+ physician wellness data- uha clinics may 21, 2015
TRANSCRIPT
+
Physician Wellness Data-UHA ClinicsMay 21, 2015
2+Self-Reported Burnout & High Professional Fulfillment
Burnout High Professional Fulfillment0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35% 32%
20%
28%
20%
UHAStanford
3+Emotional Exhaustion
Emotional Exhaustion0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
1.40 1.32
UHAStanford
Mean
Score
s
4+Depersonalization
Depersonalization0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
0.64 0.62
UHAStanford
Mean
Score
s
5+Perceived Appreciation
Perceived Appreciation0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
2.582.35
UHAStanford
Mean
Score
s
6+Perceived Peer Support
Perceived Peer Support0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
2.792.53
UHAStanford
Mean
Score
s
7+Mission Alignment
Mission Alignment0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
2.39 2.35
UHAStanford
Mean
Score
s
8+Meaningfulness of Clinical Care
Meaningfulness of Clinical Care0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
3.34 3.27
UHAStanford
Mean
Score
s
9+Depression
Depression4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
18.00
20.00
5.44 5.72
UHAStanford
Mean
S
core
s
10+Anxiety
Anxiety4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
18.00
20.00
5.62 5.93
UHAStanford
Mean
Score
s
11+Sleep Related Impairment
Sleep Related Impairment8.00
12.00
16.00
20.00
24.00
28.00
32.00
36.00
40.00
16.30 17.42
UHAStanford
Mean
Score
s
12+Schedule Control
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
1.53
1.93 UHAStanford
Mean
Score
s
13+Job Related Damage to Personal Relationships
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
1.07
1.93 UHAStanford
Mean
Score
s
14+Fruit and Vegetable Consumption & Exercise
95% of UHA clinicians consume five or more fruits and/or vegetables a day (on average)
20% of UHA clinicians obtain 30 mins or more a day of moderate exercise
22% of UHA clinicians obtain 30 mins or more of strenuous exercise a day
+Sleep, Mission Alignment, Control of Schedule: Less Burnout Multiple Variable Logistic Regression
Odds Ratio
(95% CI)
Sleep related impairment
4.08 2.12 – 7.83
Mission alignment 0.66 0.42 – 1.04
Control of schedule 0.50 0.32 – 0.78
Moderate work hours (41 – 50)
1.66 0.65 – 4.25
High work hours (51 – 63) 2.63 0.99 – 6.96
Very high work hours (≥ 64) 0.93 0.26 – 9.38
15
Mode is adjusted for age category and gender.
+Sleep, Mindfulness, Control of Schedule: Less Burnout Multiple Variable Logistic Regression
OddsRatio
(95% CI)
Sleep related impairment
2.83 1.41 - 5.70
Low mindful awareness 1.86 1.21 – 2.85
Control of schedule 0.45 0.29 - 0.71
Moderate work hours (41 – 50)
1.91 0.73 - 4.97
High work hours (51 – 63)
3.48 1.28 – 9.45
Very high work hours (≥ 64) 1.40 0.30 – 6.63
16
Mode is adjusted for age category and gender.
+Appreciation, Peer Support, and Sleep: Higher Professional Fulfillment
Standardized β Significance
Perceived appreciation 0.32 <0.001
Peer support 0.20 0.003
Sleep related impairment -0.19 <0.001
Perceived control of schedule and pace of work
0.13 0.027
Mission alignment 0.14 0.041
17
Estimates are adjusted for age category, gender, and work hours.
+Appreciation, Mindfulness, and Mission Alignment: Higher Professional Fulfillment
Standardized β Significance
Perceived appreciation 0.26 <0.001
Mindfulness 0.26 <0.001
Mission alignment 0.15 0.025
Peer support 0.13 0.053
Perceived control of schedule and pace of work
0.12 0.029
Sleep related impairment -0.12 0.024
18
Estimates are adjusted for age category, gender, and work hours.