
2. The use of four or more classes in each grade in
each control and experimental group as well as the use of
two different schools--one for control and one for experi-
mental—did negate the effect of any single instructor
(N = 18).
3. At the time of the rotation, midway of the investi-
gation, the teachers of the former experimental group did
in fact become the teachers of the control group and no
longer used the stimulating techniques of the investigator.
The rotation group design did minimize the influ-
ences of uncontrolled factors.
!
Instruments
Curiosity Tests.---Paper and pencil tests for measuring
curiosity,--devised, validated, and tested for reliability
29
by Maw and Maw# through the course of three studies and/or
downward extensions of these paper and pencil tests by Brad-
ley and Adkisson—were employed in this investigation. The
data relevant to this pilot study is given in Appendix D.
The instruments designed to measure curiosity were validated
by establishing two criterion groups, one group high in
curiosity and the remaining low in curiosity. The tests
were designed to meet the behavioral requirements of the
Maw and Maw definition of curiosity as follows:
TABLE I
CURIOSITY TESTS AND THEIR BEHAVIORAL CORRELATES AS DEFINED BY MAW AND MAW*
Curiosity Tests . Behavioral Correlates
Self Judgment of Curiosity*#. . Exhibits a need or desire to know more about himself
Story Memory of Evidence### . . Exhibits a need or desire to know more about his environment
Persistence###. . Persists in examining and Hidden Objects exploring stimuli in Mazes order to know more Geometric Tree about them
Desire to Know### . Scans his surroundings seek-What's Wrong? ing new experiences What Grows into What?
Desire for the Incongruous##. . Reacts positively to new, {Which to Discuss) strange, incongruous, or
mysterious elements in his environment by mov~
*(5> PP. 117-119) ing toward them, by ##Maw and Maw exploring them, or by *##Bradley manipulating them
# (c) copyright, Wallace H. and Ethel Maw, I96.I, used by permission.
30
The Self Judgment of Curiosity Test reliability was
obtained, with 158 cases comprising the population of the
Maw and Maw first preliminary study. By using the split-
half method with the first forty items and the Spearman-
Brown formula for correction, an estimated reliability of
.91 was obtained. Cnildren in the high curiosity group
gave themselves higher scores on curiosity than did the
remaining group. The difference between the means was sig-
nificant at the .005 level (5, p. 36).
The Self Judgment of Curiosity Test has had only one
form. Bradley devised another form of this instrument for
the purpose of this investigation. The correlation coeffi-
cient of the Bradley instrument with the Maw and Maw instru-
ment was .63, greater than .01 level of confidence. The
correlation coefficient of the Bradley instrument in test-
retest with two week interval was .61, greater than .01
level of confidence.
The reliability of the Maw and Maw Which to Discuss
Test was computed by the split-half method. The reliability
coefficient of .91 was based on the scores of 560 children
for whom complete data was accumulated (5, p. 97). This
test was included in instruments of this current study as
the Desire for the Incongruous Test.
The Self Judgment of Curiosity and the Which to Discuss
Tests needed no downward extension, as no reading was re-
quired. Other 1— "
31
extensions. Bradley and Adkisson developed such downward
extensions, and reliability was established by the test-
ret est method on 270 cases. The reliability coefficient
for Story Memory was . 7» greater than .01 level of signif-
icance; Desire to Know was .^8, greater than .01 level of
significance.
The Persistence tests did not have significant corre-
lation. Maw and Maw had their lowest correlation in per-
sistence, .35 (5j P. 97). In the present study when the
Persistence Test was correlated with the total battery, on
Battery A the coefficient was .58, greater than .01 level of
confidence; on Battery B the coefficient was .61, greater
than .01 level of confidence.
The descriptive labels of Garrett denote the corre-
lations as obtained on the three downward extensions as
being of substantial or marked relationship (2, p. 173).
Smith (9 , p. 7), after nine years of study at Harvard Uni-
versity's medical school, found that students who do their
best in school score highest on his measures of persistence.
In this current study the Persistence Test was left in the
battery on the basis of the correlation with the total score
of the battery, and on the assumption that a valuable instru-
ment in the prediction of academic achievement of first and
second grade students could be lost to research if it were
not used.
32
Achievement Tests.--Achievement tests used were the
Stanford Achievement Test as revised in 196^ and published
by Harcourt, Brace, and World, Inc., New York. The Stanford
authors sought to insure content validity by examining
appropriate courses of study and textbooks as a basis for
determining the skills, knowledges, and understandings to be
measured (*}-). Reliability data for these tests using the
Kud e r-Ri chard son reliability coefficient was: Primary I
Word Reading .85, Paragraph Meaning .88, Vocabulary .83
(3> P* 30); Primary II Word Meaning .85, Paragraph Meaning
.93, Word Study Skills .93 (**, p. 30).
Mental Ability Tests.--Otis-Lennon Mental Ability
Tests, Elementary I, Forms J and K were used and are recom-
mended for the last half of grade one through the end of'
grade three (?). The tests are designed for use with class-
room groups and x ere easily administered by the classroom
teacher. The reliability, using Kuder-Riehardson reliability
coefficients, was .88 (7, p. 20).
Experimental Treatment
The teachers of the experimental group had at their
disposal a thinking operations stimulus kit. The kit con-
tained 5 X 7 stimulus cards in twelve categories of think-
ing operations which were devised to arouse the questioning
attitude within the child. The stimulus kit was constituted
on the basis of the questioning procedures suggested by
33
Bradley and Earp (1, pp. 65-?2) with the categories expanded
to twelve of the fifteen delineated by Raths (8, pp. 5-23)•
The stimulus card had a place for the teacher to
initial and date each time it was used. A check was made to
see which cards were preferred and how often teachers
cooperated. The investigator made this check every two
weeks and was available upon request to teachers of the
experimental group every Tuesday and Thursday during the
term of the experiment. In addition, Bradley visited the
experimental schools four times during the term of the
experiment.
The teachers of Group I experimental, received complete
instructions on how to use the stimulus kit through directions
contained in the manual, "Stimulating Children to Think."
Classroom demonstrations using the thinking skills kit were
given to all teachers.
Teachers of the experimental group were given help in
knowing how to give pupils time to think and how to get
pupils to formulate and discern pertinent questions during
the discussion period (1, p. 35).
The discussion is not the place to settle the answers to all questions, but the place to raise them. It may be better that pupils have some discussions that come, before study; thereby discovering what needs to be studied rather than recite on what they have studied (5» p. 5^)«
There was an orientation period for the experimental .
group teachers during week one of the study. Test I was
3^
given to all students of the investigation during week one
of the study. The control group was completely ignored ex-
cept for the testing of students.
During week nine all kits, manuals, and other materials
furnished to Group I were rotated to Group II because
Group II became the experimental group. Group II received
the same orientation as Group I had experienced. Group I
then became the control group during weeks ten through six-
teen. Group I teachers were asked to give no thinking
operations instructions other than the regular program during
the seven weeks they served as the control group. The
teachers were not to discourage students from using the
questioning procedures they learned to use during the time
they were the experimental group.
Procedures for Collecting Data
Two schools within an independent school district in
North Central Texas were used for this investigation. The
schools were composed of students from urban, middle income
families. One school had four first-grades totaling 108
students and four second-grades totaling 82 students. The
remaining school had five first-grades with 133 students and
five second-grades with 11'+ students (N = ^3?). All classes
of first and second-grade students in these schools partici-
pated. These schools were referred to as Group I and
Group II.
35
The term of this investigation was seventeen weeks and
is diagra.mmatioa.lly presented:
TABLE II
DIAGRAM OP RESEARCH DESIGN
Weeks Group I Group I I Weeks Group I Group I I
1 T1 0 T1 10 C T20E 2 E C 11 C E 3 E C 12 C E k E C 13 C E 5 E c Ik C E 6 E c 15 C E 7 E c 16 c E 8 ET2 CO 17 T3 T3 9
*T - Test, Arabic Numerals - Testings, 0 - Orientation, E - Experimental Method, C - Control Method.
***Spring Vacation.
During the first week of the study Group I teachers
were introduced to the use of the experimental procedures,
and Test 1 was administered to both groups. Test 1 included
Battery A of the Combined Tests of Curiosity, Stanford
Achievement Tests, Primary I_, Form W, for first-grade and
Primary II, Form W, for second-grade, as well as the Otis-
Lennon Mental Ability Test, Form J. In the following seven
week period, weeks two through eight, Group I received the
experimental treatment, and Group II served as the control.
During the latter part of the eighth week Group II
teachers received orientation for the use of the thinking
operations, and Group I was administered Test 2. Included in
36
Test 2 were the Combined Tests of Curiosity, Battery B,
Stanford Achievement Test, Primary I_, Form X, for first
grade, and Primary II, Form X, for second grade, and the
Otis-Lennon Mental Ability Test, Form K.
During week nine classes did not meet, as this was the
week of the spring vacation. During the tenth week Group II
was tested the second time, and the teachers received a
review of the orientation given the latter part of week
eight.
In the following seven week period, weeks ten through
sixteen, Group II received the experimental treatment and
Group I served as the control group. During week seventeen,
the final week of the investigation, Test 3 was administered
to both groups. Test 3 used the same batteries as Test 1.
Procedures for Analysis of Data
Sources of data were scores from (1) the Otis-
Lennon Mental Ability Test, Elementary I (Xx); (2) the
Combined Tests of Curiosity (CTC) sub tests: Self Judgment
(X2), Story Memory of Evidence (X^), Persistence (Xzj.),
Desire to Know (X^), Desire for the Incongruous (X5), and
total CTC (Xr,); (3) Stanford Achievement Tests. Primary j[
and Primary II. sub tests as illustrated in Table III. The
purpose of this table is to justify the assignment of the
I variables, since sub tests in the Stanford batteries are
not the same by table or in number of tests utilized.
37
TABLE III
COMPARISON OF STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT SUB TESTS OF PRIMARY I AND PRIMARY II BATTERIES
Primary I (Y3_6) (Y!U9> M 2 S H H
First-Grade Second-Grade
Word Reading (i.i>
di) Word Meaning
Paragraph Meaning (Y2) (Y2) Paragraph Meaning
, (Y^) Science and Social Studies
Vocabulary (Y^)
Spelling (Y^) . . . . (Y^) Spelling
Word Study Skills (Y^). . . . . . . .(Y^) Word Study Skills
Arithmetic (Y5)
(Y5) Language
. (Yr,) Arithmetic Computation
. . . . . . .(Yg) Arithmetic Concepts
The null hypotheses tested were that no correlations
existed between the strength of the X and Y variables
(Table III) at the .05 level of confidence. A significant
correlation is one that differs by more than a chance amount
from a postulated "true" population value of zero. The
value of r measures the gain in precision of an estimate of
an unknown Y from a known X (10, p. 233). Correlation does
not imply causation but relationships.
In testing the null hypotheses the following computations
were utilized:
A
38
1. Product moment coefficients of correlation as
illustrated in Table IV.
TABLE IV '
ZERO-ORDER COEFFICIENTS OF CORRELATION
X 1 * 2 x 3 x ^ x 5 x 6 X 7 Y
X 1 - - XX XX XX XX XX XX
X 2 XX XX XX XX XX XX
x 3 XX XX XX XX XX
— - XX XX XX XX
x 5 XX XX XX
x 6 — XX XX
X 7 — XX
X —
2. Coefficients of multiple correlation to ascertain
the joint action of the measures of X and I variables.
3. The increase in R^ expressed in terms of Beta
coefficients to yield the proportion of variance explained
by the X variables.
Partial regression coefficients to form regression
equations from which a Y score was able to be estimated
39
by using raw scores of the - Xr, variables. The Standard
Error of the Estimate SE^Qst was computed with each
regression equation, and is reported to indicate the degree
of confidence which can be placed in them.
Hypotheses 1, 2, (K and 5.
Product moment coefficients of correlation were com-
puted (2, p. 13*0. Each measure of academic achievement {Y)
was correlated with each of the measures of ability (X) as
illustrated in Table IV.
Hypotheses J3> 6, £.» and 8
Means and standard deviations were computed using the
•raw scores. A two tailed t-test was used to test for sig-
nificance at the .05 level. The two-tailed test of signifi-
cance is used for the null hypothesis when any difference
that is observed between the two means, regardless of the
direction of the difference, is sought (2, p. 218).
Hypotheses £ and 10
The possible combinations of zero-order coefficients of
correlation between measures of academic achievement (Y^ - Y^)
Primary I, (Y^ - Y^) Primary II, (X^ - X^) each of the
selected measures of ability, were utilized in multiple
correlation formulae. Table IV illustrates inter-
correlations. Only the best predictor variables were in-
cluded in the formulae. Partial coefficients of correlation
were used to construct regression equations from which a Y
ij-o
achievement score may be predicted by using the known scores
of the X variables.
If the variability of the standard deviation of Y is
small, and the correlation between the Y and X high, values
of Y can be predicted from the known X values to a certain
degree of accuracy. The educator may not be sure concerning
the achievement of a given individual, but knowing the cor-
relation between a sub test or a total battery and some
criterion measure of achievement, he can predict often with
ample accuracy the probable achievement. The degree of
accuracy in such predictions depends upon the size of the
correlation coefficient (2, p. 163).
Summary
Chapter III has presented a description of the limi-
tations, basic assumptions, instruments, experimental treat-
ment, procedures for collecting data, and procedures for the
analysis of data. The findings will be reported in Chap-
ter IV.
CHAPTER BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Bradley, R. C. and N. Wesley Earp, Exemplars of the Teacher*s Cognitive Domain, Dubuque, Iowa," Wm. G. Brown Co. ,~Inc.,~ 1967.
2. Garrett, Henry E., Statistics in Psychology and Education, New York, Longman"'s, "Green and" Co., 1953*
3» Kelly, Truman L., Richard Madden, Erie P. Gardner, Herbert C. Rudman, Stanford Achievement Test, Direc-tions for Administering, Primary"I Battery, New York, Harcourt, Brace, and" World, Inc., 1964.
4. Kelly, Truman L., Richard Madden, Eric P. Gardner, Herbert C. Rudman, Stanford. Achievement Test, Direc-tions for AdmIniste'ring, Primary II Battery, New York, Harcourt," Brace, "and World, Inc., 196'^
5. Maw, Wallace H. and Ethel W. Maw, "An Exploratory Investi-gation into the Measurement of Curiosity in Elementary School Children," Washington, U.S. Office of Blucation, 1964.
6. Maw, Wallace H., and Ethel W. Maw, "Self-appraisal of Curiosity," The Journal of Educational Research, Vol. LXI, (July, 1968)7^62*^57
7. Otis, Arthur S. and Roger T. Lennon, Otis-Lennon Mental Ability Test, Manual for Administratlon, Mementary I_ Level,"New York, Harcourt7 Brace, and World, Inc., 1967.
8. Raths, Louis S., Arthur Jonas, Arnold Rothstein, Selma Wassermann, Teaching for Thinking, Theory and Appli-cation, Columbus," Ohio, "Charles E. Merrill" Publishing Co .7 1967.
9. "Research Clues," Today*s Education, Vol. LIX, (March, 1970), 7. — -
10. Walker, Helen M. and Joseph Lev, Statistical Inference, New York, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1953*
UA
CHAPTER IV
FINDINGS
The organization of this current investigation included
in Chapter I a general statement of the problem researched,
hypotheses, background and significance of the study, and a
definition of terms. In Chapter II the research specifically
related to the study was reviewed. The description of the
sample, limitations, basic assumptions, research design,
description of the measures employed, procedures for collection
of data, and the procedure for analyzing the data was given
in Chapter III. The primary purposes of Chapter IV was to
report the findings of the study.
The current investigation tested ten hypotheses formu-
lated to answer three specific questions:
1. Will curiosity test scores indicate a student's
ability to achieve academically?
2. If the answer to question one is in the affirmative,
will the questioning procedures of Bradley and Earp concom-
itantly increase the curiosity and reading comprehension
scores?
3. What are the best predictors of academic achievement
when a combination of test scores is utilized?
Research hypotheses were restated as null hypotheses
for the purpose of statistical treatment. Fisher's t test
ILO
^3
was used to test Hypotheses 3» 6, 7> and. 8 to ascertain
whether a significant difference existed "between the result-
ant mean scores as measured "by the instruments selected for
this investigation.
The Pearson Product Moment Coefficient of Correlation
(r) was utilized to test Hypotheses 1, 2, 5> 9» and 10.
The reliability of an obtained r may be tested against the
hypothesis that the population is in fact zero (^, p. 199)*
Also utilized were the descriptive labels given by Garrett
which indicate that the coefficients of correlation ranging
from .00 to +.20 denote "indifferent or negligible"
relationships; from + .20 to +.40 denote "low" relationships;
from +.40 to +.70 denote "substantial or marked" relation-
ships; and from +.70 to +1.00 denote "high to very high"
relationships (k, p. 173)•
All curiosity tests were given by the investigator in
order to maintain uniformity in the administration of the
instruments. Tests given by the teachers were the Stanford
Achievement Tests, Primary I and Primary II, and the Otis-
Lennon Mental Ability Test, Elementary I. These tests were
used in accordance with the procedures recommended in the
manuals.
Three testings of mental ability were completed during
the course of this investigation. The tests of mental
ability were given prior to beginning the program, at the
time the groups were rotated, and at the conclusion of the
44
experimental treatment. The data related to first-grades are
presented in Table V. Each of the three testings indicated
no significant difference between experimental and control
groups. Mental ability is relatively constant and an increase
. TABLE V
MEANS, STANDARD DEVIATIONS, FISHER'S t VALUE, AND LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE BET WEEN EXPERIMENTAL AND CONTROL
GROUP SCORES ON THE OTIS-LEMNON MENTAL ABILITY TEST, ELEMffTARY" I, FOR"
TlRST-GRADE (N = 241)
Test Group Mean Standard Deviation
Fisher's t
Value
Level of
Significance
1 I
I I
31.62
33-64
9 .74
8 .77
I.67' Less than .05
2 I
I I
37.48
36 .53
8.67
9 .78 0 .78
Less than .05 . .
3 I
I I
41 .07
4 3 . 8 1
10.68
11 .38 1 ,90
Less than .05
in raw scores would not necessarily indicate an increase in j
IQ since it is a ratio of the mental age divided by the
chronological age multiplied by 100 to remove the decimal
fraction.
^5
The data as presented in Table VI indicates the second-
grades had no significant difference in mental ability at
the inception of the experimental treatment. At the time of
TABLE VI
MEANS, STANDARD DEVIATIONS, FISHER*S t VALUE, AND LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE BETWEEN EXPERIMENTAL AND CONTROL
GROUP SCORES ON THE OTIS-LHNNON MENTAL ABILITY TEST, ELEMENTARY I, FOR
SECOND-GRADE ' (N = .196)
Test Group Mean Standard Deviation
Fisher's t
Value
Level of
Significance
.1 I
II 43.69
10.62
10.65 0.15
Less than .05
2 I
II
4-6.48
50.31
- 11.15
11.53 2.31
Greater than .05
3 I
II
50.88
5 * • 89
11.^9
11.72 2.37
Greater than .05
the rotation of the groups, when the second test of mental
ability was given, Group II was significantly different at
the .05 level of confidence. At the time of the third test
of mental ability which was at the conclusion of the exper-
imental treatment, Group II was significantly different at
the .02 level of confidence.
i±6
This difference may be predicated on the fact that the
Group I students had one third the exposure to the stimulus
cards of the experimental program as the Group IX students
had. The groups were of no significant difference in IQ
when the program began in January, each having an IQ of 110.
Seven weeks later Group I had an IQ of 111, Group II of 116.
At the conclusion of the experimental program in May,
Group I had an IQ of 113 and Group II of 118.
It also is well to note that tests two and tests three
each had a spread of five IQ points. This means the last
two scores may indicate the difference in the three testings
as being nothing more than becoming familiar with the tests.
The difference may be predicated on non-intellective
variables because
far more than the person's "intellect" is involved. His effort and his success depend on his self-concept, his feeling about the authority who gives the test, his ability to tolerate stress and frustration, and many other qualities. The test, then, gives a picture of the adjustment of the total person to a standardized situation making intellectual demands (3, P. 2Mi).
The performance limitation is indicated in the sub te3t
scores of the Stanford Achievement Test, Primary II as well
as in the Otis-Lennon Mental Ability Test. Therefore, the
data for the second-grade groups was used with the limitation
that the interpretation of the results are confined to the
local situation in which they occurred.
Findings Relevant to the First Question, Will Curiosity Test Scores Indicate A Student's Ability to Achieve
; Academically?
Data Related to Hypothesis 1
The hypothesis tested was that there is no significant
relationship "between academic achievement as measured by
Stanford Aohievement Tests, Primary £ (Y) for first-grade,
and each of the following measures of ability:
X^ intellectual ability as determined by Otis-
Lennon Mental Ability Test,
X2 Self Judgment of Curiosity as determined by
Combined Tests of Curiosity (CTC).
Story Memory of Evidence as determined by CTC.
X^ Persistence as determined by CTC.
X^ Desire to Know as determined by CTC.
X^ Desire for the Incongruous as determined by CTC,
Xr, total ability of curiosity as determined by CTC.
Correlations between measures of academic achievement
and selected measures of ability in first-grade children are
given in Table VII. Hypothesis 1 was tested utilizing 239
degrees of freedom. The value of r must have reached .13
for rejection of the null hypothesis at the .05 level of
confidence and .17 for rejection at the .01 level of con-
fidence, The significant relationships may be ascertained
from Table VII as follows:
^8
TABLE VII
CORRELATIONS BETWEEN MEASURES OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND SELECTED MEASURES OP ABILITY
IN FIRST-GRADE STUDENTS (N = 21*1)
Variables
*1 *2 *3 *1+ r5 *6
Variables
Vford Meaning
1
Paragraph Meaning
1 I
Vocabulary
Spelling
Word Study Skills
Arithmetic
Total Achievement
X-|_ Otis-Lennon .1+79* .530* .537* .501* . 5I14* .573* .627*
X2 Self Judgment .102 .198* .182* .21+0* .218* .185* .221*
Story Memory .^03* .1*77* .*+00* .1441* .^78* .50*+* .5^1*
Xif, Persistence .020 .096 .013 .01+6 .026 .001+ .037
X<j Desire to Know .21+1+* .306* . 298* .325* • 295* .278* .3^1*
Desire for " Incongruous
.196* .210* .172* .169* .265* .179* .238*
X? Total CTC . 352* A75* .398* . 14-59* -7k* .439* .51^*
'""Signifleant at .05 (k , p . 200)
,evel with value of r .13 or greater
ii-9
The null hypothesis that there is no significant
relationship "between Total Achievement (Yr?) and Otis-
Lennon (X^) was rejected with an r value of .627 at the .01
level of confidence. The null hypothesis that there is no
significant relationship between Total Achievement (Yr,) and
Self Judgment (Xg) was rejected with an r value of .221 at
the .01 level of confidence. The null hypothesis that there
is no significant relationship between Total Achievement (Yr,)
and Story Memory (X^) was rejected with an r value of .5^1
at the .01 level of confidence.
The null hypothesis that there is no significant
relationship between Total Achievement (Yr,) and Persist-
ence (X^) was retained since the r value of *037 did not
reach the ,05 level of confidence. The null hypothesis
that there is no significant relationship between Total
Achievement (Yr,) and Desire to Know (X^) was rejected with
an r value of .3^1 at the .01 level of confidence.
The null hypothesis that there is no significant
relationship between Total Achievement (Y7) and Desire for
Incongruous (X5) was rejected with an r value of .238 at
the .01 level of confidence. The null hypothesis that there
is no significant relationship between Total Achievement (Yr,)
and Total CTG (X^) was rejected with an r value of .51^ at
the .01 level of confidence.
Null hypotheses may be formulated using the r value of
the Stanford Achievement sub tests and the sub teats of
50
the CTC. Table VII gives all possible correlations related
to Hypothesis 1. All correlations with an asterisk are
significant at the .05 level of confidence or better, and
the null hypothesis would be rejected. All correlations
without an asterisk indicate that the null hypotheses would
have to be retained, as they do not reach the .05 level of
confidence.
Of the forty-nine possible null hypotheses which could
be formulated from Table VII, forty-one are rejected and
eight are retained. This means that on the hypothesis of a
population r of zero, only five times in one hundred trials
would a positive r of .130 or larger arise through accident
or sampling which would result in forty-one of the forty-nine
null hypotheses being rejected (**, p. 201).
In order to determine the degree of relationship for
evaluation, Table VII has had abstracted from it a summary
of those tests which meet the r value fitting Garrett's
descriptive labels depicting relationship (^, p. 173).
This summary is found in Table VIII which lists those
relationships which were substantial or marked.
The relationships as reported in Table VIII agree
remarkably with the data related to Hypotheses 9 and. 10 in
which a regression equation was made and unrelated variables
partialed out through multiple regression. This means
when the nature of the variables with which we are concerned
and the purpose for which the r was computed is considered,
51
TABLE VIII
SUMMARY OF CORRELATIONS ABSTRACTED FROM TABLE VII SHOWING MARKED RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN MEASURES OF ACADEMIC
ACHIEVEMENT AND SELECTED MEASURES OF ABILITY OF FIRST-GRADE STUDENTS
(N = 241)
Variable Correlation
Otis-Lennon (X-i) and Word Meaning (Ix). *79 Paragraph Meaning (Y2) 530 Vocabulary (Y3) . 537 Spelling (Y4) * 501 Word Study Skills (Y<) . . . . . « . . . • .5^ Arithmetic (Yg). 573 Total Achievement (Yr?) .627
Story Memory (X3) and Word Meaning (Y^). < • • • • * ^03 Paragraph Meaning (Y2) .^77 Vocabulary (Yo) .400 Spelling (Y4). .441 Word Study Skills (Y^) -78 Arithmetic (Y^) 50^ Total Achievement (Yr?) 5^1
Total CTC (X?) and Paragraph Meaning {Y2) .^75 Spelling (Yij,).... 459 Word Study Skills (Y5) 474 Arithmetic (Y5). .^39 Total Achievement (Y^) 514
that curiosity test scores in Story Memory and Total CTC
do indicate a student's ability to achieve academically.
Data Related to Hypothesis 2
The hypothesis tested was that there is no significant
relationship between academic achievement as measured by
the Stanford Achievement Tests, Primarv T
52
the following measures of ability after administration of
the experimental programs
X1 intellectual ability as determined by Otls-
Lennon Mental Ability Test.
Xg Self Judgment of Curiosity as determined by
Combined Tests of Curiosity (CTC).
Xj Story Memory of Evidence as determined by CTC.
X;+ Persistence as determined by CTC.
Desire to Know as determined by CTC.
Xfi Desire for the Incongruous as determined by CTC.
Xy total ability of curiosity as determined by CTC.
Group I,— Correlations between measures of academic
achievement and selected measures of ability of first-grade
students after administration of the experimental program are
given in Table IX. Hypothesis 2 was tested utilizing 106
degrees of freedom. The value of r must have reached .19
for rejection of the null hypothesis at the .05 level of
confidence and .2/+ for rejection at the .01 level of confi-
dence. The significant relationships may be ascertained
from Table IX.
The null hypothesis that there is no significant
relationship between Total Achievement (Yy) and Otis-
Lennon (X^) was rejected with an r value of .617 at the .01
level of confidence. The null hypothesis that there is no
significant relationship between Total Achievement (Yj) and
Self Judgment (X2) was rejected with an r value of .360 at
53
TABLE IX
CORRELATIONS B 1ST WEEN MEASURES OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND SELECTED MEASURES OF ABILITY IN FIRST-GRADE
GROUP I STUDENTS AFTER THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM
(N = 108)
Variables
*1 *2 Y3 y5 y6 *7
Variables
V/ord Meaning
j I
Paragraph Meaning
s 1 | Vocabulary
i | Spelling
Word Study Skills
i |
1 Arithmetic
i i ; Total Achievement i
Xx Otis-Lennon .480* . 473* • 557* .514* .516* .597* . 617*
X2 Self Judgment . 372* .334* .196* . 329* .258* . 384* . 360*
Xj Story Memory .40 5# . 451* .468* .525* .403* .554* • 551*
Xji Persistence .085 .107 .080 .114 .100 .12? .112
X^ Desire to Know .339--' . 210* . 309* • 333* .378® . 369* • 373*
X/r Desire for Incongruous
.214* .245* .031 .185 .222* .218# . 2 1 6 *
Xr, Total CTC
Jfc n • • <r% • «
.505* .482* .403*. . 534* .4 76* . 596* .580#
(4, p. 200).
5<4-
the .01 level of confidence. The null hypothesis that there
is no significant relationship between Total Achievement (Y^)
and. Story Memory (X^) was rejected with an r value of .551
at the .01 level of confidence.
The null hypothesis that there is no significant
relationship between Total Achievement (Y>p) and Persist-
ence (X^) was retained since the r value of .112 did not
reach the .05 level of confidence. The null hypothesis
that there is no significant relationship between Total
Achievement (Yr?) and Desire to Know (X^) was rejected with
an r value of .373 at the .01 level of confidence.
The null hypothesis that there is no significant
relationship between Total Achievement (Yr,) and Desire for
Incongruous (X^) was rejected with an r value of .216 at the
.05 level of confidence. The null hypothesis that there is
no significant relationship between Total Achievement (Yr,)
and Total CTC (X^) was rejected with an r value of .580 at
the .01 level of confidence.
Null hypotheses may be formulated using the r value of
the Stanford Achievement sub tests and the CTC sub test
scores. Table IX gives all possible correlations related
to Hypothesis 2, Group I. All correlations with an asterisk
are significant at the .05 level of confidence or better,
and the null hypothesis would be rejected. Correlations
without an asterisk indicate that the null hypotheses would
have to be retained, as they do not reach the .05 level of
confidence.
55
Of the forty-nine possible null hypotheses which could
be formulated from Table IX, forty are rejected and nine are
retained. This means that on the hypothesis of a population
r of zero, only five times in one hundred trials would a
TABLE X
SUMMARY OF CORRELATIONS ABSTRACTED FROM TABLE IX SHOWING MARKED RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN MEASURES OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND SELECTED MEASURES OF ABILITY
IN FIRST-GRADE GROUP I STUDENTS AFTER THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE EXPERIMENTAL
PROGRAM (N =108)
Variable Correlation
Otis-Lennon (X _) and Word Meaning (Y-]_) .^80 Paragraph Meaning (Y2) .^73 Vocabulary (Yo). .557 Spelling (YhK 51/4-Word Study Skills (Yj . 516 Arithmetic (Yg). . . . . .597 Total Achievement (Yy) .617
Story Memory (Xo) and Word Meaning (Y _). . .405 Paragraph Meaning (Yo) .ii-51 Vocabulary (Yo) Z168 Spelling (YhK 525 Word Study Skills (Y^) J+03 Arithmetic (Yg). . . . .55^ Total Achievement (Y7) .551
Total GTC (X?) and Word Meaning (Y-i). . , . . .505 Paragraph Meaning (Y2) . .482 Vocabulary (Y~). .403 Spelling (Y . .53^ Word Study Skills (Y<-) .ij.76 Arithmetic (Y5). . .596 Total Achievement (Y7) .580
56
positive r of .191 or larger arise through acoident or
sampling which would result in forty of the forty-nine null
hypotheses being rejected (>4, p. 201).
In order to determine the degree of relationship for
evaluation, Table IX has had abstracted from it a summary
of those tests which meet the r value fitting Garrettfs
descriptive labels depicting relationship (4, p. 173). From
the summary as given in Table X a listing of those relation-
ships which were substantial or marked may be found.
The relationships as reported in Table X correlate
remarkably with the data related to Hypotheses 9 and 10 in
which a regression equation was made and unrelated variables
partialed out through multiple regression. This means that
'when the nature of the variables are taken into account and
the purpose for which the r was computed is considered,
curiosity test scores in Story Memory and Total CTC may be
used to indicate a student's ability to achieve academically.
C-roup 2.—Correlations between measures of academic
achievement and selected measures of ability in first-grade
students after administration of the experimental program
are given in Table XI. Hypothesis 2 was tested utilizing
131 degrees of freedom. The value of r must have reached
.171 for rejection of the null hypothesis at the .05 level
of confidence and .224 for rejection at the .01 level of
confidence. The significant relationships may be ascer-
tained from Table XI.
57
TABLE XI
CORRELATIONS BETWEEN MEASURES OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND SELECTED MEASURES OF ABILITY IN FIRST-GRADE
GROUP II STUDENTS AFTER THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM
(N = 133)
Y1 I 2 y3 % y5 . t „
y6 *7
W CQ H H _ 1
5tal Achievement
. Variables bD £ •H
0)
Ti
M & £k 05 U hD 6 as P*
ff cd H 3 ,0 a$ 0
i 1 j Spelling
I
• r l
m j>
+3 CO
t A
0 •ri -P 0) a & -p "H
5tal Achievement
tS
M & £k 05 U hD 6 as P*
O >
i 1 j Spelling
I
M n <4 E~*
X-j_ Otis-Lennon ,486* .492* .580* .437* .508* .622* .614*
X2 Self Judgment .020 .106 .120 .009 .019 .062 .059
Xj Story Memory .150 .205* .277* .127 .181* .297* .249*
X^ Persistence .050 .088 .020 .069 .051 .116 ,066
X^ Desire to Know .269# .287* . 294# .211# .216* . 301* .312*
v. Desire for ° Incongruous
.173* .173* .273* .0*4-3 .175* .221* .212*
X ? Total CTC .247* . 347* .378* .108 . 214* .400* .347*
"Significant at .05 greater (4, p. 200) •
level with value of r .171 or
58
The null hypothesis that there is no significant
relationship between Total Achievement (Yr,) and Otis-
Lennon (X^) was rejected with an r value of .61*4- at the .01
level of confidence. The null hypothesis that there is no
significant relationship between Total Achievement (Yr,) and
Self Judgment (X2) was retained since the r value of .059
did not reach the .05 level of confidence.
The null hypothesis that there is no significant
relationship between Total Achievement (Yy) and Story Mem-
ory (X-j) was rejected with an r value of .2^9 at the .01.
level of confidence. The null hypothesis that there is no
significant relationship between Total Achievement (Yy) and
Persistence (X^) was retained 'since the r value of .066 did
not reach the .05 level of confidence.
The null hypothesis that there is no significant
relationship between Total Achievement (Yr,) and Desire to
Know (X^) was rejected with an r value of .312 at the .01
level of confidence. The null hypothesis that there is no
significant relationship between Total Achievement (Yy) and
Desire for Incongruous (X^) was rejected with an r value of
.212 at the .05 level of confidence. The null hypothesis
that there is no significant relationship between Total
Achievement (Yr,) and Total CTG (Xy) was rejected with an
r value of .3^7 at the .01 level of confidence.
Hull hypotheses may be formulated using the r value of
the Stanford Achievement sub tests and the CTG sub tests.
59
Table XI gives all possible correlations related to
Hypothesis 2, Group II. All correlations with an asterisk
are significant at the .05 level of confidence or better,
and the null hypothesis would be rejected. Correlations
without an asterisk indicate that the null hypotheses would
have to be retained, as they do not reach the .05 level of
confidence.
Of the forty-nine possible null hypotheses which could
be formulated from Table XI, thirty-one are rejected and
eighteen are retained. This means that on the hypothesis
of a population r of zero, only five times in one hundred
trials would a positive r of .171 or larger arise through
accident or sampling which would result in thirty-one of the
forty-nine null hypotheses being rejected {^, p. 201).
TABLE XII
SUMMARY OF CORRELATIONS ABSTRACTED FROM TABLE XI SHOWING MARKED RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN MEASURES OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND SELECTED MEASURES OF ABILITY
IN FIRST-GRADE GROUP II STUDENTS AFTER THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE
EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM (N = 133)
Variable Correlation
Otis-Lennon (X^) and Word Meaning <*!>•. r '+86 Paragraph Meaning (Yo) 4q2 Vocabulary (Yo) \ q 0 Spelling (Y^f Word Study Skills (Ye) ^08 Arithmetic (Y5) [ ',622 Total Achievement (Yy) . * * * ',61k
Total CTC (X?) Arithmetic (Y5) J4.QO
60
In order to determine the degree of relationship for
evaluation, Table XI has had abstracted from it a summary
of those tests which meet the r value fitting Garrett's
descriptive labels depicting relationship (^, p. 1?3). This
summary is found in Table XII which tests those relation-
ships which were substantial or marked relationships.
Data Related to Hypothesis k
The hypothesis tested was that there is no significant
relationship between academic achievement as measured by
Stanford Achievement Tests, Primary II (Y) for second-grade,
and each of the following measures of ability:
Xx intellectual ability as determined by Otls-
Lennon Mental Ability Test.
X2 Self Judgment of Curiosity as determined by CTC.
Xj Story Memory of Evidence as determined by CTC.
X^ Persistence as determined by CTC.
X^ Desire to Know as determined by CTC.
X^ Desire for the Incongruous as determined by CTC.
X? total ability of curiosity as determined by CTC.
Correlations between measures of academic achievement
and selected measures of ability in second grade children are
given in table XIII. Hypothesis 4 was tested utilizing
19^ degrees of freedom. The value of r must have reached
.1^0 for rejection of the null hypothesis at the .05 level
of confidence and .18^ for rejection at the .01 level of
61
confidence. The significant relationships may be ascertained
from Table XIII.
TABLE XIII
CORRELATIONS EST WEEN MEASURES OP ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND SELECTED MEASURES OP ABILITY
OF SECOND-GRADE STUDENTS (N = 196)
Variables
*1 *2 *3 *4 Y5 *6 y7 *8 *9
Variables
Word Meaning
Paragraph Meaning
Sci. & Soc. Studies
w
•H H rH © ft CO Word Study Skills
Language
i
s O -P OS 4-> 3 P n 0 0 •
-p
:Arithmetic Concepts
Total Achievement
X- Otis-Lennon .587 &
.592 CO #
.391 .517 • 532 *
.453 *
.620 .628
X2 Self Judgment ,052 .002 .049 .109 .003 .016 . 0 3 2 .019 .017
X-j Story Memory .369 *
.387 . zst . # .240 .382
a
*343 fr
.394 *
.373 .421
Xij, Persistence H 1
VO*
j
. 1 9 5 .16? .095 .069 .098 .074 .18? .15?
Xc Desire to Know
„ * .230 . 2 3 ! .26$ .124 .158 •»
.175 .104 "A*
.228 .215
X^ Desire for Incongruous .20.t .240
I'*
. 2 3 1 .092 .131 . 2 o t .14? .245 .23?
Xy Total CTC • 393 .401 .371 At
.260 «•
.278 .29^ .260 .401 *
.395
Significant at .05 level with value of r .140 or greater (4, p. 200).
62
The null hypothesis that there is no significant
relationship between Total Achievement (Yy) and Otis-
Lennon (X^) was rejected with an r value of ,628 at the .01
level of confidence. The null hypothesis that there is no
significant relationship between Total Achievement (Yr?) and
Self Judgment (X2) was retained since the r value of .01?
did not reach the .05 level of confidence.
The null hypothesis that there is no significant
relationship between Total Achievement (Y,-,) and Story Mem-
ory (X^) was rejected with an r value of . -21 at the .01
level of confidence. The null hypothesis that there is no
significant relationship between Total Achievement (Yr,) and
Persistence (X^) was rejected with an r value of .157 at
the ,05 level of confidence.
The null hypothesis that there is no significant
relationship between Total Achievement ( Y y ) and Desire to
Know (X^) was rejected with an r value of .215 at the .01
level of confidence. The null hypothesis that there is no
significant relationship between Total Achievement (Y^) and
Desire for Incongruous (X^) was rejected with an r value
of .232 at the .01 level of confidence. The null hypoth-
esis that there is no significant relationship between
Total Achievement (Yy) and Total CTC (Xy) was rejected with
an r value of .395 at the .01 level of confidence.
Null hypotheses may be formulated using the r value of
the Stanford Achievement sub tests and the CTC sub test
63
scores. Table XIII gives all possible correlations related
to Hypothesis 1. All correlations with an asterisk are
significant at the .05 level of confidence or better, and
the null hypothesis would be rejected. All correlations
without an asterisk indicate that the null hypotheses would
have to be retained, as they do not reach the .05 level of
confidence.
Of the sixty-three possible null hypotheses which could
be formulated from Table XIII, forty-six are rejected and,
seventeen are retained. This means that on the hypothesis -•
of a population r of zero, only five times in one hundred
trials would a positive r of .1 -0 or larger arise through
accident or sampling which would result in forty-six of the
sixty-three null hypotheses being rejected (**, p. 201).
In order to determine the degree of relationship for
evaluation, Table XIII has had abstracted from it a summary
of those tests which meet the r value fitting Garrett's
descriptive labels depicting relationship (^, p. 173).
This summary is found in Table XIV which lists those
relationships which were substantial or marked relationships
The relationships as reported in Table XIV agree
remarkably with the data related to Hypotheses 9 and 10 in
which a regression equation was made and unrelated variables
partialed out through multiple regression. This means
when the nature ot the variables with which we are concerned
and the purpose for which the r was computed is considered,
6k
curiosity test scores in Story Memory and. Total CTC do
indicate a student's ability to achieve academically.
TABLE XIV
SUMMARY OP CORRELATIONS ABSTRACTED FROM TABLE XIII SHOWING MARKED RELATIONSHIPS - BETWEEN MEASURES OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND SELECTED MEASURES OF ABILITY
OF SECOND-GRADE STUDENTS (N = 196)
Variable Correlation
Otis-Lennon (Xn) and Word Meaning (Y* ). . . . . . » 587 Paragraph Meaning {Y2) .592 Science & Social Studies (Yo). . . . . . . . .582 Word Study Skills (Yj . . i .517 Language (Yg). . . 532 Arithmetic Computation (Yo) 4-53 Arithmetic Concepts (Yg) . . . . . . . . . . .620 Total Achievement (Y^) 623'
Story Memory (Xo) and Total Achievement (Y^) . . . kZl
Total CTC (X7) and Paragraph Meaning (Y?) ^01 Arithmetic Concepts (Yg) *4-01 Total Achievement (Y^) . . . 395
Data Related to Hypothesis £
The hypothesis tested was that there is no significant
relationship between academic achievement as measured by
the Stanford Achievement Tests, Primary II (Y) for second-
grade, and each of the following measures of ability after
administration of the experimental program:
X-j_ intellectual ability as determined by the Otis-
Lennon Mental Ability Test.
65
X2 Self Judgment of Curiosity as deterained by CIC.
Xj Story Memory of Evidence as determined "by CTC.
Persistence as determined by the CTC.
Desire to Know as determined by the GTC.
Xg Desire for the Incongruous as determined by CTC.
Xr, total ability of curiosity as determined by GTC.
Group I.--Correlations between measures of academic
achievement and selected measures of ability of second grade
students after administration of the experimental program are
given in Table XV. Hypothesis 5 was tested utilizing 80 de-
grees of freedom. The value of r must have reached .217 for
rejection of the null hypothesis at the .05 level of confi-
dence and .283 for rejection at the .01 level of confidence.
The significant relationships may be ascertained from
Table XV.
The null hypothesis that there is no significant
relationship between Total Achievement (Yy) and Otis-
Lennon (X]_) was rejected with an r value of .70^ at the
.01 level of confidence. The null hypothesis that there is
no significant relationship between Total Achievement (Yr>)
and Self Judgment (X2) was retained since the r value of
.0 8 did not reach the .05 level of confidence.
The null hypothesis that there is no significant
relationship between Total Achievement (Yr,) and Story Mem-
ory (X^) was rejected with an r value of .38I at the .01
level of confidence, The null hypothesis that there is no
66
TABLE XV
CORRELATIONS BETWEM MEASURES OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND SELECTED MEASURES OF ABILITY IN SECOND-GRADE
GROUP I STUDENTS AFTER THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM
(N = 82)
.Variables
*1 *2 *3 YI| *5 Y 6 *7 *8 Y 9
.Variables
Word Meaning
Paragraph Meaning
1
Sci. & Soc. Studies
Spelling
Word Study Skills j
1 j Language
j
Arith. Computation CO p
0 0 £J 8 O «H P 0 s p •H
Total Achievement
X-j_ Otis-Lennon .6^5 •ft
.639 4
.589 Ab7 • »
. 6 0 6 ft
.591 45,
.327 - f t
.685 *
.704
X2 Self Judgment . 0 6 1 .0^7 . 0 2 7 . 0 9 6 . 0 ^ .005 .005 . 0 6 5 .048
X^ Story Memory .350 _ -X-
. 2 9 3 . 2 5 8 . 2 1 9 *
.327 . 2 9 3 . 3 6 . ! .381
X^ Persistence .192 .172 .195 .101 .173 •»
. 2 6 3 .124 .183 .216
XE Desire to Know
i 4* -V *V
CO CM * .265" .391 . 1 7 6 .196 .262 .107 .28$ . 290
X5 Desire for Incongruous .26? . 2 6 0 .193 . 2 2 ?
• f t
.275 .186 .05^ #
.283 *
. 2 7 6
X7 Total CTC «^77 .^2? .*•4. /f
.397 • 33$ , *
.3^7 44.
.^12 .23? .^50 • * .^71
greater (V, p. 200). 05 level with value of r .217 or
significant relationship between Total Achievement (Y-p) and
Persistence (X^) was retained since the r value of .216 did
6?
not reach the .05 level of confidence. The null hypothesis
that there is no significant relationship between Total
Achievement (Yr,) and Desire to Know (X^) was rejected with
an r value of .290 at the .01 level of confidence.
The null hypothesis that there is no significant
relationship between Total Achievement (Yy) and Desire for
Incongruous (X^) was rejected with an r value of .276 at the
.05 level of confidence. The null hypothesis that there is
no significant relationship between Total Achievement (Yy)
and Total CTC (Xy) was rejected with an r value of .471 at
the .01 level of confidence.
Null hypotheses may be formulated using the r value of
the Stanford Achievement sub tests and the CTC sub test scores.
Table XV gives all possible correlations related to Hypoth-
esis 5j Group I. All correlations with an asterisk are sig-
nificant at the .05 level of confidence or better, and the
null hypothesis would be rejected. Correlations without an
asterisk indicate that the null hypotheses would have to be
retained, as they do not reach the .05 level of confidence.
Of the sixty-three possible null hypotheses which could
be formulated from Table XV, forty are rejected and twenty-
three are retained. This means that on the hypothesis of a i
population r of zero, only five times in one hundred trials
would a positive r of .217 02? larger arise through accident
or sampling which would result in forty-six of the sixty-
three null hypotheses being rejected (4, p. 201).
68
In order to determine the degree of relationship for
evaluation, Table XV has had extracted from it a summary of
those tests which meet the r value fitting Garrett's descrip-
tive labels depicting relationship (4, p. 173)* This
TABLE XVI
SUMMARY OF CORRELATIONS ABSTRACTED FROM TABLE XV SHOWING MARKED RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN MEASURES OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND SELECTED MEASURES OF ABILITY
IN SECOND-GRADE GROUP I STUDENTS AFTER THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM
(N = 82)
Variable Correlation
Otis-Lennon (X-,) and Word Meaning (Y^) • .6^5 Paragraph Meaning (Yg) .639 Science & Social Studies (Yo). . . . . . . *5^9 Spelling (Yh.) .W? Word Study Skills (Y5) .606 Language (Y5) .591 Arithmetic Concepts (Yo) .685 Total Achievement (Y^) .705-
Story Memory (Xq) and Word Meaning (Y^) /+19
Total CTC (X7) and Word Meaning (Y^) *^77 Paragraph Meaning {Y2) .426 Science & Social Studies (Yo). . . . . . . .397 Arithmetic Concepts (Yg) .450 Total Achievement (Y^) . . . . . .^71
summary is found in Table XVI, which lists those relationships
which were substantial or marked relationships.
Group 2.—Correlations between measures of academic
. ±- •*
69
s t u d e n t s a f t e r a d m i n i s t r a t i o n of t h e e x p e r i m e n t a l p rog ram,
a r e g i v e n i n T a b l e XVII . H y p o t h e s i s 2 was t e s t e d u t i l i z i n g
TABLE XVII
CORRELATIONS BETWEEN MEASURES OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND SELECTED MEASURES OF ABILITY IN SECOND-GRADE
GROUP I I STUDENTS AFTER THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM
(N = 11*0
V a r i a b l e s
*1 *2 y 3 Yi* Y 5 *6 *7 * 8 Y9
V a r i a b l e s
| W
ord
Mea
nin
g
Para
gra
ph
M
ean
ing
i
Sci.
&
So
c.
Stu
die
si 1 1
Spell
ing
1 V
/ord
S
tud
y S
kil
ls
i ! j '
1 L
ang
uag
e ] i
Ari
th
. C
ompu
t at i
on
Ari
thm
eti
c
Co
ncep
ts
Tota
l A
chie
vem
ent
X^ O t i s - L e n n o n ^ * . 601 • ** . 695 • 53^
• I f r . 5 0 3 .617
, * . 6 2 1 . 5 5 ? . 7 2 7 . 73?
X2 S e l f Judgment ,126 .099 .159 .075 . 0 5 1 .008 .017 .032 .068
X j S t o r y Memory ,22% . 2 6 ? .33^ .162 . 2 l S . 2 0 5 . 15? , 27$ . 2 6 ?
X^ P e r s i s t e n c e JJ.
.329 . 3 5 3 .139 .3O5 .2 7§ ~ * . 2 3 9 . 00^ .280 . 2 9 3
Xj- D e s i r e t o Know .32? .312
-
. 2 7 0 . 1 9 8 „ J* . 2 5 3
. 2 6 1 .078 . 2 6 $ . 2 9 !
X^ D e s i r e f o r I n c o n g r u o u s .28$ . 25? . 2 5 0 . 0 9 5 . 1^2 . 2 ^ 3 .16k . 2 3 §
X ? T o t a l CTC A?0 .b?£ # • 390 . 32? JSt
.352 .3^2 .109 . 398 .1*2% ^ S i g n i f i c a n t a t . 0 5 l e v e l w i t h v a l u e of r . 185 o r
g r e a t e r (4 f p . 2 0 0 ) .
70
112 degrees of freedom. The value of r must have reached
,185 for rejection of the null hypothesis at the ,05 level
of confidence and .2^1 for rejection at the .01 level of
confidence. The significant relationships may be ascer-
tained from Table XVII.
The null hypothesis that there is no significant
relationship between Total Achievement (Yr,) and Otis-
Lennon (X- ) was rejected with an r value of .736 at the
.01 level of confidence. The null hypothesis that there is
no si gi if leant relationship between Total Achievement (Y<p)
and Self Judgment (X2) was retained since the r value of
.068 did not reach the .05 level of confidence.
The null hypothesis that there is no significant
relationship between Total Achievement (Y^) and Story Mem-
ory (X3) was rejected with an r value of .266 at the .01
level of confidence. The null hypothesis that there is no
significant relationship between Total Achievement (Y^) and
Persistence (X^) was rejected with an r value of .293 at
the .01 level of confidence.
The null hypothesis that there is no significant
relationship between Total Achievement (Yr,) and Desire to
Know (Xij) was rejected with an r value of . 29I at the
.01 level of confidence. The null hypothesis that there is
no significant relationship between Total Achievement (Y^)
and Desire for Incongruous (X5) was rejected with an r value
of .244 at the .01 level of confidence. The null hypothesis
71
that there is no significant relationship between Total
Achievement (Y^) and Total CTC (X^) was rejected with an
r value of *k22 at the ,01 level of confidence.
Null hypotheses may be formulated using the r value of
the Stanford Achievement sub tests and the CTC sub test
scores. Table XVII gives all possible correlations related
to Hypothesis 5J Group II. All correlations with an asterisk
are significant at the .05 level of confidence or better,
and the null hypothesis would be rejected. Correlations
without an asterisk indicate that the null hypotheses would
have to be retained, as they do not reach the .05 level of
confidence.
Of the sixty-three possible null hypotheses which could
be formulated from Table XVII, forty-three are rejected and
twenty are retained. This means that on the hypothesis of a
population r of zero, only five times in one hundred trials
would a positive r of .185 or larger arise through accident
or sampling which would result in forty-three of the sixty-
three null hypotheses being rejected (^, p. 201).
In order to determine the degree of relationship for
evaluation, Table XVII has had abstracted from it a summary
of those tests which meet the r value fitting Garrett's
descriptive labels depicting relationship ('+, p. 173). This
summary is found in Table XVIII which lists those relation-
ships which were substantial or marked relationships.
72
TABLE XVIII
SUMMARY OF CORRELATIONS ABSTRACTED FROM TABLE XVII SHOWING MARKED RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN MEASURES OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND SELECTED MEASURES OF ABILITY
IN SECOND-GRADE GROUP II STUDENTS AFTER TH E ADMIN I STRATI ON OF THE EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM
(N = 11*0
Variable Correlation
Otis-Lennon (X^) and Word Meaning (YT) . . . .601 Paragraph Meaning (Y?) . . 695 Soienoe & Social Studies (Yq) • . . . . . . . .53^ Spelling (Yjj.). . . . . . . i . . 503 Word Study Skills (Yt) 617 Language . 621 Arithmetic Computation (Yn) 556 Arithmetic Concepts {Yo) 727 Total Achievement (Y^) 736
Total GTC (X.?) and I'brd Meaning (Y-, ) .^70 Paragraph Meaning (Y?) . . .^76 Arithmetic Concepts (Yo) 396 Total Achievement (Y^) .^22
Findings Relevant to the Second Question, Will Questioning Procedures of Bradley
and Earp Increase Curiosity and Reading Comprehension Scores?
Increase in Curiosity Scores
First-Grade,—The mean gain in curiosity was assessed
for each first-grade group. Experimental groups made larger
mean gains in total curiosity than did control groups.
These data are presented in Table XIX. Other data relevant
to the sub tests are presented in Table XXXIX Appendix H.
73
TABLE XIX
MEM GAIN OR LOSS FOR FIRST-GRADE EXPERIMENTAL AND CONTROL GROUPS FOR EACH SEVEN WEEK PERIOD
OF THE INVESTIGATION
Group Test First Seven Weeks
Test Second Seven Weeks
Test
I (N = 108)
1 Experimental 10.03
2 Control 3.16
3
II (N = 133)
1 Control -6.56
2 Experimental 13.22
3
The mean gain in curiosity for Group I-E between Test 1
and Test 2 was 10.03. Between the same tests, Control
Group II-C had a mean gain of -6.5^. After the stimulus
program was rotated to Group II-E, the mean gain for that
group was 13.22. Group I-C gained 3.76. Table XIX indi-
cates that Control Group II-C, during the initial seven
weeks of the program, regressed in curiosity but gained
significantly when the experimental program was applied to
them. The original experimental group, Group I-E, continued
to gain in curiosity after becoming the control group during
the last seven weeks of the investigation, but' at only one-
third the rate.
The strength of the experimental program as applied to
first-grade students may be considered by combining the mean
7;+
gains of the groups, I-E with II-E and I-C with II-C. The
experimental groups gained a total raw score of 23.2^, and
the control groups regressed in curiosity -2.78.
Second-Grade.—The mean gain in curiosity was assessed
for each second-grade group. Experimental groups made larger
mean gains in raw scores in total curiosity than did control
groups. These data are presented in Table XX. Other data
relevant to the sub tests are presented in Table XXXX,
Appendix H.
TABLE XX
MEAN GAIN OR LOSS FOR SECOND-GRADE EXPERIMENTAL AND CONTROL GROUPS FOR EACH SEVEN WEEK PERIOD
OF THE INVESTIGATION
Group Test First Seven Weeks
Test Second Seven Weeks
Test
I (N = 82)
1 Experimental 3.11
2 Control 2.79
3
II (N = 11*0
1 Control ~*K03
2 Experimental 9.17
3
The mean gain in curiosity for Group I-E between Test 1
and Test 2 was 3»H* Between the same tests, Control Group
II-C had a mean loss of ~^.03« After the stimulus program
was rotated to Group II-E, the mean gain for that group was
9»17» Group I-C gained 2 .79 . Table XX indicates that the
75
control group, Group II-C, during the initial seven weeks of
the.program, regressed in curiosity but gained significantly
when the experimental program was applied to them. The
original experimental group, Group I-E, continued to gain in
curiosity after becoming the control group during the last
seven weeks of the investigation but at a slower rate.
The strength of the experimental program as applied to
second grade students may be considered by combining the
mean gains of the groups, I-E with II-E and I-C with II-G.
The experimental groups gained a total combined score of
12,28, and the control groups regressed in curiosity -1.2
Increase in Curiosity.—The gain in the experimental
groups indicate that curiosity can be increased with the
questioning procedures of Bradley and Earp (1, pp. 65-72).
Regression in the control groups may indicate as Bradley
(1, p. kk$) contended and Holt (5, p. 168) declared, that
curiosity can be thwarted. (See Appendix H.)
Tests of Significance
The mean gain and Fisher1s t value for Hypotheses 3
and 6 pertaining to curiosity is given in Table XXI. Sig-
nificance is reported as being either greater or less than .05
level of confidence.
Hypothesis _2.—This hypothesis stated that there would be
no significant difference between increase in the mean test
scores of the first-grade experimental group and the first-
?6
grade control group. This hypothesis was rejected at
greater than the ,05 level of confidence in favor of the
experimental groups.
TABLE XXI
HYPOTHESES, GROUP, AND COMPUTED t VALUE RELATING TO MEAN GAINS IN CURIOSITY DURING THE FIRST SEVEN WEEKS AND
THE SECOND SEVEN WEEKS OF THE INVESTIGATION
Hypothesis
First Seven Weeks Second Seven Weeks
Hypothesis Group Computed t*
Group Computed t*
3 First Grade (N = 241)
I-E
II-C
6.89 I-G
II-E 3.88
6 Second Grade (N = 196)
I-E
II-C
2.73 I-C
II-E 2.54
*Tabled t: .05, I.96; .02, 2.32; .01, 2.57; .001, 3*%9>
Hypothesis 6_.— This hypothesis stated that there would
be no significant difference between increase in the mean
test scores of the second-grade experimental group and the
second-grade control group. This hypothesis was rejected at
greater than the .05 level of confidence in favor of the
experimental groups. The rejection of the null hypothesis
definitely attaches some weight to the contention that the
questioning procedures of Bradley and Earp (1) increases
curiosity.
77
Table XXII gives the mean gain and Fisher's t_ value
for Hypothesis 7 and 8 pertaining to curiosity. The level
of confidence is reported as being either greater or less
than *05 of confidence.
TABLE XXII
MEM GAIN, FISHER'S t VALUE, AND LEVEL OF CONFIDENCE PERTAINING TO THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE
EXPERIMENTAL GROUPS IN CURIOSITY
Hypotheses Mean Gain Fisher's Jb Value
Level of Confidence
7 First Grade (N = 2*KL)
I-E
II-E
10.04
13.22 1.27 Less than .05
8 Second Grade (N = 196)
I-E
II-E
3.10
9.17 2.3 4 Greater than .05
Hypothesis £.~~This hypothesis stated that there would
"be no significant difference between the increase in the
mean test scores of first-grade Group I-E and first-grade
Group II-E. This hypothesis was retained. This means that
in the first-grades there was substantial control of the
variables and equal exposure to the experimental program.
Hypothesis 8.—This hypothesis stated that there would
be no significant difference between the increase in the
mean test scores of second-grade Group I-E and second-grade
78
Group II-E. This hypothesis was rejected at greater than
the .05 level of confidence. This means that in the second-
grades there were variables not controlled, and that
Group I-E did not get the exposure to the experimental
treatment that the latter group received. The teacher
tally sheets upon which the teachers recorded the number of
thinking operation skills cards used in the questioning
procedures, confirms this statistical analysis. Table XXIII
TABLE XXIII
SUMMARY OF TALLY SHEETS SHOWING AVERAGE NUMBER OF SESSIONS ' AND AVERAGE NUMBER OF THINKING OPERATION STIMULUS
CARDS USED BY EACH TEACHER PER SESSION DURING THE INVESTIGATION
Group Grade
Average No. 3-5 Minute Sessions Per Teacher
Average No. Cards Used by Each Teacher Per Session
1 32 1.28 1
32
2 2? 1.37
2 1
2
33
29
3.^8
3.31
gives the group, grade level, and summary of tally sheets
showing the average number of sessions and the average num-
ber of thinking operation stimulus cards used by each
teacher per session during the investigation.
79
Increase In Reading Scores
- First-Grade.--The mean gain in reading was assessed for
each first-grade group. These data are presented in
Table XXIV. Other data relevant to the sub tests are
presented in Table XXXIX, Appendix H.
TABLE XXIV
MEM GAIN IN READING COMPREHENSION FOR FIRST-GRADE EXPERIMENTAL M D CONTROL GROUPS FOR EACH SEVEN
WEEK PERIOD OF THE INVESTIGATION
Group Test First Seven Weeks
Test Second Seven Weeks
Test
I (N = 108)
1 Experimental ^•90
2 Control 3
II (N = 133)
1 Control 6.0?
2 Experimental 6.81
3
The mean gain in reading for Group I-E betxreen Test 1
and Test 2 was -.90. Between the same tests, Group II-C had
a mean gain of 6.0?. After the stimulus program was rotated
to Group II-E, the mean gain for that group was 6.81.
Group I-C gained 4.0**. Table XXIV indicates that Control
Group II-C, during the initial seven weeks of the program,
increased in reading comprehension, but gained more when
the experimental program was applied to them. The original
experimental group, Group I-S, continued to gain in
80
reading comprehension after "becoming the control group
during the last seven weeks of the experiment.
The strength of the experimental program as applied to
first-grade students' reading comprehension may be con-
sidered by combining the mean gains of the groups, I-E with
II-E and I-C with II-C. The experimental groups gained a
total raw score of 11.71, and the control groups gained
10.11. This means that the experimental program did not
bring about change in the reading comprehension of first-
grade students during the period of the investigation. .
Se cond-Grade.--The mean gain in reading comprehension
was assessed for each second-grade group. Experimental
groups made larger mean gains in raw scores in reading com-
prehension than did control groups. These data are pre-
sented in Table XXV. Other data relevant to the sub tests
are presented in Table XXXX, Appendix H.
TABLE XXV
MEM GAIN IN READING COMPREHENSION FOR SECOND-GRADE EXPERIMENTAL AND CONTROL GROUPS FOR EACH SEVEN
WEEK PERIOD OF THE INVESTIGATION
Group Test First Seven Weeks
Test Second Seven Weeks
Test
I (N = 82)
1 Experimental 5.00
2 Control -1.39
3
(N 1 Control
2.27 2 Experimental
4,71 3
81
The mean gain in reading comprehension for Group I-E
between Test 1 and Test 2 was 5*00. Between the same tests,
Control Group II-C had a mean gain of 2,27. After the stim-
ulus program was rotated to Group II-E, the mean gain for
that group was 4.71. Group I-C scored -1.39. Table XXV
indicates that Group II-C, during the initial seven weeks of
the program, gained in reading comprehension, but gained
significantly when the experimental program was applied to
them. The original experimental group, Group I-E, regressed
in reading comprehension once the stimulus program was
removed.
The strength of the experimental program as applied to
second grade students may be considered by combining the
mean gains of the groups, I-E with II-E and I-C with II-C.
The experimental groups gained a total combined score of
9.71» and the control groups gained a total combined score
of 0.88. (See Appendix H.)
Increase in Reading Comprehension.—The gain in the
second grade experimental groups indicates that reading com-
prehension can be increased concomitantly with an increase
in curiosity of second grade children using the methods
advocated by Bradley and E&rp (1). The first grade groups
showed an increase in curiosity but no significant increases
in reading comprehension. The etiology of this may be that
a first grade student does not have the reading vocabulary
power to truly explore through books.
82
Tests of
The mean gain and Fisher's t_ value for Hypotheses 3
and 6 pertaining to reading comprehension is given in
Table XXVI. Significance is reported as being either
greater or less than .05 level of confidence.
TABLE XXVI
HYPOTHESES, GROUP, M D COMPUTED t VALUE RELATING TO MEAN GAINS IN READING COMPREHENSION DURING THE FIRST
SEVEN WEEKS AND THE SECOND SEVEN WEEKS OF THE INVESTIGATION
Hypothesis
First Seven Weeks Second Seven Weeks
Hypothesis Group Computed t*
Group Computed t*
3 First Grade (N = 2kl)
I-E
II-C 1.^0
I-C
II-E 3.09
6 Second Grade (N = I96)
I-E
II-C
2.58 I-C
II-E 5.78
^Tabled t: .05, 1.96; .02, 2.32; .01, 2.57; .001, 3.29.
Hypothesis 2*—This hypothesis stated that there would
be no significant difference between the increase in the
mean test scores of the first-grade experimental group and
the first-grade control group. This hypothesis was retained,
as shorn in Table XXVI, as there was no significant differ-
ence between the two groups.
83
Hypothesis £.—This hypothesis stated that there would
be no significant difference between the increase in the
mean test scores of the second-grade experimental group and
the second-grade control group. Hypothesis 6 was rejected
at greater than the .05 level of confidence in favor of the
experimental groups, as shown in Table XXVI. The rejection
of the null hypothesis definitely attaches some weight to
the contention that the questioning procedures of Bradley
and Earp (1) increase reading comprehension in second-grade
children.
TABLE XXVII
MEAN GAIN, FISHER'S t VALUE, AND LEVEL OF CONFIDENCE PERTAINING TO THE DIFFERENCE BET WEEN THE
EXPERIMENTAL GROUPS IN READING COMPREHENSION
Hypotheses Mean Gain Fisher's t Level of Confidence
7 I-E -.90 First-Grade (N = 2/-J-1) II-E 6.81 2.20 Greater
than .05
8 I-E 5.00 0.28 Less Second-Grade than .05 (N = 196) II-E ^.?1
than .05
Hypotheses 2 and 8.—Table XXVII gives the mean gain
and Fisher's t value for Hypothesis 7 and 8. These hypoth-
eses pertain to reading comprehension.
8^
Hypothesis 7 stated that there would be no significant
difference between the increase in the mean test scores of
first-grade Group I-K and first-grade Group II-E. This
hypothesis was rejected at greater than the .05 level of
confidence.
Hypothesis 8 stated that there would be no significant
difference between the increase in the mean test scores of
second-grade Group I-E and second-grade Group II-E. This
hypothesis was retained. This means that the two experi-
mental groups had probable equal gains in reading compre-
hension. The probability that the questioning procedures of
Bradley and Earp increase reading comprehension scores
equally in different groups of students, is reinforced.
Findings Relevant to the Third Question, What Are the Best Predictors of
Academic Achievement Mien A Combination of Test Scores Is Utilized?
The formulae used in the computation for Hypotheses 9
and 10 were the stepwise regression formulas used at the
North Texas State University Computer Center. The data were
punched on IBM cards, and all the statistical analyses were
computed at the computer center. The .05 level of signif-
icance was arbitrarily established as the level at which the',
null hypotheses would be rejected.
Data Related to Hypothesis £
The hypothesis tested was that there is no significant
relationship between academic achievement as measured by
85
the Stanford. Achievement Tests, Primary I_ (Y), and a
combination of the following measures of ability:
X-j_ intellectual ability as determined by the Otis-
Lennon Mental Ability Test.
Xg Self Judgment of Curiosity as determined by CTC.
X-j Story Memory of Evidence as determined by CTC.
X^ Persistence as determined by CTC.
X^ Desire' to Know as determined by CTC.
X^ Desire for the Incongruous as determined by CTC.
Xr, total ability of curiosity as determined by CTC.
Relationship between the total academic achievement
score and scores of selected measures of ability.--Product
moment coefficients of correlation between a measure of
academic achievement as indicated by the Stanford Achieve-
ment Test, Primary I for first-grade, and measures of abil-
ity as indicated by the Otis-Lennon Mental Ability Test.
Form J, (Xx) and the Combined Tests of Curiosity (X^ - X^)
are presented in TableXXVIII. Means and standard deviations
for these measures are presented in Table XXXXI, Appendix H.
The range of coefficients of correlation between a
measure of total academic achievement (Y^) and measures of
ability (X) was .037 to .627. The coefficient of correlation
between total academic achievement (Yr?) and Otis-Lennon
^ental. M l i l Test (X1) was .627. The coefficient of cor-
relation between total academic achievement (Y^) and Story
Memory (X3) was .5^1.
86
The coeffioient of correlation between total academic
achievement (Y?) and Total CTC (X?) was .514. The coeffi-
cient of correlation between total academic achievement (Yy)
and Desire to Know (X^) was .3^1. The coefficient of cor-
relation between total academic achievement (Y ). and Desire
for Incongruous (X^) was .238. The coefficient of corre-
lation between total academic achievement and Self Judg-
ment {X2) was .221.
TABLE XXVIII
COEFFICIENTS OF CORRELATION BETWEEN THE TOTAL MEASURE OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND SELECTED MEASURES OF
ABILITY IN FIRST-GRADE STUDENTS TOGETHER WITH STANDARD ERRORS OF ESTIMATE
Tests
Variables Otis-Lennon Self Judgment Story Memory-Persistence Desire to Know Desire for Incongruous Total arc
.627* ,221* .5^1* .037 . 3^1* .238* .51^*
SE (est. y)
3 .006 fe.573 6.713 3.622 ^1.036 bz. 398 37.^5
I
Significant at the .01 level or greater.
The Persistence Test (Xj ) was the only coefficient of
correlation between total academic achievement and ability
which had no significance. The correlation was .037* The
other six coefficients were significant at greater than .01
level of confidence. According to Garrett's descriptive
87
labels for interpreting coefficients of correlation
(ij-, p. 173), a "substantial or marked" relationship appeared
to exist between the score of the criterion measure of aca-
demic achievement (Y^) and Otis-Lennon, Story Memory, and
Total (JSC,
Coefficients of multiple correlation,—The stepwise
regression formulae of the North Texas State University
Computer Center gives the best combinations of the seven
predictor variables. These were Otis-Lennon (X- ), Story
Memory (X^), Persistence (X^), and Total CTC (Xr,).
The extent to which total academic achievement was
determined by the combined action of each of the predictor
variables was obtained by selecting the statistical procedure
which would provide coefficients of multiple correlation in
terms of beta coefficients (R^). The coefficients of cor-
relation (R) were then derived by extracting the square root
of R^. The procedure was used by Martin (6, p. 3) in pre-
dicting learning achievement in various languages. Walked '
and Lev ( 7 > P» 326) describe and use the following formula:
R2y. 13^7=rylbVl^7+ry2b*y3.l^7*ry3b*y^l37*^b%7a3^
where
ryl coefficient of correlation between the first independent variable and the criterion variable',
k*yl.34*7=relative weight which the first independent variable contributes to the criterion variable.
ry2 coefficient of correlation between the second independent variable and the criterion variable.
88
b ' y = relative weight which the second independent variable contributes to the criterion variable.
ry3 = the coefficient of correlation between the third independent variable and the criterion variable.
^y^.137 = relative weight which the third independent variable contributes to the criterion variable.
ry^ = coefficient of correlation between the fourth independent variable and the criterion variable.
'y?.13^ = relative weight which the fourth independent variable contributes to the criterion variable.
By substituting the known values of the variables used
in this study into the above basic formula, the coefficients
of multiple correlation were determined for each of the
combinations discussed in subsequent sections of this chap-
ter. Other data relevant to the known values of the variables
used are presented in Tables XXXXI and XXXXII, Appendix H.
Relationships Between a Measure of Total Academic
Achievement and Combined Measures of Ability.—Coefficients
of multiple correlation were computed to show the joint
action of the measures of ability combined with the criterion
measure of academic achievement. The product moment
coefficients of correlation used in the computation of the
various combinations of multiple correlation and prediction
formulae are presented in Table XXIX. Means and standard
deviations for the variables are presented in Tables XXXXI
and XXXXII, Appendix H.
89
TABLE XXIX
INTERCORRELATIONS BET WEEN A MEASURE OP ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND SELECTED MEASURES OP ABILITY FOR FIRST-GRADE STUDENTS
(N = 24.1)
Test Coefficients of Correlation
X1 X2 x3 X/* x5 • x6 X? Y7
Otis-Lennon (X- ) .083 #
.388 .021 .3 75 .198 .368 .627
Self Judgment (Xg) .2 54 .061 .089 .050 .638 •5*
.221
Story Memory (X^) .098 .2l2 .183 .703 .5^1
Persistence (X/j,) .063 .0^9 .037
Desire to Know (X^) .20? .512 .3*f
Desire for Incon-gruous (x^)
. ft .409 .23§
Total CTC (X7) .51?
Total Achieve-ment (Yr,)
^Significant at .01 level when r reaches .170. ^Significant at .05 level when r reaches .130.
The correlations between a measure of total academic
achievement and measures of scholastic aptitude ranged from
.037 to .627. The intercorrelations among the predictor
variables ranged from .021 to .703. The descriptive labels
given by Garrett indicate that coefficients of correlation
90
ranging from .00 to +.20 denote "indifferent or negligible"
relationships; from +.20 to +.^0 denote "low" relationships;
from +.40 to +.70 denote "substantial or marked" relation-
ships; and from +.70 to +1.00 denote "high to very high"
relationships (**, p. 173). Only the best predictor variables
were included in the formulae.
The coefficient of multiple correlation between the
scores.made on the criterion variable total academic achieve-
ment (Y-p) and the combined action of the independent
variables Otis-Lennon (Xj_) and Story Memory (X^) was .705.
The proportion of the variance of the criterion variable
attributed to the joint action of the two independent
variables was ^9.8 per cent. Of this amount 39*^ per cent
of the total variance to academic achievement was the
independent contribution of Otis-Lennon (X^), and 10.^ per
cent was the independent contribution of Story Memory (X-j).
The remaining 50.2 per cent of the variance was attributed
to other factors not measured by these tests.
The coefficient of multiple correlation between the
scores made on the criterion variable total academic
achievement (Yr,) and the combined action of the independent
variables Otis-Lennon (X]_), Story Memory (X- ), and total
CTG (Xr,) was .716. The proportion of the variance of the
criterion variable attributed to the joint action of the
three independent variables was 5-T-.3 per cent. Of this
amount 39*^ per cent of the total variance to academic
91
achievement was the independent contribution of
Otis-Lennon (X- ). The independent contribution of Story-
Memory (X^) to the total variance was 10.4 per cent, while
the contribution of Total CTC (X^) was 1.5 per cent. The
remaining k8.7 per cent of the variance was attributed to
other factors not measured by these tests.
The coefficient of multiple correlation between the
scores made on the criterion variable total academic
achievement (Y^) and the combined action of the independent
variables Otis-Lennon (X- ), Story Memory (X^), and Persist-
ence (X^) was .718. The proportion of the variance of the
criterion variable attributed to the joint action of the
four independent variables was $1.6 per cent. Of this
amount 39*^ per cent of the total variance to academic
achievement was the independent contribution of Otis-
Lennon (Xx). The independent contribution of Story Mem-
ory (X3) to the total variance was 10.k per cent, while the
contribution of Total CTC (Xy) was 1.5 per cent. The inde-
pendent contribution of Persistence (X^) to the total vari-
ance was .32 per cent. The remaining per cent of the
variance was attributed to other factors not measured by
these tests.
As indicated in Table XXX, the best predictors when two
variables were combined were Otis-Lennon (X^) and Story
Memory (X^) which correlated higher with total academic
achievement than the other combinations with two predictor
92
variables. The coefficient of multiple correlation for this
combination was *705*
TABLE XXX .
COEFFICIENTS OF MULTIPLE CORRELATION BETWEEN A MEASURE OF TOTAL ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND COMBINATIONS " OF SELECTED MEASURES OF ABILITY FOR FIRST-
GRADE STUDENTS (N = 2^1)
Multiple R Factors R R2
Ry.13* .705** .^9?
Ry.137 .716"** .512
Ry.137^ .718** .516
*Variables 1. Otis-Lennon 2. SelF Judgment -. Story Memory . Persistence I
5. Desire to Know 6. Desire for Incongruous 7. Total CTC X total academic.achievement
**Significant at greater than .01.
The best predictors when three variables were combined
were Otis-Lennon (X-j_), Story Memory (X-j), and Total CTC (X^),
which correlated higher with total academic achievement than
the other combinations with three predictor variables. The
coefficient of multiple correlation for this combination
was .716.
When four predictor variables were combined, the best
predictors were Otis-Lennon (X- ), Story Memory (X^), Total
93
CTC (Xr,), and Persistence (X^), which correlated higher with
total academic achievement than the other combinations of
four variables. The coefficient of multiple correlation for
this combination was .718.
Prediction by multiple repression.—Only the best
predictors as given by the North Texas State University
Computer Center stepwise regression formula were used in the
computation of the multiple coefficients of correlation.
The procedures involved in the computation of multiple
coefficients of correlation servedto maximize the predictive
power of independent variables by the assignment of optimal
weights to these variables. The process used for accom-
plishing this is described by Walker and Lev ( 7, p. 32*0
and involves the following basic formula: A
y13 7 = Ay.l3^7 + hyl.3^7*1 + by3.1^7X3 + Vk13?X/j, + V?.13^X7
Where A Y13^7 = predicted score of criterion measure.
• V.13 7 = a constant.
kyl.3^7 = partial regression coefficient giving the weight of the score attached to the first independent variable with the second, third, and fourth independent variables held constant.
= score of first independent variable.
by3.14-7 = partial regression coefficient giving the weight of the score attached to the second independent variable with the first, third, and fourth independent variables held constant.
X 3 = score of second independent variable.
9^
y^.137 = partial regression coefficient giving the weight of the score attached to the third independent variable with the first, second, and fourth independent variables held con-stant.
X-L). ~ score of third independent variable.
ky7.13^ = partial regression coefficient giving the weight of the score attached to the fourth independent variable with the first, second, and third independent variables held constant,
^7 = score of fourth independent variable.
The application of the above basic formula in deter-
mining the score weights of Otls-Lennon (X^), and Story-
Memory (X3) in predicting total achievement, results in the
following:
Y = ^1.70 + 2.3lXx + 1.8^3.
The weights of 2.31 and 1.85 indicate the amount by
which the scores in variables Otls-Lennon (X^) and Story
Memory (X^) must be multiplied in order to give the pre-
diction of Y. This means that a prediction of a total
academic achievement score may be made by substituting in
the regression equation the known values of XT and X . The x 3
standard error of estimate of any total academic achievement
score predicted from the above formula is +31.07 as shorn in
Table XXXI. This means that the chances are about two in
three that the forecast of the total achievement score will
not miss the actual score of total achievement on the cri-
terion measure by more than +31.07 points.
The application of the basic formula in determining the
score weights of Xi, Xj, and X^ in predicting total academic
95
TABLE XXXI
STANDARD ERRORS OF ESTIMATE FOR TOTAL ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT SCORES OF FIRST-GRADE STUDENTS PREDICTED FROM BEST
COMBINATIONS OF SELECTED MEASURES OF ABILITY (N = 2*KL)
Variables* Combined . SE (est. y)
Otis-Lennon (X-i) and Story Memory (X^) ±31.07*#
Otis-Lennon (X- ), Story Memory (Xo), and Total CTC (X?).
J ±30.66
Otis-Lennon (X-j) Story Memory (Xo), Persistence (Xkj, and Total CTC +30.62
*See Appendix H for data relative to the variables.
•ins-Total battery of CTC had raw score sum of 200,
achievement results in the following:
If = 22.07 + 2.21X! + 1.23X3 + .^2X7.
The weights of 2.21, I.23, and ,k2 indicate the amount by
which the scores in variables X]_, X^, and Xr, must be multi-
plied in order to give the prediction of Y. This means that
a prediction of total academic achievement may. be made by
substituting in the regression equation the known values of
xl' x3> a n d x7* T h e standard error of estimate of any total
academic achievement score predicted from the above formula
is +30.66 as shorn in Table XXXI. This means that the
9 6
chances are about two in three that the forecast of the
total achievement score will not miss the actual score of
total academic achievement on the criterion measure by more
than +30.66 points.
The application of the basic formula in determining the
score weights of Xj_, X^,X^, and Xy in predicting total
academic achievement, results in the following:
I = 23.18 + 2.17X;1 + l.llX^ ~ .52X4 + .53X7.
The weights of 2.17, 1«11> —.52 and .53 indicate the amount
by which the scores in variables X^, X^, X^, and Xr; must be
multiplied in order to give the prediction of Y. This means
that a prediction of total achievement may be ma.de by sub-
stituting in the regression equation the known values of
Xi, X3, Xjj,, and X7. The standard error of estimate of any
total achievement score predicted from the above formula is
+ 30.62 as shown in Table XXXI. This means that the chances
are about two in three that the forecast of total achievement
will not miss the actual score of total achievement on the '
criterion measure by more than +30.62 points.
As indicated in Table XXXI, the independent variables
Otis-Lennon (X-j_) and Story Memory (X^) combined, produced a
better prediction of total academic achievement (Y^) than the
other combinations of two predictor variables. The standard
error of estimate for this combination was +31.07.
The three independent variables Otis-Lennon (Xi), Story
Memory (X^), and Total CTC (Xr ) combined, produced a better
97
prediction of total academic achievement (Yr,) than the other
combinations of three predictor variables. The standard
error of estimate for this combination was +30,66.
The four independent variables Otis-Lennon (X-j), Story
Memory (X3), Persistence (X/^), and Total CTC (Xr,) combined,
produced a better prediction of total academic achievement (Y7)
than the other combinations of four predictor variables.
The standard error of estimate for this combination
xvas +30.66.
Data Related to Hypothesis 10
The hypothesis tested was that there is no significant
relationship between academic achievement as measured by the
Stanford Achievement Tests, Primary XI (Y), and a combination
of the following measures of ability:
X-j_ intellectual ability as determined by the Otis-
Lennon Mental Ability Test.
X2 Self Judgment of Curiosity as determined by CTC.
Xj Story Memory of Evidence as determined by CTC.
Xif, Persistence as determined by CTC.
X<j Desire to Know as determined by CTC.
X^ Desire for the Incongruous as determined by CTC.
Xr> total ability of curiosity as determined by CTC.
Relationship between the total academic achievement
score and scores of selected measures of ability.—Product
moment coefficients of correlation between a measure of
academic achievement as indicated by the Stanford Achievement
98
Test, Primary XI for second-grade, and measures of ability
as indicated "by the Otis-Lennon Mental Ability Test, Form J
(X- ), and the Combined Tests of Curiosity (X2 - X7) are
presented in Table XXXII. Means and standard deviations for
these measures are presented in Table XXXXII, Appendix H.
The range of coefficients of correlation between a
measure of total academic achievement (Y;j_) anc* m©asures
ability (X) was .017 to .628. The coefficient of correlation
between total academic achievement (Y-p) and Otis-Lennon
Mental Ability Test (Xx) was .628. The coefficient of cor-
relation between total academic achievement (Y^) and Story
Memory (X^) was .^21.
The coefficient of correlation between total academic
achievement (Yr?) and Total CTC (Xy) was .395* The coeffi-
cient of correlation between total academic achievement (Y ,)
and Desire to Know (X^) was .215. The coefficient of cor-
relation between total academic achievement (Y^) and Desire
for Incongruous (X^) was .232. The coefficient of corre-
lation between total academic achievement and Persistence (X/j,)
was .157•
The Self Judgment Test (X2) was the only coefficient of
correlation between total academic achievement and ability
which had no significance. The correlation was .017. Five
of the other six coefficients were significant at greater
than .01 level of confidence. Persistence was significant
at the .05 level.
99
TABLE XXXII
COEFFICIENTS OF CORRELATION BETWEEN THE TOTAL MEASURE OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND SELECTED MEASURES OF
ABILITY IN SECOND-GRADE STUDENTS TOGETHER WITH STANDARD ERRORS OF ESTIMATE
(N = 196)
Tests r SE (est. y)
Variables Otis-Lennon .628* *J-8.52 Self Judgment .01? 62.3^5 Story Memory .4-21* 56.558 Persistence .157** 61.580• Desire to Know .215» 60.895 Desire for Incongruous .232# 60.652 Total CTC .395* 57*283
Significant at the .05 level or greater.
According to Garrett's descriptive labels for inter-
preting coefficients of correlation ( , p. 173), a
"substantial or marked" relationship appeared to exist be-
tween the score of the criterion measure of academic
achievement (Y-p) and Otis-Lennon. Story Memory, and
Total CTC.
Coefficients of multiple correlation.—The stepwise
regression formulae of the North Texas State University
Computer Center give the best combinations of the seven
predictor variables. These were Otis-Lennon (Xn), Story
Memory (X^), Desire to Know (X^), and Desire for Incongruous (X^)
100
The extent to which total academic achievement was
determined by the combined action of each of the predictor
variables was obtained by selecting the statistical procedure
which would provide coefficients of multiple correlation in
terms of beta coefficients (R^). The coefficients of cor-
relation (R) were then derived by extracting the square root
p
of R". The procedure was used by Martin (2, p. ^3) in pre-
dicting learning achievement in various languages. Vfeilker
and Lev (7 , p. 326) describe and use the following formula: R2y .1356 = rylbVl. 356+ry2b^y3.l56-fry3w y5.136+ry^y6.1.35
where ryl = coefficient of correlation between the first
independent variable and the criterion variable.
b*yl.356 = relative weight which the first independent variable contributes to the criterion variable.
ry2 = coefficient of correlation between the second independent variable and the criterion variable.
k*y3.156 = relative weight which the second independent variable contributes to the criterion variable.
ry3 = the coefficient of correlation between the third independent variable and the criterion variable.
b*y5.136 = relative weight which the third independent variable contributes to the criterion variable.
ryb = coefficient of correlation between the fourth independent variable and the criterion variable.
y6.135 = relative weight which the fourth independent variable contributes to the criterion variable.
101
By substituting the known values of the variables used
in this study into the above basic formula, the coefficients
of multiple correlation were determined for each of the
combinations discussed in subsequent sections of this chap-
ter. Other data relevant to the known values of the variables
used are presented in Table XXXXII, Appendix H.
Relationships Between a Measure of Total Academic
Achievement and Combined Measures of Ability.—Coefficients
of.multiple correlation were computed to shoitf the joint
action of the measures of ability combined with the criterion
measure of academic achievement. The product moment
coefficients of correlation used in the computation of the
various combinations of multiple correlation and prediction
formulae are presented in Table XXXIII. Means and standard
deviations for the variables are presented in Table XXXXII,
Appendix H.
The correlations between a measure of total academic
achievement and measures of ability ranged from .01? to .628.
The intercorrelations among the predictor variables ranged
from .022 to .6 -2. The descriptive labels given by Garrett
indicate that coefficients of correlation ranging from .00 to
±•20 denote "indifferent or negligible" relationships; from
+.20 to + .40 denote "low" relationships; from +.*K) to +.70
denote "substantial or marked" relationships; and from +.70
to +1.00 denote "high to very high" relationships {*!-, p. 173).
Only the best predictor variables were included in the formulae.
TABLE XXXIII
IN T ERCO RRELATIONS BETWEEN A MEASURE OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND SELECTED MEASURES OF ABILITY FOR SECOND-GRADE STUDENTS
(N = 196)
.102
.Test Coefficients of Correlation
X1 X2 X.3 x5 x6 Xr? *9
Otis-Lennon (X^) .05^ ,^o5 .18? A27 .21® .1*77 #
.628
Self Judgment (X2) .05? .058 .125 .0 -3 1 *
A70 .017
Story Memory (X-j) - - - - .022 .130 .035 ^35 . #
Ml
Persistence (X^) .152 .077 .6$ .157
Desire to Know (X^) .103 .520 •»
.215
Desire for Incon-gruous (X^)
# • 375
- *
.232
Total CTC (X7) .395
Total Achieve-ment (Y^)
^Significant at .01 level when r reaches .18 -.
•^Significant at .05 level when r reaches .1^0,
The coefficient of multiple correlation between the
scores made on the criterion variable total academic
achievement (Y-p) and the combined action of the independent
103
variables Otis-Lennon (X^) and Story Memory (X^) was .60.
The.proportion of the variance of the criterion variable
attributed to the joint action of the two independent
variables was ^2.8 per cent. Of this amount 39*^ P e r cent
of the total variance to academic achievement was the
independent contribution of Otis-Lennon (X- ), and 3.^ per
cent was the independent contribution of Story Memory (X^),
The remaining 57*2 per cent of the variance was attributed
to.other factors not measured by these tests.
The coefficient of multiple correlation between th<?
scores made on the criterion variable total academic
achievement (Yy) and the combined action of the independent
variables Otis-Lennon (X-j_), Story Memory (X^), and Desire
for the Incongruous was ,66k. The proportion of the
variance of the criterion variable attributed to the joint
action of the three independent variables was Vl-.O per cent.
Of this amount 39*^ per cent of the total variance to
academic achievement was the independent contribution of
Otis-Lennon (X- ). The independent contribution of Story
Memory (X^) to the total variance was 3*^ P6** cent, while
the contribution of Desire for the Incongruous was 1.2 per
cent. The remaining 56 pe** cent of the variance was
attributed to other factors not measured by these tests.
The coefficient of multiple correlation between the
scores made on the criterion variable total academic
achievement (Yr?) and the combined action of the independent
10^
variables Otis-Lennon {X- ), Story Memory (X^), Desire to
Know (X^), and Desire for the Incongruous (X^) was ,665.
The proportion of the variance of the criterion variable
attributed to the joint action of the four independent
variables was ^.3 per cent. Of this amount 39*^ per cent
of the total variance to academic achievement was the
independent contribution of Otis-Lennon (X^). The
independent contribution of Story Memory (X^) to the total
variance was per cent, while the contribution of Desire
for the Incongruous (Xg) was 1.2 per cent. The independent
contribution of Desire to Know (X^) to the total variance
was .02 per cent. The remaining 55*7 Pe^ cent of the
variance was attributed to other factors not measured by
these tests.
As indicated in Table XXXIV, the best predictors when
two variables were combined were Otis-Lennon (X^) and Story
Memory (X^) which correlated higher with total academic
achievement than, the other combinations with two predictor
variables. The coefficient of multiple correlation for this
combination was .628.
The best predictors when three variables were combined
were Otis-Lennon (X- ), Story Memory (X^), and Desire for
Incongruous (X^), which correlated higher with total academic
achievement than the other combinations with three predictor
variables. The coefficient of multiple correlation for this
combination was .663.
10 5
TABLE XXXIV
COEFFICIENTS OF MULTIPLE CORRELATION BETWEEN A MEASURE OF TOTAL ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND COMBINATIONS OF SELECTED MEASURES OF ABILITY FOR SECOND-
GRADE STUDENTS (N = 2^1)
Multiple R Factors R R2
By. 13* .628** .39^
Ry.136 .663** .428
^.1365 .665** • 4^0
^'Variables 1. Otis-Lennon 2. Self Judgment
Story Memory Persistence I
5. Desire to Know 6. Desire for Incongruous 7. Total CTC Y total academic achievement
^Significant at greater than .01.
When four predictor variables were combined, the best
predictors were Otis-Lennon (X^), Story Memory (X^), Desire
for Incongruous (X ), and Desire to Know (X^) which correlated
higher with total academic achievement than the other com-
binations of four variables. The coefficient of multiple
correlation for this combination was .665.
Prediction by multiple regression.—Only the best
predictors as given by the North Texas State University
Computer Center stepwise regression formulae were used in the
10 6
computation of the multiple coefficients of correlation.
The procedures involved, in the computation of multiple
coefficients of correlation serve to maximize the predictive
power of independent variables by the assignment of optimal
weights to these variables. The process used for accom-
plishing this is described by Walker and Lev (7, p. J2k)
and involves the following basic formula;
11356 = ^y.l 356 + byl.356Xx = by3.156X3 + by5.136X5 + by6.135X6
Where
• 1356 = predicted score of criterion measure.
Ay.1356 = a constant.
byl*356 = partial regression coefficient giving the weight of the score attached to the first independent variable with the second, third, and fourth independent variables held constant.
X-j_ - score of first independent variable.
by3.i56 = partial regression coefficient giving the weight of the score attached to the second independent variable with the first, third, and fourth independent variables held constant.
X3 = score of second independent variable.
by5.l36 = partial regression coefficient giving the weight of the score attached to the third independent variable with the first, second, and fourth independent variables held constant.
X5 = score of third independent variable.
"by6.135 = partial regression coefficient giving the weight of the score attached to the fourth independent variable with the first, second, and third independent variables held constant.
^6 = score of fourth Independent variable.
10?
The application of the above basic formula in determining
the score weights of Otis-Lennon (X- ), and Story Memory (X^)
in predicting total achievement, results in the following:
Y = 3.26 + 3.20X-L + 2.I8X3.
The weights of 3.20 and 2,18 indicate the amount by
which the scores in variables Otis-Lennon (X^) and Story
Memory (X^) must be multiplied in order to give the pre-
diction of Y. This means that a prediction of a total
academic achievement score may be made by substituting in
the regression equation the known values of X-j_ and Xy The
standard error of estimate of any total academic achievement
score predicted from the above formula is +47*^0 as shorn
in Table XXXV. This means that the chances are about two in
three that the forecast of the total achievement score will
not miss the actual score of total achievement on the cri-
terion measure by more than +47.^0 points.
The application of the basic formula in determining the
score weights of X- , X^, and X5 in predicting total academic
achievement results in the following: A Y = -15.71 + 3.o^xx + 2.26X3 + 1.5^X5.
The x-jeights of 3*0^, 2.26, and 1.5^ indicate the amount by
which the scores in variables X^, X^, and Xg must be multi-
plied in order to give the prediction of Y. This means that
a prediction of total academic achievement may be made by
substituting in the regression equation the known values of
X^, and X5. The standard error of estimate of any. total
108
TABLE XXXV
STANDARD ERRORS OF ESTIMATE FOR TOTAL ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT SCORES OF SECOND-GRADE STUDENTS PREDICTED FROM BEST
COMBINATIONS OF SELECTED MEASURES OF ABILITY (N = 196)
Variables* Combined SS (est. y)
Otis-Lennon (X-,) and Story Memory (X3) +47.40
Otis-Lennon (X-j_), Story Memory (Xo), and Desire for Incongruous (X^) . . . . . . . . +47.00
Otis-Lennon (Xq ) Story Memory (Xo), Desire to Know (X5), and Desire for Incongruous (X5) ±47.02
"See Appendix H for data relative to the variables.
academic achievement score predicted from the above formula
is +47.00 as shoxvn in Table XXXV. This means that the
chances are about two in three that the forecast of the
total achievement score will not miss the actual score of
total academic achievement on the criterion measure by more
than +47.0 points.
The application of the basic formula in determining the
score weights of X- , X3, X^, and X^ in predicting total
academic achievement, results in the following: -a Y = -2,70 + 3.19X1 + 2.23X3 ~0.80X5 + 1.55X6.
109
The weights of 3.19, 2.23, -0.80 and 1.55 indicate the amount
by which the scores in variables X^, X^, and X^ must be
multiplied in order to give the prediction of X. This means
that a prediction of total achievement may be made by substi-
tuting in the regression equation the known values of X- , X^,
Xcj, and Xg. The standard error of estimate of any, total
achievement score predicted from the above formula is £47.02
as given in Table XXXV. This means that the chanGes are about
two in three that the forecast of total achievement will not
miss the actual score of total achievement on the criterion
measure by more than +47.02 points.
As indicated in Table XXXV, the independent variables
Otis-Lennon (X\) and Story Memory (X^) combined, produced a
better prediction of total academic achievement (Y-p) than the
other combinations of two predictor variables. The standard
error of estimate for this combination was +47.40.
The three independent variables Otis-Lennon (X^), Story
Memory (X^), and Desire for Incongruous (X^) combined, pro-
duced a better prediction of total academic achievement (I7)
than the other combinations of three predictor variables.
The standard error of estimate for this combination was +47.0.
The four independent variables Otis-Lennon (X _), Story
Memory (X^), Desire to Know (X^), and Desire for Incon-
gruous (X5) combined produced a better prediction of total
academic achievement (Y7) than the other combinations of four
predictor variables. The standard error of estimate for this
combination was +47.02.
CHAPTER BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Bradley, R. C. and N. Wesley Earp, Exemplars of the Teacher*s Cognitive Domain, Dubuque, Iowa, Win. C. Brown Co., ~Inc., 19*6 7.
2. Bradley, R. C. and Billie Edward Martin, "A Study and Assessment of the Value of Selected Placement Tests for Predicting Achievement in Spanish, French, and.German for First Semester Freshmen," The Journal of Experi-mental Education, Vol. XXXVI, TWinter, 19&7T, 50-5^.
3. Cronbach, Lee J., Essentials of Psychological Testing, New York, Harper~and Row, Publishers," i960 *
4. Garrett, Henry E., Statistics in Psychology and Education, New York, Longman"'s, Green and Co., 1953*
5. Holt, John, How Children Learn, New York, Pitman Pub-lishing Corporation, "T9S7.
6. Martin, Billie Edward, "A. Study of the Value of Freshman Placement Tests for Predicting Achievement in Spanish, French, and German at the University of Missouri," unpublished doctoral dissertation, School of Education, University of Missouri, Columbia, 1965.
7. Vfelker, Helen M. and Joseph Lev, Statistical Inference, New York, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1953*
CHAPTER V
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION, IMPLICATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Summary
Hypotheses
Major purpose of the investigation*—The major purpose
of this investigation was concerned with the problem of
determining the value of selected curiosity tests for pre-
dicting academic achievement in first and second-grade
students. In order to assess the value, the relationshipsof
selected curiosity test scores with Stanford Achievement
Test scores were determined for the purpose of ascertaining
the best predictors of a'student's ability to achieve
academically.
More specifically, in seeking a solution to the prob- .
lem, answers were sought to the following questions:
1. Will curiosity test scores indicate a student's
ability to achieve academically?
2. If the answer to question one is in the affirmative,
will the questioning procedures of Bradley and. Sarp concom-
itantly increase the curiosity and reading comprehension
scores?
3. What are the best predictors of academic achieve-
ment when a combination of test scores is utilized?
Ill
1X2
Question one.—In order to find the answer to question
one, the following four hypotheses were formulated:
1. There will be a significant relationship between
academic achievement as measured by Stanford Achievement
Tests, Primary I_ (Y) for the first-grade, and each of the
measures of ability (X).
2. There will be a significant relationship between
academic achievement as measured by the Stanford Achieve-
ment Tests, Primary I (Y) and each of the measures of
ability (X) after administration of the experimental program.
h. There will be a significant relationship between
academic achievement as measured by the Stanford Achieve-
ment Tests, Primary II (Y) for second-grade, and each of the
measures of ability (X).
5. There will be a significant relationship between
academic achievement as measured by the Stanford Aohlevement
Tests, Primary II (Y) for second-grade, and each of the
measures of ability (X) after administration of the experi-
mental program.
Question two.—The answer to question two required the
testing of the folloxving hypotheses;
3« There will be a significant difference between the
increase in the mean test scores of the first-grade experi-
mental group and the mean test scores of the first—grade
control group.
113
6. There will be a significant difference between the
increase in the mean test scores of the second-grade experi-
mental group and the mean test scores of the second-grade
control group.
7. There will be no significant difference between the
increase in the mean test scores of first-grade Group I
Experimental and first-grade Group II Experimental.
8. There will be no significant difference between the
increase in the mean test scores of second-grade Group I
Experimental and second-grade Group II Experimental.
Question three.—Question three required the testing of
the following hypotheses:
9. There will be a significant relationship between
learning achievement as measured by the Stanford Achievement
Teats, Primary I_ (Y), and a combination of the measures of
ability (X).
10. There will be a significant relationship between
learning achievement as measured by the Stanford Achievement
Tests, Primary II (Y) and a combination of the measures of
ability (X).
Subjects for the investigation.—To test the hypotheses,
subjects for the investigation consisted of 2 -1 first-grade .
and 196 second-grade students attending two separate team
teaching schools in a metropolitan area of North Texas. The
subjects comprised the total population of the first and
second-grades in the two schools.
11**
Experimental design.--The rotation group design was
utilized, using two cycles. In Cycle I, Group I received
the experimental treatment and Group II served as the control
group. In Cycle II, Group I was the control group and
Group II received the experimental treatment. See Table II,
page 35.
Stimulus program.—The stimulus program, patterned after
the questioning procedures recommended by Bradley and Earp,
consisted of a thinking operations kit. The kit contained
5 X 7 cards having pictures, statements, and questions
designed to arouse the questioning attitude within the child.
Table XXIII gives the amount of stimulus exposures each group
received.
Instruments.—The instruments employed to measure ouri-
osity were tests devised, validated, and tested for reli-
ability by Maw and Maw with fifth-grade students through the
course of three studies. Downward extensions were made by
Bradley and Adkisson. The tests as used in the investi-
gation were tested for reliability in a pilot study (Appen-
dix S) of 270 subjects. Sixty subjects were selected at
random for the purpose of analysis. The achievement of
first and second-grade children was tested utilizing the
Stanford Achievement Tests, Primary I and II. Also used as
a measure of ability was the Otls-Lennon Mental Ability Test.
115
The two latter tests are commercially printed and sold by
Harcourt, Brace, and World.
Statistical treatment.—After collection of the data,
the tenability of the hypotheses of the study were tested by
the folloxtfing statistical treatment:
1. The research hypotheses were restated in the null
form.
2. Hypotheses 1, 2, and 5 were tested by the util-
ization of the Pearson Product Moment Coefficient of Cor-
relation. An appropriate table was consulted to determine
the significance of the difference of r from .00 (2, p. 200).
Also, Garrett *s descriptive labels were applied (2, p. 1?3).
3. Hypotheses 3, 6, 7, and 8 were tested by the util-
ization of the significance of the difference between two
means. Fisher's t test was used to ascertain the level of
confidence which could be placed in the difference between
the means.
The findings were arbitrarily rejected or retained
at the .05 level of significance.
Findings
The findings of this investigation are limited to the two
schools in which the data were gathered. It is not intended
that the findings be generalized to other situations dis-
similar to those described for this experiment.
116
Hypothesis l_.~~Qf the forty-nine possible null hypotheses
which could be formulated from Hypothesis 1 as given in
Table VII page 48, forty-one are rejected and eight are
retained. When Garrett's descriptive labels are applied as
in Table VIII page 51, Story Memory (X3) and Total CTC (X?)
have a substantial relationship to academic achievement.
Hypothesis 2, Group 1.--Of the forty-nine possible null
hypotheses which could be formulated from Hypothesis 2 as
given in Table IX page 53> forty are rejected and nine are
retained. When Garrett1s descriptive labels are applied as
in Table X page 55 > Story Memory (X3) and Total CTC (X7)
have a substantial relationship to academic achievement.
Hypothesis 2, Group 2_. —Of the forty-nine possible null
hypotheses which could be formulated from Hypothesis 2 as
given in Table XI page 57» thirty-one are rejected and
eighteen are retained. When Garrett's descriptive labels
are applied as in Table XII page 59, Total CTC (Xr,) has a
substantial relationship to Arithmetic (Yg) but not with
total achievement (Y^).
Hypothesis jk—Experimental groups made significant
mean gains over control groups in curiosity, as indicated in
Table XXI page 76. Group I-fi was significant over Group II-C
at the .001 level. Group II-B was significant over Group I-0
at the .001 level.
117
The experimental, group I-E did not make significant
gains over the control group in reading comprehension. This
is indicated in Table XXVI p. 82. The control group had
greater mean gain than I-E, but it was at less than .05
level of significance. In the second cycle II-S was sig-
nificantly better than I-G. The difference was at greater
than .01 level of confidence.
Hypothesis —Of the sixty-three possible null
hypotheses which could be formulated from Hypothesis k as
given in Table XIII page 61, forty-six are rejected and
seventeen retained. When Garrett's descriptive labels are
applied as in Table IV page 6< , Story Memory (X^) and
Total CTG (Xrj) have a substantial relationship to. academic
achievement.
Hypothesis j5, Group I>.—Of the sixty-three possible
null hypotheses which could be formulated from Hypothesis 5
pertaining to Group I, as given in Table XV page 66, forty
are rejected and twenty-three are retained. Mien Garrett's
descriptive labels are applied as in Table XVI page 68,
Story Memory (X^) and Word Meaning (Y^) have a substantial
relationship. Total GTC (X,-,) has a substantial relationship
with total academic achievement (Y^).
Hypothesis £, Group II.—Of the sixty-three possible
null hypotheses which could be formulated from Hypothesis 5
118
pertaining to Group II as given in Table XVII page 69,
forty-three are rejected and twenty retained. When Garrett's
descriptive labels are applied as in Table XVIII page 72,
Total CTC has a substantial relationship t o total academic
achievement.
Hypothesis 6.—Experimental groups made significant
mean gains over control groups in curiosity as indicated in
Table XXI page 76. Group I-E was significant over II-C at
the .01 level. Group II-E was significant over II-C at the
.02 level.
The experimental groups ma,de significant mean gains
over the control groups in reading comprehension, as indi-
cated in Table XXVI page 82. Group I-S was significant over
II-C at the .01 level, and Group II-E was significant over
I-S at a level greater than .01.
Hypothesis —The null hypothesis relevant to curiosity
was retained, as indicated in Table XXII page 77* The null
hypothesis relevant to reading comprehension was rejected,
as indicated in Table XXVII page 83.
Hypothesis 8.—The null hypothesis relevant to curiosity
was rejected at greater than .05 level of confidence, as
indicated in Table XXII page 77* The null hypothesis rele-
vant to reading comprehension was retained as indicated in
Table XXVII page 83.
119
Hypothesis £.—The null hypothesis was rejected, at
greater than .01 level of significance, as indicated in
Table XXX page 92. The best combination of two variables
was Otis-Lennon (X^) and Story Memory (X^). The best com-
bination of three variables was Otis-Lennon (X-^), Story
Memory (X^), and Total CTC (Xr,). The best combination of
four variables was Otis-Lennon (X^), Story Memory (X^),
Persistence (X^), and Total CTC (Xr,).
Hypothesis 10.—The null hypothesis was rejected at
greater than .01 level of confidence, as indicated in
Table XXXIV page 105* The best predictors when two variables
were combined were Otis-Lennon (X^) and Story Memory (X^)«
The best predictors when three variables were combined were
Otis-Lennon (X-j_), Story Memory (X^), and Desire for Incon-
gruous (X6). The best predictors when four predictors were
combined were Otis-Lennon (Xx), Story Memory (X^), Desire
for Incongruous (X5), and Desire to Know (X^).
Conclusions
Question One
Will curiosity test scores indicate a student's ability
to achieve academically?
1. Based upon the findings related to Hypotheses 1 and
4 as summarized in Table XXXVI, the following may be con-
cluded;
120
TABLE XXXVI
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS RELATED TO QUESTION 1, RELATIONSHIP OF TOTAL ACHIEVEMENT AND
TOTAL CMC
Hypothesis Grade Garrett's Descriptive Labels
r Value
1 1 (N = 2'41)
Substantial .51^*
2 Group I
1 (N = 108) Substantial .580*
2 Group II
1 (N = 133)
Lot? . 3^7*
kr 2 (N = 196)
Substantial .395*
5 Group I
2 (N A 82)
Substantial .1*71*
5 Group II
2 (N = 1.VO
Substantial .i+22*
•^Significant at greater than .01.
a. Total CTC scores can indicate a first-grade
student's ability to achieve academically measured at
the end of a semester.
b. Total CTC scores can indicate a first-grade
student * s ability to achieve academically at the end of
a program designed to stimulate curiosity.
121
2. Based upon the findings related to Hypotheses 2 and 5
as summarized in Table XXXVI, the following conclusions may
be made:
a. Total CTC scores can indicate a second-grade
student's ability to achieve academically, measured at
the end of a semester.
b. Total CTC scores can indicate a second-grade
student's ability to achieve academically, measured at
the end of a program designed to stimulate curiosity.
TABLE XXXVII
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS RELATED TO QUESTION 2 RELEVANT TO CURIOSITY
Hypothesis Group Level of
Confidence
3
(N = 2/4-1)
I-E and II-C
II-E and I-C
Greater than .001
Great er than .001
6
(N = 196)
I-E and II-C
II-E and I~C
Greater than .01
Greater than .02
7
(N = 2 iKL)
I-E and II-E Less than .05
8
(N = I96)
I-E and II-E Greater than .05
122
Question Two
Will the questioning procedures of Bradley and Earp
concomitantly increase the curiosity and reading compre-
hension scores of students? Based upon the findings related
to Hypotheses 3 and 6 as summarized in Tables XXXVII and
XXXVIII relevant to curiosity and reading comprehension, the
following conclusions may be made:
TABLE XXXVIII
SUMMARY OP FINDINGS RELATED TO QUESTION 2 RELEVANT TO READING COMPREHENSION
Hypothesis Group Level of
Confidence
3 (N = 21*1)
I-E and II-C II-S and I~C
Less than .05 Greater than .01
6 (N = 196)
I-E and II-C II-S and I-C
Greater than .01 Greater than .02
7 (N = 2^1)
I-E and II-S Greater than .05
. 8 (N = 196)
I-E and II-E Less than .05
1. First-grade students' curiosity scores can be
increased significantly with the questioning procedures of
Bradley and £&rp, but reading comprehension scores are not
concomitantly increased with the curiosity scores.
123
2. Second-grade students' curiosity and reading
comprehension scores can be increased significantly and con-
comitantly with the questioning procedures advocated by
Bradley and Earp.
Question Three
What are the best predictors of academic achievement
when a combination of test scores is utilized? Based upon
the findings related to Hypothesis 9 relevant to first-grade
students, the following conclusions may be made:
1. Otis-Lennon (X^) and Story Memory (X^) are the best
combination of two variables.
2. Otis-Lennon (X- ), Story Memory (X^), and Total GTC
(Xy) are the best combinations of three variables.
3» Otis-Lennon (X- ), Story Memory (X^), Persistence (X^),
and Total GTG (Xr,) are the best combination of four variables.
Based upon the findings related to Hypothesis 10 rele-
vant to second-grade students, the following; conclusions may
be made:
1. Otis-Lennon (X- ) and Story Memory (X^) are the best
combination of two variables.
2. Otis-Lennon (X- ) , Story Memory (X^), and Desire for
Incongruous (Xg) are the best combinations of three variables.
3. Otis-Lennon (Xx), Story Memory (X^), Desire for
Incongruous (X^), and Desire to Know (Xtj) are the best com-
bination of four variables.
12^
According to the findings relevant to Hypotheses 9
and 10, self appraisal of curiosity may have little relation-
ship to performance in academic achievement.
Implications
Inferred by Analysis of Findings and Conclusions
The following implications were inferred from an analysis
of the findings and conclusions in this study:
1. According to the data related to Question One rele-
vant to Hypotheses 1, 2, and 5> the curiosity battery as
presently organized should be used only as a total battery
rather than scored as separate sub tests. Data relevant to
Hypotheses 9 and 10 is significant in that an implication may
be made indicating sub tests other than Story Memory have
little weight in prediction.
2. The data relevant to Question Two relating concom-
itantly to increase of curiosity and reading comprehension,
may have been limited by the sheer lack of a reading vocab-
ulary. A first grader may not be able to read well enough
to pursue moves to be curious through the printed page.
3» The questioning procedures of Bradley and Earp should
be implemented into the classroom activities of first and
second-grade children. Further, the implication is that
teachers should be taught how to effectively arouse curious
moves intrinsically, using external stimuli similar to the
stimulus cards used in this study.
125
Inferred by Observation During the Course "of the Investigate,on
1. Few teaohers are cognizant of methods for stimulating
divergent thinking through questioning and do not understand
the various categories of thought processes.
2. During the time when materials were being chosen to
be used in the investigation, it was discovered that only
seven of the twelve thinking operations used in the stimulus
kit were found in the standardized tests. The standardized
tests used, were chosen because they required the use of a
larger number of the twelve thinking operations than other
tests perused. The implication is that standardized tests as
now constructed are inadequate for a school program which has
a thinking centered rather than a facts centered curriculum.
3. Thinking operations used as channels for questioning
do not need to be specifically taught during the reading
lesson in order to increase reading comprehension.
Recommendations for Further Research
As a result of this present study the following recom-
mendations are made;
1. Eetter instruments for measuring curiosity need to be
devised, validated, and reliability established through sev-.
eral pilot studies for first-grade children.
2. A further study needs to be made to test a hypothesis
having to do with reading vocabulary in relation to curiosity.
Can first-grade second semester children really pursue their
126
moves to be curious through the abstract process of reading
when limited vocabulary is apparent?
3. A study should be made of curriculum materials used
in first and second-grades to see if they foster an approach
to learning involving the questioning procedures advocated
by Bradley and Earp.
k. The current study should be replicated at other
grade levels using the thinking operations stimulus kit.
5. A study should be made using the thinking operations
stimulus kit x^th students having retardation, learning,
disability, and/or minimal brain injury.
6, Teacher workshops should be conducted in order for
teachers
a. to become orientated to the questioning pro-
cedures of Bradley and Earp with special consideration
given to areas of reading, arithmetic concepts, science,
and social studies; (See Appendix F.)
b. to select and devise thinking operation categories
to be utilized in teaching thinking processes to first
and second-grade students; (See Appendix G.)
c. to build a thinking operations stimulus kit
using pictures, familiar quotations, and famous sayings
which would cause a student to question^
d. to discover ways of planning heterogeneous
groupings for maximum participation of all concerned;
e. to know ways of obtaining rapport and evaluating
the quality of the rapport during the stimulus encounter.
CHAPTER BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Bradley, R. C. and N. Wesley Earp, Exemplars of the Teacher's Cognitive Domain, Dubuque, Iowa, Wm."~C. Brown Co., Inc., 196 7.
2. Garrett, Henry E., Statistics in Psychology and Education, New York, Longman7"^, dreen and Co., 1953. " - —
3. Kelly, Truman L., Richard Madden, Eric F. Gardner, Herbert C. Rudman, Stanford Achievement Test, Directions for Administering, "Primary I"Battery, Mew York, KarcourE,
. and Wo fid 7 Inc., lyStfT "~
Kelly, Truman L., Richard Madden, Eric P. Gardner, Herbert C. Rudman, Stanford Achievement Test, Directions for Administering, Primary Ii Battery, New York, 'Earcourt, Brace, and World, Inc., 19^.
5. Maw, Wallace H. and Ethel W. Maw, "An Exploratory Investi-gation into the Measurement of Curiosity in Elementary School Children," Washington, U.S. Office of Education, 196^.
6. Otis, Arthur 3. and Roger T. Lennon, Otis-Lennon Mental Ability Test, Manual for Administration, Elementary I Level, New York, Harcourt, Brace, and "World, "inc., 1967.
127
A P P E N D I C E S
APPENDIX A
BATTERY A
Name School
Date Boy Girl Teacher_
In this series of short exercises you are asked to tell what you know about yourself*, tell what you would like to discuss**, tell what you remember about some interesting stories4**, tell what you find in some pictures, and solve some puzzles.
In most of the exercises there are no right or wrong answers. You are to tell what you believe to be true.
You are to work on one exercise at a time. You are not to go ahead to the next exercise or turn back to an earlier one. You will be told when to start and stop each exercise. Work quickly but correctly.
P L E A S E S T O P
Do not turn page
until told to do so
* © Wallace H. Maw and Ethel W. Maw, I96I. Used by permission.
* * © B. C. Bradley, 1969. Used by permission.
iMarae_
Room
School
ABOUT MYSELF
Date 130
This is a study of some of your habits and attitudes. There is 110 right or wrong answer for any statement. The best answer is what you feet is true of yourself. For each statement mark X before the w r d which tells how true it is of yourself.
1. I like to explore strange daces,
Never Sometimes Often Always
2. If a grown-up says something, I believe it.
Never Sometimes Often Always
3. When I see a neighbor digging in his yard, I wonder what he is doing.
Never Sometimes Often Always
Mien someone talks about strange things, I want to 'enow more about them.
Never Sometimes Often Always
5. I question things that I !re&d or sfee.
Never Sometimes Often _A I way j
6. When, there is something new in the room, I notice it riprht away.
Never Sometimes Often _Alwaya
7. I like to find out how things work,
Never Sometimes
8. I make, up my mind very quickly.
JJever Sometimes
9. I keep my hands clean.
rjever ' Sometimes
Often
Often
__ALways
Always
Often _Always
10. I keep away from strange and unusual things.
Never Sometimes Often Always
11. I ask questions in school.
Never Sometimes Often JVlways
12, When someone tells something; strange, I doubt the truth of it.
Never Sometimes Often Always
13. When I see a base or boy that I haven't seen "before, I peek into it to see what is there.
Never Sometimes Often Alt-rays
131
14. I take things apart to see how they work.
Never Sometimes Often Always
15. I believe the things I read in books.
Never Sometimes Often Always
16. Whenever I see a film, I see things that other people miss.
Never Sometimes Often Always
17. When I see my neighbors getting into their oar, I wonder where they are going.
Never Sometimes Often Always
18. I find that things puzzle me.
Never Sometimes Often Always
19. I grow out of my shoes before I wear them out.
Never sometimes Often Always
20. I like to find, out as much-as I can before I make up my mind.
Never Sometimes Often ^Always
21. I keep my clothes neat and clean.
Never Sometimes Often Always
22. When I see something new, I want to know what it is.
Never Sometimes Often Always
23. After I visit a new place, I like to learn more about it.
Never Sometimes Often Always
2k, When I see people I know going along the street, I wonder where they are going.
^ Never Sometimes Often _Always
25. I like people who are adventurous.
Never Sometimes Often _Always
26. I have a lot of curiosity.
Never Sometimes
27. I like to discover new things.
Never Sometimes
132
Often'
Often
_Always
Always
28. T/Jhen I see something nev, I want to know how much it cost.
Never Sometimes Often Always
29. I notice things that other people do not see,
Never Sometimes Often
30. I like to look around inside old buildings.
Never Sometimes Often
Always
Always
31. I believe things I hear or see.
Never Sometimes Often Always
32. I like to play with children who are adventurous.
Never Sometimes . Often ^Always
33. I ask about things I want to knofa.
Never Sometimes Often _AlwayS
3^„ When a new house is be ins: built, I watch the men working and look around for new things.
Never Sometimes Often Always
35. I take good care of my toys and. school supplies.
Never Some times Often
36. I think I can be called an adventurous person.
Never Sometimes Often
37. I like to find out how things are made.
Never Sometimes Often
_Always
_Always
Always
38. When I see a strange machine, I go up to it and look at it,
Never Sometimes Often _Always
39• My parents encourage me to ask questions.
Never Sometimes Often ^Always
133 ho, I like to look around, the room.
Never Sometimes , Often Always
.l. I like to x*ork on puzzles until I solve them.
Never Sometimes Often Always
DO YOU KNOW?
THERE 1 3 AIM ANIMAL CALLED A HYDRA. I T LOOKS LIKE THIS
I T CAN CHANGE ITS SHAPE. I F A HYDRA I S CUT IN HALF THE
PARTS GROW INTO TWO HYDRAS, I T TAKES SOME TIME BUT AFTER
A WEEK OR SO EACH PIECE GROWS NSW LEGS JUST WHERE LEGS
OF HYDRAS SHOULD BE.
HYDRAS LIVE IN PONDS. PONDS ARE CALLED TANKS IN
TEXAS. TANKS HOLD WATER, PEOPLE CANNOT GROW EXTRA PARTS
LIKE HYDRAS. I T I S STRANGE HOW A HYDRA CAN BE CUT IN TWO
PARTS AND EACH PART THEN GROWS INTO A NEW HYDRA. ONCE
A SCIENTIST UNDERSTANDS WHAT MAKES HYDRAS GROW, HE WILL
KNOW MORE ABOUT HOW PEOPLE GROW.
© R. C. B r a d l e y 1969
DO YOU KNOW?
135
1. The story of an animal that changes its shaue was abouts
a pond.
a tank
&• hydra
a scientist
2, The strangest thing about this story was?
a hydra, likes to swim
a hydra grows slowly
9. hydra grows in a strange way
. a person is like a hydra
3. If you had a chance to read, more about hydras, which
of these things would you want to know more about!
how hydras live in tanks?
how people grow?
why ponds are called tanks?
what makes hydras grow new parts?
k. Put an X on the picture which shows that a hydra has
been cut into two parts;
5. Put an X on the picture of the hydra which has grown
new partss
© R. C. Bradley 19^9
DO YOU KNOW? I36
THIS I S A PICTURE OF A CRAB.
A CRAB LIVES BY THE SEA. HE LIKES TO EAT THE FOOD THAT WAVES
OF WATER WASH UP ON THE SAND. THE WAVES CARRY FOOD AND THINGS
ONTO THE LAND. WHICH HE LIKES TO EAT. AS THE WATER GOES BACK INTO
THE OCEAN, SOME FOOD I S LEFT ON THE SAND. AS THE WAVES FALL BACK
INTO THE OCEAN, THE CRAB RUNS OUT IN HIS SLOW WAY AND LOOKS FOR
FOOD. WHEN THE WAVES COME BACK ONTO THE LAND, THE CRAB RESTS.
THE CRAB ALSO CHANGES COLOR EACH DAY. HE I S DARK IN THE DAY,
AND LIGHT IN COLOR AT NIGHT. I F YOU TOOK A CRAB AWAY FROM H I S
FRIENDS WHO LIVE ON THE BEACH, HE WOULD TURN DARE: IN COLOR AT THE
SAME TIME HIS FRIENDS TURN DARK M O STILL LIVE AT THE BEACH. A
PET CRAB ALSO WOULD TURN DARK. I F YOU BROUGHT A CRAB TO SCHOOL
THAT YOU FOUND ON THE BEACH, HE WOULD WANT TO RUN- AND PLAY AND
LOOK FOR FOOD AT THE TIME H I S FRIENDS BACK AT THE BEACH WOULD WANT
TO RUN AND PLAY AND LOOK FOR FOOD.
© H ' C. B r a d l e y 19&9
DO YOU KNOW?
137
I, This story was about;
a fish
a waterfall
a. crab
sand
2, The strangest thins: about this story was:
waves left food on the sand
_ crabs changed color
crabs liked to eat
_ crabs"make good pets
3« If .you had a ch3nce to read more about crabs, which of these things would you want to know more about:
how waves work for crabs
what makes a crab change color
_why crabs look for food
_why crabs rest
Put an X on the picture which tells that it is dark outside:
5. Put an X on the picture of the crab which show?; that it is dark and time to search for food.
;v£4.st-f£
© B. C. Bradley 1969
MOTHER BIRD HAS LOST HER BABIES. HOW MANY CAN YOU FIND FOR HER?
Z>
J
(c) copyright R C Bradley 1969 139
$
m /)
1
JMNS'I SCHOOL BUS IS WAITING POH IIEH.
M
THIS IS A FUNNY PICTURE. MARK AN X
ON EVERYTHING YOU SEE THATS WRONG.
v (c)Copyright R C Bradley 1969
14.1 THIS IS A TRAPEZOID TREE.
THIS IS A TRAPEZOID: / ] zzz\ ^ CAM YOU FIND HOW MANX TRAPEZOIDS ARE IN A TRAPEZOID TREE?
HOW MANY?
(o) copyright R. C, Bradley 19&9
WHAT GROWS INTO WB'iT ?
A t a d p o l e grows i n t o a • Draw a l i n e f rom each £;mal..L o b j e c t t o a word which . t e l l s what i t . grows i n t o .
1^-2
-PI owe r s
r o 3
O a k 4 r e e
O
PA
m
C a f
D o 3
C W b n
B u - f j - e r P l y
( c ) Copyr ight R.C. B rad ley 1969
a>3
Name
Room
School Date
WHICH TO DISCUSS?
You are told that there is a story about each figure in the sets below. If you could hear only one story for each set, which one of the three signs would you select? Draw a circle around the one sign in each set you would want to discuss.
1. .
2.
kJ K.)
x
7.
8.
o ~ o o o
3.
u.
5.
6.
I 9.
10.
11
rv
12.
\ J
13. 20. o
a lU. 21.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
t=>
/ 22.
W V 23.
2U.
"1 O Vl 25-
26.
Iks
27. 3h.
o 28. 35.
29.
30.
9 S> J 3
31.
32.
X 7^ 33.
rui
36.
37.
38.
a TJ
o Q Q
0 0 t
ooo 66. 9x)
APPENDIX B
BATTERY 3
Name School
Date Boy Girl Teacher
In this series of short exercises you are asked to tell what you know about yourself*, tell what you would like to discuss*, tell what you remember about some interesting stories**, tell what you find in some pictures, and solve some puzzles.
In most of the exercises there are no right or wrong answers. You are to tell what you believe to be true.
You are to work on one exercise at a time. You are not to go ahead to the next exercise or turn back to an earlier one. You will be told when to start and stop each exercise. Work quickly but correctly.
P L E A S E S T O P
Do not turn page
until told to do so
* @ Wallace H. Maw and Ethel W. Maw, 1961. Used by permission.
** (c) R. C. Bradley, 1969. Used by permission.
1 hX
Name School Date
Room
ABOUT KYSEL?
This is P {study of some of your habits and attitudes. There is no ri^ht or wrong answer for any statement. The best answer is what you feel is true of yourself. For each statement mark X before the word which tells how true it is of yourself.
1. I like to see new things.
Never Sometimes Often Always
2. If I see something strange on television I think about it.
Never Sometimes Often Always
3. When I see men dlogins' on an old lot, I wonder what they are going to build.
Never Sometimes Often Always
k, When I hear a story that is hard to believe, I want to learn more about it.
Never Sometimes Often Always
5. X ask people things that X don't know.
Never Sometimes Often Always
6. If there is something different on our street, I see it right away.
Never Sometimes Often Always
?. I want to know how things work.
Never Sometimes Often Always. .
8. I can find out about things very auiekly.
Never Sometimes Often Always
9. The things I do at home keep me very clean.
_ Never Sometimes _ Often Always
10. If I see something strange I want to know sny more about it.
Never Sometimes < Often Always
11. I ask my teacher many Questions when I want to know about some-thing.
Never Sometimes Often Always
(ct} R. C. Bradlffv iQf'o
1^8
12. If I come across something I haven't heard about before, I doubt if it in true.
Never '• Sometimes Often Always;
13. If mother brings! In a boy I haven't Keen before, I can't vait to i?ee T'hat' in it.
Never Sometimes ' . Often Always
1^. I like to take things apart.
Never Sometimes: Often . Always
1-5. I believe most things: I nee on television.
Never otae times jOften Always
16. Whenever I see a science'film, I often see things: other children miss.
Never Sometimes: Often Alv.T0.yy
17. When I s:ee my friends dressed 'up to ,<ro somewhere, I ^onder where they are going.
Never -Sometimes •' Often Always
18. I find that noisy objects puzzle me.
Never _J3ome times . Often Alijay<i
19< tty folks believe I wear out my "clothes.
Never Sometimes : Often Always
20. I try to find out all I cr.n before I woke up my mind to do sbme thing.
Never Sou? times Often Always*
21. I keep neat and clean.
Never Sometimes Often Always
22. If I see something which puzzles me, I want to know more about it.
Never Sometimes Often Always '
23, After I read about a new place, I !®nt to read more about it.
Never Sometimes _ Often Always
1^9
2k, As people pass my bouse, I wonder where they might be going.
Never Sometimes. jOften __A'lways
25. I .Like to have friends; vrho explore.
Never oometimns Often
28. When something look#: nev to me, I want it.
Never Sometimes Often
29. I notice things my classmates seldom sen.
Never Sometimes Often
30. I like to hike and explore.
Never Sometimes Often
31. I "believe things most people tell me.
Never Sometimes Often
32. I like to have friends who are curious.
Never Sometimes Often
33• I ask anyone who can tell me things I want to know.
Never Sometimes Often
_Always
26. I have much more curiosity than most of my friends.
Never _ Sometimes Often • Always
27. I like to search for new things.
Never Sometimes Often Always
Always
Always
^Always
Always
Always
Always
3 » I like to find things no one wants and play make believe that they are something else.
Never Sometimes Often Always
•35. X known as one who cares for his toys, playthings, and books,
Never Sometimes Often Always-
36, I believe I am a curious child.
, Never Sometime a Often Always
150
3?. I ask peotj'.le who have t h i n g s t h a t look s t r a n g e how they a r e made.
Never ^on-otlme?: Of ten _Alv7ays
38. I f I .-;ee a s t r a n g e c a r , I ™ant to go up and look a t i t .
j.\iever Sometime?! Of ten _Alwa yr:
39. My parent?: g i v e me a chance to exp lore and. f i n d out new t h i n g s .
j.\i"ever Of ten Always
ij-O. I l i k e to go doratoMi i u ' t to look around.
Never Sometimes Of t en Always
^1. I l i k e to TOrk on p i c t u r e m i z z l e s .
Never Sometime i=; Of ten ' Always
DO YOU- KNOW?
THIS IS A GRASSHOPPER. £
HE HAS A HEAD, A NECK, AND A STOMACH. HIS EYES ARE ON THE SIDES
OF HIS HEAD. THE LONG HAIRLIKE ANTENNAE ARE CALLED "FEELERS".
THESE FEELERS SERVE TO PICK UP SOUND AND TO TELL THE GRASSHOPPER
IF HE IS TOUCHING SOMETHING. HIS EARS ARB PUT IN A STRANGE PLACE.
YOU WILL FIND THEM ON HIS STOMACH.
BIRDS LIKE GRASSHOPPERS TO EAT. CROWS ARE BIG BLACK BIRDS.
THEY REALLY LIKE GRASSHOPPERS TO EAT. IT TAKES MANY GRASSHOPPERS
TO FILL THE STOMACH OF A CROW. YOU CAN SEE WHY CROWS ARE A GRASS_
HOPPER"S WORST ENEMY.
INDIANS ONCE ROASTED GRASSHOPPERS FOR DESSERT. THEY HUNTED
BUFFALOES FOR THEIR HIDES AND USED BUFFALO MEAT FOR STEAKS. INDIAN
HUNTERS WERE VERY SMART. THE INDIAN HUNTER USED TO LIE DOWN ON
THE GROUND WITH HIS EAR NEXT TO THE DIRT TO LISTEN FOR STAMPEDING
BUFFALO. WITH HIS EAR CLOSE TO THE GROUND, THE INDIAN COULD HEAR .
SOUNDS AND FEEL THE SHAKING OF THE GROUND IF BUFFALOES WERE MOVING
VERY FAST.
© R. C. Bradley
152
: DO YOU KNOW?
1. The best name for this story is:
a . Indian Hunters
b Buffaloes
Gra sshoppers
d Grasshoppers, Crows, and Indians
2. A strange thing about grasshoppers is that they:'
a__ have eyes
k have ears close to the ground
o _fly
d are chased by crows
3. Grasshoppers' ears are located on their stomachs because:
a they like them there
k there was no room on top
they could hear the crows slipping up through the grass
^ grasshoppers are funny
If a train track were near your home, you would know a train was passing, by:
a riding your bicycle to the track
b . seeing it from the roof of your house
o putting your ear to the ground
^ s t e n i n g to a friend tell you
© copyright R. C. Bradley 1969
153 DO YOU KNOW?
THIS STORY I S ABOUT LIZARDS. ONE LIZARD I S -CALLED A WHIP-
TAIL LIZARD BECAUSE HE USES HIS TAIL LIKE A WHIP AND SCARES OF?
H I S ENEMIES* THE OTHER LIZARD IN THIS -STORY I S A SPINY LIZARD.
H I S SPINES ARE TOUGH, ROUGH PIECES OF HARD SKIN THAT MAKE I T HARD
FOR OTHER ANIMALS TO BITE HIM. I T MAY 3E STRANGE TO FIND OUT THAT
THESE TWO TYPES OF LIZARDS DO HAVE THE SAMS THINGS TO KEEP THEM
WARM OR MAKE THEM COLD, BUT THE '//HIP-TAIL LIZARD I S ALWAYS ABLE TO
STAY WARMER THAN A SPINY LIZARD.
THESE TWO LIZARDS ARE ABLE TO USE THE THINGS THAT AID THEM IN
STAYING WARM AND STAYING COLD IN DIFFERENT WAYS. A LIZARD CAN HELP
HIMSELF STAY AS COOL AS HE WANTS IN THE HOT SUMMER TIME BY THE WAY
HE BREATHES AND 3Y CHANGING COLOR TO TAKE IN MORE OF THE HEAT FROM
THE SUN. HE ALSO MAY CHOOSE A PLACE TO BE IN THE SUN SO AS TO GET
HOT, OR HE MAY CHOOSE A SHADY PLACE OUT AWAY FROM THE SUN TO KEEP
COOL. IN FACT, THE WAY HE LIES IN THE SUN CHANGES HOW COOL HE WILL
BE. I F HE FACES AWAY FROM THE SUN, HE I S COOLER THAN I F HE TURNS
H I S EODY LONGWAYS SO THAT THE SUN'S RAYS HIT MORE OF HIS BODY.
HE MAY CHOOSE TO L I E ON A COOL
ROCK IN THE SHADE DURING THE HOT
SUMMER, OR L I E ON A ROCK THAT"S
OUT IN THE SUN WHEN HE'S COLD IN
THE WINTER.
NOW YCU CAN SEE THAT A LIZARD CAN KEEP WARM OR COOL BY ( l ) THE
WAY HE BREATHESj ( 2 ) BY CHANGING COLOR, ( 3 ) BY CHOOSING A PERFECT
PLACE TO L I E WHERE IT I S COOL OR WARM, AND ( ^ ) BY THE WAY HE LIES
IN THE SUN.
( p ) c o p y r i g h t R. C. B r a d l e y 1969 ( o v e r )
DO YOU KNOW?
SCIENTISTS TELL US THAT THE! COLOR BLACK TAKES IN THE SUN'S
HEAT AND MAKES A THING HOTTER THAN A LIGHT COLOR. THIS I S THE
REASON THAT IN THE SUMMER TIME A CAR WITH A BLACK ROOF WILL BE
SOMEWHAT HOTTER I N S I D E WHEN THE WINDOWS ARE ROLLED U P , THAN WILL BE
A CAR WITH A WHITE ROOF.
155
DO YOU KNOW?
1. Which lizard is always cooler?
whip-tailed lizard
•spiny lizard
2. Which lizard is always hotter?
whip-tai led lizard
spiny lizard
3. Which lizard should be cooler if he is lying in the hot sun?
a black lizard
a light green lizard
A man living in Texas in the summer time said, "My car is
always hotter than yours when I leave the windows up and
go to get into it." His car roof is probably:
light in color
dark in color
© copyright R. C. Bradley I969
TOO M Y HATS. PUT Ajtf X 0N EVERYONE YOU 'SEE. 156
[f
Q^iisP, (W
© copyright R G Bradley 1969
15?
GEANDMwTHE&B
mmM $
0 3
z e
MAHK^HB1 s h o r t ' U 8 S YOUR pencil to
/
(c)Copyright R.C„ Bradley I969
THIS IS A FUNNY PICTUR3. MASK AN X ON EVERYTHING YOU SEE TEATS WRONG,
159 THIS I S A TRIANGLE TREE.
THIS I S A TRIANGLE
CAN YOU FIND HOW M Y . TRIANGLES ARE IN A TRIANGLE TREE?
HOW MANY ?
(cT) c o p y r i g h t R. G. B r a d l e y 1969
16 0
WHAT GROWS INTO WHAT ?
. Draw e l i n e f rom each a b u l b grow; i n t o _____ s m a l l o b j e c t t o word which c e l l s what i t grows i n t o ,
B i M
f I owe rS
C o w
V / o man
1 u 1 i PS
W'o r m
P y od ( c ) Copyr igh t R, G. Brad ley 1969
. 161
Name
Room
School
Date
WHICH TO DISCUSS?
You axe told that there is a story about each figure in the sets below. If you could hear only one story for each set, which one of the three signs would you select? Draw a circle around the one sign in each set you would want to discuss.
1.
O
2.
C z k C Z I <C=3 C Z > &
3.
h.
5.
o 0
o o
7.
9.
10.
11.
8.
Q -
1 / V
o
n
o
6. 12.
162
lfc.
m'
15.
i, p -
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
2h.
25.
26.
O <b
O O
a
r ^ i
163
r\
-29.
30.
31.
32
3h.
J
35.
36.
V
37.
A ~ 7 \ / V V ^ <
38.
V \ / \
39.
Uo.
A < 1 >
V
k>
i>
APPENDIX C
THINKING OPERATION S SKILLS
Facts and Prinoip3.es in New Situations. —Using
what has been learned in one situation in an entirely new
situation, discriminating that 'which is relevant from that
which is irrelevant.
Assuming.—Taking for granted that which may be true or
false.
Classifying.--Involves analysis and synthesis and is
sorting things into groups according to set principles.
Collecting and Organizing Data.—Examining and defining
the findings, then placing them in a prescribed order (1st,
2nd, 3rd, etc.).
Comparing.-.-Observing differences and similarities with
the specific purpose of ascertaining what relationship one
has with the other.
Criticizing.—Not finding fault or censoring, but
making appraisals on the basis of standards set by previous
experience or by alternative standards set by others.
Hypothesizing.—Proposing a possible solution to a
certain problem.
Imagining.•—Forming some kind of idea about that which
is not formally present and/or not fully experienced.-
1 £}i
165
Interpreting.—Explaining the meaning of experiences by
the process of understanding what has been put into and
extracted from these experiences.
Observing.—fetching, noting, perceiving details, pro-
cedures, or substance.
Recalling.--Listing, naming, or bringing forth from
memory.
Summarlzing.•—Briefly stating what has been presented;
restating of the big idea in much shorter form.
APPENDIX D
Jack /\<Jlvisson, M . O . 4 6 1 3 € 3 L A C I E R S T R E E T
F O R T W O R T H , T E X A S 7 6 1 1 5
y Pho.VE: (a 1 7 ) W A 7 - B S 2 1
a o s? emb er 19 > 19&9 (214) 9 9 s - 6 71 s
Dr. Wallace H. Maw University of Delaivare Uewark, Delaware
Dear Dr. Maw:
In pursuing a tentative proposal for a dissertation study at North Texas State University dealing with thinking operations and curiosity acts of First and Secona G-rade children, I would like to obtain permission from you to use your expei-imental materials as f ollcvra j
(1) "\Vhioh to Discuss?" test
(2) "About Myself" test
(3) "What Would You Do?" test with modifications; namely, use two alternatives in lieu of four, since this study mil" deal only with First and Second Grades, the teacher having to read the questions as y/ell as the answers»
Thus, I'm asking to use the aforementioned tests, (1) and (2), exactly as they are, and am seeking in (3) permission to use your idea of test construc-tion, placing it on the attention span and natural line of thinking of First Grade children. (A tentative example of this is enclosed,,)
Yours very sincerely,
(vLv/ fr / ' A -;'7 Jack Adkisson
JA/rla
Permission to use the data mentioned above in this letter and in accordance Tsri'ch the stipulations as outlined above, is hereby granted.
'Jul*. Wallace Ho Maw
i /• /• iojh G.X Info M&YtT
APPENDIX E
THE PILOT PROGRAM
Having worked previously with the thinking operations
in the way advocated "by Bradley and Earp and recognizing the
need of the development of ideas which could be used with
very young children, there was initiated intermittently
throughout the Pall Terra of 1969 actual face to face contact
with groups of first and second-grade children. Questions
and pictures were tried on individuals, small groups (three
to five), and complete classes in Farmer's Branch Elementary
School (a team teaching school) and two conventional schools
in Piano that had the usual self contained classroom modi-
fications.
The tests have been tried on 150 first-grade and 120
second~gra.de public school children. Although permission
was received to use the test reliability scores for all
tests devised by Maw and Maw, Bradley and Adkisson determined
their own reliability scores on responses obtained from 270
primary children. These tests were given as test, retest,
Form A first and Form B second, tiro weeks apart. The data
was randomized to 60 subjects and correlated, using the
computer at North Texas State University.
Maze type tests and the like were (if not of a com-
mercial nature) constructed, revised, and finalized under
168
the guidance and help of teachers of first and second
graders. However, the evaluations of these tests offered
by the participating teachers were used with certain
reservations. Among these reservations were; (1) the
likelihood that teachers were not as aware of how to use
thinking operations as a springboard to studying certain
kinds of information available in the isolated fashion shown
on the cards; (2) the possibility that these teachers did
not necessarily hold in high regard concepts of curiosity
if, in fact, they were known; and (3) because the conven-
tional procedure of instruction typically used by most pri-
mary level teachers would not hold valid certain opinions
that test items, the thought procedure being used, and
related high level teaching operations could be done by
pupils in early primary education.
The opinions of the teachers were primarily sought
regarding how the children were receptive to the men who
were reading the tests to which oral responses were sought,
the efficiency of the speed with which items were read,
whether or not items were being clearly perceived by the
youngsters, and if the procedure used for "pacing" responses
was adequate.
APPENDIX P
STIMULATING CHILDREN TO THINK
Applying the Experimental Program R. C. Bradley, M . D.
The following information may be helpful in extending
the use of the information placed on each cf the Thinking
Operations Cards in your possession. Each of the thought
processes for this experiment are identified and an outline
is given for presentation of the information found on the
cards.
Applying Facts and Principles in New Situations
The cards give situations. You are to describe a sit-uation and then ask the student to predict the outcome in given circumstances. In some instances the child is asked to solve a problem. For each instance, cite the information that the child is to apply, and then give him the new situ-ation.
E.g. Situation needing solution: We x*jant to give two candy canes to each of the children in this group. Data given: 30 children. Ask, "How many candies do we need? How do you get that? How do you know you are right?"
E.g. Situation given: "You have three colors with which to paint a picture, yellow, blue, and red. What do you think will happen ttfhen yellow and blue are mixed? Red and blue? If you guessed correctly, what were the reasons for your predictions?" Generally instruction stops when we receive an answer to the question, but in this work we would like you to extend a child's learning to answer this ques-tion, "Why do you think so?" That is, "What would happen when you drop a magnet into a box of tacks? Why do you think so?" In the course of teaching, seek to correct all notable misconceptions.
170
Observing.--Cards are provided for the accumulation, of facts"as a means to a general intellectual conclusion, not for the accumulation of isolated facts only. When pupils view and discuss these cards, they are getting practice in noticing and describing. The teacher is to help them differentiate between what actually was observed and any assumptions made from the observation. "What did you actually see on the card?" "What made you say that?" "Are you sure that was shown on the card?" "Did you read some-thing else into the idea?" "What might have caused you to believe that was on this card?" "Name once again exactly what you saw."
Recalling.—Cards illustrating this thought process are shown or read, and the pupils are asked to respond to the questions written on the back of the cards. Pupils are experiencing listing, naming, and bringing forth from memory something learned previously. We are dealing here with immediate recall. However, some cards are made to be intro-duced later in the study which then causes children to rely upon information learned earlier in the study. Recall is based generally upon the pupil's attentiveness to what was being viewed in the first place. After observing, a pupil usually reports. • The teacher should seek to discover the accuracy of the report. Therefore, what was once observed must be recalled. Checking perceptions (perceivings) is much easier than checking recollections (rememberings). Consequently, these cards are used to increase memory span. The child is helped to discover an individual system that he might use in recalling information at a later time. The teacher says, "What can you do to help you recall this data if I ask for it again sometime?" "'What is it that you will try to recall?" "What can you do to remember this infor-mation?" "What is it that is important about this?" "Do you have a way of remembering this?" "What ideas go together that might help you remember this?" "What is strange about this idea?" "What is helpful about this idea?"
Summarizing.—These cards are used to help students learn how to determine what is significant and what is not, what is relevant and what is not, what is pertinent and what is not, what is essential and what is not. Consequently, the teacher presents card experiences which help him to synthesize material, determine what is important, and then to restate the essential points in a meaningful and sequential verbal presentation.
E.g.: A story is read, and a student tells the real meaning in one sentence. A series of pictures are shown, and a student tells in two or three sentences the summary ideas of the sequence. Hence, these cards can be used to present broad ideas, but the students are expected to restate only the gist of the matter or the.big idea or ideas.
171
Assuming.—In this activity we need to help the children understand that to make an assumption is not necessarily wrong, but that we want them to know that an assumption is being made. We look at an orange and say it is "orange" in color. This clearly is observable. Some assumptions are based then upon strong bits of evidence. However, when we look at an orange and say it is "seedless" or that it "has seeds" the strength of evidence becomes less. One might look at an apple and say, "It has seeds." We cannot see the seeds, but it is a reasonable assumption that it does have seeds, recognizing the possibility that this may not be so. To look at an apple and say that all apples are red is to make a rather broad assumption. When cards are used dealing with assumption making, seek to find out how the pupils are guess-ing that something is true. Ask the pupil to give evidence or support for his statements and beliefs about the situation.
E.g.: Two cars are in a race. Car 1 reaches the end of the race ahead of Car 2. Can we conclude that Car 1 is faster? Perhaps Car 2 had a flat. Pupils are led to see that Car l's being believed to be faster is one's choice as an assumption. Pupils are taught to recognize that further evidence would be needed before one could determine which car really was faster.
Classifying. •—Children who respond to these cards are being asked, to arrange a variety of items according to cat-egory or groups. The child is learning to see distinct relationships among ideas and. concrete items. Discussion centers upon how to set up categories rather than on placing the objects into established groups. An important element that children learn is that setting up groups must be done with selected purposes in mind. Ask the pupil to reveal why he has made those groups. Are there other groupings just as significant (important)? He learns that his purpose deter-mines the nature of his categories.
E.g.: If a list of words were given (ball, drum, wagon, eggs, cake, sled, nuts, hat, muff, apple, dress, mitten), the pupil might be asked to determine the categories under which these words might be appropriately placed (We eat; we put onj we play).
Collecting and organizing data.—Cards of this type are used to help a pupil seek logical pattern, sequence, and informational arrangement. For determining if a child can see the sequence of events the teacher asks, "What is the first thing you want to tell?" "What should come next?" "In what order should these things be placed to tell a story?"
E.g.: Trace the movement of the planting of seed potato to its final placement in a can at the factory. Or, ask the
1?2
pupils to enumerate the steps involved in making of butter, and write what they find, as a step by step outline.
E.g.: Pictures of buildings in a community can be used to show which came first. Or, recreation can be organized by the seasons. Use of numbering systems, alphabetizing, and sizes and weights can be used to show how things are organized for various purposes. Therefore, the pupil who responds to these cards is learning something of the col-lection and organization of data, a system used quite often in our society.
Comparing.—Through the use of these cards the pupils are learning to understand what steps are involved in making accurate comparisons. First, there is the element of observ-ing, of noting details. Then, there Is a mental sorting of these details, so that both similarities and differences of the objects being compared are noted with respect to their influence on one's interpretation to a question.
E.g.: If a child responds, "An 11 year old boy in the suburbs is more civilized than an 11 year old boy in the Congo," the teacher should not judge these comparative points right or wrong, but only question for additional evi-dence. That is, "What else can you think of that is differ-ent about the activities of a boy in the Congo and one in suburban Dallas?" "What is similar about the family struc-ture of a Congolese and a suburban boy?" Moreover, search-ing for likes and dislikes makes food for thought for comparative purposes.
Criticizing.—The pupil is taught that criticizing is not mere fault finding or censuring. These cards are used to help the pupil see the basis for any criticisms that he chooses to make. After a child criticizes a picture, object, or idea, it is well to ask for his evidence to support his comments. When the child responds, "I don't like it," or "It's not good," the teacher should help him examine his reasons for feeling that way. Say,"T,tiy do you like it?" or "Why do you think that isn't any good?" If the pupil says, "I don't know," follow with, "You like this, but you really don't know why you do. Is that right?" The child may pursue the question further. Indeed, the teacher may want to respond, "Do you not like the picture because it is not colored?" Not only is the purpose here to help children criticize but to do so with good judgment and to find a basis for supporting what they are saying negatively or positively.
Hypothesizing.—The primary purpose of these cards is to lay a basis for a discussion which involves helping pupils to understand and consider the variety of possibilities which may be involved in arriving at the explanation of a phenom-enon. They are being taught that an hypothesis is an edu-cated guess, a reasonable possibility, a tentative explanation
173
of something they have observed or have been told about. They will find that in some instances more than one hypoth-esis may provide an appropriate explanation of a given phenomenon.
E.g.: Fred did a problem involving addition. It was a three column figure containing 8 rows of numbers. His answer was incorrect. What do you think the trouble might have been? (Responses may vary as below:)
a. It might be that he forgot to invert the divisor. b. Perhaps he was feeling ill and could not think
clearly. c. Maybe Fred was not taught how to do this. d. He may not have read his problem clearly.
As the teacher works with these cards, she should be ready to accept any reasonable possibility offered by the children as an hypothesis. Thus, the more hypotheses given about each card and the more discussion, the more likely children can arrive at the feasibility of selecting one hypothesis over another. In any event, consideration must be given to analyzing those hypotheses that are most worthy of being further tested.
Imagining.--These cards are used to allow a child to enjoy thinking in a fanciful wo rid: he can be what he wants to be, can take an imaginative trip and go beyond the real world. In so doing, however, he must ponder upon what his real world is about and why he likes to leave it in thought. In these card experiences the teacher asks the pupils to fancy freely what they would do if.... "What if today were a day in which electricity did not work?" "If you owned a magic carpet, what would you do?11
Interpreting.--The information on these cards deals with ways of deriving meaning from children's experiences. When children are asked how they got that particular meaning from an experience, they are being asked to give supporting details in defense of their interpretations. Consequently, these cards can be used to judge whether the data of the experience supports the interpretation, and whether or not a . generalization is being made upon the basis of insufficient evidence. Maps, charts, graphs, illustrations, photographs, and the like are used for these purposes.
It should be remembered that the data given on the card must support the interpretation. Discussions should center • upon the data on the card. Extension of information can be provided by going beyond the evidence in the illustration wherein time permits. In the stories provided, the pupils should be asked to check their verbal statements against the facts in the story or picture to see if the data support the interpretation.
1?'+
Some Do's mid. Don'ts About the Experimental Program
by Jack Adkisson
Do's*—1. Do recognize that this experiment is a very-essential study to test teaching procedure as to the benefits of teaching facts versus leading children to think and ques-tion. You are not just helping a person get a doctorate, but you are testing a procedure being advocated by professors in some of the leading universities in the United States.
2. Do recognize that you are a vital part in this exper-iment. It is very important for you to complete the assigned program every school day. Consistency is the absolute essen-tial.
3. Do three or more Thinking Skills Cards every day in sessions lasting from three to five minutes. A minimum of 15 cards per x?eek or a total of 108 cards should be used during the seven weeks of the experiment. There is no maxi-mum limit. Use as many cards as you desire.
Do take 6 thinking operations stimulus cards from the kit at one time. Work through the thinking operations in order, starting with one and going through twelve. At the end of the study you should total at least 9 cards (exposures) for each thinking operation. Many teachers will total more than this because they will learn to use 6 or more cards in one session.
5. Do innovate questioning procedures into subject areas during the study, especially reading, science, and social • studies. Bradley and Earp state in Exemplars of the Teacher*s Cognitive Domain, "To both teacher and pupil the ability to structure and raise questions is as important as the ability to answer. If children are taught to formulate stimulating questions, then the teacher can find his place in accommo-dating the pupil's sense of direction" (p. 67). Pre-questioning 'tunes' the child to the learning experience to the extent that he is searching for further information when the unit is ultimately introduced" (p. 69). Also,, during the study you should through questioning on your part and on the part of the student "develop a divergent line of thinking other than that passed by the textbook author" (p. 67), * Mays found that questioning increased achievement in fifth grade students whether it was done by the teacher or by the student.
6. Do read Bradley and Earp, and Raths' books. Paper clips are placed on pertinent pages, and much information
175
relating to this study has been •underlined. These books are placed with or near the Thinking Operations Kit. Please share these books. Make sure they are available to others.
7. Do expect to get a copy of the 500 word abstract of the dissertation. It will be sent to you in August. Also, a bound copy of the complete dissertation will be given to Dr. Hendrick for the Piano District's professional library. However, because binderies are notoriously slow, do not ex-pect it to be available before November 1970.
8. Do keep a systematic tabulation of the 5 minute sessions and the number of stimulus cards used. A tabulation table is furnished on the front of your manual for you to keep your tabulations current at all times. Make a diagonal mark for each card used during a 5 minute session, then circle, indicating a session, as; . lour tabulation table should be returned with all other materials at the end of the seven weeks of the experiment. Also, you should initial and date each stimulus card used, and return it to the file on that day. This will help keep an adequate number of "good" cards in circulation.
9. Do call for help when you need it. Call day or night, ^2^1—6715• If you are absent for any reason, please call if you desire that the researcher help the substitute teacher present the stimulus cards for that day. The stimulus cards need to be presented 3 each day consistently day after day of the seven weeks.
Don'ts.—1. Don11 fail to initial every stimulus card used before returning it to the kit.
2. Don't take this study lightly. It is funded by the State of Texas through the Elementary Biucation Faculty of North Texas State University. Dr. R. G. Bradley was awarded the research grant, and the researcher is assistant to him for this study.
3» Don't miss a day with the assumption that you will make it up later. Consistency is essential for maximum results. A hit or miss procedure will not produce an adequate experimental study, deciding one of the major issues facing educators today.
Don't fail to mark your tabulation chart after using each stimulus card. Know where you are at all times. Use 3 or more stimulus cards each day, 15 or 16 each week, or 108 plus as a total. Go through all 12 thinking operations 3 or more times in the seven xveeks of the experiment.
176
5. Don't fail to innovate in using the cards. Be creative. Slant the questioning procedure to the way you desire to use the card. Do not go strictly "by what is sug-gested on the card. Get your personality into it. You are not teaching cards but children how to utilize channels of questioning to increase thinking processes. The cards are to help you provide a stimulus. Just keep the questioning response reinforced for the particular operation the card is purported to stimulate, if you have a bright idea for a card, use it! Make a card, use it, place it in kit for others,
6, Don't stop with the minimum (J6) number of (3 to 5 minute) sessions. Have 2 or 3 sessions during some days.
APPENDIX G
CURIOSITY BEHAVIORAL CORRELATES
Curiosity is an intrinsic energy initiated by environ-
mental stimuli which moves by the means of inquiry into the
unknoxm, bringing forth behavioral investigative acts of
manipulation, observation, comparison, and exploration,
O^KNCVV.V
INTRINSIC
Fig. 1—A conceptual model of curiosity power relationships
which through cognitive conflict results in creative pro-
duction, confirmation, interpretation, and solution. Fig-
ure 1 illustrates these power relationships.
1 nn
APPENDIX H
TABLE XXXIX
VARIABLES, GROUP, MEAN GAIN, COMPUTED t* VALUE RELATING TO MEAN GAIN IN ABILITY, AND ACHIEVEMENT OF FIRST-
GRADE STUDENTS DURING THE FIRST SEVEN WEEKS AND THE SECOND SEVEN WEEKS OF
THE INVESTIGATION {N = 24l)
Variable Fi rs t S even We e k s Second Seven Weeks
Variable Group Mean
Gain Com-puted t
Group Mean Gain
Com-puted
t
Word Meaning
I-E II-C
5.09 4.43
1.08 I-C II-E
4.43 2.68
2.72
Para-graph Meaning
<*2)
I-E II-C
4.90 6.07 1.40
I-C II-E
4.04 6.81 3.09
Vocab-ulary
« 3 )
I-B II-C
2.92 1.46
2.27 I-C II-E
2.57 2.82 0,33
Spelling I-E II-C
3.93 3.67
0.58 I-C II-E
2.62 2.75 O.27
Word Study Skills
(r5) I-E II-C
4.75 4.54
0.25 I-C II-E
2.49 2,60 0.14
Arith-metic
<*6>
I-E II-C
9.37 4.78
4.64 I-C II-E
3.49 4.93 1.82
Total Achieve-ment
tt7)
I-E II-C
30.80 25.00
2.74 I-C II-S
19.94 22.52 1.20
179
TABLE XXXIX—Continued
Variable
Otis-Lennon
<V Self Judg-ment (X2)
Story Memory
(x3)
Persist-ence
U14.)
Desire to Know
(x5)
Desire for Incon-gruous
(x6)
Total GTG
X„
-a-sffissKj
First Seven Weeks
Group
I-S II-C
I-S II-C
I-B II-C
I-IS II-C
I-S II-C
I-B II-C
I-S II-C
Mean Gain
5.85 2.89
3.68 0,60
f -4.29 8.79
1 .71 0,88
5.85 1,99
2.29 0 .33
10.03 6.54
Com-puted t
2.91
3-54
4.01
O.67
3.82
2.97
6.89
I
Second Seven Weeks
Group
I-C II-E
I-C II-S
I-C II-S
I-C II-E
I-C II-E
I-C II-S
Mean Gain
3.59 7.27
-0.72 0.57
6.68 9.49
2.19 1.40
-3.62 0.64
-0.91 0.08
I-C II-E
3.76 13.21
Com-puted t
3.77
1 .35
2.22
0.75
4.37
1.68
3.88
' Tabled t* .05. X.Q6* 0? ? 00. a-« o _ - *»J*S .01, 2.57; .001, 3.29,
180
. TABLE XXXX
VARIABLES, GROUP, MEAN GAIN, COMPUTED t# VALUE RELATING TO MEAN GAIN IN ABILITY, AND A CHI EVEMEMT OF SECOND-
GRADE STUDENTS DURING THE FIRST SEVEN WEEKS AND THE SECOND SEVEN WEEKS OF
THE INVESTIGATION (N = 196)
Variable First Seven Weeks Second Seven Weeks
Variable Group Mean
Gain Com-puted t
Group Mean Gain
Com-puted
Word Meaning
<*lf
I - E II-C
2.14 2.23 .141
1-C Il-E
0.81 0.99 .276
Paragraph Meaning
<*2>
I-E II-C
5.00 2.27
2.58 I-C II-E
-1.39 4.71 5.78
Science & Soc. St.
u 3>
I-E II-C
1.40 2.78 1.94
I-C II-E
0.02 0.36 0.59
Spelling w I-E II-C
1.23 3.07 3.75
I-C II-E
1.46 2.52 2.04
Word Study Skills _ < M
I-E II-C
2.41 1.29
1.10 I-C II-E
I.60 5.09 3.^3
Language w I-E II-C
3.91 4.25 0.35
I-C II-E
1.18 4.49 3.32
Arith.Comp. (Y?)
I-E II-C
3.03 3.31 0.30
I-C II-E
0.34 4.28 4.73
Arith. Con. <*8>
; I-E ; ii-c
2.62 2.29
0.45 I-C II-E
-0.06 3-87 5.45
Total Achievement
U 9>
I-E II-C
22.7 21,53
0.42 I-C II-E
2,40 26.29 8.01
181
TABLE XXXX—Continued
Variable
First Seven Weeks Second Seven Weeks
Variable Group Mean
Gain Com-puted t
Group Mean Gain
Com-puted
t
Otis-Lennon " H P
I-E II-C
3.02 6.662 3 .47
I-C II-E
4 . 3 9 4 . 5 7 0 .18
Self Judgment
u 2 >
I-S II-C
0 . 1 3 - 1 . 4 1
1 . 7 1 I-C II-E
-O.29 0 . 5 3 1.00
Story Memory
( x 3 ) I-E II-C
- 8 . 6 3 - 1 2 . 1 ?
3.16 I-C II-E
9.70 1 3 . 0 1 3 .27
Persist-ence
(XJL|.)
I-H II-C
4.96 1 .80
1 .94 I-C II-E
-2.43 0 .58 1 .68
Desire to Know
( x 5 ) I-S II-C
4 .48 5 .68 1.31
I-C II-E
-3*35 -2.72 O.69
Desire for Incon-gruous
<x6)
I-S II-C
1 .60 2 ,07 0 .70
I-C II-E
- 0 . 4 1 - 2 . 1 6
2 .54
Total CTC
( x 7 ) I-S
II-C 3 .11
- 4 . 0 3 2 . 7 3 I-C
II-E 2.79 9 .17 2 . 5 4
'-Tabled t: .05, 1.96; .02, 2.32; .01, 2.57; .001, 3-29<
182
TABLE XXXXI
VARIABLE, POSSIBLE SCORE, MEAN, STANDARD DEVIATION OF EACH TEST FOR FIRST-GRADE GROUPS I AND II
Vari-able#
1
2
i 6 7 8 9 10 .11 12
u
1
2
I 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 1 1
Possible Score
35 38 39 20 56 63
251 80 41 40 4o 39 40
200
35 38 39 20 56 63 2 51 80 41 40 40 39 40
200
Group. I (N = 108), _ T e s t *
Mean j Standard Deviation
12.8889 9 .9815
17.3704 4 .8241
28.7870 30.5463
104.3055 31.6296 17.6759 23.9630 12.8889 19.0000 14.27778 87 .898I
5.7692 5.8689 5.1937 4 .2727 7 .9571
11.9019 33.0588 9.7426 8 .7864 8.7178 5 .6525 6 .2465 4 .6743
20.6106
Group I-E, Test 2
17.9815 14.8889 20 .2963
8 .7593 33.5370 39.9259
135.1111 37.4815 21 .3611 19.6667 14., 6019 24.8518 16 .5741 97.9352
6,2376 8 .5053 5 .8488 5.5258 7.8792
11.156.1 39.2224 8.6768 6.9021 6.6917 6 .6763 6 .2418 4.4394
17.4396
Group II (N - 133), Test 1
Mean Standard Deviation
17.6391 11 .3835 19.7895 8.8496
33.9549 32.8571
124.4737 33.6391 20.1504 26„7669 13.4286 19.5338 15.2932 95.1579
6 .5848 7.3410 5.6410 4 .8905 8.8121
I I . 2 3 6 5 34.9609 8.7740 8.2138 7 .6177 5.5580 5.0554 3 .7991
15.6418
Group II-G, Test 2
22.0902 17.4586 21.2556 12„5263 38.5038 37.6466
149.4812 36.5338 19.5489 17.9699 14.3158 21 .5263 15 .6241 88.6165
6 .6485 9.2188 5.5464 5.6590 8 .7537
11.9342 40.1420
9 .7815 7 .8774 6 ,1363 7 .7337 6 .6237 4 .6187
15.2946
183
TABLE XXXXI — Continued
Vari-able^
Possible Score
Group I-• G, Test 3 Group II-l B, Test 3 Vari-able^
Possible Score Mean Standard
Deviation Mean Standard
Deviation
1 35 2.2.4167 6.8274 24.7744 7.8555 2 38 18.9352 10.0049 24.2707 10.1885 3 39 22.8704 6.5180 24.0827 5.9750 4 20 11,3889 5.5224 15.2782 5.6280 5 56 36.0278 9.7909 41,1053 9.4736 6 63 43.4167 10.2173 42.5865 11.9505 7 251 155.0555 41.2539 172.0075 43 .9047 8 80 41.0741 10.6890 43.8120 11.3774 9 41 20 ,6389 6.2413 20.1203 6.3578 10 40 26,3518 9.5601 27.4586 9.1607 11 40 1 6 . 7 9 6 3 5.5707 15.7218 6 . 1 7 0 9 12 39 21.2222 5.8172 22 .1729 5.2135 1 ?
40 15.6574 4.7826 15.7068 3.8384 14 200 101.6944 20 .2917 101.8346 18.7938
*1
2
I I 7 8 9 10 II 12
Word Reading Paragraph Meaning ( ) Vo c abul ary (Yo) Spelling (Yk)
J
Word Study 3kills Arithmetic (X^) Total Achievement Otls-Lennon (Xi) Self Judgment '("Xp) Story Memory (Xo7 Persistence (X/j,f Desire to Know (Xt-) Desire for Incongruous Total CTC (X7)
(Y5)
(I?)
w
184
TABLE XXXXI
VARIABLE, POSSIBLE SCORE, MEAN, STANDARD DEVIATION OF EACH TEST FOR SECOND-GRADE GROUPS I AND I I
V a r i - P o s s i b l e Group I (N = 8 2 ) , Group I I (N = 114 ) , a b l e * Score .Test 1 Tes t 1
Mean Standard Mean .S tandard Dev ia t i on D e v i a t i o n
1 36 16 .1463 6 .2492 16 .5351 6 .9877 2 6o 23.6829 11.1715 27.1316 12 .1731 3 38 16 .7439 4 .2508 17.4912 4 .8091 4 30 U . 6 7 0 ? 6 .6315 11.5000 6 .7085 5 64 33.^146 11 .2953 39.5263 11.5487 6 75 33.2317 8.1992 32.8333 8 .1864 7 6o 15 .5^88 6.2336 18.7368 6 .5038 8 46 15.5000 6 .1965 I 8 . 2 1 9 3 8.6580 9 409 164.9756 47.4142 181 .9561 52 .8401
10 80 43.4634 10.6292 43.6930 lO.65.i7 11 41 21.2805 6 .5319 20.8333 6 .2351 12 4o 31.1707 5 .7505 33.1228 5.5190 13 40 15.6098 6 .6914 17.4386 8,3362 14 39 23.3537 4.5916 22.9474 4 .2113 15 40 15.0976 4 .4024 15.2982 4 .7145 16 200 106.3902 13.6987 109.7193 14.7439
• # # • Group I - E , Tes t 2 Group I I - -C, Tes t 2
1 36 I 8 . 2 9 2 7 6 .?850 18.7719 5.7766 2 6o 28.6829 12.3850 29.4035 12.5109 3 38 18 .1463 4 .7835 20.2807 4 .6858 if 30 12 .9024 7 .33^5 14.5789 7.2256 5 64 35.8293 12.9510 40.8246 12.8215 6 75 37.1463 8 .8182 37.0877 8 .8224 7 i 6o 18.5854 8 .0501 22.0526 9 .1918 8 46 18.1219 7.2556 20.5175 8 .7321 9 409 187.7073 55.^608 203.4912 57.2150
10 80 46.4878 11 .1501 50.3158 1 1 . 5 3 ^ 11 41 21.4146 6 .4221 19 .4211 6 .4535 12 40 22.5366 6.4168 20.9^74 6.2980 13 40 20.5732 IO.6543 19.2456 10.1667 14 1 39 27.8415 6 .4948 28.6316 5.8539 15 40 16 .7073 4 .6210 17.3684 5.1798 16 200 109.5000 17.8566 10 5.6842 18.7965
185
TABLE XXXXI —Continued.
Vari-able^
Possible Group I - C, Test 3 Group I I - E , Test 3 Vari-able^ Score Mean Standard
Deviation Mean Standard
Deviation
1 36 19.1097 6.7264 .'L9.7632 6.4104 2 60 27.2927 13.3156 34.1140 11.8350 3 38 18.1707 4.7979 20.6491 4.7259 4 ?? 14 . 3659 7 .5893 17.1053 7.6369 5 64 37.4390 12.3201 45.9211 13.0425 6 75 38.3293 8.9239 41.5789 10.2811 7 - 60 I8.9268 7.4503 26.3333 9.1878 8 46 18.0610 7.8838 24.3947 10.0286 9 409 190.1097 55.5108 229.7807 61.4464
10 80 50.8780 11.4938 54.8947 11.7290 11 41 21.1219 6.9095 19.9561 5.8750 12 40 32.2439 5.9379 33.9649 5.4611 13 40 18.1463 7.7666 19.8333 9.8095 14 39 24.4878 5 .7663 25.90 35 4.8159 15 4o 16.2927 4.2870 .15.2018 4.1468 16 200 II2.2927 16.2417 114.8596 16.1941
* 1 -
2 ~
I: I: 7 -8 -9 -
10 -11 -12 -13 -14 -15 -16 -
Wo I'd Meaning (Y^) Paragraph Meaning (Y2) Science and Social Studies (Yo) Spelling {Yju) J
Word Study Skills (Yt>) Language Arithmetic Computation (Yo) Arithmetic Concepts (Yg) Total Achievement (Yg) Otis-Lennon (X-j) Self Judgment [X2) Story Memory (Xg) Persistence (X ,7 Desire to Know (Xc) Desire for Incongruous (X r) Total CTC (X?)
186
TABLE XXXXII
VARIABLES, GROUPS, MEM GAIN, STANDARD DEVIATION, COMPUTED t VALUE RELATING TO MEM GAIN IN ABILITY, AND ACHIEVEMENT
OP FIRST-GRADE STUDENTS IN COMBINED EXPERIMENTAL GROUPS AND IN COMBINED CONTROL GROUPS DURING
THE INVESTIGATION (N = 482)
Variable Groups Mean Gain
Standard Deviation
Computed t
Value
Signif-icance
Word Reading
<*!> I - E & II-E I-C & II-C
3 .?6 4.44
4.7982 4.860 3 1.55 N SD*
Paragraph Meaning
<*2)
I-E & II-E I-C & I.I-C
5-96. 5.16
6.7310 6.7241
1.29 NSD
Vocab-ulary
U 3 )
I-E & II-E I - C & II-C
2.8? 1.96
4.8084 5.1707
1.99 , 0 5
Spelling w I-E & II-E I-C & II-C
3.28 3.21
3.2970 3.5938
0.2.4 NSD
Word Study-Skills
(Y5)
I - E & II-E I-C & II-C
3.56 3.62
5.9824 6 . 0 2 2 3 0.11 NSD
Arithmetic <*6>
I-S & II-E I-C & II-C
6.93 4.21
7 . 2 6 9 2 6.9281
4.21 .001
Total Achieve-ment
U 7 )
I-E & II-E I-C & II-C
! 26.24 22.74
16.5810 17.0099
2 . 2 9 . 0 5
Otis-Lennon
(Xl)
I - E & II-E I-C & II-C
6.64 3.21
8 . 0 2 5 9 7 . 3620
4 . 8 9 .001
Self Judgment
vx2)
I-E & II-E I-C & II-C
1.97 - . 6 5
8.4562 8.5626
3.39 ,001
TABLE XXXXII —Continued.
18?
Variable Groups Mean Gain
Standard. Deviation
Computed t
Value
Signif-icance
Story Memory
<x3)
I-E & II-K I-C & II-c
3.31 -1.86
II.5329 U.9623
ij-,82 .001
Persist-ence
(%)
I-E & 11-33 I-C & II-C
1.5^ 1A?
7.9853 9.^556
0.09 NSD
Desire to Know
(X5)
I-E & II-E I-C & II-C
2.98 -0.53
8.131^ 8.1030
.001
Desire for Incon-gruous
(X6)
I-E & II-E I-C & II-C
1.0? -0.23
5.0211 ^. 806^
2.91 .01
Total ore
(X7) I-E & II-E I-C & II-C
11.79 -1.93
19.2583 I8.7673
7.91 .001
*No significant difference,
188
TABLE XXXXII
VARIABLES, GROUPS, MEAN GAIN, STANDARD DEVIATION, COMPUTED t VALUE RELATING TO MEAN GAIN IN ABILITY, AND ACHIEVEMENT
OF SECOND-GRADE STUDENTS IN COMBINED EXPERIMENTAL GROUPS AND IN COMBINED CONTROL GROUPS DURING
THE INVESTIGATION (N = 392)
Variable Groups Mean Gain
Standard Deviation
Computed t
Value
Signif-icance
Word Meaning
(*1>
I-E & II-E I-C & II-C
1 . 4 ? 1 . 6 4
4 . 4 6 3 5 4 . 3 9 4 1 0 . 3 7 NSD*
Paragraph Meaning
(Y2T
I-E & II-E I-C & II-C
4 . 8 3 0 . 7 3
7 . 0 6 7 2 7 . 6 9 3 4
5 . 4 8 . 0 0 1
Science & Soo. St.
( I 3 )
I-S & II-E I-C & II-C
0 . 8 0 I.63
4 . 0 8 0 7 5 . 0 5 2 3 1 . 7 9 NSD
Spelling < V
I-E & II-E I-C & II-C
1 . 9 8 2 , 4 o
3 .7696 3 . 3 3 8 3 1 . 1 6 NSD
Wbrd Study-Skills
(Y5>
I-E & II-E I-C & II-C
3 . 9 7 1 . 4 2
7 . 2 4 8 3 6.8238
3 - 5 8 . 0 0 1
Language TO
I-E & II-E!
I-C & II-C 4 . 2 5 2.96
7 . 0 3 3 5 6 . 5 4 2 9
1 . 8 6 NSD
Arith. Comp. (Y ? )
I-E & II-E I-C & II-C
3 .76 2 . 0 7
6 . 1 9 9 1 6 . 1 3 9 0
2 . 7 1 , 0 1
Arithmetic Concepts
<*8>
I-E & II-E I-C & II-C
3 . 3 5 1 . 3 1
5 . 0 2 7 5 5 . 0 2 8 1
4 . 0 2 . 0 0 1
Total Achievement
(Y 9 )
I-E & IX—EJ I-C & II-C
2 4 . 8 0 1 3 . 5 3
19.8638 22.2589
5 . 2 9 . 0 0 1
TABLE XXXXII — Continued
189
Variable Groups Mean Gain
Standard Deviation
Computed it
Value
Signif-icance
Otis-Lennon
(xx)
I-E & II-S I-C & II-C
3.92 5.68
6.9286 7.2203 2.46 .02
Self Judgment
(X2)
I-E & II-B I-C & II-C
O.36 -0.9^
5.8492 6.110 3
2.17 .05
Story-Memory
(x3)
I-E & II-S I-C & II-C
3.95 -3.02
12.9440 13.1211
5.30 .001
Persist-ence
(x^)
I-E & II-S I-C & II-C
2.4l 0.03
12.1815 U.7423
1.97 .05
Desire to Know
(x5)
I-B & II-S I-C & II-C
0.29 1.90
7.1319 7.7231 2.15 .05
Desire for Incon-gruous |
(X5)
I-E & II-S I-C & II-C
-0.58 1,03
4.9508 4.8250 3.27 | .01
Total ore
(Xy) I-S & II-S I-C & II-C
6.64 -1.18
18.0417 17.8559
4.31 .001
*No significant difference.
M X M o
fh $ <5
Hi M I—I XJ X X X
txj
03 <i E~*
M
w •
W
-4" %vi It
0) o 0 03 43 01 (D CH £ o •-H
-P •HI O-
^uoniDAafqov
of 4^aiu/4^iV
STIPIS JCpnqs p-x
S u i i x e d f ?
AiBxnqeooA
3u t ui3 apj qd's.iSv
S u f p ' e a a p,xoi4
a> H o a C/3
03 D
o •H 4-> CO o s o Pi
o->*
vO N
vn
<r\ N
CNi H
H
DJ.0 m o j j
sno rux3uocu j ,xoj oottsoq
^OITV 9,XTS9Q
OOUGq.Sf^JEOtJ
jtaouiajj Xioag
vo S£
VOtVtH 0~N JS- o o o w
ca oo vo o *h en
ON<tn O N CM
O O CM o o o
CXJVO ON \—1 vH vH
CO VO ^ o o o
O CO vo r~i CD *—J
tH Osi 0s*. (TWO CV
o o o
vH rH c\]
q/aetaSpnp J i e g
u o x r a a ^ - s f ^ o
cj -p <sj
C cd >
H e> P*
xag
l o o q o s
ap^a'O aS'.i T£ a^-quink opoo '4Uopnag
S u p ^ s ^ j ,
VO <TN CN 0 ( M h
c o t t t c O O r-4
<*> j vo co ^ f O rH O
O O rH O h W
00 vo ON HCJ(\]
o o o
o o o o o o
Oi O N
1 n/\
191
ND 0 3 £ .p
£ O
I I
M IHI l'{
><!
a
X
m
EH
! H "
>£P
CM
\—I 5H
" KWA V'SFFATSOJE
O -X
4 " CM H VO N O CD CD \—F
O O -H CA CA
CM ON {>-CVL H H
R I O ^ o o o
CM-4* H VH H CM
O O ^ - VA R . O N O H H CM
O Q\^ VA
CO VACO CA-3 - ^
CM V A 0 0 . H H H
NO NO CA H CM CM
H V O O
H -CJ* £N-
rl H H
CM CM O -C A ^ } - j$-
ca-3- co C A O A C A
•4- O N C A O O H
-3* H CA ON CA O-
CD \—l rH
0 - \ 0 CA CA- :T
-3 - V A C A VA ON CM H H CM
CM O -C A V A " U A
Q \ N ( N CM C A - ^
O CD ON O O H
VO 0 0 ON -3 " ^
CAQO ON H H H
ON-^R CM NO R - C A O O H
NO CANO H CM CA
\o\o^ CM CNJ CA
CANO O O O H
~3"VO CA ON CA CA O H H
ONCO H CM OA
NO {N-JJ-CM ( A C A
CA H CO O H O
H O C A CM CM CA
^ O O O O H
-3* CM H H C A C A
£ N O CM O CM CM
CA-CFR H CM CM
\ D H ^ 5 * O H H
CM TH CM CM CA CA
V A H . ^ TH CM CA
CANO H H O CM
TH C A ON
O O O
ON CM CA tH CM \ H
C A C A O H C M
H ON CM TH O H
0 0 O - H H CM CA
H CO H CM H
ON ON
O H C M -3 " V A CM CM CM CA
O O CM H H CM
F A ^ V T \H tH rH
NO X
CM X
VH VA ON ONCO V A O O O
O H H
XAMD O CM CM TH
CO (X) ON O O O
O N H O N ON CM H O rH vH
O NO CO O C M H vH rH H
0 - I > ~ C 0 ^ A O O O vH H
C N - O W O O rH rH
VANO V A CM CACM
NO \r\\A H CM rH
CA CM *-A RH CACM
H CA CM CM CM CM
CM ON NO <e—I vH rH
VH CM V A ON H CM O H TH
0 0 ( N H TH <M CN1
^ 3 - oo b\ NO O N O O O rH
V A C A O O H C M
C O < D N C 7 ONCO o O O rH
H ONNO rH rH rH
VACM V A CM CACM
•3* o o rH CM CM
rH 0 0 0 0 rH tH rH
CM NO CD A H O
ON r H 0 0 H CM H
CM O CM CACM CA
CM CM CACM CA
O H 4 O H H
CM CM CM CA
H NO NO CM CM CM
0 0 O - C O CM CM CM
o o O A C M
-TH H NO vH tH CM
^ * N O NO CM CACA
O M D i>-H CD H
NO VAON
H CM H
0 0 NO NO H H CM
CM CACM CM CM CM
VA O VA H H H
O CM CO 0 0 NO 0 0 CM H CM CM H CM
V A CM NO CM 0 0 V A O H H CM H CM
F > - O < ^ CNJVOVO -^T C M ^ R ^ J - CM CM -R}- VANO NO CM CM IT" CA CA CA
O O O H H H O O O O O O O O O H H H o o o
H H H H vH H H H H H H H H H H H H H
S S S & 8 S S S 3 S S S § § £ & & & " § § § o o a § g § g g g
H N N TH <U 0 ^ H ( M ( ^ V H C \ ! < ^ C\] T-I CM O
192
WSJJSCKIFT SKWS*-:
CM H
>H
-1*<*SSMN,WKAWRRAI
&
3
O-X
$
i * P
CM X
H X
H CO -4* VO H
vH i—J CM
CAXAO-CA- ~4*
H H N -4" -3" VA
CA~T CO T—I H <H
O~CMOO \Q O CA O H H
N ^ O HOJ N
(SHN H CACA
c n o o o ' O O H
A WO CA ON CM OO OHH
O CM H ON CM ">A O H H
H (AGO CM CACA
O s O ON CM (A
CM 00 CV O O H
ONCACM H CA-4"
-4* -4* CO CVRNO
-3- NO O O H
CVTT CA ON (AND O H H
CA H H CM-4* '-A
XA XA ON CM CrNCM
H XA ON o o o
*ACACM CO O CM H CM CM
* A ON £>--4" -4- XA
M3 O (A -4" A*A
~R}- ON ON H H H
A\ D-VA O CM <H H <H
O ^ A N O ~-T CA-3"
XA VANO CM CACA
H O-OO o o o
ON O O H CM CA
CA00 VO H H CM
O O ^ A CM C4 CM
O c t - o CM CM CA
VAA O-H CM CM
0-f\0 (A CM CM
O N - 4 " - 4 * H CM CM
TN-4* CM H CM CA
O O CA H H H
CM ( A H CM H ( A
O CN-CA H H H
NO H M D H H CM
CO CA-4" CM CA CA
ONOO ON o o o
00-4- XA H CM CA
H ~4* -4" H H H
XACM CA O H CA
CA H 00 H H H
C A i N - H H H CM
CM CO CA CM CM CA
\ A 0 0 CM H H CM
(N-CV-CO CO H H OHH
NO ONH CO CN- H O O H
VO i N O \ 00 H ON OHO
H *A CA ON O ON CO RH CO
CM 00 CA VO ON CM O O H
VO ONOO H H H
COONU H H CM
M0 V \ C 0 O (AH
XAVO NO H O H
CM O-CM CM H CM
CA-4* VO H H CA
ONVQ v O H H H
CA04 H CM H
CA H -4* H H H
ON CM * A H ( A C M
CM 000 •H VH H
VACMVO CM CA H
CAH^ H "H H
XA ON CM CM CM CA
H O N O H O CM
CO 00 NO CM CM CA
CM vO v O VH -H V"?
awo H H H CM
~4" NO H CM CM CM
-4- CM VO CM (AH
CM O - r r H CN2 CM
-4* CM O CM H CM
00 CM CM O CACA
-4- MO CA (M04-H H I v"?
04 CM O CM CM C4
XACAA CM CM CM
VA H CO H H CA
MO-4" O CA CM ~4*
MO O ON H CACM
XA O- VA O H CM
VOMO O CM CM CM
H CM H 00 O CM O H H
NO H CO CM CN2 H
XANO XA CM CM CM
ONXAVO O H H
0-4*0 CM CM-4"
H NO CM O H CM
-4- ON CM VQ CO CA - 4 - X A H O - O CM H O N A A C A N H C ^ - 4 " ^ CACM-4* CM C A ^ - CM CA-4" CM C A C A C A - 4 - X A -4* C A * A CA CA CA
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O H H H
H H H H V~ J H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H RH
ON ON ON O O O H H H CM CM CM C A C A C A -4" ^ J4* X A X A X T \ CO CO CO H i M—! H I t—I TH VH <:—( vH vH *—I - H H \—t H I vHI vH r H V~4 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
H CM CA H CM CA H CM CA H CM CA H CM ( A H fN) r r \ —J ^
193
tS 0 PJ
CJ •H 4 3
S
a M M M
X M
9 EH
FSARESASKSSM
&
H
V A Q \ 0 0 ON o.^-O O rH
v o r \ o CM CA-3-
v o C A O CM CM CM
O CM D -O O H
CO CM 0 0 C N - O V N O T~i t H
CM ON O r H CM L A
CQ\Q^ CM CM CM
CM rH VO O O O
ONVO CM CA.~> L^-vH x; I r H
£N. O C M CA t H CM CM
* A > A G N O O H O O rH t H
O £ > - ^ i>-ONCM CD O vH
O CM ON CM CAVO rH v—\ r H
C O H N 1 A * A VA
CO CM N CM C A C A
rH rH <5—I VO VO v£>
CM VO -4- VTN\T\
4 0 0 \ CM CM CM
V A V O xr\ CM CACM
VO C A r H RH CM -RJ-
C M ^ t CM ( A C M
4 * o r \ C M - 4 * ^ T
0 0 u ^ o CA CACT
v o r H j j -O \ H vH
^ A O O O H N H
CM ONOO O O O
C A C A O N O O O
ON H V* > O H X—I
CM CN- O -CM CM CM
VO O ON H CJ H
vH CM CM CM CM
ON VH .^3" CM C A C A
CO 0 0 rH H H CM
CM JH
vH H
O -x
&
O MD ON t H CD x—!
r H CM 0 0 t H t—! C\}
O CM O \ H TH CM
O W 4 -CM C A C A
ON ( A 0 0 O \ H O
( A O ON RH CM CM
( A O -RT O t H O
CA ON £>-CM RH CM
TH CVJ ~rt" H H CM
H 0 0 V > I vH 0 CM
O v r } - vH O H ( A
v o 0 0 O rH r H CM
v o 0 0 - 4 -CM CM ( A
{N- ONOO O t H r H
RH ON £N-rH O r H
V A V A O H H CM
^ 4 - O N O N G N O O O t H
0 ~ O - CM v O O N O D O
C - C N - J ^ C1- ON CM O O vH
-3* VO ON C A ^ A T H rH r H VH
C A t H ON 0 0 CO ON O O O
H (N* O ON CO 0 0 O O O
v o O N * A VH CM O SH TH v -I
V A V O 0 0 rH t H r H O H O
TH CM -4* t H rH T H
C ^ C O C F rH CM CM
VO \ T \ C M rH t H rH
O CA-4 -H H O
0 0 CN-CM rH rH
><
, £ T l X
CM
X
*~'~&aP3iK .vs&QjfxSm:
vn \r\ \r\ CM CM CM
-3- ( A O N H H O
0 0 CM Cxi CV? ( A
VO CM * A rH CM CM
O CM ON O CM *H
V A C A O N C A C A v H
O VO O CM RH CM
O V O ON rH vH t H
0 0 V O ^ -O C A C A
CMVO CM t H ( A
VAONVF>» CM CA CM
C A ^ t ON CM ( A O
O n CM CM rH CM CM
CM ON ( A H CM H
0 0 * A C M rH CM CM
v o O N O O O CM
V A C A - 3 * H TH H
O D D CM .4 - CM CA
-4" CM CM rH CM
CM 0 0 0 ( A CM CM
C A V V A t H ( A r H
VO CO CM CACM ( A
CA CM ON O CM O
t H r H CM CM CM
ON IN- ON CM CM CM
CO CA t H r H CM CM
CM CM t H CM t H CM
* A CA ON CM CM t H
4 " V O H ^ A
O - O CM CM t H > A V O 0 0 VD ON ON CO CO CM ON H-CM CA-IH C A C A J T -4" ~\f * A C A C A C A t H CM CA ~r> CM - 3 -
TH r H r H O O O O O O O O O O O O H H
t H r H TH r H rH r H
VO VO VO O - O - CN-r H TH X—I RH r H RH O O O O O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 rH vH t H O O O
ON ON ON t H rH t H O O O
vH rH rH
O O O CM CM CM O O O
r H r H rH
H H H CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM O O O O O O
T H C S I C ^ H C V l r i r - I C M C - N vH O.) H W n
1 9 ^
I N H CN OJ CN-XA >S | !>- cv <r\ cv. o \ ON
l o H H O O O
\R\ > V
fi
NO c A (A £N- G\ ON vH CM CM
CA o \ O o \ CN-NO CM <\] ^ CM RN CM
C A * A O N CV^R {>-rH rH rH
-3" O CNJ
C~\CM ON CACACA
VO C A 0 J MDCO H CO CO t"H
(ACO vr> TH CM CM
CO ^ {N. vH CM CM
N ^ A O \ -3* MO 00 vH vH *H
ON -3- * A ^
V0 CM JN-C A . ^
-4- CM CM O- O- ON o o o
CMOVO cv] CM CM
NO ONCA ^ACO
O O O
CM O ( A O CM ( A
I N - I A 00 CM CM CM
&
i n
R | ! F ) 0 W C\J VO C ^ C Q V > O O T-I O O O O O RH
CO v~l CA \ 0 ( ^ N C O V O O <H CM C\J T—( vH t-l C\i CM CA
OJ 1 A O O O <H
r-f C\i CA rH *H rH
">H CA rH O O O
ON ON H TH H CM
rH O rH O O O
CM CM NO H H CM CM CM CM
CV-WFR sH vH CM
O H N H H O
vH
ONONOO CA c\J ON R ^ X P I ^ -O O O O O O H H W
4 " O OS rH O O
NO CV- TH rH rH ( A
O o tN-O O O
NO NO ON O O O
XN NO ^ ON H H r f O d O
CM ON rH -c—f vH
XOI O ?H vH
FN-^AXA rH rH CM
CN* ONNO O O O
00 C A CM O O rH
{N-X
V0
00 -3- CO ^ ONTO* FFLOO NQONFN- [S-ONRH O T - H T - I O O O O O T H
ON ON !>-IN-ON ON O O O
O ON NO H H D rH tH tH
vH CA VN
O O O
I A
ON VH CA V O CO CO O O O
NO VH NO XTNN0 {>- CM O vH V--! vH o rH tH O vH CM
00 CM CO VA CN] CM o CM XPi rH CAtH CM (ACM rH (ACM
C A > A ^ -*H rH vH
CO rH NO H (M H
O ^ T 1 A vH \ H rH
H H M ) r~f CM rH
(A rH NO CO CM H ON ON CO tH rH CM O r M O O O
- 3 - ^ C O CM NO CO O O ^ N O CM CM CM vH vH CO CM CM (A
OJ CN-MO NO 00 ON ON O- CM ON H CM H tH vH rH rH CM CNJ
O VAXTN VH CM CM
^A^h ON rH vH CO
O N C O CM *H CM
rH ON ON CM CM CM
VNNO >A CM -CA CM
-3- a ) co rH T--J vH
NO NO CACNJ O
N O H fH CM CM
CM O N CM TW O
0 0 ^ ' r l O H
O o CM A CM CM
O-CM-3 -v—f O TH
CM NO .3* H H O
NO NO CM r-4 r~i rH
CA VN\P> \H CM O
^ACM ON TH CM rH
$ £ 3 5 £ 8 TH CM rH CM CA
H H H O O O H H H H H H O O O O O O
vH tH vH rH rH rH vH TH H H vH rH tH vf <vH tH vH tH rH
g g g l § l g g g i i i § f f
^ C M C A ^ C M C A H W N RTWN ^ CM <A
195
0 £
4.3 c 5 I I M M H
£3
EH
&
tn
&
CM !H
H
• ,w**ii:c£s'';ysfe
C"-X \o
X
£ CA
cm
H ><!
cahno CO H CM CO H %—S
caoo o CM cA»j-
~zt~ NO CM CM CM ca
{nNO O O H
ch 00 CM 00 CO On O O O
CM ON O CM H CM
CA A A CM CM CM
H A-CA CD O CM H CM CM
VOVON 1A *aia
CANO CA va
CD CM O G\0\£N-O O O
.4* O VO CM^ CA CM CM CM
CM CO H CO O H H CM <M
VQVO N 00 ONO\ O O O
^10 £>-.ct C A H
CM CD O CM H CM
CO CA IN-LAND *A
Q\H (N CA A h CA
CA CM CA
CN-CAA CACA t ~h* J&
On On A-H CM CM
O N M O O O
MO O ON H CM H
CM tH H O O O
VOOOO H C M H
V0OOO H HCM
H CACA O O O
O C O O n H *H rH
H VQ CO 04 H H
00 MD H O O H
ON CD ON O O O
H CM NO CM CM CM
A-OA * 5 , (A (A
(A CO O H H H CM
CA (A CA 00 H H CM CACA
CA CO H H H H
O N O ON O H O
A-A-00 CACACA
CD VNO CM CACA
"LAvOt H H %-H
ONCACD O H x—I
CO o ^ CM CACA
CN-XACA O H H ON CA (A
00 H CA CM CACA
CD VACO O O O
CM - 3" H HH
H O N O O ON CO \—« o o
-3" XA ON A-00 O O O H
00 H (S-O O H H H x—t
co h oJH NO ON D-O O O
vb-dTo H CA H H H
O H ON H H O N H d O
ON tH CM VAOMS-O O O
O-CMVO r l H O
VAIAV0 CM CM H
C A H M 3 \—I V" l \—I
O O CM CM CM H
-3* A-H h o h CM ONtA H H CM
(ACQ CO H H H
NOVO O H H CM
NO 0~ £N-H H H
^AON^ C\i CM CM
IN-CM CA O H H
00 CM CM CM H CA
^ CACA H H H
co on a~ H CM H
00 TACA O H rH
O O vo CM CM rH
(AO CA CM CA CM
vr\ ON CM CM o"N CA
O O-vO vH rH rH
CM NO CM CM H CM
-Cl CM rH rH CM CM
ON NO O O CM O
0-3- O CM rH CM
NO CM O A ( A 4 "
00 *A<A O rH r l
NO CO CD CACM CM
CACA 0 0 rf H H
NO NO O H rH CM
NO H O CM CACA
ON - A ON H CM
CM H O CA CA CA
00CA O H H
CM CNVA H CM H ^ XPiO
CACA 04 CA O H H
CM NO CA CA On^- CA CA NO CM A- CN -HO CA C A A- CA £>- *A CM CA CA CA CM CM CA^ NO CM CA CM \ANO A- CA VVfr CM CM CM
O O O O O O O O O O O O H H H O O O
H H H vH H H H H H H H H H H H H H H •H rH rH
O O O H H H CM CM CM CACACA CACACA CACACA CACACA CACACA O O O O O O O O O O O O
vnvvA no no no CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA O O O O O O O O O
H CM CA H CM CA H CM CA H CM CA H CM CA H CM ON H CM CA
1 9 6
xS 0)
£ •H 43
£
CS I I
hi M M
X
W
E-t
1 ^ "
J H CM 00 ON CM *A O H V H
: WI|®EJOMFC»IW
&
&
>-1
\.~U rsYiMS,SSsats.K^
& CVJ X
TH
C^-X
#
"5
NO O - ^ CM R \ C N
O N O O CO H »~A O H H
CM I N - O CM (A-3"
CA-^-NO 00 R H H O H H
^ 0 4 " ON CA-3* CA
rH CM CM 00 ON CM CD CD RH
CM £>-CA CM CM CA
VAOSOS H < N O \ H RH RH
CAOO-^* ^ ^
CA CM CO CM L T \ N VH RH RH
NO V \ C A
I R ^ CA H 4 " *A H H I
C A H O C A ^ I A
VH NO VT\ (ACA-3"
RH 00 ON CACACA
00 NO H CM CM
NO CACA CM CM CA
O ^ J - VA CACA-3*
^ VAMD CACM CA
' O-CO CA ] CM CM CA
CAC0 ON O O O
JJ- O -3* O YH RH
CA^~ *A O O O
O H H O O O
CA -4- CO O O H
NO ON £>-O O O
H ONJ^* RH CD RH
CM XRV:T VH VH CM
XACO XA RH H RH
CM 00 NO RH RH RH
CA IN- CM H H CM
CM ON H CM CM
O £>~XA CM CM H
VO MD £N-H CM H
CO RH CO CD RH RH
A A I N O H RH
CO CM XA O H H
O H NO H H O
CACA^T H H CM
NO CA^A O H O
ONODCH H H H
H XA OO H VH CM
CM CM VN H CM CM
V O O N O H H
O CAI>-H H CM
CM CD C \ H H CM
H CA CM RH CM CM
ON CM XA O CM CM
H HMD 00 O N H CD CD RH
CACM O -O 00 O H O H
£
&
&
H
O-N0 00 RH \—I H
O VR\CM CM H CM
! N R A O \ ONGO ON O O O
00 VH ON T—I CM H
1 5 " 6 R S " " VQ VO O O O H
CM ^ - O -H H O
^ A H 4 " ON O O O H H
>AGD CM H RH RH
CA RH 3 T O H O H H H
" O T 3 " C T " -H O O RH RH RH
O W N CO CD CM rH
0 \ 0 ON H CM H
*A CM CM RH CM CM
NOVO VTN O RH CM
X A CD CM CM -CM CM
RH JJ- CD H H CM
CM NO *A CM CM CM
^ A H ^ * H CM CM
CM NO CA CM RH O
RH RH O RH RH CM
O U^NO CM RH RH
- ^ N O ^ -CM H H
ON RH CD RH RH
0 D 4 - O O R H CM
CM O CO RH CM O
O N C A O VH VH CM
00 NO NO C M H H
NO CM CJ* RH RH CM
CO CM CO CM RH CM
NO O 00 RH CM CM
4 O C 0 CM CM CM
NO 00 CO (A CM CM
NO CA~"T H CM CM
CO O N O CM CM CM
CM CM NO H rH rH
CN-RHNO RH CM CM
CACKCM CM CM CM
04 CACA CM CM CM
O O CO CM CQ CM
4 * CM (N CACACM
CM-CT CA CA3*
ONCO H MD H NO MD 00 VT\^H RH CA OA CM CA C A CM CA CA VA
NO CANO 00 NO ON XAXA CM -Z~T CA
RH H H RH RH RH O O O O O O O O O O O O H H
RH RH RH H H H RH RH RH RI RH \H RH RH RH RL \H H RH RH RH
O - CN- O - 00, 001X0 ~ CACACA CA CA CA CA CA CA ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ -R> O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
RH CM .CA H CM CA RH CM CA RH CM CA RH CM CA RH CM CA RH CM CA
197
<D
£ -p
a i i
M M
IO 0 \Q O VO CM d vd vd
Cv- ON d ONCAVO O d d
CM- - N OOONH o o d
N O W O d d
ON^VO co - VO O1
\—I v—I
CM Q\~zt 00 CM CA O d d
CM *A NONO O O H
^ ' CM
H
d H
o-X
VO X
-3* ><
CM X
c ^ o o
~h -Ci* *A CACM CM
CM CM >A o o o
d On On d CM d
ON A n n 4 '
m O CM CM CACA 4 W H
CM CACA {N-CA*A CM^-^-
00-3" o d CA-3*
00 O-VO d CACA
00 (NO-cm caca
ca O d d
O VO VO CM CM CM
cacm ca o o o
CA00 CM CM CM CM
tH CO CM
CN-VO VO cm caca
ono £>-d CM CM
CM -ch O O O H
CA CM XO O vd d
CA^Ad O O d
ca*A*A O O O
CM CD V O vd d CM
CM 00 Q\ CM TH rd
CM CACM H H CM
CANVA d d d
cm vo r -tH \—i rd
VO ONO rd O d
o men tH m O
co on<a O vd CM
0(M4-d CM CM
O VO O-H vd H
dCAtM rd (A H00 ON CN-VO VO OONH d O d O rd d d d CM O vd O vd O r H
ca a a cm in o- -3*0.3- xacm-3- vo-~f vo o HCM H H CVl rd CM CM d CM CM O d d
V"\ rd VO o d ca N O O CO O d O d d O d d
V ) 0 ( n V O d d O d d
cavo ca vo oo o O O d
CO d O-00 O-CO o o o
O XOid O-vO On o o o
ONCM vd d CM
caco vo
{N- CM CM CM ca*A O CM CM d CM CM
MD CM d O d d
ia cavo CM CM d
-3* 00 VO d d d
\A ia £N> d d O
n o .3-
VAO-d VO CM ON O d O
\A\A*A d d d
d ><;
ON*A O 00 O d O d CM d d d
CO-4* o 00 O VO CM CM CM CM CM CA
d ncv] ON O IA CM CM CM O CA CM
O CO 00 d CA CM
^ A ON ON CM d d
co^t o O d CM
vO O vr\ d d CM
vO O CM d CM CM
VO A O d CM CM
(A ON 00 rd O vd
CM ON CA d O d
vd vd VN d d d
VO O CM VO CO -3* VO CO V0 CM -3" CO VO O d CM CA d CM CM CM d CM d d CM O d CM
ONC-VO O d O O d ON CA-3* CO XA^Ad OdCM O d CM CM CM O r d d d d CM CM
VO -3" VO ONVO CM 00 CM CO MD 00 On CM CO 04 N dVNfA CM CA CA <M -3" A CA-3" -3" CM CA CM CM (A CA CMCACA CM CA CM
d d d d d d d d d O O O d d d
d d d d d d d d d vd d d d d d d d d
-•±^-^3- vpiIAV>, ~ * -~3~ -0 -3* — O O O O O O
VOVOVO !>- O- !>. 03 03 CO CJ\ ON ON O O O -3" -3; -3- -3- -3- u^vnxn
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
v-i O] C<"N H CM n HOJC^ tH CM C"N H M n H OJ r \ TH CM
198
<D
£ 4* £
6 I I
M ?-H M
a x
M
9 EH
j c o v o o cm c a on o v o o o H t n
j H H H O H H
£ P C°> £ N - \ 0 O 0 0 C \ CA-CJ- CA <A CA
oo cavo CACO C-cvi c a c a cm cm c a
£N- (A *A XA CN- On O H H O O O
^-•ch O O N O \ rH CM CM H H H
CM 0 0 IN- c A VH O T H O o vH
OYO CM CO O CM O \H vH
CM vH
TM ( A I A C A C M CM
CM VTi C A O O O
tH c a o vH vH CM
* A V ^ C A O rH rH
C A N N O N O ^ .:$-rH rH rH
^ A H CM v a ^ ) -
'-AO0 ON CM CM c A
CM CO {N-o o o
CM CACA T H cm cm
O V 0 4 -rH <rH vH
CM *A{v. Owr\\r\ O rH rH
C A O N V Q CM C A ( A
rH CV- O -CACACA
CM O- CN-O <rH tH
I N V ^ I A < \ I RH
MO \ Q U S O h C M
n N O O O rH rH
JN-O-3-*H CACA
VRVFR 0s? CM CM
O _^v VO o o o
CM VACM rH rH rH
0 \ t H CO O rH O
CA rH VO tH M0 rH rH CM CM rH rH CM
0 0 VO o O rH CM
G \ G \ ^ T O rH CM
X A R H N rH CM CM
O M O ON rH rH rH
- 3 - O V C M VQ CO < r r " ~ ^ c T o ^ '
° O \ 0 0 O ON O O O O T" ( O O V ^ O ,—(
£ > 0 0 0 J H 4 - < } . V O M D C*-O H CM H t - | O H H H
O p c o v o CK V O CM C\J U-V-3- O \ ^ L < - F C M R H CM C A C M C M W T H
vH C ^ v o v Q o c o CM O N C O *H rH rH tH ,-f O i-i
BFTTFXSI-SSFFLASKAAA ,,
O O v O C V O O ^ J - CO .ZJ- CM CM CM t-H C<^ O CM CM CM P A
CO CM O . t 'J H N cr^ o \ C° i 1 - 1 H H N n n CM rH CM
rH r^CM o \ n n O rH rH
-"3* tH CM rH CM rH
\ acm *A CM (A CM
C A O V Q tH CM rH
M 0 0 0 CO rH CM CM
- 3 - C O ^ H C O O N H O O rH
CM M0 ON O rH rH
ON O CM rH CM CM
--3- CAVO rH rH rH
M0 CO CACM CM
C A CM rH C\? CACA
CA > A ON rH CM CM
- $ • O O N " CAONOv t H o o
O rH CA CM CM vH
CM O-CM CM rH CM
C O - 4 * O CA tH CM
O - C J -CM CM CM
O 00 O CA vH CM
O VO 0 0 v o O CM O rH rH
0 4 * CN-CM C A C A
CM CA CM CM CA CA
O C M 4 * O O O
- 3 * C A O x—I H CM
CM C K V O O O O
CM x o Q \ O rH CM
V N 0 V = P ^ 0 0 O \ O O O
V O O I N rH rH rH
ON On vH rH CM
CM 00 NO rH rH rH
00 ^ C M O O CA
O C O ^ -o CA O
k5^ I ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ CM On rH O rS 1 CO ro.ro rvi J : ^ T C M C ^ C M C M ^ 3 £ C > V O V . C M CO C X ) ^
O O O TH rH O O O VH O O O O O O O O O
rH rH rH H H H H H H H H H
rH *H r*™f
W S « « « " S I P R " ~ S K I ~ 5 » - O VAVN\J ->1 L A A ^ X A \ A \ A VO V O V O O ~ £>- { > -
2 H H - 2 £ 2 _ o o o S S S g g g
H w " - " , c g ' ^ " « n d « n w w t n CM C A
199
xS <L>
A «rH .p
£ 8
I I
M M M X
m <
£H
S O CAOO H iN- ON H H H
VO Q \ N CA-3* ~3-
O\OO CA o CAMO H H H
CD (X) H 0 \ C A ^ I V
O H H
O H 4 " O ^ - vr\ H H H
O ^ A H 0 0 T>-A\ o o o
C A * A 0 0 C 0 0 4 O H H
O H R I o o v o o o O rl H
O ON £>-C A C A ^ -
H C A ^ - 3 *
J J P
{H
EMBS3053DE?VAIH»
CM H
£N-X
&
> T '
&1
H
X
O ON CM C A C A ^
H O N rH YH YH
V O ^ A O H CM CA
CM CM O O CM c A
H 3" CA <A <r\
v o C A ^ O rH H
O-VO J>~ tH rH x—!
O VO CM VH H CM
CM H CA CM
0 ~ CAVO CA-4*
CAONCM CM C A ^
CMM3 O CACM CA
vo o o CM CM CM
> A I A C A CM CA-^T'
V-NONTH CM CM CA
>A-4* MO CA~R]" ^3"
O ^ F V O CM (ACT*
O H ri
CM CAV^ CM CM H
> A H CA O tH H
H \ 0 ON O O O
O ON rH CM H CM
>AVO CA rH rH rH
CM rH vH O O O
*3- 0 - 3 -O O H
CM O N H O O rH
CM ^ A h rH rH CM
rH ON CM rH O rH H CM CM
*N VNCO O O O
C - O N O O O N
V^LANO O CM CM
V ^ 0 0 CM tH CM CA
L A O O N TH CM CM
O N * A * A O H CM
CAOO ( A H H CM
CA00 TH O O rH
vH VO 0 0 rH rH CM
0--rj- rH H CM CA
O - v H H rH TH
RH RH
^A CA ON-3- CO O rH O
VO rH ^A vo 00 ON O O O
V A O N O H CACM H rH VH
ON £>- CM VO ON ON o o o
CACM CA O ONOO rH O O
CM rH CM (N-00 ON O O O
VACACA H CM CM
VO CM VO CM CArH
O 00 VO CM rH H
CAH 00 H r i O
CM CM ON rH CAVH
CA C A O 0 n—{ vH vH
-3- O - O -r~f rH rH
O O vn, rH rH CM
O N O A O O O CM
GO vO ON H rH rH
CM VO O rH rH CM
TH rH JN-CM CM rH
O H N H CM H
0 0 CAVA H CM CM
CM NO 0 0 H r-4 H
vo CM o O ' C A H
0 0 ONOO O H H
CM ON ON CM H H
CM 00 VO H O rH
4 * O CM CM CM ( A
* A H ^ CM CM CM
4 - C M O CM C A CM
-3" -3* CO CM CM O
CM VA00 (ACM H
O H *A O CM CM
CM 0 0 CO ( A O CM
* A O N O CM CM ( A
0 0 0 0 - 3 * CM O CM
*ACM O H 04 CM
00 O 00 CM CM O
O -rj- CA CM CM CM
CACM M0 O CM H
< A ^ V0 H H H
VOOO CM H CM
CM CXD VT\ CM O H
O-C^-vo, N O O N C-CMCM ^vHCX> ^ ^ 4 - cm o - i c ^ o - \ c ^ c ^ r v 3 - . j - cm o-^CM w n n c\) r><r>
^ 1 ^ ^ ^ O O O O O O T"! tH rH v-l x—I V—i tH T~ I t—I
H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H
0 0 0 0 CD ON ON ON O O O H H H CMCMCM CA CA CA H- H- H-v o v o v o MO VO NO NOVOVO VO VO v o
o o O Q O Q ^ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
H CM.CA H CM CA H CM CA H CM CA H CM CA H CM CA H CM CA
200
<D $ £ •H -P £ 8
M M M X
X w dl
9 £d
C\J H
SH
c3" fH
£>-X
$
1T\ b>A rN
3
>v
CM O O CO H M D O d d
00 CM d O UN M\ d d d
CA (A d rd 00 rd x—I rd
(N-O O O d d
d ^A00 Q\MD d O O d
no d cm 00 >A^A CD rd x—{
*ACG -3* onca-^* O d d
G\td *A cm ij-
-4 " O n O CM C M ^
(ACM C\ C^^A-zt
ON cm.^ ca
oo ( n w CM CA-3"
CM ON NO -th CA- >
CM-4* O-CM jfr
CNtN-O d CM CM
vd ^AMD CACM CA
o caca CM CM d
Q\^r 0\ vd XA-3"
D-NO CM CM W 4 "
CM ONTH P~NCA-4-
cm ( n n
( A 00 d O O d
oo onon o o o
\r\ V A N CD vd vd
O CACA o o o
C A O CO o o o
CAOOMD o o o
jfr rd CM O vd rd
CM -4" CA CM O- O N H I N CN-CACA rd *ACO -3" O d On £>~C0 H H N CM d CM d CM CM H d d CM vd CM vd CM CM O d d
vOiN-O N ^ A 0 \ CO CA^A ON ON 00 4 0 ^ A CM00 00 vQ CO NO O O CM O vd O O d C M O O O O O d d d O O d d
00 O rd CAQ0 d d CM A O d On CM CM CO rd *A\0 CS- On CA O C\| CM rl H CM rd CM CM rd rd O vd O vd vd CM CM rd rd CM
rd 00 ON ON 00 O-o o o
00 >A CA On CD \—f O vd vd
CN-CAVO ON ON v d O O rd
rd O CO CO 00 NO O O O
no o o 00 O ON O Vd o
>A00-3-O ON r d rd CD rd
~:t (A CA 00 00 00 O O O
CANO CA rd rd rd
CM C A CM CM CM CM
( A 0 4-d ( M d
Jzf NQ CM d CM
CM rd On CM CM Vd
00 CM A Vd CM CM
rd ON CO vd CD vd
V^OO NO d d d
^A ON CM CM Vd CM
{N-d O O h C M
VAONNO rd O O
CA^ANO rd CM rd
M ) H O O vd rd
CM CM ON CM <Avd
O- O CA d CM CM
ON C A ^ A vd rd CM
O-ONOO vd O vd
{AND rd rd rd rd
ONNO^t O CM rd
ON ON rd O O
^ A ON ON CM CM vd
CANO-^-\d rd rd
CO 00 00 CM CM CM
O O N O CM CM CA
CM NO 00 rd rd O
0 0 0 4 CM CM CM
CM -ci* CO CA CM CM
On CM NO rd vd O
On V A ca v-d CM CM
O VT\CM CA CM CM
4 - d O CM CM CM
(N- d NO H CM CM
00 CM rd CM
.^-NO CO CM rd CM
00 CA (A O d d
d x •wr-fSStcenai**;-,
CM C A O CM d O CM N O ON U N CM N O d CM I N L A N ^ A C A N O O n C A C A O C M ^ - V A O A ( A C A CM C A C A CM C A C A CM ^ * A CM C A C A
d v d d O O O d d d O O O O O O O O O d d d
d d d d d d d d d vd vd d d d d d d d d d d
ir\\A*A NO NO NO {N- {N- {N- CO 00 CO On ON ON NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NQNONO \C) M3 NO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O {—I d d O- (N- O- CN- O- O-O O O O O O
d CM C A H CM ( A d CM C A d CM C A d CM C A d CM C A d CM C A
201
xS Q)
£ •HI 4 3
£ 0
O
1 i
M H I H
X
X!
SC3PS®YW®S
>?
C O - 3 * O -O M D O N H H H
C O O N * A N O H CD RH R -1
I N - O N C O O C O N Q RH RH H
V O H H C \ J V O O H H CM
H CM H 0 \ C M ~ 3 * O RL RL
V A O H
CM MO O N H RL H
O N H N
O ~ C O C M H C S I C N J
00 CM 00 C O \r\ \r\
C O 0 0 0 4 CM CM
* O C M ^ -
C M - 3 - - 3 -C \ ] H N
CM C O C O
J S P
CM
H
V O ^ - 0 0 O H H
0 0 0 0 N H H CM
0 . 3 - C O 0 0 0
V H - ^ - O
H H ( M
^ O O N O O
CM C O - ^ T
0 \ C M 0 0 C N N N
N O O H
O VH H
O - I O ^ O
H CM CM
C N - O N C O C O ^ V O
O N H C O
CO.^3"
CM O CM
C O - 3 - - 3 -
I N - O CM
CM N R \
O N O - V O
C O ~ 3 - \ O
O N H O
CM C O ~ 3 -
0 0 C M S .
CM * A \ O
H N N * 0 ^ 0 X 0
O N U ~ \ { > -CO RH H
O - H C O H CM CM
N O C O M 0
O H CM CM M 0
O H O O - O N O H H
I N - C O O
O N N
£N- V O O N O O O
CM CM C O TH CM CM
0 0 C O V O O O TH
{ > - 0 0 - 3 -O CO TH
C N C N - 0 0
H CM CM
00 o o tH CM CM
- 3 " H O CM C O C O
CM CM CS-H CM CM
N O X O - R T
CM COCO
Y A O 0 0 RH CM CM
CM O RH RH CM CM
C O O O CM TH RH CM
(S- CM O H CM CO
^ A £ S 0 O O TH RH
O N ^ A N H CM CM
CM COXO CO CO CO
V O
X
VT\
X
*»AWR,-£S-A
EN- O O O \—f C S - O vH 0 0 0 0 MD O - On NO H O tH O rH O O O O d d
CM RH C O O N £ V . £>_ " O N O N 0 0 O O - O
O O O RH O RH
4 " CM O H TH C O H RH RH
CO C O £N-O N TH CM O H H
CM - 3 * 0 0 ( N - O N O N 4 H H t H rH O vH H rH H CM CM
O RH V O O N O - CM CM GO O H CM H XH RH CM H H H
O C N O H RH CM
£ F * P
CM
X
RH
X
t O O V O NO NO iN- NO N O C K CM CM CM H C M O O CM H
CM C N N O X O N O CM V O C O CM
RH RH O C M T H C M CM CM ( O CM V > \ T \
CM CM CM
N O - 3 - T O O N O 0 0 V O O R H TH TH RH O RH RH RH RH H
0 0 N O CM N O N O N O C O CM CM
CM RH C O H H H CM C O C O
O N V O N O C O O N MO O H H H O H
CO 0 0 CM N O CM 0 0 CM O CO CO H CM
O N C O O O H
- 3 - ^ A C O VH H CM
O O - * H £N- H - 3 - H C O CM CM CM H CO CO O CM H
RH O JT>- MO C O O N - 3 - C O H H CM H
N O ^ - N O
CO CM CO
0 0 - 3 -CO COCO
CM CM CM C O CO CO
o CM CM CM CM CM
O N CM CM M O ^ ^ - S ^ NO CM CO -3" O CM CO-c3" ry . xrs r\)
W W *
H H H H H H H H H H H H H H O O O O O O
1 H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H VH H
£ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ C O C O O D
Q P O — O . O O O O P £ & £ & & & £ & £ £ & &
N r H CVJ ^ CM D N N H N O ^ V H C V I ^
202
0
£
•P £ 0
o 1 I
M M M
I <\1 r m U c o o
^ H t H C j
H M O ^ T C O O H O H T H
00 O 00 H V O ( N H H H
VO 0 - v r \ O N H CA O V" ? H
ONVO £N-O N H
H H CM
ON CO H *AC0 H H t—1 CM
\D H O ON-CH CO O d d
s i p
>?
CM H
H !H
D-X
$
&
£
CM
H X!
O ^ A N -4r -cr -"3*
.3- O N C A CACA-4-
CM CN-C0 H H H
xrv o w o CM CM CA
00 v I CM CM CA
CACO M3 O O O
VTMN-xH CA^t *A
H O NCA CACA-^-
O N * A M O CM C A C A
MO H (A CM C A C A
v o vo CA ~;t
* A O \ O N <A-^
00 H - j " O H H
^0 X A H O O *H
O W O H H H
CM CM O-VAVi^>A
CM VO O c a VA
vO SO iN-O rH n—f
H - t O CM .3- XA
C O O ^ A CM -4*
H ^ O H H
CA00 o \ CM CM CM
OV:* VO O H H
O~ Q\ CA H CM H
*AC0 CA H H CM
-3 -vo v \ CM N N
H . r t XA H CM CA
00 C A O O H H
0 4 - o \ H H CM
O- CM O O H H
00 VO CA O CM CA
O- chxr\ H CM CM
H O vr\ CM C A C A
C A O CM H CM CA
vO CO -r> H O H
CM 00 H CM CM (A
CM- t *A H H H
O - O CO H CM CM
CAVO CM H TH CM
VO -;3" H H CM (A
H ^ N C4 CM CM
-3* 00 XA H H CM
c\i o vo ONO H CO H H
£>->A*A CN-CM Q\ O H O
00 CN- \—I H CM CM
0 - V 0 \ 0 H H H
CO CM C ~ O H O H H
-3- ONVo H H H
H V^VO VO 00 ON O O O
Cv- CTN -O O CM H H H
4 " 0 ( N ( A O CM H H TH
H C M H H O O H TH H
GNG0 H H H CM
-4~ CAO-H H H
VO CM CM H CM
(ACQ ON H H H
CM vn CM CM CM CM
ON CM CM O CAH
CM *A*A CM CM CM
CM-^ O CM H CM
Y A ON CM CM CACA
1AVO XA CM CM CM
* A O \ 0 0 CM H kH
XAH 00 H rH H
OVO CM CM H CA
i N H (A H CM CM
CA- t* H H CA H
VO O VO H CM CA
Cv2 ( A O CM CM CM
O O ON H H O
O CO O CM CM-4-
CM- - *A H H H
00 CM VO O H H
O ON H CM tH
O O V O ^ CM CA
O O 00 CM CM H
VO H VO H H H
O VO O 4* H 4 *
vO CM CM CACACA
CM CM CM H CM CM
O {N--3-O CM CM
O - O H H CM
*ACM CM CM CM CM
H CM vO CM CM H
CM O-VO j$r xn
H H 00 e ^ f A ^
£>-{>-\A C M ^ - ^
O-VO C A C M ^ -
VO HVO J t VA>A
VAIN-CO < A ^
O C M ^ C A c t ^ t
H H H O O O O O O O O O H H O O O
Hi H H vH "H Hi H H H H H H H H H H H H
ON ON ON O O O H H H CM CM CM (A CA CA -3* \r \ \£ \ \C\ 2 *2 99 COOOCO OOCOOO OOOOOO CO GO CO 00 00 CO
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
H CM CA H CM CA H CM CA H CM CA H CM CA H CM CA H CM CA
2 0 3
r b 0
£ •H 43
a
8
M M
X
rx3
>-•3
•a isrwseK:
£ P
H n ' ^ O CO O CO vr\-3* ca-c}- ~3- co m o o o o J& O O O O H r~! H H H
00 ONOO CM V A H H H CM
&
c t ^ C * - OQVOVO . 3 - r ^ C M ONv- i iN . o o o c j vpi r ^ i } -
tH C^-CO \ Q CM {N- G \ 0 0 00 H r | H cvj m CM CM 0"^ 0"> O^^J-
CM C*- O ONC^CM O H H
4 - O V O cm m
00 v o ON CM ( A CM
c^-r} - H O M A O N O H x—!
c n n o cm CA-4" * A
O N f A O IN. ON H O O H
CA^O m H c n
^ CANQ CM c n c ^
* A £ N - m CM CM 04
o o t h m o o m o ] ^ i o N O m O N O O O O O H O O \H O H H
m > A O \ o o o
o j m m O H H
H C\] O O O H
v o CO O 0 - - 3 - .r> CD O H tH CM CA
CM CM O CM H CM
C n ^ t H CM CM CA
^ H O \ CM CM H
CD CM O H CM m
00 CM H tHI H CM
CM t H
•rH JH
£N-
CM ON H VACO VO O O O O O CM
H CM 00 r—I H tH
M3 O N ^ t O r t n
CM CM O CM H
O CM CM H (M
CA£N- ON H O O
•zf £>- O \ 0 >A m O O H O H CM
C A H {N-H H H
\ A < A 0 N H CM CM
oo m * A O H T-l
o oo CO H h n
ONON^t O H H
^A c-- ON CM V^CM O O O
o n ^ A O -£>-- o CD O H \—I
On h m ON CO ON o o o
NO X
&
X
O r \ H H tH tH
ON O O O C M H
V^CO CN-H W H
O n CM CM h cacm
CM H N CM CM CM
CM w CM O H 0 N O (M H G \ O -O O N O C O O ON h H CM CO O On h ° h o h o h h h o h o
NO 00 00 V O > A O ^ A o o v O 4 - C D O tH tH vH H H H H H H H H H
CM > A * A H CM CM
^ C M ^ CM VV3* CM CM * A CM CM CM m CM CM .CM CM CM CA CM CM CM CM
CM NO 00 o o o
ON H 00 O tH H
ON O-CO O O O
ON H NO CO ON CO ^ACO NO .4* CM •w -H tH CD t [ CD H tH tH H tH tH
4 M ) 0 O H O
-3" -3" CM CM CM CA
00 00 NO CM O H
C Q O N O NO CO CM O NO NO O 00 (ACM ( A H CM CM CACM CA H CM CM
O 01 o 0 0 0
ON (N- ON H CM H
C M O Q D H CM H
NO o o CM ^ N O
O D O N CM CM H
O O N CM H O
CM CM O NO VTMN-CM CM CM CM CM CM
(TNV^CM tH CACM
( A ^ G D CM CACA
CO CM * A cm m m
* a o m m ^ t m
CM * A m m - 3 * XA
On CD ON CM CM CM
O O O O O O H H H H H H O O O O O O x H H H
H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H
111 §§5 111 f i t III III III ^ < M ( ^ W N n ^ O i c n t H CM H ( M n
H c \ i m
20k
o
£ • H . p
£ l
a
M I H HI
r'S f x l
a
E-i
i ^ "
£?
&
£
HM3 CO r d ^ - ^ r d r H r H
X A O O r d C A C A - ^ "
^ o - o oaca-3*
C^-3" CM O N * a v r \ O r d r d
N O o A - 3 * CM * A ^ A
0 4 " 0 \ c a c a c a
axe}- OA -Zf" O - T—I H H 0 4
v r \ w On u A ^ A ^ A
—I n o *-A vH O A N O r d r d rH
O O a s rH CO v d rH H CM
O OXCO \T\ O - i > -t—5 H H
^JT O - VH o caoo r d r d r d
G \ ( N O C A - ^ * V A
00 ( N l ^ * A
V A ' u a c M V A ^ A ^ A
0 - M 3 O - CM VAC0 c a c a c a
r d VT\NO
O A - 3 " ^3"
c A C A ca-3- ca
voy^- oa O d d O r d O
00 CM MO O d d
r ^ O v O O X"H r d
0 0 V A C O O r d r d
CM CO NO rH r H H
N > A O
CM c a * A
-4- NO CO cm c a o a
( n n v ^ O y—! r H
& OJ
M
M
SN-
v Q
X
KjWtBfifAStMAllr J
1 P \ X
O O 0 0 0 0 k*A O - H n N N O x~'\ N O CO U A N C d d N CM CM v d d d d O A CM C A r d CM CM r d CM O A CM CM CM CM CM O A
C D 0 0 CO O r d r d
NO ONOA O d M
H N H OA O-CO ON NO ^ - O O N vd xout r d CM O A d O d o w n v d CM CM H H CM
O N O N CO - 3 " CO CM O rH r d r d r d r d
O - O O A r d CM CM
CO NO o -O r d \—1
N O -^3" \—f r d CM O A
-^3" CM r d vH CM CM
CM * A r H r d r d CM
O-- o j no cm oa oa on no o 0 0 O H r d O on tH O CM CD O r*i r d r d CD rH H rH
^ 3 - ^ ON N O O \ O r d CD
V A O - O N * > - £ > - O N o o o
N O O N NO 00 On v d O CD v d
rH V A O -r d O N ON r H O O
CM t>-M3 v d v d r d
CM r d O -CM t H n d
v d CM i > -<M H H
r d O n O A r d r d r d
O M N v d r H r d
O - O N N O CD r H rH
On rd CV O r d O
.3r ><
CM X
t H
X
CO CM v r \ r d CM CM
X A X A C M r d C\J CM
V > O N C M CM O A O A
U A V f A * A CM CM CM
\Q Xf\tT\ r d CM CM
- 3 -r d \—J r H
O N o o r d CM CM
-3- CM NO rH r H v d
ONOAMO O v d r H
O N r H O r d v d
C h ^ V A r d CM CM
ON00 v d r d r H
\ A V A V O CvJ O J CM
O N V O 0 0 r d r H r H
CO N O N O CM -c3* CM N O CM VO ~:3" - 4 " NO CM - 3 * CM r H O A ( A CM r d C A CM O A r H CM CM rH rH CM
CM CM O c n n - t
NO CO NO (A CM OA
V A CM CM - 3 * O A CM C A O N C A C A C A r d ^ - C s » O N CM r d r H CM CM CM CM CM CM r H CM v d CM CM CM r d vH r d C M r H CM H r H
C A ^ A M O C A i > ~ V A 4 * ^ A O \ N O CM ( A O N N O CO ( A ^ v d CM C A C M C A C A ^ 3 * C A C A ^ 3 - V A X A V ^ C A C A - ^ 3 " CM C A ^
O O CD r d r H r H O O O O O O O O O O O O r d r d
r d r d v d r d r d r d v d r d r d r d r H r d r d v d r d r d r d r d
C A C A C A -r}- -^3- \r\\T\XT\ N O N O N O C - O - 0 0 0 0 CO O N O N O N ON ON ON ON ON ON O N O O N O n ON ON ON ON ON OnONON ON ON ON O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
rH CM O A r H CM C A r d CM ( A r H CM O A r H CM ( A r H CM ( A t d CM O A
205
i j <D & a
.p
o ! t
M M M
\A
O -3- -3* CN-O
^ d d CM J: CNCACA -3- 0 \ 0 \ I \—{ CM
O O O H cm cacm H H H
ONCN-VO O - O O O d d
O C O H vO O N O h h N
O-CO CA d 00 d d d
VO o n N r-J H d
{ 2 0
iM
o ca o-, tAXA*A
VO [N-VO caca-^-
-.•*< wxarcsm
>SP
CM H
d M
jn-X
vO X
CM X
d X
vaca-3* O H H
-3" *A^A
xA^t XA -^r -^-
O n ^ A O O O d d
JN- tN CA-^ d
H XPiN CACACA
^ *aca O O d
O (N-VA CM CM ca
>A v-l 00 cm ca d
on jfr ^A^A
IN-VO <N-CA-3" -4"
CMM0 00
vb CNVO caca-3-
O-vamO CM^-3*
00 CM- -CM CA-:±
O ^ VO o o o
W O O N d CM d
CM CACA O d v~v
<N- CV] *A O d d
^ • 4 - 0 CM CM CA
O ( N H d CM CA
O O CA CM CA CA
d CN-^-CM CM CM
00 VO CA H d CM
ON-23" O-•c—i V—I d
d-^T VA CM CM CM
0 N O M 3 d CM CM
O n ca tH O CM CA
( A IN- O d O d
00 CM-3* O d d
G \ * A d d CACA
O V A N d d CM
d O ( A x—I H CM
XAOVO d CM CM
d vO CA CM CM CM
O- O- O tH H CM
00 CN-O O d d
4* o CM CM CA CA
VO d-3-d CM CM
4*v0 d d d cm
&
<r^ X
o vSco ~~ cm o J c T 3 F o J o inc^-tr^ o w o -3- -cj- r> o ^ J c T COCS-ON h O (M C--G\ON *AC^-C0 O C -t-4 tH O CO O-ONOO O O O TH T-l *~l O O O O O O T-IOTH H H O O O O
CO ONCM !>-d- tH d d d d v—? d
00 CAV0 O d o
VACM CM CM CM CM
00 d o O d CM
O CM NO CM d CA
VACM A CM CACM
CM MO ^A CM CM CM
vO CM VN d d d
CA^AVO d CM d
d o CM d d
lAMO VA CM CM CM
vO d -it O d d
d O D N CM d d
ONCM ON d ( A d
00 CM 00 d CA d
O VO O CM d CM
-3- O O CM CM
ON d ON O d O
00-3-00 O CM CM
ON d 00 O d d
CO CM O O d
CACA^ d d d
CA d CA d d
N O ^ O CM d
O vOvO CM d CA
VO-4-VO CA CM d
ON d CO O d O
VO d CM CM CM
CN00 CM CM d CM
ONVACM O CM CM
d Cv- d CM O CM
ON^> CA d CM CM
00 VO 00 CM d CM
UAOOVO O O O
VO C^vMD VT> O CA -c3" -=J- CVi COOOCO V0 00 1A r^\O i n n o r>^3--3- -3- ^ - ^ -1^1 c\) c\! cm cncs j r^ c^-^-
x—J H H H H \—! O O O H H H CD O O O O O H H •
rd t—t d d d d d d d d d d v - H d d d d d d d
O O O d d d CM CM CM CACA (A -3" -3" -3* VNVA^A VQVOMD O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d
d CM CA d CM CA d CM CA d CM CA d CM CA d W (A d CM CA
206
CD
£ - p
5 I I
M M
e-i
c m n c M VO VO CO o o o
04 VO ON n O N O H H N
VO CM C°\ H H n
ONC-CM
O W Q vH tH CM CM
V^<M O
!H
>«KiCVaey«*re.
v~f 0 ^ - 4 * o o o
GNXOiO O H CM
vH CM rH tH
0 0 O-VQ tH CM CM
-
CM t N
0 0 ( N - O o o o
vO CN-_^-H N c n
H H
o O O rH
V^CO J>-tH CM CM
•
{>-M
C ^ O W O -3- COM3 o o o
c o h 4 * Q \ t H ^ O H r !
X 3 C\j^r c n O H tH
VO CM '-A H CM H
IF O \ > a o \ •H CM tH
t A > A < M CM CM c n
1 | %
i
\ D O - C N O tH tH
r H . ^ - v o n n r \
>T -3- CM O tH O
c o c o o CM CM-4-
>< ^ A H CS-O CM v~t
C0 CM tH tH CM CM
%
r-l X
•3sic'S»a3S.5RB'jrw»-*5
CM CM CM O O 0 0
•
• ' O O O o o o
• H H H H v H t H
ff o o o H H H
OQCOOO o o o tH tH tH
• H C M n H C M n
207
> i—i X
w
B
O
I W M E-i Q :
fx! W Eh }-—»
O
CO B
«
£> B CO
9
o f *
P E h
8W B
m CO
H B M co o HI PI CO p B b co
PHI B o
§ 1
M H
Q M
g B
PQ S Q
8 g
r , &3 £3 W <* EH B
03
pq
W
oa W rt
8 CO
W £d EH
Q
\ o ON
If
S5
| a u s n i e A a f u o y x ® Q - ° a .
I1? I
f c ^ o ^ o - 1 o n n H Cv] CM
s q . d 9 o u o o 0 T q . 8 m u q . X J c y CO w
GNCTs^n H H W
m W ; | u o f q - e q n d u i o o o x q e r a q q x J C V O -
N
o d v o c ^ r - i CM O-l
° o sSnxiSwai vo
H
c ^ r N j j -c^ -4 -
X i CO 0)
-. B -
£ o
s i l X ^ g - - C p n q s vz°!t xr\ JH
c ^ T c o X i CO 0)
-. B -
£ o
xr\ JH
X i CO 0)
-. B -
£ o
S u x i x s d s H
vO VO f—i rH C\) .
u 0) p
s s x p n q g
p 3 T o o g p u e a o u a x o g M
H CM -3" H H r l
O S u x t i s a ^ q d - e j g - a i B J CM H
0 ^ - j - £>-c n c ^ c ^
S ' - a x u & a H p j c o / 4 H
vO O 00 H 04 H
<1>
O o
-• t o p
CO (0
B
- 5
0 1 0 ' f e q o i o -X
o u T o r " rH 0 \ O rH O r l
<1>
O o
-• t o p
CO (0
B
- 5
s n o n j c S u o o u x JCOJ s j c x s o q VO c a ? T " H r~! CJt
<1>
O o
-• t o p
CO (0
B
- 5
MOIQJ o q . s o : x s & ( i VTN
X CM CM o j
<1>
O o
-• t o p
CO (0
B
- 5
8 0 U 3 q . 2 X S J S i ( J
i , _ , -3*
X
-3- x o r~| r™l i—I
*P
o
A i o h i q k - & i o q . g c n X
CM VO 0D r \ H CM
fc H "* j ] So
o u
q u . a m S p n j ? j r e g CM
X VO CM O CM CM CM
u o u u s i ' - s x q o TH X
CM CNO0
• • •
(S p „
X 3 g « - i
H H H
Q
-P ,
l o o q o g 9 I CM CM CM
§ > © -
S p B . I i ? p i u o o s g "
j c a q a u M s p o o q . t t a p n q . g * f i
ON Ov ON O O O rH t—1 rH | ^
rH © 3 u x a s 9 . T . . ! J j»v * AT\
208
RD <1> PF
S 3 •rH
-P
0 O
1 t > M
a £H
! > r 00 (ACM VOOON rH CM rH
NO On CM ONO-4* rH CM CM
rH CAON (NO\*A r~-j rH rH
j:}- NO Gn rH O O H rH
^aoooo j f r JNCN CM CM CM
i—1 ON 00 CM >A(N i—i rH (H
>? VT\C0 Oi H H H
CM C N O CM CM CA
ON^ACN rH rH rH
00 rH CM O H H
C V ^ A H CM CM CA
ONCO H O H CM
H H f ^ C\1 H H
H CMVO CM CM CM
O O H CM rH rH
NO - V\ O H H
IN- rH O-CM CA CM
VACM On rH CM rH
£ P * A \ Q CA CM -3" -4*
O VT\(N •4- CA.3"
NOCOO cm caca N 0 0 4 -
CM CACM rH H A
*A-3" rH *A0O CAOI CM
VT\ iH
XANO CO CACACM
V A C A H caca- -
00 CA-4*CM
ON00 00 H CM H
CM H 00 .:x NO * A
H v O rH CM CM CA
JH" iNOO rH O O H
H ^A { N rH rH rH
CNCANO r~| rH
H O i n o o o
IN- iN-00 CM CM CM
CM NO -4" O O O
pp O Tsr~\ CM CM CM
rH NO ON C M H H
00 Jft H H H CM
NO 00 H r H rH rH
CM ON i N CM rH rH
On NO 00 rH rH rH
*7L caoo ON cacaca
no oo *a cm caca
NO ON ( N rH CArH rH rH rH NO 00 A
CACAJ^*
VACACN H CACA
CMH A rH CM CM
o cacn CM CM CM
CNCACM rH CM CM
CA- 00 O O O
<ANO (N CM CM CM
ONCA^A O H H
o~ 1 !* i
^ CO ca On rH O O H H
-4- caca rH rH rH rH rH rH
VT\NO * A CM H H H rH rH
0 . r > O CM O O r~i rH rH
COH4" rH CA H H rH
4 " 0 ( n o o o rH rH rH
oo cacn O H H
iN-NO >A rH i—1 rH
CM H CM H
VAONCA H H H
CM NO NO CM CM CM
-4- *ACM H H H
*ACM vrv CM CACM
CM CM VA CM CACM
CM CM * A CnJ CACM
*ANO ^A CM CM CM
CD *AXTy H CM CM
VT^ONIA CM CM CM
i? -3* NO NO H C^H
NO U^ \C H H H
0\0\0\ rH rH rH
O SNON n o
NO ON CO H CA CM
NO O * A H CM H
>V O CM NO -3- caca
CO 00 NO CM CM CA
CM CM-3-C A H CM
NO -3" CM H o c n
NO 00 NO CA CM CA
NO -4" NO CA CM CA
>? N ^ A C K o o o
rH Ox] i—1 CACM CM CNCvJ *A
cacaca ONrH
CM H CM NO ( A ON CM CM H
CA CM *A rH rH rH
^aonoo XA\r\*A
00 O-NO j j - * A
NOOOO ^ A v n
CAXHCA CACACA
ACO vr\ ^A-^t NO
ON NO O CA- - *
•
• H H r l O O O o o o H rH H c:> O O O O O
• CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
• O O O rH rH r~1 rH rH rH
i—1 rH « H rH rH rH
CM CM CM rH f H rH (—1 rH rH
CACACA rH rH rH
^ -3* r - l rH rH X?!
XNXR^\R\ rH rH rH rH rH t—1
• HCxJC^ rH CM CA H CM CA H CM CA rH CM CA rH CM CA
' C N M
209
\ O H n C N C V j O l _-4- V O i r H C A * A ! N - S > - - t O - i > - - 3 " <M 1 O H N <M C3- * A v r ^ . j - i n CO C O O ~t O - O C O H H 1 CM CM CM CM CM CM H H r-1 H H CM H H CM H CM CM g
>? XT\YT\VO VTUACA O CV1 ONON TVCMVO VPNO-VQ J CM CM CM CM CM CM H H H r l r l H H CM CM H H H I
O C -VO VO < > - o S O N M > V T \ t P i C J O O N ON^A H CAVQ I CM CM CM CM H CM H H H H CM CM H H CM CM H H |
• 3 * - 3 " 0 0 * A C A - 3 - - 3 " C A - 4 " CM H «N- O CO 0 0 O — d " O
<A-4-CA CA-3--3- CACACA CA.3-CA CACMCA CA-3--3"
H
v o CACM CA H c o v o c n * n VOJ^-ON O VT\VA ON-4"OO C ^ < A - ^ } - j j - VPi i -O, CM CM CM CM C A C A C A < A - 4 " CM - 3 "
H C A C M v o V O O V O < A O - 1 A V O O C5\ O H _t}- O C O CM CM CM H H CM O O O O O H O H H H H H
O - H ^ A H C A C N O - O O V O H CM O C O O N O N C M V O H H H CM CM H H CM CM H CM CM CM H H H CM H ,
*2
O-CO ON O V O * A 0 0 ^ 3 * 0 - VP\VO CM ON O - C A CM CM * 0 CM CM CM - 3 - - 3 - - 3 * H CM CM O CM ^ O CM CM ( A C A C A
C ^ O V A C A C A < > - O - C M C A CM V O C O C A * A O O CM C A CM CM CM C M C M C M H H H H H H H H C M CM ( A CM
i y
1
| ^X
H o n j j - C " - 0 O C O CM C O CM 0\ > A v O D- - H - 3 " 0 H H O O O H O C O O N O O O O O O CM CM C A H H H H H H H O O H H H H H H H H H
H * A 0 N CM ' A N O V Q i A CM f > - 4 " O - * A C A ^ 0\0-H H O H H H H H H CM H H H H H H H H
SF 1 C M ^ A O v v P i C M C J > A O N C M C O Q N * A CM CM V O * A V 0 CM CM CM O CM C A C A CM H CM H CM CM CM C A H CM C A C A
1 >? O N C O O v r v ^ - c o O N O S ^ - - t j - i - T \ v o t > - v O v o v o v o o H H C M H H H O O H CM H C A H H H H CM CM
> R C O . c i - CM V O CM CM CO O O C O C O O V Q O O V ) CM CM C A ( A C A C A , CM CM CM C M C M C M CM CM C A J3* CM C A
H C O C A M ) 4 - H C O - c J - H V O H O H l A M O v o C A V A C A C M C A H H H C M C M C M H CM H C M C M C M C M C M C M
0 - 3 - 0 - 0 - V O - r > V P i O D H O - O v H CM - 3 " O O V O { > -C A C A C A v n ^ v O C A C A - 3 " ( A - j - v O V V j - V O V 0 V O M 3
• -
• O O O O O O O O O H H H O O O H H H
• C M C M C M C M C M C M C M C M C M CM CM CM C M C M C M C M C M C M j
9
•
V O V O v o N N N C O CO 0 0 O V O V O N O O O H H H H H H i—1 H H t—I H H i—i i—1 i—1 CM CM CM CM CM CM
cd.cd-,-~-£dj^Uzi~~—cJ_d_ci j c d - i d L c i » , c ! - r ± d „
r - I C M C A H CM C A H CM C A H C M C A H CM C A H CM C A
210
ON N
RH H O N H C A H 1—i H rH
C *A\r\ CM O -H H H
N O O O ~RT 0 0 ON CM CM CM
N O 0 0 O N O O ^ A H CM CM
C A C O O CA AC-CM CM CM
4 - C M I N V ^ N 0 4 * H H H
I JH
O rH (—1 rH
0 0 O N H O H H
G V 0 4 -CM CM CM
V A O N C M CM CM C A
^ CM ( A CM C A C A H H H
!H" O C X ) 0 0 H O H
<5 ON CM RH RH CM
"TTcvJTT""6 CM CM C A
" oToS H CM CM
•hftskdv"" CM CM CM H H O
VAO ( A CM
00> 0 0 CM CM C A
o o C A X T V A ^ A
" CTCSN CACA-3"
<\foCH3 A-4" *A
6F&Tt ( A C A C A
vr% H
O N O V O CM CM CM
N O N O *A CM CM C A VR\NO * A
H rH rH C A C A - 4 *
"a3 *cvT C A * A - ^ * C A CM CM
C - O N X A o o o
C O N O C A O O H
\A*AVA CM CM CM
C O C O * A O H H
* A O CM H CM CM
J^-NO CM H H CM
rH rH rH V A O N O O
rH rH rH N O H O H CM CM
O - C A C M H CM CM
CM H C A CM CM CM H H H
tN O N O N C A O H H
IFVRH HI H CM C A
CM O N CM
cn t A o- NOT^T" H C A ^ C A C A - ^
fT7TKr~ CM CM H
V O C A C M O H H
H rH CO rH rH rH
C O ^ - CJN CM CM CM
H o~o H H CM
C A O (N-
CM CM CM
N O H O N H CM O
p-X 04*n O O N O N rH O O
N O CM O N rH ON O H O H
H <AO CM o J$• H rH H
O N CO C A CM H ^ H H H
O CM N O H -r}- H H H H
^ A D - 0 0 O 0 0 O N H O O
] ^ OD O N H O O
CM O - N O H O H
ONVO H H H
3- H CM CM CM CM
CM CAON CM CM H
C A O N N S " " """""
H H H
>r ON CM NO rH CA rH CM CM CM
V ^ C M CM CM C A C A
GNVQ ON CO C'-MTA
^ A C M * A CM C A 0 4
L A ^ A ^ A
CM CM CM
J ^ 0 0 O C A rH CM rH
4* H H rH rH Hi
0 0 N O V O
rH rH C A
O V O O CM H CM
* A O CD
H ^ T CM CM H H
>v N O CM CO C A H CM
N O - ^ 0 0 C A C M CM
V O O N O C O CM < A
SO O O O CM -3"
CM O CM C A CM C A
C O NO-3" CM H CM
1 ^ C A C M £>~ H CM CM
ON ON CM CM CM
( A ON CM CM H CM
O *ACM CM CM CM
H C N - O CM CM CM
> A C M O -H H H
X* N O CM CM C A C A C A
C A G 0 O N
cA.3~ ONVTM>~ vr\A
V - V C V O O VO VO VO
CO -I-NO V V A N O
O - C M C -
# '
• rH rH rH O O O rH rH rH o o o O O O H H rH
* CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
*
CM CM CM CM CM CM rH rH rH
CM CM CM rH rH rH
J:}-CM CM CM H H H
U^XNU-N,
CM CM CM rH H H
NO NO NO CM CM CM H H H
i>~ £>-£>-CM CM CM H H H
• H CM C A rH CM <A H CM CA H CM C A H 04 C A H CM C A
211
J - CO V " \ O N C ^ C M O n 4 1 S O N N r \ 0 \ ^ 0 CM C ^ C M ( \ j H W v n o O O N O ~ \ C M CO CM * A V \ 0 - C Q 0 D O \ O \ H H H H CM CM H N N H CM CM r l H H O O o
J H P V O O H O 0 0 H H H O v - d * H V O CM N H * A O O H H H H H N N CM CM C° \ H H H H H H
. IN-M
H CM O - VO v O O <M O J -=3* 0 0 \ H H CO O - N H ^ A H O O C H H CM CM CM CM CM C A H H H O O O
. IN-M
V O 0 0 ( A V O O - O C - O ^ C O U ^ O - O CM CO CM V O C A C M CM CM C A H C A - j " C A - 3 " c*~\-y- CM C A - 4 " H CM C ° i
VPS n o ^ 4-iao ono-O i n o n co«no- covovo c n P-> CM v v j - * r \ c ^ - 3 - - 3 - C A . 4 - - } - - 3 - - 4 * H H H
O - ON ON O H O 4 4 ^ C - - M 3 ON ONCM C A CACM CM c i H H i—1 CM CM O i—1 i 1 i 1 i 1 H CD ^ H O O O ! 1 !
CM H t > - O r - n n -j-CNJjj- VP^oO ( A ! S O M 5 O N C ~ -H H O H C M H H C M H H H H H C M H H H H
' oa O H H - 3 " - r > C~\ O n O - C N - d " H 0 - - 3 " O n CM CM H H H CM C ° v O 0 ~ \ - 3 " <T\ CM CM C A CM H CM O H H
ON CM ON O C^-CM N H ^ A C - C \ i<~\ v r \ - 4 - 0 0 C A C A O H O CM H CM CM CM CM H CM CM H H H O H H
D -
X
C'AVO H V O p - x c ^ O N H O H O CM C V I O I N O N O O O CO N N 0 0 CM O O CM CM O CM O H H H H H H O O O O H H H H H H H H H H H H H H
>e * A V \ C M c n < r \ c M O N V O H I A O - ON C - C A H V O O V O i—1 !—i i—J H CM t—1 H CM CM H i—1 H H CM CM i 1 CM CM
O O vO VO CM vn »AOnOJ CM NO ON >AVO CM VO CM H H H CM CM CM CM CA f~> CM CM CM CM CM CACM CM
CTsO vo COCOON H vP\\n .toifi ON CM-4- ^ On H O H O O n O H H H H H H O H H H O H
CA VOOVO -•-•vo VO CO O VO CO CM CM -~j-vO CM CO CM H CM H CM CM n C CM h (^(M^ C CM CA CACM CA
C°iH H -ch H H 00 CA*A VO ON ON ON*AH -3-£--3" CM CM CM CM CM CM HCMH O H O CM CM CM CM CM CM
VO ON CM -3- CM ONH CA H -=j- CO -3" CO ACN-CV1 CM CNO"" VO VO l/V-AVO -3* AVO CM -3"
• •
• O O O H H H H H H H H H H H H O O O
* CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
<*
~C0 CO 00 CAOSON O O O Hr-lH CM CM CM oSrSPS CM CM CM CM CM CM CACACA CACAO CACACA CACACA H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H
o H CM CA HN(A H CM CA H CM (A H Cvl (A H CM CA
2X2
CD
£ *H -P 0 0 O 1 1 > M X X X X
M
si o \ 1
M
N O 0 0 £ N * A 0 0 C -H H i—i
C O H V A H CM C A H H H
O N C O C A * A O CM H CM CM
( A O O N O H H CM C A C A
N O C A * A C M N N CM CM CM
0 0 N O O N CM * A N O CM CM CM
, 0 0 M
v O H CM H
N O O rH O r H
C A W f r CM CM CM
C O * A C O CM C A C A
O O N C A C A C M C A
O O vr\ CM CM CM
vr\ \r\\Q CM CM CM
0 0 C O N O O O H
H O O N H CM H
0 0 C A H CM CM
CM CM ^ A CM C A C A
CM H C A CM CM CM
& y -4" O N O N c a c a c m
O O V O ^ CM C A C A
O N O ( A CM-^t-3"
~4* CM C V N O * A
N O 0 0 0 0 C A ^ ~ 3 -
O O n o O
* A H
~i- H CM CM CM C A
H 0 0 * A CM CM C A
O N C A O C A 4 - 4 "
N 4 - N > r \ ^ A * A
CM C O CM CA-4--3-
r-Cxi N O ^r~$r
>? H * A ^ r \ H H H
C A C A C A O O O
M O ( A O O H H
C O 0 \ 0 0 CM CM CM
O H H H H H H CM CM
l c a H
0 0 ^ * A H CM CM
O n O C O rH CM rH
-4* O N - 4 CM H CM
( A 0 0 CM CM CM
N O O N CM CM CM C A
CM * A N O CM CM CM
l c m H
V A O N 4 -H H H
O - C O rH rH O H
N O C O H rH CM -4*
N O H O - 4 ~ ^ A * A
0 0 C A N O C A ^ - 4 *
CM O O ^ A \ A
C A O O N H CM H
0 0 CM C D O H O
H O CM H CM CM
C A C M O N CM C A C M
CM C A O Q C A C A CM
H -4" O -CM CM CM
£ V X
O H N C A H i—! H r i H
O N H rH O O N H H O H
I N - O n H H H H H H
0 0 -4" CM H 0 ~ - t H H H
0 0 CM O H N O H H H
~i- H * A CM cm C A H H H
A ° VT\CM ^ A H H H
CM O N H H O H
C A ^ A ^ t CM <\i CM
O \ A C A CM CM CM
O - O O 0 H r H CM
N O ^ t H H H H
X ^ CM C A O N CM CM H
CM C A ^ A C A C M CM
1 A O n * A CM C A C M
X T \ O N C M CM CM C A
^ A O N C M CM CM C A
CM O N C M C A C A C A
5 " rH H H - 4 H 0 0 H H H
H C O H H H
> A C A N O H H CM
O O O CM CA-3"
-4" ON-4* H O CM
C^i > 4
0 4 * 0 0 -4" CM CM
CM O CM C A C M C A
CM N O C A C M C A
O 0 0 O -4- CM
N O O O C A CM ~Zt
N O CM N O C A C A C A
1 O N 0 0 O N C A C A C A
O n O O > A H CM CM
O O O N O CM H H
C O O N H H O CM
O O - O H H C A
N O O - CM CM CM < A
X* 0 0 - 4 * 0 0 C A - ^ - ^ -
N O O > A * A * A
O N C A C M - 4 - N O N O
H > A H ir\NO O -
CM H H N O i N - O -
O N N O O N -4* ^ A * A
•
• O O C D O O O O O O O O O H H H O O O
• CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
•
- j^r^T ~r t C A C A C A C A C A C A 1—{ H 1—1 H H H
f A n n H H H
C ^ T ^ T ^ ~ C A C A C A H H H
" r m t T O * * C A C A C A r H (—i H
C A C A C A H H H
• H CM C A H CM C A H CNJ C A H CM C A rH CM C A H CM C A
. I
213
.ON *AO CM vo cano H CM CM o o\^ CACM £N* HHH
-s3* CM -3" O H H H CM CM ONO tf\ ON O j—1 O H H
ONNOJ3* VO ON O O O H
Ain4* C0 04* H CM CM
iH5 caoo ca H eg CM
rH rH ON rH rH O CM VO H HHH CO CM *A O H H
VAO-ON O O O CO O O H CM CM
M"" cacn-h H o CM
H CM CO HHH HVO ON CM H H CO H H O H H H O NO HHH
O 00 H j H H CM
itf OOHO CM -3" -3* 4-HO\ cacm ca
H ON £N-cacaca
00 O-CM CM CM CA CM CAVA H CM CM O CO CA -3" CA-3"
ONU VO CM-4*-3* cano r\
CM H CM vo cao J$T *A*A
H~3- CM CM H CM H H H H CM CM CM O CM CA A A
-3" cnNJt H H CM CM £N- H H H CM ONH4* O H H O O O O O O CAO CM O O O ONH CM H CM CM
CO-4* O-CM CM CM MD CM <A O H H CACM O-HHH NO (ACM
H H rH COON H CM H 4-CMN H H H
LC\I H H <A*A CM -3--3" ON CM i—i h cm ca
CACM CM cA- ih H H HHH ^caoT O H O
-3-00 CA CA CM CA
o xno-CM CM CM
-3*00 CO HHH ONCA-3* H CM CM
O-CM ON OHO H CM *A O O O 00 00 NO H H CM
O-X
o o\o 0.4- ca rH rH rH
CNA0 O GNVO CO o o o
On CM A H H CM HHH Onj3* CA NO O On OHO
o\4* ON CO O O O H
CANO ON O H H HHH
l ^ CO-3* CM H CM CM *aonca
H O H CAO-CA CM CM CM On h *A O H H 00 On U"\
p O H {N-\AVA H H CM
Sc i 1
CM On ON sacacm CO Q\a\ H H O 00 CA CM H H CM CVCM CM O CCM ONV VA H CM CM
ON CM 00 H CM H
ONNO i—I O PiH r.J jr-J p-l
H CO HHH On -NO O CM H *A O O HHH
CANO H H CA rH
>V -3-oono cm cm ca CM 00 C O CM NO CM NO CACACA O CM CM CM H CA 00 ONO CM CM CA CM-3* O CACM-4*
>? O- CM CM H CM CA CD ON H H H CM 00 OnvO CM CM CM -4* ACO CM CM O \ACO CM CM H CM On A CM H CM
>& caonco VO UVO O CO ON cacm ca *ACAO
^ xr\\r\ --00 VT\ CM CAJ ONVO CA CM CA CA H ONO-
•
• ( 1 s—1 i—( HHH HHH O O O HHH O O O • CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM •
o o o ~"3* J3* J3-H H H r-T rfrT *" 3-H H H
CM cxTCvT £* \nr ^ jfr -$• -$• HHH H rH H
-Srf • -3* -d* HHH HHH 1 -H CM CA h cm ca H CM ( A H CM CA H CM CA H CM CA
21k
<D £ £ •H -P £ 0
O 1 I > &
x X
W Y
EN
I ^ JH
H CA>ANO CM CM CM
CAONNO O H C N J RH RH rH
* A { N - 0 -O N O 00 I—1 CM H
C A C ^ * A CANO * A CM CM CM
CO-3- H < A C A * A H , H H
. F _ J
CO 00 O N O H CM H
, 0 0 SH
00 O EN H CM CM
O N N H rH O
O - C A ^ CM CM CM
O CACA CM CM CM
V A C A C A H CM CM
ONOO O rH H
I N " O \ C A > A H CM CM
D - r H O O O H H
£N- H NO H CACM
NO VPIOO H CM H H CM CM
NO * A 0 0 H H H
& JN-00 MD O - V N
rH CM CM O N O CM CACA-~T
CACAJ^-^ * A * A
CO CACA CM CM CM
CM ON NO CACA CM
VR\ H
0 - - ^ ~ V 0 -J- * A * A
CK ON 00 rH OJ rH
COCO ON CACM CM
CM 00 CM VPYXT\VRS
D-CM JN-C\J CM CM
-3" H -3" C A C A C A
> T C O O N rH CM rH
NO H CM O H R I
O-OO O H H CM
* A ON CM CM H CM
CA CM R -0 0 0
C A O H H CM
S H ^ 0 V 0 4 -CM TH rH
ON O NO H H H
NO H CA H CM CM
-4" ON CO H H H
NO ( A H H CM CM
CM U - V H CVL CM CM
H IN-MD ^ -3*
CACO CA rH 0 H
H 00 NO (ACM H
H O - O -4* -3*
CN-NO »—1 H CM H
CO O CM CA rH
I > V .4" -3* CM CM CM
C A H !>-rH H H
ON CM VO H CM H
CM ( A 00 CM CM CM
^ H * A H H H
ON C A O H CM CM
I *>-
X 00 0 - - 3 1
0 4 - ^ rH r—I 1—I
O 00 NO O O O O H O O
-4* * A rH O O N H rH O H
O - ^T O CM C A ^ T H H H
O - (N-NO O H ON H H O
J^-NONO CM CM CM H H H
>e £v-I>~CA H rH CM
CM CM VPS H H H
O H CN» r l H H
NO H CA H CM CM
O N O - O -O H O
CM O O O CM CM H
1 ^ VPION CM CM
N O O H CM H
* A 0 N * A CM CM CM
CM CM * A OI CA CM
* A ON CM CM H CM
CM ON CM CACACA
1 ON NO -3* O C A H
O O O CM CM CM
O N H N O O H H
00 O - ^ A C A C A C A H ( A H
O N O H O H H
>p V O V O O ( A C A ^
CO NO O CM H CM
NO NO CM C A H CA
00 O CO CM CM
CM J$R CM (ACM CA
CM -4" CM CA CM CA
& H O N * A CM H CM
CN-O H CM CM CA
• 4 - 0 0 H CM CM CM
CAJT ON CM CM CM
N ( A H CM CM CM
ON CACA CM CACA
S?H RN H CN-*A X N \ N \ A
00 -3* CO CM CM CM
CM CA * A ^ A
CAONON -RT IT- .4-
NO XA-3* -3* *AVT \
NO CM £N-> A * A \ 0
• *
• H H H H H rH O O O H H H O O O O O O
« CM CM CM CM CM CM! CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
• VO NO VO
J ^ I X I X D
O-C*~C--
. H X D L C U
CO 00 0 0 -3" ~:T H H rH
ON ON ON
H H H
O O O V A \ A * A H H . f H
H H H V P y U ^ l A H fH H
•
1
H CM CA r H CM <A H C M N rH CM ( A H CM CA rH CM CA
215
ON H
CO O-CM v o
H H H
CM O H VOOO ON CM CM H
H COCO CO-3- O -CM CM CM
ONCVCO CO COCO H CM CM
VO { > - 0 0 H CO CM H H H
VO H VO U ^ t N - V O H H H
i H *
O > O H H H N
ON CO H CM CM
.3- v o r - f CM CM CO
O CO H CM CM CM
O N - ^ V O O H O
H VO H CM CM CM
VOCM r l H H
O - H CO rH CM CM
CO-3- v o CM COCO
O - v O O H CM CM
VO v o 0 0 O H O
. r t C O V O , H O H
^ A £ S O O CO COCO
C O ^ t VO O * A H c o ^ -
ON CO CO CO-3"
-3- CM CM CO CM CO
ONJ^- O CM COCO
H
VO ON ON CM H CM
• 4 " 0 0 CO V O ^ O V O
O O VO V A ^ O i o
CO C O H C M - 4 * - ^
CM 0 0 CO CM CM CM
O O - O N CO CM CO
H H H CM CO CS. CM CM CM
0 0 0 v o CM H CM
CM O - C ^ H H H
( N - O V O O H O
O - O - O O O O
>T VO CM O H H H
H COCO CM CM CM
CN- ON r H r H rH CM
O v o v o CM CM CM
-3* O O H CM CM
0 0 VO O H H CM
t O J H rH CO CM CM H
{ > - V O O N •WRW
O ON H CO CO-3*
v o vO CO CO CO CO
ON-3- v o O H H
0-0--3-CM CO CM
>T< CO H H H
ON C O H CM COCO
CN-COcM CM CM CM
CM CD CM CM CM
VO j^ - CO H H H
O CM M0 1—I CM H
0 -M
-3" COVQ H CM O H H I H
COJ^-CO O H H H H H
ON CO 0 0 0 0 H H O H H
CM ^OCO -4* rH CM H H H
H CM H 0 0 CM O O r H H
CM H H H O N O H O H
COM3 VO H H H
O CN H H O CM
O N ^ 0 0 H H H
ON CO : t H H H
CM 0 0 VO H H H
CO 0 v o H H H
> f *
CM CM VO CM CO CM
V O O N V O CM CM CM
ON CM CM H CM CO
N G V N CO CO C O
CM ONVO H H H
VOCM VO CM CO CM
X ~ *
O 0 0 ON CM r \ H
^ - ^ t c o r H COi rH
ON ^ O O ( O H
-3" CO 0 0 CO H H
CO 0 0 0 0 H CO CM
^ O X O CO H H H
VO CM CD CO H CM
CM CM O CO CO-3"
0 0 0 v o CM CM CO
0 0 O O CM CM CO
0 0 CO 0 0 CM CM CM
CM VO CO CM CO
CO VOON CM CM H
CM CJ CM rH r H
-4- c o c -H CM r H
ONXOJ^-CM CM CM
H O N ^ t H H H
CM O CM CM H H
NT*
O N H ^ A CO CO-3*
H 0 0 £ S VO x o v o
CM 0 0 {>- c o v o - d -C O V O ^ O
M3 {V-£N-COCOCO
D - O - ^ O x o v o v o
• '
• o o o r H rH r H O O O O O O H H H O O O
• CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM C\) CM CM
• CM CM CM ^ 0 \ O t r \ H H H
CO CO CO V O V O ^ O rH rH rH
V O V O ^ O H H H
v o v o ^ O
, H H H t
VO VO VO v o v o v o
l . H H H _
CN-I>-CV U ^ v o x o
• crrl CM CO H CM CO H CM CO H CM c o H CM CO H CM CO
216
V Y ^ - C O VA.3- CA H H H
CM NO 00 O 00 o O O i—1
ca«>-NO H ON H CM H
ON^T O~ 00 00 ON H H H
O-ONCA CM CM VA H H H
oo o *a O *ACA CM CM CM
>? G\ CN-VO r j r—j rH
O - O ON O H O
H ( A (—' f—1 o
0-ONVA H H H
O-tN-NO O O O
H ON ON CM CM H
x7 1
CO ^AJN O O O
CM NO-4-O O H
ONOO ^A O H H
CM NO NO CM CM CM
00 CM 00 O H O
C A O N H CM CM CM
H CM CA oo ONCO CM CM! CA
CM ON*A .3--3-.3-
*AVO O-CACM CA
CACM-3-CM (ACA
o
VA ONOO VA CACMCM
( A H ON CM H H
ON *A CA CM CACA
NO {N-O CA(A^
,VOI00 H CM H CA
00 C A O C A * A * A
& CM CM O H H H
o O O o o o
\ACM VA H CM CM
VAi>-0\ t—1 H H
VAO *A H H H
X A I N ^ H H H
>p ON CM o H CM CM
00.3* *A o H H H H H
O H N H H H
0-J3--3" H H H
- t ^ i H H H CM
CM in
V0 4 - 0 CM H «H
-3" NO -3" H o o
NO A ON CM CACA
O-CM CA CACA CM
NO o *A H CM CM
ON CM * A (A-3"
C^ONCN-H H H
O O ON H H o
CN-NO CM H CM CM
C—NO O H H CM
NO NO O H H CM
00 00 O H H CM
o-1 M
rxi
VO 0QVO CM H H H H H
{N-CONO T N - O O O O H
VACAH N O N H H H
CM ^AO ONCAO O H H
VACAON 00 (N-ON O O O
£N-R> CM O H CA H H H
CM H CA CM CM H
O O CM H H H
H NO NO H H H
CM 00 CA H H H
CM CM ^ H H rH
CAMO CA H H H
*r CM CACM CACACA
NO O M A H rH CM
* A ON CM CM CM CM
ONVO CM H H C M
ON CACM H H H
vryvO -A CM CM CM
i | ^
^ 4 - *A <—1 i—11—I
ONH H O H H
NO O V O C A H CM
00-4* CA O H H
CA00 O H O CM
RH NO NO H E M
0^ X
CM OVO CA CM CA
O CM 00 CM H CM
OOJ± O CM CM
-4" O CM CM CM
CO NO CM CM H CA
NO O V O CACM CA
& u*\o o CM (ACM
CM NO O CM CM CA
{N-CM CM CM
ON CM 00 CM CA CM
CA~T O H CM CM
CM NO CM CM CM CM
XT' ^AJ3" VO
-D" * 0 -3-00 *A CM CACA
O-ON^A (ACACA
N ^ O O N CM CACA
00 H NO CM CACM
T^OO CA LA^ANO
•
• o o o O O O H H H O O O H H H H H H
• CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
e 00 00 00
• ,- ,n.H, H..H, ,
ON ON ON xr\\r\\r\ .^esUdjdL.
O O O NO NO NO
.... j-rf ..H. H ,
H H H NO NO NO
CM CM CM OACACA NO NO MD NO NO NO
.rrrl . .......HI. rH. rH..
• H CM CA H CM CA HCMtn H CM CA H 04 n H CM CA
2 1 7
1 ON
N
( *ANO ON j CM CA-3-1 i—i i—f i—{
H 4 - 0 NO GO CO rH rH rH
CANO-^V O H O H H H
rH rH On
H H CM
CM -4" CM C M ^ - 3 * H H H
ON 3-NO C A ^ T X A i—! H H
1 . 00 >H
ON 00 H O O H
rH NO *A ^ rH rH
O CACO rH H O
CANO CM rH rH CM
CM CAOO H H O
^ACAJ^-H H H
ev H
ON CM V \ H CM CM
rH {N-CJN rH rH rH
VO J$r 00 O i—{ o
0 4 * ^ tH rH rH
CO O ON O CM H
CM 0\CN-H H H
] t e
1 O H V O CACA CM
ON NO VP> CACAj;fr
NO-^- vn ( A CACA
CO CArH C M - ^ - ^ -
ON CO H CM CM (A
^4 H 4 CM CACA
VPj JH
N W CM CM CA
CA-3" C^. ^
~3* ON (N-H H H
CM CACA CACA-3"
CM O O (A CACA CM CM CA
^ACO j$r o o o
rH ON VA H O H
<M rH CM O O O
rH NO OS H O O
VANOMD O O O
C-CM ON O H O
NO *A^A rlrjrl
^ 0 4-H H H rH rH rH
NO ON * A CM CM (A
H NO CM H H rH
00 H H H H
t N M
CM CO H H H CM
CM C A H rH'CAH
NO rH CA rH r j rH
O N H CA rH rH CM
CMNO O-H H rH
00 ON H H CM
(N-H CM O r H H
ONON^" rH H rH
*A ON NO O O O
CM O N H H H C M
C A ^ A O N H H H
00 H CM H H H
TN- rH CN^A 0-3--3"
1 rH HI rH
rH CA^h O rH rH H
VAO-NO O O O H H H
ONOD o-ON f—I O O H H
•zt ON NO O N O - O O O H
(v. C A H O O N O H O H
C A * A rH rH rH
-3* O rH rH CM CM
CANQ O -H rH rH
rH £N- O rH rH CM
ON VA CA O H H
CN-00 CM H H H
*ANO CM CM CACA
*ACM CM CM CACA
N O V O CM H CM CM
VACM VR\ CM <ACM
* A O W T \ CM H CM
*ACM vr\ CM CM CM
*> 0 0 0 0 NO o CACA
H H O H H 4
NOVO O rH CACM
-3* ON^-rH O rH
^ ONVO H O H
O N H ON O H O
CA
I * NO^TNO (ACM CA
0 0 NO CM CM rH CA
00 CM-3-CM rH CM
CO CM 00 CM CA CM
NO NO CO C A H CM
NO O N O CA CM CA
CO NO NO H CA CM
CA~T OS CM CM H
CM O-CA C A H CM
H 00 O CM CM CM
O 0-3* H CM CM
O CM ON CM CM H
><RH NO GO O J3" VNIVO
N V N O VT\
0 \ - 3 * ~3" CM CACA
rH H O NO NO NO
H H NO C A ^ - A V A
C A - 3 - * A C A - 3 - - 3 -
m
• o o o rH rH rH O O O O O O H H H rH H H
• CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
• NO NO NO Y T V A I A NO NO NO
NO NO NO NO NO NO -jdUdLci
cv-o-r-NO NO NO
.,cH...rHr...-..L_
CO CO CO NO NO NO H H r-|
ON ON ON M 0 NO NO H i—1 H
6 H CM C A rH CM CA «H CM CA rH CM CA H CM CA H CM 0 ^
218
a* H
00 iH
>e
JH
CA N
.CM H
D--X
*ACM £>-MDOCSJ H Csl CM
£VH o" H N N
CQ CO D-CM CM CM
^ A H CM
caca-3-
* A C A V O vo cs-oo H r Hi H H H CA
r-4 r-J r~j
H CM-4* O- ON-3* t—I H rH
AON"5\ H O O
ca - c-1T\0 ^ rH H H
IT rT T rH rH fH
H CM CA CAjfrjfr rH rH rH
C-VO O-vo CN-O H H CM
VOO^A rH rH rH
VO CAVO CM CACM
CM O CM O O O
CM O - V 0 H H H
CO CO vo O rH CM
00 i—| O -rH rH rH
VO O - O n rH rH rH
C0 4 * H caca.3- vo CM vo
( A CM O D V O
CACM CM C M O O O C A C A C M ~4* (A-3-
VO CO CM C A - 3 -
O V N Q \ H I rH rH
-tMO CM CM t'NCA
00 00 MO C A C A C A
O V O rH - 3 - C A C A
CO CO H CM H
o C A C A C A C M - 4 *
H O V O rH rH rH
VAVO ON rH H H
-3* A00 O O O
CO CO N H O O
O N V O CM rH rH CM
O £> - CM CM CM CM
rH OnVN rH O H
rH O O CM CSL CM
vno-cM rH rH CM
VO V P \ Q \ H H H
CnU^ rH rH rH
ONOON H CM CM
~>oo *A CM CM CM
^ C A H CM C A H
H O V O CM H H
0 \ , H 0 \ rH CM rH i—I CAH
00 O O H CM CM
O 04 00 CM H H
O ^ A H CM CM CM
CM O CA rH rH rH
4-M3H H H H
N H N H CM CM
H O CM ( A H H H H H
H vt\ON ONOO ON o o o
4 H V O H -3* CM H H H
CAOvOO 00 On 00 O O O
H VO VO O H O H fH H
O C M - t O H H H H H
JP VO VO 00 H H H
VO D-CO O H rH
0 0 * A V O H H O
CM * A I > ~ H H H
00 C\XfN H H H
V O H CN-H CM RH
X
& If
&
Hf1
* A O N CM CM CM CM
vrvAXA CM CM CM
VACM *A CM CA CM
VO ON XTN CM CACM
* A CM CM CM C A C A
CM XT\ *A CM CM CM
4 " O ( A CM CM H
H O V O H H H
CAVO H ( A C A
O N H H O H H
VO ON-rh H CM H
-4" vO H H H
O- t O - 5- CM -3"
C 0 0 4 -CM CM CM
vo vO O CACAJt
00 CO CM CM CM C A
4 * 0 0 O CM CM -4*
CM tVO (ACM CA
VO H ON CM CM H
H C A V O CM H H
CM CM H CM CM CM
0 0 VO CA O O O 00 00 A
H O O VO VO CM H CM CM
( A O {N-A.- vr\ CM vo D-CACA-3-O *A<\J •4- CA4*
O CM VO VO CACA.^*
CA00 O 4*vo
71 O O O H H H H H H O O O H H H O O O
CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
9 P P H H H CM CM Csl CACACA .4" -4" v y * A X f \ iN-O-SN- C ^ - O - O - O - C ^ i N - IN- C^-
J C ± i d L c i d j H r j , . H H H H H H H H H £ j x i ~
H CM C A H CM C A H CM CA H CM C A H CM CA H CM CA
9*: 19
*d 0
£ •H -P a 0
o 1 i > fH
a
M j-3
Eh
f H * r \ N 4 -H N C n rH rH rH
H JN-CM H C A H H H H
C ^ O N C O -3" iN-VO CM CM CM
O H O - O ON H CM H
o ^ v o O - H CM H CM CM
* f M N - 0 cncM-4-H H H
Q \ -3R ON O rH O
VO 00 cs-O O O
ON CM ON CM C^NCM
H H H S—i I—1
r \ o ON H CM CM
CM H H H H H
SH" ^ \ D ON rH rH rH
O C N - O H H H
^ iN-VO CM CM CM
ONO-VO H CM CM
o c n o N H CM H
cncM CM H CM
I ^ ONONVO CM CM CM
O N O CM 0°\CM
^ H 0 0 -3~ ^ N - 3 "
CM CM H i t
o - ^ v o c n c n ^
rH CM »—1 CM C N M
v \ rH
f>- <M CM rH v N CM
VO 0 \ C M CM CM CM
-4* O O YAvO vo
C ^ O CN Q\C0 c ^ ^ t c n
S>~00 ON ^ CM H CM
00 ON ON O O O
D-CAD-O O O
0 - * r \ c n H CM CM
Owr\\r\ O H H
Cn^n^TN H H H
VO c n ^ t O O O
fH ^ACO CX) H O H
C A H CA H CM H
00 CD NO H H H
CM ~tM0 r i H H
vr\vo vr\ H H H
M C M CM CM CM CM
i rH
0N.3- ON O H O
O CA-3h H H H
C A H C^ CN-3* e n
v£> vn*cM CM <NCM
vo ^ n v o CM C N C N
O X H H H H H
CM *ACM H O rH
O VO H H H
C^xr^ON CM CM CM
C-VO CM H H CM
H H 00 CM CM 0 4
CM H H I—\
O-M
M } ^ \ N ON CO O O O H
VTNVO {>_ O C V H H H H
( n o H H - 4 " H H H
* A H ON O O N O I—1 O i—1
O N O VO O O H H H H
VO H 03 O H O H H H
1 ^ * A O N H H O H
V ^ O N H H H CM
VO ^ O -H CM H
vo -3- -"3" H H H
N H ! N H H H
H O G ) CM CM H
CM CM CM ON CM CM H C A C A
VACM CM CACM
CM VO CM CM CM CM
ONVO CM H CM CM
CM CM CM CACM
J ? H CX) CO H O H
^ -4- NO H <TNH
VO ^ O H H - 3 -
QNVO H O H
c ^ O vr\ H CM H
O H H CM
1 «""> X
~r}~ -r}-CM CM CM
VO CM VO C A C V N
0 4 * 0 CM-r3-
O 0 0 MD -3" CM CA
CM NOVO c n n <rs
v o e o v o CACM CA
& H ON ON CM H CM
H CN CM CM H H
CN-COCO H H H
CM H H H CM
00 O-VO CM CM CM
VO O- ON H H O
K ' 1 VO C NON CAC^CA
o c n o o CAC^CA
-3* O VR\ W O M0
H 00 CO CA-^-
O H H W t 00 *ACM
*
• H H H O O O H H H O O O O O O O O O
• CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
•
^ — , — „ 4
VO NO MO iN-CN-JN* H H H
CN- O- £N-CVC^CN-H H H
CO 00 00 (N-O-CN-H H H
ON ON ON £N- SN- O-H H H
O O O CO 00 00 H »—1 I—1
H H H 00 00 00 H H H 1 • H C M N ri CM <T\ H CM C°v H CM CA H C M C n H CM m
220
rd <D
-P
a t i > H
m
>5* CO cvo\ O H O H H H
CM CM H CACACA rl H H
o 4 - o (A V'A4* H H H
ON Q\J$-ON CM O H CM CM
ONO ON CM CA CM H H H
0s- H O-H CMCO CM CM H
iH5 CO ON^ O O H <JNCA~f
O H H *ANQ
H H H CM ONCA H H H
O CM H H H H
MXCX> vn • H H H
O-OQNO H O O
O H oY* CM H H trscKtfV
H H O CM CM CM H H O H O H
1 , ( j ,
CAN5~trT CACACM
cnJ oo *a CACM CM a\ uTc^~
C\i C O i cd ONThT CACA-3" o15rir~
CACACM
iH ON
l—i CM « } O CN-O-CM CM CM
ONON" CM c^cn
H CM>~ MTF\co CM CM CM
co"3\tTT * -s)- OCM
-3" >7 00-3" *A O O O ON H CM
O H H -j- u^vo o o o
NO ONO H H CM
o-oo rA O O H •3- H
H H H
H 0-c}~ O H H
CA H H H
rH-J-VO H H H
AONNO H H H
O V^os rH rH rH
H ^ O — CM CM CM
,CM iH
C-CO i—Is—{ i—f H H H
™~cTS"cT~ CM CM H CM (ACM
cT*rv3F"-H CM H
~dTm~c3 — —
rH AOO H O O
CM CM CM H H H
NO NO H O H H
ONO O H CM CM
0--3" CM O O H CO CO vo
CM CM CM
t>~ X
HMD O O H O H H H
ANO <r\ oo on as O O O
H V\\A ONO o o H H
ONO o H O O H H H
-3" O O 00 CO Os O O O
CM VO Oi H CM O H H H
CM V~\Q\ H H H H CACA
H H Hi NHNO H CM H
' " o T o l F CM CM CM
>vO CM H H H
M3 H V O H CJ H
> p CM CM ON CM r \ H *AV>*CM
CM CM HI CM ON CM CM H CM
ACANO CM (AH
ONO^n H H OJ CM cvj vr\
CM CM CM
>? o o ^ 1
CM C A H ~7TSm53
H H HI ON o vrr O CM H i>- c ~~F~
H O H ^3rvo~ H H H
, CM-3" H
] > r ON4* CM CACM CO
CM CM CM 00 00 00 CM CM CM 00
CM CM CM 00 CM NO CM H H coo4 -
CM CM CM
& O - C ^ CM O CM CAO CM
H CM CM *A £N- ~ H H CM
CM O CO CM CM rH
00 ONH O H CM CM
CM CM CM CD O H CAMO *A O 00 MO
CACM CA O H N CACA-
H C-NO VACA - CAONO
CA CM CM rH ON XT\\0 XTV
•
« H H H H H H O O o H H H H H H O O O
• CM CM CM C<1 CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM <N CM CM CM CM
• CM CM CM CO €0 00 H rl H
CACACA 00 CO CO H H H 00 00 CO
H H H XTsiTNXA 00 00 00 H H H
NO NO NO 00 CO CO H H H
JN-{>-£V-CO 00 CO H H H
I • H CM H H CM CA H CM CA H CM CA H CM CA H O J N
i
221
xS 0 3 fi •H -P a
o s
> M X a x
P3
V 0 0 4 * o ^n<r\ CM CM CM
CM ^ H O N V O , 0 (N-cm «r\cM
c n o N ^ t 0 0 O O CM C A C A
! H ° H CM CM CM
N O V O H CM
* n o cm cm < n c n
! H " O N CD
rH CM CM c o v o o - 4 - i f CM c n n CM <r\CM
I 4 - O N -4* n ^ t
{ N - - ^ C O xr\
v n JH,
C O O N C M ^ C A
CN* i—1 CM \f\\Q \Ps
H -4* V O V O V O *
*? 0 - 3 * <X\ CM CM CM
w o n CM CM CM CM CM CM
!H 0 0 v o O -H H H
O C A 0 0 CM CM H
O {N-XT\ CM CM CM
LCVJ fH
C D O C n -3-
CM (N-CA -3* -3*-^-
0 0 O N O N ™
CM V O * A CM CM CM
O O O O N CM CM CM
VTsvO O CM CM <T\
Cv-X
V O O N V D O H O N rl H O
o 4 - a ) n n o N rH rH O
C°\ H o n n iH rH rH
1 0 N J > - 0 -o H H CM CM CM H CM H
H v n C M r i r i H
1 ^ \ c m o n CM c n n
^ H C M * A CM C~\CM
^ a c m CM C A C M
1 c n v o h H n n c n c n n
O O 0 0 CM C A H
x T O o v o
CM V O C O CM (T\C<1 ( A
O 0 0 CM CM CM C A
O N J t <r\ r~| rH rH
r~lC0 CM H H
CN-VQ 0 0 CM CM CM
N T 1
CM H O N V T \ ^ (T\
V O * n o vr^xps\r\
0 0 i—| rH * A V O V O
•
• Hi iH rH «—1 rH i—i O O O
• CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
• C O 0 0 C O CO 0 0 C O r^f rH HI
On q n o , C O 0 0 0 0 H H H
O O O O N O N O N rH H H
• rH CM C°S H CM €*% rH cm <r\
i
222
> b
m t-5 9 EH
a
d is © P. r KG
t~r o frl « E~*
0 01 EH i-j* gj O D r~i ca
Q s O I £H r/3 P4 M &4
JH PQ W 9 *—t ca m « 8 CO
N £H M CO o fH PI CO £> £* O £0
w !>« EH] o
£~f CO R &S w frl tu £2 Q l-P3 Jr? M < f £Q J>« P .
So 1*6 K<5 E~i E~* CO IH co en H B W »-l hi fd <
m
fH Q
x—! --4 CM (( fe5
1 1 | ^USK8A9"fU0Y X"3aOJ I
Y?
1
o \oca 00 (T\-ct O nH rH
0) o o C£ 43 CQ O £H a O *H Pi O P •*H fM CX
of 9»iqq.TJCV VD 1 o\^t c r-i c°\ CM
0) o o C£ 43 CQ O £H a O *H Pi O P •*H fM CX
STT"P;S A^O-S pJEOj.1 A >*i CM rH
CM cncn
0) o o C£ 43 CQ O £H a O *H Pi O P •*H fM CX
3-uiXTGcIs CO CO O O *~f
0) o o C£ 43 CQ O £H a O *H Pi O P •*H fM CX
XiernqBOOA <T\ k i r" *
rH CM CM CM CM CM
0) o o C£ 43 CQ O £H a O *H Pi O P •*H fM CX
SuTUt2sj.{ i{dB-.rS-ej;T3cj
Z*
1 i
CD jj- vH t—J rHf CM
0) o o C£ 43 CQ O £H a O *H Pi O P •*H fM CX
SufpBSH P>*°M H c^co <r\ H H CVJ
m s
010 Xeq.oj, C X
"VXaSyS''' o {N ON sH o O
Sco
re tmoruSuooux xoj s j i x s g q VO
X TH ao a\ CM H H
Sco
re
I'iovrji oq. •G,xiP5(j xr\ Sx;
O \D VO tH vH t H
43 CO <D
&• soaaq.sxs.xaj tH VH
vH x—! H
Pro
gn
ost
ic
iCaoras5j Aioag k A r'-
MD vC CO CvH CM
Pro
gn
ost
ic
^uoffi3pnf jxog CM v rN
CN-D-vO CM tH.VH
Pro
gn
ost
ic
• «
UOViTl&J~S%%Q IMOOO"1" C^CMj -
m wwwm-
•
C$ p
xss • • ri H H •
c3 Q L O O U O O « CM CM CM
43 ^ ( > o H 0)
s~*,* 3
sp'ea-o •jraqtanjtf spoo q.U3pnag «
tH r H v~f 0\0\0\ r-^ vH VH :
43 ^ ( > o H 0)
s~*,* 3 t~^ T*T"irS f~1 M"
223
i-d <D S H 43 £ 0 o 1 I >
X
}&-CM xn^t rvt-3-H H H
Nncn CM-h £>~ H H H
CO ONN NO {N-O H H CM
ON-- ON vo CO CO o o o
CM *A_ -O-NO CO o o o
o-co o O-O o O H H
00 H^t O H H }&-
O- 0 \H H ^ Vf> mmj3-
H vr\\Q vrvj-
CO CM vr\ H CM C4
O ONO CM 04 04
00 m o CM men
rv:3- 00 oa mm
jJP COCO CO 04 mcM \AV\O\ -3-V0-3-
~"T C - * O D-ON CM CM H
mH O CM CM m
ON o m • h m CM
o co cn 1 mcM m
£ 4 - H H O H H
\0 CO ON H H H
H NO O H H CM
o m^n o o o H O x—[
o o o H 0 4 " o o o H NNO
o o o
& VOOO CM H CM
H H NO CM CM CM
O CM m CM CM CM •3"-3- *A
H H H ON-- cn H \—J vH
NO NO O-H H CM
mcM H CM CM m
CM H H4- o
vH H H 00 NO o O H CM
ONOO m H CM m
ON ON CM O O H O O N o o o
ON NO O-O H O
O H EN-O H H
! i
11!
i i
M3 O-O r i H C\1
NO co^t H H CM
mCM H CM mm
CO ON<TN O O H
ONO N O H O
m ON o H o
O^t O H H CM
•
NO 00 NO O H O H \—1 H
n O i A ONOO H O O H
H (N H 000 ON H O O
ON ON-3" *A CN- JN-O O O
CO {>~m 00 ON O O O
o o o CM H ON H H O
ISTToT" 00 NO CO O O o
i ^
~
^ CO ^ H H H i>-C0 o
H O H m ^ \r* H H H
CM O O H H H
(NO00 H CM H
CM CO O-CM H H
O o ON CM CM H
NO ON CM H CM CM
ON CM *A H CM CM
CM ON ON CM Cj H
ONONNO O H H no *nm
H CM H ON CM \T\ H CM CM
CM CM H H
: 1
>n H v\ \—I *—1 H!
ONH m CD >H v—I
OOONO H O O vno CM
H H H p~\00 ON cH rH CD
mNONO mH H
CNH H O H H
CM-3" CM -mcM m
-3-NQ CM CM H m
CM NO NO C~S H m
CM NO O H H
^00-^-04 04 O
ONO CM CM H
NO O 00 H CM CM
$ CNVO CM CM M C M CM CM m CM CM H
ONOO O H CM CM
CO NO ON H O O
CM NO CM O N H
H ONO M O H
*
H X CM H vr\
m^-^-CO r-CM CM cn^t
00 NO H CM m*A
M M C M CM CM CM ON H H
CM CN m CM CM m CM cJ"
•
• H H H o o o o o o H H H H H H o o o H H H
•
WKI»Wfc MiTtSi'Jtl WHJCt
CM CM CM CM CM CM CM Cxi CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
9 CM CM CM On On ON H H H
mmm ON ON On *H H <H
^ ^3r ON ON ON H H H ON ON ON H H H
NO NO NO ON ON ON H *H -H
ON ON CN H H H
00 00 00 ON ON ON H H H
• H CM m H CM M H CM M H CM m h w h H CM m H CM m
22h
rd 0
3 •H 4-5 fl
0 O 1 I
w
JM*
H O O GNCA JN-O H H
c o on^a ^ O - O H xH CM
* A O <M H V O O H H C J
^A(AC\1 ~ch O - o H H CM
O- iN* O VO O N H H H C M
n i n o VO M3 iN-O O O
00 O vH O W H
O-cn. CA CM ca-3-
c o v n jn. cm cm.^-
CM H H -3- ^\\r\
CM O XP\ ca-3-^
v o c a o (A-rr ^A
H -Tt rH >r\\r\\r\
\0 H H H CACM CA
vo os^t caca^-
^ a o o O H ( M
4 4 - O n H H H
ON £N- H CM ^A
{N-^- ON O H H
On CM vo CA^-~3-
>AvO ^ CA-3* >A
rH-3" O-C\| C\2 0s2
H N n CM CM ( A
c A On On H H H
N n O H H CM
O O H O O O
CM 00 O-o o o
CM X
H H
i..-A»«Kua.»Eo>;<i
c>-X
CM ON VP» H H H
-4" H CM CM CN
CO V>CM H H CM
MD C50 ON H H H
CM H CA CM CM CM
V0 £V~ C*"N > A O H H CM CM
> A O O O CM CM
CM (A H H CM (A
u^u^cM O H CA
UN U^ VN H CM CA
H H CA CM CACA
O C A O -O O O
VO O H O H H
^ - O N ^ H H CM
o UNCN CM CM CM
-d* ON CA CM CM ( A
VO VO CA CM CM CA
H CM CM CM CACA
CM U"\00 tH O O
C O H 4 O H H
&
• 5 ?
H X
v o H CO 4 * CO O ONONCM **~oo ^ v T " O N D - 0 3 O VO ON Cv-ONH CO £>- H O O O H O O O O H O O H
CO 0 0 CM ONOO ON O O O
O- UNCO oo^h
O O O
7 K v 5 ~ ~ F O O N O H O H
CM A C M -3- O CM CN-VO CO H O H H O H H H
CM VO vO H H H
VO V f ^ H CM H H H H
CM VT\00 H rH H
CMVOON CMCMON U^ ON CM CM H H CM CM H CMHCM
CM CM UN CM CM CM
CM *A CM CM CM CM
O CM O H CM H
CO (N- H CO H O N C ^ i n . O H O H H H O O CACM
O O O HI H rH
-3* O 00 C A H H
H CACA H H H
ON \ A CM H C M CM
C A O O H CM CM
NOO-i - CM O CM - j - w c o HCvlCM C~\ CM CM H CM
-3" -c}- vQ CM O C"N
O CM 3-CM H CM
CM NO 00 H H O
O O.;}-CM CM
COC^CM CO *ACO NO O CN-^-CM CM CM H H H O H CM CM CM CM
v o v o ^ -O H H
H O ( A O CM O
W O O CM H CM
O o n ^ O O CMOO^-%t ^ v n-- J ^ CM^tcn CJ- r>xr\ CM CM CM CM C^
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O H H H
CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM OJ CM CM CM
g g g 3 3 3 g g g g g g - g g - j f
^ L r L l l ^ ft* ^ CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM ^
H p m HCMC-N H w n H W n H e M e n H o i r , H e M e n
225
nJ CD
£ •H -P 0 s
I I >
^ . V O C M 0 4
{ ^ T I iN-ONCM 1 O O rH
s ?
CO O O O H XT\ -c)- \ Q \T\ vr\ CA \Q />_ \r\ w-v ~v ° ? ^ ° £ ^ - 2
TWVH C M O d d T f CM CM H H N
f t
&
CO xr\^ C M rH C M
C A O H C M C A C A
c A O ~ t -3- .3- * A
C A G N \ £ > -3* -3- -3-
00 nO On
O-XACM
t H ^ NO O O O
NO UN ON O H H
o ~ \ o o H H CM
P " ^ V CM CA CA-4*
* A C O o o
vH CACM
H 0 4 -o o o
^ N£> NQ *H XA 0 0 \ C M v A ^ n u ^
NQ (AVO 00 H 0 0 CACA 00 CA-^- CA ^ i r \ ^ t cA-3- ^
OONOCA -3* ON ON CNJ4- o o H d r i H H H H (M
rH 04-3* W H CM
^ j O O j v o ^ J O H H
H fH
v p
CM ONrH T—f vH CM
N O > A CM CM C\i
N H O O H C M
i N - U ^ O rH C M CM
^ - - 3 - 0 0 r - l CM CM
rH NO * A -3- CA CA £>- CA i>» oo oo tH 04 CM CM CM CM rH CM CM
^ACACM CM CM CA
C N O - . ^ -04 04 CA
rH CO CO \ Q O N I A H H V O CM CAVA r H O O O O vH CM CACA rH CM CA
CA00 ON O-CO O ^ A O N H O rH £>-rH rH O rH rH CM CM CM CA CMCMCM
U*\ V 1
FN
,j-4*
> r
CA ON 00 £N- ON VA o o o
CACN-CA H H H
00 00 o O O rH
CM CM VO rH rH rH
CAXANO H CM O
C M V O C M
C M C M C M
O C ATH rH vH rH
r ^ o c o H H H
-3- ^ 00 o o o vH rH rH
H O i A CM CM vH
* A ON CM 04 CM CA
-3- -3* -3-rH rH vH
O O O CM CM O
O CM 04 CM rH ( A
CM-3- 00 (ACM CM
C ^ - R V C D
T H C M C M
00 NO ON H CM H
CM £N-On vH rH rH
C M -^R C M
O O N H H O
CA rH O -H H O
C M O O 0 4 C M vH
ovo 00 TH rH O
CM NO O CA rH CM
^ i H N CM ^ CM
CAC0 O-ON ON ON o o o
MD f - \ O -H H rH
* A O N * A CM CM CM
rH VA vH t-H rH rH
O 0 - 3 -C M C M C M
H r l O C M C M C M
-3* -3* O O O TH
C A - 3 * C M
rH O C A
H H H
rH NO CA NO GNVO rH O rH
v v « A * A C M C M C M
( A O 00 rH CM rH
V A O - X A C M O C M
rHNO CO rH CA CM
NO MO NO CA rH CA
0 4 O O
CA 04
vH X
ON {>-00 TH CM rH
ON CM CA CM CA CM
^ O - C O NO CO CM CM CM 0~N -3* -3* -3- NO
N C M O rH CA-3-
ON CM CM C A ^ VA
VA CA 04 C A C A ^ -
^N00 O -CA CAVA
H H o o o o o o O O O O O O O O O r-4 T H *H
CMCMCM CMCMCM CMCMCM CMCMCM CM CM CM CMCMCM CMCMCM
' O ^ o o o o o o o o o 2 2 2 ^ ^ « H W C V T C M
v d C M t n ^ C M c n *H CM 0 ^ *H CM r-t CM C~s ^ CM
226
CD 2 fi •H -P £
O I I >
sJO
-d-
s *P
CM iM
i H
c -X
v£)
r "m
CM X!
CM CM tH O s C ^ O CO a s rH C"- ON CM H H N O O tH
ONNO O-o ^ r v S *
G\^t 00
CO O ON H CM H
m N O CM vH rH CM!
h C N ^ A CM CM CM
- r t QNCn O Q tH
O O O M 3 r v o ON rH vH vH
C M N O C7\
^3- -3*
NO 00 NO C^-Zt 4 *
CN-CO ON O rH tH
00 ON CM CM CM
OND-.NO CM c ^ < r \
00 A4-tH H CM
O N O m O tH i H
00 m rH rH tH CM
00 ON ON NO ON CD O O O
NO 00 tH CM CM CM
H O N N CM CM CM
O^NCNGO O O O
C N m C " \ O H H
c ^ - 3 - O O 00 i N CM CM O CM NO ON CN00 ON ON rH tH rH rH rH vH tH rH O vH tH
o o 0 ^ f -r>
-3- oo e n 0"N CNct*
O-CM O O H CM
ON 00 tH CM CM
c ^ c n c M tH rH CN
ON rH CM CM <TNCn
CM rH rH vH CM
4 - 0 0 o . tH CM CM
O O O -O tH O
v-i^r c^\ tH H r l
O - c h oo rH CM CM
ONNo tH rH CM <TN
m m m
NO NO rH
rNNO £N-
rH x—( x—I
rH ON CM CM vH CM
v-i CM <r\
C ^ j n - O CM CM 0 ^
O r - m (r\(r\(r\
• ^5- e - m CM CM CM
rH m ^ o o o
00 tH m tH CM CM
vHNO tH vH O vH
00 NO O O rH tH
rH m o C M ON tH TH O *H
01"N NQ NO 00 00 ON O O O
CM m O O N O CM O H rH
£N-ON£N H H H
NO ON NO H H H
o - r - o o H H H
m N O CM CM CM CM
<r\ ON ON H O O
NO NO NO C^wH r N
m O N N O tH rH tH
sH (>-00 vH O rH
4 N O O CM r~1 CM
O M N O
C ^ N C M C M
C^-mNO rH CM CM
CM O ON CM CM CM
ON NO 00 O n n
NO NO CM rH tH (TN
oo NO e n CM rH CM
oo a s 00 IN-00 O O O
rNCM o~ rH tH rH
C N C ° \ 0 ^
m N O N O rH rH vH
4 * n 0 O CM tH CM
O N rH rH CM CM
m N O N O
ON 00 ON O O O
CM C ^ N tH CM tH
00 ON CM rH tH CM
O s O tH O rH rH
00 CM 00 C M tH CM
CO CM 00 CM CM rH
CM a~\ f>-H O O N rH tH O
CO NO £>~ tH rH tH
VHCMOS C M C N V H
-3" tH m rH rH tH
NO 00 E N E M C M
O N O 00 «H C M tH
4 - O C M £N O -
O O o
tH m m rH rH tH
C M C ' ^ O N
C M T H rH
CN-ct M0 O rH rH
CO^h csi o o
o o 00 rH CM rH
m - 3 - O 4 - C O H EN-NO {>- CM CM CNCM-^* H O ^ N O O N r H m CM CM r N CM (TN0^ CM CM CM CNCNO^ c t m c M c n < r \
rH rH tH rH rH vH O O O O O O rH rH rH O O O
CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
C ^ R N O ^ m m m N O V O N O J N C N C N O O C O O O O N O N O N
tH rH rH tH rH rH rH rH rH tH rH rH rH rH rH rH rH rH rH rH rH CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
rH CM CN H M r \ tH CM n H CM r \ H CM c n v-! CM C^ tH CM 0 ^
2 2 7
• d CD 3
• a ~ p
£
« s I I
m
if* 00 CM CM OA O H 0\ CV OA Vf\ t/\ ^^£7 vo-co ocvjw H H H O *-* *~i HHH O O O HHH
~i OSJ V Oi C^ x A T-f Q\ H 0\0 CM NO CM ~ V -3" CM OA-4" CM CM OA rH CM CM 0A
t>p CM 0V3" OA COM3 CN- OA H G\ 0"N tN. CMOACA OA OA CM HH^j CM S A N
2 ! I 7 9 5 £ } - H O H N 0 0 H v n o v o O v H H O O H H r 4 H O O O O H O
° 2 X ) ^ ^ i f ) ^ O O 0 \ X f A \ a A \ 0 H CM CM H CM CM H CM CM HHO H HH
CO On CM H H CM
H O A C O ^r\\r\\r\
CN-MD H c K : t ^ A
* A 0 \ O H rM CM
H 0AO On On h H H CM
H VO H OA OA-3-
\ o \ o n —J*
CM CO O H vH CM
£N- VA H CM CM OA
H O ^ A OA CM OA
rjT-«S».*3»i533sr-£*
^ 2x1 00OAOA O O ON ON O- CM H H CM H O H i O H H OOO O O H
On On CM O V - 3 - CO ^ uaoa 0 A ~ d - h h m v n O C M v - , 0 $ < M H ; H o CM
CM O-0A CM CM OA
V O CO 0 0 OA OA OA
VVO H CM CM OA
U A V ^ O A OA OA OA
N O ^ - ^ CO CNOO O O O
OWACO H H H
04 V0 CM CM H CM
HOD O NOVO £>-O O O
^ O O A ( \ I H
o ^ t O HHH
CM XACN. ( N - C ^ -O O O
O N O > C M NO NOVO O O O
r H <—1 vH
•3" CM CM CM H r H
CV00 CD O H H
00 OA H O ri H
NO CM O H H CM
CM On NO CM O H
H 0 4 H O H
NOVO CM H CM 04
OA CD H O H H
O CM O CM H O
N O H CM O
N O X T ^ H H H
ONOCM H H CM
OVO H r \ H H
CM V0 00 H H O
CMO (S H H O
V O O A CM O - 0 Q N O O O O
V0 O-CO H H O
ON O CM H CM CM
H CO H H O H
00 O CM CM CM H
CM CO On O h o
00 CM O H OA O O ON H o H H O H H H H
N C N O N H H O
VAVO CM CM H OA
OVOOO H H CM
CM jj-0ACM CM
O D N i N H H H
O-ct OA OA H H
* A C M \f\ CM CM CM
H ON<h CM O vH
NO CM V0 cac^CA
owo cm CM CM CM
4 v O O O A O A ^
VO ONh CM CM-" CCMCA CM H CM OA OA OA ^
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O H H H OOO
W C M C M N O J M W W W C M C M C M CM CM CM C M C M C M CM CM C\ i
O O O ™ 5 n n n w w w v . o v o v o
a S i S i
W ° ^ C M C > t - l CM C~\ H N ( n
228
, V \ CACO ^ l ^ G x 0
JO O
ONXACA
H XAOO
H H H
H N N l A £>- O H H CM
O H M ) VAMO O -
H H H
ONCAON o ^ h cx) H H H
CA H C}-
CO H -D*
O H RH
CM CM CM
00 (>-00 CM H CM
ONHGO
O H H
CM
H
H
H
o -X
MO X
* A X
c^ "
X
O ON CA CM CACA
ON CM ON C A ^ t - ^ *
O O -CA .
H H H
C V 3 - ON C A ^ t ~~t*
C A H CA C A ^ t * A
^ v O O H * H CM
MO H M O CM CACA
H 00 rH C A f A C A
ONCM-RT*
O RH RH
X A ( A H
CM CA-4"
*AON~3~ C A { A ^ t
CAMO O vH \—I CM
H H O CM CA-Ch
C ^ O - C A H - 4 " XA H H tH
CA £S- CN-CM CACA
MO V M A H CM CA
00 00 A O O H
•M0 00 MO CA ( A CA
O CM 00 H rH tH
X A C A ^ A H H H
100 ON ON o o o
rH O V O CM CM CM
00 o ~ o -O rH CM
^ A CA CM CM CM
CAONNO CM H CM
H CO CM rH rH CM
ON *>."£>-
O H H
CM ^zt CA CM CM CM
4 - N C A CM tH CA
CM CM O -( A CACA
V A O N r H O rH CA
CM CM 00 rH rH rH
CM CAMO
H H H
I A O V 4 -H H H
H O ON
CM CM CM CAONON CM CM CM
ON ON CM CM CM CA
O 00 H
CM H CA JN-00 ON
H H H
4 " CACA
H CM CM
CO MO IN- ON CO O H ON r H O ON ON O CO O ON 0 - CM O O O N O
O O O O O H H O H H O O H O H O O H O O H
H V ^ O N ^ O N H 0 0 C N - 3 " D - C M ^ A ^ A C A ^ A * A H XA H O N O N
H H O H H CM H H CM H H H H H H H H H H H H
O - O O ON ON ^ A CM CM ^ A ^ A CM * A C \ CA * A CM VO * A NO CAMO RH H CM H H CM CM CA CM CM CA CM H H CM CM H CM H H H
M0 CM 00 V A ^ A O MO ON^* " A CA O ( M O O -3* H O MO -3-C M O O H H CM H O H H H H H C4 H H H H H H
X
O O O CM O CM O ^ CM -4* MO CM CO CM ^ M3 V0 O CM M0 CM CM CM (ACM CA CM CA CM H CA CM H CM H H C M CMCACA
CD O O O CM ON CM MO 00 CO H CM C O H V O M O M O O ON 00 CO O CM CM H H O C M H H CM CM H CM H H CM H CM H H C M
R C 0 ~ 0 CM VA IN- CAVA OA VA00 VA OFCM O NOIFMO '~ONCACA
CM CM CA CA CM CA^± VA CACA-3" C M CACA CA CM CA C A C M ^ H x
O O O O O O O O O H W H H H H O CO CO
CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CMCMCM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
O - (N- CN- 00 00 00 ON ON ON O O O rH H H CMCMCM CA CA CA CMCMCM CMCMCM CMCMCM ( A CACA ( A CACA CA CA CA C A CA CA CMCMCM CMCMCM CMCMCM CMCMCM CM CM CM CMCMCM CMCMCM
H CM CA H CM CA H CM CA H CM CA H CM CA H CM CA H CM CA
229
Q) 3 S3 +3 c <3
CM O rH OCM^A H H H
O-O D-o\~ - ca O H tH
t—1 MD iN-O tH rH CM CM
O {>-vO CO O CM vH CM CM
CM CA £N-O M0 tH rH rH
o - r v n 00 tH
rH rH CM rH CN-VO 00 O O O
CA IN-CM n n r \ o n o
CM CA CM O -3*^- >A
V\CA-C}--3* vo\r\
*ano 0 rH CM CA
ca cavo cn^t *A
O CM 00 CM tH rH
& vH CM VO -3- -3* - "
o oo ca cacaca -3* ON vH vovo *A
xr\ ca on ca CAIA^ CO +H CM cj- ^ ^zt
CM 04 CM
!H" vo ca !>-O tH tH
vaco o\ O tH H
vo c%co rHI rH vH
V0 00 O tH rH CM
JN-VO VO O tH tH
O CM ON H r i H rH (A*A
O O O Os^ O i—f H CM
VO VO CA H H C\l cncno
CM CM ca caod-c}-CM tH CM
i>- CN tH x 1 vH CM CO CA-3"
cm caca O rH CM tH tH tH
cm H ^ O 00
O rH rH ON H H r l
CM O -VO cm caca
>ACN-C0 CM CACA
CM tH 00 rH CM CM
vo O N xr\ *h cm ca
VO \A*A O O tH
vH H
•V^FFLSSKISSESAAFC
0\-zf 00 vH CM T—1
VO tH (A tH CM CM VO H rH cm caca
xr\xr\xr\ cm caca
CO CM ON rH CM CM CM AOn
cm cm cm O O rH r •} H rH
•
£>-X! O^H H CO £N- r~? O O tH
NOON tH JN-00 rH O O
00 ON CM O ON rH rH O vH
CM ON (N-O O CM tH rH rH
CM VO CO CO CO On O O O
VO CM CM Of^tH tH rH rH
O ONO C-O-ON O O O
' \o X cm {N-co
H H H \OVO ON rH T H V H
CM <MCO rH tH O
CM-ct CM CM CM
VO VO O-tH rH tH vO vH ON
rH tH O C \AtH H vH H
VT\ X
ONONCA H H OJ VTyO ON
CM rH rH ^AO *A (SI CM CM ON ON *A
rH CM CM CM ON CM CM rH CM 00 ON CM
TH CM CM vo O N MD tH rH *H
# o-caoo O d d ON CM ON
(A*h o vr\vO rH CM rH
^ O rH rH CA ONOVO
O rH rH vo -r VO r-i CACM
vo 1AO O tH CM
>T VO 00 CM tH CM
OCM^ CM rH CM
V0MD O HtH4-
CM -M" VO CACM CA
00 O CM CM CM vo CM CM CM CM O
rH tH CM
$ H\0 4* N O C M
£N- t 00 rH tH rH O *A-3*
0 3 CM CM lAiN-CM rH T H rH
CN- rH On O CM tH
O V O < A CM CM CM
ONOO CA tH tH CM
•
vH aoncm
cm cm <a c^O xr\ CM ^ C A
O C A C A
*A\r vo ONCAON * A \ A
CMC$* rH C A C A * : T
V0 tH rH AVO O- CM CM CM
•
•" o o o O O O rH tH rH rH rH rH 0 0 0 O O O rH tH rH
• CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
• C A C A C A CM CM CM
invTiin cacaca CM CM CM
vo vo NO (ACACA CM CM CM
0 - C A -caca ca CM CM CM
00 00 00 cacaca CM CM
ON O N O N ca ca ca CM CM CM
O O O -:r -4* CM CM CM
• tH CM C A vh cm ca RH CM C A tH CM CA rH CM CA tH CM ca tH CM CN
2 3 0
xi <D pf
4 3 £
<3; >
£ 3 H i
EH
V8KWSar *»*.
{ 2 0
! h
CM X
d H
o -X
VO X !
> A O ^ o c n o CM d O - ^ O n ^ A d d O O M D - ^ C M c a c v o o o \ c a * a 0 0 0 d 0 4 c a c a ^ a n o H H H O d d H d d d d H d H d
CM D - O H H O i
o o o o ^ a v n o a o \ n n h j > - c o o - c A d x a c a o n x a r-4 c\2 CA H O ^ t n CM CM CA C A C A C A . 4 - v v < A C A C A - 4 "
O ON CO CM O VA O D d O CM CANO NOVO CN- ON * A ON CA-4* CA C M C A C A CACM CA C A C A ^ t C A - ^ -3"
NO O O 0 0 ^ -3 - CANO 4 " H ON U ^ C O * A (AMD O d CM CM d d d O O O O d d O O d d d CM
O n O GO CM NO 0 0 d d d
CANO d CA-3" VA
d N Q CA-3*
ON . ^ - GO O H H
CANO VA d O N O O n ^ A C M N O d - 4 " G M N 0 ^ > A - d " d d d d d CM d d CM W CM H CM CM CM d CM CM
0 0 NO O -CM CM CM
O CO CA X A C M O CM C Q ^ r {N- NO d O ( A O O n d CM CM CM CA O d CM d O O O r d vd r d d vd O CM CA
0 0 ON-^3" N O H {S- 4N--3" C N - r d r d ( A r d ^ A CD CO CM CM CM CA r d CM CM d d d d CM CM d CM t d d CM CA
d CANO r d d CM
4*0 0 d CM CM
d 0 \ CM o \ ^ o O O d
CM U T 5 n CO 0 - 0 0 O O O
O O O O CO N O N O N O a o H N d CM O CA vd <0 r d O O O d O O vd O H H H v d
CA X
CM X
d X
•'sss'sisssisaas'.'iEsesitw
CM O d d d d
M D \ Q V \ tH C\i
r M v j -d d v *i
CM NO NO CM v d d
NO 0 0 NO d d d
ON O - CA d d d
C A O N V A d O d
O N O N ^ A d CM CM
0 0 ON ON d d d
X A O n X A CM d CM
>-A^3* d vd d d
X A C A ^ A CM d CM
^ A C M N O r d d d
^ A ON CM CM CM CA
OA d d d d d
ON d NO O d v d
V \ O N O d CM d
d vd CA d d d
CM CM CM CA d CA
O N O c ] -CM d CM
NO NO NO C A d CA
0 0 . 3 - 0 0 CM CM CM
ON ON v d O O v d
O V 0 4 * CM d CM
v d NO d d d
CO CM NO CM d CA
O N O O d CM CA
NO O 0 0 CACM CM
CO O CA d d CM
CO ON v d v d vd
O V « A O N d d d
0 0 O XA d O v d
CM V T \ H C A O O
O ^ CM CACM CM
^ O d CACM CA
NO o CO CM 0 0 0 0 V A 0 0 d * A ON-^- >ANO 0 0 0 \ 3 r 3 r ~ ^ d 0 " C A C A C A CA C A 4 * CM d CA C A C A C A ^ > A CM CA-^* CM
d d d O O O d d d O O O O O O d d d O O O
CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
d d vd CM CM CM C A C A C A -3* ^ ^ \ f \ i r \ x r \ N O N O N O {>- O - O -< 3 - . 3 - . 3 - . 3 - . 3 - . 3 - - 3 - . 3 - - 3 -
CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CN? CM CM CM CM
d CM CA d CM CA d CM CA d CM CA d CM CA d CM CA d CM CA
231
CD
£ •H +5
a
&3
E^
r^~
& CM
X
•zanrvSfSaasettA:
£N-
v a X
3
f ^ P
&*
X
CO 3" r-4 o ^ t co
v-< tH
O O N \ 0 00 CO o o o
md i r \ !>-G \ CO v a O H H
00 VO rH V P i O N H H 1—I N
C^CN-CA CM-3* 00 H H H
H CM ON 00 vH c a tH CM CM
\ Q ( A O 4 - ^ A O H H 0J
ca~3- j j -c a c a v O H H H
I N O n O CM ca-4-
00 C^MD rH CM CM
^ CN- £V CM CACA
O f X ) H CM CA-3"
O CM CO \r\xr\\r\
CAOO x a c a c a ^ A
• 4" ON -3* * A * A
c a c a c m x n
i > - C A O C A O W O -3- (A-3-
O - C A C A jfr v n i r v
' O H CO
M ) O N O H H
* A 0 0 ON H H H
CM CM x n o o o
C A ^ a o o rH rH rH
O 0 - 0 -rH O x—!
vH \ o 00 rH rH rH
N P i N O d d
O j v O O H H CM
v HVO O H H CM
C O O N *H CM vH
vnc5* * A CM CM CM CM CM CA
ON CN> £N-CM CM CA
CM CACA CM CM CM
{N-CM CA O n n
^ A O \ n O O H
O CM rH CM CM CA
O v : r O H O
ONM3 rH O O CM
x r > { N . ^ H H CM
{N -CN-N O CM CM
rH ^ VO H rH rH
rH O 0s-cm c a c a
n o o H H CM
00 JJ- CA H C M n
O 00 ON rH rH rH
00 CM CA cm n n
0s- O 00 rH CM CM
rH rH 00 O^vo ON CACACA 00 -3* -3* CACA On \ Q rH CrFcM CO CO rH O -V^qo O 00 00 00 on On On CO rH On 00 CM OOONrH O O rH O O O rH O O O O O O O r H O O rH O O rH
^ V O r H O W ^ N O ON t~i 00 CM rH * A VT\00 O O ( A ON O vH rH CM O O r H r H C M r H CM H H rH rH CM rH CM rH H rH CM
VO On * A CA (AMD * A ON ( A * A ON * A ON xr\ ON ON ON * A o n ^ A rH vH CM H H H H H r l CM CM CM rH CM CM rH H W rH CM CM
XT\ rH CO * A CA CN- CM ON ON x t \ \ D j3* * A \ A 00 VH CO 00 H O H H r l H H d vH O O r ! CM H rH rH rH O \H CM O d d
O VO CM CM CM VO M3 ^ ^ O CO 00 CM M O ^ O CO VO CM CM \-H CA H H H CM rH CM CM CM CM CM O CA C A CM -:3* CM rH <A
MO ON CM ~ r CA-^t n c o ON CM CO VO VO N C ° \ ^ O O N CM > A ^ A rH rH CM CM rH CM CA rH rH O O rH rH H CM r H r H r H CM CM CM
C^^3-^h 00 rH ( A CM ( A O N 0 - V A C M VOOOMO rHCMON (AONOO' CMCACA CM ( A ( A CACACA ^ \ A CACA^A VAXA^A (ACM -3*
r H r H O O O r H r H r H r H r H r H r H r H r H O O O O O O
CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CMCMCM CMCMCM
CO 00 00 ON ON ON O O O rH rH rH CMCMCM ( A ( A ( A - 3 - ^ - 4 - \r\ vr\ \T\ xr\\r\\r\ \jr\\r\\r\ v n u ^ i r ^ v a v a \ a CMCMCM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CMCMCM CM CM CM CMCMCM
rH CM ( A rH CM CA vH CM CA rH CM CA rH CM ( A rH CM ( A rH CM CA
2 3 2
OJ tH
H
D-X
vO *
i ! P
CA X
CM X
X
^ 0 - 3 * o i ^ - o \ H H H
o o - ^ r 0-^A£>~ o o o
VO 0\CA C A N O o o d d d
O ONCA E N CM CO H H H
H i N \—I v ^ v o o o o
*ACA00 C^-H ( n O H H
VO^t O CM-rr Oi CM CM
CM O - O -C A C A - 3 *
C ^ . O N C O
O *AN0 H H H
N O ^ i d CM CM
* a CM d CM
O O d o o o
CAO~-^* CA-^ *A
NO CO o « A ^ *A
*A O- On H H t—I
CO H N CM CM (A
0 4 - N -3- cj- -3-
o H H CM
CM d O N d H O
IN- O N X A HHCN3
O O tH O O O
\ O h N d (A (A
CO CO O N \ H CM CM
no O~^A O O tH
CAd-3" xamO XA
CM *A-3* I A ^ A ^ A
NO O O d CM CM
d O d CM tH CM
CA O vH CA
N O 0 - - 3 " d O d
CO O - N O o o o
N O O Y A tH CM tH
NO CO N O d tH CM
O O d d tH d
O- O-NO tH d CM
vamd C\ CA CA CA
-3-^-NO rH tH vH
tH NO *A d rH CM
O O N o o o
O N d CM O d d
NO CO 00 CA (A CA
-3- v r \ o \ CM CM CM
^ A O - i n O O O
CM ( A ON CM CM CM
CM NO 00 CM d CM
CM O-OO tH O O
O N O N O N O d d
^ ^A CA CA CA
vH^h 00 O 00 d CO O- ONNO O-rH vO 00 On OX CM CA C O O H O - O O - 00 O-OO O ( N O tH O-MO O- O-NO 0 \ 0 4* O d d O d O O O O t H O t H d O O O O O O d d
^ • ^ A O ^ CM CM NO NO CM ^A~r> d VAGQ *A CM CO 00 d O *A d d CM d d d O O d d d d d O d d d d d tH d
CM NO ON ON O- ON NO 01 CA >lA CM XA CM O ON O ^ACA *A CM ON CM CM CM d O d d CA d CM CM CM CM.CMd d C M d CMCACM
ONd ON O d O
•3* 00 NO C\J CM CA
CA~4" *A d CA d
CM CM 00 d d O
CM ON*A d O d
04 NO CM CA d CA
n d ^ d d CM
CM CM O C A d CM
-3" O-OO O d ON CAdNO CA O O d d O d tH CA
O ^ 0 0 NO - CM N O O NO CM OJ O d CM d (ACM CA
( M 4 - 0 d CM CM
O d O CM ^ CM
CM 00 NO CM O d
CM O VO CM CM CM
CA00 d <X)-3- O- 4 " ( A N CM H d CM CM d d CM CM
O N 0 0 C A ^ A O O N CO * A O N d -CT* N O O N CM NO J J - O N 0 0 O N C A O N CM C A ^ ± CM CM 0 4 CM C A ^ T C A C A - 3 * d CM CM CM CM CM * A M 0 > A
d d d O O O O O O O O O d O O O O O O
CM CM CM CM CM CM CMCMCM CM CM CM CMCMCM CMCMCM CM CM CM
VA^A VA NO NO NO O-O-O- 000000 ON ON ON O O O H W H %A\R\VA \A^AV>I VAXAXA I A VA \ A VA VA*A \Q \Q \Q \Q\Q\Q ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ CM Q] CM ^ CM pa CM CM CM 04 CM CM CM
d CM CA d CM CA d CM CA d CM CA d CM CA d CM CA d CM CA
233
<D
• H
- P
o
m iA 3 EH
&-V \ ^ * A
O - H CM
TH 0 4 CM
a w o O D C M M O O
V" -? r H CM
CM V O C O
v o O N CM
O O T~t
J N - > A C M v o O v
H t H H
- 3 - O ^ r C A * A O -t H t H r H
^ A O v v Q
* A O CM
r H CM CM
X A r H 0 0
O O v H
t H v H t H
j & O N C A O N
C V 3 - - 3 -
CM i > - ( S -
C A C A J 3 -
V A r H CM
v H C A - 3 *
CM CM CM
CM CM C A
4 - V O H
CM C A - 3 -
C A O - X A J $ - \ T \ \ T \
0 0 O - O -
CM r H CM
1 ^
O N C A ^ A
* A * A
CM C A C O 0 0 V O V A
t H CM CM
O N ^ A O
c v j ^ a - I A
Q \ TH £ N
C A - 3 * - 3 *
C A 0 4 * V \ * A
CM O O
C A C A C A
! H 4 - O O N
t H CM t H
O - CM O N
O H H
X A C A O N
O O O
V ^ - 3 " O N
H \ ~ i H CM C M M D
r H H t H O v c A O v
O t H t H
^ M 0 CM
O O t H
& r H C A CM
CM C A C A
CM C A O O
CM CM CM
C A C 0 V O
H H CM
C A C A ( N -
CM CM CM O t H C A
CM CM CM
O N 0 N ^ *
CM CM C A
O EN-CM
CM t H CM
CM
H v o C A V O
CM C A C A o C A ^ 3 -
r H CM C A C A ^ A O O O t H
t v ~ t H G \
CM C A C M
r H O - C A
CM r H CM
t H C D C A
t H C A C A
V D 4 * O
O t H r H
v H
H C M - ^ t
CM C A C A
V O O Q CM
v H CM ( A 0 0 C A V O O H r H
r i O ^ A
C A C A C A 0 0 C A ^ t
t H CM CM
O O r H
CM C A C A
V A C N - C N -
t H r H r H
«
£>- o - c o ^3-O N O O o
O O r H
4 - M D O
O G \ CM
• H O r l
C O 0 0 0 0 V O V O O O O r H
CM C O 0 0 O N O - O v
o o o
0 0 0 0 D -
O C O o \
t H o O
O V A '
O O N CM
H O H
a v o v o o
O N C O C O
o o o
1 ^ ' 0 D 0 0 O -
r l H r l C O H \ D
H C M H 4 - O v i N
t H t H TH V O ^ t CM t H r H CM
t H V O V O
CM t H t H CM C A * A t H t H t H
r H * A C M
v H v H t H
CM O M A CM « H o a
CM V O * A
H H CM ^ A ^ A C M t H CM CM
CM O N V O
CM t—1 v H ^ A O * A
C M . r H CM
V O ( n O
t H t H C A O N V O CM
r H CM CM
O H V O
H r i H
x r \ \ A V O
H H H - 3 - 0 0 - 3 * H O H
C O V O t „ H
O *—1 H O N O O N O t H O
V 0 V O C O
CM t H r H - 4 - 0 0 £ N - -r H O O
J^P - 3 " - 3 * C O CM o a CM
V O O v Q
C A C M ( A -^3* v o 0 0
CM t H CM
0 0 0 0 V O
CM O C A 0 0 - 3 * C O
CM CM CM 0 - 3 - o
CM CM - 3 *
0 0 v o O
CM t H CM
CM
X C A V O 0 0
CM H H C A ~ * t £N-CM CM CM
r H O £N*
O O CM 0 0 CM C A
H CM H
V A C O O N
CM CM t H CM
C A C M CM CM CM CM
•
t H
X " a N V O T T "
C A C A V A
V A V O
C A - r t ^ -
C \ > A 0 0
CM r H C A CM ^ A O N
C A C M CM
V A O v ^ -
C A C A ^ t O C A ^ t
- 3 - ^ " X A C ~ \ ^ T O N CM
m
• o o o r l H H O O O O O O t H r H t H o o o H H H
* CM CM CM CM O j CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
t
CM CM CM \ 0 M D v o CM CM CM
C A C A C A V Q V O V O CM CM CM
- 3 " - 3 " - 3 *
v O V O V O
CM CM CM
v a V A > A V O V O v o
CM CM CM
V O v o V O
V O V O M D
CM CM CM
C - i N - *>~
V O V O V O
CM CM CM
0 0 0 0 C O
N O N O N O
CM CM CM
• r H CM ( A r H CM C A r H CM C A H C M c n t H CM C A r H CM C A H CM f 1 ^
2 3 ^
&
M
o vr\ ON \ A CN-vH *—I H
04 CM OJ cnvr> ON H H H
4-OVO CM-3* {N-H H H
ONO ON *A£N-<M H O H £S- H H O -Cj" VO %—I VO £N-H CM CM rt H r l H H H
EN-CO-3" -3--3- ^
vn H Ds~ on-3- on
CK CM O O H
o oaon ON-3*
0 4" o\ on- * -4-
N H H H
VN04-3-OAOA- *
O-vncm onov^-
CN-cmmd O H H
oa o h
^ o ^ vnva
vH ON 0*2 CM OA-3"
O {> -!>--3* ON OA
ONVN N
* n o cm -3*
owe o H H 04
ONCO H cm cm on
D-cmvo H CM C4
on-C}- -3* cm cm on
JV ! CM CM OS H H H
CO COM3 H W (Nj
XAC ON O h h
CM in. vn H cm 04
00 VY-O CM n P i
4-OVA O H H
cm co oa H H CM
VO CO CM O H CM
0-iN CO O H H
00 CNCM H H 04
ON. t Ox O h h
ON OK 00 CM 0-00
OA VNVO \r\\r\\r\
£NCM ON H ^ - ^ t
00 VP* OA O H H
ONO-O CM CM OA
00 00 VA O H CM
H
»«»&«!rsa.5cffia-.ifir
t>-X
VO X
&
3
&
X
CO CM CM H H CM
oa^ H H CM OA
N O H H CM CM
00 CM ON CM OA ON
CM *A0A CM CM CM
OA CM UN 4 N H Htvj H H CM CM
CM CM VD CO vrTo""^©sf~~~T8~o5^5 c T c T S ^ c5oT>?\ O CM CO C- CM O CO tH t-I O vH CO O- CO *—[ [v. o O CM C% t-1 r-1 <~< O O r H H O H H r l H O O O H O H r l H H
~3" OWA H H H
-COMD H H H
ODjj- CM H H H
00 H 00 H H H
CACNON H H H
OA H H H
OA ON CM H H H
VNONCM ONOAVO CM OACM VJAOACM CMVOCM ONCM A CM H CM H H H H H CM CM OA OA CM H(\J CM H CM H OA CM
^ OVO OA H H VOH^- ON 00 O VNONO NO.r>3-O CM OA H H H h h h H H H O O CM HOCM H CM ON
H X
04 CO VO VO VO O vO .;3- \D CM 04 00 CM CM 00 O ^ O O VO OACM OA r , H ^ OACMOA OAOACM CM H H CM CM CM -3- CM OA
r l if} ON CO CM VNc$- OA ^ 0 ^ 4 " ON CM iN- 04 V0 ON O N00 CM CM CM H H ON CM CM OA CM CM 04 O CM H OA H CM CM C4 CM
^ 00 CO H VO 0"> ON H CM CM £N ON ON " I^ c ToN ^ Q f\p| ON-3* VN CM OA- OA OV;± XTNXTNVO CM CM CM ONCM t OA CM *A
Li O O O O O O O O O r l t H H O O O O O O O O O
CM CM CM CM CM CM CMCMCM CMCMCM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CO CM
ON ON On O O O H h H CM CM CM ON ON p"N "-4- -~v vr\ \rT\nT VOVOSO O- C- O- tN-JN-Cv- C . CM <M CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CMCMCM CMCMCM CMCMCM OJCMCJ
vHCMC r-ICMtn ^CMCn H W n H W (n H CM ( 1 H CVJ P">
235
rd Q) $ £
4-3
3
E-I
o o O N C A tH ~Zf O H H C M
CM c a v o CM CNtH H H C M
CM ^"N ON O-cJ-NO tH tH t H
tH tH TH 4 CN-O H H CM
CM *N-VO 00 tH CM tH CM CM
-3" -3- CM -4- v ^ O \ H H H
H i A O {N- ON nH tH xH CM
n N N n r \ 4 -
O O N O ( A C ' V A
W CM CA CACA 4 *
00 ONCA C A C A ^ A
ON vH VT\ 4 * A \ A
CM CM MO \T\\r\xr\
O CM NO V V A * A
& ON vH (N-C A < A 4
A -V0 CM cA-cf V A
O H CM C A 4 " CO
CM O N O 4 " 4 *
4 * 0 0 0 4 4 * * A 4 CA4*
O CACM I •4" -4"* 4f" !
M NO V A O O *H CM
tH O N O tH vH CM
v n c A O -O tH tHI
4 - ^ A O tH tH CM
CN- ON O tH tH CM
CM ^ A * A tH tH vH
0 \ 0 4 * O CM r l
CAVO CM H H CM
O n c a ^ A TH CM CM
NO o o TH CM CA
VT\vO v a CM CM CM
00 CM CM CM CACA
4 * * A O CM CM CA
c n ^ T u i -CACACA
CM JH ON CVJ-j-
o w n £N(N-XT\ o tH < a
D-~ ONXTN O H CM
VNCN-^t O tH CM
00 4 - N O tH CACA
CAVO tH O O CM
NO 4 4 vH CM CA
vH rH
-<uWOKWJEM3T(«r3a«fc'
co co c^v H O j r \
CO O N 4 H C M n
( A O CM tH CM CM
A - VA ON tH CM CM
V0 CACA CM CACA
CM CM VA tH CM CM
CA tH O CM CM CA
•
1 ^ n o w O-OO ON o o o
VO o~oo ONCO t H O O tH
CO O VO O N O O O H tH
ON V-H ON O H O H H H
O - CN-tH tH tH CM tH tH *H
V0 tH VO ON ON VH O O tH
CM 4 " (N. CM CA CM tH tH tH
t ^ VO vH 0^, x—1 H vH
r~?^t CM tH vH TH
O V O tH yH tH tH
CM CD ON r l r ! O
CM CVI CVJ CM CVJ CM
* A 0 0 4 * H H H
CNONVO tH H \H
•* +mnmWSB&V*aBlKf*
VO O VPj tH CM CM
ON CM * A tH CM CM
"*AON>A CM CM CM
^OONON t H CM CM
CM VO CM O O c n
* A 4 CM CM tH CA
\ACM OJ CACM
g c a c a 4 r l H H H H
0 - 3 - vH tH O tH
4 " ONVO tH O vH
VO v o v o TH TH I H
* A 4 " *H tH tH tH
r H 4 * 4 " tH tH vH
>^p 0 0 4 o CM o CM
VO O CO C~\CM CM
CM CO CM ( A C M ( A
0 0 4 CM CM CM C A
CO c j - CM CM CM
O 4 ' V 0 CM CM CA
00 00 v o CM CM CA
$ O CM o O H C M
V M > - 0 \ TH R I TH
H C N N CM CM CM
ON tH CA CA CA CM
ON OS Ov TH TH VH
•tH vH CA CM CM CM
rH tH VO 4 4 CA
•
TH X
®**ASB6SSA«WA6««I«
O N O N O CM CM ( A
vO v r . vo CA4" * A
O - O N V O 4 * - c r v o
* A O CA < A * A > A
£S- O V \ 4 " 4 " * A
0 0 0 0 TH 4 * * A N D
^ A r J ( A C A ^ A V O
•
• o o o H H H o o o O O O VH TH THI O O O O O O :
• CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
• To^c>yS~~
CN £ N CN CM CM CM
C N C N I N -CN ( N ( N CM CM CM
CO CO CO {>- £N. A -CM CM CM
ON ON ON CN £ N 5 N CM CM CM
O O O 0 0 0 0 CO CM CM CM
H H H 0 0 0 0 0 0 CM CM CM
CM CM CM 0 0 0 0 0 0 <N| CM CM
* TH CM CA R- L CM CA tH CM CA tH CM CA TH CM CA VH CM CA * H CM CA
236
0) 2 •r»f -p £ 0 o 1 I > X!
m iA
i>" 0 4 - N 00 0\0 H tH CM
O-£>-£>-CO H-^ O tH \H
OH^A O VA00 V-| r~j r l
O CM 00 H OACA vH vH tH
N O xr\ o oa*a H H H
ON CM NO h -cr On H tH tH
O- H (N-CM O-CO H H H
O-NO--»df*
H H 00 oa oaoa O-ON^ cn-4- *A
n w N o O-VA OA CM ON
HVOO OA CM VA
NCA CA OA i'
s20
IH
O 00 o tr^ vr\
as CM OAOA
v D-CM CM cn-4-
oa-:}* -4* nCACN
O N OA O-cm oac°i
CM OA O-* NJj" H oa- T
s20
IH VPiOsON H H H
H £V CM O O H
N O H O H H
oo On tH O O tH
ON oo NO O O tH
OCO ON tH H tH
O 00 CO H H H
cm oo cm CM H CM
O H O CM CM CM
4CMO H CM <A
XOktH ON tH CM tH
H (AO CM CM CM
D-CM £N tH CM CM
H NO OA H H CM
CM H 0AM3 cm oaoa
tH H OA \H H H
ON-t C\ O H CM
-3" NO CM O O tH
(A NO tH HH(A
H O N O tH CM
NO NO ON H CM CM
tH *A ON *A CM CM OA
O H HCM
00 ON ON O H H
IN H O CM tH
tH OA NO tH CM tH
CO OA NQ H CM CM
ONO OA H OA OA
•
rv. X
ONOO CO O CM O d H
C AOO O-CO O O O H
ON tH tH ONO tH O tH rH
^AHNQ o UAO tH O rH
H O N tH ON CM H O H
00 O jj-OO 00 ON o o o
CO NO OA ONCO O O O H
nr o-^vo H H H
.3-0-0 H H CM
00 O-OA tH CM CM
VNO 00 tH tH tH
4" H H H CM CM
H VA CM H H H
-^-^NO H tH tH
>T" GNO UN t H H CM
MO C\VA H H CM
On CM V\ vH CM CM
va o on Osl tH CM
On On"ua tH tH CM
ON GANG O tH H
ON NO NO v-HI H t-H
VANOMO tH tH tH
0--4* CN-O H H
NO On h h o h
tH H CN tH tH tH
MO O O tH H CM
O H O CM H CM
OA OA 00 H H H
> T ^ CM O CM OAct
NONO CM oah oa
NO ~r)* NO OA CM CA
NQ o 00 OA CM CM
NO OVO {ACM OA
CM .3" 04 H CM
00 ONO CM CM OA
<M X 4-co
H CM CM O ov^ O H H
O ON NO H T*i tH
00 O 00 tH O tH
no o vn CM CM CM
.3- OA CM CM O) CM
4 ( A N CM CM H
•
H X
CM OAH ^-3" *A
OACO o CM CA^
XAOO ON 0A0A-ri-
^S(AH tH On~iJ* OA CM »3"
<X) J$r ON CM CM OA
00 O H CM 0A-4"
*
•" H H H o o o o o o o o o tH tH tH H vH H H H H
• CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM 04 CM CM CM CM CM CM <Sl
t *
oaoaoa COCO CO CM CM CM
-3* CO 00 00 CM CM CM
vr\ir\*A 00 00 00 CM CM CM
NO NO NO 00 00 00 CM CM CM
O- CV O-00 00 00 CM CM CM
00 00 00 00 00 00 CM CM CM
ON ON ON 00 00 CO CM CM CM
• H CM C*A H Ovl OA H CM OA HCMCA H CM OA H C4 OA H CM OA
2 3 7
<D
£
-P £
0 O I 1 >
X
m
<*
EH
&
*H CO-3" CO O N O O O rH
-4-CM CM CM
rH O- CM V\CO v H <"•4 H C\I
N C\! H CM-3" V\
O-VO ~J-imoo »H H H O J
*H O rH -3" vr>tvr\
O n o om »OCO cm rH rH CM
^ • W O -3- CO o tH T-t CM
*MCM 0\ CMS-On. H H H
4 H O D - O CA rH CM CM
O CO N O XA
O r-f vH ^ xa*A
H n c n c a ^
CO CO v* *a
M
CM !H
H
ON O CO cm cacm
sHNONO o o o
\o c m n <a~3-.^-
>aca-^ c o n n ca-3* *A
OXCN-OO C A ^ -th
(nc^o\ CM ON CM
CM vnjsw H H rl
^ o o tH CM CM
*AOO O v-l xH CM
O-MD CK o >acv H H H
CM ON ON T~i rH t—!
CM H ON r~l v-4 v~J
H O CM rHI r-f vH
*A*ACO W H O O N vH CTNfV m jvnv CM CM CM rH CM CM C M ^ C M C"M £? Si S
CO O CO N0 -7" ON NO CN- CACO .HC^CA H H f ^ H C M n O tHCM
CO CN-CM O CM CA
-4* VO VO O vH r~(
t~f CO CM ON CM (A ON (A O CM OJ CACMCA CM CM CA CM CM CA C M C A ™
*A£V-ON CM CM CM
tH T~J VA CACACA
CN-VO CO rH CM CA
caco >a CM CM CA
£>-X
NO XI
ON UN ONO~ON O O O
On co cr ONOO o O O vH
ON tH CM O N iN- o ^ - c o U N O N r H O O rH O C O h ° O rH H r l d H O d
VO On O O-CO CM O O vH
O <A-^ rH CM H H H
NO ONVO H O h
EN-ONVO H H H
CM-3* CM O vH v-f
ON*H XA {N-CG Cs-*H CM CM H H H
CANO N «H rHI rH
*A !><
$
VO V-,os h w h
CM MD vr, rH CM CM
ON ON CM rH CM CM
CM VMCM CO V-Q vr\ o CMCM rH CM CM h h cm h h cj
CM-4"^-CM CM CM
V-\NQ ON CM CMCM
O c t cm v-l v~{ rH
CM CO c n o CM
>ACA (A H H H
CM CO CO C A O CM
t-lr-INO -"t NO CO NONO-d" CO tH NO M r l H tHtHtH H H r l O H H
ON{^ VT\ O H W
H i*3
w o ® VO CM NO CONONO CM tH C I CM CM Cv} CMxH CM CM rH CM
O CM CM CM CM CM
CM CM CM CM CM CM
CM xH CO O CM CM
tMCM v-0 CN- (M ON CM CM CM v-I CM CNJ v-l CM
V O O CM C M CM C M
CO rH CM CM
s s s 5 ^ 3 ^ s s ~ a R s ~ T s a
T CMCM Cj-CM^}- ^J-Chvn,
T H r-f TA t i tH t~( O O O rH t-H rH O O O O O O
CM CM CM CM CM CM C M C M C M CM CM CM C M C M C M CM CM CM C M CM CM
£ l £ i £ l _ i l . £ i ^ . _ _ ^ C M O . i C M C ^ W g ^ \ ° M -
tH CM ( M ^ CM C M ^ C M C - . r H CM C M H CM C M RH CM C M RH CM C M
2 3 8
&-
&
&
H
CM i n
JH
.• ssaw«®saiar«ii(.
V O O N H U ^ N H H H
ONO-3" C A VA U"\ H 1*H H
O n v v s -CM O-ON H H H
VO-3- ON x a * A V \ O O O
O CM £>-CA^t ^
00 vr\ £V
c a c a - 4 -
oo O H O
OWO CA C\3 CACA
£>-{>-V3 O H H
vo CO CV C A ^ - ^
H camd cA~ch 5*
O ON H H H
\ D ^ - 4 -H H v l
H N 0 ^ \ On H
H H CM
CA ^ -C}-cAc}* *A
NO 00 'LA ON H H H O i
CvJ O V O -3" H CM vh CM CM
iN-ON*A *A
O-vO o H \r\\Q
CA D- C--H X—I H
CM O H O O O
H O- *A -4*
^ O D ON H H H
-3" OW0 -3* c i ' vr\
CM 00 ON H r l H
x a ^ A
-4- ON ON H rH H
NO H 00 CM CA CM
O vH H H n r \
ONCAO CM CM CM
c n *avo H H H
ONOO o -H CM CM
H CN--IA r H H CM
00 *A CM TH H H
CM o CM O O O
(N-tH ON CM C A CM
O iEN-VO rH CM (A
CA CM CM CM
NO MO ON O CM CM
tN-CA^O CM CM CM
(ACM £N rH CACA
CM ON CM H H CM
CA-r)- CM CM CM CM
CM V A O CM CM CA
VNCO CA O O H
NO t A O rH CM CA
-3- ON CM CM CM CA
O- O-CA CM CM CA
O-X
O C A O rH rH O rH rH rH
O rH 00 0\CM CA O rH rH
ON NO O O O ^ O O O O vH
H O V ^ 00 CN-XA O O O
CM CA CM O O N O
O rH
rH CM O 00 ON rH O O rH
0 0 0 ON H O O
XA X
ONNO CM O rH rH
VAO \ A CM CM CM
CO V-NCM O H H
CO CM rH rH rH
CM O-OO HHO
O O CM H H H
^ * C A H rH CM CM
H NO CA CM CM CM
CM MD CA rH CM CM
ONNO CM rH rH CM
ON Q NO H tH rH
NO C A CM rH CM CM
-d- ^ o \ vH O O
i>- C~VO o n n
CJ\V>iO O tH CO
00 MD 00 o c n o
-4-V0 vo rH \—! H
CM ON CM CVJ rH CM
vHVOKO t-J H rH
VPiVO VP\ CM CM CM
4 O-i" tH CM CVJ
MD 00 CM <T%cm <r\
vo o o c^CM-d-
- j " MD 00 CM v—f CM
-d" CM CO CM vH O
CM NOc5- CM CM rH CM
c - o - c -CM CM CM
ON £N- rH tH O rH
00 rH O rH
COCO o CM CM-3-
. ^ V O CM CA rH H
OVO O CM H
-3" CO H t H rH H
rH X
NO NO CM CACAXA
C A H ^ r CACA-3*
CM CM O-CM ^
V A O CA CM CM CM
MO ON CA -3--3- vr t
CMMD CA
CM VO O CA rH CM
CO rH -z}" O O O
^ ONiN-^3- ^AM3
O O O O O O O O O rH O O O tH r l rH rH vH rH
CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
O- O- CN- 00 CO CO ON ON ON O O O H H H CM CM CM CA CA CA ONONON ONOxON ONONON O O O O O O O O O O O O CM CM CM CM CM 04 CM CM CM CA CA CA CA C \ CA CA CA CA CA CA
H CM CA H C M C A H CM CA H CM CA H CM CA H CM CA H CM (A
239
<1)
I •HI -P £ O o
a m
$3 B
1 }S-J 0 \ - 3 * GO | C A - ^ ON
H H H
* A CN-^F V M N O H H ( M
co O ~ C A CM-4" N RH TH *—1
CA O - rH H H V T \ rH rH rH
ONCACM CAVO O rH rH CM
CA CA CM U N V O V O rH rH rH
VO O N * A O V I ON rH rH rH
C A O N C O CM o CA
ONVO O . •^R Z F JIF
( N - - 3 - O C A - 3 - * A
CM C A C O CM CM rH
CO 0 0 - 3 --3* ^ A
C A O * A \ A V V < A
CACM ON CM CA C A
* 2 0 O - o o N O \ M D
CA C A C A ~3" rH C A C A ^ -
CN-4" CM C A ^ * -C3~
VO 0 0 ON CA CA CA
CA-3" O C A ^ H * A :
[< %j*'S*SStS38U®ws»ia*«
VH £N- O H H CM
CAOD ON r*l H r*?
O N H OX O tH TH
ON rH 0 0 O rH rH
C A C A CO H H H
- * ± 0 0 0 O rH O
r ( N O rH T—F CM
0 0 - 3 * O CM CM CA
CM CM rH CM CM CM
vH VQ ( A CM CM CM
X A O ON CM CM CM CM CM CA
J N - O N ^ T CM CM CA
0 0 VO 0 0 RH CM CM
<M SH
ONCO CM R-4 CM CA
> A ( T V - 3 -TH CM CA
CO CM * A O rH CM
VO VO ^ A O T—F VH
C A O N O O O CA
V O V O 0 0 H H O
RH > A ON RH rH CM
rH H
F. TKSSACWSAX'S'#*
{ > - 4 * CA rH CM CA
CNCO TH R I C V I N
vo o vH TH CM
{N-VO O -rH rH CM
C A C O rH CM CM
N O 0 D rH CM rH
O V A O N rH CM CM
•
X ~
VO CA ON O O N D rH O TH
CM O 0 0 RH ON ON TH O O
vD V V J ON CM rH O O N O O N O rH O T—! rH CD T—1
T A - R CA O O rH rH rH rH
- T R T J T R T " O 0 0 VH rH O rH
• " T T T T X K * CO N O V O O o
vo X
CMMD 0 0 CM TH vH
ONVO O H H W
V O ^ - - ^ H CM H
£N- CAVO rH rH rH
ON CM ^ A rH rH rH
- 3 - C J V O CM CM rH
- 3 - X A C A rH rH rH
K \ \ Q CM CM vH CM
VO ON CM O vH H
V A V O VO C\i CM vH
CM VO CM CM CM CM
V N Q N C M CM CM CM
CM ON CM CM CM CM
G N O N ^ A rH CM CM
£ novo H H H
O rH CM RH rH
O-CH o rH rH CM
ON ON RH H O H
CO C A C A O CM rH
vH CM O rH O CM
V T I O C O -vH rH RH
-3* VO CM CM CA
VO VO CO ( A rH CM
^ 0 0 VO CM O CA
CO 0 0 CM CM O CA
CM O VO CACM CA
00 vovo CM rH CA
O ( M C O CM rH CM
>< CM R - C N -CM CM CM
H C 0 4 * CACM CM
rH ( A 0 0 CA CM rH
C A M 3 O CM rH CM
O N O (N-rH CM CM
CM V 0 ON CM *H r H
^3* U N W O *H
•
o rH C A C A C A
^ V A \ A G N T H V O
CM .CR CA O N C A CA CA CA
CA-CH CM -3* * A V O
V O N C A -3" -C}-
C A O N O C A C M - 4 *
•
»<«MWCISO»B»«>I®
• ' o o o H H H o o o o o o o o o o o o O O O
• CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
• o o o C A C A C A
\ A X A * A o o o N N C A
VO vovo o o o CA CA CA
NO- O-O O CD CA CA CA
00 00 CO o o o CACACA
ON ON ON O O O CACACA
O O O tH vH rH CACACA
• rH CM CA rl CM N r l CM CA TH CM CA vH CM CA rH CM CA v~i CM CA
2 4 0
t j <u
' s i •H . p £ 0
O I 1 > ><!
m
Eh
&
&
>?
O - C O M D M0 0 3 rH
I t H cm
O-CO MO c ^ v n o o H H H
0 0 0 4 - CM £N- t - l -3- ^ ^ A
O ^ i H VO { N - O H H CM
• 3 - - 3 - * A
-3- -d- c---P v - O N t H H H CM
COMO PA MO CO CM r~i i CM
4 " CM I S CM CM O -H H H
CM C \ 0 0 0 \ H M ) O H H
r - f 0 0 -3- * A ^
H ON O -ch C ^ X A
£ v O G \ CM C A C A
t V i S - O cm CM-^t
v o v r \ o -
( A 0 0 O H H C V ]
O W Q O ( A C A ^ A
CO rH (TY O H rH
CM * A
c a v r \ o H r i C M
CO IN-MO .3-
VO VO M0 - 3 * - 3 * V \
o o o c o - t CM
CM ON CM PA CM .3-
-cj- C^-CO •HI vH H
* A 0 0 O H H CM
0 0 - ^ ^ O H H
C A ^ t VO O H H
O-MD VO C \ O CM CM CM CM CM CA
H O VO CM ( A C M
-3" O N O \ CM CM CM
CM ONVO CM CM CM
CN-cJ* > A CM CM CM
H O O H CM CM
CM i H
JH
O -
_
o\ o-co 4 - r \ H \r\\r\ o H CM CA O H CM H H ( A
O V 3 - - 3 -H CM ( A
CM O N O -CM CM CA
CO V ^ C A O O ( A
VO O CM O H CM
CM-^hCA CO CM H C A 0 0 O CM H CA H CM CM CM CM CA
* A M 3 CM CM CM ( A
CM V ^ CM CM CA
~X>" r H CO H CM CM
CAONOO H H CM
* A rH CM O N O H O H H
-3- * A C A C O O C M O H H
0 \ H CO O H O H
O ^ - M D CO 0 0 o O O H
0 0 CM £>-o o \ o o H o o
v o CA CM 0\0\0 O O H
CM * A O -O O H x ! t—I t—I
VO 0 0 * A H O H
CM (TWO H H H
( A * A C M CM H CM
00 o H CM CM
O O N O CM H CM
VO 0 \ - 3 -H H H
CM C A C A H H H
><
& rN
CO VO CM H CA CA
VO CM ^ A H CM CM
VACM Ov CM CM H
Cv j vo > A H CA CM
* A O v V 0 CM CM H
^ A O \ * A CM CM CM
C \ 0 ON H CM CM
H v o VO H H H
O v O V O O H H
CO O CA O H H O ( A CM
O N H ON O H O
•3" H ON H H O
O N O t>-O CM H
C M - ^ CM CA CM CA
V O - ^ - CM H CM ( A
00 O 00 CM CM CM
-3- CM-3" C M H C M
0 0 O - £N-H H H
H V O ^ C A C A C A
O {N-CN-C A H CM
O N D - O H H H
0 0 CM O CM H CM
VO t~hi CM CM CM CM
VO CM CM %H t H PA
-d" -c f CM CM CM PA
i n CM CM CM CM CM
H x
CO COM3 PA CM CM
U A \ 0 OA - 3 - - 3 " \ 0
ON ON *—I P A P A ^ } "
M N O \ - 3 - ^ h v o
CM O W O -3- p a . ^ -
O O 00 -3- r > u - \
-3- o o ^ t p a p a ^ } -
r H O O C M ^ - J j -
O O O O O O vH r H r l H H O O O O O O
CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
v a v i a v a M O v O M D f N O - t > -vH vH H r - s r H H H H H H H H H *H *—! \ , c o c n c ^ c ^ c ^ c n C^P-XP-N
C M P A T H C M t n v H C M P A H O I r \ 1-1 CM H (M r i vH CM CA
2 ^ 1
G)
£
0 o
I 1
W
EH
I C N O i 0 0 vH
^ J rH tH CM
o r - v - \ <rv - t 0 \ \H tH tH
CMN-TH c n ^ O D
V O O ^ CM-^-vO H H H
tnOD-3* v r s v y O o o o
CM G \ 0 0 EN-CO O O O rH
$9
&
JH"
><P
CM H
<H tH
£>-X
#
& -3-
tH X
[NCM IN- SO vH CM ONOO^t CM CM CS
O v 1 H < r s c n r s
c o r%*H O rH tH
O £N-CO N H H
^ M N S O O ~NJF" TH ~-t -3"
O S ^ CM CM rH CM CM CM CM
n o v o CM CNCM
CM o o o rH tH CM
ON tH CN O H TH
n O N O vH vHI CM
0 \ M 3 CN O rH rH
O H N o o o
CM^t vr* o o o
O H V O CM CM CM
O N Q \ H tH rH O S
CN rH rH tH CM CM CM CM CM
4 C O H rH O tH
O d O \ CM rH CM
CM^-VO tH CM <T\
rH CM OS tH rH CM
c n O N 4 * rH rH
O H H CM
CM H N O O CD
XT\JN-^ O O rH
rHOO O CM CM
v n i O *A tH CM CM
CM SO O CM CM CN
\ o .-3-rH rH CM
O - CM H O tH tH
O VQ O CM rH
W I^ZmT tH CO O rH O rH
rH rH C°\ H 0 \ H rH O tH
CM C ^ O OSGD rH O O tH
" c 5 - v r ^ 3 " ONMD ON o o o
CJMT XO O-CJN o o o
c \ f t r v © " { N 0 0 0 0 o o o
rH CN O CM CM CM
O vH rH CM
tH -:•$• O H H H
SO ON CM H H CM tH vH CM
r - | V O - ^ tH *H tH
v s o w n CM TH CM
OnON^A rH rH C J
ONMO CN rH CM tH
^ o \ ^ A CM rH CM
s o e n s o O CM rH
V W ^ t M CM CM CM
H N O v l O CM
CO CN^A rH H tH
SO CM CO rH O tH
(TNCM^ c n o rH
rH OS OS tH O O
O S O tH H H H
SO 0 - 3 * CN CM CM
CM CO CM eneM CN
- 3 - S 0 . 4 -CM rH CM
SO CM O rH tH CM
CO CO CM O O tH
-3* CM SO O tH tH
SO CO tH rH tH
CN £N rH CM tH CM
CM VNCM CM CM CM
CO c n £ > -O rH tH
CM rH CO CM CM rH
e n CM c n RH CM CM
£>-3- *-< t>- o c*- RH CM o > \ c T c o ~ o J * o T 7 ~ CMCNO^ CM CM CM CM CM CM H N H CM
rH tH tH vH rH rH tH O O O tH rH tH O O O
CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CN} CM CM CM CM CMCMCM CMCMCM
0 0 CO 0 0 rH rH rH
OS ON ON O O O H r l H CM CM CM CN CN CN _ tH rH vH CS| CM CM CM CM CM 02 CM CM CM CM CM c \ CN CN CN c n CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN
rH CM CN rH CM m tH CM CN tH CM CN H CM vH CM c n
2kZ
M >
m
iA
B
B
5251 O
! CO M B O H H EH
O co S
Q £> B m m p
c i
N B *2; CO O B o B w CO
!H B H CO o H P4 CGI 5 O CO
w [X, B O
B 03 #3 B ca g W N
»xi Q H Kjw 525 M <5 m S CS'
at P
5 B ca
PQ £3 Q a
P3
CO
W
Q
vO O tH il
qU9iri3A0Xu;0Y XP%°Z ON H 04 cn
[CM H C\3 CM ca
U f 0) fc .
s ada o UCQ O t q.0 uiqq. t <xy
uoi^Bq.ndnioo c Tq.©raiteT<£Y
CO >1
N
H rl H CVJ
cn u^\o CM CM CM
* o i o j 01
s£-Brt3u'sri fH
0 c^\^r C -Tj*
.p CO a
B
O •H f4 0) •p
o
SIXTHS o, M
00 ^ ^ vn
.p CO a
B
O •H f4 0) •p
o
S u i x i s d s -dr H
0 VO A CM CM CM
.p CO a
B
O •H f4 0) •p
o
savpm+g XBfOOg p u s 0OUS"POS r~\ D- 00 .4-
H H H
.p CO a
B
O •H f4 0) •p
o Swpjresji qdBviS^JiBj CM JH
CO c^co cn CM CM
SufU89JI pa;0/4 CM rHI O CM CM CM
<D c o a | ca
.p CO-
010 m o , i
sr>.o"aj.Suooux .IOJ 'a,iTssr[
X
M3 , *
<ri„,r^-|, •• Mf -1 THT N| — ,J
CM CF\0-O O O H H rHi VO CM H CM CM
<D c o a | ca
.p CO-
^wij * Mm. 1WJ w—"L «*»• • iwjfwwyj(rr»nht«im^
i'lOUJJ oq. 9O[IS0Q[ i >A X OWO
r-4 CM CM r
B j O
eonociSTs^acT I X
ko ^AH rH tH 1—\
•H -P 03
i o ^xonxajj Atoq.g e-i
X CM 5" CM CM cn
& ' o q.uauiSpnf J t a g OJ X Cv {v.\D
CM HI rHI $4
uouua^-sxq.O vH X *A >AO
* • •
as .; -P .
X.9S • H H tH . .
<$ a -p „
l o o q o s -r , N , ™ . - T - -
«
CM C\J CM
g 1 cS > 0 j
- apB^3 p u o o a g jcaqcm^ a poo q.ts3pnqg
•
; ._• j$- j$r CM CM CM jCN C »<n
H 0 rt
t Siryq.ssj; * rH CM Cn
2 4 3
1 <* s * 2 V \ j f r O ! VO D - C A J H H CM
00 O D ^ -3" C - ON 04 04 eg
^ - V O O { N - O - H OJ 04 CA
O GOOD CO VO CO rH H rH
( A O H ^ - ^ * 04 04 CM
0 - 4 " o H H * A H H H
04 04 ON rH H H
00 CAOO 04 e n n
VAQNCA -3- c n ^ t
O H N rH rH O
VO CM 00 CM CM CM
CO ON ON O o o
> H " O O N 04 CM 04
O Vf> 04 CAO^ 04 CM CA
H 00 ON 04 O O
C A T ^ S N " CM 04 CM
tf^cTTT" o H H
j £ ° VO O * A H CA-3"
CO O V O C A W S -
0 - H 00 CO 04 04 04
0 \ 0 ~ * A CM CACA
CM r T f r -
CACACA
* A JH
ONCA 00 CA~4- VA
CAGNON V A V A ^ A
JN-XAVO -$• XfAUA
rH CA04 -3- CA-3*
O-VO * A J ^ - ^ A ^ A
C A ^ F O N " CM H CM
«HT CACMVO H H H
XAVO O 04 04 CA
VO ON ON rH rH rH
CA-3- *N> rH rH rH
V A D - V O rH rH rH
XA-4* {>-O o o
^CA N VO O-
rH H H 00 00 ON rH rH rH
00 00 O 04 04 CA
O V O XA r H H H
H ( A O 04 CM 04
C M ^ - V O H H H
• C O rH O V O O
CACM CA NO, 04 H CA-I}~
04 O N O •4* C A * A
X A ^ A ^ CA 04 CA
r - H CACA~>
CA 04 H H CM CA
GNO-GO H H H
NO O M 3 04 CM 04
04 VO ( N 04 04 04
04 ON 04 04 H 04
O N ^ t V O H CM H
CM 00 -3 * H O H
O ->4
ON H ON i N H O N O H O
4 - O N O 04 rH rH i—1 !—i
rH rH CO CACA.3" H H H
C A N r l ON CO H O O H
O C A ^ A ^ C A ^ A H H H
O - O IN-O CM O H H H
04 O W A (—1 rH rH
ON 04 O H 04 04
M O N rH rH i H
0 - 0 - 3 " H H H
C A C M ^ t H rH H
N 0 \ 0 H H CM
j * -CAVO ON H C M H
04 04 * A 04 CA04
CV 04 CM CM CACA
00 OnXT\ H H 04
CM CM CM CACACA
CM ONXA CM CACM
1 * * V > \ Q ON H C A O
C A * A H H C A H
VO v o v o CA CACA
00 * A H O H H
O O O •~*3h —Jh -0"
NOVO O H rH 04
> T 04 00 04 C A O CA
NOVO O n H 4 "
VO 04 O CACA-3*
04 O V O CA 04 CA
0 4 - 3 - v O CA CM CA
CM O CM CACM CA
{N-04-3* O 04 04
^ * A H rH rH 04
O V O CA 04 rH 04
00 CA00 H 04 CM
CACACA CM CM CA
O V O O 04 04 H
00 O ^ 04 ( A
4 - H a ) ^AVOVO
ON 04 * A NOVO {N-
CM CA.5-
XAVO XA \ A ^ A V O
CA-4-VO CACACA
* •
• rH rH rH rH rH H O O O O O O H rH H H H H
• 04 CM 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 CM CM 04 CM CM CM
» X A ^ A ^ A 04 04 04 CA CA 0*N
VO VO VO 04 04 O j CACACA
O - C-~ O -04 04 CV2 CA CA 0"%
CO 00 00 CM 04 CM CACACA
ON ON ON CM 04 04 CACACA
O O O CACACA CACACA
* H 04 CA H CM CA i H 04 CA H 04 CA H CM CA H CM CA
2 4 4
xi 0 0 £
43 S3 O
O I I
H I
a X
m iA
<
v r \ o o - H o v o ( \ i r \ 4 - o\*r\ON H * - 0 0 ^ 1 ^ n o - o o v o v r \ c o \ o o \ o c ^ v a ^ A * n a \ { N - 1
CM CM CM CM CM H H H CM CM H H H CM CM CM
RH° {N-oooo n n o ON.^* <2>vb o o S v h h c v r 4 3 * CM CM CM CMO^C^ H H H C M O " " ^ H H H CM C^C0*
{ H " v n c R r S H 3 * CM H 56 o o t ^ 1 a3 <3** f ^ C r \ H C M < n CM CM e n H H H H cncM H CM CM C^C^CM
J Y
. ,„ rilrrjl Itll
O CM ON CNCM^A ^ A 5 ( > " v T t n o D VOCOOX CMu|NAO CM (T\<r \ - 3 " U \ ^ CnCMCM
XT* >-?
, , ... , , , . _ , ....,. , .„ <r_ . . . .. J. , -0 J - 3 - O H N 4 O N » A { > - O N O ON ONVO F - \ C ^ O N O VO VT\VO V V R \ V " \ CM CM CM * A T F \ RH OJ <T\ VT\VPTVO
CM CM CM CM e n o o - H r - v o CM OO * n c o cv (N-co CM CM CM W N W H O H r l H N O O O CM CM CJ
L C ^ \ RH
OWO VO VO O VO CO - j - O- {>- rH CM H VQ C H H r l H H H CM CM CM H H H CM CM CA CM CM H H CM CM
CM >4
O N I N ^ j - O 5 N O J > ^ 2 F H O N H i F - S f v o ^ V C T C M -=}- -3" -3" cno^c- \ u^_3- v r \ H CM H c-s.d-.3-
H CM VPI O N ! > - £ > - N O V O CM O O N O N O N C ^ O N C ^ D - C ^ CM CM CM CM CM CM H H CM C~\CM CM O H H CM CM CM
D -X
VO O U A 4 - ' 6 ' O O H P S O D H O H -3* CN-CO 4 - " H O \ C°\,—| O ( T \ H ^ t H v i ^v^CM C ^ O N H o n n H H H H H H H H H H H H H O H H H H
A D
N H N o < R V N I N O K ) V O O N I N . " V B ^ - CCJ co * o ~ i £ H CM H CM CV H H CM H H H H H H H O H H
1 II 1 111 T "
m a
OJ CM CM v o VO CM ON CM CMVO CM O N C ^ O N VP>ONCM CM C A C ^ I CM CM < N C M C ^ C 1 ^ C ^ C ' ^ C N CM CM CM CM CM
I ^ v S v c T o s VO~5"vO tnviTuS O V O H CM O N ^ O V S T F S M . H O C N C M C N C ^ C ^ H - D - O ^ H O ~ \ O H H E N N
? * R
O VO CO VO O O V C ^ - C M VO CM O V O C M V O CM CM O -D" H CM C ^ C M - 4 " 0 - \CM C- \ C ' ^ - J - C N O ^ O ^ C ^ C ^ ^ -
H V T I O \ VO 0 0 . 4 - H I > - 0 - H H ONVO ON-3 " 0 0 CM CM H H H CM H CM CM CM CM CM CM H CM CM CM H
VO ^ O ON i>- ON O - C M O V O CM o - 3 " H CO C ^ V O ON _3- v r \ v o u>>vr\vp» VQVQ O - C V 3 - - 3 - i r \ x n v r v
•
H H H O O O O O O O O O O O O H H H
• CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CMCMCM CM CM CM CM CM CM
• H H H CMCMCM c ^ c n c ^ , v n v ^ v r H v c v o v o ( n c ^ r t o~\ (TN. C^O^O-N. C^C^O-N C^O^C*^ c ^ o ^ c n
C N C ^ O ^ C ^ C ^ C N C ^ C ^ O ^
• H . C M C ^ H CM C \ H C V I N R L N H H C V T \ H O j n
2hs
. Os }H
(AvO >A H H n H H H
o xr\cA^n H i—1 H
ONCAH vo OVO CM CM CA
rH (A HI CA IN- rH rH rH CM
od xr\ ~3* CMVO CM CM CM
( S H O rH rH rH rH
CO CM Cn O H H
ENONCO i—( r"! i—1
CM cnvO <r\cncn
O - O ON rH rH rH
00 VO 00 CM rH CM
T^-C\F r—t O rH rH
3 1 "3-oo H H H
" 0 \ c 3 00""~ O HI O CM CA0~\
^ x r o s - * * H W H
~tOTTljN~ CM CM CM
• x z r p n ^ ***~ O rH H
CACMVO CM CM 04
O CO £>-CACACM
~aoTEFc<T~ o j^-vo" CM
*^c3T^FT" <5N<5CT~1-CM CI CA
V\ CM CM CM 03 0 \ 0 0 CM H CM
0 \ v r \ H lAU^vo
00 vr^pj CAC^VP\
jfoBTTT" J -VO CM CM CM
1 ** -3" r-i^t o o o
vo vo r -o o o
CO C<"\£>-H CM CM
O -=}' VT\ rH rH rH
^CN-OO H rH rH
ONVO CM O O CM
ir\ *noo H H H CM
o o \ c ^ CM H CM
c n c ^ o s CM CM CM
VT\ON00 H rH rH
H H N CM CM CM
55 CNO rH rH CM
. N fH
•~C0 ^AON O VH H
rTCO H CM O CM
CO H PT" -3"
ON rH CM O CM
3* c5 0^-4* rH rH rH
0 - ON0N 1—{ o o
GNVO 0~N H r l CM
*A\r\tr\ CM CM CM
O CM O rH rH CM
-3* -3* CM CM CM
O * A O N i—1 rH O
( IV X
H HMD O H* C A H H H
V^CN-O I—J CM C°\ i—I H H
oo -3* O^O^A H i—1 rH
CMVO rH ONONO O O H
O O N 4*M3 n H H H
H N O ONrH ON O H O
| >f o - - = h o H CM CM
VO ON 00 rH rH rH
vo VT\\Q rH CM CM H H H
00 (N-H H CM CM
C~ {>- CM H r l H
>Ty CM CTNCM C°\ CM C""V
CTsCM A H CACM
VT\CM CM CM CACA
CM CM CM CM CA<T\
ON ON CM ON! CACA
CMVO CM CM CM CM
>? 3" HVO
H H C~\ CACACA CO vo o CAH-3-
C A H CO rH HI rH CA.^ rH
cnvCT H H
>v CO COCO CM CM CM
CO 00 vo CM CM cn
vo vo O ( n H 4 -
00 OvO CM CM r-f
v o ^ - O CACM-3"
vo VO O H H CM
& O CJNO rH H CM
00-3- o~ rH rH rH
ONOVVO H H H
VT\00 rH H H CM
4 - O O N CM f ^ H
CM (A <N3 CM CM
XT' o CAON J-fr £NJ3"^ 0 \ 0 H
tr\\jo (N-ON CM £N- CO CM JN-
vO vO O
CM CM (TN
•
• r l i—! i—I o o o rH rH rH o o o O O O O O O
• CM CM CM CM CM (M CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
• £N {N-IN-c n n n er\(n<r\
CO CO CO e n c n c n c ^ c n c n
ON ON ON CNCNCA cA<r\r \
O O O -3* Jzf .zfr c n c n c A
rH rH rH
c*Ncnc*-\
CM CM CM
CNCACN
• H CM CA rH CM c i H CM ^ H CM CA rH CM CA H CM CA
Zk6
Ti 0 P' £
-P £
3 r i
M
m } J I
EH
1 s
11!
196
191
211
25
239
CM 0 0 0 ^ i N - 0 0 O H rH CM
CM CM CO CM VO CM CM CM
< n v O N O CM CM CM
VO OOVO * A C O ON r H r H r H
C O O - C M CO r H VO H CM CM
1 s
11!
196
191
211
25
239
O O ^ H CM CM
cs-vM t r \ H CM CO
v o ! 5 o * ~ CM COCO
v g CM^T r H r H r H CM CM -4"
S h ~
0 c o ^ n C\1 C \ J N
e r s m " CM H Cvi CM CM CM
r i w r CM CO CM
• n n T c i s r r H r H CM CM CO~4"
O UTQD c o c o c o
t n o x c n COCM
CO CVl V&"1
c o . 4 - . 4 -i v ^ H COCO-4" CM CO CM CM c n . 4 -
' - A On r H ON ^ * r \ \ r *
^ c ^ v o ON-rx O ^ T f ^ T T c o c ^ - 4 - .4 - U ^ v r \ U ^ V A V O
r T r H C T " '^sxtxar— ^ 4 * 4 -
j » _ H VO H H 1—1 CM
~ " ^ J - o o ~ v 3 ~ CM H H
CM * A c o r H r H r H
\T\0 VP\ H CM CM
c o c \ n n CM CM CM
0 ONVO r H H r H
o v o H H H
H VO H H 1—1 CM
~ " ^ J - o o ~ v 3 ~ CM H H
ON ON CO H H H
^ n g T r H r H r H CM H CM r H r H r H CM CM CM
f H 1
CM U N O COCM-3-
0 0 -4^ -4T~" CM C ^ c n
^ I K o T T ^ T CO-4 - -4 -
™ o 5 " r w r CM -4" CO CM CM CO
~ T T ^ c r ~ — • CM CM CO
> T " O N O A a H CM H
4 - O C M H CM H
u^xr\\o CM CM CM
CO CM -3* CM CM CM
r H ON O -r H r H r H
CM CM ' " " r H r H r H
c ~ S>-" r x i
CN-OD ON CM CM CM r l H H
ON CM CO O C - C M t-H O f H
n n o r H r H r H
0 0 VO , H CM r H CM r H r H r H
r H ON CO O CO O r H O H
O VO CM " H O N H H O H
| 0 4 - M ) ~ r H H f H
C M ^ J CN. r H O H
"^TTP^ocf**" CM CM H
C N C ^ H r H r H r H r H r H r H
1 ' f c t x S h S i — - — ~ O O H
CM CO C M CM CM CM
CM ON ON CM H CM
CM VO v o CM CM CM
ON CM CM COCO
CM CM ON CM C O H
\r\owr\ — ~ CM <M CM
J L -^r NO -3r c i n n
o v o VO COCM <CM
T r a ^ q r O ^ C ^ H H COCO r H O r H H H CM
>P VO -4* CM C^CM CO
VO CM MD C M 4 - 0 CO CM .4"
o c o 4 --4* O CM
VO CMVO c n n n
O O CO -4* CM CM
i ^
V N CO CO CM
O N H O r H i H
VO COCO CM CM H
^ A O O CM CM CM
NO ON ON r H r H r H
O CM 0 0 CM CM CM
XT"1
o - c o O c o c o V > *
^ T N O V O -4" v v a
H r H r H ON O O * A V 0 O -
^ CM 0 0 co~4 - J4*
0 0 0 4 * v o v o v o
•
# O O O r H H r H O O O O O O i H r H H O O O
» CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CQ CM CM
• c o c n c o -4" ~4~ ^4" c o c o c o
~4* -4" - 4 * - 4 * - 4 " c ^ c n c ^
yr\\r\xr\
c o c o c o
VO v o VO - 4 - - 4 * .4 -CO CO CO
O-CN-CN-- 4 ~ - 4 * - 4 -CO CO CO
CO CO CO 4 * 4 *
CO CO CO
• H CM c o r H CM CO H CM CO H CM CO H CM CO H CM CO
2 k 7
ON | - 3 - v O O 5 c a c t o I CM CM CA
£N ON 00 CM CAVO CM (V CM
H ^ O * A - : r c o r H pJ
.00
CN-H
s i p
* A H
>?
ON-4* CM H C\J C°\
~ h «~F t H rH CM
*>~CMOQ O H H
r H CN-00 CO H CM CM
157oW' i—! H CM
CACO on - $ • 0 0 H CM CM CA
O OWO o n r t cacaca
CO CM ON CM caca
O -4* ca~3-
^ A r H c^-cm caca r H CM rH
" ^ o o v \ H H CM
4 - 0 0 \ CM OA CM
v r v o O -CM-3- -3"
c o cm o a o a
CM CM VO O A - j - * A
"H H H" X T \ V a x r \
CM £ V ! > -C^CM CM
CO O O CM 0 ^ - 3 "
v i A O W \ 0
H O N 1TWOVO
o a o - V A v r v - ^ UA
VO H ON -4- * A _ 3 -
rH 0-vr\ CA(M CA
o o n ^ * A * A
^AONOD \ A X O | \ A
HCACA VO VO MO
VO ONU r H r H CM
o o o o o H CM CM
^CA H
CM >i
t><P
. Y^<
On H OA H CM CM
O O - C M CM H CM
Ov CM VO r H rH
CO 0 0 0 0 H H H
cao-cn-CM CM CM
0 0 iN-ON H H H
CO ON On H CM CM
ON CM O rH H
CO CAOO H CM CM
CN-VO CA CM H CM
•5^5:* ^ §T £r-3; H coco ON MD r-CAJT -4* (A *A CM H CM CM CM CA CACA-3* \A*A
VO <AA CM CM CM
ON CM CO ON H CA O H H
*A CAVO CM CM CM
CM VO O H H CM
ON CM rH H CM CM
ONlAH H CM CM
0 0 *ACN-CM CM CM
VA D - CA O C A j J -r ~ j ^ r \
C ^ t A j f r r—I i—I rH
O ONVO H i H r l
VO CM H ONQNO O O H
o T o ' v o " H H O
O iN* ON O CN-ON r H O O
VO r ^ C M i—I ON O H O H
H CM CA (AO H r H r H r H
CA-4* * A O O O
ONO O-H CM H
ON ONVO r H r H r H
v o on in r H CM CM
*ACM CM CM CACA
^ A \ C v r \ CM CM CM
* A v O v o
CM H CM ^ACM * A CM CA CM
*AO CM CM CACA
« i H CM CA
CA X!
X T 1
CM O O CACM-3-
rH VO VO rH CACA
CM -3" CM (ACM CA
i > ~ H \ 0 O i—\ r « |
CAVO o H H CM
V O N H H O H
vO\OVO CNh CA
VO-4* 0 0 CACM CM
VO O V O CACM CA
o v o 4 -4 - H H
CM-4-VO CACM CA
0 0 vO * A H C M CM
CN-VO £N-CM CM CM
0 0 CAOO H CM r H
CA O- O CM H CM
O 0 0 CM CM r H j—I
*ACA*A r H r H r H
C0-^ t ON C A 3 - O N v o { x ~ H j f r v o * A C4 O ^ C A
CTv^ACA r H C A ^ t
VO r H f A XT\£V £>-
O ^ A O VO v o O -
O O O O O O o o o o o o o o o o o o
CM CM Cvi CMCMC3 CM CM CM CM CM CM CMCMCM CM CM CM
? v $ v S v r~A rt CM CM CM .4 -v r \ v n i r \ \ r % v p \ v o u ^ v r v x i ^
P v \ tM t c cn 00 0 C~\ OA o~\ o~\
1-iCM H e M e n rH CM r N i—1 CM C°> H C M O ^ H CM OA
248
0\ H
tC0 H
CM O On O i—!
CM CM CA
CA CANO ON CM CM CM
04 00 O *AN0 (N-H H H
NOVO *N-NO rH rH H CM CA
tr\CM ON 3" CO CO CM CM CM
-d" CM CO ONCA-3* H CM CM
NO 00 H CACA-3*
CO U^GO H CM CM
CM O - O rH rH rH
OCO^s CM CM CA H *AOO
CCACA n w o CM CACA
SH"
>e \ r \
tH
-4" >T
ONNONO CM CA-4"
*ACACA rH CM CM
CA ON 00 VA 3" *A
*A-3" *A <r\uvn
NO CM O -3- ^avo
NOVO CM H CM CM
H H 0^ cacacm
O-NO CM CM CM (A O ON CO
CM CM CM caoo ca CM CM CA
CM--NO rvrt-3-V O O N CA-3--3-
O O rH NO NO NO
0NO iH CM CA-3" nocaon ^c-ca
(A-3* XT\ \A\A^I NO O ON ca. - ca
tCA N
CM N
>T*
Cv-
> r
>?
i * r
>?
VA4" vo H CM CM
-^r * A CA rH rH CM
ONO *-r\ H CM CM
CD CAVT* H CM CM
C0 4 - 0 O rH CM
CA ON-"t rH O
ONOVO 00 H CA O H CM H CM CM
NOVO (N-rH rH rH
on-3 -CA O N H O rH CM CM H CACM
On CM CM H CM CM
CO H CM caj3"
o o ^ANO O CM CM CM CM^Ox IPCjSFH NO pfvo^
CM CM-4* -3* A H CACA
O-OO MD H CM CM
CACA^ CM On CM rH O i—I
-3* NO NO CM CM CM CO * A O
rH rH CM CAOQ O r - | rH CA
CI CM CO CM CM CM
*ACA-3" CM CM CM
-T NO O CM CA rH rH rH
rH ON CN-COOO o o o
EN-CM ON H CM H i—{ i—I i—I
O O rH rH -3* rH rH rH rH
*ANO CN-H 4 " H rH rH rH
O H O CM CM CM
H O O D H CM H
ONOO O O O H
(N-ONCO rH rH rH
ON NO H H H
ON CM H H CM H
> A O CM CM CM CA
VACM VPs CM CA CM
ON CA CM H CM CM
On ON \r\ CM CA CM
CT> ON CM H CACA
lACM CM CM CACA
NO X A * A r H H H
*A\o\o H CACA
NO ON O H H CM
ON -NO O rH rH
(AND H H C A H
CACM CA H C A H
NO NO NO CA H CA
NO 00 VO CACM CA
CM CM NO H H H
NO O N O CACM CA
NO 00 CM CACM CA
CM CM NO CA CA CA
NO H H CM CM CM
£N-0 ON H H H
CO O N H H H CM
VO O CM CACM
CO A ON ANOnq
CO NT\ CN-NO NO 00 ONVO
CM CACA O H 0 0
NO * A
CAH CM CM CM CM
Onvo AXOkVO
NO 00 * A CM CM CM
ON H T—I cano xr>
H H H H H H O O O H r l r l O O O O O O
CM C\J C\J CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM (VJ CVI W CM <\1 CM
K j g S £ £ £ , £ £ £ SRS°» $ $ $ o o o
H CM CA H CM H CM CA H CM CA H CM CA H CM CA
2 ^ 9
r d 0)
8 -P £ 0
o 1 J
M
X w
U ^ C M H 0~~3" CA 1—f H CM
0 0 * A V 0 rH VO 1—I CM CM CA
O N ^ A CM CO CM 1—1 O 1—1
H CAVO 00 On j^ -rH rH CM
j f r H * A CM -4" VO CM CM CM
H O H H CM
CO w O Q \VO
n H N
CO CN* rH H CM CA
4 - l N C M CM O H
00 CA ( A H CM CA
VT\CO O rH rH CA
CAVO H H CM
O N H N H r ! r l cm c a c a
O N ^ rH O O CM
rH *ACM CM CM CA
CA H H CM
ONVO CA H CM CA
00 <\i * A cm c a c a > a
^ v r v S ^ O N ^ CM CM CM
rH rH VO CAJ3*
O *AOO j j - .$•
VO O - O H CM CA
* A H
ON GO CJ r i n
O-CO ON v a * A
CM On rH CM H CM
0 - U V 3 " CACA-3*
X A v O j f r ^ A
CM ON CM CACM * A
1 ** 00 CN-VO O 0 H
H f - 0 3 CM CM CM
CM CA~3" O O O
0 0 O-CM O O H
( S C M O H CM CM
C - O N ^ t O O H
CA N
cm > n H CM CM
H H 0 0 CM CM CM
O N O ON H CM H
CO O CM i—I CM CM
rH H CA CM CM CM
ON ONVO O rH r H
lCM H
CM H * A CACM-4*
VO On CA-CACA . :±
rH rH 00 H O O
rH rH O -CACM CA
t A V O CM -4* -4"
* ~ C O ^ A ~ O H CM
| %
!
1 1
o c o n CM H CM
Q W O ON H CM CM
CM O N H H O rH
CN H O rH CM CM
O N ^ A CM CM CM
O O O O O H O O
f ^ ><
c a o - o v A n n H r l H
CM CO CM H H H H H
O C A D -On ON O O O rH
O ONCA O O N O rH O rH
O H CA ON CM CM O H H
O O O N H H O H
' * > H * A V O CM rH rH
j—1 rH VO CM ^ CM
CM H O H H
ONUNCA H CM rH
{N- CM ON O CM H
rH * A O N CM H H
? * r
CM CM CM c a c a c a
* A CM ON CM C A H
CM vO vrv CM (ACM
CM CM ^ A CM CACM
CM VO CM CM CACA
CM CM ^ A H CM CM
i 1 5
-3" O O CA-3* CM
CA ONVO H H CM
> A O \ r H H O i H
* A ON r~i H O ( H
G \ ^ A ON H CM O
VO CAVO H H H
>v vO O CA CM 4 "
vO O Osl CA CM CA
CO CM ~ t CM H CM
CM O O CACM -3*
0 0 O O CM CM -4*
CM -3* CM CACM CA
& O VO CM CA CM CM
O - CM *«A CM CM CM
CACM VO CM CM CA
CM CA-3-rH rH rH
-3- 0 0 CA rH rH CM
O N O CM H CM CM
X* v r \ 0 CO i n v o XA
1H O N ^ t - 4 * ^ * A
0 0 ^ A H C A ^ - 3 *
H C A O * A v O VO
CM *AOO O W A O CM * A - 3 "
•
• O O O H H H O O O O O O rH rH rH O O O
• CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
• H H H VO VO vO c a c a c a
CM CM CM VO vO V O C A C A C A
CACACA VO MD VO CACACA
VO VO VO c a c a c a
x r \ t r \ \ r \ vO V O vO CA CACA
VO VO VO VO VO vO C A C A C A
• H CMCn H CM CA H CM CA H CM CA H CM CA H CM CA
. I
250
ON -3- cacd COH^i iH CM INI
^ (NO cacd o H H CM
NO NO ON NOOH H rH CM vnooo O CM *A CM CM CM
CD -4* ON N04* H CM CM
*AO ON (NO CM H CM CM
>? ON ON H i—I rH CA A4- CA H H CM NO O o H
O ONH CM H CM rH CM rH rH H CM H «N>A H H CM
iH*" CAH CM h cm cm
NO iNCA H CM CM H
H O H NO-3- ON CM CM CA
CM <N~ ON CM rH rH
CD ON-t , rH rH CM |
IN ON ON CACA-4* ONONO CM-3--3-
o ca CM CA -3* -3"
*ACM *A CA -d" CO ONO CACAA CO VAH CM CA-3"
JM CA-3* ON ca«S}"
ONCO -4* rH CM CM OVON xr\ \r\ xr\
CAACA Vj~\ , j$r H CAAA NO NO CD jfr *A
-d" JH
.4- (N*A O O rH NO (A On O O O {N H (NC -rH CM CD ON
CM CM CM -4" £NU H H CM CNONCA
rH rH CM
ca H
H- -vO CM CM CM CN - A
OHH 3-rH
CA CO rH rH CA VT\ VP\ rH rH rH
rH UNNO H H H
NO (N*A rH rH rH |
CM CO NO CA caca~4-
i , j -.._ . ...
O O NO ca-3* en
{N CM
O UN (A CM
CM >A {N (A CACA rH CA CM (ACA-3* ON ON ON CM CM CM
oncaca H CM CM
CM CO -3* rH rH CM rH CM CO ON H rH NO NO ON
rH rH rH <N-{NA rH rH CM
OOQ t H rH rH
o-X
rH O jj* rH (A rH i—1 i—t i—1 cac CM OiNON H O O
CO ON O •4- CM O CM H rH
0-VTV3-CD IN- ON H O O CANO H rH CA rH rH rH rH
EN rH rH ONH CM OHH
1 ^ 00 H H H CM i—f rH CA ON «—1 rH O CM rH NO rH rH
O CA-3* H H rH rH CN~j~ H rH rH H CN ON
H H H
J ^ VTNONXn CM CA CM
UN CM CM CM CM CM UN VO CM CM CAfA CM CM CM CM CM CM UN ON CM CM CACA XHCM CM CM CA CA
>? ca~3*-3-H CACM
O H ^ CM H H rH rH rH -*3* rH rH UNNO
rH HI rH rH NO rH H CAH (A ON NO
H rH H <
>v NOVO O CAH -3"
CD CM CO CM H CM 00 CM CM NO
H CA CM NO CM CA rH (A CM CO NO (A CM CA
^ ONO CM CM CA
& ONO^ H CM H ON ON ON
i—1 rH rH CM CM ONVO CM CM
ONONO O O H NO CO
CAH H -3* CA00 CM CM H
ca. - o XT\\o iN-
{nca<n -4* *AU\ CD CA CM (A *A\A IN CM CA CAvrwn CM (ACM *A-3h J-NO UN
• •
* GOO rH rH rH rH rH rH rH rH rH rH HI rH H H H
* CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
• (N (NO-NO NO NO cacaca
CD CO GO M3 NO N0 <ACA CA On NO n
ON ON NO NO CACA O O O Cv-O-C CCA.CA r
rH rH rH CNtNtN . (ACACA CM CM CM C-£N{N CA <A fA ,
1 • rH CM CA H cm ca H CM CA rH CM CA H CM CA H CM CA
251
1 O 00 (N-O H O - O - t n O N H H CO O IN-*r} Q\ 1 H ON ON 4 ' V O H J ^ - O - O *A{>-CM 0 \ 0 CO ^ n O N C 4
|H J H H H H H CM CM CM CA H H O l H H H CM CM (A
%
C°\ I—1 CO lAC^lW 1 A N C N N O C O H O O ^ H PACM H H H r > W C\ H O N H N N CM P A C A
in""
p S ^ - n o o n o n o -d- c'- vb <\i c5 aJjjfXS 351£r H CM H a O <r-\ H CM CM CM CM H O CM CM CM PA PA
- d r v o o o n p S O O I S O v cQ jj- H CT^25^"T" C K ^ T K " CM P A P A CM OA-3" CM 0^-3" CM CM PA ^A
VA iH
' CN-'CM H i>-vn1cvJ ON O N C \ N0N©C^-CM v n P A P A ^ ^ ^ ^ A PA-3"UA C ^ P A O A VPtVOiVO
H
.3- CM *A ^ A O CO H *T\vfA O rS CM vrSvO !N -d" CO 00 O H H O H H CM CM CM H H H O O O CM CM CM
p S { > ~ 0 i/ScMCM On ON PA O N O N O -dp VlA^f <55 H M O H H CM H CM CM H CM CM CM H H H CM CM H CM CM
CM PAPA'VPT EfA-d-^ CM <5 5N ^\6\d5 ~~x>T3"F!\ "2fT^7JT~'~™' H H CM CM CM PA PA-j"-3- H CM PA O CM CM .=}•-d" VP,
O U A P A CM -4" ON H O D ? - CM H CO O-JS" H S O N H H H H H H CM CM CM H H H O H H CM CM CM
£>~ v« ?N
i s v o H pa h o 3- pac-- S t p a o n o v o vo h o o -C O O N O H o CM H P A P A CM O CM O CO O CM CM cn O O H H H H H H H H H H H O H H H H
1
O N O CO P A H CM \ O r i ^ PA CM PA CO-3" PT" 5 \ c J 1 5 ~ H CM H H CM CM H C M H H H H H H H H CM CM
OScmvt\ oo CJ vri CM o CM V\CMVTT CO ON CM VfScM X?S H P A C M H P A C M CM CM CM CM H CM CM CM PA CM
H H M O P A { N O \ V S V T \ O O 5-JAO P A H UA O CKC5 H H H H O H H PA-3" CM H CM H H H N H 4 " i
>p -3" NO - j" O NO CO O 00 CM O CO NO MO CM CO O NO NO CM H CM -ir H CM 4 w n CM PA P A H CM -3" P A P A
& O N C O ONVTvNO H ON00 N Q N O V O H O O D C--HNO CM H H CM CM CM CM H H CM CM CM CJ CM CM H H H
XT1
O NO H ON !>- O CO CM O O v N NO O H NO NO O PA-3" P A ^ A ^ A NO {>-£>- -j- PAvr\_3- VfiO-C-
• •
• H H H H H H O O O O O O O O O H H H
• w CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
• ST^PAPA .3--3--3- u-\*nxn NO NO NO C ^ C V C - c o o o c o K r O - O - {>-C^-CN- O- O- C - CN-C^-C^- O- O- o- !>- o -^ P A P A P A P A C A C L O A C A O A P A P A C A P A P A P A P A P A
• t—' CM PA H CM PA H w r \ H CM PA H OJ PA H N H
2 5 2
*r3 CD 3 a •H •P
8 I I
M
i-3
EH
ON H
cnvo ^t VO VO ON CM CM 04
VO **A00 ON^AON H CM CM
CACM o <rvr> o CM CM 0 ^
H O N O CVUT CACAA
^ C O * A -4*vooo rH rH rH
00 CM 00 ON rH -4* CM CACA
VOIN-CM CACA~3-
* A 0 G \ O CM CM <A
-4" 0 4 " CM CM <A
CO CMTN c A c n 4
CM £>-I3-H H i—1 CACACA
5M"
CD UN £>• CM C
rH NO HI CM CA«3- CM CA-3"
o-3R\P" CACACA
— ^ S T r H i—1 rH CM CM CA~~T
CACVS-CM *ACVL CACAAA
VO rH O-CA-3- >A
CMVBD-V ^ \ R ^ CACACA
T^rftrcrs VAVNVO
* A ' ^ " o J o T U^U lA
\r\\ry\r\ ~3r -^H * A
* A R \ > A \NXR\VN
o H F T " VOVCND
<5 ovb w
' (ACM CA T \ 5 ^ t T ^ TFVAVO
>? U^VRY^ CM CM CM
O-~J-VO H CM CM
-4* ONCA j—l rH CM
CA^RTO CM CMCM
VO OOO O H O
7 T N O ~ CM CM CA
<A H
CM O i F ~ CM CM CM
* A 0 0 O H CM CM
N H H rH CM CM
CACN^T CM CM CM
CM O-CM CM CM CM
M3 H < S CM CM CM
,CM N
CACACA CM Sp CM CM CA-3" CACAJS-
6 N C 5 C ~ -4- v n u ^ H C M C A XPLU~\V"1
oTFvy CM CM CM
OV^AVO H CM CM
VT\jj- >A CM CM CM
VO 0 0 0 CM CACM
C M O N H CM H
H ON C\J C"\CM P~\
i O-X
CM H ~ T HI HI rH
coovo O H H rH rH i—i
CM CKCA ON OVCA O O H
0NCM*A H CM H rH rHrH
v0- -v0 H O CM r - | ,H rH
o h " 3 * <?\<r\<r\ H H H
CM CM H CAVO ^A rH rH rH
CM L^-VO rH rH iH
O -ONO rH rH CM
H H O S H CM H H OJ H
s T
uSvo ^ CM CM CM
ON CM * A H CACM
GNVO rH rH CM
VAON^A CM CM CM
V Y O CM CM CM CA
vricvj U*S CJ C°\<M
* *
R CXT^F^O"" H R L C N
R \ O V O rH CM rH
ONOCO O CM CA
1 : O V O " " rH H H H H H CJ CM M
>T* o o o -3* CM -4"
O O O ^ CM j3-
CD CO O J3- CM
O OVO -4" CMCA
OVOVO JZt H 0~N
AO CO <M R>ICVJ
N O V O CM CACM
CACM O CM CM CM
CM 0 0 - 4 H t—1 {—1
ON-4* 00 rH CM H
O-VO CA CM CM CM
C^CO-'t O C\] <M
N 5 O -3- V>T{>-
VO CM O -3* ^ A N
rH -4* rH *A*AVO
O-VACA \AVO C -
H C A H *AvO VO
C -d- o VO ( V O -
•
• o O o H H H H H H O O O O O O H H H
• CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
• O N O Q N I>~{N-£N. CACACA
O O O CO CO CO CACACA
rH rH rH CO CD 00 ( A < A < A
CM CM CM 00 CO 00 CACACA
CACACA CO 00 00 CACACA
00 00 CO (ACACA
•
1
H CM N H CM CA H CM CA rH CM CA rH CM CA rH CM CA
253
<D $ £ •P £
<8
I HI
m T-3
ON <7NJT VO ^OxH H H CM
VPV-D" CM -3- VN O rH *H rH
rH C A O ONO .4* H CM CM
J3-CO^5-CO C\CA H H CM
O - H * A CM CA^A rH rH rH
O- ONJ^ CA^ANO H H H
R— %
! A5 CA CM H H CM
VO H H CM
vr \ 0M>-rH fH rH
CM CM £>-CM CACA
NO O CM O H R H
oo CN! O H H
FN"
'^(XT^sFT" rH CM CM
CM CM CM rH rH CM rH rH CA CM CM CM rH rH H CM CM H
£ P CM CM-3-
HNONG CACMCM
"~V\35TT" CA CM * A CM CM CA CACACA
VP* >4
^UCT^RS C^\IR\SF
V A ^ A H -3" CACA
H O^CO U^VPV'JPY
CA ONJJ -3* 0 ^ * A
c^^tvT" 0"%C\L 04
^ G R G N ? \ ( A ( A ( A
CO CM ON O H H
C^OO o O O H
CVJ O-VO H H rH
<T\J$r ON O H O
*AEV-3* O O H
CA~T * A H H H
> r ^ I S - O N H H H
ON^AOO RH CM CM
XACO CA rH rH rH
CAONNO CM H H
NO H CA H CM CM
O I > - H H H H
T<M fH T\o5 o\
CM 04 CM o o.~F" H CM CA
rH ^ T E ^ " CACM CA
C S T O T T " CM CACA
HFTvITPT" H H CM rH H H
C A ^ . ^ RH rH I—1
*A*AOO O H H
•4-NO CM H H CM
CM NO -4* H H H
CN-R}- H H H H
O-CAON O H H
1 O -•V1
vdu^Sf CNCD O CD O rH
-4-00 CM O CM R-J RH rH
O NO v \ H ON CM rH O rH
NO CACA H ON CM H O H
N0 4 - 0 H ON H H O H
o ON00 00 o o o
*P ""H^CM O~~
H CM CM V ) O N rH CM rH
R ^ O N O rH rH CM
ONGO CA rH rH rH
j *NO CM CM H CM
*AVO UA H H H
> P ON ON CM H H N
U^\Q XA CM CM CM
•NVO CM
CM CM CA *AXR\ \A CM CM CM
ON CANO H CM H
04CMNO CM 4
! ** H H H NO NO O rH rH CM
co ^To O H CM
CANOOO rH H CA
^ C^FTRY"
H O H H O H
>4 R-.-V \ 0 <ACM CA
NO NO NO < A H CA
O ONO -RT CM CA
O O CM -3- CM CA NO CO NO CACM CA
CM O CM H ca
& CAONCM H O H
rH O VO CACACM
^ N O O-CM H H
0N~ 4* * A
rH H H CA^AH CM CM CM
^ XOILA CM H H
ONcM ON C ^ I N ^ N
-3* CO NO V 0 0 4 1
J-NONO CANO CM CA-^-NO
CM ^ACM -3--3- >A
CAOO -CA t A
»
• ° o o o o o R-J rH rH fH rH rH H H H O o o
• C^ CM CM 0-2 CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
• ^CO CO MO NO VO 00 CO CO CACACA
CN-O-O-00 00 00 CACACA
00 00 00 00 00 00 CACACA
ON ON ON 00 00 CD CACACA
O O O ON ON ON CACACA
«: H 0 J (TN rH CM CA H CM 0~\ H CM CA H CM CA H CM CA
2 5 ^
0 0 I—\ EN* D - O O H CM CM
^ I H O O SFR (X) CM CM CM
* A O - O N C A O N C A CM CM CA
C A . 4 * 0 0 C A > A O N CM CM CM
0 0 « N - * A V A D - C M H r H CM
^ 0 0 ON ON ~>NO H CM CM
H H H LTT*OVCM CM H CA
CM C"- CM C A C A - 3 *
C A C A * A CM CM CA
O CNVO rH O r H H 04 CM
CM CM CM D T O O " " RH CM CA
CM 4 - o o ^ S N M J ^ C D ( 5 R A \ ( A - 3 * * 0 H CM CM CM CM CM CM C A C A
— T O T ^ T R T " 3 " CM CM C A J ^ >F\
0 0 CM O C A V Y O
O - J J O N C A - 3 - - 3 -
O C A C A CA C A ^ T C M ^ T
VPS FN
H CO HA"" C N C N N
CM O - O ^ \ 4 - \P>
H * A £ N ^ A
CASN-NO V N ^ \ A CM ~3* ^ A ^ M D
CM CS \ 5 H O H
MD CM NO rH CM CM
V A O N v o r H RH CM
ON ON ( A H r •! CM
O N O 0 0 O r H rH
0 0 NO NO H CM CM
SH rH rH H I
vo O - ' A rH CM CM
CM MD O -CM CM CM
J3* V \ 0 CM CM CA
-3" CO V \ CM rH CM
NO H CM O H CM
, 0 4 - O T H T A
C A C A C A C A C N ^ N H ^ I C A ^ U T
V N O N V F T " rH RT C5 CM CACM CM C A C A
o"o3 CM CM CM CM
N O \ A , H H CM CM
o o <r\jfr\ H CM CM
nno CM CM CA
NO C A O N rHI r H rH
O N O C -r \ CM r H
O-f -'T5nSp3S'—
H O N O r i O i—1
" " V R V S ' C ~ O O CM RH H H
Q\ir\\r\ O N O CM O H H
CO I N - O O O H I—1 RH rH
C - * A H O ON CM r H O H
^ A J > - H r~i O N O rH O rH
>e r H r~i RH
O - C M C -H H O
0 0 H M D rH CM rH
NO O - rH H CM <N1
CACO ^ P ~ r H rH RH rH r H r H
- • ' m 7 \ C T * R,J| H I CM
* A C M * A CM CACM
ON CM * A H CACM
* A C M * A CM CACM
NO * A C M r H CM CM
CM CM ^ A CM CACM
—(^TKfyxtr^ -3" CM H
O N O o CM CM ~ I*
XFN^T O rH H I -^3"
NO H I—I rH r H
T H M T R-^ RH rH r H r H r H
C"\ X
O CM NO 4 - H C ^ I
CM J^-VO CACM CA
CM CM NO C A C A C A
O N O O -3* RH ^
NO O O CA CM .£}*
O O -^R CM CM
& H CM H rH CM ^ H H H
VANO CO r H O O
H oo < A H H r H
0 0 H ON CM Cv] CM
NO r H CM CM CM CM
o V ^C A -£$* -3"
vO^J-vo CAVAVO
NO ^ A CA I R \ \ O O -
C A * A T A * A M D £N- CAj^- L A
; 1 r H CM ^ A N O
• •
* rH rH I—I o o o H H H O O O RH RH rH rH R H r H
• CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
• H H H ON ON ON C A C A C A
CM CM CM ON ON AS CA F A C A
C A C A C A ON ON ON C A C A C A
-4-~3" -3" ON ON ON C A C A C A
\ A * A * A O O N 0 N C A C A C A
M0 NO NO ON 0 N ON ( A C A C A
RH CM CA ^ CM CA R H CM CA rH CM CA H CM CA RH CM CA
255
o\ ! N w r i c\j o\f^ jH I r^^3-\o j^-voo
I I I—1 I—I C\} <M F * \
t°0 JH
fH^
> T
JH1
C^ X
xr\ X
<? >$
>P
&
X*
HC^4" H HCM
T N - C M < \ I H N C n
H ON CM C A C M H H H
HCO 00 H O O
N O U > C D O N C A C A O H H
00 H H CM H CM H (—J H
CO N O CM CM * A { V -H H H
D-CM O O H rl
C A C O 0 0 H O O
o « T V A H H rl
C O H ^ A H CM CM CM CM C A
CM H 0 0 H H H
* A O CM O H CM
> A C M C A
H rl rl On On
H O H
COVO *A ( A CM < A
H O N CM -3" CAVA
£ > - O N O N CM CM CM
O N O O CM CM CM C A
* A V O C A CM CM CM
ONVO O H CM C A
QNONO vtva\O
o o \ o C A C A C M
^ V O CM CM CM CM
N O O N O N CM H CM
CM O N O O H O
oo xnvo H CM CM
CM O N C A H O H o o o
C M O I O I o o o
CM £ N O O O H
cad^^A rl rl rl
ON MO CO CA S-
o O N C O H O O
XT\ON HCO NO CM H H
NO -00 O H H
CM - 3 * CM CM H H
n n o N CM C A C V I
•4" -4" CA H H H
C A C - C O O H O
NO ONH O O H
O N H CM O H H
O-^ACM O ON CM H O H
OO CAON O O ON r j H o
CO ONO 00 ONO O O H
NO O CO O CN-CO H O O
H - 3 * O N O {>-00 H O O
-3" NO H H ON ON H O O
CO NO NO O H H
0 0 CM C A H CM H
CM O N O H H H H OH
O N C A O N O H O
MD 00 NO HHH
\psno *A CM CM CM
CM N O * A CM CM CM
• AND CM H H CM
^AndnO CM H O
CANO On rl CM H
CO VA ON H CM H
CANONO H H H
C A H N O H H H
CM O N O H CA i—I
^ ^ O H H CM
O H NO H H H
00 H On CM H O
N O N O N O C A H C A
M ) 0 . ^ CACM CM
00 NO NO CM H C A
CO NO CM CM H CA
ONO NO ^ H CA
00 O O CM CM CM
V A H O N
CM CM CM On J* IH H CM CM
HOO NO CM H H
*AGNNO CM H H
On CO ON CM O O
^ CM { N CM CM CM
NO O *A > A
H * A C A N O
H C A C M CM CM CM
NO £>- On CM CM CM
- 3 - - 4 - CM CACA-4-
CM * A * > ~ C A CM
HHH OOO HHH HHH OOO HHH
CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM 0 4 CM CM CM CM CM CM
l>£r£: ®^^o~5t5r-rrcTt3—,=n=nq—trrsrvr ^ O N O N ( > O N O N O N O O O O O O O O O
C A C A 0"N C A C A C A C A C A C A ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
H CM C A H CM C A H CM C A H CM C A H CM C A H CM C A
O N N O O N C A C A C A
C A N O N O C A C A C A
- 3 * O N N O H C M N O 0 0 H 4 H O C O O H N O * A O C A H H H CM CM CM O CM H H CM H CM CM H H C A C M
2 5 6
6X
j i
C^vO ON c n o n e n H H CM
VO VO VO O H CM H H H
On£>-*A CO rH VO O rH rH
ON CM CM CM CAOn i—! 1—1 1—1
I S H O H CACA rH rH rH
^ A O -CM o n ^ A rH H H
M 0 00 CM ON H H H
r H Jjr 00 rH H O
Ox ON rH O O rH
-4" NO * A H H H
c o ^ - ^ O rH rH
O O O M N H H rH
J>?" VO CN-^t H H CM
0 0 c n O O O
ON JN- ON O O rH
VA-3" (N-H 1—1 CM
VOVQ <J\ H O O
00 O ON H H H
1 v o o \ c o c n c n - 3 -
-3"-3" *4" CM CM CA
O O CN-H CM o n
CO ^ACN-CM CM CM
CVC^CN-CM CM CM
O CM CM CM CM CM
c w o CM CM on~3-
>AcO CM CM CM CA
VO U ^ O CM H o n
^ c n o CM CM CM
CM CM CA c n o n c n
ONVO CM CM CM o n
CD vn-3-O H H
CM O O O
-3" CM -4" O rH rH
<r\xr\xr\ O O O
rH VO O -O O O
CM ON CO O O O
i H ^ ^ I H * A O CA CM
C A H £>-H CM H
CM rH VO H CM H
CM O ^ rH CM rH
00 ON H CM H
v o CM o n H CM CM
( * v < A H CM CM-3-
CM (AOO CM H H
on*A£N-O H CM
CO OVX) c—1 rH «—1
C O H 4 * O rH H
\ A c n c M H H CM
>¥* ^ H V O O CM CM
O H O O r l H
H O O H O H H
vnvO O -H H O
( N - H £>-O H O
ON-4" -4" O H H
tN-X
rH On_^-CM O N H H O r l
O - O n c n (N CM H O H rH
CM H * A ON CN-CO O O O
CO CM rH ON H rH O rH
00 OnC^-ON O O O
CM o n H O H H H H
I VO O - O -rH rH rH
O VO VO rH rH O
O CM O CM H i—1
O O O NO CM H rH
CM VO 00 CM CM H
CN-VO O H CM CM
>p ^A CM CM cm o n o n
ON CM CM H <T\CM
CM VO ^ A CM CM CM
VNCM CM CM (ACM
ONONVA H H CM
^r\\r\\r\ CM CM CM
-"J CO o \ N r l O
ON-4" 00 O c n c n
rH ^A CM rH rH rH
rH CO rH rH H
> A O N H H O H
-3* ON-3* CM O H
>v CM CM VO C ^ H 0 ^
CM O O O c n CvJt CM
^ CM CM CM H CA
CM CM O r \ H 4 *
00 O CM CM CM m
C M ^ V O oncM o n
& -4- O O CM CM CM
£N H ON O VO H
*AVO \Q H 0 0
NO CO 0 CM rH CM
o n O CM H O H
v o 00 00 H H H
XT' ! > - * n \ o -3- -3-
00 CM! ON c n c n o n
ONcncs . CM
H CM N O CM ON o n o n o n
ONCM VO V A * A
• •
• H H H O O O rH rH rH rH rH rH O O O O O O
• 1 CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
• 2 O O •3"-3--^
-d" -3W~UR
O O O -3* - 5"
U-N1T\\A O O O -Zjf*
VO ^ o v c T ~ O O O
-4-
O- O - {>- " O O O
00 co 6b" B)l" O O O
• F-' CM C°V rH CM CA H CM On H CM <A H CM o n H CM o n
257
rti <D
a
43 £
8 I I
Hi
£H
, 0 *AJ± H CM VQ vO »H H tH
ONVO O-ON 1—f rH O rH rH
VT\0-0 H^i}" rH rH fH
ONONA O -4* CM H H H
CO *ACO cm CACA H H H
<r~\ CM ~± H rH H H
Lco tH
CAACM H H CM
VOONN OOO
ino\4-rH H H
CO CM CM O H H
VO CM CA O H H
CM O- A H H H
CN-J O H H CM
-3" ONNO O O H
rH rH CN-CM CM CM
NO O VQ H H H
CM CWO H O H
lf\C^O~" O H H
*AO (A CM CACM
ONCAA CM CM CA
O-ON CM CM CM
O CM CACACA
(Ajfr CM CACACM
*AoO (N-CACM CM
*A CAO CO CACACM
C A H 0 CM CACM
C A O 0 CM CACM
C A O CM r \H
o o n eleven
O 00 CM CAH CA
HI 00 rH OO H
H4-f^ OOO
H O-VO OOO
0 D-V0 0 0 0
ONVO 0 0 0
CM CAH O O H
M ONt O H CACA
CO vo .3" rH rH 1—1
O-H O rH CM CM
CA.3- 0 H CM CM
VO CA-4" H CM CM
vr\ CM H H H CM
'CM !H
CM ON CO HI rH H
O CAO H H 1—I
ON CO H O O CM
O O-Csj H H H
CO ONH H O H
O7TON* ~~ H H H
ON OHO
CO H CM O rH rH
CM CM 00 OHO
ON £>- H O rH H
ON«H CA O H H
4"00\ OHO
IV X
COH l O CM O 1—1 !—I rH
ONHOO COCO O-OOO
O *AH O ON CM H O H
CM *ACM H ON O H O H
CACA-3" O ON ON H O O
*A,H vr\ cnc^H H O H
>5P .4- O-CO H H O
CA-3" J>-H H O
CO ACA H H H
H HOD H H O
j -NO O O O H
r\N4-H O H
j ^
CA CM VO CM CACM
ONVV-A H CM iH
CM VO CM CM CM CM
ON CM CO H cnn
AVO *A CM CM CM
CM CACM CAH CA
«* ^AH
rH rH rH O ONi H CM O H
ON ONVO O O CM
VO CA CM H H
VAH *A H H H
•4* ONVO n o H
CO CO VO CM CM CA
-3* 0 4-CM CM (M
CM NO CACM CA
vO O VO CACM CA
O CM CM -3* CACA
O O CM CM CM (A
QN ON CM CM CM
ncnH H H CM
ONH4* H CM CM
CM VO O-CM H CM
ON CO CM H H H
VO CM H (ACM CM
wr1 CAO-CM j$j$r *A
£>-H-t CM CM CM
ONCAON CMjfrjfr
acm r-cnc^4-
ovo o~ •3*-3* *A
O CO 0 ^-3-^A
• -
• 0 0 0 OOO OOO 0 0 0 OOO OOO
• CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
* ^ O. ON O O O --J" j3" _n}-
OOO rH fH rH •4--J3--3-
H H H H H H -3" J3* j3"
CM CM CM H H H
CACACA H H H
jfr-a-jfr rl H H J* jfrjfr
• rH (M H CM r \ H CM H H CM CA HNO^ H CM CA
2 5 8
D - O O -C N ^ I N i—! rH rH
VO O - O H rH CM
rH rH 00 O C A * A CM CM CM
ON CM ON CA>ACQ CM CM CM
VOOO H O O * N CM CM CM
H CM o C N ^ A H rH iH CM
r l ^ O rH rH CM
CO O O O H CM
VO CM VO CM CACM
XN CO CM CM CA
CAVA CM 04 CM CA
O O-VO r-j rH rH
CM <M H CA
H * A CM CM 04
N E N V N H H CM
*AVO o CM CM CA
o CA ON CM CM CM
O O ^ A CM CM CM
VO CM VO 04 CACA
\ A \ O ON CM CACA
D - H O CA-3- XA
r l O H JFR . j - VR*
H CM CA CA-4* -3*
rH * A O -CM CACA
>*. ( N O CA CM < N < N
ON"1 A ON 04 CM CA
£N*CM CA CACA.4-
RH CAVO x r N v n ^
, CM v r \ c n -4"
VACO 04 CACM-3*
irs^rCQ o o o
t A C V f r H H H
1 A 0 4 * o H H
GNCAVO H CM CM
RH C A * A rH rH rH
CM CO ^ A O O H
CA-^-NO CMCM H
CN^NCA H rH H
00 CM V0 CM CACM
Cs~vO vo rH r-J H
H - 3 " ON CM H H
.4-CO CM CM H CM
Cvl X
ONVO ON H H H
(A-3-.3-( A CM CA
V0 ON <A~3- ^
00 O-rH VO N O ON CACM CA
rH rH H H CA
CSWO <A O H H
O H o H 04 CM
H VA*A CM CM CM
C A - 3 - ^ CM CM CM
CM O H CM CM CM
00 CM CM O H CM
!>-x
G \ 0 CN O O H r i H H
00 £>-vO o o o rH rH rH
co r ^ o o H CM ~3" rH rH rH
vo O ON CM H O rH
vncMoo H o H rH rH rH
CM NO-3* r*i O CM rH rH rH
o c n c o CM CM H
CM O ^ H CM CM CM
O-vO VO CM CM HI
ON^AVO <3 rH rH
VA-3" O^ CM CM rH
iH O-VO H O H
ON*AVA H CM Ol
*A04 ON CM CA H
CM ON ON CA CM CM
CM VO CM CM CACA
CMNO^A CM CM CM CM CM CM
CO CO ^ A H O H
O O VO CM 04 RH
VO H O H H CA
ON NO * N H I—1 (—1
ON H 00 o iH e n HHH
o X
CD O CM CM CM CA
4 * o o o CM 04 CM
VO CM O H CA.4"
04VQ O (A
O^ 00 CM CACM CA
o o ^ t v o CM CM CA
& -3* EN CM CM CM
0 - 0 4 CM rH rH CM
O-ONCA CM CM CA
CM CACM CM rH CM
N C ^ H CM H H
C A O CA CA CA
VO (AGO H O JS CA-QR CA
CM 00 00 vo vo *A
QNO-O-.3- V N ^ A
•3- < A H -AVTX
H JZt ^A^A
•
« O O O rH |—| rH o o o rH rH <H O O O rH rH rH
• CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
•
' { K ^ W - j r l H
^^TK£FZ&~ rH f—S rH
t ^ T ^ l S rH i—1 i—1 j$r -3* -4"
'"TFJW'Tty" rH rH j—1 ^ ,4-,3-
,"',"131N,'0,N0^ rH rH rH CM CM CM
( T | r H ^ ^ H CNJF CA H CM EN RH CM C A H CM CA £—1 CM C*~N
259
<D
£
CS
9 E-I
AS 5 H i ON^ACO CM~3- *A RH H H
-DH H 0 0 * A * A \ O rH H H
VO CM VO C A O C M CM C\J CA
IN-00 va 00 O H CM CACA
VAH CO 00 H CM rH CM CM
RH
A C
H
T - F
CA JH
CM H
NOO (AO-ON rH i—I rH
^ACM O H O
CM 0> AT\ H H H
CM VO CA CACA-3"
L A G V ^ A CM CM CM
CACM O \ rH CM rH
VO O CA H CM CM
ON CM-3* O H CM
(S-1—J \0 rH rH rH
CACM H CM CA-4"
CM-3" U- \ CM CACA VO CM O CM CM CA
CM CA-3" CM CM CM
ON O - H H CM CA
O - ^ ^ A CACACA
O *AO\ CACACM VO C \ H
CA-^JH * A ^ ON-3" V T \ \ A V A
CACACM CACA-3 "
O C - 0 0 ( A C M CA
H CM Qv (A (A
CAONCO V A V A I A
CM ONCA VO VR\\O
O * A O CACAJ^* VO VO 00
CACA.3 -
^ T V O ^ * O O O
00 O rH O
H CAV.O H CM CM
C A O - 1 * CM CM CM
^ R - C -
rH rH rH 0 0 O O O H H
CO 00 O-rH HI rH
O W O 0 0 O rH rH CM ON * A
CM rH CM ( A O CM CM CACA
CM VO ^ A CM ON~3* rH rH rH
rH C\Gv CM H CM rH *A0O
CM H CM IN-CM t < A ^ A \ R \
CN-CN-ON -3*
CM -4" rH C A 4 - 4 *
O N X ^ C A O CM CM
J>*H
VO O - C A rH rH rH VO ON ON
H O H CM C\? 0 0 CM CM CM
H O CA C A O ^ C A
CM CM CM CM CM O O
O H H
O - W ^ -ODON OHO * A O 00 O CM O H H H
( N - O - O H 0 4 H H H
-3* H - ^ " O O - D -H RH H
^ T - D - 0 0 H O H H H H
O-JFR O ONCNO O O H
O R \ O CM CM H
V O O N N H rH H
CM {N- ON CM CM H
H V ^ O CM H CM
-ZT VO H H H CM
-4*VO O H H H
CM ON ON CM CM H
00 VO 00 O H O
V A O \ I R \ CM CM CM
D-OO VO H H H
VAONCM CM CM CA
VACACM CM CACA
VNCM ^ A CM CACM
VAONCM CM CACA
H CN-3-H O CA
ON UN0O O H CA
C A H ON H H O
H VO 0 0 H O H
O O O C O CM CM CM
CO CO O CM CM.4-
V O - ^ - V O CACM CA
VOCOVO CACM ( A
VO ^ T V O CACM CA
00 -3 -VO CM CM CA
ONCN-ON OHO ONVO O
H CM H CA0O ON CM H H
C A O C O H H H
V O H N CM CM CM
ON0V-3- - -H O O
ONVO CM CM CA-3"
C A H {N* CM CO VO VO VO. O- O- CA ON V N U ^ I A
O O CO * A - 3 - - 3 *
ON-^* - A V W X
O O O H H H H H H H H H O O O O O O
CM CM CM CM OJ CM CM CM CM CMCMCM CM CM CM CMCMCM
H H H CM CM CM C A C A C A - ^ 5 * ^ A ^ A ^ A VOVOVO ^ ^ CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM 03 CM CM
H CM CA H CM C A H CM CA H CM CA H CM CA H C M C A
260
^HMD VOONON H i—I H
vavaco CO^ CM rH rH CM
o-o\oo c o o o rH rH CM
O CO CM VAOO CM CM CM
cooo 0 H^MD CM CM CM
CO NO ^o NOCM H CM CM
£NNO ON HH H
cm co-3* H H CM
H COO H CM CM
NO COO H CM CO
O H CM CM COCO 00 (V CM H H CM
in" -3" H O H CM CM
CM NO tN H rH CM
CM CO H cm cm co O-H CM H CM CO
H V0 O CM CM CO
OJ& CO CM CM CM
& ON CN»—1 co-3-jj*
rH COVO CM COCO
CM CO CM CO CO CO co-^-~-t NO ON CO COCO-3*
w a d -co co co
xr\ O CO co cocm co
rH *A.~f CO*A coco no CM CM CO VAVQ CO
voxovo ,CM *AH VA*ANO
O O H - -3* *A
.-=f X
NtnON O H O
^AOsH O OH {NH O
HHH 0 voco CM CM CM
*-0 iN-ON H H H
~*± CO On H H H
co !H
^ C-VO i—1 rH i—1
O C4 ,H CM H CM
COH CO r H CM CM
CM CO CO H H CM
H O-VO CM CM CM
H 0MN H H H
H 0V.-3- r-cm coco 0\C0-:t
H H cm CO CO H CM CO
CO CO ON co^- CO
1—1 H £N CO CO CO 0 CM COCO
vavah H H CM
*AONMD O O CM H H CO
H H CM CM CM CM fN-CM CM H CM CM
ANO (N H H H
o-X
OVO CO H 0~0\ H O O
-3* CO -3" H ONCM H O rH CM O H ON CO 0 O O H
CO--MD O ON Cxi H O H
G\CO£N-H COO H rH H
COH ON O ONO H O H
& -3" D-VO CM CM H
vo xnvo H H H
£N- CM CM H CM H
CO CO H rl H
CM 00 CO HHH W H
H H H
j Vf\ j ss * I ^ cm on*a CM H CM
VOCM CM CM CM CO
CO CM VO H CO CM
VACM ON CM COH
VA CM *A CM CO CM
On Qn vo H H CM
~~~f - -XAH rH rH rH
NO MO CO H H rH
COH H H H H
NO O NO H H CO
OVO A CM COH
H ONT H O H
>V NO .4- CM COO CO VO -3" CD
COCM-t CM CO NO COO CO
CO ON0 CM CM CO
NO CO CM CO CM CO CM-3* CM CO CM CO
& -3* rH rH rH rH CM H CO CM CM CM
CM £N(N H O H
H00 CM CM H CM
NO ON CM CM H CM
NO -4" IN CM CM CM
iNCNCN CO-3"-3- 00 CM C VAMD\O
CM CO CM VOCO-3- AGNCM COCO *A
CO {N-00 VA*ANO VA4" VA vo
*
• 1—( rH 1—I O O O H H H H rH rH rH H H O O O
• CM CM CM <NJ CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
* CM CM CM CM CM CM ~TrrtKTK~"
CM CM CM CO CO CO ~V —v —'si —«4
rTrTrT CO CO CO j$r
COCOON ^ -4" ~*3*
* 1
H CM CO H CM CO H CM CO H CM CO H CM CO H CM CO
261
wO\ fH CM H H NO CM H O O CO H MD HH^A CAMD 00 £NONCA V NO CO CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM H H CM CMCMCM
>? cm *a o-co -3- oocno-^-cb HONO " ***" CMCMCM CM CM C°\ CM OCA CMCMCM CACACA
tH*" no .3-cm riri h h ^ Q5*7T n dT'Os* — cm cm ca cm caca cacaca h cm cm cm cm cm
>e MO -)- oo 6 6\H CV ca CN- £>-NO CA " ccff'cD"1 " r*
(A CM CA - (Mcncn r\r\4"
vr\ K
c3:'c C dsoo CS-HH o VSH c d\5 ™ ^ -4" CM-3- -vn\D j3"-3-xn tr\vr\*A
C?\ CM ON \H00 Jt'o\H H CM MO CN-D-F ™ O H H H CM H Hi—! CM H H H H H CM
M ON CM {V ON H H CM H ON O O H ^ O . H CM H H CM CM CM CM H CMCMCM CM CM CA
•.tN1 N ?S6n vodS CM caca cKvnob -FCM^^ ~~ tAct-3- cacaca H H ca H- -CA *ACMtN- CA--CA NH(J\ ACMMO CM CM CM HCMrl CMCMCM H CM rH CMCMCM
O-
X
!
CM OVO ^CM CA NO\D O CM NO ON-4- ON " — H H H OOSO O H n O O O O CM H ( ! i ! H H O H rl H i—1 H H H H H H 1
O-
X
! H CM ON jfrOOO H CM £>~ 6-00 CA H O-VO ~ "** H CM O H H rl H H H O H H H H H
>r CM 00 ON inCMuS vScM*A CM CM CM *ACM ON CACM CM CM CM! CM CM CACM CM CACM CMCMCM
** H CM c5 H CA Vf\ tACO NO H —~—~a*M' H CA CM H H H H (A CA H H H H CM H
j*r NO O O NO -dh CM NO O NO CM NO O O N O CACM-3" CACMCA CACM CA CAH-4*
CM ON00 00 VPsH ON--NO OCAO- ON O-CA CM H H H H CM H H H CACM H H H CM
NT1 -4" CO CM HCN O CO ON O ONJJ 00 OHKJ ^ *AM0 -4*J3**A j--NO St VVA NO NO O-
•
! • H H H H H H H H H O O O H H H
• CMCMCM CMCMCM CM CM CM CMCMCM CMCMCM
• CAtACA -3" XT\\A*A MO NO NO CN- (N- {N. " cacaca cacaca cacaca cacaca cacaca
-3* -3* -3-• H CM CA H CM CA HM c HNC^ H CM 0"%
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Books
Berlyne, D. E., Conflict, Arousal, and Curiosity, New York, McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., i960.
Bloom, Benjamin S., editor, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, New York, David McKay Company, Inc., 195&•
Bradley, R. C. and N. Wesley Earp, Exemplars of the Teacher's Cognitive Domain, Dubuque, Iowa, Win. C. Brown Co., Inc., 1967.
Cronbach, Lee J., Essentials of Psychological Testing, New York, Harper SHT"l^r™riiTre¥i7"lWr" —
Dewey, John, How We Think, Boston, D. C. Heath and Co., 19il<
Garrett, Henry E., Statistics in Psychology and Education, New York, LongmanTs, Green "and Co7, 1953*"
Holt, John, How Children Learn, New York, Pitman Publishing Corporation, 196?.
Baths, Louis S., Arthur Jonas, Arnold Rothstein, Selma Wassermann, Teaching; for Thinking, Theory and Appli-oation, Columbus, Ohio, ""Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co., 1967.
Russell, David H., Children Learn to Read, Boston, Ginn and Company, I96I. ~ "
Sanders, Norris M., Classroom Questions--What Kinds? New . York, Harper and Row Publishing Co.,"19 6".
Taba, Hilda, Curriculum Development, Theory and Practice, New York, "Har court,"Brace, and" World, Inc.", 1962.
Taba, Hilda, Teacher * s Handbook for Elem.enta.ry Social Studies, Palo Alto, Addison-Wesley Publishing~Co., IncT, 1967.
Walker, Helen M. and Joseph Lev, Statistical Inference, New York, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston" 1953»"
262
263
Booklets
Bradley, R. C., "How to Take the Fun Out of Reading," Biuoational Marketing and Research, La Jolla, Calif.,
Kelly, Truman L., Richard Madden, Eric F. Gardner, Herbert C. Rudman, Stanford Achievement Test, Directions for Admin-istering, Primary I_ Battery, New York, Harcourt, Brace, and World, Inc., 196^.
Kelly, Truman L., Richard Madden, Eric F. Gardner, Herbert C. Rudman, Stanford Achievement Test, Pirections for Admin-isteringT~Trlmary IT" Battery, New York, Harcourt, Brace, and World, Inc., 196" .
Otis, Arthur S. and Roger T. Lennon, Otis-Lennon Mental Ability Test, Manual for Administration, "Elementary I Level, New York, Harcourt"," Brace, and "World, Inc. 1967.
Articles
Binder, Dorothy M., John G, Jones, R. Wray Strowig, "Non-Intellective Self-Report Variables as Predictors of Scholastic Achievement,MThe Journal of Educational Research, Vol. LXIII, (April, 1970J, 36^-366.
Bradley, R. C., "Do Current Reading Practices Stifle. Curi-osity?" The Reading Teacher, Vol. XXII, (February, 1969)»
Bradley, R. C. and Billie Edward Martin, "A Study and Assessment of the Value of Selected Placement Tests for Predicting Achievement in Spanish, French, and German for First Semester Freshmen," The Journal of Experi-mental Education, Vol. XXXVI, "("Winter, 19677, 50-5^.
Cogswell, Coralie, "Students Need a Course in Thinking," Today's Education, Vol. LVIII, (November, 1969), 60.
Coopersmith, Stanley and Jan Silverman, "How to Ehhance Pupil Self Esteem," Today's Education, Vol, LIX, (Awril, 1970K 28-29. — - - — —
Guilford, J. P., "The Structure of the Intellect," Psycho-logical Bulletin, Vol. LIII, (July, 1956), 267-293.
Hunkins, Francis P., "Analysis and Evaluation Questions: Their Effects Upon Critical Thinking." Educational Leadership, Vol. XXVII, (April, 1970) , £9^705.
264
Kingston, Albert J. and. William P. White, "The Relationship of Reader's Self Concepts and Personality Components to Semantic Meanings Perceived in the Protagonist of a Reading Selection," Reeding Research Quarterly, Vol. II, (Spring, 1970), 107-1157"
Manson, Gary and Ambrose A. Glegg, Jr., "Classroom Questions: Keys to Children's Thinking?" Peabody Journal of Edu-cation, Vol. XXXXVII, {March, 19707, 302-30?.""'
Marchman, George Frederick, "Teaching Critical Thinking and the Use of Evidence," The Quarterly Journal of Speech, Vol. XXXI, (February, 3&2_3o8.
Maw, Wallace H. and Ethel W,, "Self-appraisal of Curiosity," The Journal of Educational Research, Vol. LVI, (July-August, 190877 462-265. ~~
Neal, Elizabeth, "A Review of Epistemic Curiosity and Behav-ior," Educational Leadership, Vol. XXVII. (March, 1970), 633-6^1:
"Research Clues," Today's Education, Vol. LIX, (March, 1970), 7 *
Thatcher, David A., "Reading Instruction, Creativity, and Problem-Solving," The Reading Teacher, Vol. XXI, (Decem-ber, 1967), 235-240, 2b0, 297'.
Microfilm
McGuire, Carson and Thomas Rowland, "Curiosity in the Edu-cational Ehcounter, A Representation of Daniel E. Ber-lyne," Ed. 013 987 ERIC Microfilm.
Reference Books
Buros, Oscar Krisen, editor, The Sixth Mental Measurement Yearbook, Highland Park, New Jersey, The" Gryphon Press,
English, Horace B. and Eva Champney English, A Comprehensive Dictionary of Psychological and Paychoanaly11 cal Te*rms," New York, Longmans, "Green, ahd~~Co., 1938. ~ • ~
Funk, Isaac K., A Standard Dictionary of the English Lanp--ua^e, New York,"^unk~anli IfegnalTs Co".', 191~2T~ a
265
Unpublished MaterIals
Martin, Billie Mward, "A Study of the Value of Freshman Placement Tests for Predicting Achievement in Spanish, French, and German at the University of Missouri," unpublished doctoral dissertation, School of Education, University of Missouri, Columbia, 1965.
Maw, Wallace E. and Ethel ¥. Maw, "An Exploratory Investi-gation into the Measurement of Curiosity in Elementary School Children," Ifeshington, U. S. Office of Education, 196'4.
Mays, Sue Cox, "Curiosity in the Reading Encounter, An Experimental Study of the Effect of Questioning on Curi-osity and Heading Comprehension," unpublished doctoral dissertation, School of Education, North Texas State University, Denton, Texas, 1969.