.Presentation

Frans Ørsted Andersen Skoleforskning/ DPU / Aarhus Univeristet

Content

1. Introduction to the TA field 2.Publications and reports3.Finnish TA practice and experience4.Evaluation of the Danish TA experiments 5. Theoretical and practical approaches6. Discussion

11-04-23Frans Ørsted Andersen.TA evaluation 2

Publications1. Danish websites:

www.uvm.dk www.skolestyrelsen.dk og www.lærerassistent.dk with evaluation reports

2. Andersen, FØ & Højfeldt, G.: Undervisningsassistenter. Hvad? Hvorfor? Hvem? Hvordan.? Hans Reitzel, 2012

3. Alborz et al. (2009). The impact of adult support staff on pupils London: Social Science Research Unit.

4. Andersen, F.Ø. (2010). Danish and Finnish PISA results in a comparative, qualitative perspective. In Educational Assessment and Evaluation, 22, 159-175. Springer Science

5. Saloviita, T. & Takala, M. (2010). Frequency of co-teaching in different teacher categories. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 25, 4, 389-396. Routledge Group.

11-04-23

Frans Ørsted Andersen.TA evaluation

3

Why TA’s?

11-04-23Frans Ørsted Andersen.TA evaluation 4

Teacher work is seen as increasingly complicated and demandig due to e.g.:

More regulation and evaluation from public authorities and parents

Growing use of and demnad for digital AV / IT teaching technology

More demands for inclusion of pupils with learning difficulties

Growing number of pupils with an immigrant background

The new Danish and Norwegian TA arrangements inspired by the Finnish experience The use of TA’s in

Finland can be seen as a part of the ”Finnish Miracle of Education”.

The Finnish TA is by definition a flexible and practical assistant that teachers increasingly rely on in an ever growing amount of tasks.

11-04-23Frans Ørsted Andersen.TA evaluation 5

In Finland: Practical assistance in the classroom

Pracitical assistance with:

… setting up smart boards, tablets, pc’s etc

… solving conflicts in the classroom

… substitute teaching ….handling breaks and

excoursions …. Homework cafes ….. Speciale needs

education seems to be more and

more necessary for teachers

11-04-23Frans Ørsted Andersen.TA evaluation 6

Official evalutionl of two year 2010-12 Danish TA experiemnt conducted by Rambøll Management, University of Aarhus and VIA University College on behalf of Danish Ministry of Education.

11-04-23Frans Ørsted Andersen.TA evaluation 7

The Danish two year experiment and its evaluation All participating 25

municipalities and their approx 100 schools evaluated

Surveys to all participating teachers and principals

LRS and WBRS to all participating pupils

Case studies with interviews at 5 municipalites.

11-04-23Frans Ørsted Andersen.TA evaluation 8

Results of the evaluation

11-04-23Frans Ørsted Andersen.TA evaluation 9

Overall results of two years of evaluation in 25 Danish municipalities and around 100 Danishs schools: surprisingly positive in spite of massive resistance from DLF (Danish teachers’ Union)

Both school leaders, teachers, TA’s, pupils, parents and consultants are overwhelmingly positive

Clear positive effects on pupils’ well being and learning, both speciale needs pupil and ”normal” kids.

Clear positive effects on teacher well being and feeling of professional competence

Full evaluation report

To be found at www.uvm.dk , Danish Ministry of Education (Ministeriet for børn og undervisning).

11-04-23Frans Ørsted Andersen.TA evaluation 10

Three types of (Danish) Ta’s

1. Teacher Training College students who prolong their studies with one or more years.

2. Pedagogues (infant and preschool staff) 3. Un-skilled staff (”club workers”).

Evaluation show now significant differences between teachers’ perception of the three types. Judgement of TA’s depend on TA personal profile,not on formal background.

11-04-23Frans Ørsted Andersen.TA evaluation 11

Official theoretical approaches

TA’s seen as a way of mediating teachers’ teaching to pupils’ leanring through personal contact and relations.

Mediated learning: Vygotsky, Hundeide, Tzuriel.

”From Dianostical Practice to Identification of Ressources”

11-04-23Frans Ørsted Andersen.TA evaluation 12

Examples of practice: Odense TA’s genally used in:

Large and difficult classes

Periods with cross-curricular projects

science education (”Natur og teknik”)

In art classes

Excoursios and breaks

11-04-23Frans Ørsted Andersen.TA evaluation 13

Example of TA work schedule: NB almost full 37 hours at school /with pupils

11-04-23Frans Ørsted Andersen.TA evaluation 14

Discussion

What are the negative sides to using TA’s?

How should the paradox of overwhelming support for TA-use by teachers who actually are involved and heavy resistance from Teachers’ Unions be seen?

Can the use of TA’s be seen as a way of cutting public spending on schools?

11-04-23Frans Ørsted Andersen.TA evaluation 15

What now?

Negotiations right now in Danish Parliament about new school legislation. The TA arrangement may move from ”experiment” to ”permanent”.

11-04-23Frans Ørsted Andersen.TA evaluation 16