© iap pty ltd 1 time management – you are in control, if you choose to be!
TRANSCRIPT
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 1
Time Management – You are in Control, if You Choose to Be!
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 2
Challenges
Market Forces High fuel price Electricity – what happened? High cattle prices High feed cost Low carcass price Competition > where did they come from?
What can I control? The production process
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 3
Historical World Oil Price – Nominal & US$2006
Globally Confronting Change in Cost of Our Master Resource Energy
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 4
Reality of Recent Change in Oil Price
We cannot ignore energy cost Global oil price continues to directly influence OUR businesses Power problems in SA? Directly influences our profitability – e.g. feed tonne/litre, head number/litre
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 5
Confronting Real Domestic Issues
IMPORTED FROM BRAZIL
Flat World Economy ≠ Domestic Sustainability
How can Brazil Produce Beef so Cheap @ 40% Import Duty into SA? Lower Energy Production
Cost!
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 6
Plug & Play Anywhere
Internet has shrunk our Global World > Flat World
Rapid identification of low cost global products, suppliers & services
Advantage of territorial commodity prices no longer exist
Lowest energy cost (i.e. fuel, labour, grain, etc) = Lowest producer cost
One frontier where producers can have a competitive advantage is through their production process
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 7
Global Meat Processor Presence# 1
# 3
#2
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 8
Global Meat Processor Presence
Competitors - no longer in next state, they are in a different country separated by an ocean
Global participants do not strive to be mediocre Processors commonality - Adopt & Adapt > Running fast to
expanding their global business Incorporate excellent Controlled Production Processes Why a Controlled Production Processes?
Consistent, uniform product Lowest production cost
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 9
Controlled Production Process
Controlled Production Process creates a uniform product from raw materials
Aspects of Good Controlled Process Well Defined, Communicated &
Implemented (know what one is doing) De-Centralized or does not require daily
management decisions to be Functionally Effective (no daily crisis management)
Management decisions based on Specific Facts (data driven approach to process improvement) & devoid of Emotional Inputs (not > I think, I feel, I believe)
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 10
Manage Processes through Measurements
‘One accurate measurement is worth 1,000 expert observations’ - GM Hopper, USA Navy
Processes must be Managed through multitude of objective measurements
Resolution - Higher number of steps &/or complexity within process > More Error (KISS)
All Processes have areas that may be improved upon > higher efficiency
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 11
Defining Efficiencies
Factors Influencing Profitability Cattle Feed Energy Production Process (fuel, labour,
equipment, facilities)
What makes me Efficient? Cattle?
ADG 1.0 vs 1.8kg/d? DMC 7.0 vs 5.5? Carcass protein kg/d?
Feed Energy? Maize $ / NEG Mcal/kg? Gluten meal $ / NEG Mcal/kg?
Production? Delivered ration tonne / Fuel l?
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 12
Feedlots
Feedlots are a Production Process Production Processes are Constrained
by Time Prioritize Process Steps - Most > Least
Critical Action Trigger Pull = Most Critical Action
within a process occurring within a short time period
Execution of Trigger Pull > Consequences – good or bad
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 13
Time Management
No one can actually manage Time
Management > effectively managing an activity or process during a specified time, with defined outcomes from physical actions
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 14
Seasonal Daily Consumption Period & Feed Team Work Day
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
Midday
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
Hour
% C
attle
Fee
ding
Summer Winter
Work Day
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 15
Managing a Process We do not have 24 hr work day
> 8 hr/d Production Process > continuous
series of repeated actions > Product Production Process includes:
1. Resources - people2. Constraints – time 3. Input Elements – cattle & feed
ingredients4. Transformation – growth or tissue
deposition5. Products – carcass
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 16
Measuring a Process
One can only manage a process that can be measured Measurements are the Data that is used to improve the
process Ration tonne/fuel l (1.0-1.4t/l) Head number/fuel l (95-120hd/l) Ration tonne/mixer hr/d (12-22t/hr) Cattle feed intake kg/hd/d (10-15t/hd/d)
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 17
Production Process Quantified by Time
Production Process is Quantified by Time (e.g. ADG, km/hr, t/hr, t/d)
Good Processing Efficiency > Low cost
Failure to Control a Production Process > Process Controlling Us!
Good to Bad Controlled Process Feed Cattle from Start > Days? >
Exit to Abattoir Live Cattle Enter Abattoir >
Hours? > Carcasses or Meat Cuts
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 18
Time Can Not Be Replaced or Repeated
Production processes require a time period for completion of individual actions e.g. delivering ration kg/pen
Actions within Process impose scale of consequence – e.g. feed kg/pen delivered > ADG
Trigger Pull is a critical action within a short time period in a process
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 19
Feedlot Revolves Around Feeding Cattle
Feed Load/Mix
Feed Preparation& Processing Consumption
Feed Delivery
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 20
Ingredients - Quality & Number
Ingredient Quality (e.g. by-products, grain, silage & hay processing)
Number of ingredient materials required to build a ration
number of ingredients > loading time & loading weight error factor
Number or mixers & capacity must satisfy feed quantity delivered within 6hr period
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 21
Repeated Feed Team Action Cycle
Ration Mix
Ration Delivery Pens Feed Order
Ingredient Loading
Actions require a quantity of time
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 22
Repeated Feed Team Action Cycle
Ration Mix
Ration Delivery Pens Feed Order
Ingredient Loading
Ration > kg/pen = kg/hd/d< 1min
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 23
Repeated Feed Team Action Cycle
Ration Mix
Ration Delivery Pens Feed Order
Ingredient LoadingDiet Ingredients kg/mix
4-7min
Ration > kg/pen = kg/hd/d< 1min
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 24
Repeated Feed Team Action Cycle
Ration Mix
Ration Delivery Pens Feed Order
Ingredient LoadingDiet Ingredients kg/mix
4-7minRation mixing
4-5min
Travel time to row/pen 2-8min
Ration > kg/pen = kg/hd/d< 1min
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 25
Repeated Feed Team Action Cycle
Ration Mix
Ration Delivery Pens Feed Order
Ingredient Loading
Kg/pen > # pens2 - 4min/pen
Diet Ingredients kg/mix 4-7min
Ration mixing4-5min
Travel time to row/pen 2-8min
Travel time to Feed shed 2-8min
Ration > kg/pen = kg/hd/d< 1min
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 26
Ingredients Loading Accuracy (4-7min)
By-Product 1
Premix
Hay/Straw Silage
Maize
By-Product 3
By-Product 2
Ration
Mixer Load Impacts 200-800 hd
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 27
Repeated Feed Team Action Cycle
Ration Mix
Ration Delivery Pens Feed Order
Ingredient Loading
Kg/pen > # pens2 - 4min/pen
Diet Ingredients kg/mix 4-7min
Ration mixing4-5min
Trigger Pull
Travel time to row/pen 2-8min
Travel time to Feed shed 2-8min
Ration > kg/pen = kg/hd/d< 1min
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 28
Ingredient Loading Process
Trigger Pull - Accuracy of loading multiple ingredients into mixer – small action time w/greatest impact
Individual Ingredient Loading Accuracy is more Critical than Loading Speed
Consequence of error directly influences cattle fed by that specific mixer load > 200 – 800hd
Right ration, right ingredients, right mix & right quantity/pen
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 29
Seasonal Daily Consumption Period & Stockman Work Day
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
Midday
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
Hour
% C
attle
Fee
ding
Summer Winter
Work Day
High Cattle Activity Low Cattle Activity
No Cattle Activity
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 30
Create Consistency in Stockman Actions
Daylight is start of day for cattle - feeding behavior > 1st light & after midday
Assess pen as group of cattle within 1st 3hr of daylight
Natural posture = health Unnatural posture = non-health Trigger Pull is critical
observation time of cattle within pen > natural versus unnatural posture
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 31
Daily Stockman Action Cycle
Identify Unnatural Posture
Assess Cattle Posture
Repeated Actions of Cycle
Treatment
Pull Cattle Trigger Pull
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 32
Stockman Actions or Reactions
Pull right cattle at right time more important than antibiotic treatment –Late pulls = tissue damage
Manure physical characteristics is a poor indicator of health Assess pen feed intake kg/hd/d Focus on cattle posture!
Emotional reaction > impromptu ration change can be costly
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 33
Herd of Buffalo
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 34
Australian Mandate?
Australian - National Livestock Identification Scheme NLIS
Reason > Major Beef Exporter Created traceability for export Feedlot found economic benefit in
traceability as a measurement tool Feedlot > Identified risk of poor
individual performance ( $/hd) through new Data base ADG / Breed – Sex - Origin - Buyer Health / Breed – Sex - Origin - Buyer Carcass wt & Specification / Breed – Sex - Buyer
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 35
Future of Global Beef Industry
Traceability is the ability to verify the history, location, or application of an item by means of recorded identification
Important > Consumer Perception Meal Safety = Meal Security Maximum Residue Limits - Monitoring Program Benefits > Markets in Developed Countries How far back does AUS traceability go:
Property of cattle birth Transfer through different grazing properties Feedlot Abattoir Box (meat)
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 36
Future of Global Beef Industry
Other countries with traceability: Canada, United Kingdom, European Union – eradication program (e.g. BSE & FMD)
EU banned Brazilian beef JAN 31, 2008 for lack of traceability requirement!
What benefits would SA feedlots using EID scheme: retail meat yield carcass > carcass gain kg/d health problems – disease Beef measles – What is annual cost to your industry? Cattle Buyers – Are their cattle really Cheap? Identify individual cattle as profit centre Promote consumer confidence in SA beef meal
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 37
Cargill Steps in Marketing Better Eating
1. Indentify breeds for specific meal product
2. Specific purchase of quality cattle
3. Paddock-to-Plate traceability4. Company owned feedlot5. Superior nutrition6. Accurate measurements (full
feedlot = 250,000 cartons)7. Stress free handling of cattle8. Hide & carcass cleaning9. pH-temperature decline10. Carcass tracking11. Carcass scanning (video image of
beef quality attributes)12. Carcass sorting
13. Carcass mapping 14. Carcass monitoring15. Enhanced food safety16. Advanced table boning17. Lean point verification18. Innovative packaging19. Product identification20. Cold storage21. Inventory management22. Quality control – ISO9001-200023. Customer focus24. Continuous improvement25. Environmental management
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 38
Australian EID
Trialled electronic identification device EID > durable
Passive transponder - magnetically imbedded number on inside & visual number on outside
Same technology used in stores for tracking valuable goods in/out (e.g. plastic tag they take off clothing or scan boxes to remove from inventory)
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 39
Electronic Data Transfer
Ear tag transponder powered by battery antennae Hand held Wall mounts
Trigger Pull - capture cattle EID Software (e.g. StockaID) captures
EID Scale Weight Date/time Records
Products applied to cattle – implant, Vaccine, antibiotics, drench
Grazing paddock & pens Associated $/hd
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 40
NLIS > Connectivity
NLIS data management located on web site for EID ownership transfer
Why use electronic data? Connectivity = Transfer Information at
High Speed Accuracy of data, minimal recording
errors Allows immediate & future assessment
with additional data Does not get lost in piles of notebooks
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 41
EID + Software SchematicTracking Individual Cattle through Process – Wt, +Products, DOF, ADG,
Sort, $Inputs, $Health > Abattoir > +/-$ ROI
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 42
Individual Cattle IdentificationEach Animal is a Profit Centre
Lot No Visual ID RHINO Ind Bovillus BK Bovillus Backgrd Purchase Origin Buyer Pay Wt Off Weight Land $ Ind Sex Breed Ind Date1060 100151 Y Paddock Wingham BeefGreame Ward340 342 $704.85 SHEREFORD (horned)31/03/20061060 100196 Y Paddock Nagambie Denis Henderson413 351 $710.41 S ANGUS 31/03/20061060 100199 Y Paddock Nagambie Denis Henderson413 351 $710.41 S Shorthorn (inc Poll)31/03/20061060 100175 Y Paddock Wingham BeefGreame Ward345 347 $715.14 S BLACK BALDY31/03/20061068 46318 Y Y Saleyard Wagga Greame Ward409 402 $841.55 S ANGUS 21/05/20061069 46531 Y Y Paddock Yea Ed Lilbourne 433 433 $891.44 S Shorthorn (inc Poll)7/06/20061069 46756 Y Y Paddock Yea Ed Lilbourne 460 460 $910.57 S ANGUS 9/06/20061070 46831 Y Y Saleyard Deniliquin Denis Henderson395 357 $674.74 S ANGUS 15/06/20061070 2570 Y Y Y BackgroundSaleyard Wagga Greame Ward335 328 $693.89 H ANGUS 21/05/20061070 46804 Y Y Saleyard Deniliquin Denis Henderson430 388 $732.55 S ANGUS 15/06/20061070 2582 Y Y Y BackgroundSaleyard Wagga Greame Ward363 356 $749.76 H ANGUS 21/05/20061070 2524 Y Y Y BackgroundPaddock Macedon Denis Henderson364 364 $751.20 H ANGUS 21/05/20061070 46819 Y Y Saleyard Deniliquin Denis Henderson455 411 $773.84 S ANGUS 15/06/20061070 2503 Y Y Y BackgroundPaddock Macedon Denis Henderson391 391 $806.55 H ANGUS 21/05/20061070 2516 Y Y Y BackgroundPaddock Kyneton Denis Henderson404 404 $811.14 H ANGUS 21/05/20061070 2479 Y Y Y BackgroundPaddock Kyneton Denis Henderson404 404 $811.14 H ANGUS 21/05/20061070 2562 Y Y Y BackgroundSaleyard Wagga Greame Ward395 388 $813.61 H BLACK BALDY21/05/20061070 46812 Y Y Saleyard Deniliquin Denis Henderson480 434 $815.13 S ANGUS 15/06/20061070 46832 Y Y Saleyard Deniliquin Denis Henderson485 438 $823.38 S ANGUS 15/06/20061070 2393 Y Y Y BackgroundPaddock Howlong Ed Lilbourne 384 391 $825.60 S BLACK BALDY19/05/20061070 2400 Y Y Y BackgroundSaleyard Bathurst Neil East 405 393 $828.85 S BLACK BALDY21/05/20061070 2406 Y Y Y BackgroundSaleyard Bathurst Neil East 405 393 $828.85 S ANGUS 21/05/20061070 2495 Y Y Y BackgroundPaddock Kyneton Denis Henderson424 424 $851.05 H ANGUS 21/05/20061070 46823 Y Y Saleyard Deniliquin Denis Henderson504 456 $854.76 S ANGUS 15/06/20061070 2420 Y Y Y BackgroundSaleyard Orange Neil East 423 329 $873.49 S ANGUS 21/05/20061070 2403 Y Y Y BackgroundSaleyard Bathurst Neil East 435 423 $887.52 S BLACK BALDY21/05/20061070 2518 Y Y Y BackgroundPaddock Macedon Denis Henderson449 449 $925.45 H ANGUS 21/05/20061061 39022 Y Y Saleyard Cooma Greame Ward316 310 $663.48 S ANGUS 25/04/20061061 39018 Y Y Saleyard Cooma Greame Ward317 310 $665.48 S ANGUS 25/04/2006
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 43
Individual Cattle IdentificationIn Wt $ Animal In Dent Kill Date Ab Sex Ab Dent Exit Kg DoF ADG Tot HSW Fat Class Hosp $ HSW Grade $ Gross $ Dress% AFI340 $704.85 0 5/10/2006 Steer 2 630 164 1.77 324 19 $0.00 324 $3.80 $1,231.20 51.43% 16.05350 $710.41 0 5/10/2006 Steer 2 570 188 1.17 327.5 17 $0.00 327.5 $3.80 $1,244.50 57.46% 16.05350 $710.41 0 5/10/2006 Steer 2 615 188 1.41 329 12 $27.83 329 $3.80 $1,250.20 53.50% 16.05345 $715.14 0 5/10/2006 Steer 2 550 187 1.10 324.5 26 $29.53 324.5 $3.80 $1,233.10 59.00% 16.05440 $841.55 0 5/10/2006 Steer 2 695 141 1.81 373 14 $69.99 373 $3.80 $1,417.40 53.67% 15.95483 $891.44 0 5/10/2006 Steer 0 665 134 1.36 389 19 $21.77 389 $3.79 $1,474.31 58.50% 15.79474 $910.57 0 5/10/2006 Steer 2 735 118 2.21 417.5 28 $0.00 417.5 $3.71 $1,548.92 56.80% 15.79395 $674.74 0 5/10/2006 Steer 2 675 116 2.41 367 16 $29.53 367 $3.80 $1,394.60 54.37% 15.71360 $693.89 0 5/10/2006 Steer 2 675 141 2.23 369 18 $0.00 369 $3.80 $1,402.20 54.67% 15.71430 $732.55 2 5/10/2006 Steer 2 740 116 2.67 401 22 $0.00 401 $3.71 $1,487.71 54.19% 15.71390 $749.76 0 5/10/2006 Steer 2 660 141 1.91 372 18 $0.00 372 $3.80 $1,413.60 56.36% 15.71340 $751.20 0 5/10/2006 Steer 2 620 110 2.55 356 16 $0.00 356 $3.80 $1,352.80 57.42% 15.71455 $773.84 0 5/10/2006 Steer 2 705 116 2.16 397 24 $0.00 397 $3.79 $1,504.63 56.31% 15.71365 $806.55 0 5/10/2006 Steer 2 670 110 2.77 361 19 $0.00 361 $3.80 $1,371.80 53.88% 15.71400 $811.14 0 5/10/2006 Steer 2 660 111 2.34 374 16 $0.00 374 $3.80 $1,421.20 56.67% 15.71400 $811.14 0 5/10/2006 Steer 2 735 111 3.02 398 24 $0.00 398 $3.79 $1,508.42 54.15% 15.71425 $813.61 0 5/10/2006 Steer 2 700 141 1.95 385 26 $33.13 385 $3.79 $1,459.15 55.00% 15.71480 $815.13 0 5/10/2006 Steer 0 685 116 1.77 408 11 $0.00 408 $3.71 $1,513.68 59.56% 15.71485 $823.38 0 5/10/2006 Steer 2 725 116 2.07 416.5 22 $0.00 416.5 $3.71 $1,545.21 57.45% 15.71395 $825.60 0 5/10/2006 Steer 0 655 140 1.86 389.5 18 $0.00 389.5 $3.79 $1,476.20 59.47% 15.71400 $828.85 2 5/10/2006 Steer 2 640 138 1.74 374 29 $0.00 374 $3.80 $1,421.20 58.44% 15.71400 $828.85 0 5/10/2006 Steer 2 700 138 2.17 398.5 30 $0.00 398.5 $3.79 $1,510.31 56.93% 15.71420 $851.05 0 5/10/2006 Steer 2 660 111 2.16 376.5 30 $0.00 376.5 $3.80 $1,430.70 57.05% 15.71504 $854.76 0 5/10/2006 Steer 2 735 116 1.99 431 19 $0.00 431 $3.21 $1,383.51 58.64% 15.71400 $873.49 0 5/10/2006 Steer 2 660 111 2.34 366 17 $0.00 366 $3.80 $1,390.80 55.45% 15.71430 $887.52 0 5/10/2006 Steer 2 700 138 1.96 379.5 36 $0.00 379.5 $3.70 $1,404.15 54.21% 15.71420 $925.45 0 5/10/2006 Steer 2 710 111 2.61 399.5 21 $0.00 399.5 $3.79 $1,514.10 56.27% 15.71330 $663.48 0 9/10/2006 Steer 2 575 166 1.48 318.5 19 $0.00 318.5 $3.80 $1,210.30 55.39% 15.66330 $665.48 0 9/10/2006 Steer 0 615 166 1.72 339.5 22 $38.58 339.5 $3.80 $1,290.10 55.20% 15.66
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 44
Electronic Identification Device EID
EID technology is only as good user that implements – No Silver Bullets (cure all)
Technology is not a cost decision > assess through return on investment
AUS NLIS start 2000 & full activity since 2005 > got it Right!
SAFA should take initiative to develop uniform system & government will adopt
Don’t re-invent the wheel – it is already in working mode
© IAP Pty Ltd© IAP Pty Ltd 45
Summary
Global markets will continue to dictate our commodity prices Feedlot revolves around feeding cattle through production
process Trigger Pull – is a critical action within your production process Cattle traceability will become more dominant in our meal
industry > Adopt to your advantage to measure your efficiencies Technology is only as good as the user – No Silver Bullets You are in control of your Process - if You Choose to Be!