content · club debate motivatio debate r debate time/s roles, materi debate debate procedur the de...
TRANSCRIPT
ContentClub Debate
Motivatio
Debate R
Debate
Time/S
Roles,
Materi
Debate
Debate
Procedur
The De
Structu
Debate
Entry P
Introdu
Introdu
Introdu
Q&A R
Cross-E
Rebutt
Conclu
Exit Po
Debate E
Speech
Points
Points
Points
Fusion
Unacce
Rules f
Access
Judging a
Resource
© Al
s es .................
on ................
Rules .............
e Topics .......
Space debate
Teams and O
ials Needed .
e moderator
e Judges ......
re .................
ebate within
ure and Timi
e Introductio
Poll ...............
uction of the
uction of the
uctory Roun
Rounds .........
Examination
tal Round .....
uding Round .
oll .................
lements ......
hes ...............
of Informati
of Order (PO
of Agreeme
of Teams ....
eptable beha
for Evidence
sory Rules ....
and Scoring ..
es .................
exander Hristo
....................
....................
....................
....................
es ................
Organization
....................
r ...................
....................
....................
the meeting
ng ...............
on ................
....................
e Teams .......
e Judges ......
d .................
....................
Round .......
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
ion (POI) .....
OO) ..............
nt (POA) .....
....................
avior ............
...................
....................
....................
....................
v, Agora Speak
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
n ...................
....................
....................
....................
....................
g ...................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
- 1 -kers Internation
Version 0.1
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
nal, 2017 - www
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
w.agoraspeaker
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
rs.org
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
................. 3
................. 3
................. 5
................. 5
................. 6
................. 7
................. 7
................. 8
................. 8
................. 9
................. 9
............... 10
............... 11
............... 11
............... 12
............... 12
............... 12
............... 13
............... 14
............... 14
............... 14
............... 15
............... 16
............... 16
............... 16
............... 17
............... 17
............... 18
............... 20
............... 21
............... 21
............... 22
............... 23
6
7
7
8
8
9
9
0
4
4
4
6
6
6
7
7
8
0
Other
Learnin
Debate
Debate
Referenc
© Al
Debate Rule
ng to Debate
e Topics .......
e Videos ......
es ................
exander Hristo
e Systems .....
e ..................
....................
....................
....................
v, Agora Speak
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
- 2 -kers Internation
Version 0.1
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
nal, 2017 - www
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
w.agoraspeaker
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
rs.org
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
............... 23
............... 23
............... 23
............... 24
............... 25
4
Motivatio "Agora Speahelping peoskills." Debating whas been neand the Ago There's a gr
• Deb& L
• Deb• Deb
(Ho• The
(Me• The
pos• Exp• Deb
& M• Deb
una(Pa
There are mparliamentaUsually, thearguments into considethe action isflexible, suc Debating hathat debatewell as focuthe adversacommunica The propos
1. Not2. Serv
© Al
on
akers Internaople develop
as present ineglected in tora Guide, it'
rowing body
bating enhanouden, 1999bating is the bating providobbs & Chandere's a clear rezuk, Bondarere's a very hsitions in socperienced debating drastiMezuk, 2012)bating is oneanimous (99.rcher, 1998)
many debate ary systems aey proceed inand evidenceration othes much less och as court p
as also its proes tend towausing them toarial natural oate.
ed debate rut making theving an educ
exander Hristo
ational is a wtheir public s
n the Agora She education's time to ad
of research
nces critical t9), (Howell, 1most effecti
des significandler, 1991) relationship renko, Smith
high correlatiiety (Keele &baters have cally reduces)
e of the most.26%) endors
contests anand parliamen turns with e can be intrr forms of deordered androceedings o
oblems. A nord dualism, poward the quof debates is
ules try to str meetings ex
cational purp
v, Agora Speak
Clu
worldwide nospeaking, co
Speakers decnal materialsdress this.
showing the
thinking, mu1943), (Hill, 1ve activity o
nt benefits fo
between deh, & Tucker, 2ion between
& Matlon, 19much lowers (as much a
t endorsed asement from
d debating rentary procea strict orderoduced. Howebate, espec fast-paced,
or business n
otable paperpersuading puestion of ws not natural
rike a delicatxcessively lonpose
- 3 -kers Internation
Version 0.1
ub Deba
onprofit assoommunicatio
claration of ps, and with th
e huge benef
ch more tha1993), (Greenon college caor people en
bate particip2011), (Pet
n debate part984), (Union,r verbal aggres three time
ctivities fromm students, h
ule systems edure (especr of what anwever, in thecially those hor those deb
negotiations.
r by professoparticipants t
winning or losl to the way f
te balance bng
nal, 2017 - www
ates
ociation of pan, critical th
purpose sinche second ite
fits of debati
n public spenstreet, 1993mpuses for t
ntering caree
pation and imers, 2009), (ticipation an1960)
essiveness sces) the dropo
m former parhigher than a
in existencecially the Britd when can e fast-paced
happening onbate-like situ.
or Nancy Tumto view issuesing. Additionfemales and
etween:
w.agoraspeaker
assionate volinking, deba
ce its very inceration of th
ng as an edu
aking alone 3) teaching reseers in all secto
mproved writHuseman, Wd attainmen
cores in geneout probabilit
rticipants. In ny other edu
, most of theish Parliamebe said, as wworld of tod
n TV, radio ouations that a
mposky (Tumes as having nally, severacertain mino
rs.org
lunteers devating and lea
ception, but he Education
ucational too
(Allen, Berko
earch skills. ors (Center,
ting and listeWare, & Grunnt of leadersh
eral life (Colty in schools
fact, it enjoyucational act
em based onentary Procedwell as when day, we mus
or similar mealso are muc
mposky, 2004only two poal studies sugority groups
voted to adership
until now it al Program
ol:
owitz, Hunt,
1982)
ening skills. ner, 1972) hip
lbert, 1993)s (Anderson
ys almost tivity.
n dure). new t also take dia, where ch more
4) argued sitions, as ggest that think and
3. Bein4. Dev5. Not6. Allo
enc Although clhave a set osection, as w Point (1) is tof roles, so mixture of bwith the VPdepending oWe should danger becagenerate cenot replace members th
© Al
ng as realistiveloping skillt creating a bowing debatecouraging co
ubs retain, aof standard, Awell as to act
the easiest tthat clubs caboth if time a
PE being in chon the numbbe weary, thause debateertain "addic
it. Also, we hat participa
exander Hristo
ic as possiblels that can bebad atmosphes to be mornsensus buil
as always, fleAgora-wide t as the seed
o achieve, byan choose toallows. Thereharge of orgaber of teamshough, of turs tend to be tion". Debatshould remete in them.
v, Agora Speak
e e used in a b
here in the clre than zero-ding.
exibility to derules that ac
d for a possib
y altering theo have a come will be a reanizing them and the timning Agora cfunnier and
tes should coember that t
- 4 -kers Internation
Version 0.1
broad range olub -sum section
efine their dect as guidancble debating
e requiremempletely classequirement,
m. A debate isme the VPE al
clubs into ded more excitiomplement ahe goal of Ag
nal, 2017 - www
of real word
ns in which o
ebate formatce for new cl
contest in th
ents that all msical meetingthough, to hs expected tolocates to ea
ebate clubs, aing than prepand extend tgora debates
w.agoraspeaker
debate or d
ne team win
ts and use otubs that havhe future.
meetings mug, or a debatehave at least o last betweach of the seas this is not pared speechhe existing es is mainly ed
rs.org
ebate-like si
ns and the ot
ther rules, itve never used
ust have a mie-only meetfour debate
een 30 and 90ections.
the goal. Thhes, so they
educational pducational fo
tuations.
ther loses,
's useful to d that
inimum set ing, or a
es per year, 0 minutes,
his is a can
program, or the
Debate R
Debate To Each DebatnonambiguHigher Educanswers:
• Tea• Tea• Tea
We explicitland "no-tea Topics shou Topics that
• Pur"tru
• Tighbas
• Tausma
• Extrto b
When organelectronicalthan presennaturally, a It is also rechalf-hearted It's the role
© Al
Rules
opics
e will have aous and cleacation Be Fre
am Y: "Yes, Ham N: "No, Peam D: "Highe
ly encourageams" as rarel
uld be real-w
are not suitarely subjectivue"?. ht cases (Topse position). utologies (Toaller than theremely knowbe properly d
nizing the delly or at a menting the topnd avoids be
commended dly positions
of the VPE t
exander Hristo
a clearly statearly defined aee?", and the
Higher Educaeople should
er Education
e a non-dualily real-world
world, relevan
able for debave topics for
pics for whicFor example
opics for whice Sun?. wledge-specdebated). Fo
ebate, it's sugeeting), and pic and a pre-eing labelled
that peoples they don't b
to decide the
v, Agora Speak
ed, short debanswer to there could be
tion should ad invest in theshould be fre
istic view of d issues have
nt topics, and
ates (APDA, which no ob
ch it's extreme: No personch only one p
ific cases (Tor example: "
ggested thatwaits for peo-defined set as biased or
sign up for tbelieve in.
e final compo
- 5 -kers Internation
Version 0.1
bate questiohat question.
three teams
always be freeir own educee for those
complex issue a simple "ye
d can be pro
2016): bjective argu
mely difficult n should everposition can
opics that re"Disposing of
t the VPE meople to expreof options. T
r one-sided.
teams that t
osition of tea
nal, 2017 - www
on, and each For example
s, each of the
ee." cation." under a spec
ues, so we sues/no" answ
oposed to the
uments can b
or impossiblr be tortured logically exi
quire a greatf PVC : altern
erely presentess the positThe first syst
ruly represe
ams.
w.agoraspeaker
team will dee, the debateem defendin
cific level of i
uggest tryinger.
e VPE of the
be presented
le to argue aby the statests). For exa
t deal of spenative compo
ts the topic ttions they watems allows t
nt their posit
rs.org
efend a specie topic could
ng these sam
income."
g to avoid "ye
club by any
d. E.g.: Which
a different side without a remple: Is the
ecific knowleounds"
to the membant to defenteams to "em
tion, rather t
ific, d be "Should
mple
es-teams"
member.
h religion is
de of the eason. Earth
dge in order
bers (either d, rather
merge"
than defend
d
r
Time/Spac
Time / Spacthe role of aspecific poinhave just re
The debatedebate topi
Time/Spacesimulate anavailable to
For examplethe existencby the repreafterwards.would knowattack itself
Informationthe above eprior noticeattack shou
Although thpersonality theatrical , is focused. June 20th, 1teams and "historically
It is also reccontroversi
1 American P2 Two days b
© Al
ce debates
ce debates (aa specific pent of time in
eceived the la
s may or maic was "
e debates pron historical sio the represe
e, if a team ice of Nucleaesented pers Continuing
w about the Pf happened o
n whose avaiexample, it's e of the attaculd not be us
he APDA recoof the imperole-playing For an Agor941 2 and de"won", althodue to Hitler
commended al events, un
Parliamentary efore the beg
exander Hristo
as per the APrson (usually history. For atest satellit
y not specify
oceed as nortuation, a te
ented person
s representir Weapons.
son, but not iwith the samPearl Harboron Dec 7th.
ilability is nonot yet agre
ck, so if a teaed.
ommends thrsonated leaand researca debate, it w
efending thatough such anr's personalit
that for Timnless the club
Debate Assoc
ginning of Ope
v, Agora Speak
PDA1) are a sy a political leexample: "Ye photos sho
y a spatial loc
rmal debateseam represenn or body at t
ng the JapanNote that th
information me example, r attack plan
t agreed on eed by historam is represe
e rule that dader, we conh area rathewould be pet it would be outcome ofty.
me/Space debb has a solid
ciation eration Barbar
- 6 -kers Internation
Version 0.1
special type oeader) or bo
You're John. owing that th
cation. In th
s, with one nnting a specithe time.
nese emperohis rule restrthat was kno it's perfectlys in a debat
by historiansrians whetheenting the US
debate shoulsider that th
er than the arrfectly valid
e better not tf events coul
bates, topicstradition of
rsossa - the in
nal, 2017 - www
of debate in ody (a govern
F. Kennedy dhe URSS is in
he above cas
notable excefic position c
or in WWII, thricts the use own but not y valid to asse happening
s should be aer the US govS governmen
d be done rehis would stergumentativif a team repto proceed fld presumab
are not pickcivilized deb
nvasion of the
w.agoraspeaker
which the tenment, a boaduring the Cunstalling ICBM
e, it is not re
ption: since tcannot use in
hey cannot uof informatiobecome wid
sume that thg on Dec 1st ,
avoided. Convernment didnt on Dec 1st,
especting theer the debate / educatiopresenting thurther scorely have neve
ked from verybate without
Soviet Union
rs.org
eams are askard of directouban MissileMs in Cuba".
elevant. How
they are debnformation t
use the knowon that was dely known uhe Japanese e
1941, even
ntinuing onced or did not h, 1941, the P
e psychologite more intonal side on whe Nazi gove
ed higher thaer really happ
ry recent or vt personal ar
n by Germany.
ked to play ors) at a e Crisis. You
wever, if the
bates that that wasn't
wledge of not known
until emperor though the
e more with have clear
Pearl Harbor
cal the
which Agora ernment in an the other pened
very guments.
.
Roles, Tea Debates arerequires tha
• A d• Deb• A d• Two
hav• If p• All t• Fille• The• If th
wel• The• The
Materials N The followin
• An • A se
sectcan
© Al
ams and Org
e organized aat the follow
ebate modebate Judges, ebate timer o or more teve no more tpossible, eacteams must er Words Coe Grammariahe club has all. e Meeting Eve Meeting Le
Needed
ng is a list ofEntry and anet of cards wtion. If the te
n be printed o
exander Hristo
ganization
and schedulewing roles be
rator. in the case o(can be the ams with at han five teamh team shouhave the samunter and W
an is used dua Body Langu
valuator shoueader introdu
f materials nen Exit poll "ba
with the nameams are naonce and reu
v, Agora Speak
ed by the VPfilled:
of a contest fsame as the least two m
ms. uld have at leme number o
Word of the Dring the sect
uage or Liste
uld evaluate uces the Deb
eeded for thallot", for eaes or numbemed with sinused for all d
- 7 -kers Internation
Version 0.1
PE of the Club
format. regular timeembers each
east one bacof team mem
Day are not ution, since laning evaluat
the debate mbate Modera
e debate: ach audienceers of the teangle-digit or debates.
nal, 2017 - www
b, at least tw
er of the meeh. For practi
kup membermbers. used during tnguage corr
tor, the role c
moderator.tor and the r
e member. am (for eachsingle-letter
w.agoraspeaker
wo weeks in a
eting) cal purposes
r that can re
the section ectness is a gcan be used
remaining ro
audience mnames as su
rs.org
advance. Eac
s, it's recomm
place a no-s
goal in all spduring the s
oles as usual
member), for uggested, the
ch debate
mended to
how.
peeches. section as
.
the Q&A ese cards
Debate mo The role of
• To i• To c• To i• To g• To m• To a
The debate to introducsure that ththe results. In contests,
Debate Jud Debate judg
• Que• Offe• If th
They should Debate Judgsuggestions
• Tea• Jou• Me• Loc• Bus• Doc• Law
The last two
© Al
oderator
the debate mintroduce thconduct the introduce thgive the floomake sure thapply discipl
moderator i
ce the topic ohe rules and s
the Debate
dges
ges are in chestioning theering feedbahis is a conte
d be unbiase
ges need nots for judges c
achers or facrnalists. mbers of othal politicians
siness ownerctors
wyers
o are especia
exander Hristo
moderator ise topic of thentry and exe teams and
or to teams inhat the debainary measu
is helped by
of the debatestructure of
Moderator a
arge of: e teams duriack at the enest, awarding
ed (as much a
t be Agora Scould be:
ulty staff of s
her clubs of As or political rs.
ally indicated
v, Agora Speak
s: e debate xit polls and
d the positionn turn and rete rules are res during th
the timer to
e, conduct itthe debate a
also briefs th
ng the Q&A d of the mee
g scores to ea
as possible) a
peakers mem
schools and
Agora or othparty memb
d for debates
- 8 -kers Internation
Version 0.1
announce thn that each teceive it fromfollowed he debate to
o control the
t, give the floare observed
he Debate Ju
section. eting ach of the te
and qualified
mbers and, i
universities.
her public spbers / leaders
s involving so
nal, 2017 - www
he results. team is defenm them.
o keep the to
lengths of th
oor to teamsd, conduct th
udges.
eams.
d professiona
n fact, it is e
eaking organs
ocial or ethic
w.agoraspeaker
nding.
one polite an
he speaking
and receivehe entry and
als.
ncouraged th
nizations.
cal issues.
rs.org
nd respectful
turns.
e it from them exit polls an
hat they are
.
m, make nd announce
not. Some
e
Procedur
The Debat The debate Leader will debate, upo If the debatplace it, althnervous an(If the debasource of in The VPE decwell as whemeeting. The topic ofmust be knopositions ar This would
The order odraw, and g A no-show b The Meetinmeeting, anwhere they available at
© Al
re
te within th
is a self-congive the floo
on which the
te section is ehough we re
nd wanting toate is done benspiration for
cides the amether the deb
f the debateown by the tre written, no
be a recomm
of speaking ogiven to the D
by a team m
g Facilitator nd that they will be seate the brandin
exander Hristo
he meeting
tained sectioor to the Debe floor is retu
embedded incommend it
o be finishedefore, the Hr questions).
mount of timebate will take
, the positiotime of the mot the comp
mended mee
of the teams Debate Mod
member on th
should makare previoused, together
ng portal.
v, Agora Speak
on of the mebate Moderaurned to the
n a classical to be after t
d as soon as pHot Question
e to allocate e place durin
ns that will bmeeting. Howosition of th
eting agenda
is decided byerator.
he day of the
e sure that Esly distributer with pencils
- 9 -kers Internation
Version 0.1
eeting, muchtor, which wMeeting Lea
meeting, it'sthe preparedpossible), ans section can
to the debang a "traditio
be defendedwever, in thee teams defe
entry:
y the Meetin
e meeting wi
Entry and Exied to all attens or pens. Te
nal, 2017 - www
h like the "Howill take the lader.
s up to the Vd speeches (
nd before or n use whatev
te, which caonal" meetin
, as well as te meeting agending each
ng Leader be
ll not be gro
it ballots arendees, or at emplates for
w.agoraspeaker
ot Questionsead from the
PE of the clusince preparin replacemever has happ
nnot be less g or it will be
he teams deendas, only tposition.
efore the me
unds for can
printed andleast placed
r Entry and E
rs.org
s" section. There until the
ub to decide red speakersent of "Hot Qpened in the
s than 40 mine a debate-o
efending eacthe debate t
eting by a ra
ncelling the d
d available fo on the table
Exit ballots w
he Meeting e end of the
where to s are usually Questions" debate as a
nutes, as only
h position topic and
andom
debate.
or the es or chairs
will be
Structure a The Debate # R1 D2 E3 I4 I5 I6 Q7 C8 R9 Q10 C11 C12 E13 J14 D This gives th
© Al
and Timing
e proceeds as
Round Name Debate IntroducEntry Poll ntroduction of ntroduction of ntroductory Ro
Q&A Round Cross-ExaminatRebuttal RoundQ&A Round Cross-ExaminatConcluding RouExit Poll udges Feedbac
Debate Conclus
he following
Numb2 3 4 5
exander Hristo
g
s follows (wit
ction by the De
Teams and theJudges
ound
ion Round
ion Round nd
ck sion
timings dep
ber of Teams
v, Agora Speak
th suggested
ebate Master
eir positions
ending on th
M4111
- 10 -kers Internation
Version 0.1
d timings exp
he number o
Min Time 45 min 1h 1h 20min 1h 35 min
nal, 2017 - www
pressed)
of teams:
Ma1h 1h 1h 2h
w.agoraspeaker
Min1 2 1 2
0
0
2 5 1
ax Time 10 min 25 min 40 min
rs.org
n Time Ma2 2 2 2
4 x # of te10
3 x # of te3 x # of te
10 3 x # of te3 x # of te
2 7 1
ax Time
eams
eams eams
eams eams
Debate Int Upon receivprovides a snews have hthe positionpreference Teams are n
Entry Poll As everythinbesides eduthis has act The Entry Pwith the goinfluence thposition. Ofto minimize After introdEntry Poll athe Entry Po
The Entry P
© Al
troduction
ving the flooshort backgrhappened thns that will bor endorsing
not introduc
ng in Agora, ucational – coually happen
oll is an anonal being tryin
hat can exertf course, teae its impact.
ducing the dend hand it baoll is volunta
oll and the c
exander Hristo
r from the Mound inform
hat make it ine defended,g any of them
ed at this po
we strive toonvincing pened. This is d
nymous poll,ng to get a st knowing thm compositi
ebate topic aack to him. R
ary.
collection of
v, Agora Speak
Meeting Leadmation of the
nteresting or without com
m.
oint.
achieve an oeople of yourdone by two
, conducted napshot of tat a certain fon cannot b
and positionsResults are n
the ballots s
- 11 -kers Internation
Version 0.1
der, the Deba subject, sucr worth debammenting on
objective mer viewpoint. polls : an en
before the ihe true viewfriend or fell
be kept secre
s, the Debateneither count
should not la
nal, 2017 - www
ate Moderatch as why thiating. The Den any of them
easure of ouAs such, thetry and an e
introductionws of the audlow member
et, but that d
e Moderatorted nor anno
st more than
w.agoraspeaker
or introduces topic is rele
ebate Moderm and witho
r success. Th best measuxit poll.
of the teamience while
r is on a teamoesn't mean
r will ask attounced at th
n 2 minutes.
rs.org
es the debateevant or whrator also enut expressin
he goal of a dure of succes
ms and their mminimizing t
m defending n that we sho
tendees to fiis point. Part
e topic and at recent
numerates g
debate is – s is whether
members, the this or that
ouldn't try
ll in the ticipating in
Introducti After the Enstates whichor a single-l Unless improther teamsstage or a s After the De
Introducti After the teintroduce espeak brieflModerator
Introducto During the Isystems), a argumentatgrace period Normal timexceeds the
© Al
ion of the T
ntry Poll has h position eaetter name.
racticable, tes and from tpecial seatin
ebate Mode
ion of the Ju
eams are intrach of themly about eachexpress wha
ory Round
Introductoryrepresentat
tion. The repd.
ing signals ae 3:30 time m
exander Hristo
Teams
been conduach team is d
eam membehe audience
ng area of the
rator has int
udges
roduced, and in turn. If thh of them anat position (if
y Round (equive from eac
presentative
re used durimark.
v, Agora Speak
cted, the Dedefending. It
rs should be . All teams se room.
roduced the
d if there arehey are not mnd their credf any) a Deba
uivalent to thch team explspeaks unint
ng this speec
- 12 -kers Internation
Version 0.1
ebate Modert is recomme
seated or stshould share
e teams, he a
e Debate Judmembers of tentials. Undate Judge ha
he Affirmativains the posterruptedly f
ch, and the D
nal, 2017 - www
ator introduended that ea
tanding togee an area aw
announces th
ges, the Debthe club, theder no circumas in the mat
ve or Governition of the tfor a maximu
Debate Mod
w.agoraspeaker
ces the teamach team is g
ther, separaay from the
he speaking o
bate Moderae Debate Momstances shoter being de
ment Round team and theum of 3 minu
erator shoul
rs.org
ms, their memgiven either
ate from memaudience – e
order drawn
tor proceedsoderator shouould the Debebated.
d in traditionae supportingutes, with a
ld stop any s
mbers, and a number
mbers of theeither on
n before.
s to uld also
bate
al debate g 30 second
peaker that
e
Q&A Roun Q&A Roundmake questModerator Each questialso. ThereJudges are t Follow-up qinto a ping- For questiowith the teathe floor. Ateam. Ideally, the session, dist After the peanswer, or c The Q&A Ro
© Al
nds
ds are roundtions to the tshould not a
on should tae's no grace pthe first to a
questions arepong match
ns from audam name to ll questions
use of cardstributing the
erson has fincan declare t
ound finishe
exander Hristo
ds during whteams. They allow these t
ake no more period for thsk questions
e also alloweor a dialogu
ience membwhich the qmust be rele
s with the teae questions s
nished speakthe question
s either whe
v, Agora Speak
ich both the can also ma
to be turned
than 1 minue question, a
s, with the au
ed, but againe.
bers, the persuestion is ad
evant to the t
am name wiso that all tea
ing, the Debn inadmissibl
en the time a
- 13 -kers Internation
Version 0.1
Debate Judgke their owninto speech
ute, and eachand there's audience next
, the Debate
son wanting ddressed, andtopic, stated
ll allow the Dams get a sim
ate Moderatle and state t
allotted for it
nal, 2017 - www
ges and Audn points as paes.
h answer shoa 30 second gt when the ju
e Moderator
to ask one od waits for th
d unambiguo
Debate Modemilar numbe
tor can give tthe reason.
t is up, or wh
w.agoraspeaker
ience membart of a ques
ould take no grace periodudges have n
should be w
or more queshe Debate Musly and add
erator to conr of question
the floor to t
hen there are
rs.org
bers (in this ostion, but the
more than 1d for the answno more que
weary of thes
stions raises Moderator todressed at a
nduct a balans.
the alluded t
e no more qu
order) can e Debate
1 minute wer.
estions.
se turning
the card o give him
specific
nced Q&A
team to
uestions
Cross-Exam The Cross-Ecross-exam The order o(so that if thwill be Team The Debateanswers sho
Rebuttal R The Rebuttaspeaking roarguments The mechan
Concludin In the Conc During the c The order oprimacy-rec
© Al
mination R
Examination ine other tea
of questioninhe speaking m 1, Team 3,
e Moderator ould take no
Round
al Round (eqound where tin support o
nics, timing a
g Round
luding Round
concluding r
of speaking iscency effect.
exander Hristo
Round
round is a siams.
g is the reveorder was Te, Team 2).
will give theo more than 1
quivalent to tteams can off their positi
and order of
d, teams ma
ound, no ne
s the same a
v, Agora Speak
milar round
erse of the oream 2, Team
floor in turn1 minute.
the Negativeffer argumenon.
speaking in
ke their fina
w argument
s in the Intro
- 14 -kers Internation
Version 0.1
to the Q&A
rder of speakm 3, Team 1 f
n to the diffe
e or Oppositints against th
this section
l statement.
ts or interrup
oductory rou
nal, 2017 - www
Round and i
king that wafor example,
erent teams.
on round in he positions
is the same
A represent
ptions are all
und. This is e
w.agoraspeaker
n it, teams a
s drawn for tthe Cross-Ex
As in the Q&
other debateof other tea
as in the Intr
tative f
owed.
specially imp
rs.org
are given the
the Introducxamination r
&A round, qu
e systems) isms, or offer
roductory Ro
portant to ba
chance to
ctory Round round order
uestions and
s a second additional
ound.
alance the
Exit Poll After the deshould not As in the prpresented b The Exit Polchoose to pboth or in n This could b
If there is eend of the mblog, etc. If
© Al
ebate has colast more th
evious case,by the differe
ll is carried oparticipate onnone.
be a sample E
nough time fmeeting. If nthe club doe
exander Hristo
ncluded, thean 2 minute
the Exit Pollent teams m
out regardlesnly in the Ent
Exit Poll ballo
for countingot, they are
esn't any of t
v, Agora Speak
e Exit Poll is ps.
l is an anonyade any effe
ss of whethetry and not i
ot (the desig
and summaposted on th
these, they a
- 15 -kers Internation
Version 0.1
performed. T
ymous poll thect on the ide
r there was ain the Exit Po
gn is subject
arizing the rehe Club webare announce
nal, 2017 - www
The Exit Poll
hat tries to meas of the au
an ending cooll, only in th
to change):
esults, resultspage / Whated at the beg
w.agoraspeaker
and the colle
measure wheudience.
onsensus or nhe Exit and no
s of both poltsApp group ginning of th
rs.org
ection of the
ether the arg
not. An attenot in the Ent
lls are annou/ Facebook
he next regul
e ballots
guments
ndee can try one, in
unced at the group / lar meeting.
Debate E
Speeches It is always from the auby the Deba Members frprepared sptime, that t Reading prethird-perso To avoid pe("The other ("you" or "J
Points of I Points of Infmembers o POIs can bemember of accept or nothe opponerequest and A POI can la Usually, moConsideringspeech.
© Al
Elements
the Debate Mudience to spate Moderat
rom debate tpeech, offerihey speak fr
e-written spen quotes, etc
ersonalizationteam", "The
John, that is f
nformation
formation arf other team
e requested othe other teot the offere
ent. In the sed continuing.
ast no more t
ost debate syg the length o
exander Hristo
Moderator tpeak. Once aor or timer.
teams must ng a POI / POom their pos
eeches shouc., or for refe
n of the debae speaking mfalse"). Form
n (POI)
re well spreams to offer co
only by memeam raises hied POI. In thecond case, h.
than 15 seco
ystems definof our round
v, Agora Speak
he one that speaker has
stand up whOA / etc. or asition rather
ld be avoideerring to arg
ate, all speakmember frommality, howev
ad in most deounter-argum
mbers of teams hand. The
e first case, hhe can say "N
onds.
e a "protecteds, this prote
- 16 -kers Internation
Version 0.1
grants the fls begun, he i
hen speakingasking a que than walkin
d, except foruments mad
kers should rm Team 2", "O
ver is not ne
ebate styles ments,
ms other thae speaker to whe can simplyNo, thanks",
ed time" of aected time w
nal, 2017 - www
oor to a teams only oblige
g - regardlessstion. It is reg to a centra
r snippets ofde by the oth
refer to the rOur opponeneded.
and are brie
n the one thwhich the POy say "Yes?" or merely m
a speech, duould be the
w.agoraspeaker
m member, aed to give up
s of whether ecommendedal stage.
f data – statisher side.
rest of the tets") instead
f interruptio
at is speakinOI was addreand give yieake a hand g
ring which Pfirst and last
rs.org
a judge, or ap the floor wh
they are ded, to avoid w
stics, historic
eams in thirdof statemen
ons of the sp
ng. To do thaessed can cheld temporargesture dism
POIs cannot bt 45 seconds
a person hen ordered
livering a waste of
cal events,
d person nts like
eaker by
at, the oose to
rily the floor missing the
be made. of the
Points of O A Point of Obroken, and The proced
1. The2. The3. The
per4. Aft
In general, P
• Can• Are• Can• Are
Points of A Points of Agconsensus bdifferent temust agree To prevent the argumenuanced or that there'sstatement m The proced
1. Duragr
2. Themad
3. Theor "
© Al
Order (POO
Order can bed it must be d
ure for raisin
e debater wie speaker stoe debater wiriod, timing ter hearing th
Points of Ordn interrupt a e not debatabnnot be amee decided by
Agreement
greement arebuilding. Theam. This acc(there must
"yes, but…" ent of the op
in any way es a moderatemade by the
ure for a Poiring their sperees with thee statement de.
e target team"Rejected" (if
exander Hristo
O)
raised by andone immed
ng a Point of
ishing to maops speakingith the POO is suspendedhe case, the
der: speaker.
ble nded or recothe Debate
(POA)
e an innovate purpose of
ceptance cant be consens
scenarios thposing teamelaborated f
e amount of f opposing te
int of Agreemeaking turn, e position/stamust be an e
m either replif it does not)
v, Agora Speak
ny team memdiately when
Order is the
ke a POO stag addresses thd. Debate Mod
onsidered Moderator, w
ive feature of a POA is to
nnot later be us).
at representm exactly as it
urther. For efraud happen
eam is accept
ment is: a member o
atement of teexact repetit
ies "Accepted). If the latte
- 17 -kers Internation
Version 0.1
mber who be the violatio
e following:
ands up and
he Debate M
derator make
with the dec
of Agora debstate a teamwithdrawn.
t disagreemet was originaexample, a tening in subsited as it was
of the team peam XXXX thtion of an arg
d" (if the staer, a short ex
nal, 2017 - www
elieves the run is noticed.
says "Point O
Moderator an
es a decision
cision being f
bates directem's acceptanc
To raise a PO
ent rather thally stated. Iteam cannot sidized high es stated, or th
proposing thehat : statemegument or po
atement as qplanation m
w.agoraspeaker
ules of the de
Of Order"
d explains hi
n.
final.
d at steeringce of an arguOA, all mem
an agreemecannot be d
say "We agreducation, buhere can be
e POA explicent". osition that t
uoted indeeay be added
rs.org
ebate have b
is case. Durin
g debates towument propobers of the r
nt, A POA mdistorted, adree with the put….". Either no POA on it
citly states "O
the other tea
ed reflects th.
been
ng this
wards osed by a raising team
ust repeat orned, position the t.
Our team
am has
eir position)
Fusion of TFusion of Teconsensus. At any poinconsensus pposition thincome leve
When two tresulting fusame numb Fusing requ
1. Thepromu
2. Durand<wois a a sp
3. Afte4. Wh
debdecbe uord
5. Afteaskacc
© Al
Teams eams is a uni
t of the debaposition. In tat "People sh
el is below a
teams fuse tsed team mu
ber of memb
uires unanime proposing toposing teamst have pre-sring any spead saying somording of theproposal fo
pecific targeter the offer ien the turn
bate for the tcision, whichunanimous, er to maintaer the pauses if they acceeptance or ra. If the ta
floor to
exander Hristo
ique charact
ate, two teamhe example hould pay focertain level
heir positionust leave in oers.
ous agreemeteam decides
m must agreeselected the aking turn ofething like "
e consensus pr merging pot team. is made, the of the propotarget team t can be only and it must
ain balance ine, regardless ept or declinrejection; no arget team do the next tea
v, Agora Speak
eristic of Ago
ms may reacabove, Teamr their own el":
n and becomorder to mai
ent by all thes to offer a c
e to the wordteam memb
f the proposiWe would likproposed". Wositions, the
speaker proosing team coto decide. Dto accept or
be clear whin the fused tof whose tue the offeredarguments oeclines, the
am in turn to
- 18 -kers Internation
Version 0.1
ora Speakers
ch agreemenms N and D meducation, an
me one team,ntain fairnes
e members oconsensus poding of the cobers that wiling team, thke to offer thWhatever forproposal mu
oceeds with honcludes, th
During the par decline thech team memteam. rn to speak id position. Tor speeches debate proc
o speak
nal, 2017 - www
s Debates th
nt and mergemight agree tnd the amou
an appropriss, and the ru
of the two teosition to anoonsensus pol leave in cas
he speaker sthe following rmula is chosust be worde
his regular spe moderator
ause, the tare offered conmbers from
is, the modeThe target te
are allowed ceeds norma
w.agoraspeaker
at encourag
e as one teamto merge, deunt should be
iate number ule that all te
eams, and proother team. sition. Also,
se the offer itarts by addrconsensus posen, it must bed clearly and
peech. r grants a paget team desensus positthe acceptin
rator addresam can only at this pointlly, with the
rs.org
ges trying to
m, defendingefending a coe symbolic if
of memberseams must h
oceeds as foAll the memthe proposins accepted.
ressing the taosition to tebe made cled it must be
use of 1 minliberates andtion. Acceptang team will
sses the targ respond witt. moderator g
reach a
g a common,ommon their
s of the have the
ollows: mbers of the
ng team
arget team am XXXX : ar that this directed to
nute in the d makes a ance must leave in
et team andth
giving the
,
Re-splitting Fused teamcross-exam Debate end If this is a deConsensus" Note that iffused teams
© Al
b. If the tafused tethat it h
on fused teams are consid
ination turn,
ds automatic
ebate contes". Contests sh
f any kind of s, regardless
exander Hristo
arget team aeam continuhas already u
ams is not alered from th, with the sta
ally with "Co
st, all teams hould encou
individual aws of whether
v, Agora Speak
grees, then tes. This new
used its turn
llowed. he point of thandard timin
onsensus" if n
fused into thrage this kin
wards are avthey left the
- 19 -kers Internation
Version 0.1
the pre-selecw team canno
in point 3.
heir fusion ang applicable
no more tea
he final and d of outcom
vailable, theye debate dur
nal, 2017 - www
cted membeot speak duri
s a single teae to any norm
ms remain a
last one are me.
y should be gring the fusio
w.agoraspeaker
ers of both teing this roun
am, enjoyingmal team.
after a fusion
declared "W
given to all thon to mainta
rs.org
eam leave, and, as it is co
g a single spe
n.
Winners with
he initial mein team bala
nd a single nsidered
eaking and
mbers of ance.
Unaccepta It is imperatarguments, disqualificatgestures, fo A Personal aof a person
• Agecon
• Edu• Life• Pub
arg Personal argthe above cis an ad homjudgmentalthat "People The debate member to compel the moderator
1. Wa2. Sto
one3. Disq4. Disq
the5. Ter
A different
• Constan• Using st• Being p• Breakin
© Al
able behavi
tive for a hea respectful stion of a tea
or example),
argument is of the oppo
e, Gender, Senditions. ucational or Pestyle, preferblications or uments that
guments arecriteria, evenminem even research eve in Elbonia
moderator which the pmoderator tbelieves tha
rn the team p the speake
e round. qualify the oqualify the teir members minate the d
kind of less s
ntly interruptalling to "eaersistently o
ng or abusing
exander Hristo
or
althy debatepeech or raim member oand they sti
any argumeosing team or
exual orienta
Professional rences, hobbstatements
t can be oppo
e also argumn if the addre
if no one in vidence concwork only 12
must act immersonal arguto act, to wht a personal
member usier from spea
offending teaeam itself, ifhas been dis
debate itself,
severe, but e
ting other spat into" the tovertime g the rules
v, Agora Speak
e and club atsing the toneor the team ill have to be
nt (or questir items outsi
ation or iden
Backgroundbies and inte
made outsidosed are tho
ents that areessee does nthe debate ierning group2.6 hours per
mediately upument was adhich the mod
argument ha
ing the ad hoking, and de
am member amembers of
squalified for, if he sees th
equally unacc
peakers withime of the o
- 20 -kers Internation
Version 0.1
mosphere toe or shoutingitself. Note penalized.
ion, or commde the sphe
tity, Nationa
d. rests. de of the deb
ose expressed
e applied at got belong tos from Spainps of people r week, as op
pon hearing addressed ma
derator shouas been used
ominem to reeprive the off
and remove f the team pr that reasonhat it has de
ceptable beh
h spurious POother team, e
nal, 2017 - www
o prevent ang. None of ththat insults c
ment) targetire of the deb
ality, Race, C
bate. (Debatd during the
generalizatioo the group. Fn. Note, how
is allowed. Fpposed to 37
a personal aay raise his hld either repd, he or she
efrain from ffending team
him from thersist in usin
n. volved into a
havior, is:
OIs or fake POespecially du
w.agoraspeaker
y kind of inshese is allowcan be nonve
ng the charabate, includin
olor, Religion
es are self-codebate itsel
ons of groupsFor example ever, that of
For example,7.4 hours per
rgument. If thand and statly with "Disamay do one
future similam from their
he offending ng personal a
an ad homin
OAs ring the cros
rs.org
ults, personawed and can r
erbal (in the
acteristics orng (but not l
n, Ideology,
ontained, anlf).
s of people b "All Spaniarffering objec, it's legitimar week in Fra
this doesn't te "Ad hominagree" or "Agof the follow
r argumentsspeaking tu
team. arguments a
nem match.
ss-examinati
al result in the form of
r attributes imited to ):
Medical
nd the only
based on rds are lazy" ctive non-ate to claim ance".
happen, the nem" to gree". If the
wing:
s. rn during
fter one of
on rounds.
e
Rules for E Evidence ar The followin
• Eacpiec
• All e"abstat
• Evidbeh
• All ethatyouwhe
• Upoand
• At l
Accessory
• Tea• Inte
han
© Al
Evidence
re facts, pictu
ng rules appch piece of evces of evidenevidence sho
bstract or fuztements shodence may nhavior is consevidence uset any of them
u use a printeere others caon request bd in writing. Ieast the folloo Author'o Author'o Compleo In case
Rules
am memberserruption of ndled by the
exander Hristo
ures, videos,
ly to evidencvidence musnce. ould be idenzy evidence"uld be reform
not be distortsidered unaced should bem can make ed chart to man take it to
by any other If the evidenowing inform's name 's qualificatioete bibliograpof Internet s
s cannot recespeakers by Debate Mod
v, Agora Speak
data, quote
ce: st be clearly s
tified, source" in statemenmulated as "ted, misquotcceptable. e made availause of it dur
make a pointuse it. team or the ce is too lon
mation shoul
ons that are phic source isources, the
eive any extethe audienc
derator. Che
- 21 -kers Internation
Version 0.1
es, etc. that s
separated fr
ed and indepnts similar to"Research doted, partially
able to the oring their spe, the printed
judges, evidg, at least onld be provide
relevant to tinformation,full URL and
ernal coachince or other teeering is not
nal, 2017 - www
support an a
om the spea
pendently veo "Research sone by <authy quoted, or
other teams, eaking turns.d chart must
dence used mne page of ited by each p
the topic at h, including da the date of
ng during theam membeallowed.
w.agoraspeaker
rgument of a
ker's own op
erifiable. Thisshows that …or> in <yearquoted out o
the audiencThis means,be placed in
must be provmust be avaiece of evide
hand. ate and pageaccess
e duration ors is not perm
rs.org
a speaker.
pinion and fr
s explicitly d…". Instead, sr> shows thaof context. S
ce and the ju, for example
n a place insi
vided in detaailable. ence:
e number
of the debatemitted and s
rom other
isallows such t …"
Such
dges, so e, that if de the room
iled form
e. should be
m
Judging a The result odepending o The scoringguidelines s
• Accawaadv
• Exp• Con
writ• Mis
it sh• Una
It is also sugparticipatiounsurmoun
© Al
and Scorin
of a debate inon how conv
g system will should apply
ceptance of Parded to botversarial confposure of fallnstant readintten speech.srepresentinghould in turnacceptable b
ggested thaton. This syste
table barrier
exander Hristo
ng
n Agora is novincing the te
have to be d:
POAs and Futh teams) to frontation. acies in the
ng of notes s. g evidence, o
n greatly rewbehavior sho
each Agora em, howeverr to newcom
v, Agora Speak
ot "Winning"eam was.
developed on
sion of Teamgive more w
reasoning ofhould be pe
or citing nonwarded.
uld be greatl
member hasr, should not
mers.
- 22 -kers Internation
Version 0.1
" or "Losing",
nce all the ru
ms should beweight to con
f other teamnalized, espe
nexistent evid
ly penalized
s a global pebe purely ac
nal, 2017 - www
, but being a
ules have bee
greatly enconsensus build
s should be ecially if the
dence should
ersonal debatccumulative
w.agoraspeaker
warded a sp
en settled, b
ouraged (andding and find
rewarded team memb
d be greatly
ting score thin order not
rs.org
pecific amou
but the follow
d therefore sding bridges t
ber is reading
penalized, a
hat can encot to present a
nt of points
wing basic
score than to
g a pre-
nd exposing
urage an
Resource
Other DebFor explana
• Thehttp
• Linchttp
• BrithttpAsM
• Cathttp
• Sashttp
Learning t• http• The
http• MIT
7_D• A se
http• Tor
http• Cou• (Co
http
Debate ToFor ideas abcentered w • https://• https://• http://w• https://• www.u• http://w Also, check most-popul NY Times' lihttps://lear
© Al
es
bate Rule Syations of othee Sydney 200p://worlddebcoln-Douglasps://www.uitish Parliamep://www.wilModelOfSociholic Schoolp://www.csdkatchewan Ep://www.sas
to Debate p://www.leae Monash Asp://www.moT Debating 1Debate101.pet of video tups://www.yoronto Debatips://www.yoursera coursemmercial) Tps://www.th
opics bout debate ebsites:
/www.kialo.c/www.procowww.debate/idebate.org/rbandebate.www.parli.or
the NY Timear-student-q
st of 301 toprning.blogs.n
exander Hristo
ystems er debate sy
00 Rules : bating.blogss Debate Ruliltexas.org/fientary Debatllamette.edualAndEducats' Debating A
da.nsw.edu.aElocution andskdebate.com
arndebating.sociation of
onashdebate01: http://codf utorials on doutube.com/ng tutorials aoutube.com/e on negotiahe Art of De
hegreatcours
topics, as we
com n.org
e.org/ / org rg/resolution
es list of debaquestions-fo
pics for argumnytimes.com/
v, Agora Speak
stems, check
pot.ru/2000/es: les/academi
te: u/cla/china_dtionalDebateAssociation:au/debatingRd Debate Assm/media/32
com/ offersDebaters off
ers.com/dowourses.csail.m
ebating: /channel/UCand example/channel/UCtion: https:/bate, from T
ses.com/cou
ell as argume
ns/
ate topics : hr-debate-and
mentative w/2015/02/05
- 23 -kers Internation
Version 0.1
k the followi
/03/wudc-sy
ics/speech/L
debate/doc/e.docx
Rules.html sociation:
2277/2013rev
s a free dowfers a free G
wnloads/Schomit.edu/6.14
Cmx7Qc5fx1ses: CBNJPhtaO5a//www.coursThe Great Corses/the-art
ents for both
https://learnd-persuasive
writing: 5/301-promp
nal, 2017 - www
ng:
ydney-2000-
LDRulesProce
/ReviewerOn
visedgenera
nloadable e-uide to Deba
ools%20Train41/spring201
sglz8Gz5MFN
a974DyFTRMsera.org/learurses series -of-debate.h
h sides of a t
ning.blogs.nye-writing/
pts-for-argum
w.agoraspeaker
rules.html
edures.pdf
nlyFiles/Ch%2
l%20rules%2
-Book on debating - ning%20Guid13/pub/lectu
N3A
MByA rn/negotiatio:
html
opic, check t
times.com/2
mentative-w
rs.org
2003%20BP%
20of%20deb
bating.
de.pdf ures/Forum-
on
the following
2016/02/24/
writing/
%20Debate
ate.pdf
g debate-
/our-100-
282 Originahttp://www
Debate Vid For sample • Debate • America• Recordi• Debate
© Al
l Ideas for arw.myspeechc
deos
debate vide
Matters - htan Parliameings of DebaCentral vide
exander Hristo
rgumentativclass.com/ide
os of debate
ttp://www.dntary Debatte Contests o
eos - http://
v, Agora Speak
e writing: eas-for-argu
es in other or
debatingmatte Associationof in the Higdebate.uvm
- 24 -kers Internation
Version 0.1
mentative-s
rganizations,
ters.com/resn - http://vidh Schools of.edu/wudcvi
nal, 2017 - www
peech-topics
, you can wa
sources/debdeos.apdawef the US - httideo.html
w.agoraspeaker
s.html
tch the follo
atingmatterseb.org/ p://www.pa
rs.org
owing:
sonfilm/
arli.org/resouurce/
Referenc Allen, M., B
andAnderson, S
achAdo
APDA. (201http
Center, B. (1Colbert, K. (
ComGreenstreet
JouHill, B. (199
AbiHobbs, J., &
SpeHowell, W.
103Huseman, R
Org265
Keele, L. M.JOU
Mezuk, B., BdebEdu
Parcher, J. (201
Peters, T. L.fore
Tumposky, Union, F. a.
© Al
ces
erkowitz, S.,d CommunicaS., & Mezuk, hievement amolescence, Vo6). Americanp://www.apd1982). Debat(1993). The emmunicationt, R. (1993). rnal, 11, 13-3). The Valuelity. CEDA Ye
& Chandler, Reaker and Ga(1943). The
3. R., Ware, G., ganize Ideas:5. ., & Matlon, URNAL OF THBondarenko,bate programucational Res(1998). Evalu17, from http. (2009, Octoensics and stN. R. (2004, (1960). 100
exander Hristo
, Hunt, S., & ation EducatB. (2012, Oc
mong at-risk olume35(Issun Parliamentdaweb.org/gte and the joeffects of den Education(4Academic De28. e of Competearbook, 14, R. (1991). Theavel, 21, 4-6. effects of Hi
& Gruner, C A Multi-Var
R. J. (1984). HE AMERICAN, I., Smith, S.
m on academsearch and Ruation Reporp://groups.wober). An invtandarized teNov-Dic). Thof 160 leade
v, Agora Speak
Louden, A. (tion on Criticctober). Partadolescents
ue 5), 1225-1tary Debate Aguide/rulesob market. Dbate particip42), 206-214ebate and Cr
titive Debate1-22.
e Perceived
gh School De
. (1972). Critiate Approac
A survey of pN FORENSIC , & Tucker, E
mic achievemReviews, Vol 6rt - Philodem
wfu.edu/NDT/estigation inest scores. Rohe Debate deers began ca
- 25 -kers Internation
Version 0.1
1999, Januacal Thinking. ticipating in as in an urban1235. Association.
Debate Issuespation on arg4. ritical Thinki
e as a Vehicle
Benefits of P
ebating on C
tical Thinkingch. Journal o
participants ASSOCIATIO
E. (2011, Sepment: Evidenc
6(9), 622-63ic Debate So/Articles/gtr
nto the relatiostrum, Vol
ebate. Clearireers as stud
nal, 2017 - www
ry). A Meta-aCommunica
a policy deba public schoo
Retrieved 10
s, 15, 4-6. gumentative
ng: A Look a
e for Promot
Policy Debate
Critical Thinki
g, Reflective of the Americ
in the nationON., 20, 194-2ptember 5). Ice from the C5.
ociety, Georgreport.htm onship betw84(2), 37-50ng House, v7dent debater
w.agoraspeaker
analysis of thtion Educatio
ate program ol district: 19
0 9, 2017, fro
ness and ver
t the Evidenc
ing Developm
e training in
ing. Speech M
Thinking, ancan Forensics
nal debate to205. mpact of parChicago Urba
getown Unive
ween particip.
78(2), p52. rs. Freedom
rs.org
he Impact ofon, 48. and academ
997-2007. Jo
om
rbal aggressi
ce. National
ment of Crit
Various Prof
Monographs
nd The Abilitys Association
ournament,
rticipating inan Debate Le
ersity. Retrie
pation in com
and Union, 6
f Forensics
mic ournal of
ion.
Forensic
ical Thinking
fessions.
s, 10, 96-
y to n, 9, 261-
1947-1980.
n a policy eague.
eved 10
mpetitive
6-7.
g