rizwan bashir created date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 am

489
P S L M –2014-15 PAKISTAN SOCIAL AND LIVING STANDARDS MEASUREMENT SURVEY (2014-15) National / Provincial /District Government of Pakistan Statistics Division Pakistan Bureau of Statistics Islamabad March- 2016 www.pbs.gov.pk

Upload: phamquynh

Post on 19-May-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

P S L M –2014-15 PAKISTAN SOCIAL AND LIVING STANDARDS MEASUREMENT

SURVEY (2014-15)

National / Provincial /District

Government of PakistanStatistics Division

Pakistan Bureau of Statistics Islamabad

March- 2016

www.pbs.gov.pk

Page 2: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PSLM 2014-15

(i)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION . . . ............................................................................................................................................... 1

1.1 THE MDGS, PRSP AND THE PSLM…………………………………………………………………………………………... 1 1.2 SAMPLE DESIGN OF PSLM SURVEY 2014-15 (DISTRICT LEVEL)………………………………………………….. 2 1.3 OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF ANALYSIS…………………………………………………………………………………………. 4 1.4 HOUSE HOLD AND SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE……………………………………………………………. . . ....………………..4 1.5 DATA QUALITY AND RELIABILITY MEASURES……………………………………………………………………………. ........ 4

2. EDUCATION . . ............................................................................................................................................................. 5

2.1 INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 5 2.2 SCHOOL ATTENDANCE………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 6 2.3 ENROLMENT RATES…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 7 2.4 PRIMARY ENROLMENT RATES…………………………………………………………………………………………………...8 2.5 MIDDLE ENROLMENT RATES………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 12 2.6 MATRIC ENROLMENT RATES………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 14 2.7 LITERACY……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 16

3. HEALTH . . . ....................................................................................................................................................... 120

3.1 INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… . 120 3.2 SICK OR INJURED…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 121 3.3 IMMUNIZATION………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... 122 3.4 DIARRHOEA………………..………………..………………..………………..………………..………………..…………. 124 3.5 PRE AND POST-NATAL CARE………………..………………..………………..………………..…………………………… 126

4. HOUSING, WATER SUPPLY & SANITATION . . . .................................................................................................. 331

4.1 INTRODUCTION………………..………………..………………..………………..………………..………………..……… 331 4.2 HOUSING………………..………………..………………..………………..………………..………………………………

4.5 Electricity & Gas…………………………………………………………………………………………..……………….. 339

5. HOUSEHOLD PERCEPTION OF ECONOMIC SITUATION AND SATISFACTION BY FACILITIES AND SERVICE USE. ... 423

5.1 INTRODUCTION………………..………………..………………..………………..………………..……………………...... 423 5.2 PERCEPTION OF ECONOMIC SITUATION………………..………………..………………..………………..……………….. 423 5.3 SATISFACTION BY FACILITIES AND SERVICE USE………………..………………..………………..……………………….. 424

APPENDIX A: TECHNICAL NOTES . . . ...................................................................................................................... 456

ACRONYMS…………………………………………………………………………….............................. . . ........................................... 468

PSLM INDICATORS USED FOR MONITORING OF MDG'S. . . .................................................................xxii

SUMMARY OF KEY INDICATORS ............................................................................................................................. xix

EDUCATION………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… xiHEALTH……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. xii HOUSING, W ATER SUPPLY & SANITATION………………………………………………………………………………………. xivHOUSEHOLD PERCEPTION OF ECONOMIC SITUATION AND SATISFACTION BY FACILITIES AND SERVICES………………………... xv

LIST OF OFFICERS…………………………………………………………………………………………………..ix

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………......xi

PREFACE…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...v

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT………………………………………………………………………………………………vii

332 4.3 SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER………………..………………..………………..………………..……………………….. 335 4.4 SANITATION........…….....………………..………………..………………..………………..………………………………. 337

Page 3: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PSLM 2014-15

(iii)

LIST OF TABLE

Education

TABLE 2.1 POPULATION THAT HAS EVER ATTENDED SCHOOL – BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT . . ............................ 17

TABLE 2.2 PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION THAT HAS COMPLETED PRIMARY LEVEL OR

HIGHER - BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT . ........................................................................................................ 21

TABLE 2.3 (a) GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE PRIMARY LEVEL (AGE 5-9)-BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT (EXCLUDING

KATCHI CLASS) . . . ....................................................................................................................................... 25

TABLE 2. 3 (b) GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE PRIMARY LEVEL (AGE 6 – 10) - BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

(EXCLUDING KATCHI CLASS . ..................................................................................................................... 29

TABLE 2. 4 GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE PRIMARY LEVEL (AGE 4 – 9) - BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT (INCLUDING

KATCHI CLASS . ............................................................................................................................................ 33

TABLE 2.5 GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO FOR GOVERNMENT PRIMARY SCHOOLS (AGE 5 – 9) - BY PROVINCE &

DISTRICT (EXCLUDING KATCHI CLASS) . . ................................................................................................ 37

TABLE 2.6 (a) NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE PRIMARY LEVEL (AGE 5 – 9) - BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT (EXCLUDING

KATCHI CLASS) . . . ....................................................................................................................................... 41

TABLE 2.6 (b) NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE PRIMARY LEVEL (AGED 6 – 10) – BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT (EXCLUDING

KATCHI CLASS) . . . ....................................................................................................................................... 49

TABLE 2.7 NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE PRIMARY LEVEL (AGE 4 – 9) BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

(INCLUDING KATCHI CLASS) . .................................................................................................................... 53

TABLE 2.8 NET ENROLMENT RATE IN GOVERNMENT PRIMARY SCHOOLS (AGE 5 – 9) - BY PROVINCE

& DISTRICT (EXCLUDING KATCHI CLASS) . . ...............................................................................................57

TABLE 2.9(a) PRIMARY LEVEL ENROLMENT IN GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL

ENROLMENT - BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT( EXCLUDING KATCHI) . . .................................................. 61

TABLE 2.9(b) PRIMARY LEVEL ENROLMENT IN GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL

PRIMARY ENROLMENT - BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT (INCLUDING KATCHI) . . .................................. 69

TABLE 2.10 (a) GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE MIDDLE LEVEL (AGE 10 – 12) - BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT . . .... 73

TABLE 2.10 (b) GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE MIDDLE LEVEL (AGE 11 – 13) - BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT . . ... 77

TABLE 2.11 (a) NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE MIDDLE LEVEL (AGE 10 – 12) - BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT . . ........... 81

TABLE 2.11 (b) NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE MIDDLE LEVEL (AGE 11 – 13) - BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT . . .......... 85

TABLE 2.12 (a) GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE MATRIC LEVEL (AGE 13 – 14) - BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT . . ... 89

TABLE 2-12 (b) GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE MATRIC LEVEL (AGE 14 – 15) - BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT . . ... 93

TABLE 2.13 (a) NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE MATRIC LEVEL (AGE 13 –14) - BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT . . ........... 97

TABLE 2.13 (b) NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE MATRIC LEVEL (AGE 14 - 15) - BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT . . ......... 101

TABLE 2.14 (a) LITERACY- POPULATION 10 YEARS AND OLDER . . ............................................................................... 105

TABLE 2.14 (b) ADULT LITERACY- POPULATION 15 YEARS AND OLDER . . . ................................................................. 113

Page 4: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PSLM 2014-15

(iv)

Health

TABLE 3.1 PERCENTAGE OF POPULATION FALLEN SICK OR INJURED DURING LAST TWO WEEKS OF

THE INTERVIEW AND BY HEALTH CONSULTATION ............................................................................... 130

TABLE 3.2 PERCENTAGE OF POPULATION UNDER 5 YEARS FALLEN SICK OR INJURED DURING

LAST TWO WEEKS AND BY HEALTH CONSULTATION . . . . .............................................................. 140

TABLE 3.3 PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF HEALTH CONSULTATIONS IN PAST TWO WEEKS

BY TYPE OF HEALTH PROVIDER CONSULTED . ...................................................................................... 150

TABLE 3. 4 PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN AGED 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNISED . ....................... 159

TABLE 3.5 PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNISED BY TYPE OF ANTIGEN

– BASED ON RECORD . . . ........................................................................................................................... 175

TABLE 3.6 PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN AGED 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNISED BY TYPE OF ANTIGEN –

BASED ON RECORD AND RECALL . ......................................................................................................... 185

TABLE 3.7 CHILDREN UNDER 5 SUFFERING FROM DIARRHOEA IN PAST 30 DAYS -

BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT . . . ............................................................................................................. 195

TABLE 3.8 TREATMENT OF DIARRHOEA IN CHILDREN UNDER 5 YEARS– BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT . ...... 199

TABLE 3.9 TYPE OF PRACTITIONER CONSULTED FOR DIARRHOEA TREATMENT – BY DISTRICT AND PRACTITIONER

.................................................................................................................................................................. 207

TABLE 3.10 PRE – NATAL CONSULTATIONS – BY PROVINCE AND PERSON / FACILITY . ................................... 229

TABLE 3.11 PREGNANT WOMEN THAT HAVE RECEIVED TETANUS TOXOID INJECTION . ................................... 258

TABLE 3.12 CHILD DELIVERY – LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE . . ............................................................ 262

TABLE 3.13 POST- NATAL CONSULTATIONS – BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT . . . ................................................. 303

Housing, Water Supply & Sanitation

TABLE 4.1 PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY HOUSING TENURE . ........................................... 341

TABLE 4.2 PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY MATERIAL USED FOR ROOF . . . ...................... 351

TABLE 4.3 PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY MATERIAL USED FOR WALLS . . ...................... 361

TABLE 4.4 PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY NUMBER OF ROOMS . . . ................................... 371

TABLE 4.5 MAIN SOURCE OF DRINKING WATER BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT . ................................................. 381

TABLE 4.6 TYPE OF TOILET USED BY THE HOUSEHOLD BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT . . .................................. 395

TABLE 4.7 PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY FUEL USED FOR LIGHTING . . . . ....................... 403

TABLE 4.8 PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY FUEL USED FOR COOKING . . . . ....................... 413

Perception of Economic Situation

TABLE 5.1 PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY PERCEPTION OF THEIR ECONOMIC SITUATION

COMPARED TO THE YEAR BEFORE . . . .................................................................................................... 426

TABLE 5.2 PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY PERCEPTION OF ECONOMIC

SITUATION OF THE COMMUNITY COMPARED TO THE YEAR BEFORE . .............................................. 436

TABLE 5.3 PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLD SATISFACTION BY FACILITIES ANDSERVICES USE.446

Page 5: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PSLM 2014-15

PREFACE Pakistan Social and Living Standards Measurement Survey (PSLM), 2014-15 is

the tenth round of a series of surveys that were to be conducted up to June 2015. The

survey has been conducted with the aim to provide data to be used by the government to

monitor development plans at district level and rapid assessment of programmes initiated

under Poverty Reduction Strategy (PRSP) in the overall context of MDGs. Going

forward this survey would be instrumental in SDG indicators monitoring.

This survey has been conducted covering 78,635 households to provide

indicators representative at the District level in the sectors such as Education, Health,

Water & Sanitation, Household Economic Situation and Satisfaction by facilities and

services used. Accordingly this report provides information on the key social indicators

as mentioned above at district level. The fieldwork was carried out between October

2014 and June 2015.

I would like to congratulate Mr. Ayazuddin, Deputy Director General PBS and

the whole PSLM team for the successful completion of the task. I also appreciate the

efforts of field services for the data collection and Data Processing Centre for the

processing of the valuable data and Sample Design section of PBS. The report is also

available on the website of PBS.

Comments and suggestions for further improvement of this report in future will be

most welcome.

(Asif Bajwa) Chief Statistician

Government of Pakistan Statistics Division Pakistan Bureau of Statistics Islamabad March, 2016

(v)

Page 6: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PSLM 2014-15

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Pakistan Social and Living Standards Measurement (PSLM) Survey was started in the

year 2004 and planned to be conducted up to 2015. It provides Social & Economic indicators in

the alternate years at Provincial and District level. The PSLM Survey is a major contribution

towards construction of district level database on Education, Health, Household Assets, Water &

Sanitation and Household Economic Situation and Satisfaction by facilities and services used.

The district level data provides valuable insights into the dynamics of districts according to

different aspects and help to evaluate the impact of any changing environment as a result of

implementation of the government devolution plans, which were initiated in the overall context

of Millennium Development Goal’s (MDGs).

This is sixth report of PSLM District level survey after PSLM 2004-05, 2006-07, 2008-

09, 2010-11 & 2012-13 and provides information at National/ Provincial and District level. This

report contains the data collected from 78,635 household based on 5326 urban & rural Primary

sampling units (PSUs). Fieldwork of PSLM 2014-15 was started in October 2014 and completed

in June 2015.

The timely completion of the sixth round of the PSLM District level report has been

possible because of the enormous hard work and devotion put in by the PSLM management team

at headquarters, the Data Processing Centre, PSLM field teams and Sample Design Section of

the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics. It is indeed a matter of great pride for the whole organization.

Considering the requirements of the policy makers, planners, researchers and other data

users, efforts have been made to improve this report. It is hoped that the data users will find it

useful. Any further comments and suggestions for future improvement will be highly

appreciated.

(Ayazuddin) Deputy Director General

Government of Pakistan Statistics Division Pakistan Bureau of Statistics Islamabad March, 2016

(vii)

Page 7: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PSLM 2014-15

List of Officers Involved In PSLM Survey 2014-15 The PSLM report is produced by the efforts of the following officers/officials of

Pakistan Bureau of Statistics listed under the specific tasks:

PLANNING, EXECUTION OF SURVEY AND FINALIZATION OF REPORT: -

§ Mr. Ayazuddin Deputy Director General § Ms. Rabia Awan Director § Mr. Saqib Sultan Khawar Statistical Officer § Ms. Hina Kanwal Statistical Officer § Ms. Kaneez Amna Statistical Officer § Ms. Sana Habib Chaudhary Statistical Officer

{{[

MANAGEMENT TEAM:-

§ Mr.Sajid Akhtar Lodhi Statistical Officer § Ms. Safia Begum Statistical Officer § Ms. Kulsoom Fatima Statistical Assistant § Mr. Khalid Rafique Statistical Assistant § Malik Latifullah Statistical Assistant § Mr. Shazad Asghar Statistical Assistant

DATA PROCESSING:-

§ Mr. Mumtaz Uddin Shaikh Ex Deputy Director General § Mr. Muhammad Akram Assi Deputy Director General § Mr. Arif Akhtar Chief System Analyst § Mr. Azizullah Bhatti Chief System Analyst § Mr. Muhammad Ehtesham Chief System Analyst § Mr. Mudasir Akhtar Data Processing Officer § Mr. Tahir Mahmood Data Processing Officer § Raja Aurangzeb Khan Data Processing Assistant

SAMPLE DESIGN: -

§ Mr. Naseer Ahmed Chief Statistical Officer

§ Mr Muhammad Waseem Statistical Officer

FIELD OPERATIONS: -

§ Munawar Ali Ghanghro Director

(ix)

Page 8: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PSLM 2014-15

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This report presents district along with National/provincial level findings of the

tenth round of the Pakistan Social and Living Standards Measurement (PSLM) Survey

2014-15. In this survey, 78,635 households were covered in the entire country and

information was collected from households on a range of social sector issues. These are

primarily focussed on the main sectors i.e. Education, Health, Immunisation, Pre/Post

Natal care of females, Water & Sanitation, Household perception of the economic

situation and Household satisfaction by facilities & services in the overall context of

Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).

Indicators between different groups are presented disaggregated by

province/district, by region (urban-rural) and by gender. The indicators given in the

report have been compared with the previous reports of PSLM surveys, wherever

possible.

Education

The Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER) for primary schools (Age 6-10) at National

level has decreased to 91 percent in 2014-15 from 92 percent in 2012-13. Although all

provinces have shown same trend however, the decrease in overall Pakistan is due to

decline in Sindh to 79 percent in 2014-15 from 81 percent in 2012-13. Punjab with 98

percent has the highest GER and Balochistan with 73 percent has the lowest among the

provinces. The Net Enrolment Rate (NER) for primary schools (Age 6-10) at National

level decreased to 67 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 68 percent in 2012-13. It

remains substantially lower than the GER because of the enrolment of overage children.

Punjab with 70 percent has the highest NER at primary level whereas Balochistan with

56 percent has the lowest. The PSLM survey collects information on enrolment in all

types of schools i.e. public and private. The PSLM 2014-15 shows decrease in the share

of primary enrolments in government schools. The overall share has decreased to 62

percent in 2014-15 as compared to 66 percent in 2012-13.

(xi)

Page 9: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PSLM 2014-15

The GER for middle level (Age 11-13) at National level decreased to 62 percent

in 2014-15 as compared to 63 percent in 2012-13. Province wise GER at middle level

shows that Punjab and Sindh decreased to 64 percent and 55 percent in 2014-15 as

compared to 65 percent and 57 percent in 2012-13 respectively, whereas there is

increasing trend in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa with 71 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 69

percent in 2012-13, and Balochistan remains stagnant at 65 percent during the period

2014-15 and 2012-13. However, NER (Age 11-13) which gives more realistic picture

decreased to 37 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 38 percent in 2012-13. Province wise

comparison reveals that, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa with 41 percent has the highest middle

level NER whereas Balochistan with 26 percent has the lowest.

The Matric level GER (Age 14-15) for National level has slightly increased to 58

percent in 2014-15 as compared to 57 percent in 2012-13. Here again the provinces

follows almost the same pattern as reflected in primary and middle level GER. Punjab

with 63 percent and Balochistan with 39 percent are at highest and lowest respectively.

NER at National level increased slightly to 27 percent in 2014-15 from 26 percent in

2012-13. Looking at the provinces, Punjab with 29 percent remained at the top and

Balochistan with 15 percent has the lowest percentage.

The literacy rate of population (10 years & above) at National level remains

stagnant at 60 percent during the period 2014-15 and 2012-13. Literacy remains much

higher in urban areas than in rural areas and much higher in men than in women. Punjab

with 63 percent is the highest and Balochistan with 44 percent is the lowest among all the

provinces. Adult literacy rate (15 years & above) at National level also remains stagnant

at 57 percent during the period 2014-15 and 2012-13.

Health

Two measures of immunization coverage are presented in PSLM report, “record

based” and “recall & record based” measures for one year old children. Immunization to

the child shows that 99 percent have received at least one immunization in 2014-15 as

compared to 98 percent in 2012-13. Among provinces Punjab and Sindh has the highest

percentage of children who have received at least one immunization with 99 percent each

(xii)

Page 10: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PSLM 2014-15

in 2014-15 as compared to 97 percent and 98 percent in 2012-13 respectively and

Balochistan has the lowest percentage with 96 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 92

percent in 2012-13.

The measure of fully immunized children including both recall and record based

immunizations remains stagnant at 82 percent during the period 2014-15 and 2012-13.

Among the provinces Punjab has the highest percentage of children who are fully

immunized based on recall and record with 89 percent which remain stagnant during the

period 2014-15 and 2012-13 and Balochistan has the lowest percentage with 51 percent

in 2014-15 as compared to 53 percent in 2012-13.

Full immunization based on record increased to 60 percent in 2014-15 from 57

percent in 2012-13. Among provinces Punjab has the highest percentage of children who

are fully immunized based on record with 70 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 65

percent in 2012-13 and Balochistan has the lowest percentage with 27 percent in 2014-15

as compared to 29 percent in 2012-13.

Overall percentage of children who have suffered from diarrhoea in the last 30

days prior to survey is 9 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 10 percent in 2012-13.

Highest percentage of diarrhoea cases were reported in Balochistan with 11 percent in

2014-15 as compared to 14 percent in 2012-13 and lowest cases were reported in Sindh

with 6 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 9 percent in 2012-13. In term of percentage

points the decline in the incidence of diarrhoea during the last 30 days was much rapid in

Sindh and Balochistan than in other two provinces between 2014-15 and 2012-13.

In overall Pakistan 73 percent of mothers who had given birth in the last three

years went for pre-natal consultations during their last pregnancy in 2014-15 as compared

to 69 percent in 2012-13. Among provinces Punjab has the highest percentage of mothers

visiting for pre-natal consultation with 78 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 73 percent

in 2012-13 and Balochistan has the lowest with 47 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 50

percent in 2012-13.

(xiii)

Page 11: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PSLM 2014-15

Five doses of Tetanus Toxoid injections are given to women during pregnancy to

provide lifetime protection. In overall Pakistan 75 percent of mothers in 2014-15 as

compared to 72 percent in 2012-13 had received a tetanus toxoid injection during their

last pregnancy. Punjab is at top with 84 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 81 percent in

2012-13 and Balochistan has the lowest with 34 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 31

percent in 2012-13. In term of percentage points, Sindh is increased by 6 percentage

points i.e. 69 percent in 2014-15 from 63 percent in 2012-13, mostly accounted by rural

areas.

Post-natal consultation with 29 percent remains stagnant during the period 2014-

15 and 2012-13. Post-natal consultations are higher in urban areas with 38 percent as

compared to rural areas with 25 percent. Sindh is at top with 33 percent in 2014-15 as

compared to 35 percent in 2012-13 and Balochistan has the lowest with 21 percent in

2014-15 as compared to 23 percent in 2012-13.

Housing, Water Supply & Sanitation

The housing units by tenure reveals that percentage of households who are living

in their own dwelling units declined to 84 percent in 2014-15 from 86 percent in 2012-

13, while the remaining 16 percent live in either rented, rent free or subsidized housing

units. The comparison of housing units by number of rooms shows that there is increase

in housing units with one room, 28 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 26 percent in

2012-13 and there is marginal decline in housing units with 2-4 rooms, 67 percent in

2014-15 as compared to 68 percent in 2012-13. However, houses with 5 or more rooms

remains stable at 6 percent during 2014-15 and 2012-13.

In Pakistan 27 percent of the households is using tap water as main source of

drinking water; however a decreasing pattern has been observed for last few years as

motorized pumping is increasing. Motorized pumping has increased to 33 percent in

2014-15 as compared to 30 percent in 2012-13. Among provinces regarding piped water

as main source of drinking water, Sindh with 41 percent has the highest while Punjab

with 18 percent has the lowest percentage.

(xiv)

Page 12: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PSLM 2014-15

Overall in Pakistan 73 percent of households use flush toilet, 13 percent

households have no toilet facility while 13 percent are using non-flush. By comparing

provinces Punjab with 79 percent is at the top having flush facility whereas, Balochistan

with 31 percent is at the bottom.

The housing units using electricity as source for lighting remains stagnant at 93

percent during the period 2014-15 and 2012-13. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa with 96 percent

has the highest percentage of household using electricity as a main source for lighting

while Balochistan with 81 percent has the lowest percentage. For cooking purposes gas

remained major source as fuel for cooking with 41 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 38

percent in 2012-13. Among provinces Sindh has the highest percentage of households i.e.

56 percent using gas as main fuel for cooking in 2014-15 as compared to 53 percent in

2012-13 and Balochistan has the lowest percentage with 25 percent in 2014-15 as

compared to 23 percent in 2012-13.

Household Perception of Economic Situation and Satisfaction by Facilities and Services Used.

Households were asked to compare their economic situation with last year. In

response to this question 44 percent in 2014-15 reported no change as compared to 43

percent in 2012-13, whereas 37 percent reported worse or much worse which remains

stagnant during 2014-15 & 2012-13 and 19 percent reported better or much better in

2014-15 as compared to 20 percent in 2012-13. However, when asked to compare the

economic situation of the community where they live, 62 percent reported no change in

2014-15 as compared to 60 percent in 2012-13, whereas 21 percent reported worse or

much worse in 2014-15 as compared to 19 percent in 2012-13 and 13 percent reported

better or much better in 2014-15 as compared to 16 percent in 2012-13.

Households were also asked to give opinion about their satisfaction of the

facilities/services provided. Only 57 percent of the household were satisfied from Basic

Health Facility in 2014-15 as compared to 53 percent in 2012-13. The household which

were satisfied with the Family Planning Service were 83 percent in 2014-15 as compared

(xv)

Page 13: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PSLM 2014-15

to 76 percent in 2012-13. The household which were satisfied with Schools were 94

percent in 2014-15 as compared to 93 percent in 2012-13. Household Satisfaction with

Police remains stagnant at 48 percent during the period 2014-15 and 2012-13.

(xvi)

Page 14: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PSLM 2014-15

PSLM INDICATORS USED FOR MONITORING OF MDGs

Indicator 1990-91

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2010-11

2011-12

2012-13

2013- 14

2014-15

MDG (Base line)

Target 2015

Education Net Primary Enrolment Ratio

46 56 55 57 56 57 57 57 57 100

Literacy Rate 35 55 56 57 58 58 60 58 60 88

Gender parity Index (GPI) for primary education

0.73 0.81 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.89 0.88 0.88 1

Gender parity Index (GPI) for secondary education

N.A 0.80 0.81 0.80 0.85 0.81 0.89 0.84 0.87 0.94

Youth Literacy GPI

0.51 0.75 0.78 0.77 0.79 0.81 0.82 0.80 0.82 1

Health Proportion of fully immunized children 12-23 months

75 76 73 78 81 80 82 76 82 >90

Proportion of under 1 year children immunized against measles

80 77 76 79 82 81 83 77 83 >90

Proportion of children under five who suffered from diarrhoea in the last 30 days

26 11 10 10 11 8 10 9 9 <10

(xvii)

Page 15: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PSLM 2014-15

Indicator 1990-91

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2010-11

2011-12

2012-13

2013- 14

2014-15

MDG (Base line)

Target 2015

Proportion of births attended by skilled birth attendants

18 37 40 41 43 49 55 58 58* >90

Proportion of women 15-49 years who had given birth during last 3 years and made at least one antenatal care consultation

15 58 56 53 62 68 69 72 73 100

Water Supply and Sanitation Proportion of population (urban and rural) with sustainable access to improve water source

53 87 91 89 87 89 87 87 86** 93

Proportion of population (urban and rural) with access to sanitation

30 59 66 63 66 72 71 74 73*** 90

Notes:

* Skilled Birth Attendant includes Doctor, Nurse, Midwife and LHV.

**Improved water source includes Tap water, Hand Pump and Motorized pumping as per new practice used in MDG report by PD& R Division.

***This represents flush facility in the Household.

(xviii)

Page 16: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PSLM 2014-15

SUMMARY OF KEY INDICATORS KEY INDICATORS: BASIC EDUCATION

2010-11 PSLM 2012-13 PSLM 2014-15 PSLM PRIMARY GER M F T M F T M F T (CLASS1-5 & age 6-10)OVERALL 99 82 91 98 84 92 98 82 91Punjab 103 92 98 103 94 98 103 92 98 Sindh 91 71 82 89 71 81 88 69 79 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 100 76 89 103 80 92 103 80 92 Balochistan 92 54 75 88 54 73 89 54 73 PRIMARY NER M F T M F T M F T (CLASS 1-5 & age 6-10)OVERALL 71 61 66 72 64 68 72 62 67Punjab 73 68 70 74 70 72 73 67 70 Sindh 68 55 62 67 56 62 67 54 61 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 71 56 64 76 60 68 78 62 71 Balochistan 68 40 56 65 42 55 67 42 56

GOVT ENROLMENT – PRIMARY ( percent TOTAL ENROLMENT)

M F T M F T M F T

OVERALL 69 68 68 66 65 66 62 61 62Punjab 62 64 63 60 62 61 55 57 56 Sindh 73 67 71 70 64 67 67 60 64 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 76 78 76 72 73 72 67 71 69 Balochistan 96 95 95 92 90 91 92 87 90

MIDDLE GER (CLASSES 6-8 & age 11-13)

M F T M F T M F T

OVERALL 68 54 62 69 56 63 68 56 62Punjab 67 61 64 68 62 65 67 62 64 Sindh 66 50 59 64 49 57 61 48 55 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 80 46 64 82 53 69 84 54 71 Balochistan 58 26 45 63 29 48 59 34 48 MIDDLE NER (CLASSES 6-8 & age 11-13) M F T M F T M F T OVERALL 38 32 35 40 35 38 39 34 37Punjab 37 36 37 39 40 39 39 38 38 Sindh 39 32 36 39 32 36 37 30 34 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 40 25 33 44 31 38 48 31 41 Balochistan 34 13 25 36 17 28 31 19 26 MATRIC GER (CLASSES 9-10 age 14-15) M F T M F T M F T

OVERALL 61 48 55 65 48 57 64 50 58Punjab Sindh

63 56 59 68 57 62 68 58 63 Sindh 56 42 50 59 41 51 57 44 51 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 67 35 52 71 38 55 69 38 55 Balochistan 46 16 34 47 16 33 50 21 39 MATRIC NER M F T M F T M F T (CLASSES 9-10 age 14-15)OVERALL 24 21 23 28 23 26 29 24 27Punjab 24 25 25 28 27 28 29 29 29 Sindh 26 20 23 28 21 25 29 20 25 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 23 14 19 31 18 25 34 18 27 Balochistan 21 4 14 19 7 14 19 9 15

(xix)

Page 17: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PSLM 2014-15

KEY INDICATORS: LITERACY2010-11 PSLM 2012-13 PSLM 2014-15 PSLM

LITERACY RATES10 YEARS AND OLDER)

M F T M F T M F T

OVERALL 69 46 58 71 48 60 70 49 60Punjab 70 51 60 71 54 62 71 55 63 Sindh 71 46 59 72 47 60 70 49 60 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 68 33 50 70 35 52 71 35 53 Balochistan 60 19 41 62 23 44 61 25 44 Adult Literacy Rate (Aged 15 Years & Older) M F T M F T M F T

OVERALL 67 42 55 69 45 57 68 45 57Punjab 67 47 57 69 50 59 69 51 60 Sindh 71 43 58 72 45 59 70 46 58 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 65 28 46 67 30 48 66 29 47 Balochistan 56 15 37 58 18 39 56 18 38

(xx)

Page 18: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PSLM 2014-15

KEY INDICATOR :HEALTH

2010-11 PSLM 2012-13 PSLM 2014-15 PSLM AT LEAST 1 IMMUNIZATION(12-23 months) M F T M F T M F T

OVERALL 97 97 97 98 98 98 99 99 99Punjab 97 96 97 98 98 98 99 99 99 Sindh 99 98 98 98 98 98 99 99 99 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 98 98 98 98 98 98 99 98 98 Balochistan 94 94 94 93 92 92 97 95 96

FULL IMMUNIZATION M F T M F T M F T (12-23 MONTHS BASE ON

RECALL AND RECORD)OVERALL 82 79 81 84 81 82 82 82 82Punjab 87 84 86 90 88 89 90 89 90 Sindh 75 74 75 75 73 74 72 74 73 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 78 77 77 79 73 76 79 77 78 Balochistan 55 56 56 58 49 53 52 50 51

DIARRHOEA LAST 30 DAYS (UNDER 5 YEARS)

M F T M F T M F T

OVERALL 12 11 11 10 10 10 9 9 9Punjab 11 11 11 10 10 10 10 9 9 Sindh 12 13 12 10 9 9 6 7 6 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 11 10 10 11 11 11 10 10 10 Balochistan 14 13 13 14 13 14 11 12 11

PRE- NATAL CONSULTATION(Percentage of Married women aged 15 to 49 years)

U R T U R T U R T

OVERALL 79 57 64 83 63 69 86 67 73Punjab 79 63 68 83 69 73 87 75 78 Sindh 85 49 65 86 55 68 87 59 72 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 69 49 52 76 56 59 80 61 64 Balochistan 55 41 44 65 45 50 65 41 47 TETANUS TOXOID(Percentage of Married Women U R T U R T U R T OVERALL 83 63 69 86 67 72 87 70 75Punjab 86 74 77 91 77 81 91 81 84 Sindh 84 42 60 83 48 63 85 56 69 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 74 58 61 81 62 65 82 64 67 Balochistan 41 28 31 48 26 31 55 26 34POST- NATAL CONSULTATION(Percentage of Married Women aged 15-49 years)

U R T U R T U R T

OVERALL 38 24 28 37 25 29 38 25 29Punjab 40 24 28 37 25 28 37 25 29Sindh 40 29 34 40 31 35 40 28 33Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 29 22 23 30 22 23 33 23 25Balochistan 22 17 18 28 21 23 32 17 21

(xxi)

Page 19: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PSLM 2014-15

REGION AND PROVINCE

Main Source of Drinking Water Tap

Water Hand Pump

Motor Pump

Dug Well

Others Total

PSLM 2014-15

OVERALL 27 26 33 3 11 100Punjab 18 28 45 1 9 100 Sindh 41 34 11 4 10 100 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 35 12 26 8 18 100 Balochistan 33 7 18 11 30 100

PSLM 2012-13

OVERALL 30 27 30 3 9 100Punjab 22 28 42 1 6 100 Sindh 43 34 9 4 10 100 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 44 12 18 8 18 100 Balochistan 34 7 14 14 31 100

KEY INDICATORS: COMPARISON OF HOUSING INDICATORS OF PSLM 2010-11, 2012-13, 2014-15

S. No Major Indicators 2010-11 PSLM

2012-13 PSLM

2014-15 PSLM

1 Housing units with one room (percent) 24.8 25.7 27.5

2 Housing units with 2 – 4 rooms (percent) 69.3 68.5 66.7

3 Housing units with 5 & more rooms (percent) 5.8 5.9 5.8

4 Owned Housing Units (percent)

85.9 85.8 84.1

5 Household size(Mean) 6.5 6.3 6.2

6 Piped water (percent) 32 30 27

7 Electricity (as source of lighting) (percent) 91.3 93.2 93.5

8 Gas (as cooking fuel) (percent) 35.4 38.3 41.3

(xxii)

Page 20: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PSLM 2014-15

KEY INDICATORS: WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION

TYPE OF TOILET (percent households)

2010-11 PSLM 2012-13 PSLM 2014-15 PSLM

U R T U R T U R T

FLUSH 96 51 66 97 57 71 97 60 73 NON-FLUSH 3 22 15 2 20 14 2 20 13 NO TOILET 2 27 18 1 22 15 1 21 13 TOTAL 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

2014-15 PSLM – Province/ District

FLUSH TOILET (percent households)

URBAN RURAL TOTAL URBAN RURAL TOTAL

2012-13 PSLM 2014-15 PSLM

FLUSHPunjab 98 68 77 98 70 79 Sindh 96 26 63 97 31 67 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 96 66 71 97 71 76Balochistan 80 14 30 78 14 31

Notes:

1. Results regarding Balochistan for the PSLM survey 2014-15 may please be read with caution, as the large number of areas i.e. 108 were dropped from the scope of the survey which also includes all areas of Panjgur and Kech district out of the total 790 areas. This is likely to affect the overall results of Balochistan province, whereas during the PSLM survey 2012-13 only 21 areas of Panjgur district were dropped, therefore the comparison for the two rounds may not be truly comparable for overall Balochistan.

REGION AND PROVINCE

ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE HOUSEHOLD Much Worse

Worse Same Better Much Better

Don’t Know

Total

A. PSLM 2014-15

OVERALL 7.24 29.59 44.08 16.48 2.39 0.22 100.00Punjab 6.58 31.02 42.57 17.60 2.14 0.09 100.00 Sindh 5.98 29.40 49.41 12.79 1.92 0.49 100.00 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 11.69 25.70 38.04 19.48 4.88 0.22 100.00 Balochistan 11.49 22.51 48.05 16.09 1.72 0.15 100.00 A. PSLM 2012-13

OVERALL 7.23 30.06 42.83 17.15 2.42 0.31 100.00 Punjab 6.57 32.08 40.52 18.41 2.31 0.12 100.00 Sindh 4.98 26.34 52.75 13.26 1.84 0.83 100.00 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 13.21 28.11 34.13 20.00 4.35 0.20 100.00 Balochistan 11.46 28.93 44.30 13.39 1.49 0.43 100.00

(xxiii)

Page 21: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PSLM 2014-15

Notes:

1. Table 5.3, Denominator includes only those households who are using the facility.

REGION AND PROVINCE

ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE COMMUNITY Much Worse

Worse Same Better Much Better

Don’t Know

Total

B. PSLM 2014-15

OVERALL 3.58 17.39 61.61 11.10 1.40 4.92 100.0Punjab 2.89 14.38 66.50 11.21 1.29 3.74 100.0 Sindh 3.82 26.62 55.81 8.10 0.95 4.70 100.0 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 4.10 11.61 54.24 18.57 2.98 8.49 100.0 Balochistan 10.06 16.19 53.13 7.26 1.14 12.21 100.0

B. PSLM 2012-13

OVERALL 3.94 15.30 60.48 13.94 1.83 4.51 100.0Punjab 3.09 14.13 63.43 14.85 1.50 3.00 100.0 Sindh 4.71 19.11 61.34 7.99 1.25 5.60 100.0 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 5.34 12.26 45.64 23.84 4.89 8.12 100.0 Balochistan 7.17 18.86 58.62 5.83 0.95 8.57 100.0

REGION AND PROVINCE

FACILITIES AND SERVICES USE BASIC

HEALTH UNIT

FAMILY PLANNING

SCHOOL VETERINARY HOSPITAL

AGRICULTURAL (EXT.) POLICE

C. PSLM 2014-15

OVERALL 57.40 82.66 93.70 71.06 69.35 48.48Punjab 65.84 85.53 96.24 79.74 79.67 49.71 Sindh 51.45 80.75 89.95 58.08 57.77 35.14 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 49.73 82.26 92.77 57.92 56.86 65.79 Balochistan 43.49 62.36 82.33 47.30 54.74 50.38

C. PSLM 2012-13

OVERALL 53.10 75.81 93.25 62.43 62.11 47.75Punjab 56.80 79.54 95.59 69.58 71.02 50.21 Sindh 52.43 73.72 88.87 54.27 51.87 38.13 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 44.83 75.21 93.55 48.23 54.14 55.43 Balochistan 44.91 43.90 80.46 35.20 46.35 49.85

(xxiv)

Page 22: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Introduction PSLM 2014-15

1. Introduction 1.1 The PSLM

The Pakistan Social and Living Standards Measurement Survey is one of the main

mechanism for monitoring the implementation of the development projects and tracking of the

MDGs. It provides a set of district level representative, population-based estimates of social

indicators and their progress under the MDGs. These include intermediate as well as ‘output’

measures, which assess what is being provided by the social sectors, e.g. enrolment rates in

education. They include a range of ‘outcome’ measures, which assess the welfare of the

population, e.g. Immunization Rate. Policy makers need to know, for example, whether the poor

have benefited from the programme or whether increased government expenditure on the social

sectors has been captured by the better off.

In the remainder of this introduction, a description of the PSLM Survey 2014-15

is provided. Data relating education, health, household assets / amenities, immunization, pre and

post-natal care and satisfaction of services is given in the following chapters.

Objectives

The data generated though PSLM Survey is used by the government in formulating the

poverty reduction strategy as well as development plans at district level. The indicators are

developed at district level in the following sectors.

1. Education 2. Health 3. Water & Sanitation. 4. Household Assets/Amenities. 5. Satisfaction to Service Delivery.

1.2 SAMPLE DESIGN OF PSLM SURVEY 2014-15 (DISTRICT LEVEL)

Universe: The universe for Pakistan Social and Living Standards Measurement Survey

(PSLM) consists of all urban and rural areas of the four provinces of Pakistan defined as such by

1998 Population Census excluding FATA and military restricted areas. The population of

excluded areas constitutes about 2% of the total population.

Sample Design: A stratified two-stage sample design is adopted for the survey.

1

Page 23: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Introduction PSLM 2014-15

Sampling Frame: Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS) has developed its own area

sampling frame for both Urban and Rural domains. Each city/town is divided into enumeration

blocks. Each enumeration block is comprised of 200 to 250 households on the average with well-

defined boundaries and maps. The list of enumeration blocks are updated from field on the

prescribed proforma by Quick Count technique for urban domain in 2013 and the updated list of

villages/mouzas/dehs or its part (block), based on House Listing 2011 for conduct of Population

Census are taken as sampling frames. Enumeration blocks are considered as Primary Sampling

Units (PSUs) for urban and rural domains respectively.

Stratification Plan

Urban Domain: Large cities Karachi, Lahore, Gujranwala, Faisalabad, Rawalpindi,

Multan, Sialkot, Sargodha, Bahawalpur, Hyderabad, Sukkur, Peshawar, Quetta and Islamabad

are considered as large cities. Each of these cities constitutes a separate stratum, further sub-

stratified according to low, middle and high income groups based on the information collected in

respect of each enumeration block at the time of demarcation/ updating of urban area sampling

frame.

Remaining Urban Areas: In all the four provinces after excluding the population of large

cities from the population of an administrative division, the remaining urban population is

grouped together to form a stratum.

Rural Domain: Each administrative district for all four provinces namely Punjab, Sindh,

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) and Balochistan is considered as an independent stratum.

Selection of primary sampling units (PSUs): Enumeration blocks in both Urban and rural

domains are taken as Primary Sampling Units (PSUs). Sample PSUs from each ultimate

stratum/sub-stratum are selected with probability proportional to size (PPS) method of sampling

scheme. In both Urban and Rural domains, the number of households in an enumeration block is

considered as measure of size.

Selection of secondary sampling units (SSUs): The listed households of sample PSUs are

taken as Secondary Sampling Units (SSUs). A specified number of households i.e. 12 from each

urban sample PSU and 16 from rural sample PSU are selected with equal probability using

systematic sampling technique with a random start.

2

Page 24: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Introduction PSLM 2014-15

Sample Size and its Allocation: Keeping in view the objectives of the survey, the sample

size for the four provinces has been fixed at 5428 sample blocks (PSU’s) comprising 81992

households (SSU’s), which is expected to produce reliable results at the district level. It is worth

mentioning here that Panjgur district of Balochistan was dropped from the scope of the survey at

the allocation stage due to prevailing situation in Panjgur district. While 7 PSUs from Sindh, 13

PSUs from KP and 82 PSUs from Balochistan province ( including Kech district) were dropped

from the scope of the survey during execution of the survey due to law and order situation. The

province wise sample size and its allocation is given as under; PROFILE OF THE PSU’S AND SSU’S FOR PSLM SURVEY 2014-15

PROVINCE

Fixed for the survey Covered during the survey 2014-15 2014-15

Urban Rural Total Urban Rural Total PSUs: Punjab 594 1860 2454 594 1860 2454 Sindh 376 907 1283 375 901 1276 KP 104 777 881 104 764 868 Balochistan 113 651 764 110 572 682 Islamabad 27 19 46 27 19 46 Overall 1214 4214 5428 1210 4116 5326 SSUs/Households Punjab 7128 29760 36888 6814 29188 36002 Sindh 4512 14512 19024 4399 14336 18735 KP 1248 12432 13680 1184 11898 13082 Balochistan 1356 10416 11772 1276 8971 10247 Islamabad 324 304 628 292 277 569 Overall 14568 67424 81992 13965 64670 78635

Note: Non-contact and refusal households are excluded from covered PSUs and SSUs. Province wise detail of dropped sample areas (PSUs) and sample households (SSUs) is shown as under:-

Province/Area Sample Enumeration Blocks

(PSUs) Sample Households (SSUs)

Urban Rural Total Urban Rural Total Khyber Pakhtunkhwa - 13 13 - 208 208 Punjab - - - - - - Sindh 1 6 7 12 96 108 Balochistan 3 79 82 36 1264 1300 Pakistan 4 98 102 48 1568 1616

Note: In Balochistan, two districts namely Kech and Panjgur have been dropped from the scope

of the survey.

3

Page 25: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Introduction PSLM 2014-15

Estimation Procedures: Detail of estimation procedures for estimates and their variances is attached as Annexure-I.

1.3 Objectives and scope of analysis This is the sixth analytical report containing district level indicators of the PSLM Survey.

It provides an overview of the findings in all sectors at district levels. Given that the PSLM is a

large, complex household survey that collects information on a number of different topics, the

tabulations presented here comprise the detailed tables at National/ Provincial/ District levels.

1.4 Household and Survey Questionnaire

At both individual and household level, the PSLM Survey collects information on a wide

range of topics using an integrated questionnaire. The questionnaire comprises a number of

different sections, each of which looks at a particular aspect of household behavior or welfare.

Data collected under Round X includes Education, Health, Water & Sanitation and Household

Economic Situation & Satisfaction by facilities and services use.

1.5 Data Quality and Reliability Measures

Data quality in PSLM Survey has been ensured through built in system of checking of

fieldwork by the supervisors in the field as well as teams from the headquarters. Regional/ Field

offices ensured the data quality through preliminary editing at their office level. The entire data

entry was carried out at the PBS headquarter Islamabad and the data entry programme used had a

number of in built consistency checks. This is the 6th round of district level survey and it has

been observed that overall indicators do follow the usual pattern at national/provincial levels.

However, in certain districts particularly of Balochistan province there are variations in

indicators between 2004-05, 2006-07, and 2008-09, 2010-11 , 2012-13 and 2014-15 which may

be due to prevailing situation in the province, which probably lead to under/over reporting of

events.

4

Page 26: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Education PSLM 2014-15

2. EDUCATION

2.1 Introduction

Education is the process by which society transmits its accumulated knowledge, values

and skills from one generation to the next. It plays vital role in bringing social development,

economic prosperity and to enhance the individual’s potentials. Education introduces and

prepares the nation to cope with the new orders of the modern age.

The idea which is also globally perceived by adopting the MDG in the year 2000 is

exclusively focus on the discussions and analysis on economic and social development

indicators. Keeping in view the agenda government has formulated a policy to provide quality

education which is accessible and affordable for all. The some of the key areas for improving

education system are as follows:

• To expand public provision of primary education.

• To increase enrolments faster than the growth in population.

• To provide and ensure equal educational opportunities to all the citizens of Pakistan.

• To put great stress on the primary level education because it forms the core of the literate population.

• To improve the functioning & utilisation of existing schools, improve the quality of education and increase enrolments.

• To improve access to education and expand the primary education system.

It is worth mentioning that Islam places great emphasis on acquiring education for both

men and women. The Holy Prophet of Allah (S.A.W.W) has said in a Hadith which means:

"Attainment of knowledge is a must for every Muslim".

PSLM data on Education is one of the major source for monitoring MDG’s. Among the

eight goals the two goals cover through PSLM surveys.

1. Under goal 2, (Achieve Universal Primary Education), two indicators are monitored which are “Net primary enrolment” and “Literacy rate”.

2. Under goal 3, (Promote Gender Equality and Women Empowerment), two indicators are monitored “Gender parity index” for primary and secondary education and “Youth literacy GPI”.

5

Page 27: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Education PSLM 2014-15

PSLM survey producing key indicators on education is a good source for the federal

government as well as for the provinces to overview strengths and weaknesses of their respective

programmes and identify grey areas for further interventions. However, this chapter will cover

key indicators on school attendance, enrolment rates and literacy.

2.2 School attendance

The population of ten years and older that has ever attended schools at National level is

62 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 61 percent in 2012-13. This proportion is much higher in

urban areas than in rural areas 77 percent and 53 percent respectively and higher in men than in

women 72 percent and 51 percent

respectively. Province wise comparison

reveals that Punjab with 65 percent in

2014-15 as compared to 64 percent in

2012-13 have the highest proportion of

population that has ever attended school

followed by Sindh with 61 percent in

2014-15 as compared to 60 percent in

2012-13. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) and

Balochistan remains stagnant at 55 percent

and 44 percent during the period 2014-15 and 2012-13 respectively. The school attendance in

Islamabad (Federal Capital) is 85 percent. While observing the district level position, Rawalpindi

with 83 percent, Karachi with 83 percent, Abbottabad and Haripur with 72 percent and Gwadar

with 63 percent are the top ranked districts within their respective provinces. On the other hand

Rajanpur with 38 percent, Kashmore with 33 percent, Kohistan and Tor Ghar with 27 percent

and Jhal Magsi with 24 percent are the districts at the bottom within their respective provinces.

While analysing gender disparity in enrolments it is observed that significant disparities

exist in KP with 74 percent males and 36 percent females enrolment followed by Balochistan

with 60 percent males and 25 percent females enrolment. District wise comparison reveals that

significant gender difference exist in following districts, D.G.Khan with 58 percent males and 30

percent females, Kashmore with 48 percent males and 17 percent females, Kohistan with 45

percent males and only 7 percent females and Dera Bugti with 43 percent males and only 4

percent females enrolment within their respective provinces (Table 2.1).

Figure 2.1: Ever Attended School

010203040506070 61 64 60 55

44

62 65 6155

44

2012-13

2014-15

6

Page 28: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Education PSLM 2014-15

At National level, population that has completed primary level is 52 percent in 2014-15

as compared to 51 percent in 2012-13. Province wise comparison reveals that Punjab remains

stagnant at 54 percent during the period 2014-15 and 2012-13 and have the highest proportion of

population that has completed primary

level followed by Sindh with 53 percent

in 2014-15 as compared to 52 percent in

2012-13, KP also remains stagnant at 44

percent during the period 2014-15 and

2012-13 and Balochistan have the lowest

percentage of population who completed

primary level with 35 percent in 2014-15

as compared to 34 percent in 2012-13. In

Islamabad the population that has

completed primary level is 77 percent. While observing the district level position, Rawalpindi

with 75 percent, Karachi with 76 percent, Abbottabad with 62 percent and Mastung with 53

percent are the best performing districts within their respective provinces. Whereas Rajanpur

with 29 percent, Kashmore and Tando Muhammad Khan with 27 percent, Tor Ghar with 15

percent and Jhal Magsi with 19 percent are the lowest districts within their respective provinces.

Highest gender differences are observed in the following districts within their respective

provinces in completion of primary level i.e. D.G.Khan with 45 percent males and 23 percent

females, Kashmore with 40 percent males and 14 percent females, Kohistan and Tor Ghar with

30 percent males and only 3 percent females and Killa Saifullah with 63 percent males and only

4 percent females (Table 2.2).

2.3 Enrolment Rates

The comparison of GERs and NERs have been done using both standard definition by

using age group 5-9 for primary, 10-12 for middle and 13-14 for matric and the same are

presented in the table with part ‘B’ and keeping in view the ground realities in the context of

Pakistan it is felt that the age group 6-10 for primary, 11-13 for middle and 14-15 for matric

appears to be more practical and realistic, therefore these groups for enrolments are presented

with part ‘A’.

Figure 2.2: Completed Primary Level

0102030405060 51 54 52

4434

52 54 5344

35

2012-13

2014-15

7

Page 29: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Education PSLM 2014-15

2.4 Primary Enrolment Rates 2.4.1 Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER)

The GER, sometimes referred to as the participation rate, is the number of children

attending primary schools divided by the number of children who ought to be attending. The

GERs are presented in this report in different ways: excluding and including katchi class and for

different age groups.

Table 2.3(a) shows the gross primary level enrolment ratio at National level excluding

katchi for the age group 6-10 years and Table 2.3(b) for age 5-9 years. The GER for the age

group 6-10 years at National level has decreased to 91 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 92

percent in 2012-13. Province wise

comparison shows that, Punjab, KP and

Balochistan remains stagnant at 98

percent, 92 percent and 73 percent

respectively during the period 2014-15

and 2012-13. Whereas Sindh has

decreased to 79 percent in 2014-15 from

81 percent in 2012-13. The Gross

Enrolment Ratio in Islamabad is 120

percent. While observing the district level

position, Chakwal with 121 percent, Dadu with 100 percent, Abbottabad with 112 percent and

Gwadar with 102 percent are the top

ranked districts within their respective

provinces. Whereas Rahim Yar Khan with

68 percent, Tando Muhammad Khan with

51 percent, Kohistan with 56 percent and

Dera Bugti with 33 percent are the bottom

ranked districts within their respective

provinces. Significant gender differences

are evident in GERs, the highest

differences are in Sheerani district of

Figure 2.3: GER at Primary Level Age (6-10)

020406080

100 9298

8192

7391

9879

9273

2012-13

2014-15

Figure 2.4: Gender-wise Difference between provinces

020406080

100120 98 103

88103 8982

92

6980

54

Male

Female

8

Page 30: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Education PSLM 2014-15

Balochistan with 92 percent enrolment for males and only 9 percent enrolment for females

(Table 2.3a).

Almost similar patterns are observed when age group is expanded to 5-9 years. The GER

for the age group 5-9 years at National level has decreased to 89 percent in 2014-15 as compared

to 91 percent in 2012-13. Province wise comparison shows that all the provinces has slightly

decreased, Punjab at 97 percent in 2014-15 from 98 percent in 2012-13, Sindh at 79 percent in

2014-15 from 81 percent in 2012-13, KP at 90 percent in 2014-15 from 91 percent in 2012-13

and Balochistan at 71 percent in 2014-15 from 73 percent in 2012-13 (Table 2.3b).

The GER at National Level is 93 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 92 percent in 2012-

13, when katchi class is included and the age group is expanded to Children 4-9 years old. The

pattern within districts in the provinces is more or less similar to GERs without including katchi

class (Table 2.4).

The PSLM 2014-15 collected information on enrolment in all types of schools including

the private and government sectors. Table 2.5 shows the GER in government primary schools. It

is calculated as the number of children enrolled in government primary schools divided by the

number of children of primary school age.

At National level GER in government primary schools has decreased to 55 percent in

2014-15 as compared to 60 percent in 2012-13. Province wise comparison reveals that there is

overall declining trend in GER for government primary schools, Punjab at 54 percent in 2014-15

as compared to 60 percent in 2012-13,

Sindh at 50 percent in 2014-15 as

compared to 54 percent in 2012-13, KP at

62 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 66

percent in 2012-13 and Balochistan at 64

percent in 2014-15 as compared to 67

percent in 2012-13. GER in government

primary schools in Islamabad is 55

percent. While observing district level

comparison, Layyah with 88 percent,

Tharparkar with 73 percent, Lower Dir with 82 percent and Gwadar with 94 percent have the

Figure 2.5: GER in Government Primary School

010203040506070 60 60 54 66 67

55 54 5062 64

2012-13

2014-15

9

Page 31: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Education PSLM 2014-15

highest GER in government schools within their respective provinces. Whereas Bahawalpur with

34 percent, Karachi with 23 percent, Peshawar with 41 percent and Dera Bugti with 29 percent

have the lowest government primary GER within their respective provinces. Here an interesting

fact is observed that apart from Islamabad, which has a rich facility of Government schools and

colleges, the general trend in all other big cities shows an increasing trend for private educational

facilities. Results reveals that the absence of private schools leaves no alternatives and makes

government schools a priority in small districts (Table 2.5).

2.4.2 Net Enrolment Rates (NER)

The NER at primary level refers to the number of students enrolled in primary schools of

primary school age divided by the number of children in the age group for that level of

education. Primary NER is the number of children aged 6 to 10 years attending primary level

divided by the number of children aged 6 to 10 years.

The NER for Pakistan has decreased to 67 percent in 2014-15 from 68 percent in 2012-

13. Province wise comparison reveals that Punjab and Sindh has shown slight decline, Punjab at

70 percent in 2014-15 from 72 percent in 2012-13 and Sindh at 61 percent in 2014-15 from 62

percent in 2012-13, while KP increased to

71 percent in 2014-15 from 68 percent in

2012-13 and Balochistan has shown slight

increase to 56 percent in 2014-15 from 55

percent in 2012-13. Primary level NER for

Islamabad is 90 percent. Comparing

primary level NERs for districts, Jhelum

with 91 percent, Dadu with 81 percent,

Mardan with 83 percent and Gwadar with

82 percent are top ranked districts within

their respective provinces. Whereas Rahim Yar Khan with 50 percent, Tando Muhammad Khan

with 35 percent, Kohistan with 37 percent and Dera Bugti with 28 percent are at bottom within

their respective provinces. The NERs at primary level shows that females have a lower

enrolment rate than males and the difference is markedly larger in rural areas than in urban areas

(Table 2.6a).

Figure 2.6: NER at Primary Level Age (6-10)

0

20

40

60

80 68 7262 68

5567 70

6171

56

2012-13

2014-15

10

Page 32: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Education PSLM 2014-15

Net enrolment rate at primary level for children 5-9 years shows almost same pattern,

there is increasing trend in KP from 54 to 56 percent and slight increase in Balochistan province

from 45 to 46 percent whereas the other two provinces shows declining trend. Primary level

NER age (5-9) for Islamabad is 82 percent (Table 2.6b).

NER at primary level for age 4-9 including katchi class shows increasing pattern in

overall Pakistan and all provinces like Gross Enrolment Ratio at primary level age 4-9 (Table

2.7).

NER for government primary schools is the number of children aged 5-9 years enrolled

in government primary schools divided by the total number of children aged 5-9. Like the GER

for government schools, it measures the

extent to which publicly provided

education is reaching its target group.

However, this measure excludes overage

children who are enrolled in primary

schools. In Overall Pakistan there is a

decline to 34 percent in 2014-15 from 37

percent in 2012-13. By analysing

provinces it is revealed that NER in

Punjab decreased to 32 percent in 2014-15

from 36 percent in 2012-13, Sindh

decreased to 33 percent in 2014-15 from 36 percent in 2012-13, KP slightly increased to 38

percent in 2014-15 from 37 percent in 2012-13 and Balochistan also slightly increased to 41

percent in 2014-15 from 40 percent in 2012-13. The NER for Government primary schools

within districts follows a similar pattern as observed for NERs for the primary enrolment (Table

2.8).

2.4.3 Primary Level Enrolment in Government School

The percentage of primary school students who are enrolled in government schools is

shown in Table 2.9 (a). The government share of primary enrolment at National level is 62

percent in 2014-15 as compared to 66 percent in 2012-13. Province wise comparison reveals that

there is overall declining trend for enrolment in government primary schools, Punjab at 56

Figure 2.7: NER in Government Primary School

0

10

20

30

40

5037 36 36 37 40

34 32 3338 41

2012-13

2014-15

11

Page 33: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Education PSLM 2014-15

percent as compared to 61 percent in

2012-13, Sindh at 64 percent as

compared to 67 percent in 2012-13, KP

at 69 percent as compared to 72 percent

in 2012-13 and Balochistan at 90

percent as compared to 91 percent in

2012-13. Primary level enrolment in

government schools in Islamabad is 48

percent. While observing district level

position, Bhakkar with 79 percent,

Shahdadkot with 93 percent, Upper Dir and Tor Ghar with 96 percent and Nushki, Kachhi

(Bolan) and Washuk with 100 percent are the top ranked districts within their respective

provinces. Whereas Lahore with 35 percent, Karachi with 23 percent, Peshawar with 43 percent

and Quetta with 75 percent have the lowest primary enrolment in government schools within

their respective provinces. The above analysis reflects that developed districts have larger share

of private education whereas less developed districts mainly depend on government educational

facilities (Table 2.9a).

2.5 Middle Enrolment Rates

2.5.1 Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER)

Gross Enrolment Ratio for the middle level with age group 11-13 years old are presented

in Tables 2.10(a). The GER for the

middle level age 11-13, for Pakistan

as a whole decreased to 62 percent in

2014-15 as compared to 63 percent in

2012-13. The middle level enrolment

in urban areas remains stagnant at 77

percent during the period 2014-15

and 2012-13, whereas it marginally

decreased in rural areas i.e. 55

percent in 2014-15 as compared to 56

percent in 2012-13. Province wise

Figure 2.9: GER at Middle Level Age (11-13)

01020304050607080 63 65

5769

48

62 6455

71

48

2012-13

2014-15

Figure 2.8: Primary Level Enrolments in Government School

020406080

10066 61

67 7291

62 56 64 6990

2012-13

2014-15

12

Page 34: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Education PSLM 2014-15

situation of GER at middle level reveals that, Punjab and Sindh decreased to 64 percent and 55

percent in 2014-15 as compared to 65 percent and 57 percent in 2012-13 respectively, While KP

increased to 71 percent in 2014-15 from 69 percent in 2012-13 and Balochistan is stagnant at 48

percent during the period 2014-15 and 2012-13. GER for middle level in Islamabad is 104

percent. Comparing middle level GERs for districts, result shows that Chakwal with 107 percent,

Karachi with 83 percent, Swabi with 102 percent and Quetta with 78 percent are the best

performing districts within their respective provinces. While Bahawalpur with 39 percent, Thatta

with 27 percent, Kohistan with 26 percent and Dera Bugti with 23 percent have lowest GERs

within their respective provinces. Highest Gender disparity is observed in Kohlu district of

Balochistan with 56 percent males and only 4 percent female gross enrolment in middle level

(Table 2.10a).

Tables 2.10(b) is also included for GER at middle level by changing age group from 11-

13 years to 10-12 years, to make comparison and to see the impact on the Gross Enrolment

Ratios. The GER for the middle level age 10-12, for Pakistan as a whole decreased to 55 percent

in 2014-15 as compared to 56 percent in 2012-13. It shows almost the same pattern for provinces

which is followed in table 2.10a.

2.5.2 Net Enrolment Rates (NER)

Net enrolment rates for the middle level with age group 11-13 years old are presented in

Tables 2.11(a). Net enrolment rates at the middle level are much lower than Gross Enrolment

Ratios. This is due to the large number

of overage children that are enrolled in

these classes. NER at middle level

decreased to 37 percent in 2014-15 as

compared to 38 percent in 2012-13.

Province wise comparison also reveals

that all provinces are more or less at

the same pattern of year 2012-13. The

district level comparison within the

provinces depicts NERs have almost

the same patterns which are observed

Figure 2.10: NER at Middle Level Age (11-13)

0

10

20

30

40

5038 39 36 38

28

37 38 3441

26

2012-13

2014-15

13

Page 35: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Education PSLM 2014-15

for GERs. Islamabad with 67 percent is at top in the country whereas Killa Abdullah with 12

percent enrolment is at the bottom (Table 2.11a).

Tables 2.11(b) is also prepared by changing age group from 11-13 years to 10-12 years.

NER for middle level with age group 10-12 is stagnant at 22 percent during the period 2014-15

and 2012-13. Province wise comparison reveals that Punjab and KP remains stagnant at 25

percent and 21 percent respectively during the period 2014-15 and 2012-13, Sindh and

Balochistan decreased to 18 percent and 13 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 19 percent and 14

percent in 2012-13 respectively (Table 2.11b).

2.6 Matric Enrolment Rates

2.6.1 Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER)

At matric level, GER for the age

group 14-15 at National level has

slightly increased to 58 percent in 2014-

15 from 57 percent in 2012-13. Province

wise comparison reveals that Punjab

slightly increased to 63 percent in 2014-

15 from 62 percent in 2012-13, Sindh

and KP remains stagnant at 51 percent

and 55 percent respectively, While

Balochistan increased to 39 percent in

2014-15 as compared to 33 percent in

2012-13. The GER at matric level in Islamabad is 106 percent. While district level position

reveals that, Rawalpindi with 99 percent, Karachi with 89 percent, Chitral with 84 percent and

Quetta with 69 percent have the highest GER at matric level within their respective provinces.

However, Rahim Yar Khan with 33 percent, Sujawal with 14 percent, Kohistan with 15 percent

and Dera Bugti with 9 percent have the lowest level of gross enrolment in matric within their

respective provinces. District Barkhan with 59 percent males and only 2 percent females in

Balochistan have shown the widest gender disparity at matric level (Table 2.12a).

Figure 2.11: GER at Matric Level Age (14-15)

010203040506070 57 62

51 55

33

58 6351 55

39

2012-13

2014-15

14

Page 36: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Education PSLM 2014-15

Table 2.12(b) is regarding GER for matric level by changing age group from 14-15 years

to 13-14 years. The GER for matric at National level is stagnant at 59 percent during the period

2014-15 and 2012-13. It shows more or less the same pattern for provinces which are followed in

table 2.12a.

2.6.2 Net Enrolment Rates (NER)

Net enrolment rates for the matric level with age group 14-15 years old are presented in

Tables 2.13(a). The NER for Pakistan

as a whole is slightly increased to 27

percent in 2014-15 as compared to 26

percent in 2012-13. Province wise

comparison reveals that Punjab

slightly increased to 29 percent in

2014-15 from 28 percent in 2012-13,

Sindh remains stagnant at 25 percent

during the period 2014-15 and 2012-

13, while KP and Balochistan

increased to 27 percent and 15 percent in 2014-15 from 25 percent and 14 percent in 2012-13

respectively. Matric level NER for Islamabad is 49 percent. Comparing primary level NERs for

districts, Rawalpindi with 49 percent, Karachi with 39 percent, and Karak with 39 percent and

Mastung with 40 percent are top ranked districts within their respective provinces. Whereas

Rahim Yar Khan with 15 percent, Thatta with 3 percent, Kohistan with 4 percent and Barkhan

with 5 percent (lowest Matric NER in overall country) are at bottom within their respective

provinces (Table 2.13a).

Tables 2.13(b) have been added for NER, for matric level by changing age group from

14-15 to 13-14 for our readers who are interested to know the pattern for the age group 13-14.

NER for matric level with age group 13-14 shows lower enrolments i.e. 14 percent as compared

to age group 14-15 i.e. 27 percent as it seems more practical interval for matric level.

Figure 2.12: NER at Matric Level Age (14-15)

05

1015202530 26 28

25 25

14

27 2925 27

15

2012-13

2014-15

15

Page 37: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Education PSLM 2014-15

2.7 Literacy

Literacy is an important indicator

of education as its improvement is likely

to have an impact on other important

indicators of welfare. The literacy rate for

population 10 years and above at National

level remains stagnant at 60 percent during

the period 2014-15 and 2012-13. Literacy

remains much higher in urban areas with

76 percent than in rural areas with 51

percent and much higher in men with 70

percent than in women with 49 percent. Province wise comparison reveals that Punjab leads with

63 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 62 percent in 2012-13, followed by Sindh which remains

stable at 60 percent, KP with 53 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 52 percent in 2012-13, and

Balochistan which remains stagnant at 44 percent during the period 2014-15 and 2012-13.

Literacy rate of Islamabad is 85 percent. District level comparison shows that, Rawalpindi with

83 percent, Karachi with 82 percent, Abbottabad and Haripur with 69 percent and Quetta with 63

percent are the top ranked districts within their respective provinces. Whereas Rajanpur with 38

percent, Tando Mohammad Khan with 30 percent, Tor Ghar with 23 percent and Dera Bugti and

Jhal Magsi with 25 percent are at bottom within their respective provinces (Table 2.14 a).

Adult literacy rate for the population (aged 15 and above) is stagnant at 57 percent during

the period 2014-15 and 2012-13. The pattern among districts within the provinces is similar to

the Literacy rate of population 10 years and above (Table 2.14 b).

Figure 2.13: Literacy (age >=10)

010203040506070 60 62 60

5244

60 63 6053

44

2012-13

2014-15

16

Page 38: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

Pakistan 83 71 77 66 40 53 72 51 62Punjab 84 74 79 69 47 58 74 56 65

Islamabad 91 80 86 91 74 83 91 78 85

Attock 94 76 84 77 51 63 81 57 69

Rawalpindi 92 80 86 90 72 80 91 76 83

Jhelum 90 86 88 85 67 76 87 73 79

Chakwal 89 76 82 84 61 71 85 63 72

Sargodha 84 72 78 68 43 56 74 54 64

Bhakkar 82 61 72 68 34 51 70 38 54

Khushab 82 61 71 73 37 54 76 44 60

Mianwali 84 60 72 77 36 55 78 41 58

Faisalabad 81 76 78 72 55 63 76 65 70

Chiniot 72 59 66 60 27 44 64 38 52

Jhang 83 70 77 68 35 51 72 43 57

Toba Tek Singh 88 77 82 72 55 63 76 60 67

Gujranwala 84 79 81 72 64 68 78 72 75

Hafizabad 78 66 72 68 53 60 72 57 64

Gujrat 86 82 84 81 70 75 82 73 77

Mandi Bahuddin 84 73 78 71 57 64 73 60 66

Sialkot 90 87 89 83 76 79 85 79 82

Narowal 89 74 82 80 67 72 82 68 74

Lahore 87 81 84 84 70 78 86 78 82

Kasur 78 70 74 72 55 63 74 60 66

Sheikhupura 78 70 74 72 62 67 74 64 69

Nankana Sahib 85 75 79 75 55 65 78 61 69

Okara 75 68 71 63 42 52 66 49 58

Sahiwal 83 72 78 67 47 57 70 52 61

Pakpattan 81 57 69 63 39 51 65 42 53

Vehari 78 65 71 63 38 50 66 43 54

Multan 79 72 76 62 39 51 69 52 61

Lodhran 84 66 75 64 36 51 67 41 54

Khanewal 81 64 73 69 45 57 71 49 60

D.G.khan 84 71 78 54 22 38 58 30 44

Rajanpur 76 57 67 44 18 32 49 25 38

Layyah 88 68 78 75 46 61 77 49 64

Muzaffargarh 79 63 71 58 28 43 60 33 47

Bahawalpur 76 61 69 56 30 43 61 38 50

Bahawalnagar 75 64 70 61 37 49 64 43 54Rahim Yar Khan 74 61 68 57 29 43 60 35 48

TABLE 2.1 POPULATION THAT HAS EVER ATTENDED SCHOOL BY- PROVINCE AND DISTRICTS.URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT

NOTES:1. Population aged 10 years and older that has ever attended school expressed as a percentage of the total population aged 10 years and older.2. Attended school: all those individuals who have ever attended school (either currently attending, or attended in the past) were taken to have attended school.

17

Page 39: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.1 POPULATION THAT HAS EVER ATTENDED SCHOOL BY- PROVINCE AND DISTRICTS.URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Sindh 83 71 77 57 25 42 71 50 61

Jacobabad 77 43 60 42 11 27 52 20 36

Kashmore 68 37 53 38 7 23 48 17 33

Shikarpur 72 52 62 56 20 38 61 30 45

Larkana 78 55 66 69 38 53 73 46 59

Shahdadkot 61 40 50 48 21 35 51 26 39

Sukkur 82 59 71 66 17 43 75 43 60

Ghotki 73 42 58 57 15 37 60 21 42

Khairpur 76 45 61 66 26 46 69 32 51

Naushahro Feroze 86 64 76 79 54 67 81 56 69

Shaheed Benazirabad 75 55 66 64 23 44 67 33 50

Dadu 94 78 87 74 50 63 78 54 67

Jamshoro 75 49 63 56 29 43 61 34 48

Hyderabad 73 61 67 49 25 38 69 55 62

Tando Allah Yar 70 54 63 46 22 35 52 30 42

Tando Muhammad Khan 71 62 67 37 14 26 44 23 34

Matiari 77 49 64 58 29 44 63 34 49

Badin 72 49 61 50 19 36 55 26 41

Thatta 81 60 71 56 19 38 59 24 43

Sujawal 78 61 69 49 15 33 53 22 38

Sanghar 81 60 71 59 20 40 65 31 48

Mirpur Khas 79 69 74 52 19 36 61 35 49

Umerkot 74 46 60 49 13 32 55 21 39

Tharparkar 75 56 65 55 20 38 56 22 40

Karachi 87 81 84 61 55 58 86 80 83

18

Page 40: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.1 POPULATION THAT HAS EVER ATTENDED SCHOOL BY- PROVINCE AND DISTRICTS.URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 82 53 68 72 33 52 74 36 55

Chitral 81 61 73 75 44 60 76 46 62

Upper Dir 79 42 61 68 25 46 68 25 46

Lower Dir 88 58 74 81 37 59 81 38 60

Swat 82 57 70 70 32 52 72 36 55

Shangla - - - 60 13 37 60 13 37

Buner - - - 63 19 39 63 19 39

Malakand PA 81 58 70 78 46 62 78 47 63

Kohistan - - - 45 7 27 45 7 27

Mansehra 91 64 77 77 52 63 78 53 64

Batagram - - - 71 25 46 71 25 46

Abbottabad 92 82 87 79 59 68 82 63 72

Haripur 91 70 80 83 59 70 85 61 72

Tor Ghar - - - 51 8 27 51 8 27

Mardan 77 42 59 72 32 51 73 34 53

Swabi 70 43 56 66 35 50 66 36 51

Charsadda 78 40 60 71 29 50 72 32 52

Peshawar 84 52 68 74 31 52 79 42 61

Nowshera 76 50 63 69 39 54 71 42 57

Kohat 88 56 71 72 28 48 75 33 53

Hangu 74 27 50 71 15 41 72 17 43

Karak 97 70 82 89 42 64 90 43 65

Bannu 89 61 76 82 27 55 82 29 56

Lakki Marwat 91 46 68 81 24 54 82 27 56

D.I.Khan 86 69 77 60 24 42 63 30 46

Tank 76 42 59 68 21 44 70 24 47

19

Page 41: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.1 POPULATION THAT HAS EVER ATTENDED SCHOOL BY- PROVINCE AND DISTRICTS.URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Balochistan 74 43 59 55 17 38 60 25 44

Quetta 72 47 60 77 46 64 74 46 61

Pishin 80 32 57 70 24 49 71 25 50

Killa Abdullah 79 24 52 39 6 25 43 8 28

Chagai 84 39 64 43 6 26 47 9 30

Nushki 78 27 53 64 22 45 67 23 46

Loralai 80 50 65 58 15 40 61 22 44

Barkhan 85 35 62 41 5 24 47 8 29

Musa Khel 61 26 46 55 29 42 57 28 43

Killa Saifullah 82 7 45 74 5 38 76 6 40

Zhob 85 46 68 54 7 32 64 18 43

Sheerani - - - 68 6 38 68 6 38

Sibi 81 50 66 35 24 30 53 34 44

Harnai 82 51 66 41 9 27 44 12 29

Ziarat 92 42 71 53 22 39 56 23 41

Kohlu 79 26 56 44 10 28 50 12 32

Dera Bugti 60 23 43 41 2 23 43 4 25

Kachhi (Bolan) 85 52 71 49 16 34 57 23 42

Jaffarabad 62 24 43 52 12 33 55 15 36

Nasirabad 69 24 48 42 6 25 49 11 32

Jhal Magsi 74 22 49 34 11 23 35 11 24

Kalat 87 69 79 56 40 49 61 45 54

Mastung 92 66 80 71 30 53 76 38 59

Khuzdar 65 40 53 58 18 40 60 26 45

Awaran - - - 63 23 46 63 23 46

Kharan 89 51 70 49 11 32 63 26 46

Washuk - - - 53 16 36 53 16 36

Lasbela 78 58 68 35 14 26 50 31 42

Gwadar 83 50 69 79 20 54 81 37 63

NOTES:

1. The Panjgur & Kech districts have been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

20

Page 42: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 2.2 PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION THAT HAS COMPLETED PRIMARY LEVEL OR HIGHER - BY PROVINCE & DISTRICTS

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

Pakistan 73 63 68 53 31 42 60 43 52

Punjab 73 66 70 54 38 46 61 47 54

Islamabad 84 74 79 79 66 73 83 71 77

Attock 82 67 74 66 42 53 71 48 59

Rawalpindi 82 73 77 82 65 73 82 69 75

Jhelum 83 81 82 75 58 66 77 64 70

Chakwal 83 70 77 75 54 63 76 56 65

Sargodha 75 65 70 55 33 44 62 45 53

Bhakkar 70 52 62 55 24 39 57 29 43

Khushab 69 52 60 61 30 45 64 36 49

Mianwali 74 53 63 63 28 44 65 33 48

Faisalabad 71 69 70 61 47 54 66 57 62

Chiniot 65 51 58 49 20 35 55 31 43

Jhang 72 59 66 53 26 39 58 34 46

Toba Tek Singh 70 69 70 60 46 53 62 51 56

Gujranwala 74 69 71 57 53 55 66 61 64

Hafizabad 64 59 62 54 42 48 57 47 52

Gujrat 76 74 75 67 63 65 69 66 67

Mandi Bahuddin 74 66 70 56 48 52 59 52 55

Sialkot 77 76 76 68 64 66 70 67 69

Narowal 78 65 72 69 56 61 71 57 63

Lahore 77 73 75 66 60 63 74 71 72

Kasur 60 59 60 54 40 47 56 46 51

Sheikhupura 65 61 63 60 51 55 61 54 57

Nankana Sahib 72 63 67 62 46 54 65 51 58

Okara 64 58 61 48 31 39 52 39 45

Sahiwal 77 63 70 55 39 47 59 44 52

Pakpattan 71 50 60 47 27 37 50 31 40

Vehari 65 53 59 45 27 35 48 31 40

Multan 69 64 67 48 28 38 57 42 49

Lodhran 73 59 66 48 27 37 51 32 42

Khanewal 69 56 63 53 35 44 57 39 48

D.G.khan 76 67 71 40 14 27 45 23 34

Rajanpur 67 49 58 33 12 23 38 18 29

Layyah 75 61 68 61 36 49 63 40 52

Muzaffargarh 70 57 63 42 19 31 46 24 35

Bahawalpur 61 53 57 39 22 30 45 30 38

Bahawalnagar 59 51 55 46 28 37 49 33 41

Rahim Yar Khan 61 52 57 41 21 31 45 27 36

PROVINCE & DISTRICT URBAN RURAL TOTAL

21

Page 43: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 2.2 PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION THAT HAS COMPLETED PRIMARY LEVEL OR HIGHER - BY PROVINCE & DISTRICTS

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Sindh 75 64 70 47 20 34 62 43 53

Jacobabad 68 37 53 34 7 21 43 15 29

Kashmore 60 31 46 30 5 18 40 14 27

Shikarpur 64 44 54 46 15 31 51 23 37

Larkana 71 46 58 59 30 44 64 37 50

Shahdadkot 53 29 41 36 15 26 40 18 29

Sukkur 75 52 64 57 12 36 68 36 53

Ghotki 65 32 49 47 12 31 51 16 35

Khairpur 67 38 53 59 21 41 61 27 45

Naushahro Feroze 74 54 65 69 48 59 70 49 60

Shaheed Benazirabad 65 48 57 52 17 35 56 26 42

Dadu 86 69 78 64 42 54 68 47 58

Jamshoro 68 42 55 46 22 34 51 27 40

Hyderabad 65 53 59 38 20 30 60 48 54

Tando Allah Yar 62 46 54 36 16 27 42 23 33

Tando Muhammad Khan 65 50 58 28 10 19 35 18 27

Matiari 68 44 56 48 22 36 53 28 41

Badin 63 43 53 38 14 27 44 20 33

Thatta 76 55 66 42 13 28 47 19 34

Sujawal 72 45 58 36 11 24 41 16 28

Sanghar 67 51 59 46 16 32 52 25 39

Mirpur Khas 69 61 65 39 13 27 49 29 39

Umerkot 64 37 51 36 8 23 42 15 29

Tharparkar 68 48 58 41 12 27 42 15 29

Karachi 80 74 78 47 44 46 78 73 76

22

Page 44: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 2.2 PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION THAT HAS COMPLETED PRIMARY LEVEL OR HIGHER - BY PROVINCE & DISTRICTS

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 69 43 56 57 25 41 59 28 44

Chitral 72 55 65 65 38 52 66 39 53

Upper Dir 64 28 46 46 15 30 46 16 30

Lower Dir 66 47 57 63 26 44 63 27 45

Swat 68 48 58 55 22 40 57 26 42

Shangla - - - 41 8 25 41 8 25

Buner - - - 47 11 27 47 11 27

Malakand PA 60 40 51 68 38 52 67 38 52

Kohistan - - - 30 3 17 30 3 17

Mansehra 74 59 66 61 42 51 63 44 52

Batagram - - - 48 13 29 48 13 29

Abbottabad 85 75 80 66 51 57 70 55 62

Haripur 86 57 70 70 48 58 73 49 60

Tor Ghar - - - 30 3 15 30 3 15

Mardan 60 30 45 59 24 40 59 26 42

Swabi 62 29 45 55 29 41 56 29 42

Charsadda 66 32 50 55 21 38 58 23 40

Peshawar 69 43 57 59 22 41 65 33 49

Nowshera 58 40 49 56 32 45 57 34 46

Kohat 78 50 64 57 21 38 62 27 44

Hangu 66 21 43 54 7 29 56 10 32

Karak 89 61 74 77 35 54 78 36 55

Bannu 82 49 67 68 20 45 69 22 46

Lakki Marwat 79 39 59 71 19 46 72 22 48

D.I.Khan 79 62 70 47 18 32 51 23 37

Tank 62 35 49 55 16 35 56 19 38

23

Page 45: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 2.2 PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION THAT HAS COMPLETED PRIMARY LEVEL OR HIGHER - BY PROVINCE & DISTRICTS

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Balochistan 62 33 48 43 13 30 48 19 35

Quetta 59 36 48 64 34 52 61 35 49

Pishin 72 26 51 52 17 36 54 18 37

Killa Abdullah 57 16 37 29 3 18 32 5 20

Chagai 71 32 54 34 4 20 38 6 24

Nushki 67 18 43 50 13 33 53 14 35

Loralai 68 39 53 44 11 30 48 17 34

Barkhan 70 24 49 29 2 16 35 5 21

Musa Khel 48 20 36 43 21 32 44 21 33

Killa Saifullah 67 6 37 61 3 31 63 4 32

Zhob 74 33 56 41 4 23 51 12 33

Sheerani - - - 44 3 24 44 3 24

Sibi 68 41 55 28 20 25 44 29 37

Harnai 72 39 55 32 5 20 35 7 22

Ziarat 78 28 57 41 13 28 43 13 29

Kohlu 66 18 46 32 5 19 37 7 23

Dera Bugti 58 21 40 36 2 20 37 4 22

Kachhi (Bolan) 75 43 61 40 10 26 48 17 34

Jaffarabad 48 18 33 41 9 26 43 12 28

Nasirabad 57 16 38 34 4 20 40 8 25

Jhal Magsi 66 18 43 26 7 18 28 8 19

Kalat 84 67 76 47 34 41 53 40 47

Mastung 82 62 73 64 26 47 68 34 53

Khuzdar 56 37 47 46 16 33 50 23 38

Awaran - - - 53 20 39 53 20 39

Kharan 78 39 59 33 6 21 49 19 35

Washuk - - - 44 12 29 44 12 29

Lasbela 67 44 56 27 8 19 41 23 33

Gwadar 65 32 51 65 12 43 65 24 48

NOTES:

1. The Panjgur & Kech districts have been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

24

Page 46: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

Pakistan 106 100 103 95 74 85 98 82 91 92

Punjab 112 108 110 99 86 93 103 92 98 98

Islamabad 105 134 118 111 143 125 107 137 120 116

Attock 115 101 108 122 102 112 120 102 111 7 108

Rawalpindi 124 111 118 111 111 111 117 111 114 5 113

Jhelum 106 116 111 120 121 121 116 120 118 4 119

Chakwal 102 122 110 127 120 123 122 120 121 1 118

Sargodha 109 114 111 115 96 105 113 101 107 12 110

Bhakkar 116 90 102 98 94 96 101 94 97 22 100

Khushab 119 95 108 108 95 101 111 95 103 18 103

Mianwali 123 102 112 101 76 88 105 80 92 27 97

Faisalabad 117 114 115 100 90 95 107 100 103 17 103

Chiniot 104 93 99 100 72 86 101 78 89 29 95

Jhang 105 103 104 93 77 86 96 82 89 28 90

Toba Tek Singh 120 106 114 105 100 102 108 101 105 15 106

Gujranwala 107 112 109 105 108 106 106 110 108 10 106

Hafizabad 106 93 100 103 94 98 104 94 99 20 100

Gujrat 98 104 101 117 103 110 111 103 107 11 106

Mandi Bahuddin 120 106 112 102 109 105 105 108 106 13 110

Sialkot 146 111 127 116 113 114 124 112 118 3 123

Narowal 116 111 113 107 113 110 109 113 111 6 111

Lahore 114 102 108 110 116 113 113 105 109 9 108

Kasur 113 99 106 102 105 104 105 103 104 16 100

Sheikhupura 102 113 106 107 87 96 105 92 99 19 98

Nankana Sahib 103 131 117 100 101 100 101 110 105 14 101

Okara 104 111 107 121 100 111 117 103 110 8 110

Sahiwal 102 113 108 98 88 93 98 92 95 24 98

Pakpattan 98 124 107 109 83 96 107 88 98 21 98

Vehari 103 118 113 100 75 88 101 84 92 26 91

Multan 108 111 109 92 79 85 96 89 93 25 96

Lodhran 106 104 105 87 71 79 90 75 83 33 87

Khanewal 117 114 115 105 82 93 107 88 97 23 96

D.G.khan 123 108 116 98 70 85 100 73 88 30 93

Rajanpur 119 128 123 75 62 69 81 72 77 34 74

Layyah 137 112 123 133 108 121 134 109 121 2 119

Muzaffargarh 105 115 110 96 72 84 97 75 86 31 82

Bahawalpur 100 96 98 67 54 61 74 64 69 35 69

Bahawalnagar 107 111 109 87 71 80 91 80 86 32 90

Rahim Yar Khan 101 94 97 72 54 63 76 60 68 36 66

RANKTOTAL 2012-13

TABLE 2.3(a): GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE PRIMARY LEVEL (AGE 6-10)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT

(EXCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

25

Page 47: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL RANKTOTAL 2012-13

TABLE 2.3(a): GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE PRIMARY LEVEL (AGE 6-10)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT

(EXCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

Sindh 97 91 94 82 53 69 88 69 79 81

Jacobabad 89 70 80 68 41 56 73 48 61 20 70

Kashmore 83 74 79 58 26 43 65 38 53 23 56

Shikarpur 89 85 87 74 47 61 77 56 67 16 72

Larkana 99 85 92 97 65 80 98 73 85 5 88

Shahdadkot 92 71 81 82 60 72 84 63 74 11 72

Sukkur 95 94 94 81 49 66 88 71 80 8 80

Ghotki 106 86 95 70 35 55 75 44 61 21 70

Khairpur 101 87 94 90 62 77 93 70 82 6 74

Naushahro Feroze 113 101 107 94 74 85 98 81 90 4 84

Shaheed Benazirabad 99 97 98 87 56 73 90 66 79 10 76

Dadu 107 103 105 105 91 98 105 93 100 1 86

Jamshoro 96 90 93 84 64 75 87 70 79 9 68

Hyderabad 107 85 97 88 61 75 103 79 92 3 94

Tando Allah Yar 92 98 95 66 47 58 70 58 65 18 70

Tando Muhammad Khan 63 91 79 63 29 46 63 39 51 24 61

Matiari 92 78 87 75 53 65 79 58 70 14 74

Badin 93 85 89 75 44 60 78 51 65 17 67

Thatta 91 83 87 65 42 54 67 46 57 22 56

Sujawal 51 83 65 85 39 64 79 46 65 19

Sanghar 113 107 111 76 43 61 82 54 69 15 78

Mirpur Khas 112 97 104 87 39 64 92 52 73 12 65

Umerkot 101 82 91 76 52 65 80 59 71 13 67

Tharparkar 101 107 104 98 58 80 98 61 81 7 85

Karachi 95 94 95 89 78 84 95 93 94 2 105

26

Page 48: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL RANKTOTAL 2012-13

TABLE 2.3(a): GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE PRIMARY LEVEL (AGE 6-10)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT

(EXCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 108 98 103 102 77 90 103 80 92 92

Chitral 137 55 99 112 83 98 114 81 98 11 102

Upper Dir 77 100 87 98 59 80 97 61 80 19 85

Lower Dir 123 108 116 108 87 98 108 89 99 7 94

Swat 89 94 91 100 86 95 99 87 94 13 98

Shangla - - - 84 48 68 84 48 68 22 73

Buner - - - 112 79 97 112 79 97 12 100

Malakand PA 107 78 93 106 104 105 106 101 103 4 101

Kohistan - - - 81 27 56 81 27 56 25 55

Mansehra 80 120 100 108 90 98 106 92 98 9 105

Batagram - - - 97 78 87 97 78 87 16 92

Abbottabad 103 115 107 108 118 113 107 118 112 1 114

Haripur 122 122 122 103 106 105 107 109 108 2 120

Tor Ghar - - - 90 40 67 90 40 67 24 68

Mardan 124 99 114 110 95 103 114 96 106 3 97

Swabi 123 99 109 110 91 100 112 92 101 5 105

Charsadda 81 96 88 105 78 93 102 81 92 15 96

Peshawar 108 91 100 110 79 97 109 85 98 10 94

Nowshera 114 114 114 106 82 95 109 91 101 6 106

Kohat 108 151 121 105 72 89 106 79 94 14 93

Hangu 93 71 82 109 59 87 106 62 86 17 78

Karak 108 113 110 107 89 98 107 89 99 8 94

Bannu 81 118 100 100 55 79 99 59 80 18 87

Lakki Marwat 77 91 83 96 55 78 93 60 78 20 76

D.I.Khan 123 99 111 85 53 70 88 57 73 21 72

Tank 117 85 104 88 37 63 92 42 68 23 62

27

Page 49: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL RANKTOTAL 2012-13

TABLE 2.3(a): GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE PRIMARY LEVEL (AGE 6-10)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT

(EXCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

Balochistan 105 86 96 83 41 65 89 54 73 73

Quetta 113 92 103 113 80 95 113 86 100 2 99

Pishin 82 96 87 93 37 67 92 40 68 13 81

Killa Abdullah 75 48 64 63 16 43 65 20 45 26 44

Chagai 83 106 92 70 28 50 71 35 54 25 58

Nushki 126 57 84 80 63 73 86 61 75 10 79

Loralai 96 81 87 118 47 96 116 57 94 3 73

Barkhan 135 82 107 123 22 73 125 31 78 7 87

Musa Khel 45 61 52 86 71 81 78 68 74 11 50

Killa Saifullah 86 33 60 85 24 60 86 26 60 21 104

Zhob 112 92 102 83 27 56 90 44 68 14 59

Sheerani - - - 92 9 55 92 9 55 24 68

Sibi 110 83 98 54 34 45 74 52 65 17 92

Harnai 148 91 111 57 21 40 62 27 45 27 48

Ziarat 93 134 106 90 61 79 90 63 80 6 85

Kohlu 125 72 100 75 43 61 82 47 66 16 62

Dera Bugti 39 61 48 44 16 32 43 19 33 28 18

Kachhi (Bolan) 126 70 93 74 25 50 82 34 58 22 64

Jaffarabad 95 69 82 72 35 57 77 46 64 20 55

Nasirabad 103 66 84 69 23 48 77 35 57 23 48

Jhal Magsi 127 115 122 75 51 65 77 53 67 15 81

Kalat 90 117 104 89 44 71 89 58 76 9 78

Mastung 107 93 100 96 83 91 98 86 93 4 105

Khuzdar 102 114 108 94 45 77 96 71 86 5 85

Awaran - - - 84 37 64 84 37 64 19 55

Kharan 91 68 78 93 53 75 92 59 76 8 92

Washuk - - - 80 46 64 80 46 64 18 66

Lasbela 104 83 92 59 43 52 76 66 71 12 66

Gwadar 108 111 109 100 82 92 105 99 102 1 107

NOTES:

1. The Panjgur & Kech districts have been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

28

Page 50: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

Pakistan 105 102 103 93 73 83 97 81 89 91Punjab 110 108 109 98 85 92 101 92 97 98

Islamabad 99 119 108 122 138 130 106 125 115 110

Attock 112 96 104 124 115 120 120 109 115 4 118

Rawalpindi 115 107 112 108 110 109 112 109 110 8 115

Jhelum 105 108 107 117 117 117 114 114 114 5 116

Chakwal 107 112 109 119 121 120 118 120 119 3 119

Sargodha 106 110 108 114 96 104 111 100 105 13 106

Bhakkar 119 108 113 98 93 96 101 95 98 22 100

Khushab 119 115 118 110 95 103 113 100 107 11 106

Mianwali 110 108 109 108 79 93 108 83 96 25 93

Faisalabad 115 109 112 91 87 89 100 97 98 21 100

Chiniot 96 102 98 94 67 80 95 76 85 30 86

Jhang 106 101 103 92 75 84 95 80 88 29 87

Toba Tek Singh 131 110 122 102 98 100 108 100 104 16 107

Gujranwala 94 117 105 105 107 106 100 112 105 14 106

Hafizabad 102 100 101 99 94 96 100 95 98 24 101

Gujrat 92 119 103 109 110 110 104 113 108 9 108

Mandi Bahuddin 118 95 105 105 112 108 107 109 108 10 112

Sialkot 145 119 131 116 119 118 124 119 121 2 117

Narowal 139 114 125 99 123 109 105 121 112 7 111

Lahore 111 106 109 107 82 94 110 100 105 15 107

Kasur 126 111 118 100 105 102 106 106 106 12 106

Sheikhupura 103 105 104 109 97 103 107 99 103 17 100

Nankana Sahib 114 108 110 104 89 97 106 95 101 20 98

Okara 114 118 116 120 104 112 119 107 113 6 112

Sahiwal 117 122 120 107 92 99 109 97 102 18 104

Pakpattan 107 123 113 109 89 99 109 93 101 19 102

Vehari 125 113 117 100 75 87 103 83 92 26 90

Multan 105 106 105 90 78 84 94 87 91 28 95

Lodhran 102 93 98 88 72 80 90 74 82 32 84

Khanewal 118 110 114 107 83 94 109 88 98 23 97

D.G.khan 119 106 113 92 62 78 95 66 81 33 87

Rajanpur 113 114 113 82 60 72 87 69 78 34 77

Layyah 121 122 121 135 117 126 133 117 126 1 120

Muzaffargarh 119 111 115 91 68 80 93 72 83 31 85

Bahawalpur 95 89 92 68 52 61 74 61 68 35 69

Bahawalnagar 102 109 105 97 76 87 98 84 92 27 89Rahim Yar Khan 104 94 99 70 53 62 75 59 67 36 65

TABLE 2.3(b): GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE PRIMARY LEVEL (AGE 5-9)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT (EXCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

PROVINCE & DISTRICT TOTAL 12-13RANK

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

NOTES:1. Gross enrolment rate: [Number of children attending primary level (classes 1-5) divided by number of children aged 5 - 9 years] multiplied by 100. Enrolment in katchi is excluded.2. Numerator of GER: Raised sum of all individuals who report currently attending primary level.3 . Denominator of GER: Raised sum of all individuals aged 5 - 9 years who respond to the relevant questions.

29

Page 51: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.3(b): GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE PRIMARY LEVEL (AGE 5-9)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT (EXCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

PROVINCE & DISTRICT TOTAL 12-13RANK

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Sindh 97 96 97 80 51 67 87 70 79 81

Jacobabad 92 66 79 63 37 51 70 44 57 22 66

Kashmore 79 71 76 57 25 41 63 37 51 23 54

Shikarpur 89 80 85 73 44 59 76 52 64 19 71

Larkana 96 87 92 92 67 79 94 75 84 4 83

Shahdadkot 85 72 78 74 58 67 76 62 70 13 73

Sukkur 95 91 93 81 48 65 88 69 79 8 78

Ghotki 102 80 90 72 34 55 77 43 61 21 69

Khairpur 93 80 86 81 57 70 84 64 74 10 69

Naushahro Feroze 98 96 97 83 72 78 86 78 82 5 79

Shaheed Benazirabad 97 92 95 92 56 76 93 66 80 6 77

Dadu 96 77 87 97 76 87 97 76 87 3 84

Jamshoro 87 85 86 79 63 72 81 68 75 9 72

Hyderabad 111 90 102 87 65 77 105 84 96 2 100

Tando Allah Yar 101 107 104 67 47 58 72 58 66 17 68

Tando Muhammad Khan 77 87 83 60 27 44 62 37 49 24 63

Matiari 93 80 88 80 51 66 83 57 71 11 78

Badin 91 76 84 79 46 63 81 52 67 16 67

Thatta 98 91 95 72 44 59 75 48 62 20 57

Sujawal 56 96 72 88 44 70 83 52 70 12

Sanghar 116 86 100 77 44 62 83 53 69 14 81

Mirpur Khas 110 100 105 76 37 58 83 50 67 15 65

Umerkot 93 84 88 71 47 60 75 54 65 18 67

Tharparkar 97 92 94 95 58 79 95 61 80 7 81

Karachi 97 109 103 111 82 97 98 107 102 1 109

30

Page 52: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.3(b): GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE PRIMARY LEVEL (AGE 5-9)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT (EXCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

PROVINCE & DISTRICT TOTAL 12-13RANK

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 109 97 103 100 74 88 102 77 90 91

Chitral 116 83 105 111 86 99 112 86 100 6 103

Upper Dir 93 87 90 95 52 74 95 53 75 20 87

Lower Dir 110 100 105 107 86 98 108 87 98 7 92

Swat 105 95 100 100 78 91 101 81 93 12 95

Shangla - - - 84 45 66 84 45 66 24 70

Buner - - - 103 75 91 103 75 91 15 98

Malakand PA 101 74 88 94 95 94 95 92 93 11 101

Kohistan - - - 89 29 61 89 29 61 25 58

Mansehra 114 110 111 113 96 104 113 97 105 3 106

Batagram - - - 104 79 91 104 79 91 13 94

Abbottabad 101 113 105 114 106 110 111 107 109 1 108

Haripur 105 111 108 111 106 108 110 107 108 2 121

Tor Ghar - - - 93 41 69 93 41 69 22 70

Mardan 111 97 106 97 81 90 101 85 94 10 93

Swabi 108 104 106 107 91 99 107 93 100 5 104

Charsadda 116 100 108 104 72 89 105 76 91 14 93

Peshawar 110 96 104 99 77 90 104 86 96 8 93

Nowshera 111 92 102 119 82 100 116 85 101 4 103

Kohat 115 115 115 100 65 83 102 71 88 16 94

Hangu 101 67 83 105 59 85 104 61 85 17 79

Karak 94 113 100 107 83 95 106 84 96 9 97

Bannu 90 107 100 99 56 80 98 59 81 18 82

Lakki Marwat 107 94 100 93 52 74 94 57 77 19 72

D.I.Khan 108 90 99 81 54 68 84 57 71 21 71

Tank 109 88 101 91 35 63 94 41 67 23 64

31

Page 53: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.3(b): GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE PRIMARY LEVEL (AGE 5-9)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT (EXCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

PROVINCE & DISTRICT TOTAL 12-13RANK

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Balochistan 104 83 94 81 38 62 87 51 71 73

Quetta 109 97 104 109 78 92 109 88 99 1 100

Pishin 92 66 79 88 35 64 89 37 65 15 86

Killa Abdullah 73 49 64 61 14 40 63 18 42 27 47

Chagai 123 84 100 68 23 45 71 29 50 25 59

Nushki 113 58 80 77 62 71 82 61 73 10 82

Loralai 77 69 72 122 42 95 116 50 90 4 70

Barkhan 118 68 91 102 17 59 104 24 63 18 76

Musa Khel 42 55 48 87 64 78 77 62 71 11 53

Killa Saifullah 83 30 57 80 25 59 80 26 59 21 98

Zhob 102 97 100 65 21 44 74 37 56 23 60

Sheerani - - - 104 9 59 104 9 59 20 65

Sibi 105 87 97 53 36 46 72 55 65 14 87

Harnai 99 86 92 56 23 41 59 29 45 26 47

Ziarat 76 89 81 87 52 73 87 54 73 9 85

Kohlu 142 71 106 78 40 60 85 44 65 13 54

Dera Bugti 43 48 45 42 13 29 42 16 30 28 23

Kachhi (Bolan) 114 86 100 78 26 52 84 37 61 19 63

Jaffarabad 88 61 74 70 29 52 74 38 58 22 52

Nasirabad 88 58 72 70 22 48 75 33 55 24 47

Jhal Magsi 103 88 97 83 45 65 84 47 67 12 70

Kalat 100 93 96 91 46 73 92 58 77 7 81

Mastung 128 100 112 100 80 91 105 85 96 2 104

Khuzdar 162 96 120 93 39 72 105 60 85 5 93

Awaran - - - 88 35 64 88 35 64 17 60

Kharan 117 77 93 98 51 77 103 60 82 6 89

Washuk - - - 79 47 65 79 47 65 16 69

Lasbela 114 91 100 65 40 54 84 67 75 8 71

Gwadar 109 92 102 91 72 83 102 84 94 3 98

NOTES:

1. The Panjgur & Kech districts have been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

32

Page 54: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

Pakistan 111 105 108 95 76 86 100 85 93Punjab 118 115 116 104 91 98 108 98 103

Islamabad 103 112 107 127 130 129 110 117 114

Attock 132 110 121 129 120 125 130 117 124

Rawalpindi 126 114 120 118 120 119 122 117 120

Jhelum 112 114 113 125 128 126 121 123 122

Chakwal 107 122 114 121 114 118 119 115 117

Sargodha 115 115 115 118 102 110 117 106 112

Bhakkar 107 115 110 111 95 103 110 98 105

Khushab 132 120 127 116 91 104 121 99 110

Mianwali 109 124 116 113 87 100 112 93 102

Faisalabad 122 115 118 105 103 104 112 108 110

Chiniot 106 106 106 105 79 92 105 86 96

Jhang 118 117 117 109 87 99 111 93 103

Toba Tek Singh 130 120 126 108 109 109 113 111 112

Gujranwala 114 135 123 117 117 117 116 126 120

Hafizabad 112 113 112 114 103 108 113 106 110

Gujrat 111 134 119 125 124 125 120 127 123

Mandi Bahuddin 129 114 120 108 117 112 110 116 113

Sialkot 131 120 125 128 125 127 129 124 126

Narowal 140 101 117 109 123 115 113 118 115

Lahore 122 119 120 109 101 105 119 114 117

Kasur 132 118 125 118 116 117 121 117 119

Sheikhupura 113 122 117 119 109 114 117 112 115

Nankana Sahib 117 113 115 120 103 112 120 106 113

Okara 122 117 120 107 99 104 111 104 107

Sahiwal 101 119 110 107 92 99 106 96 101

Pakpattan 111 112 111 106 86 96 107 89 98

Vehari 128 115 119 103 79 91 106 87 96

Multan 110 111 111 85 83 84 93 92 93

Lodhran 98 93 95 87 73 80 89 76 83

Khanewal 109 100 104 104 90 97 105 92 98

D.G.khan 109 101 105 89 58 74 91 62 77

Rajanpur 109 98 103 69 50 60 75 58 67

Layyah 117 104 110 121 106 114 120 105 113

Muzaffargarh 114 106 110 90 71 81 92 74 83

Bahawalpur 108 106 107 84 66 75 89 76 83

Bahawalnagar 114 109 111 100 84 93 103 90 97Rahim Yar Khan 106 96 101 83 61 73 86 67 77

TABLE 2.4: GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE PRIMARY LEVEL (AGE 4-9)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT .................... (INCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

PROVINCE & DISTRICT URBAN RURAL TOTAL

NOTES:1. Gross enrolment rate: [Number of children attending primary level (classes 0-5) divided by number of children aged 4 - 9 years] multiplied by 100. Enrolment in katchi is included.2. Numerator of GER: Raised sum of all individuals who report currently attending primary level.3. Denominator of GER: Raised sum of all individuals aged 4- 9 years who respond to the relevant questions.

33

Page 55: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.4: GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE PRIMARY LEVEL (AGE 4-9)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT .................... (INCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

PROVINCE & DISTRICT URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Sindh 104 94 99 73 48 62 85 67 77

Jacobabad 87 66 77 55 33 44 62 40 51

Kashmore 71 61 67 48 21 35 55 31 44

Shikarpur 81 79 80 62 39 51 66 48 57

Larkana 86 76 81 81 59 69 83 66 74

Shahdadkot 75 65 70 66 52 59 68 55 62

Sukkur 84 77 81 70 40 56 77 59 69

Ghotki 85 73 79 65 30 49 68 38 54

Khairpur 89 77 83 73 53 64 77 60 69

Naushahro Feroze 102 105 104 93 71 83 94 79 88

Shaheed Benazirabad 90 88 89 89 55 74 89 64 78

Dadu 101 102 101 94 80 87 95 84 89

Jamshoro 90 83 87 81 66 74 83 70 77

Hyderabad 106 84 96 86 57 72 101 77 91

Tando Allah Yar 103 99 101 66 41 55 71 52 62

Tando Muhammad Khan 74 95 87 58 25 42 59 35 47

Matiari 99 76 90 80 50 66 85 55 71

Badin 95 77 87 72 44 59 77 51 64

Thatta 90 111 100 67 48 58 69 54 62

Sujawal 58 71 65 75 35 58 73 41 59

Sanghar 116 82 98 71 39 56 77 48 63

Mirpur Khas 111 101 106 68 32 51 76 46 62

Umerkot 84 80 82 63 43 54 67 51 59

Tharparkar 83 89 86 80 50 66 80 52 68

Karachi 114 106 111 99 81 91 113 105 109

34

Page 56: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.4: GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE PRIMARY LEVEL (AGE 4-9)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT .................... (INCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

PROVINCE & DISTRICT URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 115 107 111 106 77 93 107 82 96

Chitral 107 128 114 122 91 107 120 93 108

Upper Dir 100 89 94 99 59 80 99 60 80

Lower Dir 127 129 128 121 93 107 121 95 109

Swat 116 111 114 106 87 98 107 91 100

Shangla - - - 92 42 70 92 42 70

Buner - - - 103 77 92 103 77 92

Malakand PA 108 100 104 107 105 106 107 104 106

Kohistan - - - 81 26 55 81 26 55

Mansehra 110 117 113 121 99 110 120 100 110

Batagram - - - 103 68 85 103 68 85

Abbottabad 114 125 118 125 110 117 122 112 118

Haripur 94 124 106 118 111 115 113 113 113

Tor Ghar - - - 93 38 68 93 38 68

Mardan 122 112 118 108 88 99 111 93 103

Swabi 117 116 116 108 90 99 109 94 102

Charsadda 112 110 111 107 82 96 108 85 97

Peshawar 112 106 109 98 73 88 104 89 98

Nowshera 127 95 111 136 86 110 133 90 111

Kohat 131 123 128 114 77 96 117 83 101

Hangu 102 79 90 117 71 97 115 73 96

Karak 100 113 104 113 85 99 113 86 99

Bannu 82 113 100 110 62 88 109 66 89

Lakki Marwat 106 81 93 103 61 84 104 63 85

D.I.Khan 106 95 101 80 55 69 83 59 72

Tank 111 86 101 91 44 67 94 48 71

35

Page 57: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.4: GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE PRIMARY LEVEL (AGE 4-9)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT .................... (INCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

PROVINCE & DISTRICT URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Balochistan 93 80 87 76 40 59 80 51 67

Quetta 93 90 92 105 90 97 98 90 94

Pishin 64 66 65 80 42 62 78 43 62

Killa Abdullah 67 46 59 56 12 35 57 15 38

Chagai 103 80 90 66 23 44 68 28 47

Nushki 113 60 80 98 60 82 100 60 81

Loralai 92 64 75 112 49 89 109 53 87

Barkhan 111 66 88 93 15 53 95 22 57

Musa Khel 91 47 71 78 77 78 81 69 76

Killa Saifullah 77 34 55 92 31 68 89 32 65

Zhob 110 89 101 61 20 41 73 35 55

Sheerani - - - 99 10 58 99 10 58

Sibi 106 81 95 50 34 43 72 52 63

Harnai 90 107 99 53 20 38 55 28 42

Ziarat 89 61 77 79 44 64 79 45 64

Kohlu 113 63 88 68 32 50 73 36 55

Dera Bugti 75 45 60 38 13 26 40 15 29

Kachhi (Bolan) 86 112 98 73 44 59 76 56 66

Jaffarabad 75 58 66 65 30 49 67 38 53

Nasirabad 83 69 76 61 32 47 67 43 55

Jhal Magsi 92 85 89 73 39 57 74 41 59

Kalat 77 87 83 81 61 73 81 67 75

Mastung 116 94 103 85 66 77 91 74 83

Khuzdar 110 77 89 76 33 60 84 52 69

Awaran - - - 85 41 66 85 41 66

Kharan 114 104 108 90 50 71 96 68 82

Washuk - - - 72 42 59 72 42 59

Lasbela 105 104 104 55 35 46 73 71 72

Gwadar 104 92 99 88 70 80 97 83 91

NOTES:

1. The Panjgur & Kech districts have been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

36

Page 58: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

Pakistan 43 44 43 67 52 60 60 50 55

Punjab 39 44 41 62 56 59 56 53 54

Islamabad 39 75 55 41 71 55 40 73 55

Attock 23 25 24 85 86 86 67 68 67

Rawalpindi 34 32 33 44 57 50 39 44 41

Jhelum 38 39 39 85 95 90 72 77 74

Chakwal 37 89 58 78 86 82 71 86 78

Sargodha 23 42 32 78 71 74 59 63 61

Bhakkar 74 67 70 83 74 79 82 73 77

Khushab 53 58 55 79 73 76 71 69 70

Mianwali 53 75 63 86 61 73 80 63 71

Faisalabad 39 38 38 58 64 61 50 53 52

Chiniot 46 59 52 80 58 69 70 58 64

Jhang 27 34 30 60 53 57 54 49 51

Toba Tek Singh 54 50 52 65 66 65 63 63 63

Gujranwala 21 32 26 53 58 55 36 45 40

Hafizabad 46 43 45 69 66 67 62 60 61

Gujrat 32 43 37 54 61 57 48 56 51

Mandi Bahuddin 54 31 41 56 62 59 55 55 55

Sialkot 38 28 32 53 59 56 49 50 49

Narowal 99 48 71 53 66 59 60 62 61

Lahore 36 47 41 21 28 25 32 42 37

Kasur 65 38 51 44 52 48 48 48 48

Sheikhupura 39 33 36 50 55 52 46 50 48

Nankana Sahib 33 47 41 71 51 61 62 49 56

Okara 45 52 49 90 88 89 80 80 80

Sahiwal 61 94 79 74 70 72 72 74 73

Pakpattan 48 67 55 86 66 76 79 66 73

Vehari 39 55 50 70 58 64 67 58 62

Multan 37 42 40 52 42 48 48 42 45

Lodhran 39 32 36 56 43 50 54 41 48

Khanewal 58 47 53 77 59 68 74 57 65

D.G.khan 40 44 42 74 51 63 71 50 61

Rajanpur 57 45 51 56 47 52 56 46 52

Layyah 69 87 78 93 87 90 90 87 88

Muzaffargarh 41 39 40 59 47 53 57 46 52

Bahawalpur 30 33 32 41 28 35 38 29 34

Bahawalnagar 48 37 42 77 63 71 71 56 64Rahim Yar Khan 49 55 52 53 39 46 53 41 47

TABLE 2.5: GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO FOR GOVERNMENT PRIMARY SCHOOLS (AGE 5-9)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

PROVINCE & DISTRICT URBAN RURAL TOTAL

(EXCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

NOTES:1.Gross enrolment rate in government primary schools: [Number of children attending government primary schools (classes 1-5) divided bynumber of children aged 5 - 9 years] multiplied by 100. Katchi is excluded.2.Numerator of GER: Raised sum of all individuals who report currently attending primary level in Government schools.3.Denominator of GER: Raised sum of all individuals aged 5 - 9 years who respond to the relevant questions.

37

Page 59: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.5: GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO FOR GOVERNMENT PRIMARY SCHOOLS (AGE 5-9)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

PROVINCE & DISTRICT URBAN RURAL TOTAL

(EXCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

Sindh 40 40 40 70 43 57 58 42 50

Jacobabad 40 40 40 54 32 43 51 34 43

Kashmore 63 54 59 48 20 34 52 28 41

Shikarpur 56 63 59 63 36 50 61 43 52

Larkana 81 82 82 79 60 69 80 69 74

Shahdadkot 81 64 73 69 55 63 71 57 65

Sukkur 43 51 47 73 42 58 58 46 53

Ghotki 56 43 49 62 27 46 61 30 46

Khairpur 55 49 52 71 49 61 67 49 58

Naushahro Feroze 34 25 29 75 68 72 67 57 63

Shaheed Benazirabad 55 55 55 88 53 72 81 54 68

Dadu 38 42 40 85 49 67 75 47 61

Jamshoro 39 35 37 61 50 56 56 47 52

Hyderabad 53 55 54 75 60 68 58 56 57

Tando Allah Yar 75 74 74 63 44 55 65 50 58

Tando Muhammad Khan 42 67 58 51 25 38 50 32 41

Matiari 72 61 68 72 48 60 72 50 62

Badin 50 39 45 76 44 61 71 43 58

Thatta 45 27 36 62 40 52 60 39 50

Sujawal 49 82 62 81 39 64 76 46 63

Sanghar 85 58 71 75 39 58 76 43 60

Mirpur Khas 55 46 51 71 32 53 68 35 52

Umerkot 76 60 68 67 40 55 68 44 57

Tharparkar 84 87 86 88 53 72 88 56 73

Karachi 23 24 23 23 9 16 23 23 23

38

Page 60: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.5: GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO FOR GOVERNMENT PRIMARY SCHOOLS (AGE 5-9)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

PROVINCE & DISTRICT URBAN RURAL TOTAL

(EXCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 44 48 46 73 56 65 69 55 62

Chitral 83 66 78 90 66 78 89 66 78

Upper Dir 93 87 90 90 50 71 90 52 71

Lower Dir 61 84 72 87 77 83 86 78 82

Swat 31 44 38 70 60 66 66 57 62

Shangla - - - 72 35 55 72 35 55

Buner - - - 81 62 73 81 62 73

Malakand PA 78 48 64 69 79 74 70 75 72

Kohistan - - - 77 27 53 77 27 53

Mansehra 55 18 32 81 69 75 80 65 72

Batagram - - - 89 63 76 89 63 76

Abbottabad 24 34 27 88 81 85 72 74 73

Haripur 19 45 30 82 80 81 69 74 71

Tor Ghar . . . 88 40 66 88 40 66

Mardan 73 49 63 66 67 66 68 63 66

Swabi 39 59 50 73 57 65 68 58 63

Charsadda 42 20 30 73 59 66 70 54 62

Peshawar 31 48 39 45 40 43 39 44 41

Nowshera 57 40 49 79 58 68 71 52 62

Kohat 45 67 53 71 54 63 67 55 61

Hangu 42 35 38 73 41 59 67 40 55

Karak 20 99 45 74 65 70 71 66 69

Bannu 34 67 53 74 44 60 72 45 60

Lakki Marwat 76 52 64 76 45 62 76 46 62

D.I.Khan 47 70 59 57 36 47 56 39 48

Tank 32 56 41 68 29 48 62 32 47

39

Page 61: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.5: GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO FOR GOVERNMENT PRIMARY SCHOOLS (AGE 5-9)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

PROVINCE & DISTRICT URBAN RURAL TOTAL

(EXCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

Balochistan 85 67 77 78 35 59 80 44 64

Quetta 76 59 68 106 62 82 87 60 74

Pishin 92 66 79 82 35 61 83 37 62

Killa Abdullah 73 49 64 50 14 33 53 17 37

Chagai 123 84 100 68 23 45 71 29 50

Nushki 113 58 80 77 61 70 82 60 72

Loralai 77 43 57 122 42 94 116 42 87

Barkhan 118 68 91 99 17 57 101 24 61

Musa Khel 42 40 41 85 64 77 76 58 69

Killa Saifullah 83 30 57 74 24 55 76 26 56

Zhob 102 91 97 63 18 41 72 34 54

Sheerani - - - 99 9 57 99 9 57

Sibi 105 87 97 53 33 45 72 53 64

Harnai 99 79 88 46 23 35 49 29 40

Ziarat 76 89 81 67 52 61 68 54 62

Kohlu 142 71 106 76 25 52 83 31 58

Dera Bugti 43 48 45 42 12 28 42 15 29

Kachhi (Bolan) 114 86 100 78 26 52 84 37 61

Jaffarabad 49 61 56 70 29 52 65 38 53

Nasirabad 54 37 45 70 20 47 66 25 46

Jhal Magsi 91 88 90 83 45 65 83 47 67

Kalat 100 93 96 91 46 73 92 58 77

Mastung 101 100 101 100 79 91 100 84 93

Khuzdar 162 96 120 93 39 72 105 60 85

Awaran - - - 88 35 64 88 35 64

Kharan 106 73 86 98 51 77 100 59 80

Washuk - - - 79 47 65 79 47 65

Lasbela 101 80 89 65 40 54 79 61 70

Gwadar 108 92 101 91 72 83 101 84 94

NOTES:

1. The Panjgur & Kech districts have been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

40

Page 62: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

Pakistan 79 75 77 69 56 63 72 62 67 68Punjab 81 79 80 70 62 66 73 67 70 72

Islamabad 84 92 87 93 95 94 87 93 90 91Attock 86 88 87 87 84 85 87 85 86 4 78

Rawalpindi 83 83 83 69 76 73 76 80 78 10 87

Jehlum 91 87 89 96 87 92 94 87 91 1 90

Chakwal 82 87 84 93 87 90 91 87 89 2 93

Sargodha 72 75 73 75 65 70 74 68 71 19 78

Bhakhar 83 74 78 69 68 69 71 69 70 21 74

Khushab 81 60 71 71 67 69 74 65 70 23 78

Mianwali 84 80 82 76 61 68 77 64 70 20 72

Faisalabad 84 87 86 72 72 72 77 78 78 11 78

Chiniot 77 79 78 65 63 64 68 68 68 28 70

Jhang 82 81 81 70 61 65 72 65 69 26 68

Toba Tek Singh 83 86 84 75 74 74 76 76 76 13 80

Gujranwala 79 81 80 68 72 70 74 76 75 15 78

Hafizabad 68 83 75 70 66 68 70 71 70 22 77

Gujrat 83 90 86 83 71 78 83 77 80 9 86

Mandi Bahuddin 96 87 91 76 82 79 79 83 81 7 88

Sialkot 91 88 89 83 83 83 85 84 85 5 86

Narowal 92 87 89 78 83 80 80 84 82 6 81

Lahore 85 70 77 85 55 71 85 67 76 14 80

Kasur 75 77 76 62 69 66 65 71 68 27 70

Sheikhupura 81 74 78 75 69 72 77 70 74 16 72

Nankana Sahib 78 80 79 77 74 76 77 76 77 12 74

Okara 74 89 81 87 75 81 84 78 81 8 80

Sahiwal 91 82 86 75 68 71 77 70 73 17 71

Pakpatten 86 78 84 77 65 71 79 66 73 18 69

Vehari 56 78 70 76 62 69 73 65 69 24 63

Multan 74 81 77 66 57 62 68 64 66 29 69

Lodhran 77 73 75 62 52 57 64 55 60 32 62

Khanewal 84 82 83 71 61 66 73 65 69 25 72

D.G.khan 90 83 87 71 51 62 73 54 64 30 70

Rajanpur 80 87 83 52 40 47 56 47 52 34 51

Layyah 85 92 89 90 85 87 89 86 87 3 84

Muzaffar Garh 79 90 84 69 48 58 70 51 61 31 61

Bahawalpur 73 74 74 47 40 44 52 48 50 35 49

Bahawalnager 66 69 68 64 48 57 64 53 59 33 58Rahim Yar Khan 77 69 73 50 41 46 53 46 50 36 49

TABLE 2.6(a): NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE PRIMARY LEVEL (AGE 6-10)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

PROVINCE & DISTRICT URBAN RURAL

(EXCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

TOTALRANK

TOTAL12-13

NOTES:1. Net enrolment rate: [Number of children aged 6 - 10 years attending primary level (classes 1-5) divided by number of children aged 6 - 10 yearsmultiplied by 100. Enrolment in katchi is excluded.2. Numerator of NER: Raised sum of all individuals aged 6 - 10 years who report currently attending primary level.3. Denominator of NER: Raised sum of all individuals aged 6 - 10 years who respond to the relevant questions.

41

Page 63: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

42

Page 64: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.6(a): NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE PRIMARY LEVEL (AGE 6-10)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

PROVINCE & DISTRICT URBAN RURAL

(EXCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

TOTALRANK

TOTAL12-13

Sindh 75 72 73 61 41 52 67 54 61 62

Jacobabad 75 60 68 50 30 41 56 37 47 19 57

Kashmore 66 62 65 45 20 33 51 31 42 22 49

Shikarpur 70 66 68 53 39 46 56 45 51 16 57

Larkana 74 68 71 73 51 61 74 58 65 5 71

Shahdadkot 70 58 64 65 47 57 66 50 58 10 59

Sukkur 79 74 77 65 33 50 72 53 63 8 64

Ghotki 83 75 79 55 30 44 59 38 49 17 58

Khairpur 74 67 70 74 55 65 74 58 67 4 64

Naushahro Feroze 91 82 86 77 53 67 80 60 71 3 67

Shaheed Benazirabad 75 75 75 74 45 61 74 53 64 6 59

Dadu 93 88 91 81 75 78 83 78 81 1 72

Jamshoro 80 68 74 62 53 58 66 57 62 9 51

Hyderabad 75 54 66 64 46 55 73 52 64 7 72

Tando Allah Yar 66 77 72 47 34 41 50 43 47 20 51

Tando Muhammad Khan 31 66 52 45 20 33 44 27 35 24 42

Matiari 64 65 64 54 41 48 56 46 52 14 54

Badin 67 62 64 50 33 42 53 37 46 21 48

Thatta 54 63 58 41 26 34 42 30 36 23 34

Sujawal 47 63 54 61 29 47 59 34 48 18 -

Sanghar 86 73 80 57 35 47 62 41 52 13 60

Mirpur Khas 82 71 76 59 32 46 63 41 53 12 51

Umerkot 76 66 71 52 40 47 57 46 52 15 50

Tharparkar 77 76 76 62 42 53 63 44 54 11 60

Karachi 75 76 75 61 41 52 74 74 74 2 75

43

Page 65: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

44

Page 66: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.6(a): NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE PRIMARY LEVEL (AGE 6-10)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

PROVINCE & DISTRICT URBAN RURAL

(EXCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

TOTALRANK

TOTAL12-13

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 82 73 78 77 60 70 78 62 71 68

Chitral 80 55 68 85 69 77 84 68 76 10 73

Upper Dir 53 61 57 67 43 56 66 43 56 20 54

Lower Dir 56 68 62 75 69 72 74 69 72 15 62

Swat 77 69 73 83 69 78 82 69 77 8 64

Shangla - - - 53 33 44 53 33 44 24 50

Buner - - - 87 66 78 87 66 78 7 72

Malakand PA 81 65 74 83 82 82 82 79 81 3 76

Kohistan - - - 51 21 37 51 21 37 25 40

Mansehra 60 100 80 79 69 74 78 71 74 13 75

Batagram - - - 68 52 60 68 52 60 19 61

Abbottabad 82 90 85 74 86 80 76 87 81 4 85

Haripur 85 83 84 78 83 80 79 83 81 2 83

Tor Ghar - - - 60 31 46 60 31 46 23 44

Mardan 89 67 80 91 77 85 90 75 83 1 78

Swabi 100 84 91 83 74 78 85 75 80 5 86

Charsadda 57 77 65 85 66 76 81 67 75 11 78

Peshawar 85 74 79 85 61 74 85 67 77 9 76

Nowshera 86 72 80 86 70 79 86 71 79 6 80

Kohat 84 72 80 84 60 72 84 61 74 14 69

Hangu 81 65 73 83 50 69 83 54 70 16 60

Karak 85 42 70 82 67 75 82 66 74 12 75

Bannu 60 82 71 78 47 64 77 49 64 17 67

Lakki Marwat 73 70 72 76 45 62 75 48 63 18 59

D.I.Khan 85 63 74 59 39 50 61 42 52 21 50

Tank 70 67 69 59 29 45 61 33 48 22 47

45

Page 67: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

46

Page 68: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.6(a): NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE PRIMARY LEVEL (AGE 6-10)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

PROVINCE & DISTRICT URBAN RURAL

(EXCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

TOTALRANK

TOTAL12-13

Balochistan 78 65 72 63 32 49 67 42 56 55

Quetta 78 69 74 78 64 70 78 67 72 3 77

Pishin 68 36 56 53 26 41 55 27 42 23 55

Killa Abdullah 55 32 46 50 14 34 51 16 36 26 34

Chagai 71 87 78 50 25 38 52 30 42 24 40

Nushki 91 49 65 55 52 53 59 51 56 12 53

Loralai 67 61 63 88 31 70 86 40 69 4 48

Barkhan 94 74 83 85 16 51 86 24 55 14 67

Musa Khel 30 41 35 69 52 63 61 49 57 8 34

Killa Saifullah 72 30 52 76 23 54 75 25 54 15 82

Zhob 77 68 72 57 21 40 62 33 48 17 45

Sheerani - - - 74 7 44 74 7 44 22 54

Sibi 85 64 76 34 23 29 53 38 46 20 64

Harnai 71 64 66 37 17 27 38 21 30 27 39

Ziarat 62 50 58 68 38 56 68 39 57 9 62

Kohlu 86 64 76 52 30 42 56 34 46 19 47

Dera Bugti 39 61 48 35 15 26 35 18 28 28 13

Kachhi (Bolan) 89 67 76 54 21 38 59 30 45 21 47

Jaffarabad 69 60 64 56 27 44 59 37 49 16 47

Nasirabad 67 39 52 52 15 35 55 21 39 25 38

Jhal Magsi 81 100 89 62 43 55 63 45 56 11 63

Kalat 70 92 82 76 34 59 75 46 62 6 58

Mastung 92 80 86 84 70 79 86 73 80 2 84

Khuzdar 88 100 94 67 35 56 72 59 67 5 61

Awaran - - - 79 31 59 79 31 59 7 47

Kharan 77 48 61 65 37 53 69 41 56 13 64

Washuk - - - 68 43 56 68 43 56 10 50

Lasbela 78 62 68 33 18 27 50 43 47 18 42

Gwadar 94 70 86 86 66 77 91 68 82 1 79

NOTES:

1. The Panjgur & Kech districts have been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

47

Page 69: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

48

Page 70: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

Pakistan 67 66 66 57 48 53 60 53 57 57Punjab 70 71 70 60 54 57 63 59 61 62

Islamabad 77 89 82 79 86 82 77 88 82 82

Attock 68 76 72 69 65 67 69 68 68 10 72

Rawalpindi 72 69 71 72 72 72 72 70 71 7 73

Jhelum 78 86 82 77 76 76 77 79 78 3 80

Chakwal 84 80 82 80 85 82 81 84 82 1 83

Sargodha 71 69 70 64 59 61 66 62 64 16 65

Bhakkar 77 69 73 57 57 57 60 59 59 25 59

Khushab 71 70 70 61 63 62 64 64 64 15 66

Mianwali 77 69 74 62 52 57 65 55 60 23 64

Faisalabad 71 74 73 61 58 59 65 65 65 14 65

Chiniot 66 69 68 60 50 55 62 55 58 27 56

Jhang 73 70 71 57 50 53 60 54 57 28 55

Toba Tek Singh 78 72 76 66 62 64 68 64 66 13 69

Gujranwala 62 66 64 61 60 61 62 63 62 18 63

Hafizabad 64 73 68 58 58 58 60 62 61 22 64

Gujrat 63 80 70 66 66 66 65 70 67 11 71

Mandi Bahuddin 80 70 74 66 72 69 68 71 70 8 70

Sialkot 85 85 85 73 76 75 76 79 77 4 73

Narowal 85 86 86 68 74 71 71 77 74 6 76

Lahore 66 65 65 61 48 54 65 61 63 17 68

Kasur 72 69 70 59 60 60 62 62 62 20 61

Sheikhupura 67 65 66 61 59 60 63 60 62 21 61

Nankana Sahib 73 61 66 64 57 61 66 58 62 19 63

Okara 75 80 77 81 71 76 79 73 76 5 75

Sahiwal 79 78 78 65 63 64 67 66 66 12 65

Pakpattan 81 82 81 72 63 67 74 65 69 9 65

Vehari 68 76 74 65 49 57 65 55 60 24 56

Multan 68 69 68 56 47 52 59 54 57 30 61

Lodhran 66 62 64 52 45 49 54 48 51 33 53

Khanewal 76 71 73 60 52 56 63 56 59 26 63

D.G.khan 88 78 84 63 45 54 65 48 57 29 62

Rajanpur 75 81 78 47 36 42 51 43 48 34 49

Layyah 89 89 89 81 81 81 82 82 82 2 76

Muzaffargarh 74 79 77 55 45 50 56 48 52 32 52

Bahawalpur 59 65 62 35 32 33 40 40 40 36 41

Bahawalnagar 65 64 64 56 43 51 58 48 54 31 50Rahim Yar Khan 68 64 66 41 36 39 45 40 42 35 43

TABLE 2.6(b): NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE PRIMARY LEVEL (AGE 5-9)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT (EXCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

TOTAL 12-13PROVINCE & DISTRICT RANK

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

NOTES:1. Net enrolment rate: [Number of children aged 5 - 9 years attending primary level (classes 1-5) divided by number of children aged 5 - 9 years] multiplied by 100. Enrolment in katchi is excluded.2. Numerator of NER: Raised sum of all individuals aged 5 - 9 years who report currently attending primary level.3. Denominator of NER: Raised sum of all individuals aged 5 - 9 years who respond to the relevant questions.

49

Page 71: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.6(b): NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE PRIMARY LEVEL (AGE 5-9)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT (EXCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

TOTAL 12-13PROVINCE & DISTRICT RANK

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Sindh 62 61 61 51 36 44 55 46 51 52

Jacobabad 66 51 59 42 25 34 47 31 39 19 45

Kashmore 58 53 56 39 18 29 45 27 36 22 41

Shikarpur 60 59 59 46 33 39 49 39 44 14 51

Larkana 63 56 60 62 52 57 63 53 58 3 58

Shahdadkot 60 53 57 50 43 47 52 45 49 10 49

Sukkur 72 56 65 57 34 46 65 44 55 7 55

Ghotki 75 54 63 47 28 38 51 33 43 16 50

Khairpur 64 62 63 63 45 55 63 50 57 6 52

Naushahro Feroze 69 68 68 55 55 55 58 58 58 4 55

Shaheed Benazirabad 63 66 65 62 39 52 62 46 55 8 50

Dadu 71 56 63 64 56 60 65 56 61 2 59

Jamshoro 65 66 66 47 42 45 51 48 50 9 45

Hyderabad 68 49 60 55 47 52 65 49 58 5 66

Tando Allah Yar 55 62 59 39 29 35 42 35 39 21 41

Tando Muhammad Khan 42 54 50 29 16 23 30 22 26 24 34

Matiari 53 53 53 44 32 38 47 36 42 17 47

Badin 54 51 53 44 27 36 46 32 39 20 42

Thatta 58 61 59 39 27 33 41 30 36 23 32

Sujawal 43 39 41 49 26 39 48 28 40 18

Sanghar 67 56 61 46 30 39 50 35 43 15 52

Mirpur Khas 62 65 63 51 24 39 53 33 44 13 46

Umerkot 61 64 62 45 34 40 48 40 44 12 47

Tharparkar 75 79 77 56 34 47 57 38 49 11 49

Karachi 59 65 62 53 38 46 59 63 61 1 62

50

Page 72: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.6(b): NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE PRIMARY LEVEL (AGE 5-9)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT (EXCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

TOTAL 12-13PROVINCE & DISTRICT RANK

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 67 62 64 60 49 55 61 51 56 54

Chitral 66 34 55 60 51 56 61 50 56 13 56

Upper Dir 43 40 41 47 31 39 47 31 39 23 39

Lower Dir 40 58 49 54 53 53 53 53 53 17 45

Swat 63 60 61 65 49 59 65 51 59 12 47

Shangla - - - 37 28 33 37 28 33 24 35

Buner - - - 66 51 59 66 51 59 11 56

Malakand PA 64 43 54 62 64 63 62 61 62 8 58

Kohistan - - - 43 16 30 43 16 30 25 35

Mansehra 71 82 78 66 63 64 67 64 65 4 63

Batagram - - - 59 49 54 59 49 54 16 56

Abbottabad 83 77 81 66 73 70 70 73 72 1 67

Haripur 74 85 79 66 71 68 68 73 70 3 74

Tor Ghar - - - 50 28 40 50 28 40 22 34

Mardan 69 56 64 65 59 62 66 58 62 6 58

Swabi 81 69 75 72 68 70 74 68 71 2 67

Charsadda 70 62 66 67 50 59 68 52 60 10 59

Peshawar 63 60 62 65 52 60 64 56 60 9 61

Nowshera 69 65 67 63 57 60 65 59 62 7 62

Kohat 68 69 69 59 45 52 61 48 54 15 54

Hangu 75 54 64 63 38 52 65 42 55 14 49

Karak 67 57 64 68 57 63 68 57 63 5 64

Bannu 67 66 67 56 37 48 57 39 49 19 56

Lakki Marwat 77 73 75 59 38 49 60 42 52 18 51

D.I.Khan 67 52 60 45 33 40 47 35 42 20 39

Tank 59 56 57 51 27 39 52 30 41 21 39

51

Page 73: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.6(b): NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE PRIMARY LEVEL (AGE 5-9)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT (EXCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

TOTAL 12-13PROVINCE & DISTRICT RANK

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Balochistan 66 56 62 52 27 40 56 35 46 45

Quetta 70 62 67 65 56 60 68 59 64 3 63

Pishin 64 40 52 38 20 30 40 22 31 24 44

Killa Abdullah 41 22 34 42 11 28 42 12 28 26 26

Chagai 52 61 57 35 18 26 36 22 29 25 34

Nushki 67 35 48 38 35 37 42 35 39 19 38

Loralai 49 54 52 81 26 62 76 34 60 4 40

Barkhan 80 49 63 77 13 44 77 18 46 9 51

Musa Khel 11 38 23 57 34 48 47 35 42 13 31

Killa Saifullah 57 28 42 57 17 42 57 20 42 14 67

Zhob 69 60 65 39 15 28 46 24 36 22 35

Sheerani - - - 70 6 40 70 6 40 18 41

Sibi 70 50 62 35 23 30 48 33 42 15 50

Harnai 62 54 57 31 14 24 33 18 26 27 30

Ziarat 50 55 52 59 22 43 58 24 44 12 45

Kohlu 93 52 72 44 27 36 50 30 40 17 37

Dera Bugti 39 39 39 26 12 20 27 14 21 28 9

Kachhi (Bolan) 66 54 60 45 14 30 49 21 35 23 36

Jaffarabad 59 51 55 47 21 36 50 30 41 16 35

Nasirabad 61 39 50 47 17 33 51 24 38 20 30

Jhal Magsi 72 85 78 60 34 48 60 36 49 7 45

Kalat 78 87 83 64 26 49 66 41 55 6 52

Mastung 91 86 88 73 64 69 76 70 73 1 73

Khuzdar 86 81 83 61 30 49 65 50 58 5 54

Awaran - - - 59 27 45 59 27 45 10 43

Kharan 59 42 49 47 36 42 50 38 44 11 49

Washuk - - - 55 37 47 55 37 47 8 45

Lasbela 52 47 49 31 18 25 39 34 36 21 34

Gwadar 76 58 68 67 56 62 72 57 66 2 67

NOTES:

1. The Panjgur & Kech districts have been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

52

Page 74: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

Pakistan 79 76 77 65 55 60 69 61 65Punjab 85 84 85 72 65 69 76 71 73

Islamabad 84 87 86 89 87 88 85 87 86

Attock 94 92 93 85 77 81 88 81 85

Rawalpindi 88 83 86 89 86 88 89 85 87

Jhelum 91 95 93 89 91 90 90 92 91

Chakwal 84 92 87 88 86 87 87 86 87

Sargodha 85 82 83 76 70 73 79 73 76

Bhakkar 73 79 76 75 64 70 74 66 71

Khushab 89 84 87 74 64 69 79 69 74

Mianwali 81 89 85 74 64 69 75 68 71

Faisalabad 84 86 85 78 77 78 81 81 81

Chiniot 82 79 80 74 64 69 76 68 72

Jhang 92 90 91 79 66 73 81 71 76

Toba Tek Singh 89 89 89 78 79 78 80 81 80

Gujranwala 88 92 90 80 78 79 84 85 85

Hafizabad 79 89 83 80 74 77 79 78 79

Gujrat 88 98 92 88 89 88 88 91 89

Mandi Bahuddin 95 94 95 77 83 80 80 85 82

Sialkot 86 90 88 93 90 92 91 90 91

Narowal 88 78 82 85 85 85 85 84 84

Lahore 87 87 87 75 73 74 84 83 84

Kasur 83 72 77 84 81 82 84 79 81

Sheikhupura 82 85 83 80 77 78 80 79 80

Nankana Sahib 88 73 79 86 77 82 86 76 81

Okara 92 85 89 76 70 73 80 74 77

Sahiwal 80 82 81 73 68 70 74 70 72

Pakpattan 89 80 85 77 64 71 79 66 73

Vehari 77 84 82 74 57 65 74 63 68

Multan 81 80 81 58 56 57 65 64 64

Lodhran 73 69 71 57 51 54 59 53 57

Khanewal 74 69 71 65 63 64 67 64 66

D.G.khan 85 80 83 64 44 55 66 47 57

Rajanpur 81 77 79 43 33 38 48 41 45

Layyah 89 80 84 79 79 79 80 79 80

Muzaffargarh 78 78 78 59 51 55 60 53 57

Bahawalpur 79 86 82 54 49 52 60 58 59

Bahawalnagar 88 79 83 67 58 63 72 63 68Rahim Yar Khan 75 70 73 58 46 52 60 50 55

TABLE 2.7: NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE PRIMARY LEVEL (AGE 4-9)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

PROVINCE & DISTRICT URBAN RURAL TOTAL

(INCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

NOTES:1. Net enrolment rate: [Number of children aged 4 - 9 years attending primary level (classes 0 – 5) divided by number of children aged 4 -9 years] multiplied by 100. Enrolment in katchi is included.2. Numerator of NER: Raised sum of all individuals aged 4 - 9 years who report currently attending primary level, including katchi class.3. Denominator of NER: Raised sum of all individuals aged 4 - 9 years who responded to the relevant questions.

53

Page 75: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.7: NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE PRIMARY LEVEL (AGE 4-9)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

PROVINCE & DISTRICT URBAN RURAL TOTAL

(INCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

Sindh 73 66 70 50 35 43 59 48 54

Jacobabad 64 54 59 36 22 30 43 29 36

Kashmore 54 46 50 33 15 25 39 23 32

Shikarpur 56 61 58 41 30 35 44 37 40

Larkana 61 51 56 58 47 52 59 48 54

Shahdadkot 55 49 52 46 39 43 48 41 45

Sukkur 66 53 60 50 29 40 58 41 50

Ghotki 63 51 56 44 25 35 47 30 39

Khairpur 65 62 64 58 43 51 60 49 54

Naushahro Feroze 76 81 78 67 56 62 69 62 66

Shaheed Benazirabad 63 66 64 65 40 54 64 47 56

Dadu 77 82 79 65 63 64 67 67 67

Jamshoro 72 67 69 53 48 51 57 53 55

Hyderabad 69 49 60 58 42 51 66 48 58

Tando Allah Yar 64 62 63 42 27 35 45 33 40

Tando Muhammad Khan 48 64 57 32 16 24 33 23 28

Matiari 67 54 62 50 33 42 54 38 46

Badin 65 56 61 44 29 37 48 34 41

Thatta 57 89 72 40 34 37 41 39 40

Sujawal 47 33 40 43 22 34 44 24 35

Sanghar 74 57 65 45 28 37 49 33 42

Mirpur Khas 74 68 71 47 22 35 52 32 43

Umerkot 57 61 59 43 33 38 45 38 42

Tharparkar 69 77 73 50 31 42 52 34 44

Karachi 81 74 78 60 45 53 79 73 76

54

Page 76: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.7: NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE PRIMARY LEVEL (AGE 4-9)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

PROVINCE & DISTRICT URBAN RURAL TOTAL

(INCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 79 76 78 70 56 64 72 59 66

Chitral 64 86 71 74 58 66 72 60 67

Upper Dir 53 52 53 57 39 48 56 40 48

Lower Dir 69 87 77 72 64 68 72 65 69

Swat 79 81 80 74 61 68 74 65 70

Shangla - - - 50 26 39 50 26 39

Buner - - - 70 56 64 70 56 64

Malakand PA 73 75 74 78 77 77 77 77 77

Kohistan - - - 41 15 29 41 15 29

Mansehra 82 92 87 81 68 75 82 70 75

Batagram - - - 64 43 53 64 43 53

Abbottabad 96 95 95 84 81 82 86 83 85

Haripur 81 100 88 82 82 82 82 84 83

Tor Ghar - - - 56 26 43 56 26 43

Mardan 84 74 80 80 67 74 81 69 75

Swabi 92 85 89 75 69 72 78 71 74

Charsadda 74 72 73 76 63 70 76 64 70

Peshawar 73 73 73 70 51 63 72 62 68

Nowshera 89 73 81 82 63 72 84 67 75

Kohat 90 85 88 77 58 68 79 62 71

Hangu 80 68 73 79 52 67 79 56 69

Karak 77 57 71 78 64 71 78 63 71

Bannu 64 80 73 73 46 60 72 48 61

Lakki Marwat 80 63 71 74 48 62 74 50 63

D.I.Khan 77 61 70 50 38 44 52 40 47

Tank 63 58 61 56 37 46 57 39 48

55

Page 77: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.7: NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE PRIMARY LEVEL (AGE 4-9)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

PROVINCE & DISTRICT URBAN RURAL TOTAL

(INCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

Balochistan 62 58 60 51 30 41 54 38 47

Quetta 61 61 61 69 70 69 64 65 65

Pishin 44 40 43 36 29 33 37 30 34

Killa Abdullah 38 21 32 39 9 25 39 11 26

Chagai 43 60 53 37 18 27 37 22 29

Nushki 67 40 50 64 36 52 64 37 52

Loralai 66 50 56 74 34 60 73 39 59

Barkhan 77 47 61 69 11 39 70 16 42

Musa Khel 63 33 49 52 49 51 54 44 50

Killa Saifullah 55 32 43 72 24 53 69 26 51

Zhob 83 59 72 37 14 26 48 24 36

Sheerani - - - 67 7 39 67 7 39

Sibi 75 51 65 33 22 29 49 33 42

Harnai 59 74 67 31 14 23 33 19 26

Ziarat 65 38 53 54 20 39 54 21 40

Kohlu 73 45 59 40 22 31 44 25 35

Dera Bugti 72 38 54 25 12 19 28 14 21

Kachhi (Bolan) 50 83 65 44 33 39 45 42 44

Jaffarabad 52 48 50 49 27 39 50 33 42

Nasirabad 61 54 57 44 28 37 48 35 42

Jhal Magsi 70 81 75 53 30 42 54 32 44

Kalat 62 81 72 59 43 53 59 52 56

Mastung 85 82 83 64 53 59 67 61 64

Khuzdar 63 67 65 50 26 41 53 44 49

Awaran - - - 60 34 49 60 34 49

Kharan 69 70 70 46 37 42 52 48 50

Washuk - - - 52 34 44 52 34 44

Lasbela 55 66 61 27 16 22 38 41 39

Gwadar 75 62 69 66 58 62 71 60 67

NOTES:

1. The Panjgur & Kech districts have been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

56

Page 78: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

Pakistan 25 27 26 41 33 37 36 32 34Punjab 22 26 24 37 35 36 33 32 32

Islamabad 28 49 37 27 38 32 28 46 36

Attock 12 23 17 46 45 45 36 38 37

Rawalpindi 21 19 20 30 33 31 25 26 25

Jhelum 27 30 28 55 61 58 47 51 49

Chakwal 27 57 39 49 60 55 46 60 52

Sargodha 11 21 16 40 42 41 30 36 33

Bhakkar 52 36 44 47 43 46 48 42 45

Khushab 30 32 31 43 47 45 39 44 41

Mianwali 36 48 41 48 41 45 46 43 44

Faisalabad 20 19 20 35 40 38 29 32 30

Chiniot 27 41 33 49 44 46 42 43 43

Jhang 10 24 17 35 34 35 30 32 31

Toba Tek Singh 31 33 32 40 40 40 38 39 38

Gujranwala 11 13 12 30 27 28 20 20 20

Hafizabad 23 29 26 38 38 38 34 36 35

Gujrat 17 23 19 34 34 34 29 31 30

Mandi Bahuddin 31 23 27 31 36 33 31 33 32

Sialkot 16 14 15 31 31 31 27 27 27

Narowal 58 27 41 36 39 37 39 36 38

Lahore 20 29 24 11 13 12 18 25 21

Kasur 38 13 25 28 24 26 30 22 26

Sheikhupura 20 19 19 28 33 30 25 29 27

Nankana Sahib 13 16 15 43 32 38 36 27 32

Okara 24 30 27 61 58 60 52 52 52

Sahiwal 43 59 52 46 47 47 46 49 47

Pakpattan 38 45 41 56 45 50 52 45 49

Vehari 28 33 31 44 38 41 42 37 40

Multan 20 25 23 32 24 28 29 25 27

Lodhran 19 21 20 34 27 31 32 26 29

Khanewal 38 32 35 40 35 37 40 34 37

D.G.khan 25 31 27 50 38 44 48 37 43

Rajanpur 38 29 34 31 28 29 32 28 30

Layyah 44 61 53 56 61 59 55 61 58

Muzaffargarh 23 25 24 33 30 32 33 29 31

Bahawalpur 16 23 20 19 16 18 19 18 18

Bahawalnagar 25 18 21 44 35 40 40 31 36Rahim Yar Khan 31 35 33 30 26 28 30 27 29

TABLE 2.8: NET ENROLMENT RATE IN GOVERNMENT PRIMARY SCHOOLS (AGE 5-9)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

PROVINCE & DISTRICTURBAN RURAL TOTAL

(EXCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

NOTES:1. Net enrolment rate in government primary schools: [Number of children aged 5 - 9 years attending government primary schools (classes 1-5) divided by number of children aged 5 - 9 years] multiplied by 100. Enrolment in katchi is excluded.2. Numerator of NER: Raised sum of all individuals aged 5 - 9 years who report currently attending primary level in Government schools, excluding katchi.

57

Page 79: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.8: NET ENROLMENT RATE IN GOVERNMENT PRIMARY SCHOOLS (AGE 5-9)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

PROVINCE & DISTRICTURBAN RURAL TOTAL

(EXCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

Sindh 24 25 25 45 30 38 37 28 33

Jacobabad 26 31 28 35 21 28 33 23 28

Kashmore 48 41 45 33 13 23 37 20 29

Shikarpur 36 50 43 38 26 32 38 32 35

Larkana 53 51 52 54 46 50 53 48 51

Shahdadkot 59 46 53 47 40 44 50 41 46

Sukkur 32 24 28 53 31 42 43 27 35

Ghotki 43 29 35 40 23 32 41 24 33

Khairpur 37 37 37 55 39 47 51 38 45

Naushahro Feroze 20 17 18 49 52 50 44 43 43

Shaheed Benazirabad 36 34 35 59 37 49 54 36 46

Dadu 22 30 26 53 30 42 47 30 39

Jamshoro 28 28 28 35 34 34 33 33 33

Hyderabad 30 29 30 46 42 44 34 32 33

Tando Allah Yar 39 44 41 37 27 33 37 31 34

Tando Muhammad Khan 17 39 31 25 15 20 24 19 22

Matiari 38 39 38 41 30 36 40 32 36

Badin 28 23 26 42 26 34 39 25 32

Thatta 26 19 23 33 25 29 32 25 29

Sujawal 36 29 33 45 24 36 44 25 36

Sanghar 43 32 37 45 27 37 45 28 37

Mirpur Khas 26 25 25 47 22 35 43 22 33

Umerkot 48 47 48 42 28 36 43 32 38

Tharparkar 62 74 68 51 32 42 52 35 44

Karachi 13 15 14 17 9 13 13 14 14

58

Page 80: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.8: NET ENROLMENT RATE IN GOVERNMENT PRIMARY SCHOOLS (AGE 5-9)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

PROVINCE & DISTRICTURBAN RURAL TOTAL

(EXCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 24 31 27 43 37 40 40 36 38

Chitral 50 34 45 47 37 42 48 36 42

Upper Dir 43 40 41 45 30 38 45 30 38

Lower Dir 25 42 33 43 49 46 42 48 45

Swat 18 26 22 46 37 43 43 35 40

Shangla - - - 32 21 27 32 21 27

Buner - - - 52 41 47 52 41 47

Malakand PA 48 30 39 45 52 48 46 49 47

Kohistan - - - 38 14 27 38 14 27

Mansehra 27 18 21 46 42 44 46 40 43

Batagram - - - 51 43 47 51 43 47

Abbottabad 20 22 20 48 53 50 41 48 44

Haripur 6 27 15 48 52 50 40 48 44

Tor Ghar - - - 48 28 39 48 28 39

Mardan 45 30 39 45 45 45 45 42 44

Swabi 25 47 37 47 44 46 44 45 44

Charsadda 9 12 11 47 41 45 43 38 41

Peshawar 14 34 23 27 27 27 21 30 25

Nowshera 35 25 30 41 40 41 39 35 37

Kohat 17 30 22 42 37 39 38 36 37

Hangu 31 28 29 44 25 36 42 26 35

Karak 7 57 23 45 44 45 43 45 44

Bannu 12 33 24 42 29 36 41 29 35

Lakki Marwat 53 43 48 48 32 41 49 34 42

D.I.Khan 29 33 31 31 21 26 31 22 27

Tank 11 34 20 38 21 30 34 23 28

59

Page 81: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.8: NET ENROLMENT RATE IN GOVERNMENT PRIMARY SCHOOLS (AGE 5-9)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

PROVINCE & DISTRICTURBAN RURAL TOTAL

(EXCLUDING KATCHI CLASS)

Balochistan 53 44 49 50 25 39 51 30 41

Quetta 48 31 41 65 49 56 54 40 48

Pishin 64 40 52 36 20 29 38 22 30

Killa Abdullah 41 22 34 32 11 22 33 12 23

Chagai 52 61 57 35 18 26 36 22 29

Nushki 67 35 48 38 34 36 42 34 38

Loralai 49 32 39 81 26 62 76 27 57

Barkhan 80 49 63 73 13 42 74 18 45

Musa Khel 11 25 17 56 34 47 46 32 40

Killa Saifullah 57 28 42 55 17 41 55 20 41

Zhob 69 54 62 38 14 26 45 22 34

Sheerani - - - 68 6 39 68 6 39

Sibi 70 50 62 35 22 29 48 32 41

Harnai 62 47 53 24 14 19 26 17 22

Ziarat 50 55 52 50 22 38 50 24 39

Kohlu 93 52 72 43 18 31 49 22 36

Dera Bugti 39 39 39 26 11 19 27 13 21

Kachhi (Bolan) 66 54 60 45 14 30 49 21 35

Jaffarabad 31 51 41 47 21 36 43 30 37

Nasirabad 33 24 28 47 17 33 43 19 32

Jhal Magsi 59 85 71 60 34 48 60 36 49

Kalat 78 87 83 64 26 49 66 41 55

Mastung 73 86 80 73 62 69 73 69 71

Khuzdar 86 81 83 61 30 49 65 50 58

Awaran - - - 59 27 45 59 27 45

Kharan 59 38 46 47 36 42 50 36 43

Washuk - - - 55 37 47 55 37 47

Lasbela 48 45 46 31 18 25 37 32 35

Gwadar 75 58 68 67 56 62 71 57 65

NOTES:

1. The Panjgur & Kech district has been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

60

Page 82: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

A. EXCLUDING KATCHI CLASS:

Pakistan 40 43 42 72 72 72 62 61 62Punjab 35 40 38 63 66 65 55 57 56

Islamabad 40 62 51 34 51 43 38 59 48

Attock 20 26 23 69 75 72 56 62 59

Rawalpindi 29 30 30 41 52 46 35 41 37

Jhelum 36 37 36 73 81 76 63 67 65

Chakwal 35 79 53 65 71 68 61 72 66

Sargodha 22 39 30 69 74 71 53 63 58

Bhakkar 62 62 62 85 80 82 80 76 79

Khushab 45 51 47 72 77 74 63 69 66

Mianwali 48 69 58 80 78 79 73 76 75

Faisalabad 34 34 34 63 73 68 50 55 52

Chiniot 48 58 53 85 86 85 74 77 75

Jhang 26 34 30 66 70 68 57 61 59

Toba Tek Singh 41 45 43 63 67 65 58 63 60

Gujranwala 23 28 25 50 54 52 36 40 38

Hafizabad 46 43 44 70 70 70 62 63 63

Gujrat 35 36 36 50 55 52 46 49 47

Mandi Bahuddin 46 32 39 53 55 54 52 51 52

Sialkot 26 23 25 46 49 47 39 42 41

Narowal 71 42 56 54 54 54 57 51 54

Lahore 32 44 38 20 34 27 29 42 35

Kasur 52 34 43 44 49 47 46 46 46

Sheikhupura 38 31 35 45 57 51 43 50 46

Nankana Sahib 29 43 37 68 56 63 58 52 55

Okara 40 44 42 75 84 79 67 74 71

Sahiwal 52 77 66 69 76 73 66 76 72

Pakpattan 45 55 49 79 75 77 72 71 72

Vehari 31 49 43 70 78 73 65 69 67

Multan 36 40 38 58 54 56 51 49 50

Lodhran 39 35 37 64 60 62 60 56 58

Khanewal 49 43 46 72 71 72 68 64 66

D.G.khan 33 42 37 80 81 81 75 76 75

Rajanpur 50 40 45 69 78 72 65 68 66

Layyah 57 72 64 69 74 71 67 74 70

Muzaffargarh 35 36 35 64 69 66 61 64 63

Bahawalpur 32 38 35 60 53 57 52 48 50

Bahawalnagar 47 34 40 80 83 81 73 67 70Rahim Yar Khan 47 58 53 75 74 75 70 70 70

TABLE 2.9(a): PRIMARY LEVEL ENROLMENT IN GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL

PROVINCE & DISTRICTURBAN RURAL TOTAL

ENROLMENT- BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

NOTES:1. Children attending primary level in a government school, expressed as % of all children attending primary level -

enrolment in katchi is excluded.

61

Page 83: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

62

Page 84: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.9(a): PRIMARY LEVEL ENROLMENT IN GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL

PROVINCE & DISTRICTURBAN RURAL TOTAL

ENROLMENT- BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

Sindh 41 41 41 88 83 86 67 60 64

Jacobabad 44 61 51 85 87 86 73 78 75

Kashmore 80 76 78 85 78 83 83 77 81

Shikarpur 62 78 70 86 83 85 80 81 81

Larkana 84 94 89 86 89 87 85 91 88

Shahdadkot 96 89 93 93 95 93 93 93 93

Sukkur 45 56 50 90 88 89 66 67 67

Ghotki 55 54 55 85 79 83 80 70 76

Khairpur 59 61 60 87 86 87 80 77 78

Naushahro Feroze 35 26 30 90 95 92 78 74 76

Shaheed Benazirabad 57 60 58 96 94 95 87 82 85

Dadu 39 54 46 87 64 77 77 62 71

Jamshoro 46 40 43 77 80 78 70 68 69

Hyderabad 48 61 53 87 92 89 55 66 59

Tando Allah Yar 74 69 71 94 95 94 90 86 88

Tando Muhammad Khan 55 77 70 85 93 87 81 87 84

Matiari 78 76 77 90 94 92 87 89 88

Badin 55 52 54 96 97 96 88 84 86

Thatta 46 29 38 86 92 88 81 81 81

Sujawal 87 85 86 93 88 92 92 88 91

Sanghar 73 68 71 96 88 93 91 81 88

Mirpur Khas 50 46 48 93 86 91 82 69 78

Umerkot 82 71 77 95 87 92 92 82 88

Tharparkar 87 95 91 93 91 92 92 92 92

Karachi 24 22 23 21 11 17 23 22 23

63

Page 85: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

64

Page 86: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.9(a): PRIMARY LEVEL ENROLMENT IN GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL

PROVINCE & DISTRICTURBAN RURAL TOTAL

ENROLMENT- BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 41 50 44 73 77 74 67 71 69

Chitral 71 80 74 81 76 79 80 76 78

Upper Dir 100 100 100 95 96 96 95 96 96

Lower Dir 55 84 69 81 90 85 80 89 84

Swat 30 46 38 70 76 72 66 70 67

Shangla . . . 85 78 83 85 78 83

Buner . . . 79 83 80 79 83 80

Malakand PA 77 66 73 73 83 78 74 81 77

Kohistan . . . 87 93 88 87 93 88

Mansehra 48 16 29 72 71 72 71 67 69

Batagram . . . 85 80 83 85 80 83

Abbottabad 23 30 26 77 77 77 65 69 67

Haripur 18 40 28 74 75 75 63 69 66

Tor Ghar . . . 94 99 96 94 99 96

Mardan 65 51 60 68 82 74 67 74 70

Swabi 36 57 47 68 63 65 63 62 63

Charsadda 36 20 28 70 81 74 66 71 68

Peshawar 28 50 38 45 52 48 37 51 43

Nowshera 52 43 48 67 70 68 62 61 61

Kohat 39 58 46 71 83 76 65 78 70

Hangu 42 52 46 69 69 69 65 65 65

Karak 22 87 46 69 78 73 67 78 72

Bannu 38 62 53 75 78 76 73 76 74

Lakki Marwat 71 56 63 82 86 83 81 80 81

D.I.Khan 44 78 59 70 66 68 67 68 67

Tank 29 63 41 74 82 77 67 78 70

65

Page 87: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

66

Page 88: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.9(a): PRIMARY LEVEL ENROLMENT IN GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL

PROVINCE & DISTRICTURBAN RURAL TOTAL

ENROLMENT- BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

Balochistan 82 81 81 96 93 95 92 87 90

Quetta 69 60 66 98 80 90 80 69 75

Pishin 100 100 100 93 100 95 94 100 95

Killa Abdullah 100 100 100 82 94 84 84 96 86

Chagai 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Nushki 100 100 100 100 99 100 100 99 100

Loralai 100 62 79 100 100 100 100 84 97

Barkhan 100 100 100 96 100 97 97 100 98

Musa Khel 100 73 86 98 100 99 99 94 97

Killa Saifullah 100 100 100 93 98 93 94 99 95

Zhob 100 94 97 96 87 94 98 91 95

Sheerani . . . 95 100 95 95 100 95

Sibi 100 100 100 100 91 97 100 96 99

Harnai 100 92 96 82 100 86 84 98 88

Ziarat 100 100 100 77 100 84 78 100 85

Kohlu 100 100 100 97 64 87 98 71 89

Dera Bugti 100 100 100 100 91 98 100 93 98

Kachhi (Bolan) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Jaffarabad 56 100 75 100 99 100 88 100 91

Nasirabad 62 64 63 100 90 98 88 77 85

Jhal Magsi 88 100 93 100 100 100 99 100 100

Kalat 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Mastung 79 100 90 100 98 99 96 99 97

Khuzdar 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Awaran . . . 100 100 100 100 100 100

Kharan 90 95 93 100 100 100 97 98 97

Washuk . . . 100 100 100 100 100 100

Lasbela 89 89 89 100 100 100 94 92 93

Gwadar 99 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

NOTES:

1. The Panjgur & Kech district has been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

67

Page 89: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

68

Page 90: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

B. INCLUDING KATCHI CLASS:

Pakistan 36 39 37 70 69 70 59 58 58Punjab 32 36 34 61 64 62 52 54 53

Islamabad 37 57 46 31 49 40 35 54 44

Attock 17 25 20 63 71 67 50 58 53

Rawalpindi 25 27 26 36 47 41 30 36 33

Jhelum 30 32 31 71 77 74 59 63 61

Chakwal 35 73 52 64 67 65 60 68 64

Sargodha 22 39 30 67 74 71 52 62 57

Bhakkar 64 64 64 83 77 80 79 75 77

Khushab 44 42 43 70 76 73 61 65 63

Mianwali 44 59 51 78 79 78 72 74 73

Faisalabad 31 30 30 60 68 64 47 51 49

Chiniot 44 53 48 83 84 84 71 74 73

Jhang 22 27 25 64 68 66 55 57 56

Toba Tek Singh 38 41 39 62 65 64 57 60 58

Gujranwala 19 23 21 47 49 48 32 35 33

Hafizabad 42 42 42 65 68 66 58 61 59

Gujrat 28 34 31 46 53 49 41 48 44

Mandi Bahuddin 41 26 32 49 54 51 48 48 48

Sialkot 24 24 24 42 45 43 37 39 38

Narowal 72 45 58 50 52 51 53 51 52

Lahore 28 35 31 20 32 26 26 34 30

Kasur 51 31 41 40 47 43 42 43 43

Sheikhupura 33 27 30 42 53 47 39 47 43

Nankana Sahib 25 41 34 63 54 59 53 50 52

Okara 35 37 36 75 83 79 64 71 67

Sahiwal 44 69 58 66 76 71 63 74 69

Pakpattan 42 55 47 76 71 74 70 68 69

Vehari 35 48 44 71 77 73 66 69 67

Multan 31 38 34 58 52 55 48 46 47

Lodhran 37 34 36 62 60 61 58 55 56

Khanewal 47 44 46 71 69 70 67 64 65

D.G.khan 34 42 37 80 81 81 75 76 75

Rajanpur 50 44 47 69 77 72 65 67 66

Layyah 57 72 65 69 74 71 67 74 70

Muzaffargarh 31 33 32 64 69 66 61 64 62

Bahawalpur 27 33 30 59 56 58 50 49 50

Bahawalnagar 46 35 40 78 81 79 71 66 69Rahim Yar Khan 45 56 50 75 74 75 70 70 70

TABLE 2.9(b): PRIMARY LEVEL ENROLMENT IN GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL

PROVINCE & DISTRICTURBAN RURAL TOTAL

PRIMARY ENROLMENT- BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

NOTES:1. Children attending primary level in a government school, expressed as a percentage of all children attending primary level - enrolment in

69

Page 91: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.9(b): PRIMARY LEVEL ENROLMENT IN GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL

PROVINCE & DISTRICTURBAN RURAL TOTAL

PRIMARY ENROLMENT- BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

Sindh 35 36 36 87 83 86 62 56 60

Jacobabad 41 56 47 85 87 86 71 75 73

Kashmore 80 77 78 84 78 82 82 77 81

Shikarpur 60 72 66 86 84 85 80 79 80

Larkana 82 92 87 86 89 87 84 90 87

Shahdadkot 96 89 93 92 95 94 93 94 93

Sukkur 43 54 48 90 87 89 65 65 65

Ghotki 55 53 54 85 79 83 79 69 76

Khairpur 61 62 61 87 85 86 80 77 78

Naushahro Feroze 36 28 32 91 95 93 80 73 77

Shaheed Benazirabad 52 56 54 96 95 96 86 80 84

Dadu 40 48 44 85 66 77 76 62 70

Jamshoro 45 41 44 76 78 77 69 68 69

Hyderabad 45 56 49 86 93 89 52 63 56

Tando Allah Yar 66 65 65 93 95 94 87 84 86

Tando Muhammad Khan 48 73 64 86 93 88 81 85 83

Matiari 68 69 68 89 93 91 83 86 84

Badin 49 49 49 96 97 96 85 82 84

Thatta 42 27 34 85 91 87 80 79 79

Sujawal 76 83 80 92 89 91 90 87 89

Sanghar 69 65 67 97 87 94 90 79 86

Mirpur Khas 42 41 42 93 85 90 78 65 74

Umerkot 77 67 73 94 81 90 90 77 85

Tharparkar 88 95 91 91 90 91 91 90 91

Karachi 19 19 19 18 9 14 19 18 19

70

Page 92: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.9(b): PRIMARY LEVEL ENROLMENT IN GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL

PROVINCE & DISTRICTURBAN RURAL TOTAL

PRIMARY ENROLMENT- BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 39 48 43 72 76 74 67 70 68

Chitral 73 77 75 80 75 78 79 76 78

Upper Dir 100 94 97 95 96 96 95 96 96

Lower Dir 53 82 66 80 89 84 79 88 83

Swat 25 48 37 71 74 72 65 69 67

Shangla . . . 82 77 81 82 77 81

Buner . . . 79 82 80 79 82 80

Malakand PA 68 75 71 71 83 77 71 82 76

Kohistan . . . 87 93 89 87 93 89

Mansehra 32 14 22 68 71 70 66 67 67

Batagram . . . 83 80 82 83 80 82

Abbottabad 25 30 27 75 76 75 65 68 66

Haripur 26 39 32 70 73 71 62 67 65

Tor Ghar . . . 94 99 95 94 99 95

Mardan 63 52 59 67 79 72 66 72 69

Swabi 35 52 44 68 63 66 63 61 62

Charsadda 30 18 25 70 76 72 65 68 67

Peshawar 29 46 36 46 52 48 38 48 42

Nowshera 44 42 43 68 69 68 60 59 59

Kohat 39 50 43 69 82 74 63 76 68

Hangu 44 50 47 72 68 70 67 63 66

Karak 30 87 48 68 75 71 66 76 70

Bannu 34 53 47 76 75 75 74 72 74

Lakki Marwat 70 56 63 82 88 84 81 83 82

D.I.Khan 40 67 52 68 65 67 65 65 65

Tank 33 66 44 76 84 79 69 81 73

71

Page 93: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.9(b): PRIMARY LEVEL ENROLMENT IN GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL

PROVINCE & DISTRICTURBAN RURAL TOTAL

PRIMARY ENROLMENT- BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

Balochistan 81 81 81 95 94 94 90 88 90

Quetta 69 63 66 84 84 84 75 72 74

Pishin 100 100 100 93 99 95 94 99 95

Killa Abdullah 98 100 98 82 94 84 84 96 86

Chagai 100 94 97 100 100 100 100 98 100

Nushki 100 100 100 100 99 100 100 99 100

Loralai 93 62 78 100 100 100 99 87 96

Barkhan 100 100 100 96 100 97 97 100 98

Musa Khel 87 73 83 98 100 99 96 95 95

Killa Saifullah 100 100 100 94 99 95 95 99 96

Zhob 95 93 94 96 87 94 96 90 94

Sheerani . . . 94 100 95 94 100 95

Sibi 91 92 91 99 91 97 95 92 94

Harnai 100 91 95 80 100 85 83 97 87

Ziarat 100 100 100 78 99 84 79 99 85

Kohlu 100 100 100 97 64 87 98 72 89

Dera Bugti 81 100 88 100 93 98 98 94 97

Kachhi (Bolan) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Jaffarabad 57 98 76 100 100 100 89 99 92

Nasirabad 62 60 61 99 91 96 87 77 83

Jhal Magsi 88 100 93 100 100 100 99 100 100

Kalat 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Mastung 81 100 91 100 98 99 96 99 97

Khuzdar 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Awaran . . . 100 99 100 100 99 100

Kharan 92 96 94 100 100 100 98 98 98

Washuk . . . 100 100 100 100 100 100

Lasbela 90 86 88 100 100 100 95 89 92

Gwadar 99 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

NOTES:

1. The Panjgur & Kech district has been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

72

Page 94: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 2.10(a): GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE MIDDLE LEVEL (AGE 11-13) - BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

Pakistan 77 78 78 64 45 55 68 56 62 63Punjab 72 80 76 65 53 59 67 62 64 65

Islamabad 107 95 102 139 77 108 118 88 104 105

Attock 68 120 90 107 86 96 98 92 95 2 95

Rawalpindi 62 88 77 94 98 96 79 92 86 5 92

Jhelum 94 81 87 89 92 90 91 88 89 3 88

Chakwal 94 63 79 105 116 111 104 110 107 1 94

Sargodha 87 74 80 87 60 74 87 66 76 9 62

Bhakkar 74 71 72 61 41 52 62 47 55 28 58

Khushab 86 65 76 76 69 73 79 68 74 11 72

Mianwali 61 88 73 100 57 78 92 62 77 8 69

Faisalabad 72 86 79 69 62 66 71 74 72 14 70

Chiniot 66 79 72 56 30 45 59 49 55 29 51

Jhang 71 64 67 64 37 53 66 45 56 24 50

Toba Tek Singh 74 100 85 72 65 69 73 71 72 15 72

Gujranwala 67 80 74 72 75 73 70 77 74 12 78

Hafizabad 85 69 75 78 55 66 80 59 68 16 63

Gujrat 80 91 87 77 88 83 78 89 84 6 88

Mandi Bahuddin 61 106 79 82 66 74 77 73 75 10 71

Sialkot 84 73 78 86 94 90 86 88 87 4 79

Narowal 70 76 72 73 85 78 72 83 77 7 82

Lahore 71 81 76 88 36 63 74 72 73 13 76

Kasur 63 74 69 68 51 60 67 58 62 21 60

Sheikhupura 76 67 72 56 68 61 61 68 64 19 64

Nankana Sahib 57 62 59 75 62 69 70 62 66 17 72

Okara 80 86 83 58 42 50 64 53 58 23 61

Sahiwal 90 77 83 66 52 60 71 58 65 18 65

Pakpattan 96 94 95 54 44 49 60 52 56 25 58

Vehari 62 81 68 51 50 51 54 55 54 30 55

Multan 60 75 67 56 41 48 58 52 55 27 55

Lodhran 57 59 58 52 47 50 53 49 51 31 49

Khanewal 66 79 73 59 43 52 60 51 56 26 61

D.G.khan 67 79 73 56 19 40 58 29 45 32 48

Rajanpur 113 52 84 39 24 32 51 28 40 35 36

Layyah 58 89 73 65 55 61 64 60 62 20 52

Muzaffargarh 71 76 73 48 25 37 51 30 41 34 47

Bahawalpur 49 61 54 33 34 34 37 41 39 36 42

Bahawalnagar 71 84 79 64 44 54 65 52 59 22 54Rahim Yar Khan 74 75 75 50 22 37 53 31 43 33 41

PROVINCE & DISTRICTURBAN RURAL TOTAL

RANKTOTAL12-13

NOTES:1.Gross enrolment rate: [Number of children attending middle level (classes 6 - 8) divided by number of children aged 11 - 13 years]multiplied by 1002.Numerator of GER: Raised sum of all individuals who report currently attending middle level (class 6 - 8). 3.Denominator of GER: Raised sum of all individuals aged 11 - 13 years who respond to the relevant questions.

73

Page 95: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 2.10(a): GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE MIDDLE LEVEL (AGE 11-13) - BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICTURBAN RURAL TOTAL

RANKTOTAL12-13

Sindh 78 78 78 48 22 36 61 48 55 57

Jacobabad 85 82 84 44 9 29 53 26 42 13 45

Kashmore 71 49 62 44 13 31 52 25 41 15 42

Shikarpur 75 72 74 47 21 34 55 35 45 11 48

Larkana 77 71 74 69 37 52 72 53 62 4 54

Shahdadkot 56 35 46 41 21 30 44 24 34 20 42

Sukkur 78 71 75 71 18 47 75 49 63 3 58

Ghotki 62 51 57 52 14 37 54 21 41 16 48

Khairpur 71 71 71 52 29 42 58 45 52 5 53

Naushahro Feroze 64 66 65 57 21 37 59 28 42 12 57

Shaheed Benazirabad 62 78 67 59 23 41 60 34 48 7 44

Dadu 84 87 85 47 30 40 52 38 46 9 56

Jamshoro 78 56 66 47 34 41 53 39 46 8 53

Hyderabad 69 72 71 47 28 39 65 65 65 2 76

Tando Allah Yar 78 65 71 42 22 33 50 33 42 14 51

Tando Muhammad Khan 99 84 92 22 14 18 31 23 28 23 31

Matiari 78 73 76 48 29 40 55 41 49 6 49

Badin 58 52 55 35 12 25 39 20 30 21 35

Thatta 72 42 58 34 13 24 38 16 27 24 29

Sujawal 82 46 55 30 16 24 34 24 29 22

Sanghar 62 53 58 50 18 35 53 26 41 17 50

Mirpur Khas 93 83 88 35 18 27 49 40 45 10 48

Umerkot 48 54 50 48 14 33 48 23 37 19 46

Tharparkar 84 82 83 46 20 34 48 23 37 18 46

Karachi 84 87 85 70 42 55 83 84 83 1 78

74

Page 96: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 2.10(a): GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE MIDDLE LEVEL (AGE 11-13) - BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICTURBAN RURAL TOTAL

RANKTOTAL12-13

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 101 82 93 81 49 67 84 54 71 69

Chitral 79 124 93 112 79 97 108 82 97 2 99

Upper Dir 58 49 53 75 39 58 74 39 58 20 55

Lower Dir 79 72 76 88 78 84 88 77 84 6 68

Swat 71 123 87 69 37 57 70 47 61 18 64

Shangla - - - 64 23 47 64 23 47 22 48

Buner - - - 83 33 61 83 33 61 17 57

Malakand PA 86 47 75 103 63 83 100 61 82 7 88

Kohistan - - - 40 9 26 40 9 26 25 20

Mansehra 112 132 118 77 79 78 80 81 80 8 69

Batagram - - - 66 23 46 66 23 46 23 46

Abbottabad 124 80 96 100 79 90 103 79 91 3 95

Haripur 207 97 128 102 70 86 108 74 90 4 91

Tor Ghar - - - 44 10 27 44 10 27 24 27

Mardan 105 59 87 77 50 64 85 52 70 13 74

Swabi 124 120 122 113 88 100 114 92 102 1 95

Charsadda 94 63 83 74 37 57 78 41 62 15 72

Peshawar 104 83 96 73 49 63 89 65 80 9 73

Nowshera 115 73 94 94 72 84 99 72 86 5 79

Kohat 103 77 91 95 41 74 97 52 78 11 69

Hangu 144 55 111 90 20 61 98 25 68 14 67

Karak 100 151 119 93 57 77 93 60 79 10 75

Bannu 100 50 77 83 32 61 84 33 62 16 65

Lakki Marwat 116 83 98 87 43 68 90 49 72 12 65

D.I.Khan 81 95 87 68 36 53 70 42 56 21 53

Tank 64 90 73 78 30 56 75 38 59 19 52

75

Page 97: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 2.10(a): GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE MIDDLE LEVEL (AGE 11-13) - BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICTURBAN RURAL TOTAL

RANKTOTAL12-13

Balochistan 84 60 72 51 20 39 59 34 48 48

Quetta 83 76 79 76 78 77 79 77 78 1 87

Pishin 188 54 83 56 20 40 58 23 42 14 49

Killa Abdullah 45 29 37 60 9 40 58 12 40 16 48

Chagai 140 67 114 26 4 16 39 9 26 23 39

Nushki 46 61 54 54 34 44 53 39 46 10 43

Loralai 58 41 47 61 15 48 61 24 48 8 49

Barkhan 84 117 95 45 4 26 53 18 38 18 37

Musa Khel 43 36 41 40 12 28 41 16 31 21 21

Killa Saifullah 95 32 70 92 4 39 93 9 46 9 49

Zhob 77 73 75 36 12 26 51 32 43 12 32

Sheerani - - - 47 - 27 47 - 27 22 32

Sibi 98 57 80 30 46 37 57 50 54 5 70

Harnai 94 33 63 51 8 36 55 12 39 17 32

Ziarat 84 74 80 77 38 60 77 40 61 4 71

Kohlu 53 13 43 56 3 33 56 4 35 20 23

Dera Bugti 51 25 42 27 11 21 29 12 23 28 11

Kachhi (Bolan) 88 73 84 36 16 28 51 26 41 15 36

Jaffarabad 63 41 51 42 9 29 47 20 35 19 39

Nasirabad 62 45 55 17 8 14 28 18 24 27 25

Jhal Magsi 55 22 40 34 13 25 35 13 26 24 41

Kalat 100 20 60 77 13 48 80 14 50 6 42

Mastung 78 150 91 71 40 59 73 53 66 2 59

Khuzdar 147 28 84 36 4 24 64 13 43 13 43

Awaran - - - 39 4 25 39 4 25 26 31

Kharan 68 72 71 60 4 34 62 37 48 7 52

Washuk - - - 36 8 25 36 8 25 25 34

Lasbela 83 59 70 32 15 25 51 36 44 11 40

Gwadar 96 39 72 61 19 50 81 34 64 3 59

NOTES:

1. The Panjgur & Kech district has been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

76

Page 98: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

Pakistan 70 74 72 56 39 48 60 50 55 56Punjab 70 80 75 58 48 53 61 57 59 60

Islamabad 115 101 109 112 85 100 114 95 105 104

Attock 79 112 95 100 77 88 96 83 89 2 90

Rawalpindi 74 98 88 95 84 89 86 91 89 3 85

Jhelum 98 86 92 83 88 86 87 88 87 4 89

Chakwal 84 108 92 104 101 102 101 102 101 1 98

Sargodha 80 81 80 71 54 64 74 64 69 12 64

Bhakkar 68 58 62 55 33 44 56 38 47 29 46

Khushab 74 63 69 70 60 65 71 61 66 14 68

Mianwali 76 74 75 80 52 66 79 56 68 13 72

Faisalabad 77 80 79 66 64 65 71 72 72 10 70

Chiniot 63 75 69 53 27 42 56 45 51 25 53

Jhang 64 67 66 60 34 49 60 43 53 24 45

Toba Tek Singh 56 86 68 64 64 64 62 68 65 15 65

Gujranwala 65 84 75 67 77 72 66 80 74 7 72

Hafizabad 66 62 63 65 57 61 65 58 62 16 61

Gujrat 70 90 82 75 95 84 74 94 84 5 79

Mandi Bahuddin 74 107 89 71 67 69 72 74 73 8 69

Sialkot 78 85 81 86 80 83 84 81 82 6 77

Narowal 67 80 71 77 67 72 75 69 72 9 72

Lahore 67 80 74 69 42 58 68 74 71 11 72

Kasur 61 76 69 59 46 52 59 54 56 21 52

Sheikhupura 69 80 73 50 54 52 55 59 57 19 58

Nankana Sahib 58 68 63 65 57 61 63 60 61 17 65

Okara 77 76 77 53 39 46 59 48 53 23 53

Sahiwal 77 90 82 56 45 51 61 54 58 18 54

Pakpattan 73 73 73 45 33 39 49 39 44 31 46

Vehari 59 66 61 54 43 48 55 46 51 26 49

Multan 67 69 68 49 35 42 55 46 51 28 52

Lodhran 57 59 58 46 40 43 47 43 45 30 48

Khanewal 68 88 78 57 38 48 58 48 53 22 54

D.G.khan 64 82 73 49 17 35 51 26 40 32 42

Rajanpur 91 66 82 29 18 24 38 23 31 36 28

Layyah 63 83 74 64 44 55 64 49 57 20 52

Muzaffargarh 61 75 66 43 22 33 45 27 36 34 38

Bahawalpur 50 75 60 27 30 28 33 39 35 35 36

Bahawalnagar 62 71 67 51 42 47 53 48 51 27 49Rahim Yar Khan 61 66 63 41 20 32 44 28 37 33 37

TABLE 2.10(b): GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE MIDDLE LEVEL (AGE 10-12)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

TOTAL 12-13PROVINCE & DISTRICT RANK

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

NOTES:1.Gross enrolment rate: [Number of children attending middle level (classes 6 - 8) divided by number of children aged 10 - 12 years] multiplied by 100. 2.Numerator of GER: Raised sum of all individuals who report currently attending middle level (class 6 - 8).

77

Page 99: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.10(b): GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE MIDDLE LEVEL (AGE 10-12)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

TOTAL 12-13PROVINCE & DISTRICT RANK

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Sindh 66 68 67 39 18 29 51 41 46 48

Jacobabad 68 69 68 35 8 24 43 22 34 14 35

Kashmore 62 41 53 35 8 23 43 17 31 16 31

Shikarpur 70 67 68 37 19 28 44 31 38 9 38

Larkana 61 60 61 58 29 42 59 43 50 4 51

Shahdadkot 47 28 37 34 20 27 37 22 29 20 34

Sukkur 73 64 69 51 13 34 62 40 52 3 50

Ghotki 53 43 49 41 10 28 43 15 31 18 39

Khairpur 62 65 64 44 24 35 49 38 44 6 42

Naushahro Feroze 70 56 63 47 18 31 51 24 37 10 49

Shaheed Benazirabad 60 56 58 40 17 29 44 25 35 13 32

Dadu 74 70 72 50 32 43 54 39 48 5 45

Jamshoro 65 54 59 42 32 38 47 37 42 7 38

Hyderabad 61 74 67 43 22 33 58 64 61 2 67

Tando Allah Yar 65 58 61 36 19 28 42 29 36 12 44

Tando Muhammad Khan 60 56 59 20 11 16 27 18 23 22 25

Matiari 65 66 65 35 25 31 42 35 39 8 38

Badin 44 49 46 28 10 20 31 16 24 21 28

Thatta 50 46 49 25 11 18 27 14 21 23 21

Sujawal 39 30 33 23 10 17 25 15 20 24

Sanghar 60 70 64 36 14 27 41 22 33 15 41

Mirpur Khas 75 81 78 29 13 21 40 32 36 11 38

Umerkot 46 44 45 39 11 27 41 18 31 19 37

Tharparkar 79 63 72 39 16 29 42 18 31 17 40

Karachi 70 72 71 55 65 59 69 72 71 1 70

78

Page 100: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.10(b): GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE MIDDLE LEVEL (AGE 10-12)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

TOTAL 12-13PROVINCE & DISTRICT RANK

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 86 69 79 71 42 58 73 46 61 61

Chitral 87 86 86 106 68 88 104 69 88 3 88

Upper Dir 50 57 53 64 34 51 63 35 51 18 45

Lower Dir 87 80 83 77 69 74 77 69 74 5 64

Swat 75 62 69 57 30 46 59 36 50 19 59

Shangla . . . 51 19 38 51 19 38 23 40

Buner . . . 75 26 52 75 26 52 17 53

Malakand PA 102 40 81 107 63 85 106 61 85 4 75

Kohistan . . . 29 7 19 29 7 19 25 16

Mansehra 88 98 91 79 56 68 80 58 70 8 69

Batagram . . . 60 20 41 60 20 41 22 44

Abbottabad 100 99 100 83 91 86 86 93 88 2 91

Haripur 108 166 133 97 72 85 98 80 90 1 87

Tor Ghar . . . 42 9 26 42 9 26 24 22

Mardan 94 54 79 77 52 65 82 53 69 9 65

Swabi 89 68 77 84 61 72 85 62 72 6 74

Charsadda 67 50 61 66 37 53 66 39 55 15 58

Peshawar 85 68 79 73 37 56 80 51 68 11 65

Nowshera 72 74 73 70 63 67 71 66 69 10 69

Kohat 117 83 100 78 28 56 85 40 65 12 63

Hangu 97 40 77 83 16 53 86 20 57 14 57

Karak 100 86 93 85 50 70 85 52 71 7 67

Bannu 87 61 77 69 28 51 70 29 52 16 52

Lakki Marwat 86 72 79 84 34 61 84 40 63 13 60

D.I.Khan 86 78 82 57 32 45 60 36 49 21 49

Tank 74 67 71 61 25 45 63 31 49 20 47

79

Page 101: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.10(b): GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE MIDDLE LEVEL (AGE 10-12)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

TOTAL 12-13PROVINCE & DISTRICT RANK

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Balochistan 68 55 62 42 16 32 49 28 40 39

Quetta 70 74 72 92 62 78 79 70 75 1 79

Pishin 74 54 62 51 19 37 52 22 38 10 41

Killa Abdullah 39 24 32 47 7 32 47 10 32 15 36

Chagai 101 59 88 23 4 15 33 9 24 22 31

Nushki 37 51 44 49 30 39 47 34 40 6 39

Loralai 53 49 50 43 10 34 44 19 36 12 44

Barkhan 77 76 76 40 4 23 48 16 33 13 34

Musa Khel 31 25 29 27 11 21 28 14 23 23 16

Killa Saifullah 90 26 62 50 3 24 59 6 31 17 41

Zhob 73 65 70 33 11 23 48 29 40 7 24

Sheerani . . . 41 24 41 24 21 23

Sibi 87 68 80 24 38 30 47 48 47 5 57

Harnai 98 30 61 47 4 27 51 7 30 18 24

Ziarat 99 74 88 59 37 51 61 39 52 3 60

Kohlu 56 10 42 43 3 25 46 3 28 20 21

Dera Bugti 51 14 34 21 9 17 23 10 18 27 7

Kachhi (Bolan) 84 47 70 29 12 21 43 18 32 14 29

Jaffarabad 51 39 46 33 8 24 37 17 29 19 31

Nasirabad 64 35 50 13 5 10 22 12 18 28 18

Jhal Magsi 75 40 62 22 10 18 23 11 19 26 34

Kalat 83 33 66 56 10 35 60 11 38 11 36

Mastung 70 49 63 55 30 45 59 35 49 4 52

Khuzdar 68 28 54 26 3 18 40 12 31 16 36

Awaran . . . 28 4 20 28 4 20 24 27

Kharan 54 63 60 44 4 27 47 32 39 9 45

Washuk . . . 28 6 19 28 6 19 25 27

Lasbela 69 49 58 29 15 24 45 33 39 8 30

Gwadar 72 33 57 68 16 50 71 28 55 2 50

NOTES:

1. The Panjgur & Kech district has been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

80

Page 102: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 2.11(a): NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE MIDDLE LEVEL (AGE 11-13)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

Pakistan 46 49 47 36 27 32 39 34 37 38Punjab 44 51 48 36 32 34 39 38 38 39

Islamabad 80 58 71 65 57 61 75 58 67 68

Attock 38 74 53 48 55 52 46 58 52 5 56

Rawalpindi 32 69 53 52 55 54 42 63 53 3 59

Jhelum 68 75 72 49 61 56 55 66 60 1 54

Chakwal 61 42 51 58 56 57 59 54 56 2 60

Sargodha 45 52 49 44 28 36 44 38 41 14 37

Bhakkar 31 43 37 32 20 27 32 25 29 31 29

Khushab 51 36 43 41 32 37 44 33 39 15 43

Mianwali 42 61 51 50 31 41 49 37 43 12 43

Faisalabad 49 50 49 43 45 44 46 47 47 10 46

Chiniot 54 43 49 29 18 24 37 28 33 26 32

Jhang 51 45 48 41 23 34 43 29 37 21 31

Toba Tek Singh 44 67 54 48 47 47 47 51 49 7 41

Gujranwala 44 49 46 35 41 38 39 45 42 13 45

Hafizabad 41 41 41 36 36 36 38 37 37 20 37

Gujrat 55 67 63 45 56 50 47 59 53 4 56

Mandi Bahuddin 56 57 56 49 44 46 51 46 48 8 50

Sialkot 56 53 55 46 52 49 49 53 51 6 53

Narowal 47 63 53 45 50 47 45 52 48 9 47

Lahore 41 56 48 44 19 32 42 49 45 11 49

Kasur 36 44 41 36 37 36 36 39 38 19 33

Sheikhupura 46 35 41 35 43 38 38 41 39 18 37

Nankana Sahib 28 55 43 43 32 38 40 39 39 16 44

Okara 34 41 38 33 30 31 33 32 33 27 35

Sahiwal 48 47 47 40 23 32 41 29 35 22 33

Pakpattan 55 43 49 32 20 27 36 24 30 30 30

Vehari 44 22 37 34 33 34 36 31 34 23 32

Multan 36 39 37 32 25 28 33 30 31 28 33

Lodhran 33 38 36 35 29 32 35 31 33 25 32

Khanewal 35 46 41 34 27 31 34 31 33 24 33

D.G.khan 51 64 58 27 12 20 30 21 26 33 32

Rajanpur 48 52 50 24 19 22 27 25 26 32 20

Layyah 41 62 51 36 39 37 36 43 39 17 37

Muzaffargarh 39 49 43 25 12 19 27 16 22 35 25

Bahawalpur 37 30 34 16 17 16 21 21 21 36 22

Bahawalnagar 43 48 46 33 22 27 35 27 31 29 27Rahim Yar Khan 41 42 41 26 12 19 28 17 23 34 23

PROVINCE & DISTRICTURBAN RURAL TOTAL

RANKTOTAL 12-13

NOTES:1.Net enrolment rate: [Number of children aged 11 - 13 years attending middle level (classes 6 - 8) divided by number of children aged 11 - 13 years] multiplied by 100. Note that this age range is different from the one used in previous PIHS reports.

2.Numerator of NER: Raised sum of all individuals aged 11 - 13 years who report currently attending middle level.3.Denominator of NER: Raised sum of all individuals aged 11 - 13 years who respond to the relevant questions.

81

Page 103: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 2.11(a): NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE MIDDLE LEVEL (AGE 11-13)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICTURBAN RURAL TOTAL

RANKTOTAL 12-13

Sindh 47 48 48 28 14 21 37 30 34 36

Jacobabad 64 54 59 27 7 19 36 18 28 11 30

Kashmore 48 21 36 26 8 19 33 12 24 15 28

Shikarpur 46 54 50 27 14 21 32 25 28 10 31

Larkana 50 45 47 38 23 30 43 33 38 5 38

Shahdadkot 24 31 27 29 14 21 28 17 22 18 30

Sukkur 57 59 58 44 14 30 51 40 46 2 44

Ghotki 48 37 43 35 11 26 37 16 29 9 37

Khairpur 55 43 49 28 18 24 37 27 32 6 38

Naushahro Feroze 39 45 41 36 14 24 37 19 27 12 38

Shaheed Benazirabad 50 44 48 33 18 26 38 23 31 7 31

Dadu 70 70 70 41 30 37 46 35 41 3 39

Jamshoro 47 30 38 32 21 27 34 23 29 8 37

Hyderabad 41 43 42 21 21 21 37 39 38 4 51

Tando Allah Yar 42 45 43 21 12 17 25 20 23 16 26

Tando Muhammad Khan 41 30 36 10 6 8 14 9 12 22 14

Matiari 33 35 34 32 11 23 32 17 26 13 29

Badin 25 29 27 17 7 13 18 11 15 21 20

Thatta 11 29 20 11 6 8 11 8 9 24 9

Sujawal 49 25 32 7 6 6 10 11 10 23

Sanghar 37 35 36 24 12 18 27 17 22 17 30

Mirpur Khas 57 46 51 17 10 14 27 22 25 14 28

Umerkot 31 26 29 22 11 17 24 14 20 19 22

Tharparkar 51 43 48 24 9 18 26 11 19 20 27

Karachi 49 53 51 26 22 24 48 51 49 1 45

82

Page 104: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 2.11(a): NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE MIDDLE LEVEL (AGE 11-13)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICTURBAN RURAL TOTAL

RANKTOTAL 12-13

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 54 44 50 47 29 39 48 31 41 38

Chitral 45 75 54 54 50 52 53 52 53 3 52

Upper Dir 14 25 20 30 17 24 29 17 24 21 25

Lower Dir 33 36 35 44 40 42 43 40 42 13 28

Swat 54 24 45 47 22 37 48 22 38 15 25

Shangla - - - 27 13 21 27 13 21 23 23

Buner - - - 48 21 36 48 21 36 18 29

Malakand PA 63 10 48 67 40 54 66 38 53 1 44

Kohistan - - - 11 4 8 11 4 8 25 12

Mansehra 57 100 70 50 35 44 50 38 46 11 43

Batagram - - - 31 11 21 31 11 21 22 19

Abbottabad 72 50 58 38 46 42 43 47 45 12 53

Haripur 54 59 58 59 46 52 58 48 53 2 49

Tor Ghar - - - 20 7 14 20 7 14 24 15

Mardan 47 46 47 60 36 48 56 38 48 9 47

Swabi 51 52 51 52 52 52 52 52 52 4 49

Charsadda 56 32 47 47 24 36 49 25 39 14 45

Peshawar 56 46 52 52 32 44 54 39 48 8 46

Nowshera 52 32 42 62 45 54 60 42 51 5 45

Kohat 67 45 56 58 26 45 60 31 48 7 39

Hangu 59 46 54 48 17 35 50 21 38 16 34

Karak 72 50 64 61 34 49 61 34 49 6 47

Bannu 71 50 61 51 17 36 52 19 37 17 40

Lakki Marwat 87 61 73 54 29 43 57 33 46 10 44

D.I.Khan 30 44 36 40 18 30 39 21 30 19 28

Tank 44 45 44 30 16 24 33 20 27 20 31

83

Page 105: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 2.11(a): NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE MIDDLE LEVEL (AGE 11-13)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICTURBAN RURAL TOTAL

RANKTOTAL 12-13

Balochistan 36 30 33 29 13 23 31 19 26 28

Quetta 26 31 29 49 49 49 38 37 37 3 46

Pishin 33 45 42 28 10 20 28 13 21 15 23

Killa Abdullah 11 17 14 17 5 12 16 7 12 28 23

Chagai 79 56 71 9 3 6 17 7 13 27 12

Nushki 19 42 32 39 28 34 36 31 33 5 20

Loralai 37 28 31 35 9 28 35 16 29 7 19

Barkhan 57 83 65 23 3 14 30 13 23 13 21

Musa Khel 18 28 21 27 6 18 25 10 18 20 9

Killa Saifullah 35 11 26 46 1 19 42 3 21 17 35

Zhob 50 45 48 17 11 15 29 22 26 9 15

Sheerani - - - 26 0 15 26 0 15 25 14

Sibi 63 36 52 14 18 16 34 25 30 6 34

Harnai 43 13 27 20 3 14 22 5 16 23 19

Ziarat 16 50 30 33 21 28 32 23 28 8 33

Kohlu 31 13 27 26 2 15 27 3 18 21 16

Dera Bugti 51 25 42 16 10 14 18 11 16 24 3

Kachhi (Bolan) 33 43 36 17 10 14 21 16 19 19 15

Jaffarabad 21 26 24 31 8 22 29 14 22 14 27

Nasirabad 52 26 41 9 8 9 19 13 17 22 18

Jhal Magsi 36 11 25 17 6 12 18 6 13 26 21

Kalat 59 20 39 56 9 34 56 11 35 4 31

Mastung 67 50 64 71 34 56 70 36 58 1 45

Khuzdar 44 21 32 29 4 20 32 11 23 11 27

Awaran - - - 31 4 20 31 4 20 18 29

Kharan 45 34 37 32 0 17 35 16 25 10 23

Washuk - - - 34 5 23 34 5 23 12 20

Lasbela 41 29 35 13 7 11 23 18 21 16 17

Gwadar 54 39 48 39 16 33 48 33 42 2 49

NOTES:

1. The Panjgur & Kech district has been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

84

Page 106: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

Pakistan 28 32 30 20 15 18 23 21 22 22Punjab 30 37 33 22 19 21 25 25 25 25

Islamabad 57 44 51 39 44 41 50 44 47 49

Attock 30 44 37 32 29 30 31 32 32 7 31

Rawalpindi 38 45 42 37 39 38 37 42 40 3 38

Jhelum 54 46 50 38 38 38 42 40 41 2 39

Chakwal 35 48 40 45 41 43 43 41 42 1 41

Sargodha 28 41 35 28 19 24 28 27 28 12 24

Bhakkar 28 23 25 18 17 18 19 18 19 29 18

Khushab 32 30 31 28 13 21 29 19 24 17 28

Mianwali 34 45 40 28 17 23 29 22 26 15 31

Faisalabad 30 35 33 25 25 25 27 30 29 10 30

Chiniot 34 23 29 17 11 14 22 16 19 28 19

Jhang 32 29 31 23 14 19 25 18 22 21 18

Toba Tek Singh 28 40 33 28 35 31 28 36 32 6 29

Gujranwala 30 27 28 23 25 24 26 26 26 14 27

Hafizabad 24 34 29 20 19 19 21 24 22 20 23

Gujrat 31 45 39 27 29 28 28 34 31 8 35

Mandi Bahuddin 38 40 39 28 24 26 30 27 28 11 28

Sialkot 29 44 35 30 35 33 30 37 34 4 36

Narowal 32 30 31 31 27 29 31 27 29 9 30

Lahore 28 40 34 32 21 28 29 37 33 5 34

Kasur 25 29 27 25 19 22 25 22 23 18 19

Sheikhupura 27 32 29 17 16 17 20 20 20 26 21

Nankana Sahib 29 35 32 28 22 25 28 25 27 13 28

Okara 33 28 31 20 18 19 23 21 22 23 22

Sahiwal 25 52 36 23 22 22 23 28 25 16 23

Pakpattan 32 29 30 20 12 16 22 14 18 32 18

Vehari 22 34 26 17 20 19 18 22 20 25 20

Multan 22 30 26 17 15 16 19 20 19 27 19

Lodhran 25 31 29 21 19 20 22 21 21 24 23

Khanewal 28 32 30 24 16 20 24 19 22 22 21

D.G.khan 34 56 45 20 6 13 21 13 18 34 20

Rajanpur 39 25 34 18 12 15 21 14 18 33 14

Layyah 35 39 37 21 21 21 22 24 23 19 23

Muzaffargarh 22 40 29 13 8 10 14 11 12 36 15

Bahawalpur 22 32 26 9 11 10 12 15 14 35 13

Bahawalnagar 27 37 33 16 13 15 18 19 19 30 17Rahim Yar Khan 23 35 29 23 9 17 23 14 18 31 17

TABLE 2.11(b): NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE MIDDLE LEVEL (AGE 10-12)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

TOTAL12-13RANK

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT

NOTES:1.Net enrolment rate: [Number of children aged 10 - 12 years attending middle level (classes 6 - 8) divided by number of children aged 10 - 12 years] multiplied by 1002. Numerator of NER: Raised sum of all individuals aged 10 - 12 years who report currently attending middle level.3. Denominator of NER: Raised sum of all individuals aged 10 - 12 years who respond to the relevant questions.

85

Page 107: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.11(b): NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE MIDDLE LEVEL (AGE 10-12)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

TOTAL12-13RANK

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Sindh 26 27 27 13 7 11 19 16 18 19

Jacobabad 34 29 32 14 4 10 18 10 15 9 17

Kashmore 28 11 21 14 5 10 18 7 13 15 15

Shikarpur 35 35 35 15 8 12 19 15 17 7 16

Larkana 28 28 28 20 13 16 24 20 21 4 22

Shahdadkot 20 23 21 13 9 11 15 12 13 12 18

Sukkur 33 34 33 23 9 17 28 22 25 3 24

Ghotki 24 14 19 17 5 12 18 6 13 14 17

Khairpur 33 25 29 18 10 15 23 16 19 5 19

Naushahro Feroze 35 28 31 13 7 10 17 10 13 13 19

Shaheed Benazirabad 20 23 21 12 9 11 14 11 13 16 14

Dadu 35 34 34 18 12 16 21 16 19 6 24

Jamshoro 26 19 22 14 11 12 16 13 14 10 17

Hyderabad 30 32 31 11 14 12 27 29 28 1 31

Tando Allah Yar 20 23 22 11 6 9 13 10 12 17 16

Tando Muhammad Khan 23 20 22 6 4 5 9 6 8 22 8

Matiari 22 17 20 20 6 14 20 9 16 8 16

Badin 13 21 17 10 5 8 11 8 9 20 10

Thatta 16 14 15 4 2 3 5 3 4 23 6

Sujawal 12 12 12 3 1 2 4 3 4 24

Sanghar 15 15 15 9 4 7 10 6 8 21 14

Mirpur Khas 32 25 28 11 8 9 16 12 14 11 15

Umerkot 13 16 14 13 5 10 13 8 11 18 15

Tharparkar 35 33 34 11 5 9 13 7 10 19 16

Karachi 25 28 26 13 11 12 24 27 26 2 25

86

Page 108: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.11(b): NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE MIDDLE LEVEL (AGE 10-12)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

TOTAL12-13RANK

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 30 28 29 23 15 19 24 17 21 21

Chitral 37 51 43 28 32 30 29 34 31 2 30

Upper Dir 12 14 13 15 8 12 15 9 12 21 13

Lower Dir 27 30 28 22 20 21 22 21 22 14 16

Swat 19 24 22 18 11 16 18 14 16 19 13

Shangla . . . 13 6 10 13 6 10 23 12

Buner . . . 19 9 14 19 9 14 20 15

Malakand PA 27 0 18 31 18 25 31 16 24 8 23

Kohistan . . . 7 2 4 7 2 4 25 5

Mansehra 44 50 46 26 16 21 28 17 23 10 22

Batagram . . . 14 8 11 14 8 11 22 11

Abbottabad 43 57 50 23 31 26 26 36 30 4 34

Haripur 28 30 29 32 29 31 32 29 31 3 33

Tor Ghar . . . 10 5 8 10 5 8 24 8

Mardan 24 23 23 27 19 23 26 20 23 9 22

Swabi 37 22 28 26 28 27 27 27 27 5 27

Charsadda 39 21 33 20 9 15 25 11 20 17 23

Peshawar 31 25 28 26 14 20 28 19 24 7 25

Nowshera 25 26 26 23 21 22 23 22 23 11 22

Kohat 21 36 28 26 14 21 25 19 22 13 23

Hangu 31 21 28 26 8 18 27 10 20 16 19

Karak 57 43 50 39 23 32 40 24 33 1 30

Bannu 50 20 39 28 13 21 29 13 22 12 23

Lakki Marwat 41 52 47 30 15 23 31 20 26 6 25

D.I.Khan 26 26 26 23 11 17 23 12 18 18 16

Tank 33 42 37 24 8 17 25 13 20 15 17

87

Page 109: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.11(b): NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE MIDDLE LEVEL (AGE 10-12)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

TOTAL12-13RANK

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Balochistan 22 18 20 13 6 11 16 10 13 14

Quetta 20 18 19 22 23 23 21 20 21 3 26

Pishin 24 26 25 18 6 13 18 7 13 10 13

Killa Abdullah 9 10 10 6 3 5 7 4 5 28 12

Chagai 34 26 32 6 2 4 10 4 8 22 9

Nushki 7 14 11 13 4 8 12 6 9 19 5

Loralai 10 18 15 14 6 12 13 9 12 13 10

Barkhan 34 40 36 10 2 6 15 8 12 14 12

Musa Khel 3 6 4 8 5 7 7 5 6 25 3

Killa Saifullah 26 18 23 25 1 11 25 4 14 8 16

Zhob 21 13 17 6 5 6 11 7 10 18 7

Sheerani . . . 12 0 7 12 0 7 23 7

Sibi 37 35 36 7 16 11 18 22 20 4 18

Harnai 38 17 26 12 1 7 14 3 9 20 8

Ziarat 0 50 22 20 5 14 19 7 15 6 17

Kohlu 14 0 10 8 1 5 9 1 6 27 7

Dera Bugti 26 0 14 8 1 6 9 1 6 26 1

Kachhi (Bolan) 21 28 23 9 5 7 12 10 11 15 5

Jaffarabad 21 22 22 14 6 11 16 11 14 7 15

Nasirabad 37 11 24 6 2 4 11 4 8 21 8

Jhal Magsi 25 20 23 7 4 6 7 4 6 24 10

Kalat 33 33 33 26 5 16 27 8 18 5 15

Mastung 30 33 31 35 19 29 34 22 29 1 27

Khuzdar 24 14 21 11 3 9 16 7 13 11 15

Awaran . . . 14 4 11 14 4 11 16 14

Kharan 27 17 20 12 3 8 15 9 12 12 9

Washuk . . . 19 4 13 19 4 13 9 13

Lasbela 16 18 17 5 5 5 10 12 10 17 8

Gwadar 29 17 24 25 1 17 27 12 22 2 27

NOTES:

1. The Panjgur & Kech district has been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

88

Page 110: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

Pakistan 79 77 78 56 36 47 64 50 58 57

Punjab 82 86 84 61 45 53 68 58 63 62

Islamabad 105 121 111 74 114 95 97 119 106 101

Attock 154 74 103 80 71 76 92 72 82 5 77

Rawalpindi 124 87 101 112 82 98 117 85 99 1 97

Jhelum 89 127 104 106 80 93 101 92 96 2 104

Chakwal 165 154 158 120 61 85 124 71 92 4 89

Sargodha 78 70 74 57 37 48 64 50 57 21 61

Bhakkar 66 53 62 60 23 43 61 27 47 27 42

Khushab 72 98 83 90 46 68 83 61 73 8 77

Mianwali 109 55 82 71 43 58 77 45 62 19 72

Faisalabad 71 66 68 67 57 62 69 62 65 16 69

Chiniot 67 54 63 50 22 36 58 32 47 30 46

Jhang 78 58 68 71 28 50 72 35 54 24 51

Toba Tek Singh 74 67 71 76 56 66 76 58 67 15 56

Gujranwala 92 90 90 62 66 64 75 77 76 7 80

Hafizabad 71 76 74 57 52 55 62 61 61 20 60

Gujrat 79 104 93 76 76 76 77 83 80 6 69

Mandi Bahuddin 168 95 115 72 57 65 80 64 72 10 81

Sialkot 73 125 94 52 71 61 58 83 69 12 65

Narowal 80 135 97 71 55 63 73 64 69 13 63

Lahore 82 115 97 54 95 77 78 111 93 3 90

Kasur 63 85 74 71 51 61 68 62 65 17 64

Sheikhupura 71 98 85 66 63 64 68 72 70 11 61

Nankana Sahib 104 98 102 71 47 58 81 56 69 14 65

Okara 116 78 92 110 37 66 111 47 72 9 59

Sahiwal 86 110 98 67 48 58 69 59 65 18 55

Pakpattan 60 102 80 60 28 44 60 40 50 26 42

Vehari 81 60 71 56 24 41 61 31 47 28 46

Multan 71 55 63 52 33 43 60 43 51 25 53

Lodhran 67 48 56 56 25 40 57 29 42 32 46

Khanewal 99 77 87 62 34 49 69 43 56 23 54

D.G.khan 40 110 68 39 15 28 39 26 33 35 39

Rajanpur 112 119 115 32 17 25 47 34 41 33 29

Layyah 99 56 81 55 49 52 61 50 56 22 56

Muzaffargarh 89 55 71 38 23 31 44 27 36 34 39

Bahawalpur 96 97 97 40 20 30 52 37 44 31 40

Bahawalnagar 61 56 58 42 45 44 46 48 47 29 49Rahim Yar Khan 57 49 53 39 18 28 42 23 33 36 38

TABLE 2.12(a): GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE MATRIC LEVEL (AGE 14-15)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

RANKTOTAL1

2-13PROVINCE & DISTRICTURBAN RURAL TOTAL

NOTES:1. Gross enrolment rate: [Number of children attending matric level (classes 9 - 10) divided by number of children aged 14 -15 years] multiplied by 100. 2. Numerator of GER: Raised sum of all individuals who report currently attending Matric level.3. Denominator of GER: Raised sum of all individuals aged 14 -15 years who respond to the relevant questions.

89

Page 111: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.12(a): GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE MATRIC LEVEL (AGE 14-15)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

RANKTOTAL1

2-13PROVINCE & DISTRICTURBAN RURAL TOTAL

Sindh 76 72 74 38 16 28 57 44 51 51

Jacobabad 56 42 49 24 12 19 33 22 28 19 32

Kashmore 56 35 46 34 9 25 41 20 32 12 34

Shikarpur 73 39 57 32 7 19 45 17 31 16 31

Larkana 63 50 55 46 24 36 53 39 46 4 53

Shahdadkot 25 41 33 34 17 26 31 23 27 20 31

Sukkur 62 44 53 57 7 33 59 27 44 5 45

Ghotki 46 40 44 47 7 29 47 14 32 14 37

Khairpur 70 55 63 50 18 34 56 29 43 6 43

Naushahro Feroze 91 78 86 22 29 24 34 37 36 10 42

Shaheed Benazirabad 110 30 55 37 9 24 47 15 31 17 29

Dadu 117 50 79 60 43 51 71 44 57 2 60

Jamshoro 72 74 73 48 21 35 52 31 43 7 38

Hyderabad 57 39 48 44 17 34 55 37 46 3 63

Tando Allah Yar 78 77 77 44 19 31 50 33 42 8 44

Tando Muhammad Khan 31 35 32 28 12 20 29 15 23 22 24

Matiari 61 28 45 32 14 24 41 19 31 15 25

Badin 40 45 43 32 6 19 33 13 23 21 27

Thatta 36 36 36 21 5 12 24 8 15 23 19

Sujawal 53 61 56 8 8 8 14 14 14 24

Sanghar 77 30 47 25 20 22 36 23 29 18 37

Mirpur Khas 56 69 62 34 13 24 41 31 36 9 39

Umerkot 54 32 42 43 9 29 45 16 32 11 36

Tharparkar 68 54 60 50 8 30 51 12 32 13 32

Karachi 89 101 95 31 37 34 84 96 89 1 81

90

Page 112: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.12(a): GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE MATRIC LEVEL (AGE 14-15)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

RANKTOTAL1

2-13PROVINCE & DISTRICTURBAN RURAL TOTAL

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 78 51 65 67 35 53 69 38 55 55

Chitral 87 194 101 84 81 83 84 84 84 1 78

Upper Dir 67 33 47 48 23 37 48 24 38 22 38

Lower Dir 66 80 71 46 40 44 47 42 45 18 43

Swat 139 34 69 60 32 50 67 32 53 14 44

Shangla - - - 58 17 42 58 17 42 19 37

Buner - - - 53 21 40 53 21 40 20 40

Malakand PA 100 46 61 77 80 78 79 73 76 4 66

Kohistan - - - 24 15 24 15 25 14

Mansehra 142 52 117 90 44 67 95 44 70 7 84

Batagram - - - 57 16 38 57 16 38 23 42

Abbottabad 145 127 131 79 59 68 83 70 76 6 88

Haripur 106 30 67 102 57 81 103 53 79 2 82

Tor Ghar - - - 32 5 20 32 5 20 24 22

Mardan 58 37 45 68 49 59 66 45 55 11 57

Swabi 52 16 36 61 44 54 59 38 51 16 61

Charsadda 78 31 55 74 30 53 75 31 53 13 42

Peshawar 69 59 64 82 24 55 74 44 60 9 61

Nowshera 62 41 51 69 38 57 68 39 56 10 65

Kohat 98 65 84 61 24 47 68 32 54 12 55

Hangu 53 35 49 88 8 53 80 11 52 15 53

Karak 88 74 83 99 43 76 99 45 76 5 76

Bannu 151 100 125 88 25 63 90 30 66 8 53

Lakki Marwat 101 65 84 104 19 76 104 27 77 3 60

D.I.Khan 89 66 77 41 21 32 47 28 39 21 44

Tank 126 76 110 57 20 39 68 25 48 17 48

91

Page 113: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.12(a): GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE MATRIC LEVEL (AGE 14-15)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

RANKTOTAL1

2-13PROVINCE & DISTRICTURBAN RURAL TOTAL

Balochistan 76 43 63 38 9 28 50 21 39 33

Quetta 95 36 72 71 37 64 85 37 69 1 76

Pishin 62 59 60 39 12 28 40 15 29 17 40

Killa Abdullah 34 16 27 36 4 23 35 6 23 23 29

Chagai 22 143 48 26 . 16 26 8 19 26 19

Nushki 67 32 50 35 8 23 42 15 29 16 28

Loralai 100 63 83 20 9 16 35 22 30 15 30

Barkhan 65 . 28 58 3 38 59 2 37 10 36

Musa Khel 99 30 71 21 27 24 38 28 33 12 20

Killa Saifullah 39 . 28 35 4 19 36 3 21 25 31

Zhob 104 71 91 50 . 30 71 28 54 4 30

Sheerani - - - 59 4 34 59 4 34 11 20

Sibi 102 127 118 59 25 42 69 62 65 2 40

Harnai 81 82 82 46 4 29 48 10 32 13 53

Ziarat 32 100 42 69 15 47 65 17 47 5 47

Kohlu 109 28 75 17 9 15 35 15 29 18 10

Dera Bugti 26 . 19 8 7 8 9 6 9 28 2

Kachhi (Bolan) 49 56 53 33 6 22 37 21 30 14 33

Jaffarabad 39 48 43 29 2 19 32 16 26 20 21

Nasirabad 85 10 48 22 8 16 39 9 26 21 22

Jhal Magsi 200 21 44 26 32 28 28 30 29 19 24

Kalat 67 33 58 61 8 40 63 12 44 8 32

Mastung 67 33 56 58 4 41 60 12 45 7 30

Khuzdar 27 61 39 27 3 18 27 21 25 22 25

Awaran - - - 24 14 22 24 14 22 24 23

Kharan 123 37 92 22 . 13 56 10 38 9 26

Washuk - - - 20 3 13 20 3 13 27 20

Lasbela 74 51 65 25 11 20 51 34 45 6 27

Gwadar 68 64 67 71 13 59 69 47 65 3 39

NOTES:

1. The Panjgur & Kech district has been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

92

Page 114: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALETOTAL

Pakistan 86 73 79 58 37 48 67 50 59 59Punjab 84 78 81 61 46 54 68 57 63 62

Islamabad 103 106 104 86 93 90 99 101 100 101

Attock 95 85 90 72 71 71 77 74 76 5 73

Rawalpindi 99 79 87 116 92 105 107 84 95 1 96

Jhelum 100 90 95 97 76 87 98 81 89 4 94

Chakwal 83 122 104 110 73 90 105 80 92 2 92

Sargodha 84 66 74 66 40 54 73 51 62 20 61

Bhakkar 99 53 82 64 22 44 71 27 51 27 44

Khushab 91 69 79 84 49 68 86 56 71 11 76

Mianwali 97 61 81 89 43 65 91 46 68 15 74

Faisalabad 75 81 78 78 50 63 77 64 70 12 70

Chiniot 93 50 75 65 20 39 77 29 52 26 48

Jhang 73 51 62 64 25 45 66 31 49 29 51

Toba Tek Singh 94 71 83 69 63 66 74 64 69 13 62

Gujranwala 88 71 78 64 71 68 75 71 73 10 77

Hafizabad 79 73 76 64 47 54 69 56 62 19 59

Gujrat 86 95 91 74 68 71 76 75 75 6 72

Mandi Bahuddin 108 109 109 72 63 68 76 72 74 8 71

Sialkot 75 86 80 56 70 63 61 75 68 14 66

Narowal 85 79 83 73 66 70 76 69 73 9 69

Lahore 95 87 91 60 118 91 90 91 91 3 92

Kasur 77 68 72 74 55 64 75 60 67 16 64

Sheikhupura 64 82 73 60 60 60 61 67 64 17 64

Nankana Sahib 87 83 85 75 65 70 79 70 75 7 73

Okara 81 74 77 75 40 58 77 49 63 18 57

Sahiwal 75 79 77 66 40 54 68 48 58 21 55

Pakpattan 80 107 94 68 30 48 70 41 55 22 48

Vehari 64 84 70 41 29 37 46 39 43 31 44

Multan 65 70 67 51 35 44 57 48 53 24 53

Lodhran 54 55 54 54 29 42 54 33 44 30 41

Khanewal 109 64 82 56 32 45 65 39 52 25 56

D.G.khan 53 80 68 40 16 29 41 27 35 35 39

Rajanpur 112 106 109 29 22 27 44 41 43 32 29

Layyah 111 46 79 54 46 51 62 46 55 23 50

Muzaffargarh 80 61 71 41 24 33 46 29 38 34 34

Bahawalpur 69 82 75 38 20 29 46 36 41 33 41

Bahawalnagar 62 74 69 51 40 45 53 46 49 28 50Rahim Yar Khan 69 51 60 41 18 29 46 24 35 36 39

TABLE 2.12(b): GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE MATRIC LEVEL (AGE 13-14)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

PROVINCE & DISTRICT TOTAL 12-13RANK

URBAN TOTALRURAL

NOTES:1. Gross enrolment rate: [Number of children attending matric level (classes 9 - 10) divided by number of children aged 13 - 14 years] multiplied by 100. 2. Numerator of GER: Raised sum of all individuals who report currently attending Matric level.3. Denominator of GER: Raised sum of all individuals aged 13 - 14 years who respond to the relevant questions.

93

Page 115: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALETOTAL

TABLE 2.12(b): GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE MATRIC LEVEL (AGE 13-14)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

PROVINCE & DISTRICT TOTAL 12-13RANK

URBAN TOTALRURAL

Sindh 89 72 80 41 16 29 63 44 54 54

Jacobabad 61 49 56 25 12 19 35 23 30 18 31

Kashmore 62 41 52 33 10 25 41 22 34 15 33

Shikarpur 75 55 67 45 6 21 56 17 34 14 35

Larkana 70 53 59 54 23 39 61 39 49 3 51

Shahdadkot 37 44 40 35 14 24 35 21 27 20 36

Sukkur 69 45 58 59 9 37 64 30 49 4 51

Ghotki 59 46 54 52 7 31 54 14 36 11 41

Khairpur 73 55 64 58 22 40 63 33 48 6 48

Naushahro Feroze 73 76 74 36 28 31 48 36 42 8 45

Shaheed Benazirabad 58 38 49 39 9 26 43 17 31 16 32

Dadu 107 69 89 45 37 41 54 42 48 5 69

Jamshoro 89 68 78 47 20 35 53 30 42 7 40

Hyderabad 76 46 60 41 12 29 69 41 55 2 64

Tando Allah Yar 72 68 70 42 19 31 48 33 41 9 44

Tando Muhammad Khan 40 37 39 27 12 20 29 16 24 22 27

Matiari 65 35 51 39 14 28 47 21 35 12 27

Badin 45 43 44 33 6 20 35 13 24 21 31

Thatta 75 56 66 23 6 13 27 9 17 23 25

Sujawal 53 52 52 7 14 10 13 20 16 24

Sanghar 54 32 42 27 18 22 35 22 27 19 35

Mirpur Khas 70 58 63 37 13 25 47 29 38 10 42

Umerkot 59 36 47 47 9 30 50 17 35 13 38

Tharparkar 56 75 65 44 9 29 44 13 31 17 33

Karachi 108 92 100 49 39 44 104 88 96 1 85

94

Page 116: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALETOTAL

TABLE 2.12(b): GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE MATRIC LEVEL (AGE 13-14)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

PROVINCE & DISTRICT TOTAL 12-13RANK

URBAN TOTALRURAL

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 86 61 74 71 37 57 74 41 60 58

Chitral 123 65 101 89 79 85 93 78 87 1 96

Upper Dir 80 37 54 52 23 39 53 24 39 22 40

Lower Dir 74 80 76 62 39 51 63 40 52 18 42

Swat 76 46 62 67 32 53 68 35 55 16 48

Shangla - - - 62 16 42 62 16 42 20 40

Buner - - - 52 23 41 52 23 41 21 44

Malakand PA 38 36 37 73 68 71 68 61 65 10 81

Kohistan - - - 31 19 31 19 24 15

Mansehra 117 110 117 72 59 67 76 60 70 7 73

Batagram - - - 60 16 38 60 16 38 23 40

Abbottabad 75 108 96 86 64 74 85 73 78 4 91

Haripur 106 30 67 99 62 83 100 58 81 2 84

Tor Ghar - - - 25 5 18 25 5 18 25 20

Mardan 63 50 56 69 48 59 68 49 58 13 56

Swabi 116 36 80 94 58 78 97 55 78 3 78

Charsadda 113 50 84 77 29 53 84 33 58 14 48

Peshawar 85 67 77 66 35 55 75 55 67 9 66

Nowshera 78 45 59 84 40 65 83 41 64 11 68

Kohat 73 56 67 73 32 58 73 39 60 12 59

Hangu 77 39 66 82 10 56 81 14 57 15 55

Karak 139 . 200 95 42 73 97 45 76 5 72

Bannu 118 81 99 91 26 65 92 31 67 8 63

Lakki Marwat 94 63 81 93 18 70 93 26 71 6 64

D.I.Khan 96 81 89 47 22 35 54 30 43 19 42

Tank 113 86 106 68 21 44 78 27 54 17 48

95

Page 117: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALETOTAL

TABLE 2.12(b): GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO AT THE MATRIC LEVEL (AGE 13-14)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

PROVINCE & DISTRICT TOTAL 12-13RANK

URBAN TOTALRURAL

Balochistan 84 38 64 40 9 28 54 19 40 37

Quetta 106 33 73 62 20 49 86 29 64 1 78

Pishin 62 48 55 37 10 24 38 12 26 22 41

Killa Abdullah 38 14 26 34 4 23 34 6 23 24 31

Chagai 21 111 43 30 . 17 29 8 20 25 21

Nushki 113 31 62 29 9 21 40 14 28 18 28

Loralai 141 38 74 20 11 17 37 21 30 16 31

Barkhan 91 . 39 62 2 36 64 2 37 9 34

Musa Khel 82 23 57 24 26 25 41 25 33 14 19

Killa Saifullah 32 . 22 42 3 19 38 3 20 26 33

Zhob 103 79 94 46 . 28 68 28 52 2 33

Sheerani - - - 49 3 28 49 3 28 19 26

Sibi 59 84 74 50 23 37 53 50 51 3 54

Harnai 105 58 77 50 5 32 53 11 36 13 55

Ziarat 39 . 59 75 14 48 72 16 48 6 49

Kohlu 97 33 75 16 6 13 32 11 25 23 8

Dera Bugti 34 . 26 12 6 10 14 6 11 28 3

Kachhi (Bolan) 131 72 90 41 5 25 50 22 36 10 41

Jaffarabad 45 48 46 32 3 21 35 18 29 17 23

Nasirabad 104 12 58 22 7 15 43 8 26 21 18

Jhal Magsi 57 27 39 27 24 26 28 24 26 20 32

Kalat 99 33 77 65 9 43 72 14 50 4 38

Mastung 58 100 63 61 4 43 60 16 48 5 34

Khuzdar 41 61 50 39 6 28 40 31 36 12 29

Awaran - - - 44 15 33 44 15 33 15 27

Kharan 102 21 65 29 . 15 62 8 36 11 27

Washuk - - - 29 3 18 29 3 18 27 23

Lasbela 80 44 64 21 14 19 49 34 44 8 31

Gwadar 63 33 54 41 7 33 54 25 46 7 44

NOTES:

1. The Panjgur & Kech district has been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

96

Page 118: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

Pakistan 38 38 38 25 17 21 29 24 27 26Punjab 39 44 41 24 21 23 29 29 29 28

Islamabad 51 59 54 20 49 34 44 56 49 50

Attock 53 48 50 22 24 23 27 31 29 14 32

Rawalpindi 33 69 56 54 28 42 45 52 49 1 43

Jhelum 56 55 56 39 42 41 45 45 45 3 41

Chakwal 66 54 58 38 41 40 40 42 41 4 43

Sargodha 34 46 40 31 25 28 32 33 33 9 32

Bhakkar 32 35 33 21 9 16 24 13 20 29 19

Khushab 33 39 35 24 12 18 27 19 24 22 25

Mianwali 58 38 48 32 16 24 35 20 28 16 34

Faisalabad 36 42 39 40 27 33 38 35 36 7 35

Chiniot 49 20 40 16 13 15 31 15 24 21 25

Jhang 39 41 40 25 12 19 28 18 23 24 22

Toba Tek Singh 42 37 40 26 22 24 30 25 28 17 22

Gujranwala 35 39 37 28 27 27 31 33 32 10 30

Hafizabad 34 32 33 29 23 26 31 27 29 15 28

Gujrat 25 60 44 28 48 39 27 51 40 5 34

Mandi Bahuddin 78 49 57 25 35 30 29 38 34 8 31

Sialkot 43 71 54 16 27 21 23 38 30 13 36

Narowal 43 74 52 34 35 34 36 40 37 6 30

Lahore 51 45 48 11 51 33 45 46 46 2 42

Kasur 26 23 25 17 25 21 20 25 23 27 27

Sheikhupura 28 35 32 19 25 22 22 28 25 19 23

Nankana Sahib 29 17 24 34 29 32 33 27 30 12 28

Okara 26 41 35 29 17 22 28 23 25 20 23

Sahiwal 29 29 29 28 22 25 28 23 26 18 20

Pakpattan 35 43 39 26 13 20 28 18 23 26 24

Vehari 41 21 32 24 10 18 28 12 20 28 19

Multan 31 32 32 18 17 17 23 24 23 23 28

Lodhran 22 32 28 23 10 17 23 14 18 31 18

Khanewal 35 43 39 22 15 19 25 21 23 25 20

D.G.khan 34 66 47 16 10 13 19 17 18 33 21

Rajanpur 24 73 44 16 12 14 17 22 19 30 16

Layyah 55 42 49 32 23 29 36 26 32 11 25

Muzaffargarh 39 37 38 19 10 15 22 13 18 34 19

Bahawalpur 32 34 33 13 11 12 17 16 17 35 14

Bahawalnagar 17 28 24 10 23 16 11 25 18 32 17Rahim Yar Khan 25 33 29 17 7 12 18 12 15 36 18

TOTAL 12-13

TABLE 2.13(a): NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE MATRIC LEVEL (AGE 14- 15 ) - BY PROVINCE & REGION

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT RANK

NOTES:1. Net enrolment rate: [Number of children aged 14 - 15 years attending matric level (classes 9 - 10) divided by number of children aged 14 - 15 years] multiplied by 100. 2. Numerator of NER: Raised sum of all individuals aged 14 - 15 years who report currently attending matric level.3. Denominator of NER: Raised sum of all individuals aged 14 - 15 years who respond to the relevant questions.

97

Page 119: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTALTOTAL 12-13

TABLE 2.13(a): NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE MATRIC LEVEL (AGE 14- 15 ) - BY PROVINCE & REGION

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT RANK

Sindh 39 33 36 20 8 14 29 20 25 25

Jacobabad 38 39 39 16 5 11 22 16 20 9 14

Kashmore 29 25 27 10 4 8 16 13 15 18 18

Shikarpur 32 26 29 17 3 10 22 10 16 16 15

Larkana 34 26 29 35 14 26 34 21 28 4 30

Shahdadkot 13 18 15 19 7 13 17 10 14 19 22

Sukkur 38 30 34 20 5 13 30 19 25 5 31

Ghotki 34 33 33 28 5 18 30 11 21 8 25

Khairpur 52 25 39 36 16 26 41 19 30 3 22

Naushahro Feroze 54 55 55 16 17 16 23 24 23 7 22

Shaheed Benazirabad 51 30 36 20 4 13 24 12 18 12 15

Dadu 76 25 47 41 14 28 48 17 32 2 25

Jamshoro 47 20 34 21 7 14 26 9 18 11 23

Hyderabad 28 22 25 24 0 15 28 20 24 6 29

Tando Allah Yar 11 40 28 16 10 13 16 17 16 13 13

Tando Muhammad Khan 18 12 16 10 4 7 12 5 9 21 9

Matiari 19 15 17 20 6 14 20 10 15 17 16

Badin 22 30 26 16 3 10 17 8 12 20 13

Thatta 12 0 7 6 1 3 7 1 3 24 8

Sujawal 33 0 18 0 3 2 4 3 4 23

Sanghar 28 21 24 18 18 18 20 19 19 10 21

Mirpur Khas 25 18 22 19 8 14 21 11 16 14 18

Umerkot 35 25 30 16 6 11 20 12 16 15 12

Tharparkar 19 39 31 14 0 7 14 3 9 22 18

Karachi 44 40 42 4 9 6 40 38 39 1 36

98

Page 120: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTALTOTAL 12-13

TABLE 2.13(a): NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE MATRIC LEVEL (AGE 14- 15 ) - BY PROVINCE & REGION

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT RANK

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 34 26 30 34 16 26 34 18 27 25

Chitral 43 0 37 28 28 28 30 27 29 11 39

Upper Dir 0 22 13 18 7 13 18 8 13 21 14

Lower Dir 50 50 50 29 14 23 30 16 24 15 20

Swat 50 4 19 32 17 27 34 13 25 14 15

Shangla - - - 10 4 8 10 4 8 24 17

Buner - - - 28 10 21 28 10 21 17 14

Malakand PA 19 33 29 38 36 37 37 36 36 3 31

Kohistan - - - 7 0 4 7 0 4 25 7

Mansehra 42 0 30 27 19 23 28 18 23 16 30

Batagram - - - 16 5 11 16 5 11 22 11

Abbottabad 39 50 47 28 28 28 29 32 30 10 34

Haripur 32 0 15 48 32 40 47 28 38 2 31

Tor Ghar - - - 10 4 8 10 4 8 23 4

Mardan 28 26 27 57 20 40 51 22 36 4 25

Swabi 44 16 31 42 23 34 42 21 34 8 28

Charsadda 29 31 30 46 18 33 42 22 32 9 27

Peshawar 31 30 30 35 10 23 33 21 27 13 30

Nowshera 18 12 15 47 27 39 42 23 34 7 32

Kohat 46 45 46 39 1 25 40 10 29 12 26

Hangu 26 8 22 24 3 15 25 4 16 20 19

Karak 62 50 58 52 17 37 53 19 39 1 37

Bannu 49 25 37 46 18 35 46 19 35 6 28

Lakki Marwat 78 44 63 47 0 32 51 7 36 5 30

D.I.Khan 19 30 25 21 9 15 21 12 17 19 16

Tank 31 32 32 27 6 17 27 9 19 18 23

99

Page 121: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTALTOTAL 12-13

TABLE 2.13(a): NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE MATRIC LEVEL (AGE 14- 15 ) - BY PROVINCE & REGION

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT RANK

Balochistan 26 16 22 15 5 12 19 9 15 14

Quetta 24 16 20 10 13 11 18 15 17 7 25

Pishin 21 59 40 8 11 9 9 14 11 20 11

Killa Abdullah 19 0 11 12 0 8 13 0 8 23 4

Chagai 22 43 27 6 0 4 8 2 6 27 2

Nushki 31 0 16 22 6 15 24 5 15 11 11

Loralai 41 0 23 12 7 10 18 5 13 18 7

Barkhan 0 0 0 9 0 6 8 0 5 28 16

Musa Khel 11 14 12 10 27 18 10 25 17 8 3

Killa Saifullah 10 0 7 30 1 15 24 1 13 16 16

Zhob 44 32 39 18 0 11 29 13 22 4 13

Sheerani - - - 31 0 17 31 0 17 9 8

Sibi 0 52 34 12 11 12 9 26 18 6 17

Harnai 33 0 18 10 1 7 12 1 7 25 16

Ziarat 0 100 14 21 4 14 19 7 14 15 11

Kohlu 50 28 40 4 0 3 13 9 12 19 3

Dera Bugti 13 0 9 7 7 7 8 6 7 24 1

Kachhi (Bolan) 25 44 35 14 0 8 16 14 15 12 8

Jaffarabad 27 7 19 20 2 13 22 3 15 13 11

Nasirabad 27 5 16 14 8 12 17 7 13 17 11

Jhal Magsi 100 21 31 8 28 14 9 27 15 10 5

Kalat 67 33 58 32 6 21 42 10 30 2 22

Mastung 67 33 56 49 4 35 54 12 40 1 22

Khuzdar 27 11 22 27 3 18 27 6 19 5 14

Awaran - - - 9 10 9 9 10 9 22 22

Kharan 22 0 14 5 0 3 11 0 7 26 5

Washuk - - - 14 3 9 14 3 9 21 7

Lasbela 29 21 26 0 0 0 16 12 14 14 11

Gwadar 16 11 15 51 13 43 27 12 24 3 25

NOTES:

1. The Panjgur & Kech district has been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

100

Page 122: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

Pakistan 18 24 21 12 9 10 14 14 14 13Punjab 21 26 24 13 12 13 16 17 16 15

Islamabad 28 32 30 8 12 10 24 25 24 29

Attock 15 28 21 15 14 14 15 18 16 15 16

Rawalpindi 15 34 26 25 24 24 20 30 25 2 22

Jhelum 20 30 25 18 11 14 18 17 18 9 19

Chakwal 33 21 27 18 21 20 21 21 21 4 20

Sargodha 22 27 24 16 9 13 18 16 17 11 16

Bhakkar 28 18 24 10 6 8 14 8 11 29 12

Khushab 16 12 14 16 7 12 16 9 12 24 11

Mianwali 28 18 24 19 15 17 21 15 18 8 19

Faisalabad 13 24 18 19 12 15 16 18 17 13 17

Chiniot 23 18 20 8 7 7 14 10 12 26 13

Jhang 24 15 20 10 6 8 13 8 11 34 9

Toba Tek Singh 20 20 20 18 17 18 18 18 18 7 13

Gujranwala 20 18 19 16 16 16 18 17 17 10 18

Hafizabad 23 32 28 12 9 11 16 17 17 14 16

Gujrat 18 32 27 20 19 20 20 23 21 3 19

Mandi Bahuddin 28 28 28 10 11 11 12 15 13 22 14

Sialkot 19 37 28 12 18 15 14 24 19 6 20

Narowal 28 41 34 16 17 16 18 22 20 5 19

Lahore 27 32 30 18 25 22 26 31 29 1 23

Kasur 32 16 23 12 16 14 18 16 17 12 13

Sheikhupura 14 12 13 9 14 12 11 13 12 27 10

Nankana Sahib 8 26 14 16 12 14 13 15 14 21 13

Okara 11 23 17 17 14 15 16 16 16 16 14

Sahiwal 16 24 20 16 12 14 16 15 15 17 16

Pakpattan 12 30 22 10 10 10 11 13 12 25 12

Vehari 20 29 23 10 9 10 12 13 12 23 12

Multan 17 28 22 12 10 11 14 17 15 18 14

Lodhran 18 19 18 15 12 13 15 13 14 20 15

Khanewal 29 14 20 10 7 9 13 9 11 31 9

D.G.khan 22 31 27 11 5 8 12 10 11 30 11

Rajanpur 29 35 32 6 5 5 10 11 10 35 9

Layyah 26 31 29 12 12 12 14 15 14 19 12

Muzaffargarh 41 23 32 11 5 8 15 7 11 28 11

Bahawalpur 17 24 20 7 7 7 10 12 11 33 9

Bahawalnagar 13 16 15 7 9 8 8 10 9 36 12Rahim Yar Khan 15 18 17 12 7 10 12 9 11 32 15

TABLE 2.13(b): NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE MATRIC LEVEL (AGE 13-14)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

PROVINCE & DISTRICT TOTAL 12-13RANK

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

NOTES:1. Net enrolment rate: [Number of children aged 13 - 14 years attending matric level (classes 9 - 10) divided by number of children aged 13 -14 years] multiplied by 100. 2. Numerator of NER: Raised sum of all individuals aged 13 - 14 years who report currently attending matric level.3. Denominator of NER: Raised sum of all individuals aged 13 - 14 years who respond to the relevant questions.

101

Page 123: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.13(b): NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE MATRIC LEVEL (AGE 13-14)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

PROVINCE & DISTRICT TOTAL 12-13RANK

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Sindh 14 23 19 9 4 6 11 14 12 12

Jacobabad 24 18 21 4 4 4 10 8 9 12 7

Kashmore 15 13 14 7 2 5 9 7 8 15 8

Shikarpur 21 8 16 5 2 3 11 3 7 20 8

Larkana 23 13 17 13 8 11 18 11 14 4 14

Shahdadkot 18 14 16 7 5 6 9 7 8 16 12

Sukkur 13 19 16 10 1 6 12 12 12 6 13

Ghotki 14 16 15 12 2 7 12 5 9 13 10

Khairpur 27 22 25 12 6 9 17 12 15 3 13

Naushahro Feroze 29 30 29 13 10 11 18 13 16 2 12

Shaheed Benazirabad 15 16 15 6 1 4 8 5 7 19 7

Dadu 19 19 19 12 6 9 13 8 11 9 17

Jamshoro 17 20 18 11 1 6 12 5 9 14 11

Hyderabad 12 14 13 12 2 8 12 13 12 5 16

Tando Allah Yar 12 30 22 8 4 6 9 11 10 11 8

Tando Muhammad Khan 23 13 19 6 2 4 9 4 7 18 6

Matiari 23 6 15 15 1 9 18 2 11 8 8

Badin 17 12 14 9 1 5 10 3 7 17 8

Thatta 26 36 30 2 1 2 4 3 4 23 3

Sujawal 33 0 17 0 0 0 4 0 2 24

Sanghar 7 7 7 3 9 6 4 8 6 21 9

Mirpur Khas 19 14 16 13 3 8 15 7 11 10 8

Umerkot 25 20 22 11 4 8 14 9 12 7 6

Tharparkar 19 30 24 7 0 4 7 2 5 22 9

Karachi 11 29 21 0 10 5 11 28 20 1 15

102

Page 124: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.13(b): NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE MATRIC LEVEL (AGE 13-14)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

PROVINCE & DISTRICT TOTAL 12-13RANK

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 13 15 14 11 7 9 12 8 10 10

Chitral 21 0 13 4 13 8 6 12 8 11 13

Upper Dir 20 12 15 6 6 6 7 6 6 21 9

Lower Dir 18 30 23 7 6 7 7 7 7 16 7

Swat 17 5 12 8 3 6 10 3 7 18 3

Shangla - - - 6 2 4 6 2 4 24 4

Buner - - - 7 2 5 7 2 5 22 5

Malakand PA 0 26 14 7 5 6 6 9 7 17 7

Kohistan . . . 8 0 5 8 0 5 23 5

Mansehra 35 0 30 13 14 13 15 14 14 6 16

Batagram - - - 10 5 7 10 5 7 19 7

Abbottabad 40 57 51 10 15 12 14 23 19 3 14

Haripur 32 0 15 18 14 16 20 12 16 5 20

Tor Ghar - - - 4 2 3 4 2 3 25 3

Mardan 7 5 6 9 7 8 8 7 8 15 8

Swabi 9 0 5 7 6 7 8 6 7 20 7

Charsadda 7 13 10 19 2 10 16 4 10 10 13

Peshawar 8 14 11 11 8 10 10 12 10 9 12

Nowshera 12 22 18 10 9 10 11 12 11 7 12

Kohat 5 15 9 6 10 8 6 12 8 13 14

Hangu 8 21 12 10 2 7 10 4 8 12 9

Karak 20 . 20 33 16 26 33 16 26 1 17

Bannu 19 20 20 25 4 17 24 6 17 4 11

Lakki Marwat 37 27 33 24 6 18 25 9 20 2 14

D.I.Khan 25 20 23 5 5 5 8 7 8 14 7

Tank 21 33 24 14 2 8 16 5 10 8 9

103

Page 125: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.13(b): NET ENROLMENT RATE AT THE MATRIC LEVEL (AGE 13-14)- BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

PROVINCE & DISTRICT TOTAL 12-13RANK

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Balochistan 13 9 11 7 2 5 9 4 7 6

Quetta 11 13 12 3 4 4 8 10 9 5 10

Pishin 0 31 17 3 2 3 3 4 3 20 4

Killa Abdullah 4 0 2 9 1 6 9 1 6 12 3

Chagai 11 0 8 0 0 0 2 0 1 24 3

Nushki 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 23 2

Loralai 17 0 6 7 0 5 8 0 5 17 1

Barkhan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 1

Musa Khel 15 0 9 6 11 9 9 9 9 6 0

Killa Saifullah 8 0 6 11 1 5 10 1 5 14 1

Zhob 4 7 5 0 0 0 2 3 2 22 6

Sheerani - - - 5 0 3 5 0 3 21 3

Sibi 0 19 12 2 3 2 1 10 6 10 2

Harnai 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 25 4

Ziarat 0 . 0 7 3 5 6 3 5 15 4

Kohlu 0 33 12 4 0 3 3 7 4 18 0

Dera Bugti 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 26 0

Kachhi (Bolan) 0 0 0 4 5 4 3 4 4 19 6

Jaffarabad 22 7 15 11 1 7 13 3 9 4 5

Nasirabad 7 0 3 11 4 8 10 3 7 8 6

Jhal Magsi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 3

Kalat 50 33 44 15 5 11 23 10 18 1 10

Mastung 28 0 25 19 4 14 22 4 17 2 6

Khuzdar 0 0 0 13 0 9 9 0 5 13 6

Awaran - - - 8 0 5 8 0 5 16 8

Kharan 18 0 10 8 0 4 12 0 6 9 2

Washuk - - - 12 0 7 12 0 7 7 8

Lasbela 11 9 10 0 0 0 5 6 6 11 5

Gwadar 28 6 22 8 0 6 20 4 15 3 13

NOTES:

1. The Panjgur & Kech district has been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

104

Page 126: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 2.14(a): LITERACY-POPULATION 10 YEARS AND OLDER

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

Pakistan 82 69 76 63 38 51 70 49 60 60Punjab 82 73 77 65 45 55 71 55 63 62

Islamabad 92 82 87 88 72 80 91 79 85 86

Attock 94 76 85 76 51 62 81 57 68 10 68

Rawalpindi 92 80 86 89 72 80 90 76 83 1 82

Jhelum 89 85 87 85 67 75 86 72 79 3 72

Chakwal 93 76 84 82 64 72 84 66 74 6 76

Sargodha 83 71 77 69 42 55 74 53 63 16 63

Bhakkar 82 62 72 67 33 50 70 38 54 26 56

Khushab 82 60 71 72 37 54 75 44 59 21 59

Mianwali 84 61 72 76 35 54 78 41 58 23 60

Faisalabad 79 74 77 69 53 61 74 63 69 9 69

Chiniot 70 58 64 58 25 41 62 36 50 30 47

Jhang 83 70 76 66 34 50 70 42 56 24 53

Toba Tek Singh 86 77 81 70 54 62 74 59 66 13 69

Gujranwala 80 76 78 67 60 63 74 69 71 7 72

Hafizabad 74 63 68 64 49 56 67 53 60 18 61

Gujrat 84 79 82 78 68 72 80 71 75 5 68

Mandi Bahuddin 81 72 76 69 56 62 71 59 65 14 69

Sialkot 86 82 84 78 72 75 81 75 77 4 70

Narowal 85 70 78 76 62 68 78 63 70 8 63

Lahore 85 79 82 73 67 70 82 77 80 2 78

Kasur 70 65 67 64 49 56 66 54 59 20 54

Sheikhupura 76 68 72 69 59 64 71 62 66 12 63

Nankana Sahib 83 72 77 72 53 62 75 59 66 11 61

Okara 74 66 70 59 40 49 63 47 55 25 55

Sahiwal 82 71 76 65 46 55 68 51 59 19 58

Pakpattan 81 57 69 60 36 48 63 40 51 29 53

Vehari 69 63 66 54 33 43 57 38 47 31 54

Multan 79 72 75 61 38 50 68 52 60 17 60

Lodhran 83 66 75 62 35 49 65 40 53 27 53

Khanewal 79 64 72 66 44 55 69 48 58 22 58

D.G.khan 84 71 77 53 21 37 58 29 43 35 45

Rajanpur 79 57 69 45 18 32 51 25 38 36 39

Layyah 88 68 78 75 46 61 77 49 64 15 59

Muzaffargarh 79 63 71 55 26 41 59 31 45 34 49

Bahawalpur 71 59 65 48 27 38 55 36 45 33 48

Bahawalnagar 73 64 68 58 36 47 61 42 52 28 54Rahim Yar Khan 72 58 65 53 28 41 57 33 45 32 45

PROVINCE & DISTRICT TOTAL 12-13RANK

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

NOTES:1. Population aged 10 years and older that is literate expressed as a percentage of the population aged 10 years and older.2. Literacy: For all surveys, literacy is taken as the ability to read a newspaper and to write a simple letter.

105

Page 127: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

106

Page 128: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 2.14(a): LITERACY-POPULATION 10 YEARS AND OLDER

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT TOTAL 12-13RANK

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Sindh 82 70 76 55 24 40 70 49 60 60

Jacobabad 76 42 59 41 11 26 50 19 35 22 41

Kashmore 68 38 54 37 7 23 47 17 33 23 39

Shikarpur 72 53 62 55 19 37 60 29 45 13 47

Larkana 78 55 66 67 36 51 72 45 58 6 54

Shahdadkot 64 46 55 46 20 33 51 27 39 16 42

Sukkur 82 58 71 66 16 42 76 42 60 4 57

Ghotki 72 41 57 57 14 37 60 20 41 14 45

Khairpur 76 46 61 66 26 47 69 32 51 7 53

Naushahro Feroze 84 65 75 77 52 66 79 55 68 2 60

Shaheed Benazirabad 73 55 64 64 23 44 66 33 50 8 51

Dadu 94 78 87 74 49 62 77 54 66 3 62

Jamshoro 73 46 60 53 26 40 58 31 45 12 44

Hyderabad 70 58 64 45 24 35 66 52 59 5 70

Tando Allah Yar 67 52 60 42 20 32 48 28 38 17 47

Tando Muhammad Khan 69 60 65 32 12 23 39 21 30 24 45

Matiari 73 46 61 54 25 40 59 30 45 11 48

Badin 68 45 57 44 16 31 49 23 37 20 36

Thatta 78 59 70 54 18 36 57 24 41 15 36

Sujawal 77 55 66 47 15 32 51 21 36 21

Sanghar 81 59 70 56 19 38 63 30 47 10 54

Mirpur Khas 79 69 74 51 18 35 60 35 48 9 46

Umerkot 73 44 59 49 13 32 54 20 38 19 40

Tharparkar 73 56 65 53 18 36 54 21 38 18 39

Karachi 87 80 84 55 50 53 85 78 82 1 82

107

Page 129: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

108

Page 130: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 2.14(a): LITERACY-POPULATION 10 YEARS AND OLDER

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT TOTAL 12-13RANK

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 80 52 66 69 31 50 71 35 53 52

Chitral 82 61 74 76 44 60 76 45 62 6 59

Upper Dir 77 42 60 63 21 41 64 22 42 20 50

Lower Dir 87 58 73 78 35 57 79 36 58 9 51

Swat 77 57 67 61 26 44 63 31 48 16 51

Shangla - - - 59 12 36 59 12 36 22 41

Buner - - - 61 18 38 61 18 38 21 41

Malakand PA 78 52 66 77 45 61 77 46 62 5 60

Kohistan - - - 42 5 24 42 5 24 24 29

Mansehra 85 68 76 77 51 63 78 52 64 4 61

Batagram - - - 53 16 33 53 16 33 23 42

Abbottabad 92 75 83 79 56 66 82 59 69 1 73

Haripur 90 75 82 80 56 67 81 59 69 2 70

Tor Ghar - - - 46 6 23 46 6 23 25 21

Mardan 73 44 59 70 31 50 71 34 52 13 52

Swabi 68 32 49 64 34 49 65 34 49 15 50

Charsadda 75 37 57 69 29 48 71 30 50 14 48

Peshawar 83 51 68 73 31 52 78 42 61 7 59

Nowshera 75 46 60 69 38 54 71 41 56 10 57

Kohat 88 56 71 70 27 47 74 33 52 12 54

Hangu 74 27 50 70 15 41 71 17 43 19 44

Karak 92 66 78 89 41 64 89 43 64 3 55

Bannu 89 61 76 81 26 54 81 28 55 11 48

Lakki Marwat 90 55 72 81 30 57 82 34 59 8 50

D.I.Khan 84 68 76 56 22 39 60 28 44 17 37

Tank 72 39 55 62 18 40 64 22 43 18 37

109

Page 131: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

110

Page 132: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 2.14(a): LITERACY-POPULATION 10 YEARS AND OLDER

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT TOTAL 12-13RANK

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Balochistan 78 42 61 54 17 38 61 25 44 44

Quetta 79 45 63 76 45 63 78 45 63 1 70

Pishin 80 32 57 69 24 49 70 25 49 5 56

Killa Abdullah 79 24 52 38 5 24 42 8 27 26 38

Chagai 82 39 63 44 6 27 48 9 30 23 34

Nushki 76 20 49 65 22 45 67 21 46 7 46

Loralai 80 50 65 58 15 40 61 22 44 11 37

Barkhan 85 35 62 41 5 24 47 8 29 25 36

Musa Khel 61 27 46 55 29 42 57 28 43 12 24

Killa Saifullah 82 6 45 73 5 38 76 6 40 16 37

Zhob 85 46 68 54 7 32 64 18 43 14 33

Sheerani - - - 68 6 38 68 6 38 18 29

Sibi 81 50 67 38 23 31 55 34 45 8 57

Harnai 82 46 64 41 9 26 44 12 29 24 37

Ziarat 92 39 70 53 20 38 55 21 39 17 57

Kohlu 79 26 56 44 10 27 50 12 32 21 17

Dera Bugti 60 23 43 41 2 23 43 4 25 28 16

Kachhi (Bolan) 95 52 77 48 15 33 59 23 43 13 37

Jaffarabad 62 24 43 53 12 34 55 15 36 19 32

Nasirabad 67 23 47 41 6 25 49 11 31 22 24

Jhal Magsi 74 22 49 36 10 24 38 11 25 27 39

Kalat 89 69 79 55 40 48 61 45 54 4 45

Mastung 92 66 80 71 30 53 75 38 59 3 48

Khuzdar 65 40 53 58 18 40 60 26 45 9 46

Awaran - - - 63 23 46 63 23 46 6 45

Kharan 89 52 71 44 11 29 60 27 44 10 43

Washuk - - - 53 16 36 53 16 36 20 33

Lasbela 81 57 69 36 14 26 52 31 42 15 38

Gwadar 82 48 68 78 20 54 81 37 62 2 56

NOTES:

1. The Panjgur & Kech district has been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

111

Page 133: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

112

Page 134: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

Pakistan 81 66 74 60 33 46 68 45 57 57Punjab 81 70 75 62 41 51 69 51 60 59

Islamabad 91 81 86 89 70 80 91 77 84 84

Attock 93 74 83 72 45 57 78 52 64 10 66

Rawalpindi 91 77 84 88 69 78 90 72 81 1 80

Jhelum 88 83 85 83 63 72 84 69 76 3 69

Chakwal 93 73 82 80 60 68 82 62 70 6 73

Sargodha 82 68 74 64 36 50 70 48 59 15 59

Bhakkar 80 56 68 63 27 45 66 32 49 26 51

Khushab 79 55 67 69 32 49 72 38 54 21 55

Mianwali 81 56 68 72 28 48 74 34 52 23 55

Faisalabad 78 72 75 66 48 57 72 60 66 9 67

Chiniot 69 54 62 53 19 36 59 31 45 30 45

Jhang 81 66 73 61 29 44 66 37 51 24 48

Toba Tek Singh 85 74 79 66 49 57 70 55 62 13 65

Gujranwala 79 73 76 63 55 59 72 65 68 7 69

Hafizabad 71 59 65 59 43 51 63 48 55 18 57

Gujrat 83 76 79 75 63 68 77 67 71 5 66

Mandi Bahuddin 79 68 73 66 50 58 69 54 61 14 64

Sialkot 85 80 83 76 68 72 78 72 75 4 68

Narowal 85 67 76 74 58 65 76 59 67 8 59

Lahore 84 77 81 72 64 69 81 74 78 2 77

Kasur 67 62 64 61 43 51 63 48 55 19 49

Sheikhupura 74 65 69 67 55 61 69 58 63 12 61

Nankana Sahib 81 69 75 69 49 58 72 55 63 11 58

Okara 73 60 66 55 33 43 60 40 50 25 50

Sahiwal 80 67 73 61 40 50 65 46 55 20 54

Pakpattan 78 50 64 57 31 44 60 34 47 29 49

Vehari 67 58 62 50 29 38 53 34 43 31 50

Multan 78 69 74 59 32 45 67 47 57 17 57

Lodhran 82 60 71 59 29 44 63 34 49 27 47

Khanewal 78 58 68 63 38 50 66 42 54 22 54

D.G.khan 84 67 75 47 16 31 53 24 38 35 38

Rajanpur 75 50 63 40 13 27 46 20 33 36 32

Layyah 87 64 75 71 38 55 73 42 58 16 53

Muzaffargarh 78 59 68 51 21 36 55 26 40 34 44

Bahawalpur 70 56 63 47 23 35 53 32 42 32 45

Bahawalnagar 70 58 64 55 30 43 58 37 48 28 50Rahim Yar Khan 71 55 63 51 24 37 55 29 42 33 42

TABLE 2.14(b): ADULT LITERACY-POPULATION 15 YEARS AND OLDER

PROVINCE & DISTRICT TOTAL 12-13RANK

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

NOTES:1.Population aged 15 years and older that is literate expressed as a percentage of the population aged 15 years and older.2.Literacy: For all surveys, literacy is taken as the ability to read a newspaper and to write a simple letter.

113

Page 135: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.14(b): ADULT LITERACY-POPULATION 15 YEARS AND OLDER

PROVINCE & DISTRICT TOTAL 12-13RANK

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Sindh 82 68 75 54 20 38 70 46 58 59

Jacobabad 75 37 56 38 7 23 49 16 32 22 36

Kashmore 66 34 51 34 5 20 45 15 30 23 36

Shikarpur 72 46 59 53 16 35 59 25 42 13 45

Larkana 77 49 63 65 28 46 70 38 54 6 50

Shahdadkot 64 42 53 42 15 29 47 22 35 20 37

Sukkur 82 55 69 63 12 39 75 38 58 5 53

Ghotki 71 37 54 54 12 34 58 17 38 15 42

Khairpur 73 37 55 64 20 42 67 25 46 7 50

Naushahro Feroze 82 59 71 77 46 63 78 49 64 2 57

Shaheed Benazirabad 72 50 61 61 17 39 64 27 46 8 49

Dadu 92 74 84 71 44 58 74 49 62 3 57

Jamshoro 72 42 57 51 22 37 56 27 42 12 43

Hyderabad 70 56 63 46 22 35 66 51 59 4 69

Tando Allah Yar 68 44 57 42 18 30 48 24 37 16 46

Tando Muhammad Khan 69 59 64 31 11 21 38 20 30 24 45

Matiari 76 48 62 54 23 39 60 30 45 10 48

Badin 69 42 56 46 14 31 51 21 37 17 35

Thatta 78 58 69 51 13 33 55 20 38 14 36

Sujawal 80 55 68 46 14 30 50 19 35 19

Sanghar 78 55 66 57 14 36 62 26 44 11 51

Mirpur Khas 77 66 72 50 15 33 59 32 46 9 45

Umerkot 71 40 56 46 8 28 52 16 35 21 38

Tharparkar 73 53 63 51 14 33 52 17 35 18 37

Karachi 87 79 83 54 49 52 85 77 81 1 81

114

Page 136: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.14(b): ADULT LITERACY-POPULATION 15 YEARS AND OLDER

PROVINCE & DISTRICT TOTAL 12-13RANK

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 77 46 61 64 25 43 66 29 47 48

Chitral 79 52 68 71 36 54 72 37 55 6 53

Upper Dir 73 35 55 57 16 35 58 16 36 19 42

Lower Dir 83 47 66 74 25 48 75 26 49 11 44

Swat 71 47 59 52 18 35 55 22 39 17 49

Shangla - - - 53 8 30 53 8 30 22 34

Buner - - - 51 10 28 51 10 28 23 36

Malakand PA 71 42 57 74 36 54 73 37 55 7 55

Kohistan - - - 37 3 20 37 3 20 24 25

Mansehra 79 65 71 72 45 57 72 47 58 4 56

Batagram - - - 52 13 31 52 13 31 21 39

Abbottabad 90 71 81 74 50 60 78 54 64 2 69

Haripur 89 73 80 77 51 62 79 55 66 1 67

Tor Ghar - - - 39 3 18 39 3 18 25 15

Mardan 68 40 54 64 22 42 65 27 45 13 45

Swabi 64 21 42 59 26 42 60 25 42 15 43

Charsadda 71 30 50 63 22 42 65 24 44 14 42

Peshawar 80 45 63 68 26 47 75 36 56 5 56

Nowshera 72 41 56 62 32 47 65 35 50 10 54

Kohat 84 49 66 65 23 42 69 28 47 12 51

Hangu 66 21 41 62 10 32 63 12 34 20 38

Karak 90 62 74 86 34 57 86 36 58 3 53

Bannu 86 54 71 78 21 49 78 23 50 9 44

Lakki Marwat 89 49 68 76 26 51 78 29 54 8 48

D.I.Khan 83 65 74 53 19 36 57 25 41 16 36

Tank 68 33 50 60 12 36 61 16 38 18 32

115

Page 137: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 2.14(b): ADULT LITERACY-POPULATION 15 YEARS AND OLDER

PROVINCE & DISTRICT TOTAL 12-13RANK

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Balochistan 74 33 55 49 12 32 56 18 38 39

Quetta 77 38 59 70 33 54 75 36 57 1 66

Pishin 77 20 51 65 17 43 66 17 44 5 50

Killa Abdullah 77 14 47 33 3 19 37 4 22 27 36

Chagai 76 29 52 41 3 23 44 6 26 22 29

Nushki 76 18 48 58 10 37 62 12 39 8 47

Loralai 76 42 59 51 9 32 55 15 37 12 35

Barkhan 79 13 50 30 2 16 37 3 21 28 26

Musa Khel 54 19 38 47 18 33 49 18 34 16 24

Killa Saifullah 79 4 41 68 1 34 71 2 36 14 22

Zhob 79 28 55 42 3 23 52 10 32 18 31

Sheerani - - - 67 6 37 67 6 37 13 27

Sibi 79 41 61 39 16 29 55 26 42 7 54

Harnai 80 45 63 38 6 23 40 9 26 23 34

Ziarat 90 32 64 48 12 31 50 13 33 17 52

Kohlu 76 15 47 38 5 21 44 6 25 24 8

Dera Bugti 65 22 44 39 1 21 41 3 23 26 17

Kachhi (Bolan) 97 40 72 45 10 29 57 16 39 9 30

Jaffarabad 58 17 38 46 9 28 49 11 31 19 26

Nasirabad 65 15 42 35 4 20 44 7 27 21 18

Jhal Magsi 69 22 46 36 8 23 37 9 24 25 34

Kalat 86 65 76 48 31 40 54 38 47 4 42

Mastung 88 63 75 67 23 47 71 32 53 2 41

Khuzdar 58 33 46 51 12 32 53 20 37 11 39

Awaran - - - 60 19 42 60 19 42 6 41

Kharan 86 27 60 36 5 22 54 13 36 15 42

Washuk - - - 47 9 29 47 9 29 20 27

Lasbela 77 48 63 34 11 24 48 24 37 10 36

Gwadar 73 32 54 71 11 43 72 23 49 3 50

NOTES:

1. The Panjgur & Kech district has been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

116

Page 138: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Education PSLM 2014-15

CONFIDENCE INTERVAL EDUCATION Gross Enrolment Ratio at Primary Level (Aged 6 to 10)

Net Enrolment Rate at Primary Level (Aged 6 to 10)

Region/Province Estimate CV Standard error Confidence interval Min Max

Urban Areas 103 1.17 1.21 100.59 105.33 Punjab 110 1.98 1.40 107.27 112.76 Sindh 94 2.61 2.46 89.47 99.12 KP 103 2.42 2.50 98.37 108.19 Balochistan 96 3.59 3.45 89.17 102.69 Rural Areas 85 0.74 0.63 83.93 86.41 Punjab 93 1.27 0.89 90.85 94.32 Sindh 69 1.97 1.36 65.95 71.27 KP 90 1.27 1.14 88.17 92.66 Balochistan 65 3.82 2.47 59.86 69.57 Overall 91 0.62 0.56 89.37 91.58 Punjab 98 0.76 0.74 96.10 99.01 Sindh 79 1.52 1.20 76.92 81.64 KP 92 1.13 1.05 90.41 94.53 Balochistan 73 3.34 2.45 68.49 78.10

Region/Province Estimate CV Standard error

Confidence interval Min Max

Urban Areas 77 1.14 0.88 75.27 78.73 Punjab 80 1.29 1.04 78.10 82.17 Sindh 73 2.51 1.84 69.73 76.95 KP 78 2.09 1.63 74.67 81.04 Balochistan 72 3.35 2.40 67.04 76.46 Rural Areas 63 0.73 0.46 61.89 63.68 Punjab 66 0.90 0.60 65.25 67.60 Sindh 52 2.24 1.17 49.72 54.29 KP 70 1.31 0.91 67.73 71.31 Balochistan 49 3.64 1.80 45.89 52.94 Overall 67 0.63 0.42 66.19 67.85 Punjab 70 0.78 0.55 69.26 71.40 Sindh 61 1.65 1.00 58.89 62.84 KP 71 1.15 0.81 69.25 72.44 Balochistan 56 3.09 1.72 52.19 58.92

117

Page 139: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Education PSLM 2014-15

Gross Enrolment Ratio at Middle Level (Aged 11 to 13)

Net Enrolment Rate at Middle Level (Aged 11 to 13)

Region/Province Estimate CV Standard error

Confidence interval Min Max

Urban Areas 78 2.40 1.85 73.76 81.02 Punjab 76 2.81 2.12 71.29 79.59 Sindh 78 5.29 4.12 69.70 85.86 KP 93 5.21 4.85 83.62 102.64 Balochistan 72 7.83 5.60 60.53 82.48 Rural Areas 55 1.29 0.71 53.50 56.29 Punjab 59 1.76 1.04 57.06 61.14 Sindh 36 3.61 1.29 33.12 38.17 KP 67 2.15 1.43 63.80 69.42 Balochistan 39 9.04 3.49 31.79 45.49 Overall 62 1.22 0.76 60.78 63.76 Punjab 64 1.51 0.97 62.41 66.22 Sindh 55 3.53 1.95 51.34 58.97 KP 71 2.01 1.42 68.13 73.71 Balochistan 48 6.46 3.12 42.16 54.39

Region/Province Estimate CV Standard error

Confidence interval Min Max

Urban Areas 47 2.44 1.15 44.95 49.46 Punjab 48 2.75 1.31 45.13 50.26 Sindh 48 5.33 2.54 42.74 52.71 KP 50 6.53 3.29 43.93 56.82 Balochistan 33 8.59 2.87 27.79 39.04 Rural Areas 32 1.51 0.48 30.96 32.85 Punjab 34 1.84 0.63 32.76 35.21 Sindh 21 5.95 1.28 18.94 23.95 KP 39 2.53 0.99 37.04 40.90 Balochistan 23 10.8 2.45 17.94 27.56 Overall 37 1.35 0.50 35.94 37.90 Punjab 38 1.56 0.60 37.18 39.54 Sindh 34 4.06 1.36 30.94 36.29 KP 41 2.42 0.99 38.89 42.76 Balochistan 26 7.17 1.85 22.24 29.51

118

Page 140: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Education PSLM 2014-15

Literacy Rate - Population 10 years & older

Adult Literacy - Population 15 years & older

Region/Province Estimate CV Standard error

Confidence interval Min Max

Urban Areas 76 0.78 0.59 74.38 76.70 Punjab 77 0.82 0.64 76.21 78.71 Sindh 76 1.65 1.25 73.51 78.42 KP 66 2.37 1.57 63.19 69.35 Balochistan 61 3.00 1.82 57.23 64.39 Rural Areas 51 0.81 0.41 49.78 51.40 Punjab 55 0.94 0.52 54.14 56.17 Sindh 40 2.65 1.07 38.34 42.55 KP 50 1.44 0.71 48.23 51.03 Balochistan 38 4.54 1.71 34.31 41.02 Overall 60 0.59 0.35 59.09 60.48 Punjab 63 0.65 0.40 62.00 63.59 Sindh 60 1.54 0.91 57.78 61.37 KP 53 1.25 0.66 51.46 54.04 Balochistan 44 3.72 1.65 41.74 47.65

Region/Province Estimate CV Standard error

Confidence interval Min Max

Urban Areas 74 0.87 0.64 72.32 74.84 Punjab 75 0.94 0.71 73.96 76.73 Sindh 75 1.76 1.32 72.37 77.56 KP 61 2.72 1.67 58.03 64.56 Balochistan 55 3.83 2.10 50.70 58.92 Rural Areas 46 1.00 0.46 45.45 47.26 Punjab 51 1.16 0.59 49.90 52.23 Sindh 38 2.99 1.12 35.39 39.79 KP 43 1.71 0.74 41.90 44.80 Balochistan 32 4.97 1.58 28.67 34.87 Overall 57 0.69 0.39 55.85 57.39 Punjab 60 0.77 0.46 58.61 60.42 Sindh 58 1.67 0.97 56.36 60.17 KP 47 1.46 0.68 45.47 48.15 Balochistan 38 4.39 1.69 35.14 41.77

119

Page 141: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Health PSLM 2014-15

3. HEALTH 3.1 Introduction

The health profile of Pakistan is still not much encouraging. The overall mortality

reduction of infants and children has been slow in the country. Awareness regarding nutritional

needs, Pre and Post-natal care of mothers is also weak. The poor people of the country have very

less knowledge about the diseases and illnesses and on the other hand they face extreme

difficulty to have high cost private treatment as they have very few assets. As per the World

Health Organization (WHO) definition the health in its broader sense "a state of complete

physical, mental, and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity."

Therefore government and private sector needs to pay much attention to improve the overall

quality of health facilities to all masses.

The Ministry of National Health Services Regulation and Coordination is a government

agency responsible for Pakistan’s health system. The Ministry of health was devolved to the

provinces under the 18th Amendment. Besides the federal health department, each of the

four provinces of Pakistan has their respective health departments and Secretariat, headed by the

health minister. Respective Ministries are responsible to control, manage, administer medical

services matters, also frame and enforce health policies in line with that promulgated by the

federal health department.1 The following programs have been transferred to provincial health departments

• National Programme for Family Planning & Primary Health Care,

• Polio Eradication Program,

• National Maternal, Neonatal and Child Health (MNCH) Program, Expanded Program on

Immunization and

• National Program for Prevention and Control of Hepatitis.

1 Ministry of Health (Pakistan) /WHO apprehensive about Health Ministry’s devolution.

120

Page 142: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Health PSLM 2014-15

Pakistan Social and Living Standard Measurement (PSLM) Survey data on Health is a

good source to monitor the progress in Health sector which includes percentage of population

who got Sick or Injured, Type of health consultation, Immunization, Diarrhoea and Pre and Post-

natal care. It also gives detailed comparison between the data results from previous rounds. This

chapter will present key indicators on Health at National/Provincial and District level to provide

an opportunity to overview the progress and to assess the areas where serious and comprehensive

efforts are required. 3.2 Sick or Injured

During the reference period of two weeks prior to the date of interview 6.4 percent of the

population in 2014-15 reported sick or injured. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) with 9.1 percent has

comparatively higher prevalence of

sick or injured population as compared

to Punjab with 5.9 percent, Sindh with

6.3 percent and Balochistan with 4.7

percent. In Islamabad (Federal

Capital), reported number of cases

fallen sick or injured is 4.4 percent.

While observing the district level

position, Toba Tek Singh and

Bahawalpur with 9.7 percent, Thatta

with 11.0 percent, Peshawar with 14.9

percent and Lasbela with 8.4 percent

have the highest prevalence of sick and

injured population among their

respective provinces. About 96 percent of sick and injured persons had some type of health

consultation (Table 3.1). It is worth mentioning here that percentage of sick or injured for age

less than 5 years is 12 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 13.4 percent in 2012-13, which shows

higher tendency of being sick or injured for children than the elder ones (Table 3.2). Overall 70

percent of sick or injured persons consulted private dispensary/hospitals and 20 percent visited

public dispensary/hospitals or RHC/BHU for their treatment (Table 3.3). Analyzing the type of

Figure 3.1 Percentage of Population Sick or Injured

7.213.4

6.412.0

7.7

14.5

7.5

15.17.0

12.9

5.8

10.6

WholePopulation

under five WholePopulation

under five

2012-13 2014-15

Pakistan Urban Rural

121

Page 143: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Health PSLM 2014-15

consultation among the districts, it is observed that almost every district in Punjab people prefer

private dispensary/hospital for consultation, however in Sindh, KP & Balochistan the pattern

varies among the districts.

3.3 Immunization

IMMUNIZATION is a method of making a person immune to disease by injecting

certain substances into the body, which stimulate the production of disease-fighting antibodies.

Immunization is mandatory for a healthy nation, it is considered as one of the most successful

and cost effective health interventions. It has eradicated small pox, lowered the global incidence

of polio and achieved dramatic reductions in illness, disability and death from DPT (Diphtheria,

Pertussis (whooping cough), and Tetanus). It is a world-wide program being carried out in all

countries assisted by WHO, UNICEF and by other donor agencies. The World Health

Organization suggests that a child must receive a dose of BCG vaccination in order to get

protected against tuberculosis, three doses of DPT to have protection against diphtheria,

pertussis, and tetanus, three doses of polio vaccine and two doses of measles vaccination.

In the past, immunization for children comprises a series of vaccinations e.g., BCG

(anti-TB); DPT, anti-polio (drops), given by mouth not by injection and Measles. A few years

back, government has also introduced COMBO (1, 2, and 3) combination of DPT and Hepatitis.

But from 2010 onwards government have introduced PENTA (Diphtheria, Pertussis, Tetanus,

Hemophilus Influenza B and Hepatitis B); instead of COMBO and also Measles 2 is introduced

along with routine BCG, anti-polio drops and measles. These all are administered at specific

intervals as mentioned below:

IMMUNIZATION SCHEDULE ___________________________________________________________ Age of Child Previous Schedule New Schedule ___________________________________________________________ At birth BCG (anti-TB); Polio drops BCG (anti-TB) + Polio 0 6-weeks DPT-I; Polio drops; Hepatitis-I Pentavalent 1 + Polio 1 10 weeks DPT-II; Polio drops; Hepatitis-II Pentavalent 2 + Polio 2 14 weeks DPT-III; Polio drops; Hepatitis-III Pentavalent 3 + Polio 3 9 months anti-measles vaccine Measles 1 12-15 months Measles 2 _____________________________________________________________

122

Page 144: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Health PSLM 2014-15

One of the primary objectives of the government in health sector is to expand the

coverage of immunization and also issue vaccination cards to keep track of vaccinations given to

the child. However, measuring immunization coverage is not an easy task; parents often do not

have the children’s immunization / health cards with information/record on vaccinations

received. Immunization rates based only on the information given on immunization cards

categorized as ‘record’ may therefore, underestimate coverage, however, it has the benefit of

using written information recorded by health workers. The alternative is to ask parents about

their child’s vaccination history, and calculate coverage rates using this information termed as

‘recall’. This runs the risk that parents will not remember vaccinations and will confuse different

types of vaccines or other injections with vaccinations. However questions are asked in

questionnaire in a way to filter out such cases and during training the enumerators are also

briefed about probing techniques to get better and reliable information. In this report, both of

these measures are calculated for all children of the age range 12 to 23 month.

Full immunization rates (all the

11 recommended vaccines) based on

record increased to 60 percent in 2014-

15 from 57 percent in 2012-13.

Regarding the urban and rural

comparison the immunization rates for

urban areas has increased to 70 percent

in 2014-15 as compared to 66 percent in

2012-13 and similar pattern is observed

in rural areas 56 percent in 2014-15 as

compared to 54 percent in 2012-13.

Among provinces Punjab with 70

percent in 2014-15 has the highest

percentage of children who are fully

immunized based on record as compared to 65 percent in 2012-13 followed by KP with 58

percent in 2014-15 as compared to 53 percent in 2012-13, Sindh with 45 percent in 2014-15 as

Figure 3.2 Full Immunization

0102030405060708090

Record Recall Record Recall

2012-13 2014-15

66

87

70

86

54

80

56

80

57

82

60

82

Urban Rural Pakistan

123

Page 145: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Health PSLM 2014-15

compared to 42 percent in 2012-13 and Balochistan which has slightly declined to 27 percent in

2014-15 as compared to 29 percent in 2012-13 (Table 3.4 b).

Full immunization rates based on recall and record remains stagnant at 82 percent

between 2014-15 & 2012-13. Islamabad also remains stagnant at 90 percent. While analyzing the

district level pattern, Narowal with 99 percent, Matiari with 87 percent, Charsadda and Chitral

with 98 percent and Awaran with 85 percent are the top ranked districts within their respective

provinces. While D.G Khan with 75 percent, Tharparkar with 38 percent, Tor Garh with 3

percent and Chagai with 30 percent are the bottom ranked districts within their respective

provinces (Table 3.4 c).

Table 3.5 (record Based) and Table 3.6 (based on record and recall) provides coverage by

Antigen. Having a look at record based measure, the visible increase is seen in all antigens at

provincial level as compared to 2012-13, however coverage of measles vaccination with 61

percent in 2014-15 as compared to 57 percent in 2012-13 is still very low as compared to other

vaccinations. Rahim Yar khan in Punjab, Jacobabad in Sindh, Tor Garh in KP and Washuk in

Balochistan have lowest coverage of all antigens with in their respective provinces. Measles

coverage is highest in Punjab with 71 percent followed by KP with 58 percent, Sindh with 46 percent and Balochistan with 28 percent.

3.4 Diarrhoea

Diarrhoea is a condition that involves the frequent passing of loose or watery stools - it is

the opposite of constipation and can have many causes, which may be infectious or non-

infectious. Diarrhoea can kill anyone by dehydration, because diarrhoea is watery in nature, it

takes up a lot of the water in your body. Diarrhoea can be dangerous in new born and infants. In

small children, severe diarrhoea lasting just a day or two can lead to dehydration.

Diarrhoea disease is the second leading cause of death in children under five years old.

Diarrhoea can last several days, and can leave the body without the water and salts that are

necessary for survival. Most children who die from diarrhoea actually die from severe

124

Page 146: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Health PSLM 2014-15

dehydration and fluid loss2. Childhood diarrhoea has been a serious health problem in Pakistan.

Both its prevention, through improved water and sanitation, and the treatment of dehydration

through oral re-hydration salt (ORS) are goals of the government. Home management of

diarrhoea through Oral Rehydration Salt (ORS) or a recommended home fluid (RHF) - can

prevent many of these deaths.

Households were asked to report whether a child had diarrhoea in the 30 days prior to the

survey. If child suffered from diarrhoea in last 30 days, series of questions were asked whether

they have consulted someone for it or not and whether ORS has been given to child or not.

Overall percentage of children who have suffered from diarrhoea in the 30 days prior to

survey is 9 percent in 2014-15 as

compared to 10 percent in 2012-13.

Highest percentage of diarrhoea cases

were reported in Balochistan with 11

percent in 2014-15 as compared to 14

percent in 2012-13 and lowest cases were

reported in Sindh with 6 percent in 2014-

15 as compared to 9 percent in 2012-13.

In Islamabad percentage of cases affected

by diarrhoea is 5 percent. While observing

the district level position Layyah with 26

percent, Naushahro Feroze with 12

percent, Peshawar with 16 percent, Kalat with 31 percent have the highest percentage of cases

reported with diarrhoea in last 30 days within their respective provinces (Table 3.7).

Among 94 percent of diarrhoea cases a practitioner of some kind was consulted. The use

of ORS in diarrhoea cases has been decreased to 72 percent in 2014-15 from 75 percent in 2012-

13. Use of ORS for treatment of diarrhoea is more prevalent in urban areas with 77 percent than

in rural areas with 69 percent. ORS is mostly used in Balochistan with 90 percent followed by

2 WHO Media center, Diarrhoea disease, Fact sheet No. 330

Figure 3.3 Percentage of Diarrhoea cases in children

0

5

10

1510 10 9 11

149 9

610 11

2012-13 2014-15

125

Page 147: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Health PSLM 2014-15

Sindh with 87 percent and KP with 81 percent, whereas in Punjab its only 63 percent. District

level analysis reveals that Sheikhupura with 34 percent, Umerkot with 53 percent, Charsadda

with 59 percent and Pishin with 29 percent have the lowest number of cases who reported use of

ORS for treatment of diarrhoea (Table 3.8).

In cases of diarrhoea, the most consulted practitioner constitutes to be a private

practitioner with 73 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 70 percent in 2012-13. Basic health units

(BHU) and rural health centers (RHC) were consulted by only 5 percent of the cases in Pakistan,

which gives some indication of the very limited use of the government primary health network

for these kinds of curative services. In Balochistan 36 percent diarrhoea cases received

consultation from government facilities such as hospitals, dispensaries, RHC, BHU and this

trend is also prevalent in many districts of Sindh and KP especially in rural areas. Rawalpindi

with 67 percent, Thatta with 76 percent, Chitral with 77 percent and Gwadar with 79 percent are

the districts where highest numbers of cases used government hospital/RHC/BHU for treatment

of diarrhoea (Table 3.9).

3.5 Pre and Post-natal Care

Maternal health is the serious issue in developing countries including Pakistan. To reduce

the maternal mortality, the provision of quality pre-natal care can help to reduce the risk factors

including pre-eclampsia, anemia, and sexually transmitted diseases. Pre-natal care also

encourages women to learn the symptoms of pregnancy and delivery, to be immunized against

tetanus, to know about infant care.

In overall Pakistan 73 percent of mothers who had given birth in the last three years went

for pre-natal consultations during their last pregnancy in 2014-15 as compared to 69 percent in

2012-13. Pre-natal consultations have increased in urban as well as in rural areas, however they

are higher in urban areas with 86 percent as compared to 67 percent in rural areas. Punjab has the

highest consultation rate with 78 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 73 percent in 2012-13 and

Balochistan has the lowest with 47 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 50 percent in 2012-13. In

Islamabad, 95 percent women went for pre-natal consultation. While observing the district level

position, Rawalpindi with 95 percent, Karachi with 96 percent, Haripur with 85 percent, Lasbela

with 79 percent are the top ranked districts within their respective provinces. While Narowal

126

Page 148: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Health PSLM 2014-15

with 58 percent, Umer Kot with 42 percent, Tor Garh with 24 percent and Killa Abdullah with

21 percent are at the bottom within their respective provinces. It is observed that in majority of

districts of Punjab and Sindh women are seeking consultation from private hospital/clinic while

the trend is reverse in KP and Balochistan where women in majority of districts went to public

hospitals for consultations. In Overall Pakistan, the three most commonly consulted sources were

private hospital/clinic with 57 percent, government hospital/clinic with 31 percent followed by

home LHW with 5 percent and home TBA with 4 percent each (Table 3.10).

Tetanus Toxoid injections are given to women during pregnancy to protect infants from

neonatal tetanus, a major cause of infant death that is primarily due to unsanitary conditions

during childbirth. In addition these

injections protect women from

developing tetanus themselves or

suffering from sepsis. Two doses of

tetanus Toxoid during pregnancy offer

full protection. However, if a woman

was vaccinated during a previous

pregnancy, she may only need a

booster dose to give full protection.

Five doses are thought to provide

lifetime protection. Overall 75 percent

of mothers in 2014-15 as compared to 72 percent in 2012-13 had received a tetanus toxoid

injection during their last pregnancy. Punjab is at top with 84 percent in 2014-15 as compared to

81 percent in 2012-13 and Balochistan is at bottom with 34 percent in 2014-15 as compared to

31 percent in 2012-13. In Islamabad, 94 percent women received tetanus toxoid injections.

While observing the district level position Narowal with 98 percent, Karachi with 91 percent,

Charsadda with 89 percent and Kalat with 80 percent are the top ranked districts within their

respective provinces (Table 3.11).

In Pakistan most of the deliveries i.e. 55 percent took place at public or private

hospital/clinics while 45 percent took place at home, however percentage of home deliveries are

higher in rural areas with 55 percent as compared to urban areas with 24 percent only. District

Figure 3.4 Percentage of Women received at least one Tetanus Injection

0

20

40

60

80

100 87 91 85 82

55

70 8156 64

26

75 8469

67

34

127

Page 149: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Health PSLM 2014-15

wise analysis reveals that Rajanpur with 89 percent, Tharparkar with 85 percent, Tor Garh with

82 percent and Sheerani with 99 percent are the districts within their respective province where

majority of deliveries took place at home.

Overall 58 percent deliveries were assisted by skilled3 birth attendants as compared to 54

percent in 2012-13.Among them majority of the deliveries were performed by the doctors in all

three provinces except Balochistan. Percentages of deliveries assisted by doctor in Punjab are 47

percent, Sindh 53 percent, KP 44 percent and Balochistan 23 percent. While analyzing district

level position Lahore with 84, Karachi with 88 percent, Peshawar with 72 percent and Quetta

with 57 percent are the top ranked districts within their respective provinces who have obtained

the services of skilled birth attendants for delivery cases. On the other side Rajanpur with 11

percent, Tharparkar with 16 percent, Tor Gar with 18 percent and Sheerani with 2 percent are the

bottom ranked districts with in their respective provinces (Table 3.12).

3 Skilled birth attendant includes Doctor, Nurse, Mid Wife and LHV.

Figure 3.6 Place Where Child was delivered

Home45%

Govt. Hospital/RHC

/BHU17%

Private Hospital/Cl

inic38%

Other0%

Figure 3.5 Person that assisted with delivery

Doctor47%

Nurse6%

Midwife 3%TBA

12%

Trained Dai/Dai

20%

Family member/Neighbour/

Friend9%

LHV3% Other

0%

128

Page 150: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Health PSLM 2014-15

Post-natal consultation rates in

2014-15 as always are still much lower

than the pre-natal rates as cited above.

Post-natal consultation with 29 percent

remains stagnant between 2014-15 &

2012-13. Post-natal consultation is higher

in urban areas with 38 percent as

compared to rural areas with 25 percent.

In Islamabad, 74 percent women went for

post-natal consultations. While observing

the district level position, Sahiwal with

47 percent, Hyderabad with 62 percent, Lower Dir with 41 percent and Barkhan with 40 percent

are the top ranked districts for post-natal consultations within their respective provinces.

The most commonly cited sources of post-natal care in urban areas as well as rural areas

were private hospital/clinic with 64 percent and 58 percent respectively followed by government

hospital/clinic with 27 percent and 26 percent respectively in both urban areas and rural areas

(Table 3.13).

Figure 3.7 Post-Natal Consultations

38 37 4033

3225 2528

23 17

29 2933

2521

Urban Rural Total

129

Page 151: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

Pakistan Total 5.78 7.02 6.39 95.95 96.30 96.14Urban 6.88 8.16 7.51 95.10 95.10 95.10Rural 5.19 6.41 5.79 96.57 97.13 96.87

Punjab Total 5.58 6.21 5.90 96.60 96.95 96.79Urban 6.23 6.74 6.48 96.16 96.25 96.20Rural 5.25 5.95 5.61 96.87 97.34 97.12

Islamabad Total 4.17 4.70 4.43 100.00 97.02 98.47Urban 2.97 3.78 3.36 100.00 97.32 98.56Rural 6.77 6.55 6.66 100.00 96.67 98.38

Attock Total 3.30 5.24 4.31 97.46 96.98 97.15Urban 6.27 10.43 8.40 95.99 94.29 94.91Rural 2.16 3.36 2.79 99.10 100.00 99.67

Rawalpindi Total 4.92 7.38 6.16 98.49 98.68 98.60Urban 6.56 8.22 7.40 97.77 97.67 97.71Rural 3.23 6.51 4.89 100.00 100.00 100.00

Jehlum Total 3.21 4.28 3.76 96.95 97.70 97.39Urban 3.36 5.59 4.47 90.63 100.00 96.46Rural 3.14 3.74 3.45 100.00 96.28 97.91

Chakwal Total 5.03 5.90 5.51 96.54 96.86 96.73Urban 3.34 4.27 3.84 100.00 82.23 89.40Rural 5.30 6.14 5.77 96.20 98.36 97.48

Sargodha Total 6.32 7.45 6.90 98.46 95.99 97.10Urban 7.61 9.00 8.32 100.00 94.07 96.71Rural 5.62 6.59 6.11 97.33 97.45 97.40

Bhakhar Total 2.75 4.06 3.40 99.16 99.23 99.20Urban 3.41 3.59 3.49 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 2.61 4.15 3.38 98.92 99.10 99.03

Khushab Total 5.19 6.78 6.00 98.77 95.67 96.99Urban 4.92 7.96 6.45 100.00 96.35 97.74Rural 5.32 6.27 5.81 98.26 95.29 96.62

Mianwali Total 4.93 5.06 5.00 95.98 90.47 93.04Urban 7.43 5.94 6.67 100.00 96.16 98.24Rural 4.26 4.84 4.57 94.10 88.73 91.07

Faisalabad Total 6.16 6.50 6.33 94.89 93.82 94.34Urban 6.64 6.57 6.61 96.20 96.39 96.30Rural 5.74 6.44 6.09 93.55 91.49 92.45

Chiniot Total 5.54 6.42 5.98 94.29 90.48 92.27Urban 6.26 7.28 6.76 95.55 90.51 92.90Rural 5.16 5.99 5.57 93.48 90.46 91.86

Jhang Total 8.19 9.45 8.83 95.53 95.30 95.40Urban 9.74 13.48 11.60 95.46 90.68 92.70Rural 7.74 8.33 8.04 95.55 97.38 96.51

130

SICK OR INJURED HEALTH CONSULTATIONPROVINCE & DISTRICT

TABLE 3.1: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION FALLEN SICK OR INJURED DURING LAST TWO WEEKS OF THE INTERVIEW AND BY HEALTH CONSULTATION.

Page 152: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL SICK OR INJURED HEALTH CONSULTATIONPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Toba Tek Singh Total 9.38 9.99 9.70 95.33 95.43 95.38Urban 13.28 14.42 13.85 87.03 89.52 88.34Rural 8.29 8.83 8.57 99.07 97.96 98.47

Gujranwala Total 4.42 5.11 4.77 97.90 95.78 96.75Urban 4.25 6.52 5.41 100.00 94.72 96.75Rural 4.61 3.47 4.04 95.72 98.10 96.75

Hafizabad Total 4.78 4.99 4.89 100.00 96.61 98.23Urban 3.56 4.88 4.22 100.00 92.87 95.87Rural 5.35 5.03 5.19 100.00 98.21 99.10

Gujrat Total 3.37 4.36 3.89 97.48 100.00 98.96Urban 1.02 3.36 2.21 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 4.34 4.74 4.55 97.24 100.00 98.76

Mandi Bahuddin Total 3.86 5.21 4.55 95.09 94.72 94.88Urban 3.39 4.88 4.19 100.00 83.62 89.73Rural 3.96 5.29 4.63 94.18 97.24 95.95

Sialkot Total 5.58 3.28 4.40 96.28 96.91 96.52Urban 3.30 2.67 2.98 92.74 100.00 96.03Rural 6.49 3.52 4.96 97.01 96.01 96.64

Narowal Total 4.79 4.60 4.69 97.13 98.63 97.91Urban 6.92 6.30 6.62 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 4.27 4.29 4.28 95.99 98.26 97.22

Lahore Total 6.38 5.96 6.18 94.50 97.13 95.71Urban 6.97 6.41 6.70 93.91 96.88 95.29Rural 4.52 4.40 4.47 97.37 98.36 97.82

Kasur Total 4.89 4.43 4.65 94.83 93.24 94.04Urban 6.26 5.43 5.82 92.29 95.62 93.93Rural 4.41 4.07 4.23 96.11 92.07 94.09

Sheikhupura Total 5.48 5.06 5.27 95.11 94.42 94.78Urban 6.68 6.01 6.37 96.48 95.59 96.08Rural 4.98 4.71 4.84 94.34 93.87 94.11

Nankana Sahib Total 6.12 5.55 5.83 96.09 95.47 95.79Urban 10.62 6.87 8.67 92.84 89.74 91.57Rural 4.40 5.03 4.72 99.08 98.59 98.81

Okara Total 2.59 3.92 3.27 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 3.66 3.62 3.64 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 2.21 4.03 3.14 100.00 100.00 100.00

Sahiwal Total 2.90 2.38 2.64 97.54 100.00 98.66Urban 2.45 1.01 1.72 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 3.00 2.70 2.85 97.08 100.00 98.48

Pakpatten Total 4.54 4.72 4.63 99.24 100.00 99.63Urban 5.15 5.37 5.26 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 4.43 4.60 4.52 99.08 100.00 99.55

131

TABLE 3.1: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION FALLEN SICK OR INJURED DURING LAST TWO WEEKS OF THE INTERVIEW AND BY HEALTH CONSULTATION.

Page 153: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL SICK OR INJURED HEALTH CONSULTATIONPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Vehari Total 6.10 6.62 6.37 98.73 100.00 99.41Urban 11.71 6.02 8.65 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 4.98 6.75 5.88 98.13 100.00 99.23

Multan Total 5.18 6.46 5.80 97.11 96.62 96.84Urban 5.98 6.71 6.34 96.41 96.97 96.70Rural 4.67 6.30 5.47 97.67 96.39 96.95

Lodhran Total 6.50 7.36 6.92 98.20 98.27 98.24Urban 5.63 5.94 5.78 97.45 96.00 96.70Rural 6.65 7.63 7.12 98.31 98.59 98.46

Khanewal Total 5.44 6.57 6.01 96.84 98.12 97.55Urban 6.25 6.26 6.26 100.00 97.85 98.93Rural 5.23 6.65 5.95 95.84 98.19 97.17

D. G. Khan Total 7.16 9.26 8.21 99.29 99.35 99.32Urban 7.54 8.69 8.10 100.00 97.51 98.70Rural 7.09 9.34 8.22 99.17 99.60 99.42

Rajanpur Total 5.18 6.06 5.60 97.97 99.20 98.61Urban 5.07 9.41 7.17 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 5.20 5.39 5.29 97.58 98.92 98.23

Layyah Total 6.80 9.85 8.29 99.36 97.48 98.27Urban 7.87 9.88 8.90 100.00 95.79 97.60Rural 6.63 9.84 8.18 99.24 97.79 98.40

Muzaffar Garh Total 4.44 5.80 5.13 94.18 95.36 94.86Urban 5.61 7.74 6.67 100.00 94.44 96.78Rural 4.27 5.54 4.92 93.12 95.53 94.50

Bahawalpur Total 8.98 10.45 9.71 96.54 98.99 97.85Urban 9.84 11.44 10.64 93.97 100.00 97.22Rural 8.67 10.08 9.37 97.57 98.57 98.11

Bahawalnagar Total 3.37 4.08 3.72 86.37 94.53 90.76Urban 1.29 5.02 3.19 78.55 91.09 88.60Rural 3.93 3.80 3.87 87.06 95.90 91.27

Rahim Yar Khan Total 7.72 8.26 7.99 98.54 98.28 98.40Urban 9.00 8.97 8.98 98.19 98.17 98.18Rural 7.45 8.11 7.77 98.62 98.30 98.46

NOTES 1. Fallen Sick or Injured: Number of persons fallen sick or injured expressed as percentage of total population during last two weeks. 2. Health Consultation: Number of persons who consulted for treatment expressed as percentage of total persons fallen sick or injured during last two weeks.

132

TABLE 3.1: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION FALLEN SICK OR INJURED DURING LAST TWO WEEKS OF THE INTERVIEW AND BY HEALTH CONSULTATION.

Page 154: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL SICK OR INJURED HEALTH CONSULTATIONPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Sindh Total 5.56 7.16 6.33 95.76 95.87 95.82Urban 7.34 9.19 8.23 95.36 95.11 95.22Rural 3.77 5.09 4.40 96.55 97.26 96.94

Jacobabad Total 0.80 1.34 1.06 94.76 95.02 94.92Urban 1.06 2.08 1.56 91.04 91.18 91.13Rural 0.71 1.08 0.89 96.64 97.56 97.18

Kashmore Total 0.77 0.88 0.82 100.00 96.52 98.19Urban 1.75 0.74 1.28 100.00 86.27 96.24Rural 0.30 0.95 0.62 100.00 100.00 100.00

Shikarpur Total 2.19 4.54 3.34 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 2.70 5.73 4.20 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 2.00 4.09 3.02 100.00 100.00 100.00

Larkana Total 2.85 2.27 2.55 100.00 98.16 99.17Urban 4.83 4.01 4.41 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 1.30 0.87 1.08 100.00 91.34 96.48

Shahdadkot Total 1.54 2.35 1.94 95.69 97.81 96.95Urban 3.30 5.45 4.39 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 1.04 1.39 1.21 91.83 95.17 93.69

Sukkur Total 3.06 5.15 4.07 96.78 98.03 97.55Urban 3.09 4.77 3.92 97.35 97.42 97.39Rural 3.02 5.69 4.29 96.00 98.77 97.74

Ghotki Total 2.82 4.70 3.71 96.99 98.94 98.17Urban 6.40 5.47 5.94 96.59 95.73 96.20Rural 1.94 4.49 3.14 97.32 100.00 99.12

Khairpur Total 1.44 2.48 1.94 98.57 99.12 98.91Urban 1.32 3.10 2.19 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 1.49 2.21 1.83 98.04 98.58 98.35

Nowshero Feroze Total 4.03 6.99 5.41 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 4.23 10.67 7.30 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 3.98 6.01 4.92 100.00 100.00 100.00

Shaheed Benazirabad Total 2.58 4.13 3.32 96.95 100.00 98.77Urban 5.25 3.52 4.40 94.46 100.00 96.66Rural 1.59 4.37 2.91 100.00 100.00 100.00

Dadu Total 4.68 6.26 5.42 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 5.03 6.09 5.53 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 4.60 6.29 5.40 100.00 100.00 100.00

Jamshoro Total 6.03 9.45 7.63 96.37 92.81 94.31Urban 7.64 11.32 9.43 100.00 92.89 95.85Rural 5.52 8.81 7.04 94.79 92.78 93.63

Hyderabad Total 6.72 10.27 8.40 98.75 99.34 99.09Urban 6.68 10.71 8.60 100.00 99.77 99.87Rural 6.91 8.08 7.46 93.02 96.51 94.79

133

TABLE 3.1: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION FALLEN SICK OR INJURED DURING LAST TWO WEEKS OF THE INTERVIEW AND BY HEALTH CONSULTATION.

Page 155: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL SICK OR INJURED HEALTH CONSULTATIONPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Tando Allah Yar Total 6.38 9.57 7.88 99.26 98.13 98.61Urban 9.02 13.46 11.17 97.60 94.87 96.01Rural 5.64 8.40 6.93 100.00 99.69 99.82

Tando Muhammad Khan Total 6.62 7.15 6.87 98.45 99.59 99.02Urban 9.63 7.03 8.37 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 6.02 7.17 6.58 97.97 99.51 98.77

Matiari Total 5.93 8.18 7.00 97.86 97.05 97.41Urban 7.29 10.40 8.73 97.12 100.00 98.71Rural 5.45 7.45 6.40 98.20 95.69 96.81

Badin Total 6.08 8.80 7.38 98.97 99.67 99.37Urban 6.58 9.31 7.89 98.75 100.00 99.46Rural 5.94 8.65 7.23 99.04 99.56 99.34

Thatta Total 9.30 12.82 11.00 99.11 100.00 99.61Urban 7.84 16.38 11.85 92.03 100.00 97.20Rural 9.52 12.31 10.87 100.00 100.00 100.00

Sujawal Total 9.27 10.76 10.00 98.48 94.25 96.24Urban 8.09 8.85 8.49 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 9.45 11.10 10.25 98.28 93.42 95.72

Sanghar Total 4.21 7.43 5.78 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 4.41 7.49 5.96 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 4.15 7.42 5.72 100.00 100.00 100.00

Mir Pur Khas Total 2.41 2.47 2.44 98.00 97.31 97.67Urban 2.13 2.97 2.53 100.00 95.38 97.41Rural 2.52 2.27 2.40 97.31 98.35 97.78

Umer Kot Total 1.95 2.99 2.44 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 3.20 3.59 3.39 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 1.62 2.82 2.18 100.00 100.00 100.00

Tharparkar Total 4.89 4.55 4.73 94.88 93.26 94.14Urban 2.98 2.35 2.66 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 5.01 4.72 4.88 94.68 93.00 93.92

Karachi Total 9.21 10.78 9.96 93.34 92.88 93.10Urban 9.15 11.00 10.03 94.06 93.42 93.73Rural 10.09 7.30 8.79 83.54 80.18 82.24

134

TABLE 3.1: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION FALLEN SICK OR INJURED DURING LAST TWO WEEKS OF THE INTERVIEW AND BY HEALTH CONSULTATION

Page 156: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL SICK OR INJURED HEALTH CONSULTATIONPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Total 7.85 10.44 9.14 95.29 96.19 95.80Urban 10.52 14.35 12.39 93.06 94.34 93.78Rural 7.25 9.59 8.42 96.02 96.79 96.46

Chitral Total 3.24 7.36 5.19 100.00 98.76 99.17Urban 6.66 1.73 4.69 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 2.80 7.88 5.25 100.00 98.74 99.09

Upper Dir Total 5.53 7.43 6.50 87.95 86.98 87.39Urban 4.75 7.17 5.96 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 5.56 7.44 6.52 87.56 86.53 86.97

Lower Dir Total 3.78 6.83 5.29 100.00 99.19 99.49Urban 4.05 2.78 3.43 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 3.77 7.07 5.40 100.00 99.17 99.47

Swat Total 5.94 9.44 7.60 97.34 97.19 97.25Urban 10.52 14.51 12.63 88.76 92.77 91.20Rural 5.24 8.41 6.71 100.00 98.74 99.27

Shangla Total 4.17 7.12 5.60 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban - - - - - -Rural 4.17 7.12 5.60 100.00 100.00 100.00

Buner Total 7.93 9.89 8.93 97.48 97.81 97.67Urban - - - - - -Rural 7.93 9.89 8.93 97.48 97.81 97.67

Malakand PA Total 7.12 8.08 7.60 98.43 100.00 99.26Urban 10.20 13.57 11.78 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 6.61 7.28 6.94 98.02 100.00 99.07

Kohistan Total 6.01 7.49 6.73 57.13 82.31 70.70Urban - - - - - -Rural 6.01 7.49 6.73 57.13 82.31 70.70

Manshera Total 5.25 7.21 6.29 92.54 98.01 95.87Urban 8.19 7.87 8.03 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 5.01 7.16 6.15 91.52 97.84 95.44

Batagram Total 5.72 8.26 7.07 97.09 97.18 97.14Urban - - - - - -Rural 5.72 8.26 7.07 97.09 97.18 97.14

Abbottabad Total 6.23 8.11 7.23 97.43 92.55 94.51Urban 9.10 13.15 11.08 91.86 88.21 89.75Rural 5.44 7.00 6.29 100.00 94.33 96.56

Haripur Total 7.38 8.36 7.89 97.83 97.27 97.52Urban 8.27 6.88 7.57 89.07 100.00 94.06Rural 7.18 8.65 7.96 100.00 96.85 98.19

135

TABLE 3.1: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION FALLEN SICK OR INJURED DURING LAST TWO WEEKS OF THE INTERVIEW AND BY HEALTH CONSULTATION.

Page 157: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL SICK OR INJURED HEALTH CONSULTATIONPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Tor Garh Total 4.31 7.56 6.03 96.58 98.16 97.62Urban - - - - - -Rural 4.31 7.56 6.03 96.58 98.16 97.62

Mardan Total 11.04 13.92 12.48 95.11 97.89 96.66Urban 12.28 19.15 15.63 91.08 96.35 94.22Rural 10.58 12.11 11.35 96.86 98.73 97.87

Swabi Total 5.05 6.53 5.80 94.63 95.02 94.85Urban 2.95 7.44 5.26 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 5.44 6.35 5.91 94.08 93.91 93.98

Charsadda Total 9.41 13.19 11.29 95.73 96.50 96.18Urban 10.21 14.51 12.27 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 9.21 12.88 11.06 94.54 95.61 95.16

Peshawar Total 13.24 16.75 14.89 94.57 95.01 94.81Urban 12.12 15.71 13.82 92.18 92.97 92.60Rural 14.43 17.89 16.04 96.71 96.99 96.86

Nowsehra Total 8.14 13.01 10.55 97.15 93.92 95.18Urban 11.75 20.74 16.30 96.87 89.38 92.04Rural 6.47 9.22 7.82 97.39 98.94 98.28

Kohat Total 11.23 12.45 11.85 97.19 93.02 94.97Urban 10.58 12.51 11.54 89.76 95.12 92.64Rural 11.40 12.44 11.93 98.99 92.50 95.55

Hangu Total 9.11 12.28 10.72 94.10 97.35 95.99Urban 8.77 13.56 11.21 100.00 98.30 98.95Rural 9.19 11.98 10.61 92.74 97.10 95.24

Karak Total 7.95 8.85 8.42 96.93 100.00 98.62Urban 10.76 9.04 9.92 80.00 100.00 88.92Rural 7.79 8.84 8.34 98.28 100.00 99.23

Bannu Total 6.01 8.80 7.36 98.93 99.16 99.07Urban 2.45 8.04 5.12 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 6.22 8.84 7.49 98.91 99.12 99.03

Lakki Marwat Total 7.48 10.15 8.74 100.00 98.87 99.38Urban 8.24 13.47 10.93 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 7.39 9.66 8.45 100.00 98.64 99.27

D. I. Khan Total 7.45 10.31 8.85 96.93 98.55 97.85Urban 10.35 7.66 9.04 94.40 100.00 96.72Rural 7.05 10.67 8.83 97.44 98.41 98.01

Tank Total 8.23 11.08 9.65 97.21 98.83 98.14Urban 9.21 10.63 9.88 88.48 100.00 94.33Rural 8.04 11.16 9.61 99.08 98.65 98.83

136

TABLE 3.1: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION FALLEN SICK OR INJURED DURING LAST TWO WEEKS OF THE INTERVIEW AND BY HEALTH CONSULTATION.

Page 158: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL SICK OR INJURED HEALTH CONSULTATIONPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Balochistan Total 3.60 5.92 4.67 90.58 91.29 90.99Urban 4.64 7.13 5.82 81.93 82.79 82.43Rural 3.20 5.42 4.21 95.43 95.92 95.72

Quetta Total 3.98 7.50 5.61 71.66 76.19 74.47Urban 5.16 9.46 7.17 64.97 70.47 68.36Rural 2.02 4.08 2.96 100.00 99.30 99.56

Pishin Total 1.29 2.72 1.95 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 1.23 2.02 1.60 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 1.30 2.79 1.98 100.00 100.00 100.00

Killa Abdullah Total 1.72 2.90 2.25 98.73 100.00 99.46Urban 0.89 1.34 1.09 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 1.82 3.09 2.39 98.66 100.00 99.44

Chaghai Total 2.40 5.87 4.06 95.81 89.29 91.30Urban 3.59 12.11 7.60 100.00 90.93 93.20Rural 2.28 5.24 3.70 95.12 88.90 90.90

Nushki Total 2.72 5.14 3.87 80.26 94.56 89.25Urban 4.03 4.85 4.46 50.55 73.50 63.64Rural 2.44 5.22 3.72 90.84 100.00 96.76

Loralai Total 5.04 7.55 6.13 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 8.61 4.54 6.40 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 4.43 8.43 6.07 100.00 100.00 100.00

Barkhan Total 5.06 11.09 8.06 94.70 95.21 95.05Urban 1.23 11.80 6.27 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 5.63 10.99 8.31 94.52 94.51 94.52

Musa Khel Total 4.91 8.07 6.35 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 5.91 10.02 7.77 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 4.61 7.51 5.94 100.00 100.00 100.00

Killa Saifullah Total 4.53 4.34 4.43 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 4.23 3.41 3.83 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 4.63 4.66 4.65 100.00 100.00 100.00

Zhob Total 3.66 9.84 6.61 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 3.24 8.30 5.55 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 3.81 10.34 6.98 100.00 100.00 100.00

Sheerani Total 3.11 2.30 2.72 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban - - - - - -Rural 3.11 2.30 2.72 100.00 100.00 100.00

Sibbi Total 4.26 6.70 5.37 64.82 71.12 68.40Urban 4.70 8.38 6.41 43.17 63.23 55.34Rural 3.99 5.59 4.71 80.85 78.96 79.84

137

TABLE 3.1: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION FALLEN SICK OR INJURED DURING LAST TWO WEEKS OF THE INTERVIEW AND BY HEALTH CONSULTATION.

Page 159: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL SICK OR INJURED HEALTH CONSULTATIONPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Harnai Total 3.45 5.59 4.45 90.58 97.86 94.86Urban 11.11 8.29 9.71 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 2.89 5.37 4.04 87.92 97.59 93.90

Ziarat Total 3.52 6.36 4.83 97.80 96.57 97.06Urban 0.00 3.43 1.49 0.00 100.00 100.00Rural 3.73 6.52 5.02 97.80 96.47 97.00

Kohlu Total 5.37 6.04 5.70 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 5.95 6.42 6.16 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 5.27 5.98 5.63 100.00 100.00 100.00

Dera Bugti Total 1.77 2.58 2.15 98.42 96.49 97.35Urban 0.76 4.16 2.37 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 1.86 2.44 2.13 98.37 95.96 97.09

Bolan/ Kachhi Total 3.23 3.58 3.39 85.89 84.04 84.99Urban 2.65 2.44 2.55 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 3.39 3.87 3.61 82.87 81.49 82.18

Jaffarabad Total 1.78 3.52 2.61 100.00 97.74 98.55Urban 1.45 1.61 1.53 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 1.90 4.24 3.00 100.00 97.41 98.28

Nasirabad Total 3.49 3.78 3.63 98.26 100.00 99.12Urban 2.82 3.07 2.94 92.09 100.00 96.03Rural 3.73 4.05 3.88 100.00 100.00 100.00

Jhal Magsi Total 4.98 7.46 6.12 58.35 53.25 55.51Urban 3.59 2.24 2.99 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 5.05 7.70 6.26 56.94 52.64 54.52

Kalat Total 4.86 7.57 6.08 98.91 100.00 99.52Urban 8.30 10.19 9.21 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 4.15 6.95 5.39 98.46 100.00 99.34

Mastung Total 2.57 3.41 2.96 100.00 98.96 99.45Urban 5.64 7.10 6.37 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 1.83 2.33 2.05 100.00 98.03 98.99

Khuzdar Total 4.63 7.68 6.01 96.72 99.37 98.25Urban 6.55 8.92 7.72 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 3.72 6.92 5.10 94.00 98.86 96.84

Awaran Total 3.61 6.78 4.97 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban - - - - - -Rural 3.61 6.78 4.97 100.00 100.00 100.00

Kharan Total 3.95 6.26 5.04 100.00 95.86 97.57Urban 3.06 3.85 3.45 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 4.40 7.65 5.89 100.00 94.66 96.81

Washuk Total 3.59 4.47 3.99 83.36 89.58 86.53Urban - - - - - -Rural 3.59 4.47 3.99 83.36 89.58 86.53

138

TABLE 3.1: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION FALLEN SICK OR INJURED DURING LAST TWO WEEKS OF THE INTERVIEW AND BY HEALTH CONSULTATION.

Page 160: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL SICK OR INJURED HEALTH CONSULTATIONPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Lasbela Total 7.27 9.80 8.45 100.00 97.64 98.72Urban 8.97 9.58 9.27 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 6.32 9.95 7.93 100.00 96.02 97.79

Gwader Total 4.84 8.29 6.30 99.53 100.00 99.79Urban 2.99 3.83 3.34 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 7.48 14.55 10.49 99.27 100.00 99.70

NOTES:NOTES:1. The Panjgur and Kech districts have been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

139

TABLE 3.1: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION FALLEN SICK OR INJURED DURING LAST TWO WEEKS OF THE INTERVIEW AND BY HEALTH CONSULTATION.

Page 161: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

Pakistan Total 12.44 11.40 11.93 97.51 98.42 97.93Urban 15.88 14.23 15.07 95.90 98.78 97.23Rural 10.87 10.08 10.49 98.58 98.18 98.40

Punjab Total 11.26 9.21 10.27 97.67 98.50 98.03Urban 13.08 10.36 11.79 95.55 98.07 96.60Rural 10.44 8.71 9.60 98.87 98.72 98.81

Islamabad Total 7.19 2.00 4.77 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 3.70 1.34 2.66 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 16.36 3.28 9.57 100.00 100.00 100.00

Attock Total 7.61 7.03 7.34 91.88 75.40 84.46Urban 12.53 12.04 12.28 83.64 58.50 71.21Rural 5.49 4.38 4.99 100.00 100.00 100.00

Rawalpindi Total 11.23 9.80 10.55 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 17.26 11.72 14.62 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 4.79 7.74 6.19 100.00 100.00 100.00

Jehlum Total 6.46 4.86 5.78 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 8.87 9.15 8.97 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 5.12 3.17 4.24 100.00 100.00 100.00

Chakwal Total 10.30 7.56 8.88 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 0.00 5.20 4.17 0.00 100.00 100.00Rural 10.79 8.05 9.47 100.00 100.00 100.00

Sargodha Total 14.29 14.35 14.32 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 14.89 20.32 17.18 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 13.96 11.94 12.95 100.00 100.00 100.00

Bhakhar Total 4.08 5.33 4.70 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 4.60 2.83 3.96 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 3.96 5.65 4.84 100.00 100.00 100.00

Khushab Total 11.51 9.48 10.54 98.91 87.64 94.09Urban 3.99 7.77 6.02 100.00 69.50 78.88Rural 14.36 10.40 12.59 98.80 94.96 97.38

Mianwali Total 8.26 5.98 7.13 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 13.26 7.88 10.69 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 6.85 5.49 6.17 100.00 100.00 100.00

Faisalabad Total 15.12 11.97 13.55 95.10 97.19 96.02Urban 14.69 11.05 12.92 94.44 100.00 96.75Rural 15.47 12.67 14.05 95.62 95.34 95.49

Chiniot Total 11.98 12.82 12.42 100.00 98.05 98.95Urban 12.89 13.30 13.12 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 11.45 12.50 11.99 100.00 96.71 98.24

Jhang Total 14.88 12.30 13.56 95.89 98.62 97.16Urban 17.39 18.72 18.11 100.00 95.64 97.55Rural 14.32 10.61 12.44 94.76 100.00 97.02

SICK OR INJURED HEALTH CONSULTATIONPROVINCE & DISTRICT

140

TABLE 3.2: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION UNDER 5 YEARS FALLEN SICK OR INJURED DURING LAST TWO WEEKS OF THE INTERVIEW AND BY HEALTH CONSULTATION.

Page 162: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL SICK OR INJURED HEALTH CONSULTATIONPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Toba Tek Singh Total 15.27 11.61 13.50 98.21 94.16 96.53Urban 24.94 15.81 21.03 95.37 84.83 91.98Rural 12.26 10.63 11.45 100.00 97.42 98.81

Gujranwala Total 4.50 7.14 5.69 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 2.92 10.47 6.53 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 6.07 2.89 4.75 100.00 100.00 100.00

Hafizabad Total 9.23 6.19 7.71 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 3.87 3.25 3.57 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 11.48 7.36 9.40 100.00 100.00 100.00

Gujrat Total 3.42 3.13 3.28 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 5.11 4.02 4.56 100.00 100.00 100.00

Mandi Bahuddin Total 7.15 7.12 7.14 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 7.82 17.61 12.72 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 7.02 4.67 5.97 100.00 100.00 100.00

Sialkot Total 8.15 2.22 5.30 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 2.23 0.00 1.05 100.00 0.00 100.00Rural 10.01 3.12 6.82 100.00 100.00 100.00

Narowal Total 6.63 5.48 6.07 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 7.24 18.63 12.51 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 6.52 3.24 4.91 100.00 100.00 100.00

Lahore Total 15.72 8.17 12.27 93.55 100.00 95.51Urban 17.48 10.49 14.41 92.17 100.00 94.68Rural 10.68 2.99 6.83 100.00 100.00 100.00

Kasur Total 7.26 3.74 5.45 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 16.59 8.92 12.87 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 5.36 2.82 4.04 100.00 100.00 100.00

Sheikhupura Total 8.90 7.25 8.09 96.32 82.07 90.06Urban 13.42 9.61 11.57 100.00 86.49 94.58Rural 7.19 6.40 6.80 93.73 79.65 87.20

Nankana Sahib Total 11.07 7.93 9.52 93.20 90.24 91.99Urban 15.26 9.15 12.47 83.68 67.53 78.28Rural 9.26 7.50 8.37 100.00 100.00 100.00

Okara Total 5.69 6.71 6.18 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 7.84 8.03 7.94 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 5.02 6.13 5.53 100.00 100.00 100.00

Sahiwal Total 7.05 6.08 6.59 92.66 100.00 95.91Urban 5.50 6.31 5.90 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 7.37 6.03 6.73 91.52 100.00 95.14

Pakpatten Total 11.32 6.64 9.18 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 9.67 11.90 10.72 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 11.56 5.85 8.95 100.00 100.00 100.00

141

TABLE 3.2: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION UNDER 5 YEARS FALLEN SICK OR INJURED DURING LAST TWO WEEKS OF THE INTERVIEW AND BY HEALTH CONSULTATION.

Page 163: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL SICK OR INJURED HEALTH CONSULTATIONPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Vehari Total 15.11 10.82 12.95 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 21.43 3.28 11.55 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 14.08 12.30 13.20 100.00 100.00 100.00

Multan Total 9.95 7.86 8.97 98.32 98.88 98.55Urban 13.66 9.23 11.59 96.71 100.00 97.94Rural 7.75 7.03 7.42 100.00 97.99 99.12

Lodhran Total 12.71 11.67 12.22 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 5.62 12.10 8.74 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 13.94 11.60 12.84 100.00 100.00 100.00

Khanewal Total 11.37 9.38 10.40 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 13.33 11.69 12.49 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 10.97 8.82 9.94 100.00 100.00 100.00

D. G. Khan Total 16.11 15.78 15.94 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 13.32 11.16 12.46 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 16.47 16.17 16.32 100.00 100.00 100.00

Rajanpur Total 5.81 7.51 6.67 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 9.14 13.99 11.70 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 5.26 6.31 5.79 100.00 100.00 100.00

Layyah Total 18.16 17.36 17.75 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 20.73 23.49 22.45 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 17.93 16.43 17.19 100.00 100.00 100.00

Muzaffar Garh Total 8.88 8.25 8.56 100.00 98.97 99.50Urban 11.65 6.40 9.03 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 8.52 8.48 8.50 100.00 98.87 99.44

Bahawalpur Total 22.60 20.62 21.62 96.17 100.00 97.98Urban 22.77 19.65 21.11 91.39 100.00 95.64Rural 22.54 21.04 21.82 97.87 100.00 98.86

Bahawalnagar Total 3.59 2.53 3.06 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 0.00 2.79 1.49 0.00 100.00 100.00Rural 4.41 2.46 3.45 100.00 100.00 100.00

Rahim Yar Khan Total 13.60 13.46 13.53 98.18 99.02 98.58Urban 18.89 12.36 15.53 96.41 100.00 97.88Rural 12.55 13.72 13.11 98.71 98.82 98.76

NOTES:1. Fallen Sick or Injured: Number of persons (under age five years) fallen sick or injured expressed as percentage of total population during last two weeks. under age five years2. . Health Consultation: Number of persons who consulted for treatment expressed as percentage of total persons fallen sick or injured during last two weeks.

142

TABLE 3.2: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION UNDER 5 YEARS FALLEN SICK OR INJURED DURING LAST TWO WEEKS OF THE INTERVIEW AND BY HEALTH CONSULTATION.

Page 164: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL SICK OR INJURED HEALTH CONSULTATIONPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Sindh Total 14.08 14.27 14.17 96.49 98.47 97.48Urban 20.66 19.91 20.27 95.73 99.66 97.72Rural 9.54 9.87 9.70 97.64 96.59 97.12

Jacobabad Total 1.02 0.87 0.94 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 3.16 2.70 2.93 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 0.44 0.39 0.42 100.00 100.00 100.00

Kashmore Total 1.20 0.53 0.85 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 1.97 0.00 0.99 100.00 0.00 100.00Rural 0.90 0.71 0.80 100.00 100.00 100.00

Shikarpur Total 5.36 7.21 6.23 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 5.50 7.65 6.48 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 5.32 7.08 6.15 100.00 100.00 100.00

Larkana Total 4.76 1.71 3.22 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 9.51 2.93 6.04 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 2.21 0.95 1.59 100.00 100.00 100.00

Shahdadkot Total 2.39 1.35 1.87 100.00 87.39 95.47Urban 7.32 4.45 5.81 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 1.54 0.74 1.14 100.00 72.44 91.20

Sukkur Total 5.78 5.40 5.58 97.76 96.37 97.04Urban 6.05 5.34 5.65 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 5.50 5.49 5.49 95.14 91.54 93.34

Ghotki Total 6.70 6.05 6.38 97.82 94.36 96.20Urban 17.14 7.06 11.79 100.00 77.92 93.00Rural 4.27 5.76 4.99 95.78 100.00 98.14

Khairpur Total 2.25 2.43 2.34 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 4.58 5.02 4.79 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 1.31 1.48 1.39 100.00 100.00 100.00

Nowshero Feroze Total 12.67 16.79 14.76 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 13.67 32.69 24.42 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 12.51 13.46 12.98 100.00 100.00 100.00

Shaheed Benazirabad Total 8.88 10.01 9.44 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 16.20 4.98 10.32 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 6.37 12.03 9.11 100.00 100.00 100.00

Dadu Total 11.89 15.69 13.74 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 8.16 9.70 8.95 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 12.51 16.78 14.58 100.00 100.00 100.00

Jamshoro Total 15.88 14.50 15.24 93.90 100.00 96.60Urban 20.85 19.07 19.95 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 14.20 12.57 13.46 90.85 100.00 94.69

Hyderabad Total 11.14 14.39 12.60 97.75 100.00 98.91Urban 10.33 14.80 12.31 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 14.64 12.84 13.78 90.92 100.00 94.95

143

TABLE 3.2: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION UNDER 5 YEARS FALLEN SICK OR INJURED DURING LAST TWO WEEKS OF THE INTERVIEW AND BY HEALTH CONSULTATION.

Page 165: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL SICK OR INJURED HEALTH CONSULTATIONPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Tando Allah Yar Total 14.07 14.81 14.45 100.00 95.04 97.39Urban 23.15 21.72 22.41 100.00 83.79 91.91Rural 11.69 12.99 12.36 100.00 100.00 100.00

Tando Muhammad Khan Total 12.56 13.16 12.85 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 10.24 22.01 15.26 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 12.89 12.14 12.53 100.00 100.00 100.00

Matiari Total 12.72 12.74 12.73 100.00 96.55 98.42Urban 11.29 18.81 14.72 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 13.23 10.63 12.04 100.00 94.43 97.74

Badin Total 12.90 14.09 13.49 98.95 100.00 99.49Urban 17.43 14.46 15.97 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 11.44 13.98 12.69 98.44 100.00 99.28

Thatta Total 34.15 41.52 38.03 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 28.29 20.68 23.75 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 34.76 44.53 39.81 100.00 100.00 100.00

Sujawal Total 30.95 32.42 31.77 95.94 95.46 95.66Urban 22.20 27.19 25.41 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 32.29 33.65 33.02 95.51 94.60 95.01

Sanghar Total 11.01 11.58 11.30 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 5.69 12.01 9.34 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 12.22 11.44 11.84 100.00 100.00 100.00

Mir Pur Khas Total 3.67 3.21 3.45 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 1.70 1.91 1.81 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 4.20 3.62 3.93 100.00 100.00 100.00

Umer Kot Total 2.06 1.88 1.97 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 8.13 6.09 7.13 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 0.84 1.02 0.93 100.00 100.00 100.00

Tharparkar Total 13.50 11.96 12.78 98.77 98.03 98.45Urban 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 14.11 12.83 13.52 98.77 98.03 98.45

Karachi Total 31.59 28.83 30.17 94.37 98.14 96.23Urban 31.15 28.61 29.81 94.52 100.00 97.30Rural 34.88 31.74 33.65 93.35 76.06 86.99

144

TABLE 3.2: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION UNDER 5 YEARS FALLEN SICK OR INJURED DURING LAST TWO WEEKS OF THE INTERVIEW AND BY HEALTH CONSULTATION.

Page 166: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL SICK OR INJURED HEALTH CONSULTATIONPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Total 16.13 16.41 16.27 99.07 98.62 98.85Urban 19.60 18.29 18.95 99.65 98.66 99.17Rural 15.43 16.00 15.70 98.93 98.61 98.77

Chitral Total 5.74 5.72 5.73 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 25.37 0.00 11.56 100.00 0.00 100.00Rural 3.98 6.26 5.19 100.00 100.00 100.00

Upper Dir Total 13.27 11.14 12.20 95.25 82.70 89.48Urban 33.03 25.00 28.44 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 12.74 10.66 11.70 94.92 81.27 88.69

Lower Dir Total 6.01 5.81 5.90 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 6.32 6.22 6.27 100.00 100.00 100.00

Swat Total 16.39 13.72 14.99 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 28.83 9.64 16.06 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 14.72 14.82 14.77 100.00 100.00 100.00

Shangla Total 15.24 15.06 15.15 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban - - - - - -Rural 15.24 15.06 15.15 100.00 100.00 100.00

Buner Total 14.40 19.59 16.74 97.38 98.15 97.79Urban - - - - - -Rural 14.40 19.59 16.74 97.38 98.15 97.79

Malakand PA Total 9.08 9.63 9.37 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 2.51 28.79 15.59 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 10.62 5.69 8.01 100.00 100.00 100.00

Kohistan Total 5.84 6.58 6.23 77.38 92.51 85.81Urban - - - - - -Rural 5.84 6.58 6.23 77.38 92.51 85.81

Manshera Total 4.11 3.42 3.79 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 0.00 17.49 8.75 0.00 100.00 100.00Rural 4.52 1.82 3.26 100.00 100.00 100.00

Batagram Total 10.69 10.55 10.62 100.00 97.79 98.89Urban - - - - - -Rural 10.69 10.55 10.62 100.00 97.79 98.89

Abbottabad Total 4.37 7.20 5.73 100.00 91.56 94.90Urban 8.13 8.47 8.30 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 3.43 6.86 5.08 100.00 88.84 92.77

Haripur Total 9.87 7.69 8.93 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 14.13 0.00 8.80 100.00 0.00 100.00Rural 9.05 8.83 8.95 100.00 100.00 100.00

145

TABLE 3.2: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION UNDER 5 YEARS FALLEN SICK OR INJURED DURING LAST TWO WEEKS OF THE INTERVIEW AND BY HEALTH CONSULTATION.

Page 167: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL SICK OR INJURED HEALTH CONSULTATIONPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Tor Garh Total 4.67 8.25 6.32 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban - - - - - -Rural 4.67 8.25 6.32 100.00 100.00 100.00

Mardan Total 24.39 25.44 24.90 100.00 98.17 99.08Urban 23.67 32.06 28.15 100.00 95.08 97.01Rural 24.62 22.66 23.70 100.00 100.00 100.00

Swabi Total 13.90 11.94 13.01 94.86 100.00 97.01Urban 7.04 0.00 4.19 100.00 0.00 100.00Rural 15.31 13.85 14.63 94.37 100.00 96.85

Charsadda Total 24.24 19.89 22.06 98.77 100.00 99.33Urban 43.33 17.81 32.03 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 21.31 20.14 20.71 98.39 100.00 99.19

Peshawar Total 25.08 27.06 25.94 100.00 99.12 99.60Urban 21.62 19.74 20.74 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 27.77 34.69 30.53 100.00 98.60 99.37

Nowsehra Total 20.10 28.68 24.79 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 23.48 23.15 23.30 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 17.72 32.68 25.85 100.00 100.00 100.00

Kohat Total 23.45 21.39 22.55 98.86 100.00 99.33Urban 10.59 7.91 9.27 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 26.83 26.18 26.56 98.75 100.00 99.26

Hangu Total 26.99 23.43 25.23 98.48 95.89 97.28Urban 20.58 27.24 23.95 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 28.43 22.53 25.52 98.23 94.71 96.70

Karak Total 18.94 17.12 18.01 97.70 100.00 98.82Urban 26.88 21.83 25.00 74.67 100.00 82.89Rural 18.40 16.94 17.64 100.00 100.00 100.00

Bannu Total 15.91 19.67 17.82 98.35 100.00 99.28Urban 8.00 26.42 16.77 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 16.48 19.24 17.89 98.29 100.00 99.23

Lakki Marwat Total 17.06 18.30 17.61 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 27.08 16.73 21.39 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 16.08 18.56 17.14 100.00 100.00 100.00

D. I. Khan Total 11.79 16.82 14.11 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 13.09 0.00 8.48 100.00 0.00 100.00Rural 11.64 18.02 14.66 100.00 100.00 100.00

Tank Total 18.45 13.54 16.02 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 10.40 9.75 10.10 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 19.69 14.04 16.87 100.00 100.00 100.00

146

TABLE 3.2: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION UNDER 5 YEARS FALLEN SICK OR INJURED DURING LAST TWO WEEKS OF THE INTERVIEW AND BY HEALTH CONSULTATION.

Page 168: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL SICK OR INJURED HEALTH CONSULTATIONPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Balochistan Total 7.92 7.91 7.92 94.90 95.83 95.36Urban 11.63 8.97 10.35 92.69 93.51 93.03Rural 6.47 7.52 6.99 96.46 96.85 96.67

Quetta Total 6.65 8.76 7.72 86.82 91.36 89.45Urban 9.04 6.81 7.90 84.28 82.15 83.34Rural 2.80 11.98 7.44 100.00 100.00 100.00

Pishin Total 1.44 4.80 3.00 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 4.07 0.00 2.48 100.00 0.00 100.00Rural 1.14 5.19 3.06 100.00 100.00 100.00

Killa Abdullah Total 1.83 1.55 1.70 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 3.28 0.00 2.18 100.00 0.00 100.00Rural 1.61 1.67 1.64 100.00 100.00 100.00

Chaghai Total 10.49 9.01 9.66 100.00 88.30 93.91Urban 22.35 7.75 16.24 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 9.05 9.09 9.07 100.00 87.65 92.94

Nushki Total 14.24 11.04 12.46 72.94 100.00 86.27Urban 35.70 4.04 16.94 50.55 100.00 57.55Rural 9.42 12.93 11.34 91.96 100.00 96.97

Loralai Total 17.22 16.01 16.61 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 17.91 18.39 18.18 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 17.04 15.12 16.11 100.00 100.00 100.00

Barkhan Total 19.53 23.79 21.86 91.55 92.18 91.92Urban 0.00 40.86 20.60 0.00 100.00 100.00Rural 21.85 22.12 22.00 91.55 90.76 91.11

Musa Khel Total 13.09 14.76 13.86 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 18.28 22.60 20.53 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 11.38 11.13 11.27 100.00 100.00 100.00

Killa Saifullah Total 11.21 11.29 11.26 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 19.78 12.45 15.92 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 7.68 10.92 9.58 100.00 100.00 100.00

Zhob Total 13.99 16.18 15.17 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 15.60 8.15 11.45 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 13.64 18.06 16.01 100.00 100.00 100.00

Sheerani Total 7.60 0.00 4.36 100.00 0.00 100.00Urban - - - - - -Rural 7.60 0.00 4.36 100.00 0.00 100.00

Sibbi Total 6.32 11.30 8.75 38.79 70.92 59.00Urban 10.01 11.94 11.01 0.00 64.90 36.58Rural 4.00 10.80 7.15 100.00 76.19 83.34

147

TABLE 3.2: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION UNDER 5 YEARS FALLEN SICK OR INJURED DURING LAST TWO WEEKS OF THE INTERVIEW AND BY HEALTH CONSULTATION.

Page 169: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL SICK OR INJURED HEALTH CONSULTATIONPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Harnai Total 6.00 3.36 4.59 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 26.27 8.85 20.66 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 3.68 3.12 3.37 100.00 100.00 100.00

Ziarat Total 3.47 1.04 2.21 83.07 100.00 87.21Urban 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 3.64 1.11 2.34 83.07 100.00 87.21

Kohlu Total 6.52 8.54 7.66 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 7.97 9.79 9.03 100.00 100.00 100.00

Dera Bugti Total 6.37 1.53 4.12 98.93 94.90 98.24Urban 0.00 4.66 2.14 0.00 100.00 100.00Rural 6.90 1.28 4.28 98.93 93.41 98.16

Bolan/ Kachhi Total 5.18 6.16 5.66 72.58 91.55 82.68Urban 5.18 0.00 2.79 100.00 0.00 100.00Rural 5.17 7.69 6.42 64.73 91.55 80.66

Jaffarabad Total 4.42 5.80 5.10 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 5.33 5.59 5.45 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 4.10 5.86 4.99 100.00 100.00 100.00

Nasirabad Total 10.83 4.61 7.76 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 1.48 3.55 2.44 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 13.73 4.89 9.29 100.00 100.00 100.00

Jhal Magsi Total 10.35 8.03 9.26 69.39 61.64 66.24Urban 9.09 9.92 9.28 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 10.42 8.00 9.26 67.84 60.73 64.91

Kalat Total 19.56 13.81 16.70 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 38.73 11.16 27.38 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 12.82 14.41 13.65 100.00 100.00 100.00

Mastung Total 9.15 11.05 10.20 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 24.80 33.33 30.00 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 5.96 4.92 5.40 100.00 100.00 100.00

Khuzdar Total 9.99 10.39 10.16 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 17.16 13.32 15.24 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 6.44 8.16 7.12 100.00 100.00 100.00

Awaran Total 2.72 0.69 1.88 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban - - - - - -Rural 2.72 0.69 1.88 100.00 100.00 100.00

Kharan Total 9.21 11.26 10.19 100.00 93.51 96.55Urban 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 14.59 14.83 14.72 100.00 93.51 96.55

148

TABLE 3.2: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION UNDER 5 YEARS FALLEN SICK OR INJURED DURING LAST TWO WEEKS OF THE INTERVIEW AND BY HEALTH CONSULTATION.

Page 170: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL SICK OR INJURED HEALTH CONSULTATIONPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Washuk Total 1.59 0.92 1.29 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban - - - - - -Rural 1.59 0.92 1.29 100.00 100.00 100.00

Lasbela Total 22.28 19.87 21.17 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 41.22 28.83 35.73 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 7.93 13.85 10.73 100.00 100.00 100.00

Gwader Total 9.06 6.47 8.04 100.00 100.00 100.00Urban 8.38 4.94 7.12 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 10.23 8.46 9.47 100.00 100.00 100.00

NOTES:NOTES:1. The Panjgur and Kech districts have been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

149

TABLE 3.2: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION UNDER 5 YEARS FALLEN SICK OR INJURED DURING LAST TWO WEEKS OF THE INTERVIEW AND BY HEALTH CONSULTATION.

Page 171: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PRIVATE PUBLIC RHC/ HAKEEM/ HOMEO CHEMIST/ SAINA/DISP/HOSP DISP/HOSP BHU HERBALIST PATH PHARMACY SAINI

Pakistan Total 70.28 20.34 3.40 1.47 0.51 3.20 0.54 0.27Urban 76.45 19.15 0.36 0.87 0.65 1.95 0.42 0.13Rural 66.04 21.15 5.48 1.88 0.41 4.06 0.61 0.37

Punjab Total 77.23 16.95 1.28 1.79 0.48 1.58 0.35 0.34Urban 76.65 20.39 0.05 1.08 0.41 0.97 0.24 0.22Rural 77.55 15.00 1.98 2.19 0.52 1.93 0.42 0.41

Islamabad Total 68.19 30.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.59 0.00Urban 57.34 42.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 79.64 18.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.78 1.21 0.00

Attock Total 75.18 21.86 0.71 0.93 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.57Urban 73.40 23.91 0.00 1.25 1.45 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 77.07 19.68 1.48 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.17

Rawalpindi Total 74.28 24.84 0.18 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00Urban 78.43 20.42 0.00 0.00 1.15 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 67.93 31.62 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Jehlum Total 74.45 24.53 0.00 0.00 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.00Urban 72.66 27.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 75.44 22.99 0.00 0.00 1.57 0.00 0.00 0.00

Chakwal Total 80.76 16.90 0.24 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.87Urban 72.61 27.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 81.52 15.93 0.26 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.95

Sargodha Total 75.20 17.10 1.18 1.31 0.00 4.47 0.39 0.35Urban 78.23 14.97 0.00 0.91 0.00 4.16 0.91 0.83Rural 72.94 18.68 2.06 1.62 0.00 4.70 0.00 0.00

Bhakhar Total 74.78 20.66 2.83 1.32 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00Urban 68.79 24.44 0.00 6.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 76.09 19.83 3.45 0.13 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.00

Khushab Total 79.88 13.68 1.40 1.82 1.36 1.50 0.25 0.10Urban 76.81 15.30 0.00 0.00 4.11 3.78 0.00 0.00Rural 81.41 12.88 2.10 2.72 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.14

Mianwali Total 67.04 26.79 1.51 2.71 1.60 0.00 0.00 0.36Urban 64.96 31.94 0.00 0.00 3.10 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 67.89 24.69 2.12 3.81 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.51

Faisalabad Total 79.34 14.21 3.11 2.44 0.25 0.22 0.44 0.00Urban 80.23 16.98 0.00 1.93 0.00 0.43 0.43 0.00Rural 78.45 11.43 6.22 2.95 0.50 0.00 0.46 0.00

Chiniot Total 84.82 8.92 1.80 0.99 0.33 0.00 1.18 1.94Urban 87.74 12.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 82.94 6.78 2.96 1.63 0.55 0.00 1.94 3.20

Jhang Total 81.78 12.41 0.11 3.56 0.32 0.72 0.51 0.59Urban 73.97 18.43 0.37 4.06 0.00 1.61 0.90 0.67Rural 84.86 10.04 0.00 3.36 0.45 0.37 0.36 0.56

Toba Tek Singh Total 84.92 10.08 0.38 1.92 0.99 1.07 0.51 0.12Urban 91.38 5.88 0.71 0.00 1.10 0.93 0.00 0.00Rural 82.38 11.74 0.25 2.67 0.95 1.13 0.71 0.17

HEALTH PROVIDER / CONSULTED

OTHER

TABLE 3.3: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HEALTH CONSULTATIONS IN PAST 2 WEEKS BY TYPE OF HEALTH PROVIDER CONSULTED.

PROVINCE & DISTRICT

150

Page 172: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PRIVATE PUBLIC RHC/ HAKEEM/ HOMEO CHEMIST/ SAINA/DISP/HOSP DISP/HOSP BHU HERBALIST PATH PHARMACY SAINI

HEALTH PROVIDER / CONSULTED

OTHER

TABLE 3.3: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HEALTH CONSULTATIONS IN PAST 2 WEEKS BY TYPE OF HEALTH PROVIDER CONSULTED.

PROVINCE & DISTRICT

Gujranwala Total 69.03 19.73 4.71 3.19 0.00 2.02 1.08 0.23Urban 70.70 24.43 0.00 2.55 0.00 1.68 0.63 0.00Rural 66.46 12.51 11.93 4.18 0.00 2.55 1.78 0.59

Hafizabad Total 82.00 12.07 2.58 1.75 0.00 1.01 0.30 0.30Urban 61.08 36.15 0.00 2.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 89.49 3.44 3.50 1.39 0.00 1.37 0.41 0.41

Gujrat Total 52.30 21.76 11.84 8.86 0.00 5.24 0.00 0.00Urban 76.24 11.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.26 0.00 0.00Rural 47.66 23.74 14.13 10.58 0.00 3.88 0.00 0.00

Mandi Bahuddin Total 72.92 13.50 8.08 4.49 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.52Urban 77.56 15.28 0.00 7.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 72.02 13.16 9.66 3.97 0.00 0.58 0.00 0.62

Sialkot Total 84.03 10.11 0.56 1.96 0.00 0.79 0.33 2.22Urban 85.16 6.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.12 0.00 4.14Rural 83.76 10.94 0.70 2.43 0.00 0.00 0.40 1.77

Narowal Total 86.23 12.87 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.51Urban 72.22 27.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 90.97 7.82 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.68

Lahore Total 77.85 21.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.00 0.00Urban 77.63 21.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00Rural 78.92 19.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.46 0.00 0.00

Kasur Total 79.83 19.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40Urban 77.86 22.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 80.80 18.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60

Sheikhupura Total 75.02 18.52 3.27 1.19 0.13 0.53 0.40 0.95Urban 78.97 18.77 0.00 1.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.09Rural 72.94 18.39 4.98 1.21 0.20 0.80 0.61 0.87

Nankana Sahib Total 80.52 17.69 0.36 1.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Urban 77.05 22.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 82.83 14.20 0.60 2.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Okara Total 82.64 11.22 3.07 1.48 0.00 0.00 1.59 0.00Urban 85.40 14.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 81.47 9.78 4.37 2.11 0.00 0.00 2.27 0.00

Sahiwal Total 88.56 5.53 5.66 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Urban 88.75 11.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 88.54 4.71 6.47 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Pakpatten Total 85.63 10.59 2.06 1.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Urban 92.83 7.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 84.16 11.30 2.49 2.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Vehari Total 79.96 16.01 0.94 0.38 0.63 0.95 0.00 1.14Urban 72.56 24.79 0.00 0.00 2.65 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 82.28 13.26 1.23 0.49 0.00 1.24 0.00 1.49

Multan Total 64.36 20.91 0.34 5.26 1.05 6.72 1.06 0.30Urban 66.78 24.39 0.00 2.57 0.52 4.99 0.75 0.00Rural 62.59 18.35 0.60 7.24 1.43 7.99 1.29 0.53

151

Page 173: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PRIVATE PUBLIC RHC/ HAKEEM/ HOMEO CHEMIST/ SAINA/DISP/HOSP DISP/HOSP BHU HERBALIST PATH PHARMACY SAINI

HEALTH PROVIDER / CONSULTED

OTHER

TABLE 3.3: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HEALTH CONSULTATIONS IN PAST 2 WEEKS BY TYPE OF HEALTH PROVIDER CONSULTED.

PROVINCE & DISTRICT

Lodhran Total 63.32 17.99 1.41 1.39 0.40 14.45 0.61 0.43Urban 86.81 8.98 0.00 1.55 0.00 0.00 2.66 0.00Rural 60.00 19.26 1.61 1.37 0.45 16.49 0.32 0.49

Khanewal Total 76.11 16.67 0.13 1.41 1.01 2.43 1.64 0.61Urban 84.10 10.53 0.00 2.18 0.00 0.89 1.03 1.27Rural 73.91 18.36 0.17 1.19 1.29 2.85 1.80 0.42

D. G. Khan Total 69.84 21.18 0.00 2.94 1.19 4.65 0.09 0.12Urban 66.84 27.32 0.00 5.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 70.29 20.25 0.00 2.50 1.37 5.35 0.10 0.14

Rajanpur Total 68.98 25.07 0.00 5.60 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00Urban 85.15 14.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 64.57 27.86 0.00 7.13 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00

Layyah Total 78.09 19.39 0.93 0.70 0.23 0.00 0.49 0.17Urban 74.58 21.94 0.00 2.01 1.47 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 78.74 18.92 1.11 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.20

Muzaffar Garh Total 75.72 14.96 0.20 5.04 0.93 2.45 0.50 0.19Urban 64.36 25.35 0.00 5.80 2.59 1.90 0.00 0.00Rural 77.89 12.99 0.24 4.89 0.62 2.56 0.60 0.22

Bahawalpur Total 81.74 14.31 1.13 0.67 0.60 0.54 0.21 0.80Urban 69.00 28.08 0.00 0.53 0.96 0.00 0.28 1.15Rural 86.90 8.74 1.59 0.73 0.45 0.75 0.18 0.66

Bahawalnagar Total 52.73 33.49 0.61 3.30 4.89 4.99 0.00 0.00Urban 50.10 40.28 0.00 9.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 53.32 31.94 0.75 1.86 6.00 6.13 0.00 0.00

Rahim Yar Khan Total 91.28 6.96 0.27 0.54 0.29 0.33 0.21 0.11Urban 89.26 9.57 0.43 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.39 0.00Rural 91.78 6.31 0.23 0.68 0.28 0.41 0.17 0.14

NOTES:1. Number of persons fallen sick or injured who consulted for treatment the above health providers expressed as percentage of total population fallen sick or injured during the last two weeks.

152

Page 174: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PRIVATE PUBLIC RHC/ HAKEEM/ HOMEO CHEMIST/ SAINA/DISP/HOSP DISP/HOSP BHU HERBALIST PATH PHARMACY SAINI

HEALTH PROVIDER / CONSULTED

OTHER

TABLE 3.3: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HEALTH CONSULTATIONS IN PAST 2 WEEKS BY TYPE OF HEALTH PROVIDER CONSULTED.

PROVINCE & DISTRICT

Sindh Total 75.59 19.94 1.80 0.85 0.80 0.40 0.40 0.21Urban 84.05 13.51 0.23 0.57 1.07 0.49 0.05 0.04Rural 59.86 31.90 4.74 1.38 0.29 0.24 1.07 0.52

Jacobabad Total 73.73 22.96 3.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Urban 68.68 31.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 76.55 18.28 5.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Kashmore Total 93.76 6.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Urban 93.79 6.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 93.73 6.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Shikarpur Total 81.89 17.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.56Urban 88.32 10.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.65Rural 78.57 21.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Larkana Total 71.99 22.69 0.00 4.56 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.00Urban 78.84 15.24 0.00 5.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 49.02 47.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.31 0.00

Shahdadkot Total 78.60 19.96 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.81Urban 73.05 25.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.52Rural 84.92 13.73 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.00 0.00 0.00

Sukkur Total 79.79 17.51 1.05 1.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Urban 81.56 16.96 0.00 1.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 77.57 18.21 2.37 1.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Ghotki Total 80.44 16.41 2.93 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Urban 88.22 7.82 3.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 76.77 20.46 2.43 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Khairpur Total 56.30 7.96 31.49 2.53 0.41 0.00 1.30 0.00Urban 69.40 15.28 11.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.82 0.00Rural 49.51 4.17 41.85 3.84 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00

Nowshero Feroze Total 75.56 23.25 0.00 0.88 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00Urban 90.26 6.59 0.00 3.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 69.89 29.67 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00

Shaheed Benazirabad Total 53.67 32.66 12.90 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.00 0.00Urban 78.86 21.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 39.48 39.15 20.17 0.00 0.00 1.20 0.00 0.00

Dadu Total 47.71 48.88 1.90 1.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Urban 84.32 15.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 39.88 55.97 2.31 1.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Jamshoro Total 55.16 36.03 6.68 1.23 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.18Urban 56.45 40.27 0.00 3.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 54.58 34.13 9.68 0.32 1.03 0.00 0.00 0.26

Hyderabad Total 77.67 22.04 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Urban 78.38 21.48 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 73.48 25.31 1.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

153

Page 175: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PRIVATE PUBLIC RHC/ HAKEEM/ HOMEO CHEMIST/ SAINA/DISP/HOSP DISP/HOSP BHU HERBALIST PATH PHARMACY SAINI

HEALTH PROVIDER / CONSULTED

OTHER

TABLE 3.3: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HEALTH CONSULTATIONS IN PAST 2 WEEKS BY TYPE OF HEALTH PROVIDER CONSULTED.

PROVINCE & DISTRICT

Tando Allah Yar Total 66.97 32.12 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.17Urban 75.64 23.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.15 0.00Rural 63.09 36.12 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25

Tando Muhammad Khan Total 58.46 40.70 0.00 0.24 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00Urban 54.20 45.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 59.55 39.40 0.00 0.30 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00

Matiari Total 73.85 23.81 1.92 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Urban 76.92 23.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 72.40 24.15 2.84 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Badin Total 63.27 33.14 1.58 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.80Urban 76.28 23.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.67Rural 59.19 36.30 2.07 1.19 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.84

Thatta Total 66.63 25.37 3.16 3.46 1.00 0.00 0.37 0.00Urban 88.50 8.80 2.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 63.20 27.98 3.23 4.01 1.16 0.00 0.43 0.00

Sujawal Total 47.67 36.25 1.70 6.31 0.99 2.16 4.91 0.00Urban 43.06 51.11 0.00 5.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 48.34 34.10 1.95 6.37 1.14 2.48 5.62 0.00

Sanghar Total 69.26 28.80 1.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Urban 64.37 34.18 1.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 70.90 26.99 2.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Mir Pur Khas Total 62.24 36.57 0.00 1.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Urban 70.36 29.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 58.77 39.54 0.00 1.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Umer Kot Total 82.52 13.41 2.29 1.08 0.00 0.00 0.71 0.00Urban 78.93 14.95 6.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 84.03 12.75 0.68 1.53 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00

Tharparkar Total 28.59 51.65 3.73 2.49 0.27 1.04 6.31 5.92Urban 88.17 11.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 26.12 53.30 3.88 2.59 0.29 1.08 6.57 6.17

Karachi Total 86.03 10.62 0.61 0.47 1.45 0.66 0.15 0.00Urban 86.97 10.32 0.00 0.50 1.53 0.70 0.00 0.00Rural 67.51 16.61 12.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.18 0.00

154

Page 176: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PRIVATE PUBLIC RHC/ HAKEEM/ HOMEO CHEMIST/ SAINA/DISP/HOSP DISP/HOSP BHU HERBALIST PATH PHARMACY SAINI

HEALTH PROVIDER / CONSULTED

OTHER

TABLE 3.3: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HEALTH CONSULTATIONS IN PAST 2 WEEKS BY TYPE OF HEALTH PROVIDER CONSULTED.

PROVINCE & DISTRICT

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Total 46.97 28.34 10.85 0.86 0.30 11.32 1.15 0.21Urban 52.73 30.55 2.03 0.54 0.36 11.12 2.50 0.16Rural 45.15 27.64 13.64 0.96 0.28 11.38 0.72 0.23

Chitral Total 26.96 67.28 2.01 0.00 0.00 3.76 0.00 0.00Urban 70.70 29.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 22.56 71.10 2.21 0.00 0.00 4.13 0.00 0.00

Upper Dir Total 42.82 39.56 4.28 0.70 0.00 12.20 0.44 0.00Urban 9.83 80.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.11 0.00 0.00Rural 44.09 38.00 4.44 0.73 0.00 12.28 0.45 0.00

Lower Dir Total 51.08 30.14 11.15 0.41 0.00 7.21 0.00 0.00Urban 72.91 27.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 50.24 30.26 11.58 0.43 0.00 7.49 0.00 0.00

Swat Total 32.45 44.70 16.12 0.00 0.00 6.74 0.00 0.00Urban 59.81 30.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.64 0.00 0.00Rural 24.07 49.03 21.05 0.00 0.00 5.85 0.00 0.00

Shangla Total 63.88 34.73 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.00Urban - - - - - - - -Rural 63.88 34.73 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.00

Buner Total 30.47 38.68 12.31 1.14 0.10 17.18 0.00 0.11Urban - - - - - - - -Rural 30.47 38.68 12.31 1.14 0.10 17.18 0.00 0.11

Malakand PA Total 40.86 46.80 4.45 0.00 0.00 7.59 0.00 0.31Urban 39.14 54.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.78 0.00 0.00Rural 41.32 44.85 5.65 0.00 0.00 7.80 0.00 0.39

Kohistan Total 35.87 38.48 9.24 9.14 3.25 1.99 0.94 1.09Urban - - - - - - - -Rural 35.87 38.48 9.24 9.14 3.25 1.99 0.94 1.09

Manshera Total 70.84 27.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.42 0.00 0.00Urban 67.21 32.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 71.24 27.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.58 0.00 0.00

Batagram Total 60.52 33.66 3.12 0.23 0.00 1.73 0.28 0.47Urban - - - - - - - -Rural 60.52 33.66 3.12 0.23 0.00 1.73 0.28 0.47

Abbottabad Total 56.60 34.25 0.00 3.24 0.00 5.91 0.00 0.00Urban 58.03 17.50 0.00 3.81 0.00 20.66 0.00 0.00Rural 56.03 40.96 0.00 3.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Haripur Total 69.81 26.50 0.45 0.00 0.53 2.11 0.59 0.00Urban 50.80 49.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 73.36 22.26 0.54 0.00 0.63 2.51 0.71 0.00

155

Page 177: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PRIVATE PUBLIC RHC/ HAKEEM/ HOMEO CHEMIST/ SAINA/DISP/HOSP DISP/HOSP BHU HERBALIST PATH PHARMACY SAINI

HEALTH PROVIDER / CONSULTED

OTHER

TABLE 3.3: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HEALTH CONSULTATIONS IN PAST 2 WEEKS BY TYPE OF HEALTH PROVIDER CONSULTED.

PROVINCE & DISTRICT

Tor Garh Total 66.74 25.96 2.12 2.29 0.00 2.47 0.41 0.00Urban - - - - - - - -Rural 66.74 25.96 2.12 2.29 0.00 2.47 0.41 0.00

Mardan Total 34.12 28.45 18.55 0.17 0.75 17.12 0.48 0.35Urban 41.15 29.86 4.52 0.00 2.31 20.55 0.81 0.81Rural 30.77 27.78 25.26 0.26 0.00 15.49 0.32 0.13

Swabi Total 27.53 31.91 24.58 1.80 0.57 13.10 0.50 0.00Urban 39.40 24.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 35.80 0.00 0.00Rural 25.40 33.18 29.00 2.12 0.68 9.02 0.59 0.00

Charsadda Total 36.85 37.43 15.29 0.52 0.00 8.46 1.46 0.00Urban 27.32 62.50 0.00 2.36 0.00 7.82 0.00 0.00Rural 39.50 30.44 19.56 0.00 0.00 8.64 1.86 0.00

Peshawar Total 52.24 19.93 12.22 0.44 0.00 11.58 3.00 0.59Urban 61.71 22.96 2.80 0.00 0.00 7.83 4.70 0.00Rural 43.82 17.22 20.61 0.83 0.00 14.92 1.48 1.12

Nowsehra Total 34.99 28.31 16.19 0.00 0.00 17.43 3.07 0.00Urban 44.97 38.15 2.20 0.00 0.00 9.52 5.16 0.00Rural 25.74 19.19 29.17 0.00 0.00 24.78 1.12 0.00

Kohat Total 34.43 31.63 14.93 0.00 0.00 17.80 1.18 0.03Urban 33.53 42.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.01 1.74 0.00Rural 34.65 28.98 18.51 0.00 0.00 16.79 1.05 0.03

Hangu Total 34.84 30.39 16.98 0.00 0.00 16.35 1.44 0.00Urban 32.85 54.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.82 0.00 0.00Rural 35.36 24.06 21.48 0.00 0.00 17.29 1.82 0.00

Karak Total 51.54 16.55 3.12 0.00 0.00 27.78 0.51 0.51Urban 62.29 37.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 50.93 15.34 3.29 0.00 0.00 29.36 0.54 0.54

Bannu Total 55.31 16.74 2.66 0.90 2.78 21.61 0.00 0.00Urban 62.50 37.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 55.02 15.90 2.77 0.93 2.89 22.48 0.00 0.00

Lakki Marwat Total 67.28 4.51 13.96 0.41 0.00 13.52 0.00 0.32Urban 69.56 17.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.75 0.00 2.15Rural 66.89 2.25 16.39 0.48 0.00 14.00 0.00 0.00

D. I. Khan Total 72.70 16.84 0.63 5.10 0.82 1.74 2.17 0.00Urban 71.86 18.68 0.00 9.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 72.82 16.58 0.72 4.50 0.94 1.98 2.47 0.00

Tank Total 72.09 10.84 2.02 1.62 0.00 13.21 0.22 0.00Urban 87.52 9.48 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 69.42 11.07 1.85 1.90 0.00 15.50 0.26 0.00

156

Page 178: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PRIVATE PUBLIC RHC/ HAKEEM/ HOMEO CHEMIST/ SAINA/DISP/HOSP DISP/HOSP BHU HERBALIST PATH PHARMACY SAINI

HEALTH PROVIDER / CONSULTED

OTHER

TABLE 3.3: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HEALTH CONSULTATIONS IN PAST 2 WEEKS BY TYPE OF HEALTH PROVIDER CONSULTED.

PROVINCE & DISTRICT

Balochistan Total 61.22 28.36 3.89 4.66 0.01 1.12 0.69 0.06Urban 64.02 31.59 0.58 3.04 0.00 0.70 0.08 0.00Rural 59.89 26.82 5.46 5.42 0.02 1.32 0.98 0.08

Quetta Total 65.50 27.76 0.00 4.15 0.00 2.59 0.00 0.00Urban 62.72 31.67 0.00 5.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 73.36 16.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.90 0.00 0.00

Pishin Total 76.17 20.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.37 0.00 0.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 74.48 21.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.61 0.00 0.00

Killa Abdullah Total 70.45 26.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.32 0.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 68.82 27.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.50 0.00

Chaghai Total 39.50 46.90 5.35 6.15 0.00 2.10 0.00 0.00Urban 52.68 32.72 7.30 0.00 0.00 7.30 0.00 0.00Rural 36.63 49.98 4.93 7.48 0.00 0.97 0.00 0.00

Nushki Total 48.46 32.57 8.66 5.48 0.00 1.80 3.03 0.00Urban 57.13 8.74 11.13 0.00 0.00 11.13 11.87 0.00Rural 46.79 37.16 8.19 6.53 0.00 0.00 1.33 0.00

Loralai Total 67.47 20.46 0.00 11.09 0.00 0.97 0.00 0.00Urban 84.51 0.00 0.00 10.30 0.00 5.19 0.00 0.00Rural 63.53 25.19 0.00 11.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Barkhan Total 27.43 55.70 3.02 12.53 0.00 0.00 1.32 0.00Urban 8.44 91.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 29.61 51.59 3.36 13.97 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.00

Musa Khel Total 79.60 15.42 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Urban 82.64 17.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 78.44 14.69 0.00 6.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Killa Saifullah Total 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Zhob Total 35.82 51.99 4.13 5.75 0.00 0.00 1.26 1.05Urban 48.74 51.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 32.29 52.19 5.25 7.32 0.00 0.00 1.60 1.34

Sheerani Total 38.71 60.29 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Urban - - - - - - - -Rural 38.71 60.29 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Sibbi Total 53.88 40.78 0.23 3.79 0.00 0.00 1.32 0.00Urban 53.33 46.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 54.22 37.19 0.37 6.10 0.00 0.00 2.12 0.00

Harnai Total 88.94 5.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.16 0.00 0.00Urban 64.52 4.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.02 0.00 0.00Rural 93.81 6.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Ziarat Total 87.10 12.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 86.88 12.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.61

157

Page 179: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PRIVATE PUBLIC RHC/ HAKEEM/ HOMEO CHEMIST/ SAINA/DISP/HOSP DISP/HOSP BHU HERBALIST PATH PHARMACY SAINI

HEALTH PROVIDER / CONSULTED

OTHER

TABLE 3.3: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HEALTH CONSULTATIONS IN PAST 2 WEEKS BY TYPE OF HEALTH PROVIDER CONSULTED.

PROVINCE & DISTRICT

Kohlu Total 67.03 13.06 0.00 0.28 0.00 19.63 0.00 0.00Urban 87.72 12.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 63.24 13.21 0.00 0.33 0.00 23.22 0.00 0.00

Dera Bugti Total 14.76 5.04 69.94 10.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Urban 16.93 0.00 83.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 14.54 5.55 68.63 11.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Bolan/ Kachhi Total 63.48 10.40 21.52 2.89 0.00 0.00 1.71 0.00Urban 85.29 0.00 14.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 58.51 12.77 23.07 3.55 0.00 0.00 2.10 0.00

Jaffarabad Total 81.38 12.14 5.22 0.00 0.00 1.26 0.00 0.00Urban 68.38 23.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.90 0.00 0.00Rural 83.85 9.94 6.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Nasirabad Total 86.41 12.25 0.00 1.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Urban 42.85 57.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 98.29 0.00 0.00 1.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Jhal Magsi Total 36.65 35.03 20.90 2.79 0.62 0.28 3.73 0.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 34.08 36.46 21.75 2.90 0.65 0.29 3.88 0.00

Kalat Total 56.10 20.61 17.56 3.70 0.00 0.00 2.03 0.00Urban 59.70 40.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 54.74 13.16 24.20 5.11 0.00 0.00 2.79 0.00

Mastung Total 50.16 39.42 0.00 3.75 0.00 0.00 6.67 0.00Urban 67.12 32.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 36.02 44.88 0.00 6.87 0.00 0.00 12.23 0.00

Khuzdar Total 66.32 24.48 3.04 5.75 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.00Urban 87.04 12.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 48.99 34.11 5.58 10.56 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.00

Awaran Total 55.85 15.27 12.00 16.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Urban - - - - - - - -Rural 55.85 15.27 12.00 16.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Kharan Total 81.33 17.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.34 0.00 0.00Urban 78.33 21.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 82.30 15.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.77 0.00 0.00

Washuk Total 61.63 13.41 1.35 23.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Urban - - - - - - - -Rural 61.63 13.41 1.35 23.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Lasbela Total 44.93 50.01 0.00 4.13 0.00 0.00 0.92 0.00Urban 25.89 70.80 0.00 3.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 59.28 34.35 0.00 4.75 0.00 0.00 1.62 0.00

Gwader Total 31.08 68.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Urban 71.59 28.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 12.72 87.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

NOTES:1. The Panjgur and Kech district s have been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.2. Total may not add to 100 because of rounding

158

Page 180: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

Pakistan 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99Punjab 98 98 98 99 99 99 99 99 99

1. Islamabad 88 89 88 100 100 100 91 93 92

2. Attock 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

3. Rawalpindi 90 100 95 100 100 100 94 100 97

4. Jehlum 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

5. Chakwal 100 100 100 100 95 97 100 96 98

6. Sargodha 100 84 93 98 98 98 99 94 96

7. Bhakhar 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

8. Khushab 100 100 100 95 93 94 97 95 96

9. Mianwali 100 94 96 100 100 100 100 98 99

10. Faisalabad 95 94 94 100 100 100 98 97 97

11. Chiniot 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

12. Jhang 90 95 92 99 99 99 96 98 97

13. Toba Tek Singh 96 100 96 99 100 100 98 100 99

14. Gujranwala 100 100 100 97 100 98 99 100 99

15. Hafizabad 100 100 100 98 100 99 98 100 99

16. Gujrat 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

17. Mandi Bahuddin 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

18. Sialkot 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

19. Narowal 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

20. Lahore 100 97 99 100 100 100 100 98 99

21. Kasur 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

22. Sheikhupura 100 100 100 98 98 98 99 98 99

23. Nankana Sahib 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

24. Okara 100 100 100 95 100 97 96 100 98

25. Sahiwal 100 100 100 96 100 98 97 100 99

26. Pakpatten 100 100 100 100 97 99 100 98 99

27. Vehari 100 100 100 98 100 99 98 100 99

28. Multan 100 100 100 99 100 99 99 100 100

29. Lodhran 100 100 100 99 100 100 100 100 100

30. Khanewal 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

31. D. G. Khan 100 100 100 100 99 100 100 99 100

32. Rajanpur 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

33. Layyah 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

34. Muzaffar Garh 94 100 97 99 99 99 99 99 99

35. Bahawalpur 100 100 100 99 100 100 99 100 100

36. Bahawalnagar 100 91 96 96 97 96 97 96 9637. Rahim Yar Khan 100 100 100 100 99 100 100 99 100

TABLE 3.4: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN AGED 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNISED A: BASED ON RECALL - AT LEAST ONE IMMUNISATION

PROVINCE & DISTRICT URBAN RURAL TOTAL

NOTES:1. Note that even the record-based measure cannot be based exclusively on vaccinations recorded on the health card, since it is not possible to identify the source of the information on each antigen. Instead, it is calculated for all children who had a health card, using all immunizations reported, whether or not these were recorded on the card. It is likely that most will have been recorded on the card.2. Full immunization means that the child has received: BCG, DPT1, DPT2, DPT3, Polio1, Polio2, Polio3, H.B1, H.B2, H.B3 and

159

Page 181: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 3.4: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN AGED 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNISED A: BASED ON RECALL - AT LEAST ONE IMMUNISATION

PROVINCE & DISTRICT URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Sindh 100 100 100 99 99 99 99 99 99

1. Jacobabad 100 100 100 100 99 100 100 99 100

2. Kashmore 100 100 100 100 99 100 100 100 100

3. Shikarpur 100 94 97 100 100 100 100 98 99

4. Larkana 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

5. Shahdadkot 100 100 100 98 100 99 98 100 99

6. Sukkur 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

7. Ghotki 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

8. Khairpur 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

9. Nowshero Feroze 100 100 100 98 98 98 99 99 99

10. Shaheed Benazirabad 100 100 100 100 98 99 100 99 99

11. Dadu 100 100 100 92 96 94 93 97 95

12. Jamshoro 100 100 100 83 94 88 87 96 92

13. Hyderabad 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

14. Tando Allah Yar 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

15. Tando Muhammad Khan 100 100 100 100 98 99 100 99 99

16. Matiari 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

17. Badin 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

18. Thatta 100 100 100 100 87 93 100 89 94

19. Sujawal 100 100 100 99 100 99 99 100 99

20. Sanghar 88 100 94 100 100 100 97 100 99

21. Mir Pur Khas 100 100 100 100 98 99 100 98 99

22. Umer Kot 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

23. Tharparkar 100 100 100 97 98 98 97 99 98

24. Karachi 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

160

Page 182: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 3.4: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN AGED 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNISED A: BASED ON RECALL - AT LEAST ONE IMMUNISATION

PROVINCE & DISTRICT URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 99 99 99 99 98 98 99 98 98

1. Chitral 0 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

2. Upper Dir 0 100 100 98 98 98 98 98 98

3. Lower Dir 100 100 100 100 96 98 100 96 98

4. Swat 100 100 100 100 95 98 100 96 98

5. Shangla - - - 100 100 100 100 100 100

6. Buner - - - 100 100 100 100 100 100

7. Malakand PA 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

8. Kohistan - - - 100 96 98 100 96 98

9. Manshera 100 100 100 91 100 96 92 100 97

10. Batagram - - - 100 100 100 100 100 100

11. Abbottabad 100 100 100 95 94 95 96 95 96

12. Haripur 77 100 87 100 100 100 96 100 98

13. Tor Garh - - - 96 96 96 96 96 96

14. Mardan 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

15. Swabi 100 0 100 96 90 94 97 90 95

16. Charsadda 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

17. Peshawar 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

18. Nowsehra 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

19. Kohat 100 86 94 98 100 98 98 95 97

20. Hangu 100 100 100 96 96 96 97 97 97

21. Karak 100 0 100 99 100 99 99 100 99

22. Bannu 100 100 100 97 93 95 97 93 95

23. Lakki Marwat 0 100 100 100 96 98 100 97 98

24. D. I. Khan 100 100 100 96 99 98 97 99 98

25. Tank 100 100 100 97 100 98 97 100 99

161

Page 183: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 3.4: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN AGED 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNISED A: BASED ON RECALL - AT LEAST ONE IMMUNISATION

PROVINCE & DISTRICT URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Balochistan 97 96 96 97 95 96 97 95 96

1. Quetta 91 92 92 100 100 100 94 94 94

2. Pishin 100 0 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

3. Killa Abdullah 100 100 100 100 93 95 100 93 96

4. Chaghai 80 0 80 96 86 91 93 86 90

5. Nushki 100 100 100 83 100 95 90 100 97

6. Loralai 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

7. Barkhan 100 100 100 66 78 73 67 82 76

8. Musa Khel 84 100 91 100 100 100 95 100 97

9. Killa Saifullah 100 100 100 90 98 95 94 98 97

10. Zhob 100 100 100 95 94 95 95 95 95

11. Sheerani - - - 61 47 55 61 47 55

12. Sibbi 100 61 81 100 95 97 100 81 91

13. Harnai 100 100 100 95 81 88 96 82 89

14. Ziarat 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

15. Kohlu 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

16. Dera Bugti 100 100 100 100 98 99 100 98 99

17. Bolan/ Kachhi 100 100 100 89 100 95 92 100 96

18. Jaffarabad 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

19. Nasirabad/ Tamboo 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

20. Jhal Magsi 100 100 100 85 61 71 85 62 72

21. Kalat 100 0 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

22. Mastung 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

23. Khuzdar 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

24. Awaran - - - 100 100 100 100 100 100

25. Kharan 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

26. Washuk - - - 100 100 100 100 100 100

27. Lasbela 100 100 100 74 72 73 85 77 83

28. Gwader 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

NOTES:1. The Panjgur and Kech districts have been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation

162

Page 184: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.4: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN AGED 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNIZED B: BASED ON RECORD - FULLY IMMUNIZED

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

Pakistan 70 69 70 57 56 56 61 60 60 57Punjab 76 74 75 68 69 68 70 70 70 65

Islamabad 77 89 81 62 89 74 73 89 79 78

1. Attock 90 100 95 73 78 75 79 88 83 9 73

2. Rawalpindi 72 85 79 88 81 84 80 83 81 12 83

3. Jehlum 100 100 100 86 95 90 88 96 92 4 85

4. Chakwal 100 100 100 79 86 83 81 89 85 7 85

5. Sargodha 79 67 74 70 62 65 74 63 68 24 55

6. Bhakhar 100 88 93 73 65 69 76 68 72 20 67

7. Khushab 75 47 66 63 71 67 68 65 66 26 68

8. Mianwali 78 89 85 71 69 70 73 75 74 17 66

9. Faisalabad 62 65 64 48 58 53 54 61 58 30 59

10. Chiniot 53 75 64 73 63 68 64 68 66 27 72

11. Jhang 45 51 48 41 47 44 42 48 45 35 39

12. Toba Tek Singh 71 71 71 71 65 68 71 66 69 23 64

13. Gujranwala 67 64 66 83 79 82 76 72 74 16 70

14. Hafizabad 84 74 78 66 69 68 72 71 71 21 68

15. Gujrat 78 100 89 96 91 93 90 93 92 3 89

16. Mandi Bahuddin 77 86 84 75 87 81 75 87 81 11 77

17. Sialkot 100 79 90 96 89 93 97 87 93 2 87

18. Narowal 67 81 75 87 87 87 84 86 85 8 83

19. Lahore 88 82 85 74 46 57 86 73 79 13 75

20. Kasur 62 46 56 94 88 90 88 85 86 6 78

21. Sheikhupura 71 66 69 80 86 83 77 80 78 15 65

22. Nankana Sahib 100 100 100 92 88 90 94 91 93 1 91

23. Okara 100 91 95 74 70 72 81 77 79 14 81

24. Sahiwal 69 77 74 92 92 92 89 89 89 5 89

25. Pakpatten 71 62 66 75 74 75 75 72 74 18 69

26. Vehari 100 66 86 68 75 72 72 75 73 19 77

27. Multan 67 73 69 62 62 62 64 66 65 28 52

28. Lodhran 72 69 71 54 50 52 57 52 55 32 47

29. Khanewal 64 71 67 56 53 54 57 56 57 31 42

30. D. G. Khan 70 55 65 64 54 59 65 54 60 29 49

31. Rajanpur 70 60 64 68 68 68 68 67 68 25 75

32. Layyah 64 80 74 76 89 83 75 87 82 10 79

33. Muzaffar Garh 48 52 50 45 49 47 45 50 47 34 30

34. Bahawalpur 73 38 59 47 54 50 55 49 53 33 34

35. Bahawalnagar 79 91 84 63 71 67 67 75 71 22 6836. Rahim Yar Khan 56 40 48 34 40 37 38 40 39 36 26

RANK TOTAL 12-13PROVINCE & DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

NOTES:1. Note that even the record-based measure cannot be based exclusively on vaccinations recorded on the health card, since it is not possible to identify the source of the information on each antigen. Instead, it is calculated for all children who had a health card, using all immunizations reported, whether or not these were recorded on the card. It is likely that most will have been recorded on the card.2. Full immunization means that the child has received: BCG, DPT1, DPT2, DPT3, Polio1, Polio2, Polio3 , H.B1, H.B2, H.B3 and measles

163

Page 185: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

164

Page 186: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.4: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN AGED 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNIZED B: BASED ON RECORD - FULLY IMMUNIZED

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL RANK TOTAL 12-13PROVINCE & DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Sindh 61 62 62 34 33 33 45 45 45 42

1. Jacobabad 26 21 24 0 4 2 5 7 6 24 11

2. Kashmore 14 12 13 7 8 7 10 9 9 22 7

3. Shikarpur 29 28 29 13 8 11 18 13 15 21 15

4. Larkana 65 72 69 51 51 51 55 56 56 4 65

5. Shahdadkot 65 70 68 33 45 38 37 52 44 10 68

6. Sukkur 46 56 53 9 12 11 27 40 35 15 27

7. Ghotki 17 14 16 4 10 7 7 11 9 23 5

8. Khairpur 44 39 42 14 8 11 26 16 21 20 11

9. Nowshero Feroze 0 80 55 52 50 51 49 54 51 5 34

10. Shaheed Benazirabad 38 46 44 36 25 31 36 33 34 16 27

11. Dadu 78 80 79 71 71 71 73 72 72 2 62

12. Jamshoro 50 55 53 43 45 44 44 49 47 7 49

13. Hyderabad 50 47 49 22 28 25 46 44 46 9 49

14. Tando Allah Yar 68 57 62 40 35 37 47 40 43 11 38

15. Tando Muhammad Khan 36 39 37 37 31 34 37 32 34 17 25

16. Matiari 40 47 44 54 40 47 51 41 46 8 37

17. Badin 57 44 50 41 38 40 45 40 42 12 34

18. Thatta 67 65 66 38 30 34 43 34 38 13 44

19. Sujawal 60 100 74 35 34 35 37 37 37 14

20. Sanghar 32 64 47 22 16 19 25 26 25 18 34

21. Mir Pur Khas 76 72 74 45 35 40 52 47 50 6 39

22. Umer Kot 80 69 75 57 63 60 61 64 63 3 65

23. Tharparkar 63 53 56 19 18 18 22 23 22 19 26

24. Karachi 78 74 76 51 50 51 76 72 74 1 75

165

Page 187: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

166

Page 188: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.4: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN AGED 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNIZED B: BASED ON RECORD - FULLY IMMUNIZED

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL RANK TOTAL 12-13PROVINCE & DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 72 77 74 57 51 54 60 56 58 53

1. Chitral 0 67 67 71 77 74 71 74 73 4 72

2. Upper Dir 0 33 33 64 56 60 64 55 60 14 54

3. Lower Dir 100 59 74 76 79 78 77 78 77 1 74

4. Swat 100 78 86 66 57 61 70 61 65 10 58

5. Shangla - - - 27 31 29 27 31 29 21 30

6. Buner - - - 63 56 60 63 56 60 13 50

7. Malakand PA 53 90 68 57 57 57 55 66 60 12 56

8. Kohistan - - - 14 17 16 14 17 16 24 10

9. Manshera 100 62 68 50 59 56 53 60 57 15 57

10. Batagram - - - 43 40 42 43 40 42 18 35

11. Abbottabad 89 100 93 83 61 73 84 68 77 2 77

12. Haripur 77 100 87 69 72 70 70 78 73 5 72

13. Tor Garh - - - 1 3 2 1 3 2 25 0

14. Mardan 76 62 72 68 70 69 70 69 70 6 68

15. Swabi 56 0 56 73 53 68 70 53 66 9 62

16. Charsadda 66 79 73 61 65 63 62 66 64 11 60

17. Peshawar 74 85 80 80 55 69 78 71 74 3 71

18. Nowsehra 69 69 69 57 70 64 62 70 67 8 64

19. Kohat 74 71 73 68 61 66 69 64 67 7 57

20. Hangu 50 23 37 61 49 55 59 44 52 16 47

21. Karak 24 0 24 28 34 31 28 34 31 20 31

22. Bannu 68 100 76 31 7 19 34 10 22 22 17

23. Lakki Marwat 0 38 38 25 12 20 25 16 21 23 19

24. D. I. Khan 46 65 53 55 44 49 54 46 49 17 42

25. Tank 58 71 61 32 39 36 39 42 40 19 29

167

Page 189: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

168

Page 190: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.4: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN AGED 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNIZED B: BASED ON RECORD - FULLY IMMUNIZED

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL RANK TOTAL 12-13PROVINCE & DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Balochistan 47 48 48 23 17 20 30 25 27 29

1. Quetta 55 67 62 55 44 51 55 61 58 1 54

2. Pishin 65 0 65 36 31 34 38 31 35 10 39

3. Killa Abdullah 37 0 25 18 8 11 22 7 13 23 14

4. Chaghai 50 0 50 16 19 17 23 19 21 20 21

5. Nushki 53 51 51 10 16 14 27 28 28 17 30

6. Loralai 33 18 24 10 24 14 16 20 18 22 11

7. Barkhan 100 50 59 47 36 41 49 38 43 5 50

8. Musa Khel 42 52 46 27 10 19 32 22 28 18 17

9. Killa Saifullah 56 81 67 40 21 26 47 32 37 8 53

10. Zhob 46 35 40 63 23 49 62 26 48 2 40

11. Sheerani - - - 33 34 33 33 34 33 13 60

12. Sibbi 67 61 64 30 35 32 46 46 46 4 44

13. Harnai 50 100 77 9 24 16 11 30 21 21 24

14. Ziarat 100 100 100 35 18 26 39 21 29 16 32

15. Kohlu 100 100 100 27 27 27 30 30 30 15 27

16. Dera Bugti 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0

17. Bolan/ Kachhi 79 66 74 24 19 22 39 28 34 12 21

18. Jaffarabad 12 9 10 13 9 11 13 9 11 24 8

19. Nasirabad/ Tamboo 31 33 32 0 0 0 8 6 7 26 0

20. Jhal Magsi 25 33 28 32 21 26 32 22 26 19 48

21. Kalat 100 0 100 19 12 15 58 12 36 9 39

22. Mastung 100 100 100 22 25 24 32 33 33 14 35

23. Khuzdar 22 22 22 7 7 7 10 10 10 25 13

24. Awaran - - - 46 45 46 46 45 46 3 42

25. Kharan 48 47 48 23 47 35 31 47 39 6 37

26. Washuk - - - 6 0 4 6 0 4 27 6

27. Lasbela 43 0 38 41 34 38 42 29 38 7 42

28. Gwader 46 0 40 7 33 20 39 20 35 11 21

NOTES: 1. The Panjgur and Kech districts have been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

169

Page 191: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

170

Page 192: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.4: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN AGED 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNIZED

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

Pakistan 86 86 86 81 80 80 82 82 82 82Punjab 89 87 88 90 90 90 90 89 89 89

Islamabad 88 89 88 93 97 95 89 92 90 90

1. Attock 100 100 100 93 96 94 96 98 97 3 97

2. Rawalpindi 90 85 87 100 97 99 94 91 92 13 93

3. Jehlum 100 100 100 95 100 98 96 100 98 2 95

4. Chakwal 100 100 100 100 92 95 100 93 96 5 91

5. Sargodha 93 67 82 95 96 95 94 88 91 19 86

6. Bhakhar 100 88 93 94 79 86 95 80 87 30 96

7. Khushab 96 91 94 90 87 89 92 88 91 21 87

8. Mianwali 100 89 92 87 91 89 89 90 90 24 87

9. Faisalabad 82 82 82 96 89 93 91 86 88 29 82

10. Chiniot 86 100 93 92 85 88 89 92 90 23 90

11. Jhang 90 84 87 89 91 90 89 89 89 27 87

12. Toba Tek Singh 90 100 92 94 88 91 93 89 91 16 90

13. Gujranwala 93 85 89 92 92 92 92 89 91 18 89

14. Hafizabad 100 95 97 94 99 97 96 97 97 4 93

15. Gujrat 78 100 89 96 93 94 90 94 92 12 96

16. Mandi Bahuddin 100 100 100 79 100 90 82 100 92 15 93

17. Sialkot 100 79 90 96 92 95 97 89 94 10 94

18. Narowal 100 100 100 97 100 98 97 100 99 1 92

19. Lahore 88 90 89 85 95 91 88 91 89 25 89

20. Kasur 62 46 56 94 88 90 88 85 86 32 84

21. Sheikhupura 71 88 79 94 86 90 86 86 86 31 84

22. Nankana Sahib 100 100 100 95 93 94 96 95 96 6 99

23. Okara 100 91 95 83 96 89 87 94 91 22 92

24. Sahiwal 69 77 74 94 95 95 90 92 91 17 96

25. Pakpatten 71 62 66 100 93 97 98 89 94 9 82

26. Vehari 100 66 86 91 96 93 92 93 92 11 95

27. Multan 94 100 96 91 88 90 92 92 92 14 95

28. Lodhran 100 100 100 91 97 94 93 97 95 8 92

29. Khanewal 88 100 94 100 91 95 97 93 95 7 87

30. D. G. Khan 90 66 83 77 70 74 79 70 75 36 78

31. Rajanpur 70 83 77 94 92 93 91 90 91 20 92

32. Layyah 64 90 80 87 94 91 84 93 89 26 95

33. Muzaffar Garh 75 95 85 90 88 89 88 88 88 28 86

34. Bahawalpur 93 76 86 78 88 82 83 84 83 33 78

35. Bahawalnagar 88 91 89 74 77 76 78 80 79 35 9036. Rahim Yar Khan 91 75 82 83 84 84 84 82 83 34 77

C: BASED ON RECALL AND RECORD - FULLY IMMUNIZED

RANK TOTAL 12-13PROVINCE & DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

NOTES:1. Note that even the record-based measure cannot be based exclusively on vaccinations recorded on the health card, since it is not possible to identify the source of the information on each antigen. Instead, it is calculated for all children who had a health card, using all immunizations reported, whether or not these were recorded on the card. It is likely that most will have been recorded on the card.

171

Page 193: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.4: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN AGED 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNIZED

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

C: BASED ON RECALL AND RECORD - FULLY IMMUNIZED

RANK TOTAL 12-13PROVINCE & DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Sindh 81 84 83 65 67 66 72 74 73 74

1. Jacobabad 88 86 87 64 56 60 68 61 65 16 47

2. Kashmore 92 87 90 75 59 66 81 66 73 10 60

3. Shikarpur 71 78 74 65 57 61 67 62 65 17 82

4. Larkana 80 81 80 63 69 67 68 72 70 13 84

5. Shahdadkot 72 81 78 50 68 58 53 71 62 21 82

6. Sukkur 93 79 83 83 68 75 88 75 80 8 71

7. Ghotki 65 60 63 57 66 62 59 65 62 20 63

8. Khairpur 86 90 88 76 76 76 80 79 80 7 76

9. Nowshero Feroze 42 100 82 76 63 70 74 68 71 12 80

10. Shaheed Benazirabad 83 73 76 76 77 76 77 75 76 9 69

11. Dadu 78 93 86 87 79 82 85 81 83 4 89

12. Jamshoro 100 100 100 55 91 73 67 94 82 5 84

13. Hyderabad 86 83 85 76 85 80 85 84 84 3 86

14. Tando Allah Yar 91 92 92 80 85 83 83 87 85 2 77

15. Tando Muhammad Khan 86 77 81 61 60 60 64 62 63 19 59

16. Matiari 100 85 93 83 87 85 87 87 87 1 81

17. Badin 72 88 81 66 76 70 67 80 73 11 62

18. Thatta 100 100 100 46 39 42 55 47 51 22 60

19. Sujawal 100 100 100 45 44 44 49 46 48 23

20. Sanghar 72 100 85 52 67 60 56 73 65 15 55

21. Mir Pur Khas 92 94 93 54 50 52 63 65 64 18 56

22. Umer Kot 80 69 75 61 70 65 65 69 67 14 84

23. Tharparkar 100 91 94 32 31 31 36 40 38 24 44

24. Karachi 78 84 81 75 66 70 78 82 80 6 89

172

Page 194: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.4: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN AGED 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNIZED

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

C: BASED ON RECALL AND RECORD - FULLY IMMUNIZED

RANK TOTAL 12-13PROVINCE & DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 91 89 90 76 75 75 79 77 78 76

1. Chitral 0 100 100 100 95 97 100 96 98 2 88

2. Upper Dir 0 100 100 78 76 77 78 77 77 14 73

3. Lower Dir 100 59 74 87 83 85 87 81 84 10 94

4. Swat 100 100 100 89 84 87 91 87 89 7 83

5. Shangla - - - 46 50 49 46 50 49 23 57

6. Buner - - - 76 81 78 76 81 78 13 70

7. Malakand PA 92 90 92 97 95 96 96 94 95 4 96

8. Kohistan - - - 19 24 22 19 24 22 24 20

9. Manshera 100 100 100 69 78 74 71 82 77 15 69

10. Batagram - - - 55 48 51 55 48 51 21 51

11. Abbottabad 89 100 93 95 94 95 93 95 94 5 91

12. Haripur 77 100 87 76 91 81 76 93 82 12 81

13. Tor Garh - - - 2 4 3 2 4 3 25 3

14. Mardan 100 62 88 92 90 91 95 85 90 6 93

15. Swabi 100 0 100 93 60 85 95 60 87 8 83

16. Charsadda 100 100 100 98 98 98 99 98 98 1 94

17. Peshawar 94 91 93 98 96 97 96 94 95 3 91

18. Nowsehra 84 91 88 82 81 81 83 85 84 9 84

19. Kohat 74 86 80 83 88 85 82 87 84 11 77

20. Hangu 100 84 92 73 70 72 78 73 75 16 70

21. Karak 75 0 75 68 55 62 68 55 63 19 72

22. Bannu 68 100 76 61 51 56 61 53 57 20 61

23. Lakki Marwat 0 38 38 46 55 50 46 53 49 22 48

24. D. I. Khan 78 100 87 65 60 62 67 63 65 18 71

25. Tank 72 100 78 60 67 64 63 70 66 17 68

173

Page 195: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.4: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN AGED 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNIZED

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

C: BASED ON RECALL AND RECORD - FULLY IMMUNIZED

RANK TOTAL 12-13PROVINCE & DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Balochistan 67 73 70 47 42 45 52 50 51 53

1. Quetta 68 73 71 55 48 52 63 66 65 6 73

2. Pishin 65 0 65 47 51 49 48 51 49 15 52

3. Killa Abdullah 37 0 25 26 33 30 28 31 30 27 20

4. Chaghai 50 0 50 30 25 27 34 25 30 28 25

5. Nushki 73 63 66 61 38 45 66 47 53 12 72

6. Loralai 67 55 59 37 24 33 45 44 45 18 51

7. Barkhan 100 73 78 64 68 66 66 69 68 4 91

8. Musa Khel 84 74 79 27 10 19 46 29 38 21 19

9. Killa Saifullah 56 81 67 57 38 44 57 46 50 14 74

10. Zhob 74 100 90 65 57 62 66 66 66 5 57

11. Sheerani - - - 61 47 55 61 47 55 11 66

12. Sibbi 67 61 64 53 64 58 59 63 61 8 70

13. Harnai 50 100 77 25 37 31 27 42 34 22 37

14. Ziarat 100 100 100 42 20 30 45 22 33 23 46

15. Kohlu 100 100 100 27 29 28 30 31 31 25 31

16. Dera Bugti 100 100 100 34 17 26 41 20 32 24 6

17. Bolan/ Kachhi 79 100 87 47 54 50 56 63 59 10 71

18. Jaffarabad 100 71 85 32 32 32 45 43 44 19 35

19. Nasirabad/ Tamboo 70 90 79 19 15 17 31 28 30 26 33

20. Jhal Magsi 25 33 28 59 34 45 57 34 44 20 70

21. Kalat 100 0 100 83 77 79 91 77 84 2 81

22. Mastung 100 100 100 66 77 72 70 79 75 3 75

23. Khuzdar 22 100 61 61 60 60 53 68 61 9 56

24. Awaran - - - 88 82 85 88 82 85 1 91

25. Kharan 48 47 48 58 77 67 55 68 61 7 87

26. Washuk - - - 55 38 49 55 38 49 17 35

27. Lasbela 68 0 59 45 43 44 55 36 49 16 54

28. Gwader 53 50 53 38 57 47 50 54 51 13 55

NOTES:1. The Panjgur and Kech districts have been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

174

Page 196: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.5: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNIZED BY TYPE OF ANTIGEN-BASED ON RECORD

Pakistan 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 61Urban 76 76 75 75 76 75 74 76 75 75 71Rural 61 61 60 60 61 61 60 60 60 60 57

Punjab 76 76 75 75 76 75 75 75 75 75 71Urban 81 81 80 80 81 81 80 81 80 80 75Rural 73 73 73 72 73 73 73 73 73 72 69

Islamabad 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 79Urban 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81Rural 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 74

Attock 87 87 87 86 87 87 87 87 87 86 83Urban 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95Rural 81 81 81 79 81 81 81 81 81 79 75

Rawalpindi 82 82 81 82 82 82 82 82 81 82 82Urban 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79Rural 86 86 84 86 86 86 86 86 84 86 86

Jehlum 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Rural 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90

Chakwal 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 85Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Rural 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83

Sargodha 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 68Urban 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 74Rural 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 65

Bhakhar 76 76 75 75 76 76 75 76 75 75 72Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 93Rural 73 73 72 72 73 73 72 73 72 72 69

Khushab 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 66Urban 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 66Rural 71 70 70 70 71 70 70 70 70 70 67

Mianwali 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 74Urban 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85Rural 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 70

Faisalabad 64 64 63 63 63 63 63 64 63 63 58Urban 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 64Rural 58 58 57 57 57 57 57 58 57 57 53

Chiniot 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 66Urban 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 64Rural 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 68

Jhang 49 50 49 49 50 49 49 50 49 49 46Urban 48 51 48 48 51 48 48 51 48 48 48Rural 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 45

PROVINCE & DISTRICT BCG DPT1 DPT2 DPT3 POLIO1 MEASLESH.B2 H.B3POLIO2 POLIO3 H.B1

175

Page 197: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.5: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNIZED BY TYPE OF ANTIGEN-BASED ON RECORD

PROVINCE & DISTRICT BCG DPT1 DPT2 DPT3 POLIO1 MEASLESH.B2 H.B3POLIO2 POLIO3 H.B1

Toba Tek Singh 74 73 73 73 74 73 73 73 73 73 69Urban 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 71Rural 73 73 72 72 73 72 72 73 72 72 68

Gujranwala 81 81 80 78 81 81 79 81 80 78 76Urban 76 76 74 70 76 76 73 76 74 70 70Rural 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 82

Hafizabad 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 71Urban 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78Rural 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 68

Gujrat 94 96 96 96 97 96 96 96 96 96 93Urban 95 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 93Rural 94 94 94 94 96 94 94 94 94 94 93

Mandi Bahuddin 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86Urban 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84Rural 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86

Sialkot 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 93Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 90Rural 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 94

Narowal 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 85Urban 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75Rural 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 87

Lahore 88 87 85 85 88 86 86 87 85 85 80Urban 95 95 93 93 95 93 93 95 93 93 85Rural 60 57 57 57 60 60 60 57 57 57 60

Kasur 95 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 86Urban 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 56Rural 96 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 90

Sheikhupura 86 86 84 84 86 84 84 86 84 84 78Urban 85 85 79 79 85 79 79 85 79 79 69Rural 87 86 86 86 87 86 86 86 86 86 83

Nankana Sahib 97 97 97 94 97 97 94 97 97 94 93Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Rural 96 96 96 91 96 96 91 96 96 91 90

Okara 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 79Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 95Rural 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 72

Sahiwal 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 89Urban 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 74Rural 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 92

176

Page 198: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.5: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNIZED BY TYPE OF ANTIGEN-BASED ON RECORD

PROVINCE & DISTRICT BCG DPT1 DPT2 DPT3 POLIO1 MEASLESH.B2 H.B3POLIO2 POLIO3 H.B1

Pakpatten 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 74Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 66Rural 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 75

Vehari 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 74Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 86Rural 74 74 73 73 74 74 74 74 73 73 73

Multan 69 69 69 69 70 70 69 69 69 69 65Urban 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 69Rural 67 68 68 67 69 69 68 68 68 67 62

Lodhran 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55Urban 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71Rural 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 52

Khanewal 59 60 60 60 59 59 59 60 60 60 57Urban 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 67Rural 56 57 57 57 56 56 56 57 57 57 55

D. G. Khan 77 77 76 75 77 76 76 77 76 75 60Urban 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65Rural 78 78 77 77 78 77 77 78 77 76 60

Rajanpur 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 77Urban 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 64Rural 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 78

Layyah 89 89 89 89 88 88 88 89 89 89 83Urban 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 74Rural 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 84

Muzaffar Garh 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 47Urban 54 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 50Rural 52 53 53 52 53 53 53 53 53 52 47

Bahawalpur 56 56 55 55 56 55 55 56 55 55 53Urban 60 60 59 59 60 59 59 60 59 59 59Rural 54 54 54 53 54 54 54 54 54 53 50

Bahawalnagar 84 84 82 82 84 83 82 82 81 80 72Urban 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84Rural 83 83 82 81 83 83 81 81 80 79 68

Rahim Yar Khan 43 43 42 41 43 43 42 43 42 41 40Urban 53 53 51 49 53 53 52 53 51 49 49Rural 41 41 40 40 41 41 40 41 40 40 38

23 21 21 19 20 20 20

NOTES:1.Based on record: Children who reported having received the specified immunisation who also have an immunization card, expressed as a percentage of all children aged 12-23 months.

177

Page 199: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.5: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNIZED BY TYPE OF ANTIGEN-BASED ON RECORD

PROVINCE & DISTRICT BCG DPT1 DPT2 DPT3 POLIO1 MEASLESH.B2 H.B3POLIO2 POLIO3 H.B1

Sindh 50 50 50 50 50 50 49 50 50 50 46Urban 68 68 68 68 68 68 66 68 68 68 64Rural 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 33

Jacobabad 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6Urban 26 24 24 24 26 26 24 24 24 24 24Rural 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

Kashmore 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9Urban 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13Rural 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

Shikarpur 17 16 16 16 17 17 17 16 16 16 15Urban 35 31 31 31 35 35 35 31 31 31 29Rural 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11

Larkana 60 60 60 59 60 60 59 60 60 59 57Urban 88 88 88 84 88 88 84 88 88 84 73Rural 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51

Shahdadkot 48 47 47 46 47 47 47 47 47 46 45Urban 87 85 85 79 82 82 82 82 82 76 71Rural 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38

Sukkur 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 35Urban 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 53Rural 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11

Ghotki 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 10Urban 21 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 18Rural 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 7

Khairpur 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 21Urban 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42Rural 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 11

Nowshero Feroze 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 51Urban 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55Rural 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 51

Shaheed Benazirabad 38 39 39 39 39 39 38 39 39 39 37Urban 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44Rural 36 38 38 38 38 38 36 38 38 38 34

Dadu 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 72Urban 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 79Rural 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 71

Jamshoro 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47Urban 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53Rural 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44

178

Page 200: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.5: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNIZED BY TYPE OF ANTIGEN-BASED ON RECORD

PROVINCE & DISTRICT BCG DPT1 DPT2 DPT3 POLIO1 MEASLESH.B2 H.B3POLIO2 POLIO3 H.B1

Hyderabad 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 46Urban 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 49Rural 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25

Tando Allah Yar 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 43Urban 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 62Rural 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37

Tando Muhammad Khan 37 37 37 37 37 37 36 37 37 37 34Urban 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 37Rural 36 36 36 36 36 36 35 36 36 36 34

Matiari 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 46Urban 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 44Rural 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 47

Badin 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 42Urban 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 50Rural 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 40

Thatta 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38Urban 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66Rural 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34

Sujawal 42 41 39 37 42 41 41 39 39 37 37Urban 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74Rural 40 38 37 35 40 39 39 37 37 35 35

Sanghar 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 25Urban 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 47Rural 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 19

Mir Pur Khas 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 50Urban 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74Rural 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 40

Umer Kot 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63Urban 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75Rural 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60

Tharparkar 35 33 31 30 35 35 34 32 31 30 23Urban 63 63 63 56 63 63 56 56 56 56 56Rural 31 30 27 27 31 31 31 29 27 27 19

Karachi 82 82 82 81 82 82 78 82 82 81 78Urban 84 84 84 84 84 84 79 84 84 84 81Rural 61 61 61 51 61 61 61 61 61 51 51

179

Page 201: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.5: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNIZED BY TYPE OF ANTIGEN-BASED ON RECORD

PROVINCE & DISTRICT BCG DPT1 DPT2 DPT3 POLIO1 MEASLESH.B2 H.B3POLIO2 POLIO3 H.B1

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 58Urban 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 74Rural 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 54

Chitral 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 73Urban 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67Rural 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 74

Upper Dir 74 73 72 69 73 72 69 73 72 69 60Urban 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33Rural 75 74 73 70 74 73 70 74 73 70 60

Lower Dir 84 84 84 82 84 84 82 84 84 82 77Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 74Rural 83 83 83 81 83 83 81 83 83 81 78

Swat 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 65Urban 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86Rural 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 61

Shangla 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29Urban - - - - - - - - - - -Rural 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29

Buner 67 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 61Urban - - - - - - - - - - -Rural 67 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 61

Malakand PA 65 65 64 63 65 65 63 65 64 63 61Urban 76 76 72 72 76 76 72 76 72 72 68Rural 61 61 61 59 61 61 59 61 61 59 58

Kohistan 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 16Urban - - - - - - - - - - -Rural 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 16

Manshera 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57Urban 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68Rural 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56

Batagram 45 46 45 45 46 46 46 46 45 45 42Urban - - - - - - - - - - -Rural 45 46 45 45 46 46 46 46 45 45 42

Abbottabad 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 77Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 93Rural 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73

Haripur 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 73Urban 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87Rural 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 70

180

Page 202: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.5: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNIZED BY TYPE OF ANTIGEN-BASED ON RECORD

PROVINCE & DISTRICT BCG DPT1 DPT2 DPT3 POLIO1 MEASLESH.B2 H.B3POLIO2 POLIO3 H.B1

Tor Garh 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2Urban - - - - - - - - - - -Rural 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2

Mardan 75 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 70Urban 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72Rural 76 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 69

Swabi 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 66Urban 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56Rural 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 68

Charsadda 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64Urban 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73Rural 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63

Peshawar 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 74Urban 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 80Rural 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 69

Nowsehra 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 67Urban 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 69Rural 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 64

Kohat 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 67Urban 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 73Rural 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66

Hangu 60 60 60 59 60 60 59 54 54 53 55Urban 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 37Rural 64 64 64 62 64 64 62 57 57 55 59

Karak 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31Urban 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24Rural 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31

Bannu 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 22Urban 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76Rural 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 19

Lakki Marwat 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 21Urban 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38Rural 20 20 20 20 21 21 21 20 20 20 20

D. I. Khan 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 49Urban 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53Rural 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 49

Tank 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 40Urban 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61Rural 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 36

181

Page 203: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.5: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNIZED BY TYPE OF ANTIGEN-BASED ON RECORD

PROVINCE & DISTRICT BCG DPT1 DPT2 DPT3 POLIO1 MEASLESH.B2 H.B3POLIO2 POLIO3 H.B1

Balochistan 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28Urban 51 51 51 49 51 51 49 51 51 49 50Rural 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20

Quetta 62 62 62 58 62 62 58 62 62 58 62Urban 68 68 68 62 68 68 62 68 68 62 68Rural 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51

Pishin 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35Urban 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65Rural 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34

Killa Abdullah 14 14 14 13 14 14 13 14 14 13 13Urban 36 36 36 25 36 36 25 36 36 25 25Rural 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11

Chaghai 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21Urban 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50Rural 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17

Nushki 30 30 30 28 30 30 30 30 30 28 30Urban 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51Rural 17 17 17 14 17 17 17 17 17 14 17

Loralai 18 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23Urban 24 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36Rural 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14

Barkhan 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43Urban 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59Rural 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41

Musa Khel 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 28Urban 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46Rural 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 19

Killa Saifullah 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37Urban 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67Rural 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26

Zhob 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48Urban 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40Rural 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49

Sheerani 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33Urban - - - - - - - - - - -Rural 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33

Sibbi 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46Urban 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64Rural 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32

Harnai 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21Urban 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77Rural 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16

182

Page 204: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.5: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNIZED BY TYPE OF ANTIGEN-BASED ON RECORD

PROVINCE & DISTRICT BCG DPT1 DPT2 DPT3 POLIO1 MEASLESH.B2 H.B3POLIO2 POLIO3 H.B1

Ziarat 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Rural 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26

Kohlu 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 30Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Rural 32 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 28

Dera Bugti 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Urban 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Rural 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Bolan/ Kachhi 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34Urban 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74Rural 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22

Jaffarabad 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11Urban 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10Rural 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11

Nasirabad 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 7Urban 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 32Rural 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Jhal Magsi 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 26Urban 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28Rural 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 26

Kalat 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Rural 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 15

Mastung 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Rural 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24

Khuzdar 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10Urban 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22Rural 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

Awaran 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46Urban - - - - - - - - - - -Rural 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46

Kharan 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39Urban 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48Rural 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35

Washuk 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4Urban - - - - - - - - - - -Rural 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

183

Page 205: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.5: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNIZED BY TYPE OF ANTIGEN-BASED ON RECORD

PROVINCE & DISTRICT BCG DPT1 DPT2 DPT3 POLIO1 MEASLESH.B2 H.B3POLIO2 POLIO3 H.B1

Lasbela 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38Urban 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38Rural 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38

Gwader 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 35Urban 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 40Rural 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20

NOTES:1. The Panjgur and Kech districts have been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

184

Page 206: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Pakistan 89 89 88 88 98 98 97 89 88 88 83Urban 95 95 93 93 98 97 96 94 93 93 87Rural 87 87 86 86 98 98 98 86 86 86 81

Punjab 96 96 95 95 99 98 98 96 95 95 90Urban 96 96 95 94 98 97 97 96 95 94 89Rural 96 96 96 95 99 99 98 96 96 95 91

Islamabad 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 90Urban 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88Rural 100 100 100 99 100 100 100 100 100 99 95

Attock 100 100 100 99 100 100 100 100 100 99 97Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Rural 100 100 100 98 100 100 100 100 100 98 94

Rawalpindi 95 95 94 95 97 97 97 95 94 95 93Urban 90 90 90 90 95 95 95 90 90 90 87Rural 100 100 99 100 100 100 100 100 99 100 100

Jehlum 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 98Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Rural 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 98

Chakwal 97 97 97 97 98 98 98 97 97 97 96Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Rural 96 96 96 96 97 97 97 96 96 96 95

Sargodha 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 91Urban 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 82Rural 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 95

Bhakhar 93 93 92 92 100 100 99 93 92 92 87Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 93Rural 92 92 91 91 100 99 99 92 91 91 86

Khushab 95 95 95 95 96 96 96 95 95 95 91Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 94Rural 93 93 93 93 94 94 94 93 93 93 89

Mianwali 98 98 97 96 99 99 98 98 97 96 90Urban 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 92Rural 98 98 98 96 100 100 98 98 98 96 89

Faisalabad 96 96 96 96 97 97 96 96 96 96 88Urban 92 92 92 92 94 94 92 92 92 92 82Rural 100 100 99 99 99 99 99 100 99 99 93

Chiniot 97 97 97 95 99 99 97 97 97 95 90Urban 97 97 97 97 100 100 100 97 97 97 93Rural 97 97 97 94 99 99 95 97 97 94 88

Jhang 95 96 94 94 97 96 95 96 94 94 90Urban 89 92 87 87 92 87 87 92 87 87 87Rural 97 97 97 97 99 99 98 97 97 97 91

BCG DPT1 DPT2 DPT3 POLIO1 MEASLESH.B2 H.B3

TABLE 3.6: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNIZED BY TYPE OF ANTIGEN-BASED ON RECORD AND RECALL.

POLIO2 POLIO3 H.B1PROVINCE & DISTRICT

185

Page 207: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

BCG DPT1 DPT2 DPT3 POLIO1 MEASLESH.B2 H.B3

TABLE 3.6: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNIZED BY TYPE OF ANTIGEN-BASED ON RECORD AND RECALL.

POLIO2 POLIO3 H.B1PROVINCE & DISTRICT

Toba Tek Singh 97 97 96 96 99 97 97 97 96 96 91Urban 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 92Rural 97 97 95 95 100 97 97 97 95 95 91

Gujranwala 97 97 96 95 99 99 97 97 96 95 93Urban 100 100 98 94 100 100 96 100 98 94 93Rural 95 95 95 95 98 98 98 95 95 95 92

Hafizabad 98 98 98 98 99 99 99 98 98 98 97Urban 97 97 97 97 100 100 100 97 97 97 97Rural 99 99 98 98 99 99 99 99 98 98 97

Gujrat 95 96 96 96 100 97 97 96 96 96 94Urban 95 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 93Rural 95 95 95 95 100 96 96 95 95 95 94

Mandi Bahuddin 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Rural 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95

Sialkot 100 100 100 99 100 100 99 99 99 99 95Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 90Rural 100 100 100 99 100 100 99 99 99 98 96

Narowal 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Rural 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 98

Lahore 98 97 95 95 99 97 97 97 95 95 90Urban 99 99 97 97 99 97 97 99 97 97 89Rural 94 91 91 91 100 100 100 91 91 91 94

Kasur 95 91 91 91 97 97 97 91 91 91 86Urban 81 81 81 81 100 100 100 81 81 81 56Rural 96 93 93 93 96 96 96 93 93 93 90

Sheikhupura 95 94 93 93 99 96 96 94 93 93 86Urban 95 95 90 90 100 95 95 95 90 90 79Rural 95 94 94 94 98 97 97 94 94 94 90

Nankana Sahib 100 100 100 97 100 100 97 100 100 97 96Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Rural 100 100 100 95 100 100 95 100 100 95 94

Okara 98 98 98 97 98 98 97 98 98 97 91Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 95Rural 97 97 97 96 97 97 96 97 97 96 89

Sahiwal 96 96 96 96 98 98 98 96 96 96 91Urban 87 87 87 87 100 100 100 87 87 87 74Rural 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 95

186

Page 208: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

BCG DPT1 DPT2 DPT3 POLIO1 MEASLESH.B2 H.B3

TABLE 3.6: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNIZED BY TYPE OF ANTIGEN-BASED ON RECORD AND RECALL.

POLIO2 POLIO3 H.B1PROVINCE & DISTRICT

Pakpatten 98 98 98 98 99 99 99 98 98 98 94Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 66Rural 98 98 98 98 99 99 99 98 98 98 97

Vehari 96 96 96 95 99 99 98 96 96 95 93Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 86Rural 96 96 95 94 99 99 98 96 95 94 94

Multan 97 98 98 97 100 100 99 98 98 97 92Urban 98 98 98 98 100 100 100 98 98 98 96Rural 97 97 97 96 99 99 98 97 97 96 90

Lodhran 98 98 98 98 99 99 99 98 98 98 95Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Rural 98 98 97 97 99 99 98 98 97 97 94

Khanewal 99 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 95Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 94Rural 99 100 100 100 99 99 99 100 100 100 96

D. G. Khan 96 96 95 95 100 98 98 96 95 94 76Urban 95 95 95 95 100 100 100 95 95 95 88Rural 97 97 95 95 100 98 98 96 95 94 74

Rajanpur 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 91Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 77Rural 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 93

Layyah 100 100 100 100 99 99 99 100 100 100 90Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 80Rural 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 92

Muzaffar Garh 94 94 94 94 98 98 98 94 94 94 89Urban 90 87 87 87 92 92 92 87 87 87 85Rural 95 96 96 95 99 99 99 96 96 95 89

Bahawalpur 90 89 88 88 99 99 99 89 88 88 83Urban 91 91 89 89 98 97 97 91 89 89 86Rural 89 89 88 87 99 100 99 89 88 87 82

Bahawalnagar 94 95 94 93 96 95 94 94 92 92 81Urban 89 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96Rural 95 95 93 93 96 95 93 93 91 91 77

Rahim Yar Khan 92 92 90 89 100 99 98 92 90 89 84Urban 92 92 90 88 100 100 99 92 90 88 84Rural 92 91 90 89 100 99 98 91 90 89 84

23 21 21 19 20 20 20

NOTES:1.Based on record: Children who reported having received the specified immunisation who also have an immunization card, expressed as a percentage of all children aged 12-23 months.

187

Page 209: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

BCG DPT1 DPT2 DPT3 POLIO1 MEASLESH.B2 H.B3

TABLE 3.6: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNIZED BY TYPE OF ANTIGEN-BASED ON RECORD AND RECALL.

POLIO2 POLIO3 H.B1PROVINCE & DISTRICT

Sindh 83 82 81 80 99 98 96 81 81 80 74Urban 95 94 91 91 99 97 93 91 91 91 85Rural 74 73 73 72 98 98 98 73 73 73 66

Jacobabad 68 67 66 66 99 99 98 67 66 66 66Urban 93 91 91 91 97 97 94 91 91 91 91Rural 62 62 61 61 99 99 99 62 61 61 60

Kashmore 81 81 81 81 100 100 100 81 81 81 73Urban 96 96 96 96 100 100 100 96 96 96 90Rural 73 73 73 73 100 100 100 73 73 73 66

Shikarpur 68 66 66 66 99 99 99 66 66 66 65Urban 83 79 79 79 97 97 97 79 79 79 74Rural 63 61 61 61 100 100 100 61 61 61 61

Larkana 86 84 83 82 97 96 95 83 83 82 71Urban 100 100 100 96 100 100 96 100 100 96 84Rural 82 79 77 77 96 94 94 77 77 77 67

Shahdadkot 70 66 66 64 98 98 97 66 65 64 62Urban 100 97 97 91 94 94 94 94 94 89 81Rural 62 59 58 58 99 99 98 59 58 58 58

Sukkur 85 85 85 85 100 100 100 85 85 85 80Urban 89 88 88 88 100 100 100 88 88 88 83Rural 80 80 80 80 100 100 100 80 80 80 75

Ghotki 71 71 71 69 100 100 99 71 71 70 64Urban 80 82 82 80 100 100 100 82 82 82 68Rural 68 68 68 67 100 100 99 68 68 67 62

Khairpur 91 91 91 91 98 98 98 91 91 91 80Urban 93 93 93 93 95 95 95 93 93 93 88Rural 91 91 91 91 100 100 100 91 91 91 76

Nowshero Feroze 89 89 88 87 99 99 99 89 88 87 71Urban 100 100 100 82 100 100 100 100 100 82 82Rural 88 88 87 87 98 98 98 88 87 87 70

Shaheed Benazirabad 97 97 97 97 98 98 97 97 97 97 78Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 76Rural 96 96 96 96 97 97 96 96 96 96 79

Dadu 91 91 91 91 95 95 95 91 91 91 83Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 86Rural 90 90 90 90 94 94 94 90 90 90 82

Jamshoro 85 83 83 83 92 92 91 83 83 83 82Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Rural 78 74 74 74 88 88 86 74 74 74 73

188

Page 210: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

BCG DPT1 DPT2 DPT3 POLIO1 MEASLESH.B2 H.B3

TABLE 3.6: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNIZED BY TYPE OF ANTIGEN-BASED ON RECORD AND RECALL.

POLIO2 POLIO3 H.B1PROVINCE & DISTRICT

Hyderabad 92 92 92 92 100 100 100 92 92 92 84Urban 93 93 93 93 100 100 100 93 93 93 85Rural 80 80 80 80 100 100 100 80 80 80 80

Tando Allah Yar 87 87 87 87 100 100 100 87 87 87 85Urban 96 96 96 96 100 100 100 96 96 96 92Rural 85 85 85 85 100 100 100 85 85 85 83

Tando Muhammad Khan 67 67 67 67 98 98 97 67 67 67 63Urban 87 87 87 87 100 100 100 87 87 87 81Rural 64 64 64 64 97 97 96 64 64 64 60

Matiari 93 93 93 93 100 100 100 93 93 93 87Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 93Rural 91 91 91 91 100 100 100 91 91 91 85

Badin 80 78 78 78 100 100 100 78 78 78 73Urban 94 88 88 86 100 100 100 88 88 86 81Rural 74 74 74 74 100 100 100 74 74 74 70

Thatta 51 51 51 51 94 92 92 51 51 51 51Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Rural 42 42 42 42 93 91 91 42 42 42 42

Sujawal 53 51 50 48 99 96 92 50 50 48 48Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Rural 50 48 47 44 99 95 92 47 47 44 44

Sanghar 77 77 77 77 99 99 99 77 77 77 65Urban 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 85Rural 73 73 73 73 100 100 100 73 73 73 60

Mir Pur Khas 65 65 65 65 98 98 98 65 65 65 64Urban 93 93 93 93 97 97 97 93 93 93 93Rural 53 53 53 53 99 99 99 53 53 53 52

Umer Kot 68 68 68 68 100 100 100 68 68 68 67Urban 75 75 75 75 100 100 100 75 75 75 75Rural 66 66 66 66 100 100 100 66 66 66 65

Tharparkar 56 51 47 46 98 98 96 51 49 48 42Urban 100 100 100 94 100 100 94 94 94 94 94Rural 50 44 40 40 98 98 97 45 43 43 35

Karachi 95 95 89 88 100 96 88 89 89 88 85Urban 97 97 90 90 100 95 87 90 90 90 86Rural 80 80 80 70 100 100 100 80 80 70 70

189

Page 211: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

BCG DPT1 DPT2 DPT3 POLIO1 MEASLESH.B2 H.B3

TABLE 3.6: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNIZED BY TYPE OF ANTIGEN-BASED ON RECORD AND RECALL.

POLIO2 POLIO3 H.B1PROVINCE & DISTRICT

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 84 84 84 83 98 98 98 84 83 83 78Urban 97 96 96 96 99 99 99 96 96 96 90Rural 81 81 81 80 98 98 97 81 81 80 76

Chitral 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 98Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Rural 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 97

Upper Dir 92 91 90 87 97 96 93 91 90 87 77Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Rural 91 90 89 87 97 96 93 90 89 87 77

Lower Dir 91 91 91 89 98 98 96 91 91 89 84Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 74Rural 90 90 90 88 98 98 96 90 90 88 85

Swat 91 91 91 91 98 98 98 91 91 91 89Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Rural 89 89 89 89 98 98 98 89 89 89 87

Shangla 49 49 49 49 100 100 99 49 49 49 49Urban - - - - - - - - - - -Rural 49 49 49 49 100 100 99 49 49 49 49

Buner 85 84 84 84 99 99 98 84 84 84 79Urban - - - - - - - - - - -Rural 85 84 84 84 99 99 98 84 84 84 79

Malakand PA 100 100 99 98 100 100 98 100 99 98 96Urban 100 100 95 95 100 100 95 100 95 95 92Rural 100 100 100 99 100 100 99 100 100 99 98

Kohistan 24 24 24 24 98 97 95 23 23 23 22Urban - - - - - - - - - - -Rural 24 24 24 24 98 97 95 23 23 23 22

Manshera 93 93 93 91 94 94 94 93 93 91 77Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Rural 92 92 92 89 93 93 93 92 92 89 74

Batagram 59 59 58 57 100 100 100 59 58 57 53Urban - - - - - - - - - - -Rural 59 59 58 57 100 100 100 59 58 57 53

Abbottabad 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 94Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 93Rural 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95

Haripur 94 94 94 92 98 98 96 94 94 92 82Urban 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87Rural 95 95 95 93 100 100 98 95 95 93 81

190

Page 212: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

BCG DPT1 DPT2 DPT3 POLIO1 MEASLESH.B2 H.B3

TABLE 3.6: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNIZED BY TYPE OF ANTIGEN-BASED ON RECORD AND RECALL.

POLIO2 POLIO3 H.B1PROVINCE & DISTRICTTor Garh 9 9 8 6 96 96 96 9 8 6 3Urban - - - - - - - - - - -Rural 9 9 8 6 96 96 96 9 8 6 3

Mardan 97 96 96 96 99 99 99 96 96 96 90Urban 93 93 93 93 100 100 100 93 93 93 88Rural 98 96 96 96 99 99 99 96 96 96 91

Swabi 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 87Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Rural 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 85

Charsadda 99 99 99 99 100 100 100 99 99 99 98Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Rural 99 99 99 99 100 100 100 99 99 99 98

Peshawar 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 95Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 93Rural 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 97

Nowsehra 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 84Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 88Rural 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 81

Kohat 87 87 87 87 97 97 97 87 87 87 84Urban 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 80Rural 85 85 85 85 98 98 98 85 85 85 85

Hangu 84 84 84 83 97 97 95 78 78 77 78Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 92Rural 80 80 80 79 96 96 94 73 73 72 75

Karak 63 63 63 63 99 99 99 63 63 63 63Urban 75 75 75 75 100 100 100 75 75 75 75Rural 62 62 62 62 99 99 99 62 62 62 62

Bannu 63 61 60 60 95 94 94 61 60 60 57Urban 100 76 76 76 100 76 76 76 76 76 76Rural 60 60 59 59 95 95 95 60 59 59 56

Lakki Marwat 50 50 50 50 98 98 98 50 50 50 49Urban 38 38 38 38 100 100 100 38 38 38 38Rural 51 51 51 51 98 98 98 51 51 51 50

D. I. Khan 68 68 68 68 98 98 97 68 68 68 65Urban 87 87 87 87 100 100 100 87 87 87 87Rural 66 66 66 66 98 98 97 66 66 66 62

Tank 68 68 68 68 99 97 97 68 68 68 66Urban 78 78 78 78 100 100 100 78 78 78 78Rural 65 65 65 65 98 97 97 65 65 65 64

191

Page 213: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

BCG DPT1 DPT2 DPT3 POLIO1 MEASLESH.B2 H.B3

TABLE 3.6: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNIZED BY TYPE OF ANTIGEN-BASED ON RECORD AND RECALL.

POLIO2 POLIO3 H.B1PROVINCE & DISTRICTBalochistan 54 55 55 54 96 96 95 55 55 54 52Urban 74 75 75 72 96 96 94 75 75 72 73Rural 47 48 48 48 96 96 95 48 48 48 45

Quetta 68 68 68 65 94 94 91 68 68 65 68Urban 76 76 76 71 92 92 86 76 76 71 76Rural 52 52 52 52 100 100 100 52 52 52 52

Pishin 49 49 49 49 100 100 100 49 49 49 49Urban 65 65 65 65 100 100 100 65 65 65 65Rural 49 49 49 49 100 100 100 49 49 49 49

Killa Abdullah 31 31 31 30 96 96 90 31 31 30 30Urban 36 36 36 25 100 100 90 36 36 25 25Rural 30 30 30 30 95 95 90 30 30 30 30

Chaghai 30 30 30 30 90 90 90 30 30 30 30Urban 50 50 50 50 80 80 80 50 50 50 50Rural 27 27 27 27 91 91 91 27 27 27 27

Nushki 54 54 54 53 97 97 97 54 54 53 54Urban 66 66 66 66 100 100 100 66 66 66 66Rural 48 48 48 45 95 95 95 48 48 45 48

Loralai 45 55 55 55 100 100 100 55 55 55 55Urban 59 83 83 83 100 100 100 83 83 83 83Rural 33 33 33 33 100 100 100 33 33 33 33

Barkhan 68 68 68 68 76 76 75 68 68 68 68Urban 78 78 78 78 100 100 100 78 78 78 78Rural 66 66 66 66 73 73 72 66 66 66 66

Musa Khel 52 52 52 52 97 97 97 52 52 52 38Urban 79 79 79 79 91 91 91 79 79 79 79Rural 39 39 39 39 100 100 100 39 39 39 19

Killa Saifullah 50 50 50 50 93 97 97 50 50 50 50Urban 67 67 67 67 88 100 100 67 67 67 67Rural 44 44 44 44 95 95 95 44 44 44 44

Zhob 67 67 67 67 95 95 95 67 67 67 66Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 90Rural 62 62 62 62 95 95 95 62 62 62 62

Sheerani 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55Urban - - - - - - - - - - -Rural 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55

Sibbi 61 61 61 61 91 91 91 61 61 61 61Urban 64 64 64 64 81 81 81 64 64 64 64Rural 58 58 58 58 97 97 97 58 58 58 58

Harnai 34 34 34 34 89 89 89 34 34 34 34Urban 77 77 77 77 100 100 100 77 77 77 77Rural 31 31 31 31 88 88 88 31 31 31 31

192

Page 214: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

BCG DPT1 DPT2 DPT3 POLIO1 MEASLESH.B2 H.B3

TABLE 3.6: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNIZED BY TYPE OF ANTIGEN-BASED ON RECORD AND RECALL.

POLIO2 POLIO3 H.B1PROVINCE & DISTRICT

Ziarat 33 33 33 33 100 100 100 33 33 33 33Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Rural 30 30 30 30 100 100 100 30 30 30 30

Kohlu 38 46 48 48 100 100 100 44 46 46 43Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Rural 36 44 46 46 100 100 100 42 44 44 41

Dera Bugti 32 32 32 32 99 99 99 32 32 32 32Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Rural 26 26 26 26 99 99 99 26 26 26 26

Bolan/ Kachhi 62 62 62 62 95 95 95 62 62 62 59Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 87Rural 50 50 50 50 93 93 93 50 50 50 50

Jaffarabad 45 45 45 45 100 100 100 45 45 45 44Urban 90 90 90 90 100 100 100 90 90 90 85Rural 32 32 32 32 100 100 100 32 32 32 32

Nasirabad 32 32 32 32 100 100 100 32 32 32 30Urban 90 90 90 90 100 100 100 90 90 90 79Rural 17 17 17 17 100 100 100 17 17 17 17

Jhal Magsi 45 45 45 45 72 72 72 45 45 45 44Urban 28 28 28 28 100 100 100 28 28 28 28Rural 46 46 46 46 71 71 71 46 46 46 45

Kalat 94 94 94 94 100 100 100 94 94 94 84Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Rural 92 92 92 92 100 100 100 92 92 92 79

Mastung 77 77 77 77 100 100 100 77 77 77 75Urban 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Rural 74 74 74 74 100 100 100 74 74 74 72

Khuzdar 75 75 75 75 99 100 100 75 75 75 61Urban 61 61 61 61 100 100 100 61 61 61 61Rural 79 79 79 79 99 100 100 79 79 79 60

Awaran 85 85 85 85 100 100 100 85 85 85 85Urban - - - - - - - - - - -Rural 85 85 85 85 100 100 100 85 85 85 85

Kharan 61 61 61 61 100 100 100 61 61 61 61Urban 48 48 48 48 100 100 100 48 48 48 48Rural 67 67 67 67 100 100 100 67 67 67 67

Washuk 49 49 49 49 100 100 100 49 49 49 49Urban - - - - - - - - - - -Rural 49 49 49 49 100 100 100 49 49 49 49

193

Page 215: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

BCG DPT1 DPT2 DPT3 POLIO1 MEASLESH.B2 H.B3

TABLE 3.6: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN 12-23 MONTHS THAT HAVE BEEN IMMUNIZED BY TYPE OF ANTIGEN-BASED ON RECORD AND RECALL.

POLIO2 POLIO3 H.B1PROVINCE & DISTRICT

Lasbela 49 49 49 49 83 83 80 49 49 49 49Urban 59 59 59 59 100 100 100 59 59 59 59Rural 44 44 44 44 73 73 70 44 44 44 44

Gwader 56 56 56 56 100 100 100 56 56 56 51Urban 60 60 60 60 100 100 100 60 60 60 53Rural 47 47 47 47 100 100 100 47 47 47 47

NOTES:1. The Panjgur and Kech districts have been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

194

Page 216: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.7: CHILDREN UNDER 5 SUFFERING FROM DIARRHEA IN PAST 30 DAYS-BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

M F T M F T M F T

Pakistan 10 11 10 8 8 8 9 9 9 10Punjab 11 11 11 9 8 9 10 9 9 10Islamabad 4 6 5 2 10 7 3 7 5 5

1 Attock 22 16 19 2 4 3 8 8 8 19 32 Rawalpindi 4 7 5 1 4 2 2 5 4 35 33 Jehlum 10 10 10 2 5 4 5 7 6 32 14 Chakwal 0 6 5 3 4 3 3 4 4 36 35 Sargodha 17 17 17 7 9 8 10 11 11 9 136 Bhakhar 10 11 10 6 8 7 7 8 8 22 77 Khushab 11 11 11 7 6 7 8 8 8 20 88 Mianwali 7 9 8 5 5 5 5 6 5 34 159 Faisalabad 8 8 8 9 12 10 9 10 9 13 6

10 Chiniot 2 5 4 6 9 8 5 7 6 30 711 Jhang 11 14 13 14 11 13 14 12 13 6 1012 Toba Tek Singh 16 12 14 13 12 13 14 12 13 5 1213 Gujranwala 11 11 11 8 8 8 9 9 9 12 414 Hafizabad 15 13 14 10 7 9 12 9 10 10 415 Gujrat 1 10 5 6 10 8 4 10 7 26 316 Mandi Bahuddin 21 11 16 8 5 7 10 6 9 18 917 Sialkot 13 19 16 9 3 6 10 8 9 15 1318 Narowal 21 5 13 8 8 8 10 8 9 16 1219 Lahore 11 6 9 13 4 9 12 6 9 14 1020 Kasur 23 19 21 5 5 5 8 8 8 23 721 Sheikhupura 10 4 7 7 4 5 8 4 6 31 622 Nankana Sahib 10 3 7 7 4 5 7 4 6 33 623 Okara 13 27 21 8 8 8 9 14 11 7 1224 Sahiwal 11 10 11 7 6 6 8 6 7 27 1025 Pakpatten 13 10 12 9 4 7 9 5 7 24 1126 Vehari 8 26 18 8 8 8 8 11 10 11 1127 Multan 7 10 8 14 11 12 11 10 11 8 928 Lodhran 7 5 6 17 15 16 15 13 14 4 829 Khanewal 12 16 14 5 6 5 6 8 7 28 1030 D. G. Khan 19 17 18 17 13 15 17 13 15 3 2531 Rajanpur 12 6 9 7 6 7 8 6 7 29 1732 Layyah 36 23 28 25 27 26 26 27 26 1 3033 Muzaffar Garh 10 9 9 8 6 7 8 6 7 25 1034 Bahawalpur 19 20 19 16 15 16 17 17 17 2 1735 Bahawalnagar 3 18 11 10 6 8 8 9 9 17 1036 Rahim Yar Khan 8 6 7 9 8 8 9 7 8 21 8

RANKTOTAL 12-13

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT

NOTES:1. Children who have suffered from diarrhoea in last 30 days prior to the date of interveiw are expressed a percentage of all children aged less than 5 years .2. Diarrhoea in past 30 days : The survey 2012-13 contained a question addressed to the mothers of all the children aged less than 5 years where they were asked whether they had suffered from an episode of diarrhoea in the past 30 days.

195

Page 217: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.7: CHILDREN UNDER 5 SUFFERING FROM DIARRHEA IN PAST 30 DAYS-BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

M F T M F T M F T RANKTOTAL 12-13

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Sindh 7 10 8 5 5 5 6 7 6 9

1 Jacobabad 5 3 4 2 3 2 2 3 3 21 23

2 Kashmore 3 4 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 22 6

3 Shikarpur 4 5 5 4 8 6 4 7 6 13 8

4 Larkana 11 7 9 1 3 2 5 5 5 18 21

5 Shahdadkot 8 7 7 1 2 1 2 2 2 24 5

6 Sukkur 5 7 6 13 9 11 9 8 9 5 8

7 Ghotki 10 11 11 5 5 5 6 6 6 12 5

8 Khairpur 2 6 4 2 3 3 2 4 3 20 5

9 Nowshero Feroze 17 30 24 8 11 9 9 15 12 1 11

10 Shaheed Benazirabad 7 5 6 7 7 7 7 6 7 9 11

11 Dadu 7 9 8 1 1 1 2 2 2 23 4

12 Jamshoro 9 15 12 3 4 3 4 7 6 14 9

13 Hyderabad 5 16 10 12 9 11 7 15 10 3 9

14 Tando Allah Yar 10 6 8 5 5 5 6 5 6 15 9

15 Tando Muhammad Khan 4 27 14 4 3 3 4 5 5 17 7

16 Matiari 9 10 10 10 8 9 9 8 9 4 6

17 Badin 7 6 6 5 4 4 5 4 5 16 6

18 Thatta 6 4 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 19 9

19 Sujawal 12 10 11 10 5 7 10 6 8 6 -

20 Sanghar 15 23 20 8 7 8 10 11 10 2 17

21 Mir Pur Khas 3 3 3 8 6 7 7 6 6 11 7

22 Umer Kot 14 9 11 5 6 6 6 7 7 10 9

23 Tharparkar 8 10 9 5 8 7 6 9 7 8 7

24 Karachi 7 9 8 4 8 6 6 9 8 7 11

196

Page 218: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.7: CHILDREN UNDER 5 SUFFERING FROM DIARRHEA IN PAST 30 DAYS-BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

M F T M F T M F T RANKTOTAL 12-13

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 18 17 17 9 8 9 10 10 10 11

1 Chitral 0 0 0 2 9 6 2 8 5 19 2

2 Upper Dir 11 17 14 14 11 12 14 11 12 6 7

3 Lower Dir 10 23 18 3 3 3 3 4 4 24 4

4 Swat 23 22 22 2 3 3 5 7 6 18 6

5 Shangla - - - 5 5 5 5 5 5 20 4

6 Buner - - - 3 4 3 3 4 3 25 14

7 Malakand PA 23 23 23 8 7 7 11 10 10 13 5

8 Kohistan - - - 8 5 7 8 5 7 17 5

9 Manshera 25 8 17 3 5 4 5 5 5 21 14

10 Batagram - - - 15 16 15 15 16 15 2 13

11 Abbottabad 8 20 14 8 1 5 8 5 7 16 2

12 Haripur 27 12 21 2 1 1 6 2 4 22 15

13 Tor Garh - - - 5 3 4 5 3 4 23 11

14 Mardan 15 26 21 8 7 8 10 13 11 9 17

15 Swabi 0 0 0 9 8 8 7 7 7 15 5

16 Charsadda 12 5 9 11 11 11 11 10 11 11 15

17 Peshawar 22 16 19 14 11 13 17 14 16 1 12

18 Nowsehra 21 18 20 8 13 11 14 15 15 4 17

19 Kohat 18 8 13 11 8 10 12 8 11 12 11

20 Hangu 14 21 18 14 7 11 14 10 12 7 10

21 Karak 14 22 17 14 7 11 14 8 11 10 12

22 Bannu 17 9 13 12 16 14 12 16 14 5 13

23 Lakki Marwat 15 3 9 12 12 12 12 11 11 8 12

24 D. I. Khan 14 7 12 15 16 15 15 15 15 3 15

25 Tank 8 3 6 11 8 10 11 8 9 14 16

197

Page 219: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.7: CHILDREN UNDER 5 SUFFERING FROM DIARRHEA IN PAST 30 DAYS-BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

M F T M F T M F T RANKTOTAL 12-13

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Balochistan 10 15 12 11 11 11 11 12 11 14

1 Quetta 4 10 7 6 18 12 5 13 9 16 9

2 Pishin 0 0 0 2 2 2 1 1 1 26 13

3 Killa Abdullah 0 3 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 27 8

4 Chaghai 0 0 0 5 7 7 5 7 6 23 9

5 Nushki 12 8 10 6 7 7 8 8 8 19 1

6 Loralai 12 23 18 32 19 26 28 20 24 3 5

7 Barkhan 0 23 11 14 15 14 13 15 14 9 7

8 Musa Khel 26 20 23 23 16 20 24 17 21 4 4

9 Killa Saifullah 12 7 9 5 9 7 7 8 8 18 10

10 Zhob 5 8 7 10 19 14 9 17 13 11 9

11 Sheerani - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 13

12 Sibbi 9 9 9 12 7 9 11 8 9 15 12

13 Harnai 27 11 22 15 8 11 16 8 12 13 12

14 Ziarat 0 0 0 4 9 6 3 8 6 22 14

15 Kohlu 0 0 0 6 13 10 5 11 8 17 5

16 Dera Bugti 0 0 0 6 3 5 6 2 4 25 18

17 Bolan/ Kachhi 0 24 11 3 5 4 2 9 6 24 17

18 Jaffarabad 3 4 3 6 8 7 5 7 6 21 30

19 Nasirabad/ Tamboo 14 7 11 19 20 20 18 17 18 6 17

20 Jhal Magsi 6 0 5 16 13 14 16 12 14 10 10

21 Kalat 54 33 46 26 28 27 34 29 31 1 20

22 Mastung 50 66 60 9 8 9 16 21 19 5 42

23 Khuzdar 33 44 38 26 17 22 28 28 28 2 20

24 Awaran - - - 21 10 16 21 10 16 8 22

25 Kharan 19 19 19 14 18 16 16 19 17 7 6

26 Washuk - - - 10 11 11 10 11 11 14 16

27 Lasbela 9 15 11 4 6 5 6 9 8 20 7

28 Gwader 11 5 9 20 13 17 14 9 12 12 7

NOTES:1. The Panjgur and Kech districts have been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation .

198

Page 220: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

Pakikstan 92 95 94 95 94 94 94 94 94Punjab 89 94 92 95 93 94 93 94 93Islamabad 100 100 100 100 95 96 100 98 98Attock 61 74 67 100 100 100 68 82 75Rawalpindi 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Jehlum 54 100 71 64 82 75 57 89 73Chakwal 0 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Sargodha 96 100 98 100 95 97 98 97 97Bhakhar 59 63 61 92 100 97 83 94 89Khushab 100 100 100 95 98 96 97 99 98Mianwali 73 100 88 91 85 88 86 90 88Faisalabad 90 94 92 100 100 100 96 98 97Chiniot 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Jhang 100 88 93 94 98 96 95 96 95Toba Tek Singh 90 100 93 94 97 95 93 98 95Gujranwala 62 100 80 79 80 79 69 93 80Hafizabad 74 90 81 82 88 84 79 89 83Gujrat 100 68 74 88 86 87 89 82 84Mandi Bahuddin 63 100 75 100 90 97 88 93 90Sialkot 85 93 90 83 57 77 84 82 83Narowal 100 100 100 95 93 94 97 94 96Lahore 95 100 97 100 76 94 97 95 96Kasur 91 71 82 74 69 71 82 70 76Sheikhupura 100 71 91 86 95 89 91 87 90Nankana Sahib 100 0 79 92 78 87 95 62 84Okara 100 100 100 95 100 97 97 100 99Sahiwal 71 69 70 92 78 86 87 75 82Pakpatten 100 100 100 93 90 92 94 92 93Vehari 100 100 100 92 100 96 93 100 97Multan 90 94 92 100 87 95 98 89 94Lodhran 80 100 88 98 92 96 97 92 95Khanewal 90 78 83 95 97 96 94 90 91D. G. Khan 100 91 97 100 98 99 100 98 99Rajanpur 73 100 82 100 92 97 94 93 94Layyah 100 100 100 99 95 97 99 95 97Muzaffar Garh 58 78 67 99 98 99 93 95 94Bahawalpur 100 100 100 99 94 97 99 96 98Bahawalnagar 100 89 90 92 100 95 93 95 94Rahim Yar Khan 91 100 94 95 98 97 94 98 96

TABLE 3.8: TREATMENT OF DIARRHOEA IN CHILDREN UNDER 5 YEARS

PROVINCE & DISTRICT

1. DIARRHOEA CASES WHERE A PRACTITIONER WAS CONSULTED

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

NOTES: 1.Diarrhoea cases where a practitioner was consulted expressed as a percentage of all diarrhoea cases during past 30 days in children under 5 years.2.Cases where a practitioner was consulted: For all the children that reported an episode of diarrhoea in the past 30 days the mothers were asked whether they consulted a practitioner for the ailment. The statistics reported here represent the percentage of cases where a practitioner was consulted.

199

Page 221: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 3.8: TREATMENT OF DIARRHOEA IN CHILDREN UNDER 5 YEARS

PROVINCE & DISTRICT

1. DIARRHOEA CASES WHERE A PRACTITIONER WAS CONSULTED

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Sindh 98 97 97 96 95 95 97 96 96

Jacobabad 73 33 58 94 93 93 86 80 83

Kashmore 44 100 77 100 100 100 82 100 92

Shikarpur 100 100 100 91 96 94 93 96 95

Larkana 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Shahdadkot 100 78 89 86 86 86 94 82 88

Sukkur 100 100 100 95 88 92 96 94 95

Ghotki 100 100 100 96 100 98 98 100 99

Khairpur 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Nowshero Feroze 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Shaheed Benazirabad 100 100 100 100 90 95 100 92 96

Dadu 63 76 70 100 100 100 82 85 84

Jamshoro 100 80 87 91 74 82 95 78 85

Hyderabad 100 100 100 78 84 81 92 98 96

Tando Allah Yar 85 100 91 100 100 100 95 100 97

Tando Muhammad Khan 100 42 52 100 100 100 100 69 83

Matiari 83 100 91 100 85 94 96 89 93

Badin 91 70 81 95 94 95 94 86 91

Thatta 100 100 100 86 79 82 87 82 85

Sujawal 100 100 100 84 88 86 87 92 89

Sanghar 100 90 93 100 89 95 100 90 94

Mir Pur Khas 100 56 76 100 100 100 100 94 97

Umer Kot 86 100 91 100 100 100 95 100 97

Tharparkar 100 100 100 92 96 94 93 96 95

Karachi 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

200

Page 222: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 3.8: TREATMENT OF DIARRHOEA IN CHILDREN UNDER 5 YEARS

PROVINCE & DISTRICT

1. DIARRHOEA CASES WHERE A PRACTITIONER WAS CONSULTED

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 94 100 97 94 95 94 94 97 95

Chitral 0 0 0 100 100 100 100 100 100

Upper Dir 100 100 100 84 86 85 84 87 85

Lower Dir 100 100 100 90 100 95 91 100 96

Swat 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Shangla - - - 92 95 94 92 95 94

Buner - - - 100 100 100 100 100 100

Malakand PA 100 89 95 100 93 96 100 91 96

Kohistan - - - 61 82 70 61 82 70

Manshera 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Batagram - - - 95 94 95 95 94 95

Abbottabad 100 100 100 91 100 93 93 100 96

Haripur 100 100 100 100 0 77 100 72 94

Tor Garh - - - 75 100 85 75 100 85

Mardan 88 100 96 97 100 99 94 100 97

Swabi 0 0 0 100 100 100 100 100 100

Charsadda 100 100 100 100 96 98 100 96 98

Peshawar 94 100 97 94 100 96 94 100 97

Nowsehra 87 100 94 100 100 100 91 100 96

Kohat 100 100 100 100 89 96 100 92 97

Hangu 100 100 100 72 85 76 77 91 83

Karak 100 100 100 93 95 94 93 96 94

Bannu 52 100 67 86 95 91 83 95 90

Lakki Marwat 75 100 80 100 100 100 97 100 98

D. I. Khan 100 100 100 99 94 97 99 94 97

Tank 53 100 66 97 94 96 93 95 94

201

Page 223: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

TABLE 3.8: TREATMENT OF DIARRHOEA IN CHILDREN UNDER 5 YEARS

PROVINCE & DISTRICT

1. DIARRHOEA CASES WHERE A PRACTITIONER WAS CONSULTED

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Balochistan 100 93 96 94 92 93 95 92 94

Quetta 100 81 86 94 100 99 97 91 93

Pishin 0 0 0 100 100 100 100 100 100

Killa Abdullah 0 100 100 81 89 86 81 90 87

Chaghai 0 0 0 73 91 84 73 91 84

Nushki 100 48 74 70 100 87 79 88 84

Loralai 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Barkhan 0 100 100 100 96 98 100 96 98

Musa Khel 100 100 100 100 93 98 100 96 98

Killa Saifullah 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Zhob 100 100 100 92 93 93 93 93 93

Sheerani - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sibbi 100 100 100 65 74 68 77 87 81

Harnai 85 0 71 61 66 63 65 62 64

Ziarat 0 0 0 86 81 83 86 81 83

Kohlu 0 0 0 79 100 94 79 100 94

Dera Bugti 0 0 0 77 84 79 77 84 79

Bolan/ Kachhi 0 74 74 28 63 50 28 69 60

Jaffarabad 100 100 100 91 86 88 93 88 90

Nasirabad/ Tamboo 100 100 100 100 99 100 100 99 100

Jhal Magsi 100 0 100 71 47 61 72 47 62

Kalat 100 100 100 96 97 96 97 98 98

Mastung 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Khuzdar 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Awaran - - - 100 100 100 100 100 100

Kharan 100 50 81 100 87 92 100 78 89

Washuk - - - 100 81 92 100 81 92

Lasbela 100 100 100 100 76 86 100 91 95

Gwader 100 100 100 98 82 93 99 88 96

NOTES:1. The Panjgur and Kech districts have been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation

202

Page 224: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL

Pakistan 75 78 77 68 70 69 70 74 72 75Punjab 66 66 66 61 62 62 63 63 63 64

Islamabad 100 68 82 63 88 83 93 77 83 95

1 Attock 80 81 80 85 81 83 81 81 81 7 85

2 Rawalpindi 100 80 88 100 100 100 100 88 92 5 77

3 Jehlum 100 100 100 100 82 88 100 89 95 4 75

4 Chakwal 0 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1 94

5 Sargodha 79 60 71 55 48 51 69 53 61 20 63

6 Bhakhar 100 100 100 86 84 85 90 87 88 6 95

7 Khushab 100 75 86 52 45 49 70 59 65 18 72

8 Mianwali 73 78 75 86 80 83 83 79 81 8 94

9 Faisalabad 49 65 57 54 41 47 52 49 51 28 52

10 Chiniot 50 44 46 61 46 52 59 46 51 27 61

11 Jhang 35 51 45 48 56 52 46 55 50 29 46

12 Toba Tek Singh 67 48 60 49 57 53 54 56 55 26 61

13 Gujranwala 48 63 55 33 44 37 42 56 48 32 51

14 Hafizabad 43 53 47 57 69 62 51 62 56 24 54

15 Gujrat 100 34 46 84 74 78 85 65 72 12 92

16 Mandi Bahuddin 65 62 64 67 37 56 66 45 59 21 53

17 Sialkot 53 53 53 57 66 59 56 56 56 23 59

18 Narowal 79 0 65 43 26 35 55 24 42 34 38

19 Lahore 69 67 68 68 56 66 69 64 68 14 67

20 Kasur 39 58 47 45 55 51 42 56 49 31 50

21 Sheikhupura 41 61 47 18 47 27 26 52 34 36 20

22 Nankana Sahib 51 100 61 24 42 31 35 54 41 35 27

23 Okara 70 88 83 37 65 50 48 79 66 16 62

24 Sahiwal 100 100 100 52 56 53 63 69 66 17 70

25 Pakpatten 100 0 60 54 64 57 62 47 58 22 52

26 Vehari 100 100 100 69 71 70 73 82 78 9 68

27 Multan 48 65 57 83 82 82 75 76 75 10 72

28 Lodhran 73 100 84 73 64 69 73 66 70 13 71

29 Khanewal 89 40 61 67 58 62 74 51 62 19 59

30 D. G. Khan 100 100 100 99 99 99 99 99 99 3 98

31 Rajanpur 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 2 93

32 Layyah 100 100 100 66 74 70 69 77 73 11 87

33 Muzaffar Garh 67 67 67 67 65 66 67 66 66 15 74

34 Bahawalpur 48 38 43 46 46 46 46 43 45 33 37

35 Bahawalnagar 0 53 47 67 44 58 63 48 55 25 5036 Rahim Yar Khan 58 79 66 45 47 46 47 51 49 30 57

TOTAL 12-13

TABLE 3.8 : TREATMENT OF DIARRHOEA IN CHILDREN UNDER 5 YEARS

2. DIARRHEA CASES WHERE ORS WAS GIVEN TO CHILD

PROVINCE & DISTRICT RANKURBAN RURAL TOTAL

NOTES: 1. Diarrhoea cases where ORS was administered to the child expressed as a percentage of all diarrhoea cases during the past 30 days in children under5 years.2. Cases where ORS was administered: For all children that reported an episode of diarrhoea in the past 30 days, the mothers were asked if ORShad been given to the child. The statistics reported here represent the percentage of cases where ORS was given to the child.

203

Page 225: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTALTOTAL 12-13

TABLE 3.8 : TREATMENT OF DIARRHOEA IN CHILDREN UNDER 5 YEARS

2. DIARRHEA CASES WHERE ORS WAS GIVEN TO CHILD

PROVINCE & DISTRICT RANKURBAN RURAL TOTAL

Sindh 92 95 94 78 82 80 85 89 87 91

1 Jacobabad 100 63 86 86 90 88 92 84 88 9 100

2 Kashmore 100 100 100 86 100 94 91 100 96 3 100

3 Shikarpur 75 100 88 95 81 87 91 84 87 11 97

4 Larkana 100 100 100 28 100 78 87 100 94 4 100

5 Shahdadkot 100 100 100 59 74 68 82 87 85 14 100

6 Sukkur 62 91 81 96 90 94 87 91 89 8 90

7 Ghotki 78 100 90 88 97 92 85 98 92 5 97

8 Khairpur 100 100 100 97 100 98 98 100 99 2 91

9 Nowshero Feroze 100 100 100 83 85 84 88 90 89 7 96

10 Shaheed Benazirabad 56 100 74 81 95 88 75 96 84 15 95

11 Dadu 100 100 100 100 34 71 100 75 87 10 96

12 Jamshoro 55 55 55 100 83 91 78 66 71 19 71

13 Hyderabad 100 90 93 55 75 63 84 88 87 12 79

14 Tando Allah Yar 33 100 59 93 93 93 73 94 83 16 81

15 Tando Muhammad Khan 0 55 46 75 57 68 65 56 60 21 74

16 Matiari 47 100 72 63 77 68 59 84 69 20 65

17 Badin 79 33 57 57 63 59 63 53 59 23 78

18 Thatta 100 100 100 80 100 90 82 100 91 6 82

19 Sujawal 0 100 61 89 88 89 75 92 82 17 -

20 Sanghar 90 95 93 82 77 80 85 86 86 13 81

21 Mir Pur Khas 100 56 76 76 82 78 78 79 78 18 89

22 Umer Kot 89 33 68 48 45 46 63 42 53 24 85

23 Tharparkar 100 30 54 49 68 60 52 65 59 22 9724 Karachi 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1 95

204

Page 226: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTALTOTAL 12-13

TABLE 3.8 : TREATMENT OF DIARRHOEA IN CHILDREN UNDER 5 YEARS

2. DIARRHEA CASES WHERE ORS WAS GIVEN TO CHILD

PROVINCE & DISTRICT RANKURBAN RURAL TOTAL

22 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 80 84 82 78 82 80 79 83 81 84

1 Chitral 0 0 0 67 74 73 67 74 73 20 77

2 Upper Dir 100 100 100 78 75 77 79 76 77 18 96

3 Lower Dir 100 100 100 85 84 84 87 90 89 11 79

4 Swat 100 71 81 100 86 91 100 76 85 13 94

5 Shangla - - - 100 89 94 100 89 94 4 72

6 Buner - - - 60 96 78 60 96 78 16 84

7 Malakand PA 100 100 100 100 76 88 100 86 93 6 79

8 Kohistan - - - 93 100 96 93 100 96 3 81

9 Manshera 34 100 50 64 100 85 50 100 74 19 69

10 Batagram - - - 96 87 91 96 87 91 8 74

11 Abbottabad 100 100 100 38 29 37 50 84 63 24 85

12 Haripur 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1 84

13 Tor Garh - - - 60 80 68 60 80 68 23 92

14 Mardan 100 100 100 66 80 72 79 92 86 12 80

15 Swabi 0 0 0 100 64 84 100 64 84 14 100

16 Charsadda 100 100 100 57 50 54 63 53 59 25 90

17 Peshawar 68 66 67 67 85 74 68 74 70 21 78

18 Nowsehra 100 100 100 62 95 83 87 97 93 7 82

19 Kohat 71 68 70 77 55 69 75 58 70 22 79

20 Hangu 84 87 86 97 84 93 94 86 91 9 88

21 Karak 100 100 100 91 95 92 91 96 93 5 91

22 Bannu 100 100 100 96 100 99 97 100 99 2 91

23 Lakki Marwat 47 100 59 87 100 93 83 100 90 10 97

24 D. I. Khan 70 0 55 83 77 80 81 74 78 17 9325 Tank 53 100 66 81 76 79 79 78 78 15 89

205

Page 227: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTAL MALE FEMALE TOTALTOTAL 12-13

TABLE 3.8 : TREATMENT OF DIARRHOEA IN CHILDREN UNDER 5 YEARS

2. DIARRHEA CASES WHERE ORS WAS GIVEN TO CHILD

PROVINCE & DISTRICT RANKURBAN RURAL TOTAL

Balochistan 99 90 94 88 90 89 91 90 90 94

1 Quetta 100 75 81 97 95 95 98 85 89 18 98

2 Pishin 0 0 0 35 22 29 35 22 29 27 87

3 Killa Abdullah 0 100 100 100 43 61 100 50 64 24 95

4 Chaghai 0 0 0 82 91 88 82 91 88 19 76

5 Nushki 100 48 74 100 100 100 100 88 93 10 100

6 Loralai 100 100 100 99 100 99 99 100 99 6 82

7 Barkhan 0 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1 97

8 Musa Khel 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1 75

9 Killa Saifullah 100 0 60 65 100 90 82 79 80 22 94

10 Zhob 100 100 100 92 100 98 93 100 98 7 74

11 Sheerani - - - - - - - - - 28 94

12 Sibbi 100 100 100 95 60 83 97 81 90 15 100

13 Harnai 100 100 100 90 100 94 92 100 95 8 79

14 Ziarat 0 0 0 59 100 89 59 100 89 17 94

15 Kohlu 0 0 0 42 49 47 42 49 47 26 73

16 Dera Bugti 0 0 0 92 89 92 92 89 92 13 99

17 Bolan/ Kachhi 0 74 74 28 73 56 28 74 63 25 100

18 Jaffarabad 100 100 100 94 93 93 95 94 94 9 100

19 Nasirabad/ Tamboo 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1 100

20 Jhal Magsi 100 0 100 79 78 79 80 78 79 23 94

21 Kalat 100 100 100 87 91 90 93 93 93 12 86

22 Mastung 100 100 100 48 61 54 75 87 83 21 96

23 Khuzdar 100 100 100 75 69 73 85 90 87 20 89

24 Awaran - - - 88 100 91 88 100 91 14 72

25 Kharan 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1 100

26 Washuk - - - 99 87 93 99 87 93 11 82

27 Lasbela 58 100 82 100 100 100 73 100 89 16 9628 Gwader 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1 100

NOTES:1. The Panjgur and Kech districts have been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

206

Page 228: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Pakistan Private Dispensary/Hospital 75 72 73Govt. hospital/dispensary 19 16 17RHC/BHU 2 6 5LHW 0 1 1LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 3 4 3Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 1 1 1Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Punjab Private Dispensary/Hospital 74 83 80Govt. hospital/dispensary 22 11 15RHC/BHU 1 2 2LHW 0 1 1LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 2 2 2Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 1 1 1Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Islamabad Private Dispensary/Hospital 70 85 76Govt. hospital/dispensary 30 15 24RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Attock Private Dispensary/Hospital 93 71 86Govt. hospital/dispensary 7 14 9RHC/BHU 0 14 5LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Rawalpindi Private Dispensary/Hospital 12 81 33Govt. hospital/dispensary 88 19 67RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Jehlum Private Dispensary/Hospital 49 20 36Govt. hospital/dispensary 51 63 57RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 17 8Total 100 100 100

PERCENTAGE OF DIARRHEA CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

TABLE 3.9: TYPE OF PRACTITIONER CONSULTED FOR DIARRHEA TREATMENT

207

Page 229: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF DIARRHEA CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

TABLE 3.9: TYPE OF PRACTITIONER CONSULTED FOR DIARRHEA TREATMENT

Chakwal Private Dispensary/Hospital 0 85 72Govt. hospital/dispensary 100 15 28RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Sargodha Private Dispensary/Hospital 76 69 72Govt. hospital/dispensary 3 18 10RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 9 11 10Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 12 2 7Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Bhakhar Private Dispensary/Hospital 59 85 81Govt. hospital/dispensary 41 10 15RHC/BHU 0 5 4LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Khushab Private Dispensary/Hospital 78 75 77Govt. hospital/dispensary 11 23 18RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 1 1LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 11 0 5Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Mianwali Private Dispensary/Hospital 85 64 70Govt. hospital/dispensary 15 26 23RHC/BHU 0 6 4LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 4 3Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Faisalabad Private Dispensary/Hospital 76 79 78Govt. hospital/dispensary 21 10 14RHC/BHU 0 8 5LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 3 2 3Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

208

Page 230: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF DIARRHEA CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

TABLE 3.9: TYPE OF PRACTITIONER CONSULTED FOR DIARRHEA TREATMENT

Chiniot Private Dispensary/Hospital 100 83 87Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 8 7RHC/BHU 0 9 7LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Jhang Private Dispensary/Hospital 100 91 93Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 5 4RHC/BHU 0 1 1LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 1 1Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100

Toba Tek Singh Private Dispensary/Hospital 100 90 93Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 10 7RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Gujranwala Private Dispensary/Hospital 63 85 72Govt. hospital/dispensary 29 3 19RHC/BHU 0 4 2LHW 0 7 3LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 4 0 2Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 4 0 2Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Hafizabad Private Dispensary/Hospital 84 94 90Govt. hospital/dispensary 4 2 3RHC/BHU 0 2 1LHW 0 2 1LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 7 0 3Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 4 0 2Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Gujrat Private Dispensary/Hospital 100 66 71Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 0 0RHC/BHU 0 16 13LHW 0 5 4LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 5 4Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 9 8Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

209

Page 231: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF DIARRHEA CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

TABLE 3.9: TYPE OF PRACTITIONER CONSULTED FOR DIARRHEA TREATMENT

Mandi Bahuddin Private Dispensary/Hospital 86 87 87Govt. hospital/dispensary 14 8 9RHC/BHU 0 3 2LHW 0 2 1LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Sialkot Private Dispensary/Hospital 73 87 80Govt. hospital/dispensary 27 10 18RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 3 1LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Narowal Private Dispensary/Hospital 100 98 99Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 2 1RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Lahore Private Dispensary/Hospital 71 100 79Govt. hospital/dispensary 29 0 21RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Kasur Private Dispensary/Hospital 92 91 91Govt. hospital/dispensary 8 9 9RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Sheikhupura Private Dispensary/Hospital 81 95 90Govt. hospital/dispensary 9 5 6RHC/BHU 11 0 4LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

210

Page 232: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF DIARRHEA CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

TABLE 3.9: TYPE OF PRACTITIONER CONSULTED FOR DIARRHEA TREATMENT

Nankana Sahib Private Dispensary/Hospital 100 94 96Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 6 4RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Okara Private Dispensary/Hospital 54 84 69Govt. hospital/dispensary 29 8 18RHC/BHU 18 4 11LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 4 2Total 100 100 100

Sahiwal Private Dispensary/Hospital 100 90 93Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 3 2RHC/BHU 0 6 5LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Pakpatten Private Dispensary/Hospital 84 84 84Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 4 3RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 16 13 13LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Vehari Private Dispensary/Hospital 51 69 64Govt. hospital/dispensary 30 20 23RHC/BHU 0 6 4LHW 0 4 3LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 19 1 6Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Multan Private Dispensary/Hospital 88 91 90Govt. hospital/dispensary 8 4 5RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 4 1 2Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 3 2Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

211

Page 233: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF DIARRHEA CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

TABLE 3.9: TYPE OF PRACTITIONER CONSULTED FOR DIARRHEA TREATMENT

Lodhran Private Dispensary/Hospital 100 72 73Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 11 10RHC/BHU 0 2 1LHW 0 2 2LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 14 13Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 1 1Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Khanewal Private Dispensary/Hospital 100 95 97Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 3 2RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 2 1LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

D. G. Khan Private Dispensary/Hospital 87 69 71Govt. hospital/dispensary 13 30 28RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 1 1Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Rajanpur Private Dispensary/Hospital 100 94 95Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 6 5RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Layyah Private Dispensary/Hospital 69 74 73Govt. hospital/dispensary 31 18 19RHC/BHU 0 6 5LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 2 2Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Muzaffar Garh Private Dispensary/Hospital 71 76 76Govt. hospital/dispensary 22 4 6RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 6 5LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 7 9 9Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 4 4Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100

212

Page 234: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF DIARRHEA CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

TABLE 3.9: TYPE OF PRACTITIONER CONSULTED FOR DIARRHEA TREATMENT

Bahawalpur Private Dispensary/Hospital 79 87 84Govt. hospital/dispensary 16 9 11RHC/BHU 0 1 1LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 2 0 1Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 3 0 1Other 0 2 1Total 100 100 100

Bahawalnagar Private Dispensary/Hospital 66 72 71Govt. hospital/dispensary 34 19 22RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 2 2LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 5 4Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 2 1Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Rahim Yar Khan Private Dispensary/Hospital 81 91 89Govt. hospital/dispensary 19 9 11RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 1 0Total 100 100 100

NOTES:1.Column 1: Diarrhoea cases in which the practitioner indicated was consulted for treatment of diarrhea expressed as a percentage of all diarrhea consultations.

213

Page 235: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF DIARRHEA CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

TABLE 3.9: TYPE OF PRACTITIONER CONSULTED FOR DIARRHEA TREATMENT

Sindh Private Dispensary/Hospital 86 59 74Govt. hospital/dispensary 12 32 21RHC/BHU 1 7 4LHW 0 1 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 1 0Total 100 100 100

Jacobabad Private Dispensary/Hospital 100 83 86Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 11 9RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 6 5Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Kashmore Private Dispensary/Hospital 100 86 90Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 11 8RHC/BHU 0 3 2LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Shikarpur Private Dispensary/Hospital 77 78 78Govt. hospital/dispensary 23 15 16RHC/BHU 0 3 2LHW 0 2 1LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 3 2Total 100 100 100

Larkana Private Dispensary/Hospital 89 76 86Govt. hospital/dispensary 11 0 8RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 24 7LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Shahdadkot Private Dispensary/Hospital 54 68 60Govt. hospital/dispensary 37 24 31RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 9 9 9LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

214

Page 236: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF DIARRHEA CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

TABLE 3.9: TYPE OF PRACTITIONER CONSULTED FOR DIARRHEA TREATMENT

Sukkur Private Dispensary/Hospital 93 83 87Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 11 6RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 7 7 7Total 100 100 100

Ghotki Private Dispensary/Hospital 83 52 63Govt. hospital/dispensary 10 28 22RHC/BHU 7 20 15LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Khairpur Private Dispensary/Hospital 39 46 44Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 25 16RHC/BHU 46 27 34LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 14 0 6Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 2 1Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Nowshero Feroze Private Dispensary/Hospital 91 56 67Govt. hospital/dispensary 9 42 32RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 1 1Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Shaheed Benazirabad Private Dispensary/Hospital 66 51 55Govt. hospital/dispensary 34 27 29RHC/BHU 0 17 13LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 4 3Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Dadu Private Dispensary/Hospital 100 59 78Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 41 22RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

215

Page 237: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF DIARRHEA CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

TABLE 3.9: TYPE OF PRACTITIONER CONSULTED FOR DIARRHEA TREATMENT

Jamshoro Private Dispensary/Hospital 60 83 70Govt. hospital/dispensary 40 17 30RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Hyderabad Private Dispensary/Hospital 91 100 93Govt. hospital/dispensary 9 0 7RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Tando Allah Yar Private Dispensary/Hospital 63 59 60Govt. hospital/dispensary 37 41 40RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Tando Muhammad Khan Private Dispensary/Hospital 48 77 71Govt. hospital/dispensary 52 17 24RHC/BHU 0 6 5LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Matiari Private Dispensary/Hospital 100 93 95Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 7 5RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Badin Private Dispensary/Hospital 84 72 76Govt. hospital/dispensary 16 17 17RHC/BHU 0 10 7LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

216

Page 238: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF DIARRHEA CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

TABLE 3.9: TYPE OF PRACTITIONER CONSULTED FOR DIARRHEA TREATMENT

Thatta Private Dispensary/Hospital 100 11 24Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 68 59RHC/BHU 0 21 18LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Sujawal Private Dispensary/Hospital 70 27 38Govt. hospital/dispensary 30 69 59RHC/BHU 0 4 3LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Sanghar Private Dispensary/Hospital 88 63 73Govt. hospital/dispensary 12 34 25RHC/BHU 0 3 2LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Mir Pur Khas Private Dispensary/Hospital 72 40 43Govt. hospital/dispensary 28 47 46RHC/BHU 0 13 11LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Umer Kot Private Dispensary/Hospital 52 64 61Govt. hospital/dispensary 48 36 39RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Tharparkar Private Dispensary/Hospital 54 42 43Govt. hospital/dispensary 46 50 50RHC/BHU 0 6 6LHW 0 2 2LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

217

Page 239: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF DIARRHEA CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

TABLE 3.9: TYPE OF PRACTITIONER CONSULTED FOR DIARRHEA TREATMENT

Karachi Private Dispensary/Hospital 89 28 85Govt. hospital/dispensary 11 72 15RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

218

Page 240: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF DIARRHEA CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

TABLE 3.9: TYPE OF PRACTITIONER CONSULTED FOR DIARRHEA TREATMENT

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Private Dispensary/Hospital 60 50 53Govt. hospital/dispensary 18 18 18RHC/BHU 5 18 14LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 15 13 13Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 1 1 1Other 2 0 1Total 100 100 100

Chitral Private Dispensary/Hospital 0 17 17Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 56 56RHC/BHU 0 21 21LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 6 6Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 0 100 100

Upper Dir Private Dispensary/Hospital 33 31 31Govt. hospital/dispensary 67 10 12RHC/BHU 0 22 21LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 38 36Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Lower Dir Private Dispensary/Hospital 0 58 42Govt. hospital/dispensary 78 10 29RHC/BHU 0 24 17LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 22 0 6Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 9 6Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Swat Private Dispensary/Hospital 19 62 36Govt. hospital/dispensary 39 20 31RHC/BHU 0 9 3LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 23 9 17Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 19 0 12Total 100 100 100

Shangla Private Dispensary/Hospital - 37 37Govt. hospital/dispensary - 45 45RHC/BHU - 8 8LHW - 0 0LHV/ Nurse - 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy - 10 10Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist - 0 0Other - 0 0Total - 100 100

219

Page 241: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF DIARRHEA CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

TABLE 3.9: TYPE OF PRACTITIONER CONSULTED FOR DIARRHEA TREATMENT

Buner Private Dispensary/Hospital - 48 48Govt. hospital/dispensary - 43 43RHC/BHU - 10 10LHW - 0 0LHV/ Nurse - 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy - 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist - 0 0Other - 0 0Total - 100 100

Malakand PA Private Dispensary/Hospital 100 31 59Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 25 15RHC/BHU 0 6 4LHW 0 3 2LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 35 21Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Kohistan Private Dispensary/Hospital - 43 43Govt. hospital/dispensary - 10 10RHC/BHU - 48 48LHW - 0 0LHV/ Nurse - 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy - 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist - 0 0Other - 0 0Total - 100 100

Manshera Private Dispensary/Hospital 26 100 76Govt. hospital/dispensary 74 0 24RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Batagram Private Dispensary/Hospital - 40 40Govt. hospital/dispensary - 55 55RHC/BHU - 2 2LHW - 0 0LHV/ Nurse - 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy - 2 2Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist - 0 0Other - 0 0Total - 100 100

Abbottabad Private Dispensary/Hospital 59 53 56Govt. hospital/dispensary 41 47 44RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

220

Page 242: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF DIARRHEA CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

TABLE 3.9: TYPE OF PRACTITIONER CONSULTED FOR DIARRHEA TREATMENT

Haripur Private Dispensary/Hospital 59 100 68Govt. hospital/dispensary 21 0 16RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 20 0 16Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Tor Garh Private Dispensary/Hospital - 76 76Govt. hospital/dispensary - 16 16RHC/BHU - 4 4LHW - 0 0LHV/ Nurse - 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy - 4 4Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist - 0 0Other - 0 0Total - 100 100

Mardan Private Dispensary/Hospital 50 35 42Govt. hospital/dispensary 18 21 20RHC/BHU 16 44 30LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 16 0 8Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Swabi Private Dispensary/Hospital 0 38 38Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 17 17RHC/BHU 0 29 29LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 16 16Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 0 100 100

Charsadda Private Dispensary/Hospital 41 44 44Govt. hospital/dispensary 59 3 8RHC/BHU 0 35 32LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 18 16Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Peshawar Private Dispensary/Hospital 80 66 74Govt. hospital/dispensary 2 7 4RHC/BHU 5 17 10LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 13 11 12Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

221

Page 243: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF DIARRHEA CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

TABLE 3.9: TYPE OF PRACTITIONER CONSULTED FOR DIARRHEA TREATMENT

Nowsehra Private Dispensary/Hospital 60 22 43Govt. hospital/dispensary 7 19 12RHC/BHU 0 49 22LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 33 10 23Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Kohat Private Dispensary/Hospital 41 28 31Govt. hospital/dispensary 30 20 23RHC/BHU 0 37 26LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 21 14 16Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 8 2 4Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Hangu Private Dispensary/Hospital 46 57 53Govt. hospital/dispensary 54 5 21RHC/BHU 0 28 19LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 7 5Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 3 2Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Karak Private Dispensary/Hospital 26 41 40Govt. hospital/dispensary 74 6 11RHC/BHU 0 2 1LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 42 39Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 10 9Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Bannu Private Dispensary/Hospital 48 42 43Govt. hospital/dispensary 52 27 29RHC/BHU 0 3 2LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 28 26Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Lakki Marwat Private Dispensary/Hospital 100 57 60Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 10 9RHC/BHU 0 28 26LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 3 3Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 1 1Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

222

Page 244: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF DIARRHEA CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

TABLE 3.9: TYPE OF PRACTITIONER CONSULTED FOR DIARRHEA TREATMENT

D. I. Khan Private Dispensary/Hospital 55 72 70Govt. hospital/dispensary 23 19 19RHC/BHU 0 2 2LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 5 4Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 22 3 5Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Tank Private Dispensary/Hospital 42 77 75Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 14 13RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 6 5Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 3 3Other 58 0 3Total 100 100 100

223

Page 245: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF DIARRHEA CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

TABLE 3.9: TYPE OF PRACTITIONER CONSULTED FOR DIARRHEA TREATMENT

Balochistan Private Dispensary/Hospital 73 54 60Govt. hospital/dispensary 26 27 26RHC/BHU 1 14 10LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 1 3 3Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 2 1Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Quetta Private Dispensary/Hospital 75 58 66Govt. hospital/dispensary 25 14 19RHC/BHU 0 17 9LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 11 6Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Pishin Private Dispensary/Hospital 0 81 81Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 19 19RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 0 100 100

Killa Abdullah Private Dispensary/Hospital 100 93 93Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 7 7RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Chaghai Private Dispensary/Hospital 0 15 15Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 58 58RHC/BHU 0 20 20LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 7 7Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 0 100 100

Nushki Private Dispensary/Hospital 67 25 35Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 71 55RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 33 4 11Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

224

Page 246: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF DIARRHEA CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

TABLE 3.9: TYPE OF PRACTITIONER CONSULTED FOR DIARRHEA TREATMENT

Loralai Private Dispensary/Hospital 86 71 74Govt. hospital/dispensary 14 26 24RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 3 2Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Barkhan Private Dispensary/Hospital 0 29 27Govt. hospital/dispensary 100 46 51RHC/BHU 0 1 1LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 22 20Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100

Musa Khel Private Dispensary/Hospital 85 65 71Govt. hospital/dispensary 15 35 29RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Killa Saifullah Private Dispensary/Hospital 100 90 93Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 0 0RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 10 7Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Zhob Private Dispensary/Hospital 85 28 34Govt. hospital/dispensary 15 52 48RHC/BHU 0 3 2LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 2 1Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 16 14Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Sheerani Private Dispensary/Hospital - 0 0Govt. hospital/dispensary - 0 0RHC/BHU - 0 0LHW - 0 0LHV/ Nurse - 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy - 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist - 0 0Other - 0 0Total - 0 0

225

Page 247: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF DIARRHEA CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

TABLE 3.9: TYPE OF PRACTITIONER CONSULTED FOR DIARRHEA TREATMENT

Sibbi Private Dispensary/Hospital 0 21 10Govt. hospital/dispensary 76 66 71RHC/BHU 0 2 1LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 24 0 12Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 11 5Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Harnai Private Dispensary/Hospital 41 62 59Govt. hospital/dispensary 59 24 29RHC/BHU 0 12 11LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 1 1Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Ziarat Private Dispensary/Hospital 0 81 81Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 14 14RHC/BHU 0 5 5LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 0 100 100

Kohlu Private Dispensary/Hospital 0 78 78Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 1 1RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 21 21Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 1 1Other 0 0 0Total 0 100 100

Dera Bugti Private Dispensary/Hospital 0 19 19Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 12 12RHC/BHU 0 61 61LHW 0 7 7LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 0 100 100

Bolan/ Kachhi Private Dispensary/Hospital 0 0 0Govt. hospital/dispensary 34 0 17RHC/BHU 66 54 60LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 5 2Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 41 20Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

226

Page 248: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF DIARRHEA CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

TABLE 3.9: TYPE OF PRACTITIONER CONSULTED FOR DIARRHEA TREATMENT

Jaffarabad Private Dispensary/Hospital 100 96 97Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 1 1RHC/BHU 0 3 2LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Nasirabad/ Tamboo Private Dispensary/Hospital 62 100 95Govt. hospital/dispensary 38 0 5RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Jhal Magsi Private Dispensary/Hospital 100 10 12Govt. hospital/dispensary 0 48 47RHC/BHU 0 16 15LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 17 17Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 9 9Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Kalat Private Dispensary/Hospital 50 28 35Govt. hospital/dispensary 50 20 30RHC/BHU 0 52 35LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Mastung Private Dispensary/Hospital 41 41 41Govt. hospital/dispensary 59 47 55RHC/BHU 0 9 4LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 2 1Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Khuzdar Private Dispensary/Hospital 97 37 68Govt. hospital/dispensary 3 46 24RHC/BHU 0 16 8LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

227

Page 249: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF DIARRHEA CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

TABLE 3.9: TYPE OF PRACTITIONER CONSULTED FOR DIARRHEA TREATMENT

Awaran Private Dispensary/Hospital - 37 37Govt. hospital/dispensary - 29 29RHC/BHU - 34 34LHW - 0 0LHV/ Nurse - 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy - 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist - 0 0Other - 0 0Total - 100 100

Kharan Private Dispensary/Hospital 77 38 50Govt. hospital/dispensary 23 0 7RHC/BHU 0 18 13LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 43 30Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Washuk Private Dispensary/Hospital - 47 47Govt. hospital/dispensary - 26 26RHC/BHU - 13 13LHW - 0 0LHV/ Nurse - 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy - 15 15Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist - 0 0Other - 0 0Total - 100 100

Lasbela Private Dispensary/Hospital 43 31 39Govt. hospital/dispensary 57 69 61RHC/BHU 0 0 0LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Gwader Private Dispensary/Hospital 12 28 21Govt. hospital/dispensary 88 65 76RHC/BHU 0 7 4LHW 0 0 0LHV/ Nurse 0 0 0Chemist/Pharmacy 0 0 0Hakeem/Homeopathic/Herbalist 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

NOTES:1. The Panjgur and Kech districts have been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.2. Total may not add to hundred because of rounding .

228

Page 250: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.10: PRE-NATAL CONSULTATION-BY PROVINCE AND PERSON/FACILITY

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

PakistanPre - Natal Consultation 86 67 73

Home-TBA 3 5 4Home -LHW 3 6 5Home - LHV 1 3 2Home-Doctor 1 1 1Govt Hosp/Clinic 33 30 31Private hosp/Clinic 59 55 57 Other 0 1 1

PunjabPre - Natal Consultation 87 75 78

Home-TBA 3 5 4Home -LHW 2 7 6Home - LHV 1 3 2Home-Doctor 1 1 1Govt Hosp/Clinic 34 22 26Private hosp/Clinic 58 61 60 Other 0 0 0

IslamabadPre - Natal Consultation 93 98 95

Home-TBA 0 3 1Home -LHW 0 0 0Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 1 0 1Govt Hosp/Clinic 68 44 61Private hosp/Clinic 30 53 37 Other 0 0 0

AttockPre - Natal Consultation 73 82 79

Home-TBA 0 1 1Home -LHW 0 9 7Home - LHV 0 1 0Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 38 50 46Private hosp/Clinic 62 39 46 Other 0 0 0

RawalpindiPre - Natal Consultation 93 97 95

Home-TBA 2 1 1Home -LHW 1 5 3Home - LHV 0 1 1Home-Doctor 0 1 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 59 48 54Private hosp/Clinic 37 44 41 Other 0 0 0

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

229

Page 251: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.10: PRE-NATAL CONSULTATION-BY PROVINCE AND PERSON/FACILITY

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

JehlumPre - Natal Consultation 92 93 93

Home-TBA 0 0 0Home -LHW 4 3 4Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 50 54 53Private hosp/Clinic 46 42 43 Other 0 0 0

ChakwalPre - Natal Consultation 94 79 82

Home-TBA 0 2 1Home -LHW 0 3 3Home - LHV 0 2 2Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 49 35 37Private hosp/Clinic 51 58 57 Other 0 0 0

SargodhaPre - Natal Consultation 82 71 74

Home-TBA 4 5 5Home -LHW 0 5 3Home - LHV 0 3 2Home-Doctor 0 1 1Govt Hosp/Clinic 24 25 25Private hosp/Clinic 71 59 63 Other 0 1 1

BhakharPre - Natal Consultation 72 68 68

Home-TBA 3 6 5Home -LHW 2 7 7Home - LHV 0 3 2Home-Doctor 5 0 1Govt Hosp/Clinic 45 33 35Private hosp/Clinic 45 47 46 Other 0 4 3

KhushabPre - Natal Consultation 76 72 74

Home-TBA 5 7 6Home -LHW 0 8 5Home - LHV 11 4 6Home-Doctor 5 0 2Govt Hosp/Clinic 19 17 18Private hosp/Clinic 60 60 60 Other 0 4 3

230

Page 252: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.10: PRE-NATAL CONSULTATION-BY PROVINCE AND PERSON/FACILITY

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

MianwaliPre - Natal Consultation 75 64 67

Home-TBA 2 4 4Home -LHW 5 7 6Home - LHV 3 4 4Home-Doctor 0 6 5Govt Hosp/Clinic 32 30 31Private hosp/Clinic 57 41 45 Other 0 7 6

FaisalabadPre - Natal Consultation 86 73 79

Home-TBA 4 2 3Home -LHW 0 2 1Home - LHV 2 1 2Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 14 26 20Private hosp/Clinic 78 69 73 Other 1 0 1

ChinniotPre - Natal Consultation 93 80 85

Home-TBA 6 11 9Home -LHW 0 2 1Home - LHV 0 2 1Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 12 16 14Private hosp/Clinic 82 70 75 Other 0 0 0

JhangPre - Natal Consultation 70 67 67

Home-TBA 6 12 11Home -LHW 2 1 1Home - LHV 0 2 2Home-Doctor 0 1 1Govt Hosp/Clinic 8 8 8Private hosp/Clinic 83 75 77 Other 0 0 0

Toba Tek SinghPre - Natal Consultation 88 85 85

Home-TBA 15 17 17Home -LHW 0 1 1Home - LHV 0 2 1Home-Doctor 0 1 1Govt Hosp/Clinic 4 7 6Private hosp/Clinic 81 72 74 Other 0 0 0

231

Page 253: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.10: PRE-NATAL CONSULTATION-BY PROVINCE AND PERSON/FACILITY

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

GujranwalaPre - Natal Consultation 88 82 85

Home-TBA 2 1 1Home -LHW 6 7 6Home - LHV 0 3 1Home-Doctor 0 1 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 19 20 20Private hosp/Clinic 74 68 71 Other 0 0 0

HafizabadPre - Natal Consultation 64 70 68

Home-TBA 2 0 1Home -LHW 11 27 22Home - LHV 5 0 1Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 15 12 13Private hosp/Clinic 64 60 61 Other 2 0 1

GujratPre - Natal Consultation 89 86 87

Home-TBA 2 2 2Home -LHW 0 7 5Home - LHV 0 3 2Home-Doctor 0 2 2Govt Hosp/Clinic 32 22 25Private hosp/Clinic 66 64 64 Other 0 0 0

Mandi BahuddinPre - Natal Consultation 86 92 91

Home-TBA 4 4 4Home -LHW 6 12 11Home - LHV 5 9 8Home-Doctor 0 1 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 18 14 14Private hosp/Clinic 64 61 61 Other 3 0 0

SialkotPre - Natal Consultation 80 69 72

Home-TBA 2 0 1Home -LHW 0 1 0Home - LHV 0 2 1Home-Doctor 12 6 8Govt Hosp/Clinic 33 7 15Private hosp/Clinic 52 84 74 Other 0 1 0

232

Page 254: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.10: PRE-NATAL CONSULTATION-BY PROVINCE AND PERSON/FACILITY

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

NarowalPre - Natal Consultation 77 54 58

Home-TBA 14 10 11Home -LHW 5 4 4Home - LHV 5 10 9Home-Doctor 21 26 25Govt Hosp/Clinic 31 13 17Private hosp/Clinic 24 38 35 Other 0 0 0

LahorePre - Natal Consultation 98 74 91

Home-TBA 1 0 1Home -LHW 0 1 0Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 47 45 47Private hosp/Clinic 51 54 52 Other 0 0 0

KasurPre - Natal Consultation 82 77 78

Home-TBA 0 2 2Home -LHW 0 1 1Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 38 43 42Private hosp/Clinic 59 53 55 Other 3 1 1

SheikhupuraPre - Natal Consultation 87 80 82

Home-TBA 1 1 1Home -LHW 2 0 1Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 30 26 27Private hosp/Clinic 64 72 70 Other 2 0 1

Nankana SahibPre - Natal Consultation 93 85 87

Home-TBA 0 0 0Home -LHW 0 1 1Home - LHV 0 2 1Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 38 13 21Private hosp/Clinic 62 84 77 Other 0 0 0

233

Page 255: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.10: PRE-NATAL CONSULTATION-BY PROVINCE AND PERSON/FACILITY

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

OkaraPre - Natal Consultation 75 66 68

Home-TBA 0 6 4Home -LHW 4 14 11Home - LHV 9 10 9Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 14 18 17Private hosp/Clinic 69 53 57 Other 5 0 1

SahiwalPre - Natal Consultation 85 77 78

Home-TBA 14 3 5Home -LHW 0 7 6Home - LHV 0 4 3Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 24 17 19Private hosp/Clinic 62 68 67 Other 0 0 0

PakpattenPre - Natal Consultation 79 63 65

Home-TBA 12 8 8Home -LHW 6 20 18Home - LHV 17 5 6Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 20 12 13Private hosp/Clinic 45 54 53 Other 0 1 1

VehariPre - Natal Consultation 93 78 80

Home-TBA 18 15 16Home -LHW 0 5 4Home - LHV 0 4 3Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 24 19 20Private hosp/Clinic 58 57 57 Other 0 0 0

MultanPre - Natal Consultation 85 73 77

Home-TBA 6 11 9Home -LHW 2 4 3Home - LHV 3 1 2Home-Doctor 1 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 24 11 16Private hosp/Clinic 65 73 70 Other 0 0 0

234

Page 256: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.10: PRE-NATAL CONSULTATION-BY PROVINCE AND PERSON/FACILITY

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

LodhranPre - Natal Consultation 66 74 72

Home-TBA 8 10 10Home -LHW 0 2 1Home - LHV 0 1 1Home-Doctor 5 0 1Govt Hosp/Clinic 12 15 15Private hosp/Clinic 76 72 72 Other 0 1 0

KhanewalPre - Natal Consultation 83 78 79

Home-TBA 8 10 9Home -LHW 7 4 5Home - LHV 4 0 1Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 21 8 10Private hosp/Clinic 61 77 74 Other 0 0 0

D.G.khanPre - Natal Consultation 77 60 61

Home-TBA 1 3 3Home -LHW 0 3 3Home - LHV 10 2 3Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 37 53 51Private hosp/Clinic 51 39 40 Other 0 0 0

RajanpurPre - Natal Consultation 86 69 71

Home-TBA 0 0 0Home -LHW 0 0 0Home - LHV 23 25 24Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 48 59 57Private hosp/Clinic 29 16 18 Other 0 0 0

LayyahPre - Natal Consultation 80 61 63

Home-TBA 12 0 2Home -LHW 0 34 29Home - LHV 5 8 8Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 42 35 36Private hosp/Clinic 41 23 26 Other 0 0 0

235

Page 257: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.10: PRE-NATAL CONSULTATION-BY PROVINCE AND PERSON/FACILITY

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Muzaffar GarhPre - Natal Consultation 74 77 77

Home-TBA 1 7 6Home -LHW 0 5 4Home - LHV 4 0 1Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 40 15 18Private hosp/Clinic 54 72 70 Other 0 0 0

BahawalpurPre - Natal Consultation 84 76 78

Home-TBA 0 1 0Home -LHW 1 0 1Home - LHV 0 1 1Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 32 12 18Private hosp/Clinic 67 85 80 Other 0 0 0

BahawalnagerPre - Natal Consultation 80 71 73

Home-TBA 2 3 3Home -LHW 0 4 3Home - LHV 0 9 7Home-Doctor 0 1 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 23 4 9Private hosp/Clinic 75 79 78 Other 0 0 0

Rahim Yar KhanPre - Natal Consultation 83 78 79

Home-TBA 7 10 9Home -LHW 18 34 31Home - LHV 2 2 2Home-Doctor 2 1 1Govt Hosp/Clinic 20 9 11Private hosp/Clinic 51 44 45 Other 0 0 0

NOTES:1.Currently married women aged 15 – 49 years who had given birth in the last three years and who had attended at least one pre-natal consultation during the last pregnancy, expressed as a percentage of all currently married women aged 15 – 49 years who had given birth in the last three years.2.Currently married women aged 15-49 years who had given birth in the last three years and who had attended a pre-natal consultation at the source indicated expressed as a percentage of all of the same women who had had a pre-natal consultation.

236

Page 258: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

237

Page 259: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.10: PRE-NATAL CONSULTATION-BY PROVINCE AND PERSON/FACILITY

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

SindhPre - Natal Consultation 87 59 72

Home-TBA 1 8 4Home -LHW 3 4 3Home - LHV 0 1 0Home-Doctor 1 1 1Govt Hosp/Clinic 25 40 32Private hosp/Clinic 69 46 58 Other 0 1 1

JaccobabadPre - Natal Consultation 68 57 60

Home-TBA 9 3 5Home -LHW 2 10 8Home - LHV 0 5 4Home-Doctor 0 3 2Govt Hosp/Clinic 16 24 22Private hosp/Clinic 73 54 59 Other 0 0 0

KashmorePre - Natal Consultation 68 49 54

Home-TBA 0 0 0Home -LHW 20 2 8Home - LHV 1 0 0Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 11 46 34Private hosp/Clinic 67 52 57 Other 0 0 0

ShikarpurPre - Natal Consultation 71 64 66

Home-TBA 7 1 3Home -LHW 2 1 1Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 0 1 1Govt Hosp/Clinic 19 27 25Private hosp/Clinic 71 69 70 Other 2 0 1

LarkanaPre - Natal Consultation 62 57 59

Home-TBA 7 5 6Home -LHW 3 2 2Home - LHV 2 0 1Home-Doctor 13 0 6Govt Hosp/Clinic 29 54 43Private hosp/Clinic 46 39 42 Other 0 0 0

238

Page 260: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.10: PRE-NATAL CONSULTATION-BY PROVINCE AND PERSON/FACILITY

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

ShahdadkotPre - Natal Consultation 55 43 45

Home-TBA 9 3 4Home -LHW 9 3 4Home - LHV 4 0 1Home-Doctor 5 0 1Govt Hosp/Clinic 58 20 29Private hosp/Clinic 14 74 60 Other 0 0 0

SukkurPre - Natal Consultation 77 73 75

Home-TBA 2 4 3Home -LHW 4 3 4Home - LHV 1 2 1Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 14 36 23Private hosp/Clinic 80 55 69 Other 0 0 0

GhotkiPre - Natal Consultation 63 44 48

Home-TBA 8 1 3Home -LHW 16 21 19Home - LHV 3 0 1Home-Doctor 2 1 2Govt Hosp/Clinic 20 20 20Private hosp/Clinic 52 57 56 Other 0 0 0

KhairpurPre - Natal Consultation 68 56 60

Home-TBA 4 4 4Home -LHW 15 12 13Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 37 60 52Private hosp/Clinic 44 24 31 Other 0 0 0

Nowshero FerozePre - Natal Consultation 72 68 68

Home-TBA 5 2 2Home -LHW 0 1 1Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 4 44 37Private hosp/Clinic 91 54 60 Other 0 0 0

239

Page 261: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.10: PRE-NATAL CONSULTATION-BY PROVINCE AND PERSON/FACILITY

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Shaheed BenazirabadPre - Natal Consultation 83 59 65

Home-TBA 1 1 1Home -LHW 8 3 5Home - LHV 3 0 1Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 49 73 65Private hosp/Clinic 39 23 28 Other 0 0 0

DaduPre - Natal Consultation 85 65 68

Home-TBA 2 2 2Home -LHW 0 0 0Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 33 42 40Private hosp/Clinic 65 56 58 Other 0 0 0

JamshoroPre - Natal Consultation 82 80 81

Home-TBA 7 5 5Home -LHW 3 2 2Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 3 0 1Govt Hosp/Clinic 31 44 40Private hosp/Clinic 56 49 51 Other 0 1 0

HyderabadPre - Natal Consultation 94 63 88

Home-TBA 2 5 2Home -LHW 3 13 5Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 26 24 26Private hosp/Clinic 68 58 67 Other 0 0 0

Tando Allah YarPre - Natal Consultation 85 52 60

Home-TBA 3 11 9Home -LHW 4 2 3Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 29 24 26Private hosp/Clinic 64 62 63 Other 0 0 0

240

Page 262: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.10: PRE-NATAL CONSULTATION-BY PROVINCE AND PERSON/FACILITY

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Tando Muhd KhanPre - Natal Consultation 82 52 55

Home-TBA 8 3 3Home -LHW 9 2 3Home - LHV 0 1 1Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 15 27 25Private hosp/Clinic 68 67 68 Other 0 0 0

MatiariPre - Natal Consultation 90 75 79

Home-TBA 4 7 6Home -LHW 4 2 3Home - LHV 2 0 1Home-Doctor 2 1 1Govt Hosp/Clinic 33 26 28Private hosp/Clinic 55 64 61 Other 0 0 0

BadinPre - Natal Consultation 78 66 69

Home-TBA 1 10 7Home -LHW 1 8 6Home - LHV 0 1 1Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 23 24 24Private hosp/Clinic 75 56 62 Other 0 0 0

ThattaPre - Natal Consultation 87 67 69

Home-TBA 0 23 20Home -LHW 0 0 0Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 42 48 47Private hosp/Clinic 58 26 30 Other 0 3 3

SujawalPre - Natal Consultation 84 78 79

Home-TBA 19 28 27Home -LHW 0 2 2Home - LHV 0 1 1Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 20 51 45Private hosp/Clinic 56 12 20 Other 6 5 6

241

Page 263: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

242

Page 264: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.10: PRE-NATAL CONSULTATION-BY PROVINCE AND PERSON/FACILITY

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

SangharPre - Natal Consultation 72 65 67

Home-TBA 0 2 1Home -LHW 2 0 1Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 11 0 3Govt Hosp/Clinic 36 68 59Private hosp/Clinic 52 30 36 Other 0 0 0

Mir Pur KhasPre - Natal Consultation 78 44 52

Home-TBA 0 0 0Home -LHW 0 0 0Home - LHV 0 1 0Home-Doctor 0 10 7Govt Hosp/Clinic 22 54 43Private hosp/Clinic 78 35 50 Other 0 0 0

Umer KotPre - Natal Consultation 67 36 42

Home-TBA 0 2 1Home -LHW 5 0 1Home - LHV 2 1 1Home-Doctor 36 4 14Govt Hosp/Clinic 11 36 28Private hosp/Clinic 47 57 54 Other 0 0 0

TharparkarPre - Natal Consultation 72 57 58

Home-TBA 16 47 45Home -LHW 15 3 4Home - LHV 0 1 1Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 17 20 20Private hosp/Clinic 52 10 13 Other 0 19 17

KarachiPre - Natal Consultation 97 90 96

Home-TBA 0 13 1Home -LHW 1 0 1Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 1 0 1Govt Hosp/Clinic 25 44 26

74 43 710 0 0

243

Page 265: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.10: PRE-NATAL CONSULTATION-BY PROVINCE AND PERSON/FACILITY

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Khyber PakhtunkhwaPre - Natal Consultation 80 61 64

Home-TBA 1 3 2Home -LHW 6 2 3Home - LHV 1 3 3Home-Doctor 1 1 1Govt Hosp/Clinic 47 45 46Private hosp/Clinic 43 45 45 Other 1 1 1

ChitralPre - Natal Consultation 75 64 65

Home-TBA 0 0 0Home -LHW 0 1 1Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 33 69 67Private hosp/Clinic 67 29 32 Other 0 0 0

Upper DirPre - Natal Consultation 55 38 39

Home-TBA 0 1 1Home -LHW 0 2 2Home - LHV 0 7 7Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 50 74 73Private hosp/Clinic 50 15 16 Other 0 0 0

Lower DirPre - Natal Consultation 68 59 60

Home-TBA 0 0 0Home -LHW 0 0 0Home - LHV 0 1 1Home-Doctor 0 1 1Govt Hosp/Clinic 84 51 54Private hosp/Clinic 16 47 44 Other 0 0 0

SwatPre - Natal Consultation 66 69 68

Home-TBA 0 0 0Home -LHW 36 10 15Home - LHV 8 2 3Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 25 45 41Private hosp/Clinic 30 43 41 Other 0 0 0

244

Page 266: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.10: PRE-NATAL CONSULTATION-BY PROVINCE AND PERSON/FACILITY

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

ShanglaPre - Natal Consultation - 62 62

Home-TBA - 1 1Home -LHW - 0 0Home - LHV - 22 22Home-Doctor - 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic - 39 39Private hosp/Clinic - 38 38 Other - 0 0

BunerPre - Natal Consultation - 65 65

Home-TBA - 1 1Home -LHW - 0 0Home - LHV - 0 0Home-Doctor - 1 1Govt Hosp/Clinic - 45 45Private hosp/Clinic - 53 53 Other - 0 0

Malakand PAPre - Natal Consultation 88 69 73

Home-TBA 0 0 0Home -LHW 44 1 11Home - LHV 0 1 1Home-Doctor 0 2 2Govt Hosp/Clinic 26 49 43Private hosp/Clinic 30 47 43 Other 0 0 0

KohistanPre - Natal Consultation - 27 27

Home-TBA - 4 4Home -LHW - 1 1Home - LHV - 2 2Home-Doctor - 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic - 38 38Private hosp/Clinic - 52 52 Other - 3 3

MansehraPre - Natal Consultation 91 67 69

Home-TBA 9 8 8Home -LHW 0 4 4Home - LHV 0 4 3Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 18 24 23Private hosp/Clinic 73 61 62 Other 0 0 0

245

Page 267: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.10: PRE-NATAL CONSULTATION-BY PROVINCE AND PERSON/FACILITY

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

BatagramPre - Natal Consultation - 50 50

Home-TBA - 1 1Home -LHW - 0 0Home - LHV - 5 5Home-Doctor - 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic - 35 35Private hosp/Clinic - 56 56 Other - 3 3

AbbottabadPre - Natal Consultation 96 79 83

Home-TBA 0 4 3Home -LHW 0 1 1Home - LHV 0 1 1Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 47 30 34Private hosp/Clinic 53 63 61 Other 0 1 1

HaripurPre - Natal Consultation 88 84 85

Home-TBA 0 4 3Home -LHW 0 0 0Home - LHV 7 4 4Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 49 47 47Private hosp/Clinic 28 42 39 Other 15 4 6

Tor GarhPre - Natal Consultation - 24 24

Home-TBA - 9 9Home -LHW - 3 3Home - LHV - 0 0Home-Doctor - 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic - 28 28Private hosp/Clinic - 60 60 Other - 1 1

MardanPre - Natal Consultation 79 79 79

Home-TBA 6 0 2Home -LHW 6 0 2Home - LHV 0 1 0Home-Doctor 0 1 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 55 44 47Private hosp/Clinic 33 54 49 Other 0 0 0

246

Page 268: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.10: PRE-NATAL CONSULTATION-BY PROVINCE AND PERSON/FACILITY

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

SwabiPre - Natal Consultation 65 69 68

Home-TBA 0 1 1Home -LHW 0 1 1Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 74 70 70Private hosp/Clinic 26 28 28 Other 0 0 0

CharsaddaPre - Natal Consultation 73 66 67

Home-TBA 0 0 0Home -LHW 0 1 1Home - LHV 0 2 1Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 64 51 53Private hosp/Clinic 36 46 44 Other 0 0 0

PeshawarPre - Natal Consultation 88 73 81

Home-TBA 0 0 0Home -LHW 0 3 1Home - LHV 0 2 1Home-Doctor 2 0 1Govt Hosp/Clinic 53 48 51Private hosp/Clinic 45 47 46 Other 0 0 0

NowsheraPre - Natal Consultation 78 81 80

Home-TBA 0 1 1Home -LHW 2 2 2Home - LHV 0 2 1Home-Doctor 0 1 1Govt Hosp/Clinic 38 62 52Private hosp/Clinic 60 31 43 Other 0 0 0

KohatPre - Natal Consultation 81 62 66

Home-TBA 0 0 0Home -LHW 0 0 0Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 55 64 62Private hosp/Clinic 45 36 38 Other 0 0 0

247

Page 269: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.10: PRE-NATAL CONSULTATION-BY PROVINCE AND PERSON/FACILITY

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

HanguPre - Natal Consultation 61 73 71

Home-TBA 0 1 1Home -LHW 0 0 0Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 0 1 1Govt Hosp/Clinic 68 45 48Private hosp/Clinic 32 53 50 Other 0 0 0

KarakPre - Natal Consultation 64 43 44

Home-TBA 0 0 0Home -LHW 0 0 0Home - LHV 0 13 12Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 11 19 19Private hosp/Clinic 89 67 69 Other 0 0 0

BannuPre - Natal Consultation 69 48 49

Home-TBA 12 0 1Home -LHW 0 3 3Home - LHV 22 1 3Home-Doctor 0 1 1Govt Hosp/Clinic 22 47 45Private hosp/Clinic 45 47 47 Other 0 0 0

Lakki MarwatPre - Natal Consultation 62 32 36

Home-TBA 0 0 0Home -LHW 13 5 7Home - LHV 8 1 2Home-Doctor 0 5 4Govt Hosp/Clinic 26 24 24Private hosp/Clinic 53 66 63 Other 0 0 0

D.I.KhanPre - Natal Consultation 67 54 55

Home-TBA 0 21 19Home -LHW 51 2 8Home - LHV 0 13 12Home-Doctor 0 4 4Govt Hosp/Clinic 15 43 40Private hosp/Clinic 34 15 17 Other 0 0 0

248

Page 270: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.10: PRE-NATAL CONSULTATION-BY PROVINCE AND PERSON/FACILITY

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

TankPre - Natal Consultation 62 50 52

Home-TBA 23 23 23Home -LHW 4 2 2Home - LHV 3 12 10Home-Doctor 19 2 5Govt Hosp/Clinic 14 32 29Private hosp/Clinic 38 20 23 Other 0 9 8

249

Page 271: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

250

Page 272: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.10: PRE-NATAL CONSULTATION-BY PROVINCE AND PERSON/FACILITY

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

BalochistanPre - Natal Consultation 65 41 47

Home-TBA 5 10 8Home -LHW 4 2 2Home - LHV 1 1 1Home-Doctor 1 1 1Govt Hosp/Clinic 66 52 57Private hosp/Clinic 23 32 29 Other 0 2 2

QuettaPre - Natal Consultation 64 41 54

Home-TBA 5 4 5Home -LHW 1 3 2Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 71 39 61Private hosp/Clinic 23 54 33 Other 0 0 0

PashinPre - Natal Consultation 52 28 30

Home-TBA 18 4 6Home -LHW 9 0 1Home - LHV 16 1 4Home-Doctor 25 0 4Govt Hosp/Clinic 32 52 49Private hosp/Clinic 0 43 37 Other 0 0 0

Killa AbdullahPre - Natal Consultation 54 17 21

Home-TBA 14 4 6Home -LHW 0 0 0Home - LHV 0 12 9Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 58 61 60Private hosp/Clinic 21 23 23 Other 7 0 2

ChaghiPre - Natal Consultation 62 40 41

Home-TBA 0 3 2Home -LHW 0 0 0Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 14 0 1Govt Hosp/Clinic 65 90 87Private hosp/Clinic 21 8 9 Other 0 0 0

251

Page 273: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.10: PRE-NATAL CONSULTATION-BY PROVINCE AND PERSON/FACILITY

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

NushkiPre - Natal Consultation 54 33 38

Home-TBA 8 0 3Home -LHW 0 9 6Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 0 9 7Govt Hosp/Clinic 75 55 61Private hosp/Clinic 16 27 24 Other 0 0 0

LoralaiPre - Natal Consultation 56 22 31

Home-TBA 0 39 21Home -LHW 0 0 0Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 71 37 53Private hosp/Clinic 29 24 26 Other 0 0 0

BarkhanPre - Natal Consultation 62 61 61

Home-TBA 0 0 0Home -LHW 0 0 0Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 77 44 47Private hosp/Clinic 23 20 21 Other 0 35 32

Musa KhelPre - Natal Consultation 39 35 36

Home-TBA 36 33 34Home -LHW 0 13 8Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 8 23 18Private hosp/Clinic 56 32 40 Other 0 0 0

Killa SaifullahPre - Natal Consultation 56 39 43

Home-TBA 19 4 9Home -LHW 0 0 0Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 20 39 33Private hosp/Clinic 61 57 58 Other 0 0 0

252

Page 274: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.10: PRE-NATAL CONSULTATION-BY PROVINCE AND PERSON/FACILITY

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

ZhobPre - Natal Consultation 55 50 50

Home-TBA 7 2 3Home -LHW 11 0 2Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 7 0 1Govt Hosp/Clinic 39 51 49Private hosp/Clinic 31 15 18 Other 5 32 27

SheeaniPre - Natal Consultation - 68 68

Home-TBA - 97 97Home -LHW - 0 0Home - LHV - 0 0Home-Doctor - 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic - 3 3Private hosp/Clinic - 0 0 Other - 0 0

SibbiPre - Natal Consultation 66 50 56

Home-TBA 0 11 6Home -LHW 14 0 6Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 0 29 16Govt Hosp/Clinic 67 58 62Private hosp/Clinic 19 1 9 Other 0 0 0

HarnaiPre - Natal Consultation 64 52 53

Home-TBA 0 9 8Home -LHW 0 5 5Home - LHV 17 0 2Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 40 47 47Private hosp/Clinic 42 38 38 Other 0 0 0

ZiaratPre - Natal Consultation 62 35 37

Home-TBA 0 4 3Home -LHW 0 3 3Home - LHV 0 2 1Home-Doctor 0 4 3Govt Hosp/Clinic 25 56 53Private hosp/Clinic 75 32 36 Other 0 0 0

253

Page 275: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.10: PRE-NATAL CONSULTATION-BY PROVINCE AND PERSON/FACILITY

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

KohluPre - Natal Consultation 75 25 35

Home-TBA 0 0 0Home -LHW 0 0 0Home - LHV 31 27 29Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 69 73 71Private hosp/Clinic 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0

Dera BugtiPre - Natal Consultation 48 25 27

Home-TBA 0 2 1Home -LHW 0 2 2Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 0 2 1Govt Hosp/Clinic 84 53 58Private hosp/Clinic 16 41 38 Other 0 0 0

BolanPre - Natal Consultation 45 38 39

Home-TBA 0 0 0Home -LHW 0 3 2Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 0 1 1Govt Hosp/Clinic 100 96 97Private hosp/Clinic 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0

JafarabadPre - Natal Consultation 81 55 61

Home-TBA 0 27 18Home -LHW 20 6 11Home - LHV 2 0 1Home-Doctor 2 1 1Govt Hosp/Clinic 40 28 32Private hosp/Clinic 36 38 38 Other 0 0 0

NasirabadPre - Natal Consultation 63 55 57

Home-TBA 3 0 1Home -LHW 0 0 0Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 44 42 43Private hosp/Clinic 53 57 56 Other 0 0 0

254

Page 276: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.10: PRE-NATAL CONSULTATION-BY PROVINCE AND PERSON/FACILITY

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Jhal MagsiPre - Natal Consultation 83 44 46

Home-TBA 0 13 12Home -LHW 0 1 1Home - LHV 0 1 1Home-Doctor 60 1 6Govt Hosp/Clinic 30 74 71Private hosp/Clinic 10 10 10 Other 0 0 0

KalatPre - Natal Consultation 55 58 58

Home-TBA 0 0 0Home -LHW 0 0 0Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 100 73 78Private hosp/Clinic 0 27 22 Other 0 0 0

MastungPre - Natal Consultation 67 49 53

Home-TBA 0 0 0Home -LHW 0 0 0Home - LHV 16 0 4Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 84 50 59Private hosp/Clinic 0 50 37 Other 0 0 0

KhuzdarPre - Natal Consultation 49 61 57

Home-TBA 0 0 0Home -LHW 0 0 0Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 0 2 1Govt Hosp/Clinic 100 81 86Private hosp/Clinic 0 18 13 Other 0 0 0

AwaranPre - Natal Consultation - 50 50

Home-TBA - 2 2Home -LHW - 4 4Home - LHV - 0 0Home-Doctor - 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic - 31 31Private hosp/Clinic - 63 63 Other - 0 0

255

Page 277: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.10: PRE-NATAL CONSULTATION-BY PROVINCE AND PERSON/FACILITY

URBAN RURAL TOTALPERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

KharanPre - Natal Consultation 69 45 53

Home-TBA 9 14 12Home -LHW 17 4 9Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 38 24 30Private hosp/Clinic 36 59 49 Other 0 0 0

WashukPre - Natal Consultation - 43 43

Home-TBA - 15 15Home -LHW - 0 0Home - LHV - 0 0Home-Doctor - 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic - 46 46Private hosp/Clinic - 39 39 Other - 0 0

LasbelaPre - Natal Consultation 90 71 79

Home-TBA 11 54 33Home -LHW 0 0 0Home - LHV 0 1 1Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 68 43 55Private hosp/Clinic 21 0 10 Other 0 1 1

GwadarPre - Natal Consultation 82 37 63

Home-TBA 6 3 5Home -LHW 2 1 2Home - LHV 0 0 0Home-Doctor 0 0 0Govt Hosp/Clinic 74 77 75Private hosp/Clinic 17 19 18 Other 0 0 0

NOTES:1. The Panjgur and Kech districts have been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.2. Total may not add to hundred because of rounding .

256

Page 278: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

257

Page 279: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Pakistan 87 70 75 72Punjab 91 81 84 81Islamabad 94 96 94 99

1 Attock 93 89 90 14 942 Rawalpindi 90 97 93 8 913 Jehlum 94 95 95 4 894 Chakwal 88 85 85 18 725 Sargodha 99 88 91 11 906 Bhakhar 98 82 85 21 787 Khushab 94 84 87 16 868 Mianwali 99 83 87 17 959 Faisalabad 89 79 84 25 79

10 Chiniot 89 82 85 19 7811 Jhang 85 69 72 32 6412 Toba Tek Singh 83 77 78 29 8213 Gujranwala 96 94 95 3 9114 Hafizabad 92 94 94 6 9015 Gujrat 96 94 94 5 9616 Mandi Bahuddin 86 95 94 7 9517 Sialkot 99 95 96 2 9618 Narowal 100 98 98 1 9019 Lahore 94 83 91 12 9120 Kasur 78 78 78 28 8121 Sheikhupura 93 86 88 15 8622 Nankana Sahib 92 90 91 13 8223 Okara 89 83 84 22 7624 Sahiwal 81 69 71 33 7025 Pakpatten 56 69 68 35 7326 Vehari 85 93 92 10 8527 Multan 94 77 84 24 7628 Lodhran 79 82 81 27 7629 Khanewal 85 84 84 23 8030 D. G. Khan 86 70 72 31 6631 Rajanpur 93 82 83 26 8332 Layyah 94 92 92 9 9133 Muzaffar Garh 91 84 85 20 7734 Bahawalpur 85 72 76 30 7035 Bahawalnagar 83 65 69 34 6036 Rahim Yar Khan 70 57 59 36 64

TABLE 3.11 : PREGNANT WOMEN THAT HAVE RECEIVED TETANUS TOXOID INJECTION TOTAL 12-13RANK

PERCENTAGE OF PREGNANT WOMENPROVINCE & DISTRICT

NOTES:1. Ever married women aged 15-49 years who had a birth in the last three years and received a tetanus toxoid injection during the last pregnancy, expressed as a percentage of all Ever married women aged 15-49 years who had a birth in the last three years.

258

Page 280: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.11 : PREGNANT WOMEN THAT HAVE RECEIVED TETANUS TOXOID INJECTION TOTAL 12-13RANK

PERCENTAGE OF PREGNANT WOMENPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Sindh 85 56 69 63

1 Jacobabad 75 43 50 22 48

2 Kashmore 66 48 53 18 44

3 Shikarpur 75 60 64 13 63

4 Larkana 55 72 66 10 66

5 Shahdadkot 58 52 53 17 58

6 Sukkur 77 62 70 5 63

7 Ghotki 69 47 51 20 42

8 Khairpur 79 57 64 12 55

9 Nowshero Feroze 73 62 64 11 42

10 Shaheed Benazirabad 86 65 71 4 67

11 Dadu 68 69 69 7 62

12 Jamshoro 96 59 69 6 56

13 Hyderabad 89 65 84 2 84

14 Tando Allah Yar 83 64 68 8 51

15 Tando Muhammad Khan 85 57 61 14 59

16 Matiari 80 81 80 3 82

17 Badin 75 64 67 9 55

18 Thatta 88 49 53 19 46

19 Sujawal 68 47 51 21

20 Sanghar 75 51 57 15 43

21 Mir Pur Khas 75 47 54 16 36

22 Umer Kot 76 41 47 23 32

23 Tharparkar 61 28 30 24 5524 Karachi 93 71 91 1 91

259

Page 281: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.11 : PREGNANT WOMEN THAT HAVE RECEIVED TETANUS TOXOID INJECTION TOTAL 12-13RANK

PERCENTAGE OF PREGNANT WOMENPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 82 64 67 65

1 Chitral 100 87 88 2 84

2 Upper Dir 100 59 61 15 56

3 Lower Dir 93 57 59 16 54

4 Swat 79 64 67 11 69

5 Shangla - 61 61 14 61

6 Buner - 56 56 19 57

7 Malakand PA 77 83 82 5 86

8 Kohistan - 22 22 25 15

9 Manshera 83 60 63 13 48

10 Batagram - 59 59 18 63

11 Abbottabad 80 85 84 4 78

12 Haripur 100 74 78 7 82

13 Tor Garh - 34 34 24 37

14 Mardan 88 79 81 6 79

15 Swabi 73 67 68 9 63

16 Charsadda 96 88 89 1 84

17 Peshawar 87 81 84 3 81

18 Nowsehra 61 72 67 10 71

19 Kohat 98 69 75 8 75

20 Hangu 74 60 63 12 71

21 Karak 57 45 46 22 40

22 Bannu 76 58 59 17 73

23 Lakki Marwat 57 52 53 21 54

24 D. I. Khan 64 54 55 20 4725 Tank 38 39 39 23 35

260

Page 282: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.11 : PREGNANT WOMEN THAT HAVE RECEIVED TETANUS TOXOID INJECTION TOTAL 12-13RANK

PERCENTAGE OF PREGNANT WOMENPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Balochistan 55 26 34 31

1 Quetta 48 27 39 12 33

2 Pishin 26 15 16 24 20

3 Killa Abdullah 34 6 9 28 23

4 Chaghai 22 18 18 19 17

5 Nushki 45 17 23 18 23

6 Loralai 61 18 29 14 27

7 Barkhan 31 13 15 25 26

8 Musa Khel 29 13 18 20 7

9 Killa Saifullah 7 17 15 26 16

10 Zhob 75 6 17 21 15

11 Sheerani - 71 71 2 59

12 Sibbi 70 35 48 8 50

13 Harnai 60 27 29 13 50

14 Ziarat 46 15 17 23 23

15 Kohlu 40 51 49 7 4

16 Dera Bugti 44 27 28 15 36

17 Bolan/ Kachhi 50 23 28 16 15

18 Jaffarabad 91 24 40 11 31

19 Nasirabad/ Tamboo 63 14 25 17 18

20 Jhal Magsi 58 15 17 22 12

21 Kalat 64 84 80 1 77

22 Mastung 67 64 65 3 60

23 Khuzdar 79 56 63 4 46

24 Awaran - 54 54 5 57

25 Kharan 0 14 10 27 12

26 Washuk - 47 47 9 56

27 Lasbela 80 34 54 6 4828 Gwader 49 36 44 10 53

NOTES:1. The Panjgur and Kech districts have been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

261

Page 283: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

Pakistan

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 24 55 45Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 25 13 17Private Hospital/Clinic 51 32 38Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 68 37 47Nurse 6 6 6Midwife 3 3 3TBA 5 15 12Trained Dai/Dai 12 24 20Family member/Neighbour/Friend 3 12 9LHV 2 3 3Other 0 1 0Total 100 100 100

Punjab

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 25 51 43Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 26 12 16Private Hospital/Clinic 49 36 40Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 67 38 47Nurse 8 8 8Midwife 2 3 3TBA 5 12 10Trained Dai/Dai 15 32 27Family member/Neighbour/Friend 2 3 2LHV 2 2 2Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100

Islamabad

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 10 14 11Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 54 42 51Private Hospital/Clinic 36 43 38Other 0 1 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 89 85 87Nurse 0 3 1Midwife 0 2 1TBA 2 8 4Trained Dai/Dai 4 1 3Family member/Neighbour/Friend 4 1 3LHV 1 0 1Other 0 1 0Total 100 100 100

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

262

Page 284: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Attock

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 17 40 33Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 29 35 33Private Hospital/Clinic 54 25 34Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 81 59 66Nurse 0 2 1Midwife 4 2 3TBA 2 1 2Trained Dai/Dai 6 21 16Family member/Neighbour/Friend 6 11 9LHV 0 2 1Other 0 2 1Total 100 100 100

Rawalpindi

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 27 11 19Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 34 46 40Private Hospital/Clinic 39 42 40Other 0 1 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 75 83 79Nurse 0 1 0Midwife 1 0 1TBA 3 3 3Trained Dai/Dai 8 7 7Family member/Neighbour/Friend 12 2 7LHV 0 1 1Other 0 3 1Total 100 100 100

Jehlum

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 15 23 21Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 42 41 41Private Hospital/Clinic 39 37 37Other 4 0 1Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 82 74 76Nurse 0 1 0Midwife 4 1 1TBA 5 2 2Trained Dai/Dai 10 20 17Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 0 0LHV 0 1 1Other 0 3 2Total 100 100 100

263

Page 285: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Chakwal

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 13 22 21Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 48 32 35Private Hospital/Clinic 39 45 45Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 87 73 75Nurse 0 2 2Midwife 0 1 1TBA 0 3 3Trained Dai/Dai 6 15 14Family member/Neighbour/Friend 6 3 4LHV 0 2 2Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Sargodha

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 21 35 31Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 14 22 20Private Hospital/Clinic 65 42 49Other 0 1 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 67 52 57Nurse 9 9 9Midwife 1 1 1TBA 5 7 6Trained Dai/Dai 12 21 19Family member/Neighbour/Friend 1 5 4LHV 6 4 5Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100

Bhakhar

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 31 52 49Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 22 18 18Private Hospital/Clinic 47 30 33Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 52 35 38Nurse 9 5 6Midwife 5 0 1TBA 4 10 9Trained Dai/Dai 20 37 34Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 1 0LHV 11 12 12Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

264

Page 286: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Khushab

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 37 48 44Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 7 11 10Private Hospital/Clinic 55 41 45Other 1 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 54 39 44Nurse 7 11 10Midwife 0 2 1TBA 7 11 10Trained Dai/Dai 18 26 23Family member/Neighbour/Friend 9 5 6LHV 5 3 3Other 0 3 2Total 100 100 100

Mianwali

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 26 42 38Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 18 19 19Private Hospital/Clinic 57 39 43Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 69 45 50Nurse 0 6 4Midwife 0 1 1TBA 7 8 8Trained Dai/Dai 19 19 19Family member/Neighbour/Friend 1 8 7LHV 3 10 9Other 0 2 1Total 100 100 100

Faisalabad

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 24 47 37Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 12 5 8Private Hospital/Clinic 63 48 55Other 1 0 1Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 71 46 57Nurse 6 6 6Midwife 0 0 0TBA 5 24 16Trained Dai/Dai 17 20 19Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 1 1LHV 1 1 1Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100

265

Page 287: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Chiniot

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 27 57 46Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 9 6 7Private Hospital/Clinic 63 37 46Other 1 0 1Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 59 35 44Nurse 13 7 9Midwife 0 0 0TBA 15 23 20Trained Dai/Dai 13 30 24Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 2 2LHV 0 0 0Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100

Jhang

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 27 52 47Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 4 4 4Private Hospital/Clinic 69 44 49Other 0 1 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 47 32 35Nurse 6 5 5Midwife 7 12 11TBA 17 27 25Trained Dai/Dai 4 11 9Family member/Neighbour/Friend 3 2 2LHV 17 11 12Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100

Toba Tek Singh

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 31 46 43Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 4 6 6Private Hospital/Clinic 66 48 51Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 64 48 51Nurse 3 6 6Midwife 4 9 8TBA 19 26 25Trained Dai/Dai 8 7 7Family member/Neighbour/Friend 2 1 1LHV 0 4 3Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

266

Page 288: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Gujranwala

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 24 38 31Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 11 14 12Private Hospital/Clinic 65 48 57Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 70 56 64Nurse 8 9 8Midwife 2 0 1TBA 10 23 16Trained Dai/Dai 6 11 8Family member/Neighbour/Friend 1 0 1LHV 2 1 2Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Hafizabad

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 34 48 44Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 11 6 8Private Hospital/Clinic 55 45 48Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 60 41 46Nurse 15 3 6Midwife 1 1 1TBA 21 21 21Trained Dai/Dai 3 27 20Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 1 1LHV 0 6 4Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100

Gujrat

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 5 35 26Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 36 15 21Private Hospital/Clinic 58 50 53Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 93 60 69Nurse 0 9 6Midwife 0 1 1TBA 5 19 15Trained Dai/Dai 0 11 8Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 0 0LHV 2 0 0Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100

267

Page 289: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Mandi Bahuddin

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 40 51 49Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 14 7 8Private Hospital/Clinic 45 41 41Other 0 2 2Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 50 47 48Nurse 13 1 3Midwife 6 2 2TBA 20 22 22Trained Dai/Dai 4 23 20Family member/Neighbour/Friend 3 4 4LHV 4 0 1Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100

Sialkot

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 5 35 27Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 19 11 13Private Hospital/Clinic 76 52 59Other 0 2 1Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 61 46 50Nurse 28 26 26Midwife 2 0 0TBA 0 1 1Trained Dai/Dai 10 24 20Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 2 2LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Narowal

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 42 50 49Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 26 12 14Private Hospital/Clinic 32 38 37Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 32 27 28Nurse 35 24 26Midwife 5 2 3TBA 0 0 0Trained Dai/Dai 27 45 42Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 1 1LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

268

Page 290: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Lahore

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 9 41 18Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 44 17 37Private Hospital/Clinic 46 42 45Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 85 49 75Nurse 8 11 9Midwife 1 0 1TBA 0 1 0Trained Dai/Dai 6 39 16Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 0 0LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Kasur

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 35 52 49Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 21 12 14Private Hospital/Clinic 43 34 36Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 54 24 30Nurse 11 23 21Midwife 0 1 0TBA 0 0 0Trained Dai/Dai 35 52 48Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 1 1LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Sheikhupura

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 32 34 34Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 21 17 18Private Hospital/Clinic 45 48 48Other 1 1 1Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 52 44 46Nurse 18 22 21Midwife 2 1 1TBA 1 4 3Trained Dai/Dai 26 29 28Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 1 0LHV 0 0 0Other 1 0 0Total 100 100 100

269

Page 291: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Nankana Sahib

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 26 30 29Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 25 11 15Private Hospital/Clinic 49 60 56Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 71 51 57Nurse 5 18 14Midwife 0 1 0TBA 0 6 4Trained Dai/Dai 24 23 23Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 1 0LHV 0 1 1Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Okara

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 43 66 60Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 15 7 9Private Hospital/Clinic 42 27 31Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 37 26 29Nurse 19 4 8Midwife 0 1 1TBA 0 1 1Trained Dai/Dai 35 64 57Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 1 1LHV 6 3 3Other 2 0 1Total 100 100 100

Sahiwal

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 45 49 49Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 11 7 8Private Hospital/Clinic 44 44 44Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 24 24 24Nurse 31 22 24Midwife 0 1 0TBA 0 1 1Trained Dai/Dai 45 48 48Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 1 1LHV 0 2 2Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

270

Page 292: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Pakpatten

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 55 64 63Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 17 6 7Private Hospital/Clinic 24 30 29Other 4 0 1Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 37 18 20Nurse 5 12 11Midwife 0 0 0TBA 0 3 3Trained Dai/Dai 58 57 57Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 3 2LHV 0 6 5Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100

Vehari

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 40 55 52Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 18 10 11Private Hospital/Clinic 40 35 36Other 3 0 1Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 46 35 37Nurse 12 5 6Midwife 4 6 6TBA 0 14 12Trained Dai/Dai 33 35 35Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 1 1LHV 6 4 4Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100

Multan

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 24 52 41Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 24 7 14Private Hospital/Clinic 52 41 45Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 70 39 51Nurse 5 8 7Midwife 4 14 10TBA 2 13 9Trained Dai/Dai 14 21 18Family member/Neighbour/Friend 1 2 2LHV 4 2 3Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100

271

Page 293: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Lodhran

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 45 60 58Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 9 9 9Private Hospital/Clinic 46 31 33Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 49 25 28Nurse 8 11 11Midwife 0 12 10TBA 14 7 8Trained Dai/Dai 22 41 38Family member/Neighbour/Friend 8 1 2LHV 0 3 3Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Khanewal

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 52 53 53Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 9 5 6Private Hospital/Clinic 40 42 41Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 46 35 37Nurse 3 10 8Midwife 6 10 9TBA 19 18 18Trained Dai/Dai 18 21 21Family member/Neighbour/Friend 4 2 3LHV 2 3 2Other 1 2 2Total 100 100 100

D. G. Khan

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 46 84 80Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 17 7 8Private Hospital/Clinic 37 9 12Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 44 10 13Nurse 2 0 1Midwife 1 0 0TBA 5 25 23Trained Dai/Dai 34 39 38Family member/Neighbour/Friend 6 20 18LHV 9 6 6Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

272

Page 294: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Rajanpur

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 71 92 89Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 10 3 4Private Hospital/Clinic 18 4 6Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 29 6 9Nurse 0 0 0Midwife 0 1 1TBA 7 17 16Trained Dai/Dai 64 61 62Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 14 12LHV 0 1 1Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Layyah

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 50 61 60Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 17 12 13Private Hospital/Clinic 28 27 27Other 5 0 1Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 54 34 36Nurse 0 0 0Midwife 0 0 0TBA 0 3 3Trained Dai/Dai 43 57 55Family member/Neighbour/Friend 4 0 0LHV 0 6 5Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Muzaffar Garh

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 36 65 62Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 26 9 11Private Hospital/Clinic 37 26 27Other 1 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 49 31 33Nurse 7 4 5Midwife 4 0 1TBA 5 16 15Trained Dai/Dai 23 44 41Family member/Neighbour/Friend 1 2 2LHV 11 1 2Other 0 2 1Total 100 100 100

273

Page 295: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Bahawalpur

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 39 60 54Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 25 8 13Private Hospital/Clinic 36 32 33Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 59 38 44Nurse 1 1 1Midwife 8 10 9TBA 9 23 19Trained Dai/Dai 24 26 25Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 0 0LHV 0 1 1Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100Bahawalnagar

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 53 58 57Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 21 6 9Private Hospital/Clinic 26 37 34Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 41 36 37Nurse 2 4 4Midwife 21 18 19TBA 10 1 3Trained Dai/Dai 22 37 34Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 2 2LHV 4 2 2Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100Rahim Yar Khan

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 38 62 58Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 16 10 11Private Hospital/Clinic 45 27 31Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 49 28 32Nurse 9 8 8Midwife 1 3 2TBA 7 19 17Trained Dai/Dai 31 40 38Family member/Neighbour/Friend 1 3 2LHV 1 1 1Other 0 1 0Total 100 100 100

274

Page 296: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Sindh

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 19 62 43Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 19 12 15Private Hospital/Clinic 62 26 42Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 76 35 53Nurse 2 2 2Midwife 3 3 3TBA 7 32 21Trained Dai/Dai 7 10 9Family member/Neighbour/Friend 4 17 11LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Jacobabad

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 35 72 64Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 19 5 8Private Hospital/Clinic 47 23 29Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 62 26 34Nurse 3 2 2Midwife 2 0 1TBA 29 68 60Trained Dai/Dai 4 0 1Family member/Neighbour/Friend 1 3 2LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Kashmore

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 51 75 68Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 3 1 2Private Hospital/Clinic 46 24 30Other 1 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 48 24 30Nurse 2 0 1Midwife 1 1 1TBA 48 74 67Trained Dai/Dai 2 0 1Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 0 0LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

275

Page 297: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Shikarpur

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 34 55 50Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 16 10 11Private Hospital/Clinic 49 35 38Other 1 1 1Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 64 43 48Nurse 1 1 1Midwife 0 1 0TBA 24 50 44Trained Dai/Dai 7 5 6Family member/Neighbour/Friend 3 1 1LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Larkana

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 33 48 42Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 31 16 22Private Hospital/Clinic 35 36 36Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 62 51 55Nurse 1 2 2Midwife 4 0 1TBA 5 43 28Trained Dai/Dai 27 3 12Family member/Neighbour/Friend 1 1 1LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Shahdadkot

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 51 56 55Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 17 7 9Private Hospital/Clinic 32 36 35Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 49 42 44Nurse 0 1 0Midwife 2 0 1TBA 6 53 44Trained Dai/Dai 42 1 9Family member/Neighbour/Friend 2 2 2LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

276

Page 298: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Sukkur

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 20 72 42Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 13 6 10Private Hospital/Clinic 67 22 48Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 74 26 53Nurse 6 3 5Midwife 0 0 0TBA 18 71 41Trained Dai/Dai 1 0 1Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 0 0LHV 1 0 1Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Ghotki

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 44 72 66Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 13 5 6Private Hospital/Clinic 43 23 27Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 55 27 33Nurse 3 1 1Midwife 2 0 0TBA 28 70 61Trained Dai/Dai 8 0 2Family member/Neighbour/Friend 3 1 1LHV 0 0 0Other 0 1 0Total 100 100 100

Khairpur

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 45 69 62Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 11 7 8Private Hospital/Clinic 44 24 30Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 52 31 37Nurse 6 1 2Midwife 3 0 1TBA 36 65 56Trained Dai/Dai 3 2 3Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 1 1LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

277

Page 299: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Nowshero Feroze

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 17 51 45Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 5 18 16Private Hospital/Clinic 78 31 39Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 78 46 51Nurse 3 5 4Midwife 5 13 11TBA 0 22 19Trained Dai/Dai 9 1 2Family member/Neighbour/Friend 6 14 13LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Shaheed Benazirabad

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 42 72 64Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 18 10 12Private Hospital/Clinic 41 17 23Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 58 28 36Nurse 1 0 0Midwife 0 1 1TBA 0 0 0Trained Dai/Dai 40 71 63Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 1 1LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Dadu

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 44 62 59Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 18 16 16Private Hospital/Clinic 37 23 25Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 52 37 39Nurse 9 1 2Midwife 6 8 7TBA 10 24 21Trained Dai/Dai 17 13 13Family member/Neighbour/Friend 6 15 14LHV 0 3 2Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

278

Page 300: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Jamshoro

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 39 54 50Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 15 18 17Private Hospital/Clinic 46 28 33Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 60 42 47Nurse 3 2 2Midwife 0 1 1TBA 12 21 18Trained Dai/Dai 17 3 7Family member/Neighbour/Friend 8 31 24LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Hyderabad

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 13 47 19Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 26 18 25Private Hospital/Clinic 60 34 55Other 1 0 1Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 85 42 77Nurse 2 6 3Midwife 0 4 1TBA 3 3 3Trained Dai/Dai 2 18 5Family member/Neighbour/Friend 8 27 12LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Tando Allah Yar

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 15 45 38Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 29 14 18Private Hospital/Clinic 54 41 44Other 2 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 85 52 60Nurse 0 3 2Midwife 1 1 1TBA 4 3 3Trained Dai/Dai 7 15 13Family member/Neighbour/Friend 3 26 21LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

279

Page 301: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Tando Muhammad Khan

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 24 40 38Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 25 20 21Private Hospital/Clinic 52 40 41Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 69 58 59Nurse 0 3 3Midwife 0 1 0TBA 9 3 4Trained Dai/Dai 11 9 9Family member/Neighbour/Friend 11 27 25LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Matiari

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 20 35 31Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 27 22 23Private Hospital/Clinic 51 43 45Other 2 0 1Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 78 62 66Nurse 0 3 3Midwife 2 0 0TBA 4 2 2Trained Dai/Dai 0 11 8Family member/Neighbour/Friend 15 22 20LHV 2 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Badin

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 24 52 45Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 20 14 15Private Hospital/Clinic 56 34 39Other 1 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 76 40 49Nurse 0 7 5Midwife 0 1 1TBA 4 10 9Trained Dai/Dai 7 13 11Family member/Neighbour/Friend 13 29 25LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

280

Page 302: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Thatta

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 29 64 60Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 30 28 28Private Hospital/Clinic 42 8 12Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 64 25 29Nurse 7 3 3Midwife 0 18 16TBA 0 14 13Trained Dai/Dai 15 7 8Family member/Neighbour/Friend 14 26 24LHV 0 0 0Other 0 7 6Total 100 100 100

Sujawal

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 37 61 56Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 16 32 30Private Hospital/Clinic 47 7 14Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 63 30 36Nurse 0 3 2Midwife 0 7 5TBA 26 18 20Trained Dai/Dai 0 5 4Family member/Neighbour/Friend 11 38 33LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Sanghar

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 18 67 54Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 18 11 13Private Hospital/Clinic 64 22 33Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 77 32 44Nurse 4 1 1Midwife 0 2 1TBA 0 4 3Trained Dai/Dai 18 38 33Family member/Neighbour/Friend 2 23 18LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

281

Page 303: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Mir Pur Khas

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 22 72 61Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 19 5 8Private Hospital/Clinic 59 22 31Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 76 28 39Nurse 0 0 0Midwife 0 15 11TBA 9 4 5Trained Dai/Dai 5 4 4Family member/Neighbour/Friend 10 50 40LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Umer Kot

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 43 77 71Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 3 6 6Private Hospital/Clinic 54 16 23Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 55 23 29Nurse 0 0 0Midwife 0 8 7TBA 12 0 3Trained Dai/Dai 5 0 1Family member/Neighbour/Friend 27 67 60LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Tharparkar

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 56 87 85Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 12 7 7Private Hospital/Clinic 31 6 7Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 44 12 14Nurse 0 1 1Midwife 0 2 1TBA 0 27 26Trained Dai/Dai 10 4 5Family member/Neighbour/Friend 47 54 53LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

282

Page 304: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Karachi

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 9 41 12Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 19 24 20Private Hospital/Clinic 72 35 68Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 84 42 80Nurse 2 16 3Midwife 6 0 5TBA 2 24 4Trained Dai/Dai 5 18 6Family member/Neighbour/Friend 2 0 2LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

283

Page 305: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 25 51 46Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 36 19 22Private Hospital/Clinic 38 30 32Other 1 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 59 41 44Nurse 7 2 3Midwife 1 1 1TBA 3 5 4Trained Dai/Dai 12 13 13Family member/Neighbour/Friend 8 29 26LHV 9 8 8Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100

Chitral

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 51 69 68Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 0 13 12Private Hospital/Clinic 49 18 20Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 49 18 20Nurse 0 11 10Midwife 0 5 4TBA 0 2 2Trained Dai/Dai 0 2 2Family member/Neighbour/Friend 51 60 59LHV 0 1 1Other 0 2 2Total 100 100 100

Upper Dir

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 64 74 73Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 18 19 19Private Hospital/Clinic 18 8 8Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 18 27 26Nurse 0 0 0Midwife 0 1 1TBA 18 0 1Trained Dai/Dai 0 1 1Family member/Neighbour/Friend 46 65 64LHV 18 7 7Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

284

Page 306: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Lower Dir

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 22 35 34Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 43 31 31Private Hospital/Clinic 36 35 35Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 71 54 55Nurse 0 2 2Midwife 0 1 1TBA 0 2 2Trained Dai/Dai 0 1 1Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 33 31LHV 29 7 8Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Swat

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 18 39 35Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 30 34 34Private Hospital/Clinic 52 26 31Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 72 55 58Nurse 2 0 0Midwife 2 0 0TBA 0 7 6Trained Dai/Dai 8 1 3Family member/Neighbour/Friend 5 29 25LHV 11 7 8Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Shangla

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home - 73 73Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU - 7 7Private Hospital/Clinic - 21 21Other - 0 0Total - 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor - 17 17Nurse - 3 3Midwife - 3 3TBA - 0 0Trained Dai/Dai - 1 1Family member/Neighbour/Friend - 71 71LHV - 6 6Other - 0 0Total - 100 100

285

Page 307: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Buner

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home - 52 52Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU - 22 22Private Hospital/Clinic - 27 27Other - 0 0Total - 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor - 42 42Nurse - 1 1Midwife - 0 0TBA - 1 1Trained Dai/Dai - 12 12Family member/Neighbour/Friend - 37 37LHV - 6 6Other - 1 1Total - 100 100

Malakand PA

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 16 48 41Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 60 19 27Private Hospital/Clinic 23 33 31Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 74 47 53Nurse 0 2 2Midwife 0 0 0TBA 0 7 5Trained Dai/Dai 18 4 7Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 26 21LHV 8 10 9Other 0 4 3Total 100 100 100

Kohistan

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home - 79 79Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU - 7 7Private Hospital/Clinic - 14 14Other - 1 1Total - 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor - 20 20Nurse - 0 0Midwife - 1 1TBA - 11 11Trained Dai/Dai - 6 6Family member/Neighbour/Friend - 60 60LHV - 2 2Other - 0 0Total - 100 100

286

Page 308: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Manshera

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 33 54 52Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 17 9 10Private Hospital/Clinic 51 37 38Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 67 38 41Nurse 0 6 5Midwife 0 1 1TBA 8 9 8Trained Dai/Dai 25 24 24Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 16 14LHV 0 3 3Other 0 3 3Total 100 100 100

BatagramPLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home - 56 56Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU - 11 11Private Hospital/Clinic - 33 33Other - 0 0Total - 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor - 44 44Nurse - 0 0Midwife - 1 1TBA - 7 7Trained Dai/Dai - 4 4Family member/Neighbour/Friend - 44 44LHV - 2 2Other - 0 0Total - 100 100

Abbottabad

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 25 41 38Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 19 18 18Private Hospital/Clinic 56 41 44Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 75 53 57Nurse 0 5 4Midwife 0 0 0TBA 4 3 3Trained Dai/Dai 18 25 24Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 9 8LHV 4 3 3Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

287

Page 309: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Haripur

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 26 42 39Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 26 22 22Private Hospital/Clinic 48 33 36Other 0 3 3Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 62 55 56Nurse 6 3 4Midwife 7 1 2TBA 7 5 5Trained Dai/Dai 19 22 22Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 12 10LHV 0 3 2Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Tor Garh

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home - 82 82Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU - 5 5Private Hospital/Clinic - 13 13Other - 0 0Total - 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor - 17 17Nurse - 0 0Midwife - 0 0TBA - 9 9Trained Dai/Dai - 7 7Family member/Neighbour/Friend - 66 66LHV - 1 1Other - 0 0Total - 100 100

Mardan

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 32 34 34Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 27 17 20Private Hospital/Clinic 41 48 46Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 63 55 57Nurse 2 0 1Midwife 0 0 0TBA 8 8 8Trained Dai/Dai 23 6 11Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 17 12LHV 4 14 11Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

288

Page 310: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Swabi

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 39 58 55Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 24 22 22Private Hospital/Clinic 37 20 23Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 45 31 33Nurse 0 4 3Midwife 0 1 1TBA 0 2 2Trained Dai/Dai 0 17 15Family member/Neighbour/Friend 31 39 38LHV 24 6 8Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Charsadda

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 20 39 37Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 14 20 19Private Hospital/Clinic 66 41 44Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 70 45 49Nurse 0 1 1Midwife 0 0 0TBA 0 11 10Trained Dai/Dai 0 11 9Family member/Neighbour/Friend 20 14 15LHV 10 18 17Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100

Peshawar

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 14 38 26Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 54 29 41Private Hospital/Clinic 31 33 32Other 1 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 62 47 54Nurse 17 2 9Midwife 0 0 0TBA 2 5 3Trained Dai/Dai 9 10 9Family member/Neighbour/Friend 7 23 15LHV 3 14 8Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

289

Page 311: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Nowsehra

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 42 48 45Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 22 27 25Private Hospital/Clinic 32 25 28Other 4 0 2Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 40 48 44Nurse 7 2 4Midwife 0 0 0TBA 0 7 4Trained Dai/Dai 17 9 13Family member/Neighbour/Friend 22 33 28LHV 15 1 7Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Kohat

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 18 37 33Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 34 36 35Private Hospital/Clinic 49 27 32Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 65 52 55Nurse 0 4 3Midwife 0 0 0TBA 3 3 3Trained Dai/Dai 5 10 9Family member/Neighbour/Friend 2 24 20LHV 25 5 10Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100

Hangu

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 16 44 39Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 25 18 19Private Hospital/Clinic 59 38 42Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 57 48 49Nurse 0 1 1Midwife 0 1 1TBA 0 2 2Trained Dai/Dai 7 9 8Family member/Neighbour/Friend 9 32 28LHV 24 7 10Other 3 1 1Total 100 100 100

290

Page 312: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Karak

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 22 45 44Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 28 5 7Private Hospital/Clinic 50 49 49Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 50 35 36Nurse 0 2 2Midwife 7 1 1TBA 7 0 1Trained Dai/Dai 15 13 14Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 22 21LHV 21 26 25Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Bannu

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 54 52 52Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 23 17 17Private Hospital/Clinic 23 31 31Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 22 43 42Nurse 0 3 3Midwife 0 0 0TBA 8 2 2Trained Dai/Dai 15 30 29Family member/Neighbour/Friend 8 14 14LHV 46 8 10Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100

Lakki Marwat

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 89 61 65Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 3 16 14Private Hospital/Clinic 8 23 21Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 8 33 30Nurse 0 1 0Midwife 10 1 2TBA 0 1 1Trained Dai/Dai 16 31 29Family member/Neighbour/Friend 20 21 21LHV 41 10 13Other 6 3 3Total 100 100 100

291

Page 313: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

D. I. Khan

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 27 67 64Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 43 11 14Private Hospital/Clinic 30 21 22Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 48 24 26Nurse 7 3 4Midwife 5 1 1TBA 0 1 1Trained Dai/Dai 14 36 34Family member/Neighbour/Friend 15 23 23LHV 8 9 9Other 3 3 3Total 100 100 100

Tank

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 43 72 68Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 22 6 9Private Hospital/Clinic 30 21 23Other 5 0 1Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 37 26 27Nurse 0 0 0Midwife 21 1 4TBA 0 3 2Trained Dai/Dai 8 30 26Family member/Neighbour/Friend 16 38 35LHV 18 3 5Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

292

Page 314: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Balochistan

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 43 71 64Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 42 18 24Private Hospital/Clinic 15 10 12Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 37 17 23Nurse 14 5 7Midwife 6 7 7TBA 12 23 20Trained Dai/Dai 17 17 17Family member/Neighbour/Friend 12 29 25LHV 1 1 1Other 1 0 1Total 100 100 100

Quetta

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 39 44 41Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 49 46 48Private Hospital/Clinic 13 9 11Other 0 1 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 38 46 41Nurse 20 7 15Midwife 1 1 1TBA 7 0 4Trained Dai/Dai 22 32 26Family member/Neighbour/Friend 10 15 12LHV 0 0 0Other 2 0 1Total 100 100 100

Pishin

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 51 68 66Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 31 15 17Private Hospital/Clinic 18 17 17Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100MidwifePERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 22 8 9Nurse 22 25 25Midwife 0 1 1TBA 0 6 6Trained Dai/Dai 22 4 5Family member/Neighbour/Friend 35 56 54LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

293

Page 315: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Killa Abdullah

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 36 56 54Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 36 33 34Private Hospital/Clinic 29 11 12Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 21 30 29Nurse 34 10 13Midwife 0 3 3TBA 7 6 6Trained Dai/Dai 16 5 6Family member/Neighbour/Friend 21 45 43LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Chaghai

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 66 70 70Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 34 28 28Private Hospital/Clinic 0 1 1Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 0 5 5Nurse 0 3 3Midwife 61 23 25TBA 13 4 5Trained Dai/Dai 26 36 35Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 23 22LHV 0 0 0Other 0 5 5Total 100 100 100

Nushki

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 49 79 73Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 39 15 20Private Hospital/Clinic 12 3 5Other 0 2 2Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 17 8 9Nurse 5 1 2Midwife 43 27 31TBA 9 0 2Trained Dai/Dai 13 51 43Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 13 10LHV 13 0 3Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

294

Page 316: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Loralai

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 79 77 78Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 21 6 9Private Hospital/Clinic 0 17 13Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 0 11 8Nurse 8 0 2Midwife 5 2 3TBA 0 0 0Trained Dai/Dai 42 76 67Family member/Neighbour/Friend 37 12 18LHV 0 0 0Other 8 0 2Total 100 100 100

Barkhan

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 62 79 77Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 17 12 12Private Hospital/Clinic 21 9 10Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 0 3 2Nurse 17 0 2Midwife 46 29 31TBA 0 0 0Trained Dai/Dai 8 4 5Family member/Neighbour/Friend 7 58 53LHV 21 6 8Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Musa Khel

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 76 95 89Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 13 2 6Private Hospital/Clinic 11 3 6Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 18 5 9Nurse 7 0 2Midwife 0 0 0TBA 0 0 0Trained Dai/Dai 53 85 75Family member/Neighbour/Friend 23 9 13LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

295

Page 317: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Killa Saifullah

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 91 87 88Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 0 2 1Private Hospital/Clinic 9 10 10Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 4 9 8Nurse 4 0 1Midwife 0 10 7TBA 4 1 2Trained Dai/Dai 21 5 9Family member/Neighbour/Friend 62 71 69LHV 5 4 4Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Zhob

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 66 79 77Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 5 11 10Private Hospital/Clinic 29 10 13Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 19 2 4Nurse 0 1 1Midwife 39 35 35TBA 3 2 2Trained Dai/Dai 4 4 4Family member/Neighbour/Friend 14 48 43LHV 21 8 10Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100

Sheerani

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home - 99 99Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU - 1 1Private Hospital/Clinic - 0 0Other - 0 0Total - 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor - 1 1Nurse - 0 0Midwife - 0 0TBA - 0 0Trained Dai/Dai - 99 99Family member/Neighbour/Friend - 0 0LHV - 0 0Other - 0 0Total - 100 100

296

Page 318: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Sibbi

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 35 70 57Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 61 27 40Private Hospital/Clinic 3 2 2Other 0 1 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 55 25 36Nurse 4 0 2Midwife 0 17 11TBA 0 6 4Trained Dai/Dai 40 30 33Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 9 5LHV 0 0 0Other 0 14 9Total 100 100 100

Harnai

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 67 83 82Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 29 1 3Private Hospital/Clinic 5 16 15Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 0 1 1Nurse 38 16 17Midwife 0 0 0TBA 20 12 13Trained Dai/Dai 10 13 12Family member/Neighbour/Friend 32 58 56LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Ziarat

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 23 61 59Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 38 14 15Private Hospital/Clinic 39 25 26Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 38 9 11Nurse 31 29 30Midwife 8 0 0TBA 8 24 23Trained Dai/Dai 0 10 10Family member/Neighbour/Friend 15 26 26LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

297

Page 319: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Kohlu

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 67 94 89Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 22 5 8Private Hospital/Clinic 11 1 3Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 0 0 0Nurse 0 0 0Midwife 16 6 8TBA 0 0 0Trained Dai/Dai 67 58 59Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 36 29LHV 17 0 3Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Dera Bugti

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 84 88 88Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 8 1 2Private Hospital/Clinic 8 11 10Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 16 9 10Nurse 0 3 3Midwife 0 0 0TBA 76 78 78Trained Dai/Dai 0 3 3Family member/Neighbour/Friend 8 7 7LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Bolan/ Kachhi

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 39 68 62Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 61 29 35Private Hospital/Clinic 0 3 2Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 55 11 19Nurse 6 0 1Midwife 11 41 35TBA 0 2 2Trained Dai/Dai 28 32 31Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 13 10LHV 0 1 0Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100

298

Page 320: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Jaffarabad

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 66 87 81Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 4 1 2Private Hospital/Clinic 31 12 17Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 31 13 17Nurse 3 0 1Midwife 3 1 1TBA 47 52 51Trained Dai/Dai 13 7 8Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 28 21LHV 2 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Nasirabad/ Tamboo

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 55 92 84Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 9 3 4Private Hospital/Clinic 36 6 12Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 43 5 14Nurse 2 0 0Midwife 7 1 2TBA 29 24 25Trained Dai/Dai 0 45 35Family member/Neighbour/Friend 19 24 23LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Jhal Magsi

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 67 59 59Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 21 23 23Private Hospital/Clinic 12 18 18Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 21 29 28Nurse 0 4 4Midwife 29 11 11TBA 0 14 14Trained Dai/Dai 46 24 25Family member/Neighbour/Friend 4 18 17LHV 0 1 1Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

299

Page 321: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Kalat

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 18 78 66Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 55 17 24Private Hospital/Clinic 27 5 9Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 73 12 24Nurse 0 0 0Midwife 9 3 4TBA 0 60 48Trained Dai/Dai 9 6 7Family member/Neighbour/Friend 9 17 16LHV 0 2 1Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Mastung

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 67 81 78Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 23 3 7Private Hospital/Clinic 11 16 15Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 33 17 21Nurse 0 1 1Midwife 0 0 0TBA 0 72 58Trained Dai/Dai 45 0 9Family member/Neighbour/Friend 22 9 12LHV 0 0 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Khuzdar

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 11 86 61Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 81 7 32Private Hospital/Clinic 9 6 7Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 89 13 38Nurse 0 0 0Midwife 0 1 1TBA 0 68 45Trained Dai/Dai 0 0 0Family member/Neighbour/Friend 11 17 15LHV 0 1 0Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

300

Page 322: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Awaran

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home - 63 63Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU - 21 21Private Hospital/Clinic - 16 16Other - 0 0Total - 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor - 25 25Nurse - 5 5Midwife - 0 0TBA - 63 63Trained Dai/Dai - 8 8Family member/Neighbour/Friend - 0 0LHV - 0 0Other - 0 0Total - 100 100

Kharan

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 50 68 62Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 44 14 23Private Hospital/Clinic 6 18 14Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 0 21 14Nurse 50 4 19Midwife 0 0 0TBA 13 12 12Trained Dai/Dai 25 8 13Family member/Neighbour/Friend 13 53 40LHV 0 3 2Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Washuk

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home - 62 62Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU - 24 24Private Hospital/Clinic - 14 14Other - 0 0Total - 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor - 15 15Nurse - 0 0Midwife - 19 19TBA - 35 35Trained Dai/Dai - 13 13Family member/Neighbour/Friend - 13 13LHV - 5 5Other - 0 0Total - 100 100

301

Page 323: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

TABLE 3.12: CHILD DELIVERY-LOCATION AND TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

PERCENTAGE OF CASESPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Lasbela

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 41 77 62Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 40 23 30Private Hospital/Clinic 19 0 8Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 46 11 26Nurse 0 0 0Midwife 13 13 13TBA 24 7 14Trained Dai/Dai 14 0 6Family member/Neighbour/Friend 0 69 40LHV 4 0 2Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Gwader

PLACE WHERE CHILD WAS DELIVERED:Home 34 65 47Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 57 27 45Private Hospital/Clinic 9 7 8Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PERSON THAT ASSISTED WITH DELIVERY:Doctor 24 11 19Nurse 22 5 15Midwife 21 19 20TBA 11 10 11Trained Dai/Dai 7 43 22Family member/Neighbour/Friend 14 9 12LHV 0 2 1Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

NOTES: NOTES:1. The Panjgur and Kech districts have been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

302

Page 324: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.13: POST-NATAL CONSULTATIONS-BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTAL

PakistanHealth Facility Consulted 38 25 29

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 3 9 72. Home LHW 2 2 23. Home LHV 3 3 34. Home Doctor 1 1 15. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 27 26 266. Private Hospital/Clinic 64 58 617. Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100

PunjabHealth Facility Consulted 37 25 29

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 3 11 82. Home LHW 2 3 33. Home LHV 2 3 34. Home Doctor 0 1 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 31 20 246. Private Hospital/Clinic 60 61 617. Other 0 2 1Total 100 100 100

IslamabadHealth Facility Consulted 73 77 74

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 3 12. Home LHW 4 0 33. Home LHV 1 1 14. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 61 43 556. Private Hospital/Clinic 35 52 407. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

AttockHealth Facility Consulted 42 28 32

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 5 1 33. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 34 66 536. Private Hospital/Clinic 61 33 447. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

RawalpindiHealth Facility Consulted 41 33 37

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 4 6 53. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 38 47 416. Private Hospital/Clinic 58 45 537. Other 0 2 1Total 100 100 100

PROVINCE & DISTRICT PERCENTAGE OF CASES

303

Page 325: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.13: POST-NATAL CONSULTATIONS-BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT PERCENTAGE OF CASES

JehlumHealth Facility Consulted 44 21 27

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 0 2 14. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 34 45 406. Private Hospital/Clinic 66 53 597. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

ChakwalHealth Facility Consulted 58 24 29

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 10 0 32. Home LHW 0 6 43. Home LHV 0 1 14. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 33 25 276. Private Hospital/Clinic 57 68 657. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

SargodhaHealth Facility Consulted 43 33 36

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 2 3 32. Home LHW 0 1 03. Home LHV 0 2 14. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 20 25 236. Private Hospital/Clinic 77 66 707. Other 0 3 2Total 100 100 100

BhakharHealth Facility Consulted 23 15 17

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 2 12. Home LHW 0 1 13. Home LHV 0 4 34. Home Doctor 8 0 25. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 40 26 296. Private Hospital/Clinic 53 51 527. Other 0 16 12Total 100 100 100

KhushabHealth Facility Consulted 43 32 36

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 6 0 32. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 7 5 54. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 16 15 156. Private Hospital/Clinic 72 72 727. Other 0 9 5Total 100 100 100

304

Page 326: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.13: POST-NATAL CONSULTATIONS-BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT PERCENTAGE OF CASES

MianwaliHealth Facility Consulted 40 29 31

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 4 3 43. Home LHV 0 4 34. Home Doctor 0 4 35. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 22 20 206. Private Hospital/Clinic 74 57 627. Other 0 12 9Total 100 100 100

FaisalabadHealth Facility Consulted 33 26 29

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 2 12. Home LHW 2 0 13. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 15 10 136. Private Hospital/Clinic 80 88 847. Other 3 0 1Total 100 100 100

ChiniotHealth Facility Consulted 36 18 25

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 0 29 146. Private Hospital/Clinic 100 71 867. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

JhangHealth Facility Consulted 36 26 28

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 16 112. Home LHW 3 5 43. Home LHV 6 22 184. Home Doctor 3 0 15. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 11 2 46. Private Hospital/Clinic 78 54 607. Other 0 2 1Total 100 100 100

Toba Tek SinghHealth Facility Consulted 35 28 29

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 4 18 152. Home LHW 10 0 23. Home LHV 11 17 164. Home Doctor 0 1 15. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 3 6 56. Private Hospital/Clinic 72 58 617. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

305

Page 327: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.13: POST-NATAL CONSULTATIONS-BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT PERCENTAGE OF CASES

GujranwalaHealth Facility Consulted 42 29 36

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 6 4 52. Home LHW 6 4 53. Home LHV 1 0 14. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 6 17 106. Private Hospital/Clinic 80 76 787. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

HafizabadHealth Facility Consulted 35 12 19

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 4 0 24. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 4 5 46. Private Hospital/Clinic 92 95 937. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

GujratHealth Facility Consulted 31 30 30

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 0 4 34. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 34 11 186. Private Hospital/Clinic 66 85 797. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Mandi BahuddinHealth Facility Consulted 29 31 31

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 0 3 34. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 0 6 56. Private Hospital/Clinic 100 91 927. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

SialkotHealth Facility Consulted 21 9 13

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 0 4 23. Home LHV 0 1 14. Home Doctor 0 3 25. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 42 8 246. Private Hospital/Clinic 58 83 727. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

306

Page 328: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.13: POST-NATAL CONSULTATIONS-BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT PERCENTAGE OF CASES

NarowalHealth Facility Consulted 10 3 5

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 0 10 63. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 48 305. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 100 8 436. Private Hospital/Clinic 0 34 217. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

LahoreHealth Facility Consulted 36 19 31

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 0 2 03. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 51 19 466. Private Hospital/Clinic 49 79 547. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

KasurHealth Facility Consulted 35 12 16

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 0 3 23. Home LHV 14 0 54. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 7 24 176. Private Hospital/Clinic 79 70 747. Other 0 3 2Total 100 100 100

SheikhupuraHealth Facility Consulted 21 19 20

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 15 3 72. Home LHW 0 4 33. Home LHV 5 0 24. Home Doctor 4 0 15. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 26 32 306. Private Hospital/Clinic 49 59 567. Other 0 2 2Total 100 100 100

Nankana SahibHealth Facility Consulted 22 22 22

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 0 4 33. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 48 23 306. Private Hospital/Clinic 52 72 667. Other 0 2 1Total 100 100 100

307

Page 329: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.13: POST-NATAL CONSULTATIONS-BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT PERCENTAGE OF CASES

OkaraHealth Facility Consulted 45 29 33

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 14 0 52. Home LHW 0 1 13. Home LHV 26 13 184. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 0 16 116. Private Hospital/Clinic 60 69 657. Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100

SahiwalHealth Facility Consulted 47 47 47

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 20 172. Home LHW 0 2 23. Home LHV 0 1 14. Home Doctor 0 4 35. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 23 8 116. Private Hospital/Clinic 77 60 637. Other 0 5 4Total 100 100 100

PakpattenHealth Facility Consulted 42 33 34

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 23 14 152. Home LHW 0 1 13. Home LHV 20 4 64. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 31 13 156. Private Hospital/Clinic 26 43 417. Other 0 25 22Total 100 100 100

VehariHealth Facility Consulted 32 19 21

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 23 8 112. Home LHW 21 2 73. Home LHV 0 7 64. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 36 24 266. Private Hospital/Clinic 10 59 487. Other 10 0 2Total 100 100 100

MultanHealth Facility Consulted 44 39 41

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 3 23 152. Home LHW 1 2 23. Home LHV 1 1 14. Home Doctor 0 1 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 29 10 186. Private Hospital/Clinic 67 63 657. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

308

Page 330: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.13: POST-NATAL CONSULTATIONS-BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT PERCENTAGE OF CASES

LodhranHealth Facility Consulted 39 27 29

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 17 13 132. Home LHW 0 2 23. Home LHV 5 1 24. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 19 10 126. Private Hospital/Clinic 59 73 717. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

KhanewalHealth Facility Consulted 34 36 35

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 11 33 292. Home LHW 0 4 33. Home LHV 0 1 14. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 9 7 76. Private Hospital/Clinic 80 55 597. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

D. G. KhanHealth Facility Consulted 55 19 23

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 0 3 23. Home LHV 8 1 34. Home Doctor 0 3 25. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 28 54 476. Private Hospital/Clinic 64 38 457. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

RajanpurHealth Facility Consulted 37 13 16

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 11 0 34. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 37 58 526. Private Hospital/Clinic 52 42 457. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

LayyahHealth Facility Consulted 60 30 34

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 0 14 113. Home LHV 0 4 34. Home Doctor 0 1 15. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 41 41 416. Private Hospital/Clinic 59 39 447. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

309

Page 331: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.13: POST-NATAL CONSULTATIONS-BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT PERCENTAGE OF CASES

Muzaffar GarhHealth Facility Consulted 45 35 36

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 4 25 222. Home LHW 11 2 33. Home LHV 2 1 14. Home Doctor 2 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 32 21 236. Private Hospital/Clinic 50 51 517. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

BahawalpurHealth Facility Consulted 26 10 15

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 1 12. Home LHW 7 4 53. Home LHV 5 1 34. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 32 10 216. Private Hospital/Clinic 56 84 707. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

BahawalnagarHealth Facility Consulted 19 21 21

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 8 72. Home LHW 0 5 43. Home LHV 10 5 64. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 60 14 236. Private Hospital/Clinic 30 68 607. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Rahim Yar KhanHealth Facility Consulted 41 28 31

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 25 31 292. Home LHW 5 5 53. Home LHV 0 1 14. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 16 13 146. Private Hospital/Clinic 52 50 517. Other 1 0 1Total 100 100 100

NOTES:1. Currently married women aged 15-49 years who received post-natal check-up expressed as a percentage of all currently married women aged 15-49 years who had a birth in the last three years.2. Percentage of currently married women aged 15-49 years who received post-natal check-up by source of check-up.

310

Page 332: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.13: POST-NATAL CONSULTATIONS-BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT PERCENTAGE OF CASES

SindhHealth Facility Consulted 40 28 33

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 2 8 52. Home LHW 2 2 23. Home LHV 2 2 24. Home Doctor 1 1 15. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 16 29 226. Private Hospital/Clinic 75 58 677. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

JacobabadHealth Facility Consulted 28 17 20

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 5 4 52. Home LHW 1 13 93. Home LHV 3 7 64. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 10 14 126. Private Hospital/Clinic 82 62 687. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

KashmoreHealth Facility Consulted 37 18 23

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 11 3 73. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 2 0 15. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 2 14 96. Private Hospital/Clinic 85 83 847. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

ShikarpurHealth Facility Consulted 31 16 20

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 2 3 33. Home LHV 0 3 24. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 37 27 316. Private Hospital/Clinic 56 68 637. Other 4 0 2Total 100 100 100

LarkanaHealth Facility Consulted 59 53 55

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 6 42. Home LHW 2 3 33. Home LHV 5 1 34. Home Doctor 12 0 55. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 29 46 396. Private Hospital/Clinic 52 43 477. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

311

Page 333: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.13: POST-NATAL CONSULTATIONS-BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT PERCENTAGE OF CASES

ShahdadkotHealth Facility Consulted 49 27 32

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 2 1 22. Home LHW 0 5 43. Home LHV 12 1 54. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 55 27 366. Private Hospital/Clinic 31 65 557. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

SukkurHealth Facility Consulted 40 13 29

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 2 9 32. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 8 0 64. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 14 5 126. Private Hospital/Clinic 76 86 787. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

GhotkiHealth Facility Consulted 34 14 19

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 4 0 12. Home LHW 5 5 53. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 13 20 176. Private Hospital/Clinic 79 76 777. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

KhairpurHealth Facility Consulted 32 27 28

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 0 1 13. Home LHV 14 9 114. Home Doctor 0 1 15. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 23 19 206. Private Hospital/Clinic 64 69 677. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Nowshero FerozeHealth Facility Consulted 38 43 42

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 3 22. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 14 28 266. Private Hospital/Clinic 86 69 727. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

312

Page 334: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.13: POST-NATAL CONSULTATIONS-BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT PERCENTAGE OF CASES

Shaheed BenazirabadHealth Facility Consulted 37 13 19

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 6 6 63. Home LHV 0 3 14. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 15 51 326. Private Hospital/Clinic 80 41 617. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

DaduHealth Facility Consulted 45 48 48

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 4 32. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 19 28 276. Private Hospital/Clinic 81 68 707. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

JamshoroHealth Facility Consulted 52 43 46

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 22 11 142. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 0 1 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 27 39 356. Private Hospital/Clinic 51 50 507. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

HyderabadHealth Facility Consulted 69 36 62

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 9 14 102. Home LHW 2 0 23. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 16 17 166. Private Hospital/Clinic 73 69 727. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Tando Allah YarHealth Facility Consulted 61 27 34

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 13 13 132. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 25 23 246. Private Hospital/Clinic 62 64 637. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

313

Page 335: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.13: POST-NATAL CONSULTATIONS-BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT PERCENTAGE OF CASES

Tando Muhammad KhanHealth Facility Consulted 54 33 35

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 10 82. Home LHW 0 2 13. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 23 23 236. Private Hospital/Clinic 77 66 687. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

MatiariHealth Facility Consulted 50 41 44

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 7 52. Home LHW 0 3 23. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 43 21 276. Private Hospital/Clinic 57 69 667. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

BadinHealth Facility Consulted 45 35 37

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 6 26 202. Home LHW 5 1 23. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 1 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 14 18 176. Private Hospital/Clinic 74 54 607. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

ThattaHealth Facility Consulted 13 6 7

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 0 10 86. Private Hospital/Clinic 100 90 927. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

SujawalHealth Facility Consulted 6 8 8

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 15 132. Home LHW 100 0 143. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 0 75 646. Private Hospital/Clinic 0 10 87. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

314

Page 336: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.13: POST-NATAL CONSULTATIONS-BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT PERCENTAGE OF CASES

SangharHealth Facility Consulted 34 22 25

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 20 132. Home LHW 4 1 23. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 8 0 35. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 35 13 216. Private Hospital/Clinic 54 65 617. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Mir Pur KhasHealth Facility Consulted 66 36 43

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 0 3 24. Home Doctor 0 10 65. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 23 48 396. Private Hospital/Clinic 77 39 537. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Umer KotHealth Facility Consulted 48 37 39

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 2 12. Home LHW 0 4 33. Home LHV 0 1 14. Home Doctor 43 4 135. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 11 32 286. Private Hospital/Clinic 46 57 547. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

TharparkarHealth Facility Consulted 49 25 27

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 37 332. Home LHW 0 5 43. Home LHV 0 3 24. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 15 32 306. Private Hospital/Clinic 85 15 237. Other 0 8 7Total 100 100 100

KarachiHealth Facility Consulted 33 13 31

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 3 0 23. Home LHV 3 0 24. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 11 84 136. Private Hospital/Clinic 84 16 827. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

315

Page 337: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.13: POST-NATAL CONSULTATIONS-BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT PERCENTAGE OF CASES

Khyber PakhtunkhwaHealth Facility Consulted 33 23 25

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 4 32. Home LHW 3 1 13. Home LHV 5 5 54. Home Doctor 1 1 15. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 38 36 376. Private Hospital/Clinic 53 53 537. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

ChitralHealth Facility Consulted 25 34 33

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 0 2 24. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 0 55 526. Private Hospital/Clinic 100 43 467. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Upper DirHealth Facility Consulted 18 25 25

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 1 12. Home LHW 0 1 13. Home LHV 0 2 24. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 50 77 776. Private Hospital/Clinic 50 19 197. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Lower DirHealth Facility Consulted 39 42 41

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 1 12. Home LHW 0 1 13. Home LHV 19 0 14. Home Doctor 0 3 35. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 27 47 456. Private Hospital/Clinic 54 48 497. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

SwatHealth Facility Consulted 54 24 30

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 1 12. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 7 7 74. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 44 46 456. Private Hospital/Clinic 49 46 477. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

316

Page 338: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.13: POST-NATAL CONSULTATIONS-BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT PERCENTAGE OF CASES

ShanglaHealth Facility Consulted - 17 17

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA - 2 22. Home LHW - 0 03. Home LHV - 7 74. Home Doctor - 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU - 49 496. Private Hospital/Clinic - 42 427. Other - 0 0Total - 100 100

BunerHealth Facility Consulted - 19 19

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA - 8 82. Home LHW - 0 03. Home LHV - 4 44. Home Doctor - 2 25. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU - 33 336. Private Hospital/Clinic - 53 537. Other - 0 0Total - 100 100

Malakand PAHealth Facility Consulted 42 23 27

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 0 5 33. Home LHV 0 6 44. Home Doctor 0 5 35. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 67 49 556. Private Hospital/Clinic 33 36 357. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

KohistanHealth Facility Consulted - 12 12

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA - 0 02. Home LHW - 0 03. Home LHV - 3 34. Home Doctor - 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU - 52 526. Private Hospital/Clinic - 42 427. Other - 3 3Total - 100 100

MansheraHealth Facility Consulted 34 24 25

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 49 13 176. Private Hospital/Clinic 51 87 837. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

317

Page 339: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.13: POST-NATAL CONSULTATIONS-BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT PERCENTAGE OF CASES

BatagramHealth Facility Consulted - 8 8

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA - 9 92. Home LHW - 2 23. Home LHV - 6 64. Home Doctor - 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU - 33 336. Private Hospital/Clinic - 51 517. Other - 0 0

- 100 100

AbbottabadHealth Facility Consulted 47 26 30

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 4 32. Home LHW 0 1 13. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 19 28 256. Private Hospital/Clinic 81 66 717. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

HaripurHealth Facility Consulted 25 21 21

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 0 1 13. Home LHV 0 13 104. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 100 44 556. Private Hospital/Clinic 0 41 337. Other 0 1 1Total 100 100 100

Tor GarhHealth Facility Consulted - 5 5

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA - 15 152. Home LHW - 1 13. Home LHV - 6 64. Home Doctor - 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU - 28 286. Private Hospital/Clinic - 49 497. Other - 0 0Total - 100 100

MardanHealth Facility Consulted 26 27 27

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 5 42. Home LHW 6 0 23. Home LHV 0 12 94. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 39 20 256. Private Hospital/Clinic 54 63 617. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

318

Page 340: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.13: POST-NATAL CONSULTATIONS-BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT PERCENTAGE OF CASES

SwabiHealth Facility Consulted 17 21 20

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 50 0 74. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 0 43 376. Private Hospital/Clinic 50 57 567. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

CharsaddaHealth Facility Consulted 36 24 26

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 7 52. Home LHW 0 1 13. Home LHV 0 4 34. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 0 23 186. Private Hospital/Clinic 100 66 737. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PeshawarHealth Facility Consulted 31 31 31

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 10 52. Home LHW 0 3 23. Home LHV 6 0 34. Home Doctor 3 0 25. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 39 38 386. Private Hospital/Clinic 52 49 507. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

NowsehraHealth Facility Consulted 31 30 30

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 18 102. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 7 0 34. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 32 20 256. Private Hospital/Clinic 61 63 627. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

KohatHealth Facility Consulted 32 20 23

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 0 2 13. Home LHV 8 0 34. Home Doctor 8 0 35. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 39 48 456. Private Hospital/Clinic 45 50 487. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

319

Page 341: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.13: POST-NATAL CONSULTATIONS-BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT PERCENTAGE OF CASES

HanguHealth Facility Consulted 33 23 25

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 13 2 42. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 23 0 54. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 7 22 196. Private Hospital/Clinic 58 76 727. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

KarakHealth Facility Consulted 14 16 16

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 0 2 24. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 0 36 356. Private Hospital/Clinic 100 62 647. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

BannuHealth Facility Consulted 46 20 21

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 16 2 43. Home LHV 0 6 64. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 16 32 306. Private Hospital/Clinic 67 60 617. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Lakki MarwatHealth Facility Consulted 17 16 16

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 5 42. Home LHW 49 0 63. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 34 46 446. Private Hospital/Clinic 17 50 467. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

D. I. KhanHealth Facility Consulted 40 32 32

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 10 92. Home LHW 25 2 43. Home LHV 0 16 144. Home Doctor 0 4 45. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 66 28 336. Private Hospital/Clinic 9 40 367. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

320

Page 342: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.13: POST-NATAL CONSULTATIONS-BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT PERCENTAGE OF CASES

TankHealth Facility Consulted 33 25 27

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 3 22. Home LHW 0 8 63. Home LHV 6 6 64. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 50 26 306. Private Hospital/Clinic 44 58 557. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

321

Page 343: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.13: POST-NATAL CONSULTATIONS-BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT PERCENTAGE OF CASES

BalochistanHealth Facility Consulted 32 17 21

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 5 9 82. Home LHW 2 3 23. Home LHV 1 1 14. Home Doctor 2 0 15. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 53 48 506. Private Hospital/Clinic 36 37 377. Other 0 2 1Total 100 100 100

QuettaHealth Facility Consulted 30 5 19

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 2 0 22. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 3 0 34. Home Doctor 4 0 45. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 46 16 436. Private Hospital/Clinic 45 84 497. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

PishinHealth Facility Consulted 18 16 16

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 26 6 82. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 26 0 25. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 48 33 356. Private Hospital/Clinic 0 61 557. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Killa AbdullahHealth Facility Consulted 28 14 15

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 6 15 132. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 77 53 576. Private Hospital/Clinic 17 32 297. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

ChaghaiHealth Facility Consulted 32 12 13

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 4 42. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 100 96 966. Private Hospital/Clinic 0 0 07. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

322

Page 344: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.13: POST-NATAL CONSULTATIONS-BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT PERCENTAGE OF CASES

NushkiHealth Facility Consulted 21 25 24

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 18 152. Home LHW 0 19 153. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 84 32 426. Private Hospital/Clinic 16 31 287. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

LoralaiHealth Facility Consulted 31 16 20

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 29 182. Home LHW 42 0 163. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 25 56 446. Private Hospital/Clinic 34 15 227. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

BarkhanHealth Facility Consulted 55 38 40

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 0 1 13. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 75 44 486. Private Hospital/Clinic 25 21 227. Other 0 34 29Total 100 100 100

Musa KhelHealth Facility Consulted 29 23 25

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 48 41 442. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 0 31 196. Private Hospital/Clinic 52 27 377. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Killa SaifullahHealth Facility Consulted 31 17 20

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 79 0 292. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 10 61 426. Private Hospital/Clinic 10 39 297. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

323

Page 345: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.13: POST-NATAL CONSULTATIONS-BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT PERCENTAGE OF CASES

ZhobHealth Facility Consulted 27 26 26

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 32 7 113. Home LHV 0 1 14. Home Doctor 15 0 25. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 14 49 436. Private Hospital/Clinic 29 22 237. Other 10 21 19Total 100 100 100

SheeraniHealth Facility Consulted - 12 12

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA - 0 02. Home LHW - 0 03. Home LHV - 0 04. Home Doctor - 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU - 83 836. Private Hospital/Clinic - 17 177. Other - 0 0Total - 100 100

SibbiHealth Facility Consulted 30 21 24

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 57 312. Home LHW 0 4 23. Home LHV 0 8 44. Home Doctor 0 6 35. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 53 25 386. Private Hospital/Clinic 47 0 217. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

HarnaiHealth Facility Consulted 10 21 20

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 50 54 546. Private Hospital/Clinic 50 46 467. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

ZiaratHealth Facility Consulted 31 21 22

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 2 22. Home LHW 0 7 63. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 2 25. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 24 29 286. Private Hospital/Clinic 76 61 627. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

324

Page 346: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.13: POST-NATAL CONSULTATIONS-BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT PERCENTAGE OF CASES

KohluHealth Facility Consulted 39 16 21

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 10 72. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 29 0 104. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 59 52 546. Private Hospital/Clinic 12 38 297. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Dera BugtiHealth Facility Consulted 48 14 17

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 17 4 73. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 50 14 226. Private Hospital/Clinic 33 82 717. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Bolan/ KachhiHealth Facility Consulted 27 11 14

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 6 42. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 6 45. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 60 87 776. Private Hospital/Clinic 40 0 157. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

JaffarabadHealth Facility Consulted 30 23 25

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 29 202. Home LHW 5 0 23. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 17 20 196. Private Hospital/Clinic 78 51 597. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

Nasirabad/ TambooHealth Facility Consulted 30 32 31

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 0 10 83. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 49 41 436. Private Hospital/Clinic 51 49 497. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

325

Page 347: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.13: POST-NATAL CONSULTATIONS-BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT PERCENTAGE OF CASES

Jhal MagsiHealth Facility Consulted 8 13 13

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 100 16 192. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 0 1 14. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 0 47 466. Private Hospital/Clinic 0 36 357. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

KalatHealth Facility Consulted 55 31 36

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 83 87 866. Private Hospital/Clinic 17 13 147. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

MastungHealth Facility Consulted 55 23 29

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 7 42. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 81 22 446. Private Hospital/Clinic 19 72 527. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

KhuzdarHealth Facility Consulted 38 18 25

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 0 2 13. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 100 78 896. Private Hospital/Clinic 0 19 107. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

AwaranHealth Facility Consulted - 12 12

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA - 0 02. Home LHW - 0 03. Home LHV - 0 04. Home Doctor - 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU - 78 786. Private Hospital/Clinic - 22 227. Other - 0 0Total - 100 100

326

Page 348: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 3.13: POST-NATAL CONSULTATIONS-BY PROVINCE AND DISTRICT

URBAN RURAL TOTALPROVINCE & DISTRICT PERCENTAGE OF CASES

KharanHealth Facility Consulted 19 11 13

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 5 32. Home LHW 0 16 93. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 34 56 466. Private Hospital/Clinic 66 23 437. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

WashukHealth Facility Consulted - 13 13

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA - 22 222. Home LHW - 0 03. Home LHV - 0 04. Home Doctor - 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU - 42 426. Private Hospital/Clinic - 36 367. Other - 0 0Total - 100 100

LasbelaHealth Facility Consulted 7 6 6

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 0 0 02. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 0 0 04. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 50 100 776. Private Hospital/Clinic 50 0 237. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

GwaderHealth Facility Consulted 50 20 37

PERSON/FACILITY CONSULTED1. Home TBA 7 0 52. Home LHW 0 0 03. Home LHV 0 16 44. Home Doctor 0 0 05. Govt. Hospital/RHC/BHU 60 68 626. Private Hospital/Clinic 33 16 297. Other 0 0 0Total 100 100 100

NOTES:1. The Panjgur and Kech districts have been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.2.Total may not add to hundred because of rounding .

327

Page 349: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Health PSLM 2014-15

CONFIDENCE INTERVAL HEALTH

Children Immunized at least Once Region/Province Estimate C.V Standard

error Confidence interval Min Max

Urban Areas 99 0.38 0.37 97.86 99.31 Punjab 98 0.63 0.62 96.76 99.19 Sindh 100 0.14 0.14 99.54 100.08 KP 99 0.68 0.67 97.76 100.42 Balochistan 96 2.23 2.15 92.13 100.54 Rural Areas 99 0.15 0.14 98.50 99.06 Punjab 99 0.16 0.15 98.90 99.52 Sindh 99 0.39 0.39 97.90 99.43 KP 98 0.41 0.40 97.47 99.06 Balochistan 96 0.78 0.75 94.54 97.49 Overall 99 0.16 0.15 98.41 99.02 Punjab 99 0.23 0.22 98.39 99.27 Sindh 99 0.23 0.23 98.69 99.60 KP 98 0.36 0.36 97.72 99.11 Balochistan 96 0.82 0.79 94.56 97.64

Children fully Immunized (Recall and Record based) Region/Province Estimate C.V Standard

error Confidence interval Min Max

Urban Areas 86 1.75 1.50 82.88 88.77 Punjab 88 1.67 1.47 85.23 91.01 Sindh 83 4.59 3.79 75.20 90.08 KP 90 2.69 2.43 85.38 94.89 Balochistan 70 8.99 6.26 57.40 81.95 Rural Areas 81 0.78 0.63 79.37 81.84 Punjab 90 0.71 0.64 89.10 91.61 Sindh 66 3.26 2.15 61.72 70.16 KP 75 2.06 1.55 72.41 78.50 Balochistan 45 6.23 2.79 39.27 50.20 Overall 82 0.78 0.64 80.99 83.50 Punjab 90 0.71 0.63 88.42 90.91 Sindh 73 2.71 1.98 69.07 76.84 KP 78 1.72 1.35 75.49 80.77 Balochistan 51 5.65 2.89 45.48 56.80

328

Page 350: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Health PSLM 2014-15

Children < 5 years suffering from Diarrhoea Region/Province Estimate C.V Standard

error Confidence interval Min Max

Urban Areas 10 5.16 0.53 9.31 11.40 Punjab 11 6.75 0.72 9.18 11.98 Sindh 8 11.50 0.93 6.28 9.94 KP 17 10.94 1.89 13.57 20.98 Balochistan 12 14.69 1.83 8.89 16.08 Rural Areas 8 2.76 0.22 7.62 8.50 Punjab 9 3.51 0.31 8.21 9.42 Sindh 5 6.82 0.34 4.27 5.59 KP 9 6.71 0.57 7.40 9.65 Balochistan 11 8.53 0.91 8.91 12.49 Overall 9 2.59 0.23 8.34 9.23 Punjab 9 3.27 0.30 8.76 9.96 Sindh 6 7.11 0.45 5.40 7.15 KP 10 6.06 0.61 8.85 11.24 Balochistan 11 7.59 0.85 9.53 12.86

Pre-Natal Consultation Region/Province Estimate C.V Standard

error Confidence interval Min Max

Urban Areas 86 0.88 0.76 84.23 87.20 Punjab 87 1.08 0.94 85.35 89.06 Sindh 87 1.57 1.37 84.68 90.06 KP 80 3.06 2.45 75.33 84.95 Balochistan 65 4.09 2.65 59.61 70.00 Rural Areas 67 0.92 0.62 66.16 68.58 Punjab 75 1.01 0.76 73.09 76.05 Sindh 59 2.06 1.22 56.88 61.66 KP 61 2.19 1.33 58.20 63.43 Balochistan 41 6.75 2.78 35.67 46.56 Overall 73 0.71 0.52 72.18 74.21 Punjab 78 0.78 0.61 77.22 79.63 Sindh 72 1.57 1.12 69.48 73.89 KP 64 1.85 1.19 61.94 66.59 Balochistan 47 5.03 2.39 42.73 52.09

329

Page 351: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Health PSLM 2014-15

Post-Natal Consultation Region/Province Estimate C.V Standard

error Confidence interval Min Max

Urban Areas 38 4.52 1.70 34.20 40.85 Punjab 37 5.03 1.87 33.51 40.84 Sindh 40 10.23 4.09 31.96 48.00 KP 33 9.59 3.17 26.84 39.28 Balochistan 32 7.32 2.31 27.06 36.13 Rural Areas 25 2.24 0.56 23.74 25.92 Punjab 25 3.12 0.78 23.38 26.43 Sindh 28 4.35 1.22 25.62 30.40 KP 23 4.79 1.13 21.29 25.70 Balochistan 17 6.95 1.19 14.81 19.48 Overall 29 2.22 0.64 27.61 30.12 Punjab 29 2.71 0.78 27.13 30.18 Sindh 33 5.54 1.84 29.68 36.91 KP 25 4.41 1.11 23.02 27.38 Balochistan 21 5.93 1.25 18.55 23.43

330

Page 352: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Housing, Water supply & sanitation PSLM 2014-15

4. Housing, Water supply & Sanitation

4.1 Introduction

Provision of drinking water, adequate sanitation and personal hygiene are vital for

the sustainable environmental conditions and human health. Not having access to water

and sanitation is a courteous expression for a form of deprivation that threatens life,

destroys opportunity and undermines human dignity. The inadequate quantity of

improved drinking water along with poor quality of sanitation invites the variety of

diseases i.e. diarrhoea, hepatitis and other stomach related disorders. Thus, investing in

the provision of water supply and adequate sanitation is not only a development oriented

strategy in itself, it can also yield other socio-economic benefits in terms of improved

health status, quality of labour force and reduced burden-of-disease. Water and Sanitation

is the neglected sector in Pakistan.

In Pakistan most of the households do not have access to adequate potable or

shallow water. Similarly many households also lack toilets and adequate sanitation

facilities, these poor people, mostly living in rural areas or urban slums .Sanitation is one

of the basic necessities, which contributes to human dignity and quality of life and is an

essential pre-requisite for success. This is an uphill task for government to provide clean

and safe drinking water, especially the poorest of the poor need urgent attention. The

Government of Pakistan, while recognizing that access to safe drinking water is the basic

human right of every citizen and that it is the responsibility of the state to ensure its

provision to all citizens, is committed to provide adequate quantity of safe drinking water

to the entire population at an affordable cost and in an equitable, efficient and sustainable

manner. The Ministry of Environment, in line with provisions of the National

Environment Policy has formulated the National Drinking Water Policy 2009 through a

countrywide consultation process which aims to increase public awareness about water

safety, safe hygiene practices and water conservation.1

1 National Drinking Water Policy 2009, Ministry of Environment, Government of Pakistan

331

Page 353: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Housing, Water supply & sanitation PSLM 2014-15

In this chapter, information is presented on indicators such as Housing, Fuel used

for lighting and cooking, main source of drinking water and type of toilet used by

household. In housing it covers different types of dwelling ranging from huts to complex

structures and fuel used for lightning & cooking includes gas, electricity, LPG, kerosene

oil, wood and charcoal.

4.2 Housing A house is a building that functions as a home for humans, including

simple dwellings ranging from rudimentary huts of nomadic tribes and complex

structures composed of many systems. Occupancy status wise houses are of different

types like own, rent, free and subsidized rent.

In overall Pakistan the number of household that own dwelling units declined to

84 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 86 percent in 2012-13. The percentage is higher in

rural areas, 90 percent as compared to 74 percent in urban areas. Provincial comparison

reveals that percentage of household that own dwelling units is highest in Balochistan

with 88 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 91 percent in 2012-13 followed by KP which

remains stable at 87 percent, Punjab with to 85 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 87

percent in 2012-13, while Sindh with 81 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 82 percent in

2012-13 have the lowest percentage of household who live in own dwelling units (Table

4.1). In Islamabad (Federal Capital) 50 percent of households have their own housing

units in 2014-15 as compared to 51 percent in 2012-13.Comparison of districts shows

that; D.G khan with 96 percent, Tharparkar with 99 percent, Karak with 97 percent and

Awaran with 100 percent are the districts where people predominantly live in their own

housing units within their respective provinces. On the other hand, Rawalpindi with 68

percent, Karachi with 66 percent, Peshawar with 74 percent, and Quetta with 71 percent

has the lowest percentage of households who own dwelling units within their respective

provinces.

In overall Pakistan 10 percent households are living in rented and subsidize rented

houses in 2014-15 as compared to 8 percent in 2012-13. Provincial level comparison

shows that Sindh is at top with 13 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 12 percent in 2012-

13 and Balochistan is at bottom with 7 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 6 percent in

332

Page 354: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Housing, Water supply & sanitation PSLM 2014-15

2012-13. In Islamabad 41 percent households living in rented and subsidize rented

houses. While comparing districts, Rawalpindi with 23 percent, Karachi with 28 percent,

Peshawar with 24 percent and Quetta with 27 percent are top ranked districts living in

rented and subsidize rented houses within their respective provinces.

Table 4.2 shows percentage distribution of households for material used for roof.

In overall Pakistan Garder/T-iron with 39 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 37 percent

in 2012-13 is predominantly used as material for roof construction. This percentage is

higher in rural areas, 45 percent as compared to 28 percent in urban areas. The use of

Garder/T-iron is highest in Punjab

with 50 percent and lowest in KP

with 13 percent. District

comparison reveals that Bahawalpur

with 85 percent, Dadu with 80

percent, Karak with 53 percent and

Jaffarabad with 34 percent are top

ranked districts using Garder/T-iron

as material for roof construction

within their respective provinces.

The second most used material in construction of roof is RCC/RBC with 30

percent in 2014-15 as compared to 28 percent 2012-13. This percentage is higher in

urban areas, 57 percent as compared to 14 percent in rural areas. KP has highest

percentage of households with 35 percent using RCC/RBC, while Balochistan has the

lowest percentage with 7 percent. In Islamabad, 82 percent households used RCC/RBC

for construction of roof. District wise comparison reveals that Lahore with 82 percent,

Karachi with 76 percent, Swabi with 67 percent and Quetta with 24 percent are top

ranked districts using RCC/RBC for construction of roof within their respective

provinces.

Figure 4.1: Material used for Roof

05

10152025303540

28 30

4

37

1

30 27

4

39

1

2012-13 2014-15

333

Page 355: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Housing, Water supply & sanitation PSLM 2014-15

The third most used material in construction of roof is Wood/Bamboo which has

shown decline to 27 percent in 2014-15 from 30 percent in 2012-13. Balochistan has the

highest percentage of households using Wood/Bamboo with 68 percent in 2014-15 as

compared to 72 percent in 2012-13, while Punjab with 19 percent in 2014-15 as

compared to 23 percent in

2012-13 have the lowest

percentage of households

using Wood/Bamboo in

construction of roof (Table

4.2). In Islamabad only 1

percent, household used

Wood/Bamboo for

construction of roof.

Analysing districts, it is

observed that Hafizabad with

51 percent, Tharparkar with 83 percent, Tor Ghar with 92 percent and Barkhan with 96

percent are the top ranked districts within their respective provinces.

Table 4.3 shows percentage distribution of households for material used for the

construction of walls. In overall Pakistan, Burnt bricks/Blocks have been used

predominantly for construction of walls with 79 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 76

percent in 2012-13. This percentage is higher in urban areas, 96 percent as compared to

69 percent in rural areas. Provincial comparison shows that the use of Burnt

Bricks/Blocks is highest in Punjab with 90 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 87 percent

in 2012-13 followed by Sindh with 72 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 69 percent in

2012-13, KP with 61 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 57 percent in 2012-13 and

Balochistan with 30 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 28 percent in 2012-13. In

Islamabad, 99 percent households use Burnt Bricks/Blocks as material for construction of

walls. While comparing districts, Sialkot and Lahore with 100 percent, Karachi with 99

percent, Nowshera with 93 percent and Quetta with 68 percent are the top ranked districts

using Burnt bricks/Blocks for construction of walls in their respective provinces. D.G

Figure 4.2: Material used for Wall

0

20

40

60

80

BURNTBRICKS

MUD WOOD OTHERS

72

22

2 4

76

19

2 4

79

161 4

2010-11 2012-13 2014-15

334

Page 356: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Housing, Water supply & sanitation PSLM 2014-15

Khan with 56 percent, Tharparkar with 26 percent, Tor Ghar with 2 percent and Harnai

with 5 percent are the bottom ranked districts in respect of Burnt bricks/Blocks for

construction of walls within their respective provinces.

Housing units by number of rooms (Table 4.4) shows that majority of the

households in Pakistan live in housing units with 2-4 rooms, however, there is a

marginal decline in housing units with 2-4 rooms, from 68 percent in 2012-13 to 67

percent in 2014-15, while houses with five or more rooms remain stagnant at 6 percent

during the same period. Similar pattern is prevalent while observing the provinces,

Balochistan have the highest percentage i.e. 77 percent household with 2-4 rooms, while

Sindh has lowest percentage i.e. 62 percent household with 2-4 rooms in 2014-15. It is

observed that, 28 percent of households in overall Pakistan have 1 room. District

comparison reveals that Kasur with 42 percent, Tharparkar with 16 percent, Upper Dir

with 24 percent and Sheerani with 52 percent have highest percentage of households with

1 room within their respective provinces.

4.3 Sources of Drinking Water

In PSLM Survey, questions are asked to know the main source of drinking water.

According to this, information is collected about tap water, motorised pumping, hand

pump, dug well and others. The category “others” include tanker, mineral water, filtration

plant and sea/river/pond/stream. Tap water is a delivery system where the water is

delivered through a network of pipes and the water is treated before it is supplied. In

urban areas generally water comes in to house through pipes and is stored in tanks, built

in the house. Then the water for the use of household is lifted to small tanks built at the

top of the house, such system should be recorded as tap water supply. Hand Pump is a

pump operated manually to draw water from a bored hole. Sometimes hand pump and

motor are operated at the same hole. Dug well is of two types opened and closed well

closed well. The closed dug well is a covered and opened well is a dug well without any

covering.

335

Page 357: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Housing, Water supply & sanitation PSLM 2014-15

In overall Pakistan 27 percent of households are using tap water as main source of

drinking water in 2014-15 as compared to 30 percent in 2012-13. It is observed that there

is shift from tap water to motorized pumping for last few years as it increased to 33

percent in 2014-15 as compared to 30 percent in 2012-13. The third main source is hand

pump with 26 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 27 percent in 2012-13 (Table 4.5). It is

observed that main source of

drinking water in urban areas is

tap water with 51 percent and

hand pump in rural areas with

38 percent. Provincial level

comparison shows that number

of households using tap water

as a main source of drinking

water is highest in Sindh with

41 percent in 2014-15 as

compared to 43 percent

followed by KP with 35 percent

in 2014-15 as compared to 44

percent in 2012-13, Balochistan with 33 percent as compared to 34 percent in 2012-13

and Punjab with 18 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 22 percent 2012-13. In Islamabad,

only 20 percent household are using tap water as main source of drinking water as

compared to 54 percent in 2012-13, this change is due to shifting in motorized pumping

and filtration plant. While comparing districts, Lahore with 60 percent, Karachi with 84

percent, Chitral with 74 percent and Quetta with 70 percent are the top ranked districts

for using tap water as main source of drinking water within their respective provinces. On

the other hand Muzaffargarh with 1 percent, Larkana and Shikarpur with 1 percent,

Swabi with 4 percent and Jhal Magsi and Washuk with 3 percent household are the

bottom ranked districts within respective provinces.

Figure 4.3: Main Source of Drinking Water

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

TapWater

HandPump

MotorPump

Dug Well Others

35

30

24

48

30 27 30

3

9

2726

33

3

11

2010-11 2012-13 2014-15

336

Page 358: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Housing, Water supply & sanitation PSLM 2014-15

4.4 Sanitation The term sanitation, however, extends to cover cleanliness, hygiene, proper

collection of liquid and solid wastes and their environmentally proper disposal. In this

endeavor, the needs for waste reduction, reuse, recycle and change in the attitude towards

consumption and production patterns are other imperatives for achieving goals of

sustainable environment. For this purpose the globally used best practices should be

adopted in order to reuse and recycle the waste material. The main goal of National

Sanitation Policy is to provide adequate coverage for improving the quality of life of the

people of Pakistan and to provide physical environment necessary for healthy life2

4.4.1 Toilets Sanitation is also an important indicator of MDG. Toilet is a fixture for defecation

and urination, consisting of a bowl fitted with a hinged seat and connected to a waste pipe

and a flushing apparatus. In the questionnaire response was recorded regarding the type

of toilet used by the household. A toilet, which is used by the household and is situated in

the yard, is considered as a toilet within the household.

Overall in Pakistan 73 percent of households are using flush toilet facilities in

2014-15 as compared to 71 percent in 2012-13. Percentage of households using flush

toilet is higher in urban areas with 97 percent as compared to 60 percent in rural areas.

Provincial level comparison shows that the highest number of household in Punjab with

79 percent in 2014-15 are using flush toilet as compared to 77 percent in 2012-13

followed by KP with 76 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 71 percent in 2012-13, Sindh

with 67 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 63 Percent in 2012-13 and Balochistan with

31 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 30 percent in 2012-13 have the lowest percentage

of households using flush facility (Table 4.6). In Islamabad, 99 percent households are

using flush toilet facility. While observing district level pattern, Lahore with 99 percent,

Karachi with 97 percent, Haripur with 90 percent and Quetta with 76 percent are the top

ranked districts in their respective provinces.

2 National Sanitation Policy, Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan ,Ministry of Environment

337

Page 359: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Housing, Water supply & sanitation PSLM 2014-15

In overall Pakistan 13 percent households are using non flush facility as compared

to 14 percent households in 2012-13.Non flush category includes, a soak pit is a “katcha”

structure, which is closed,

once it is filled up. It is

designed so that water

disappears into the ground, dry

raised latrine No flush a

“khuddi” is used and the waste

matter is taken away by a

sweeper/jamadar and pit

latrine a hole is dug in the

ground, connected to a pit in

which the waste matter is

accumulated. The hole is

closed once the pit is filled up.

Overall there are only 13 percent household in 2014-15 that do not have toilet

facility as compared to 15 percent in 2012-13 (Table 4.6). This varies greatly between

urban and rural areas, 1 percent of urban households have reported no toilet facility as

compared to 21 percent of rural household. Provincial level comparison shows that

Punjab has the highest percentage of households reporting no toilet with 16 percent in

2014-15 as compared to 15 percent in 2012-13 followed by Balochistan with 13 percent

in 2014-15 as compared to 15 percent in 2012-13, KP with 12 percent in 2014-15 as

compared to 13 percent in 2012-13, while Sindh with 7 percent as compared 8 percent in

2012-13. While observing district level pattern, Chiniot and Jhang with 40 percent

Tharparkar with 44 percent, Tor Ghar with 49 percent and Loralai with 49 percent are the

districts with the highest percentage of households without any toilet facility in their

respective provinces.

Figure 4.4: Toilet Facility

01020304050607080

FLUSH NON FLUSH NO TOILET

66

15 18

71

14 15

73

13 13

2010-11 2012-13 2014-15

338

Page 360: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Housing, Water supply & sanitation PSLM 2014-15

4.5 Electricity & Gas

In PSLM survey information is collected from households about the major source

used for lighting. For this purpose following categories are included, Electricity,

Gas/Kerosene oil, Wood/ Candles and Others.

Table 4.7 shows that 93 percent of households are using electricity as fuel for

lightning which remains stagnant during the period 2012-13 and 2014-15. This

percentage is higher in urban areas with 99 percent as compared to 90 percent in rural

areas. Provincial comparison shows that use of electricity as a source of lighting is

highest in KP with 96 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 94 Percent in 2012-13 followed

by Punjab at 95 percent which remains stagnant during the period 2012-13 to 2014-15,

Sindh with 91 percent which remains stable during the period 2012-13 to 2014-15 and

Balochistan with 81 percent in 2014-15 as compared to 79 percent in 2012-13. In

Islamabad, 98 percent households are using electricity as a source of lighting. While

comparing districts, Gujrat and Mandi Bahuddin with 100 percent, Hyderabad and Dadu

with 99 percent, Bannu, Chitral and Charsadda with 100 percent and Jaffarabad with 98

percent are the top ranked districts within their respective provinces. Whereas, districts

D.G Khan with 82 percent, Tharparkar with 39 percent, Tor Ghar with 68 percent and

Chagai with 27 percent are the bottom ranked districts in respect of use of electricity as

main source of lightning within their respective provinces.

Similarly in PSLM Survey, information is collected from households about the

major fuel used for cooking. Different sources of fuel used for cooking have been

discussed like Gas, Kerosiene Oil, Wood/Sticks and others (dung cake and crop residue,

electricity and charcoal are included in the others category). It is worth mentioning here

that the category electricity was included as separate category in year 2012-13 but due to

its insignificant values as fuel for cooking ,from the year 2014-15, it will be included in

others, and Gas & Oil are reported as separate categories, so the table is not comparable

with 2012-13.

339

Page 361: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Housing, Water supply & sanitation PSLM 2014-15

Table 4.8 indicates that the vast majority of households i.e. 51 percent are using

Wood/Sticks as fuel for cooking in overall Pakistan. This percentage is higher in rural

areas, 73 percent as compared to only 13 percent in urban areas. Provincial level

comparison shows that 73 percent household in Balochistan and KP are using

Wood/Sticks as main fuel for cooking in 2014-15, followed by Punjab with 51 percent

and Sindh with 38 percent. District comparisons reveals that Rajanpur with 98 percent,

Tharparkar with 99 percent, Upper Dir with 100 percent and Musa Khel with 100 percent

have the highest percentage of household using Wood/Sticks as main fuel for cooking.

41 percent of households are using gas as fuel for cooking. This percentage is

higher in urban areas with 85 percent as compared to 16 percent in rural areas. Provincial

level comparison reveals that 56 percent household in Sindh followed by 39 percent in

Punjab, 26 percent in KP and 25 percent households in Balochistan are using gas as main

source of fuel for cooking. In Islamabad, 87 percent household are using gas as a fuel for

cooking. While comparing districts, Lahore with 92 percent, Karachi with 98 percent,

Peshawar with 73 percent and Quetta with 87 percent are the top ranked districts for

using gas as main fuel for cooking within their respective provinces.

340

Page 362: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

OWN RENT FREE SUBSIDIZE RENT TOTAL

Pakistan 84.09 8.16 6.32 1.44 100.00Urban 73.67 17.94 5.14 3.25 100.00Rural 90.19 2.42 7.01 0.38 100.00

Punjab 84.72 7.41 6.97 0.90 100.00Urban 74.61 16.70 6.26 2.43 100.00Rural 89.79 2.76 7.32 0.13 100.00

Islamabad 50.40 21.39 8.20 20.01 100.00Urban 36.67 25.78 7.88 29.67 100.00Rural 78.60 12.36 8.86 0.17 100.00

Attock 80.96 7.48 8.19 3.36 100.00Urban 60.92 21.12 9.02 8.94 100.00Rural 88.89 2.09 7.86 1.16 100.00

Rawalpindi 67.88 20.24 8.67 3.21 100.00Urban 50.96 31.01 11.85 6.18 100.00Rural 84.14 9.89 5.61 0.36 100.00

Jehlum 81.58 8.69 8.46 1.28 100.00Urban 60.40 22.12 13.11 4.37 100.00Rural 90.32 3.14 6.54 0.00 100.00

Chakwal 90.84 4.11 5.05 0.00 100.00Urban 64.08 27.98 7.95 0.00 100.00Rural 94.83 0.55 4.62 0.00 100.00

Sargodha 86.77 6.32 6.62 0.29 100.00Urban 77.99 15.94 6.07 0.00 100.00Rural 91.45 1.19 6.92 0.45 100.00

Bhakkar 93.46 0.98 2.59 2.96 100.00Urban 78.63 5.51 0.00 15.86 100.00Rural 96.67 0.00 3.15 0.18 100.00

Khushab 91.62 3.34 4.87 0.17 100.00Urban 88.06 8.79 2.78 0.37 100.00Rural 93.18 0.95 5.79 0.08 100.00

Mianwali 92.12 3.30 4.45 0.13 100.00Urban 90.55 6.51 2.30 0.63 100.00Rural 92.54 2.44 5.03 0.00 100.00

Faisalabad 84.36 10.51 4.10 1.02 100.00Urban 79.27 16.00 2.49 2.24 100.00Rural 88.65 5.90 5.46 0.00 100.00

Chiniot 84.39 4.60 11.01 0.00 100.00Urban 80.98 11.90 7.12 0.00 100.00Rural 86.11 0.93 12.96 0.00 100.00

TABLE 4.1: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY HOUSING TENURE.

PROVINCE & DISTRICT HOUSING TENURE

341

Page 363: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

OWN RENT FREE SUBSIDIZE RENT TOTAL

TABLE 4.1: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY HOUSING TENURE.

PROVINCE & DISTRICT HOUSING TENURE

Jhang 86.41 3.22 10.20 0.18 100.00Urban 80.63 10.02 8.56 0.79 100.00Rural 88.07 1.27 10.67 0.00 100.00

Toba Tek Singh 88.04 3.32 8.64 0.00 100.00Urban 78.40 11.91 9.69 0.00 100.00Rural 90.56 1.07 8.37 0.00 100.00

Gujranwala 86.87 7.82 5.32 0.00 100.00Urban 83.40 11.74 4.86 0.00 100.00Rural 90.98 3.15 5.86 0.00 100.00

Hafizabad 87.71 3.76 8.07 0.46 100.00Urban 86.13 9.19 4.09 0.60 100.00Rural 88.46 1.21 9.94 0.39 100.00

Gujrat 90.13 4.37 5.50 0.00 100.00Urban 80.29 12.26 7.45 0.00 100.00Rural 93.74 1.48 4.79 0.00 100.00

Mandi Bahauddin 89.52 2.37 8.11 0.00 100.00Urban 85.73 8.55 5.72 0.00 100.00Rural 90.36 1.01 8.63 0.00 100.00

Sialkot 90.17 6.94 2.04 0.84 100.00Urban 85.72 12.91 0.48 0.90 100.00Rural 91.90 4.63 2.65 0.82 100.00

Narowal 93.82 4.05 1.98 0.15 100.00Urban 79.93 20.07 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 96.77 0.65 2.40 0.18 100.00

Lahore 69.66 20.73 9.43 0.19 100.00Urban 71.11 20.99 7.66 0.24 100.00Rural 64.62 19.82 15.56 0.00 100.00

Kasur 81.72 4.31 13.89 0.08 100.00Urban 79.88 12.57 7.55 0.00 100.00Rural 82.36 1.44 16.10 0.11 100.00

Sheikhupura 86.15 8.06 5.76 0.04 100.00Urban 80.73 13.49 5.78 0.00 100.00Rural 88.25 5.94 5.75 0.05 100.00

Nankana Sahib 85.57 5.20 8.87 0.36 100.00Urban 84.01 11.00 3.63 1.35 100.00Rural 86.13 3.11 10.76 0.00 100.00

Okara 82.15 3.57 13.04 1.24 100.00Urban 76.84 10.97 8.26 3.93 100.00Rural 84.23 0.67 14.92 0.18 100.00

342

Page 364: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

OWN RENT FREE SUBSIDIZE RENT TOTAL

TABLE 4.1: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY HOUSING TENURE.

PROVINCE & DISTRICT HOUSING TENURE

Sahiwal 82.85 3.90 11.46 1.79 100.00Urban 70.41 12.30 7.61 9.68 100.00Rural 85.67 2.00 12.33 0.00 100.00

Pakpattan 88.56 2.18 9.03 0.24 100.00Urban 82.27 11.73 4.47 1.52 100.00Rural 89.71 0.43 9.86 0.00 100.00

Vehari 86.22 2.81 10.28 0.70 100.00Urban 73.76 12.78 9.56 3.90 100.00Rural 88.94 0.63 10.43 0.00 100.00

Multan 86.33 7.91 5.12 0.64 100.00Urban 77.90 15.95 5.02 1.13 100.00Rural 91.79 2.69 5.19 0.33 100.00

Lodhran 90.97 1.75 7.28 0.00 100.00Urban 85.81 11.14 3.05 0.00 100.00Rural 91.88 0.09 8.03 0.00 100.00

Khanewal 91.23 2.43 5.28 1.05 100.00Urban 83.83 7.98 3.67 4.53 100.00Rural 93.12 1.02 5.69 0.17 100.00

D.G Khan 96.22 2.23 1.55 0.00 100.00Urban 85.63 12.52 1.85 0.00 100.00Rural 98.13 0.37 1.49 0.00 100.00

Rajanpur 96.13 1.57 2.31 0.00 100.00Urban 90.79 3.30 5.91 0.00 100.00Rural 97.21 1.22 1.57 0.00 100.00

Layyah 95.15 2.14 2.70 0.00 100.00Urban 84.54 11.01 4.45 0.00 100.00Rural 97.08 0.54 2.38 0.00 100.00

Muzaffargarh 89.24 2.39 7.50 0.87 100.00Urban 75.96 12.84 4.82 6.38 100.00Rural 91.14 0.90 7.88 0.08 100.00

Bahawalpur 93.33 3.88 2.64 0.15 100.00Urban 84.59 10.89 3.97 0.54 100.00Rural 96.71 1.16 2.12 0.00 100.00

Bhawal Nagar 83.31 3.11 13.42 0.16 100.00Urban 78.42 12.68 8.16 0.75 100.00Rural 84.60 0.59 14.81 0.00 100.00

Rahim Yar Khan 91.89 3.22 4.60 0.29 100.00Urban 79.12 15.63 4.35 0.90 100.00Rural 94.85 0.34 4.66 0.15 100.00

343

Page 365: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

OWN RENT FREE SUBSIDIZE RENT TOTAL

TABLE 4.1: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY HOUSING TENURE.

PROVINCE & DISTRICT HOUSING TENURE

Sindh 80.98 10.61 5.97 2.44 100.00Urban 72.59 18.97 4.26 4.17 100.00Rural 90.99 0.63 8.00 0.38 100.00

Jacobabad 84.86 2.89 11.55 0.69 100.00Urban 83.36 10.66 3.20 2.79 100.00Rural 85.36 0.35 14.30 0.00 100.00

Kashmore 83.83 4.07 12.05 0.05 100.00Urban 84.91 12.47 2.62 0.00 100.00Rural 83.33 0.24 16.35 0.07 100.00

Shikarpur 86.22 3.08 10.59 0.12 100.00Urban 82.87 11.11 5.61 0.42 100.00Rural 87.50 0.00 12.50 0.00 100.00

Larkana 87.76 5.64 6.34 0.26 100.00Urban 79.85 12.70 6.87 0.58 100.00Rural 94.09 0.00 5.91 0.00 100.00

Shahdadkot 88.62 2.42 8.96 0.00 100.00Urban 88.55 7.38 4.07 0.00 100.00Rural 88.64 0.72 10.63 0.00 100.00

Sukkur 81.07 8.73 5.72 4.47 100.00Urban 74.54 13.19 5.31 6.96 100.00Rural 92.81 0.73 6.46 0.00 100.00

Ghotki 91.03 2.25 4.04 2.68 100.00Urban 79.49 10.25 1.02 9.23 100.00Rural 94.19 0.05 4.87 0.89 100.00

Khairpur 95.41 1.99 2.00 0.60 100.00Urban 90.69 6.28 1.88 1.15 100.00Rural 97.40 0.19 2.05 0.36 100.00

Naushahro Feroze 96.13 1.56 2.10 0.22 100.00Urban 89.71 6.47 2.83 0.99 100.00Rural 97.91 0.19 1.90 0.00 100.00

Shaheed Benazirabad 85.48 2.31 10.96 1.26 100.00Urban 83.77 9.15 2.10 4.98 100.00Rural 86.06 0.00 13.94 0.00 100.00

Dadu 93.02 2.25 1.42 3.30 100.00Urban 84.24 5.04 0.00 10.72 100.00Rural 95.01 1.62 1.75 1.62 100.00

Jamshoro 93.25 2.56 1.58 2.61 100.00Urban 84.20 6.42 2.91 6.48 100.00Rural 96.52 1.16 1.11 1.21 100.00

344

Page 366: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

OWN RENT FREE SUBSIDIZE RENT TOTAL

TABLE 4.1: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY HOUSING TENURE.

PROVINCE & DISTRICT HOUSING TENURE

Hyderabad 89.24 8.27 1.85 0.63 100.00Urban 87.20 9.95 2.08 0.77 100.00Rural 98.73 0.49 0.78 0.00 100.00

Tando Allah Yar 97.06 0.83 1.53 0.59 100.00Urban 92.09 4.03 1.00 2.88 100.00Rural 98.34 0.00 1.66 0.00 100.00

Tando Muhammad Khan 98.28 1.27 0.21 0.25 100.00Urban 90.82 7.68 0.00 1.51 100.00Rural 99.75 0.00 0.25 0.00 100.00

Mitiari 97.79 1.10 0.54 0.57 100.00Urban 92.57 4.66 1.00 1.78 100.00Rural 99.39 0.00 0.41 0.20 100.00

Badin 97.45 1.16 0.76 0.63 100.00Urban 89.54 4.71 2.83 2.92 100.00Rural 99.62 0.19 0.20 0.00 100.00

Thatta 93.85 0.62 5.53 0.00 100.00Urban 79.29 4.15 16.57 0.00 100.00Rural 95.96 0.11 3.93 0.00 100.00

Sujawal 91.97 0.37 7.30 0.37 100.00Urban 84.53 2.69 10.09 2.69 100.00Rural 93.13 0.00 6.87 0.00 100.00

Sanghar 89.07 1.01 9.42 0.50 100.00Urban 90.84 4.87 1.91 2.38 100.00Rural 88.61 0.00 11.39 0.00 100.00

Mirpur Khas 69.54 3.00 26.05 1.41 100.00Urban 79.27 11.14 4.36 5.23 100.00Rural 65.95 0.00 34.05 0.00 100.00

Umerkot 80.94 1.01 17.63 0.41 100.00Urban 86.99 5.02 5.96 2.03 100.00Rural 79.42 0.00 20.58 0.00 100.00

Tharparkar 99.49 0.13 0.15 0.23 100.00Urban 94.31 1.66 2.01 2.01 100.00Rural 99.91 0.00 0.00 0.09 100.00

Karachi 66.26 23.44 5.42 4.87 100.00Urban 65.83 24.39 4.81 4.97 100.00Rural 73.28 8.06 15.36 3.30 100.00

345

Page 367: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

OWN RENT FREE SUBSIDIZE RENT TOTAL

TABLE 4.1: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY HOUSING TENURE.

PROVINCE & DISTRICT HOUSING TENURE

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 86.58 6.98 4.52 1.92 100.00Urban 70.95 21.80 2.74 4.51 100.00Rural 90.14 3.61 4.93 1.33 100.00

Chitral 97.53 0.69 1.37 0.41 100.00Urban 91.18 4.41 0.00 4.41 100.00Rural 98.19 0.30 1.51 0.00 100.00

Upper Dir 94.59 0.74 3.18 1.49 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 94.36 0.77 3.32 1.55 100.00

Lower Dir 90.43 3.60 3.46 2.50 100.00Urban 61.45 18.23 20.32 0.00 100.00Rural 92.48 2.57 2.27 2.68 100.00

Swat 81.49 13.82 2.73 1.96 100.00Urban 65.88 31.74 2.38 0.00 100.00Rural 84.86 9.95 2.80 2.38 100.00

Shangla 92.50 0.92 6.18 0.40 100.00Urban 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 92.50 0.92 6.18 0.40 100.00

Buner 78.98 1.66 17.61 1.75 100.00Urban - - - - -Rural 78.98 1.66 17.61 1.75 100.00

Malakand PA 81.52 6.95 8.23 3.31 100.00Urban 71.84 23.92 4.23 0.00 100.00Rural 83.18 4.04 8.91 3.87 100.00

Kohistan 94.38 0.00 5.62 0.00 100.00Urban - - - - -Rural 94.38 0.00 5.62 0.00 100.00

Mansehra 92.36 3.16 4.48 0.00 100.00Urban 83.00 17.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 93.00 2.21 4.79 0.00 100.00

Batagram 84.39 3.37 12.24 0.00 100.00Urban - - - - -Rural 84.39 3.37 12.24 0.00 100.00

Abbottabad 89.75 6.28 2.76 1.21 100.00Urban 60.79 29.02 3.18 7.01 100.00Rural 95.81 1.52 2.67 0.00 100.00

Haripur 87.63 8.35 4.02 0.00 100.00Urban 80.56 16.48 2.96 0.00 100.00Rural 89.30 6.43 4.27 0.00 100.00

346

Page 368: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

OWN RENT FREE SUBSIDIZE RENT TOTAL

TABLE 4.1: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY HOUSING TENURE.

PROVINCE & DISTRICT HOUSING TENURE

Tor Ghar 86.28 3.04 10.68 0.00 100.00Urban - - - - -Rural 86.28 3.04 10.68 0.00 100.00

Mardan 79.84 8.67 7.60 3.89 100.00Urban 72.47 23.07 4.45 0.00 -Rural 82.56 3.34 8.77 5.33 100.00

Swabi 91.13 4.60 4.27 0.00 100.00Urban 91.55 6.14 2.30 0.00 100.00Rural 91.05 4.30 4.64 0.00 100.00

Charsadda 84.48 4.68 6.23 4.60 100.00Urban 82.73 10.88 1.55 4.85 100.00Rural 84.96 3.00 7.50 4.54 100.00

Peshawar 73.62 17.42 2.13 6.83 100.00Urban 62.18 24.95 2.39 10.49 100.00Rural 87.68 8.17 1.81 2.34 100.00

Nowshera 89.87 6.92 2.13 1.07 100.00Urban 76.83 15.05 4.54 3.58 -Rural 95.47 3.43 1.10 0.00 100.00

Kohat 90.48 7.96 1.01 0.55 100.00Urban 73.62 26.38 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 95.54 2.44 1.31 0.71 100.00

Hangu 87.19 10.53 1.52 0.76 100.00Urban 68.43 27.43 1.60 2.54 100.00Rural 92.31 5.92 1.50 0.27 100.00

Karak 96.70 0.96 2.33 0.00 100.00Urban 95.94 4.06 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 96.75 0.79 2.46 0.00 100.00

Bannu 81.33 11.00 6.94 0.73 100.00Urban 40.75 54.86 4.39 0.00 100.00Rural 84.12 7.98 7.12 0.78 100.00

Lakki Marwat 91.12 3.52 4.65 0.70 100.00Urban 77.50 19.64 0.00 2.86 100.00Rural 93.21 1.06 5.36 0.37 100.00

D.I Khan 93.85 3.78 2.37 0.00 100.00Urban 85.72 14.28 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 95.08 2.19 2.72 0.00 100.00

Tank 95.68 2.89 1.27 0.17 100.00Urban 79.04 18.81 1.08 1.08 100.00Rural 98.70 0.00 1.30 0.00 100.00

347

Page 369: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

OWN RENT FREE SUBSIDIZE RENT TOTAL

TABLE 4.1: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY HOUSING TENURE.

PROVINCE & DISTRICT HOUSING TENURE

Balochistan 88.05 6.05 4.84 1.07 100.00Urban 76.83 17.90 2.35 2.91 100.00Rural 92.24 1.62 5.76 0.38 100.00

Quetta 70.52 24.65 2.09 2.74 100.00Urban 59.52 34.72 1.07 4.69 100.00Rural 85.99 10.48 3.53 0.00 100.00

Pishin 96.46 1.17 2.37 0.00 100.00Urban 82.39 11.93 5.69 0.00 100.00Rural 97.63 0.28 2.10 0.00 100.00

Killa Abdullah 93.57 0.86 5.57 0.00 100.00Urban 85.08 8.08 6.84 0.00 100.00Rural 94.58 0.00 5.42 0.00 100.00

Chagai 85.67 0.31 14.02 0.00 100.00Urban 96.52 3.48 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 84.63 0.00 15.37 0.00 100.00

Nushki 89.17 1.31 8.21 1.31 100.00Urban 87.05 6.48 0.00 6.48 100.00Rural 89.71 0.00 10.29 0.00 100.00

Loralai 94.86 2.51 2.10 0.52 100.00Urban 69.01 16.96 10.52 3.51 100.00Rural 99.36 0.00 0.64 0.00 100.00

Barkhan 98.07 0.96 0.96 0.00 100.00Urban 84.94 7.53 7.53 0.00 100.00Rural 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00

Musa Khel 95.58 4.42 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 81.19 18.81 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 99.34 0.66 0.00 0.00 100.00

Killa Saifullah 93.85 3.89 2.27 0.00 100.00Urban 89.79 8.08 2.14 0.00 100.00Rural 95.34 2.35 2.31 0.00 100.00

Zhob 92.10 4.08 2.05 1.78 100.00Urban 76.90 16.08 0.00 7.02 100.00Rural 97.26 0.00 2.74 0.00 100.00

Sheerani 92.47 0.00 7.38 0.15 100.00Urban - - - - -Rural 92.47 0.00 7.38 0.15 100.00

Sibi 95.34 1.58 2.11 0.97 100.00Urban 92.24 3.95 1.63 2.18 100.00Rural 96.97 0.33 2.37 0.33 100.00

348

Page 370: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

OWN RENT FREE SUBSIDIZE RENT TOTAL

TABLE 4.1: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY HOUSING TENURE.

PROVINCE & DISTRICT HOUSING TENURE

Harnai 97.72 0.58 1.19 0.50 100.00Urban 89.82 7.62 2.56 0.00 100.00Rural 98.38 0.00 1.07 0.55 100.00

Ziarat 94.10 0.32 3.22 2.37 100.00Urban 63.07 0.00 36.93 0.00 100.00Rural 96.56 0.35 0.54 2.55 100.00

Kohlu 94.79 1.52 2.65 1.04 100.00Urban 79.26 12.32 0.00 8.43 100.00Rural 96.98 0.00 3.02 0.00 100.00

Dera Bugti 95.25 1.44 2.88 0.44 100.00Urban 69.53 8.33 16.40 5.73 100.00Rural 97.37 0.87 1.76 0.00 100.00

Kachhi( Bolan) 90.28 1.03 8.15 0.54 100.00Urban 91.67 5.46 0.00 2.87 100.00Rural 89.95 0.00 10.05 0.00 100.00

Jaffarabad 83.56 2.29 14.14 0.00 100.00Urban 83.75 9.47 6.78 0.00 100.00Rural 83.50 0.00 16.50 0.00 100.00

Nasirabad 81.10 3.10 14.71 1.10 100.00Urban 83.06 11.30 1.64 4.00 100.00Rural 80.36 0.00 19.64 0.00 100.00

Jhal Magsi 84.46 0.23 15.31 0.00 100.00Urban 94.51 5.49 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 84.03 0.00 15.97 0.00 100.00

Kalat 99.23 0.00 0.77 0.00 100.00Urban 95.91 0.00 4.09 0.00 100.00Rural 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00

Mastung 93.51 1.89 4.60 0.00 100.00Urban 95.71 4.29 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 92.75 1.05 6.21 0.00 100.00

Khuzdar 86.31 4.58 5.27 3.84 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 80.01 6.69 7.70 5.60 100.00

Awaran 99.70 0.00 0.30 0.00 100.00Urban - - - - -Rural 99.70 0.00 0.30 0.00 100.00

349

Page 371: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

OWN RENT FREE SUBSIDIZE RENT TOTAL

TABLE 4.1: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY HOUSING TENURE.

PROVINCE & DISTRICT HOUSING TENURE

Kharan 96.66 2.76 0.58 0.00 100.00Urban 91.12 8.88 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 99.16 0.00 0.84 0.00 100.00

Washuk 98.65 0.00 1.35 0.00 100.00Urban - - - - -Rural 98.65 0.00 1.35 0.00 100.00

Lasbela 92.14 4.29 2.33 1.24 100.00Urban 81.21 11.65 3.77 3.37 100.00Rural 98.51 0.00 1.49 0.00 100.00

Gwadar 92.66 2.01 4.26 1.07 100.00Urban 92.98 3.66 1.42 1.95 100.00Rural 92.26 0.00 7.74 0.00 100.00

NOTES:

1. The Panjgur & Kech districts has been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

350

Page 372: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Pakistan 29.96 26.52 3.94 38.70 0.89 100.00Urban 57.33 8.65 5.10 28.49 0.43 100.00Rural 13.90 37.00 3.25 44.69 1.15 100.00

Punjab 28.48 18.85 1.38 49.90 1.39 100.00Urban 57.02 8.72 0.74 32.80 0.72 100.00Rural 14.17 23.93 1.70 58.47 1.72 100.00

Islamabad 82.29 1.37 2.29 14.05 0.00 100.00Urban 81.05 0.15 2.95 15.85 0.00 100.00Rural 84.84 3.89 0.93 10.35 0.00 100.00

Attock 46.53 19.05 0.35 33.84 0.23 100.00Urban 85.00 5.85 0.00 9.16 0.00 100.00Rural 31.32 24.26 0.49 43.60 0.33 100.00

Rawalpindi 77.66 5.39 4.75 12.10 0.09 100.00Urban 96.32 1.31 0.00 2.37 0.00 100.00Rural 59.74 9.32 9.31 21.45 0.19 100.00

Jehlum 36.62 15.75 2.31 45.31 0.00 100.00Urban 71.19 7.43 1.78 19.60 0.00 100.00Rural 22.35 19.19 2.53 55.93 0.00 100.00

Chakwal 21.82 17.48 5.33 55.37 0.00 100.00Urban 64.67 11.04 2.14 22.16 0.00 100.00Rural 15.42 18.44 5.81 60.33 0.00 100.00

Sargodha 14.22 21.71 1.84 61.76 0.47 100.00Urban 35.51 12.38 3.18 48.93 0.00 100.00Rural 2.88 26.68 1.13 68.60 0.71 100.00

Bhakkar 1.20 15.56 0.09 83.06 0.09 100.00Urban 2.81 13.41 0.00 83.78 0.00 100.00Rural 0.85 16.03 0.11 82.90 0.11 100.00

Khushab 4.19 22.68 0.69 72.17 0.26 100.00Urban 11.22 17.94 0.46 70.02 0.36 100.00Rural 1.12 24.75 0.79 73.12 0.22 100.00

Mianwali 4.98 29.19 0.25 65.24 0.33 100.00Urban 10.35 21.70 0.00 67.44 0.50 100.00Rural 3.53 31.21 0.32 64.65 0.29 100.00

Faisalabad 18.78 11.91 0.10 69.17 0.03 100.00Urban 37.03 6.59 0.23 56.15 0.00 100.00Rural 3.44 16.39 0.00 80.12 0.06 100.00

Chiniot 5.82 26.64 0.43 66.89 0.22 100.00Urban 15.90 17.08 0.81 66.21 0.00 100.00Rural 0.74 31.45 0.24 67.24 0.33 100.00

OTHERS TOTAL

TABLE 4.2: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY MATERIAL USED FOR ROOF

PROVINCE & DISTRICTMATERIAL USED FOR ROOF

RCC/RBCWOOD/

BAMBOOSHEET/IRON/

CEMENTT-

Iron/GARDER

351

Page 373: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

OTHERS TOTAL

TABLE 4.2: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY MATERIAL USED FOR ROOF

PROVINCE & DISTRICTMATERIAL USED FOR ROOF

RCC/RBCWOOD/

BAMBOOSHEET/IRON/

CEMENTT-

Iron/GARDER

Jhang 3.83 12.39 0.00 82.76 1.02 100.00Urban 14.55 6.25 0.00 79.20 0.00 100.00Rural 0.76 14.15 0.00 83.78 1.31 100.00

Toba Tek Singh 6.64 14.77 0.28 78.14 0.16 100.00Urban 23.66 8.26 0.00 68.08 0.00 100.00Rural 2.20 16.47 0.36 80.77 0.21 100.00

Gujranwala 58.37 35.32 0.26 6.05 0.00 100.00Urban 76.80 21.30 0.19 1.70 0.00 100.00Rural 36.49 51.97 0.35 11.20 0.00 100.00

Hafizabad 18.82 50.69 3.10 27.39 0.00 100.00Urban 32.56 36.57 1.25 29.62 0.00 100.00Rural 12.37 57.31 3.97 26.35 0.00 100.00

Gujrat 49.26 35.95 6.89 7.60 0.29 100.00Urban 78.12 16.98 1.76 3.14 0.00 100.00Rural 38.69 42.90 8.77 9.24 0.40 100.00

Mandi Bahauddin 22.14 42.67 1.89 28.20 5.09 100.00Urban 55.86 30.47 3.18 10.49 0.00 100.00Rural 14.72 45.36 1.61 32.10 6.20 100.00

Sialkot 61.81 21.79 0.91 15.49 0.00 100.00Urban 82.08 7.37 1.11 9.45 0.00 100.00Rural 53.96 27.38 0.84 17.83 0.00 100.00

Narowal 24.60 31.52 6.96 36.60 0.31 100.00Urban 59.77 19.74 20.50 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 17.14 34.03 4.09 44.38 0.38 100.00

Lahore 81.83 3.44 0.32 12.62 1.79 100.00Urban 86.31 2.74 0.00 9.89 1.07 100.00Rural 66.26 5.88 1.43 22.14 4.29 100.00

Kasur 20.42 13.33 0.32 43.39 22.54 100.00Urban 47.92 9.09 0.00 34.62 8.37 100.00Rural 10.84 14.81 0.42 46.45 27.48 100.00

Sheikhupura 38.41 26.81 7.05 22.72 5.01 100.00Urban 66.57 7.83 1.41 20.07 4.12 100.00Rural 27.47 34.19 9.24 23.74 5.36 100.00

Nankana Sahib 19.78 32.55 8.56 30.32 8.79 100.00Urban 46.94 24.10 1.08 24.53 3.35 100.00Rural 9.99 35.60 11.26 32.41 10.75 100.00

Okara 8.36 20.67 0.59 70.38 0.00 100.00Urban 20.12 9.85 0.00 70.03 0.00 100.00Rural 3.77 24.89 0.82 70.51 0.00 100.00

352

Page 374: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

OTHERS TOTAL

TABLE 4.2: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY MATERIAL USED FOR ROOF

PROVINCE & DISTRICTMATERIAL USED FOR ROOF

RCC/RBCWOOD/

BAMBOOSHEET/IRON/

CEMENTT-

Iron/GARDER

Sahiwal 10.88 8.13 0.38 80.54 0.07 100.00Urban 35.31 4.90 1.17 58.62 0.00 100.00Rural 5.34 8.86 0.20 85.51 0.09 100.00

Pakpattan 5.23 17.23 0.93 76.62 0.00 100.00Urban 24.93 16.08 0.00 58.98 0.00 100.00Rural 1.62 17.43 1.10 79.84 0.00 100.00

Vehari 7.32 16.82 0.00 75.86 0.00 100.00Urban 30.66 6.61 0.00 62.73 0.00 100.00Rural 2.23 19.04 0.00 78.72 0.00 100.00

Multan 20.19 21.40 0.12 57.94 0.34 100.00Urban 40.54 16.03 0.32 42.76 0.36 100.00Rural 7.01 24.88 0.00 67.78 0.33 100.00

Lodhran 4.77 15.55 0.00 79.49 0.19 100.00Urban 18.41 16.79 0.00 64.80 0.00 100.00Rural 2.37 15.33 0.00 82.08 0.23 100.00

Khanewal 4.85 18.17 0.00 75.90 1.09 100.00Urban 18.24 15.06 0.00 63.25 3.46 100.00Rural 1.45 18.96 0.00 79.11 0.48 100.00

D.G Khan 5.53 49.54 0.81 43.90 0.23 100.00Urban 32.32 3.83 4.45 59.39 0.00 100.00Rural 0.70 57.78 0.15 41.10 0.27 100.00

Rajanpur 2.90 47.17 0.29 49.44 0.19 100.00Urban 14.91 23.72 1.74 59.63 0.00 100.00Rural 0.47 51.92 0.00 47.37 0.23 100.00

Layyah 3.72 13.17 1.35 81.76 0.00 100.00Urban 21.02 5.25 0.00 73.72 0.00 100.00Rural 0.58 14.61 1.59 83.22 0.00 100.00

Muzaffargarh 4.54 29.89 0.21 64.81 0.54 100.00Urban 22.82 15.83 0.00 60.58 0.78 100.00Rural 1.93 31.90 0.24 65.41 0.51 100.00

Bahawalpur 5.19 8.99 0.22 85.48 0.12 100.00Urban 14.75 6.00 0.80 78.18 0.26 100.00Rural 1.49 10.15 0.00 88.30 0.06 100.00

Bhawal Nagar 11.97 16.89 0.64 68.76 1.73 100.00Urban 37.26 4.17 2.54 53.88 2.15 100.00Rural 5.30 20.25 0.14 72.69 1.62 100.00

Rahim Yar Khan 4.63 12.28 0.08 82.83 0.19 100.00Urban 15.78 3.02 0.00 81.20 0.00 100.00Rural 2.04 14.44 0.09 83.20 0.23 100.00

353

Page 375: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

OTHERS TOTAL

TABLE 4.2: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY MATERIAL USED FOR ROOF

PROVINCE & DISTRICTMATERIAL USED FOR ROOF

RCC/RBCWOOD/

BAMBOOSHEET/IRON/

CEMENTT-

Iron/GARDER

Sindh 34.46 29.55 6.67 29.23 0.09 100.00Urban 59.32 5.04 10.91 24.63 0.11 100.00Rural 4.80 58.79 1.62 34.72 0.07 100.00

Jacobabad 0.85 58.16 0.18 40.43 0.37 100.00Urban 3.07 13.84 0.00 82.57 0.52 100.00Rural 0.13 72.70 0.24 26.60 0.33 100.00

Kashmore 1.08 67.93 0.73 30.10 0.16 100.00Urban 1.30 29.49 1.75 66.94 0.52 100.00Rural 0.98 85.43 0.26 13.33 0.00 100.00

Shikarpur 1.21 53.58 0.00 44.52 0.69 100.00Urban 3.09 24.54 0.00 70.38 1.99 100.00Rural 0.49 64.72 0.00 34.60 0.20 100.00

Larkana 1.45 43.65 1.94 52.97 0.00 100.00Urban 3.26 27.22 4.36 65.16 0.00 100.00Rural 0.00 56.78 0.00 43.22 0.00 100.00

Shahdadkot 0.84 61.57 0.32 37.14 0.14 100.00Urban 2.93 24.78 1.25 70.49 0.54 100.00Rural 0.13 74.10 0.00 25.77 0.00 100.00

Sukkur 11.43 26.61 0.61 61.35 0.00 100.00Urban 17.39 12.55 0.94 69.12 0.00 100.00Rural 0.73 51.88 0.00 47.39 0.00 100.00

Ghotki 6.39 51.77 1.87 39.92 0.04 100.00Urban 24.97 14.01 3.93 57.09 0.00 100.00Rural 1.29 62.14 1.31 35.21 0.05 100.00

Khairpur 0.73 33.87 0.15 65.25 0.00 100.00Urban 1.79 21.11 0.00 77.10 0.00 100.00Rural 0.28 39.23 0.22 60.27 0.00 100.00

Naushahro Feroze 1.30 22.01 1.03 75.66 0.00 100.00Urban 5.31 4.45 3.62 86.62 0.00 100.00Rural 0.19 26.89 0.31 72.61 0.00 100.00

Shaheed Benazirabad 4.41 43.90 0.00 51.24 0.44 100.00Urban 16.76 3.08 0.00 79.17 0.99 100.00Rural 0.25 57.68 0.00 41.82 0.26 100.00

Dadu 1.41 18.46 0.00 80.00 0.13 100.00Urban 6.86 4.20 0.00 88.24 0.70 100.00Rural 0.17 21.68 0.00 78.14 0.00 100.00

Jamshoro 16.87 26.91 1.27 54.87 0.08 100.00Urban 32.70 4.92 0.76 61.62 0.00 100.00Rural 11.14 34.87 1.46 52.43 0.10 100.00

354

Page 376: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

OTHERS TOTAL

TABLE 4.2: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY MATERIAL USED FOR ROOF

PROVINCE & DISTRICTMATERIAL USED FOR ROOF

RCC/RBCWOOD/

BAMBOOSHEET/IRON/

CEMENTT-

Iron/GARDER

Hyderabad 56.37 15.46 0.08 28.09 0.00 100.00Urban 67.38 7.69 0.00 24.93 0.00 100.00Rural 5.11 51.60 0.48 42.81 0.00 100.00

Tando Allah Yar 8.59 47.38 1.10 42.93 0.00 100.00Urban 37.17 8.15 0.00 54.68 0.00 100.00Rural 1.23 57.48 1.39 39.90 0.00 100.00

Tando Muhammad Khan 6.73 69.56 0.69 23.02 0.00 100.00Urban 35.39 13.09 0.71 50.82 0.00 100.00Rural 1.07 80.72 0.68 17.53 0.00 100.00

Mitiari 5.93 38.24 0.95 54.87 0.00 100.00Urban 14.88 14.28 0.00 70.85 0.00 100.00Rural 3.18 45.61 1.25 49.96 0.00 100.00

Badin 5.41 65.95 0.64 28.00 0.00 100.00Urban 22.47 22.43 0.00 55.11 0.00 100.00Rural 0.74 77.86 0.82 20.57 0.00 100.00

Thatta 15.11 60.38 11.06 13.29 0.16 100.00Urban 70.57 5.28 20.63 3.52 0.00 100.00Rural 7.07 68.37 9.68 14.71 0.18 100.00

Sujawal 5.87 69.04 13.46 11.63 0.00 100.00Urban 34.18 4.37 47.35 14.10 0.00 100.00Rural 1.42 79.20 8.14 11.24 0.00 100.00

Sanghar 3.98 49.43 2.00 44.35 0.24 100.00Urban 8.49 7.87 9.61 74.03 0.00 100.00Rural 2.80 60.34 0.00 36.56 0.30 100.00

Mirpur Khas 10.32 63.71 0.74 24.40 0.82 100.00Urban 37.91 15.04 2.76 41.66 2.63 100.00Rural 0.14 81.66 0.00 18.04 0.16 100.00

Umerkot 1.89 70.99 0.00 27.12 0.00 100.00Urban 7.59 26.06 0.00 66.35 0.00 100.00Rural 0.45 82.35 0.00 17.20 0.00 100.00

Tharparkar 1.06 82.82 0.22 15.89 0.00 100.00Urban 2.01 34.20 0.00 63.79 0.00 100.00Rural 0.99 86.80 0.24 11.97 0.00 100.00

Karachi 75.84 0.37 15.65 8.14 0.00 100.00Urban 76.07 0.25 15.67 8.01 0.00 100.00Rural 72.06 2.30 15.40 10.24 0.00 100.00

355

Page 377: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

OTHERS TOTAL

TABLE 4.2: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY MATERIAL USED FOR ROOF

PROVINCE & DISTRICTMATERIAL USED FOR ROOF

RCC/RBCWOOD/

BAMBOOSHEET/IRON/

CEMENTT-

Iron/GARDER

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 34.95 41.72 10.29 12.53 0.51 100.00Urban 65.53 20.32 4.06 9.85 0.23 100.00Rural 28.00 46.59 11.70 13.13 0.58 100.00

Chitral 1.27 54.39 44.34 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 9.36 36.91 53.73 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 0.43 56.19 43.38 0.00 0.00 100.00

Upper Dir 8.73 83.59 3.99 3.69 0.00 100.00Urban 41.09 54.80 0.00 4.11 0.00 100.00Rural 7.35 84.83 4.16 3.67 0.00 100.00

Lower Dir 46.18 50.94 2.73 0.15 0.00 100.00Urban 69.52 30.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 44.52 52.38 2.93 0.16 0.00 100.00

Swat 49.21 49.50 0.26 0.87 0.16 100.00Urban 80.26 19.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 42.52 55.92 0.32 1.05 0.19 100.00

Shangla 13.71 55.75 30.47 0.07 0.00 100.00Urban - - - - - -

Rural 13.71 55.75 30.47 0.07 0.00 100.00

Buner 43.37 54.87 0.49 1.26 0.00 100.00Urban - - - - - -

Rural 43.37 54.87 0.49 1.26 0.00 100.00

Malakand PA 51.68 38.00 7.22 3.10 0.00 100.00Urban 50.39 44.19 5.43 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 51.90 36.94 7.53 3.63 0.00 100.00

Kohistan 4.32 81.28 7.65 6.53 0.22 100.00Urban - - - - - -

Rural 4.32 81.28 7.65 6.53 0.22 100.00

Mansehra 35.79 12.26 51.21 0.00 0.74 100.00Urban 95.86 0.00 4.14 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 31.65 13.10 54.46 0.00 0.79 100.00

Batagram 25.78 21.05 51.62 0.23 1.32 100.00Urban - - - - - -

Rural 25.78 21.05 51.62 0.23 1.32 100.00

Abbottabad 39.07 23.32 37.49 0.12 0.00 100.00Urban 78.62 1.92 19.46 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 30.79 27.80 41.27 0.15 0.00 100.00

Haripur 62.84 17.19 5.32 14.06 0.59 100.00Urban 80.73 7.97 2.96 8.33 0.00 100.00Rural 58.62 19.36 5.88 15.41 0.73 100.00

356

Page 378: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

OTHERS TOTAL

TABLE 4.2: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY MATERIAL USED FOR ROOF

PROVINCE & DISTRICTMATERIAL USED FOR ROOF

RCC/RBCWOOD/

BAMBOOSHEET/IRON/

CEMENTT-

Iron/GARDER

Tor Ghar 1.55 92.23 5.69 0.53 0.00 100.00Urban - - - - - -

Rural 1.55 92.23 5.69 0.53 0.00 100.00

Mardan 38.11 40.47 7.09 14.32 0.00 100.00Urban 53.83 28.37 5.52 12.27 0.00 100.00Rural 32.30 44.95 7.67 15.08 0.00 100.00

Swabi 67.31 26.49 0.56 5.64 0.00 100.00Urban 79.37 14.96 1.83 3.84 0.00 100.00Rural 65.00 28.70 0.32 5.98 0.00 100.00

Charsadda 32.70 48.27 5.14 13.68 0.22 100.00Urban 60.16 29.88 2.97 5.97 1.02 100.00Rural 25.26 53.25 5.72 15.77 0.00 100.00

Peshawar 53.80 35.07 1.41 9.71 0.00 100.00Urban 76.92 18.13 1.33 3.61 0.00 100.00Rural 25.40 55.88 1.52 17.19 0.00 100.00

Nowshera 50.22 39.87 2.97 6.94 0.00 100.00Urban 60.16 30.26 2.35 7.22 0.00 100.00Rural 45.95 44.00 3.23 6.82 0.00 100.00

Kohat 32.90 31.96 0.35 34.79 0.00 100.00Urban 60.34 10.68 0.00 28.98 0.00 100.00Rural 24.67 38.34 0.46 36.53 0.00 100.00

Hangu 46.89 30.89 0.00 22.22 0.00 100.00Urban 63.22 19.03 0.00 17.76 0.00 100.00Rural 42.44 34.12 0.00 23.44 0.00 100.00

Karak 1.62 45.17 0.00 53.14 0.07 100.00Urban 4.06 8.55 0.00 87.39 0.00 100.00Rural 1.48 47.23 0.00 51.22 0.07 100.00

Bannu 10.87 42.71 1.12 45.10 0.21 100.00Urban 54.23 13.79 0.00 31.97 0.00 100.00Rural 7.88 44.70 1.20 46.00 0.22 100.00

Lakki Marwat 1.96 63.61 0.20 32.86 1.38 100.00Urban 9.38 31.76 1.51 57.35 0.00 100.00Rural 0.82 68.49 0.00 29.11 1.59 100.00

D.I Khan 2.29 46.56 3.44 42.14 5.58 100.00Urban 9.83 27.79 14.19 44.47 3.71 100.00Rural 1.15 49.39 1.81 41.78 5.86 100.00

Tank 2.36 47.75 1.54 42.84 5.52 100.00Urban 11.72 14.62 7.13 62.64 3.89 100.00Rural 0.66 53.75 0.52 39.25 5.81 100.00

357

Page 379: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

OTHERS TOTAL

TABLE 4.2: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY MATERIAL USED FOR ROOF

PROVINCE & DISTRICTMATERIAL USED FOR ROOF

RCC/RBCWOOD/

BAMBOOSHEET/IRON/

CEMENTT-

Iron/GARDER

Balochistan 6.96 68.07 3.06 21.72 0.19 100.00Urban 21.09 30.73 5.99 41.16 0.04 100.00Rural 1.68 82.03 1.96 14.07 0.24 100.00

Quetta 24.37 37.04 5.25 33.34 0.00 100.00Urban 35.97 22.55 6.81 34.66 0.00 100.00Rural 8.04 57.43 3.06 31.47 0.00 100.00

Pishin 1.42 82.22 1.24 15.12 0.00 100.00Urban 8.81 20.18 0.00 71.01 0.00 100.00Rural 0.80 87.35 1.35 10.50 0.00 100.00

Killa Abdullah 1.05 80.15 0.86 17.94 0.00 100.00Urban 9.91 34.45 7.46 48.19 0.00 100.00Rural 0.00 85.57 0.08 14.35 0.00 100.00

Chagai 1.84 90.58 0.00 7.58 0.00 100.00Urban 20.89 40.98 0.00 38.13 0.00 100.00Rural 0.00 95.36 0.00 4.64 0.00 100.00

Nushki 0.26 76.92 1.42 21.05 0.35 100.00Urban 0.00 24.88 2.24 72.88 0.00 100.00Rural 0.33 90.12 1.21 7.90 0.44 100.00

Loralai 2.66 81.43 0.52 15.39 0.00 100.00Urban 17.95 26.66 3.51 51.89 0.00 100.00Rural 0.00 90.95 0.00 9.05 0.00 100.00

Barkhan 1.57 95.51 0.00 2.92 0.00 100.00Urban 11.30 65.86 0.00 22.84 0.00 100.00Rural 0.14 99.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00

Musa Khel 0.31 93.28 0.00 6.41 0.00 100.00Urban 1.48 75.13 0.00 23.39 0.00 100.00Rural 0.00 98.03 0.00 1.97 0.00 100.00

Killa Saifullah 0.57 83.41 1.00 15.01 0.00 100.00Urban 2.14 66.57 0.00 31.30 0.00 100.00Rural 0.00 89.59 1.37 9.04 0.00 100.00

Zhob 4.21 83.89 0.09 11.81 0.00 100.00Urban 15.93 43.69 0.00 40.38 0.00 100.00Rural 0.23 97.54 0.12 2.12 0.00 100.00

Sheerani 13.56 49.22 30.11 6.47 0.64 100.00Urban - - - - - -

Rural 13.56 49.22 30.11 6.47 0.64 100.00

Sibi 7.52 73.27 0.06 19.16 0.00 100.00Urban 19.54 41.77 0.00 38.68 0.00 100.00Rural 1.21 89.78 0.09 8.92 0.00 100.00

358

Page 380: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

OTHERS TOTAL

TABLE 4.2: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY MATERIAL USED FOR ROOF

PROVINCE & DISTRICTMATERIAL USED FOR ROOF

RCC/RBCWOOD/

BAMBOOSHEET/IRON/

CEMENTT-

Iron/GARDER

Harnai 0.45 89.94 0.06 9.55 0.00 100.00Urban 5.10 36.58 0.00 58.32 0.00 100.00Rural 0.06 94.37 0.07 5.50 0.00 100.00

Ziarat 1.58 73.38 20.10 4.94 0.00 100.00Urban 10.51 10.51 78.98 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 0.87 78.38 15.42 5.33 0.00 100.00

Kohlu 0.06 78.99 0.20 20.76 0.00 100.00Urban 0.00 43.65 0.00 56.35 0.00 100.00Rural 0.07 83.96 0.23 15.75 0.00 100.00

Dera Bugti 0.22 70.21 0.15 29.01 0.41 100.00Urban 2.87 24.73 0.00 72.40 0.00 100.00Rural 0.00 73.97 0.16 25.43 0.44 100.00

Kachhi( Bolan) 8.49 81.29 0.00 9.79 0.43 100.00Urban 43.68 37.07 0.00 19.25 0.00 100.00Rural 0.29 91.59 0.00 7.59 0.53 100.00

Jaffarabad 0.05 64.05 0.00 34.27 1.63 100.00Urban 0.00 30.05 0.00 69.95 0.00 100.00Rural 0.06 74.92 0.00 22.87 2.15 100.00

Nasirabad 0.82 75.13 0.36 23.28 0.41 100.00Urban 2.35 52.39 0.73 43.68 0.84 100.00Rural 0.24 83.71 0.22 15.57 0.25 100.00

Jhal Magsi 0.47 86.71 0.00 12.71 0.12 100.00Urban 11.18 72.26 0.00 16.56 0.00 100.00Rural 0.00 87.34 0.00 12.54 0.12 100.00

Kalat 1.55 65.76 0.00 32.38 0.31 100.00Urban 4.09 8.33 0.00 87.58 0.00 100.00Rural 0.96 79.14 0.00 19.52 0.38 100.00

Mastung 4.40 66.96 0.29 28.36 0.00 100.00Urban 16.41 21.47 0.00 62.12 0.00 100.00Rural 0.21 82.81 0.39 16.59 0.00 100.00

Khuzdar 2.27 64.12 0.64 32.96 0.00 100.00Urban 7.21 23.20 0.00 69.59 0.00 100.00Rural 0.00 82.97 0.94 16.09 0.00 100.00

Awaran 0.00 93.35 0.00 6.65 0.00 100.00Urban - - - - - -

Rural 0.00 93.35 0.00 6.65 0.00 100.00

359

Page 381: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

OTHERS TOTAL

TABLE 4.2: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY MATERIAL USED FOR ROOF

PROVINCE & DISTRICTMATERIAL USED FOR ROOF

RCC/RBCWOOD/

BAMBOOSHEET/IRON/

CEMENTT-

Iron/GARDER

Kharan 0.92 76.43 0.00 22.65 0.00 100.00Urban 2.96 67.46 0.00 29.58 0.00 100.00Rural 0.00 80.48 0.00 19.52 0.00 100.00

Washuk 0.00 93.79 0.00 6.21 0.00 100.00Urban - - - - - -

Rural 0.00 93.79 0.00 6.21 0.00 100.00

Lasbela 18.59 49.51 21.93 9.97 0.00 100.00Urban 33.61 11.20 36.23 18.96 0.00 100.00Rural 9.83 71.85 13.59 4.73 0.00 100.00

Gwadar 6.58 66.73 0.00 26.69 0.00 100.00Urban 11.94 50.96 0.00 37.10 0.00 100.00Rural 0.00 86.10 0.00 13.90 0.00 100.00

NOTES:1. The Panjgur & Kech districts has been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.2. Total may not add to 100 because of rounding.

360

Page 382: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

BURNT BRICKS /BLOCKS

MUD BRICKS/MUD WOOD OTHER TOTAL

Pakistan 79.15 15.85 1.45 3.54 100.00Urban 96.15 3.20 0.27 0.37 100.00Rural 69.18 23.26 2.15 5.40 100.00

Punjab 89.85 9.23 0.16 0.76 100.00Urban 98.41 1.37 0.08 0.15 100.00Rural 85.56 13.18 0.20 1.06 100.00

Islamabad 99.00 0.81 0.03 0.16 100.00Urban 98.56 1.20 0.00 0.24 100.00Rural 99.90 0.00 0.10 0.00 100.00

Attock 92.92 1.55 0.00 5.53 100.00Urban 97.50 1.85 0.00 0.65 100.00Rural 91.11 1.43 0.00 7.45 100.00

Rawalpindi 95.25 1.15 0.00 3.60 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 90.69 2.26 0.00 7.05 100.00

Jehlum 97.99 1.18 0.17 0.66 100.00Urban 97.23 1.76 0.00 1.00 100.00Rural 98.31 0.94 0.24 0.52 100.00

Chakwal 92.84 6.08 0.00 1.08 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 91.78 6.98 0.00 1.24 100.00

Sargodha 93.58 5.99 0.28 0.15 100.00Urban 99.51 0.00 0.49 0.00 100.00Rural 90.41 9.18 0.18 0.23 100.00

Bhakkar 79.83 17.91 .06 2.21 100.00Urban 88.80 8.49 .00 2.71 100.00Rural 77.89 19.94 .07 2.10 100.00

Khushab 90.14 4.14 0.02 5.70 100.00Urban 98.26 1.74 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 86.59 5.19 0.03 8.19 100.00

Mianwali 83.60 11.32 0.00 5.08 100.00Urban 91.49 8.16 0.00 0.35 100.00Rural 81.47 12.17 0.00 6.36 100.00

Faisalabad 98.59 1.26 0.00 0.15 100.00Urban 99.37 0.63 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 97.94 1.79 0.00 0.27 100.00

Chiniot 93.70 6.16 0.03 0.11 100.00Urban 98.94 1.06 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 91.06 8.72 0.05 0.17 100.00

TABLE 4.3: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY MATERIAL USED FOR WALLS.

PROVINCE & DISTRICTMATERIAL USED FOR WALLS

361

Page 383: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

BURNT BRICKS /BLOCKS

MUD BRICKS/MUD WOOD OTHER TOTAL

TABLE 4.3: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY MATERIAL USED FOR WALLS.

PROVINCE & DISTRICTMATERIAL USED FOR WALLS

Jhang 82.53 16.26 0.05 1.17 100.00Urban 96.84 2.62 0.00 0.54 100.00Rural 78.43 20.17 0.06 1.34 100.00

Toba Tek Singh 94.10 5.74 0.00 0.16 100.00Urban 98.95 1.05 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 92.84 6.96 0.00 0.20 100.00

Gujranwala 98.32 1.54 0.14 0.00 100.00Urban 98.11 1.89 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 98.56 1.12 0.32 0.00 100.00

Hafizabad 94.45 5.13 0.08 0.34 100.00Urban 96.98 2.17 0.00 0.85 100.00Rural 93.26 6.52 0.11 0.11 100.00

Gujrat 99.10 0.32 0.43 0.15 100.00Urban 98.90 0.00 0.55 0.55 100.00Rural 99.17 0.43 0.39 0.00 100.00

Mandi Bahauddin 97.39 1.90 0.62 0.10 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 96.81 2.31 0.75 0.13 100.00

Sialkot 99.71 0.18 0.12 0.00 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 99.59 0.24 0.17 0.00 100.00

Narowal 98.32 1.24 0.13 0.31 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 97.97 1.50 0.16 0.38 100.00

Lahore 99.80 0.20 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 99.74 0.26 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00

Kasur 94.96 4.80 0.18 0.06 100.00Urban 98.80 1.20 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 93.62 6.05 0.25 0.08 100.00

Sheikhupura 97.13 2.11 0.76 0.00 100.00Urban 99.12 0.88 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 96.36 2.58 1.06 0.00 100.00

Nankana Sahib 95.60 4.29 0.11 0.00 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 94.01 5.84 0.15 0.00 100.00

Okara 91.51 8.26 0.00 0.23 100.00Urban 98.20 0.98 0.00 0.82 100.00Rural 88.90 11.10 0.00 0.00 100.00

362

Page 384: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

BURNT BRICKS /BLOCKS

MUD BRICKS/MUD WOOD OTHER TOTAL

TABLE 4.3: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY MATERIAL USED FOR WALLS.

PROVINCE & DISTRICTMATERIAL USED FOR WALLS

Sahiwal 95.34 4.43 0.00 0.23 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 94.29 5.44 0.00 0.28 100.00

Pakpattan 85.42 14.58 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 98.48 1.52 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 83.03 16.97 0.00 0.00 100.00

Vehari 84.76 15.10 0.00 0.14 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 81.43 18.39 0.00 0.17 100.00

Multan 87.31 12.04 .16 .48 100.00Urban 97.91 1.71 .19 .19 100.00Rural 80.45 18.74 .14 .67 100.00

Lodhran 85.44 12.47 0.31 1.78 100.00Urban 95.46 4.54 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 83.67 13.87 0.37 2.09 100.00

Khanewal 85.93 12.29 0.38 1.39 100.00Urban 96.82 1.55 1.63 0.00 100.00Rural 83.17 15.02 0.07 1.75 100.00

D.G Khan 55.62 40.50 0.16 3.73 100.00Urban 97.79 0.80 0.47 0.94 100.00Rural 48.01 47.66 0.10 4.23 100.00

Rajanpur 52.05 47.04 .35 .56 100.00Urban 94.09 4.81 1.10 .00 100.00Rural 43.53 55.60 .20 .67 100.00

Layyah 86.01 13.84 0.15 0.00 100.00Urban 97.81 2.19 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 83.87 15.95 0.18 0.00 100.00

Muzaffargarh 73.70 24.97 0.40 0.93 100.00Urban 94.11 5.11 0.00 0.78 100.00Rural 70.78 27.81 0.46 0.95 100.00

Bahawalpur 80.30 19.47 0.12 0.11 100.00Urban 93.56 6.18 0.00 0.25 100.00Rural 75.17 24.61 0.16 0.05 100.00

Bhawal Nagar 76.14 23.66 0.00 0.20 100.00Urban 91.22 8.13 0.00 0.65 100.00Rural 72.16 27.76 0.00 0.08 100.00

Rahim Yar Khan 78.56 20.93 0.44 0.07 100.00Urban 95.76 4.24 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 74.57 24.81 0.54 0.08 100.00

363

Page 385: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

BURNT BRICKS /BLOCKS

MUD BRICKS/MUD WOOD OTHER TOTAL

TABLE 4.3: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY MATERIAL USED FOR WALLS.

PROVINCE & DISTRICTMATERIAL USED FOR WALLS

Sindh 72.06 22.57 4.62 .76 100.00Urban 96.49 2.84 .57 .10 100.00Rural 42.90 46.11 9.45 1.55 100.00

Jacobabad 58.34 31.81 6.47 3.38 100.00Urban 95.14 2.01 2.33 0.52 100.00Rural 46.26 41.59 7.82 4.32 100.00

Kashmore 58.98 34.83 6.09 0.10 100.00Urban 86.96 11.88 0.97 0.19 100.00Rural 46.24 45.28 8.42 0.06 100.00

Shikarpur 58.21 37.59 3.65 0.55 100.00Urban 91.08 6.93 0.00 1.99 100.00Rural 45.59 49.36 5.05 0.00 100.00

Larkana 65.82 32.14 1.95 0.09 100.00Urban 84.08 13.77 2.15 0.00 100.00Rural 51.23 46.82 1.79 0.16 100.00

Shahdadkot 54.25 41.39 3.58 0.77 100.00Urban 86.75 11.16 1.66 0.43 100.00Rural 43.18 51.69 4.24 0.89 100.00

Sukkur 73.31 24.22 2.46 0.00 100.00Urban 90.69 7.85 1.46 0.00 100.00Rural 42.10 53.64 4.26 0.00 100.00

Ghotki 58.94 31.30 9.76 .00 100.00Urban 91.70 8.30 .00 .00 100.00Rural 49.95 37.61 12.44 .00 100.00

Khairpur 47.68 50.64 1.68 0.00 100.00Urban 74.83 23.71 1.45 0.00 100.00Rural 36.26 61.96 1.78 0.00 100.00

Naushahro Feroze 67.68 24.85 2.54 4.93 100.00Urban 99.01 0.99 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 58.97 31.48 3.25 6.31 100.00

Shaheed Benazirabad 61.18 36.87 0.17 1.78 100.00Urban 99.56 0.44 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 48.24 49.16 0.22 2.38 100.00

Dadu 65.75 28.29 0.42 5.53 100.00Urban 87.62 10.96 0.00 1.42 100.00Rural 60.81 32.21 0.52 6.46 100.00

364

Page 386: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

BURNT BRICKS /BLOCKS

MUD BRICKS/MUD WOOD OTHER TOTAL

TABLE 4.3: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY MATERIAL USED FOR WALLS.

PROVINCE & DISTRICTMATERIAL USED FOR WALLS

Jamshoro 67.66 24.72 3.61 4.01 100.00Urban 92.43 6.60 0.00 0.97 100.00Rural 58.69 31.28 4.91 5.11 100.00

Hyderabad 89.89 6.43 3.68 0.00 100.00Urban 95.49 2.81 1.69 0.00 100.00Rural 63.82 23.28 12.91 0.00 100.00

Tando Allah Yar 56.96 34.02 9.02 0.00 100.00Urban 94.93 5.07 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 47.19 41.47 11.34 0.00 100.00

Tando Muhammad Khan 38.70 43.92 17.38 0.00 100.00Urban 92.36 7.64 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 28.10 51.09 20.81 0.00 100.00

Mitiari 60.36 33.06 6.57 0.00 100.00Urban 83.10 12.41 4.49 0.00 100.00Rural 53.37 39.41 7.21 0.00 100.00

Badin 37.86 43.89 18.20 .04 100.00Urban 81.36 12.70 5.74 .21 100.00Rural 25.95 52.44 21.62 .00 100.00

Thatta 37.93 46.64 11.98 3.45 100.00Urban 94.72 5.28 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 29.70 52.63 13.72 3.95 100.00

Sujawal 26.23 63.95 5.83 3.98 100.00Urban 95.63 4.37 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 15.34 73.31 6.75 4.60 100.00

Sanghar 52.17 37.54 10.04 0.24 100.00Urban 96.69 1.78 1.53 0.00 100.00Rural 40.48 46.94 12.28 0.30 100.00

Mirpur Khas 44.06 35.62 18.15 2.17 100.00Urban 91.79 4.38 1.80 2.03 100.00Rural 26.45 47.14 24.18 2.22 100.00

Umerkot 29.07 49.69 21.17 0.07 100.00Urban 75.84 19.93 4.23 0.00 100.00Rural 17.24 57.21 25.45 0.09 100.00

Tharparkar 26.06 63.37 10.31 0.25 100.00Urban 72.99 16.98 10.03 0.00 100.00Rural 22.22 67.17 10.34 0.27 100.00

Karachi 99.12 0.62 0.27 0.00 100.00Urban 99.83 0.17 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 87.51 7.88 4.61 0.00 100.00

365

Page 387: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

BURNT BRICKS /BLOCKS

MUD BRICKS/MUD WOOD OTHER TOTAL

TABLE 4.3: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY MATERIAL USED FOR WALLS.

PROVINCE & DISTRICTMATERIAL USED FOR WALLS

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 61.18 15.61 0.56 22.64 100.00Urban 89.53 6.84 0.05 3.57 100.00Rural 54.74 17.61 0.67 26.98 100.00

Chitral 13.21 33.17 0.00 53.62 100.00Urban 31.41 50.14 0.00 18.45 100.00Rural 11.34 31.43 0.00 57.23 100.00

Upper Dir 10.93 0.16 0.00 88.91 100.00Urban 36.98 0.00 0.00 63.02 100.00Rural 9.82 0.17 0.00 90.02 100.00

Lower Dir 59.53 3.81 0.00 36.66 100.00Urban 69.52 0.00 0.00 30.48 100.00Rural 58.82 4.08 0.00 37.10 100.00

Swat 64.22 1.30 1.74 32.74 100.00Urban 85.94 2.91 0.00 11.16 100.00Rural 59.54 0.95 2.11 37.40 100.00

Shangla 20.77 0.47 0.31 78.44 100.00Urban - - - - -Rural 20.77 0.47 0.31 78.44 100.00

Buner 53.57 17.19 0.00 29.24 100.00Urban - - - - -Rural 53.57 17.19 0.00 29.24 100.00

Malakand PA 60.67 8.42 0.22 30.69 100.00Urban 53.29 1.33 0.00 45.38 0.00Rural 61.93 9.63 0.26 28.17 100.00

Kohistan 13.15 8.83 8.40 69.62 100.00Urban - - - - -Rural 13.15 8.83 8.40 69.62 100.00

Mansehra 58.80 5.87 0.72 34.61 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 55.96 6.28 0.77 37.00 100.00

Batagram 45.66 2.98 0.66 50.70 100.00Urban - - - - -Rural 45.66 2.98 0.66 50.70 100.00

Abbottabad 59.41 8.00 0.55 32.04 100.00Urban 95.01 2.24 0.00 2.76 100.00Rural 51.96 9.20 0.67 38.17 100.00

Haripur 78.64 1.96 0.22 19.18 100.00Urban 97.49 2.51 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 74.19 1.83 0.27 23.71 100.00

366

Page 388: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

BURNT BRICKS /BLOCKS

MUD BRICKS/MUD WOOD OTHER TOTAL

TABLE 4.3: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY MATERIAL USED FOR WALLS.

PROVINCE & DISTRICTMATERIAL USED FOR WALLS

Tor Ghar 1.71 2.46 0.13 95.70 100.00Urban - - - - -Rural 1.71 2.46 0.13 95.70 100.00

Mardan 78.31 16.39 0.00 5.30 100.00Urban 88.95 8.49 0.00 2.56 100.00Rural 74.38 19.31 0.00 6.31 100.00

Swabi 87.34 12.29 0.00 0.37 100.00Urban 90.80 9.20 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 86.67 12.89 0.00 0.44 100.00

Charsadda 75.85 24.09 0.06 0.00 100.00Urban 94.48 5.52 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 70.80 29.12 0.08 0.00 100.00

Peshawar 81.15 18.85 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 93.20 6.80 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 66.35 33.65 0.00 0.00 100.00

Nowshera 92.80 4.37 0.00 2.83 100.00Urban 98.78 1.22 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 90.23 5.72 0.00 4.04 100.00

Kohat 69.98 12.37 0.26 17.38 100.00Urban 95.91 2.94 1.15 0.00 100.00Rural 62.21 15.20 0.00 22.59 100.00

Hangu 77.66 9.08 0.00 13.26 100.00Urban 88.71 10.70 0.00 0.59 100.00Rural 74.65 8.64 0.00 16.72 100.00

Karak 59.52 29.29 0.23 10.96 100.00Urban 95.72 0.00 0.00 4.28 100.00Rural 57.48 30.94 0.24 11.34 100.00

Bannu 67.24 32.58 0.17 0.00 100.00Urban 95.61 4.39 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 65.29 34.52 0.19 0.00 100.00

Lakki Marwat 44.47 52.76 1.34 1.43 100.00Urban 49.87 47.27 0.00 2.86 100.00Rural 43.64 53.60 1.55 1.21 100.00

D.I Khan 39.35 53.95 0.22 6.48 100.00Urban 74.66 16.36 0.00 8.99 100.00Rural 34.02 59.62 0.26 6.10 100.00

Tank 28.57 63.57 0.00 7.86 100.00Urban 95.15 4.85 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 16.50 74.21 0.00 9.29 100.00

367

Page 389: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

BURNT BRICKS /BLOCKS

MUD BRICKS/MUD WOOD OTHER TOTAL

TABLE 4.3: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY MATERIAL USED FOR WALLS.

PROVINCE & DISTRICTMATERIAL USED FOR WALLS

Balochistan 30.32 63.67 1.51 4.50 100.00Urban 67.13 31.40 0.09 1.38 100.00Rural 16.56 75.73 2.04 5.67 100.00

Quetta 67.53 32.47 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 86.42 13.58 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 40.95 59.05 0.00 0.00 100.00

Pishin 10.86 89.14 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 44.04 55.96 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 8.12 91.88 0.00 0.00 100.00

Killa Abdullah 7.70 92.30 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 52.65 47.35 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 2.37 97.63 0.00 0.00 100.00

Chagai 7.88 92.12 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 75.75 24.25 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 1.33 98.67 0.00 0.00 100.00

Nushki 45.44 54.21 0.35 0.00 100.00Urban 70.54 29.46 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 39.07 60.49 0.44 0.00 100.00

Loralai 16.86 82.30 0.00 0.84 100.00Urban 38.10 61.90 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 13.17 85.85 0.00 0.99 100.00

Barkhan 24.95 74.28 0.19 0.58 100.00Urban 76.60 18.83 0.00 4.57 100.00Rural 17.36 82.42 0.22 0.00 100.00

Musa Khel 6.41 79.28 0.00 14.31 100.00Urban 23.39 72.83 0.00 3.78 100.00Rural 1.97 80.97 0.00 17.06 100.00

Killa Saifullah 13.29 30.61 1.70 54.41 100.00Urban 33.19 58.59 0.00 8.22 100.00Rural 6.00 20.36 2.32 71.33 100.00

Zhob 10.52 64.41 0.66 24.42 100.00Urban 35.83 58.33 2.59 3.25 100.00Rural 1.93 66.47 0.00 31.60 100.00

Sheerani 41.05 36.85 4.47 17.63 100.00Urban - - - - -Rural 41.05 36.85 4.47 17.63 100.00

Sibi 23.06 76.88 0.00 0.06 100.00Urban 51.80 48.20 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 7.99 91.92 0.00 0.09 100.00

368

Page 390: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

BURNT BRICKS /BLOCKS

MUD BRICKS/MUD WOOD OTHER TOTAL

TABLE 4.3: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY MATERIAL USED FOR WALLS.

PROVINCE & DISTRICTMATERIAL USED FOR WALLS

Harnai 4.56 87.27 0.27 7.90 100.00Urban 40.98 59.02 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 1.53 89.62 0.30 8.56 100.00

Ziarat 9.59 90.41 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 47.17 52.83 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 6.60 93.40 0.00 0.00 100.00

Kohlu 14.63 83.83 0.22 1.33 100.00Urban 50.19 49.81 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 9.62 88.62 0.25 1.51 100.00

Dera Bugti 13.71 86.11 0.18 0.00 100.00Urban 55.73 44.27 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 10.24 89.56 0.20 0.00 100.00

Kachhi( Bolan) 17.80 82.20 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 82.76 17.24 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 2.66 97.34 0.00 0.00 100.00

Jaffarabad 37.37 48.01 12.98 1.63 100.00Urban 86.10 13.90 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 21.81 58.91 17.13 2.15 100.00

Nasirabad 30.92 67.91 0.94 0.23 100.00Urban 64.60 34.56 0.00 0.84 100.00Rural 18.20 80.51 1.29 0.00 100.00

Jhal Magsi 29.39 70.26 0.35 0.00 100.00Urban 64.24 27.43 8.33 0.00 100.00Rural 27.88 72.12 0.00 0.00 100.00

Kalat 18.24 78.03 3.73 0.00 100.00Urban 75.16 24.84 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 4.98 90.42 4.60 0.00 100.00

Mastung 27.53 72.47 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 58.08 41.92 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 16.88 83.12 0.00 0.00 100.00

Khuzdar 12.03 87.74 0.22 0.00 100.00Urban 20.96 79.04 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 7.92 91.75 0.33 0.00 100.00

Awaran 23.04 76.54 0.42 0.00 100.00Urban - - - - -Rural 23.04 76.54 0.42 0.00 100.00

369

Page 391: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

BURNT BRICKS /BLOCKS

MUD BRICKS/MUD WOOD OTHER TOTAL

TABLE 4.3: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY MATERIAL USED FOR WALLS.

PROVINCE & DISTRICTMATERIAL USED FOR WALLS

Kharan 12.26 83.45 0.00 4.29 100.00Urban 29.58 70.42 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 4.45 89.33 0.00 6.22 100.00

Washuk 22.28 77.31 0.13 0.28 100.00Urban - - - - -Rural 22.28 77.31 0.13 0.28 100.00

Lasbela 42.13 36.18 3.40 18.29 100.00Urban 78.23 9.98 0.00 11.78 100.00Rural 21.07 51.46 5.38 22.08 100.00

Gwadar 51.49 48.51 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 49.66 50.34 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 9.11 90.89 0.00 0.00 100.00

NOTES:1. The Panjgur & Kech districts has been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

370

Page 392: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.4: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY NUMBER OF ROOMS- BY

One Room 2 - 4 Rooms 5 & More Rooms Total

Pakistan 27.51 66.69 5.80 100.00Urban 23.71 69.67 6.62 100.00Rural 29.74 64.93 5.32 100.00

Punjab 27.00 66.72 6.28 100.00Urban 24.08 68.42 7.50 100.00Rural 28.46 65.87 5.67 100.00

Islamabad 8.17 77.15 14.68 100.00

Urban 8.90 78.34 12.76 100.00

Rural 6.67 74.68 18.65 100.00

Attock 11.86 77.36 10.78 100.00

Urban 13.62 78.31 8.07 100.00

Rural 11.16 76.98 11.85 100.00

Rawalpindi 9.80 80.43 9.77 100.00

Urban 12.31 82.95 4.75 100.00

Rural 7.39 78.01 14.60 100.00

Jehlum 11.38 73.07 15.54 100.00

Urban 10.87 71.59 17.55 100.00

Rural 11.60 73.69 14.71 100.00

Chakwal 7.81 81.80 10.38 100.00

Urban 10.28 89.72 0.00 100.00

Rural 7.44 80.62 11.93 100.00

Sargodha 23.96 68.36 7.67 100.00

Urban 16.57 69.41 14.01 100.00

Rural 27.90 67.80 4.30 100.00

Bhakkar 23.97 69.27 6.77 100.00

Urban 23.38 72.43 4.18 100.00

Rural 24.09 68.58 7.32 100.00

Khushab 17.62 71.65 10.73 100.00

Urban 17.70 70.65 11.65 100.00

Rural 17.58 72.09 10.33 100.00

Mianwali 14.86 77.97 7.18 100.00

Urban 12.45 79.46 8.09 100.00

Rural 15.50 77.56 6.93 100.00

Faisalabad 30.98 63.31 5.71 100.00

Urban 30.02 63.39 6.59 100.00

Rural 31.79 63.24 4.97 100.00

Chiniot 34.55 63.00 2.45 100.00

Urban 33.32 63.59 3.09 100.00

Rural 35.17 62.70 2.13 100.00

PROVINCE & DISTRICTHOUSING UNITSPROVINCE & DISTRICT

371

Page 393: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.4: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY NUMBER OF ROOMS- BY

One Room 2 - 4 Rooms 5 & More Rooms Total

PROVINCE & DISTRICTHOUSING UNITSPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Jhang 26.89 66.25 6.85 100.00

Urban 22.29 70.84 6.87 100.00

Rural 28.21 64.94 6.85 100.00

Toba Tek Singh 23.69 67.65 8.66 100.00

Urban 17.96 73.84 8.20 100.00

Rural 25.18 66.03 8.79 100.00

Gujranwala 22.36 68.71 8.93 100.00

Urban 20.94 69.17 9.89 100.00

Rural 24.05 68.17 7.78 100.00

Hafizabad 25.29 67.87 6.84 100.00

Urban 24.38 69.66 5.96 100.00

Rural 25.72 67.03 7.25 100.00

Gujrat 17.47 73.14 9.38 100.00

Urban 20.36 66.15 13.48 100.00

Rural 16.41 75.71 7.88 100.00

Mandi Bahauddin 21.60 70.95 7.45 100.00

Urban 23.35 64.69 11.96 100.00

Rural 21.21 72.33 6.45 100.00

Sialkot 18.92 71.10 9.99 100.00

Urban 15.00 70.78 14.22 100.00

Rural 20.43 71.22 8.35 100.00

Narowal 20.95 70.49 8.56 100.00

Urban 22.35 66.29 11.36 100.00

Rural 20.65 71.38 7.97 100.00

Lahore 26.96 66.36 6.68 100.00

Urban 27.96 64.24 7.79 100.00

Rural 23.47 73.72 2.81 100.00

Kasur 42.35 54.74 2.91 100.00

Urban 35.56 62.46 1.98 100.00

Rural 44.71 52.05 3.23 100.00

Sheikhupura 30.32 66.27 3.41 100.00

Urban 27.10 67.85 5.05 100.00

Rural 31.57 65.66 2.77 100.00

Nankana Sahib 29.60 64.03 6.36 100.00

Urban 20.33 70.83 8.84 100.00

Rural 32.95 61.58 5.47 100.00

Okara 37.70 58.96 3.35 100.00

Urban 32.63 63.00 4.37 100.00

Rural 39.68 57.38 2.95 100.00

372

Page 394: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.4: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY NUMBER OF ROOMS- BY

One Room 2 - 4 Rooms 5 & More Rooms Total

PROVINCE & DISTRICTHOUSING UNITSPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Sahiwal 25.95 66.87 7.19 100.00

Urban 21.24 70.15 8.61 100.00

Rural 27.01 66.12 6.86 100.00

Pakpattan 36.07 61.10 2.83 100.00

Urban 42.11 55.15 2.74 100.00

Rural 34.96 62.19 2.85 100.00

Vehari 33.65 63.39 2.97 100.00

Urban 32.41 62.62 4.98 100.00

Rural 33.92 63.56 2.53 100.00

Multan 31.66 64.07 4.27 100.00

Urban 27.78 66.62 5.61 100.00

Rural 34.18 62.43 3.40 100.00

Lodhran 29.74 65.63 4.63 100.00

Urban 21.36 73.27 5.37 100.00

Rural 31.22 64.28 4.50 100.00

Khanewal 28.75 66.26 5.00 100.00

Urban 25.22 70.65 4.14 100.00

Rural 29.64 65.14 5.21 100.00

D.G Khan 19.76 75.46 4.78 100.00

Urban 15.32 74.83 9.85 100.00

Rural 20.56 75.58 3.87 100.00

Rajanpur 28.59 68.99 2.43 100.00

Urban 26.94 70.19 2.87 100.00

Rural 28.92 68.74 2.34 100.00

Layyah 28.07 67.78 4.15 100.00

Urban 13.66 76.21 10.13 100.00

Rural 30.68 66.25 3.07 100.00

Muzaffargarh 41.32 55.42 3.26 100.00

Urban 28.74 64.35 6.91 100.00

Rural 43.12 54.15 2.73 100.00

Bahawalpur 34.95 60.86 4.19 100.00

Urban 31.39 64.40 4.21 100.00

Rural 36.33 59.49 4.18 100.00

Bhawal Nagar 31.86 63.79 4.35 100.00

Urban 23.26 72.92 3.81 100.00

Rural 34.13 61.38 4.49 100.00

Rahim Yar Khan 34.52 60.75 4.73 100.00

Urban 26.51 67.73 5.76 100.00

Rural 36.38 59.13 4.49 100.00

373

Page 395: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.4: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY NUMBER OF ROOMS- BY

One Room 2 - 4 Rooms 5 & More Rooms Total

PROVINCE & DISTRICTHOUSING UNITSPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Sindh 35.27 62.25 2.49 100.00Urban 25.07 71.04 3.89 100.00Rural 47.43 51.76 0.81 100.00

Jacobabad 54.78 43.96 1.26 100.00

Urban 33.51 61.85 4.65 100.00

Rural 61.76 38.09 0.15 100.00

Kashmore 57.04 41.77 1.20 100.00

Urban 42.06 55.61 2.34 100.00

Rural 63.86 35.47 0.68 100.00

Shikarpur 47.65 51.77 0.58 100.00

Urban 47.83 50.63 1.54 100.00

Rural 47.58 52.20 0.21 100.00

Larkana 34.44 63.23 2.33 100.00

Urban 21.11 74.54 4.35 100.00

Rural 45.10 54.20 0.70 100.00

Shahdadkot 48.89 49.64 1.47 100.00

Urban 32.90 64.34 2.75 100.00

Rural 54.34 44.63 1.03 100.00

Sukkur 36.36 62.25 1.39 100.00

Urban 33.08 65.33 1.59 100.00

Rural 42.25 56.72 1.03 100.00

Ghotki 39.74 58.83 1.43 100.00

Urban 27.49 70.02 2.49 100.00

Rural 43.11 55.76 1.14 100.00

Khairpur 32.22 64.84 2.94 100.00

Urban 33.02 61.89 5.08 100.00

Rural 31.88 66.08 2.04 100.00

Naushahro Feroze 28.98 69.19 1.83 100.00

Urban 27.64 68.60 3.75 100.00

Rural 29.35 69.35 1.30 100.00

Shaheed Benazirabad 45.49 53.95 0.56 100.00

Urban 35.67 63.55 0.78 100.00

Rural 48.81 50.71 0.48 100.00

Dadu 28.50 70.35 1.14 100.00

Urban 15.74 80.63 3.63 100.00

Rural 31.39 68.03 0.58 100.00

374

Page 396: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.4: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY NUMBER OF ROOMS- BY

One Room 2 - 4 Rooms 5 & More Rooms Total

PROVINCE & DISTRICTHOUSING UNITSPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Jamshoro 40.70 58.80 0.50 100.00

Urban 29.72 68.86 1.43 100.00

Rural 44.68 55.16 0.16 100.00

Hyderabad 46.53 52.91 0.56 100.00

Urban 43.02 56.29 0.69 100.00

Rural 62.85 37.15 0.00 100.00

Tando Allah Yar 50.60 48.63 0.77 100.00

Urban 29.15 68.79 2.06 100.00

Rural 56.13 43.43 0.44 100.00

Tando Muhammad Khan 59.15 40.08 0.78 100.00

Urban 42.08 54.57 3.35 100.00

Rural 62.52 37.22 0.27 100.00

Mitiari 50.39 48.21 1.39 100.00

Urban 40.36 58.21 1.43 100.00

Rural 53.48 45.14 1.38 100.00

Badin 51.42 48.20 0.39 100.00

Urban 48.38 50.53 1.08 100.00

Rural 52.25 47.56 0.20 100.00

Thatta 65.39 34.18 0.43 100.00

Urban 32.70 66.08 1.22 100.00

Rural 70.13 29.56 0.31 100.00

Sujawal 63.34 35.57 1.09 100.00

Urban 41.74 52.24 6.02 100.00

Rural 66.73 32.95 0.32 100.00

Sanghar 52.11 47.25 0.64 100.00

Urban 36.53 61.13 2.34 100.00

Rural 56.21 43.60 0.19 100.00

Mirpur Khas 53.60 45.25 1.15 100.00

Urban 33.83 63.11 3.06 100.00

Rural 60.90 38.65 0.45 100.00

Umerkot 43.50 55.76 0.74 100.00

Urban 34.08 63.63 2.28 100.00

Rural 45.88 53.77 0.35 100.00

Tharparkar 16.47 80.39 3.14 100.00

Urban 30.54 69.46 0.00 100.00

Rural 15.32 81.28 3.40 100.00

Karachi 21.07 74.40 4.53 100.00Urban 19.35 75.84 4.80 100.00Rural 49.12 50.88 0.00 100.00

375

Page 397: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.4: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY NUMBER OF ROOMS- BY

One Room 2 - 4 Rooms 5 & More Rooms Total

PROVINCE & DISTRICTHOUSING UNITSPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 16.79 72.91 10.30 100.00Urban 17.16 68.73 14.11 100.00Rural 16.70 73.86 9.44 100.00

Chitral 9.62 76.65 13.72 100.00

Urban 0.00 72.46 27.54 100.00

Rural 10.61 77.08 12.30

Upper Dir 23.72 66.53 9.75 100.00

Urban 16.44 71.01 12.56 100.00

Rural 24.03 66.34 9.63 100.00

Lower Dir 13.85 67.86 18.28 100.00

Urban 15.11 58.33 26.56 100.00

Rural 13.77 68.54 17.70 100.00

Swat 10.96 75.58 13.46 100.00

Urban 13.21 68.11 18.68 100.00

Rural 10.48 77.19 12.33 100.00

Shangla 16.20 77.08 6.71 100.00

Urban - - - -

Rural 16.20 77.08 6.71 100.00

Buner 16.42 70.67 12.91 100.00

Urban 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00

Rural 16.42 70.67 12.91 100.00

Malakand PA 16.35 70.06 13.59 100.00

Urban 37.18 58.83 3.99 0.00Rural 12.77 71.99 15.24 100.00

Kohistan 21.24 75.32 3.44 100.00

Urban - - - -

Rural 21.24 75.32 3.44 100.00

Mansehra 22.84 68.56 8.60 100.00

Urban 21.57 55.99 22.44 100.00

Rural 22.93 69.43 7.64 100.00

Batagram 14.72 75.28 10.00 100.00

Urban - - - -

Rural 14.72 75.28 10.00 100.00

Abbottabad 13.82 75.62 10.56 100.00

Urban 11.14 77.60 11.25 100.00

Rural 14.38 75.20 10.42 100.00

Haripur 16.22 72.61 11.17 100.00

Urban 21.68 70.34 7.97 100.00

Rural 14.93 73.15 11.92 100.00

376

Page 398: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.4: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY NUMBER OF ROOMS- BY

One Room 2 - 4 Rooms 5 & More Rooms Total

PROVINCE & DISTRICTHOUSING UNITSPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Tor Ghar 19.26 76.71 4.03 100.00

Urban - - - -

Rural 19.26 76.71 4.03 100.00

Mardan 18.60 72.18 9.22 100.00

Urban 21.93 67.16 10.91 100.00

Rural 17.37 74.04 8.59 100.00

Swabi 17.46 78.76 3.78 100.00

Urban 16.87 75.55 7.58 100.00

Rural 17.57 79.37 3.05 100.00

Charsadda 21.65 73.76 4.59 100.00

Urban 25.06 71.03 3.91 100.00

Rural 20.72 74.50 4.77 100.00

Peshawar 15.19 69.11 15.70 100.00

Urban 12.29 67.51 20.19 100.00

Rural 18.74 71.07 10.18 100.00

Nowshera 17.09 76.01 6.91 100.00

Urban 19.08 68.97 11.95 100.00

Rural 16.23 79.03 4.74 100.00

Kohat 14.09 77.20 8.71 100.00

Urban 24.89 71.69 3.41 100.00

Rural 10.85 78.86 10.29 100.00

Hangu 8.13 80.31 11.56 100.00

Urban 14.48 73.29 12.23 100.00

Rural 6.40 82.22 11.38 100.00

Karak 14.06 75.06 10.87 100.00

Urban 16.67 66.67 16.67 100.00

Rural 13.92 75.53 10.55 100.00

Bannu 15.44 74.48 10.08 100.00

Urban 22.88 58.94 18.18 100.00

Rural 14.93 75.55 9.52 100.00

Lakki Marwat 13.91 70.30 15.79 100.00

Urban 8.90 81.57 9.53 100.00

Rural 14.68 68.57 16.75 100.00

D.I Khan 23.41 68.43 8.15 100.00

Urban 29.53 62.63 7.83 100.00

Rural 22.49 69.31 8.20 100.00

Tank 17.75 72.00 10.25 100.00Urban 16.04 71.38 12.58 100.00Rural 18.06 72.12 9.83 100.00

377

Page 399: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.4: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY NUMBER OF ROOMS- BY

One Room 2 - 4 Rooms 5 & More Rooms Total

PROVINCE & DISTRICTHOUSING UNITSPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Balochistan 15.93 76.58 7.49 100.00

Urban 13.02 75.01 11.97 100.00

Rural 17.01 77.16 5.82 100.00

Quetta 5.73 81.31 12.96 100.00

Urban 8.66 76.06 15.29 100.00

Rural 1.62 88.71 9.67 100.00

Pishin 11.84 68.94 19.23 100.00

Urban 5.69 70.46 23.86 100.00

Rural 12.34 68.81 18.85 100.00

Killa Abdullah 9.56 74.17 16.27 100.00

Urban 5.70 61.31 32.99 100.00

Rural 10.02 75.69 14.28 100.00

Chagai 18.28 81.03 0.68 100.00

Urban 5.36 91.16 3.48 100.00

Rural 19.53 80.06 0.41 100.00

Nushki 7.74 87.32 4.94 100.00

Urban 14.11 85.89 0.00 100.00

Rural 6.12 87.69 6.19 100.00

Loralai 10.60 88.88 0.52 100.00

Urban 12.92 83.57 3.51 0.00Rural 10.20 89.80 0.00 100.00

Barkhan 0.00 89.15 10.85 100.00

Urban 0.00 96.23 3.77 100.00

Rural 0.00 88.11 11.89 100.00

Musa Khel 8.53 91.22 0.26 100.00

Urban 5.56 94.44 0.00 100.00

Rural 9.30 90.38 0.32 100.00

Killa Saifullah 4.12 84.40 11.47 100.00

Urban 1.98 86.10 11.92 100.00

Rural 4.91 83.78 11.31 100.00

Zhob 0.00 88.42 11.58 100.00

Urban 0.00 93.09 6.91 100.00

Rural 0.00 86.83 13.17 100.00

Sheerani 51.99 48.01 0.00 100.00

Urban - - - -

Rural 51.99 48.01 0.00 100.00

Sibi 20.19 74.09 5.72 100.00

Urban 8.68 76.02 15.29 100.00

Rural 26.22 73.07 0.70 100.00

378

Page 400: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.4: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY NUMBER OF ROOMS- BY

One Room 2 - 4 Rooms 5 & More Rooms Total

PROVINCE & DISTRICTHOUSING UNITSPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Harnai 16.88 71.59 11.54 100.00

Urban 0.00 80.79 19.21 100.00

Rural 18.28 70.82 10.90 100.00

Ziarat 11.85 72.92 15.23 100.00

Urban 32.08 67.92 0.00 100.00

Rural 10.24 73.32 16.44 100.00

Kohlu 24.46 75.34 0.20 100.00

Urban 14.59 85.41 0.00 100.00

Rural 25.85 73.92 0.23 100.00

Dera Bugti 44.58 54.17 1.25 100.00

Urban 38.53 61.47 0.00 100.00

Rural 45.08 53.56 1.36 100.00

Kachhi( Bolan) 26.28 69.50 4.22 100.00

Urban 41.09 58.91 0.00 100.00

Rural 22.83 71.97 5.21 100.00

Jaffarabad 35.25 63.40 1.34 100.00

Urban 29.87 66.88 3.25 100.00

Rural 36.97 62.29 0.73 100.00

Nasirabad 19.15 79.63 1.21 100.00

Urban 34.56 63.61 1.82 100.00

Rural 13.33 85.69 0.98 100.00

Jhal Magsi 19.52 74.25 6.24 100.00

Urban 19.51 74.90 5.59 100.00

Rural 19.52 74.22 6.27 100.00

Kalat 8.49 76.21 15.30 100.00

Urban 0.00 49.84 50.16 100.00

Rural 10.47 82.36 7.18 100.00

Mastung 12.96 82.47 4.57 100.00

Urban 0.00 83.33 16.67 100.00

Rural 17.47 82.17 0.35 100.00

Khuzdar 4.17 85.54 10.29 100.00

Urban 0.00 72.08 27.92 100.00

Rural 6.09 91.74 2.17 100.00

Awaran 17.14 80.99 1.86 100.00

Urban - - - -

Rural 17.14 80.99 1.86 100.00

379

Page 401: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.4: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY NUMBER OF ROOMS- BY

One Room 2 - 4 Rooms 5 & More Rooms Total

PROVINCE & DISTRICTHOUSING UNITSPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Kharan 18.90 80.88 0.22 100.00

Urban 11.91 88.09 0.00 100.00

Rural 22.05 77.63 0.32 100.00

Washuk 18.77 80.68 0.55 100.00

Urban - - - -

Rural 18.77 80.68 0.55 100.00

Lasbela 42.24 56.11 1.64 100.00

Urban 33.80 65.06 1.14 100.00

Rural 47.17 50.89 1.94 100.00

Gwadar 14.79 85.21 0.00 100.00

Urban 13.33 86.67 0.00 100.00

Rural 16.60 83.40 0.00 100.00

NOTES:

1. The Panjgur & Ketch district has been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.2. Total may not add to 100 because of rounding.

380

Page 402: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.5: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLD BY SOURCE OF DRINKING WATER BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

TAP WATER

HAND PUMP

MOTOR PUMP

DUG WELL OTHERS TOTAL Rank

Tap Water

2012-13

Pakistan 27 26 33 3 11 100 30

Urban 51 7 27 1 14 100Rural 13 38 36 5 9 100

Punjab 18 28 45 1 9 100 22Urban 35 7 40 1 18 100Rural 9 38 47 1 4 100

Islamabad 20 2 43 8 27 100 54Urban 21 2 37 3 38 100Rural 18 2 56 19 5 100

Attock 34 12 41 10 3 100 3.0 35Urban 61 1 36 1 2 100Rural 24 16 44 13 3 100

Rawalpindi 32 1 40 10 17 100 4.0 47Urban 47 0 32 5 16 100Rural 18 3 47 15 18 100

Jehlum 27 7 56 6 3 100 5.0 39Urban 28 0 59 6 7 100Rural 27 10 55 6 2 100

Chakwal 17 9 64 5 5 100 11.0 33Urban 8 0 89 3 0 100Rural 19 10 60 5 5 100

Sargodha 6 57 30 0 7 100 24.0 6Urban 14 35 31 0 20 100Rural 2 69 29 0 0 100

Bhakkar 5 64 29 0 1 100 34.0 5Urban 5 27 64 0 5 100Rural 6 72 22 0 0 100

Khushab 26 43 26 0 4 100 7.0 31Urban 28 38 32 0 3 100Rural 25 46 24 0 5 100

Mianwali 17 46 28 4 6 100 13.0 26Urban 21 36 43 0 0 100Rural 16 49 24 5 7 100

Faisalabad 13 18 41 0 28 100 17.0 19Urban 18 3 31 0 48 100Rural 8 30 50 0 11 100

Chiniot 4 46 48 0 2 100 31.0 5Urban 10 8 76 0 6 100Rural 1 65 34 0 0 100

PROVINCE & DISTRICT

WATER DELIVERY SYSTEM

381

Page 403: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.5: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLD BY SOURCE OF DRINKING WATER BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

TAP WATER

HAND PUMP

MOTOR PUMP

DUG WELL OTHERS TOTAL Rank

Tap Water

2012-13

PROVINCE & DISTRICT

WATER DELIVERY SYSTEM

Jhang 3 53 42 0 2 100 32.0 4Urban 7 13 71 0 8 100Rural 2 64 33 0 0 100

Toba Tek Singh 26 23 44 0 7 100 6.0 32Urban 22 9 49 0 20 100Rural 27 27 43 0 4 100

Gujranwala 5 15 69 0 11 100 29.0 5Urban 9 4 69 0 18 100Rural 0 28 70 0 2 100

Hafizabad 2 45 49 0 4 100 35.0 2Urban 5 43 41 0 11 100Rural 1 46 52 0 1 100

Gujrat 17 10 69 0 4 100 12.0 26Urban 35 5 51 0 9 100Rural 10 13 75 0 2 100

Mandi Bahauddin 5 44 47 0 3 100 28.0 7Urban 4 20 63 0 12 100Rural 5 50 44 0 1 100

Sialkot 19 11 58 1 10 100 10.0 23Urban 35 2 49 1 13 100Rural 13 14 62 1 9 100

Narowal 9 21 61 1 7 100 22.0 9Urban 33 6 41 2 17 100Rural 5 24 66 1 5 100

Lahore 60 1 23 0 17 100 1.0 74Urban 73 0 7 0 20 100Rural 13 2 78 0 7 100

Kasur 15 23 56 0 6 100 15.0 16Urban 29 9 48 0 13 100Rural 10 28 59 0 3 100

Sheikhupura 10 17 66 1 7 100 21.0 22Urban 24 8 55 0 13 100Rural 4 21 70 1 4 100

Nankana Sahib 5 28 47 0 19 100 27.0 9Urban 11 11 40 0 38 100Rural 3 35 50 0 12 100

Okara 9 17 72 0 1 100 23.0 11Urban 20 3 72 0 5 100Rural 4 23 72 0 0 100

382

Page 404: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.5: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLD BY SOURCE OF DRINKING WATER BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

TAP WATER

HAND PUMP

MOTOR PUMP

DUG WELL OTHERS TOTAL Rank

Tap Water

2012-13

PROVINCE & DISTRICT

WATER DELIVERY SYSTEM

Sahiwal 6 24 69 0 1 100 26.0 12Urban 26 1 69 0 3 100Rural 1 30 68 0 1 100

Pakpattan 16 14 70 0 1 100 14.0 12Urban 59 2 38 0 0 100Rural 8 16 75 0 1 100

Vehari 11 20 66 0 3 100 19.0 11Urban 29 0 61 0 11 100Rural 7 24 67 0 1 100

Multan 10 21 63 0 7 100 20.0 13Urban 19 1 70 0 10 100Rural 4 33 58 0 4 100

Lodhran 22 25 49 0 4 100 9.0 16Urban 19 1 64 0 16 100Rural 22 30 46 0 2 100

Khanewal 3 27 68 0 2 100 33.0 3Urban 2 12 79 0 7 100Rural 3 31 66 0 0 100

D.G Khan 26 48 17 1 9 100 8.0 26Urban 59 5 18 0 17 100Rural 20 55 17 1 8 100

Rajanpur 12 61 12 4 11 100 18.0 11Urban 27 20 44 2 8 100Rural 9 69 6 5 12 100

Layyah 6 58 35 0 0 100 25.0 7Urban 28 25 47 0 0 100Rural 2 65 33 0 0 100

Muzaffargarh 1 72 25 0 1 100 36.0 3Urban 5 30 60 0 5 100Rural 1 78 21 0 0 100

Bahawalpur 14 40 42 0 4 100 16.0 16Urban 12 7 72 0 10 100Rural 15 53 31 0 1 100

Bhawal Nagar 35 41 18 1 6 100 2.0 42Urban 62 12 18 1 7 100Rural 27 48 18 1 6 100

Rahim Yar Khan 5 64 26 0 5 100 30.0 13Urban 11 33 36 0 19 100Rural 3 71 24 0 2 100

383

Page 405: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

384

Page 406: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.5: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLD BY SOURCE OF DRINKING WATER BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

TAP WATER

HAND PUMP

MOTOR PUMP

DUG WELL OTHERS TOTAL Rank

Tap Water

2012-13

PROVINCE & DISTRICT

WATER DELIVERY SYSTEM

Sindh 41 33 11 4 10 100 43Urban 69 8 11 1 11 100Rural 7 63 12 8 9 100

Jacobabad 2 72 1 0 25 100 22.0 8Urban 4 6 2 0 88 100Rural 1 93 1 1 4 100

Kashmore 2 79 16 0 2 100 21.0 2Urban 7 38 48 0 6 100Rural 0 98 1 0 1 100

Shikarpur 1 78 21 0 0 100 23.0 1Urban 3 57 40 0 0 100Rural 0 86 14 0 0 100

Larkana 1 59 39 0 0 100 24.0 1Urban 1 48 49 1 1 100Rural 1 68 31 0 0 100

Shahdadkot 10 61 12 1 17 100 10.0 16Urban 26 19 26 0 29 100Rural 4 76 7 1 12 100

Sukkur 28 37 28 2 5 100 4.0 32Urban 41 13 38 1 7 100Rural 3 81 10 5 0 100

Ghotki 6 74 19 0 0 100 16.0 12Urban 10 49 38 2 1 100Rural 5 81 14 0 0 100

Khairpur 4 77 16 3 0 100 20.0 10Urban 12 58 29 0 0 100Rural 0 85 10 4 0 100

Naushahro Feroze 8 64 27 0 0 100 12.0 14Urban 0 38 60 0 2 100Rural 11 71 18 0 0 100

Shaheed Benazirabad 7 73 18 0 2 100 13.0 7Urban 26 23 45 0 6 100Rural 1 90 9 0 1 100

Dadu 16 40 33 10 0 100 8.0 8Urban 49 20 31 0 0 100Rural 8 45 34 13 0 100

385

Page 407: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.5: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLD BY SOURCE OF DRINKING WATER BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

TAP WATER

HAND PUMP

MOTOR PUMP

DUG WELL OTHERS TOTAL Rank

Tap Water

2012-13

PROVINCE & DISTRICT

WATER DELIVERY SYSTEM

Jamshoro 46 22 10 11 10 100 3.0 38Urban 70 8 14 0 8 100Rural 38 28 9 15 11 100

Hyderabad 61 14 15 0 9 100 2.0 73Urban 72 4 15 0 9 100Rural 11 65 17 0 6 100

Tando Allah Yar 4 70 24 0 1 100 19.0 9Urban 13 16 68 0 3 100Rural 2 84 12 0 1 100

Tando Muhammad Khan 6 82 8 0 3 100 14.0 8Urban 35 25 34 0 6 100Rural 1 93 3 0 3 100

Mitiari 5 71 23 0 1 100 18.0 7Urban 15 33 50 1 1 100Rural 2 82 15 0 1 100

Badin 11 68 12 1 8 100 9.0 14Urban 33 29 29 2 7 100Rural 5 79 7 1 8 100

Thatta 19 28 12 10 30 100 7.0 16Urban 66 7 7 4 16 100Rural 13 31 13 11 32 100

Sujawal 10 49 3 4 34 100 11.0Urban 66 6 2 6 20 100Rural 1 56 4 3 36 100

Sanghar 6 65 25 0 4 100 17.0 14Urban 13 15 70 0 2 100Rural 3 79 13 0 4 100

Mirpur Khas 25 39 12 0 24 100 5.0 35Urban 79 13 4 0 4 100Rural 5 49 15 0 31 100

Umerkot 21 38 3 9 29 100 6.0 30Urban 55 35 10 0 1 100Rural 13 38 1 11 37 100

Tharparkar 6 7 3 75 8 100 15.0 7Urban 67 9 0 20 3 100Rural 1 7 4 79 9 100

Karachi 84 1 1 1 13 100 1.0 86Urban 85 1 1 1 12 100Rural 54 5 7 9 26 100

386

Page 408: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

387

Page 409: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.5: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLD BY SOURCE OF DRINKING WATER BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

TAP WATER

HAND PUMP

MOTOR PUMP

DUG WELL OTHERS TOTAL Rank

Tap Water

2012-13

PROVINCE & DISTRICT

WATER DELIVERY SYSTEM

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 35 12 26 8 18 100 44Urban 55 7 32 4 3 100Rural 30 14 25 9 22 100

Chitral 74 0 0 0 26 100 1.0 83Urban 96 0 0 0 4 100Rural 71 0 0 0 28 100

Upper Dir 26 0 6 1 67 100 16.0 11Urban 54 0 33 0 13 100Rural 25 0 5 1 69 100

Lower Dir 27 1 21 22 29 100 12.0 37Urban 60 0 0 33 7 100Rural 25 1 23 21 30 100

Swat 47 2 21 9 20 100 8.0 54Urban 78 0 7 15 0 100Rural 41 2 24 8 25 100

Shangla 43 0 1 0 55 100 9.0 57Urban - - - - - -Rural 43 0 1 0 55 100

Buner 24 5 27 11 32 100 19.0 46Urban - - - - - -Rural 24 5 27 11 32 100

Malakand PA 26 9 35 22 8 100 15.0 38Urban 34 5 24 18 19 100Rural 24 10 37 23 6 100

Kohistan 8 2 0 5 85 100 23.0 6Urban - - - - - -Rural 8 2 0 5 85 100

Mansehra 49 6 9 19 18 100 7.0 59Urban 54 0 41 5 0 100Rural 49 6 7 20 19 100

Batagram 55 5 3 4 33 100 4.0 77Urban - - - - - -Rural 55 5 3 4 33 100

Abbottabad 71 0 11 1 18 100 2.0 80Urban 93 0 7 0 0 100Rural 66 0 11 1 22 100

Haripur 42 1 39 7 11 100 10.0 63Urban 75 0 25 0 0 100Rural 34 1 43 8 14 100

388

Page 410: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.5: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLD BY SOURCE OF DRINKING WATER BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

TAP WATER

HAND PUMP

MOTOR PUMP

DUG WELL OTHERS TOTAL Rank

Tap Water

2012-13

PROVINCE & DISTRICT

WATER DELIVERY SYSTEM

Tor Ghar 60 0 0 0 40 100 3.0 68Urban - - - - - -Rural 60 0 0 0 40 100

Mardan 24 20 50 5 1 100 17.0 20Urban 24 8 64 4 0 100Rural 24 25 44 6 1 100

Swabi 4 22 53 17 4 100 25.0 15Urban 2 11 75 12 0 100Rural 5 24 48 18 5 100

Charsadda 5 38 43 14 0 100 24.0 14Urban 19 12 64 5 0 100Rural 1 44 38 16 0 100

Peshawar 49 14 27 9 1 100 6.0 56Urban 79 4 17 0 1 100Rural 14 27 39 19 1 100

Nowshera 24 22 40 8 6 100 18.0 40Urban 27 22 47 2 1 100Rural 23 22 37 10 8 100

Kohat 26 17 30 6 21 100 13.0 47Urban 44 10 32 6 8 100Rural 21 18 30 6 24 100

Hangu 20 14 31 21 13 100 20.0 34Urban 25 10 49 15 2 100Rural 19 15 27 23 16 100

Karak 17 10 40 11 21 100 22.0 18Urban 17 0 21 0 62 100Rural 17 11 41 12 19 100

Bannu 55 15 28 0 1 100 5.0 69Urban 78 0 22 0 0 100Rural 53 17 28 1 1 100

Lakki Marwat 26 22 33 1 18 100 14.0 42Urban 65 0 30 0 5 100Rural 20 25 34 1 20 100

D.I Khan 19 34 22 0 25 100 21.0 36Urban 15 25 36 0 24 100Rural 19 36 20 0 25 100

Tank 41 9 16 0 34 100 11.0 57Urban 60 0 27 1 12 100Rural 38 10 14 0 38 100

389

Page 411: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

390

Page 412: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.5: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLD BY SOURCE OF DRINKING WATER BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

TAP WATER

HAND PUMP

MOTOR PUMP

DUG WELL OTHERS TOTAL Rank

Tap Water

2012-13

PROVINCE & DISTRICT

WATER DELIVERY SYSTEM

Balochistan 33 7 18 11 30 100 34Urban 69 3 11 1 17 100Rural 20 8 21 15 36 100

Quetta 70 0 7 1 21 100 1.0 83Urban 71 0 2 0 27 100Rural 69 1 14 3 13 100

Pishin 66 1 16 6 11 100 2.0 83Urban 91 0 9 0 0 100Rural 64 1 16 7 12 100

Killa Abdullah 18 0 21 11 50 100 18.0 23Urban 53 0 1 0 46 100Rural 13 0 23 12 51 100

Chagai 11 0 6 83 0 100 22.0 9Urban 100 0 0 0 0 100Rural 2 0 6 91 0 100

Nushki 44 0 50 2 4 100 6.0 64Urban 100 0 0 0 0 100Rural 30 0 62 2 5 100

Loralai 8 13 31 2 46 100 24.0 14Urban 40 0 36 0 24 100Rural 3 15 30 2 50 100

Barkhan 6 7 20 41 27 100 25.0 11Urban 19 0 54 27 0 100Rural 4 7 15 43 30 100

Musa Khel 15 10 15 14 47 100 20.0 0Urban 48 6 1 13 32 100Rural 6 12 18 14 50 100

Killa Saifullah 14 5 72 4 4 100 21.0 21Urban 19 3 76 2 0 100Rural 12 6 70 5 6 100

Zhob 31 0 4 15 50 100 9.0 15Urban 99 0 1 0 0 100Rural 8 0 4 20 67 100

Sheerani 15 0 0 0 85 100 19.0 1Urban - - - - - -Rural 15 0 0 0 85 100

Sibi 61 0 8 1 30 100 3.0 68Urban 91 0 0 2 7 100Rural 46 0 12 0 42 100

Harnai 24 0 13 10 53 100 12.0 24Urban 63 0 0 34 3 100Rural 21 0 15 8 57 100

391

Page 413: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.5: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLD BY SOURCE OF DRINKING WATER BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

TAP WATER

HAND PUMP

MOTOR PUMP

DUG WELL OTHERS TOTAL Rank

Tap Water

2012-13

PROVINCE & DISTRICT

WATER DELIVERY SYSTEM

Ziarat 21 0 15 13 51 100 16.0 33Urban 84 0 0 5 11 100Rural 16 0 17 13 54 100

Kohlu 4 1 20 0 74 100 26.0 3Urban 32 0 68 0 0 100Rural 0 1 13 0 85 100

Dera Bugti 23 2 13 21 41 100 15.0 18Urban 100 0 0 0 0 100Rural 16 2 14 22 45 100

Kachhi( Bolan) 26 0 8 4 62 100 11.0 24Urban 100 0 0 0 0 100Rural 9 0 10 5 77 100

Jaffarabad 24 41 5 1 30 100 14.0 17Urban 63 26 8 0 4 100Rural 11 46 4 1 39 100

Nasirabad 24 22 0 14 39 100 13.0 14Urban 87 2 0 0 11 100Rural 0 30 0 20 50 100

Jhal Magsi 3 0 22 14 60 100 27.0 16Urban 72 0 0 0 28 100Rural 0 0 23 15 61 100

Kalat 36 0 42 10 13 100 8.0 37Urban 100 0 0 0 0 100Rural 21 0 52 12 16 100

Mastung 37 0 53 0 10 100 7.0 36Urban 100 0 0 0 0 100Rural 16 0 71 0 13 100

Khuzdar 18 8 43 6 25 100 17.0 34Urban 28 0 52 0 20 100Rural 13 11 39 9 28 100

Awaran 11 0 29 35 26 100 23.0 10Urban - - - - - -Rural 11 0 29 35 26 100

392

Page 414: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.5: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLD BY SOURCE OF DRINKING WATER BY PROVINCE & DISTRICT

TAP WATER

HAND PUMP

MOTOR PUMP

DUG WELL OTHERS TOTAL Rank

Tap Water

2012-13

PROVINCE & DISTRICT

WATER DELIVERY SYSTEM

Kharan 59 4 1 28 8 100 5.0 32Urban 100 0 0 0 0 100Rural 41 6 1 41 12 100

Washuk 3 3 27 31 36 100 28.0 0Urban - - - - - -Rural 3 3 27 31 36 100

Lasbela 26 12 6 30 27 100 10.0 28Urban 70 10 6 2 12 100Rural 1 13 5 46 35 100

Gwadar 61 3 11 8 16 100 4.0 46Urban 81 0 7 0 12 100Rural 36 7 16 19 22 100

NOTES:1. The Panjgur & Kech districts has been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.2. Total may not add to 100 because of rounding.

393

Page 415: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

394

Page 416: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

U R T U R T U R T

Pakistan 97 60 73 2 20 13 1 21 13 71

Punjab 98 70 79 1 6 5 1 24 16 77

Islamabad 100 97 99 0 0 0 0 3 1 99

Attock 90 82 84 8 9 9 2 9 7 12 77

Rawalpindi 99 89 94 1 1 1 0 10 5 4 87

Jhelum 99 82 87 0 5 4 1 12 9 9 86

Chakwal 100 83 85 0 8 7 0 9 8 11 86

Sargodha 98 67 78 1 8 6 2 24 17 17 81

Bhakkar 94 37 47 1 31 26 5 32 27 36 46

Khushab 94 67 75 2 5 4 4 28 21 21 74

Mianwali 98 64 72 2 13 10 1 23 18 23 72

Faisalabad 99 86 92 0 0 0 1 14 8 7 92

Chiniot 97 40 60 0 0 0 3 60 40 30 59

Jhang 94 49 59 5 1 2 1 51 40 31 54

Toba Tek Singh 99 75 80 1 13 10 1 13 10 15 74

Gujranwala 100 91 96 0 2 1 0 7 3 2 96

Hafizabad 95 69 78 3 1 1 2 30 21 18 79

Gujrat 99 89 92 0 3 3 1 7 6 6 89

Mandi Bahuddin 97 78 82 2 3 3 2 18 15 13 82

Sialkot 98 94 95 0 0 0 2 6 5 3 94

Narowal 95 75 79 5 0 1 0 24 20 16 80

Lahore 100 98 99 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 98

Kasur 96 90 91 2 0 1 2 10 8 8 87

Sheikhupura 99 91 94 0 1 0 1 8 6 5 94

Nankana Sahib 99 81 86 0 3 2 1 17 12 10 86

Okara 99 74 81 0 1 1 1 25 18 14 76

Sahiwal 100 72 78 0 0 0 0 27 22 19 71

Pakpattan 98 61 67 2 4 4 0 35 29 27 57

Vehari 99 55 62 1 15 12 0 31 25 29 60

Multan 98 59 75 1 17 11 1 23 14 22 76

Lodhran 95 42 50 0 27 23 5 31 27 33 61

Khanewal 93 62 68 4 17 14 3 21 17 26 60

D.G.khan 100 45 53 0 9 8 0 46 39 32 43

Rajanpur 100 40 50 1 1 59 49 34 53

Layyah 98 72 76 0 6 5 2 22 19 20 73

Muzaffargarh 92 42 48 6 24 21 2 35 31 35 59

Bahawalpur 96 60 70 1 0 1 3 40 29 24 66

Bahawalnagar 98 62 70 0 2 2 2 36 29 25 67

Rahim Yar Khan 94 56 64 0 4 3 6 40 33 28 63

TABLE 4.6: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE OF TOILET.

RANK FLUSH 2012-13

FLUSH NON FLUSH NO TOILETPROVINCE AND DISTRICTS

395

Page 417: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

396

Page 418: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

U R T U R T U R T

TABLE 4.6: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE OF TOILET.

RANK FLUSH 2012-13

FLUSH NON FLUSH NO TOILETPROVINCE AND DISTRICTS

Sindh 97 31 67 3 53 26 1 16 7 63

Jacobabad 95 22 40 3 67 51 2 11 9 16 54

Kashmore 90 29 48 9 62 46 1 9 6 11 38

Shikarpur 90 46 58 10 48 38 0 6 4 8 46

Larkana 98 64 79 2 35 20 0 2 1 3 67

Shahdadkot 96 47 59 2 52 39 1 1 1 7 67

Sukkur 95 38 75 5 52 22 0 10 4 4 67

Ghotki 95 52 61 5 44 36 4 3 5 59

Khairpur 77 29 43 21 65 52 1 6 4 15 39

Naushahro Feroze 98 50 60 2 43 34 1 7 6 6 43

Shaheed Benazirabad 95 30 46 5 65 50 0 6 4 14 44

Dadu 99 35 47 1 54 45 0 10 8 12 36

Jamshoro 100 33 50 0 46 34 0 22 16 9 37

Hyderabad 93 36 83 5 48 12 2 16 5 2 86

Tando Allah Yar 90 20 34 9 75 61 1 6 5 18 38

Tando Muhammad Khan 97 27 38 3 64 54 0 9 8 17 28

Matiari 80 18 32 10 56 45 11 26 23 19 37

Badin 77 9 24 22 68 58 1 23 18 21 14

Thatta 84 11 20 14 60 55 2 28 25 22 16

Sujawal 100 2 15 0 57 49 0 41 35 23

Sanghar 93 34 47 7 52 43 0 13 10 13 52

Mirpur Khas 95 32 49 4 51 38 1 17 13 10 46

Umerkot 81 12 26 10 38 33 9 50 42 20 29

Tharparkar 78 7 12 19 46 44 3 47 44 24 8

Karachi 99 64 97 0 31 2 0 5 0 1 97

397

Page 419: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

398

Page 420: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

U R T U R T U R T

TABLE 4.6: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE OF TOILET.

RANK FLUSH 2012-13

FLUSH NON FLUSH NO TOILETPROVINCE AND DISTRICTS

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 97 71 76 2 15 12 1 14 12 71

Chitral 100 87 88 0 8 7 0 5 4 3 85

Upper Dir 83 65 66 17 29 29 0 6 6 17 56

Lower Dir 93 79 80 3 16 15 3 6 5 12 77

Swat 100 79 83 0 5 4 0 16 13 9 87

Shangla 0 67 67 0 9 9 0 24 24 16 62

Buner - 56 56 - 25 25 - 19 19 21 55

Malakand PA 92 82 84 3 8 8 5 9 9 8 63

Kohistan - 27 27 - 29 29 - 44 44 25 14

Mansehra 100 84 85 0 0 0 0 16 15 7 74

Batagram - 70 70 - 10 10 - 21 21 15 73

Abbottabad 100 85 88 0 4 3 0 11 9 4 83

Haripur 100 87 90 0 1 1 0 12 10 1 87

Tor Garh - 40 40 - 10 10 - 49 49 24 37

Mardan 91 79 82 8 8 8 2 13 10 10 78

Swabi 98 85 87 0 8 7 2 7 6 6 80

Charsadda 90 71 75 5 10 9 5 18 16 13 75

Peshawar 99 74 88 1 8 4 0 18 8 2 88

Nowshera 97 83 87 1 7 5 2 10 8 5 83

Kohat 96 56 65 3 27 22 1 17 13 18 70

Hangu 94 76 80 4 19 15 2 6 5 11 75

Karak 96 62 64 4 29 28 0 9 8 19 57

Bannu 100 68 70 0 29 27 0 3 3 14 59

Lakki Marwat 92 60 64 6 35 31 2 6 5 20 49

D.I.Khan 96 49 55 2 41 36 2 10 9 22 48

Tank 98 34 44 0 56 47 2 10 9 23 39

399

Page 421: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

400

Page 422: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

U R T U R T U R T

TABLE 4.6: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE OF TOILET.

RANK FLUSH 2012-13

FLUSH NON FLUSH NO TOILETPROVINCE AND DISTRICTS

Balochistan 78 14 31 22 68 55 0 18 13 30

Quetta 94 51 76 6 45 22 0 5 2 1 82

Pishin 77 38 41 23 54 52 0 8 7 5 40

Killa Abdullah 54 6 11 45 70 68 1 24 21 22 10

Chagai 82 3 10 18 66 62 0 30 28 23 14

Nushki 74 12 24 26 77 66 0 12 9 12 40

Loralai 89 24 34 11 19 18 0 57 49 6 36

Barkhan 85 23 31 8 37 33 8 40 36 7 29

Musa Khel 73 36 44 20 30 28 7 34 28 3 38

Killa Saifullah 69 6 23 31 72 61 0 22 16 13 6

Zhob 91 35 50 5 29 23 3 36 28 2 50

Sheerani - 19 19 - 42 42 - 39 39 16 26

Sibi 84 19 42 14 52 39 2 28 19 4 60

Harnai 38 12 14 62 61 61 0 27 25 20 17

Ziarat 84 9 14 16 54 52 0 37 34 21 12

Kohlu 66 1 9 29 49 46 5 51 45 25 3

Dera Bugti 91 12 18 9 55 52 0 33 31 17 17

Kachhi (Bolan) 64 4 15 36 73 66 0 24 19 19 14

Jaffarabad 80 8 25 20 83 68 0 9 7 11 41

Nasirabad 84 4 26 15 93 72 1 2 2 10 25

Jhal Magsi 44 7 8 56 60 59 0 34 32 26 10

Kalat 45 0 9 55 100 91 0 0 0 24 10

Mastung 66 5 21 34 92 77 0 3 2 14 25

Khuzdar 54 4 20 46 94 79 0 2 1 15 26

Awaran - 1 1 - 99 99 - 0 0 27 2

Kharan 48 1 16 52 70 65 0 28 19 18 7

Washuk - 0 0 - 88 88 - 12 12 28 1

Lasbela 69 5 29 29 83 63 1 12 8 8 32

Gwadar 51 2 29 49 90 67 0 9 4 9 30

NOTES:1. The Panjgur and Kech districts has been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.

401

Page 423: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

402

Page 424: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.7: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY FUEL USED FOR LIGHTING

ELECTRICITY GAS/OILWOOD

&CANDLE OTHER TOTAL

Pakistan 93.45 4.00 0.77 1.79 100.00Urban 98.70 0.96 0.18 0.17 100.00Rural 90.37 5.78 1.11 2.74 100.00

Punjab 94.82 3.74 0.54 0.89 100.00Urban 98.55 1.10 0.26 0.09 100.00Rural 92.96 5.07 0.68 1.29 100.00

Islamabad 98.48 1.52 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 97.89 2.11 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 99.69 0.31 0.00 0.00 100.00

Attock 96.56 2.91 0.00 0.53 100.00Urban 98.32 1.68 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 95.86 3.40 0.00 0.74 100.00

Rawalpindi 97.69 1.95 0.09 0.27 100.00Urban 98.12 1.88 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 97.28 2.01 0.19 0.53 100.00

Jehlum 98.45 1.55 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 98.15 1.85 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 98.57 1.43 0.00 0.00 100.00

Chakwal 93.38 4.32 1.05 1.25 100.00Urban 95.73 4.27 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 93.03 4.33 1.21 1.44 100.00

Sargodha 95.65 2.60 0.06 1.69 100.00Urban 98.19 1.81 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 94.30 3.02 0.09 2.59 100.00

Bhakkar 92.98 6.54 0.13 0.34 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 91.47 7.96 0.16 0.42 100.00

Khushab 90.78 3.50 1.11 4.61 100.00Urban 98.52 1.48 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 87.40 4.38 1.59 6.62 100.00

Mianwali 89.65 5.35 0.65 4.35 100.00Urban 98.19 1.47 0.00 0.34 100.00Rural 87.34 6.39 0.83 5.44 100.00

Faisalabad 98.82 0.88 0.10 0.21 100.00Urban 98.97 1.03 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 98.70 0.75 0.18 0.38 100.00

Chiniot 96.34 3.04 0.28 0.33 100.00Urban 98.29 1.71 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 95.36 3.71 0.42 0.50 100.00

FUEL USED FOR LIGHTINGPROVINCE & DISTRICT

403

Page 425: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.7: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY FUEL USED FOR LIGHTING

ELECTRICITY GAS/OILWOOD

&CANDLE OTHER TOTAL

FUEL USED FOR LIGHTINGPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Jhang 87.06 10.24 0.52 2.18 100.00Urban 97.31 1.61 0.00 1.08 100.00Rural 84.13 12.72 0.66 2.49 100.00

Toba Tek Singh 98.33 1.17 0.04 0.45 100.00Urban 98.47 1.53 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 98.30 1.08 0.05 0.57 100.00

Gujranwala 99.07 0.64 0.29 0.00 100.00Urban 99.44 0.56 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 98.64 0.73 0.63 0.00 100.00

Hafizabad 98.61 0.80 0.59 0.00 100.00Urban 98.69 0.46 0.85 0.00 100.00Rural 98.57 0.96 0.47 0.00 100.00

Gujrat 99.74 0.26 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 99.01 0.99 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00

Mandi Bahauddin 99.72 0.19 0.09 0.00 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 99.66 0.23 0.11 0.00 100.00

Sialkot 99.38 0.49 0.13 0.00 100.00Urban 98.77 1.23 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 99.62 0.20 0.18 0.00 100.00

Narowal 99.42 0.27 0.31 0.00 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 99.30 0.32 0.38 0.00 100.00

Lahore 98.28 0.91 0.80 0.00 100.00Urban 97.93 1.18 0.90 0.00 100.00Rural 99.52 0.00 0.48 0.00 100.00

Kasur 97.12 1.91 0.63 0.34 100.00Urban 99.19 0.00 0.81 0.00 100.00Rural 96.40 2.57 0.57 0.46 100.00

Sheikhupura 97.78 1.36 0.86 0.00 100.00Urban 99.36 0.64 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 97.17 1.64 1.20 0.00 100.00

Nankana Sahib 97.05 2.16 0.48 0.30 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 95.99 2.95 0.66 0.40 100.00

Okara 98.49 1.37 0.14 0.00 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 97.90 1.91 0.19 0.00 100.00

404

Page 426: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.7: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY FUEL USED FOR LIGHTING

ELECTRICITY GAS/OILWOOD

&CANDLE OTHER TOTAL

FUEL USED FOR LIGHTINGPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Sahiwal 95.98 2.56 0.09 1.37 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 95.07 3.15 0.11 1.68 100.00

Pakpattan 95.46 3.48 0.00 1.06 100.00Urban 97.53 1.24 0.00 1.24 100.00Rural 95.09 3.89 0.00 1.02 100.00

Vehari 90.25 7.93 0.21 1.61 100.00Urban 98.79 1.21 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 88.38 9.39 0.26 1.96 100.00

Multan 96.47 2.97 0.23 0.33 100.00Urban 98.44 1.56 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 95.20 3.88 0.38 0.54 100.00

Lodhran 92.49 5.21 0.83 1.47 100.00Urban 97.61 1.32 1.08 0.00 100.00Rural 91.58 5.89 0.79 1.73 100.00

Khanewal 95.13 3.39 0.41 1.07 100.00Urban 98.14 1.53 0.00 0.33 100.00Rural 94.36 3.86 0.52 1.26 100.00

D.G Khan 82.20 12.41 4.90 0.49 100.00Urban 98.84 1.16 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 79.20 14.44 5.79 0.57 100.00

Rajanpur 73.96 23.85 0.00 2.19 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 68.68 28.69 0.00 2.63 100.00

Layyah 84.26 12.07 0.68 2.99 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 81.40 14.26 0.81 3.53 100.00

Muzaffargarh 89.90 8.05 1.19 0.86 100.00Urban 99.25 0.00 0.00 0.75 100.00Rural 88.56 9.20 1.36 0.88 100.00

Bahawalpur 89.67 4.77 0.19 5.37 100.00Urban 97.88 1.58 0.00 0.54 100.00Rural 86.49 6.01 0.27 7.23 100.00

Bhawal Nagar 88.36 9.28 0.65 1.72 100.00Urban 98.70 0.00 0.65 0.65 100.00Rural 85.63 11.72 0.64 2.00 100.00

Rahim Yar Khan 90.83 6.35 1.41 1.41 100.00Urban 98.72 0.44 0.26 0.58 100.00Rural 89.00 7.73 1.68 1.60 100.00

405

Page 427: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.7: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY FUEL USED FOR LIGHTING

ELECTRICITY GAS/OILWOOD

&CANDLE OTHER TOTAL

FUEL USED FOR LIGHTINGPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Sindh 91.28 4.09 1.21 3.43 100.00Urban 98.90 0.73 0.10 0.27 100.00Rural 82.18 8.10 2.52 7.20 100.00

Jacobabad 92.73 3.69 2.86 0.72 100.00Urban 96.99 2.49 0.52 0.00 100.00Rural 91.33 4.09 3.62 0.96 100.00

Kashmore 97.09 2.44 0.47 0.00 100.00Urban 98.42 1.58 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 96.49 2.83 0.68 0.00 100.00

Shikarpur 97.74 1.06 0.42 0.78 100.00Urban 98.52 0.98 0.00 0.50 100.00Rural 97.44 1.09 0.58 0.89 100.00

Larkana 96.36 2.85 0.78 0.00 100.00Urban 93.90 5.73 0.38 0.00 100.00Rural 98.33 0.56 1.11 0.00 100.00

Shahdadkot 96.29 1.44 1.69 0.57 100.00Urban 99.61 0.39 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 95.16 1.80 2.27 0.76 100.00

Sukkur 97.26 1.17 1.56 0.00 100.00Urban 99.57 0.43 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 93.13 2.50 4.37 0.00 100.00

Ghotki 95.30 2.23 1.99 0.49 100.00Urban 95.01 3.91 0.00 1.07 100.00Rural 95.37 1.76 2.53 0.33 100.00

Khairpur 95.05 3.07 1.88 0.00 100.00Urban 98.04 0.62 1.34 0.00 100.00Rural 93.79 4.10 2.10 0.00 100.00

Naushahro Feroze 97.66 1.79 0.09 0.46 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 97.01 2.29 0.12 0.58 100.00

Shaheed Benazirabad 97.87 2.13 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 99.22 0.78 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 97.41 2.59 0.00 0.00 100.00

Dadu 99.11 0.26 0.39 0.24 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 98.91 0.32 0.47 0.30 100.00

Jamshoro 91.14 2.93 0.67 5.26 100.00Urban 98.63 1.37 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 88.42 3.50 0.91 7.17 100.00

406

Page 428: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.7: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY FUEL USED FOR LIGHTING

ELECTRICITY GAS/OILWOOD

&CANDLE OTHER TOTAL

FUEL USED FOR LIGHTINGPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Hyderabad 99.05 0.41 0.26 0.27 100.00Urban 99.68 0.00 0.32 0.00 100.00Rural 96.11 2.34 0.00 1.54 100.00

Tando Allah Yar 94.67 0.24 0.98 4.11 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 93.30 0.30 1.23 5.17 100.00

Tando Muhammad Khan 83.34 1.98 5.74 8.94 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 80.05 2.37 6.88 10.70 100.00

Mitiari 93.29 1.19 1.45 4.07 100.00Urban 92.21 2.12 1.13 4.53 100.00Rural 93.62 0.90 1.55 3.93 100.00

Badin 73.47 2.08 1.26 23.19 100.00Urban 89.69 1.77 1.13 7.41 100.00Rural 69.03 2.16 1.29 27.51 100.00

Thatta 56.91 38.85 0.27 3.97 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 50.66 44.48 0.31 4.55 100.00

Sujawal 44.96 50.87 1.51 2.66 100.00Urban 95.63 4.37 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 37.00 58.17 1.75 3.08 100.00

Sanghar 90.73 4.99 0.88 3.40 100.00Urban 97.79 2.21 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 88.88 5.72 1.12 4.29 100.00

Mirpur Khas 79.48 13.76 1.91 4.85 100.00Urban 98.36 0.51 0.00 1.12 100.00Rural 72.51 18.64 2.61 6.23 100.00

Umerkot 66.91 12.46 4.22 16.40 100.00Urban 91.02 0.00 0.50 8.48 100.00Rural 60.81 15.62 5.16 18.41 100.00

Tharparkar 38.55 9.47 13.33 38.65 100.00Urban 93.44 0.00 0.00 6.56 100.00Rural 34.06 10.24 14.42 41.28 100.00

Karachi 98.11 1.57 0.00 0.32 100.00Urban 99.47 0.53 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 76.07 18.43 0.00 5.50 100.00

407

Page 429: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.7: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY FUEL USED FOR LIGHTING

ELECTRICITY GAS/OILWOOD

&CANDLE OTHER TOTAL

FUEL USED FOR LIGHTINGPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 96.20 1.10 0.20 2.50 100.00Urban 99.20 0.69 0.00 0.11 100.00Rural 95.51 1.20 0.25 3.04 100.00

Chitral 99.84 0.00 0.00 0.16 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 99.82 0.00 0.00 0.18 100.00

Upper Dir 88.58 1.93 0.18 9.31 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 88.09 2.01 0.19 9.70 100.00

Lower Dir 97.76 1.21 0.00 1.03 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 97.61 1.29 0.00 1.10 100.00

Swat 98.46 1.12 0.00 0.42 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 98.13 1.36 0.00 0.51 100.00

Shangla 97.94 0.23 0.00 1.83 100.00Urban - - - - -Rural 97.94 0.23 0.00 1.83 100.00

Buner 88.53 3.92 0.14 7.41 100.00Urban - - - - -Rural 88.53 3.92 0.14 7.41 100.00

Malakand PA 98.14 0.22 0.00 1.63 100.00Urban 94.57 0.00 0.00 5.43 0.00Rural 98.76 0.26 0.00 0.98 100.00

Kohistan 73.13 2.01 0.75 24.10 100.00Urban - - - - -Rural 73.13 2.01 0.75 24.10 100.00

Mansehra 98.22 0.11 0.27 1.41 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 98.10 0.11 0.28 1.50 100.00

Batagram 88.86 0.77 2.17 8.20 100.00Urban - - - - -Rural 88.86 0.77 2.17 8.20 100.00

Abbottabad 98.69 1.19 0.00 0.12 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 98.42 1.44 0.00 0.14 100.00

Haripur 97.71 1.41 0.23 0.65 100.00Urban 97.13 2.87 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 97.85 1.07 0.28 0.80 100.00

408

Page 430: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.7: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY FUEL USED FOR LIGHTING

ELECTRICITY GAS/OILWOOD

&CANDLE OTHER TOTAL

FUEL USED FOR LIGHTINGPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Tor Ghar 68.48 1.33 0.77 29.42 100.00Urban - - - - -Rural 68.48 1.33 0.77 29.42 100.00

Mardan 98.65 0.99 0.22 0.14 100.00Urban 98.72 1.28 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 98.62 0.88 0.30 0.19 100.00

Swabi 99.15 0.67 0.00 0.19 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 98.99 0.79 0.00 0.22 100.00

Charsadda 99.66 0.26 0.08 0.00 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 99.57 0.32 0.11 0.00 100.00

Peshawar 98.33 1.41 0.00 0.25 100.00Urban 99.59 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 96.79 2.65 0.00 0.56 100.00

Nowshera 99.50 0.50 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 98.34 1.66 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00

Kohat 97.30 2.30 0.05 0.35 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 96.49 2.99 0.06 0.46 100.00

Hangu 97.12 0.98 0.41 1.48 100.00Urban 99.19 0.00 0.00 0.81 100.00Rural 96.56 1.25 0.53 1.67 100.00

Karak 91.66 4.46 1.28 2.60 100.00Urban 87.39 12.61 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 91.90 4.00 1.35 2.75 100.00

Bannu 99.57 0.26 0.18 0.00 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 99.54 0.27 0.19 0.00 100.00

Lakki Marwat 99.21 0.69 0.00 0.10 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 99.09 0.79 0.00 0.12 100.00

D.I Khan 94.90 0.58 0.47 4.05 100.00Urban 97.20 2.80 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 94.55 0.24 0.54 4.66 100.00

Tank 96.90 0.25 0.00 2.85 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 96.34 0.29 0.00 3.37 100.00

409

Page 431: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.7: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY FUEL USED FOR LIGHTING

ELECTRICITY GAS/OILWOOD

&CANDLE OTHER TOTAL

FUEL USED FOR LIGHTINGPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Balochistan 80.73 15.12 2.64 1.51 100.00Urban 97.59 1.93 0.18 0.30 100.00Rural 74.42 20.06 3.56 1.96 100.00

Quetta 96.14 3.12 0.27 0.47 100.00Urban 96.85 1.88 0.46 0.80 100.00Rural 95.13 4.87 0.00 0.00 100.00

Pishin 93.36 6.47 0.17 0.00 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 92.81 7.01 0.18 0.00 100.00

Killa Abdullah 88.40 11.27 0.07 0.25 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 87.02 12.61 0.08 0.29 100.00

Chagai 26.79 55.58 16.12 1.50 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 19.73 60.94 17.68 1.65 100.00

Nushki 87.16 12.84 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 83.90 16.10 0.00 0.00 100.00

Loralai 70.45 27.35 0.00 2.20 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 65.31 32.10 0.00 2.59 100.00

Barkhan 53.44 46.56 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 46.61 53.39 0.00 0.00 100.00

Musa Khel 60.15 27.86 0.00 11.99 100.00Urban 98.74 1.26 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 50.06 34.81 0.00 15.13 100.00

Killa Saifullah 87.68 12.32 0.00 0.00 0.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 83.17 16.83 0.00 0.00 0.00

Zhob 89.03 10.97 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 85.31 14.69 0.00 0.00 100.00

Sheerani 72.41 2.20 24.94 0.44 100.00Urban - - - - -Rural 72.41 2.20 24.94 0.44 100.00

Sibi 70.84 20.55 8.39 0.22 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 55.54 31.33 12.79 0.34 100.00

410

Page 432: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.7: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY FUEL USED FOR LIGHTING

ELECTRICITY GAS/OILWOOD

&CANDLE OTHER TOTAL

FUEL USED FOR LIGHTINGPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Harnai 47.62 51.65 0.00 0.72 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 43.27 55.94 0.00 0.79 100.00

Ziarat 82.30 17.70 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 80.90 19.10 0.00 0.00 100.00

Kohlu 70.48 28.55 0.97 0.00 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 66.32 32.57 1.10 0.00 100.00

Dera Bugti 76.36 15.53 8.11 0.00 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 74.41 16.82 8.78 0.00 100.00

Kachhi( Bolan) 90.54 9.46 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 88.34 11.66 0.00 0.00 100.00

Jaffarabad 98.04 1.39 0.57 0.00 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 97.41 1.84 0.75 0.00 100.00

Nasirabad 83.28 12.21 0.74 3.77 100.00Urban 98.32 1.68 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 77.60 16.19 1.02 5.20 100.00

Jhal Magsi 73.36 25.39 1.03 0.22 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 72.20 26.49 1.07 0.23 100.00

Kalat 95.00 1.11 3.89 0.00 100.00Urban 95.75 4.25 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 94.82 0.38 4.80 0.00 100.00

Mastung 81.83 1.19 11.18 5.81 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 75.49 1.60 15.07 7.83 100.00

Khuzdar 72.88 23.56 2.22 1.35 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 60.38 34.41 3.24 1.97 100.00

Awaran 40.85 46.96 7.32 4.88 100.00Urban - - - - -Rural 40.85 46.96 7.32 4.88 100.00

411

Page 433: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.7: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY FUEL USED FOR LIGHTING

ELECTRICITY GAS/OILWOOD

&CANDLE OTHER TOTAL

FUEL USED FOR LIGHTINGPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Kharan 77.59 13.67 0.00 8.74 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 67.48 19.83 0.00 12.68 100.00

Washuk 55.46 30.37 3.87 10.30 100.00Urban - - - - -Rural 55.46 30.37 3.87 10.30 100.00

Lasbela 58.98 24.33 12.03 4.66 100.00Urban 86.53 13.47 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 42.91 30.67 19.04 7.37 100.00

Gwadar 89.05 10.95 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 75.59 24.41 0.00 0.00 100.00

NOTES:

1. The Panjgur and Kech districts has been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.2. From the year 2014-15 Wood is also included with Candle as source of lightning.3. Total may not add to 100 because of rounding.

412

Page 434: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.8: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY FUEL USED FOR COOKING

GAS WOOD/STICKS OIL OTHER TOTAL

Pakistan 41.34 51.17 0.08 7.42 100.00Urban 84.84 13.30 0.07 1.79 100.00Rural 15.83 73.37 0.08 10.72 100.00

Punjab 38.80 51.06 0.07 10.07 100.00Urban 82.38 15.01 0.08 2.53 100.00Rural 16.94 69.14 0.06 13.86 100.00

Islamabad 86.90 12.97 0.06 0.08 100.00Urban 95.19 4.81 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 69.86 29.72 0.17 0.25 100.00

Attock 46.65 52.55 0.11 0.69 100.00Urban 97.24 2.76 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 26.64 72.25 0.15 0.97 100.00

Rawalpindi 68.20 31.40 0.22 0.18 100.00Urban 99.55 0.00 0.45 0.00 100.00Rural 38.08 61.56 0.00 0.36 100.00

Jehlum 42.72 56.31 0.00 0.96 100.00Urban 80.78 17.37 0.00 1.85 100.00Rural 27.01 72.40 0.00 0.60 100.00

Chakwal 27.48 70.90 0.15 1.47 100.00Urban 93.59 6.41 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 17.62 80.51 0.18 1.69 100.00

Sargodha 37.31 62.11 0.30 0.29 100.00Urban 83.63 15.68 0.69 0.00 100.00Rural 12.61 86.86 0.09 0.45 100.00

Bhakkar 4.64 95.13 0.09 0.14 100.00Urban 23.32 76.68 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 0.60 99.12 0.11 0.17 100.00

Khushab 14.98 84.29 0.11 0.62 100.00Urban 45.18 53.97 0.00 0.85 100.00Rural 1.77 97.54 0.16 0.53 100.00

Mianwali 10.49 88.57 0.00 0.94 100.00Urban 43.86 56.14 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 1.47 97.33 0.00 1.19 100.00

Faisalabad 54.72 39.43 0.00 5.85 100.00Urban 86.56 11.75 0.00 1.69 100.00Rural 27.95 62.71 0.00 9.34 100.00

Chiniot 27.01 58.39 0.09 14.50 100.00Urban 79.58 19.84 0.00 0.59 100.00Rural 0.54 77.81 0.14 21.51 100.00

FUEL USED FOR COOKINGPROVINCE & DISTRICT

413

Page 435: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.8: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY FUEL USED FOR COOKING

GAS WOOD/STICKS OIL OTHER TOTAL

FUEL USED FOR COOKINGPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Jhang 17.20 69.93 0.16 12.71 100.00Urban 70.19 28.92 0.00 0.88 100.00Rural 2.01 81.68 0.21 16.10 100.00

Toba Tek Singh 22.39 64.41 0.00 13.20 100.00Urban 84.89 12.58 0.00 2.53 100.00Rural 6.05 77.96 0.00 15.99 100.00

Gujranwala 72.23 8.27 0.00 19.50 100.00Urban 93.61 3.61 0.00 2.79 100.00Rural 46.86 13.80 0.00 39.34 100.00

Hafizabad 47.91 13.06 0.26 38.76 100.00Urban 79.01 9.58 0.00 11.41 100.00Rural 33.34 14.70 0.39 51.58 100.00

Gujrat 50.37 19.21 0.00 30.42 100.00Urban 93.47 2.17 0.00 4.36 100.00Rural 34.59 25.45 0.00 39.96 100.00

Mandi Bahauddin 23.00 55.00 0.10 21.90 100.00Urban 83.23 13.46 0.00 3.31 100.00Rural 9.74 64.15 0.13 25.99 100.00

Sialkot 56.84 5.80 0.11 37.25 100.00Urban 95.51 2.70 0.00 1.79 100.00Rural 41.86 7.00 0.15 50.99 100.00

Narowal 7.51 20.96 0.12 71.41 100.00Urban 31.91 40.88 0.00 27.22 100.00Rural 2.32 16.73 0.14 80.80 100.00

Lahore 91.51 3.89 0.00 4.60 100.00Urban 95.20 2.55 0.00 2.24 100.00Rural 78.68 8.55 0.00 12.77 100.00

Kasur 19.66 49.38 0.00 30.96 100.00Urban 46.51 36.76 0.00 16.73 100.00Rural 10.31 53.77 0.00 35.92 100.00

Sheikhupura 50.04 32.00 0.18 17.78 100.00Urban 85.85 9.24 0.33 4.59 100.00Rural 36.12 40.85 0.12 22.90 100.00

Nankana Sahib 30.27 44.36 0.14 25.23 100.00Urban 78.07 21.93 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 13.04 52.45 0.19 34.32 100.00

Okara 35.84 49.93 0.00 14.24 100.00Urban 81.86 18.14 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 17.86 62.34 0.00 19.80 100.00

414

Page 436: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.8: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY FUEL USED FOR COOKING

GAS WOOD/STICKS OIL OTHER TOTAL

FUEL USED FOR COOKINGPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Sahiwal 25.56 72.96 0.00 1.48 100.00Urban 91.96 8.04 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 10.52 87.66 0.00 1.82 100.00

Pakpattan 8.31 83.18 0.00 8.51 100.00Urban 43.52 54.55 0.00 1.93 100.00Rural 1.86 88.42 0.00 9.72 100.00

Vehari 14.06 74.76 0.13 11.04 100.00Urban 56.85 33.96 0.00 9.19 100.00Rural 4.73 83.66 0.16 11.45 100.00

Multan 49.03 49.33 0.00 1.63 100.00Urban 92.14 6.68 0.00 1.18 100.00Rural 21.10 76.97 0.00 1.93 100.00

Lodhran 12.46 85.72 0.09 1.73 100.00Urban 57.53 34.52 0.00 7.95 100.00Rural 4.51 94.76 0.11 0.63 100.00

Khanewal 23.31 75.80 0.00 0.90 100.00Urban 76.70 22.56 0.00 0.74 100.00Rural 9.74 89.32 0.00 0.94 100.00

D.G Khan 13.00 86.55 0.00 0.45 100.00Urban 79.40 19.22 0.00 1.38 100.00Rural 1.02 98.70 0.00 0.28 100.00

Rajanpur 2.18 97.66 0.17 0.00 100.00Urban 12.07 87.93 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 0.17 99.63 0.20 0.00 100.00

Layyah 7.19 92.81 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 33.77 66.23 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 2.37 97.63 0.00 0.00 100.00

Muzaffargarh 9.02 87.18 0.08 3.72 100.00Urban 48.75 44.48 0.31 6.47 100.00Rural 3.35 93.28 0.05 3.33 100.00

Bahawalpur 18.33 79.79 0.10 1.78 100.00Urban 62.97 34.92 0.27 1.84 100.00Rural 1.05 97.16 0.03 1.75 100.00

Bhawal Nagar 3.77 84.69 0.10 11.44 100.00Urban 17.08 80.26 0.00 2.65 100.00Rural 0.26 85.85 0.12 13.76 100.00

Rahim Yar Khan 16.04 78.24 0.02 5.69 100.00Urban 64.11 33.11 0.00 2.78 100.00Rural 4.87 88.73 0.03 6.37 100.00

415

Page 437: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.8: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY FUEL USED FOR COOKING

GAS WOOD/STICKS OIL OTHER TOTAL

FUEL USED FOR COOKINGPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Sindh 56.34 38.29 0.05 5.33 100.00Urban 90.74 8.29 0.03 0.95 100.00Rural 15.30 74.08 0.07 10.55 100.00

Jacobabad 21.41 36.12 0.11 42.36 100.00Urban 72.22 20.52 0.46 6.79 100.00Rural 4.73 41.24 0.00 54.03 100.00

Kashmore 20.86 55.67 0.06 23.41 100.00Urban 59.15 24.02 0.21 16.62 100.00Rural 3.44 70.07 0.00 26.49 100.00

Shikarpur 28.99 42.54 0.00 28.46 100.00Urban 61.61 19.90 0.00 18.49 100.00Rural 16.47 51.23 0.00 32.29 100.00

Larkana 47.13 32.00 0.31 20.55 100.00Urban 75.52 20.91 0.70 2.87 100.00Rural 24.44 40.86 0.00 34.69 100.00

Shahdadkot 19.79 40.21 0.00 40.00 100.00Urban 74.32 13.63 0.00 12.04 100.00Rural 1.21 49.27 0.00 49.52 100.00

Sukkur 60.64 34.87 0.10 4.39 100.00Urban 84.52 12.35 0.00 3.13 100.00Rural 17.75 75.31 0.29 6.65 100.00

Ghotki 24.79 55.77 0.22 19.22 100.00Urban 73.92 24.69 0.00 1.39 100.00Rural 11.31 64.30 0.28 24.12 100.00

Khairpur 25.83 73.19 0.04 0.94 100.00Urban 54.55 43.48 0.00 1.97 100.00Rural 13.76 85.67 0.06 0.51 100.00

Naushahro Feroze 32.20 58.83 0.00 8.98 100.00Urban 91.98 2.69 0.00 5.32 100.00Rural 15.57 74.44 0.00 9.99 100.00

Shaheed Benazirabad 34.20 64.98 0.43 0.40 100.00Urban 89.95 9.27 0.00 0.78 100.00Rural 15.39 83.77 0.57 0.27 100.00

Dadu 50.85 34.93 0.00 14.21 100.00Urban 96.49 3.51 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 40.54 42.03 0.00 17.43 100.00

Jamshoro 37.38 55.82 0.13 6.68 100.00Urban 79.50 19.38 0.00 1.12 100.00Rural 22.12 69.01 0.17 8.69 100.00

416

Page 438: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.8: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY FUEL USED FOR COOKING

GAS WOOD/STICKS OIL OTHER TOTAL

FUEL USED FOR COOKINGPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Hyderabad 75.89 23.93 0.04 0.14 100.00Urban 88.24 11.71 0.04 0.00 100.00Rural 18.43 80.79 0.00 0.78 100.00

Tando Allah Yar 42.59 57.41 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 80.67 19.33 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 32.78 67.22 0.00 0.00 100.00

Tando Muhammad Khan 21.09 78.19 0.00 0.73 100.00Urban 86.85 11.64 0.00 1.51 100.00Rural 8.10 91.33 0.00 0.57 100.00

Mitiari 32.79 66.86 0.00 0.35 100.00Urban 73.78 24.73 0.00 1.50 100.00Rural 20.19 79.81 0.00 0.00 100.00

Badin 17.10 82.67 0.05 0.18 100.00Urban 63.81 35.80 0.00 0.39 100.00Rural 4.31 95.51 0.06 0.12 100.00

Thatta 13.93 86.07 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 98.24 1.76 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 1.71 98.29 0.00 0.00 100.00

Sujawal 11.57 88.31 0.00 0.12 100.00Urban 80.70 19.30 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 0.71 99.15 0.00 0.14 100.00

Sanghar 23.70 76.22 0.00 0.08 100.00Urban 88.93 11.07 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 6.57 93.33 0.00 0.10 100.00

Mirpur Khas 18.03 81.40 0.00 0.58 100.00Urban 57.69 41.71 0.00 0.60 100.00Rural 3.39 96.04 0.00 0.57 100.00

Umerkot 1.17 97.70 0.00 1.13 100.00Urban 4.91 95.09 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 0.22 98.36 0.00 1.42 100.00

Tharparkar 0.71 99.07 0.07 0.15 100.00Urban 9.36 90.64 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 0.00 99.76 0.08 0.16 100.00

Karachi 97.76 2.24 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 98.61 1.39 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 83.88 16.12 0.00 0.00 100.00

417

Page 439: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.8: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY FUEL USED FOR COOKING

GAS WOOD/STICKS OIL OTHER TOTAL

FUEL USED FOR COOKINGPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 25.87 72.61 0.10 1.43 100.00Urban 80.29 18.73 0.16 0.82 100.00Rural 13.49 84.86 0.09 1.56 100.00

Chitral 0.39 99.61 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 0.44 99.56 0.00 0.00 100.00

Upper Dir 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 100.00

Lower Dir 8.08 91.59 0.00 0.33 100.00Urban 62.75 37.25 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 4.22 95.43 0.00 0.35 100.00

Swat 15.58 82.16 0.20 2.07 100.00Urban 80.18 19.82 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 1.64 95.60 0.24 2.51 100.00

Shangla 0.15 99.68 0.00 0.17 100.00Urban - - - - -Rural 0.15 99.68 0.00 0.17 100.00

Buner 0.10 99.53 0.15 0.23 100.00Urban - - - - -Rural 0.10 99.53 0.15 0.23 100.00

Malakand PA 25.75 72.07 0.00 2.18 100.00Urban 36.29 63.71 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 23.95 73.50 0.00 2.55 100.00

Kohistan 0.07 99.93 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban - - - - -Rural 0.07 99.93 0.00 0.00 100.00

Mansehra 9.65 90.00 0.00 0.35 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 3.42 96.21 0.00 0.37 100.00

Batagram 0.95 98.79 0.26 0.00 100.00Urban - - - - -Rural 0.95 98.79 0.26 0.00 100.00

Abbottabad 29.62 69.85 0.13 0.39 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 14.89 84.48 0.16 0.47 100.00

Haripur 41.10 57.22 0.55 1.13 100.00Urban 59.66 31.55 2.87 5.92 100.00Rural 36.72 63.28 0.00 0.00 100.00

418

Page 440: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.8: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY FUEL USED FOR COOKING

GAS WOOD/STICKS OIL OTHER TOTAL

FUEL USED FOR COOKINGPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Tor Ghar 0.00 99.91 0.00 0.09 100.00Urban - - - - -Rural 0.00 99.91 0.00 0.09 100.00

Mardan 33.55 64.81 0.21 1.43 100.00Urban 72.29 25.15 0.00 2.56 100.00Rural 19.22 79.49 0.29 1.01 100.00

Swabi 20.93 76.77 0.00 2.29 100.00Urban 74.27 25.73 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 10.70 86.57 0.00 2.73 100.00

Charsadda 35.89 62.64 0.00 1.47 100.00Urban 74.80 25.20 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 25.34 72.79 0.00 1.87 100.00

Peshawar 73.32 25.70 0.10 0.88 100.00Urban 95.56 4.17 0.00 0.27 0.00Rural 46.00 52.14 0.23 1.62 100.00

Nowshera 54.90 44.69 0.00 0.42 100.00Urban 75.54 23.08 0.00 1.39 100.00Rural 46.04 53.96 0.00 0.00 100.00

Kohat 36.19 48.67 0.26 14.88 100.00Urban 92.24 6.62 1.15 0.00 100.00Rural 19.39 61.27 0.00 19.34 100.00

Hangu 21.39 78.61 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 49.25 50.75 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 13.79 86.21 0.00 0.00 100.00

Karak 42.76 57.06 0.18 0.00 100.00Urban 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 39.55 60.26 0.19 0.00 100.00

Bannu 12.79 86.91 0.00 0.30 100.00Urban 95.30 0.00 0.00 4.70 100.00Rural 7.11 92.89 0.00 0.00 100.00

Lakki Marwat 9.11 90.89 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 68.60 31.40 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 100.00

D.I Khan 8.20 89.68 0.12 2.00 100.00Urban 52.17 46.42 0.00 1.41 100.00Rural 1.56 96.21 0.14 2.09 100.00

Tank 3.71 95.54 0.00 0.75 100.00Urban 24.18 75.82 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 0.00 99.11 0.00 0.89 100.00

419

Page 441: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.8: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY FUEL USED FOR COOKING

GAS WOOD/STICKS OIL OTHER TOTAL

FUEL USED FOR COOKINGPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Balochistan 24.71 73.14 0.32 1.83 100.00Urban 59.65 37.73 0.39 2.23 100.00Rural 11.65 86.38 0.29 1.68 100.00

Quetta 86.66 12.60 0.00 0.73 100.00Urban 93.09 6.71 0.00 0.19 100.00Rural 77.61 20.90 0.00 1.50 100.00

Pishin 38.08 61.68 0.00 0.24 100.00Urban 87.52 9.36 0.00 3.12 100.00Rural 34.00 66.00 0.00 0.00 100.00

Killa Abdullah 1.50 94.18 0.00 4.32 100.00Urban 12.11 81.98 0.00 5.91 100.00Rural 0.24 95.63 0.00 4.13 100.00

Chagai 2.62 95.70 0.00 1.68 100.00Urban 20.89 72.15 0.00 6.96 100.00Rural 0.86 97.98 0.00 1.17 100.00

Nushki 21.95 69.48 0.00 8.56 100.00Urban 21.82 45.12 0.00 33.06 100.00Rural 21.99 75.67 0.00 2.35 100.00

Loralai 0.00 99.75 0.25 0.00 100.00Urban 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 0.00 99.71 0.29 0.00 100.00

Barkhan 5.85 94.15 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 45.68 54.32 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 100.00

Musa Khel 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 100.00

Killa Saifullah 9.98 89.62 0.39 0.00 0.00Urban 37.00 63.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 0.09 99.37 0.54 0.00 0.00

Zhob 9.31 90.47 0.13 0.09 100.00Urban 35.42 64.58 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 0.45 99.26 0.17 0.12 100.00

Sheerani 0.00 98.94 0.00 1.06 100.00Urban - - - - -Rural 0.00 98.94 0.00 1.06 100.00

Sibi 38.79 61.21 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 88.99 11.01 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 12.46 87.54 0.00 0.00 100.00

420

Page 442: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.8: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY FUEL USED FOR COOKING

GAS WOOD/STICKS OIL OTHER TOTAL

FUEL USED FOR COOKINGPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Harnai 0.00 98.57 0.00 1.43 100.00Urban 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 0.00 98.45 0.00 1.55 100.00

Ziarat 16.93 83.07 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 94.61 5.39 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 10.76 89.24 0.00 0.00 100.00

Kohlu 0.06 99.94 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 0.07 99.93 0.00 0.00 100.00

Dera Bugti 28.64 71.36 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 72.40 27.60 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 25.03 74.97 0.00 0.00 100.00

Kachhi( Bolan) 11.78 88.22 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 61.78 38.22 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 0.13 99.87 0.00 0.00 100.00

Jaffarabad 15.13 82.10 0.00 2.77 100.00Urban 57.29 38.46 0.00 4.25 100.00Rural 1.66 96.05 0.00 2.30 100.00

Nasirabad 19.08 77.53 0.00 3.39 100.00Urban 60.21 32.04 0.00 7.75 100.00Rural 3.55 94.71 0.00 1.74 100.00

Jhal Magsi 0.00 98.92 0.00 1.08 100.00Urban 0.00 88.82 0.00 11.18 100.00Rural 0.00 99.36 0.00 0.64 100.00

Kalat 15.23 84.15 0.30 0.32 100.00Urban 75.48 24.52 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 1.19 98.05 0.37 0.39 100.00

Mastung 24.74 74.58 0.69 0.00 100.00Urban 95.71 4.29 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 0.00 99.07 0.93 0.00 100.00

Khuzdar 6.18 89.07 0.88 3.87 100.00Urban 19.59 73.88 0.00 6.53 100.00Rural 0.00 96.07 1.28 2.65 100.00

Awaran 0.00 97.66 2.34 0.00 100.00Urban - - - - -Rural 0.00 97.66 2.34 0.00 100.00

421

Page 443: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 4.8: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY FUEL USED FOR COOKING

GAS WOOD/STICKS OIL OTHER TOTAL

FUEL USED FOR COOKINGPROVINCE & DISTRICT

Kharan 5.52 74.65 0.00 19.83 100.00Urban 17.75 82.25 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 0.00 71.22 0.00 28.78 100.00

Washuk 2.58 93.85 0.50 3.07 100.00Urban - - - - -Rural 2.58 93.85 0.50 3.07 100.00

Lasbela 21.93 75.81 2.08 0.18 100.00Urban 57.19 37.76 5.05 0.00 100.00Rural 1.36 98.01 0.34 0.29 100.00

Gwadar 4.35 92.58 0.00 3.07 100.00Urban 7.50 88.31 0.00 4.18 100.00Rural 0.48 97.81 0.00 1.71 100.00

NOTES:1. The Panjgur and Kech districts has been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.2. Catagory, Others Include Dung Cake, Electricity, Charcoal and Others.3. Total may not add to 100 because of rounding.

422

Page 444: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Household Perception PSLM 2014-15

5. Household Perception of Economic Situation and Satisfaction by Facilities and Service Use.

5.1 Introduction

Government is giving special emphasis to improve the economic situation of

people by providing different types of facilities/services, it is very important for the

government to have an overview of how the people of the country living in various

districts perceive their wellbeing against the different facilities provided by the

government. This will help the government with necessary information about the priority

sectors to properly address the multifaceted problems and the areas of concern associated

with these sectors. Accordingly the respondents of the survey were asked to give their

perception of their economic situation as well as community improvement and how

effectively services/ facilities were provided to them.

5.2 Perception of Economic Situation

Households were asked to compare their economic situation with last year. (Table

5.1) In response to this question, 44 percent in 2014-15 reported no change as compared

to 43 percent in 2012-13, 37

percent reported worse or

much worse, which remains

stagnant between 2014-15 and

2012-13 and 19 percent

reported better or much better

in 2014-15 as compared to 20

percent in 2012-13. In

Islamabad the households who

reported worse and much

worse situation remains

stagnant at 24 percent during the period 2014-15 and 2012-13. District level position

shows that Bahawalpur with 53 percent, Umerkot and Mirpur Khas with 57 percent,

Figure 5.1: Economic Situation of Household

423

Page 445: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Household Perception PSLM 2014-15

Kohistan with 50 percent Chagai with 63 percent have highest proportion of household

who have replied that economic situation is worse or much worse within their respective

provinces. However, when

asked to compare the

economic situation of the

community where they live,

Percentage of households

who reported worse or much

worse in 2014-15 has

increased to 21 percent from

19 percent in 2012-13, while

62 percent reported no

change in 2014-15, as

compared to 60 percent in 2012-13 and 13 percent reported better or much better in 2014-

15 as compare 16 percent in 2012-13(Table 5.2).

5.3 Satisfaction by Facilities and Service Use

Households were also asked to give opinion about their satisfaction of the use of

Facilities / Services provided by the government (Table 5.3), the denominator includes

only those household who are using the facility. It is observed that overall satisfaction of

the services used is increased

for all facilities, 57 percent of

the household were satisfied

from Government Basic

health facility in 2014-15 as

compared to 53 percent in

2012-13, 83 percent of the

household were satisfied with

the Family Planning Service

as compared to 76 percent in

2012-13, 94 percent

Figure 5.3: Satisfaction by Facilities and Services use

Figure 5.2: Economic Situation of Community

424

Page 446: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Household Perception PSLM 2014-15

household were satisfied with Schools as compared to 93 percent in 2012-13, 71 percent

of household were satisfied with Veterinary Services as compared to 62 percent in 2012-

13, 69 percent of household with Agriculture Extension as compared to 62 percent in

2012-13 and Satisfaction with Police service remains stagnant at 48 percent during the

period.

It is observed that in Punjab satisfaction increased in almost all services but

satisfaction from Police remains stagnant. In Sindh Satisfaction from services of Family

Planning, Veterinary and Agriculture increased but there is decline in satisfaction from

services of Basic Health Unit & Police. In KP there is increase in satisfaction in all

services but there is marginal decline in satisfaction from School services. In Balochistan

there is increase in satisfaction from services like Family Planning, School, Veterinary

and Agriculture, while satisfaction from services of BHU marginally declined and

satisfaction from services of police remain stagnant.

425

Page 447: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 5.1:PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY THE PERCEPTION OF THE ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE HOUSEHOLD COMPARED TO THE YEAR BEFORE

MUCH WORSE WORSE SAME BETTER MUCH

BETTERDON'T KNOW TOTAL

Pakistan 7.24 29.59 44.08 16.48 2.39 0.22 100.00Urban 6.58 30.98 44.20 15.05 2.81 0.38 100.00Rural 7.62 28.77 44.02 17.32 2.15 0.12 100.00

Punjab 6.58 31.02 42.57 17.60 2.14 0.09 100.00Urban 6.86 34.09 39.93 16.51 2.43 0.19 100.00Rural 6.43 29.48 43.89 18.15 2.00 0.04 100.00

Islamabad 3.28 21.03 49.97 21.97 3.75 0.00 100.00Urban 2.03 14.27 54.49 23.76 5.46 0.00 100.00Rural 5.86 34.93 40.70 18.28 0.23 0.00 100.00

Attock 5.83 29.36 49.96 14.14 0.71 0.00 100.00Urban 6.91 31.30 39.32 22.46 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 5.40 28.60 54.17 10.84 0.99 0.00 100.00

Rawalpindi 10.43 37.52 42.50 8.98 0.43 0.14 100.00Urban 7.03 41.11 42.93 8.18 0.46 0.28 100.00Rural 13.69 34.06 42.10 9.75 0.41 0.00 100.00

Jehlum 4.81 29.72 55.31 8.86 1.31 0.00 100.00Urban 6.01 40.91 42.27 9.69 1.12 0.00 100.00Rural 4.31 25.09 60.70 8.51 1.39 0.00 100.00

Chakwal 7.52 38.28 43.29 10.65 0.25 0.00 100.00Urban 12.20 27.41 48.41 11.98 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 6.82 39.90 42.53 10.45 0.29 0.00 100.00

Sargodha 17.21 26.32 36.75 15.97 3.75 0.00 100.00Urban 13.88 27.27 31.09 21.67 6.09 0.00 100.00Rural 18.99 25.82 39.76 12.93 2.50 0.00 100.00

Bhakkar 19.13 29.41 34.83 13.74 2.89 0.00 100.00Urban 30.14 31.03 24.66 11.05 3.11 0.00 100.00Rural 16.75 29.06 37.03 14.32 2.85 0.00 100.00

Khushab 14.17 28.29 38.34 13.47 5.65 0.10 100.00Urban 15.65 35.21 24.26 15.91 8.97 0.00 100.00Rural 13.52 25.26 44.49 12.40 4.19 0.14 100.00

Mianwali 18.57 22.76 38.91 16.24 3.52 0.00 100.00Urban 16.12 19.90 39.25 20.02 4.71 0.00 100.00Rural 19.23 23.54 38.82 15.22 3.19 0.00 100.00

Faisalabad 6.71 35.03 41.42 15.93 0.90 0.00 100.00Urban 6.83 34.82 40.78 16.05 1.53 0.00 100.00Rural 6.61 35.22 41.96 15.84 0.37 0.00 100.00

Chiniot 3.88 36.16 45.44 13.77 0.58 0.17 100.00Urban 5.16 33.76 46.29 12.57 1.73 0.50 100.00Rural 3.24 37.37 45.01 14.37 0.00 0.00 100.00

PROVINCE & DISTRICT ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE HOUSEHOLD

426

Page 448: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 5.1:PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY THE PERCEPTION OF THE ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE HOUSEHOLD COMPARED TO THE YEAR BEFORE

MUCH WORSE WORSE SAME BETTER MUCH

BETTERDON'T KNOW TOTAL

PROVINCE & DISTRICT ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE HOUSEHOLD

Jhang 11.72 33.37 36.48 15.20 3.23 0.00 100.00Urban 13.84 29.73 38.62 14.33 3.47 0.00 100.00Rural 11.12 34.42 35.87 15.45 3.15 0.00 100.00

Toba Tek Singh 7.27 28.78 44.28 13.04 6.64 0.00 100.00Urban 14.58 33.66 33.70 6.21 11.84 0.00 100.00Rural 5.35 27.50 47.04 14.82 5.28 0.00 100.00

Gujranwala 9.26 37.24 42.00 10.46 0.89 0.15 100.00Urban 8.40 36.38 45.04 8.74 1.16 0.27 100.00Rural 10.29 38.27 38.38 12.49 0.57 0.00 100.00

Hafizabad 9.76 42.29 27.81 19.21 0.93 0.00 100.00Urban 10.01 42.16 31.74 15.05 1.03 0.00 100.00Rural 9.64 42.35 25.97 21.16 0.88 0.00 100.00

Gujrat 5.66 40.42 46.83 6.37 0.72 0.00 100.00Urban 9.19 31.59 45.71 13.51 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 4.36 43.65 47.25 3.76 0.99 0.00 100.00

Mandi Bahauddin 4.31 25.98 62.21 7.33 0.18 0.00 100.00Urban 6.51 24.82 50.68 17.01 0.98 0.00 100.00Rural 3.83 26.23 64.74 5.20 0.00 0.00 100.00

Sialkot 0.88 23.74 33.91 29.39 11.81 0.26 100.00Urban 0.19 26.48 38.80 26.53 7.63 0.37 100.00Rural 1.15 22.69 32.02 30.50 13.43 0.22 100.00

Narowal 4.15 37.22 32.15 23.44 2.89 0.15 100.00Urban 0.00 37.71 40.09 19.74 2.47 0.00 100.00Rural 5.03 37.11 30.47 24.22 2.98 0.18 100.00

Lahore 5.05 35.93 36.38 21.82 0.65 0.17 100.00Urban 5.58 37.82 37.57 17.97 0.84 0.22 100.00Rural 3.19 29.34 32.25 35.22 0.00 0.00 100.00

Kasur 6.32 34.89 29.44 28.86 0.39 0.11 100.00Urban 11.14 41.36 27.33 20.17 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 4.64 32.64 30.17 31.88 0.53 0.14 100.00

Sheikhupura 3.22 31.86 49.84 13.98 1.01 0.08 100.00Urban 6.01 35.68 36.77 18.23 3.04 0.28 100.00Rural 2.14 30.38 54.92 12.33 0.23 0.00 100.00

Nankana Sahib 3.52 28.11 47.39 18.34 0.92 1.72 100.00Urban 4.46 32.11 34.96 18.52 3.46 6.49 100.00Rural 3.18 26.67 51.87 18.28 0.00 0.00 100.00

Okara 0.40 9.88 51.62 35.42 2.68 0.00 100.00Urban 0.00 14.81 53.90 24.37 6.92 0.00 100.00Rural 0.56 7.96 50.73 39.73 1.02 0.00 100.00

427

Page 449: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 5.1:PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY THE PERCEPTION OF THE ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE HOUSEHOLD COMPARED TO THE YEAR BEFORE

MUCH WORSE WORSE SAME BETTER MUCH

BETTERDON'T KNOW TOTAL

PROVINCE & DISTRICT ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE HOUSEHOLD

Sahiwal 0.27 13.27 51.46 26.68 7.71 0.62 100.00Urban 1.08 13.86 49.90 25.68 9.48 0.00 100.00Rural 0.08 13.13 51.81 26.91 7.30 0.76 100.00

Pakpattan 0.47 20.89 50.89 22.85 4.69 0.21 100.00Urban 1.22 26.75 40.69 25.10 6.25 0.00 100.00Rural 0.34 19.81 52.76 22.44 4.41 0.25 100.00

Vehari 1.00 27.44 54.34 16.63 0.59 0.00 100.00Urban 2.11 46.60 35.65 14.34 1.30 0.00 100.00Rural 0.75 23.25 58.42 17.14 0.44 0.00 100.00

Multan 4.76 32.67 45.40 16.50 0.63 0.05 100.00Urban 6.26 33.77 42.28 16.79 0.76 0.13 100.00Rural 3.78 31.95 47.42 16.31 0.54 0.00 100.00

Lodhran 4.39 31.12 46.67 17.58 0.24 0.00 100.00Urban 7.93 29.74 52.63 9.70 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 3.77 31.36 45.61 18.97 0.28 0.00 100.00

Khanewal 3.26 30.21 51.41 14.22 0.91 0.00 100.00Urban 4.31 32.76 43.23 17.47 2.23 0.00 100.00Rural 2.99 29.56 53.48 13.39 0.57 0.00 100.00

D.G Khan 2.91 18.07 43.04 27.87 8.11 0.00 100.00Urban 3.41 17.13 33.60 30.50 15.36 0.00 100.00Rural 2.82 18.24 44.74 27.39 6.81 0.00 100.00

Rajanpur 9.83 23.55 47.02 16.17 3.44 0.00 100.00Urban 15.26 29.79 40.70 10.04 4.21 0.00 100.00Rural 8.72 22.28 48.30 17.42 3.28 0.00 100.00

Layyah 0.59 19.31 56.33 20.57 3.20 0.00 100.00Urban 1.83 22.36 32.82 25.07 17.92 0.00 100.00Rural 0.37 18.76 60.59 19.75 0.53 0.00 100.00

Muzaffargarh 11.78 35.90 41.29 10.77 0.26 0.00 100.00Urban 9.35 29.88 43.01 16.85 0.91 0.00 100.00Rural 12.12 36.76 41.04 9.90 0.17 0.00 100.00

Bahawalpur 15.44 37.12 35.76 10.81 0.84 0.03 100.00Urban 11.24 40.25 35.43 12.46 0.62 0.00 100.00Rural 17.07 35.91 35.89 10.17 0.92 0.04 100.00

Bhawal Nagar 3.42 35.00 34.38 24.82 2.37 0.00 100.00Urban 4.26 43.97 28.27 19.40 4.09 0.00 100.00Rural 3.20 32.63 35.99 26.25 1.92 0.00 100.00

Rahim Yar Khan 5.37 30.32 42.05 20.42 1.84 0.00 100.00Urban 6.05 34.96 43.38 14.23 1.37 0.00 100.00Rural 5.21 29.24 41.74 21.86 1.95 0.00 100.00

428

Page 450: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 5.1:PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY THE PERCEPTION OF THE ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE HOUSEHOLD COMPARED TO THE YEAR BEFORE

MUCH WORSE WORSE SAME BETTER MUCH

BETTERDON'T KNOW TOTAL

PROVINCE & DISTRICT ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE HOUSEHOLD

Sindh 5.98 29.40 49.41 12.79 1.92 0.49 100.00Urban 5.19 28.65 50.70 12.13 2.62 0.71 100.00Rural 6.92 30.29 47.88 13.59 1.09 0.24 100.00

Jacobabad 1.46 30.84 55.41 12.18 0.11 0.00 100.00Urban 3.25 22.79 38.66 34.86 0.44 0.00 100.00Rural 0.87 33.48 60.91 4.74 0.00 0.00 100.00

Kashmore 0.52 7.72 79.55 11.34 0.87 0.00 100.00Urban 1.67 10.80 61.21 24.19 2.12 0.00 100.00Rural 0.00 6.31 87.90 5.49 0.30 0.00 100.00

Shikarpur 1.46 34.78 48.15 15.43 0.18 0.00 100.00Urban 1.45 38.61 45.40 14.13 0.41 0.00 100.00Rural 1.46 33.31 49.21 15.93 0.10 0.00 100.00

Larkana 4.39 27.57 50.40 15.22 2.43 0.00 100.00Urban 1.29 31.47 55.19 10.61 1.44 0.00 100.00Rural 6.86 24.45 46.57 18.91 3.22 0.00 100.00

Shahdadkot 9.46 32.50 47.56 8.81 1.68 0.00 100.00Urban 1.58 36.36 55.28 5.27 1.52 0.00 100.00Rural 12.15 31.18 44.93 10.01 1.73 0.00 100.00

Sukkur 2.77 27.66 56.15 13.00 0.43 0.00 100.00Urban 3.22 25.69 55.52 15.16 0.41 0.00 100.00Rural 1.95 31.20 57.27 9.12 0.46 0.00 100.00

Ghotki 1.38 24.92 61.38 12.26 0.06 0.00 100.00Urban 0.84 32.76 51.76 14.64 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 1.53 22.73 64.07 11.59 0.08 0.00 100.00

Khairpur 25.55 8.28 38.96 25.05 2.09 0.06 100.00Urban 26.39 6.52 33.31 31.84 1.94 0.00 100.00Rural 25.20 9.02 41.34 22.20 2.15 0.09 100.00

Naushahro Feroze 4.44 22.83 42.15 27.21 2.79 0.58 100.00Urban 0.99 26.04 48.33 17.51 7.13 0.00 100.00Rural 5.40 21.94 40.43 29.91 1.58 0.74 100.00

Shaheed Benazirabad 0.17 21.73 65.03 12.44 0.63 0.00 100.00Urban 0.00 25.70 61.57 12.05 0.68 0.00 100.00Rural 0.23 20.39 66.19 12.57 0.61 0.00 100.00

Dadu 7.63 29.11 32.66 27.39 3.21 0.00 100.00Urban 3.78 18.87 38.47 30.76 8.12 0.00 100.00Rural 8.50 31.42 31.35 26.63 2.10 0.00 100.00

Jamshoro 4.12 27.10 52.90 14.52 1.36 0.00 100.00Urban 2.88 19.10 54.96 19.92 3.14 0.00 100.00Rural 4.57 30.00 52.16 12.56 0.72 0.00 100.00

429

Page 451: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 5.1:PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY THE PERCEPTION OF THE ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE HOUSEHOLD COMPARED TO THE YEAR BEFORE

MUCH WORSE WORSE SAME BETTER MUCH

BETTERDON'T KNOW TOTAL

PROVINCE & DISTRICT ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE HOUSEHOLD

Hyderabad 1.13 19.67 58.31 18.68 2.21 0.00 100.00Urban 1.16 19.15 58.03 19.11 2.54 0.00 100.00Rural 0.95 22.08 59.66 16.67 0.64 0.00 100.00

Tando Allah Yar 0.95 21.38 62.60 12.38 2.69 0.00 100.00Urban 1.17 19.75 48.73 24.36 5.98 0.00 100.00Rural 0.89 21.80 66.17 9.30 1.84 0.00 100.00

Tando Muhammad Khan 4.27 37.00 49.30 8.25 1.00 0.19 100.00Urban 6.80 19.79 51.13 16.61 5.67 0.00 100.00Rural 3.77 40.40 48.93 6.60 0.08 0.22 100.00

Mitiari 2.21 20.63 63.45 11.78 1.92 0.00 100.00Urban 4.66 23.87 52.16 17.33 1.97 0.00 100.00Rural 1.46 19.64 66.92 10.07 1.90 0.00 100.00

Badin 3.19 35.82 49.90 10.32 0.78 0.00 100.00Urban 3.23 19.33 68.21 9.23 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 3.18 40.33 44.88 10.61 0.99 0.00 100.00

Thatta 4.54 43.56 37.76 9.25 2.65 2.25 100.00Urban 0.00 46.76 33.26 19.99 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 5.19 43.10 38.41 7.69 3.03 2.58 100.00

Sujawal 11.91 41.97 36.24 6.94 2.03 0.91 100.00Urban 18.01 32.75 44.54 4.70 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 10.96 43.42 34.94 7.29 2.35 1.05 100.00

Sanghar 0.27 29.48 54.80 14.67 0.79 0.00 100.00Urban 0.54 51.31 26.16 20.32 1.66 0.00 100.00Rural 0.19 23.74 62.33 13.18 0.56 0.00 100.00

Mirpur Khas 14.04 43.05 29.12 12.96 0.75 0.08 100.00Urban 3.28 27.80 41.54 25.60 1.78 0.00 100.00Rural 18.01 48.68 24.54 8.30 0.36 0.11 100.00

Umerkot 14.66 42.37 29.53 13.23 0.22 0.00 100.00Urban 13.06 41.61 33.82 11.16 0.35 0.00 100.00Rural 15.06 42.56 28.45 13.75 0.18 0.00 100.00

Tharparkar 3.36 30.58 44.09 20.00 1.06 0.91 100.00Urban 3.86 25.38 45.22 24.37 1.17 0.00 100.00Rural 3.32 31.01 44.00 19.64 1.05 0.98 100.00

Karachi 6.45 32.28 49.30 8.19 2.76 1.02 100.00Urban 5.85 30.82 50.69 8.62 2.93 1.08 100.00Rural 16.15 56.07 26.68 1.10 0.00 0.00 100.00

430

Page 452: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 5.1:PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY THE PERCEPTION OF THE ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE HOUSEHOLD COMPARED TO THE YEAR BEFORE

MUCH WORSE WORSE SAME BETTER MUCH

BETTERDON'T KNOW TOTAL

PROVINCE & DISTRICT ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE HOUSEHOLD

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 11.69 25.70 38.04 19.48 4.88 0.22 100.00Urban 13.05 24.78 35.03 19.64 7.44 0.06 100.00Rural 11.37 25.91 38.73 19.44 4.29 0.25 100.00

Chitral 6.23 32.07 28.81 31.72 0.90 0.28 100.00Urban 0.00 4.41 31.95 63.64 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 6.86 34.90 28.49 28.45 0.99 0.31 100.00

Upper Dir 17.83 28.87 36.13 16.29 0.88 0.00 100.00Urban 0.00 4.22 79.22 16.55 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 18.59 29.93 34.28 16.28 0.92 0.00 100.00

Lower Dir 6.86 23.53 39.96 26.87 2.21 0.56 100.00Urban 13.55 6.77 39.84 39.84 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 6.39 24.72 39.97 25.95 2.36 0.60 100.00

Swat 17.17 27.07 36.52 15.95 3.03 0.27 100.00Urban 36.56 17.91 31.55 13.98 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 12.99 29.04 37.59 16.37 3.68 0.32 100.00

Shangla 5.54 27.80 29.50 32.05 0.32 4.79 100.00Urban - - - - - - -Rural 5.54 27.80 29.50 32.05 0.32 4.79 100.00

Buner 23.75 25.32 31.94 13.19 5.79 0.00 100.00Urban - - - - - - -Rural 23.75 25.32 31.94 13.19 5.79 0.00 100.00

Malakand PA 20.11 20.02 34.39 17.84 7.65 0.00 100.00Urban 48.73 29.48 17.55 2.91 1.33 0.00 100.00Rural 15.19 18.39 37.28 20.40 8.73 0.00 100.00

Kohistan 23.76 25.90 30.71 18.10 1.48 0.05 100.00Urban - - - - - - -Rural 23.76 25.90 30.71 18.10 1.48 0.05 100.00

Mansehra 8.05 22.66 50.04 12.96 6.29 0.00 100.00Urban 0.00 12.86 39.43 34.42 13.29 0.00 100.00Rural 8.61 23.34 50.77 11.48 5.81 0.00 100.00

Batagram 3.55 24.29 38.83 31.88 1.46 0.00 100.00Urban - - - - - - -Rural 3.55 24.29 38.83 31.88 1.46 0.00 100.00

Abbottabad 5.98 20.94 52.62 16.08 4.37 0.00 100.00Urban 9.40 26.62 33.07 26.92 3.99 0.00 100.00Rural 5.27 19.75 56.71 13.81 4.45 0.00 100.00

Haripur 5.00 28.29 34.97 28.22 3.52 0.00 100.00Urban 2.96 27.78 36.83 32.43 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 5.48 28.41 34.53 27.23 4.35 0.00 100.00

431

Page 453: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 5.1:PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY THE PERCEPTION OF THE ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE HOUSEHOLD COMPARED TO THE YEAR BEFORE

MUCH WORSE WORSE SAME BETTER MUCH

BETTERDON'T KNOW TOTAL

PROVINCE & DISTRICT ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE HOUSEHOLD

Tor Ghar 0.73 35.51 44.43 18.73 0.60 0.00 100.00Urban - - - - - - -Rural 0.73 35.51 44.43 18.73 0.60 0.00 100.00

Mardan 15.33 26.09 30.13 20.30 8.15 0.00 100.00Urban 18.42 33.50 22.44 17.97 7.67 0.00 100.00Rural 14.19 23.35 32.98 21.17 8.32 0.00 100.00

Swabi 13.97 26.75 45.22 9.99 3.50 0.58 100.00Urban 5.67 35.64 38.04 9.13 11.52 0.00 100.00Rural 15.57 25.04 46.59 10.16 1.96 0.69 100.00

Charsadda 13.28 21.97 37.07 18.71 8.97 0.00 100.00Urban 8.42 12.43 28.24 27.66 23.25 0.00 100.00Rural 14.60 24.56 39.47 16.28 5.10 0.00 100.00

Peshawar 12.79 25.28 37.54 17.04 7.34 0.00 100.00Urban 12.51 23.48 41.47 16.08 6.46 0.00 100.00Rural 13.12 27.50 32.72 18.23 8.43 0.00 100.00

Nowshera 12.86 31.99 35.27 10.81 9.08 0.00 100.00Urban 6.63 34.85 34.72 16.48 7.32 0.00 100.00Rural 15.54 30.75 35.51 8.37 9.83 0.00 100.00

Kohat 14.98 22.21 34.74 19.43 8.64 0.00 100.00Urban 9.52 20.35 37.94 19.68 12.51 0.00 100.00Rural 16.62 22.76 33.78 19.36 7.48 0.00 100.00

Hangu 21.62 23.35 33.00 14.46 7.35 0.21 100.00Urban 12.98 25.44 26.39 20.88 13.31 1.00 100.00Rural 23.98 22.77 34.81 12.71 5.72 0.00 100.00

Karak 7.82 31.86 35.99 23.78 0.54 0.00 100.00Urban 8.55 33.33 32.89 25.22 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 7.78 31.78 36.17 23.70 0.57 0.00 100.00

Bannu 1.81 27.93 35.98 30.34 3.94 0.00 100.00Urban 0.00 40.75 31.97 22.88 4.39 0.00 100.00Rural 1.93 27.05 36.26 30.85 3.91 0.00 100.00

Lakki Marwat 6.43 27.84 32.32 31.55 1.49 0.38 100.00Urban 10.71 30.68 17.23 30.50 8.02 2.86 100.00Rural 5.77 27.41 34.63 31.71 0.49 0.00 100.00

D.I Khan 8.43 23.10 41.60 22.51 4.16 0.20 100.00Urban 8.49 17.04 37.52 23.79 13.15 0.00 100.00Rural 8.42 24.02 42.22 22.32 2.80 0.23 100.00

Tank 7.75 23.36 43.27 23.85 1.77 0.00 100.00Urban 14.04 29.78 35.83 15.69 4.66 0.00 100.00Rural 6.61 22.19 44.62 25.33 1.25 0.00 100.00

432

Page 454: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 5.1:PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY THE PERCEPTION OF THE ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE HOUSEHOLD COMPARED TO THE YEAR BEFORE

MUCH WORSE WORSE SAME BETTER MUCH

BETTERDON'T KNOW TOTAL

PROVINCE & DISTRICT ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE HOUSEHOLD

Balochistan 11.49 22.51 48.05 16.09 1.72 0.15 100.00Urban 6.96 20.82 50.59 19.00 2.49 0.13 100.00Rural 13.18 23.14 47.11 14.99 1.43 0.16 100.00

Quetta 8.42 36.30 41.02 11.99 2.27 0.00 100.00Urban 9.98 28.14 42.84 15.74 3.29 0.00 100.00Rural 6.22 47.79 38.46 6.70 0.83 0.00 100.00

Pishin 10.60 19.69 45.98 22.31 1.30 0.13 100.00Urban 5.69 20.18 35.23 38.90 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 11.00 19.65 46.86 20.94 1.41 0.14 100.00

Killa Abdullah 24.33 12.65 34.78 27.76 0.47 0.00 100.00Urban 7.44 11.22 51.68 29.67 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 26.34 12.83 32.77 27.54 0.53 0.00 100.00

Chagai 19.88 43.07 34.02 3.03 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 0.00 32.11 57.44 10.44 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 21.80 44.13 31.76 2.32 0.00 0.00 100.00

Nushki 6.13 34.42 44.03 13.26 2.16 0.00 100.00Urban 3.89 46.20 41.24 6.57 2.10 0.00 100.00Rural 6.70 31.43 44.74 14.96 2.18 0.00 100.00

Loralai 0.36 3.69 44.07 34.00 17.88 0.00 100.00Urban 2.42 14.54 42.57 22.54 17.93 0.00 100.00Rural 0.00 1.81 44.33 35.99 17.87 0.00 100.00

Barkhan 1.53 24.20 64.97 8.25 1.06 0.00 100.00Urban 0.00 12.90 68.83 18.27 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 1.75 25.85 64.40 6.78 1.22 0.00 100.00

Musa Khel 0.07 4.67 51.45 38.98 4.83 0.00 100.00Urban 0.00 4.08 58.32 31.00 6.60 0.00 100.00Rural 0.09 4.83 49.65 41.07 4.36 0.00 100.00

Killa Saifullah 0.70 16.48 51.99 30.34 0.10 0.39 100.00Urban 2.14 14.70 49.93 31.80 0.00 1.44 100.00Rural 0.18 17.14 52.75 29.80 0.13 0.00 100.00

Zhob 0.98 18.48 61.71 17.24 1.59 0.00 100.00Urban 3.56 12.23 56.50 27.72 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 0.11 20.60 63.48 13.69 2.13 0.00 100.00

Sheerani 16.60 36.17 41.78 5.10 0.00 0.35 100.00Urban - - - - - - -Rural 16.60 36.17 41.78 5.10 0.00 0.35 100.00

Sibi 23.01 32.42 36.65 6.10 1.36 0.46 100.00Urban 6.13 37.39 39.89 12.64 3.95 0.00 100.00Rural 31.86 29.82 34.94 2.68 0.00 0.70 100.00

433

Page 455: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 5.1:PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY THE PERCEPTION OF THE ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE HOUSEHOLD COMPARED TO THE YEAR BEFORE

MUCH WORSE WORSE SAME BETTER MUCH

BETTERDON'T KNOW TOTAL

PROVINCE & DISTRICT ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE HOUSEHOLD

Harnai 10.85 31.42 44.28 13.01 0.44 0.00 100.00Urban 24.38 23.11 24.33 22.41 5.77 0.00 100.00Rural 9.73 32.11 45.93 12.23 0.00 0.00 100.00

Ziarat 10.20 8.46 51.32 29.53 0.00 0.50 100.00Urban 15.63 0.00 47.17 37.20 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 9.77 9.13 51.65 28.92 0.00 0.54 100.00

Kohlu 20.10 30.12 43.20 6.52 0.06 0.00 100.00Urban 26.63 20.47 27.44 25.45 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 19.18 31.48 45.42 3.85 0.07 0.00 100.00

Dera Bugti 30.95 13.09 19.92 35.38 0.65 0.00 100.00Urban 5.73 32.80 22.13 33.60 5.73 0.00 100.00Rural 33.03 11.47 19.74 35.53 0.23 0.00 100.00

Kachhi( Bolan) 17.80 27.76 49.02 4.14 0.20 1.08 100.00Urban 10.92 31.04 55.17 2.87 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 19.40 26.99 47.59 4.44 0.25 1.33 100.00

Jaffarabad 4.77 10.60 72.91 11.32 0.40 0.00 100.00Urban 1.02 15.50 63.90 18.60 0.97 0.00 100.00Rural 5.97 9.04 75.79 8.99 0.22 0.00 100.00

Nasirabad 0.48 14.40 78.88 6.23 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 1.77 12.08 70.23 15.92 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 0.00 15.28 82.15 2.57 0.00 0.00 100.00

Jhal Magsi 6.50 39.59 38.71 10.82 1.43 2.96 100.00Urban 0.00 16.77 60.97 16.67 5.59 0.00 100.00Rural 6.78 40.58 37.74 10.57 1.25 3.08 100.00

Kalat 14.94 10.35 54.72 19.67 0.32 0.00 100.00Urban 0.00 0.00 87.26 12.74 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 18.42 12.76 47.14 21.29 0.39 0.00 100.00

Mastung 6.80 13.06 59.68 16.93 3.26 0.26 100.00Urban 0.00 0.00 62.37 25.00 12.63 0.00 100.00Rural 9.16 17.61 58.75 14.12 0.00 0.35 100.00

Khuzdar 10.42 17.09 46.73 25.77 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 15.21 24.96 45.22 14.61 0.00 0.00 100.00

Awaran 8.71 33.04 52.31 5.94 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban - - - - - - -Rural 8.71 33.04 52.31 5.94 0.00 0.00 100.00

434

Page 456: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

TABLE 5.1:PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY THE PERCEPTION OF THE ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE HOUSEHOLD COMPARED TO THE YEAR BEFORE

MUCH WORSE WORSE SAME BETTER MUCH

BETTERDON'T KNOW TOTAL

PROVINCE & DISTRICT ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE HOUSEHOLD

Kharan 39.02 19.32 31.44 10.07 0.16 0.00 100.00Urban 20.55 0.00 64.66 14.79 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 47.35 28.03 16.45 7.93 0.24 0.00 100.00

Washuk 9.90 19.56 64.04 5.73 0.76 0.00 100.00Urban - - - - - - -Rural 9.90 19.56 64.04 5.73 0.76 0.00 100.00

Lasbela 27.99 29.60 38.52 2.12 1.38 0.38 100.00Urban 13.20 28.96 47.27 5.77 3.76 1.04 100.00Rural 36.61 29.97 33.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00

Gwadar 4.64 22.83 55.76 16.77 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 4.81 21.93 62.55 10.70 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 4.44 23.94 47.41 24.22 0.00 0.00 100.00NOTES:1. The Panjgur and Kech districts has been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.2. Total may not add to 100 because of rounding.

435

Page 457: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MUCH WORSE WORSE SAME BETTER MUCH

BETTERDON'T KNOW TOTAL

Pakistan 3.58 17.39 61.61 11.10 1.40 4.92 100.00Urban 3.45 18.47 57.87 11.76 1.83 6.61 100.00Rural 3.66 16.76 63.80 10.71 1.14 3.93 100.00

Punjab 2.89 14.38 66.50 11.21 1.29 3.74 100.00Urban 2.81 15.40 60.39 13.97 1.68 5.73 100.00Rural 2.92 13.87 69.56 9.82 1.09 2.73 100.00

Islamabad 3.32 15.65 67.59 6.09 0.88 6.48 100.00Urban 1.30 10.85 71.37 7.26 1.30 7.92 100.00Rural 7.46 25.51 59.82 3.70 0.00 3.51 100.00

Attock 1.55 13.27 67.16 12.16 0.40 5.45 100.00Urban 1.91 17.47 55.99 18.17 1.08 5.39 100.00Rural 1.41 11.61 71.58 9.79 0.13 5.48 100.00

Rawalpindi 2.77 16.91 63.61 11.47 2.01 3.23 100.00Urban 3.40 24.16 54.13 11.82 0.97 5.51 100.00Rural 2.16 9.95 72.71 11.14 3.02 1.03 100.00

Jehlum 2.96 14.58 66.35 13.09 0.26 2.76 100.00Urban 1.00 16.38 63.79 15.20 0.90 2.73 100.00Rural 3.76 13.83 67.41 12.22 0.00 2.78 100.00

Chakwal 1.42 17.13 66.32 9.67 2.47 2.99 100.00Urban 1.94 7.06 67.89 20.12 2.99 0.00 100.00Rural 1.34 18.63 66.08 8.11 2.40 3.44 100.00

Sargodha 8.21 22.54 58.06 6.43 0.87 3.90 100.00Urban 6.26 18.27 56.99 12.57 0.95 4.96 100.00Rural 9.24 24.81 58.62 3.15 0.83 3.34 100.00

Bhakkar 10.70 19.60 44.14 7.59 1.47 16.49 100.00Urban 3.01 21.30 42.92 8.25 0.60 23.92 100.00Rural 12.36 19.24 44.41 7.45 1.66 14.89 100.00

Khushab 10.63 24.12 53.51 7.22 0.61 3.92 100.00Urban 14.84 22.56 50.57 10.15 0.55 1.35 100.00Rural 8.79 24.80 54.79 5.94 0.63 5.04 100.00

Mianwali 10.51 18.44 55.28 6.37 0.82 8.58 100.00Urban 5.09 20.46 54.68 10.97 1.25 7.56 100.00Rural 11.97 17.90 55.45 5.12 0.70 8.86 100.00

Faisalabad 0.91 10.89 72.88 12.60 0.55 2.18 100.00Urban 1.87 9.34 70.80 14.83 1.20 1.95 100.00Rural 0.10 12.20 74.62 10.71 0.00 2.37 100.00

Chiniot 1.81 10.15 77.74 6.25 0.35 3.69 100.00Urban 0.00 5.67 73.74 11.91 1.06 7.62 100.00Rural 2.73 12.41 79.75 3.40 0.00 1.71 100.00

PROVINCE & DISTRICT ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE COMMUNITY

TABLE 5.2: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY THE PERCEPTION OF THE SITUATION OF THE COMMUNITY COMPARED TO YEAR BEFORE THE SURVEY

436

Page 458: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MUCH WORSE WORSE SAME BETTER MUCH

BETTERDON'T KNOW TOTAL

PROVINCE & DISTRICT ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE COMMUNITY

TABLE 5.2: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY THE PERCEPTION OF THE SITUATION OF THE COMMUNITY COMPARED TO YEAR BEFORE THE SURVEY

Jhang 6.18 16.48 73.18 2.36 0.38 1.42 100.00Urban 8.64 7.88 74.25 5.01 1.28 2.94 100.00Rural 5.48 18.94 72.88 1.61 0.12 0.98 100.00

Toba Tek Singh 2.19 12.36 79.80 2.42 1.95 1.28 100.00Urban 7.96 10.24 68.19 2.95 9.09 1.57 100.00Rural 0.68 12.92 82.84 2.28 0.08 1.20 100.00

Gujranwala 1.10 10.05 81.63 6.27 0.00 0.95 100.00Urban 1.86 10.58 79.47 7.08 0.00 1.00 100.00Rural 0.20 9.43 84.20 5.30 0.00 0.88 100.00

Hafizabad 1.02 16.39 75.05 6.75 0.34 0.45 100.00Urban 2.08 15.64 71.46 8.85 1.06 0.90 100.00Rural 0.53 16.75 76.73 5.76 0.00 0.24 100.00

Gujrat 0.00 2.52 93.64 2.92 0.00 0.92 100.00Urban 0.00 5.71 84.67 7.99 0.00 1.63 100.00Rural 0.00 1.35 96.93 1.06 0.00 0.66 100.00

Mandi Bahauddin 0.29 2.67 94.00 2.79 0.13 0.13 100.00Urban 1.59 9.88 75.25 11.84 0.72 0.72 100.00Rural 0.00 1.08 98.12 0.80 0.00 0.00 100.00

Sialkot 1.90 4.36 78.98 12.97 1.74 0.05 100.00Urban 0.99 4.07 79.77 11.85 3.13 0.19 100.00Rural 2.25 4.47 78.67 13.40 1.21 0.00 100.00

Narowal 9.29 15.79 71.84 2.66 0.00 0.43 100.00Urban 0.00 7.23 86.00 6.77 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 11.26 17.60 68.83 1.78 0.00 0.53 100.00

Lahore 1.31 17.21 48.45 21.47 2.05 9.52 100.00Urban 1.55 17.96 49.24 19.78 0.86 10.61 100.00Rural 0.48 14.60 45.72 27.32 6.15 5.74 100.00

Kasur 1.45 46.76 42.55 7.98 0.00 1.26 100.00Urban 4.15 41.33 36.08 15.87 0.00 2.57 100.00Rural 0.51 48.65 44.81 5.24 0.00 0.80 100.00

Sheikhupura 1.07 18.77 67.08 8.31 0.83 3.95 100.00Urban 1.16 24.15 49.20 13.94 0.00 11.54 100.00Rural 1.03 16.67 74.02 6.12 1.15 1.00 100.00

Nankana Sahib 1.12 22.55 62.16 8.60 0.62 4.96 100.00Urban 1.12 22.86 37.11 18.57 2.32 18.01 100.00Rural 1.12 22.43 71.19 5.01 0.00 0.25 100.00

Okara 0.30 2.76 71.22 20.78 3.31 1.64 100.00Urban 0.00 0.00 70.30 23.30 3.57 2.83 100.00Rural 0.41 3.84 71.57 19.80 3.21 1.17 100.00

437

Page 459: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MUCH WORSE WORSE SAME BETTER MUCH

BETTERDON'T KNOW TOTAL

PROVINCE & DISTRICT ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE COMMUNITY

TABLE 5.2: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY THE PERCEPTION OF THE SITUATION OF THE COMMUNITY COMPARED TO YEAR BEFORE THE SURVEY

Sahiwal 0.00 2.27 59.32 25.34 10.24 2.83 100.00Urban 0.00 0.00 51.06 32.17 12.74 4.02 100.00Rural 0.00 2.79 61.19 23.79 9.67 2.56 100.00

Pakpattan 0.00 4.97 57.24 24.83 2.76 10.20 100.00Urban 0.00 0.97 38.92 31.41 2.25 26.45 100.00Rural 0.00 5.70 60.60 23.63 2.86 7.23 100.00

Vehari 0.32 7.00 82.60 6.85 0.40 2.83 100.00Urban 0.00 14.76 72.16 6.05 2.21 4.82 100.00Rural 0.39 5.31 84.88 7.02 0.00 2.40 100.00

Multan 2.77 14.70 62.78 15.56 1.71 2.48 100.00Urban 3.87 17.67 62.88 9.59 4.26 1.74 100.00Rural 2.06 12.78 62.71 19.43 0.05 2.97 100.00

Lodhran 2.88 17.55 59.28 17.06 0.08 3.14 100.00Urban 7.37 17.85 64.11 8.33 0.00 2.34 100.00Rural 2.09 17.49 58.43 18.60 0.10 3.28 100.00

Khanewal 1.92 12.10 67.02 15.15 0.77 3.04 100.00Urban 3.08 12.92 56.66 21.87 3.83 1.65 100.00Rural 1.63 11.89 69.65 13.44 0.00 3.39 100.00

D.G Khan 2.04 8.63 72.02 8.03 3.80 5.49 100.00Urban 6.29 6.95 49.96 22.62 7.94 6.24 100.00Rural 1.27 8.93 75.99 5.40 3.06 5.35 100.00

Rajanpur 12.80 11.43 52.19 7.43 2.76 13.39 100.00Urban 20.38 13.15 36.40 12.39 4.28 13.40 100.00Rural 11.27 11.08 55.39 6.42 2.46 13.39 100.00

Layyah 0.10 1.61 72.05 20.17 1.20 4.88 100.00Urban 0.00 1.34 65.80 15.90 6.37 10.59 100.00Rural 0.12 1.66 73.18 20.94 0.26 3.84 100.00

Muzaffargarh 3.93 22.45 68.34 1.92 0.70 2.66 100.00Urban 5.00 28.16 51.72 7.89 5.10 2.13 100.00Rural 3.77 21.64 70.71 1.07 0.07 2.74 100.00

Bahawalpur 12.30 21.92 51.58 8.63 0.23 5.35 100.00Urban 9.41 15.29 51.97 13.18 0.58 9.58 100.00Rural 13.42 24.48 51.43 6.86 0.09 3.71 100.00

Bhawal Nagar 0.16 6.13 69.59 22.88 1.25 0.00 100.00Urban 0.75 11.95 71.23 10.54 5.54 0.00 100.00Rural 0.00 4.60 69.15 26.13 0.12 0.00 100.00

Rahim Yar Khan 2.71 15.99 75.77 4.57 0.23 0.74 100.00Urban 3.81 23.29 65.84 4.95 0.46 1.65 100.00Rural 2.45 14.30 78.07 4.48 0.18 0.52 100.00

.

438

Page 460: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MUCH WORSE WORSE SAME BETTER MUCH

BETTERDON'T KNOW TOTAL

PROVINCE & DISTRICT ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE COMMUNITY

TABLE 5.2: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY THE PERCEPTION OF THE SITUATION OF THE COMMUNITY COMPARED TO YEAR BEFORE THE SURVEY

Sindh 3.82 26.62 55.81 8.10 .95 4.70 100.00Urban 4.22 24.50 56.05 6.80 1.04 7.39 100.00Rural 3.34 29.16 55.52 9.66 .83 1.49 100.00

Jacobabad 2.47 17.96 72.86 2.21 4.24 0.26 100.00Urban 9.71 6.47 61.82 3.77 17.17 1.07 100.00Rural 0.09 21.73 76.48 1.70 0.00 0.00 100.00

Kashmore 6.26 17.05 73.80 1.64 1.10 0.16 100.00Urban 1.20 12.36 77.80 4.74 3.39 0.51 100.00Rural 8.56 19.18 71.98 0.22 0.06 0.00 100.00

Shikarpur 0.82 11.94 78.80 7.74 0.26 0.44 100.00Urban 0.70 12.64 73.14 12.18 0.50 0.84 100.00Rural 0.86 11.67 80.98 6.04 0.16 0.29 100.00

Larkana 0.31 13.51 77.05 7.22 1.05 0.86 100.00Urban 0.00 11.70 82.05 3.62 0.69 1.93 100.00Rural 0.56 14.95 73.06 10.09 1.34 0.00 100.00

Shahdadkot 6.14 18.70 70.95 3.46 0.37 0.38 100.00Urban 0.69 16.16 82.57 0.58 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 8.00 19.57 66.99 4.44 0.49 0.51 100.00

Sukkur 1.19 10.90 76.31 10.38 0.00 1.21 100.00Urban 1.67 9.55 73.94 13.64 0.00 1.20 100.00Rural 0.33 13.34 80.57 4.54 0.00 1.22 100.00

Ghotki 3.41 20.47 71.95 3.18 .48 .51 100.00Urban .00 7.28 80.92 8.71 .74 2.35 100.00Rural 4.35 24.09 69.49 1.67 .41 .00 100.00

Khairpur 6.25 6.97 81.52 5.10 0.00 0.16 100.00Urban 9.78 3.32 78.09 8.81 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 4.76 8.51 82.97 3.53 0.00 0.23 100.00

Naushahro Feroze 1.21 27.75 44.66 21.09 2.64 2.65 100.00Urban 3.59 27.23 60.94 7.18 0.00 1.06 100.00Rural 0.55 27.89 40.13 24.96 3.37 3.09 100.00

Shaheed Benazirabad 0.00 13.97 33.87 52.16 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 0.00 7.38 50.71 41.91 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 0.00 16.20 28.19 55.61 0.00 0.00 100.00

Dadu 9.21 41.93 34.25 10.69 0.41 3.51 100.00Urban 3.35 44.27 44.22 5.94 2.22 0.00 100.00Rural 10.53 41.40 31.99 11.77 0.00 4.31 100.00

Jamshoro 7.15 22.02 64.26 5.19 0.82 0.57 100.00Urban 2.85 13.63 68.34 11.70 1.79 1.68 100.00Rural 8.70 25.05 62.78 2.83 0.47 0.17 100.00

439

Page 461: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MUCH WORSE WORSE SAME BETTER MUCH

BETTERDON'T KNOW TOTAL

PROVINCE & DISTRICT ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE COMMUNITY

TABLE 5.2: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY THE PERCEPTION OF THE SITUATION OF THE COMMUNITY COMPARED TO YEAR BEFORE THE SURVEY

Hyderabad 0.20 16.21 74.82 7.21 0.45 1.11 100.00Urban 0.25 16.56 73.87 7.98 0.41 0.94 100.00Rural 0.00 14.58 79.22 3.64 0.64 1.91 100.00

Tando Allah Yar 0.15 12.44 81.15 5.14 0.24 0.88 100.00Urban 0.75 11.84 66.20 17.93 0.50 2.79 100.00Rural 0.00 12.60 85.00 1.85 0.17 0.38 100.00

Tando Muhammad Khan 0.95 20.37 71.31 5.03 0.23 2.10 100.00Urban 0.85 9.44 78.88 8.97 1.01 0.85 100.00Rural 0.97 22.53 69.82 4.25 0.08 2.34 100.00

Mitiari 0.31 14.40 71.64 8.48 2.59 2.58 100.00Urban 0.00 12.81 69.35 16.18 0.00 1.66 100.00Rural 0.41 14.89 72.34 6.12 3.39 2.86 100.00

Badin .62 24.31 69.47 3.65 .38 1.57 100.00Urban .00 8.81 82.80 2.91 .00 5.49 100.00Rural .79 28.55 65.82 3.85 .49 .49 100.00

Thatta 1.82 37.37 45.12 4.53 2.71 8.45 100.00Urban 0.00 21.82 61.87 10.33 0.00 5.98 100.00Rural 2.09 39.62 42.70 3.69 3.10 8.80 100.00

Sujawal 9.45 42.83 32.40 3.29 1.82 10.21 100.00Urban 5.46 41.78 39.97 7.39 2.69 2.69 100.00Rural 10.08 42.99 31.21 2.65 1.68 11.39 100.00

Sanghar 0.16 31.40 48.98 18.91 0.41 0.14 100.00Urban 0.76 51.94 35.48 10.22 1.59 0.00 100.00Rural 0.00 26.01 52.53 21.19 0.10 0.17 100.00

Mirpur Khas 0.33 55.44 31.23 12.78 0.00 0.22 100.00Urban 0.39 34.82 43.25 21.02 0.00 0.51 100.00Rural 0.31 63.04 26.80 9.73 0.00 0.11 100.00

Umerkot 0.00 53.67 31.99 14.11 0.23 0.00 100.00Urban 0.00 61.65 27.92 10.43 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 0.00 51.65 33.02 15.04 0.29 0.00 100.00

Tharparkar 5.23 37.35 45.14 6.80 3.59 1.89 100.00Urban 2.70 34.55 49.04 13.72 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 5.44 37.58 44.82 6.23 3.89 2.05 100.00

Karachi 5.74 30.14 48.26 4.74 1.00 10.12 100.00Urban 5.60 27.93 49.70 4.96 1.06 10.74 100.00Rural 8.01 66.11 24.68 1.20 0.00 0.00 100.00

440

Page 462: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MUCH WORSE WORSE SAME BETTER MUCH

BETTERDON'T KNOW TOTAL

PROVINCE & DISTRICT ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE COMMUNITY

TABLE 5.2: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY THE PERCEPTION OF THE SITUATION OF THE COMMUNITY COMPARED TO YEAR BEFORE THE SURVEY

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 4.10 11.61 54.24 18.57 2.98 8.49 100.00Urban 4.78 6.94 48.51 23.21 7.95 8.61 100.00Rural 3.95 12.67 55.55 17.52 1.85 8.47 100.00

Chitral 3.66 9.07 24.13 31.90 5.58 25.65 100.00Urban 0.00 0.00 36.36 63.64 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 4.03 10.00 22.87 28.65 6.16 28.28 100.00

Upper Dir 19.40 20.32 35.34 13.17 3.48 8.29 100.00Urban 0.00 4.11 87.56 8.33 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 20.23 21.02 33.10 13.38 3.62 8.65 100.00

Lower Dir 2.65 6.85 31.40 35.22 3.93 19.95 100.00Urban 6.77 39.84 43.49 4.95 0.00 4.95 100.00Rural 2.36 4.51 30.54 37.36 4.21 21.02 100.00

Swat 9.48 11.82 57.15 13.61 1.16 6.78 100.00Urban 33.56 23.12 22.49 13.60 2.87 4.36 100.00Rural 4.28 9.39 64.63 13.61 0.79 7.30 100.00

Shangla 2.41 8.17 24.63 36.06 4.40 24.34 100.00Urban - - - - - - -Rural 2.41 8.17 24.63 36.06 4.40 24.34 100.00

Buner 6.09 8.94 56.75 16.99 1.53 9.71 100.00Urban - - - - - - -Rural 6.09 8.94 56.75 16.99 1.53 9.71 100.00

Malakand PA 11.39 10.09 38.68 17.12 6.23 16.49 100.00Urban 43.42 17.61 15.97 18.77 2.66 1.58 100.00Rural 5.89 8.79 42.58 16.84 6.85 19.05 100.00

Kohistan 7.19 22.32 54.26 3.56 0.02 12.65 100.00Urban 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 7.19 22.32 54.26 3.56 0.02 12.65 100.00

Mansehra 3.27 19.69 67.36 8.86 0.81 0.00 100.00Urban 0.00 0.00 43.57 52.29 4.14 0.00 100.00Rural 3.50 21.05 69.00 5.87 0.58 0.00 100.00

Batagram 0.16 8.36 60.66 30.26 0.32 0.25 100.00Urban - - - - - - -Rural 0.16 8.36 60.66 30.26 0.32 0.25 100.00

Abbottabad 4.09 22.88 60.09 9.85 3.08 0.00 100.00Urban 5.67 8.92 29.44 38.16 17.81 0.00 100.00Rural 3.76 25.80 66.51 3.93 0.00 0.00 100.00

Haripur 2.43 12.66 43.65 36.00 2.43 2.82 100.00Urban 0.00 2.96 47.04 38.26 11.74 0.00 100.00Rural 3.00 14.95 42.86 35.47 0.23 3.49 100.00

441

Page 463: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MUCH WORSE WORSE SAME BETTER MUCH

BETTERDON'T KNOW TOTAL

PROVINCE & DISTRICT ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE COMMUNITY

TABLE 5.2: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY THE PERCEPTION OF THE SITUATION OF THE COMMUNITY COMPARED TO YEAR BEFORE THE SURVEY

Tor Ghar 1.02 13.55 72.77 9.86 0.76 2.04 100.00Urban - - - - - - -Rural 1.02 13.55 72.77 9.86 0.76 2.04 100.00

Mardan 2.63 3.75 61.14 21.16 4.06 7.26 100.00Urban 0.00 2.76 55.10 27.57 8.95 5.61 100.00Rural 3.60 4.12 63.38 18.79 2.24 7.87 100.00

Swabi 2.97 6.68 40.66 24.29 7.87 17.53 100.00Urban 0.00 0.00 34.06 24.69 25.32 15.94 100.00Rural 3.54 7.96 41.93 24.21 4.52 17.83 100.00

Charsadda 0.34 5.14 66.49 15.62 4.73 7.68 100.00Urban 0.00 5.34 37.79 30.24 20.17 6.47 100.00Rural 0.43 5.09 74.27 11.65 0.55 8.01 100.00

Peshawar 1.51 5.16 64.68 16.16 2.77 9.72 100.00Urban 2.74 1.09 61.24 16.94 4.74 13.26 100.00Rural 0.00 10.15 68.91 15.21 0.34 5.38 100.00

Nowshera 4.30 10.23 52.09 23.39 4.33 5.65 100.00Urban 2.36 14.76 56.20 16.13 5.75 4.80 100.00Rural 5.14 8.29 50.33 26.51 3.72 6.01 100.00

Kohat 3.82 6.22 52.45 21.73 3.26 12.51 100.00Urban 0.00 8.90 42.51 28.93 4.65 15.01 100.00Rural 4.97 5.41 55.43 19.57 2.85 11.76 100.00

Hangu 8.02 9.24 47.22 21.38 4.34 9.80 100.00Urban 0.79 7.72 39.33 28.65 10.25 13.26 100.00Rural 9.99 9.65 49.38 19.40 2.72 8.85 100.00

Karak 0.86 15.73 62.94 15.33 0.39 4.74 100.00Urban 0.00 12.17 20.72 58.99 0.00 8.11 100.00Rural 0.91 15.93 65.31 12.88 0.41 4.55 100.00

Bannu 1.43 24.09 50.05 18.94 0.28 5.20 100.00Urban 0.00 26.34 64.26 9.40 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 1.53 23.94 49.08 19.60 0.30 5.55 100.00

Lakki Marwat 3.37 24.13 47.13 18.44 0.58 6.35 100.00Urban 5.72 42.02 22.07 25.66 1.66 2.86 100.00Rural 3.01 21.39 50.97 17.33 0.41 6.89 100.00

D.I Khan 3.36 11.71 63.22 13.16 3.10 5.45 100.00Urban 1.32 0.00 53.55 19.48 8.99 16.66 100.00Rural 3.66 13.48 64.69 12.21 2.21 3.75 100.00

Tank 1.81 11.11 71.14 11.42 0.59 3.93 100.00Urban 0.00 6.86 60.54 17.06 3.50 12.04 100.00Rural 2.14 11.88 73.06 10.40 0.06 2.46 100.00

442

Page 464: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MUCH WORSE WORSE SAME BETTER MUCH

BETTERDON'T KNOW TOTAL

PROVINCE & DISTRICT ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE COMMUNITY

TABLE 5.2: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY THE PERCEPTION OF THE SITUATION OF THE COMMUNITY COMPARED TO YEAR BEFORE THE SURVEY

Balochistan 10.06 16.19 53.13 7.26 1.14 12.21 100.00Urban 1.69 15.57 57.30 15.56 2.29 7.59 100.00Rural 13.19 16.43 51.57 4.16 .71 13.94 100.00

Quetta 3.11 16.80 33.32 9.92 2.21 34.63 100.00Urban 2.18 22.47 49.86 15.59 3.79 6.12 100.00Rural 4.41 8.83 10.05 1.95 0.00 74.76 100.00

Pishin 10.97 2.74 63.43 4.29 0.00 18.58 100.00Urban 0.00 0.00 76.14 0.00 0.00 23.86 100.00Rural 11.88 2.96 62.38 4.64 0.00 18.14 100.00

Killa Abdullah 24.65 7.26 55.30 3.06 0.00 9.72 100.00Urban 1.10 3.29 70.81 14.92 0.00 9.89 100.00Rural 27.44 7.74 53.46 1.66 0.00 9.71 100.00

Chagai 15.66 43.19 34.75 4.62 0.31 1.46 100.00Urban 0.00 27.28 46.03 19.73 3.48 3.48 100.00Rural 17.18 44.73 33.67 3.16 0.00 1.27 100.00

Nushki 0.88 21.18 51.96 4.94 2.18 18.86 100.00Urban 0.00 0.00 65.31 21.82 10.77 2.10 100.00Rural 1.10 26.55 48.58 0.66 0.00 23.11 100.00

Loralai 0.00 0.25 68.99 14.53 3.78 12.46 100.00Urban 0.00 0.00 74.78 9.62 0.00 15.60 100.00Rural 0.00 0.29 67.98 15.38 4.43 11.92 100.00

Barkhan 0.34 0.55 98.92 0.19 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 0.39 0.64 98.76 0.22 0.00 0.00 100.00

Musa Khel 0.00 0.22 55.95 14.71 5.28 23.84 100.00Urban 0.00 0.00 40.40 21.61 12.20 25.79 100.00Rural 0.00 0.28 60.02 12.91 3.47 23.33 100.00

Killa Saifullah 0.00 21.47 62.83 3.25 0.00 12.44 100.00Urban 0.00 20.38 63.71 2.65 0.00 13.26 100.00Rural 0.00 21.87 62.51 3.47 0.00 12.14 100.00

Zhob 0.00 4.34 87.65 6.98 0.61 0.40 100.00Urban 0.00 6.60 69.21 22.91 1.28 0.00 100.00Rural 0.00 3.58 93.92 1.58 0.39 0.54 100.00

Sheerani 49.14 20.14 30.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Urban - - - - - - -Rural 49.14 20.14 30.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00

Sibi 20.09 23.70 47.25 5.14 0.56 3.26 100.00Urban 0.00 25.12 59.36 9.38 1.63 4.51 100.00Rural 30.63 22.95 40.89 2.92 0.00 2.60 100.00

443

Page 465: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MUCH WORSE WORSE SAME BETTER MUCH

BETTERDON'T KNOW TOTAL

PROVINCE & DISTRICT ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE COMMUNITY

TABLE 5.2: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY THE PERCEPTION OF THE SITUATION OF THE COMMUNITY COMPARED TO YEAR BEFORE THE SURVEY

Harnai 9.62 11.54 50.45 0.98 0.00 27.42 100.00Urban 15.49 48.13 18.55 12.74 0.00 5.08 100.00Rural 9.14 8.50 53.10 0.00 0.00 29.27 100.00

Ziarat 6.61 1.32 67.07 1.54 0.00 23.46 100.00Urban 0.00 10.51 78.70 5.39 0.00 5.39 100.00Rural 7.13 0.59 66.15 1.24 0.00 24.90 100.00

Kohlu 28.30 15.43 24.20 5.65 3.35 23.08 100.00Urban 26.09 12.05 38.04 3.08 5.62 15.13 100.00Rural 28.61 15.90 22.25 6.01 3.03 24.19 100.00

Dera Bugti 0.18 9.06 81.20 3.18 6.37 0.00 100.00Urban 0.00 22.13 77.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 0.20 7.99 81.47 3.45 6.90 0.00 100.00

Kachhi( Bolan) 13.71 31.54 46.84 5.80 0.88 1.23 100.00Urban 0.00 63.79 33.33 2.87 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 16.90 24.02 49.99 6.48 1.09 1.52 100.00

Jaffarabad 2.46 18.75 72.64 5.99 0.00 0.17 100.00Urban 0.00 9.54 69.44 21.02 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 3.24 21.69 73.66 1.18 0.00 0.22 100.00

Nasirabad 4.34 15.96 76.00 3.55 0.15 0.00 100.00Urban 0.00 9.28 78.41 12.31 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 5.97 18.49 75.09 0.24 0.21 0.00 100.00

Jhal Magsi 4.03 31.88 41.93 8.77 1.12 12.27 100.00Urban 5.59 11.18 83.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 3.96 32.78 40.14 9.15 1.17 12.80 100.00

Kalat 15.65 5.97 58.22 16.53 0.94 2.69 100.00Urban 0.00 4.25 45.75 41.83 4.09 4.09 100.00Rural 19.30 6.37 61.12 10.64 0.20 2.37 100.00

Mastung 11.61 6.37 50.01 24.76 4.42 2.84 100.00Urban 0.00 0.00 37.12 45.96 12.63 4.29 100.00Rural 15.65 8.59 54.50 17.37 1.55 2.34 100.00

Khuzdar 13.50 17.41 43.84 23.03 0.25 1.97 100.00Urban 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 19.72 25.42 41.00 10.61 0.36 2.88 100.00

Awaran 11.65 41.02 45.58 1.22 0.00 0.53 100.00Urban - - - - - - -Rural 11.65 41.02 45.58 1.22 0.00 0.53 100.00

444

Page 466: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

MUCH WORSE WORSE SAME BETTER MUCH

BETTERDON'T KNOW TOTAL

PROVINCE & DISTRICT ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE COMMUNITY

TABLE 5.2: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY THE PERCEPTION OF THE SITUATION OF THE COMMUNITY COMPARED TO YEAR BEFORE THE SURVEY

Kharan 54.06 1.48 30.16 0.00 0.00 14.29 100.00Urban 0.00 0.00 73.86 0.00 0.00 26.14 100.00Rural 78.45 2.15 10.45 0.00 0.00 8.95 100.00

Washuk 14.33 7.80 72.48 2.06 0.00 3.32 100.00Urban - - - - - - -Rural 14.33 7.80 72.48 2.06 0.00 3.32 100.00

Lasbela 23.70 34.33 32.65 0.96 0.96 7.40 100.00Urban 7.62 31.27 43.46 2.61 2.61 12.43 100.00Rural 33.07 36.11 26.35 0.00 0.00 4.47 100.00

Gwadar 1.17 15.07 64.80 2.33 0.00 16.62 100.00Urban 0.00 1.84 77.02 0.00 0.00 21.14 100.00Rural 2.61 31.32 49.80 5.20 0.00 11.08 100.00NOTES:1. The Panjgur and Kech districts has been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation.2. Total may not add to 100 because of rounding.

445

Page 467: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PROVINCE & DISTRICT BASIC HEALTH UNIT

FAMILY PLANNING SCHOOL VATRINARY AGRICULTURE

(EXT.) POLICE

Pakistan 57.40 82.66 93.70 71.06 69.35 48.48Urban 72.21 85.18 95.82 70.01 71.96 44.73Rural 55.37 81.04 92.36 71.13 69.14 50.45

Punjab 65.84 85.53 96.23 79.74 79.67 49.71Urban 69.15 89.75 97.03 78.02 76.22 48.55Rural 65.64 82.53 95.78 79.83 79.97 50.27

Islamabad 85.24 92.69 97.74 93.92 98.26 56.29Urban 72.90 91.91 97.58 76.74 100.00 54.61Rural 91.16 94.10 98.08 98.52 97.84 63.19

Attock 92.46 95.12 97.40 77.82 73.16 54.90Urban 79.43 85.44 95.91 70.43 72.05 32.52Rural 94.77 96.36 98.03 78.33 73.31 59.44

Rawalpindi 80.95 94.39 94.27 77.71 84.35 54.90Urban 100.00 92.01 95.48 100.00 100.00 55.21Rural 77.93 96.52 93.00 76.95 82.62 54.49

Jehlum 92.19 90.62 97.85 76.68 68.60 59.72Urban 85.26 81.19 98.83 61.27 0.00 52.97Rural 93.12 95.48 97.42 77.72 72.03 62.43

Chakwal 80.69 93.91 97.94 78.40 84.17 53.95Urban 78.48 89.05 100.00 . 0.00 75.91Rural 80.77 95.00 97.58 78.40 85.45 50.00

Sargodha 36.50 76.17 95.90 46.64 63.65 47.48Urban 46.16 86.09 96.94 84.20 62.46 51.28Rural 36.04 69.96 95.25 43.29 63.90 45.07

Bhakkar 37.10 83.29 92.60 60.40 65.77 18.63Urban 0.00 89.39 96.78 59.69 85.42 15.87Rural 37.33 81.88 91.70 60.43 64.64 19.41

Khushab 37.18 73.27 90.41 53.98 73.61 36.29Urban 24.97 72.79 88.59 44.78 77.52 30.94Rural 38.15 73.59 91.32 55.66 73.05 39.73

Mianwali 55.24 71.09 89.03 65.47 67.99 32.53Urban 67.22 71.08 98.51 60.18 57.70 43.12Rural 53.11 71.10 86.48 66.00 68.76 29.83

Faisalabad 81.82 87.28 98.49 89.16 96.15 60.44Urban 100.00 81.01 97.08 100.00 70.33 54.61Rural 81.73 97.88 99.91 88.10 97.60 66.06

Chiniot 74.12 100.00 98.33 83.84 93.20 63.46Urban 0.00 100.00 96.78 100.00 100.00 78.68Rural 74.12 100.00 99.14 83.03 92.67 56.36

TABLE 5.3: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS SATISFICTION BY FACILITIES & SERVICES USE.

446

Page 468: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PROVINCE & DISTRICT BASIC HEALTH UNIT

FAMILY PLANNING SCHOOL VATRINARY AGRICULTURE

(EXT.) POLICE

TABLE 5.3: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS SATISFICTION BY FACILITIES & SERVICES USE.

Jhang 83.09 94.58 97.98 97.63 98.30 59.88Urban 69.35 94.68 93.78 96.94 91.85 57.13Rural 85.93 94.49 99.27 97.67 98.74 62.89

Toba Tek Singh 84.20 100.00 98.92 94.93 98.21 51.57Urban 66.12 100.00 99.22 100.00 90.40 54.32Rural 87.35 100.00 98.83 94.75 98.88 49.70

Gujranwala 57.49 94.52 93.10 83.71 87.26 68.13Urban 0.00 93.69 95.48 78.00 100.00 68.54Rural 57.49 100.00 90.05 84.33 84.37 67.45

Hafizabad 76.18 66.87 86.41 47.06 42.95 76.05Urban 100.00 62.97 96.04 88.23 100.00 60.78Rural 75.86 80.70 81.91 44.61 42.25 79.65

Gujrat 28.27 96.76 96.77 85.07 87.53 33.02Urban 61.26 87.69 93.60 100.00 0.00 0.00Rural 25.87 100.00 98.04 84.15 87.53 40.87

Mandi Bahauddin 21.31 100.00 97.63 98.50 98.96 68.79Urban 14.29 100.00 95.16 100.00 100.00 73.98Rural 21.54 100.00 98.18 98.46 98.94 68.23

Sialkot 77.30 91.49 95.46 96.80 82.46 58.32Urban 100.00 79.66 96.39 100.00 100.00 53.55Rural 77.02 100.00 95.09 96.73 81.35 59.65

Narowal 59.24 94.43 98.18 74.91 57.40 69.01Urban 0.00 100.00 97.16 0.00 100.00 75.45Rural 60.33 93.71 98.41 74.91 52.13 63.40

Lahore 97.41 99.53 98.82 95.92 100.00 64.23Urban 0.00 99.39 99.79 100.00 100.00 66.12Rural 97.41 100.00 95.32 95.52 100.00 59.75

Kasur 84.35 94.54 90.31 91.05 100.00 30.90Urban 0.00 98.10 93.12 100.00 100.00 42.41Rural 84.35 92.22 89.44 90.32 100.00 26.83

Sheikhupura 84.16 98.77 96.60 96.36 100.00 91.76Urban 100.00 100.00 93.04 100.00 100.00 67.09Rural 83.84 98.12 97.91 96.10 100.00 95.93

Nankana Sahib 85.63 100.00 97.97 98.68 98.75 89.87Urban 0.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 51.52Rural 85.63 100.00 97.15 98.65 98.71 93.16

Okara 44.14 59.15 98.83 49.14 24.03 14.71Urban 87.56 96.91 98.48 100.00 100.00 42.29Rural 40.36 44.28 98.97 48.11 20.19 9.95

447

Page 469: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PROVINCE & DISTRICT BASIC HEALTH UNIT

FAMILY PLANNING SCHOOL VATRINARY AGRICULTURE

(EXT.) POLICE

TABLE 5.3: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS SATISFICTION BY FACILITIES & SERVICES USE.

Sahiwal 75.36 95.37 99.20 88.85 74.27 27.05Urban 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 48.93Rural 74.15 94.05 98.99 88.39 71.26 21.01

Pakpattan 77.12 97.82 98.87 83.50 89.99 12.88Urban 59.85 100.00 96.27 78.79 100.00 6.62Rural 79.63 97.15 99.41 83.66 89.39 14.76

Vehari 88.43 97.43 97.88 94.85 97.37 69.18Urban 0.00 100.00 96.25 65.31 100.00 35.21Rural 88.43 97.14 98.31 96.42 97.18 80.00

Multan 68.10 79.54 98.23 85.33 65.77 41.10Urban 84.00 72.15 96.50 64.09 46.88 39.11Rural 66.70 86.03 99.53 86.30 72.90 42.32

Lodhran 78.89 86.94 98.55 90.82 45.80 44.43Urban 0.00 68.88 98.22 100.00 62.76 38.89Rural 78.89 96.80 98.63 90.66 44.26 45.56

Khanewal 58.55 86.37 98.42 78.07 58.15 17.47Urban 75.00 83.68 100.00 52.66 36.12 11.38Rural 58.39 88.17 97.98 79.37 60.03 21.97

D.G Khan 72.18 68.89 87.69 80.46 78.80 48.27Urban 62.49 74.15 97.14 27.42 56.11 43.26Rural 72.34 67.06 85.56 81.38 80.02 49.34

Rajanpur 53.81 11.23 78.03 54.69 59.82 39.60Urban 0.00 4.61 78.36 15.97 16.27 42.44Rural 53.81 27.46 77.27 63.02 69.77 35.80

Layyah 58.68 77.50 97.24 67.54 66.56 76.19Urban 51.44 63.26 92.97 67.18 65.78 33.55Rural 59.20 82.87 97.96 67.56 66.65 94.39

Muzaffargarh 41.75 90.57 95.98 89.04 60.66 24.71Urban 73.61 70.34 98.87 47.47 40.23 11.21Rural 41.17 94.31 95.49 91.03 64.11 29.77

Bahawalpur 46.71 63.59 94.48 67.82 83.20 21.79Urban 17.15 67.93 96.10 69.57 44.34 24.05Rural 48.63 60.49 93.71 67.68 87.22 20.53

Bhawal Nagar 65.00 75.97 98.41 94.05 95.67 41.75Urban 46.00 74.40 100.00 84.02 45.11 58.96Rural 66.33 76.99 97.88 94.73 98.98 29.87

Rahim Yar Khan 56.12 65.56 97.52 62.66 76.39 33.21Urban 74.53 73.93 98.69 65.62 68.24 34.26Rural 55.12 63.93 97.20 62.52 76.99 32.90

.

.

448

Page 470: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PROVINCE & DISTRICT BASIC HEALTH UNIT

FAMILY PLANNING SCHOOL VATRINARY AGRICULTURE

(EXT.) POLICE

TABLE 5.3: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS SATISFICTION BY FACILITIES & SERVICES USE.

Sindh 51.45 80.75 89.95 58.03 57.77 35.14Urban 79.59 79.87 94.94 54.69 69.04 34.90Rural 42.56 81.46 82.80 58.34 56.67 35.36

Jacobabad 75.03 94.59 94.73 79.17 66.17 82.25Urban 80.78 92.50 94.84 65.64 89.12 75.57Rural 74.95 95.45 94.67 79.61 62.85 85.45

Kashmore 49.52 65.40 72.72 82.44 97.02 94.37Urban 79.33 100.00 97.33 95.78 86.51 94.45Rural 45.78 49.38 53.56 80.83 99.30 94.33

Shikarpur 66.21 88.04 89.44 90.51 91.34 65.41Urban 72.45 87.56 90.98 100.00 92.23 82.45Rural 66.15 88.25 88.72 89.73 91.29 56.07

Larkana 73.51 73.39 94.84 78.31 81.76 47.01Urban 65.03 53.85 97.51 47.18 49.10 21.68Rural 79.59 89.64 92.28 82.61 89.24 66.30

Shahdadkot 56.50 47.27 90.82 76.28 81.90 47.41Urban 54.51 39.47 98.37 29.03 27.36 48.64Rural 57.32 55.05 87.88 82.15 89.35 47.06

Sukkur 85.76 100.00 92.89 86.38 86.11 65.76Urban 100.00 100.00 96.85 86.76 100.00 72.35Rural 84.83 100.00 84.57 86.33 84.96 58.68

Ghotki 66.98 92.09 92.45 70.99 83.48 69.62Urban 100.00 92.75 93.40 82.48 92.82 75.84Rural 66.37 91.95 92.13 70.30 82.58 67.38

Khairpur 70.47 75.23 98.09 77.55 93.04 86.41Urban 52.28 83.42 97.50 57.05 84.47 85.21Rural 70.58 69.63 98.37 82.52 94.54 87.00

Naushahro Feroze 27.18 82.82 89.18 46.32 30.99 21.00Urban 23.12 59.64 89.47 6.59 72.26 23.71Rural 28.06 89.50 89.11 49.99 29.71 20.02

Shaheed Benazirabad 25.05 67.01 77.66 33.08 21.54 30.95Urban 97.07 31.91 91.55 55.57 46.34 23.97Rural 21.05 80.20 72.23 32.45 20.91 36.11

Dadu 22.85 96.89 80.90 34.32 20.43 30.83Urban 21.21 92.58 93.38 67.88 100.00 30.24Rural 23.10 97.96 77.65 32.58 19.55 31.13

Jamshoro 34.22 90.49 90.78 45.51 32.17 27.11Urban 35.18 88.82 91.17 59.30 24.81 46.71Rural 34.14 91.32 90.63 44.62 32.44 15.69

449

Page 471: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PROVINCE & DISTRICT BASIC HEALTH UNIT

FAMILY PLANNING SCHOOL VATRINARY AGRICULTURE

(EXT.) POLICE

TABLE 5.3: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS SATISFICTION BY FACILITIES & SERVICES USE.

Hyderabad 28.34 84.76 96.63 60.17 51.21 21.93Urban 100.00 82.68 97.88 13.03 66.04 22.93Rural 22.04 95.74 87.76 81.89 42.56 7.35

Tando Allah Yar 38.33 73.09 91.90 72.80 43.86 28.15Urban 0.00 64.42 98.16 35.54 15.48 17.00Rural 38.38 80.13 89.61 74.07 44.93 34.40

Tando Muhammad Khan 33.38 66.35 90.68 66.77 31.57 15.77Urban 0.00 76.06 97.50 46.13 0.00 19.77Rural 33.38 64.49 88.08 67.36 32.53 13.95

Mitiari 43.90 83.10 98.05 79.75 60.98 24.66Urban 28.72 72.53 99.00 58.38 37.03 22.79Rural 44.26 85.05 97.64 81.32 62.87 25.38

Badin 19.70 79.25 91.10 53.64 27.61 29.47Urban 0.00 92.29 98.48 74.31 72.13 45.91Rural 19.70 74.19 88.23 51.73 22.31 19.77

Thatta 65.50 69.09 92.44 17.26 59.16 5.25Urban 88.07 67.81 89.30 100.00 100.00 0.00Rural 50.16 72.93 93.12 15.65 53.82 8.85

Sujawal 37.24 20.03 79.45 44.56 37.23 11.10Urban 0.00 100.00 91.23 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 37.24 10.82 76.72 44.56 37.23 12.38

Sanghar 20.71 90.35 83.52 50.93 27.64 45.37Urban 100.00 83.46 100.00 78.98 70.98 55.45Rural 17.93 97.14 76.57 47.43 24.77 34.96

Mirpur Khas 38.27 22.51 85.53 58.44 84.18 5.43Urban 50.52 34.76 95.89 47.62 88.39 8.79Rural 35.42 18.68 79.54 59.12 83.86 4.80

Umerkot 39.80 29.89 82.77 55.30 79.55 0.79Urban 44.46 0.00 93.08 35.65 72.81 1.46Rural 38.71 36.44 78.59 56.95 80.16 0.55

Tharparkar 30.81 36.66 53.72 20.16 27.75 3.44Urban 31.94 54.24 100.00 29.74 0.00 4.57Rural 30.72 35.16 48.75 19.64 27.75 2.93

Karachi 89.82 76.70 93.61 100.00 0.00 24.99Urban 94.56 79.52 94.22 0.00 0.00 27.22Rural 70.91 25.54 81.14 100.00 0.00 0.00

450

Page 472: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PROVINCE & DISTRICT BASIC HEALTH UNIT

FAMILY PLANNING SCHOOL VATRINARY AGRICULTURE

(EXT.) POLICE

TABLE 5.3: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS SATISFICTION BY FACILITIES & SERVICES USE.

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 49.73 82.26 92.77 57.92 56.86 65.79Urban 62.25 79.35 94.76 76.33 39.57 60.77Rural 49.37 83.22 92.31 56.79 57.54 67.36

Chitral 40.79 75.38 92.25 24.09 24.04 51.38Urban 0.00 39.92 100.00 38.58 32.02 65.50Rural 40.79 82.03 91.52 23.20 22.85 49.61

Upper Dir 45.09 94.25 77.39 17.28 14.13 77.90Urban 0.00 62.28 100.00 19.84 0.00 28.99Rural 45.09 96.64 76.36 17.12 15.54 82.98

Lower Dir 46.98 96.32 90.80 43.36 73.61 63.82Urban 0.00 100.00 77.83 31.14 68.66 100.00Rural 46.98 95.08 91.71 44.24 76.49 60.55

Swat 52.13 94.49 94.83 59.13 89.57 62.84Urban 0.00 81.63 77.89 0.00 0.00 36.67Rural 52.13 96.96 98.59 59.13 89.57 74.77

Shangla 24.93 45.61 84.45 7.40 0.00 48.22Urban 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 24.93 45.61 84.45 7.40 0.00 48.22

Buner 35.38 93.42 95.13 60.66 81.79 74.72Urban - - - - - -Rural 35.38 93.42 95.13 60.66 81.79 74.72

Malakand PA 48.37 92.98 95.44 53.46 25.38 43.79Urban 0.00 68.47 82.97 50.00 0.00 17.09Rural 48.37 94.25 97.53 53.56 25.38 51.34

Kohistan 27.75 70.87 74.22 31.25 46.44 65.48Urban - - - - - -Rural 27.75 70.87 74.22 31.25 46.44 65.48

Mansehra 43.10 74.01 87.47 27.30 76.90 71.03Urban 0.00 100.00 90.93 . . 100.00Rural 43.23 68.28 87.18 27.30 76.90 67.81

Batagram 30.49 92.31 80.37 58.27 67.02 90.48Urban - - - - - -Rural 30.49 92.31 80.37 58.27 67.02 90.48

Abbottabad 41.01 71.28 90.97 63.90 100.00 51.90Urban 79.25 91.48 93.02 100.00 0.00 75.92Rural 38.05 64.95 90.52 45.53 100.00 39.99

Haripur 47.17 90.85 85.47 69.88 80.24 82.11Urban 66.55 88.36 96.28 100.00 0.00 49.61Rural 45.69 91.92 82.80 67.54 80.24 89.19

451

Page 473: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PROVINCE & DISTRICT BASIC HEALTH UNIT

FAMILY PLANNING SCHOOL VATRINARY AGRICULTURE

(EXT.) POLICE

TABLE 5.3: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS SATISFICTION BY FACILITIES & SERVICES USE.

Tor Ghar 40.21 58.79 75.17 41.26 42.20 74.11Urban - - - - - -Rural 40.21 58.79 75.17 41.26 42.20 74.11

Mardan 75.87 95.68 99.75 92.80 93.95 56.42Urban 22.22 96.77 100.00 100.00 0.00 47.09Rural 80.22 95.32 99.66 91.16 93.95 64.92

Swabi 29.84 56.39 95.88 40.04 44.62 69.71Urban 20.00 43.25 92.23 21.74 0.00 100.00Rural 30.03 65.37 96.66 42.26 46.40 67.55

Charsadda 75.37 80.76 99.43 84.93 78.87 76.73Urban 100.00 80.70 100.00 82.52 100.00 65.90Rural 73.49 80.80 99.29 85.18 77.21 80.49

Peshawar 82.96 95.05 100.00 90.24 100.00 67.66Urban 79.87 90.96 100.00 100.00 0.00 72.27Rural 83.41 100.00 100.00 89.23 100.00 62.10

Nowshera 45.00 73.78 100.00 65.85 39.46 57.46Urban 0.00 63.42 100.00 75.22 20.78 43.32Rural 45.00 86.18 100.00 63.56 53.38 69.03

Kohat 52.07 97.24 97.22 82.77 91.58 74.48Urban 0.00 100.00 91.09 100.00 0.00 69.51Rural 52.07 96.32 99.21 82.51 91.58 76.46

Hangu 49.68 65.56 96.89 64.93 69.80 77.16Urban 0.00 61.84 91.80 30.33 0.00 82.27Rural 49.68 68.24 98.34 65.89 72.47 75.83

Karak 64.49 79.29 93.42 60.94 38.25 75.88Urban 0.00 0.00 94.85 80.63 0.00 89.95Rural 64.49 79.29 93.34 59.29 39.88 75.00

Bannu 79.13 76.94 96.53 71.17 63.67 74.78Urban 66.67 100.00 93.58 0.00 100.00 72.73Rural 79.37 75.76 96.70 71.17 61.40 74.92

Lakki Marwat 68.31 66.30 92.05 68.60 62.16 72.13Urban 53.94 67.92 96.32 100.00 67.74 74.14Rural 69.91 65.74 91.41 66.58 61.93 71.56

D.I Khan 45.18 78.16 84.41 37.07 25.49 40.28Urban 0.00 89.02 78.50 0.00 0.00 54.79Rural 45.18 75.92 85.36 37.61 26.19 39.34

Tank 43.79 43.22 78.84 41.84 32.99 40.18Urban 0.00 26.51 75.28 100.00 0.00 100.00Rural 43.79 45.45 79.51 40.85 32.99 39.36

452

Page 474: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PROVINCE & DISTRICT BASIC HEALTH UNIT

FAMILY PLANNING SCHOOL VATRINARY AGRICULTURE

(EXT.) POLICE

TABLE 5.3: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS SATISFICTION BY FACILITIES & SERVICES USE.

Balochistan 43.49 62.36 82.33 47.30 54.74 50.38Urban 51.02 67.33 88.65 51.65 67.84 43.16Rural 41.06 59.43 79.01 47.05 54.16 52.88

Quetta 32.71 61.62 83.81 5.96 16.27 70.85Urban 47.67 58.24 87.48 0.00 83.77 38.33Rural 11.50 73.46 78.91 6.22 1.74 93.56

Pishin 13.27 8.51 82.13 2.04 1.47 46.20Urban 3.12 21.53 88.60 0.00 0.00 18.17Rural 14.12 7.61 81.47 2.10 1.53 48.86

Killa Abdullah 16.72 21.47 69.87 1.76 1.84 31.92Urban 15.78 6.84 89.50 0.00 50.00 31.92Rural 16.83 25.95 64.72 1.82 1.04 31.92

Chagai 37.90 52.46 70.52 85.86 88.45 86.53Urban 47.01 55.89 77.97 0.00 0.00 100.00Rural 37.01 52.00 69.03 85.86 88.45 85.68

Nushki 31.08 63.39 63.17 30.57 51.43 77.05Urban 77.85 93.60 100.00 0.00 66.27 67.19Rural 19.16 38.47 53.70 30.57 50.99 79.21

Loralai 82.87 37.75 98.40 94.07 57.93 23.09Urban 0.00 89.94 100.00 0.00 0.00 39.75Rural 82.87 25.90 98.03 94.07 57.93 20.16

Barkhan 8.58 1.33 14.48 1.20 0.00 2.30Urban 27.41 0.00 54.34 0.00 0.00 9.76Rural 4.89 1.33 6.13 1.22 0.00 0.92

Musa Khel 83.70 30.67 99.35 96.21 64.63 18.00Urban 97.43 43.88 97.55 100.00 27.53 29.66Rural 81.93 26.60 99.83 95.96 66.90 14.99

Killa Saifullah 31.65 40.35 96.61 45.62 60.80 99.86Urban 26.15 42.66 100.00 52.45 75.18 100.00Rural 33.66 39.30 95.48 43.22 54.07 99.81

Zhob 11.75 0.74 26.81 0.00 0.00 7.71Urban 18.98 0.00 61.18 0.00 0.00 24.97Rural 8.79 0.97 11.40 0.00 0.00 2.47

Sheerani 80.12 100.00 99.20 100.00 0.00 100.00Urban - - - - - -Rural 80.12 100.00 99.20 100.00 0.00 100.00

Sibi 38.05 43.37 84.25 59.09 82.71 69.62Urban 45.49 45.18 91.60 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 34.52 42.40 75.38 52.55 79.45 55.78

453

Page 475: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PROVINCE & DISTRICT BASIC HEALTH UNIT

FAMILY PLANNING SCHOOL VATRINARY AGRICULTURE

(EXT.) POLICE

TABLE 5.3: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS SATISFICTION BY FACILITIES & SERVICES USE.

Harnai 4.12 4.66 51.95 0.89 0.20 6.68Urban 34.92 0.00 80.09 27.95 0.00 11.25Rural 1.62 4.70 47.14 0.47 0.20 6.37

Ziarat 9.60 34.11 75.65 5.70 8.76 47.34Urban 52.29 0.00 85.66 0.00 0.00 41.39Rural 6.21 38.21 74.59 5.86 8.83 47.78

Kohlu 42.69 13.13 88.16 21.79 70.30 46.03Urban 0.00 0.00 88.21 44.26 100.00 12.94Rural 42.89 15.03 88.14 21.26 69.78 52.99

Dera Bugti 93.92 78.52 97.28 91.06 98.16 71.28Urban 0.00 0.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 73.52Rural 93.92 78.52 96.96 90.76 98.08 71.07

Kachhi( Bolan) 51.03 59.05 76.57 26.98 94.90 88.14Urban 77.87 100.00 86.85 0.00 100.00 .Rural 44.59 53.11 72.31 26.98 94.55 88.14

Jaffarabad 61.80 68.51 81.35 80.14 94.21 50.77Urban 100.00 100.00 97.29 89.81 76.11 45.62Rural 61.26 47.70 74.54 79.75 94.70 53.49

Nasirabad 77.67 74.44 88.67 87.43 97.68 86.93Urban 21.39 94.34 96.43 80.40 82.67 91.41Rural 78.60 58.37 84.34 88.00 98.52 76.38

Jhal Magsi 66.54 47.78 67.58 92.36 99.04 92.77Urban 67.08 100.00 67.08 100.00 100.00 100.00Rural 66.52 43.03 67.64 92.25 99.04 92.07

Kalat 61.34 99.63 99.54 63.27 69.90 48.46Urban 100.00 100.00 100.00 50.00 0.00 28.69Rural 51.02 99.53 99.39 64.57 69.90 55.43

Mastung 66.42 99.59 99.23 65.92 72.31 51.96Urban 83.12 100.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Rural 60.35 99.33 98.90 65.92 72.31 83.06

Khuzdar 82.25 100.00 99.74 39.86 65.48 62.78Urban 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.00 59.29Rural 71.22 100.00 99.58 35.63 65.48 65.73

Awaran 69.77 100.00 99.20 24.25 69.67 54.79Urban - - - - - -Rural 69.77 100.00 99.20 24.25 69.67 54.79

454

Page 476: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

PROVINCE & DISTRICT BASIC HEALTH UNIT

FAMILY PLANNING SCHOOL VATRINARY AGRICULTURE

(EXT.) POLICE

TABLE 5.3: PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS SATISFICTION BY FACILITIES & SERVICES USE.

Kharan 15.74 30.98 60.08 25.77 45.02 23.90Urban 24.10 22.65 71.21 0.00 0.00 38.27Rural 11.97 40.42 51.90 28.12 47.63 17.39

Washuk 49.74 84.62 85.54 51.10 44.54 41.14Urban - - - - - -Rural 49.74 84.62 85.54 51.10 44.54 41.14

Lasbela 9.10 35.57 77.28 13.90 27.79 88.61Urban 33.88 60.98 91.41 100.00 0.00 100.00Rural 4.15 6.65 50.58 12.07 27.79 70.48

Gwadar 29.47 63.87 71.16 20.55 16.57 31.33Urban 40.67 74.38 74.89 0.00 0.00 32.49Rural 15.78 40.61 65.94 25.64 19.77 29.09

NOTES:

1. The Panjgur and Kech districts has been dropped from the scope of the survey due to law and order situation. 2. Denominator includes only those households who are using the facility.

455

Page 477: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Technical Notes PSLM 2014-15

APPENDIX A: TECHNICAL NOTES TECHNICAL NOTES PART A

DEFINITIONS OF SOME KEY INDICATORS

PRIMARY GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO:- Number of children attending primary level (classes 1-5) divided by number of children aged 5-9 years multiplied by 100. Enrolment in Katchi is excluded. PRIMARY NET ENROLMENT RATE:- Number of children attending primary level (classes 1-5) aged 5-9 years divided by children aged 5-9 years multiplied by 100. Enrolment in Katchi is excluded. MIDDLE GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO:- Number of children attending middle level (classes 6-8) divided by number of children aged 10-12 years multiplied by 100. MIDDLE NET ENROLMENT RATE:- Number of children aged 10-12 years attending middle level (classes 6-8) divided by number of children aged 10-12 years multiplied by 100. MATRIC GROSS ENROLMENT RATIO:- Number of children attending matric level (classes 9-10) divided by number of children aged 13-14 years multiplied by 100. MATRIC NET ENROLMENT RATE:- Number of children aged 13-14 years attending matric level (classes 9-10) divided by number of children aged 13-14 years multiplied by 100. LITERACY RATE:- Population aged 10 years and older that can read and write with understanding expressed as percentage of total population aged 10 years and older. GENDER PARITY INDEX:- The GPI at primary or secondary is defined as net enrolment rate of females at primary or secondary level divided by net enrolment rate of males in primary or secondary level. YOUTH GENDER PARITY INDEX: Youth literacy GPI is defined as persons who are 15-24 years old and literate divided by total number of persons 15-24 years old. BASED ON RECALL-ATLEAST ONE IMMUNISATION:- Children aged 12-23 months reported as having received at least one immunisation expressed as percentage of all children aged 12-23 months.

456

Page 478: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Technical Notes PSLM 2014-15

BASED ON RECORD –FULLY IMMUNIZED:- Children aged 12-23 months who reported having received full immunisation who also have an immunisation card, expressed as a percentage of all children aged 12-23 months. To be classified as fully immunised a child must have received: ’BCG’, DPT1, DPT2, DPT3, polio1, polio2, polio3 and Measles. DIARRHOEA:- Children less than 5 years who suffered from diarrhoea in the last 30 days expressed as percentage of all children aged less than 5 years. PRE-NATAL:- Ever married women aged 15 – 49 years who had given birth in the last three years and who had attended at least one pre-natal consultation during the last pregnancy, expressed as a percentage of all ever married women aged 15 – 49 years who had given birth in the last three years. POST-NATAL:- Post-natal is the period beginning immediately after the birth of a child and extending for about six weeks. Ever married women aged 15-49 years who received post-natal check-up expressed as a percentage of all ever married women aged 15-49 years who had a birth in the last three years. TETANUS TOXOID INJECTIONS:- Currently married women aged 15-49 years who had a birth in the last three years and received a tetanus toxoid injection during the last pregnancy, expressed as a percentage of all currently married women aged 15-49 years who had a birth in the last three years.

457

Page 479: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Technical Notes PSLM 2014-15

TECHNICAL NOTES PART B

Annexure-I

ESTIMATION PROCEDURE ADOPTED FOR PSLM SURVEY NOTATIONS: Nh = Total number of Primary Sampling Units (PSUs) in the hth stratum of a province. nh = Total number of sample PSUs in the hth stratum of a province. Mhi = Total number of Secondary Sampling Units (SSUs) in the ith sample PSU of hth

stratum of a province. mhi = Number of sample SSUs in the ith sample PSU of hth stratum of a province. Phi = Assigned probability of selection of ith PSU of the hth stratum of a province. yhij = Value of any characteristic y of jth SSU within ith PSU of hth stratum of a province. xhij = Value of any characteristic x of jth SSU within ith PSU of hth stratum of a province with whose respect proportion is required.

(i): ESTIMATION FORMULAE FOR TOTALS AND THEIR VARIANCES

N = Nh=1

L

h∑

n = nh=1

L

h∑

hh i=1

nhi

hiY = 1

n Y

p

h

$$

OR

hh i=1

n

hi

hi

hi j=1

m

hijY = 1n

1p

Mm

yh hi

$ ∑ ∑

$ $$

Y = Y1n

Yph=1

L

hh=1

L

h i=1

nhi

hi

= h

∑ ∑ ∑

For X, another variable of interest, we have

458

Page 480: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Technical Notes PSLM 2014-15

v yn

sn n

YP

yP

nhh

ht

h h

hi

hi

hi

hii

n

hi

n

h

h

( $ )( )

$(

$)

= =−

=

=

∑∑1 1

12

2

2

2

1

1

v Yn

sn n

YP

yP

nh

ht

h hh

L

h

Lhi

hi

hi

hii

n

hi

n

h

h

( $)( )

$(

$)

= =−

==

=

=∑∑

∑∑1 1

12

11

2

2

2

1

1

(ii): FORMULA FOR RATIO ESTIMATES

r = YX

$

$

Where Y^ and X^ can be estimated by equations under item (i) given above.

Where s2hb = s2ht - s2hw

ht2

hy2 2

hx2

hxys = s + r s - 2r s

hh i=1

nhi

hi h i=1

n

hi

hi

hi j=1

m

hijX = 1n

XP

= 1n

1P

Mm

xh h hi

$$

∑ ∑ ∑

$ $$

X = X = 1n

Xph=1

L

hh=1

L

h i=1

nhi

hi

h

∑ ∑ ∑

$$

$R = Y

X

( )

Rel V(r) = 1X

1n

s + 1x

1n

Mp m

M - mM

s2h=1

L

hhb

22

h=1

L

h i=1

nhi

2

hi2

hi

hi hi

hihw

2h

$ $∑ ∑ ∑

( )

∑ n

px

-px

1-n1 = s

h

hi

hin

=1i

2

2hi

2hi

n

=1ih

2hx

h

h

ˆˆ

459

Page 481: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Technical Notes PSLM 2014-15

( )

hw2

h i=1

n

hi2

hi2

hi

hi hi

hihi

2s = 1n -1

1p

Mm

M -mM

sh

And

hi2

hiy2 2

hix2

hixys = s + r s - 2r s

hxyh i=1

nhi

hi

hi

hi

i=1

nhi

hi i=1

nhi

hi

hs = 1

n - 1Xp

yp

-

XP

yP

n

h

h h

∑∑ ∑

$ $

$ $

( )hy

2

h i=1

nhi

2

hi2

2

i=1

nhi

hi

hs = 1

n -1yp

-

yp

n

h

h

∑∑

$

$

460

Page 482: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Technical Notes PSLM 2014-15

( )hiy

2

hi j=1

m

hij2

2

j=1

m

hij

his = 1

m - 1y -

y

m

hi

hi

∑∑

( )

∑ m

x-x1-m

1 = shi

hij

m

1=j

2

2hij

m

1=jhi

2hix

hi

hi

( )hixy

hi j=1

m

hij hijj=1

m

hijj=1

m

hij

hi

s = 1m - 1

x y - x y

m

hi

hi hi

2 ∑∑ ∑

461

Page 483: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Technical Notes PSLM 2014-15

District-Wise Distribution of Sample Areas and Household – PSLM 2014-15

Code Districts Sample Area Sample Household

Urban Rural Total Urban Rural Total

1214 4214 5428 14568 67424 81992

KP 104 777 881 1248 12432 13680

111 Chitral 2 28 30 24 448 472

112 Upper Dir 2 32 34 24 512 536

113 Lower Dir 2 30 32 24 480 504

114 Swat 5 25 30 60 400 460

115 Shangla 0 48 48 0 768 768

116 Buner 0 45 45 0 720 720

117 Malakand PA 3 27 30 36 432 468

121 Kohistan 0 50 50 0 800 800

122 Mansehra 2 28 30 24 448 472

123 Batagram 0 47 47 0 752 752

124 Abbottabad 5 25 30 60 400 460

125 Haripur 3 27 30 36 432 468

126 Tor Ghar 0 46 46 0 736 736

131 Mardan 6 24 30 72 384 456

132 Swabi 5 25 30 60 400 460

141 Charsadda 6 27 33 72 432 504

142 Peshawar 18 13 31 216 208 424

143 Nowshera 7 23 30 84 368 452

151 Kohat 7 23 30 84 368 452

152 Hangu 11 20 31 132 320 452

153 Kark 2 28 30 24 448 472

161 Bannu 2 34 36 24 544 568

162 Lakki Marwat 4 28 32 48 448 496

171 D.I.Khan 6 47 53 72 752 824

172 Tank 6 27 33 72 432 504

462

Page 484: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Technical Notes PSLM 2014-15

District-Wise Distribution of Sample Areas and Household – PSLM 2014-15

Code Districts Sample Area Sample Household Urban Rural Total Urban Rural Total

Punjab Punjab

594 1860 2454 7128 29760 36888

211 Attock 13 44 57 156 704 860

212 Rawalpindi 19 31 50 228 496 724

213 Jhelum 8 32 40 96 512 608

214 Chakwal 4 36 40 48 576 624

221 Sargodha 22 47 69 264 752 1016

222 Bhakkar 11 64 75 132 1024 1156

223 Khushab 18 62 80 216 992 1208

224 Mianwali 15 52 67 180 832 1012

231 Faisalabad 46 54 100 552 864 1416

232 Chiniot 13 39 52 156 624 780

233 Jhang 21 84 105 252 1344 1596

234 Toba Tek

Singh 13 60 73 156 960 1116

241 Gujranwala 28 28 56 336 448 784

242 Hafizabad 16 48 64 192 768 960

243 Gujrat 10 30 40 120 480 600

244 Mandi

Bahauddin 7 34 41 84 544 628

245 Sialkot 12 31 43 144 496 640

246 Narowal 4 36 40 48 576 624

251 Lahore 40 10 50 480 160 640

252 Kasur 9 31 40 108 496 604

253 Sheikhupura 23 56 79 276 896 1172

254 Nankana

Sahib 8 32 40 96 512 608

261 Okara 8 32 40 96 512 608

262 Sahiwal 7 33 40 84 528 612

263 Pakpattan 7 40 47 84 640 724

463

Page 485: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Technical Notes PSLM 2014-15

Code Districts Sample Area Sample Household Urban Rural Total Urban Rural Total

271 Vehari 7 33 40 84 528 612

272 Multan 49 69 118 588 1104 1692

273 Lodhran 12 63 75 144 1008 1152 274 Khanewal 20 81 101 240 1296 1536

281 D.G.Khan 14 91 105 168 1456 1624

282 Rajanpur 6 34 40 72 544 616

283 Layyah 7 37 44 84 592 676

284 Muzaffar Garh 22 118 140 264 1888 2152

291 Bahawalpur 30 98 128 360 1568 1928

292 Bahawalnagar 10 44 54 120 704 824

293 Rahim Yar

khan 35 146 181 420 2336 2756

464

Page 486: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Technical Notes PSLM 2014-15

District-Wise Distribution of Sample Areas and Household – PSLM 2014-15

Code Districts Sample Area Sample Household

Urban Rural Total Urban Rural Total

Sindh 376 907 1283 4512 14512 19024

311 Jaccobabad 19 51 70 228 816 1044

312 Kashmore 27 48 75 324 768 1092

313 Shikarpur 18 41 59 216 656 872

314 Larkana 18 24 42 216 384 600

315 Shahdadkot 16 44 60 192 704 896

321 Sukkur 22 16 38 264 256 520

322 Ghotki 11 52 63 132 832 964

323 Khairpur 12 34 46 144 544 688

324 Naushahro Feroze 8 26 34 96 416 512

325 Shaheed Benazirabad 12 38 50 144 608 752

331 Dadu 9 22 31 108 352 460

332 Jamshoro 14 36 50 168 576 744

333 Hyderabad 26 14 40 312 224 536

334 Tando Allah Yar 14 42 56 168 672 840

335 Tando MuhammadKhan

8 52 60 96 832 928

336 Matiari 11 34 45 132 544 676

337 Badin 24 65 89 288 1040 1328

338 Thatta 5 39 44 60 624 684

339 Sujawal 4 36 40 48 576 624

341 Sanghar 12 31 43 144 496 640

342 Mir Pur Khas 18 42 60 216 672 888

343 Umerkot 15 52 67 180 832 1012

344 Tharparkar 5 63 68 60 1008 1068

350 Karachi 48 5 53 576 80 656

465

Page 487: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Technical Notes PSLM 2014-15

District-Wise Distribution of Sample Areas and Household – PSLM 2014-15

Code Districts Sample Area Sample Household

Urban Rural Total Urban Rural Total

Balochistan 113 651 764 1356 10416 11772

411 Quetta 14 8 22 168 128 296

412 Pishine 2 19 21 24 304 328

413 Killa Abdullah 5 19 24 60 304 364

414 Chagai 3 25 28 36 400 436

415 Nushki 4 16 20 48 256 304

421 Loralai 3 19 22 36 304 340

422 Barkhan 2 28 30 24 448 472

423 Musa Khel 6 15 21 72 240 312

424 Killa Saifullah 6 23 29 72 368 440

425 Zhob 6 24 30 72 384 456

426 Sheerani 0 37 37 0 592 592

431 Sibbi 4 16 20 48 256 304

432 Harnai 3 24 27 36 384 420

433 Ziarat 2 19 21 24 304 328

434 Kohlu 3 45 48 36 720 756

435 Dera Bugti 2 36 38 24 576 600

441 Bolan/Kachhi 2 23 25 24 368 392

442 Jaffarabad 8 25 33 96 400 496

443 Nasirabad 10 23 33 120 368 488

444 Jhal Magsi 2 22 24 24 352 376

451 Kalat 2 19 21 24 304 328

452 Mastung 2 18 20 24 288 312

453 Khuzdar 2 19 21 24 304 328

454 Awaran 0 20 20 0 320 320

455 Kharan 3 17 20 36 272 308

456 Washuk 0 27 27 0 432 432

466

Page 488: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Technical Notes PSLM 2014-15

Code Districts Sample Area Sample Household

Urban Rural Total Urban Rural Total

457 Lasbela 6 15 21 72 240 312

462 Kech 3 38 41 36 608 644

462 Gwadar 8 12 20 96 192 288

463 Panjgur 0 0 0 0 0 0

Islamabad

611 Islamabad 27 19 46 324 304 628

Note: Non-contact and Refusal households are included in the list of sample households.

4 6 7

Page 489: Rizwan Bashir Created Date 4/8/2016 8:41:52 AM

Acronyms PSLM 2014-15

ACRONYMS

MTDF Medium Term Development Framework

PSLM Pakistan Social and Living Standards Measurement Survey PRSP Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper KP Khyber Pakhtunkhwa MDGs Millennium Development Goals UN United Nation PBS Pakistan Bureau of Statistics PSUs Primary Sampling Units SSUs Secondary Sampling Units CV Coefficient of Variation GER Gross Enrolment Rate NER Net Enrolment Rate GPI Gender Parity Index BCG Bacillus Calmette– Guérin DPT Diphtheria, Pertussis (whooping cough) and Tetanus ORS Oral Re-hydration Salts BHU Basic Health Unit MCHC Mother Care Health Centre RHC Rural Health Facility PPS Probability Proportional to size MOS Measure of Size

468