RP260Volume 2

Government of Tanzania

SCANNED FILE COPYLAcce6ssin No. R2CP -COj 1o No: qFJ .E;P N i Date Kik,loL ILOg#AtCio -l I CCFILE (CohiphalPmrme or #)(1)iA1W ESW Colhg Adm Prc

P(070)73b

CIUP STAGE 3 REPORT

Resettlement Action PlanJully 2004

Community Infrastructure Upgrading Programin Dar es Salaam

under LGSP

Financed by the World Bank

UC LAS DHV CONSULTANTSUniversatv College of Lands THE NETHERLANDSand Archltectrural Studies

TANZANI A

iI E IrnDv

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Government of Tanzania

lll

CIUP STAGE 3 REPORT

Resettlement Action PlanJuLly 2004

Community Infrastructure Upgrading Programin Dar es Salaam

under LGSP

lI

Financed by the World Bank

UCLAS DHV CONSULTANTSUniversity College of Lands THE NETHERLANDSand Arcliitecttiral Studies

I TANZANIA

l3 Cornmuni-\ I1ntrastructure l'moradimng Program

Table of Contents

E x ecutive S um m ary ..................... .................... ............. IIAcrbnivm s and Abbreviations ..................... ....................................... V3 1 . In tro d u ctio n ..................... .................... ............................... ....I Kev sections of the RAP ......

I.-' Principles governing the CIlP planning -- minimization of resettlement ... 2I Overall extent of unavoidable resetltmcncnt and partial impacts on property 41.4 Lessons learned in similar projects involving involuntary resettlement.." .'. Pnz jProect settingy ............. ,,,,, ,,,.......... sI '.1 Brief description of the CIUIP ................. ................................... 82.2 ME1ap showing, tihe CHiP intervenitiorns .. 93. Community participation and establishment of local communities . . 10I 3.1 Selecting community representatives ............................... 103.2 Mlechanisms for community consuRtation and participation .104. On-site data collection - inventory of the affected households .................. I3I 4. 1 Household survey and questionnaires ................................. .......... 1 34.2 Results: Project-affected persons by category of impact ............. 14.......... Iii4.3 Extent of resettlement in each of the CIUP sub-wards .......... ........... 14I 5. Compensation for lost assets and hardship due to demolition and relocation ... 1 85. 1 Groups eligible for compensation ....................................... 185.2 Compensation categories ................................................... 18I 5.3 Compensation packages ............................................................ 1 96. Asset valuation process ............................................... 86.1 Procedure ....................... 28 ........................... .8I 6.2 Documentation, contract agreement and dossier .297. Proposed grievance redress mechanisms .318. Institutional arrangements for the R3AP .3I 8.1 Institutional actors .32

8.2 Organizational chart ----................................................................ 339. Implementation schedule ............................. ... 3410. MNonitoring of the proposed resettlement actions . .3710.1 Application of verifiable indicators .3710.2 Determination of the monitors and implementation of monitoring .38

I 1. Cost estimates ..................... ... ...... ....I ... ................................ 39

ANNEX 1: Itemized lists ot'affected properties and budgets in 16 sub-wards 41ANNEX 2: Mlaps showing the affected properties in 16 sub-wards. 63ANNEX 3: Resettlement Household Survey Questionnaires .79ANNEX 4: Assessment of the '20.000 plot program' areas .86ANNFEX 5: Public information meetings in the affected communities ............. 91ANNIX 6: Community Resettlement Action Plan - Sub-ward Budgets .......... 93

I

3 Comn-um-.\ n`7astsruc:ure girading Program

Executive Summary

IThis RZesettlement AAction Plan (R.AP) is an input to the Community Infrastructure'pezradinn Program (CIlP). The RAP takes into account all involuntarx resettlenment

and compensation aspects that originate from the upgrading activities in the first phaseof CLI JP which covers 16 unplanned settlements in the three municipalities of Dar es* Salaam. The upg,rading involves. among others, the construction of infrastructure suchas access roads, drainage structures and public toilets. These construction works will3 - necessarilv result in the demolition of existing houses and other structures.

Chapter I of the document describes the procedural approach to minimize unavoidableimpacts resulting from the removal of houses and resettlement. It describes the result of*Ithe technical solutions to. realize these objectives, such as flexible ROW, andappropriate standards. Efforts to minimize impacts were combined with suggestionsbrought forward by the community at an earlv staige in the planning of CIUP in order to* ftirther reduce the number of aff'ected HH. As a result of this consultative planningexercise the extent of resettlement in the 16 sub-wards is limited in both scope andscale. Out of the total of 320 impacted properties, 22 will require resettlement of theaf'fectcdl households (4 owners t 1 8 tenants).

The last section of this introductorv chapter describes the lessons learned in similarprojects in Dar es Salaam involving involuritar-v resettlement. Key lessons are thatcommunity participation in decision making is essential to reduce hardship andcomplaints from the PAPs; customary land rights should be respected to the extent* possible; notification and compensation of tenant households is contentious butnecessary. Another important lesson - followed bv the CIUP - is that the application offlexible planning- standards will result in minimal demolition of assets and hencereduced resettlement.

Chapter 2 gives an account on the project setting in the framework of the LocalGovernment Support lProgram (1LGSIP), including an overview of the demographicsituation in the 16 selected sub-wards.

ClCapter 3 outlines the procedures to ensure full and transparent information of theaffected public and the establishment of consultation mechanisms. First, the selectionprocess for community representatives is described, who constitute an importantinterface to all planning activities as well as a first hand address of affected persons toforward their concerns and aspirations with the forthcoming settlement upgradinginvestment. Second, the roles of the technical support team (TST) and the CommunityPlanning Teams (CPT) are explained in view of ensuring public and householdmeetings to facilitate the survey and explain to the PAPs all details on resettlement (asnecessary), valuation. compensation pavments, assistance and grievance resolution.

Chapter 4 accounts for the household surveys and applied methodologies to obtain a3 full picture about the impacts on individual properties and residents, including,businesses. Questioninaires are instrumental in forwarding a wide spectrum otf optionsand responses that were taken into account in the RAP. In particular. the PAPs wereoft'ered several op[ions in case of resettlement. It has been fully explained that theGovernment will pay (ne%v) mark-et value replacement costs for property (land and

l3 Coml-munit. Int(rastructure L'pgradcin Program

structures. etcj to ensure that affectei househiolds can aftfo-d to either bun or build nev.residunces or replace affected structures. Out of the 5/7 affected businesses. mainksmail street-\endinz kiosk s, tearooms and charcoal-sellers. 54 will be able to be re-arranme,'construct newv rooms within the affected property. Therefore. the temporaryimpact on local businesses will be lirnited. The chapter finally describes the extent orproperties bein_ affected in each of"the 1 6 sub-vards.

Chapter 5 describes the steps taken in preparing the compensation plan. First, thoseeligible for compensation in cash or kind are determined- i.e. affected houselholds(ownurs and tenants) rather than individuals. -The chapter then defiines thecompcnsationi packages for the different categtories of impact. Each municipality hasprovided annjiually updated (market-oriented) standard compensation rates to pavreplacement costs for land, structures and other items (graves, garden trees)Allowances to affected households are paid in cash and kind, for accommodation,disturbance, 'transport, and loss of (temporarv or permanent) profit from affectedbusiness. Vulnerable groups will receive additional allowances and assistance and theR,AP also recommends that moving assistance be provided to tenants living in the 18properties that will be fully demolished in addition to compensation for disturbance andtranst ort costs. Tenants who currently occupy rooms in properties that will onlv bepartially affected will be surveyed at a date to be determined by the M/lunicipality andwill also receive moving assistance to cope with 'inding temporary or domiciles andmove their belongings there.

Chapter 6 explains the applied methods during the valuation process (PMlav to July2004) for valuing and entering, into negotiations and agreement with the municipalvaluing team. The process by which the PAPs were informed on their rights during thecompensation process are described and the means by which the affected assets andeligible persons were documented, including the establishment of a dossier that will beeentered in a querv database stored at the valuation section in each municipality weredescribed.

A monitoring database will be established to facilitate monitoring of the resettlementaction plan, and will also be used to record information from the grievance redresssystem devised in the RAP, described in chapter 7. This section also gives an outline ofthe flow of information and responsibilities to address all cornplaints forwarded bv thePAPs with respect to the planned investment project in a correct and timely fashion.

lChapter 8 specifies the roles and responsibilities of the institutional actors relevant forthis RAP. at municipal and other levels. Kev responsibilities are attributed to theSMunicipal Council's planning and coordination department from which the CIUPcoordinator operates, while the urban planning and environmental committee of theN1C scrutinizes and approves the RAP. The chapter also outlines the roles of the wardexecutive officer and the communit planning team working under the sub-wardchairman' s conitrol.

Clhapter 9 provides the implementation schedule and the time chart for all majoractivities and events which are determined in this RAP. Timel planning of certainactivities such as valuation, compensation agreement and payment has been scheduledto allows sufficient time for the project affected person to arrange for alternati;e housingor business premises. etc.. before actual demolition starts. As stated abovc. thc vastmnajority ot impacts on properties (298 out of 320) in the unplanned settlements are

Communit\ Infrastructure L'pgradino Program

only of' small scale and temporar% nature that would allow adequate time for re-arranmement %%ithout major disruption of daily life or business ol the affected persons.

T'he proposed monitoring of the resettlement actions is described in chapter 10. Thenmain responsibilitv f'or overseeing this activity lies in the hands of the head of fheplannin-g and coordination department in each municipalitv. A set of simple verifiableindicators is recommended to monitor and evaluate the success or failureirnplemllentation of the resettlement planning. The verification method will basicallyconsist of household surveys. Community planning teams (CPT) will also be involvedin conducting household survevs to assess the socio-economic situation of PAPs.

The final chapter 11 provides cost estimates for compensation of the affected housesand private structures, and the costs associated with the relocation procedure. Theestimates for compensation costs are based on the records provided by the househoidvaluers and the survey team (records are detailed in annex 1). For-all 16 sub-wards thecosts for compensation of 320 project affected households and the relocation of 150graves amount to TSh 653.905.455.

A cost breakdown is provided for the monitoring activities, amountingy to TSh19,262,000. Together with a 5%o contingency margin, the total costs for implementingthis resettlement action plan amount to estimated TSh 706,8825.718.

IApart from the detailed household inventory and agreed compensation prices during thevaluation process (Annex 1). other detailed information is attached to this document,such as

Annex 2: 16 maps showing the individual totally or partially affected propertiesin each sub-ward selected by CIUP

Annex 3: An English template of the household questionnairesAnnex 4: An assessment of the '20.000 plot program' areas that are proposed

by the GoT to new settlersAnnex 5: List of public consulkation mectingsAnnex 6: Community Resettlement Action Plan - sub-ward budgets.

llIIlll

3 ComnIumxL lristructn,re U'Lorading Progoram

IAcronyms and Abbreviations

CBEO Communlity-based or-anizationsCDA CommunitN Development Association (eg at Hanna Mlassif Sub-

W ard)C EMi I Comm un irt Environmental Managernent PlanCIUP Communliliity Int'Iast-Lcturrc Upgrad ing ProgramcCP'F ComimilluInity Planniig I' TeamnCUP Community Upgrading Plan -

| E.EA Environimental Impact AssessmentESNIF Environmental and Social Managemenit Framewvork (for the LGSP)GRC Grievance Redress CommitteeGoT Government of Tnzan7 aHH HouseholdLGSP Local Government Support ProgramN MC M91unicipal CommTittee

* MD iMlunicipal DirectorMV Municipal ValuerNEMC >National Environmental Mtlanagement Council ( 1983)I >NGO Non-governmental organizationOP Operational Policy (of WB)O & !\ Operation and :9aintenance3 PAF project-affected FamiliesPAP(s) project-affected person(s)PO-RALG The President's Office - Regional Administration and Land

GovernmenitPWC Price Waterhouse Cooper (Consultant)RAP Resettlement Action PlanRoW Right of Way

* Rl'F Resettlement Policy FrameworkTHB Tanzaniia Housing BankTSh Tanzanian ShillingTST Technical Support Team (for CIUP)UCLAS University College of L_ands and Architectural Studies, Dar es SalaamV/NvIC ViIlage/M/ItaaCounc i te I e

| ~~~WB World BanikWUDC Ward Development Comm itteeWE() Ward Executive Officer

UI

II

l3 Community Inrfrastructure Lipgradinc Pro_ram

| I Introduction

3 1.1 Kev sections of the Resettlement Action Plan

This document outlines a resettlement action plan (RAP) for phase I of' theCommunity Infrastructure Upgrading Program. The resettlement policyt framework(RPF') for the Local Government Support Program (LGSP) which provides generalguidance for the development of this RAP. has been disclosed separately for publicdiscussion. Thlis R.N\P also serves as opcrational "uidance tor similar upraldingprograms in Tanzania. It is a model for the second phase of CIUP- a similar RAPwill be prepared for all Phase 1I communities.

UThis resettlement action plan includes the following key sections:

3 - Description oftthe project setting;- Collection of technical information to identify the extent of unavoidable

demolition of houses and structures, and the necessity for relocating affected3 ffamilies or businesses, either permanently or temporarily;- Description of the nature and extent of community consultation and

participation, including the establishment of sub-ward committees;* - On-site data collection by means of specific inventory of the affected

households to obtain exact figures of project affected persons (PAPs) by3 category of impact;- Development of compensation packages o'ffered for each type of impact- Description of the valuation process and the compensations given for each* property affected, itemized by asset- Implementation of grievance resolution procedures:3 - Institutional arrangcments for payment of' comvpcnsation. allowances,

assistances and monitoring;

- Implementatiorn schedule;

- Resettlement monitoring;

- Fotal budget estimates for the RAP.

Prior to valuation field survevs have been conducted to record the features,dimensions and values of all affected properties. The results of the surveys detail allI particulars of the affected people and affected assets. The records are stored togetherwith the household questionnaires (see Annex 3) as dossiers in the municipalplanning and coordination department.

The proposed resettlement actions and measures will ensure:3|a Fhe provision of timely and f`air compensation, with the ultimate goal that allproject-affected persons wvould be compensated at least to restore their pre-project living standard levels;I * Compensation will include loss of non-movable assets and structures (mark-et*alue by the municipality's Chief V aluer), disturbance. vulnerability,l

3 Cornmun,it\ Infrastructure l pgrading P-o-ram

accommodation. transport and loss ot profit (business) allowances. asapplicable:

Necessary assist-ance for relocation to all P.APs whose property , homne w-illbe totally demolished. prior to displacemenit; includinr assistance for theselection of new resettlement sites with adequate facilities:

1 1.2 Principles governing the CIUPI plannino - minimization of resettlement

From the perspective of resettlement the major principle adopted for the CIUP hasbeen to minimize the extent of demolition of existing residential and commercialstructures or etffect on the structural integrity of individual properties. In this contextit needs to be noted that partial demolition will be permitted under the CIUPinvestment project in accordance with two provisions made in the legislativeframework'. In several cases the land owner and valuer have come to a mutualunderstanding that partial demolition of a house will be unacceptable, although itwould structurally not affect the building's integritv: This procedural agreementrelated particularly to cases where the families claimed that the remaining property| would hardly serve as adequate homestead or, in case of small business, as basis forsustainiing the familv's livelihood. Consequently, such houses/structure would thenbe totally demolished and the corresponding reg,istration and compensation packageswould applv. For reasons of easing and compensating for the hardship the R.APtheref'Ore has categorized any property as being totally demolished when at least50%(°i of all build-up structures buildings were to be removed.

Engineering options and flexible design solutions:

| (On the engineering side the planning team adopted a more tlexible approach. Theprinciple of minimization resettlement was pursued by the following steps:

(i) To minimize the extent of involuntary resettlemerit specific technical optionshave been taken into consideration. Mvluch of the upgrading activity will focuson footpath, roads and storm water drainage improvements. In order to3 reduce the number of potentially affected houses in certain cases the CIUPplanners/engineers, in close consultation with the communities, opted toadopt levels of service that are technically and financially appropriate (basic3 and intermediate service levels).

(ii) Rather than opting for rigid technical standards with respect to ROW and3 more or less straight geometrv of new roads the engineers designedmeandering road and drainage structures to accommodate existing structuresas much as possible, reduced carriageways and rights of way (ROW) to theminimum feasible width (to maintain unhindered traffic flow), and in somesections limited vehicular flow to one-wav traffic:

I(iii) Partial demolition of built structures has been taken into account. Thepotentially affected structures have been carefully surveyed by the engineers

One i. the Land Act 1999 and the re-ulations made under it. the other is the Land Acquisition Act1(67 th;it explicitlv allo"s partial demolition ot privatic ly owncd structiures w)hent public tltereStprevails.

Cornmunit rirt'rstructur- -,r'adinen PLoramn

to determine w,hether the al'f'ected buildino vould remain structurally interalI and safe -ronm collapse after demolition of' part of the structure. In case suchexamination gave doubtful or negtive results. rull demolition has beena(greed.

(iv) Selecting location for- new w-aste collectioni structures in uninhabited spaceswhere surrounding impacts wvould be minimized, in contrast to otherI reflections that would rather place the waste collection systems in closervicinity to where (domestic) waste is generated and people would have shortdistances onl,v to deliver and store their garbage properly.

(v) In order warrant meaningful planning (e.g. to ensure safe emergencvevacuation lines and trafficable road conditions) each single location wasI carefulily screened against the above, principle versus preparing for afunctional road and drainage network..-

(vi') The plannino and ftinal dsin solut ee maps in Annex 2) have beendone in close cooperation wvith the environmental teaml wvho assessed the EIAdocumented separately as the ENIP for ChiP.

Commlunitv involvement in minimization ot' resettlement:

| The coMmunity actively participated in efforts to minimize resettlement. In the sub-ward meetings headed by the chairman residents raised numerous concerns that weredulyv taken into account by the CIUP planners. The result of this consultation wasI further reduction of potential project-induced impacts. For example, each potentiallvaffected plot has been scrutinized in a joint survey with Communitv representatives(Community Planning Teams) and PAPs for possible solutions (e.g. options forI accommnodating the re-arrangement/construction of a new room or house). Thetechnical expert gave, as applicable, advice on how such re-arrangements could becarried out without affecting the integritv and stability of the old structures. As a3 result. in most cases where only single or annexed rooms, part of rooms. latrines,verandas, kiosks and fences were considered to be demolished. solutions thatreducedl the impact to a short period were possible. In fact, in most cases if the* owners would start building/rebuilding the affected str-uctures by the time of receiptof compensation payment no temporary resettlement. loss of business or hardship3 would be encountered. As outlined in the implementation schedule (section 9.1)there is a sufficient time between compensation payment and beginning of theupgrading construction activities to allow for all newlv re-arrange/construct

residential rooms or new business annexes (e.g. kiosks) to be readv for occupationbefore demolition starts. This would result only in minor impacts on the dav-to-davlife or income situation of the affected HH.

Durin-g the consultations some residents indicated their reluctance to leave theirhabitual area and social. Some expressed concern about the prospect of finding* altemative housing within their neichborhood--- alternative re-settlement sites setaside under the 20.000 plot program such as MNbweni (see Annex 4) were too faraway. Finallv, there was some anxiety over the extent and nature of compensationpackages. although the TSTs did their level best to pro\ide a full and transparentpicture of compensation standards and to provide fair treatment to all project-affected persons.

| (Communlit\ Infrastructure Upgrading Programr

1.3 Overall extent of unavoidable resettlement and partial impacts on3 properties

As a result of applying the principle of minimizing resettlement, the magnilude ofexpected impacts and hardship will he limited to a relatively small numnber of'* f'llailics. In total 320 properties will be aff'ected. of' which 3 house owners (and 1 8of their tenants) will be fullv resettled and 3 business premises permanentlydermolished; 291 house owners will have partial demolition of their structuresI (affecting an estimated2 number ot' 80 tenants and 54 businesses which will berelocated withiln the housc owniers plot), and 15) graves which will need to berelocated within the community. In the majority of cases the CIUP will result onlyI in partial demolition of properties. often a portion of a room or secondary structureslike steps. verandas and outside storerooms.

I Overall, the CIUP interventions that will result in relocation caused by unavoidablefull demolition and removal of 22 properties. including 4 houses occupied by their3 owners, and 18 occupied by tenants and 3 businesses; and 1 50 graves as follows:

* Kinondoni M4unicipality: 10 properties and 2 graveyards with 50 graves,3 . Ilala ŽvIunicipalitv: 8 properties and I graveyard with 75 graves;* Temeke Municipalitv: 4 properties and I graveyard with 25 graves.

A fair number of graves (150) will be affected, as the new int'rastructures will passthrough cemeteries in four sub-wards. The issue of cultural and religious sensitivityhas thoroughlv been discussed in the initial consultation meetings to avoid contlicts.* The sclection of these areas has been, in all four cases, the preferred option tootherwSise increase the number of houses for total demolition. It has been noted thatthere wNas no serious objection from the community to relocate the graves to nearby* cemetery's or within existing cemeteries. In fact, the relocation of graves for publicworks interventions is not uncommon in Dar es Salaam and therefore did not causedissent among the families who were affected by this planning option. By law theI municipality is obliged to provide the affected f'amilies, free of charge, a newcemetery plot. In addition. there is a fixed compensation rate for this tvpe of impact3 to be paid to the immediate familv of the dead.

As far as partial demolition is concerned, this will affect 298 properties withoutnecessitating the resettlement of people (although 80 tenants and 54 businesses willbe relocated elsewhere on the plot) in:* . Kinondoni 'Municipality: 84 propertiesI . Ilala MvIunicipalitv: 11 5 properties* Temeke Mlunicipality: 99 properties.

I3 2The exact number is still to be determined atter the RAP appraisal. The surveyor teamt informed tilateven a lower number might come torward as in manv czscs amcillolition otfr(oolis c=inprises less th:it1halfoftthe affected structures (Annex 1) and if so. these roorns may even not fully be removed.

C ommLnlni[t Inrrastructure I pgradimne Pro2ram

NMore inrormation on spec.r'ic impacts is provided in section 4.3 and in AAnnex 1.Detajis or' The survey records on the household structures. members. houseconditions. household income situation and specitic demands of the affectedhouseholds wkill be monitored (commencinc atfer the RAP appraisal) and dossiersprepared and Ciled at the municipal planning offices.

1.4 Lessons learned in similar projects involving involuntarv resettlement

In the past. Tanzania has gained valuable experience with resettlement. Somerelevant examples' in infrastructure upgrading projects similar to the present one are:a) The Morogoro road expansion project (1995)In a top-down approach the Ministrv of Wv'ork just decided to publish a notice to thegeneral public ordering all the people residingv within the road reserve of theMlorogoro Road- o vacate the area in order to give wav for road widening. There wasno consultation between the ministrv and the communities. The affected people inthis area were upset and reluctant to have their houses demolished to pave the wayfor construction of the road and demanded compensation. In the end, only 9households appeared to be eligible for compensation as thev had legal rights andwere affected by the compulsorily acquisition of their land. A sum of TSh 77 millionwas paid eventually in 1997. The compensation went to people owning the houses,not to those who were tenants. House / land owners who were completelv affectedby the project, i.e. total demolition of their home, were given by the local authorities,free of charoe. new residential plots in the Nlbweni - Ndalindi area.

Lcssonls learned from the NMorogyoro Road project:- A top-down approach without much consideration for the people affected bythe project is likely to result in public resistance instead of cooperation.I - Community consultation may be time consuming but would result in lesstime needed for legal procedures, complaints and grievances.- Tenants of affected properties were not considered tor compcrisation ormoving assistance.

b) The Songosongo 'Gas to Electricitv Project' (1996)

This project resulted in large-scale resettlement of people from Gongo la Mboto,Ulongani, Kibada, and Kinyerezi to a planned resettlement site in Kinverezi. Peoplefrom Kimara. Ubungo. Changanvikeni and Wazo were resettled in Salasala. Theproject resulted in resettlement of 230 families. Onlv land . house owners wereconsidered eligible to partake in the resettlement program. Tenants and tenants werenot included. In case of tenancv (rented rooms, houses, kiosks etc) in houses that hadto be demolislhed the owners were stipulated to notifv the tenants 3 months inadvance betoore evacuation.

The Songosongo project involved extensive consultations with stakeholders. Theaffected people were consulted throu_h various meetings carried out by the

In all quoted projects tirst-hand c\perience has been gamned bs the resettlement specialists tromUCLAS wvho are equally working on this RAP for CIUP

lConm,munit% Int'frstructure U 'pcradinc Program

Songosongo conIsultanc:, zeam. Frequent tield %isits *~ere mzade and people creinvited for public meetings to infor-m them about the objectives and the benefits of'the projec: and the compensation that the! wnere entitled to receive.

The recipient communities of SalaSala and Kinyerezi were closely involved in theprocess and intensivelv- consulted to obtain their vievs and opinions. The SalaSalaand Kinverezi areas were under the customarv Land Tenure Svstem. The landownerswere rcquil-cd to lease part ot' their i'arms for people to be resettled in theirneighborhood. It was thus important to make plot subdivisions based on the existingfarm boundaries with provision of public space for roads, public facilities anfdinfrastructure.

Lessonis learned from the Songosongo project are:I - Project affected people tind it easier to accept negative consequences of aproject if they understand the objectives and the benefits for the communityas a whole;

- .Active involvement in the entire planning process of the project affectedpeople and consultation with the community at large is indispensable;

- Existing conditions. such as customarv (land) rights. should be respected asmuch as possible.

lllIlIlIlI

lCommuni[%. nfrasrruc-ure L'pcradinc ProLram

C) Hanna Nassif communirv infrastructure upgrading (1993-2000)T'he Fianna N4assif communitv infrastructure upgrading project is a good example orhow loss of assets and resettlement can be minimized or even completily avoidedand compensation costs reduced: Experience in Hanna Nassif shows that this can beachie\ ed by:- Intensive community consultation,- \iNegotiation with at'fected people (only house owners were considered, no

tenants);3 - Application of flexible planning standards.

The budget available for upgrading included costs for compensation andresettlement. This arrangement made the communities to understand that paymentsfor compensation or resettlement would reduce the scope of the inifrastructureupgrading. This was instrumental in achieving effective solutions and reducing theoverall compensation and resettlement costs. Some residents (owners) were evenwilling to volunteer giving Up part ot their land for the benefit of the communitywithout asking for compensation.

IllIIIlllI

I3 Community- infrastructure L peuradincr Program

2 The project settina

2.1 Brief description of the Communitv Infrastructure Upgrading Program3'lhe (ommunitv Int'rastructure Upgrading Prog!ram (CILUP.) is part of the w-ider LocalGovernment Support Program (LGSP). intending- to enhance the delivery andmana_ement capabilities, productive efficiencies and financial sustainability of local3 government in Tanzania. The CIUP will improve community infrastricture in 3,selected areas in Dar es Salaam to appropriate functional standards, affordable andresponsive to communitv demand. CIUP will upgrade infrastructure and services forroads and fbotpaths. drainage. sanitation, solid waste, and streetlights. Upgrading ofinifrastructure and urban services will take place in a period of 4 vears (2005-2008).The first phase of implementation starts in the year 2005, covers 16 unplanned areas.and benefits 167,000 people. For each ClUIP phase I area a comunIllity upgradiln;,plan (CUP) has been prepared in a demand responsive way (full CUPs are avail-ablein the project office). The respective maps are appended (Annex 2) to this report.

The basic demographic figures of the sub-wards that will participate in phase I otthe CTiP are given in Table 1. I 'Phase I CfUP sub-wards'. The map overleaf showvsthe location of both the phase I and phase 11 CIUP areas.

Table 1.1 Demographic features of the CIUP phase I sub-wards

3 No PrPoject Are Po pulation !Area (ha) |DensityMlunicipality: Kinondonii3 1 I M \lanzeseUzuri 1 15.397 36 4272 , Kilimani 1 3.523 47 1 2873 Midizini 1 6.153 39 1 414

I 4 MnaziMmoja 9.189 26 1 3565 Muungano 5.915 16 3706 Mvuleni 6.689 15 446

Sub-total Kinondoni 66.866 L 179 1 _374

Municipalitv: llala7 N Mnvamanii 17.236 48 357

9 1 8 I Malapa 12.912 34 380I.1 9 1 Madenige I12.614 32 394

10 Mtarnbani 20.447 53 3 86Sub-total llala 63.209 1 167 1 378* Municipality: Temeke

iI Chang-ombeA 4. 009 1 57312 Chang'ombeB 4.868 15 32513 Toroli 7.984 1 7 - 70I | 14 Sandali 11.713 3 33515 .vlpoRo 1 3.624 15 1 24216 1 'lwemrbeladu 5.206 18 289

Sub-total Temeke 37.404 107 350_Grand total Phase I 167.479 453 370

I .S/7urce: Censzls 2002

II

I3 ComrnunitC Infrastrucmirv LUpgradiniz Program

2.2 /laM p showving the location of the CliP interventions

Priority Sub- Wards in Phase I and 11 - CIUP - Dar es Salaam City

;t 2 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.egenad\ / Fl~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ard pcunoary

Sub oVdtd B3ondary

Boundary

4 M\- 1-' (nhja

5Muong-no

\ , ____, / 9 ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~Mal.ap|C oMadeng.

' ! * \ , S \ /~~~~~~~~~~ N 0 I A N 0 C E A N4 I2 Chang -omo .e

/ _ \ I 24Sand.fi

16 Mwerfbetadu

L ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Selected Settl-mnt

17 Kmgogo Kw,r18 r<mg.g Mbuy-rr

91K g9 Mk- urN> / t~ < [ %t r | s20 K- K opa

X ~~~~~~~~21 Mtakul1sI \2 \<~ XfA ---t 1 ) X 1 22 M.Umbem| sX--<w - a % / = ) 1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~20 K-rbo

I 24 Mlorrgan,25 Az,-ro Raskaz-kl 26 Tarmbooc-el,

27 K,cah garl,28 Az-.rr Kosmflr

nHg~J'LAL. 29 25. (ceo Mearryd 29 Keko M-arnga A

1 1M(gu-umrra-N A

| -./ I _

I>- - -a 0 1500 3000

I - Source Aerial photo. 1992 and Fieldwork, 2002

U .I

l| C'ormrnunmv Infiastructure U'pLrading Program

3 3 Community participation and establishment of local committees

Communit -participation in the CITJP was designed to ensure that an iterative3 process of consultation and .feedback was undertak-en from the beginning of programpreparation to the post-construction period. Te RAP has paid special attention tocommunitv participation seen as most critical in planning and decision-mnaking. in3 addrcssing enivirotinmental and resettlement issues, and in devising responsibilitiestor the monitoring of the outlined resettlement actions.

3.1 Selecting communitv representatives

The focus of the participation process has been on the sub-ward level, both withrespect to the entire community and the group of' representatives (CommIIunLityPlanning Team - CPT) established at the beginningg of the project preparation periodto guide the planning process. Communitv participation is regarded as crucial to thesuccess of participatorv planning, communication, monitoring and supervision. andsettling possible disputes within the community.

In each of the 16 phase I CIUP areas community planning teams were establishedthrough direct election of representatives (typically 10 per sub-wards) of "housingclusters" or geographical zones in the community. This option (direct election) wasconsidered by most sub-ward leaders as the most democratic solution-one whichwould ensure that the community's interests are adequately represented.

With respect to the preparation of the RAPs, the role of the CPT or electedrepresentatives is to- ensure the functioning of the public consultation process;I - assist Municipal Technical Support Teams (TSTs) established to prepare and

manage CIUP, in arranging for community follow-up meetings;- act as resource information persons for the surveyors of the PAPs and their

affected properties,- discuss issues raised bv affected persons and communicate them to the TST;- facilitate the assistance program (e.g. moving assistance, assistance to

vulnerable groups);- cooperate with NGOs and CBOs involved in development programs;3 - assist in initiating the process of grievance resolution;- assist, as needed, in the resettlement monitoring activities.

33.2 MNIechanisms of communitv consultation and participation

The following steps were taken to establish strong linkages between communitiesand municipalities for the purpose of community consultation and communication3with regard to the CIUP in general and RAPs in particular:- Formation of Technical Support Teams (TST) for each municipality.

consisting of municipal government staff and experts of the consultants3 team:

3l_ _ _

l3 Commmunit; Infrastructure Lporading Program

I - Preparation of maps tor each area showing the foreseen investment structuresand the individual properties that will become affected:Public announcement for meetings to iaunch the C;P project at wvard andsub-vward levels4, including presentation of the objectives, principles, rolesand responsibilities of all actors in the participatory process, likelv impactsand impacts, implications on resettlement, budget ceiling, time frames, andinstitutional aspects of the CIUP. The public and the affected persons havealso been informed about their contribution fees, their compensation rights,and about the registration procedures in line with notification times and the| . 'cut-off dates. The presentation was made by the TST:

- Elections and actual formation of Community Planning Teams (CPT) foreach CIUP area: The chairman announced a public meeting in each CIUP

d area to elect community representatives for the CIUP. In the meeting theCommunity Planning Tearm (CPT) has been presented as the group ofrepresentatives.

| - The CIUiP areas were subdivided in housing clusters (geographical zones)from where the residents had to elect representatives. Previous experience inTabata and Kijitonyama had revealed that clusters of about 30 to 40 housesI are rather balanced and most suitable in practice. This procedure ensuresequitv and eliminates favoritism to particular areas. It also facilitates directcommunication between residents and representatives, because the clustersU are small enough to ensure that people know each other.

- Housing clusters were defined in accordance with geographical features andexisting street patterns and not by using the still existing ten-cell unitssystem, which is more politically oriented. Gender equity has been achievedbv election of one male and one female from each housing cluster.3 - Subsequent housing cluster meetings were held easy to obtain feedback.Such meetings were also the forum for disseminating information andreceiving ideas and views on ways to prioritize community needs and to test3 willingness of the community to pay for urban services delivery.

- It was further decided that the sub-ward chairman and the sub-ward secretaryparticipate in the process by virtue of their administrative position. TheI various communities could opt to invite specific stakeholder representativesto participate in the process. such as N'0Os and CBOs. the businesscommunity or religious institutions.

Once agreement has been reached otn how to select representatives from theI . community, the sub-sequent steps for planning were as follows:

(i) Joint field visits (TST and CPT) for orientation, identification ofpriorities, identification of infrastructure deficiencies, proposedinfrastructure interventions. identification of environmental issues andpriorities and need for resettlement;3 (ii) Plotting of the proposed interventions on the relevant map of thecommunity area in order to give the CPT an idea of the extent of theimpact and potential problems, such as demolitions;

see Annex 5, list of organized meetings in the respective communities

lCommunit\ Infrastructure Upgrading Program

Ii ii) Case-b\-case discussions between engineers. TSTs and CPTs to Find bestsolution to minimize structure demolition and resettlement and mitigateagainst negative environmental impacts:

(in) Guided by the technical experts (including environmental and* *rsesettlement specialists) the CPTs and TSTs assisted in cost analysis and

finalization of the initial investment programs;(v) Formal approval of the investment programs by the sub-ward committee

and the ward development committee.

With exception of stepT (iii) the entire planning exercise included continual internalconsultations between representatives and residents of the respective housingclusters to obtain feedback on proposed interventions, as well as addressingcomplaints, priorities and preferences of the PAPs. In some instances. when crucialdecisions had to be made the elected leaders were mobilized to participate in theprocess and to resolve initial disputes with PAPs. This facilitated not only thedecision-making process but also demonstrated commitment and a sense ofownership on behalf of the elected leaders.

The results of the planning process, including the respective detailed maps (Annex2), arc incorporated in the CoMmunity Upgrading Plans (CUPs) that have beenprepared for each CIUP area.

lllIlllIl

l3 Communit% Infrastructure Lpgrading Program

3 4 On-site data collection - inventorv of the affected households

4.1 Household survey and questionnaires

First. the TST code-marked' all houses and structures along the new irifrastructureupgrading access routes. The chairrnan assisted in identif'ication of the house ownerswho then were notified and a date for surveving the plot was agreed. The owners ofaffected properties and their household members were surveyed and (see householdquestionnaire Annex 3) to identify their aspirations, priorities and concerns inI connection with the anticipated partial or full demolition of structures. .More detailsabout the discussed resettlement and compensation options are presented befow.

3 I)During the survey and questionnaire exercise the PAPs were explained theinmplications of impacts, their entitlements and registration requirements in linie withnotification times. Tn accord w ith the RPF, the cut-off date has been established andcommunicated to the PAPS bv the date of the inventory of all affected propertv inthie communit'v.

| Teniants were registered in name and number of people present at the time ofsurvey

| Resettlement options:

During the household surveys all heads of the project-affected households who facefull or partial demolition of their home were asked, among others, to makestatements concerning the following options concerning their choice for futureresidence:

* . within the plot, if adequate space available* within other sub-wards to be specified3 . accept a preferential plot offered by the Government6* wish to arrange future residential area at their own discretion.

| Although the municipal authorities have land set aside for resettlement (Annex 4).the displaced persons are neither obliged to take that allocated plot, nor will thevhave a preferential choice or expectation to receive a free plot. Therefore, all eligibleI PAPs will receive compensation rates and allowance packages as fixed in standardprocedures during the valuation process and remain completely independent in their3 choice of further residence.

The majority of the interviewed PAPs indicated (in the questionnaires) their wish toremain on plot" or "left to re-arrange on the same plot". According to the field

It has been noted that the number of tenant household members often fluctuates. In some casesowners were already in the process of notifying their tenants to vacate their premises and sometenants have already left in anticipation of the imminent demolition of the rented premises. Houseowners are legally obliged to give a 3 month advance notice to tenants when thev want to use the3 rented premises themselves or want to terminate the rent agreement for substantiated reasons.At the time of preparation of the questionnaires the valuers were not aware that the provision otplots (instead of full compensation for land and asset losses) will be optional (decision communicatedin May 2004).

| Communitv infrastructure Upgrading Program

surve%ors the connotation is that these project-affected persons. most of them facingonly partial demolition of their house or part of a room would opt to re-arranet/construct the room or house wvithin the same plot beundaries when spaceallows. The same holds true for businesses- such as those vending their goods onU the striet from a k-iosk attached on the roadside of the house.' Detailed numbers otthe number o'f people who will re-arrange within their plot, as well as number and3 tvpe ot'affected business are presented in A\nnex I

Compensation options:

There has been no choice offered to the PAPs with respect to cash or kindcompensationi. The RAP follows the principle that all PAPs (owners) are treated| ~~equa]lyv with t'ull cash compensation t'or land and structures at undepreciated market-* price replacement costs. This compensation, without any further allocation of funds,

is presumed to be sufficient for the purchase of a new house or alternatively a plot3 on which to construct a new home.

4.2 Rtesults: Pro ject-affected persons by categorv of impact

Table 4-1: Number of propertv owners and their resettlement options

3 Type of Impact Number of RH Opting for remaining on plot site 1* ~~~~~Tvpe of Imnpact Number of WHHl____________________________ .~_ . and re-arrangem ent

Home fuliy affected 22 not applicableBusiness fully affected 0 not applicable

I Home partly affected 298 2983 Business temporarily affecteds 7 54 9!Severe impact as PAPs belong I none

to vulnerable group l l5 ! Tenants (estimnation of RH) 80 not applicablet Graves affected I 5D0 not applicable4.3 Extent of resettlement in each of the CIUP sub-wards

I -In many cases the house owner will reconstruct rooms elsewhere on the plot and/or trim theirextensions (verarndahs, bars, shops) in accordance with the new right of way limits. Similar re-arran_ernents will be used to handle roadside storerooms, veranda or steps. Finally, businessmen suchas artisans (e.g. carpenters) who currently use the roads in the unplanned settlements as 'work andstorage place' have been notified by the chairmen and agreed to shift their informal occupancy of theROW to backyard spaces. It is unlikely that these types of artisans would be significantly affected bythe project in the performance of their activities.

' Businesses like tood vending stalls. commercial stores, charcoal selling kiosks, tea rooms, barbecuesetc. are generally integrated in house structures in the unplanned settlements; therefore there arerinumerous cases where one and the same affected properny falls under both categories of 'businessaffected' and 'residential rooms' affected. The valuation records do not distinguish betweentemporary, partly or fulling impact on a specific business.1 Three business structures are located in full, affected propenies, i.e. thes will be replaced togetherwith the inhabitants as chosen. All others have. according to the HH survey team's records, plannedto shift their business structures in line with the determined ROW,

3 Comiirnmuti r Infrastructure Upgrading Program

T lhe iocation of the properties affected by the CIL'P Mierventions is indicated on the3 map t'r each sub-wvard in Annex 2.

3 k;%KIN'ONDONI NIUNICTPALITY

(1) Uzu riBy adapting the designs to the local conditions, improvement of roads and stormI water drains affect 18 properties. including full demolition of 2 houses necessitatingresettlement of the residents. The other 16 partially affected, property owners arewilling and able to rebuild the demolished'part of their house on the same plot.

(2) KilimaniFull demolition in this sub-ward has been limited to one house, affecting onehousehold. Otherwise. 9 properties will be partiallv affected, among them one bar.

(3) Mlvuleni

Upgrading of some of the current footpaths into access roads, has led to widening ot'the ROW. Although the designs have been adapted in close consultation with the* community to avoid demolition, Two houses will be demolished and their occupantsresettled elsewhere. According to the HH survey, the owners have indicated to preferresettlement in Mbweni or Bunju (see Annex 4). 15 other houses will be partiallyaffected, involving the removal of fences, walls, gates and verandas. These affectedhouseholds have indicated to reconstruct the lost property within their plots.

1 (4) ?vnazi MojaFull demolition affects 3 properties and 13 others are to be partially demolished dueto the fact that parts of the houses (rooms. verandas, shop kiosks) protrude into theI road reserves. One house owner who will loose his property completely opts forresettlement to lMbweni or Bunju. The other house owners intend to rebuild the3 demolished part of their house on the same site. In this sub-ward 2 graveyard siteswill also be affected by the project, resultino in relocation ot'50 graves.

(5) MuunganoIn this sub-ward one house will be fully demolished due to the road rehabilitationworks. 12 houses will be partially affected (mainly verandas).

1 (6) MidiziniOne house must be completely demolished and the inhabitants must be resettled. 1 9other properties will be affected with partial demolition (verandas, side-rooms andkiosks), but this would not require relocation of people.

TEM/IEKE MEUNICIPALITY

(7) Chang'ombe'.A'One house will be demolished completelv necessitating resettlement and 22properties will be partially affected (removal of side-rooms. verandas, staircases). In3 some properties fruit trees need to be cut.

(8) Chan-'ombe B'

I3 Commnunlt\ Infrastructure LUpgradine Program

The planned upgrading vvOr.i will affect 20 properties. No house needs to beI demolished completely. The house owners opted for reconstruction of the part oftheir property that has to be demolished wvithin their current plot. A total of 25graves will be affected as the inf'rastructure investment passes through the localJgravevard. The araves (including tombstones. if present) will be relocated inaccordance with the community norms.

| (9) ToroliThe area has fairly wide access roads measuring about 6 meters wide. improvementincluding provision of the storm water drains will partiallv affect 13 properties.

(1 0) SandaliThe n-main roads are currentlv 6 to 12 meters wide. Infrastructure upgrading willI result in partial demolition of 8 structures, inciuding the removal of verandas, roomsand walls. Accordingly, there is no need for resettlement of Sandali residents.

1 (I I) i/pogoInfrastructure upgrading can be done without much demolition. Only one house willbe demolished totally necessitating resettlement. 23 more properties will be partiallvaffected, including the removal of one or two rooms, walls or verandas. Two mangotrees will also be affected. Where rooms will be partially affected, the residents havedecided to re-arrange new room constructions within their plot boundaries.

(12) MwembeladuTwo houses will be demolished and the residents will need to be relocated. 13 otherI properties will be partiallv affected (removal of walls, rooms, verandas). The ownersof these 13 houses have indicated to prefer reconstruction of the property lost withintheir original plots.

I ILALA\ INJINICIPALITY

(13) NlnvamaniThe main central access road is about 7.5 meters wide, and its improvement will

* result in a limited demolition of properties. NMost of the existing road lack side drainsand the construction of such structures will affect the workshops, kiosks, verandas3 and rooms currently extending into the existing roadway. In this denselv populatedarea. 4 properties will have to be demolished completely while 22 properties will bepartiallv affected. The 4 house owners who are fully affected have signaled theirwish to be resettled in one of the areas chosen for the purpose. All others havedecided to reconstruct new rooms within their current plots.

(14) MvalapaThe CIUP interventions in this sub-ward will result in one house being completelydemolished. 17 others will be partially affected. The affected structures consist ot3 rooms. verandas and walls/fences.

l

33 Conmrmunit\ Inmrastructure Upgrading Prograr

(15) MladengeThree houses are subject to be totallv pulled down and the affected families need tobe resettled. 41 other properties will be affected with partial demolition withoutnecessitatinQ resettlement. The gravevard in this sub-ward "ill equally be affected.requiring a total of 75 craves to be relocated.

(16) MtambaniPartial demolition of 335 properties is needed to upgrade the infrastructure inM4tamrnani. 'No house will be -totally removed. All affected people opted forreconstructing the lost property on their current plot and thus nobody would berequired to resettle elsewhere.

lllllllIIllI

l3 Community Infrastructure lpgrading Program

5 Compensation for lost assets and hardship due to demolition andrelocation

5.1 Groups eligible for compensation

The groups eligible for specific compensation and assistance packages in thecommTunity intrastructLire upg,rading program are:

(i) .Affected houses and businesses (owners and tenants) suffering any directloss, whether permanent or temporary, complete or partial, of assets orinvestment, land and property or access to natural or economic resources as aresult of the sub-project activities;

(ii) Vulnerable households - having special needs than other households. Thiscategory includes households and businesses that for various reasons" areunable to find replacement housing, pack their personal belongings orbusiness inventory, move their belongings or stock and unpack them in the3 new location.

Personis or ag,encies eligible for compensation for inadvertent construction damagewill hold the contractor liable.

The CIUP does not impinge on the local community as no public and/or social andcultural common facilities will be affected. No community building, school, clinic,or other public structure, nor any infrastructure such as telephone poles and lines,electric poles and lines, water mains, sewer mains and the like is affected bv this3 project. Compensation measures therefore do not apply.

5.2 Compensation categories

Compensation for land, built-up structures, businesses and relocation actions will bebased on the following categories of the impacts:

- Replacement cost of propertv: mainlv residential and business structures.yvegetation: Property owners (houses and businesses) are entitled toI replacement costs for land and lost structural (unmovable) assets at mark-etvalues' l;

- Compensation allowances for propertv owners: In cases where the impact onthe property is (i) partial. i.e. will not require displacement and the affectedproperty owner opts for re-arrange,'construct new structures within the existentplot. provisions are made for compensation terrmed in Tanzanian law asdisturbance allowance. In cases where (ii) fuill relocation is unavoidable,

| P0 Typically, people who need this additional assistance are:- aged people without dependences;- handicapped.' chronically ill, disabled persons without dependences;- single women with very poor status;I - people that are classified as extreme poor.

She Chief Municipal Chief 'valuier deterimiined to use the municipality's annuallk updatedcompensation lists tor all items subject Cor replacement.

l3 CommunitN Infrastructure Upgradingz Program

additional accommodation and transportation allowvance s will be paid (see3 >ection 5.3.2 below).

-- \Assistance to vulnerable households: Special assistance and allowance will be3 considered for this group.

- .Assistance for tenants: Tenants will receii-e assistance (see note., below)- tothe extent they are impacted- when the affected property is used by tenants

* for residential or business purposes. All tenants will be assisted with movingand locating new housing or businesses and provided compensation in kind'2 ,-i.e. assistance to pack up. to move the goods, to re-establish themselves in theI new places etc.) Tenants will also be assisted in lodging claims against houseowners, that do not pass on the transport allowance allocated by the project tothiem.

Shops and businesses: The owners of the affected business temporarilyaffected bv construction are eligible for compehsation in cash for thetemporary loss of profit resulting from the period of the move. As applicable,wages of salaried employees will be paid for the time the business is closed.

- (JGraves: Where the infrastructure upgrading requires the removal of a graveJ (including a tombstone), the relatives of the respective dead will be given the

riaht to remove the remains of their dead relatives and bury them in a cemeteryclose to the actual location. The municipality is responsible to allocate suchI replacement plot. Standard municipal rates apply to compensate for costs forrelocation, including possible exhumation rites.

3 5.3 Compensation packages

This RAP follows the terminology of allowances as used in the TanzanianRegulations of Land Act 4 of 1999 13. The compensation rates detailed below aremostly referring to the tables 5-1, 5-2 and 5-3 which list the standard compensationrates applied during the valuation process for replacement"' ot affected structures,utilities, horticulture, trees, graves ctc. Details oni the case-wise application of therates for each affected property are given in Annex 1.

| The rates are similar for all sub-wards within the mnunicipality. The actual valuecompensated has been the one determined during the final agreement between the3 valuer and the property owner.

Table 5-1 Compensation Standards applied for affected propertiesin Kinondoni Municipality

r1Compensation RateS/N Replacement Item Unit in TSh

Land, unbuilt , m2 5.0002 a House, block construction, floors doors, 10.000

windows, roof corrug. iron m °__

12 This is in accord with the RPF *vhich stipulates that compensation should include any otherimmediate cost or capital expenditure incurred to the development of the subject land.I G-' (,vt. Notice of 4/4/2001 The Land Assessment of the Value of Land for Compensation14 Replacement value is defined as cost of putting up an equivalent structure as the one existing at thetime of valuation and making allowance tor age. state repair and economic obsolescence in the place.

I| CommunitV Intras2tructurm Lpgrading Program

House, lower quality ciock construction, 2

floors doors, winocws, roof corrugated 0iron

c ., House, constructed of mud &poles. m2 50 000 to 80.000I : Ron sheet roof, cement screed floor _________to_80_OCO

d House, constructed of mud &poles, m2 30.000i Iron sheet roof, no cement screed floor |

eI Water connection present 1 5% increase of house valueI { I S electricity connection or 5% increase of house valuetelephone line i absent 5% increase of house value3 a Kiosk or storage room, attached to m2 80.000

,house structure good construction mquality/materials

__j

b Kiosk, attached to house structure m2 | 60. 000medium quality/materials I _3 { c , Kiosk, attached to house structure poor m2 20.000

uality/materials _4 a Veranda, roofed with concrete slab m2 40.0003 r b Veranda, roofed wl iron sheet at high 2K- F tlevel >30cm

I d Veranda unroofed m2 15.000e Steps (top surface) m 2 20.000I 5 Latrine pit, medium quality 1.5 m 0 60.000b ILatrine pit, poor quality 1.5 m 0 36.000o c Inspection chamber iece 6.000d Standard septic tank (1.8x3m) piece 900.000

6 Fence, cement block m 50.000b Fence, blocks only 4 courses m 25.000c Fence, barbed wire or poles m F 10,000dFe-nce, other material (makuli) m 5.000- Hedge m 5.o0007 Mlimbitree, fully productive 1 00% 7.000

__ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ._ _ __.._ _ _*b Coconut tree, fully productive 100% 122.000

Ic Eucalyptus tree, fully productive ! 100% 1 5.000d Miarobaini tree, fully productive 100% 7.0001e Ashoktree, fully productive 100% 5.000f. Suqarcane _ frond 800j fYams acre 7.00038Lk I _ Grave with or without tombstone per tomb 72.500

IIIIII

I3 Communivy Intrastructure LUpgrading Prorarn

3 Table 5-2: Compensation Standards applied for affected propertiesin Ilala Mlunicipality

* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ._

_ _ _ I

S/I Replacement |tem Compensation RateSIN Replacement item Unit in TSh

* 1 t _ Land, unbuflt r m2 _ _5_000__2 a House, block construction, floors doors, 2I windows, roof corrug.i ron

s ~~~~b !House, lower quality block construction, m m2 60.000 to 80.000 1floors doors, windows, roof corrugated 0iron __ _I I House, constructed of mud &poles, 2Ron sheet roof, cement screed floor 0 t

d t House, constructed of -nud &poles, m2 30.000Iron sheet roof, no cement screed floor 2

e Water connection present 5% increase of house valueelectricity connection or 5% increase of house valuetelephone line absent /5% increase of house value -3 a Kiosk or storage room, attached to m2 100.000house structure good construction

L.. quality/materialsb Kiosk, attached to house structure m2 a0.000

medium quality/materialsc Kiosk, attached to house structure poor m2. 20.000

Z -quality/materials __ _ _* 4 a IVeranda, roofed with concrete slab M-_ 40000

b Veranda, roofed w/ iron sheet at high m2 20.000level >30cm _

|d Veranda unroofed m2 15.000e Steps (top surface) m2 20.000

5 a Latrine pit, medium quality 1.5 m 0 48.0001 b Latrine pit, poor quality 1.5 m 0 36.000

Inspection chamber _iece 6.000d Standard septic tank (1.8x3m) piece 900.000

6 a Fence, cement blocks w/ grill m 50 000I r b Fence, blocks only 4 courses m 30.000* | .ic Fence, barbed wire or poles m 10.000-. dj Fence, other material (makulh F m 5.000

e Hedge F m - 5.000|7 a1 Mlimbitree, fully productive 100% | 7.000

Coconut tree, fully productive 100% 22.000c Eucalyptus tree, fully productive i 100% 5.000 1d] Miarobaini tree, fully productive 100% / 7.000 jI i e Ashoktree, fully productive 100% |5 000 f |Suqar cane frond 800j* I j g | Yams

____ace_ _7000* 8 Grave with or without tombstone per tomb 72.500

II

I3 Communit- InfrastrucTurt gpri-ading Program

3 Table 5-3 Compensation Standards applied for affected propertiesin Temeke Municipality

I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ i__ _ _ _ _ _ _

r 4 ~~~~~~~~~~Compensation Rate |* S/N Replacement Item Unit i inCTSh R

1 Land, unbuilt m23,750

2 a House, block construction, floors doors, m 1300003 ' windows, roof corrug. iron r

Ib House, lower quality block construction,b i floors doors, windows, roof corrugated 60.000 to 80 000I l Iron roof, IrIoC House, constructed of mud &poles, m2 50.000 to 80.000

Ron sheet roof cement screed floor m. .______to_______d House, constructed of mud &poles, m 2 30.000

Iron sheet roof, no cement screed floor | 3* e Water connection present 5% ;ncrease of house vaiue

electricity connection or 5% increase of house vaiuei -telephone line absent 5% increase of house vaiue

3 a Kiosk or storage rocm, attached to m2 1 80.000house structure good constructionquality/materials

__ _-| b Kiosk, attached to house structure m2 6 00I I _ _ _ _ _ _ _

mediu _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __nl5

c Kiosk, attached to house structure poor m2 40.000I _quality/materials iI a 2 Veranda, roofed with concrete slab m2 40.000

b Veranda, roofed w/ iron sheet at high I m2 40.000_level >30cm , 40_000Veranda unroofed rm2

- 15.000e fSteps (top surface) [ m2 _ 20.000a5 Latrine pit, medium quality 1.5 m 0 60.000

5 I | b E Latrine pit, poor quality _ 1.5 m 0 36.000c Inspection chamber piece 6.000d Standard septic tank (1.8x3m) pece 900.000

6 a Fence, cement blocks w/ grill m 80.000b Fence, blocks only 4 courses m 15.000I I I c Fence, barbed wire or poles [ m 1 0.000d Fence, other material (makull, I m 5.000e Hedge m 5.000L7 ai IMlimbitree, fully productive 100% TO7.000

Coconut tree, fully productive 1 100%/ 22.000i c |Eucalyptus tree, fully productive 100% 5.000

Miarobaini tree, fully productive 100% 7 000e Ashok tree, fully productive 100% / 5.000 1

'Tf 1 Sugar cane frond 1 800 13 i[ gq Yams acre i 7.0008 LGrave with or without tombstone I ertomb 75.000

| 'Note: T he rates for land in Teineke are lower in comparison to the other two municipalities.The reason is that businesspeople and residents of higher and medium income levelf irst seek residence in Kinonidonii or Ilala, and Temneke would be the less preferablearea.

ICornmunltt Inlnrastrucmure Upzradimn_ Prourarn

The compensation allok\ances and assistanice activities adopted as in the valuationprocess w,ere the folloving:

5.3.1 Propertv Valuation

For land (including non-agricultural ve2etation)This type of compensation applies to all affected households, regardless of whetherthere is need for resettlement or the PAP opts to re-arrange their structure on theremaining plot.

In accordance with § 3 of the 2001 Regulations of Land Act 4 of 1999,'5 the basisfor assessment of the value of lands affected by the project is the market value of therespective land. Land measurements were in m- . There was no land loss that wouldfall in the category of cultivated land. Horticulture items, vegetable garden, trees,hedges etc were calculated in accordance with the municipal list for standardcompensating rates (tabies 5-1, 5-2 and 5-3).

The valuers specified the market value (including unexhausted improvemenit) byusing the standard rates provided by the municipality for land valuation. As a result,the value of land for these unplanned high-density settlements varies with locationwithin the Dar es Salaam metropolitan area. For example, the Temeke municipalitystandard rate for compensating land loss is TSh 3,750/in 2 while for Kinondoni andIlala this rate is TSh 5,000/m 2 (see tables 5-1 to 5-3)

For non-movable built-up structuresThe valuer determined the compensation for all private buildings and structuresaffected by the project. Case-to-case agreements during the valuation were inrelationship to the material and quality of the structure. These valuations use theannuallv updated standard compensation lists of the respective municipality. Thesame lists specify the compensation payment to the head of familv whose grave willbe affected by the project.

5.3.2 Allowances in cash and kind

a) Accommodation allowance:

The accommodation allowance applies to all structures or portions of structures thatare to be demolished, regardless of whether resettlement is required or not. TheTanzanian Law provides for an allowance which compensates the property ownersfor the costs incurred in the period when construction of new structures is underwav.In Tanzaniani legislative terminology this is defined as accommodation allowance. Inaccordance with § 8 of the 2001 Regulations of Land Act 4 of 1999, accommodationallovvances are calculated on the basis of' monthlv standard market rents16 multipliedbv 36 (months).

15 Regulations. Gvt. Notice No 78 of 4-4,2001 The Land (Assessment ofthe value of Land forCompensation)3 1

6 Current monthly market rent for 1 room = TSh 10.000 for medium qualitv. TSh 15,000 for good*qualitv and kiosk-s, and TSh 5.000 for best quality material and finishing of walls. floors, windowsetc or tor business structures other than street kiosks. If rooms are only partially demolished. theproportional rate applies.

Community infrasTruclure L:pgrading Program

b) Disturbance allowance:

| The Tainzanian Law makes additionai provision for an allowance which compensatesproject-affected persons for impacts they experience during the process ofVdemolition and, as applicable, of relocation. This type of compensation is meant toI grive support to the family to alleviate any social problems or phvsical hardship thatthey might experience. In Tanzanian legislative terminology the compensation forthe experienced- suffering is defined as disturbance allowance. In accordance with §

)10 of the 2001 Regulations of Land Act 4 of 1999' the disturbance allowance iscalculated by multiplying the actual value of the land by the average percentage ofinterest offered by commercial banks on Fixed deposits for 12 months. TheI Tanzanian legislation only considers propertv owners eligible for this type ofcompensation.

c) Transport Nlovine Allowance:

3 Transport Allowance (for House Owners)

In accordance with § I I of the 2001 Reoulations of Land Act 4 of 1 999 a transportallowance is paid to all project-affected persons whether partially or fully affected.The payment is intended to meet transport cost incurred by property owners. It isspecifically noted that the valuers applied this compensation to all properties. i.e.also to the vast majority of those who will not be resettled. The legal provisiondetermines that the transport costs are compensated at fixed rates equivalent to theactual costs for transporting 12.000 kg of lu' 2 by road for a distance of 20 km.All three municipal authorities established the applicable rate at the time ofevaluation being TSh 12,000 per household.

N/Movingr assistance (for Tenants):

In order to ensure fair compensation of tenants (residences and businesses), the RAPwill provide a supplementary pavment- moving assistance to tenants (includingbusinesses) in (i) all properties facing complete demolition and necessitating fullresettleTment: and (ii) partially demolished structures in which tenants will beI relocated elsewhere within the plot. The survey team has currently identified 18tenant households among the 22 properties that will be fully affected. Tenants inpartially affected properties need only shift their belongings to the new structureI within the plot, assistance tor this move will be provided in kind. Tenants(household or business) will receive:

1 - timely notification (3 months) terminating the rental agreement as perTanzanian regulations ':

| - assistance to obtain anv refund of advance rent paymentsassistance in finding a new rental unit will be provided to any tenantsin properties that will be follv demolished;

i7Demolition ortrented premises, either partly or t'Lll. are amnone the sLubstantial rcasons to crii natc a| rental retationship.

lCommunity In,frastructure Upgrading Progran

I- assistance in moving7 'from current to new room on the respective plotwill be provided to tenants on properties that will onln be partiallyaffected. The new room wsill be built and the tenant moved before theold one is demolished:I - assistance in packing personal belonginas or business inventor<.transporting the same to a new location. unpacking and re-arranging.

I The respective PAPs wvill be informed bv the survey team about the assistanceoffered by the project at an early stage after the approval of the RAP. The personseligible and requesting this assistance will be registered at the Ward ExecutiveOffice (WEO). Disputes and claims will be settled bv the grievance addressingarrangements (see section 7).

* TThe MSEO will help to forward Justified claims to the grievance settlement offices forresolving problems such as obtaining back pre-paid rental fees'8 .

I The \VEO will determine the cut-off day for effecting the payment and assistances.The values of the compensation in kind are included in the resettlement budget3 (section 1 0).

e) Vulnerabilitv allowance:

Although there are no provisions in the Tanzanian legislation for dealing withvulnerable groups, PAPS who require special assistance (e.g. elderly, handicapped),I in line with the CIUP policy that no PAP suffer undue hardship because of projectinvestments, will be provided:

* Full assistance to find and receive a new residential plotI . Provision of a new plot free of charge* Construction funds for a new residence that shall be in better condition than3 the one previously inhabited, approved by the municipal authority

The vulnerabilitv allowance is calculated at 5 % of the total value of the affectedproperty to be calculated as lump sum allowance for a household that falls under the

* said category. The allowance is paid to the head of household. At present stage, theresettlement survev team has identified only one family among the PAPs that wouldfall uncler this category.

t) Loss of profit:

In accord with § 9 of the 2001 Regulations of Land Act 4 of 1999 the net monthlyprofit obtained from the business associated with the affected properties is assessed3 (for high incomes. evidenced by audited accounts1 9 where necessary and applicable.

il Most tenancies in the unplanned settlements are informal (i.e. they carry no documentation).Tenants pay their rents monthly or for longer periods (up to 12 months) and can move out any timethey want. In those instances where the tenant had paid remt in advance, e.g. for the coming year. thelandlord will rerund the arnount of the unused advance pavment.

Audited account evidence shall be considered for claimed income m 1 million TSh,vyear: In case* such e',idence cannot be presented by the claimant, the municipal trade record list will apply and the

valuer will decide the amount of profit loss.

Il

ComMunitV infrastructure lUpgrading Program

for low i rne approved by the authorities' trade business list), and multiplied bN36 months in order to arrive at the loss of profit payable. This calculation appliesalso for such businesses that are only temporarily affected during the project'sI c construction phase.

This compensation paTment will be made to all businesses regardless of the status(owner or tenant) of the user: As long as the respective business is affected by the*project the loss of profit shall be exclusively and directly paid to the person wholoses hils/her business premises.

) Compensation for inadvertent construction damagre

Persons or aoencies who suffer damage from inadvertent construction incidents areto be comnpensated by the-respective constructor at market-value plus replacementcosts for the damage incurred. The CPT will assist in bringing claims forward to themunicipality and/or the grievance resolution offices, as applicable.

As precaution measures, the technical specifications in the contracts for theI contractors for the upgrading investments contain clauses that deal with inadverterntdamage. The clauses are detailed in the CEiMIP for CIUP.

IIll

l

Il

l3 gCommuLnitj' ln ras[ructure LUpradirio Program

3 Table 5-1: Summarv matrix for eligibility and compensation

Numnber of HHCategory of Impact affecte Compensation Package*U!Loss of entire plot, built- o Compenisation at determinedaup structures and garden replacement ratesplants (residential and/or l Accommodation allowancebusiness) o Disturbance allowance;

!o Transportation allowancePartial loss of plot, built- o Compensation at determinedup structures and garden - 98 replacement ratesplants(residential and/or o Accommodation allowancebusiness)

o Disturbance allowance;5 $ Tenants in totally affected 18 o vovini assistanceproperties _ _l__ 4

fTenants din partially 80 (estimate) o Moving assistance, if required* affected properties I__ _ _ _ _ __eI I o Assistance to receive a new residentialVulnerable houselholds I plot3 _ ! i o Vulnerability allowance

o Compensation for lost structure isBusinesses, 5 7 included in the building compensationVendors (operating inI (see above)I permanent structures such o Disturbance and transport allowance forIas kiosks! street shops, those vendors not residing in the plotbars, charcoai-sellers etc.) but using it for business_____________________ ________________ o Loss of profit, as ap plicable

Daily transient vendors 50 10( At fixed public announcement date (within(easilv movable premises 11 month before construction starts) the3 | such as tables) number CPT provides alternative locations to.vendors to sell their wvares or proffertILuctuates)

_t services; no cash compensationEmployed artisans (e.g., estimated 50 1 o no specific compenisation duringcarpenters, furniture (almost all impact, as in most cases (carpenters)makers) belonging to there is option to shift open space

_____- ______ _____--____ carpenters) j workplace for short distanceslI Graves _150 ~o compensation to family at rate set by,the rnun icipal ity

I ______

3 Communlit Infrastructure (-poradin- Program

6 Asset valuation process

6.1 Procedure

The valuation of aaffected assets eli-gible for compensation, as well as theidentif'ication and ai(reement on compensation allowances has been embedded in thefollowin;, procedural scheme:

(I ) All potential resettlement issues have been analyzed based on first handinformation, i.e. from the survev of the affected households. This surveyallowed identif'ication of the magnitude and impact of resettlement. The3 survey and the answers retrieved from the questionnaires (Annex 3)substantially determined the planning for the resettlement actions. Theindividual household questionnaire responses are also an important source ofinformation in settling possible disputes at later stage.

(2) The land survev team then made demarcations in line with the technicaldesigns. and the structural assets subject to demolition were marked withcode references along with the registered names of the affected propertyIowner.

(3) The ward executive officer contacted and notified (using Land Forrm No 69,'Notice to Land Occupier to apply for Compensation') in early M/lay 2004each individual land owner / occupier to agree upon a date for valuation andfilled in Land Form No. 70, 'Application for Compensation by LandOccupier'.

(4) On the agreed date the appointed municipal valuers, accompanied bv themunicipal coordinator and members of the planning team, v alued theproperty by discussing each single item eligible for compensation, as well ascalculating, in presence of the owner, the respective compensation values.The negotiations included an agreement of temporary loss of benefit forcases where businesses will become affected. During the entire valuation* procedure the PAPs were fully informed about the use of established(standardized) criteria for compensation of lost assets as well for theallowable compensation packages. The valuers took care that the procedurewas explained in a manner comprehensible to everyone being affected.

(5) After the negotiation agreement with the affected owner the municipal valuerdrew up a contract that lists all property and land being surrendered and thetype of compensation to be given. In kind compensation was also recorded inan order form, which were signed by the respective parties and witnessed.The compensation contract was read aloud in the presence of the affectedpartv prior to signing.

(6) The items eligible t'or compensation were documented in the owners'presence. Photographs were made of the signing party and of all major assetssubject to compensation., and thev are kept in the Chief Valuers files.

(7) The owners were informed about their rig,hts and the devised mechanisms to3 forward complaints, and notified that thev must allow access to their propertyto the ward executive officer and the land officer of the respectivemunicipalities for cross-checking their claims.3 (8) In addition, the PAPs were informed that any of their complaints and claimnsprior to payment will be forwarded to the Municlpal Director who is obligcd

I _ _ _ _ _ _

3 Communlty Intrastructure LUperadine Program

to investicate the case. All claims need to be resolved before comnpensationpayments are effected. Any,, complaints advanced after a Fixed date (within xdays orfreceipt of the finall claim k\ould not be entertained.

(9) In accordance with the laid down procedures and notified schedules (still tobe determined bv the MID). the local authoritv will pay the cheques to theentitled heads of households.

(10) Thereafter, at a fixed and notified schedule. owners have the right to remove* all assets and structures. Should the owner fail to comply with this action, the

contractor will be given in writing the perrnit to unconditionally demolish| and remove all structures as and when the 'vork progress would require.

Note 1: The cut-off dates for eligibility for compensation under CIUP was not theasset inventoryv and valuation but the date of signing the agreementbetween valuer and the head of the PAPs.

INote 2: The valuation process has bso far focused on owners of affected properties.The 18 tenant families currentlv residing in properties subject to fullresettlement shall be included in the valuation process to grant them thecompensation packages described in section 5.3.2.

3 6.2 I)ocumentation, contract agreement and dossier

Written records and photographic documentation of holdings and assets is importantto settle claims and to avoid later claims or fraudulence. Therefore, along with the

* signing the agreement forms, people and assets (infrastructure) were photographedfor documentation. The detailed records of the valuation are kept in the Chief Valuer3 office in each municipalitv as dossier file.

During the valuation process (May - July) all house owners worked with valuers andmunicipal CIUP coordinators and CPTs to establish Final compensation value of

* assets affected by the project. After discussion and agreement for the totalcompensation value the municipal valuer drew up a contract listing all property andland heing surrendered and the type of compensation to be given. In kindcompensation is also recorded in an order form, which was signed by the respectiveparties and witnessed. The compensation contract was read aloud in the presence of

| the affected party prior to signing.

For each valuation record a dossier will be prepared and entered into a municipaldatabase which will have restricted access. The dossier will be prepared jointly bythe municipal CIUP Coordinator and the respective CIUP Resettlement MonitoringOfficer (see section 10.2). Each municipality office-0 will maintain such a database.The dossier will be entered in a query database that will contain inf'ormnatioln on:

* site location with propertv and valuation codes ot the atfected propertv:* particulars of household members;

* . relocation place. as applicable:* total holdings and specificationriquanitification of lost , affected items.

0 It is recommended to store this database In the municipality's Planning & CoordinationCDepartment

l3 Communit-y Infrastruclure lpgradinr Program

I* records of valuation and replacement compensation paid,I * records of compensation packages agreed* records of co mpensation payments effected;3 * description of new domicile (including land holding and built structures);. photographic documentation (digital form) of the assets affected, as per

valuation date;I . results of the first household survey2 ' (questionnaire records, see Annex 3):* claims and grievances forthcoming;-3 * claims and grievances resolved (including records for dispute resolution);* other information relevant for monitoring and verification purposes (see

section 10. 1).

A user-friendlv and tailored data base svstem with in-built security features will bedeveloped by a local expert and communicated to all three municipalities via theexisting wireless network.. The costs for an expert who will prepare the data base areincluded in the budget for the resettlement monitoring (section 11. table 1 1-2).

llllI llll

Ihe dalta hase shall also indicate and-use requiremerits and relocation particulars for all PAPs, .ethose \ ho opted to stay and rearrange their home in the diminished plot as well as those who tookresidencc in a nc%w piot aIter complete demolitiorn or the structure.

I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~3 CommLnit[ Infrastructure tLpgrading Procram

7 F'roposed grievance redress mechanisms

.At the time that the indi\iduai resettlement and compensation plans are approvedand individual compensation contracts are signed. affected individuals were alreadybeen informed of the process for expressine dissatisfaction and to seek redtess.

C'laims and complaints shall be brought to the attention of the sub-ward chairmanwho will forward all arievances concerninm non-fulfillment of contracts, level ofcompensation or seizure ot assets without compensation to the attention of themnunicipal director: If no agreement can be reached, the cases will be taken to the

* local court svstem. The basis for judging the claim will be the documentationprovided in the municipality's individual dossiers for this RAP.

The grievance procedure is simple, administered as far as possible at the local levelto facilitate access, be flexible and open to any proofs. ~Care will be taken torecoenize the fact that most people are illiterate and poor. It is advocated that allattempts would be made to settle grievances at the local level. Those seeking redressand wishing to state grievances would do so bv notifying the municipal director. Thelatter will consult with the councilors, the ward/ mtaa and elders to determine the* justification of the claims. If valid. the municipal director will notify the complainantto settle the matter. If the complainant's claim is rejected, then the matter can bebrought before the local courts for settlement. If the local courts cannot settle the*matter, it can go to the high court of Tanzania for resolution. The high court will bethe highest appellate "judge" in this system. The decision of the high court would betinal and all such decisions mlsSt be reached witlin a full growing season after the* complaint is lodged.

It' a complaint pattem etnerges, the municipal director with the TST and CPT willdiscuss possible remediation. The director will be required to give advice concerningthe need tor revisions to the procedures. Once the municipality and the communitvagree on necessary and appropriate changes a written description of the changed

* process will be made. The ward executive officer and sub-ward chairman will beresponsible for communicating the results to the complainant.

Ullll

| Communit'; Infrastructure t'puradin- Program

38 8 Institutional arrangements for the RAP

S. 1 Institutional actors

The overall responsibility for the resettlement lies in the hands- of the localauthorities under local government administrative and Financial management rules3 and manuals. In specific, the head of the planning and coordination department ineach municipality will be the main responsible official to oversee and coordinate theRAP. Funding will be processed and effected through the Ministry for Regional| Admrinistrationi and Local Governments (PO - RALG) through the decentralizedlocal governments and will comply with the financial arrangements agreed upon atproject appraisal. The finance administrative committee of the NIC maintains theoverall budget responsibility for the resettlement costs and for comnpensation andclaim pavments effected bv the municipality'5 finance department. This committeealso oversees the collection of the resident's contribution for the CIUP.

Compernsation and resettlernent activities envisaged. for the CIUP involve severalstitutional actors, including the community. individuals. local authlorities andJ ~~NGOs,iCB(Ds, such as:

The consultant (DHV). along with its local counterpart institution (UCLAS)prepared the technical design for survey is responsible of elaborating the RAP inclose consultation with all institutional actors described in this section. Theconsultant prepares the survey of affected households, the community participationprocess. the cost estimates and the implementation schedule for all activitiesdescribed in the RAP.

| Technical planninM team (TST): Responsible for the local surveys to design theurban infrastructure upgrading, maintains close linkage with the municipal planningand coordination department through the CIUP coordinator.

CIUP coordinator: He/she ensures the functioning of the community consultation3 and participation process. and the timelv launching of the project in communitymeetings Other tasks include the overseeing of the selection of communitvrepresentatives and the establishment of the CPTs who will be, among other.engaged in moving assistance to PAPs. He/she also coordinates the set-up of a* g7rievance resolution mechanism at the ward executive office, the resettlementmonitoring and the maintenance of the PAP record database.

The valuation section of the municipal planning and coordination departmentprovides annual lists for compensation standards. It determines the notification andregistration of PAPs as well as the cut-off date for compensation carries out theproperty valuation (through officers from the valuation section), while the LandOfficer is responsible for signing the transfer contracts for land-take.

The urban planning and environmental committee of the N1C scrutinizes andapproves the proposed resettlement action plan.

3 CommMUnit Infnrastructure Lperadin e Program

ITlhe %\ard executive office receives and makes all efforts to resolve community andI PAP issues and complaints. and forwards them to the MIC in case no consensus canbe re-iched in the grievance resoiution mechanism at ward-lcvel.

8.2 Organization Chart for functions and responsibilities of institutionsrelevant to the CIUP resettlement action plan

and COUNCIL

Approve the resettlement program and ensure full participation by communitiesand control decdsion-making by people concerned

W ' 'I~~~~~~~~

FINANCE ADMINISTRA-URBAN PLANNING AND TIVE COMMITTEEENVIRONMENTAL MUNICIPAL DIRECTOR Scrutinize the budget forCOMMITTEE resettlement activities

In charge of the entire- Scrutinize the entire I Development Program in theupgrading program, Municipality- Approve action plans FINANCE DEPT.including the RAP

* . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~pay compensation

DISASTERPLANNING AND COORDI- MANAGEMENT_ NATION DEPARTMENT WARD EXECUTIVE OFFICE Advice the

_ ~~~~Coorcdinate upgrading programs Project. Undertake task /ventures designed to Affected

ensure welfare of the ward residents people orTOWN PLANNING ~~Monitor and coordilnate all activities Resettlementi TOWN PLANNING | of /in the sub ward.

SECTION Receive complains and grievancesExecute and submit them to the MunicipalRegularization DirectorProaram . ..

COUNCILORSCIUPCOORDINATOR Advice the

Ensures participation SBWR CHIMNprogramRAP monitoring SUB-WARD CHAIRMAN office onDossiers, database Resolving specific community issues Resettlement

Records of project affected people withVALUATION Forward any complains to councilors

L SECTION - Initial settlement of grievances andl Property valuation of disputesI affected people

| 8 - -- ; j ~~~~~COMMUJNITY PLANNING TEAMaLAND OFF CER

* dentify Affected )roperties| Aoministration of Plots J Advise tne PAP[ applications I Assist the PAPSigning transfer contracts

3 Community Intrastructure U:pgrading Program

1 9 Implementation schedule

The rcsettlement action plan and compensation plan has to be approved by [hemunicipal governments. The resettlement sites. encompassing the 20.000 plotprogr.am. have already met the approval of the local government councils.

Timing of all resettlement activities. including land acquisition and demolition ofhouses etc., is linked with the scheduled start and progress of the construction works.,Acquisition of land and assets mav be affected onlv after compensation has beenpaid anid, where applicable. resettlement sites and relocation allowances have beenprovided to displaced persons.

I The implication is that before anv construction activity2 2 is implemented, the PAPsentitled to compensation will need to be notifiedcand compensated in due time inaccordance with the RAP. All measures required to assist households with relocationmust be completed prior to displacement. The same holds true for timelycompensation for all businesses that are required to shift temporarily.

I The timing mechanism of these measures, as outlined in table 9-1 (Proposedschedule for implementing the RAP), will be essential.

l

l

l

II_

2_ The R.AP has. without pre-empting approval dates and other time-consuming proceduresdetermined by both the GoT and the funding agency, assumed that the beginning ot constructionactivities mav be late in 2004, Notwithstanding>, the schedules for payment of compensation, settinegup of grievance redress schemes and signing contracts For handing over the atfected properties to theGoT will remain more or less the same and close to the date of approval of the RAP.

- m m - - - - m - -Communuity Infrastructur-e Upgradinig Programii

IFablc 10-1: Maliageirncnt and Monitoring Schedule for the CIUI' Wlesettlement Action P'lan

PHASES

DESIGN & PREPARATION CONSTRUCTION

Activities Respon e 2003 2004 2005 2006si'bility a_ __ ___._____ r __ __________________

89 10111212 3 4 5 6:7 8 9i1011 12 1 2 3:4 5 6 7 8 9:101112 1 2A34 5 6 7 8 9 1011 12Prepare technical design for CIUP -Eng ofinterventions _onsultantPrepare the RAP ons,

_ _ _ C~~PT,MPCD, _ _ Public notification, community IMPCD, RE, -consultation, community meetings, [TST, CPT . ..Approval of Resettlement FrameworkPlan _____.___._.___.::_._._.B._.

HI-1 Survey and identification ST, RE,fPAPs _ PT_ __.-

Official valuation of properties and MV, MDCut-off dateNegotiation, individual contracts & MVMD _signinq and cut-off date

__ _ _ __ __ =___ ----- =___ := :..,___:--*_ :=__ ,_:,__ _ :____ __ :-

RAP Approval MC, LGSP, . -.

-: __---=-- --- _ _ _ _ _ . , e._ --- l f - -_ j , _, , : ' _ ,het-up grievance resolution schee C.nd oftice _ _

Payment of replacernent MC Finan- : _ _comperisation for lost land and assets : . - -|

Resettlement Action P'lan 35

m m - -- - -m m -m - -Comm inunity Infrastructure l]pgrading Progran

Table 9-1 - cont. -

PHASES

DESIGN & PREPARATION | CONSTRUCT IONl~~ ___ __ ___ __

Activities Respon e 2003 2004 2005 2006sibility ra _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _

___ __ .8 9910112 1 2 3 4.5_6 7 8 9,10.11.12 1 234.5 6;7 891011.12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1112~Payment of allowances to IAPs MC, Finan- U Ej..

ec ept ..

Resettlement assistance PTs,rogranm and resettlement |PCDorTencement of Demolishing MC:tructures _____ractor

Monitoring the resettlernent acti v TSTe ,_o,__ __ __ _ tvhe~T 131......_,2..Evaluation of the effectivenessof the |LGSP, MC,

resettlement program of CIUP \B _ . ._'_-__.___ ,_*__

.-4l)ljevlalono (CPl- CominriiUit Pl'lanning leanm RE Resellernent Expert oJ)Design ConsultoniAIC - Municipal Council IST-- Technical Support ieaniAlL) - liunicipal DuteLcor .lP'CD - Mlunicipal l'lanniing atndl (Coordinalion l)epoartuieuAll' AMunicipal I aluer

Resettlement Action Plan 36

lComrn-ii\ I nCrastructurc L'pTradinge Program

10 NMonitoring the proposed resettlement actions

I The mlonitorine of the RAP will be also the responsibility of the head of the planningI and coordination department in each municipalitv.

3 10.1 Application of verifiable indicators

As stipulated by the resettlement policy framework, a set of simple verifiableindicators will be adopted to monitor and evaluate the implementation of| resettlement and compensation plans as given in the template below.

Table 10-1: Matrix of verifiable indicators for monitoring the RAP

Verifiable indicators to monitor pre- post resettlement situation3 Monitoring EvaluationNlumber / Percentage of PAP HH who Acceptance or rejection of new resettlementdecided to re-arrange their structure on the area proposed by the government3 F sameplot after partly demolition ___Number / Percentage of PAP HH arranging Preference of (successful) re-adjustment ofsuccessfully their new homestead after re- residence after partly demolition and re-arangement in the partly affected plot structurngNumber and reasons for failure of such re- Causes for failure, and lessons learned fora_-rangernent future resettlement actions to be plannedPercentage of moving assistance Effectiveness of assistance measuresNumber / Percentage of payments for Effectiveness compensation allowances* allowancesNumber / Percentage of payments for Effectiveness of transport allowancet ~~~transport ailowance |arrangementsNumber / Percentage of payments for loss of Effectiveness of compensationprofit compensation arrangements for lost business profitsNumber/ Percentage of additional payments Effectiveness of compensation andto vulnerable groups assistance to vulnerable groupsNumber of grievance appeals Overall performance of the RAP, and

lessons to be learned for future resettlementNumber of successfully resolved appeals -ditto -Number of unsettled qrievance appeals - ditto -Ability of (number) )individuals and familiesto re-establish their pre-displacement d- itto -activities by cateqory of impactFor displaced persons: Comparative Maintenance of better life standards afterpercentage of daily life costs (transport, resettlement; living standards at least equalmarket, utilities, school, medication) increase to pre-relocation situationin new resettlement areaNumber / percentage of PAPs in working Income situation at least equal or better afterage who found adequate income opportunity relocationin new resettlement areaPre- project production and Income ( year All affected individuals and/or householdsbefore land used) versus present production compensated or resettled have at leastand income of resettlers and affected maintained their previous standard of livingpersons (both for business and non- at final evaluation.business people)Number of impacted local residents Beneficial impacts generated by the project3 ] empioved by civil works contractors for CIUP on resident's income opportunities

l

| Communin. Infrastructure Tipgradingj Program

1 10.2 Determination of the monitors ad implementation of monitoring scheme

Consistent vith the environmental effectiveness monitoring procedures laid out inthe CEMIP, the resettlement monitorincg will be carried out by analvzing householdsurveys in all families that were reg7istered during the process of notification and3 valuation. A querv database will be maintained (see section 6.4) which contains alliridividual dossiers to keep track of the affected persons. This will ensure that alsothose families will continually be monitored who became resettled in other areas.

| At the beginning of the monitoring scheme, a user-friendlv and tailored database willbe dcveloped bv a local expert and housed in the Project Coordination Unit. Theexpert will also make provisions to develop security measures to protect misuse orunauthorized access to these confidential data. The database template will becommunicated to all 3 municipalities to maintain uniformity in records andevaluation for the entire project. The data base should also be expandable and usablefor the environmental M&E as designed in the CE?vlP for the CIUP.

The survev will be primarilv assessingo the actual socio-economic situation through astructured household interview and questionnaire. The above-described indicatorswill serve as analytic tools.

I The monitoring activities shall start at the date of the appraisal of the RAP, and willcontinue for 24 months. For this period, three CIUP Resettlement MonitoringOfficer will be identified (or recruited if need be), one for each municipality. This

* officer is responsible for all resettlement records in his/her municipality, as well asmaintenance of the data base and repetitive household surveys. Each HH survey willbe screened in line with the indicators determined in table 10-1. A schedule of aboutI 2)00 PAPs visits is foreseen in each municipality. This schedule would be suitable tovisit each affected household in the 16 sub-wards as well as in the possible outskirts3 where r PAPs may have settled. about 3 times over the 2-years monitoring period.

ll3lII

I3 Communit Uprrgstructure Lpgrading Pro-ram

I I Cost estimates to implement the RAP

3 A summarv of the resettlemcnt plans costs (in Tanzanian Shilling) for compensationof properties affected and compensation packages payable to projeet-affectedpersons properties in each sub-wvard is provided in the following table:

Table I1-1: Summarv cost estimation (in TSh) for the CIUP Resettlement| - Action Plan

Affected properties I I -

Ttal Partial Total R| I I Tz)tal Parti Replace- Compensat Other Costs TotalNo CIUP Area loss loss ment Value ion (5%), ] (no | with- ~~~~~~~~Compen- Allowances TSh _________ ____ __ TSh(Resett_ resett outsa oS

tAK~ONDO1 lement) lement) graves aTS TS T Sa) K_NN N vUNICIPALITY , ,

-1 M vIanzeseUzur, 2 16 is 16,520,000 2,519,000 1,451,950 1 30,490,950I -I2 Kilimani I 9 10 36,960,000 22,069,000 2,951,450 61,980,4503 i vlidizini 1 19 20 29,278.000 20,017,000 21464,750 51,759,7504 N/inazi Mmoja a! 3 13 16 32,268,000 18,737.000 2,550_250 53,555,2505 itiuongano I 12 13 14,880,000 10,538,000 1,270,900 26,688,9006 Nlvuleni 2 15 17 2 1'547,000 18,566,000 2,005,650 42,118,650

Totals Kinondini io 84 94 1 51,453,000 102,446.000 : 694950 266.593.9503 I b) ILALA MUNICIPALITY* Mnvarani 4- 2 26 45,514,000 17,961,000 3.173,750 66,648,7508 M lalapa I 17 18 14,431,000 5,622,000 1,002,650 2 1,055,6509 Mladenge b/ 3 41 44 56,251,000 17,210,000 3,673,055 77,134,15510 Nltambani 0 35 35 34,012000 11,438,000 212712500 47,722,500Totals Ilala 8 115 123 150,208,000 521 31,000 10,121.955 2 12 561 055c) TEMEKE MUNICIPALITY1 i11 Cian1'ombeA I 22 23 F 28,458,000 5,166,000 1 1,681,200 35.305,20012 Chang'ombeB Icl 0, 20 20 124.415,000 6,405,000 1,541,000 32,361,00013 Toroli 0 | 13 13 9,781,000 ' 2,550,000 616.550 12,947,55014 Sanda1i 0 8 8 14,922,000 2,377,000 864,950 18,163,95015 Nlpogo 1 13 24 28,017.000) 7,730,000 r 1,787,350 37,534,35016 Ivwembeladu 1 15 30.592,000 6,016,000 1,830,400 38,438,400

Totals Temeke 4 9 03 136,185,000 30.244,000 8,321,450 1 74,750,4504 SUM a) c) 1 221 298 1 320 | 437.846,000 184,92 1,000 31,138,355 653,905,455

RESETTLEMENT MVONITORING (see breakdown table I1 -2) 19,262,0003 ' Contingencies 5% 33,658.368

GRANI) TOTAL FOR RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN TSh 706,825,718

Ann.: In addition: two gravevard sites *vith 50 graves to be removedAnn.: '' In addition: one graveyard site with 75 graves to be removed

In addition: one graveyard site with 25 graves to be removed

I nadto:oelae'r iewt 5gae ob eoe

I

l3 Communtt infr-astructure -porading Projram

I The costs estimates for compensation of the affected houses and private structuresare baLsed on a complete inventory and a subsequent valuation assessme-nt for all3 properties that were either fully affected (22 of 320 = 7)o! or onlv partially (29883

The comnpensation allowances are in line with the packages described in section 6 ofthis R-AP. The presented fitures reflect the actual agreement between the valuers andthe a'f'ected person (usually the land owner).

I An iciditional 5'%,t for other costs has been added, calculated from both thecompensation payment and the allowances, to make adequate provision for othercosts related to settlement considered in this RAP, namely moving assistances)' andI assistance to vulnerable groups. This budget item also includes the operational costsfor a urievances redress office.

I1 In addition to the above total budget for the resettlement activities (TSh653.905.455) there are the costs for the resettlement monitoring which are detailedin Table 1 I-2 and in Annex 6. Including these costs and a 5o contingency martgin.the (grand total for implementation of the RAP amounts to TSh 706,8825,718.

Table I -2: Cost Estimate for Resettlement vMonitoring

DurationItem Uinit Price TSh No of Units (months) Total TShPersonnelResettiemnent Officer, one in each ofI the 3 Municipalities 150.000 3 24 10.800.000,00Local Database Expert 1.600.000 I 0,5 800.000,00Mlaterial & EquimentI Office furniture LS 200.000 3 600.000,00Fan 40.000 3 120.000,00Computer 600.000 3 I.800.000,00Printer 300.000 3 900.000,00* Scainner 180.000 3 540.000,00Telephone 250.000 3 750.000,00

Operational Costs (per month)IMeetings (2 per year perMunicipality) 50.000 6 300.000,00Stationary & printing 100.000 3 300.000,00Phiotocopies. Faxes i 0.000 3 24 720.000,00Communication 15.000 3 24 1.080.000,00TFravel Allowance (3 Site visits a 5HH per month per officer) 3.500 3 24 252.000,00Ln foreseen 100.000 3 300.000.003 S tU NI 19.262.000,00

a articuIIar reterence to the vaiue of the novicin assisiance and transport allo wances described insectioll 5.3.2

l3 Communitx Infrastructure L'pgradilng Prog,-ram

I ANNEX 1

DETAILED INFORMATION ON THE VALUATION ANDCONIPENSATION NEGOTIATIONS FOR ALL PROPERTIESI BEING AFFECTED BY THE CIUP INTERVENTIONS

5 Notes;

-This Annex provides the statistical records of the valuation process based on the3 measurements carried out bv the valuation survev teams in each of the threeC m~~nunmcipalities.

1) The figures were provided by the field survey team working under thedirection of the municipal Chief Valuers and reflect the situation as per 27 July2004. The reporting format varied between the three municipalities, and it wasintendied to maintain the presentation to facilitate later reviewing works by thesurveying and reporting team.

The recorded data did not allow to make a disaggregate analysis of theallowmaces as these were recorded altogether. Therefore, the records do not allow toidentify, for example, the calculated amount of loss of profit for businesses affected.

3) Businesspeople have not specifically been surveyed. Therefore, no data areavailable on employed service.

1 4) Thle total agreed amount of compensation for each entitled property owner donot reflect the exact amount of calculated measurements (e.g. area of affectedstructure multiplied bv the standard compensation rate) but the valuing team oftenrounded to the next thousand TSh.

5) In spite of the municipal standard compensation rates the applied ratessometimes differed, which has been explained by the degree of quality of theexamined structure or crop.

6) Whenever the demolition of a property would reach 50% of the total area ofthe built-up structures, this propertv has been categorized as "fully affected".

3 . Record data on affected properties in Kinondoni Municipality: Page 42 - 47Record data on affected properties in llala Mlunicipality: Page 48 - 53

. Record data on affected properties in Temeke Mfunicipality: Page 54 - 62

l _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

mm - mnmm---m-mm---KINONDONI MUNICIPALITY

MUUNGANO SUB-WARD

S/ PROPER VALUATION TYPE OF AFFECTED AREA RATE VALUE OF VALUE OF ALLOWAN- CROPS AGREEDN TY CODE PROPERTY AFFECTED STRUCTURE LAND CES and COMPENSATION

CODE S TREES _1 MGN/11 MGN/VAL/ Land 163.0 5,000 815,000 2,031,000 5,500,000

CIUP/01 Residential house 38.0 70,000 2,660,000total demolition

2 MGN/009 MGNNAL/ Veranda rIId a 32.0 5,000 160,000 160,000 966,000 1,286,000.__ CIUP/02 shop

3 MGN/01 MGNNAL/ Veranda fronting a 13.0 5,000 65,000 65,000 516,000 648,000CIUP/03 stiop

4 MGN/164 MGNNAL/ Partial Building 14.0 100,000 1,400,000 110,000 892,000 2,300,000CIUP/04 Standard Septic Tank

5 MGN/173 MGNNAL/ Building annex 17.0 110,000 1,870,000 85,000 1,644,000 - 3,600,000.__ CIup/os_ClUP/05

6 MGN/174 MGN/VAL/ Partial Building 18.0 120,000 2,160,000 700,000 2,039,000 4 0,000.. __ .__ CIUP/06, Land 140.0 5,000 _ . _ ___

7 MGN/-292 MGNNAL/ Tank 900,000 1,230,000 240,000 442,000 7,500 1,920,000CIUP/07 Retaining wall 22.0 15,000

Flower bed 24.0 10,0008 MGN/168 MGNNAL/ Retaining wall 6.0 15,000 90,000 0 0 90,000

CIUP/089 MGN/082 MGNNVAL/ Partial Building 22.0 90,000 1,980,000 145,000 1,140,000 3,265,000

CIUP/09 _I

10 MGN/79 MGNNAL/ Veranda 6.0 5,000 30,000 42,000 146,000 -__ 218,0C00CIUP/10 _______ {

11 MGN/78 MGNNAL! Veranda/siab - 27.0 5,000 135,000 189,000 89,000 - 413,000_ __ _ _CIUP/1 1 1 _ ___

__ MGN/78 MGNNAL/ Veranda/slab 27.0 6,000 135,000 189,000 89,000 - 413,000CIUP/12 _________

12 MGN/11 MGNNAL/ Unroofed Veranda 22.0 3,000 66,000 110,000 400,000 - 570,000CIUP/13 with reinforced_ concrete columns _ _ _ __

13 MGN/085 MGNNAL/ Step/Slab 6.0 3,000 18,000 30,000 144,000 - 192,000__ t CIUP/14 _

SUB-TOTALS I 11999,000 2,880,000 1 10,538,000 _ 25,315,000

42

- -- - m m m - m - -

KILIMANI SUB WARD

S/N PROPERTY VALUATION TYPE OF AFFECTED AREA m2 RATE VALUE OF VALUE OF | ALLOWAN CROPS AGREEDCODE CODE PROPERTY AFFECTED STRUCTURES LAND CES andTREES COMPENSATION

1 SM/MZS/352 SM/MZSNAL Veranda 31.0 5,000 155,000 155,000 750,000 -o1,060,000/CIUP/15

2 SM/MZS/375 SM/MZSNAL Veranda 13.0 5,000 65,000 65,000 276,000 406,000/CIUP/16 _ _______

3 SM/MZS/383 SM/MZSNAL Charcoal store & san- 15.0 40,000 1,500,000 75,000 903,000 2,478,000/CIUP/17 dard, septic Tank 900,000

4 SMIMZS/110 SM/MZSNAL Building, = 126.0 1 110,000 13,900,000 565,000 4,144,000 _ 18,600,0000 /CIUP/18 total demolition

- ___ Land 113.0 5,000 |5 SM/MZS/905 SM/MZSNAL Part of Bar/Guest 64.0 150,000 9,600,000 655,000 -0,--00 0 20,385,000

/CIUP/19 HouseLand 131.0 5,000

6 SM/MZS/906 SM/MZSNAL Veranda /stepes 8.0 5,000 40,000 40,000 194,000 - 274,000/CIUP/20 Unroofed _

7 SM/MZS/84 SM/MZSNAL Pit Latrine 8.0 60,000 1,380,000 1,010,000 292,000 - 2,682,000/CIUP/21 Std septic tank + 900,000

Inspection chamberLand 202,0 5,000

8 SM/MZSM8 SM/MZS/AL Toilet 12.0 100,000 1, 360,00 336,000 630,000 - 2,326,000/CIUP/22 Boundary Wall 16.0 10,000

9- SMMZS/146 SM/MZSNAL Partial Building/Shop 10.0 130,000 1,300,000 50,000 2,400,000 3,800,000/CIUP/23

10 SMIMZS/75 SM/MZSNAL Partial Building and std 33.0 140,000 4620,000 1.449,000 2,350,000 | |,4600000|/CIUP/24 septic tank inclusive 290.0

I__________ _ Land i _ _ _ _I

____I_____ SUB-TOTALS ___ 32,560,000 4,400,000 22,069,000 _ L 60,411,000

43

- - - - -

MANZESE MIDIZINI SUB WARD ________

S/N PROPERTY VALUATION TYPE OF AFFECTED AREA RATE -- VALUE OF VALUE OF ALLOWAN- CROPS AGREED

CODE CODE PROPERTY AFFECTED STRUCTURES LAND CES and TREES COMPENSATION

1SMIMDZ/65 SM/MDZNAL Veranda 12.0 5,000 600 400000 00-42,0

/ CIUP/25 __ 2 SMIMDZ/39 SM/MDZNAL Parlia 21.0 60,000 1,260,000 147,000 195,000 1,600.000

/ CIUP/26 I7, _ . - -

3__ SMIMDZ1160 SM/MDZNAI i 'l - building 23.0 90,000 2,070,000 115,000 1,292,000 3,477,000

_____ /CIUP/27 ___ _ ____ __9 07 0

__4 SM/MDZ/163 SM/MDZNAL residential house = 108.0 105,000 11,300,000 945,000 2,728,000 15,000,000

____ . /CIUP/28 total demolition _____ _____ I-_

5 SMIMDZI SM/MDZNAL Parts of building, foun- 18.0 90,000 1,620,000 90,000 1,210,000 2,920,000

152/B /CIUP/29 dation & cinema hall .. __ _ ____ _____ _7 _

SMIMDZ/- SM/MDZIVAL Veranda 26.0 5,000 130,000 182,000 397,000 709,000

/CIUP/30 __ __ _

7 SM/MDZ/83 SM/MDZNAL Veranda 9.0 5,000 45,000 63,000 246,000 354,000

/CIUPI31 I__ --

___ _______.-_l

8 SMIMDZ/88 SM/MDZIVAL Partial Housb 14.0 70,000 980,000 133,000 1,823,000 - 2,900,000

/CIUP/32 _ .________

__

9 SM/MDZ/91 SM/MDZNAL Partial House 17.0 70,000 1,190,000 147,000 516,000 - 1,853,000

_______ /CIUP/33 _________._ ______ _

10 SM/MDZ/g9 SM/MDZNAL Partial House 12.0 70,000 840,000 126,000 1,085,000 - 2,051,000

__+__ -IC /CIUP/34 _____

___

11 SMIMDZ/817 SM/MDZNVAL Partial Building 23.0 80,000 1,840,000 203,000 2,504,000 - - 4,550,000

_____ /CIUP/35 ____ _ _ _ _ _ I _ _________

1 12 SMIMDZ/805 SMIMDZNAL F -il;li Building 21.0 90,000 1,890,000 175.000 2,734,000 - 4,800,000

___ /CIUP/36 ____

13 SM/MDZ/445 SMIMDZVAL Veranda 17.0 5,000 85,000 119,000 243,000 - 447.000

/CIUP/37__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _

14 SM/MDZ/- M I/MDZNAL Partial Building 10.0 70,000 700,000 70,000 573,000 - 1,343,000

I l_ _. _ _ /CIUP/38 _1_1____I _______

__ _

15 SM/MDZ/617 SM/MDZNVAL Veranda 11.0 5,000 55,000 77,000 300,000 - 432,000

_f____ _ /C CIUP/39 1 1 1 _ I _ __ _ ___

| 6SM/MDZ/132 SM/MDZNVAL Veranda 13.0 5,000 65,000 91,000 355,000 . - 511,000

t ___I__ /CIUP/40 . I _ _ _ _____1

17 1iSM/MDZ/226 SM/MDZNAL Standard Septic Tank 900,000 900,000 0 270,000 - - 1,170,000

/CIUP/41 18 SMIMDZ/161 SM/MDZNAL|Vacant Plot - - 0 400,000 1.368,000 - 1,800,000

I ~~~~ICIUP/42 I _ _ I_.

19 XSM/MDZ/158 SMIMDZNAL Shop&Veranda 11.0 80,000 880,000 r-1 - 5,0o0 0 1,708,000 - 2,700,000

/Cl UP/43

20 SMIMDZil59 SM/MDZNAL|Veranda 8.0 5,000 40,000 56,000 194,000 - 290,000

- ~ ~ ~ /C lU P /44 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ ___ _ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ __ _ _

_________ _______ eSUB-TOTALS- < 25,950,000 3,328,000 20,017,000 ___49_327,000

44

MVULENI SUB WARD__ _ _ __ _ _ __ __ _ _ __ _

S/N PRO-0PERTY VALUATION TYPE OF AFFECTED AREA ml RATE VALUE OF VALUE OF 1 ALLOWAN. CROPS AGREED- CODE CODE PROPERTY AFFECTE l ______ STRUCTURES LAND CES and TREES COMPENSATION1 SMiMVI02-7 SM/MV/VAL/ STEP[SLAB] 5.0 5000 25,000 25,000 226,000 -276,000

_ _ _ _ Cl UP/45_ _ _ _ _ _ _

2 SM/MV/28 SM/MV/VAL/ VERANDA 8.0 5.000 40,000 40,000 360,00 440,000_____ ____ ____ Cl U P/4 6 _ _ _ _ _ _

3 SM/MV/55 SM/MV/VAL/ Partial dem-olition 90,000 28000 190,000 4,473,000 .. 7,542,000ClUP/47 Tea & tailor room 32.0

___ ________ Slab/steps, Land. 38 0 5,000 _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _

4 SM/MV/1l06 SM/MV/VAL/ Carpentry workshop 58.0 80,000 4,640,000 315,000 3,205,000 8,160,000CIUP/48 Kiosk

-total demolition 63.0 5,000 ______

5 SM/MV/232 SM/MV/VALI Boundary wali 26.0 15,000 1,322,000 248,000 940,000 2,510,000CIUP/49 paved yard 31.0O 8,000

____ ______ ~~~Bore hole_ _ _ _ _ _

6 SM/MV/227 SM/MV/VALI Traditional healers 1,394,000 265,000 779,000 2,438,000CILUP/50 office. 17.0 80,000

______ ____ _____ Pole fenice 17.0 2,000 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- _ _ _ _ j_ _

7 SM/MV/309 SM/MV/VAL/ Residential building 14.0 80,000 1,405,000 130,000 989,000 2,520,000CIUP/51 _Boudar wall 19,0 2,000 __________

8 SM/MV/363 SM/MV/VAL/ Buildg. =total dem. 29.0 110,000 3,730,000 570,000 - 2,540,000 -~__-6,863,000

CIUP/52 Chiarcoal store 18,0 30,000Land 114.0 5,000

9SMM /38 SM/MV/VAL/ 18.0 5,000 90,000 20,000 324,000 508,000___ ________ClUP/53 Veranda

10 SM/TMV/351 SM/MV/VAL/ unfinished building 11.0 30,000 330,000 55,000 0 385,000CIUP/54

11 SM/MV/348 SM/MV/VAL/ Veranda 13.0 5,000 65,000 65,000 234,000 367,000__ ClUP/55

12 SM/MV/342 SM/MV/VAL/ Slab/step 4.0 2,000 8,000 0.000 72,000 101,000CIUP/56 Land 4.0 5,000

13 SM/MV/341 SM/MV/VAL/ Shop room & 105,000 1,470,000 - 000 ,28003,068,000ClUP/57 Veranda 14 0

14 It ~ SM/MV/VAL/ Part of a saloons wall 14.0 15,000 210,000 0 0 210,000___ ~~Cl UP/58

15 SM/MV/99 SM/MVIVALi Veranda 105,000 105,000.0 256,000 466,000CIUP/59 21.0 5,000 _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _

116 SMM/ MM/A/Vrna9 0 45,000 - 45,000 137,000 227,000____CIUP/60 ____5,000

17 SM/MV/102 SM/MV/VAL/ .Party of shops slabs 8.0 140,000.0 1,460,000 185,000 2,503,000 4,148,000ClUP/61 roof grilled wall

_____ _____ Land /lawn 17.0 20,0001 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

------ SUB-TOTALS _______ 19,219,00 2,283,051 1856000_____ __ 40,229,000

45

- - m - m -m - - -- - -- - -- - -MANZESE UZURI SUB WARD

S/N PROPERTY VALUATION TYPE OF AFFECTED AREA m2 RATE VALUEOF 1 VALUEOF ALLOWAN. CROPS AGREEDCODE CODE PROPERTY AFFECTED STRUCTURES LAND CES and TREES COMPENSATION

1 SMiMZSil80 SM/MZSI)AL Veranda fronting a 6.0 5,000 30,000 30,000 199,000 259,000ICIUP/62 sho

2 SM/MZS/238 SM/MZS/NA Party Building 29.0 60,000 1,740,000 145,000 2,953,000 4,838,000_______ L/CIUP/63 two rooms

3 SMiMZS/316 SM/MZSNAL Building: 40.0 110,000 4,400,000 950,000 3,638,000 8,988,000/CIUP/64 total Demolition

Land 150.04 SM/MZSI237 SM/MZSNAL Building: 41.0 80,000 3,300,000 1,075,000 2,485,000 6,860,000

/CIUP/65 Total Demolition___ ___ , Bare Land 195.0 _

5 SM/MZS/245 SM/MZSNAL Pit Latrine 6.0 100,000 600,000 30,000 242,000 872,000/CIUP/66

6 SM/MZS/415 SM/MZSNAL Kiosk 5.0 40,000 200,000 25,000 362,000 6,000 593,000/CIUP/67 Coconut

7 SM/MZS/197 SM/MZS//VA Steps 11.0 5,000 55,000 55,000 232,000 34 2,000L/CIUP/68

: 8 SMIMZS/361 SM/MZSNAL Side Step/Slab 2.0 5,000 10,000 10,000 8,000 180,000- 208,000/CIUP/69 Medium hedge -

9 SM/MZS/006 SM/MZSNAL Retaining Wall 7.0 10,000 70,000 315,000 356,000 _741,000/CIUP/70 Bare land 63.Om 5,000

10 SM/MZS/467 SM/MZSNAL Block Boundary Wall 102.0 10,000 1,020,000 0o 230,000 27,000 1,277,000___._ l _____/CIUP/71 Mbilimbi, Coconut

11 SM/MZS/359 SM/MZSNAL Veranda 13.0 5,000 65,000 65,000 I 315,000 j 445,000/CIUP/72

12 SM/MZS/356 SM/MZS/NA Inspection Chamber 200,000 200,000 0 80,000 280,000L/CIUP/73 (partly) _ _ . _ _ _ -L_-_-_-

13 SM/MZS/166 SM/MZSNAL Retaining Wall 5.0 10,000 75,000 0 30,000 105,000___ ____ ~/CIUP/74 __ _ _ _ _ _

14 SM/MZS/404 SM/MZSNAL Slab . 22.0 5000 110,000 110,000 532,000 5,000 760,000/CIUP/75

15 SMiMZSi400 SM/MZSNAL Bare Land 90.0 5,000 0 500,000 261,000 32,000 | 743,000/CIUP/76 Pole fence 25.0 2,000

16 SM/MZS/ SM/MZSNAL Bare Land 12.0 5,000 0 60,000 0 4500 65,000/CIUP/77 CropsSu ar.Can) 800 -.-- __

17 SM/MZS/606 SM/MZSNAL Bare Land witH Partial 242.0 5,000 | - 0 | 1,215,000 | 535,000 0 1,750,000/CIUP/78 Foundation

18 SM/MZS/181 SM/MZSNAL Veranda 6.0 5,000 30,000 30,000 61,000 0 120,000_ l~~/CIUP/79_III_I,II

!p!UP179 SUB-TOTALS I 11,905,000 4,615,000 | 12,519,000 |L__i 299 ,344,0000z46

MNAZI MMOJA SUB WARD

SIN PROPERTY VALUATION TYPE OF AFFECTED AREA m' RATE VALUE OF VALUE OF ALLOWAN- CROPS AGREED

CODE CODE PROPERTY AFFECTED STRUCTURES LAND CES and TREES COMPENSATION

1 SMIMM/36N SM/MMNALI Boundary Wall | 23.0 15,000 345,000 173,000 0 518,000

_~d __CIP/80 ___ _ _ _ _ ____ _ _ _ __ _ __

_ SMIMMI44 SM/MMNVAL/ Residential 39.0 80,000 3,120,000 450,000 1,854,000 5,424,000

CIUP/81 House/LandI __ .______ Bare land 90.0 5,000

2 0__ ___ __ ___ __ .,

3 SM/MMI37M SMIMMNALI Shop Cuom Veranda& 25.0 10,000 250,000 175,000 2,307,000 2,500;000

CIUP/82, Land 7,0001

I ___ 25.0 _ __

_

4 SM/MM/29D SM/MMNAL/ Veranda& 15.0 5,000t 75,000 90,000 225,000 _ 390,000

CIUP/83 Land 3600_

_0_ _ '_ __

5 ,SMMMI33D SMIMMNAL/ Veranda& 1.30m2 5,0001 6,500 9,000 20,400 . 36,000

CIUP/84 Land _ 126_0_0

6 SM/MM/2J SM/MMNAL/ Boundary Wall 6.0 15,000 90,000 0 36,000 - 126.000

CIUP/85 ' 72_0_0 173_0_ 0

7--- SM/MM/291 SM/MMNVAL/ Veranda& Land 9.0 5,000 45,000 5 4,000 72,000 173,000

CIUP/86 _ 9.0 6,000 - _ _-

8 SM/MM11OB SMIMMNAL/ Residential House 13.0 84,000 1,092,000 105,000 1,062,000 2,260,000

_ _______ CIUP/87 _ 5 0 4_ ._.____

9 SM/MMI9B SM/MMNAL/ Barbeque food stall 71.0 80,000 5,680,000 497,000 3,456,000 9,633,000

CIUP/88 __0 __ _4__ 3___

_______

10 SM/MMI17/0 SM/MMNAL/ Residential Building& 31.0 120.000 4,080,000 602,000 4,536,000 -

|

SM/MM/_/C CIUP/89 Butcher shop 65__ __ _ 2 _63_000 3_-_I

_. .SMIMM15/0 SM/MMNAL/ Veranda 130 5,000 65,000 65,000 263,000 391,000

l __ ~~CIUP/90 0

12 -SMIMM/18/0 SM/MMNALI Standard SepticTank 2No. 900,000 1,800,000 0 0 _ 1,600,000

CIUP/91 _ _ _ _ __ I _ _ ______

13 SMIMM/6P SMIMMNAL/ 1 22.0 5,000 110,000 154,000 | 330000 600

14 SMMMI S/ N /o6CIUP/92.0 15,000 1,290,000 0 258,000 1,548,000

-- M --- ~-o1500 ,2000SM/MM/V~AL/I Boundary ~Wall

-

CIUP/93 _ __ __-._--

15 SMIMM/361 SMIMMNAL/ Retaining wall 9.0 80,000 760,000 60,000 - 0 840,00

CIUP/94 6.0 10,000

|16 |SMIMMI131 SMIMMNAL/ - 76.0 90,000 6,840,000 540,000 4,318,000 11,700,000

CIUP/9517 Cemeter 1 Graves 20 72,500 1,450,000

1.450,000

e18 metey graves 30 72,500 | 2,175,000 | _ _ 2,175,000

SUB-TOTALS 25,668,500 6,599,000 18,737,400 50,714,000

47

ILALA MUNICIPALITY

1. BUGURUNI WARD

MADENGE SUB-WARDS/NO PROPERTY VALUATION TYPE OF Structure Compensation VALUE OF Land affectE LAND ALLOWAN- VALUED AGREED TOTAL

CODE CODE PROPERTY Area m2 RATE STRUCTURE AREA m2 VALUE CES CROPS COMPENSATION1 BG/MD/365 BG/VAL/CIUP/01 2 rooms 46.6 80,000 3,728,000 46.6 233,000 878,440 0 4,800,0002 BG/VAL/CIUP/02 BG/VAL/CIUP/02 Block fence w/ grill 26,6 50,000 1,330,000 26.6 133,000 58,880 0 1,530,000

3 BG/MD/1076 BG/VAL/CIUP/O3 1 room 11.2 80,000 896,000 14.8 74,000 404,176 0 1,500,000

4 BG/MD/1026 BG/VAL/CIUPIO4 2 rooms 27.93 80,000 2,234,400 31,5 157,500 815,676 0 3,200,000

5 BG/MD/814 BG/VAL/CIUPIO5 4 rooms 70.76 50,000 3,538,000 121.68 608,400 925,856 0 5,100,000___ z =total demolition

6 BG/MD/299 BG/VAL/CIUP/06 1 Shop unit 23.1 60,000 1,386,000 87.3 436,750 612,910 0 2,400,000attached to house

7 BG/VAL/CIUP/07 BG/VAL/CIUP/07 Kiosk 10.92 100,000 1,092,000 22.2 110,000 408,120 0 1,600,000

8 BG/VAL/CIUP/08 BG/VAL/CIUP/08 Veranda in front of 8.4 20,000 168,000 8.4 42,000 368,400 0 580,000business shop

9 BG/MD/116 BG/VAL/CIUP/09 2 rooms 18.6 80,000 1,488,000 22.8 114,000 604,080 0 2,200,000

10 Cemetary/BG/MD-1 Cemetery 75 72,500 5,437,500 0 5,437,500

11 BG/MD/726 BG/VAL/CIUP/11 Steps 6.44 15,000 96,600 6 32,200 5,152 0 134,000

12 BG/MD/886 BG/VAL/CIUP/12 Steps 10.34 15,000 155,000 10.34 51,700 8,272 0 215,00013 BG/MD/887 BG/VAL/CIUP/13 1 room and 1472 80,000 1,177,600 18.48 92,400 410,800 0 1,680,000

veranda14 BG/MD/877 BG/VAL/CIUP/14 1 room 20.16 15,000 302,400 27.8 139,000 37,816 0 480,000

15 BG/MD/774 BG/VAL/CIUP/15 Veranda 16.81 15,000 252,150 16,81 84,050 13,448 0 350,000

16 BG/MD/878 BG/VAL/CIUP/16 veranda 20.2 15,000 303,000 20.2 101,000 16,160 0 420,000

17 BG/MD/224 BG/VAL/CIUP/17 Block Fence 12.3 15,000 184,500 16.6 83,000 10,700 0 278,000

18 BG/MD/825 BG/VAL/CIUP/18 1 Shop 17.8 100,000 1,780,000 20.2 101,000 615,240 0 2,500,000

19 BG/MD/488 BG/VAL/CIUP/19 pole fence 10 20,000 200,000 10 50,000 10,000 0 260,000

RAP for CIUP, Annex 1 llala Municipality 48

- - m -m - - - m - m m - -

20 BG/MD/449 BG/VAL/CIUP/20 Block Fence 17.5 10,000 175,000 24 120,000 11,800 0 307,000

22 BG/MD/312 BG/VAL/CIUP/22 1 room 11.55 80,000 924,000 11.55 57,750 399,270 0 1,380,000

23 BGNVAL/CIUPI2 BG/VALICIUP/23 3 rooms 24.19 100,000 2,419,000 24.19 120,950 1,721,598 0 4,261,000

24 BG/MD/484 BG/VAL/CIUP/24 4 rooms = total 3944 80,000 3,155,200 39 44 197,200 1,574,096 0 4,926,000

r_17_8_89_00_14_240451.9 r: !,t25 BG/MD/262 BG/VAL/CIUP/25 Block fence 17 8 20,000 356,000 17.8 89,000 14,240 0 459,000

26 BG/MD/261 BG/VAL/CIUP/26 1 commercial 14 27 100,000 1,427,000 20.82 104,100 601.244 0 2,132,000

room + veranda 305 09 005

27 BG/MD/68 BG/VAL/CIUP/27 Veranda 18 30,000 540,000 18 90,000 25,200 0 655,000

28 BG/MD/63 BG/VAL/CIUP/28 1 room+veranda 11.4 80,000 1,140,000 15.6 78,000 408,720 0 1,626,000

29 BGIMD/20 BG/VAL/CIUP/29 1 room +veranda 13.4 100,000 1,340,000 17.75 88,750 417,150 0 1,846,000

30 BG/MD/57 BG/VAUCIUP/30 1 room+veranda 13 80,000 1,040,000 17.7 88,500 405,140 0 1,533,000

31 BG/MD/322 BG/VAL/CIUP/31 Toilet and block 3.6 80,000 420,000 3.6 18,000 191,760 0 630,000

fence 6.6 20,000

32 BGIMD/525 BG/VAL/CIUP/32 1 room 10 80,000 800,000 10 50,000 570,000 0 1,424,000

33 BG/MD/522 BG/VAL/CIUP/33 veranda 15.8 40,000 632,000 15.8 79,000 28,440 0 740,000

34 BG/VAL/CIUP/3' BG/VAL/CIUP/34 1 room 12.6 50,000 630,000 12.6 63,000 387,720 0 1,080,000

35 GB/MDI514 BG/VALICIUP/35 Veranda 11.3 50,000 565,000 11.3 56,500 384,860 0 1,000,000

36 GB/MD/209 BG/VALICIUP/36 Veranda 5.85 20,000 117,000 5.85 29,250 5,850 0 152,000

37 BG/MD/26 BG/VAL/CIUP/37 small foodkiosk 9,1 50,000 455,000 9.1 45,500 380,020 0 880,500

38 BG/MD/970 BG/VALICIUP/38 Block fence 10.7 50,000 535,000 13.91 69,550 24,182 0 628,000

39 BGIMDG/602 BG/VALICIUP/39 1 commercial w/ 25.76 80,000 2,060,800 25,76 128,800 622,432 0 2,812,000

'banda'

40 BG/MDGI313 BGIVAL/CIUP/40 2 rooms + 3.6 80,000 1,310,000 12.6 63,000 774,936 0 2,148,000

veranda 15.1 20,00_

41 BGIMDG/40 BG/VALICIUP/41 veranda 11 15,000 165,000 11 55,000 8,800 0 228,000

42 BG/MDG BGIVALICIUP/42 veranda + 11 30,000 330,000 11 55,000 15,400 0 400 000

columns

43 BGIMD/591 BG/VAL/CIUP/43 Block fence 16.7 50,000 885,000 16.7 88,500 48,675 0 1,020,000

44 BG/MD/484 BG/VALICIUP/44 2 rooms 24.3 80,000 1,944,000 25.62 128,100 802,884 2,880,000

45 BG/MDG/374/37 BG/VAL/CIUP/45 3 rooms 29.5 80,000 2,360,000 34.1 170,500 1,181,220 0 3,711,000

._____ .___ _ _total demolitionSUB-TOTALS 51,474,150 4,776,950 17,209,763 73,523,000

RAP for CIUP, Annex 1 lIlaa Municipality 49

m m mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm -

MALAPA SUB-WARD

S/NO PROPERTY VALUATION TYPE OF Structure Compensation VALUE OF Land affecte LAND AL.LOWAN. VALUED AGREED TOTAL

CODE CODE PROPERTY Area m2 RATE STRUCTURE AREA m2 VALUE CES CROPS COMPENSATION1 BG/MLPJ451 BG/VAL/CIUP/46 Tea-room 7.8 40,000 312,000 7.8 39,000 374,040 0 730,0002 BG/MLP/662 BG/VAL/CIUP/47 Veranda 6 15,000 90,000 6 30,000 8,400 0 128,0003 BG/MLP/776 BG/VAL/CIUP/48 2 rooms 27 80,000 2,160,000 27 135,000 811,800 0 3,100,0004 BG/MLP/796 BGIVAL/CIUP/49 2 rooms 30 80,000 2,400,000 30 150,000 822,000 0 3,372,0005 BG/MLP/335 BG/VAL/CIUP/50 2 rooms 16.2 80,000 1,296,000 16,2 81,000 595,080 0 1,972,0006 BG/MLP/535 BG/VAL/CIUP/51 Kiosk 5.2 20,000 104,000 6.4 32,000 365,000 0 500,0007 BG/MLP/131 BG/VAL/CIUP/52 Veranda 7.56 30,000 226,800 7.56 37,800 10,584 0 275,0008 BG/MLP/636 BG/VAL/CIUP/53 Veranda 7,75 30,000 232,500 7.75 38,750 10,850 0 282,0009 BG/MLP/335 BG/VAL/CIUP/54 Veranda 8 20,000 160,000 8 40,000 10,000 0 260,000

10 BG/MLP/672 BG/VAL/CIUP/55 Block fence 8.2 40,000 328,000 8.2 41,000 14,760 0 383,00011 BG/MLP/450 BG/VAL/CIUP/56 1 roorn and 8.98 80,000 718,400 11.5 57,500 931,036 0 1,700,000

________________ tearoom12 BG/MLP/732 BIG/VAL/CIUP/57 3 rooms = 24 80,000 1,920,000 24 120,000 1,161,600 0 3,200,000

total demolition .13 OPP.BGIMLP/24 BG/VAL/CIUP/58 1 Residential 13.8 40,000 552,000 13.8 69,000 384,840 0 1,000,00014 0.. BG/VAL/CIUP/59 Toilet, Kitchen+ 13.6 60,000 979,200 23.8 119,000 43,928 0 1,100,000

block fence 8.6 0 00015 BG/MLP/739 BG/VAL/CIUP/60 1 room 17 40,000 680,000 17 85,000 30,600 0 800,00016 BG/MLP/542 BG/VAL/CIUP/61 Veranda 18,6 20,000 372,000 18 6 93,000 1 8,600 0 480,00017 BG/MLP/ BG/VAL/CIUP/62 Veranda 7.7 20,000 154,000 7.7 38,500 7.700 0 200,00018 BG/MLP/ BG/VAL/CIUP/63 Veranda 15.4 30,000 462,000 15.4 77,000 21,560 0 560,000

SUB-TOTALS 13,146,900 1,283,550 5,622,378 20,042,000

RAP for CIUP, Annex 1 llala Municipality 50

-m m -inminm m -

MNYAMANI SUB-WARD

S/NO PROPERTY VALUATION TYPE OF Structure Compensation VALUE OF Land affectc LAND ALLOWAN- VALUED AGREED TOTALCODE CODE PROPERTY Area m2 RATE STRUCTURE AREA m2 VALUE CES CROPS COMPENSATION

1 MNY/1407 BG/VAL/CIUP/64 Kiosk 11.6 80,000 928,000 11.6 58,000 579,440 0 1,565,0002 OPP.MNY/570 BG/VALICIUP/65 2 rooms 16.1 100,000 1,610,000 161 80,500 787,620 0 2,500,0003 MNY/524 BG/VAL/CIUP/66 Water tank 24.2 50,000 1,210,000 32 160,000 58,800 0 1,424,0004 MNY/907 BG/VAL/CIUP/67 2 rooms 14.5 80,000 1,160,000 14.5 72,500 769,300 0 2,000,0005 MNY/953 BG/VAL/CIUP/68 2 rooms 23.85 80,000 1,908,000 19.85 99,250 80,290 0 2,800,0006 BG/MNY/977 BG/VAL/CIUP/69 1 room 6.11 80,000 488,800 6.11 30,550 200,774 0 720,0007 BG/MNY/981 BG/VAL/CIUP/70 1 room + land 11.93 80,000 954,000 59.65 298,250 0 0 1,250,0008 BG/MNY BG/VAL/CIUP/71 2 rooms 23.73 80,000 1,898,400 23.73 118,650 800,682 0 2,818,0009 BG/MNY BG/VAL/CIUP/72 bare land 0 0 0 162.74 813,700 32,548 0 846,000

10 BG/MNY BG/VAL/CIUP/73 Veranda and 12.09 40,000 633,600 12.09 60,450 28,642 0 745.000block fence 5.0 30,000

11 BG/MNY/895 BG/VAL/CIUP/74 3 rooms = total 35.4 100,000 3,540,000 35.4 177,000 1,228,680 0 4,945,000______________ _ demolition

12 BG/MNY/950 BG/VAL/CIUP/75 1 room 12.13 100,000 1,213,000 15.695 78,475 411,659 0 1,700,00013 BG/MNY/955 BG/VAL/CIUP/76 1 Shop, 1 room, 20.79 100,000 2,079,000 20.79 103,950 807,318 0 2,990,00014 BG/MNY/958 BG/VAL/CIUP/77 1 room 11.2 100,000 1,120,000 11.2 56,000 407,040 0 1,583,00015 BG/MNY/973 BG/VAL/CIUP/78 3 rooms = total 37.2 80,000 2,976,000 37,2 186,000 1,206,480 0 4,368,000

demolition16 BG/MNY BG/VAL/CIUP/79 2 rooms 27.06 80,000 2,164,800 27.06 135,300 1,301,892 0 3,600,00017 BG/MNY BG/VAL/CIUP/80 1 room 9.24 100,000 924,000 9.24 46,200 427,720 0 1,397,00018 BG/MY/981A BG/VAL/CIUP/81 4 rooms = total 46.125 80,000 3,690,000 46.125 230,625 1,596,825 0 5,517,000

demolition19 BG/MNY BG/VAL/CIUP/82 6 rooms = total 99.37 50,000 4,968,500 102.39 511,950 2,379,218 0 7,860,000

demolition20 BG/MNY BG/VAL/CIUP/83 1 annex room 18 80,000 1,440,000 18 90,000 777,600 0 2,307,00021 BG/MNY BG/VAL/CIUP/84 3 small rooms 41.07 50,000 2,053,500 41.07 205,350 622,148 0 2,920,00022 BG/MNY BG/VAL/CIUP/85 1 room 13.14 100,000 1,314,000 19.57 97,850 438,277 0 1,850,00023 BG/MNY BG/VAL/CIUP/86 Veranda 14.4 30,000 432,000 144 72,000 17,280 0 521,00024 BG/MNY BG/VAL/CIUP/87 Block fence 3.5 30,000 105,000 3.5 17,500 4,900 0 127,40025 BG/MNY/149 BG/VAL/CIUP/88 kiosk f structure 13.5 30,000 675,000 13 5 67,500 749,700 0 1,490.00026 BG/MNY BG/VAL/CIUP/89 2 Shops 20.58 100,000 2,058,000 20.58 102,900 2,246,436 0 4,400,000

SUB-TOTALS 41,543,600 3,970,450 17,961,269 64,243,400

RAP for CIUP, Annex 1 Ilala Municipality 51

2. VINGUNGUTI WARDMTAMBANI SUB-WARD

S/NO PROPERTY VALUATION TYPE OF Structure Compensation VALUE OF Land affectE LAND ALLOWAN- VALUED AGREED TOTALCODE CODE PROPERTY Area m2 RATE STRUCTURE AREA m2 VALUE CES CROPS COMPENSATION

1 VNG/MTB VNG/VAL/CIUP/1 Canopy 9.4 40,000 376,000 11 55,000 17,240 0 450,0002 VNG/MTB/302 VNG/VAL/CIUP/2 1 Shop +1 room 19.2 100,000 1,920,000 19.2 96,000 979840 0 3,000,0003 VNG/MTB/1/826 VNG/VAL/CIUP/3 Veranda 23.1 60,000 1,386,000 23.1 115,500 60,060 0 1,600,0004 VNG/MTB/1827 VNG/VAL/CIUP/4 Veranda 11 15,000 160,500 10.7 53,500 8,560 0 223,0005 VNG/VAL/CIUP/ VNG/VAL/CIUP/5 garden 3.2 20,000 64,000 3.2 16,000 3,200 0 83,0006 VNG/MTB VNG/VAL/CIUP 1 room 17.6 80.000 1,408,000 30 150,000 422,320 0 1,980,3207 VNG/MTB/1820 VNG/VAL/CIUP/7 garden 9.3 10,000 93,000 9.3 46,500 3,720 0 143,2008 VNG/MTB/1407 VNG/VAL/CIUP/8 1 room 12.2 80,000 976,000 12 2 61,000 401,480 0 1,438,4009 VNG/MTB/1506 VNG/VAL/CIUP/9 Butchery 15 80,000 1,200,000 15 75,000 771,000 0 2,046,000

10 VNG/MTB/600 VNG/VAL/CIUP/ 10 Veranda 11.6 80,000 928,000 11.6 58,000 39,440 0 1,025,400

11 VNG/MTB/607 VNG/VAL/CIUP/ 11 Steps 32.5 20,000 650,000 32.5 162,500 32,500 0 845,000

12 VNG/MTB/898 VNG/VAL/CIUP/ 12 Veranda 17.3 40,000 692,000 17.3 86,500 31,140 0 800,000

13 VNG/MTB/1271 VNG/VAL/CIUP/13 Block fence 8,9 20,000 178,000 15.2 76,000 10,160 0 260,000

14 VNG/MTB/1148 VNG/VAL/CIUP/14 1 room 16.13 80,000 1,290,400 23.44 117,200 416,304 0 1,823,000

15 VNG/MTB/655 VNG/VAL/CIUP/15 2 Shop + charcoal 34 80,000 2,720,000 29.42 170,000 655,600 0 3,500,000store

16 VNG/MTB/1 175 VNG/VAL/CIUP/16 Hedge fence 13.5 5,000 67,500 23 115,000 7,300 0 189,000incl.tree

17 VNG/MTB/1175 VNG/VAL/CIUP/17 Hedge fence aincl. 13 5,000 65,000 11 55,000 4,800 0 124,800tree

18 VNG/MTB/188 VMG/VAL/CIUP/18 1comm. room + 1 22.61 80,000 1,808,800 22.16 110,800 976,784 0 2,896,000room

19 VNG/MTB/254 VNG/VAL/CIUP/19 1 comm. room 15 80,000 1,200,000 15 75,000 771,000 0 2,046,000

20 VNG/MTB/269 VNG/VAL/CIUP/20 1 room 8.71 80,000 696,800 8.71 43,500 389,612 0 1,129,000

RAP for CIUP, Annex 1 Ilala Municipality 521~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~5

- -m- - --- m m -- -- - -- m

21 VNG/MTB/1395 VNG/VAL/CIUPI21 1 room 18.48 80,000 1,478,400 21.4 107,000 423,410 0 2,008,800

22 VNG/MTB/304 VNG/VAL/CIUP/22 1 comm. room + 1 14.4 80,000 1,152,000 14.4 72,000 588,960 0 1,812,000. saloon

23 VNG/MTB/1261 VNG/VAL/CIUP/23 1 room 11,625 80,000 928,000 11.63 58,000 399.440 0 1,385,000

24 VNG/MTB/1261 VNG/VAL/CIUP/24 Hedged fence 10 20,000 190,800 9.54 47,700 369,540 0 600,000

25 VNG/MTB/297 VNG/VAL/CIUP/25 Veranda 10.2 30,000 306,000 15 75,000 15,240 0 400,000

26 VNG/MTB/2457 VNG/VAL/CIUP/26 1 commercial + 21.75 80,000 1,740,000 21.75 108,750 613,950 0 2,462,000veranda

27 VNG/MTB/898 B VNG/VAL/CIUP/27 1 room, 12.2 64,000 780,800 12.2 61,000 33,672 O 875,000_____ _______________ incomplete . .28 VNG/MTB/916 VNG/VAL/CIUP/28 Kiosk 8.5 60,000 510,000 8.5 42,500 562,100 0 1,114,600

29 VNG/MTB VNG/VAL/CIUP/29 garden 7.5 20,000 150,000 7.5 37,500 7,500 0 195,000

30 VNG/MTB/1147 VNG/VAL/CIUP/30 1 coomercial room 18.9 80,000 1.512,000 18.9 150,000 606,480 0 2,268,000+ veranda

31 VNG/MTB/34 VNG/VAL/CIUP/31 1 Commercial 13.32 80,000 1,065,600 13 66,000 585,288 0 1,716,000

32 VNG/MTB VNG/VAL/CIUP/32 Steps 8 15,000 120,000 8 40,000 6,400 0 166,000

33 VNG/MTB/307 VNG/VAL/CIUP/33 1 room 9.3 100,000 930,000 9.3 46,500 399,060 0 1,375,000

34 VNG/MTB VNG/VAL/CIUP/34 2 rooms 26.1 80,000 2,088,000 26.1 130,500 808,740 0 3,030,000

35 VNG/VAL/CIUP/35 1 Soak pit 10.4 30,000 312,000 17.6 88,000 16,000 0 416,000

SUB-TOTALS 31,143,600 2,868,450 11,437,840 45,425,520

RAP for CIUP, Annex 1 llala Municipality 53

' mm - - - -

TEMEKE MUNICIPALITY

1. CHANG'OMBE WARDCHANG'OMBE A -SUBWARD

S/NO PROPERTY VALUATION TYPE OF Structure Compensation VALUE OF Land affected LAND ALLOWAN- VALUED AGREED TOTALCODE CODE PROPERTY Area m2 RATE STRUCTURE AREA m2 VALUE CES CROPS COMPENSATION

1 CHG/CHA/145 CHGA/VAL/ 1 room 9.7 150,000 1,455,000 15.00 56,250 32,400 0 1,579,000CIUP/01

2 CHG/CHA/83 CHGA/VAL/ 1 room 635 130,000 826,000 10.00 37,500 415,000 0 1,241,000CIUP/02

3 CHG/CHA/82 CHGA/VALI Residency- 5.7 130,000 741,000 1000 37,500 583,000 0 1 054,000CiUP/03 extension

4 CHG/CHA/80 CHGAIVAL/ 1 room and 10.12 130000 1,316,000 20.00 75,000 248,000 0 1,564,000CIUP/04 veranda . .

5 CHG/CHA/142 CHGAIVAL/ Wall fence with 6 2,8 35,000 98,000 3.40 13,000 16,000 0 127;000CIUP/05 course

6 CHG/CHA/63 CHGA/VAL/ 1 room and 13.32 130,000 1,730,000 25.00 94,000 265,000 0 2,090,000CIUP/06 Veranda

7 CHGICHA/88 CHGA/VALI 1 room 2.08 120,000 250,000 5.00 19,000 203,000 0 472,000____ CIUP/07 _

8 CHG/CHA/90 CHGA/VAL/ Staircases 1.07 100,000 107,000 714 27,000 4,000 0 138,000CIUP/08

9 CHG.CHG.A 92 CHGA/VAL/ 1.5room+ veranda 5 130,000 605,000 10.00 38,000 218,000 0 861,000CIUP/09 __

10 CHG/CHA/54 CHGA/VAL/ 1 room and 4.75 130,000 618,000 9 00 34,000 218,000 0 867,000CIUP/10 veranda

11 CHG/CHA/192 CHGA/VAL/ Foundation /sand 7.81 130,000 1,000,000 53.00 200,000 48,000 0 1,248,000CIUP/1 1 cement block

12 CHG/CHA/100 CHGA/VAL/ Land and crops 0 0 0 80.00 300,000 24,000 51,000 375,000CIUP/12

13 CHG/CHA/4 CHGA/VAL/ Part of fence wall 22.9 20,000 458,000 36.00 135,000 24,000 0 617,000CIUP/13

RAP for CIUP, Annex 1 Temeke Municipality 54

m m m - ---- - - -- -

14 CHG/CHA/5 CHGA/VAL/ whole house 77.81 130,000 10,120,000 389.00 1,458,000 657,000 44,000 12,141,000CIUP/14 total jen,I,'.r,

crops .16 CHG/CHA/02 CHGA/VAL/ Part of resd-store 22.6 120,000 2,712,000 45.20 168,750 307,200 0 3,074,000

CUIP/1617 CHG/CHA/26 CHGA/VAL/ Gate bay of 2.37 80,000 190,000 12.49 47,000 95,000 0 332,000

CIUP/17 concrete platform18 CHG/CHA/25 CHGA/VAL/ Part of residency 3.33 130,000 434,000 7 41 28,000 570,500 0 1,033,000

CIUP/18 _________19 CHG/CHA/19 CHGA/VAL/ 1 room. 0.53 130,000 69,000 4.00 7,500 195,000 0 271,000

CIUP/2020 CHG/CHA/23 CHGA/VAL/ 1 room +veranda 7.04 130,000 916,000 46.40 174,000 596,000 0 1,686,000

CIUP/2021 CHG/CHA/21 CHGA/VAL/ Platform and 1.6 100,000 160,000 5.33 20,000 7,200 0 187,000

CIUP/21 veranda22 CHG/CHA/30 CHGA/VAL/ Veranda and 8.88 100,000 888,000 22.00 82,500 39,000 0 1,009,000

CIUP/22 . latform .23 C'HG/CHA/34 CHGA/VAL/ One room 5.15 130,000 670,000 14.00 53,000 401,000 0 1,123,000

CIUP/23 .SUB-TOTALS 25,363,000 3,105,000 5,166,300 33,089,000

RAP for CIUP, Annex 1 Temeke Municipality 55

-- -- -- - -- -im m -

CHANG'OMBE B -SUBWARDS/NO PROPERTY VALUATION TYPE OF Structure Compensation VALUE OF Land affected LAND ALLOWAN- VALUED AGREED TOTAL

CODE CODE PROPERTY Aream2 RATE STRUCTURE AREAm2 VALUE CES CROPS COMPENSATION1 CH/B/207 CHGB/VAL/ Undeveloped 0 0 0 103.50 388,125 15,525 0 404,000

._.____ CIUP/01 Land2 CH/B/222 CHGB/VALI Front Veranda2 42.84 140,000 5,997,000 54.20 203,250 1,016,034 0 7,217,000

CIUP/02 rooms and shop _

3 CH/B-CEM CHGB/VAL/ 25 Graves 75,000 1,875,000 0 1875,000CIUP/03 I...

4 CIU/B CHGB/VAL/ Small stall 36 10,000 360,000 5720 214,500 22,980 0 598,000CIUP/04

5 CH/B/218 CHGB/VAL/CIUP/0 2 rooms+veran-da 7.74 130,000 1,006,200 10.40 39,000 377,808 0 1,423,0005 and shop

6 CH/B/219 CHGB/VAL/CIUP/0 1 Veranda 0.76 130,000 98,000 6.50 24,375 88,927 0 212,0006

7 CH/B/219 CHGB/VALI Kiosk 5.28 130,000 686,400 15.50 58,125 401,781 1,146,000CIUP/07 .

8 CH/B/252 CHGB/VAL/ Part of resd +2 24.13 140,000 3,378,200 26.50 61,875 581,603 0 4,022,000CIUP/08 rooms

9 CH/B/252 CHGB/VALI Side part of 5.47 150,000 820,500 10.20 38,250 478,350 0 1,337,000CIUP/09 building

10 CH/B/252 CHGB/VALI Kiosk 4 130,000 520,000 8.10 30,375 394,015 0 944,000CIUP/10 _

11 CH/B/227 CHGB/VALI Crops 0 0 0 12.00 45,000 1,800 71,600 118,000CIUP/ 11

12 CH/B/226 CHGB/VAL/ Crops 0 0 0 20 00 75,000 3,000 14,000 92,000_ CIUP/12

13 CH/B/I135 CHGB/VAL/ Pole fence, crops 32.6 35,000 260.800 32.60 153,450 16,570 4,000 455,000CIUP/1 3

14 CH/B/1 17 CHGB/VAL/ Part of Resd. 20.3 130,000 2,639,000 28.20 106,000 1,201,790 0 3,947,000CIUP/15

15 CH/B/1 12 CHGB/VAL/CIUP/1 Veranda 2.03 140,000 284,200 6.20 23,250 96,298 0 404,0006

RAP for CIUP, Annex 1 Temeke Municipality 56

-H----- - - -- m - -

16 CH/B/138 CHGBIVAL/ Part of resd. 5 01 130,000 651,300 12 60 47,250 374,794 0 1,095,000CIUP/14

17 CH/B/110 CHGB/VALI Veranda 4.32 150,000 648,000 6.20 23,250 110,850 0 782,000CIUP/17 _

18 CH/B/103 CHGB/VAL/ Part of resd. 11.79 150,000 1,768,500 26 60 99,750 806,730 0 2,675,000CIUP/18

19 CHB/198 CHGB/VAL Veranda 6.3 130,000 819,000 16.80 63,000 119,280 0 1,001,000CIUP/19

20 CH1/Bi217 CHGB/VAL/ Charcoal Store 7.56 100,000 756,000 16.80 63,000 297,000 0 1,116,000CIUP/20

SUB-TOTALS 22,568,100 1,756,825 6,405,135 89,600 30,863,000

RAP for CIUP, Annex 1 Temeke Municipality 57

- - - - -- -- -- - -- - m - -

TOROLI SUB-WARD

S/NO PROPERTY VALUATION TYPE OF Structure Compensation VALUE OF Land affected LAND ALLOWAN- VALUED AGREEDTOTAL

CODE CODE PROPERTY Area m2 RATE STRUCTURE AREA m2 VALUE CES CROPS COMPENSATIONCHG/TRL/333 TRL/VAL/ CIUP/01 Food Stall 13.30 60,000 798,000 13.50 51,000 226,000 0 1,075,000

CHG/TRL/335 TRL/VAL/CIUP/02 Food Stall 4.93 40,000 197,200 4.93 18.750 201,000 0 417,0002

CHG/TRL/573 TRL/VAL/ CIUP/03 Part of 1 room 7.56 130,000 982,000 800 30,000 233,000 0 1,245,000

CHG/TRL/576 TRL/VAL/ CIUP/04 2 rooms 11.03 130,000 1,433,000 11.03 41,000 431,000 0 1,905,000

CHG/TRL/578 TRL/VAL/ CIUP/05 Food Stall and 9.95 130,000 1,293,500 10.00 37,500 245,000 0 1,576,0005 Latrine

CHG/TRLI11 TRL/VAL/ CIUP/06 Veranda 8.07 60,000 484,590 10.00 37,500 21,000 0 543,0006

CHG/TRL/16 TRL/VAL/ CIUP/07 2 rooms 11.22 130,000 1,459,000 11.22 43,000 612,000 0 2,054,0007

CHG/TRL/99 TRL/VAL/ CIUP/08 Food Stall 3.52 60,000 211,200 4 00 15,000 201,000 0 427,0008

CHG/TRL/378 TRL/VAL/ CIUP/09 Veranda 4.13 50,000 206,250 6.13 23,000 9,000 0 238,0009

CHG/TRL/507 TRL/VAL/ CIUP/10 (Well) 12.60 130,000 1,008,000 4.00 21,000 40,000 0 1,060,00010

CHG/TRL/506 TRL/VAL/ CIUP/1 1 Fence 0 56 35,000 24,500 1.00 3,750 1,000 0 30,0001112 CHG/TRL/511 TRL/VAL/CIUP/12 Latrine 5.72 80,000 457,600 6.00 22,500 103,000 0 583,000

CHG/TRLI13 TRL/VAL/CIUP/13 1 room + fence 2.66 30,000 855,400 7.00 26,250 227,000 0 1,109,00013

SUB-TOTALS 9,410,240 370,250 2,550,000 0 12,262,000

RAP for CIUP, Annex 1 Temeke Municipality 58

- -- - -- - -- - -- - -- -- m - -

SANDALI SUB-WARD

PROPERTY VALUATION TYPE OF Structure Compensation VALUE OF Land affected LAND ALLOWAN- VALUED AGREED TOTALCODE CODE PROPERTY Area m2 RATE STRUCTURE AREA m2 VALUE CES CROPS COMPENSAIION

1 SAD.842 SAD/VAL/ CIUP/01 1 room + covered 5.7 150,000 855,000 10,00 38,000 340,000 0 1,233,000veranda

2 SAD 847 SAD/VAL/ CIUP/02 1 room + covered 14.6 130,000 1,900,000 25,00 94,000 380,000 0 2,374,000veranda

3 SAD. 848 SAD/VAL/ CIUP/03 Covered Veranda 8.4 150,000 1,300,000 9.00 34,000 53,000 0 1,387,000

4 SAD. 840 SAD/VAL/ CIUP/04 1 room 7.3 130,000 955,000 10.00 38,000 340,000 0 1,333,000andVeranda

5 SAD. 882 SAD/VAL/CIUP/05 1 room+ wall 4.9 130,000 642,000 26.79 100,000 150,000 0 892,000fence

6 SAD. 908 SAD/VAL/ C IUP/06 2 rooms 40,2 150,000 6,027,000 34.00 130,000 473,200 0 6,630,000

7 SAD. 73 SAD/VAL/ CIUP/07 Foundation 2 15.9 100,000 1,600,000 192.00 720,000 321,000 0 2,641,000course, smallhouse partial

8 SAD. 35 SAD/VALI CIUP/08 Corrugated Iron 8.9 50,000 444,000 12.00 45,000 320,000 0 809,000sheet fence&chips kiosk

SUB-TOTALS' 13,723,000 1,199,000 2,377,200 0 17,299,000

RAP for CIUP, Annex 1 Temeke Municipality 59

m - m m m - -- - -- -m- - m -

MPOGO SUB-WARDPROPERTY VALUATION TYPE OF Structure Compensation VALUE OF Land affected LAND ALLOWAtl- VALUED AGREED TOTAL

CODE CODE PROPERTY Area m2 RATE STRUCTURE AREA m2 VALUE CES CROPS COMPENSATION

1 SAD MPO. 01 MPG/VALI CIUP/01 Mango tree 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0 16,000 16,000

2 SAD.MPO. 15 MPG/VAL/CIUP/02 1 room 12.2 130,000 1,592,000 14.50 54,000 618,000 0 2,263,000

3 SAD.MPO.16 MPG/VAL/CIUP/03 2 rooms 240.0 140,000 3,360,000 26.20 98,000 654,000 0 4,113,000

4 SAD.MPO.24 MPG/VAL/CIUP/04 1 Shop +1 Room 31.8 140,000 4,458,000 35.10 132,000 808,000 0 5,391,000

5 SAD MBA 595 MPG/VAL/ CIUP/05 1 Veranda 2.7 150,000 405,000 11.30 42,000 102,000 0 549,000

6 SAD.MPO 596 MPG/VAL/ CIUP/06 1 Veranda 6.4 140,000 1,347,000 24.60 92,000 142,000 0 1,581,000

7 SAD.MPO. 136 MPG/VAL/ CIUP/07 Crops 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0 66,000 66,000

8 SAD.MPO. 166 CIUP/VAL/ MPG/08 Crops 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0 34,000 34,000

9 SAD.MPO. 99 MPG/VAL/ CIUP/09 Crops 0.0 0 0 8.75 280,000 0 65,000 355,000

10 SAD.MPO 100 MPG/VAL/CIUP/10 Toilet+ Crops 2.4 80,000 192,000 6 20 23,000 165,000 16,000 396,000

11 SAD.MPO.98 MPG/VAL/ CIUP/11 Part of Resi-dence 20.3 130,000 2,633,000 24.40 92,000 481,000 0 3,206,000

12 SAD MPO. 36 MPG/VAL/ ClUP/12 Wall fence with6 13 3 80,000 1,064,000 30.16 113,000 59,000 C 1,250,000

Course . ._...

13 SAD.MPO 111 MPG/VAL/CIUP/13 1 room + Shop 10.7 150,000 1,600,000 13.10 49,000 618,000 0 2,271,000

frontage _ _

14 SAD.MPO. 134 MPG/VAL/ CIUP/14 Front Veranda 1.8 130,000 234,000 8.60 32,000 95,000 0 361 000

15 SAD .MPO, 136 MPG/VAL/ ClUP/15 Land and crops 0.0 0 0 15.60 59,000 216,000 5,000 280,000

16 SAD.MPO. 183 MPG/VAL/ CIUP/16 Part of Resd. and 7 8 140,000 1,085,000 14.30 54,000 490,000 0 1,618,000

Veranda

RAP for CIlJP, Annex 1 Temeke Municipality 60

m-m - --------

17 SAD.MPO. 184 MPG/VAL/CIUP/17 Veranda 3.3 130,000 426,000 12.10 46,000 103 000 0 575,000

18 SAD.MPO. 185 MPG/VAL/CIUP/18 Small food stall 1.1 100,000 106,000 5.60 21,000 377,000 0 505,000

19 SAD.MPO. 200 MPG/VAL/ CIUP/19 2 rooms 18.0 140,000 2,520,000 22.10 83,000 620,000 0 3,223,000

20 SAD.MPO 207 MPG/VAL/ CIUP/20 1 room and 8.3 150,000 1,242,000 18.50 69,000 496,000 0 1,807,000

_ ______________ veranda21 SAD.MPO. 208 MPG/VAL/ CIUP/21 Veranda 5.1 130,000 662,000 13.70 51,000 392,000 0 1,095,000

22 SAD.MPO. 198 MPG/VAL/CIUP/22 Veranda support 5.3 130,000 685,000 20.10 75,000 112,000 0 874,000

w/ 2 bush poles23 SAD.MPO. 360 MPG/VAL/ CIUP/23 2 mono-pitched 13,6 105,000 2,507,000 50.60 190,000 1,182,000 0 3,950,000

buildings = totaldemolition

24 SAD.MPO 88 MPG/VAL/ CIUPI24 Crops 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0 42,000 42,000

SUB-TOTALS 26,118,000 1,655,000 7,730,000 244,000 35,827,000

RAP for CIUP, Annex I Temeke Municipality 61

- m - m -- ----- m - - -m-

MBWELADU SUB-WARD _

PROPERTY VALUATION TYPE OF Structure Compensation VALUE OF Land affected LAND ALLOWAN- VALUED AGREED TOTALCODE CODE PROPERTY Area m2 RATE STRUCTURE AREA m2 VALUE CES CROPS COMPENSATION

1 M/LADU/131 MLD/VAL/CIUP/01 1 room 2.41 130.000 314,000 3 11,000 241,000 0 611,000

2 M/LADU/132 MLD/VAL/CIUP/02 Fence wall 10.1 35,000 375,000 15 56,000 209,000 0 640,000

3 M/LADU/168 MLD/VAL/CIUP/03 1 shop+ Veranda 12.31 130,000 1,600,000 15 56,000 438,000 0 2,095,000

4 M/LADU/163 MLD/VAL/ CIUP/05 1 Veranda 5.36 130,000 700,000 10 37,500 113,372 0 851,000

5 M/LADU/357 MLD/VAL/ CIUP/06 2 rooms 1 6 130,000 2,080,000 16 60,000 277,600 0 2,400,000(a)

6 M/LADU/427 MLD/VAL/ CIUP/06 2 rooms 18.24 130,000 2,370,000 18.24 71,000 829,000 0 3,271,000(b)

7 M/LADU/233 MLD/VAL/ CIUP/07 1 shop, 2 rooms 54.6 130,000 7,321,000 54.6 319,000 1,038,000 0 8,678,000Fence, 1 Veranda

total demolition

8 M/LADU/427 MLD/VAL/ CIUP/08 Coconuts and 24.94 40,000 998,000 160 600,000 256,000 30,000 1,884,000fenced latrine

9 M/LADU/204 MLD/VAL/ CIUP09 Building under 70.2 60,000 4,215,000 238 893,000 1,296,000 44,000 6,448,000construction,Crops

10 M/LADU/210 MLD/VAL/CIUP/10 4 courses 14 130,000 308,000 16 60,000 15,000 0 383,000._._foundation

11 M/LADU/69 MLD/VAL/CIUP/11 3 rooms = total 35.72 130,000 4,644,000 35,72 134.000 419,000 0 5,197,000demolition

12 M/LADU/80 MLD/VAL/ ClUP/12 Building party 4.55 130,000 592,000 10 38,000 397,000 0 1,026,000affected

13 M/LADU/81 MLD/VAL/CIUP/13 Veranda 5.45 130,000 709,000 14 53,000 114,000 0 876,000

14 M/LADU/67 MLD/VAL/CIUP/14 2roomsl Veranda 13,63 130,000 1,724,000 25 94,000 373,000 0 2,191,000

15 M/LADU/171 MLD/VAL/ CIUP/15 1 coconut tree 0 0 0 0 0 0 22,500 22,500

_SUB-TOTALS 27,950,000 2,482,500 6,015,972 96,500 36,573,500

RAP for CIUP, Annex 1 Temeke Municipality 62

Mnyamani Subward :Property to be affected by the project

\\\ \ ' -'- " - '@"-J>iH362 ;' t-"0-' -I 4'<</e| 'o MNY891 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~1 MPart5iartia

9i X f . +: B U Q U~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ MNY.933 7 Partial

. 2 - -, _|-i~~~~~~~~ Z , . . i', w , t4 A plot t~~~~~~3 M Yq6 Partial

, 1 , [2L > < , 15~~~~ MNY 10223 Parfial

) \ 9 , -- ~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-1 ,.|; s4 (7- 1 N Partial

t < \ \ -1 { r; t . 9 ; , ' ; 0 ;00C j, * - = ! 23 MN 1493 | r artja;~~~~~MNY.973 ToZ

e / * \ 8 1 * * J , ^1 . i t- - 4 ! , \ ' - | 25 MNY.524 Partial~~~~~~~~~ MNY977 arti

$ i > ' ' . \ ' ' ~ -- - -- x~~--- -- - - ' ~ ~ -L 1 : | | 1 I- 26 j Opp.MNY. 570MNY. Partial

I~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 4A plo PattA;\\\a\ V \\\\1 L 7>0 - \ 9VX ! \ Ir) r, 1 . - = -g nX .CW 3~3 -<<<-1 ;8- ! -| ~ ' U G U RU rl I L Ii5MNu.sI022 Parti|l

Totaldemolition~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1 BK.273n Toa

t/////~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~8B 7 Partialldmlto uligo _0 .

.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0 J

I ~~~~~Malapa Subward: Property to be affected by the project

FS/~No Prperty Code jlDe~mOfitficn Status- -; -

| 3 BG.MLP.70 PartiSal =l;- _-:00~2A\ t H ;4B3G MLP 737 Partial

5 BG.MLP.732 Partiai l.,\G,

* ~~~~~~~6 IBG MLP.662 I Total_ .. \, _

.7 BG.MLP. Partial !2 ; 8 BG.MLP.672 Partial '-

1 1[ .~~~~~~~~~~ o P a r t i a l _ I ,--_ -

J L~~~~~~~~~~~ 10 BG.MLP.33 Partial C] .L - ;X-J \I;-S--,

_ | +~~~~~~~~~~~GNILP.61, L- tD E t=-1-1 '''/^9 -L-'

|~~~~~~~~~~~1 BG.MLP.776 FPnata -^^B * -=7I1Jl u

1 15BG.MLP.S4 Pa Frtil1| t =_P , _ ir rl |I

bG.MLP.796; ; i Partia 0

| V * V k(:if , S tr:, X~~

| ~~~~~~~~~4.r -.-.O -l: := adenge ,,-

l i b--\'/,; < =! 'c-; '

I D~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Legend N~~~~~~~~~~~~~-lp

- Total demolition building ~ ~ ~ ~ pl-a*

° 0.1 0.2~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~4

| | Partial demolition building Kilometers~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~zz

Prjc raLljeR rilnnnR1g220 n ilHrr 03

Madenge Subward :Property to be affected by the project _

-c C;tY Ceatre -

SINo' Property Code Demolition Status

E G.MDG 450 Rartal ~~2_8G_MDG_825 Partial-

3 BG-MDG 450 Partial

N

4 BG.MDG.449 Partial

IPartialJ

9 eG.MDGA483 Partial -

10EBG.MDG.1070 ___Partial

I 716 BMDG22 Partial __

171 BG.MDG.051 Partial

18 BGMDG.552 ~~~Partial Niaeg

19 BG.MDG.535 __ Patl

20 BG.MDG.7740 Partial

261 BG.MDG.522 PartialD17 22BG.MDG.365 Partial ___

26 EBG.MDG.7526 _ _ PartialI M re e

270 BG.MDG.102 Partial :___.

21 BG.MDG 602aria

29' 80 MDG322 rPartial f

30 BG.MDG.89026 Partial __

'~-"' i iKi

361' BG.MDG.726 PaTotial

327 EG.MDG.2612 I__ Partial_

2 9 J~B G MD ~ 2 22Partial

, a . a

331 BG.MDG.262 Partial __

34BG MDG.2613 Partial __

L ~ - -44----

:,

35BGMDG 312 Partial

TRotal __

~. A ,IJa

3'BG .MDG.8 14 -

37 BMG29Total __-. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\ -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Tallazn,,

38 BG.MDG ____.

_i\ _ __ ____ ___

41 E3G.MDG.7 Partial _______

421 BG.MDG.20O Partial _ _ _ _____

_ _ _ _ _ _ _

3 ~~~~~~~43 BG.MDGC1il Partial

44 BG.MDG.63 Partial Lgn

Total demolition building

Partial demolition building

3 - ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Project area 00 .

Kilometers

Source; Aerial photos, 1992, 2002 and Fieldwork 2003,

Mtambani Subward Property to be affected by the project

VVA

0�

Z,

- - -----------S/No Property Code Demolition Status

1, VNG.MTS 254 Partial

2 VNG.MTB.308 Partiali

VNG.MTB.1395 Parfial

X

4 VNG MTB.304 Partial

0:

=7

5 � VNG.MTB.302 Partialp

7,

2

6 VNG MTB.295 artial

7 VNG.MTB.411 Q', .7�

a i'VNG.MTB.297 Partial

i -- 97�VNIGMT�B24S7 PlItial

10 VNG MTS 6M Partial

11 TB.227 Partial

:L

7' L .

12 VNG.MTS.898 Partial �j

13 VINIGMT13.898(adjaric i Partial

1� �VNGMTS;;O Partial C

15 j VNG,MTB.916 Partial M, t a'M b an I

16, VNG�.MTB.919� IPartial 71

I 7J VN G MiB.925 Partial --3

18 VNIGNTB.1261 Partial

A

19 VNG MTB 1271 partial 7

20 V�NGAMTS-1273 Partial 7--

21 VNG.MTB, 1 �826

22 VNG MTB 1227 PartialA

23 1 VNG,MTB.1 883 IPartiial J

24 VNG.MTB. Partial

v-

25 1 VNG.MTB.1820 Partial 41

Partia

26 VNG.MTB.1407 I � 'o ,J

27 VNG.MT6.15W Partial

x

Y,

NG.MTS.1618 Partial

29 VNG.MTB.1175 Partial

-1164 a

31 i VNG.MTB.1 148 1 Partial

32 VNG,MTB.1 147 Partial

33, VNG.MTB.607 Partial

34 VNG MTB.655 Partial

35 �VNGMTB 34 Partial

Q

mot.,

'Aa-f-Ml- Ltd',

Legend

Partial demolition building 0 0.1 0.2

Project area Kilometers

A nri!:41 nhntnq 1 qq? �)002 and Fieidwork 2003.

_33 'Z7- =-E -E m m m M M ED M M

Q_ a- 0- a- CL o- a- a- a- a- a-

co <

UN) cu) 00 nC)CD

E N Nn C"i:�i 2 :E 2. 0I U) . 0 0 vLT co U� 0) U) U) U) U) U) InN N N N N N N N 1 N NN N N N N

ia�O_4 0-7 7- -J __

U) U) 0 (n co U) U) co U) Co U) U)10 CD

co v- Lo 0)

co

P'eb�A -T CN

n

co

a)

40

CL 'IT

CDLi

L A&>1

Ql�__3

TG Lr

CL)it Z

CUL

'-ZL_P

CL7 Cfi

-E�y�(D 4- I I' 1

IS

LL cc

_T

L)C)

E5c[t -- L Z-cn

m e- - - - - -: - -m -m m -ly - -U

Muungano Subward Property to be affected by the project

/J ~~~~~+ i-- / / JJ LIL,' J /II

0 0 f + 0 Q 0 ff Bndi a+ , t

'f1t ' ,_ J/ L+ Ri ' '4 + K ji 71 ?- /fr

| /N . /rpct Nabe |>- __moiipl 51 -1 u- k4 /,i ' X 0 \;i t8ft

| 2 17M Z7 LM N '17 fPa/ a 0 \f . j : 0 1N0 . ti' (-, I

1J I I

5 SM MZS.MGN 168 Part~~~~ial , '1 -rC ; - - ' I . I - '1'

7~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ SMMSMN8 .ata -<_.e-_/ -- ---- r I }X z, ,-ri,, j/; 9 SM.MZS.MG~~~~~~~~~~~~,~N 07 P asia . ,. i i j,9 /l/-T i . - i' -ijl/ l1l

1~~~~~~J 12S.Z.G.(3 aDl .-- | - 'j~'

i.13 SM M ZS M N 0 0 (ata ... .. -, - - : - - - - I

I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I Kilmeer

IN } /rJc area.

S i t 19 N0 NiN fLI - I I ' _

'N / I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_

~N Li1/ ~ ~ J/~.i' .- JH

N / 'LI I -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

$ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- ,j N NI-..NJJ IL

''I!'!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

NI I/jf'IN I

Li vu eni ~ IJ- fL 71~~~~/~ Muungaiio " J'Tiandale O~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~L'N

~~ Vj1 ~~~~\ 'JII~~~~~~~l ' ':, ' ~~~~~~~l To Tari caleN

I NJ

'N _J NL ./

I /~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I

~~/I/!J 4 r

~Property u ------ !Ii'41-,rl- ~14' 1It h/~SIN SM MZS.MGN.292 Panoitipoal dUS . '.'

2 SM.MZS MGN.174 Partial-i -

GI"J ~~Partial II.lN . I I J '4SM.MZS_MGI 1732

I

5 SM MZS.MGNl 168 Partial. r'NIN \I6SM,MZS MG 14 Partial 2-.>fJL

' 4[.7SM.MZS MGN 082 jPartial ' ' - 7-/L ( /

1I

1V NA_-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~

8SMMZS MGN.081 Partial. '2 L,!i '/

9SM.MZS.MGN.079 Partial T2/ - - .

10 SM MZS.MGN.078 Partial CN-eLI-&ritre ~ I1 1SM.MZS.MGN,011 ~Partial -- f/ enr . /J'

12 SM.MZS.MGN.C)CD9 Partial L. 1 3SM.mzS.MGN 00 Paria____

Legend

MEENVEA/.- Partial demolition building

0 0.075 0.1 5

Project area KlmtrSource: Aerial photos, 1992, 2002 and Fieldwork 2003

Uzuri Subward: Property to be affected by the project

S/No Prop~~erty_Number JDIermolition Status

1SM.MZS.UZR.OCXJ partialChurch - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~ U) 21 ~~~~~~~~~SM.MZS UZR 400 prta

3 SM MS UZR 191 partial

r~SI .1 ZS UZRA415 Jpartial

IAr.ZS UZR,404 _ partial

_ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~IA~~~~~~~~~~~-. fIAZS.UZR.CGBR 459 partial

t.I.1!ZS.UZR.CGBR 467 partial

f j111IZS.UZR CGBR.31 6 Total7, rj P.~~~~~~~~~-I ZS.UZR CGBR.245 partial

- . I' . . Ii~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. U ZS UZR CGBR.238Ipatl

I.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r j -R./'-I ao

'Fo P.1 MZ` I-IZFI - .-. 1--

.1 ill~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I,-(APl -F

I I ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~II J) I ~~~-

01-- r i -mqry~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ i IIo

I i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ,I I,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I J

.111,, ii' Iii ~~~~~~~~~~ -I hI Ii J I~~~~~J

'I I I . --- I ~~~~~~~Ii

I 1/~~~~~~~~~

I Primary School 7"3 Mociu

I,. I I H iii 13~~Cprl~ey I I~-

LI ei -P'i d

'I II I I .* . 'i ,~~J//

7-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I

Legend ~ ~Ii;

Total demolitio~~~~~~~~~~~ii bY'ilding ,

Part~ial demoliion bildin 0 0. 0.2j-;' ,

./ I Jil Ii I// ciVie~~~ery~'K' I~Kilometer

Project area~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I

Sore eil hts 92,20 nIiedok20

- - m - - m m - - - -

Kilimani Subward : Property to be affected by the projectI ~~~~~~~~~--~~~-

SNo | Property Number Demolotion Status F -- F

1 SM.MZS.KLN llO' Total2 SM.MZS KLN.383 Partial -

3 SM.MZS.KLN375 Partial _

4 SM.MZS.KLN 352 Partial _ > --

SM.MZS.KLN.146 Partial

6 SM MZS.KLN 84 Partial , , 'K / -; /.

SM.MZS.KLN 82 Partial 2 p /4 . ' I

8 SM.MZS.KLN 75 Partialj

9 SM.MZS.KLN.90)6 Partial I Jzrf 2 /in I QMMZS VLN * Pti I .I 4 2 ' 2 I

Si r" z a k9

4 ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2

|~ ~ ~~ .0 S:fo; 00 0I Th / ; F 0: ) t02 :ttt

|~~~~~ 2 Url Saf tr ir I i 24 2/ i; ' , \2 /; |

'Ii~~~~J

I ) Urafihl StaffQual Xrs) -, 0:-- / ; : ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ff f 750 ,N,t,' =CE X f_;f ;: r - ; ;,\U t~~I ~ TUzi~

.l i / i; <],,,,/) ) | , } '' iI'j 1, -; --,,l-, ,; - / |-\ ' 1Ell 1 ' J I \',,1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ J2~{~/1'j j r

I / / 0 / ,{ I 010|t 1 4 E I - I 1

\~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~- II ; ' . .'' '' ,21' Te:.JEp /r. 0| $4 |00 0 },5i 0 }j l\ \i

I~~~~~~~~~I, 'A.,i -

[ t Project area Kilometers

- -- ~~~~~~l t I I 424 ~~~~~~~~~~~i K.1i

, .. . I

Ji~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ F-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 2

2414 - ) .' I . - . -- 2~~

.' I - -~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ I I I V~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

n

I f t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

K - I' . 4 i 42 14 /4

4 . U___bungo, ~-K '9~ ~ K ~7U/ I' ~ ~ ~ -- .-- I 'M U I'PII

411/ / 2' f. 2 II - -~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 'To City '

/ ' -~~ '~J' 2JCentre -/

;1/! rJ/ ~~ J~-.~r- _J 7_2f _- F- 4/ 'I 2 ''~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~,~Iv/ I / / :~~~~~~~~ _ _ ____ . 2 ~~~~~~~~~~ 'i<h~~~~~U 4L11 *~~~~~~j. 71-i't I I

Legend

Total demolition building

~~ ~Partial deMolitionl building 0 0.1 0.2

Project area KilometersSource: Aerial photos, 1992, 2002 and Fieldwork 2003

Chang'ombe A Subward: Property to be affected by the project

Tabisco _

Twiga Cerrlint

iCemnetery

+ L~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

3 /~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

FIE I ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ H~~~~~~

/ r F i /~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

SJoProperty Code _]eliinStalus - 7 1 CHG.CHG A. 26 -~Partial -' I/ J7

2CHG CHG A25 Partial I/. 3 COIG CHG A 24 Partial I> /4 CHG.CHG,A22 Partial 4-J1U-p

-44~~~~~~~~~~F,5 CVIG.CHG A 30 Partial L q~gobB6 CHG CHG A.34 Partial-

/

7l ClI-G CHGA 835 Partial , 71. 3

9 CHG CH-G.A.82 Partialf i. J l3-1ocGcoHCHGASO Partial '~ L

11 [CHG CHG A.1 42 Partial 3

12 CHG.CHG A. 63 PaFti2l1. -i i3 CHG.CHG A.88 Partial

15 4 CHG.CHG A90 Partial 'L "- -

1 5CFIG CH-GA592 Partial /~-

16 CHG CHG.A 54X Partial ,- .- ..

1 8CHG CF-G.A 192 -~Partial ,/ ' -

19 CHQ.CHGA.04 'Partial /-- /.,

20 CHG.CHGA.05 Total v~--, - Fi~

21 CHIG.CHG A.02 Partial ED' 71

22 CHG.CH-G.A 23 Partial

Legend N

Total demolition building +

MENIMA Partial demolotion building 0 0.1 0.2

Project area Klm trSource: Aerial photos, 1992, 2002 an'd Fieldwork 2003,

Chang'ombe B Subward Property to be affected by the project

-T'd

O C-']

7 0 J

]F

J L J7

Q, % Cb.00 FC-'H A, G 0 M "B E,

'J _-T -J4

hang'om b6

)V X,

)-Chang'ombe BM A

J YiIji

L-J.

EJ _-Z61 J

6'>1- L

SiNo operty Code Demolition Status

.41 CHG CHG B 252 Partial

2 CHG.CIAG.B.251 Partial

3 Cemetery Total 25 Graves

4 CHG.CI-qG.13 222 Partial

5 CHG.CHG.B.218 I Partial

6 CFIG CHG B.219 Partial

7 CHG C11G.B.207 Partial-----------

8 C HG Cl-lG.B1 17 Parlial

9 CHG CHG.B,103 Partial

1 0CHG.CHG.B,98 Partial

11 CHG.CHG.B Paffia

1 2CHG.CHG.B.227 Partial

1 3CHG.CHG B.126 Partial

14C HG CH G .B.135 Pa rAial

15 CIAG CHG.B 112 Partial

16 CHG CFIG.B.138 Partial Y O1 7 'CHG CHG B 1 1 0 Partial

18 HG.CHG.B 217 Partial

Legend

Total demolition building +

Partial demolition 0 0.1 0.2

Project area Kilometers

Source: Aerial photos, 1992, 2002 and Fieldwork 2003,

Mpogo Subward: Property to be affected by the project

J LII~~

1 L~~~~~~~~~a I;~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~' 7

17-, ;j~;j I- ,'- II ., -- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -

-IY'

- . Ii,~~~~~~~~~

~~~ol~~~~~~~"b' Kilakata~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I~'I

S/No Pro perty Cuilt- Dernolihon Slal,,s~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~2

8 SAD.MP(- I F, 3, 1,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~II i

9 SAD MPC. i i i F 5I r '' .

10 SADMPC- I ~rhj I -

12 SAD MPG- i:1, - I?

35 SAD MPC' w IPi,i. 14 SAD.MPC.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -

6 SAD,MPC -i~Z Fa,iII-. - 'Ii

7SAD.MPC 'ri. ,/

8 7SAD.MPcv-~ iL%*

98 SAD.MPAG 9( Pata Ii -- .

19 SAD.MPA 595 Partial

20 SAD.MPC 1• Parti1 - Ial

213 SAD.MPC'I'.18 -0r ~/

172 SAD.MPOG85O16 SAD MBA 596 ~Partial

231 SAD MPO.1 16 Patlf i I

Legend

Total demolition building +

M1111110 Partial demolition buildinig 0 -0. 1 0.2

Prjetarea KilometersSource: Aerial photos, 1992, 2002 and Fieldwork 2003,

Toroli subward :Property to be affected by the projectSINo j rpryCd Dermolition Status

11 CHG.TRL.16 Partial 30 5o

-2 CHG_TRL.13 Partial <ufy-C

3 CHG TRL 1 1 PartialJ

4 Cl--GTRL 337 Partial >~-

5CHG.TRL.335 Partial__ _ ~-6CIIGITRL378 Partial

7CGHG. [RL57 -Partial-Y

8_ CHG.TRL 506 Partial

9 CHG TRL 511 Partial-

10 CHG TRL 573 Partial C0

1 1CHG TRL,576 Partial -'

12 C1HG_TlL.578 Partial JI

13 CHG TRL 99 Partial '

It OW~~~~~~~~~'

T E I',I- i

- L lij Ii if1,_ L J

I ~~~~~~~Ii I I - - I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~jT ,F In

FIi

~~~Cerrletery- I, ~ Ii- ii .ilZ

MIN N~~~~~~~~~~~~~I

MEM I-i' C 111+I'EV ~

Project area 0 0 .1 0.2

Kilometers

Source:.Aerial photos, 1992, 2002 and Fieldwork 2003,

Sandali Subward: Property to be afffected by the project

|SINo Prop!er1y rde |Demyolitioti Statu s -\T azr

t SAD 848 | Partia 4 ~~~~~~~~~Football Pitch \J. !

2_ SAD 847 Partial ..

S AD.842 Plrartial Training R s a nd ;\i' ;!

iSAD 882 Partial--..:j SAD-908 B Partial.- P I i

6 .A.7 Pattial' Dtt7a; ;fiX alys;'

l ,, ' ~~~~~~~~~ ~Sandali . - ' , ,.

T> 0 0 t 1 g 0 V ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~J I -. ) f

I l ,1 2l, t . :0r i t 1 , ¢ I, j ! I 0 0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~: , g '. t; 0 ' : S i : w fi la U ]~~~~~~~~~

| To V J l.q S s7 , 0 '| : ; t' I ;} :

J 0 t' Q W f 0 ': g fff f 0 ... i ]~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Yombo~~~~~~~~~~~~t D

l r 4 .t tt, 0\t- rX l--i[' t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.' tI--l,-( ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ '; \~~~~~-

I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ . .. .. J .._... .. .....

. . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ __ . _ .. _ . . _~~~~~~1~~ij t

Legend~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

m Pa tial demoli(ion building * - |~~Mwo elad

IA rjetae. 0 5 1 52~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

IF- ~ ~ ~ Kioetr

Souce:Aeral hotsz 992 202 ad FeldorkJ00

Mwembeladu Subward: Property to be affected by the project.

|S].]Propety coe T6> T-a- -X j t_rl r < u o 35r- Rl' s`o kota '; I SAD.MLD.67 Partial /rj J - c -?. l -; -; I

8;SDML D 204 Partial 0/ - 3 * J2 f !2 ;

3,O SAD MLD 171 Partial NurLilyakini _ _g , *,' j , ,_, /'j,2

4 1 SAD MLD.169 Partial = =t --- ;- 3 -

| 2 SAD MLD2131 Partial i , 1 -1 -/ . -I -. \I6 3 SAD ML-D.1327 Partial ' 9 D\a-|KI _| O ;\

Legend~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

8 ADML 0 Total dmlto)bidn

10SD L 11 Partial d m lto uligU)1t

1 S WD18 Paroetiare Ki- lo etr12~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ore Aeria MLDos 192 200 andFiedwrka00

I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1

lI

ANNEX 3 PROJECT AFFECTED PEOPLE WITH RESETTLEMNENTHOUSEHOLD SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE

N.B: Where there is more than one household living in the house, the surveyor has tointerview each of the household living in the house separately.

1. LOCALITY AND IDENTIFICATION PARTICULARSI Municipality--------- Name of Interviewer ------------------------Ward --------------------------- Sub-ward ------------------- Date ------------1) Land owner ----------------------------------------------------------------I i) Name of the first Head of family ------------------------------

ii) Name of the second Head of family ---------------------------iii) Name of the third Head of family ----------------------------

2. HOUSEHOLD MEMIBERS: Age Education and Employment

2.1 Demography and Education

I S/ NAME OF 1.1 1 1.2 1.3 F 1.4N FAMILY SEX FAMILY AGE EDUCATION

MEMBER RELATION IN YRS LEVEL

3 __ __i__

4 _

l ~ ~7 ______

~~_ _= __ __

s ~~~~Coding 1.1 Sex of person =male or femaleI 1.2 Family relation (1I) Head of household(2) Wife or Husband in case wife is Head of HH

| ~~~~~~~~~~(3) Son or daughter* ~~~~~~~~~~~(4) Other relative

(5) Visitor

| ~~~~~1.3 Education LevelI ~ ~~~~~~(I) Did not attend school(2) Uncompleted elementary school

| ~~~~~~~(3) Completed elementary school(4) Uncompleted high school(5) Completed high school

3 RAP- ANNEX 3 79

I

ll

(6) Uncompleted higher technIcal/vocational school(7) Completed higher technical/vocational school(8) Uncompleted college education(9) Complete college

I 2.2 Occupation and Employment (15 to 64 yrs) in Each Household

|S/N OCCUPATION STATUS EMPLOYMENT PLACE OF!______ _____________CATEGORY EMPLOYMENT

___i______________BY INDUSTRY

4'V

I m -__

8

| A~ ~~0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ V _ _ _ _

9.3 Applied to Head of Household

(a) (i) How long have you stayed in the Project Area (sub-ward)?LO More than 10 yrsI OL 5 - IO yrsLO Less than 5 yrs

(ii) Reason for moving into this settlement?LO Employment opportunitiesLO Resettlement by the govemment

| OL Live close to relativesLO Other reasons: Specifv ---------------------------------------

3 (iii) Plans for possible resettlementLO move to new areas in the MunicipalityLO readjust in the same settlementL| move to other areas out side the municipality'?

Specify -------------------

3. HOUSING CONDITIONS(i) Type of house: single: Detached

: Semi detached| : Arrow house: Apartment.: Others

RAP-ANNEX 3 80

i

I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

(ii) Mlain Construction rnaterials for3 Outer walls: Roof- Brick/concrete tile or concrete- Galvanized galvanized3 - Wood palm leaves- Make ship make shift- Others (specify)

(iii) Ownership of dwelling- Private owner/self owned

* - Full rentalRented rooms

- House owned by relative or friend| - Government owned house

(iv) Number of habitable rooms

U one, two, three, four, five, six +

(v) Space of dwelling unit and yard - estimated total ------- m2

(vi) Number of Habitable rooms| * House is for living only

* Living is combined with shop or other comnmercial business* Living combined with workshop

| * Living is combined with office* Others (specify -------------------------------------------------)

3 (vii) In case the house is used for business purposes (shop, workshop and/oroffice) is the business officially licensed? YES / NO

| 4. HOUSEHOLD ASSETS

4.1 Does you household possess one or more of the following assets'?

3 YES / NO(1) Radio/cassette/Cd player ----------------(2) TV

* (3) Video / DVD-player ----------------(4) Fan ----------------(5) Air conditioner ----------------

* (6) Refrigerator(7) Bicycle(s) ----------------(8) Car

* (9) Pickup ----------------(10) Truck ----------------

3 IVRP AP-NEX 3 81

ll

4.2 Does the Household possess other land or housesI (other land than this house plot) '

| ~~~~~YES NOY ha. ha. Estimated/Value in TShs.

(1) other land for housing YES ---------- ----------- ----------

(2) Farmland YES ---------- ------------ ----------

1 (3) other house(s) YES ---------- ----------- ----------

Total value (1) to (3) ------------------------------------------------

4.3 Does the household possess cattle/animals'?Number Estimated value in TShsI (1) Cattle ---------------- ----------

(2) Poultry ---------------- ---------------(3) Goats - sheep ---------------- ----------------I (4) Others -------------------------------- ---------------------------Total 1 -4

4.4 Is the house connected to the power suppiy lives?I YES/NO ------------------------------------------------5. HOUSEHOLD EXPENDITURE

5.1 How much in cash did you household spent during last month on theI following expenditure items or categories. In kind means food andother items produced by your own household or collected from3 ___ relatives/friends.

S/N | ITEN I PER PER PER PERWEEK MONTH WEEK MONTH

__1 Food and drinks_2 C_ lothing + .__3 _ Transport ____4 4 Education/school _ _

5 House rent l6 House maintenancel

and repairs I7 Water supply __ _

l ~~8 Electricitv9 Fuels for cookino10 i Garbage collection11 NMedical expenses l _ - -12 lRecreation j _ _

R-3 A X Tx 8__ l l 1 _ _3 | 1 4

l O thers _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ j _ _ _ _ I _ _

| RAP- ANNEX 3 82

l

1 6. HOUSEHOLD INCONIE

3 What is approximately the total monthly household income from the following incomesources for the last month'? (Account for income of all contributing household wifeothers).

Income sources: Total month lv Total monthlyCash income TShs. Value of income

| (Mlonth) in Kind in TShs (MIonth)

(1) From main work/JobAs employee -------I (2) From other job(s) ---------------- ----------------

(3) From own production ---------------- ----------------3 (4) Remnittance from abroad ---------------- ----------------

7. WATER SUPPLY INTO YOUR HOUSE

| 7.1 Sources

* S/ | AS YOUR MAIN AS SOURCE ITHE VOLUMEN |SOURCEOF WATER SUPPLY SOURCE FOR FOR OTHER OF WATER

FOR YOUR HOUSEHOLD DRINKING WATER ENOUGHWATER USES

I Piped water house connection2 Piped water but connected

m through neighbor _ _ _ _5 3 Water from communal tap _ _ _

4 Own dug well + electric pump l

5 Deep tube well + electric pump I_ ~ ~ _ ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ._ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _6 Vendors (on the street) __ _

7 Others (water from stream) __. _ _-

3 7.2 Is your house - connection provided with a water meter? (in case you have pipedwater)3 YES / NO

7.3 Is the quality of the water good enough?

(i) for pied water YES ------------ NO ----------------(ii) for other sources like wells YES ---------------- NO ----------------I (iii) Indicate the quantity of each relevant source of water that your household in

using last month: -> See next table ./.

l| RAP- AVN>EX 3 83

I~f f X

l

I si *(SOURCE OF WATER QUANTITY: DISTANCE. WHO IS USUALLYSUPPLY FOR YOUR HOW .MANY FROM THE FETCHING THE

HOUSEHOLD BUCKETS SOURCE TO WATER FROM(EACH 20 L) YOUR HOUSE THE SOURCE

_ PER DAY IN ivIETRESI Piped water but connected'__ ,through neighbor _ _

2 fater trom communal tap .__ _

|~~- DOwn ~dug well + h'and* ipump __

4 Deep tube well + electricI pump _ _

* 5 IVendors (on the street) l

6 L Others stream/river I

-husband- wile

- son/daughter* - other relative

- hired person

l(iv) Is your household also buving bottled water from shops/factory?

YES ---------------- NO ----------------

If ves what are the reasons for buying bottled water

I8. If you are a house owner, do you have right of occupancy?

| YES -------------------------------- NO --------------------------------

9. If you have a right of occupancy: What is your leasehold? ----------------

10. If you have business: Has vour business got a license?

| (i) YES ---------------- NO-(ii) What is your business: shop, kiosk or restaurant or genge?

l

RAP- ANNAEX 3 8

1l

11. (as applicable) Your house/property is to be demolished for an infrastructure3 provision, what preference do you have among options for resettlement package ?

(i) Being compensated? ---------------- How much ---------------------------------

Il (ii) Get a new plot? ---------------- where in particular ------------------------------

3 (iii) Compensated but left to a new-location site for himself/herself

(iv) Compensated but left to readjust in the same plot? -------------------------------

(v) Property location for business needs to be compensated? -----------------------

(vi) New location should be of similar characteristics e.g. corner plot for businessU e.t.c.

12. What are you going to miss if you are displaced far from your present area?

(i

I (ii)

(iii)

I (iv)

5 13. What assistance would you likce to have to shift to the new location'?

I (ii)

I (iii)(iv)

3 ~~~(v)

Pref-erence time to shift----------------------------------------------------------------

I RAP- ANNEX 3 85

I, 1 11-11-1-11- 1_

3 .X^ANNEX 4 Assessment of the environmental conditions in theprospective new resettlement sites

I The preparation of the Resettlement Action Plan also included site visits andanalvsis of the environmental and social conditions in areas that were formerly pre-selected by the Government to be proposed to the PAPs confronted with unavoidable

* relocation. As stated in the main report. these plots are to be chosen by the PAPsthemselves at their own discretion and cost, as the principle of compensating themthe full replac-ement value for their lost land and structural assets shall enable themto purchase any of the proposed plots.

Therefore, the following analysis of the said areas (called hereunder prospective newresettlement sites) has only record character to indicate that the RAP considers fullrelocation assistance to the PAPs in order to disclose to them the pros and cons forchoosing this new resettlement area, without forestall their freedom for otherresettlement options.

Information for the PAPs on the prospective new resettlement sites

3 To assist the process of finding a new plot, the RAP survev team disclosed to theproject-affected people (both land/ house owners and tenants) that there is an optionto take part in the '20.000 plot' program offered by the Mfinistry of Lands and3 Human Settlement Development within the boundaries of their respectivemunicipalities. This assistance, provided by the CPTs and TSTs, had mere advisorycharacter and does not oblige the Government to provide free plots, as contrasting to

| previous projects where no full land compensation and market-value replacementcosts for lost structures were considered but the relocated people were provided withnew plots.

Nearest locations:

3 The prospective relocation areas nearest to the project-affected persons are:

- Those who are to be resettled from Kinondoni sub-wards may opt for newplots in Mbweni or Bunju.

- Those from llala sub-wards may choose new. at their own discretion, new3 plots in Buyuni;

- PAPs from Temeke sub-wards may choose either Toa Ngoma or Kisota asnearest new resettlement area.

Land availability and costs:

| The new plots would be much larger than in the unplanned settlements whereovercrowded conditions prevail. Thus the resettled families would have a morespacious living environment than thev have now. They would have sufficient spacefor construction of on-site sanitation facilities and for homestead gardening.

RAP for CIUP, ANNEX 4 86

l

At present (March 2004'). the priees for the said plots vary between TSh.500.000 fora high densitv plot average )500m- and TSh.'.000,000 per low-density plot (averagesize J)00 m-). These purchase price should be possible to be met by ail PAPs as theyWill-obtain full and fair compensation payment for their lost lands and assets. Their3 actual compensation rate per m of land varies between TSh 3.750 and TSh 5D000.

3 Expectancy of improved living conditions

By choosing -a new plots in the government's '20,000 plots scheme' the resettled| people can expect the following improvements of their living standards:

The areas in Mslbweni. Bunju, Mbuyuni, Toa Ngoma and Kisota are furnished withI basic infrastructure including main storm water drains, roads with sides drainchannels and water supply network. Reportedly, the local authorities plan to providethe entire area in the near future with electricity. The funds for electrification wouldcome from the revenues of sold plots.

| Environmental conditions in the resettlement sites

The prospective areas are without risk for flooding and landslides. Air pollution isabsent due to lack of industries and low traffic development that make theprospective new settlement areas are much less congested. The areas offer openspace and healthy surroundings that are commonly not available in the present living

* environment of the project affected people. Accordingly, the new settlers would not,or to much less extent, encounter the environmental problems as they face at presentin the general unhealthy status in the unplanned areas where they live. Moving to aplanned area would also considerably reduce the risk of being again affected bydisplacement due to urban upgrading development.

1Comparison of the living standards between the existing residential and the

| prospective new resettlement areas

Infrastructure and utilities

The prospective and recommended resettlement areas are former village settlementsor farms. Infrastructure and narrow unpaved roads are available, although not yet ofhigh standard. The areas offer municipal dispensaries and water wells. According tothe inquiries of the field staff involved in the RAP the local authorities have alreadydevised plans to upgrade the local roads.

As for religious aspects it is noted that the PAPs belong to different religions. It isassumed that they may find appropriate religious facilities in the new areas.

l

| ~~RAP for CIUP, ANNEX 4

Health and education facilities

In the unplanned settlements the healtlh facilities are sub-standard and the generalhealth condition of the entire population suffers from chronic contamination ofdrinking water resources and inadequate sanitation facilities. The unplannedsettlements have no proper stormn water drainage svstern. As a result nmost areas areexposed to health hazards, such as waterborne diseases. Pools of stagnant water areubiquitous and serve as mosquito breeding grounds.

The local authorities responsible for the recommended new resettlement areas haveequally planrned for adequate water supply for all residents and the construction ofappropriate storm water drainage. Nurseries and primary schools are already in placeand in operation. While most of the education facilities in the informal settlementsare overcrowded with over 100 pupils in one classroom, the situation is much betterin the prospective new resettlement areas where the primary schools have 40 to 45pupils per class.

Job opportunities

In the unplanned settlemenit marny people make a living in the informal sector. Theinformal activities that provide a living for the majority of the residents includeselling of vegetables, fruit, food, running of retail and wholesale shops, selling ofused garments, carpentry and hair care salons.

In and around the proposed new resettlement sites informal business opportunities islikely to increase over time when more people will move in and demands raise. Atpresent, farming enterprises prevail and occupy large areas. Thus, agriculture is forthe beginning a potential source of finding local jobs for the new settlers. As theplots are relatively large in size, the new settlers are likely to find additional incomeopportunities from intensively farming or horticulture activities on their own land.

Public security

General security is presently a major concern in the existing living environment. at itis relatively low in the new proposed resettlement areas. This is attributed to thelower population density and the prevailing rural character of these areas whichf'avours social relationships and control mechanisms. Police posts are not yetestablished in these areas.

Ongoing and planned programs in the new resettlement areas

The -Citv 20,000 Plots Proaram' is a new governmental project initiative forurbanisation of selected village settlements and individual farms in the outskirts ofthe city. namely in Mbweni, Bunju, Mbuyuni. Toa Ngoma and Kisota. People whohave formerly been affected by other infrastructure upgrading programs (see section2 of the main document) have been given plots in compensationi for the loss of theirproperties. Thev were also provided with assistance to build permanent houses in thenew plots. ft was made conditional that people receiving plots were obliged to

RAP for CIUP, ANNEX4 88

l

conlstruct new houses Cor their own purpose and witlhlin a detemnned period aftertransfer. Sellin_ of the new plots was not permitted virhin a fixed period.

The areas have been surveyed and sub-divided in biocks of about 200 plots each-Out of the 16.000 plots already surveyed. 4000 plots have been sold so far. Serviceprovision and infrastructure construction is planned to start in 2004.

At present, there are no NGOs active in the new resettlement areas.

Road netvork development/transport improvement program

In generalh the prospective new resettlement sites would be at much farther distancefrom the city center than the areas the PAPs would currently live.

All five prospective resettlement areas are close to the public road transport networkand are serviced by public transport (mini-buses). As the new sites will be developedin the near future the demand for public transport service will grow. Mbweni andBtnju are along Dar es Salaam Bagamoyo tarmac road about 20 km from the citycentre. Bunju is within the 2 lkm distance both ways from the tarmacked road.NMbweni is also not far from this road (4 kin) and is already serviced by mini-busesand has a covernment institution. Mbweni already accommodates people resettledfrom the expansion of Dar es Salaam to NMorogoro (Ubungo section) road. Otherlocal settlers are those who have been affected by floods in NMsimbazi valley.

The Toa Ngoma and Kisota areas are about 40 krn from the city centre alongKongowe Kigamboni tarmac road. Kongowe is along Kilwa Road. Thus both areashave immediate access to major roads and regular transport services to downtownDar es Salaam. The same applies to Buyuni area located about 40 km from the citycentre along Pugu-Chanika tarmac road. The area is well serviced by mini-busesbetween Chanika and Kariakoo to Dar es Salaam city centre. Although the plannedblocks extend about 3 km from the centre of the road they are still in walkingdistance to the nearby bus stops to the city centre.

lIndustrial development plans

The five areas have been planned as residential areas. No industrial developmentapart from service activities is expecting to be carried out in these areas.I Conclusion and Recommendations

Without anticipating the finding's and conclusion of the RAP. which is still underpreparation, it is concluded at that stage that any PAP opting for purchasing one of

| the newly offered plots in the investigated areas would ultimately benefit. All newsettlers can expect to obtain titled plots that are significantly larger than the ones intheir current settlement. and they are situated in a safer environment.

Other benetits would include:| Z - The new plots will be servicedI - Land use. infrastructure and urban services are planned.

RAP for CIUP, ANNEX 4 89

The disadvantages these people w-ould face are:- Thev wvill live far distances to their tormer settlement. which will

possiblv affect social links- Transport costs will be higher as the distance to the citv centre is

increased3 - Rental prices will be higher in the new settlement areas.- There is a time frame determined with construction of houses on the new

plot, and there are sales restrictions.

Taking into account the pros and cons, it is recommended to provide full assistanceduring the resettlement procedure to any affected party that would be interested in3 finding an adequate new residential area. In the new resettlement areas there issufficient number ot adequate plots to absorb all anticipated displaced families.

llll

Il

RAP for CIUP, ANNEX 4 90

l U

ANNEX 5

PUBLIC INFORNIATION IMIEETINGS IN THE AFFECTED CONIMUNITIES

.MNIEETING WITH THE LOCAL OFFICIALS AND THE PROJECT AFFECTED

FAMILIES TO INFORM THEM WHAT IS GOING ON AND HOW THEY ARE3 GOING TO BE AFFECTED WITH CIUP PROJECT.

3 ATTENDANTS: 1. Technical Team from UCLAS

2. Councilors from the Wards

3 3. Executive Wards Officers

4. Sub-Ward Chairpersons and their Sub-Ward Committee1 5. Community Planning Teams

6. Sub-Ward Community Members

| 7. Municipality CIUP Coordinators

3 PROGRAMME:

TEMEKE MUNICIPALITY

3 DAY rDATE SUB-WARD PLACE TIME

-l -- Toroli Sub-Ward Office I 1.00am - 1.00pmSaturday 17/1/2004

Chang'ombe 'B' Sub-Ward Office 2.00pm - 4.00pm

Chan2'ombe 'A' Sub-Ward Office 11.00am - 1.00pmSunday 18/1/2004 _I _________ Mpogo Sub-Ward Office 2.00pm - 4.00pm

2Mwembeladu Sub-Ward Office 10.30am - 1.0OpmS laturdav 24/1/2004 __________

Sandali Sub-Ward Office 2.OOpm - 4.00pm

R

Il

RAP for C11;P. .ANNEX 5 91

I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~A o 1 '..NE

I

ILALA NIUNICIPALITY

3 I'DAY DATE SUB-WARD I PLACE TIME

Buguruni - Malapa Sub-Ward Office 10.00arn - 1.00pm{ ~~~Saturday 31/1I/° 004,_3 Saturday 31/1/2004 Buguruni- Madenge Sub-Ward Office 2.00pm - 4.OOpm

I ~~~~~FSaturday 1/02/2004 Buguruni-Mnyamanil Sub-Ward Office 11.00am - 1.00pmSaturdav /0/2004 _

Vingunguti -. Mwembeladu Sub-Ward Office 2.00am - 4.OOpm

KINONDONI MUNICIPALITY

DAY I DATE SUB-WARD PLACE TIME

Saturday i7/02204 Manzese-Uzuri Sub-Ward Office 10.00am - 1 2.00noon*_,__ Manzese-Ki limani Sub-Ward Office 2.OOpm - 4.OOpm

Manzese-Muungano Sub-Ward Office I 1.00am - 12.00pmSSundav 8/02/2004 _ -

Manzese-Mvuleni Sub-Ward Office 2.00pm - 4.OOpmI'_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Manzese-INInazi Mmoja Sub-Ward Office 10.00am - 12.00pmSatLurday l14/02/2004 ..Saturday 14/02/ 4 Manzese-Md Sub-Ward Office 2.00pm - 4.0(pm

Source: Survey Team / UCLAS July 2004

g ~~~RAP for CIUP. ANNEX 5 9-

I3 !! !! !

m m -m m mm m m m - m- m m -m m - -l

ANNEX 6 COMMUNITY RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN - SALIENT FIGURES AND SUB-WARD BUDGETS

MUNICIPALITIES REPLACEMENT ALLOWANCES OTHER TOTALS Business total partly propertiesSub-Wards COSTS affected demolition demolition

affectedKINONDONI

1 Manzese - Uzuri 16,520,000 12,519,000 1,451,950 30,490,950 1 2 16 182 Manzese - Kilimani 36,960,000 22,069,000 2,951,450 61,980,450 3 1 9 103 Manzese - Midizini 29,278,000 20,017,000 2,464,750 51,759,750 2 1 19 204 Manzese - Mnazimoja a/ 32,268,000 18,737,000 2,550,250 53,555,250 3 3 13 165 Manzese-Muungano 14,880,000 10,538,000 1,270,900 26,688,900 0 1 12 136 Manzese - Mvuleni 21,547,000 18,566,000 2,005,650 42,118,650 5 2 15 17

151,453,000 102,446,000 12,694,950 266,593,950 14 10 84 94

ILALA7 Mnyamani 45,514,000 17,961,000 3,173,750 66,648,750 4 4 22 268 Malapa bl 14,431,000 5,622,000 1,002,650 21,055,650 3 1 17 189 Madenge b/ 56,251,000 17,210,000 3,673,050 77,134,050 7 3 41 44

10 Mtambani 34,012,000 11,438,000 2,272,500 47,722,500 11 0 35 35150,208,000 52,231,000 10,121,950 212,560,950 25 8 115 123

TEMEKE11 Chang'ombe'A' 28,458,000 5,166,000 1,681,200 35,305,200 1 1 22 2312 Chang'ombe'B' c/ 24,415,000 6,405,000 1,541,000 32,361,000 6 0 20 2013 Toroli 9,781,000 2,550,000 616,550 12,947,550 4 0 13 1314 Sandali 14,922,000 2,377,000 864,950 18,163,950 2 0 8 815 Mpogo 28,017,000 7,730,000 1,787,350 37,534,350 3 1 23 2416 Mwembeladu 30,592,000 6,016,000 1,830,400 38,438,400 2 2 13 15

Sub-Total 136,185,000 30,244,000 8,321,450 174,750,450 18 4 99 103

SUB-TOTALS 437,846,000 184,921,000 31,138,350 653,905,350 57 22 298 320

Resettlement Monitoring 19,262,000Contingencies 5% 33,658,368

GRAND TOTAL COSTS FOR RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN 706,825,718

Ann a) Two graveyard sites with 20 graves to be removedAnn: b) One graveyard site with 75 graves to be removedAnn: c) One graveyard site with 25 graves to be removed

93