© prentice hall 2006 chapter six participative leadership behavior 6-1
TRANSCRIPT
© Prentice Hall 2006
CHAPTER SIX
PARTICIPATIVE LEADERSHIPBEHAVIOR
6-1
© Prentice Hall 2006
Learning Objectives
Describe participative leadership behaviors and provide examples of specific leader behaviors.
Explain why participative leadership can have positive influences on follower behaviors.
Describe skills and abilities that are needed to be an effective participative leader.
Describe the individual and organizational benefits that can result from effective participative leadership.
After reading this chapter, you should be able to do the following:
6-2
© Prentice Hall 2006
Learning Objectives
Identify characteristics of followers that make participative leadership highly effective and characteristics that make it ineffective.
Identify organizational and task characteristics that make participative leadership highly effective and characteristics that make it ineffective.
Describe how leaders can modify situations to increase the effectiveness of their participative leadership.
Explain how leaders can modify followers’ work situations to make followers less dependent on the leader’s participative leadership.
After reading this chapter, you should be able to do the following:
6-3
© Prentice Hall 2006
Participative Leadership
Participative leaders involve followers in the decision processes. Participative leadership includes describing a decision problem to a group of followers and asking for their input on the implications of various alternative solutions already developed by the leader. It also involves holding informal conversations with individual followers to draw their ideas out and listening carefully to understand and incorporate their information into a decision solution.
6-4
© Prentice Hall 2006
Types of Participative Leadership Behavior
ParticipativeLeadershipBehaviors
Obtaininginformation
from followers
Obtaininginformation
from followers
Consultingwith
groups
Consultingwith
groups
DelegationDelegation
Asking foropinions about
alternatives
Asking foropinions about
alternatives
Joint decisionmaking with
followers
Joint decisionmaking with
followers
Consultingwith
individuals
Consultingwith
individuals
6-5
© Prentice Hall 2006
Degrees of Participation
AutocraticDecision
Consensus/GroupDecision DelegationConsultation
LOW HIGHInfluence by Followers
Source: Adapted from Gary Yukl (1998) Leadership in Organizations. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey
6-6
© Prentice Hall 2006
Real Leaders
Real leaders vary their use of different forms of
participation. Some leaders, for example, use
consensus decision making with only one or two
trusted followers; others prefer large group meetings
where all points of view are heard. Some leaders use
delegation only after carefully specifying guidelines
and limits to the decision option chosen and may
require that the final decision be subjected to the
leader’s approval before implementation. Other leaders
give followers complete freedom in arriving at and
implementing a solution. Most leaders use different
combinations of participation at different times,
adapting them to each situation and group of followers.
6-7
© Prentice Hall 2006
Effective Delegation
DO
•Understand your authority & responsibility
•Clearly communicate performance expectations
•Make followers responsible for results
•Delegate challenging responsibilities
•Show confidence in followers’ ability to perform
•Reward accomplishment
AVOID
•Lack of agreement on authority & responsibility
•Lack of understanding of group’s objectives
•Involvement of followers not trained to effectively perform
•Showing a lack of confidence in followers
•Requiring “nothing less than perfection”
•Making followers feel insecure
TO DELEGATE EFFECTIVELY
6-8
© Prentice Hall 2006
Skills, Traits and Sources of Power for Effective Participative Leadership
Skills, Traits & Sourcesof Power for Effective
Participative Leadership
AssertivenessSkills
AssertivenessSkills
Self-MonitoringSkills
Self-MonitoringSkills
LegitimatePower
LegitimatePower
ConflictManagement
Skills
ConflictManagement
Skills
ExpertPower
ExpertPower
ListeningSkills
ListeningSkills
Resource/ConnectionPower
Resource/ConnectionPower
6-9
© Prentice Hall 2006
Major Effects of Participative Leadership
Follower Benefits
• satisfaction with work and leader• increased performancemotivation• less resistance to changeincreased performanceimproved development
Group or Organizational Benefits
•improved quality of decisions•increased performance•smoother implementation of decisions•less resistance to change
6-10
© Prentice Hall 2006
Enhancers of Participative Leadership Effectiveness
SITUATIONAL FACTORSTHAT ENHANCE THEEFFECTIVENESS OF
PARTICIPATIVE LEADERSHIP
SITUATIONAL FACTORSTHAT ENHANCE THEEFFECTIVENESS OF
PARTICIPATIVE LEADERSHIP
FOLLOWERCHARACTERISTICS
FOLLOWERCHARACTERISTICS
TASKCHARACTERISTICS
TASKCHARACTERISTICS
• Job competence• Needs for independence and growth• Internal locus of control• Expect participation
• Job competence• Needs for independence and growth• Internal locus of control• Expect participation
•Important task•Requires followers’commitment•Uncertainty
•Important task•Requires followers’commitment•Uncertainty
GROUP & LEADERCHARACTERISTICS
GROUP & LEADERCHARACTERISTICS
• Group harmony• Trust in leader• Good leader skills in conflict management
• Group harmony• Trust in leader• Good leader skills in conflict management
6-11
© Prentice Hall 2006
Situational Factors That Neutralize Effectiveness of Participative Leadership
SITUATIONAL FACTORSTHAT NEUTRALIZE
EFFECTIVENESS OFPARTICIPATIVE LEADERSHIP
SITUATIONAL FACTORSTHAT NEUTRALIZE
EFFECTIVENESS OFPARTICIPATIVE LEADERSHIP
Large group sizeLarge group sizeTasks that are
highly structuredor complex
Tasks that arehighly structured
or complex
Passive followers, authoritarianfollowers, followers willing to accept
autocratic leadership
Passive followers, authoritarianfollowers, followers willing to accept
autocratic leadership
6-12
© Prentice Hall 2006
Overcoming Factors that Neutralize Effectiveness of Participative Leadership
Task redesign can be used to manipulate the structure and complexity of followers’ tasks, and selection procedures can help determine if specific personality types are well matched with certain jobs.
When leaders face emergency decisions or those with short time deadlines, participation is not effective. In some cases, the leader may be able to extend deadlines or learn of needed decisions sooner and thus provide more time for participative leadership.
Large groups may be split into subgroups. These subgroups can operate with some autonomy but will allow the leader to involve members in useful discussions of decision issues.
Charismatic leadership behaviors may be effective in overcoming apathetic and passive behavior.
6-13
© Prentice Hall 2006
Process Model of the Participative Leadership Process
LEADER PARTICIPATIVENESS• Drawing out & listening to followers• Holding meetings to share decision problems &
gather input• Consulting with followers on decisions• Giving serious consideration to followers’ input• Reaching consensus with followers & leaders as
equals• Delegating decisions to capable followers
FOLLOWER/GROUP PSYCHOLOGICAL
REACTIONS • Satisfaction of needs for competence, self-
control, independence, & personal growth• Satisfaction with supervisor, work, & organization• Motivation & commitment to decisions
FOLLOWER BEHAVIORS AND
OUTCOMES • Increased performance & productivity• Quality of decisions• Development of followers’ potential• Time-consuming, expensive, possible resistance
6-14
SITUATIONAL FACTORS INCREASING LEADEREFFECTIVENESS Enhancers • Task importance• Task requires followers
commitment• Environmental uncertainty• Leader’s conflict
management skills• Group harmony• Followers’ job competence
and information• Followers’ need for
independence• Followers’ internal locus of
control• Expected participation
Substitutes• Many formal rules and
procedures
SITUATIONAL FACTORS DECREASING LEADEREFFECTIVENESSNeutralizers• Highly structured task• Task complexity with
professional followers• Large group size• Short time deadlines• Passive followers• Authoritarian followers• Followers willing to
accept autocratic leadership
© Prentice Hall 2006
Applying the Model of Participative Leadership
1. Are followers highly competent and knowledgeable; do they work on important tasks; is their commitment essential to carry out the leader’s decisions?
2. Do followers value achievement, independence and self fulfillment; do they view themselves as controlling their own lives; feel harmony and trust with the leader; and expect to participate in decisions?
3. Is the leader effective in obtaining follower input and skilled at conflict management?4. Is there much environmental uncertainty?If “yes” to one or more of these questions, followers will expect and value participative
leadership
1. DIAGNOSING THE SITUATION
3. MODIFYING FOLLOWERS & SITUATIONS
Leaders also act to:• Increase formal rules and procedures which
prescribe how to deal with emergencies and short time deadlines
• Redesign tasks to increase their importance & followers’ independence
• Build group harmony• Develop followers’ job competence and
knowledge• Eliminate highly structured tasks & large
group• Reassign followers who are passive,
authoritarian or desire autocratic leadership
2. PROVIDING DIRECTIVE LEADERSHIP Leaders demonstrate participative behaviors with
followers by:• Holding informal conversations with individual
followers to obtain information related to decisions• Sharing decision problems with groups of followers to
solicit their ideas or suggested solutions• Assigning a decision problem to followers who are
competent and desire to handle it• Allowing “air time” for all followers who desire it when
discussing decision problems• Inviting input and discussion on points of
disagreement regarding decision problems• Explaining to followers why ideas or solutions are not
implemented
6-15