· created date: 12/6/2018 1:23:40 pm

3
1. Name of Procuring ASency. 2. Method of Procurement. 3. Title of Procurement. 4. Tender Enquiry No. 5. PPPA Ref.No. (TSE ). 6. Date & Time of Bid ClosinS. 7. Date & Time of Bid Opening. 8. No of Bids Received. 9. criteria for Bid Evaluation. 10. Details of Bid (s )Evaluationi Pc Evaluations: lowest EvaIuated Bidden M/s.c.o.mputer Tios Laptops Evaluations: EVAULATION RE PORT (As per Rule 35 of PP Rules.2004l Stelr..Lif.-e.Ln-s.,.rlense. C-oJpcr?J!9..[..9J. PaIi$en 9insle.SJ?se,.r-wg-.Eo.y.-e.l.o.lli ge.m-pr!.e.r.1-Lip..tep,.Prin!-er.s".9Ieel.8ech5,,& lqroits.re.i!9.ms' 9.?1.?9tS 19305.3.4.3.E 27-09-2018 at 10:30 am 27:P. *?0-19_a!.1 liQ-0_ am [9 -u!:tsen.lta!.d] tioancia!.eJ.alsa!i.o..rr..-oJ-!.e.sh.0i.9.a!!v.c.'r.?If.r.e.-d..bidd-e,r. Eyaleati-o..0..sf .!.te.a!.i.9.Bi.v.sn.belgsi Name of Bidder Marks Evaluated Cost Rule/Regulatlon/SBDt I Polict I ga sis for ReJedion /Acceptance a5 per Rule 35 of PP Rules,2004 Technlcal Financlal (lf applicable ) M/s Hascombe Business Solutlons (h^.) Ltd Technically Qualified 5,473.080 (PC) item dismissed M/sComputer fips Technically Qualified Yes 5.307.712 M/s Fatemi lmpex Technically Non-qualified NO M/s Pako Computers Technically Ouallfied Disqualified by committee Name Of Bidder Marks Evaluated Cost Rule/Regulation/sBDa I Polio sa sls For Reiedion /Acceptance as per Rule 35 of PP Rules,2OO4 Technical Flnanclal { It applicable ) M/s Hascombe Business Solutions (P!'t.)ttd Technically Qualified Yes s.289,080 M/s Kontinental Establishment Technically Qualified Ye5 4,995,600 M/s Pako Computers Technically Qualified Yes 4,77 4,800 2nd lowest evaluated bidder M/s.leelani Enterprises Technically Qualified Yes 4.442.220 Accepted--lowest evaluated bldder r-.8te (ly^ l- d >).- ) rd Page l of3 I I Yes

Upload: doandang

Post on 22-Jan-2019

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1. Name of Procuring ASency.

2. Method of Procurement.

3. Title of Procurement.

4. Tender Enquiry No.

5. PPPA Ref.No. (TSE ).

6. Date & Time of Bid ClosinS.

7. Date & Time of Bid Opening.

8. No of Bids Received.

9. criteria for Bid Evaluation.

10. Details of Bid (s )Evaluationi

Pc Evaluations:

lowest EvaIuated Bidden M/s.c.o.mputer Tios

Laptops Evaluations:

EVAULATION REPORT(As per Rule 35 of PP Rules.2004l

Stelr..Lif.-e.Ln-s.,.rlense. C-oJpcr?J!9..[..9J. PaIi$en

9insle.SJ?se,.r-wg-.Eo.y.-e.l.o.lli

ge.m-pr!.e.r.1-Lip..tep,.Prin!-er.s".9Ieel.8ech5,,& lqroits.re.i!9.ms'

9.?1.?9tS

19305.3.4.3.E

27-09-2018 at 10:30 am

27:P. *?0-19_a!.1 liQ-0_ am

[9 -u!:tsen.lta!.d]

tioancia!.eJ.alsa!i.o..rr..-oJ-!.e.sh.0i.9.a!!v.c.'r.?If.r.e.-d..bidd-e,r.

Eyaleati-o..0..sf .!.te.a!.i.9.Bi.v.sn.belgsi

Name of BidderMarks

EvaluatedCost

Rule/Regulatlon/SBDt I Polict I ga

sis for ReJedion /Acceptance a5

per Rule 35 of PP Rules,2004Technlcal Financlal

(lf applicable )

M/s HascombeBusiness Solutlons(h^.) Ltd

TechnicallyQualified

5,473.080

(PC) item dismissed

M/sComputerfips

Technically

QualifiedYes 5.307.712

M/s Fatemi lmpexTechnically

Non-qualifiedNO

M/s Pako

Computers

TechnicallyOuallfied

Disqualifiedby

committee

Name Of BidderMarks

EvaluatedCost

Rule/Regulation/sBDa I Polio sa

sls For Reiedion /Acceptance as

per Rule 35 of PP Rules,2OO4

Technical Flnanclal{ It applicable )

M/s HascombeBusiness Solutions(P!'t.)ttd

TechnicallyQualified

Yes

s.289,080

M/s KontinentalEstablishment

TechnicallyQualified

Ye54,995,600

M/s Pako

ComputersTechnicallyQualified

Yes4,77 4,800

2nd lowest evaluated bidder

M/s.leelaniEnterprises

TechnicallyQualified

Yes4.442.220

Accepted--lowest evaluatedbldder

r-.8te (ly^l- d >).-)

rdPage l of3

I

I

Yes

M/s ComputerTips

TechnicallyQualitied

Yes4,948,312

3'd lowest evaluated bidder

M/s MuhammadiStationers

Technacally

Non'QualifiedNO

M/s Fatemi lmpexTechnicallyNon-Qualified

NO

Lowest Evaluated Bidder: M/.s.J.e€la n i. -Enterprl5es

Printers Evaluatloni

Name of BidderMarks

Evaluated

cost

Rule/Regulatlon/SBD. I Pollc\ I Ba

sis tor Rejedion /Acceptance as

per Rule 35 of PP Rules,2oo4

Technlcal( rfappllcable,

Financlal( lfapplicable )

M/s KontinentalEstablishment

TechnicallyQualified

Yes

993,600Acc e p t ed - I ow e st evql u o tedbidder, but biddet hss relused toextend bld volldlty pe od

Computers

Technically

QualitiedYes

7,420,444 3'd lowest bidder

M/sJeelaniEnterprises

TechnicallyQualified

Yes1,520,760

M/s ofii.eAutomation Group

Technically

Qualified1,104,000

M/s Computer'l'ips

Technically

Qualified

Yes2,934,s-12

M/s MuhammadiStationers

TechnicallyNon-Qualitied

NO

M/s Fatemi lmpexTechnicallyNon-Qualified

NO

Lowest Evaluated Bidden M/s l(.ontincntal ff!.a..btii.hmen!

steel Racks Evaluation:

Name Of BldderMarks

EvaluatedCost

Rule/R€gulation/SBD* lgolicl I Ba

sis tor Reiection /Acceptance as

per Rule 35 o, PP Rules,2004

M/s Behzad

Enterprises

Technically

QualifiedYes 449.825 Ac(epted--lowest evaluated

bidderM/s Al MaalikEnterprises

TechnicallyQualified

Yes 47 3,375 3' lowest bidder

597,500M/s SAS TradintCompany

TechnicallyQualified

Yes

N4/sTaimoorlnternational

TechnicallyQualified

Yes

fnEineeringPakistan

TechnicallyQualified

456,300 2nd lowest bidder

M/s Office WareEnterprises

TechnicallyNon-Qualified

NO

2 lowest bidder

LowestEvaluatedBidder:M/t.-8.-e..h-z..?.d.En!-e..tp.Iit9.t

Page 2 of3

I

I

I

I I

Techni.al Financlal(lfappllcable )

631,2s0

Furniture Set Evaluation:

Lowest Evaluated Bidder: M/.9. P. -o..Vlel Elgineefi.lg Pakistan

Sitnature:c, TUFAIL

I lzcotficialstamp:

tstandard Eidding Document (sBD).

MarksEvaluated

Cgst

Rule/Regulation/sBDr I P olic! I aa

sis tor Reiection /Acceptance as

per Rule 35 of PP Rules,2004Technlcal

( lfapplicable )

Name Of Bidder

239,990

Technically

Qualitied

YesIil/s Al-MaalikEnterprises

F"rtuiaae,46,100Technically

Oualified

YesM/s SA5 TradingCompany

69,000YesTechnically

OualitiedM/sTaimoorlnternational

Accepted--lowest evaluatedbldder

33.696TechnlcallyQualified

Yes

EntineeringPakistan

TechnicallyNon-Qualified

NOM/s office WareEnterprises

Page 3 of 3

I

Financlal I

(rfapolicable ) |