the federalists believed it was unnecessary and that the constitution already guarded against...
TRANSCRIPT
The Federalists believed it was
unnecessary and that the Constitution already guarded against tyranny by limiting the government’s power The Antifederalists disagreed
If the Federalist’s had not promised to later add a Bill of Rights the Constitution may not have been ratified
Why wasn’t the Bill of Rights part of the
Constitution?
Amendments (changes to the Constitution) must be approved at the State and National levels
There are two ways to propose an amendment: 1. Congress proposes an amendment and it is
approved by 2/3 vote 2. A National convention can be called by 2/3
States There are two ways to ratify an amendment:
1. 3/4 of State legislatures vote to approve it 2. 3/4 of State conventions approve it
The Amendment Process
Adding a Bill of Rights was proposed to
respond to the people’s will However, others argued that other
important laws needed to be passed first Madison argued that it should be prepared
soon: “Make the Constitution better in the
opinion of those who are opposed to it without weakening its frame…in the judgment of those who are attached to it”
The Debate in Congress
The list of rights drew on many earlier statements
of individual rights: Magna Carta The English Bill of Rights Colonial Charters State Constitutions
There was debate as to where to place it in the Constitution. It was decided that the list of rights would be
attached to the end of the document In order to not take away from the importance of the
original document
The Bill of Rights is Prepared
12 Amendments were approved by
Congress and proposed to the states for ratification in 1789.
Only two failed to gain enough support: Proposals to enlarge the size of the
House and to limit when Congress might raise its salaries
By December 15, 1791, the states had ratified 10 amendments protecting citizen’s rights.
The Proposal for Ratification