ethical absolutism right and wrong are static, absolute, universal concepts nothing changes their...

8
ETHICS

Upload: sybil-henry

Post on 27-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ETHICAL ABSOLUTISM  RIGHT and WRONG are static, absolute, universal concepts  Nothing changes their definition  NOT situational

ETHICS

Page 2: ETHICAL ABSOLUTISM  RIGHT and WRONG are static, absolute, universal concepts  Nothing changes their definition  NOT situational

ETHICAL SYSTEMS

ETHICAL ABSOLUTISM RIGHT and WRONG are static, absolute,

universal concepts Nothing changes their definition

NOT situational

Page 3: ETHICAL ABSOLUTISM  RIGHT and WRONG are static, absolute, universal concepts  Nothing changes their definition  NOT situational

ETHICAL SYSTEMS

UTILITARIANISM Right and wrong are determined by impact on

the greatest good for the greatest number Jeremy Bentham

Page 4: ETHICAL ABSOLUTISM  RIGHT and WRONG are static, absolute, universal concepts  Nothing changes their definition  NOT situational

ETHICAL SYSTEMS

MORAL RELATIVISM Right and wrong are all relative to situations,

cultures, locations, etc. There are no absolute, universal rights and

wrongs

Page 5: ETHICAL ABSOLUTISM  RIGHT and WRONG are static, absolute, universal concepts  Nothing changes their definition  NOT situational

ETHICAL SYSTEMS

EGOISM Self-interest is the only standard of conduct

Page 6: ETHICAL ABSOLUTISM  RIGHT and WRONG are static, absolute, universal concepts  Nothing changes their definition  NOT situational

ETHICAL SYSTEMS

DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS From the Greek “deon” meaning “duty” Kant’s Categorical Imperative

Act out of obligation to duty Consequences do not matter

Page 7: ETHICAL ABSOLUTISM  RIGHT and WRONG are static, absolute, universal concepts  Nothing changes their definition  NOT situational

ETHICAL SYSTEMS

SITUATED ETHICS Correct morality exists within a given situation Aristotle

The mean

Page 8: ETHICAL ABSOLUTISM  RIGHT and WRONG are static, absolute, universal concepts  Nothing changes their definition  NOT situational

ETHICAL SYSTEMS

How would each system evaluate the Cold Equations?

1. Ethical Absolutism2. Utilitarianism3. Moral Relativism4. Egoism5. Deontological Ethics (Kant)6. Situated Ethics (Aristotle)