© Boardworks Ltd 20041 of 14

NATO and the Warsaw Pact

The Cold War

For more detailed instructions, see the Getting Started presentation.

This icon indicates the slide contains activities created in Flash. These activities are not editable.

© Boardworks Ltd 20042 of 14

What we will learn today

What we will learn today:

1. What NATO was.

2. Why NATO was set up.

3. How the USSR responded.

4. The importance of NATO and the Warsaw Pact.

© Boardworks Ltd 20043 of 14

What was NATO and why was it set up?

By the end of the 1940s, many Westerners were beginning to worry about the large armies which Russia had stationed in Eastern Europe.

How could the Berlin Blockade be considered ‘proof’ that the

USSR was a danger to Western Europe?

© Boardworks Ltd 20044 of 14

US officials called NATO an “antidote to fear”.How do you think the USSR perceived it?

The USA used this fear to set up an alliance to defend the Western world.

It was called the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), and countries signed up in April 1949. 12 countries originally signed the treaty.

© Boardworks Ltd 20045 of 14

Impact on the Arms Race

Why do you think the USA really was so keen on NATO?

The USSR did not even test nuclear weapons until later that year. By then, the USA was working on even more powerful versions!

The USA and the USSR competed to build more and more powerful weapons. This was called the Arms Race, and it is closely linked to NATO and the Warsaw Pact. Each side tried to become more powerful than the other.

The USA claimed NATO was a defensive alliance against the USSR. However, when NATO was first set up, the USA had a nuclear monopoly on the world.

© Boardworks Ltd 20046 of 14

The reaction of the USSR

In May 1955, West Germany was admitted into NATO.

Worst fears realized – Germany being rebuilt and

now part of a military alliance!

What was the real purpose of

NATO? Could it be offensive?

Action is needed – what can the USSR

do to counter NATO?

How do you think the USSRfelt about this?

© Boardworks Ltd 20047 of 14

West Germany joining NATO now meant that Germany once again had military power.

Creation of the Warsaw Pact

It was intended to be a defensive alliance, like NATO, but it was essentially used to keep control in Eastern Europe.

For the Soviets, who had suffered greatly at the hands of the Germans, this was too much. The Soviets set up the Warsaw Pact which the Eastern European countries signed.

Why do you think the USSR set up the Warsaw Pact?

© Boardworks Ltd 20048 of 14

Why was the Warsaw Pact created?

Match the reasons and the explanations.

On the next slide you can prioritize the reasons.

© Boardworks Ltd 20049 of 14

Why was the Warsaw Pact created?

Now put the reasons in order of importance.

© Boardworks Ltd 200410 of 14

Membership of NATO and the Warsaw Pact

© Boardworks Ltd 200411 of 14

The Hungarian Uprising

In Hungary in 1956 the communist government installed by the Soviet Union was overthrown by the Hungarian people. The new leader announced democratic reforms, and said Hungary would leave the Warsaw Pact.

The USSR brutally put down the revolt, rolling into Budapest with tanks and reinstating the communist government. It didn't want to lose one of its buffer states to capitalism.

Many thousands of people were killed in the uprising, and many people in the West turned away from support of the USSR.

© Boardworks Ltd 200412 of 14

Which was the stronger organization?

Which organization do you think has greater power? Why?

NATO Warsaw Pact

Moscow had political domination over central and Eastern Europe.The Warsaw Pact countries had geographic cohesion (was one large area) and land connections, so it was easy to transfer forces and weapons.

NATO had territory separated by water and land (non-NATO countries e.g. Switzerland).NATO was a voluntary alliance of democratic states.

The Warsaw Pact very clearly controlled from Moscow.

USA was a major part of NATO, but each member was involved in decision making.NATO had overall military superiority.

© Boardworks Ltd 200413 of 14

A comparison of the two treaties

What do the two treaties have in common?Is one more aggressive than the other?

Which treaty suggests more control? Why?

“…the best way to ensure peace and prevent new aggression … is the organization of a system of collective security … new measures [are required] for strengthening the defences of our peace-loving countries. The treaty of friendship, co-operation and mutual aid … is precisely to serve these aims.”

From the Warsaw Pact, 1955.

“…the Parties … will maintain and develop their individual and collective capacity to resist armed attack.”

“The Parties agree that an armed attack against one … of them … shall be considered an attack against them all.”

From the NATO Treaty, 1949.

© Boardworks Ltd 200414 of 14

How important were NATO & the Warsaw Pact?

Were these defensive alliances

really needed? What impact did the creation of NATO have on

the USSR?Remember the Berlin Blockade?

In your opinion, who had most to gain from these

alliances?

What do you think?

Discuss your ideas together…