-rproperty contains one wetland that is in a closed depression, does not have a surface water...

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Chicago District

APPLICANT: Hartz Construction Company PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: Fidler, Frieders and Cibulskis Properties in Aurora, Kane County, Illinois (Sections 10, 11 and 13, T38N R8E)

FILE NUMBER: 200501091 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLIZTED: [XI Ofice [XI~ield

Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For sites regulated under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved JD is an appealable action. (33 CFR 33 1.2)

Based on available information: There are no waters on the project site. There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.

[XI There are waters of the United States on the project site. 17 There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.

Basis of Jurisdictional Determination:

There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport

interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and tlow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(I))

The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) [XI The presence of a tributary to an interstatc water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) [XI The presence of wetlands adjacent2 ( bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US,

except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) [XI The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudtlats, sandtlats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds).

Other: Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed [XI U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: AURORA NORTH. [XI U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: AURORA NORTH, HA 70. [XI USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Kane County. [XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic M,aps: AURORA NORTH, 1993.

U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrangles: U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrangles:

[XI Aerial Photographs (Name & Date):DigiAir, no date [XI Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: KANE COUNTY [XI Site Visit Conducted on: September 1,2005 by Jaimee W. Hammit of the USACE, Chicago District [XI Other information: FEMA Firm, Wetland ~el /neat ion Reports, dated August and ~ e ~ t e m b e r 2005, prepared by

CBBEL

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): The Fidler Property contains waters of the United States. Wetland 2 is under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) due to its connection to Indian Creek. There is surface tlow that continues south through a swale and under the railroad tracks to Indian Creek. Indian Creek is a tributary of the Fox River, a navigable waterway. Wetlands 1 ,3 and 4 on the Fidler Property do not have a surface water tributary system connection and are isolated. Therefore, Wetlands I . 3 and 4 on the Fidler Property are not under the jurisdiction of the USACE. The Frieders Parcel does not have any wetlands or waters of the United States under the jurisdiction of the USACE. The Cibulskis Property contains one wetland that is in a closed depression, does not have a surface water tributary system connection and is isolated. Therefore, the wetland on the Cibulskis property is not under the jurisdiction of the USACE.

Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction (33 CFR 328 and 329): Ordinary High Water Mark indicated by:

clear, natural line impressed on the bank destruction of terrestrial vegetation 17 the presence of litter and debris shelving

changes in the character of soils other: [XI wetland boundary

Basis for Declining Jurisdiction:

[XI Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR. 328.3(a)(l), 328.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) [XI Area under consideration is likely to have been juristlictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

Area under consideration is likely have been juri!idictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on the basis. of 328.3(a)(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale]

Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries [XI This office concurs with your wetland delineation report dated August 2005 , prepared by CBBEL.

This office does not confirm your wetland boundary. /. __--- .--

Recommended by: .I> Date: -r - I Approved by: Date: / ,) 9 / a

'wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria est;lblished in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (i.e., occurrence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology). Processes fur delermining wctlands on agricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).

'Wetlands separated from other waters of the U.S. by man-made dikes or barriers, natural river berms. beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.

INFOKMATION SHEET DETERMINATIONS OF NO JURISDICTION FOR ISOLATED, NON-NAVIGABLE, INTRA-STATE WATERS RESU1,TING FROM U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION IN SOLID WASTE AGENCY O F NORTHERN COOK

COUNTY V. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

DISTRICT OFFICE: Chicago FILE NUMBER: 20050109 1

REGULATORY PROJECT MANAGER: Jaimee Hammit Date: 01/06/06

PROJECT REVIEWDETERMINATION COMPLETED: In the office (YA-) Date: 01/06/06 ,4t the project site (YIN) Date: 09/01/05

PROJECT LOCATION INFORMATION: State: Illinois County: Kane Center coordinates of site by latitude & longitudinal ccwrdinates: FidlerILat: 41-46-37, Lon: 88-16-8,

FriederslLat: 41-47-37, Lon: 88-18-8, CibulskisILat: 41-47-26. Lon: 88-17-42 Approximate size of sitdproperty (including uplands & in acres): 20, 10 and lo? Name of waterway or watershed: Indian CreeWFox Rtver

SITE CONDITIONS:

Migratory Bird Rule Factors : Use Best Professional Jud rnent

Determination

cross state lines? Is or would be used as habitat for endangered species? I u Is used to irrigate crops sold in interstate commerce? lCbeck appropriate boxes that best describe potential for applicability

1 nomnavigable, intra-stale aquatic resource area.

TYPE OF DETERMINATION: Prelinunary Or Approved (X1

OPITIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SUPPORTING NJD (e.g., paragraph 1 - site conditions; paragraphs 2-3 - rationale used to determine NJD, including information reviewed to assess potential navigation or interstate commerce connections; and paragraph 4 -site information on waters of the U.S. occu;ring onsite): -


APPLICANT: Beritus, Inc PROJECT LOCATIONNVATERWAY: LaGrange Road and South of LaPorte Road in Mokena, Will County, Illinois FILE NUMBER: 200500684 PROJECT REVIEW COhZPLETED: (XI Office OFie ld

Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For Sites regulated under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved JD is an appealable action. (33 CFR 331.2)

Based on available information: q There are no waters on the project site.

There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project site. (XI There are waters of the United States on the project site. q There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.


There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. U The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(I))

The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) (XI The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other ,water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) q The presence of wetlands adjacen? ( bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US,

except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) q The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats,

sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds). q Other:

Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed [XJ U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: TINLEY PARK. (XI U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: TINLEY PARK, 152. (XI USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Will County

U. S. Geological Survey 7.5-Minute Topographic Maps: TINLEY PARK, 1993. U. S. Geological Survey 7.5-Minute Historic Quadrangles: U. S. Geological Survey 15-Minute Historic Quadrangles:

(XI Aerials (Name & Date): Mokena, 1997 q Advanced Identification Wetland Maps:

Site Visit Conducted on: Other information:

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): The tributary located on subject property drains into Hickory Creek. Hickory Creek flows into the Des Plaines River, a navigable waters of the U.S.

Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction (33 C F R 328 and 329): Ordinary High Water Mark indicated by:

clear, natural line impressed on the bank q destruction of terrestrial vegetation U the presence of liner and debris shelving q changes in the character of soil q other: (XI wetland boundary


q Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFF. 328.3(a)(l), 328.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) q Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria q Area under consideration is not likely have been .jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on the basis of 328.3(a)(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale]

Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries This office concurs with your wetland delineation report dated , prepared by .

q This office does not confirm your wetland boundary

- 5 -. Recommended by: Date: 1 7 L0-n 0 b

-. - . 'J Approved by: Date: 7 - 7 . r c f 'wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria established in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (i.e., occurrence of hydroihytic vegetatioq hydric soils and wetland hydrology). Processes for determining wetlandson agricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).

' Wetlands separated from other waters of the U S , by man-made dikes or barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.


APPLICANT: ISTHA PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: 1-90 Plaza 7 (Marengo) at Coon Creek in Coral Township, McHenry County, IL

F ILE NUMBER: 200501058 P R O J E C T REVIEW COMPLETED: (XI Office OFie ld

Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD)(For sites regulated under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved JD is an appealable action. (33 CFR 331.2). An approved JD is an appealable action. (33 CFR 33 1.2)


IXI There are waters of the United States on the project site. There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.


There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328,3(a)(I)) The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2))

IXI The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) (XI The presence of wetlands adjacent2 ( bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US,

except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) The presence of an isolated water (e.g.. intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows. playa lakes, or natural ponds). Other: Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed IXI U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: MARENGO SOUTH. (XI U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: MARENGO SOUTH, HA 463. (XI USDA National Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Mcl-ienry County.

U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: MARENGO SOUTH, 1968. U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrangles: U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrangles: Aerial Photographs (Name & Date): Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: . Site Visit Conducted on:

IXI Other information: Wetland Delineation Report dated August 1 1 . 2005, and prepared by HDR, Inc.

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): Discharge of fill material into wetlands and tributaries of Coon Creek tributary of Kishwaukee River.

Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction (33 C F R 328 and 329): Ordinary High Water Mark indicated by: (XI clear. natural line impressed on the bank IXI destruction of terrestrial vegetation

the presence of litter and debris shelving (XI changes in the character of soil other: (XI wetland boundary


Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFK 328.3(a)(l), 328.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria Area under consideration is likely have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on the basrs of 328.3(a)(3) [anach copy of HQ rationale]

Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries This office concurs with your wetland delineation repon: dated , prepared by

(XI This office does not confirm your wetland boundary

Recommended by: - Date: /3 Tad06 - .- Approved by: Date: / 8 S F - , - ~ 6

'Wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria estihlished in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (i.e., occurrenee of hydromytic vegetatioq hydrie soils and wetland hydrology). Processes for determining wetlandson agricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland Dellneation Manual (1987).

Wetlands separated from other waters of the US, by man-made dikes or barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes. and the like are also adjacent.


APPLICANT: Nicolet Properties VI, LLC PROJECT LOCA'TION/WATERWAY: Property located west of Route 47 and and south of Main Street in Elbum, Kane County. Illinois (SW 114 of Section 20. T39N R7E)

FILE NUMBER: 200600059 PROJECT REVIEW C0MPLE:TED: [XI Office [XIField


Based on available information: There are no waters on the project site.

n There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project site. [XI There are waters of the United States on the project site.

There are both waters of the United States and non-jul-isdictional waters on the project site.


There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States prrsent on the project site. The presence of wafers which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport

interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e.. navigable waters of the US.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(l))

The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wel:landsl). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) [XI The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) [XI The presence of wetlands adjacentz ( bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US.

except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudtlats,

sandtlats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds). Other: Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed [XI U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: SUGAR GROVE. [XI U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: SUGAR. GROVE, HA 227. (XI USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soi! Survey for Kane County. [XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: SUGAR GROVE, 1993.

U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Qu3dr;~ngles: U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrangles:

(XI Aerial Photographs (Name & Date): DigiAir. Fall 2004 [XI Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: KANE COUNTY (XI Site Visit Conducted on: December 1,2005 by Jaimee W. Hammit of the USACE, Chicago District [XI Other information: FEMA FIRM

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): Blac1;beny Creek and the wetland contiguous with i t (designated as Area I in the V3 Wetland Delineation and Assessment Report) are under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Blackberry Creek is tributary to the Fox River. a navigable waternay. Therefore, Area I has a surface water tributary system connection with a navigable waterway and is under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction (33 CFR 328 and 329): Ordinary High Water Mark indicated by: [XI clear, natural line impressed on the bank destruction of terrestrial vegetation

the presence of litter and debris shelving changes in the character of soils other:

(XI wetland houndary


Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(I). 3?8.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria Area under consideration is not likely have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

Headquarters declined to approve juridiction on the bas~s of 328.3(a)(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale]

Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries [XI This office concurs with your wetland delineation report dated October 7,2005 , prepared by V3 Corn anies

This office does not contirm your wetland boundary. I P - - c.- -

Recommended by: 2 Date: / /%,/"' I -

Approved by: .- Date: / , / [ ? , f e e

'wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria est.lblished in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (i.e., occurrence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology). Processes for determining wetlands on agricultural lands may vary from methods descrrbed in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987.1.

' Wetlands separated from other waters of the IJS. by man-made dikes or barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.


APPLICANT: Westminster Swanson Land Partners LLC PROJECT LOCATIONWATERWAY: McHenry County

FILE NUMBER: 200600195 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: (XI Office OFie ld

Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD)(For sites regulated under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved ID is an appealable action. (33 CFR 33 1.2). An approved JD is an appealable action. (33 CFR 33 1.2)

Based on available information: (XI There are no waters on the project site.

There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project site. q There are waters of the United States on the project site. q There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.


[XI There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. q The presence of waters which are currently used, or wen: used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport

interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and tlow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(I))

q The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) q The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5))

The presence of wetlands adjacen? ( bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US, except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7))

q The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, )rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats. sandtlats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes. or natural ponds).

q Other: Section I0 waterway.

Information Reviewed (XI U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: MCHENRY. (XI U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: MCHENRY, HA 255. [XI USDA National Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for McHenry County. (XI U. S. Geologieal Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic blaps: MCHENRY. 1992.

U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrangles: q U. S. Geological Survey I5 Minute Historic Quadr;mgles: (XI Aerial Photographs (Name & Date):2001.2002: 2004 (XI Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: MCHENRY COUNTY..

Site Visit Conducted on: Other information:

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): No wetlands or waters of the United States are present on the project site.

Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction (33 CFR328 and 329): Ordinary High Water Mark indicated by:

clear, natural line impressed on the bank destruction of terrestrial vegetation the presence of liner and debris shelving changes in the character of soil other: wetland boundary


(XI Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(1), 328.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) Area under consideration is likely to have been juri:jdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

[XI Area under consideration is likely have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria


Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries This office concurs with y o u wetland delineation report dated , prepared by This office does not confirm your wetland boundary

-3 -- - Recommended by: Date: 1-Y 9 4 6 Approved by: - Date: - - - 6

'Wetlands are idenlified and delineated using the methods and criteriaestablished in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (i.e., occurrence of hydromytic vegetation hydric soils and wetland hydrolog)). Processes for determining wellandson agriculrural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).

' We~lands separated from other waters of the U.S. by man-made dikes or barriers, natural river berms, beaeh dunes, and the like are also adjaeent.


APPLICANT: Hunters Gate, LLC PROJECT LOCATIONlWATERWAY: Property located west of Geneva Road. north of Roosevelt Street and south of Home Street in St. Charles, Kane County, Illinois (SE 114 of Section 34, T40N R8E)

FILE NUMBER: 200600304 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: [XI Ofice OField

Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For sites regulated under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved JD is an appealable action. (33 CFR 331.2)

Based on available information: [7 There are no waters on the project site.

There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project site. [XI There are waters of the United States on the project site. [7 There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.


[7 There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport

interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(I))

The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands1). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) [XI The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) [7 The presence of wetlands adjacentZ (bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US,

except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) The presence of an isolated water (e.g.. intrastate lakes. rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats.

sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds). [7 Other: [7 Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed [XI U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: GENEVA. [XI U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: GENEVA, HA 142. [XJ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Kane County. [7 U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: [XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrangles: GENEVA, 1949. [7 U. S. Geological Survey I5 Minute Historic Quadrangles:

Aerial Photographs (Name & Date):USGS, April 10. 2002 [XJ Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: KANE COLlNTY [7 Site Visit Conducted on: [XI Other information: FEMA FIRM. Negative Wetland Findings Report, dated January 9,2006, prepared by ENCAP,

Inc.

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): The unnamed tributary on-site is tributary to the Fox River, a navigable waterway. Therefore, the unnamed tributary on-site is under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction (33 CFR 328 and 329): Ordinary High Water Mark indicated by: [XI clear, natural line impressed on the bank 0 destruction of terrestrial vegetation [7 the presence of litter and debris [7 shelving [7 changes in the character of soils [7 other:

wetland boundary


[7 Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR :128.3(a)(l). 328.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) [7 Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdi~:tional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria [7 Area under consideration is likely have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

[7 Headquarters declined to approve jurisd~ction on the basis of 328.3(a)(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale]

Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries [XI This office concurs with your wetland delineation report dated January 9 ,2006 , prepared by ENCAP, Inc.

This office does not confirm your wetland boundary.

J'. - , / / p . ' Approved by: Date: 3 /oc;-. 'wetlands are identitied and delineated using the merhods and criteria establi!;hed in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (ie., occurrence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology). Processes for determining wetlands on agricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Welland Delineation Manual (1987).

'Wetlands separated from other waters of Ihe U.S. by man-made dikes or barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT U.S Army Corps of Englner:rs, Ch~cago Dlstrict

APPLICANT: Jim Velos PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: Property located off Glen Oak Drive in Sleepy Hollow, Kane County, Illinois (SW 114 of Section 28, T42N R8E)

FILE NUMBER: 200600321 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: [XI Office [XIField

Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For sites regulated ~inder 33 CFR 320-330). An approved JD is an appealable action. (33 CFR 331.2)

Based on available information: There are no waters on the project site. There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project sile.

[XI There are waters of the United States on the project siti:. There are both waters of the United States and non-,jurisdictional waters on the project site.


There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. The presence of waters which are currently used. or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport

interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and How of the tide (i.e.. navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(l))

The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands1). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) (XI The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5))

The presence of wetlands adjacent2 (bordering. contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US. except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) The presence of an isolated water (e.g.. intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats.

sandflats. wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes. wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds). Other: Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Invm?ntory:

(XI U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ELGIN. HA 147. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Kane County.

[XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: ELGIN, 1992. U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrangles: U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrangles: Aerial Photographs (Name & Date):

@, Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: [XI Site Visit Conducted on: January 10,2006 by l a i n ~ e ~ ~ . Hammit of the USACE, Chicago District

Other information:

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): The on-site tributary is Jelkes Creek, which is a tributary of the Fox River, a navigable waterway. Therefore, lelkes Creek is under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction (33 CFR 328 and 329): Ordinary High Water Mark indicated by: (XI clear, natural line impressed on the bank destruction of terrestrial vegetation

the presence of litter and debris shelving changes in the character of soils other: wetland boundary


Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(l), 328.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria Area under consideration is likely have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria


C o d ~ r m a t i o n of Wetland Boundaries 17 This office concurs with your wetland delineation report dated . prepared by .

This office does not confirm your wetland boundary. I I

./ 5 J

Recommended by: - Date: !/24/06 - -.

Approved by: Date: ( , / z 4 / c > 6

'Wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria established in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (i.e., occurrence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology). Processes for determining wetlands on agricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).

Wetlands separated from other waters of the U.S. by man-made dikes or blrriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.

APPRO\'ED .JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DEClSlON DOCUMENT U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Chicago District

APPLICANT: Ejause Custom Homes PROJECT LOCATION~VATERWAY: 7S4il Ironwood Drive. Napervrlle. DuPage County, Illinois 1 West Branch DuPage River Watershed

FILE NUMBER: 200600249 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: [XJ Office [XJField

Approved .lurisdictional Determination (JD) (For sites regulated under 33 CFR 320-3301 An approved JD 1s an appealable action. (33 CFR 331.2)

Based on available information: q There are IIO waters on the project site.

There are non-Jurisdictional waters on the project srte. [XJ Thcre are waters of the United States on the project site. q There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.


There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project s~ te . The presence of waters whrch are currently used, or were r:sed in the past. or may be susceptible for use to transport

Interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ehh and flow of the tide (i.e.. navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(l))

The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(?)) [XI The presence of a trihutary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CPK 328.3 (a)(5))

Tile PI-esence of wetlands adjacent' ( bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US, except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 ia)(7)) The presence of an isolated water (eg., intrastate lakes, rit'ers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats. sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadoums. playa lakes, or natural ponds).

I7 Other: I] Section 10 waterway.

Information Keviewed [XJ U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: NAPERVILLE. [XJ U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: NAPER\JILLE, HA 154 [XI USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for DuPage County. [XJ U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 M~nute Topographic Maps: NAPERVILLE. 1993. q U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historlc Quadra~gles:

U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrangles: Aerial Photographs (Name Bi Date): Advartced Identification Wctland Maps: Stte Visit Conducted on: 20 January 2006 Other information. December 9, 2005 EnCap, Inc. Wetland Delineation Report

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): The subject unnamed tributary is connected to the West Branch DuPage R~ver, which flows into the DuPage River, which is a tribul.ary of the Illinois River, a navigable in-fact waterway.


q clear, natural line impressed on the bank Odestruction of terrestrial vrgetatlon q the presence of litter and debris Oshelving q changes in the character of soil other IXI wetland houndary


Unable to confirm the presence of uaters listed in 33 CFR ?28.3(a)(1), 328.3ia)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisclictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria Area under consideration is likely have been juri!;dictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule crlteria


Confirmation of WetIand Boundaries [XJ Tlits office concurs wtth your wetland deltneat~on report dated December 9, 2005, prepared h) EnCap, Inc

Thts office does not confirm your yetland bougary -N - . ' I .

Recommended i Date: 2 W O ! Approved by: - - Date:

lirl . \ 'Wetlands are identified an d tnealed using the methods and criteriaesral)libhrd in the Corps Wetland Deli occurrence of hydrophylic etalion, hydric soils and wetland hydrology) Processes for determining wetlands on a,sjcultural lands may vary from methods described in Lhe Corpb Wrtland Delineation Manual (1987)

' Wellands separated from other waters of the U.S. hy man-made dikes or Inrriers, narural river berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.

I APPROVED .IURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT U.S. Arnm Corps ol'Engineers, Chicago District

APPLICANT: Rot's Building & Development. Inc. PRO.IEC'r LOCATIONIWATERWAY: 7S610 Donwood Drive, Naperville. DuPage County. Illionis I East Branch DuPage River Wiltershed

FILE NUMBER: 200600235 PROJECT IUWLEW COMPIBTED: (XI Office n ~ i e l d

Approved .Turisdictional Determination (JD) (For sites regula~ed under 33 CFR 320-3301, An approved ID is an appealable action. (33 CFR 33 1.2)

Based on available inlbrmation: There are 110 waters on the project site. There urr non-jurisdictional waters on the projecl site. There are waters or the Un~ted States on the project sit,:. Tl~ere are both waters olthe United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.

Basis of Jurisdictional Deternlination:

There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. The presence of waters which are currently used. or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport

interstate or fore~gn commerce, including all waters which are subject Lo the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters or the U S . ) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(I))

The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetl;mdsl). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2j) (XI The presence of a triburary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) IXI The presence of wetlands adjacent2 ( bordering. contipuou:i, or neiphhoring) to interstate or other waters of the US,

except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (aj(7)) The presence or an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes. rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats. sandflats, wetlands, sloughs. prairie potholes, we( meadow!;, playa lakes, or natural ponds). Other:

q Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed [XI U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: WHEATON.

U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: WHEATON, HA 148. [XI USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for DuPage County. (XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: WHEATON, 1993.

U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minule Historic Quadrangles: U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrangles:

q Aerial Photographs (Name & Date): Advanced Identification Wetland Maps:

[XJ Site Vtsit Conducted on: 20 J a n u q 2006 (XI Other information: Wetland Delineation Report by EnCap. Inc, dated December 1,2005.

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): The subject pond w~th wetland fringe, and the unnamed tributary which the pond is adjacent and contiguous with, flows off site and into the East Branch DuPage River, which is a tributary of the DuPage River, which flows into the Illinois River, a navigable in-fact waterway.

Lateral Extent of .Turisdiction (33 CFR 328 and 329): Ordinary High Water Mark indicated by:

[XJ clear, natural line impressed on the hank ~ d e s t m c t i o n of terrestrial vegetation the presence of litter and debris (XIshelving changes in the character of soil [I other wetland boundary


n Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328,3(a)(l), 328.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria Area under consideration is likely have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria


Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries [XJ This office concurs with your wetland delineation report dated December I, 2005, prepared by EnCap, Inc

This office does not confirm your wetland boundary. A- . 1 -

Recommended

Approved by: - Date:te:

'Wetlands are identified an and criteria established in the Corps Wetland Delineat Manual (87 Manual) (i.e., occurrence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydnc soils and wetland hydrology). Processes for determining wetlands on agricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineat~on Manual i1987).

' Wetlands separated from other waters of the L1.S by man-made dikes or barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.

API'BOVED JURISDICI'IONAI~ 1)ETEIUVIINATION 1)ECISION 1)OCUMENT U.S. Arm) Corps of Engineers, Chicago District

APPLICANT: Kackert and Associates. Inc. I1ROJECT LOCATIONIWATERM'AY: South side of Butlerfield Road, just west of Routc 59 in Warrenville. DuPage County, Illinois

FILE NUMBER: 200600160 PROJECT REVIEW C:OI\IPIAETED: [XI Office [XIField

Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For sites regulated under 33 CFR 320-3301. An approved JD is an appealable action. (33 CFR 331.2)

Based on available information: q There are no waters on the project site. q There are non-jurisdictional waters on thc project site. [XI There ore waters of the United States on the project site.

There are both waters o l the United Slates and non-jurisdictional waters on the project slte.


There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. The presence of waters wh~ch are currelitly used, or were .tsed in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport

interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters whlch are ;ub;ect to the ebb and tlow of the tide ti.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(I))

The presence of interstate waters (including Interstate wetlands1). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) [XI The presence of a tributary to an interslate waler or other -water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) [XI The presence of wetlands adjacent' ( bordering, contiguot~s. or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US.

except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 ia)(7)) The presence of an isolated waler (eg. , intrastate lake:,, ri,iers, streams (including intermltlenl streams), mudflats, sandtlats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds). Other: Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed [XI U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventoly: NAPERVILLE. [XI U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: NAPERVILLE, HA 154. [XI USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service So11 Survey for DuPage County. [XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topograpluc Maps: NAPERVILLE, 1993.

U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrangles: U S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrangles:

13 Aerial Photographs (Name & Date): Advanced Identification Wetland Maps:

[XJ Site Visit Conducted on: January 20. 2006 [XI Other information: December 9, 2005 Wetland Delineation Report by EnCap, Inc.

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): The s~ibject wetland is adjacent and conliguous to a tributary to Ferry Creek, which tlows into the West Branch DuPage Rive]-, which tlows into the DuPage Rive]-, which is a tributary to the Illinois River, a navigable in-fact waterway.

Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction (33 CFR 328 and 329): Ordinary High Water Mark ~ndicated by:

clear, natural line impressed on the bank destruction of terrestrial vegetation the presence of litter and debris Oshelving changes in the character of soil other

[XI wetland boundary


Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(l), 326.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) Area under consideration IS likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria Area under consideration is likely have been jurisdictional under PI-e-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiclion on the bas~s of 328.3(a)(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale]

Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries [XI This office concurs with your wetland delineation report dated December 9,2005, prepared by EnCap Inc

This office does not confirm your wetland boundary. nn , . . - -

Recommended Date: f-n81L1@6 Approved by: - - Date:

v V 'Werl~nds are identified and delineated u s i i ~ f the methlds and crlleria established in thc Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) ( i e , occurrence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and welland hydrology). Processes for delermining wetlands on agricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineal~oli Manual ( 1 087)

' Wetlands separated from other waters oithe U.S. by inail-lnadc dikes or barriers, natural rlver berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacenl.

AI'I'RO\'EI) JbRISDICTIOh'AL l)ETEI(RIINATIOY DECISIOh DOCUhlENT U S AI my Corps o l Engln~ers, Cli~cago D~srrlcl

,IPPLICANT: lllino~s Housing Developmenl Authority 1'ROJEC:T LOCATIONIWATERWAY: West of Maple Avenue and South of Lake Street in Bloomingdale. DuPage County. lll~nois / Mtacham Creek

FILE NUMBER: 200600202 PROJECT IU3VIEH1 COMPLETED: [XJ Office [XJField

Approved Jurisdictional Determination (.TI)) (For siles regulated under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved JD is an appealable action. (33 CFR 331.21

Based on available information: Tl~ere are 110 waters on tlie prqject site.

17 There ore non-jurisdict~onal &,ate'-s on the project site. (XJ There are waters of the United Stales on the project sile.

TIIPT? arc both waters o l he United States and non-julisdictional waters on the project site.


There are no jurisdictional waters of tlie Unlted States present on the project site. The presence of waters which are currently used. or were used in the past, 01- may be susceptible for use to transport

interstate or foreign commerce, rncluding all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable walers of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(I j i

The presence or interstate waters (including Interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) The PI-esence of a tributary to an interslate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)[S)) The presence of' wetlands adjacent' ( bordering. contiguous, or ne~ghboring) to interstate or other waters of the US, except for those wetlands adJacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) The presence or an isolated water (eg. , Intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudtlats, sandtlats, wetlands, sloughs, prair~e porholes, wet meadows. playa lakes, or natural ponds). Other:


Information Reviewed (XI U. S. Fish and Wildlil'e Service National Wetland 1n.ientory: LOMBARD. (XI U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: LOMBARD, HA 143. (XI USDA Natural Resoul-ces Conservation Service Soil Survey for DuPage County. (XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: LOMBARD, 1993. q U. S. Geological Survey 7 5 Minute Historic Quadrangles:

U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrarlgles: 17 Aerial Pliotographs (Name & Date):

Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: -

IXI Site Vislt Conducted on: January 20, 2006 [XJ Other information: Hey & Associates, Inc. November 2005 Wetland Delineation Report

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): The subject vegetated swale runs north and into a large pipe under Lake Street which discha'-ges into Meacham Creek behind an auto yard. Meacham Creek tlows into the East Branch DuPage River, which connects to die DuPage River. which flows into the Illinois River, a navigable ~n-fact waterway.

Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction (33 CFR 328 and 329): Ordinary High Water Mark indicated hy:

q clear, natural line impressed on the bank ndestruction of terrestrial vegetation the presence of litter and debris Oshelving

q changes in the character of soil other [XI wetland boundary


Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3[a)(l), 328.3(a)(2), or 3283(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisclictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria Area under consideration is likely have been juri:,dictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

q Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on the basis of 3283(a)(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale]

Confirniation of Wetland Boundaries (XI This office concurs with your wetland delineation report dated November 2005, prepared by Hey & Associates, Inc. q T h ~ s offic '--- n-t mniirm your wetland boundary.

. *

Recommended by: Date: 5 3 M o d Approved by: r r r , ~ : , . , - , h 4b - 'Wetlands are identified a& delineated using the methods and criteria eslatllished in the Corps Wetland ~elineatiobklanual(8? Manual1 (i.e., occurrence of hydrophyric vegeration, hydric soils and wetland i~ydrology). Processes Tor determining wetlands on a~ricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual ( 1987).

'Wetlands separated lrom other waters of [he 1J.S. by man-made dikes or t,arriers. natural ri\,er berms, beach dunes, and the like are also ildjacen[.


APPLICANT: Naperville Church of Christ PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: 2035 E. 751h Street, Naperville, DuPage County, lllinois I East Branch DuPage River Watershed

FILE NUMBER: 200600266 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: [XI Office [XIField


Based on available information: [7 There are no waters on the project site. U There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project site. [XI There are waters of the United States on the project sire. [7 There are both waters of the United States and non-jutisdictional waters on the project site.


q There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. The presence of waters which are currently used. or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport

interstate or foreign commerce. including all waters which are :subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(l)) [7 The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) [7 7he presence o f a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) 11 The presence of wetlands adjacentZ ( bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US,

except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) [7 The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams). mudflats,

sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows. playa lakes. or natural ponds). [XI Other: Detention Basin and Roadside Ditch [7 Section I0 waterway.

Information Reviewed [XI U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: ROMEOVILLE. [XI U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ROMEO'VILLE, HA 146. [XI USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil !iuwey for DuPage County. [XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: ROMEOVILLE. 1993. q U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrangles: [7 L;. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrangles: [7 Aerial Photographs (Name &Date): q Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: [XI Site Visit Conducted on: 20 January 2006

Other information: EnCap, Inc. Wetland Delineation lleport dated December 9, 2005

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): The suhject detention basins and ditch are connected to an unnamed tributary of the East Branch DuPage River, which flows to the DuPaije River, which is a tributary of the Illinois River, a navigable in-fact waterway.


[XI clear, natural line impressed on the bank [XIdestmction of terrestrial vegetation q the presence of litter and debris nshelving

changes in the character of soil [7 other wetland boundary


Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(l). 328.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) q Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria [7 Area under consideration is likely have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

q Headquarters declined to approve ~urisdiction on the basts of328.3(a)(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale]

Cofl~rmation of Wetland Boundaries [XI Ihis office concurs with your wetland delineation reporl dared December 9,2005, prepared by EnCap, Inc. q This office does not contirm your wetland boundary.

Recommended by: Date: ZY O?W'O~ L

Approved by: c - Date: wm% 'wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria established in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (i.e., occurrence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology). P~:ocesses for determining wetlands on agricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).

'Wetlands separated from other waters of the U.S. by man-made dikes or barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Chicago District

APPLICANT: Capital Custom Homes, Inc. PROJECT I,OCATION/WATERWAY: Indian CreeWKildeer

FILE NUMBER: 200500984 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: [XI Ofice [XIField


Based on available information: q There are no waters on the project site. q There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project site. [XI There are waters of the United States on the project :site. q There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.


q There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. q The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e.. navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(I)) q The presence of interstate waters (including interstate w'etlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) [XI The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) q The presence of wetlands adjacent2 ( bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US,


sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds). q Other: q Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed q U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: q U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: . [XI USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Sod Survey for Lake County. [XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topograph~c Maps: LAKE ZURICH. 1993. q U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrangles: q U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Hlstonc Quadrangles: [XI Aerials (Name & Date):Lake County 1939,2000, B 2004; PhotoMapper 2001.2002. & 2004 IXI Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: LAKE COUNTY. IXI Site Visit Conducted on: January 19. 2006 q Other information:

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): The drainageway and wetland delineated have a tributary surface connection to the Des Plaines River via Central Slough and Indian Creek. The Des Plaines River is a navigable water of the United States below Hoffman Dam. therefore the delineated wetland and drainageway are also waters of the United States under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Army. These areas are also part of Lakce County ADID wetland 170 and therefore high quality aquatic resources.


q clear, natural line impressed on the bank ndestruction of terrestrial vegetation q the presence of litter and debris nshelving q changes in the character of soil q other

wetland boundary


q Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(1), 328.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) q Area under constderatton is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria q Area under consideration is likely have been jur~sdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

q Headquarters decltned to approve jurisdiction on the basis of 328.3(a)(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale]

Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries [XI This office concurs with your wetland delineation report dated July 25, 2005, prepared by Raisanen & Associates, Inc. q Thts office does not confirm your wetland boundary

Recommended by: -5- Date:

Approved by: Date: I

'Wetlands are Identified and delineated using the methods and criteria established i n the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (i.e., occurrence of hydrophyt~c vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology). Processes for determining wetlands on agricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).

' Wetlands separated from other waters of the U.S. by man-made dikes or barriers, natural rivcr berms, beach dunes, and Lhe like are also adjacent.


APPLICANT: Bank One Trust Company, NA PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: West of Golf Road, South of Hill Top Road In Long Grove, Lake County, Illinois (SE Section 19, T43N, R 11E)

FILE NUMBER: 200600285 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: IXJ Office OFie ld


Based on available information: q There are no waters on the project site. q There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project site. [XI There are waters of the United States on the project site. q There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.


q There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. q The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(I)) q The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands1). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) q The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) q The presencc of wctlands aujacent2 ( bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US,

except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 C:FR 328.3 (a)(7)) q The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, ribers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats,

sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds). q Other: q Section I0 waterway.

Information Reviewed q U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: IXJ U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: WHEELING, HA 71.

USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Lake County. q U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: q U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrangles: q U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrangles: IXJ Aerials (Name & Date): 2002 q Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: q Site Visit Conducted on: rn Other information: June 25, 2003

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): The one wetland identified on the project site drains north to Kildeer Creek, a tributary to Indian Creek, which flows into the Des Plaines River, a navigable water.

Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction (33 C F R 328 and 329): Ordinary High Water Mark indicatcd by:

q clear, natural line in~pressed on the bank ndestruction of terrestrial vegetation q the presence of litter and debris nshelving q changes in the charzcter of soil 17 other rn wetland boundary


n Unable to confirm the oresence of waters listed in 33 CFR 128.3(aUT). 328.3(aM2). or 328.3(aU4) throueh 328.3(aU7) - . .. . . ,. .. . .. . & . .. . Area under conj~deration is likel) to have been jur~sdlct~onal under pre-SWANCC Mlgrator) B ~ r d Rule criter~a Area under conj~derat~on is likel) hate heen jurijtlict~onal under pre-SWANCC Migrator) Bird Rule criteria

q Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on the basis of 328.3(a)(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale]

Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries q This office concurs with your wetland delineation report diited , prepared by . rn This office does not confirm your wetland boundary I /

Recommended by: -5 Date: Iby/06 / 1 Approved by: Date:

'Wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria established in the Corps Wetlard Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (i.e., occurrence of hydromytic vegetation hydric soils and wetland hydrology). Processes for determining wetlandson agricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).

Wetlands separated from othcr waters of the U.S. by man-made dikes or barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.


APPLICANT: Village Redevelopment Group, LLC PROJECT LOCbTIONnVATERWAY: Deep LakeiLake Villa

FILE NUMBER: 200600286 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: (XI Ofice NField

Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For sites regulated urider 33 CFR 320-330). An approved I D is an appealable action. (33 CFR 33 1.2)

Based on available information: q There are no waters on the projcct site. q There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project site. [XI There are waters of the United States on the project site. q There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.


There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. I h e presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport

interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(I))

I h e presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands1). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) (XI The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5))

The presence of wetlands adjacentZ ( bordering, contiguou!;, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US. except for those wetlands adjacent to othcr wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7))

q The presence of an lsolated water (e.g.. intrastate lakes, rivsers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands. sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes. or natural ponds).

q Other: Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inv(?ntory: U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: .

[XI USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Lake County. (XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: ANTIOCH, 1993.


(XI Aerials (Name & Date):Lake County 1939.2000, & :!004: PhotoMapper 2001,2002, & 2004 [XI Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: LAKE COUNTY. (X1 Site Visit Conducted on: January 19, 2006

Other information:

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): Deep Lake is a tributary to the Fox River, a navigable water of the United States, via Sequoit Creek and is therefore also a water of the United States under the jurisdiction or the Department of the Army.

Lateral Exlenl of Jurisdiction (33 CFR 328 and 329): O r d i n q High Water Mark indicated by:

clear, natural line impressed on the bank ndestruction of terrestrial vegetation the presence of litter and debris ashelvine

q changes in the character of soil other (XI wetland boundary


q Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFK 328.3(a)(l), 328.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) Area under consideration is likely to have been juristiictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria Area under consideration is @ likely have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on the basil; of 328.3(a)(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale]

Confirmalion of Wetland Boundaries [XI This office concurs with your wetland delineation report dated December 5.2005, prepared by Phoenix Environmental.

This office does not confirm your wetland boundary

Recommended by: - 5- Date:

Approved by: - Date:

'Wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and eriteria established in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (ie.. cceurrence of hydrophytie vegetation, hydrie soils and wetland hydrology). Rwesses for determining wetlands on agrieultural lands may vary iro~n methods dcscribed in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).

'Wetlands separated from other waters of the U S . by man-made dikes or barriers, natural river berms, kaeh dunes, and the like are also adjacent.

APPROVED .JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT U.S. Army Corps of Eng~neers, Chicago District

APPLICANT: Village of Grayslake PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: Mill CreeWGrayslake

FILE NUMBER: 200500398 PROJECT REVIISW COMPLETED: IXJ Omce n ~ i e l d

Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For sites regu1ate.d under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved JD is an appealable action. (33 CFR 33 1.2)

Based on available information: q There are no waters on the project site. q There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project sile.

There are waters of the United States on the project site. q There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.


q There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. q The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and tlow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(l)) q The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) IXJ The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) [XI The presence of wetlands adjacent2 (bordering. contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US,

except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) q The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudtlats,

sandtlats, wetlands, sloughs. prairie potholes, wet mead~)ws. playa lakes, or natural ponds). q Other: q Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed q U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: q U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: . [XI USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Lake County.

U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: GRAYSLAKE, 1993. q U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrangles: q U. S. Geological Survey I5 Minute Historic Quadr;mgles: [XI Aerials (Name & Date):Lake County 1939,2000,& 2004; PhotoMapper 2001,2002, & 2004 [XI Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: LAKE COUNTY. q Site Visit Conducted on: q Other information:

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): The wetland on the project site is adjecent to Mill Creek, a tributary of the Des Plaines River. The Des Plaines River is a navigable water f teh United States below Hoffman Dam. therefore Mill Creek and the wetland in question are both waters of the United Slates under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Army.


q clear, natural line impressed on the bank ndestruction of terrestrial vegetation the presence of litter and debris nshelving changes in the character of soil q other

[XI wetland boundary


q Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(l), 328.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) q Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

Area under consideration is likely have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on the hasis of 328.3(a)(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale]

C o d ~ r m a t i o n of Wetland Boundaries [XI This office concurs with your wetland delineation report dated September 2003, prepared by CH2M Hill. I7 This oftice does not confirm vour wetland boundaw / / - - 5,-

Recommended by: Date:


'wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria established in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (i.e.. occurrence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology). Processes for determining wetlands on agricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).


APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DECISlON DOCUMENT U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Chicago District

APPLICANT: El Puerto Resuarant PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: Fox Lake

FILE NUMBER: 200500475 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: (XI Office O F i e l d


Based on available informallon: q There are no waters on the project site. q There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project sit,:. (XI There are waters of the United States on the project site.

?here are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.


There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the projcct site. The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport

interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which arc subjcct to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(l))

The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR328.3 (a)(2)) [7 The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(S))

The presence of wetlands adjaccnt2 ( bordering, contiguc'us, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US, except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7))

[7 The presence of an isolatcd water (e.g.. intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats. sandflats. wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes. wet me;~do'xs, playa lakes, or natural ponds).

q Other: [XI Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed n U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: q U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: .

USDA Natural Resources Conscrvation Service Soil Survey for Lake County. (XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: FOX LAKE, 1993. q IJ. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrruigles: [7 U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute H~storic Quadrangles:

Aerials (Namc & Date):Lake County 1939,2000 & 2004; PhotoMapper 2001,20028~ 2004 [XI Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: LAKE COlINTY. q Sitc Visit Conducted on: [7 Other information:

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): Fox Lake is a navigable water of the United States under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Army.


clear, natural line impressed on the bank [XIdestmction of terrestrial vegetation [XI the presence of litter and debris shelving

changes in the character of soil other [7 wetland boundary


Unable to confirm the presence of waters listcd in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(l), 328.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) 0 Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria q Area under consideration is likely have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on the bass of 328.3(a)(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale]

Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries h i s o f concurs with y o u wetland delineation r e d a d , prepared by -/' This office does not confirm your wetland boundary - -

Recommended by: --- Date:

Approved by: - Date:

'Wetlands are idenlified and delineated using the methcds and criteria establislied i n the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (i.e., occurrence uf hydrophyric vegetation, hydric soils and u,etland hydrology). Processes for determining wetlands on agricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987)

'Wetlands separated from other waters of Ihe U S . by man-made dikes or barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.

APPROVLD JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Chicago District

APPLICANT: USDA Forest Service - MNTP PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: Prairie Creek Bridges PC #3 and PC # I6 within MNTP in Wilmington Will County, IL FILE NUMBER: 200600347 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: Office (XIField

Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For Sites regulaled under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved ID is an appealable action. (33 CFR 33 1.2)


There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project site. [XJ There are waters of the United States on the project !site. [7 There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.


[7 There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. 'l'he presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport

interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which art: subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(l)) [7 The presence of interstate waters (including intcrstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) [XJ The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) [7 The presence of wetlands adjacent2 ( bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US.

except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) [7 The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats,

sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes. wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds). [7 Other: [7 Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed IX] U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: WILMINGTON.

U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: WILMINGTON, 306. [XJ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Will County. IX] U. S. Geological Survey 7.5-Minute Topographic Maps: WILMINGTON, 1993.

U. S. Geological Survey 7.5-Minute Historic Quadrangles: . U. S. Geological Survey 15-Minute Historic Quadrangles: Aerials (Name & Date): Advanced Identification Wetland Maps:

IX] Site Visit Conducted on: 23 JAN 2006 [7 Other information:

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): Propo:;ed Discharge of fill material into Prairie Creek tributary to the Kankakee River.

Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction (33 C F R 3 2 8 a n d 329): Ordinary High Water Mark indicated by: (XI clear, natural line impressed on the bank destruction of terrestrial vegetation

the presence of litter and debris IX] shelving IX] changes in the character of soil other:

wetland boundary


Unable to confirm the preser~ce of waters listed in 33 CI'R 328.3(a)(I), 328.3(a)(2), or 328,3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria Area under consideration is likely have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria


Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries This office concurs with your wetlnnd delineation report dated January 20,2006, prepared by Robert A. Hommes

(MNTP). This office does not confirm your wetland boundary

- -__--- .----.. Recommended by: Date:

- -1- __A-

__-- Approved by: Date: 2 r 2 4 ~ - t.m ,

U

'Wetlands are identified and delineacd using h e lnethDds and criteriaestiabllshed In the Corps Wetlard Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (ic., occurrence of hydro$ytic vegetatiorl hydric soils and wetland hydrology). Processes for determining wctlandson agricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland DelineationManual (1987).

Wetlands separated from other waters of the U.S. by man-made dikes or barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMIVATION DECISION DOCUMENT L.S. Army Corps of Engi~rccrs. Chicago District

APPLICANT: Nicor Gas PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: Waukegan RLverlCity of Waukegm

FILE NUMBER: 200600089 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: [XJ Ofice (XIField

Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For sites regulated under 33 CFR 320.330). An appruved JD is an appealable action. (33 CFR 331.2)


[XI There are waters of the United States on the project sitc There are both waters of the United States and non-jur~!.dictional waters on thc project site.


q There are nojurisdictionnl waters of the United State, procnt on thc projcct site. Thc prcsence of waters which are currently used, or wel-e used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport

interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are s~~bject to the ebb and tlow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(l))

The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetl;mdsl). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) (XI The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(S)) [XJ The presence of wetlands adjacent2 ( bordering, contiguoc~s, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US.

except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 C'FR 328.3 (a)(7)) q The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrast~te lakes, rl\.crs, streams (including intermittent streams), rnudflats,

sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes. wet rneadolr .;. playa lakes, or natural ponds). Other: Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland In\,cntory: U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: .

5 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Lake County. 5 U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: ZION, 1993.

U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadra~lsles: . U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadranples:

(XI Aerials (Name & Date):Lake County 1939,2000, & 2004; PhotoMapper 2001,2002, & 2004 [X/ Advanced ldentitication Wetland Maps: LAKE COIIYTY. (XI Site Visit Conducted on: August 25,2005

Other ~nformation:

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): The ueiland area delineated on the project site is part of the Waukegan River system and is tributary to Lake Michigan, a navigdlle water of the United States. Therfore the wetlands on the project site are also waters of the United States under the jurisdicLic~ti of the Department of the Army.


clear. natural line impressed on the bank adestruction of terrestrial vegetation the presence of litter and debris Oshelving changes in the character of soil 0 other

(XI wetland boundary

Basis for Ueclining Jurisdiction:

q Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFIl 3?8.3(a)(l), 328.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) Area under consideration is likely to have heen jurisdic~ional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria Area under consideration is likely have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

lleadquilrters declined to approve jurisdiction on the basis or'328.3(a)(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale]

Conlirmation of Wetland Boundaries (XI This oftice concurs with your wetland delineation reporl d;ited August 10, 2005, prepared by

This office does not confirm your wrtland boundaq


Approved hy: Date: 1 ' 'wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria es~abli~lred in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (i.e., a-currence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wrll;tnd hydrolog).). I'rocesses for determining wetlands on agricultural lands may vary from methods described i n the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (19871.

'Wetlands separated from other waters of the US. by man-mide dikes or hi~~liers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and Ule like are also adjacent.

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETEIWINATION DECISION 1)OCUMENT U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Chicago District

APPLICANT: Catholic Bishop of Chicago PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: Aptakisic CreeWLong Grove

FILE NUMBER: 20060025 1 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: IX1 Ofice BField


Based on available information: There are rro waters on the project site.

[7 There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project site. (XI There are waters of the United States on the project site. [7 There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.

Rasis of Jurisdictional Determination:

There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the projcct site. The presence of waters which are currently used. or were used in the past. or may he susceptible for use to transport

interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and [low of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(1))

The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5))

(XI The presence of wetlands adjaccnt2 ( hordering, condguc~us, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US, except for those wellands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7))

[7 The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudtlats, sandtlats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds).

[7 Other: Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed 13 U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory:

U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: . IXI USDA Natural Resources Conscrvation Service Soil Survey for Lake County. (XI U . S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: WHEELING, 1993.

U. S. Geological Survcy 7.5 Minute Historic Quadramgles: [7 U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrangles:

Aerials (Namc & Date):Lake County 1939,2000 & 2004; PhotoMapper 2001,2002 & 2004 (XI Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: LAKE COIJNTY. (XI Sitc Visit Conducted on: January 5,2006

Other information:

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): All of the wetlands and waters on site are tributary to, or adjacent to a tributary of Aptakisic Creek, whlch 1s tr~butary to the Des Plaines River. The Des Plaines River is a navigable water of the United States below Hoffman Dam, therefore the wtlands and waters on site are also waters of the United States under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Army.

Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction (33 CFR 328 and 329): Ordinary High Water Mark indicated hy:

clear, natural line impressed on the bank Odestmction of terrestrial vegetation q the presence of litler and debris Oshelving

changes in the character of soil q other (XI wetland houndary


n Unable to confirm the oresencc of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(ai(l), 328.3(a)(2). or 328.3(a)(4) throueh 328.3(a)(7) - . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . Area undcr consideratton is Ithel) to hate hecn jur~sdictronal under prc-SWAXCC Mlgraror) Bird kulc crltcna

[7 Arc3 undcr con.\~dcrstlon 1s I~hcly h ~ v c hccn juclsd cuond under pre-SWAXCC Mtpra~ory Bird Rule criterta


Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries This office concurs with your wetland delineation repon dated , prepared by .

(XI This office does not confirm your wetland boundary 1 I ,,~ - _-

Recommended by: .. Date:

Approved by: Date:

'Wetlands are idenlifiedand delineated using the methods and criteria established in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (is., wcurrence of hydrophylic vegetation. hydric soils and wetland hydrology). hocesses for determining wetlands on agricul~nl lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).

' Wetlands separated from other waters of the U.S. by man-made dikes or lbarrrers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT U.S. A m y Corps of Engineers. Chicago District

APPLICANT: Lake Forest Academy PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: West Of Lake Forest Academy In Lake Forest, Lake County, Illinois (Sections 3 I and 36, T44N. R12E)

FILE NUMBER: 2006003 17 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: Office UFie ld


Based on available information: There are no waters on the project site. There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project slte. There are waters of the United States on the project site.

q There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.



interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(l)) q The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands1). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) [XI The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) q The prcscnce of wetlands adjacent2 ( bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US,

except for those wetlands adjacent toother wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) q The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats,

sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds). Other: Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed q U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory:

U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: . IX] USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for I.ake County. (XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: LIBERTYVILLE, 1993.

U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadriingles: q U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrangles: - IX] Aerials (Name B Date): 2002


q Site Visit Conducted on: Other information:

Rationale for Basis (applies ta any boxes checked above): Wetl.md 1, as identified in your delineation repon, is under the jurisdiction of this office becausc it drains east to the North Branch of the Chicago River, which is a navigable water.


clear, natural linc impressed on the bank ndestruction of terrestrial vegetation the presence of litter and debris Oshelving

q changes in the character of soil q other (XI wetland boundary


q Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(l). 328.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328,3(a)(7) Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

q Area undcr consideration is likely have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria


Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries This office concurs with your wetland delineation report dated July 25.2005. prepared by Hey and Associates, Inc. This office does not confirm your tetland boundary a ,/- 4 1

Recommended by: *L Date: y / / o c Approved by: - Date:

'Wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria establi:ihed in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (i.e., occurrence of hydro&ytic vegetation hydric soils and wetland hydrology). F'rocesses for determining wetlandson agriculmral lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland DelineationManual (1987).

Wetlands separated from other waters ofthe U.S. by man-made dikes or barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.


APPLICANT: Village of Lincolnshire PROJECT LOCA'TIONIWATERWAY: Des Plaines RiverILincolnshire

FILE NUMBER: 200600238 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: (XJ Office OFie ld

Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For sites I-egulated under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved JD is an appealable action. (33 CFR 331.2)

Based on available information: There a r e no waters on the project site.

q There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project site. [XI There are waters of the United States on the project site.

There a r e both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.


q There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport

interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(l))

The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) [XI The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) [XI The presence of wetlands adjacent' ( bordering. contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US,

except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 (3FR 328.3 (a)(7)) q The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats,

sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds). U Other: q Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed q U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: q U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: . (XI USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Lake County. [XI U. S . Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: WHEELING, 1993. q U . S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadra~~gles: q U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrangles: [XI Aerials (Name & Date):Lake County 1939.2000 & 2004: PhotoMapper 2001, 2002 & 2004 [XI Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: LAKE COUNTY. q Site Visit Conducted on: q Other information:

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): The wetland area and channel are adjacent and tributary to the Des Plaines River. a navigable water ol'the United States below Hoffman Dam, and therefore are also waters of the United States under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Army.


[XI clear, natural line impressed on the bank [Xldestmction of terrestrial vegetation (XJ the presence of litter and debris nshelving q changes in the character of soil q other [XI wetland boundary


Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(1), 328.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) 17 Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria



Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries [XI This office concurs with your wetland delineation report dated June 16, 2005, prepared by Christopher 8. Burke, Ltd.

This office does not confirm your wetland boundary / / - /

Recommended by: D a t e : l,/27/0b Approved by: Date:

'Wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria established in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (i.e.. occurrence of hydrophytic vegetation. hydnc soils and wetland hydrology). Processes for determining wetlands on agricultural lands may valy from methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).

'Wetlands separated from other waters of the U.S. by man-made d~kes or harriers. natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETEKMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT U.S. Army Corps of Enginelm, Chicago District

APP1,ICANT: Waukegan Park District PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: Waukegan RiverILake Michigan

FILE NUMBER: 2005001 12 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: (XI Office OField

Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For sites regulated under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved JD is an appcalable action. (33 CFR 331.2)


[XI There are waters of the United States on the project sitz. There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project slte.


Therc are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. n The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transpon interstatc or foreign commerce. including all waters which are :subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(l))

The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands1). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) q The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(S))

The presence of wctlands adjacent2 ( bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US, except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) The presence of an isolated watcr (e.g., intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandtlats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds). Other: Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland 1n.ventory: U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Lake County.

[XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: WAUKEGAN. 1993. U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrangles:

q U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrangles: Aerials (Name & Date):l.ake County 1939,2000 & 2004; PhotoMapper2001.2002 & 2004 Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: LAKE COUNTY. Site Visit Conducted on:

q Other information:

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): The Waukegan River is tributary to Lake Michigan, a navigable water ofthe United Statcs, and therefore is also a water of the IJnited States under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Army.


[XI clear, natural line impressed on the bank adestmction of terrestrial vegetation [XI the presence of littcr and debris Oshelving q changes in the character of soil q other

wetland boundary


Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(l), 328.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) though 328.3(a)(7) Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria Area under consideration is likely have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

Headquaters declined to approve jurisdiction on the basis of 328.3(a)(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale]

Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries This office concurs with your wetland delineation report dated , prepared by .

(XI This office does not confirm your wetland boundap I

Recomn~ended by: - 5- Date:


'wetlands are identitied and delineated using the methods and criteria eslablished in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (i.e., occurrence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and welland hydrolog:/). Processes for determining wetlands on agricullural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).

'Wetlands separated from other waters ol'the U.S. by man-made dikes or barners, natural river brrn~s, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.


APPLICANT: Watts Marina PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: Pistakee LakeIFox Lake

FILE NUMBER: 200500080 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: [XI Office OField

Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For sites reg11latl:d under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved JD is an appealable action. (33 CFR 33 1.2)


q There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project site. [XI There are waters of the United States on the project site. q There are both waters of the United States and non-~urisdictional waters on the project site.


q There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport

interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(l)) q The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) 17 The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5))

The presence of wetlands adjacent2 ( bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US, except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds).

q Other: [XI Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland 'Inventory:

q U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: . [XI USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Lake County. [XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: FOX LAKE, 1993.


IXI Aerials (Name & Date):Lake County 1939,2000 & 2004; PhotoMapper 2001. 2002 & 2004 IXI Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: LAKE COUNTY. q Site Visit Conducted on:

Other information:

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): Pistakee Lake is a navigable water of the United States under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Army.


[XI clear, natural line impressed on the bank [XIdestmction of terrestrial vegetation [XI the presence of litter and debris nshelving [XI changes in the character of soil other q wetland boundary


q Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(l), 328.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) q Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria q Area under consideration is likely have been ju:risdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria


ConIirmation of Wetland Boundaries q This office concurs with your wetland delineation report dated , prepared by [XI This office does not confirm your wetland boundary

F Recommended by: Date:

Approved by: Date: / 'Wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria established in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (i.e., occurrence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology). Processes for determining wetlands on agricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987 I.

Wetlands separated from other waters of the U.S. by man-madc dikes 01. barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT U.S. Army Corps of Eng~ineers, Chicago District

APPIJCANT: Ken Lauer PROJECT LOCATIONWATERWAY: Fox LakeIFox Lake

FILE NUMBER: 200S000.54 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: (XI Office OField

Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For sites regulated under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved JD is an appealable action. (33 CFR 33 1 .?)

Based on available information: q There are no waters on the project site.

There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project site. (XI There are waters of the United States on the project site. q There are both waters of the United States and nonjurisdictional waters on the project site.


Tnere are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. q The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e.. navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(I))

The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) q The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(S)) q The presence of wetlands adjacent2 (bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US,

except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (3:3 CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) q The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats,

sandtlats. wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes. wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds). q Other: (XI Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: . USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Sod Survey for Lake County. U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic bIaps: ANTIOCH, 1993. U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrangles: _ U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Qu~drangles:

[XI Aerials (Name & Date):Lake County 1939.2000 & 2004; PhotoMapper 2001,2002 & 2004 Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: LAKE COUNTY. Site Visit Conducted on:


Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): Fox Lake is a navigable water of the United States under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Army.


(XI clear, natural line impressed on the bank [Xldestruction of terrestrial vegetation [XI the presence of litter and debns Oshelving

changes in the character of soil other I] wetland boundary


Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFK 328.3(a)(I), 328.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

q Area under consideration is l~kely have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria


Contirmation of Wetland Boundaries q This office concurs with your wetland delineation report dated . prepared by (XI This office does not confirm your wetland boundary

Recommended by: =--r Date:

Approved by: Date: /

'Wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria established in the Corps Wetland Delineadon Manual (87 Manual) (i.e., occurrence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology). Processes for determining wetlands on agricultural lands may vary from methods deseribed in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).

Wetlands separated from other waters of the U.S. by man-made dikes or harriers, natural river berms, beach dunes. and the like are also adjacenl.


APPLICANT: Georse Krizanovic PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: Bangs LakeNauconda

FILE NUMRER: 200500034 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: Office n ~ i e l d

Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For sites regulat~zd under 33 CFR 320-3301, An approved JD is an appealable action. (33 CFR 331.2)

Based on available information: q There are no waters on the project site. (7 There are non-~urisdictional waters on the project sire. [XJ There are waters of the United States on the project site. (7 There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.


(7 There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. (7 The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the pa% or may be susceptible for use to transpon interstatc or foreign cummerce, including all waters which art: subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i e . , navigable waters of the US.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(l)) CI The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2))

The presence o f a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(S)) (7 The presence of wetlands adjacent2 (bordering, contiguous. or neighboring) to interstarc or other waters of the US,

except for chose wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR328.3 (a)(7)) (7 The presence of an isolated water (e.g.. intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats,

sandflats. wetlands, sloughs. prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds). Other:

1 Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed 1 U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland In.~entory: 1 U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: . [XI USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Lake County.

U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: ANTIOCH, 1993. U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Histonc Quadrangles: U. S. Geological Survey I5 Minute Historic Quadrangles: .

[XI Aerials (Name & Date):Lake County 1939, 2000 & 2004; PhotoMapper 2001. 2002 & 2004 [XI Advanced Identitication Wetland Maps: LAKE COUNTY. (7 Site Visit Conductcd on:

Other information:

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): Bangs Lake is tributary to the Fox River via B a g s Lake Drain. The Fox River is a navigable water of the United States, therefore Bangs Lake is also a water of the United States under thc jurisdiction of the Department of the Arnty.


IXI clear, natural line impressed on the bank mdestruction of terrestrial vegetation the presence of litter and debris mshelving changes in the charactcr of soil 1 other

n wetland boundary


Unahle ro confirm the prcscnce of waters listed in 33 CFR 3:!8.3(a)(1), 328.3(a)(2). or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) C] Area under consideration is likely to have bcen jurisdicLional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria (7 Area under consideration is likely have heen jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule cntena

(7 Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on the basis of 328.3(a)(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale]

Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries This office concurs wtth your wetland delineation repon dated . prepared by

[XI T h ~ s oftice docs not confirm your wetland boundary I

Recommended by: Date: * / a b Approved by: -- Date: _ '

'Wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria establishsd in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) he., occurrence of hydrophytir vegeration. hydrie soils and wetland hydrology). Processes for determining wetlands on agricultural lands may wry from methods described in the Corps Wetland Dclincation Manual (1987)

'Wetlands separated from other waters of the U S . by man-made dikes or barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.


APPLICANT: George Krizanovic PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: Lake AntiochlAntioch

FILE NUMBER: 200600201 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: IXI Office n ~ i e l d

Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For sites regulated under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved ID is an appealable action. (33 CFR 331.2)

Based on available information: q There are no waters on the project site. q There are non-jurisd~ct~ond waters on the project sire. [XI There are waters of the United States on the project site. q There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.


q There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. The presence of waters whlch are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport

interstate or foreign commerce. lncludlng all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e.. navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(l)) q The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) IXI The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5))

The presence of wetlands adjacentz (bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US, except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7))

q The presence of an isolated water (e.g.. intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes. wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds).

q Other: q Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed q U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: q U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: - [XI USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Lake County. [XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: ANTIOCH, 1993.

U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrangles: q U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Hlstoric Quadrangles: [XI Aerials (Name & Date):Lake County 1939,2000 & 2004; PhotoMapper 2001,2002 & 2004 [XI Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: LAKE COUNTY. q S ~ t e Visit Conducted on: q Other Information:

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): Lake Antioch is tributary to the Fox River via Lake Maire. The Fox River is a nav~gable water of the United States. therefore East Loon L.ake is also a water of the United States under the jurisdict~on of the Department of the Army.


[XI clear. natural line impressed on the bank [XIdestruction of terrestrial vegetation [XI the presence of litter and debris nshelving [XI changes in the character of soil q other q wetland boundary


q Unable to confirm the presence of waters l~sted In 33 CFR 328.3(a)(I), 328.3(a)(2). or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) q Area under consideration is l~kely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria q Area under consideration is likely have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

q Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on the basis of 328.3(a)(3) [attach copy of HQ rat~onale]

Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries q This office concurs with your wetland delineation report dated , prepared by [XI This office does not confirm your wetland boundary



'Wetlands are ~dentified and delineated using the methods and criteria established in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (i.e., occurrence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology). Processes for determining wetlands on agricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).

' Wetlands separated from other waters of the U.S. by man-made dikes or barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.


APPLICANT: Harold Furtner PROJECT LOCATIONlWATERWAY: East Loon LakelAntioch

FILE NUMBEW: 200600201 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: [XI Office O F i e l d


Based on available information: [7 There are no waters on the project site. [7 There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project site. [XI There are waters of the United States on the project site. 17 There are both waters of the United States and nonjurisdictional waters on the project site.


13 There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. q The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(l)) 17 The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) [XI The presence of a tributary to an interstale water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) [7 The presence of wetlands adjacent' (1 bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US,

except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (23 CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) 17 The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats,

sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds). 17 Other: 17 Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed q U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: [7 U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: _ . [XI USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Lake County. [XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: ANTIOCH, 1993. [7 U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrangles: q U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrangles: [XI Aerials (Name & Date):Lake County 1939,2000 8: 2004; PhotoMapper 2001,2002 & 2004 [XI Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: LAKE COUNTY. [7 Site Visit Conducted on: q Other information:

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): East Loon Lake is tributary to the Fox River via Sequoit Creek and the Fox Chain of Lakes. The Fox River is a navigable water of h e United States, therefore East Loon Lake is also a water of the United States under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Army.


[XI clear, natural line impressed on the bank [Xldestruction of terrestrial vegetation [XI the presence of litter and debris nshelving [XI changes in the character of soil q other 17 wetland boundary


q Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(l), 328.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) q Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdiclional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule critena

Area under consideration IS likely have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

[7 Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on the hasis of 328.3(a)(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale]

Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries [7 This office concurs with your wetland delineation report dated . prepared by . [XI This office does not confirm your wetland boundary I /


Approved by: Date:

'wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria established in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (i.e., occurrence of hydrophytic vegetalion, hydric soils and wetland hydrology). Processes for determining wetlands on agricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).

' Wetlands separated from other waters of the U S. by man-made dikes or barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.


APPLICANT: Jerry Kelley PROJECT LOCATIOXMATERWAY: Silver Lake/Antioch

FILE NUMBER: 200500178 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: [XI OCfice UField

Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For sites regulated ]under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved JD is an appealable action. (33 CFR 331.2)


[XI There are waters of the United States on the project site. There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.


17 There are no jurisdictional waters of thc United States present on the project site. The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport


The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) (XI The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(S))

The presence of wetlands adjacent2 (bordering. contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US, except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams). mudflats. sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadoirs, playa lakes, or natural ponds). Other:

q Section I0 waterway.

Information Reviewed L'. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: C. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: --

[XI USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Lake County. [XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: ANTIOCH, 1993.

U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrangles: U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrangles: Aerials (Name & Date):Lake County 1939,2000 & 2004: PhotoMapper 2001.2002 & 2004

[XI Advanced ldentification Wetland Maps: LAKE COUNTY. Site Visit Conducted on: Other information:

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): Little Silver lake is tributary to the Fox River via Sequoit Creek and the Fox Chain of Lakes. The Fox River is a navigable water of the United States, therefore Silver Lake is also a water of the United States under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Army. , Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction (33 CFR 328 and 329):

Ordinary High Water Mark indicated by: [XJ clear, natural line impressed on the bank [XIdestruction of terrestrial vegetation

the presence of litter and debris nshelving [XJ changes in Ihe character of soil other

wetland boundary


Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(1), 328.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) Area under considerat~on is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria Area under consideration is a likely have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

Headquarters declined to approvejurisdiction on the basis of 328.3(a)(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale]

Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries This office concurs with your wetland delineation report dated , prepared by

[XI This office does not confirm your wetland boundzuy


Approved by: Date:

'Wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria esmhlished in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (i.e.. occurrence of hydrophytic vegelation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology). Processes for determining wetlandson agricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).

' Wetlands separated from other waters of the U.S. by man-made dikes or barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT U.S. Army Corps of Eng~neers, Chlcago D'str~ct

APPLICANT: City of Chicago DOT PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: Ashland Avenue at the South Fork of the South Branch of the Chicago River

FILE NUMBER: 200300138 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: (XI Office OField

Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For Sites regulated under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved JD is an appealable action. (33 CFR 33 1.2)


(XI There are waters of the United States on the project si1.e. q There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.


There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the projecl site. (XI The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce. including all waters which are !subject to the ebb and tlow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(l)) q The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2))

The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) The presence of wetlands adjacent2 ( bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US, except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7))

The presence of an isolated water (e.g.. intrastate lakes, rivws, streams (including intermittent streams). mudflats. sandtlats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds). Other:

(XI Section I0 waterway.

Information Reviewed (XI U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: ENGLEWOOD.

U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: q USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Cook County. (XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: q U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrangles: [7 U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrangles:

Aerials (Name &Date): Advanced Identification Wetland Maps:

q Site Visit Conducted on: Other information:

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): The proposed activily will take place within the South Branch of the Chciago River which is a navigable waters of the U.S.

Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction (33 CFR 328 and 329): Ordinary High Water Mark ind~cated by:

clear, natural l~ne impressed on the bank destruction of lerrestr~al vegetation the presence of litter and debr~s shelvlng

[7 changes In the character of soil other: Owetland boundary


q Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(1), 328.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria Area under consideration is likely have been junsd~ctional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria


Confirmation of Welland Boundaries Thisoffice concurs with your wetland delineation repon. dated , prepared by

[7 This office does not confirm your wetland boundary.

- Recommended by: Date:

I - 2/5-36

Approved by: Date:

'Wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria established in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (ie., occurrence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology). Processes for determining wetlands on agricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).

'Wetlands separated from other waters of the U S. by man-made dikes or baniers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT 1l.S Army Corps of Engincers, Chicago District

APPLICANT: Oakdenr Dcvelopment Group, Inc PROJECT LOCATIONlWATERWAY: Flint CreeWNorth Barrington

FILE NUMBER: 200600102 PROJHCT REVIEW COMPLETED: (XI Office (XIField


Based on available information: n There ure no waters on the project site. q There are non-jurisdictional waters on the projcct site. (XI There are waters of the United States on the project site.

There ure both waters o f the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.

Basis of Jurisdiclio~~al Determination:

q There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. a The presence of waters which are currently used, or wcre used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigablc waters of the U S . ) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(l))

The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) (XI The presence o f a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5))

The presence of wetlands adjacent2 ( bordering, contiguous. or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US, except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands (3.3 CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats. sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds). Other: Section I0 waterway.

Information Reviewed U. S. Fish and W~ldlife Service National Wetland Invenlory: U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: . USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Lake County. U. S. Geolog~cal Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: BARRINGTON, 1993.

q U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrimgles: U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrangles:

(XI Aerials (Name & Date):Lake County 1939.2000 & 2004; PhotoMapper 2001, 2002 & 2004 (XI Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: LAKE COUNTY. (XI Site Visit Conducted on: January 12. 2006

Other information:

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): Both wetland areas on site have a surface conncction to Iloney Lake and from there ilre tributary to the Fox River via Flint Creek. The Fox River is a navigable water of the United States, therefore the delineated wetlands are also waters of the United States under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Army.


clear, natural line impressed on the bank Odestmction of terrestrial vegetation the presence of litter and debris nshelving changes in the character of soil other

(XI wetland boundary


q Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(1), 328.3(a)(2), or328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) q Area under consideration is likcly to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

Area under consideration is likely have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory B~rd Rule criteria

Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on thc basis of 328.3(a)(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale]

Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries [X1 This of ice concurs with your welland delineation report dated Octoher 17,2005,

This office does not

Recommended by: - Date:

Approved by: I

- Date:

'Wetlands are identified and delineated using (he methods and critctia estrhli:.led in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (i.e., occurrence of hydrophytic vegetation. hydric soils and wetland hydrology). Processes for determining wetlands on agricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).



APPLICANT: Aspen Homebuilders, Inc PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: Bangs LakelWauconda

FILE NUMBER: 200500034 PROJECT REVIEW COMP1,ETED: [XI Office n ~ i e l d

Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For sites regulated under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved I D is an appealable action. (33 CFR 331.2)

Based on available information: q There are no waters on the project site. q There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project site. [XI There are waters of the United Slates on the project site. q There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.


q There are no jurisdictional waters of the United Stales present on the project site. q The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(1)) q The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) [XI The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) 17 The presence of wetlands adjacent2 ( bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US,


sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meatlows, playa lakes, or natural ponds). 17 Other: q Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed q U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: q U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: . [XI USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Lake County. [XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: WAUCONDA, 1993.

U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrangles: q U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrangles: [XI Aerials (Name & Date):Lake County 1939.2000, & 2004; PhotoMapper 2001.2002, & 2004 [XI Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: LAKE COUNTY. q Site Visit Conducted on: q Other information:

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): Bangs Lake is tributary to the Fox River via Bangs Lake Drain. The Fox River is a navigable water of the United States, therefore Bangs Lake is also a water of the United States under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Army.


[XI clear, natural line impressed on the bank [Xldestruction of terrestrial vegetation [XI the presence of litter and debris nshelving [XI changes in the character of soil q other q wetland boundary


fl Unable to confirm the oresence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(I). 328.3(a)(2). or 328.3(a)(4) throueh 328.3(a)(7) - Area under concldcrallon 15 l~kclv to h ~ v c been jurl\d~cllonal under prc-SWA\CC fl~gralor) R~rd kule cnrcna

q Area under con\~deral~on IS llhclv h ~ v r heen jurlsd~~llondl under pre SWANCC Mlgralorv B~rd Rule cntena

Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on the bahis of 328.3(a)(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale]

Confbmation of Wetland Boundaries This office concurs with your wetland delineation rcport dated June 14, 2004, prepared by Hey and Associates, Inc

[XI This oftice does not confirm your wetland boundary I

Recommended by: -5- Date: / -pq61/ Approved by: Date:

'wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteri;i eslahlished in the Corps Welland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (i.e., occurrence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydro log!^). Processes for determining wetlands on agricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).



APPLICANT: KLM Development PROJECT LOCATIONWATERWAY: Spring Grove

FILE NUMBER: 200500978 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: Ofiice NField

Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD)(For sites regulated under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved JD is an appealable action. (33 CFR 331.2). An approved JD is an appealable action. (33 CFR 331.2)


There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project site. (XI There are waters of the United States on the pro~ect site.

There are both waters of the United States and non-,jurisdictional waters on the project site.


There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(l)) The presence of interstate waters (including interstate ~e t l ands ' ) . (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) The presence of wetlands adjacen? ( bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US, except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds). Other:

[7 Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: FOX LAKE.

(XI U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: FOX LAKE, HA 151. USDA National Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for McHenry County.

[XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic hlaps: FOX LAKE, 1993. U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrangles:

[7 U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrtmgles: [XI Aerial Photographs (Name & Date): 2004

Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: MCHENKY COUNTY.. [XI Site Visit Conducted on: August 23,2005 [7 Other information:

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): Area I and Area2, as identified in the Wetland Delineation Report dated July 19,2005, as prepared by V3 Companies of Illinois, Ltd., exhibit a surface water connection to a navigable waterway and are therefore considered waters of the U.S. by the Department of the Army.

Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction (33 CFR 328 and 329): Ordinary High Water Mark indicated by: [7 clear, natural line impressed on the bank destruction of terrestrial vegetation [7 the presence of litter and debris shelving [7 changes in the character of soil 11 other: [XI wetland boundary


Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(l), 328.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria Area under consideration is not likely have been iurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria


Confirmation of Wetland Boundarizs (XI This office concurs with your wetland delineation report dated July 19,2005, prepared by V3 Companies of Illinois, . ~

Ltd. This of ice does not confirm

Recommended by: Date: 1 130 ~QC- I

Approved by: S - Date: / / Y C / C C 'wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteriaestablished In the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (ic., occurrence of hydro@ytic vegetatioq hydric soils and wetland hydrology). Processes fur determining wetlandson agricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).

' Wetlands separated from other waters ofthe U S by man-made dikes or b;miers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like arc also adjacent.


APPLICANT: John Nelson PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: Lot #4 in Farmington Ridge Southeast of the Intersection of Farmington Drive and Farmington Road in South Barrington, Cook County, Illinois (Section 24, T42N, R9E).

FILE NUMBER: 200600222 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: (XI O m c e UFie ld

Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For Sites regulated under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved I D is an appealable action. (33 CFR 331.2)

Based on available information: There are no waters on the project site. rn There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.

(XI There are waters of the United States on the project site. There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.


There are no jurisdietional waters of the United States present on the project site. The presence of waters which are eurrently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport

interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are: subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(l))

The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) (XI The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5))

The presence of wetlands adjacent2 ( bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US, except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakcs, or natural ponds). Other: Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed (XI U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: STREAMWOOD.

U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: . USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Cook County.

(XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: STREAMWOOD, 1993. U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrangles: U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historie Quadrarlgles: .

(XI Aerials (Name & Date):Cook County 1998 and 2003 Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: . Site Visit Conducted on: Other information:

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): The wetland on the property drains to Poplar Creek, then into the Fox River, a navigable water under jurisdiction of this office. Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction (33 C F R 328 and 329):

Ordinary High Water Mark indicated by: clear, natural line impressed on the bank destruction of terrestrial vegetation the presence of litter and debris shelving changes in the character of soil other: wetland boundary


Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(l ), 328.3(a)(2), or328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria Area under consideration is not likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria


Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries This o f i ce concurs with your wetland delineation report dated , prepared by .

(XI This office does not confirm your wetland boundary.


Approved by: Date: 3) JobbL

'Wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria established in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (ie., occurrence of hydro@ytic vegetatio~ hydric soils and wetland hydrology). I'rocesses for determining werlandson agricultural lands may vary from methodsdescribed in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).

* Wetlands separated from other waters of the U.S. by man-made dikes or harriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.


APPLICANT: Crystal Tree Golf Course PROJECT LOCATIONWATERWAY: Ponds on Crystal Tree Golf and Country Club Southeast of 143rd Street and 108th Avenue in Orland Park, Cook County, Illinois (Section 8, T36N, R12E).

FILE NUMBER: 200600264 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: IXJ Office O ~ i e l d


Based on available information: q There are no waters on the project site. q There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.

There are waters of the United States on the project site. q There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waterson the project site.




The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)@)) The presence of a tributary to an intcrstatc water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) The presence ofwetlands adjacent" bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate o r other waters of the US, except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7))

17 The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadouis, playa lakes, or natural ponds). Other: Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed (XI U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: MOKENA.

U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: . USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Cook County. U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: MOKENA, 1993. U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrangles: . U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrangles: . Aerials p a m e & Date):Cook County 1998 Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: -

q Site Visit Conducted on: q Other information:

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): Ponds 1 and 2 were created online to Spring Creek, which flows to Hickory Creek, then the Des Plaines River, a navigable water underjurisdiction of this office.


clear, natural line impressed on the bank destruction of terrestrial vegetation the presence of litter and debris shelving changes in the character of soil q other:

nwe t l and boundary


Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(l), 328.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) q Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

Area under consideration is oat likely have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on the basis of 328.3(a)(3) [anach copy of HQ rationale]

Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries 17 This office concurs with your wetland delineation report dated , prepared by .

This office does not confirm your wetland boundary. -. 8 %

Recommended by: Date: 4 (i)&d' c

Approved by: Date:

'Wetlands are identified and delineaed using the methods and criteria established in the Corps Wetlard Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (ie., occurrence of hydrorhytic vegelatio~ hydric soils and wetland hydrologv). Processes for determining wetlandson agricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).

Wetlands separated from othsr waters of the U.S. by man-made dikes or barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes. and the like are also adjacent.

APPROVED JURlSDlCTlONAL DETERMlNATlON DECISION DOCUMENT U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Chicago District

APPLICANT: Jackie Hoffman PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: Property Located at 9997 Virginia Avenue, Chicago Ridge, Cook County, Illinois (Section 7, T37N. R13E).

FILE NUMBER: 200600122 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: Office RField


Based on available information: (XI There are no waters on the project site. [7 There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project site. [7 There are waters of the United States on the project site. q There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.


There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States prcscnt on the project site. The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport

interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.c., navigable watcrs of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(l))

The presence of interstate waters (including interstale wetlands1). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5))

q The presence of wetlands adjacent2 ( bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US. except for thosc wctlands adjaccnt to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7))

q The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes: wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds).

q Other: q Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed q U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory:

U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: . USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Cook County.

[XJ U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic klaps: PALOS PARK, 1993. U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrangles: . U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrangles:

(XI Aerials (Name & Date):Cook County 1998 [7 Advanced Identitication Wetland Maps: (XI Site Visit Conducted on: 16 December 2005

Other information:

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): No wetlands or other waters were found on the property.


q clear, natural line impressed on the bank q destruction of terrestrial vegetation q the presence of litter and debris q shelving [7 changes in the character of soil [7 other: Owetland boundary


(XI Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(I), 328.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) q Area under consideration is likely to have been juristlictional under prc-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria (XI Area under consideration is not likely have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

[7 Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on the basis of 328.3(a)(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale]

Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries q This office concurs with your wetland delineation report dated _ prepared by . [7 This office does not confirm your wetland boundary. T - /

Recommended by: Date: 1 1

Approved by: Date: V

'Wetlimds are identitied and del~neded using the methods and criteriaestablished in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (i.e., occurrence of hydromytic vegctatioq hydric soils and wetland hydrology). Processes for determining wetlandson agricultural lands may vary liom methods described in the Cnrps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).

Wetlands separated from other waters of the US. by man-made dikes or bilrriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.


APPLICANT: Village of Orland Hills PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: Detention Basin Southeast of 169th Place and 94th Avenue in Orland Hills, Cook County, Illinois (Section 27, 'r36N. R12E).

FILE NUMBER: 2006001 00 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: (7 Oflice NField



[7 There are waters of the United States on the project site. [7 There are both waters of the United States and non-]urisdictional waters on the project site.


[XJ There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport

interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(I)) [7 The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) [7 The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) [7 The presence of wetlands adjacent2 ( bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US,

except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) [7 The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats,

sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds). Other:

[7 Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed [7 U. S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceNational Wetland Inventory:

U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ,

[7 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Cook County. N U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: TINLEY PARK, 1993.

U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Mmute Historic Quadrangles: U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrangles:

[XJ Aerials (Name & Date):Cook County 1998 and 2003 q Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: ,

[XI Site Visit Conducted on: 16 December 2005 Other information:

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): No waters or wetlands were apparent on the property.


clear, natural line impressed on the bank [7 destruction of terrestrial vegetation [7 the presence of litter and debris shelving

changes in the character of soil other: nwetland boundary


[XJ Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(I), 328.3(a)(2), or 328,3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) Area under consideration is likely to have been jurir:dictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

[XJ Area under consideration is likely have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria


Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries This office concurs with your wetland delineation report dated : prepared by . This office does not confirm your wetland boundary. 7- -


Approved by: Date: u

'Wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria established in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (i.e., occurrence of hydrowytic vegetation hydric soils and wetland hydrology). Processes for determining wetlandson agricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland DelineationManual (1987).

Wetlands separated from other waters of the U.S. by man-made dikes or Ibarriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETE.RMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT U.S Army C o p s of Engineers, Chicago District

APPLICANT: AGL Development Corporation PROJECT 1,OCATIONIWATERWAY: Notlh BrancM\ilettawa

FILE hUMBER: 200501 135 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: q Office NField



[7 There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project slte. [XI Thrre are waters of the United States on the project sile. [7 There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.


There are no jurisdictional waters of the United Stales present on the project site. q The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328,3(a)(l))

The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands1). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) q The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) [7 The presence of wetlands adjacent2 (bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US,

except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) [7 The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflots,

sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes. wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds). Other: Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory:

[7 U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: . [XI USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Lake County.

U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: LIBERTYVILLE. 1993. [7 U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrangles: q U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrangles: [XI Aerials (Name & Date):Lake County 1939,2000,8: 2004: PhotoMapper 2001, 2002, & 2004 [XI Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: LAKE COUNTY. [XI Site Visit Conducted on: August 9,2005

Other information:

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): Wetlands on site drain Into the ditch along Bradley Road and are tributary to the North Branch of the Chicago River via the Tollway Ditches and the Dalitsch Pond. The Chicago River is a navigable water of the United Spates and therefore the onsite wetlands are also waters of the United States under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Army.


clear, natural line impressed on the bank ndestruction of terrestrial vegetation n the presence of l~tter and debris nshelving

changes in the character of soil q other [XI wetland houndary


Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(l). 328.3(a)(2), or 3283(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) q Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria [7 Area under consideration is likely have been juri!;dictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria


Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries This office concurs with your wetland delineation report dated July 2005, prepared by Boll~nger, Lach and Associates. This office does not confirm your wetland boundary , / /

- - Recommended by: - Approved by: Date: / 1 'wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria established in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (i.e., occunence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology). Processes for determining wetlands on agricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).

Wctlands separated from other waters of Lhe U.S. by man-made dikes or barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.


APPLICANT: Wilcox Development Group PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: East Side of Rt 59, three-quarters of a mile South of Renwick Road in DuPage River watershed in Plainfield Township, Will County, IL (SW 114 Sec 22 T36N R9E) FILE NUMBER: 200600178 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: Office (XIField

Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For Sites regulatad under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved JD is an appealable action. (33 CFR 33 1.2)

Based on available information: (XI There are no waters on the project site.

There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project sit-. There are waters of the United States on the project site.

[7 There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.


(XI There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. [7 The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce. including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(1)) [7 The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) [7 The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5))

The presence of wetlands adjacentZ ( bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US, except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7))

[7 The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds).

[7 Other: [7 Section I0 waterway.

Information Reviewed (XI U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: PLAINFIELD. (XI U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: PLAINFIELD, 228. (XI USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Will County. (XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5-Minute Topographic Maps: PLAINFIELD, 1993. [7 U. S. Geological Survey 7.5-Minute Historic Quadrangles:

U. S. Geological Survey 15-Minute Historic Quadrangles: [7 Aerials (Name & Date):


(XI Site Visit Conducted on: 12 JAN 2006 Other information: NRCS Determination dated February 15, 2002.

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): There are no waters on the project site.

Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction (33 C F R 328 and 329): Ordinary High Water Mark indicated by: 17 clear, natural line impressed on the bank [7 destruction of terrestrial vegetation [7 the presence of litter and debris 13 shelving

changes in the character of soil [7 other: 13 wetland boundary


[7 Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(I), 328.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

[7 Area under consideration is likely have been juri:;dictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

[7 Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on the basis of 328.3(a)(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale]

Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries [7 This office concurs with your wetland delineation report dated , prepared by [7 This office does not confirm your wetland boundary

--- - Recommended by: Date:

.-=.-- P Approved by: Date:

'Wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria established in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) ( i e , occurrence of hydromytic vegetatio~ hydric soils and wetland hydrology). Processes for determining wellandson agricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).

Wetlands separated from other waters of the U.S. by man-madc dikes or barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.


APPLICANT: Jack Riser PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: 114 Thorobred Lane. Slecpy Hollow, Kale County. Illinois (NW 114 of Section 28. T42N R8E)

FILE NUMBER: 200501 151 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: Ortice [XJField


Based on available informatiun: [XI There are no waters on the project site.

There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project sile. There are waters of the United States on the project site. There are both watcrs of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.


@ There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. 0 The presence of watcrs which are currently used, or wen: used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport inlerstate or foreign commerce. including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(I)) 0 The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) 0 The presence of a tributary to an inlerstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) 0 The presence of wetlands adjacentz (bordering, contiguous, orneighburing) to interstate or other waters of the US.

except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) 0 The presence of an isolated water (e.g.. intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds).

Other: a Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed U . S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: . U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: .

[XI USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Kane County. (XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: ELGIN, 1992.

U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrangles: . U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrangles: Aerial Photographs (Name & Date): DigiAir 2004 Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: . -.

(XI Site Visit Conducted on: 11/22/05 by Jaimee Hammil and 1110106 by Jaimee Hammit and Kate Bliss of the [ISACE, Chicago District

Other information:

Rationale for Basis (applies t o any boxes checked above): The property does not contain any waters of the United States. There is a tributary just off of the property that would be regulated by the Army Corps of Engineers due to its surface water t r iburq system connection to the Fox River.

Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction (33 CFR 328 and 329): Ord~nary High Water Mark tndicated by: rn clear, natural line ~mpressed on the bank destruction of terrestrial vegetation rn the preaence of litter and debris shelving

change$ in the character of soils other: wetland boundary


[7 Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(l), 328.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) [7 Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria [7 Area under consideration is not likely have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

0 Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on the basis of.328.3(a)(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale]

Conlirmation of Wetland Boundaries a This office concurs with your wetland delineation report dated , prepared by 0 This office does not confirm your wetland boundary. - _.-_

Recommended by: ..s -- Date:

Approved by: - S - - Date:

'Wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria established in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (i.e., occurrence of hydrophytic vegetation. hydric soils and wetland hydralog)). Processes for determining wetlands on agricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).

Wetlands separated from other waters of the U.S. by nran-made dikes or barriers, natural riverbems, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.


APPLICANT: Brian Dewitt PROJECT LOCATIOVnPATERWAY: Des Plaines RiverIBeach Park

FILE NUMBER: 200500188 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: (XI Office OField


Based on available information: [XJ There are ~ro waters on the project site.

There are non-jurisdict~onal waters on the project site. There are waters of the United States on the project sile. There are both waters of the United States and non-;urisdictional waters on the projcct site.


There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. q The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or Foreign commerce. including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e.. navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(l)) q The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands1). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) 5 The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(S)) q The presence of wetlands adjacent2 ( bordering, con~iguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US,

except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) q The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats.

sandtlats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, we1 meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds). Other:


Information Reviewed U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:

IXJ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Serrice Soi! Survey for Lake County. (XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: WADSLVORTH. 1993.


(XI Aerials (Name & Date):Lake County 1939,2000.2004 & 2005; PhotoMapper 2001,2002 & 2004 Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: LAKE COUNTY.

5 Site Visit Conducted on: q Other information:

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): The wetland on site docs not havc a discemable surface connection to a water of the United States and is therefore is not under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Army.


clear, natural line impressed on the bank Odestruction of terrestrial vegetation [7 the presence of litter and debris Oshelving C] changes in the character of soil other q wetland boundary


Unable to confirm thc prcsence of waters listed in 33 CI'R :128.3(a)(l), 328.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) [XJ Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Kule criteria


Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on the basis of 328.3(a)(3) [atrach copy of HQ rationale]

Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries This office concurs with your wetland delineation reporr dated . prepared by . This ofice does not confirm your wetland boundary

Recon~mended by: Date: , .<

n na ebtabl~shed I n the Corps Wetland Del~neatlon Manual (87 Manual) (I e ,

occurrence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology:~. Processes for determining wetlands on agricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).

' Wetlands separated From other waters of the U.S by man-made dikes or harriers, natural river berms. beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT U.S. Army Corps of Engineszrs, Chicago District

APPLICANT: Cornerstone Services, Inc. PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: Southwest of the Intersection of Black Road and Ann Street in Joliet, Will County, Illinois FILE NUMBER: 200600294 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: rn Office UFie ld


Based on available information: [XI There are no waters on the project site.

There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project site. There are waters of the United States on the project site. There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.


There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transpon

interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(1))

The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) The presence of wetlands adjacent2 ( bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US, except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 C'FR 328.3 (a)(7)) The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes. rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandtlats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds). Other: Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed rn U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: PLAINFIELD.

U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: PLAINFIELD, 228. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Will County. U. S. Geological Survey 7.5-Minute Topographic Maps: PLAINFIELD, 1993. U. S. Geological Survey 7.5-Minute Historic Quadrangles: U. S. Geological Survey 15-Minute Historic Quadrangles:

[XI Aerials (Name & Date): Plainfield, 1997 Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: Site Visit Conducted on: Other information:

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): There are no wetlands located on the subject property.


clear, natural line impressed on the bank destruction of terrestrial vegetation the presence of litter and debris shelving changes in the character of soil other: wetland boundary


17 Unable to confirm the preserce of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(1), 328,3(a)(2), or 328,3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria Area under consideration is likely have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

17 Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on the basis of 328.3(a)(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale]

Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries This office concurs with your wetland delineation repon dated , prepared by

U This office does not confirm your wetland boundary .- c.

Recommended by: 2 -- Date: / 7 4 LLn 0 6 U

Approved by: - - Date: 7 3 * - o . 6 'Wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria established in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) ( i e.. occurrence of hydroNytic vegetatio~ hydric soils and wetland hydrology). Processes for determln~ng wetlandson agricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).



APPLICANT: Westminster Swanson Land Partners 1.I.C P R O I E C T LOCATION/WATERWAY: McHenry County

FILE NUMBER: 200600197 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: [XI Office n ~ i e l d

Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD)(For sites regulated under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved ID is an appealable action. (33 CFR 33 1.2). An approved JD is an appealable action. (33 CFR 33 1.2)


There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project site. There are waters of the United States on the projecl. site. There are both waters of the United States and non.jurisdictional waters on thc project site.


(XI There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(I)) The presence of interstate waters (including interstate uietlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) n The presence of wetlands adjacen? ( bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US, except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7))

q The presence of an isolatcd water (e.g., intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), rnudflats, sandflau, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds). Other: Section 10 waterway.

Information Reviewed [XI U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: MCHENRY.

U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: MCHENRY, HA 255. USDA National Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for McHenry County.

[XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: MCHENRY, 1992. q U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrangles:

U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrangles: (XI Aerial Photographs (Name & Date):2001. 2002. 2004 (XI Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: MCHENRY COUN-I'Y..

Site Visit Conducted on: q Other information:

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): No wetlands or waters of the United States are present on the project site. A Wetland Delineation Report dated March 5, 2004, as prepared by Raisanen & Associates, details two farmed wetland signatures that were only present in 20% of representative years. Even if these areas had qualified as wetlands. they exhibit no surface water connection to a navigable waterway and are notjurisdictional.

Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction (33 C F R 328 and 329): Ordinary High Water Mark indicated by: n clear. natural line impressed on the bank destruction of terrestrial vegetation

the presence of liner and debris 13 shelving changes in the character of soil other: wetland boundary


Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(1), 328.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) 0 Area undcr consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria [XJ Area under consideration is likely have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

q Headquarters declined to approvejurisdiction on the basis of 328.3(a)(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale]

Confirmation 01 Wetland Boundaries [7 This office concurs with your wetland delineation report dated , prepared by . (XI This office does not confirm your wetland boundary

-5 - Recommended by: Date: / -( 4 -a$, - 1 -. Approved by:

'wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria established in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (i.e., occurrenee of hydromytie vegetation hydrie soils and wetland hydrology). Proeesses for determining wctlandson agricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).

Wetlands separated from other watcrs of the U S , by man-made dikes or barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.


APPLICANT: Westminster Swanson Land Partners LLC PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: McHenry County

FILE NUMBER: 200600196 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: [ql Office u ~ i e l d

Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD)(For sites regulated under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved JD is an appealable action. (33 CFR 331.2). An approved JD is an appealable action. (33 CPR 33 1.2)

Based on available information: IXJ There are no waters on the project site.

There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project site. There are waters of the United States on the project site.

q There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.


There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e.. navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(l)) The presence of interstate waters (including interstate \retlandsl). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or othcr water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) The presence of wetlands adjacent ( bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US, except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) The presence of an isolatcd water (e.g., intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds). Other: Section I0 waterway.

lnformation Reviewed U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: . U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: MCHENRY, HA 255. USDA National Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for McHenry County.

(XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic blaps: MCHENRY. 1992. U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrangles: U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrrmgles: Aerial Photographs (Name & Uate):2001,2002,2004

[XI Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: MCHENP.Y COUNTY.. Site Visit Conducted on:


Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): Then: are no waters or wetlands on the project site


clear, natural line impressed on the hank tlestruction of terrestrial vegetation the presence of liner and debris q shelving

13 changes in the character of soil other: wetland boundary

Basis tor Declining Jurisdiction:

Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(1). 328,3(a)(2). or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

(XI Area under consideration is likely have been juri:;dictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria


Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries This office concurs with your wetland delineation report dated , prepared by . This office does not confirm your wetland boundary

-5 -- Recommended by: Date: V - 5 .--

Approved by: Date: I- 2 / - Z - h C

'Wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria esthlished in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) ( i e , occurrence of hydrofiytic vegetatioq hydric soils and wetland hydrology). Processes for determining wetlandson agricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland DelineationManual (1987).

' Wetlands separated from other waters of the U.S. by man-made dikes or batriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.

APPROVED JL'RISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Chicago District

APPLICANT: Westminster Swanson Land Partners LLC PROJECT LOCATIONtWATERWAY: McHenry County

FILE NUMBER: 200600197 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: [XI O f i c e OFie ld

Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD)(For sites regulated under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved ID is an appealable action. (33 CFR 331.2). An approved JD is an appealable action. (33 CFR 33 1.2)


There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project site. q There are waters of the United States on the project site.

There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.


[XI There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on thc project site. q The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport

interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(I)) The presence of interstate waters (including intcrstate a,etlandsl). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2))

q The presenee of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) The presence of wetlands adjacent2 ( bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US, except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) The presence of an isolatcd water (e.g., intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds). Other: Section I0 waterway.

Information Reviewed [XI U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: MCHENRY. [XI U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: MCHENRY, HA 255. [XI USDA National Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for McHenry County.

U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: MCHENRY, 1992. U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minutc Ilistoric Quadrangles: U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrangles:

[XI Aerial Photographs (Namc & Date):2001,2002, 2004 Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: MCHENR.Y COUNTY.. Site Visit Conductcd on: Other information:

Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): No wetlands or waters of the United States are present on the project site. A Wetland Delineation Report dated March 5. 2004, ia prepared by Raisanen & Associates, details two farmed wetland signatures that were only present in 20% of representative years. Even if these areas had qualified as wetlands, they exhibit no surface water connection to anavigable waterway and arc notjurisdictional.

Lateral Extent ofJurisdiction (33 C F R 328 and 329): Ordinarq High Water Mark indicated by: 11 clear, natural line impressed on the bank destruction of terrestrial vegetation q the presence of litter and debris shelving

changes in the character of soil other: wetland boundary


rn Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(I), 328.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria Area under consideration is likely have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria


Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries 'l'his office concurs with your wetland delineation report dated , prepared by This office does not confirm your wetland boundary

Recommended by: / 'S ---

Date: 1 -2 c/-86 Approved by: 3- Date: / - 2 C/-ocr 'Wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria established in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (ie . oeeurrence of hydroNytic vcgetatton hydric soils and wetland hydrology). Processes for determining wetlandson agricultural lands may vary from methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).


-rproperty contains one wetland that is in a closed depression, does not have a surface water...

Documents