powerpoint presentationhome.physics.ucla.edu/calendar/workshops/cfc_fel_2009/...title powerpoint...
TRANSCRIPT
1 Zhirong [email protected]
1LCLS First LasingUCLA, May 2009
LCLS First Lasing ResultsLCLS First Lasing Results
Z. Huang, for the Z. Huang, for the LCLSLCLS Commissioning TeamCommissioning Team
UCLAUCLA Workshop onWorkshop on"X"X--ray Science at the ray Science at the FemtosecondFemtosecond
to to AttosecondAttosecond FrontierFrontier
May 18May 18--20, 2009 20, 2009
2 Zhirong [email protected]
2LCLS First LasingUCLA, May 2009
Linac Coherent Light Source at Linac Coherent Light Source at SLACSLAC
Injector (35Injector (35ºº))at 2at 2--km pointkm point
Existing 1/3 Linac (1 km)Existing 1/3 Linac (1 km)(with modifications)(with modifications)
Near Experiment HallNear Experiment Hall
Far ExperimentFar ExperimentHallHall
Undulator (130 m)Undulator (130 m)
X-FEL based on last 1-km of existing linacXX--FEL based on last 1FEL based on last 1--km of existing linackm of existing linac
New New ee−− Transfer Line (340 m)Transfer Line (340 m)
1.5-15 Å1.51.5--15 15 ÅÅ
XX--ray ray Transport Transport Line (200 m)Line (200 m)
LLNLLLNL
UCLAUCLA
3 Zhirong [email protected]
3LCLS First LasingUCLA, May 2009
LCLS Accelerator Layout
SLAC linac tunnelSLAC linac tunnel research yardresearch yard
LinacLinac--00L L =6 m=6 m
LinacLinac--11L L ≈≈9 m9 mϕϕrf rf ≈≈ −−2525°°
LinacLinac--22L L ≈≈330 m330 mϕϕrf rf ≈≈ −−4141°°
LinacLinac--33L L ≈≈550 m550 mϕϕrf rf ≈≈ 00°°
BC1BC1L L ≈≈6 m6 m
RR5656≈≈ −−39 mm39 mm
BC2BC2L L ≈≈22 m22 m
RR5656≈≈ −−25 mm25 mm DL2 DL2 L L =275 m=275 mRR56 56 ≈≈ 0 0
DL1DL1L L ≈≈12 m12 mRR56 56 ≈≈0 0
undulatorundulatorL L =130 m=130 m
6 MeV6 MeVσσz z ≈≈ 0.83 mm0.83 mmσσδδ ≈≈ 0.05 %0.05 %
135 MeV135 MeVσσz z ≈≈ 0.83 mm0.83 mmσσδδ ≈≈ 0.10 %0.10 %
250 MeV250 MeVσσz z ≈≈ 0.19 mm0.19 mmσσδδ ≈≈ 1.6 %1.6 %
4.30 GeV4.30 GeVσσz z ≈≈ 0.022 mm0.022 mmσσδδ ≈≈ 0.71 %0.71 %
13.6 GeV13.6 GeVσσz z ≈≈ 0.022 mm0.022 mmσσδδ ≈≈ 0.01 %0.01 %
LinacLinac--XXL L =0.6 m=0.6 mϕϕrfrf= = −−160160°°
21-1b,c,d
...existinglinac
L0-a,b
rfrfgungun
21-3b24-6dX 25-1a
30-8c
undulatorundulator
Commission MarCommission Mar--Aug 2007Aug 2007 Commission JanCommission Jan--Aug 2008Aug 2008 Nov 2008Nov 2008……
First lasing at 1.5 Å: April 10, 2009 (first try!)
4 Zhirong [email protected]
4LCLS First LasingUCLA, May 2009
Injector Transverse Projected Emittance <0.5 μm
135 MeV135 MeV0.25 nC0.25 nC
35 A35 A
γεγεxx ≈≈ 0.43 0.43 μμmm
γεγεyy ≈≈ 0.46 0.46 μμmm
Exceptional beam Exceptional beam quality from Squality from S--band band CuCu--cathcath. RF gun. RF gun……
TimeTime--sliced emittance: 0.3sliced emittance: 0.3--0.4 0.4 μμmm
D. DowellD. Dowell
5 Zhirong [email protected]
5LCLS First LasingUCLA, May 2009
σσzz > 25 > 25 μμmm
BC2BC2(4.3 GeV)(4.3 GeV)
BSYBSY(14 GeV)(14 GeV)
TCAVTCAV(5.0 GeV)(5.0 GeV)
550 m550 m
σσzz < 5 < 5 μμmm
old screen usedold screen used
L2L24 wires4 wires
σσzz ≈≈ 2 2 μμmmno
min
alno
min
al
Bunch compression and CSR after BC2 (0.25 nC)
6 Zhirong [email protected]
6LCLS First LasingUCLA, May 2009
Undulator Girder with Motion Control + IN/OUT
Cavity BPM (<0.5 μm)Cavity BPM (<0.5 μm)QuadrupolemagnetQuadrupolemagnet
3.4-mundulatormagnet
3.4-mundulatormagnet
Beam Finder Wire (BFW)Beam Finder Wire (BFW)
CAM-based 5-DOF motion control
CAM-based 5-DOF motion control
beamdirectionbeamdirection
X-translation
(in/out)
X-translation
(in/out)
Wire Position MonitorWire Position Monitor
Hydraulic Level SystemHydraulic Level System
sand-filled, thermally isolated supports
sand-filled, thermally isolated supports
7 Zhirong [email protected]
7LCLS First LasingUCLA, May 2009
BeamBeam--Based Undulator AlignmentBased Undulator AlignmentMeasure undulator trajectory at 4 energies (4.3, 7.0, 9.2, & 13.Measure undulator trajectory at 4 energies (4.3, 7.0, 9.2, & 13.6 GeV)6 GeV)Scale all linac & upstream transport line magnets each timeScale all linac & upstream transport line magnets each timeDo not change Do not change anythinganything in the undulatorin the undulatorCalculateCalculate…… ((MatlabMatlab GUI)GUI)Move quads and adjust BPM offsets for dispersion free trajectoryMove quads and adjust BPM offsets for dispersion free trajectoryIterateIterate……
RESULTRESULT: vary energy by factor of 3 : vary energy by factor of 3 ⇒⇒ trajectory changes by <10 trajectory changes by <10 μμmm
H. LoosH. Loos
8 Zhirong [email protected]
8LCLS First LasingUCLA, May 2009
First Lasing (April 10, 2009)First Lasing (April 10, 2009)
LCLS installed 12 undulator sections and a temporary YAG LCLS installed 12 undulator sections and a temporary YAG screen 50 m downstream (FEE not ready until June)screen 50 m downstream (FEE not ready until June)10 or 11 sections spontaneous (first and third 10 or 11 sections spontaneous (first and third harmonics) + FEL radiation (harmonics) + FEL radiation (IIpkpk = 500 A)= 500 A)
All 12 sections FEL radiation All 12 sections FEL radiation peak current (peak current (IIpkpk = 3000 A)= 3000 A)
9 Zhirong [email protected]
9LCLS First LasingUCLA, May 2009
Undulator Gain Length Measurement at 1.5 Undulator Gain Length Measurement at 1.5 ÅÅ
γεγεx,yx,y = 0.4 = 0.4 μμm (slice)m (slice)IIpkpk = 3.0 kA= 3.0 kAσσEE//EE = 0.01% (slice)= 0.01% (slice)
Recent Results!Recent Results!(25 of 33 undulators (25 of 33 undulators installed)installed)
LLGG ≈≈ 3.3 m3.3 m
1.5 1.5 ÅÅ FEL saturation observed: FEL saturation observed: April 14, 2009April 14, 2009 (after BBA)(after BBA)
Measurement is done by Measurement is done by kicking ekicking e--beam to disrupt beam to disrupt FEL along undulatorsFEL along undulators
10 Zhirong [email protected]
10LCLS First LasingUCLA, May 2009
FEL Energy (YAG)FEL Energy (YAG)
FELFEL--inducedinducedEnergy Loss (BPMs)Energy Loss (BPMs)
←← ~100 meters ~100 meters →→
4.6 MeV4.6 MeV
Pixel sum of xPixel sum of x--ray ray YAG screen CCD YAG screen CCD camera vs undulator camera vs undulator KK--tapertaper
4.6 MeV at 0.25 nC 4.6 MeV at 0.25 nC = 1.1 mJ or = 1.1 mJ or 0.80.8××10101212
photons/pulse (15 photons/pulse (15 GW at 75GW at 75--fs FWHM fs FWHM pulse length)pulse length)
1.5 1.5 ÅÅ
Dumpline Dumpline BPMsBPMs
Undulator Undulator ‘‘Taper ScanTaper Scan’’ Shows 1.1 Shows 1.1 mJmJ of Xof X--raysrays
DogDog--Leg Leg BPMsBPMs
11 Zhirong [email protected]
11LCLS First LasingUCLA, May 2009
YAGS2YAGS2
Laser Laser OFFOFFσσEE//EE << 12 keV12 keV
RF deflector RF deflector ONON
timetimeenergyenergy
Laser Heater Laser Heater Working WellWorking Welladds Landau dampingadds Landau damping
YAGS2YAGS2
Laser: Laser: 40 40 µµJJσσEE//EE ≈≈ 45 keV45 keV YAGS2YAGS2
Laser: Laser: 230 230 µµJJσσEE//EE ≈≈ 120 keV120 keV
12 Zhirong [email protected]
12LCLS First LasingUCLA, May 2009
Laser Heater Improves FEL Power
Laser heater OFFLaser heater OFF
Laser heater OFFLaser heater OFF
20 30 40 50 60 70
106
107
108
109
Active undulator length (m)
FEL
inte
nsity
(a. u
.)
Laser heater offLaser heater at 6.5 uJ
20 30 40 50 60 70
106
107
108
109
Active undulator length (m)
FEL
inte
nsity
(a. u
.)
Laser heater offLaser heater at 6.5 uJ
Laser Laser optimaloptimal
heater offheater offheater onheater on
FEL Gain:FEL Gain:
12 undulators inserted12 undulators inserted(FEL not saturated here)(FEL not saturated here)
13 Zhirong [email protected]
13LCLS First LasingUCLA, May 2009
XX--ray photon energy and bandwidthray photon energy and bandwidth
Use Ni KUse Ni K--edge (8.333 keV) before YAG to measure photon edge (8.333 keV) before YAG to measure photon energy and bandwidthenergy and bandwidthWith 12 undulatorsWith 12 undulators
With saturated FEL, Ni foil burns through in minutes With saturated FEL, Ni foil burns through in minutes estimated single pulse FEL energy: 300 estimated single pulse FEL energy: 300 μμJJ to 3 to 3 mJmJ
−0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
x 107
100*(c−d)/250 ()
YA
GS:
DM
P1:5
00:T
MIT
cha
rge
estim
ate
(Nel
)
Correlation Plot 11−Apr−2009 11:14:43
YAGS:DMP1:500:TMITerf(−(100*(c−d)/250+0.24)*6)*2.5e7+3.5e7
Error function fit yields Error function fit yields σσ=0.1% (FEL BW)=0.1% (FEL BW)
energy (%)
15 Zhirong [email protected]
15LCLS First LasingUCLA, May 2009
PostPost--saturation Tapersaturation Taper
−6 −4 −2 0 2 4 6
x 10−3
−2
0
2
4
6
8
10
XCOR at Undulator 11 (kG−m)
FE
L−
indu
ced
ener
gy lo
ss (
MeV
)
Gain + Saturation taperGaussian fitGain taper onlyGaussian fit
1560 1580 1600 1620 1640 1660 16803.465
3.47
3.475
3.48
3.485
3.49
3.495
3.5
3.505
3.51
3.515
z [m]
K
09 10 11 12 1314 15 16
1718 19
2021 22
23
2425
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
> 8 MeV E> 8 MeV E--lossloss(> 2 (> 2 mJmJ xx--ray)ray)
Scan a corrector in beginning of Scan a corrector in beginning of Undulator to determine total EUndulator to determine total E--lossloss
FEL saturation power can be increased if undulator is tapered toFEL saturation power can be increased if undulator is tapered tostay in resonance with the decreasing electron energy stay in resonance with the decreasing electron energy
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 900
2
4
6
8
10
Ele
ctro
n en
ergy
los
s (M
eV)
Active undulator length (m)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
3.47
3.48
3.49
3.5
3.51
3.52
K
K E-loss
spontaneous+wakefieldspontaneous+wakefield
16 Zhirong [email protected]
16LCLS First LasingUCLA, May 2009
Preliminary 20 Preliminary 20 pCpC resultsresults
0 20 40 60 80104
106
108
1010
Active undulator length (m)
FEL
inte
nsity
(arb
. uni
ts)
20 PC FEL gain measurements (04/24/09) at 0.15 nm
BC2BC2(4.3 GeV)(4.3 GeV)
BSYBSY(14 GeV)(14 GeV)
TCAVTCAV(5.0 GeV)(5.0 GeV)
550 m550 mOTR22
4 wires4 wires
Integrate the bunch form factor over 1-2.5 μm from simulated particles at OTR22.
Photodiode (1-2.5 μm) signal collected from OTR22 (Results from last year)
Recent 20 Recent 20 pCpC FEL results at 1.5 FEL results at 1.5 ÅÅ
preliminarypreliminary
see Y. Ding’s talk
17 Zhirong [email protected]
17LCLS First LasingUCLA, May 2009
Future studiesFuture studies
FEL wavelength tuning: lased down to 1.5 nm with 1FEL wavelength tuning: lased down to 1.5 nm with 1--2 2 mJmJxx--ray energy, do not have sufficient diagnostics (need FEE) ray energy, do not have sufficient diagnostics (need FEE) Gain length dependence on Gain length dependence on IIpkpk & energy spread to & energy spread to understand our slice parametersunderstand our slice parametersGain length dependence on projected emittance, Gain length dependence on projected emittance, ββ--matching, different average beta in undulatormatching, different average beta in undulatorEmittance spoiling studies (using UV laser, OTR)Emittance spoiling studies (using UV laser, OTR)More taper study with 8 more undulatorsMore taper study with 8 more undulatorsLook for nonlinear third harmonic (in FEE?)Look for nonlinear third harmonic (in FEE?)BC2 overBC2 over--compression for chirped SASEcompression for chirped SASEMore extensive 20 More extensive 20 pCpC studiesstudiesOther charge configurations (1 Other charge configurations (1 nCnC, 100 , 100 pCpC, 10 , 10 pCpC……))
18 Zhirong [email protected]
18LCLS First LasingUCLA, May 2009
Summary
LCLS has lased spectacularly and reached FEL LCLS has lased spectacularly and reached FEL saturation at 1.5 saturation at 1.5 ÅÅ well within the designed well within the designed undulator lengthundulator length
These results demonstrate the practicality of 4These results demonstrate the practicality of 4thth
generation xgeneration x--ray FEL sourcesray FEL sources
Thanks LCLS commissioning team (particularly P. Thanks LCLS commissioning team (particularly P. Emma) for sharing these exciting results and slides!Emma) for sharing these exciting results and slides!