macroanchoring · rt w1.6-s1.7-t150-h22 w1.6-s1.7-t300-h22 w1.6-s1.7-t350-h22 w1.6-s1.7-t400-h22...
TRANSCRIPT
Introduction and Background
Experiment Procedure
Joining of Al alloy and stainless
steel thin sheets by thermally
assisted plastic deformation
Chair for Hyper-functional Forming
Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo
Zhequn Huang and Jun Yanagimoto
Tensile Shear Test Optimal: W1.6-S1.7-T450-H22
Joining Mechanisms: Chemical bonding (800-nm-thick continuous interdiffusion layer at the interface, machoanchoring effect of the mechanical confinement and microanchoring effect.
Z: Supplied
thermal energy
Fracture
De-bonding
Distortion
Excessive
thinning
Crack
Sound joint
[0,0,0]
[0,0,-1]
[0,0,1]
Gap
Insufficient
stress
A6061P-T6
SUS304
1: excessive value 0: appropriate value -1: insufficient value
W1.6-S1.7-
RT
W1.6-S1.7-
T150-H22
W1.6-S1.7-
T300-H22
W1.6-S1.7-
T350-H22
W1.6-S1.7-
T400-H22
W1.6-S1.7-
T450-H22
W1.6-S1.8-
T300-H22
W1.6-S1.8-
T350-H22
Not bonded Not bonded Not bonded Bonded Bonded Bonded Bonded Bonded
A6061P-T6
SUS304S
Punch
DieW
Die
0.8 mm
1.2
mm
1.2
mm
(a) (b)
D =
1.7
4 m
m
1 mm1 mm
D =
1.7
3 m
m
1 mm
(d) W1.6-S1.7-T450-H28
D =
1.7
2 m
m
Distortion
1 mm
D =
1.7
2 m
m
La
= 0
.94 m
m
Lc
= 1
.03 m
m
Ld
= 1
.03 m
m
Lb
= 1
.00 m
m
A6061P-T6
SUS304
A6061P-T6
SUS304
A6061P-T6
SUS304
A6061P-T6
SUS304
(a) W1.6-S1.7-T350-H22
θa
(b) W1.6-S1.7-T400-H22
A6061P-T6
SUS304
1 mm
θb
(e) W1.4-S1.7-T400-H22
(c) W1.6-S1.7-T450-H22
Gap
A6061P-T6
θc
1 mm
(f) W1.2-S1.7-T400-H22
Gap
SUS304
Groove Width
W1.6: Groove width = 1.6 mm
r chamfer = 0.2 mm
W1.4: Groove width = 1.4 mm
r chamfer = 0.5 mm
W1.2: Groove width = 1.2 mm
r chamfer = 0.5 mm
Peel Test Optimal: W1.6-S1.7-T400-H22 with largest failure energy
Fuel consumption is linearly proportional to
the weight of transportation product.
Combining lightweight and non-lightweight materials
to develop lightweight hybrid structure is future trend.
Cross section
(a) Macroanchoring
1 μm
A6061P-T6
SUS304
1 μm
A6061P-T6
SUS304
(b) Microanchoring
Aluminum extruded sections
Aluminum sheet-sections
Aluminum casting-sections
Steel sheet-sections
Compression machine
assisted by induction heating
Experimental parameters
and used die with groove Parametric
optimization strategy
supplied plastic strain X, Y
supplied thermal energy ZDeterminants
3 m
SUS304
A6061P-T6
W1.6-S1.7-T400-H22
(neck region)(a) (b)
(c)
SUS304A6061P-T6
Macroanchoring
1 μm
A6061P-T6
SUS304
1 μm
A6061P-T6
SUS304
Microanchoring
W1.6-S1.7-T400-H22
(neck region)
~800 nm
interdiffusion layer
Aluminum alloy/steel hybrid components are widely used in different industrial areas.
However, further reducing component thickness for lightweight hybrid products has made
the dissimilar joining of Al alloy and steel thin sheets (less than 1 mm in thickness) a greater
challenge. In this research, an alternative dissimilar joining process by thermally assisted
plastic deformation is proposed for thin metallic sheets. The effects of various parameters
on the joining performance were investigated. After exposure to an elevated temperature of
450 ºC for 22 s, an optimized joint type was achieved by local plastic deformation using a
simple punch-die pair. This joint type exhibited an average joint efficiency factor of 85.2%
and average absorption energy of 1.69 kN∙mm in tensile shear tests, as well as satisfactory
joining performance in peel tests. Such high-quality dissimilar joints were realized by simply
operated die forging in air, without any yielding gas, flux brazing or surface treatment.
Source: Bandivadekar et al.
2008. Report No. LFEE 2008-
05 RP, MIT.
Source: European Aluminium
Association, 2013.
http://www.alueurope.eu.
The W1.6-S1.7-T450 joint shows
highest average ultimate tensile
shear load in tensile shear test. The
joint efficiency factor is 85.2%.
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
Te
ns
ile
sh
ea
r lo
ad
(k
N)
Displacement (mm)
W1.6-S1.7-T350-H22
W1.6-S1.7-T400-H22
W1.6-S1.7-T450-H22
W1.6-S1.7-T450-H28
(a)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
Te
ns
ile
sh
ea
r lo
ad
(k
N)
Displacement (mm)
W1.6-S1.7-T400-H22W1.4-S1.7-T400-H22W1.2-S1.7-T400-H22
(b)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
0 5 10 15 20
Peel F
orc
e (
N)
Displacement (mm)
W1.6-S1.7-T350-H22
(a)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
0 5 10 15 20
Peel F
orc
e (
N)
Displacement (mm)
W1.6-S1.7-T400-H22
(b)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
0 5 10 15 20
Peel F
orc
e (
N)
Displacement (mm)
W1.6-S1.7-T450-H22
(c)
Punch
Die
Induction coil
Blank holderSpring
(0.8-mm-thick A6061P-T6)
Thermo couple(0.5-mm-thick SUS304)
(a)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 Time (s)
Heating History CurveForming Stroke
Stroke (S)
Heat Holding Time (H)
Air Cooling
Heat Rate (15 ⁰C/s)
Temperature (⁰C)
Stroke (mm)
FormingTemperature (T)
(b)
Punch
Die
Induction coil
Blank holderSpring
(0.8-mm-thick A6061P-T6)
Thermo couple(0.5-mm-thick SUS304)
(a)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 Time (s)
Heating History CurveForming Stroke
Stroke (S)
Heat Holding Time (H)
Air Cooling
Heat Rate (15 ⁰C/s)
Temperature (⁰C)
Stroke (mm)
FormingTemperature (T)
(b)