© leanne currie, 2015 please do not share without permission electronic health records: promises...
TRANSCRIPT
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
Electronic Health Records: Promises and Pitfalls
Leanne M. Currie, RN, PhD
Associate Professor
UBC School of Nursing
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
Overview
What is informatics?
How can the electronic health record support clinical work?
What are problems associated with electronic health records?
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
Health Informatics
<Nursing> Science
Computer Science
• The application of information technology to facilitate the creation and use of health related data, information and knowledge. (Canada Health Infoway)
Organizational Behaviour
Information-Communication
Science
Human Factors
Decision Science
<Healthcare Domain>Medicine, Pharmacy, Occupational therapy, Physical therapy, Public Health
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
Scope of the field of informatics Clinical Informatics
Electronic health record (EHR) Clinical decision support
Computer readable guidelines
Clinical documentation
Systems design Health information exchange
Standardized terminologies
Information retrieval
Data mining
Public Health Informatics
Surveillance systems
Antibiotic Rx outbreak
Global Health Informatics
Low-resource settings
Radiology informatics
Picture archiving systems
Health education technology
Simulation
Computer adaptive testing
Consumer health informatics Personal health record
Patient portal
Digital literacy
Social media Technology use in homes
Telehealth/Virtual Health
Telephone advice lines
Video conference to provide access to healthcare professional
Bioinformatics
Personalized medicine Map treatments to your genome
Identify disease genome
1924!
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
Foundational fields
Computer science: Algorithmic methods for representing and transforming
information
Information science Origins, collection, storage, retrieval, transmission &
utilization of information Library science
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
Why is informatics important to patient safety and quality experts?
Quality experts need to be aware of: Data integrity Technology induced errors
Nursing/Pharmacy/Medical informatics is an expected entry-to-practice competency in Canada (and in US)
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
Why Informatics?
Need to make collection of data for re-use a part of the health care delivery process.
• Not to be confused with pushing the job of “data collection” to the frontline (already busy) clinician.
• Data and information are required to manage patient care– If you can’t name it, you can’t manage it – Need to build systems that:
• Support clinicians’ work• Maximize safe care• Can adapt to changes in knowledge• Can capture information that ‘can’t be quantified’ (i.e., free text)
7
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
The Vision
• Data should be:• Captured as a byproduct of care• Entered only once (and verified if needed) • Use and re-used for:
1. Share information and data (view reports and others‘notes)
2. Real time decision support (guideline integration, knowledge translation)
3. Administrative reporting (must know what you will get OUT of system)
4. Research
5. Practice-based evidence (knowledge discovery)
8
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
Data collection as a By-Product of care
Data that are collected as part of clinical work should be able to be automatically integrated into the documentation system E.g., dynamap data should be automatically uploaded into
the documentation system E.g., audio-record ‘report’ (e.g., shift report) and
automatically transcribe into format that can re-use the data (e.g., Dragon-talk software and Natural language programming).
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
Bar Coding for ‘data collection as a by-product of care’
10
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
1. Sharing Information
Pros: Remote & Asynchronous viewing Multiple concurrent viewers Decrease repeat tests (cost savings)
Cons: Potential for privacy breach Requires national standards for health information exchange
Info-structure costly to implement
Presumes digital literacy
15© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
Interoperability definitions Technical Interoperability
ensures that systems can send and receive data successfully. It defines the degree to which the information can be successfully “transported” between systems.
Semantic Interoperability ensures that the information sent and received
between systems is unaltered in its meaning. It is understood in exactly the same way by both the sender and receiver.
Process Interoperability is the degree to which the integrity of workflow
processes can be maintained between systems. This includes maintaining/conveying information such as user roles between systems.
From: Dolin, R (2011) Approaching Semantic Interoperability with HL7. JAMIA. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3005878/
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
Uses of Terminologies, Taxonomies and Ontologies
Modeling knowledge Sematic (meaning) relationships between concepts
Automating guideline integration
Storing in database As a record
Monitoring data For real time decision support
Querying database For aggregate data analysis (local, regional, national, international)
Transferring data From one setting to another
Billing E.g., ICD10 codes
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
iEHR Interoperable EHR supports clinical information-sharing
generated primarily on the basis of clinical assessments. Includes: Clinical Observations Professional Services Health Conditions Care Compositions Allergy/Intolerance Patient Note Clinical Documents
Discharge/Care Summary Referral Clinical Observation Document
EHR Clinical Summary/Profile Retrieval
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
Estimated Cost Savings in Canada
http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/690256-final-infoway-emr-benefits-english-summary.html
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
2. Real-time Decision Support (for clinicians)
Pros: Supports guideline adherence Prevents adverse events (e.g., drug-drug interaction Can be used for quality data tracking
Cons: Complex & time consuming to develop Alert fatigue Technology induced errors if user interface confusing Presumes data collection complete from previous users Requires comprehensive infostructure and standards
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
CPOE
http://jamia.bmj.com/content/20/3/470.full.pdf+html
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
Evidence about CDSS (Bright et al. 2012)
Outcome Examples Evidence Level (outcomes)
Clinical outcomes LOS, mortality, QOL, Adv.Event Low
Morbidity Mod (OR=0.88)
Process measures Preventative care or recommended Tx
High (OR=1.42 – 1.57)
Tests Mod (OR=1.72)
Workflow/efficiency
# patients seen Insufficient data
Clinician workload
Relationship-centered outcomes
Patient satisfaction Insufficient data
Economic outcomes Cost Mod (trend toward lower Tx costs)
Cost effectiveness Insufficient data
Healthcare Use Provider acceptance Low (often not reported)
Provider satisfaction Moderate (higher satisfaction if developed locally)
Provider use Low (overall low use)
Implementation Insufficient data
30
• Bright TJ, Wong A, Dhurjati R, Bristow E, Bastian L, Coeytaux RR, Samsa G, Hasselblad V, Williams JW, Musty MD, Wing L, Kendrick AS, Sanders GD, Lobach D. Effect of clinical decision-support systems: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jul 3;157(1):29-43. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-1-201207030-00450.
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
3. Administrative reporting Pros: Automated reports:
reduce time to get administrative data Reduce cost of medical records department
Near to ‘real-time’ administrative reporting (currently time lag due to manual data abstraction)
Cons: Data collection pushed to front-line person Uncertain how data is used for decision making
Information overload not using data Can’t get data out unless planned during system design May require additional time/expertise when building system
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
http://ihtsdo.org/fileadmin/user_upload/doc/download/doc_StarterGuide_Current-en-US_INT_20140222.pdf
http://www.himss.org/library/interoperability-standards/pharmacy-health-it-standards
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
4. Use Data for Research/Practice-based evidence
Pros: Big Data (Massive data)
Larger data sets Have full population data
Data mining techniques can be applied Time to get data faster because no need for manual data extraction
Cons: Potential for Privacy breach Can’t get data out if system not designed for it
Can take longer if data are ‘dirty’ Qualitative data might not be used
Might miss context of quantitative data
http://www.himss.org/library/interoperability-standards/pharmacy-health-it-standards
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
Syndromic Surveillance
http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/fluwatch/13-14/w15_14/index-eng.php
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
What Happens when Systems are poorly designed?
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
Avoid this Scenario
Permission obtained from Randy Glasbergen for use in presentations only
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
Software Development Team
Bill
39
Microsoft Corp Circa 1978
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permissionhttp://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/pharmacists-failure-to-check-drug-risks-leads-to-horrible-death-1.2787185
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
What Are Technology-induced Errors?
Technology-induced errors are those sources of error that “arise from the:(a) design and development of a technology
(b) implementation and customization of a technology
(c) interactions between the operation of a new technology and the new work processes that arise from a technology’s use”
(Borycki & Kushniruk, 2008, p. 154)
More specific than unintended consequences which look at all negatives outcomes of use
(Borycki & Keay, 2010; Kushniruk et al., 2005)
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
USP MEDMARX Computer Technology-Related Harmful Errors (2006)
Cause Number
Barcode, medication mislabeled 20
Information management system 1,176
Computer screen display unclear/ confusing 137
Dispensing device involved 3,181
Barcode, failure to scan 114
Computer entry (general, other than CPOE) 10,752
CPOE 24,715
Barcode, override warning 41
Total from176,409 medication error records 43,372
http://www.jointcommission.org/SentinelEvents/SentinelEventAlert/sea_42.htm
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
Model of Technology Induced Error
(Borycki et. al, 2009)
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
Magrabi F1, Ong MS, Runciman W, Coiera E. An analysis of computer-related patient safety incidents to inform the development of a classification. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Nov-Dec;17(6):663-70. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.002444.
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
Misleading Default Values Default values determined by smallest dose in pharmacy
prescribe 10 mg, even though 20 or 30 is most common
New Commands Not Checked Against Previous Ones System permitted entering new dose without canceling old dose
Patients received the sum of the old and new doses
Poor Readability Patient names in small font, names listed alphabetically Name not on all screens
Memory Overload View up to twenty screens to see all of a patient's medications
Complicated Workflow System design conflicted with hospital workflow e.g., nurses kept a separate set of paper records that they entered into
the system at the end of the shift e.g. CPOE “work-around” - Reynolds, Peres, Tatham et al. (2005)
22 Ways a System Caused Medical Errors - Koppel et al. (2005)
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
Ten Commandments for Effective Clinical Decision Support (Bates, et al. 2008)
1.Speed Is Everything- If the decision support takes too long to
appear, it will be useless
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
Ten Commandments for Effective Clinical Decision Support (Bates, et al. 2008)
2. Anticipate Needs and Deliver in Real Time- "Latent needs" are present but have not been
consciously realized
Creswick N, Westbrook JI, Braithwaite J. Understanding communication networks in the emergency department.BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Dec 31;9:247.
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
Ten Commandments for Effective Clinical Decision Support (Bates, et al. 2008)
3. Fit into the User's Workflow
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
Ten Commandments for Effective Clinical Decision Support (Bates, et al. 2008)
4. Little Things Can Make a Big Difference- Usability testing
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
Ten Commandments for Effective Clinical Decision Support (Bates, et al. 2008)
5. Clinicians Will Strongly Resist Stopping- Allow clinicians to exercise their own judgment
and override nearly all reminders and to "get past" most guidelines
6. Changing Direction Is Easier than Stopping
- provide clinicians with best practice alternatives
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
Ten Commandments for Effective Clinical Decision Support
7. Simple Interventions Work Best-fit guideline on a single screen
Cognitive Load: Short-term memory (working memory) is limited in capacity to about seven informational units (7 plus or minus 2 units of information)
Long Term Memory• Schema
Construction• Schema
Automation
Working Memory7 +/- 2 information units
• Interruptions• Information overload• Confusing user interface design
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
7. Simple interventions work best (con’t)e.g., 4 Visual Options
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
Ten Commandments for Effective Clinical Decision Support
8. Ask for Additional Info Only When You Really Need It
get data from the system
9. Monitor Impact, Get Feedback, and Respond be prepared for variation track the frequency of alerts and reminders and user
responses on a regular basis
10.Manage and Maintain Knowledge-based Systems
Create and maintain a ‘rules engine’ to ensure that all decision logic is reviewed at regular intervals
Consider housing knowledge management in Quality & Patient Safety committee
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
How can informaticians work with patient safety experts to support the triple aim?
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
Among the things most EHRs don’t do (per Ron Goldman, CEO, IHI)
they don’t support the basic functions of patient-centered medical homes and “medical neighborhoods”
don’t support robust panel management and the creation of patient registries
they don’t enhance care team communication or handovers in real time
don’t help develop coordination with care managers and community health workers
don’t effectively track abnormal lab test results and their resolution
don’t provide adequate referral to specialists or feedback from specialists back to primary care physicians and patients
don’t support patient-reported outcomes measurement; don’t integrate with patient self-management apps; and don’t provide for rich clinical data mining.
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
http://3mhealthinformation.wordpress.com/2014/12/01/the-ihi-triple-aim-and-informatics/
http://www.healthcare-informatics.com/blogs/mark-hagland/ihi-s-goldmann-making-explicit-link-between-ehrs-and-triple-aim
patient
centre
d
design
Inte
ropera
bili
ty and
usabilit
y
Manage costs of
implementation – long
term view of ROI
Well-designed decision support, with
coordinated effors
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
Summary
eHealth is here to stay
Need to be thoughtful about use and applications
Patient safety and quality experts need to be involved in system design If you don’t design what you want to track, someone will
design it for you
© Leanne Currie, 2015 please do not share without permission
THANK YOU! Questions??