quia...created date 2/21/2010 9:59:30 pm
TRANSCRIPT
.)I
U
-trn
o\
-"--:/uE
>U\JSFJ
CtC^
F\
>UC\G,C\
F\
A)C\
\
F\
$
a;{:11
a <t_
-:<.a;.\
-z-=+;:r;
i-,":
-1-
6u6Y;w
'^ !1 e-
: -mdo',i:iJ
-zO'<.:-!5^
=: rl
;s6
-3F<6ilI H-h;''i'3 6:s.:\
=59f;'ri :-c
.t:5o6wgo-<
o
s i ;FuiiriiiiiiifIiiiiia Ff rlitlgircrfi*f ii i; #
?iliIi
"iiiiiliiflliiii iliiliii*liiiiiiiifliiiiii rig
i ir ri I i{iiiiiiltiiiii1i iiiiiiii iii iiiii iiililiiiigii$
iii;il;ilsgiiiii$+iii$i illiiiiiiii iiiiiii iii
I
rs,',U
' ':'.''tiii r
\SE---| \er:
l.t
iiif{iifiiiii€iiiiils' iisiiiitilitliiit
iiiiiis,iii3*! {iif:}a;? g;i ri$ii:E;iit jEirlFit Ed $i : i; *tit$iiltiit*iiiiiiil
:EE i E g! € ri; 5;;3i ;EE;7i*
rqUzA<&z
zOl-lt'-{
,-1orr.lA<
rr1
I\z\9
fiE6\p-oUcRl=\JE rr.'o rr.tF] A<
(,':j j
'4,
i-."j
V)('"
..\*:s::{:
(-\":.:d
(.t,$
ulE
ll;tiiftisi: rffil;iE;ii r$;?!ilft{ Ffiitf{i rE
tii+Etiit3i !i f +ii f gi ig i
ii i i i iiiiifiii i iiiiiiii
g iiiigii'iifgiiggliIisiil
i
9l>,6
3 .3 n'.9&r-:For.o H Erg.9 Fr- !3d o
ivFk
c [.9 c.Q c Et:kCb€b gCtredcr1.<ciE>!uoJL
; E E.!! !€:H€i;uE:-T'EEE:;EEb{^tll3gW.rk-i5:.!thoo t - e5'tr-o.! c
'5 i'E c s">coo.9'-^.-^
.Lr{u(dr<
t E.E ECs Bs iI= e I ao(Jcdr i] C'i.E g; sEYHCkxN U d 5-'ii3r3El-ccoFlaFVW
power. This is one of the new principles ofequaliry in France. . . .
. . . The science ofgovernment being rhere-
fore so practical in itsel( and intended for
such practical .purposes, a matter which re-
quires experience, and even more experience
than any person can gain in his whole life,however sagacious and observing he may be,
it is with infinite caution that any man ought
Go venture upon pulling down an edifice
which has answered in any tolerable degree for
ages the common purposes of society, or on
building it up again, without having models
and patterns of approved utiliry before his
eyes. . . .
. . . The naturc o( man is intricate; the
obiects of society are of the Sreatest possible
complexity; and therefore no simple dispo-
sition or direction of power can be suitable
eirher to man's nature, or to the quality ofhis affairs.
When ancient opinions of life are taken
away, the loss cannot possibly be estimated.
Frorn that moment we have no comPass to 8ov-ern us; nor can we know distinctly to what port
westeer..... . . Nothing is more certain than that our
manners, our civilization, and all rhe good
things which are connecred with manners and
with civilizarion have, in this European world
. ofours, depended for ages uPon two principles
and were, indeed, the resulr of both combined:
I mean the spirit of a genrleman and the spirit
of religion. . "
Burke next compares the English peoplewith the French revolutionaries,
, . . Thanks to our sullen resistance to inno'varion, thanks to the cold sluggishness of our
national character, we still bear the stamp of -
our forefathers. , . . rilfe are no! the converts ofRousseau; we are not the disciples of Voltaire;
Helvetius has made no Progress amongst us.l
Atheists are not our preachers; madmen are riot
our lawgivers. 1il7e know thar rat have made no
discoveries, and we think that no discoveries
are to bc made, in morality, nor many in rhe
great principles of government. . . . l|Ce fear
God; *e look up with awe to kings, with affec-
rion to parliaments, with duty to magistrates'
with reverence to priests, and with resPect to
nobility. . . .
. . . \fe are afraid to Puc men to live and
trade each on his own private stock of reason'
because we suspect that this stock in each man
is small, and that the individuals would do
better to avail themselves of the general bank
and capiml of netions and ofages.
\
Fs"t(a+D
i\NkKJ
lRousseau. Voltaire, and Helvdtiur were French phi'loropher of the eighteenth century noted,
-respectively,for rduocating deirocracy, attlcking the abuses of the
Old Regime,-and applying r scientific reason to morol
principlc (sce CtePter 2).
Klemens von Metrernich k--
THEODIOLMMFTHEPHILOSOPHES
Two decades of revolutionary warfare had shaped Metternich's political think-ing. After the fall of Napoleon, Metternich worked ro resrore the European bal-ance and to suppress revolutionary movements. In rhe following memorandumto Tsar Alexander I, dated December 15, 1820, Metternich denounces theFrench philosophes for their "false s1's366s" and "fatal erors' that weakenedthe social fabric and gave rise to the French Revolution. In their presumption,thc philosophes forsook the experience and wisdom of the past, trusting onlytheir own thoughts end inclinations.
The progress of the human mind has been ex-remely rapid in the course of rhe last threecenturies. This progress having been lcceler-aced more rapidly than the growth of wisdom(the only counrerpoise to passions and ro er-ror); a revolution prepared by rhe false sysrems. . . has ar lasc broken our. . . .
. . . There were . . . sorne rhen [rhe philo-rophesJ, unhappily endowed with greac ralenrs,who felt rheir own strength, and . . . who hadthe arr to prepare and conduct men's minds tothe triumph of their detestable enterprise-ancnrerprise all the more odious as it was pursuedwithout regard to results, simply abandoningthemselves to the one feeling of hatred of Godand of His immurable moral laws.
France had the misforrune to produce thegreatesr nurhber of these men. Ir is in hermidst thar religion and all thar she holds sa-
cred, that morality artd aurhority, and all con-nected with them, have been aracked with a
steady and systemaric enirnosiry, and ir is rhere
that the weapdn of ridicule has been used wirhrhe rnosr ease and success.
Drag through the mud rhe name of God and
the powers instirured by His divine decrees,
and the revolution will be prepared! Speak ofa
social contract,l and the revolution is accom-
plished! The revolution was already complered
in the palaces of Kings, in the drawing-roomsand boudoirs of certain cities, while among thegrear mass of the people it was still only in a
srate of preparation. ., .
. . . The French Revolution broke our, and
has gone rhrough a complete revolutionary cy-cle in a vefy.short period, tvhich could onlyhave appeared long ro its victims and to itsconcerhporaries. . . .
. . . The revolutionary seed had penerratedinto every counrry. . . . It was greatly developedunder the riginc of the military despotism ofBonaparre. His conquests displaced a numberof laws, institutions, and cusroms; brokethrough bonds sacred among all nations,
strong enough to resist time itself; which is
more .than can be said of cersain benefits con-
ferred by these innovacors.
lThc social conrrrcr rheory consisted cssentielly of thefollowing principles: (l) peoplc voluntarily cnter into en
igreemenr to establish a political community; (2) govern-ment rests on the consent ofthe governed: (3) pcople pos-
ress narural freedom end cquelity, which they do noc
surrender to the strte. These principles qrcre used to chal-lenge the divine right of kings lnd absolure nonarchy.
P*+ & Gprft*tE
c
=LJo0)
=ct)
-,"\1.,\)
.t
Ac\-.L:T-
it' .
F:l**l ii*isEsE iii *a i9 F I
f,iFi is;iiisiii iiiiiiiiiru
i;liilliigiiijiiiiiiiii$iii;liillil,iiEiiilEglltiiliilii
"<)Jtn
iiigtll
\"9
dCL
;; ?i f lE;
3:a:3ar;(, .{l
(EL,3 I'p 9,c(!O
3(g.cL 6TeeEtrsl.E:pit-e5F.occE6
FGtrcOU
G,oo
llga!AJ
o-a0
c
q,oo6
6
b)ot6;gE
llii i iiiliiii ii t ilii iii iii, il iiiI
i giiiiiiii i?iiiiili ! iliiiiiI iili ii
;tiiiiiiiii: [+Fc ! t tiEl:si;
FIilitfrEEEs
rHir$iiiiiiii* I tgHf rFrii il*s r ir H'iiiiiii3 F iiit'rui* *r !a
',ifiiiiiiif8s;; !
- ! f .i3 !E EE;3!
n ; iilE6 e?f X;.= :ET Fi.H ti! tPr EtriEii;:t E E; a! fi;€ sf i iEtEb- €s-:rEiIs!EirT
",
E T; E};€$;EHEiI EI
;?Ei{ftiiElEgiji€ fiiiIiFEiE iEi:i,, IE E ifl:':g EI EfriEf
[r
Heinrich von Gagern
1%,,+ + r""&; .
THE CALL FOR GERMAN UNITYHeinrich von Gagern (1799-1880) was a liberal who helped to organize thetr:'r'ryt
-+ Bwcbenschaft,o,-Grr^^,nr,ud"n, frarernities dedicated to national unity. Inthe passage that follows, von Gagern explained the narionalist purpose of theGerman student movernenr.
Ic is very hard to explain the spirir of the stu_o.ent movemenc ro you. bur I shall try, eventhough I can only give you a fe.u characrer-rsttcs. . . .
. . . Those who share in this spiric have[aJ. . , rendency in their srudenc lifl, Love ofFatherland is their guiding principle. Theirpurpose is ro make a bet.r.. future for theFarherland, cach es best ,,ti can, to spriadnational consciousness, or .o use the rnuchridiculed--and maligned Germanic expression,more folkishness, and ro work foi b.,...constirurions. . . .
. . . \$7e want drore sense of comtnunityamong the several stares of Gerrnany, gra",a,unity in rheir policies and in rheir princfules ofgovernmenr; no separare policy for each srare,but rhe nearest possible relations with one an_orher; above all, we wanr Germany ro be con-sidered oac land and rhe German people oncpeople. In rhe forrns of our srudenr comrade-ship we show how we wanr to approach this asnearly as possible in the real world. R.egionalfrarerhities are lorbidden, and we live ;1 | 6.r_fnah comradeship, one people in spirir, as we
wanc it for all Germany in realiry. We give ourselves the freesr of constitutions, jusi as *eshould like Germany ro have the freesr possibleone, insofar as that is suirabte for the Germanpeople. !0e want a consrirurion for rhe peoplethat firs in with the spirir of rhe rimes andwirh rhe people's own level of enlightenment,rarher than what each prince gives his peoplerccording to whac he likes and what ,...,., i,i,private inrerest. Above all, we wanr rhe princesto undersrand and ro follow rhe princijle chatthey exist for rhe counrry and nor che counrryfor them. In facr, the prevailing view is thatthe constirurion should nor colne from rhe in-dividual srares ar rll. The main principles ofthe German constirution should apply co allscares in common, and should be expressed bythe German federal assernbly. This constitu-tion should deal nor only wirh the absolure ne-cessities, like fiscal administration and justice,general administrarion and church and mili_tary affairs and so on; this consriturion oughtto be extended ro rhe educacion of rhe young,et leasc ac rhe upper age levels, and ro manyorher such things.
mJ