© e. gummesson 2009 1 service and relationship marketing (srm) stockholm university school of...
TRANSCRIPT
© E. Gummesson 2009
1
SERVICE AND RELATIONSHIP MARKETING (SRM) Stockholm University School of Business February 2009
TOTALRELATIONSHIP MARKETINGPART 1: SUMMARY AND EXAMPLES
SupplierCustomer
SupplierCustomer
SupplierCustomer
SupplierCustomer
Professor Evert Gummesson
SupplierCustomer
SupplierCustomer PREVIOUS LECTURE
© E. Gummesson 2009
2
This is glimpses from an adventurous and never-ending journey within a Nordic School tradition
© E. Gummesson 2009
3SERVICE AND RELATIONSHIP MARKETING (SRM) Stockholm University School of Business February 2009
TOTALRELATIONSHIP MARKETING
PART 2:* Many-to-many marketing
* S-D logic* Service science
&summing up
TODAY
© E. Gummesson 2009
4
How about the economic crisis?
© E. Gummesson 2009
5
“Why have relationship marketing, CRM, and one-to-one marketing not become as succesful in practice astheir advocates had hoped?”
© E. Gummesson 2009
6
“Because the focus is restricted tothe simple two-party relationship, a dyadbetween a single supplier and a singlecustomer. But we all live and act in networks and communities.”
MY ANSWER
© E. Gummesson 2009
7
Traditional American marketing managementand marketing mix
Customer centric Centered on one party
Customer
Relationship marketingCRM One-to-one marketing
SupplierCustomer
Relationship centricCentered on two parties
Many-to-many marketing
Network centricCentered on many parties
© E. Gummesson 2009
8
Definition:
“Many-to-many marketingdescribes, analyzes and utilizes
the network properties of marketing.”
© E. Gummesson 2009
9
Madelene, daughter in the city
Dagmar, 85, neighbor
Ingrid & Gunnar, neighbors
Laila, Sverker,Linnea & Fredrik,neighbors
Retailer
Transportcompany
Electrolux
WE & OURFREEZER
© E. Gummesson 2009
10
air BalticAir Chinaair greenlandAir OneAtlantic AirwaysCimber AirCity AirlineEstonian AirQantasSkywaysWideroe
Adria
3 REGIONAL PARTNERS
11 SPECIALSAS PARTNERS
Blue 1
Croatia Airlines
Star Alliance
TAP Portugal
ThaiUnited
SWISS
US Airways
Spanair
South African Airways
Austrian
Asiana Airlines
Lufthansa
LOT Polish Airlines
bmi british midland
SAS Scandianvian Airlines
Singapore Airlines
Shanghai Airlines
Air New Zealand
Air China
ANA All Nippon Airways
Air Canada
19 FULL PARTNERS
THE STAR ALLIANCE,FEBRUARY 2008
© E. Gummesson 2009
11
Government
EUHotel chain headquarters
Competingdestinations
Customers:touristsbusiness travellers
Hotels
Tourist and Congress Office
THE HOTEL GROUP
Destination marketing by the town of Östersund, SwedenSource: von Friedrichs Grängsjö, Yvonne and Gummesson, Evert, “Hotel Networks and Social Capital in Destination Marketing (forthcoming 2005)
© E. Gummesson 2009
12
Networks compete with networks
© E. Gummesson 2009
13
Message-ID: [email protected] From: [email protected] (Linus Benedict Torvalds) To: Newsgroups: comp.os.inix Subject: What would you like to see most in minix? Summary: Small poll for my new operating system
Hello everybody out there using minix-I’m doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won’t be big and professional like gnu) for 386 (486) AT clones. This has been brewing since april, and is starting to get ready. I’d like any feedback on things people like/dislike in minix, as my OS resembles it somewhat
Any suggestions are welcome, but I won’t promise I’ll implement them
Linus
© E. Gummesson 2009
14
© E. Gummesson 2009
15
© E. Gummesson 2009
16
“Networks are the fundamental stuff of which neworganizations areand will be made.”
Source: Castells, Manuel, The Rise of the Network Society.Oxford, UK: Blackwells, 1996, s 168
© E. Gummesson 2009
17
“No business is an island.” Håkan Håkansson & Ivan Snehota
Researchers of B2B networks
“Everything touches everything.” Jorge Luis Borges
Argentinean author
“...nothing happens in islolation.” Albert-László Barabási
Professor of Physics
“No man is an island, entire of itself.” John Donne (1572-1631)
Poet
“Tell me who you associate withand I will tell you who you are”
Euripides (400 BC)Dramatist
© E. Gummesson 2009
18
“Society is a network of relationships - and so is business.”
And my own conclusions:
© E. Gummesson 2009
19
HUB
NODE
LINK
CENTRALIZED NETWORKDECENTRALIZED NETWORK
DISTRIBUTED NETWORK
THREE EXAMPLES:
© E. Gummesson 2009
20
* Nodes and links* Hubs* Random networks* Planned networks* Clusters* Connectors* Preferential attachment* Rich gets richer* Fitness* Fit-get-rich* Winner-takes-all* Scale-free networks* Power laws* Phase transition* Robustness, error tolerance* Cascading failure* Tipping points* Thresholds* Spreading rates* Self-organizing* Six degrees of separation* What is the Internet, really?
A SAMPLE OF CONCEPTS AND
ISSUES FROM
NETWORK THEORY:
© E. Gummesson 2009
21
* Nodes and links* Hubs* Random networks* Planned networks* Clusters* Connectors* Preferential attachment* Rich gets richer* Fitness* Fit-get-rich* Winner-takes-all* Scale-free networks* Power laws* Phase transition* Robustness, error tolerance* Cascading failure* Tipping points* Thresholds* Spreading rates* Self-organizing* Six degrees of separation* What is the Internet, really?
A SAMPLE OF CONCEPTS AND
ISSUES FROM
NETWORK THEORY:
© E. Gummesson 2009
22
Albert-László Barabási, Professor of Physics, in Linked: The New Science of Networks (2002) underscores network applications to markets:
“…understanding network effects becomes the key to survival in a rapidly evolving new economy.”
(p. 200)
“In reality, a market is nothing but a directed network.”
(p. 208)
© E. Gummesson 2009
23
Networks of life:the network of agalaxy
© E. Gummesson 2009
24
Networks of life:network of interactionsbetween proteins inbaker’s yeast
Source: Buchanan, Mark (2003), Small World. London: Phoenix, p. 144.
© E. Gummesson 2009
25
Source: Buchanan, Mark (2003), Small World. London: Phoenix, p. 81.
© E. Gummesson 2009
26
© E. Gummesson 2009
27
OVERLOAD?
TOO COMPLEX?
YES, BUT COMPLEXITY IS CHARACTERISTIC OF LIFE AND BUSINESS!
© E. Gummesson 2009
28
SERVICE-DOMINANT LOGIC(S-D LOGIC)
© E. Gummesson 2009
29
STAGE 1. SERVICE MANAGEMENT AND
SERVICES MARKETING GET STARTED
© E. Gummesson 2009
30
GOODSSERVICES
THE MARKETING LANDSCAPE IN THE 1970s
SOMETHING WASMISSING!
© E. Gummesson 2009
31
THE FOCUS WAS ON* the division of goods and services* differences between goods and services
This was perhaps a necessary buttransient stage. Let’s scrap it!
© E. Gummesson 2009
32
STAGE 2. S-D LOGIC
FROM DIVISION TO UNIFICATION
© E. Gummesson 2009
33
S-D logic is based on a synthesis of service researchand its future directions
by Steve Vargo and Bob Lusch
© E. Gummesson 2009
34
References:
Total Relationship Marketing pp. 9-11 and other pages (see Index)
Vargo, S. L. and Lusch, R. F. (2008), “Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 36 No 1, pp.1-10.
Vargo, S. L. and Lusch, R. F. (2008), “Why ‘service’?” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 36 No 1, pp.25-38.
© E. Gummesson 2009
35
THE MARKETING LANDSCAPEOF THE FUTURE
SERVICE or VALUE
© E. Gummesson 2009
36
Foundational premise (FP) of S-D logic
Revised and extended version 2008
© E. Gummesson 2009
37
FP1Service is the fundamental basis of exchangeThe application of operant resources (knowledge and skills), “service,”as defined in S-D logic, is the basis for all exchange. Service is exchanged for service
FP2 Indirect exchange masks the fundamental basis of exchangeBecause service is provided through complex combinations of goods, money, and institutions, the service basis of exchange is not always apparent
FP3 Goods are a distribution mechanism for service provisionGoods (both durable and non-durable) derive their value through use – the service they provide
FP4 Operant resources are the fundamental source of competitive advantageThe comparative ability to cause desired change drives competition
FP5 All economies are service economiesService (singular) is only now becoming more apparent with increased specialization and outsourcing
© E. Gummesson 2009
38FP6 The customer is always a cocreator of valueImplies value creation is interactional
FP7 The enterprise cannot deliver value, but only offer value propositionsEnterprises can offer their applied resources for value creation and collaboratively (interactively)create value following acceptance of value propositions, but can not create and/or deliver valueindependently
FP8 A service-centered view is inherently customer oriented and relationalBecause service is defined in terms of customer-determined benefit and co-created it isinherently customer oriented and relational
FP9 All social and economic actors are resource integratorsImplies the context of value creation is networks of networks (resource integrators)
FP10 Value is always uniquely and phenomenologically determined by the beneficiaryValue is idiosyncratic, experiential, contextual, and meaning laden
© E. Gummesson 2009
39
STAGE 3. COMBINING S-D LOGIC WITH MANY-TO-MANY MARKETING:
VALUE IS CREATED IN NETWORKS
© E. Gummesson 2009
40
OUR FREEZER
Madelene, daughter in the city
Dagmar, 85,neighbor
Ingrid & Gunnar,neighbors
Laila, Sverker,Linnea & Daniel,neighbors
Retailer
Transportcompany
Electrolux
WE
© E. Gummesson 2009
41
SERVICE SCIENCEA HUGE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
RUN BY
SERVICE SCIENCE, MANAGEMENT AND ENGINEERING (SSME)USUALLY REFERRED TO AS
© E. Gummesson 2009
42
At IBM Stockholm in May 2008
© E. Gummesson 2009
43
References:
Total Relationship Marketing, pp. 11-12
Maglio, P.P. and Spohrer, J., (2008), “Fundamentals of service science”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 36 No.1, pp.18-20.
© E. Gummesson 2009
44
Dr. James ("Jim") C. Spohrer is the Director of Service Research at IBM Almaden Research Center in San Jose, CA. Dr. Spohrer is pioneering the development of the emerging field known as Service Science, which seeks to understand service systems and improve service quality, productivity, compliance, and innovation.
© E. Gummesson 2009
45
Service Science is the study of service systems, aiming to create a basis for service innovation and improved service systems.
Service Science defines service systems as value-co-creation configurations of people, technology, value propositions connecting internal and external service systems, and shared information (e.g., language, laws, measures, and methods).
The smallest service system centers on an individual as he or she interacts with others, and the largest service system comprises the global economy. Cities, city departments, businesses, business departments, nations, and government agencies are all service systems.
© E. Gummesson 2009
46
Service Science combines organization and human understanding with business and technological understanding to categorizeand explain the many types of service systems that existas well as how service systems interact and evolve to cocreatevalue.
The goal is to apply scientific understanding to advance our ability to design, improve, and scale service systems.
The Service Science project has taken a grand grip on service by inventorying what is done in universities, engaging not only business schools but also schools of technology and other disciplines and by starting new training programs and research projects.
© E. Gummesson 2009
47
In its beginning Service Science was technologically-focused and was first called Services Science based on the idea that there is an identifiable service sector which grows.
After contact with S-D logic the s in services was dropped. This is one of several tokens of IBM’s sensitivity to new knowledge. There is a desire to innovate efficient service systems and to reduce the gap between theory and practice through multidisciplinary cooperation engaging both academe and business.
The Service Science project has been in a state of search and in 2007 a strategy could be discerned. The project is promising and can make a pivotal contribution to business and several management disciplines in the current and future economic reality.
© E. Gummesson 2009
48
T. J. Watson, Jr., President of IBM 1952-1971
RE-THINK
© E. Gummesson 2009
49
IBM Nobel Prize Winners
1987 K. Alex Mueller, along with his colleague, J. Georg Bednorz, was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1987 for his discovery of high-temperature superconductivity in a new class of materials.
1973 Leo Esaki was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1973 for his discovery of tunneling in semiconductors.
1986 Gerd K. Binnig, along with his colleague, Heinrich Rohrer, was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in in 1986 for his work in scanning tunneling microscopy.
1987J. Georg Bednorz, along with his colleague, K. Alexander Mueller, was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1987 for his discovery of high-temperature superconductivity in a new class of materials.
1986 Heinrich Rohrer, along with his colleague, Gerd K. Binnig, was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1986 for his work in scanning tunneling microscopy.
© E. Gummesson 2009
50
Benoît B. Mandelbrot (born 1924) is the father of fractal geometry. Worked at the IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center in Yorktown Heights, New York from 1955 to1987.
Partial list of awards (but not the Nobel Prize):
•2004 Best Business Book of the Year Award •AMS Einstein Lectureship •Barnard Medal •Caltech Service •Casimir Frank Natural Sciences Award •Charles Proteus Steinmetz Medal •Franklin Medal •Harvey Prize •Honda Prize •Humboldt Preis •IBM Fellowship
Japan Prize •John Scott Award •Lewis Fry Richardson Medal •Medaglia della Presidenza della Repubblica Italiana •Médaille de Vermeil de la Ville de Paris •Nevada Prize •Science for Art •Sven Berggren-Priset •Władysław Orlicz Prize •Wolf Foundation Prize for Physics
© E. Gummesson 2009
51
Mandelbrot extended the scope of science to non-smooth parts of the real world, beyond the circle, square and the triangle.
© E. Gummesson 2009
52
A fractal is an irregular geometric object that is self-similar to its substructure at any level of refinement.
© E. Gummesson 2009
53
Mandelbrot emphasized fractals as realistic and useful models of many phenomena in the real world that can be viewed as rough.
© E. Gummesson 2009
54
Natural fractals include the shapes of mountains, costlines and river basins; the structure of plants, blood vessels and lungs; the clustering of galaxies.
Man-made fractals include companies, management, service, and stock market prices, but also music, painting, and architecture.
© E. Gummesson 2009
55
ILLUSTRATIONS TO OUR NEED TO
RETHINK
© E. Gummesson 2009
56
Would we consider to squeeze the automobileinto the terminology of a horse and carriage?
Or force electronics into the languageof mechanics?
When are we going to stop squeezing goods, service and other phenomena into non-representative categories and instead recognize their complexity and true nature.
© E. Gummesson 2009
57
Economies are traditionally divided into three sectors:
The industrial (or manufacturing or goods) sectorThe service sectorThe agricultural sector
© E. Gummesson 2009
58
But is there a
SERVICESECTOR?
© E. Gummesson 2009
59
...but we never had so much food
and have never been so overweight!
According to statistics, the agricultural sector is going down
© E. Gummesson 2009
60
From the film ”The Meaning of Life” (Monty Python)
© E. Gummesson 2009
61
...but we never had
so many products!
According to statistics, the industrial/manufacturing/goods sector is going down
© E. Gummesson 2009
62
© E. Gummesson 2009
63
...but do we have the service we need?
According to statistics, the service sector is going up, up, up...
© E. Gummesson 2009
64
Waiting lines – arethey good service?
“Just now there are many peoplecalling. Your waiting time is17 minutes. You can also go toour website www……
EMERGENCY CLINIC
© E. Gummesson 2009
65
Do the statistics consider the work done buy customers? NO!
But most of the value added to any delivery or offering comes from the customer’s or citizen’s work, in part together with suppliers and governments
When service systems fail, companiesand government organization pass mostof the work on to customers and citizens
© E. Gummesson 2009
66
Exemples of systems with low capability:
the legal system
the health care system
the financial system
They are not really systems,they are loosely connected fragments
© E. Gummesson 2009
67
Buying a car:Manufacturing/industrial sector
Renting a car:Service sector
From a customer perspective: The supplier’s job is to make the car availableThe service of the car is transportation
© E. Gummesson 2009
68
Service
Service
Agriculture
Manufacturing
Example:a restaurant
A restaurant is dependent on the factory (kitchen)and the food (from the agricultural and manufacturing sectors).The only sector it can do without and still feed people is the service sector. And yet it is classified as belongingto the service sector!
X
© E. Gummesson 2009
69
The division in sectors is totally supplier and labor market focused
Customers and citizens are not in focus at all!
The ”growth” of the service sector is a statistical caricature and a distortion of what is happeningin today’s economy.
© E. Gummesson 2009
70
The service sector is a ghost!
© E. Gummesson 2009
71
SUMMING UP TOTAL
RELATIONSHIP MARKETING
© E. Gummesson 2009
72
Total relationship marketing is interaction in networks of relationships, recognizing that marketing is embedded in the total management
of the networks of the selling organization, and its nano, market and mega relationships. It is directed to
long-term win–win relationships with individual customers, and value is co-created between the
parties involved. It transcends the boundaries between specialist functions and disciplines. It is
made tangible through the 30 relationships, the 30Rs. Total relationship marketing represents
a paradigm shift in marketing.
p. 40 in Total Relationship Marketing
© E. Gummesson 2009
73
HOW ABOUT TRADITIONAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT &
THE 4Ps OF THE MARKETING MIX: PRODUCT, PRICE, PROMOTION & PLACE?
© E. Gummesson 2009
74
From: [email protected]: Evert GummessonCopy: Subject: Comments on your papers
December 3, 2004 Dear Evert: ---The question becomes whether marketing management theory is useful as a subspecie of network theory or should be totally rejected as leading to specious conclusions and dysfunctional marketing decisions. ---Best regards,Phil
EXCERPT FROM AN EMAILFROM PHILIP KOTLER
© E. Gummesson 2009
75
The 4Ps are neither 4 nor Ps any more!
See Total Relationship Marketing pp. 320-327
© E. Gummesson 2009
76
P
© E. Gummesson 2009
77product: goods and servicespricepromotion: personal selling, advertising, SP place: distribution
experienceslifestylesdreamseventsstorytellinginformation
public relations, PRbrandingsponsoring political influence
public opinionlobbying
call centerstelemarketingTVemailInternetmobile phonestext messaging
scientific researcheducation
VALUE PROPOSITIONSupplier
CustomerVALUE ACTUALIZATION
© E. Gummesson 2009
78
RM is more total than ever. S-D logic and the integration of goods and
services into service and value propositions;; the growing importance of the customer in co-creation and C2C; CRM as part of a company’s business system; many-to-many marketing addressing the whole network of stakeholders; the value-creating
network society; and the coming of service science –
they all point in the direction of a more systemic and complete view on marketing.
© E. Gummesson 2009
79
How about the economic crisis?
© E. Gummesson 2009
80
Do we ever learn from our mistakes?
© E. Gummesson 2009
81
2001
The ENRON scandal
© E. Gummesson 2009
82
July 5, 2006Enron’s Ken Lay dies of a heart attack in Colorado. He was 64.The charges against Lay carry a maximum penalty of 45 years in prison for the corporate trial and 120 years in the personal trial.
October 23, 2006 Jeff Skilling gets 24 years in prison for Enron fraud.
© E. Gummesson 2009
83Guilty of obstruction, Arthur Andersen, one of the five large firms of certified public accountants becomes the first courtroom casualty of the Enron collapse. In 2002 it ceased to exist leaving 85,000 employees behind.
THE SCENE: Arthur Andersen's Houston branch
© E. Gummesson 2009
84
© E. Gummesson 2009
85
”If history holds one lesson, it’sthat we never learn from history”
© E. Gummesson 2009
86
Must that be so?
© E. Gummesson 2009
87
What can political leaders do?
© E. Gummesson 2009
88
1. Make sure companies can get extended credit and other financial support for survival 2. Reduce interest rates3. Start public investment programs 4. Tax reductions that stimulate investment and consumption 5. Do away with stifling labor market regulations6. Speed up decison-making processes in public service agencies7. Psychological crisis, instill hope in people
© E. Gummesson 2009
89
What can business leaders do?
Suggested in an article in Fortune (European Ed.),January 19, 2009, pp. 66-71 (”How to Manage Your Business in a Recession,” by Geoff Colvin)
1. Reset priorities to face the new reality
2. Keep investing in the core
3. Communicating like crazy, balancing realism and optimism
4. Your customers face new problems, so give them new solutions
© E. Gummesson 2009
90
5. Don’t rush to cut prices
6. Focus on capital – how are you getting it and where are you using it
7. Reevaluate people – and steal some good ones
8. Reexamine compensation – what is it offering incentives for
9. Think twice before offshoring
10. Be smart about mergers and acquisitions
© E. Gummesson 2009
91
In conclusion:
Back to basics!or rather
Forward to basics!
© E. Gummesson 2009
92
relationship marketing
networks and many-to-many marketing
S-D logic and
service science
Forward to basics! is also what we try to achieve by developing
marketing thinking along the lines of
© E. Gummesson 2009
93
THE END