documents.worldbank.orgdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/pt/486301468024310034/... · web viewchina....

Document ofThe World Bank

Report No: 58534-CN

RESTRUCTURING PAPER

ON A

PROPOSED PROJECT RESTRUCTURING

OF

HEILONGJIANG DAIRY PROJECT

LOAN NUMBER 4815-CHA

December 14, 2005

TO THE

PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

FMRHABCIBRDICBM&EMRMTRNCBPADPPMOUSD

Financial Management ReportHeilongjiang Animal Breeding CenterInternational Bank for Reconstruction and DevelopmentInternational Competitive BiddingMonitoring and EvaluationMilk RecordingMid-term ReviewNational Competitive BiddingProject Appraisal DocumentProvincial Project Management OfficeUnited States Dollars

Regional Vice President: James W. AdamsCountry Director: Klaus Rohland

Sector Manager / Director: Ede Jorge Ijjasz-VasquezTask Team Leader: Andrew D. Goodland

2

CHINA

P086629CONTENTS

PageA. SUMMARYB. PROJECT STATUSC. PROPOSED CHANGESD. APPRAISAL SUMMARYANNEX 1: RESULTS FRAMEWORK AND MONITORINGANNEX 2: PROPOSED REVISED PROJECT COSTSANNEX 3: PROPOSED REVISION TO FINANCING PLAN

3

RESTRUCTURING PAPER

A. SUMMARY

The Ministry of Finance and Heilongjiang Province have proposed the following changes to the project: i) extension of the closing dates of the IBRD Loan (4815-CHA) and Italian Grant (TF053533) by twelve months, from December 31, 2010 to December 31, 2011; ii) reduction in the scope of activities and the cancellation of USD30 million from the IBRD Loan; iii) reallocation of funds under the Italian Grant; and, iv) the revision of indicators and targets in the monitoring table to reflect these changes. The proposed changes are justified by the numerous delays, mostly from external factors beyond the control of the project, which have hampered project implementation, and also changes in the dairy sector which have reduced the demand for the project activities, notably the reluctance of small-scale farmers to invest in dairy cattle.

B. PROJECT STATUS

The project was approved by the Bank’s Board of Executive Directors on January 24, 2006 and became effective on June 29, 2006. The project is financed by a USD100m IBRD loan and co-financed by a USD5.5m Italian Grant under the “Trust Fund for Environmental Protection in China”.

The implementation has been delayed at various points during implementation due to the following external events and shocks:i) Initial start-up of the project was delayed due to an unfavourable market structure and

conditions in the dairy sector which had led to a decline in farm gate prices shortly after the project was approved and hence a reluctance of farmers to invest in dairy production. Policy measures introduced in the second half of 2007 corrected these conditions and led to improved market conditions.

ii) The global and China milk market was hit hard in 2008 from the global economic downturn which further dented confidence and financial returns in the sector, and also reduced demand for dairy cattle.

iii) In October 2008, it was revealed that large scale contamination of milk powder with the industrial compound melamine had occurred in China. Although there was only one isolated incident of contamination detected in the province, the price of Chinese produced dairy products fell sharply, again affecting demand.

iv) From December 2009 to July 2010, all movements of livestock within and between provinces was banned due to fear of the spread of infectious disease, which delayed the delivery of livestock procured under the project.

The above external shocks demonstrate the vulnerability of the sector and help to explain the reluctance of smallholder farmers to take on debt to purchase dairy cattle. Also during the course of the project, and largely in response to the melamine scandal, the structure of milk production has changed. Government and the large milk processing companies are increasingly concerned about quality issues in the sector, and this is leading to a tightening of controls throughout the system. Milk processors are favouring larger units over smallholder production and village milking stations, and this trend is also been followed in Heilongjiang. This switch to larger scale units has repercussions for the project design and remaining implementation and has reduced demand from smallholders.

4

The prospects for the dairy sector in China are positive: growth trends in domestic demand remain strong despite the short term setbacks described above, averaging close to 7 percent per year. Forecasts predict this growth continuing for the foreseeable future, with an estimated growth of over 40 percent in terms of total market value from 2008-2013 (to an anticipated value of US$14 billion). There are concerns that supply will not be able to keep pace, though this provides good news for producers, who will likely see prices rise in the absence of further external shocks. Farmers who have participated in the project are benefitting from increased incomes.

Procurement problems, especially for importation of dairy cattle also caused delays in project implementation. At the start of the project, genetic improvement in the province was to be achieved through three means: i) importing high quality dairy cows; ii) importing high quality bull semen for insemination; and iii) developing a performance monitoring and a provincial dairy breed improvement program. The procurement of imported dairy cows proved problematic: i) identifying suitable suppliers; and ii) logistical issues for selecting and transporting animals. Furthermore, the assumption that farmers would be willing to pay for imported animals was wrong. For the remainder of the project, it is now agreed that dairy cattle would be purchased domestically, which is more cost effective for farmers. The focus of the provincial genetic improvement is on developing a local system for performance monitoring, with improved genetics imported via bull semen.

Disbursement under the project has accelerated from a slow start. In January 2009, after 2.5 years of implementation, the IBRD Loan disbursement stood at USD13.9m (14 percent). By the Mid-Term Review in November 2009 it had reached USD31.3m (31 percent). As of November 2010, it has reached USD45m (45 percent). Disbursement of the Italian Grant stands at USD2.3m (41 percent) as of November 2010.

With regard to the quality of implementation, the main issue raised during the MTR (in November, 2009) and follow up environment review mission (June 2010) concerned livestock waste management, which unless adequately addressed in the dairy farms and parks supported under the project, would impact the viability of the production units.

C. PROPOSED CHANGES

Project Development ObjectiveThis is unchanged and remains as stated in the PAD and Loan Agreement: The objective of the project is to assist the Borrower to: (i) improve the financial viability of dairy operations in selected areas of Heilongjiang Province; and (ii) demonstrate innovative technologies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and increase carbon sequestration in selected areas of Heilongjiang Province.

Results/indicators. Some of the indicators for of project targets are proposed to change to reflect the current status of the project. See below and Annex 1 for details.

ComponentsComponent 1: Dairy Production Component. Under this component, the project supports different types of dairy production units: i) household farms, with associated milking stations; ii) dairy parks; and, iii) demonstration farms. The following changes are proposed:

Works: the original design included allocation of funds to support works associated with the construction of milking sheds for household based production units and the construction of

5

the dairy park facilities and required access roads for new dairy parks. This is no longer required: all works have been completed with counterpart funding.

Scope: The number of units that the project would support is proposed to be reduced as follows: i) household farms from 5,500 to 4,000; due to lack of demand from farmers; ii) dairy parks from 50 new and 20 rehabilitated, to 40 new and 1 rehabilitated. The

reduction of new parks is due to lack of demand; the reduction in rehabilitated is due to there being no suitable additional dairy parks.

iii) demonstration farms from 7 to 5, due to lack of demand. iv) milking stations from 55 to 41, also due to lack of demand.

Component 2: Breed Improvement. Under this component the following changes are proposed:

Objective: The component objective, as stated in the PAD is that “A sustainable dairy herd improvement program established and producing proven bulls through contract mating programs”. While the establishing of a dairy herd improvement remains the core objective of the component, there is insufficient time for the system to produce proven bulls. This requires: i) that the milk recording system is fully functional; ii) that the system has been used to identify a nucleus of high productivity bull mothers; iii) that bulls born to these bull mothers have reached maturity and have been mated; iv) that the milking cows born have reached maturity; and, v) performance of the cows has been assessed (under the milk recording system) to identify proven bulls. This was an unrealistic target set at during preparation given these biological constraints, which would require a minimum of five years to achieve. With some initial delays in the establishment of the milk recording system, any hope of reaching the objective to produce proven bulls was lost, even with a twelve month extension. The system development is, however, progressing under the component. The proposed revised objective therefore reads: “A sustainable dairy herd improvement program established, capable of producing proven bulls through contract mating programs”.

PDO indicator #2: This currently reads as, “A sustainable system of bull selection and progeny testing is functioning”, in line with the current objective. If the objective is revised as above, this would be modified to “A sustainable system of milk recording is functioning, with plan for bull selection and progeny testing in place”.

Intermediate outcome indicator 2: The current indicator reads as, “Level of semen production and Inter-bull ranking of HABC bulls”. As noted above, progeny tested bulls would not be produced until after the project closes, there it is recommended to drop this indicator.

Scope: the following changes in scope are proposed:i) reduce the amount of imported semen from 840,000 doses to 340,000 doses, due to

import quota restrictions. ii) reduce the target for number of cows under milk recording from 150,000 to 120,000,

reflecting the initial delays in implementing this component and the limited capacity of the Animal Breeding Centre.

Component 3: Climate Change Mitigation. Note that this component is fully financed by the Italian Grant (TF053533), which it is proposed would also be extended by 12 months. Under this component the following changes are proposed:

i) The area of pasture to be rehabilitated would be increased from 16,500ha to 20,000ha, due to increased demand and availability of suitable degraded pastureland;

6

ii) The number of manure treatment units established will be reduced from 20 to 16, due to the reduction in the number of demonstration farms and dairy parks supported under the project;

iii) The number of crop treatment facilities established would increase from 5 to 9, due to increased demand for good quality silage; and,

iv) The number of research topics funded would increase from 6 to 16, due to the success of this sub-component in identifying innovative technologies for application by farmers.

Financing Project Costs: Project costing is proposed to be revised, in line with the changes in scope

described above. The proposed changes are detailed in Annex 2.

Financing Plan: The financing plan is proposed to be revised, reflecting the change and reduction in scope described above. The proposed changes are detailed in Annex 3.

Reallocations: For the IBRD Loan, no reallocation is proposed, though USD30 million would be cancelled (see below). The proposed change in expenditure categories are detailed in Annex 4. There is proposed reallocation under the Italian Grant Agreement to reflect the modifications to the scope of Component 3 above. The proposed changes are detailed in Annex 5.

Cancellations: It is proposed to cancel USD30 million from the IBRD Loan amount. As noted in the Section B above, there has been a fall in demand from farmers and therefore it is prudent to cancel outstanding funds. Note that the request to cancel these funds would be effective from the date that the letter request was received from Government, which was December 3, 2010.

Procurement As noted above, procurement issues have been one of the sources of delay under the project. This was largely due to difficulties faced in implementing ICB and NCB procedures, and the preference for farmers to be more engaged in procurement of their cattle (for which they purchase with loans under the projects). A proposed revision to the Procurement Plan received in July 2010 was considered by the Bank and a procurement team visited the Province in August 2010 to review current practice. On September 30, 2010, the Bank issued a no objection to the revised procurement plan, under which the remaining cattle to be procurement under the project would follow the Community Participation in Procurement process agreed between the PPMO and Bank team.

Closing date It is proposed to change the closing dates of both the IBRD Loan and Italian Grant Agreement from December 31, 2010 to December 31, 2011 due to the delays in implementation

Implementation scheduleBased on the restructuring proposal, a revised implementation plan has been prepared by the PPMO. It includes, for each contract, the latest cost estimates, start and finish dates and financing requirements. This is included as Annex 6. With this plan, the outstanding USD25 million (after cancellation) can be disbursed during the extension period. Of this, approximately USD10 million is already contracted and delivery is expected by March 2011. The remaining USD15 million would be used to procure cattle. With the change in procurement method described in the Procurement section above, this would be done with Community Participation, which is a relatively fast procurement method.

7

D. APPRAISAL SUMMARY

There are no expected changes in the nature of impact of the project, other than the reduced scope as described above.

Risks:The PDO is to improve the financial viability of dairy operations in Heilongjiang. During the project’s original appraisal, it was concluded that the market risk to achieving this was low. This needs to be reassessed in light of the external shocks experienced during the lifetime of the project described above. None of these could have been foreseen when the project was designed, and mitigation measures would have been difficult to put in place but market risk should have been further highlighted. It is possible that further shocks may occur during the extension period; at this stage the most damaging would be further restrictions on the movement of livestock in the country, as this would prevent the delivery of cattle procurement contracts. The approval of the revised Procurement Plan (see above) increases flexibility in selection of sources for livestock. Other market shocks which in the past have reduced demand and/or viability of dairy operations are possible, though the longer term market trend is for increasing demand.

8

ANNEX 1:Results Framework and Monitoring

CHINA: HEILONGJIANG DAIRY PROJECT

Project Development Objective (PDO): The objective of the Project is to assist the Borrower to: (i) improve the financial viability of dairy operations in selected areas of Heilongjiang Province; and (ii) demonstrate innovative technologies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and increase carbon sequestration in selected areas of Heilongjiang Province.Revised Project Development Objective: no revision

PDO Level Results Indicators* C

ore

D=DroppedC=ContinueN= New

R=RevisedUnit of

Measure Baseline

Cumulative Target Values**

Frequency Data Source/Methodology

Responsibility for Data

CollectionYR 1 YR 2 YR 3 YR4 YR5

Indicator One: Targeted dairy farmers participating in smallholder and Dairy Park-based milk production sell more high quality milk.

CTarget set

Litres 13.0 15.5[Note that no target was set during preparation]

Semiannualprogressreports

Regularproject M&E

PPMO

Indicator Two: A sustainable system of milk recording is functioning, with plan for bullselection and progenytest in place

R n/a No system in place

MR system in place and functional

End of project

PPMO –HABC

Indicator Three: Targeted dairy demonstration farms andparks are equipped with functioning manure treatment units and selected pastures.

Indicator C; target revised

# of farms

0 3 farms 6 parks

7 farms 14 parks

7 farms20 parks

7 farms20 parks

41 farms40 parks


Regularproject M&E

PPMO

INTERMEDIATE RESULTS

Intermediate Result (Component One): From PAD: About 10,000 targeted smallholders are efficiently producing greater quantities of quality of milk on their farms or in dairy parks.Revised Intermediate Result (Component One): About 7,000 targeted smallholders are efficiently producing greater quantities of quality of milk on their farms or in dairy parks.

Intermediate Result indicator One: Targeted number ofsmallholder dairy farms,dairy parks anddemonstration farmsestablished.

CTargets revised

# of farms / parks

0 Smallholders:1,650 farmsDairy parks:15 new, 1existingDemonstrationfarms: 3

Smallholders:2,000 farmsDairy parks:35 new, 1existingDemonstrationfarms: 5





Regularproject M&E

PPMO / CPMOs

Intermediate Result indicator Two: Anticipated increase indairy productivity athousehold and parks dairylevels achieved.

C Liter / day

0 13 13 15 15.2 15.5 Semiannualprogressreports

Regularproject M&E

PPMO / CPMOs

Intermediate Result indicator Three: Number of dairy farmerassociations established.

C # of associations

0 30 70 82 Semiannualprogressreports

Regularproject M&E

PPMO / CPMOs

Intermediate Result indicator Four: Number of technicians and farmer trained.

C # of trained

0 350 technicians3825 farmers

400 technicians5000 farmers





Regularproject M&E

PPMO / CPMOs

Intermediate Result indicator Five: Credit monitoring andcollection of loans

C As defined inoperationsmanual

As defined inoperationsmanual





Regularproject M&E

PPMO / Fin Bureau

Intermediate Result (Component Two): A sustainable dairy herd improvement program established and producing proven bulls through contract mating programs.

Revised Intermediate Result (Component Two): A sustainable dairy herd improvement program established, capable of producing proven bulls through contract mating programs.

Intermediate Result indicator One: Number of cows undermilk recording (MR).

C # cows 0 10,000 40,000 80,000 120,000 120,000 Semiannualprogressreports

Regularproject M&E

PPMO

Intermediate Result indicator Two: Level of semen production and Inter-bull ranking of HABC bulls

D

Intermediate Result (Component Three): From PAD: Environmentally and commercially sustainable systems for pasture development and dairy manure treatment are established.

10

Revised Intermediate Result (Component Three): not revised

Intermediate Result indicator One: Area of pastures renovated

C hectares 0 3,000 6,500 11,000 16,500 20,000 Semiannualprogressreports

Regularproject M&E

PPMO

Intermediate Result indicator Two: Number of manure/wastetreatment units established

C # units 0 6 14 16 16 16 Semiannualprogressreports

Regularproject M&E

PPMO

Intermediate Result indicator Three: Number of crop treatment for feed (silage) facilities established.

C # units 0 1 3 5 7 9 Semiannualprogressreports

Regularproject M&E

PPMO

Intermediate Result indicator Four: Number of research topics funded

C # topics 0 2 6 10 14 16 Semiannualprogressreports

Regularproject M&E

PPMO

Intermediate Result (Component Three): from PAD: PPMO and PMOs implementing project activities, monitoring outputs and impact, and providing timely progress and financial reports, annual plans and budgets.

Revised Intermediate Result (Component Three): not revised

Intermediate Result indicator One: Project progress, financial and procurement reports are initiated and submitted in a timely manner;

C 0 1 semi-annualprogress reports2 FMRs

Annual workplan2 semi-annualprogress reports2 FMRs



1 semi-annualprogress reports2 FMRs

Annualwork plansSemiannualprogress &Fin.Managmt.Reports

Regular projectM&E

PPMO

Intermediate Result indicator Two: Project impact/outcomemonitoring indicatorsregularly updated.

C 0 1 baseline survey

1 mid-termreview report byJune 30, 20081st impact survey

2nd impactsurvey1 completionreport

BaselinesurveySocioeconomicsurveys

PPMO

*Please indicate whether the indicator is a Core Sector Indicator (see further http://coreindicators)**Target values should be entered for the years data will be available, not necessarily annual

11

Annex 2: Proposed Revised Project Costs

Current Revised

ComponentLocal Foreign Total Local Foreign Total

US$ Million US$ Million US$ Million US$ Million US$ Million US$ MillionDairy Development 83.5 64.7 148.2 97.27 28.93 126.2

Household Dairy Farms 47.7 41.2 88.9 56.6 11.3 67.9Milking and Collection Stations 5.6 1.1 6.7 5.1 0.8 5.9Dairy Parks 20.3 8.6 28.9 23.77 6.03 29.8Demonstration Farms 8.1 13.2 21.3 10 10.2 20.2Training and Technology Transfer 1.5 0.6 2.1 1.5 0.6 2.1Dairy Farmer Associations 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.3 0 0.3

Breed Improvement 2.5 4.0 6.5 2.5 4 6.5Climate Change Mitigation 4.6 4.9 9.5 5.6 4.9 10.5Project Management, Monitoring and Evaluation 0.8 0.3 1.1 0.8 0.3 1.1

Total Baseline Cost 91.4 73.9 165.3 106.17 38.13 144.3Physical Contingencies 2.8 1.0 3.8 0.8 1 1.8Price Contingencies 5.3 4.3 9.6 1.3 1.3 2.6

Total Project Costs 99.5 79.2 178.7Front-end Fee 0.0 0.25 0.25 0.0 0.25 0.25

Total Financing Required 99.5 79.45 178.95 108.27 40.68 148.95

Annex 3: Proposed revision to Financing Plan

Source Current ProposedLocal Foreign Total Local Foreign Total

Borrower 22.20 2.95 25.15 22.20 2.95 25.15IBRD 35.80 64.20 100.00 44.57 25.43 70.00Italian Grant 2.20 3.30 5.50 2.20 3.30 5.50Sub-borrowers 22.30 5.50 27.80 22.30 5.50 27.80Local farmers organizations 17.00 3.50 20.50 17.00 3.50 20.50Total 99.50 79.45 178.95 108.27 40.68 148.95

13

Annex 4: Proposed Allocation of Cancelled funds under IBRD Loan

Category of Expenditure Allocation % of FinancingCurrent Revised Current Revised Current Revise(1) Civil works(Except for Parts A.1 andA.4 of the Project)

No change 7,400,000 0 25% No change

(2) Goods(Except for livestock)

No change 8,950,000 8,600,000 100% of foreignexpenditures, 100% oflocal expenditures (exfactorycost) and 75% oflocal expenditures forother items procuredlocally.

No change

(3) Livestock No change 82,000,000 60,550,000 100% No change(4) Consultant services

No change 900,000 100,000 100% No change

(5) Training and study tours overseas


(6) Fee No change 250,000 250,000 Amount due under Section2.04 of this Agreement

No change

TOTAL 100,000,000 70,000,000

Annex 5: Proposed Reallocation of Italian Grant Funds

Category of Expenditure Allocation % of FinancingCurrent Revised Current Revised Current Revise(1) Competitive Research Sub-grants under Part C.4 of the Project

No change 600,000 670,000 55% of amounts under Competitive Research Sub-projects

No change

(2) Goods under Part C of the Project

No change 2,200,000 1,940,000 100% of foreign expenditures, 100% of local expenditures (ex-factory cost) and 75% of local expenditures for other items procured locally

No change

(3) Works under Part C of the Project

No change 2,300,000 2,380,000 50% No change

(4) Consultants’ services under Part C of the Project


(5) Training under Part C of the Project


Total 5,500,000 5,500,000

15

Annex 6Implementation Plan of the Heilongjiang Dairy Project: IBRD Loan (2010.12-2011.12)

Currency: USD

Series No. Contract Type Unit Price Amount Cost Estimate ProcurementContract Amount

Down Payment

Payment on Shipment

Payment on Final Acceptance Note

1Dairy cowGT-IM-209004

2955.9 410 1211919.31 ICBContract signed; withdrawal application and disbursement is expected to be

completed by January 2011.Ongoing

2Dairy cow

GT-IM-2090062943.96 1587 4672064.52 ICB

Contract signed; withdrawal application and disbursement is expected to be completed by January 2011.

Ongoing

3Dairy cow

HDP-ICB-2009-11-5

1870.72 2530 4732921.6 ICBContract signed; withdrawal application and disbursement is expected to be

completed by March 2011Ongoing

4Purchase of dairy cow

2272.73 1425 3238636.4 CPDue to fluctuation of dairy cow price in domestic market, discrepancy between estimated cost and the actual contract value may exist. The expected contract date is around December 15, 2010 and delivery in May, 2011.

planning


2272.73 2700 6136363.6 CPDue to fluctuation of dairy cow price in domestic market, discrepancy between estimated cost and the actual contract value may exist. The expected contract date is around December 15, 2010 and delivery in May, 2011.

planning


2272.73 2265 5147727.3 CPDue to fluctuation of dairy cow price in domestic market, discrepancy between estimated cost and the actual contract value may exist. The expected contract date is around January 15, 2011 and delivery in July, 2011.

planning


2272.73 540 1227272.7 CPDue to fluctuation of dairy cow price in domestic market, discrepancy between estimated cost and the actual contract value may exist. The expected contract

planning

16

date is around January 15, 2011 and delivery in July, 2011.

Total 26,366,905.

Note: 1. Dairy cow community procurement (PC) of 12224 cows in total will be conducted in four independent batches. Liquidity permitting, disbursement for the four batches can be done at the same time.

2. PC payment shall be handled by relevant PMOs and Finance Bureaus following the code of the domestic dairy cow sector and with flexibility in the local context. However, the procurement process and documentation shall be under strict scrutiny of the PPMO.

3. PC payment will be allocated from the special account. Extension of account closing date is needed to complete all disbursement given the size of procurement and limit of the special account.

17

Implementation Plan of the Heilongjiang Dairy Project: Italian Trust Fund (2010.7 - 2011.12) (Currency: USD)

Series No. Contract Type Unit Price Amount Cost

EstimateProcurement

Contract Amount

Down Payment

1st

Installment2nd

Installment

Payment on Final

AcceptanceNote

1Pasture Improvement

100,000 mu(180,000mu completed)

160822.2 10.0 1608222.5 SOE90,000 mu are completed; 10,000 mu are to be completed next year; disbursement for 180,000 mu out of the 280,000 mu is in process and will be done by May, 2011.

In process

2Waste Management Facilities Package

- - 1600000.0 ICBTender sold on October 15, 2010. Contract expected to be signed in December. Completion and disbursement by April, 2011.

In process

3 10 Competitive Studies 36275.7 10.0 362757.0 Competitive

StudiesTopic selection done. Review and implementation will start soon. Disbursement to be completed in December, 2011.

In preparation

4 9 Straw Processing Projects 40000.0 9.0 360000.0 Competitive

Studies2 pilots were completed, and 7 contracts were signed. Disbursement to be done in October, 2011.

In process

517-month TA by Pasture

Specialists - - 49000.0 CQS 49000.0

20%，2010.8.1

3

30%，2010.12.

30

30%，2011.3.3

0

20%，2012.3

.30In process

615-month TA by Waste Management Specialists

- - 82000.0 CQS 82000.0 20

%，2010.8.30

40%，2010.9.3

0

20%，2011.5.3

0

20%，2011.1

2.30In process

715-month TA by

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Specialists

- - 87000.0 CQS 87000.0 20

%，2010.8.13

30%，2010.12.

30

30%，2011.3.3

0

20%，2011.1

1.30In process

8 25-month TA by Straw Processing Specialists

- 77000.0 CQS 77000.0 20%，2010.8.5

20%，2010.10.

40%，2010.12.

20%，2011.1

In process

18

20 31 2.30

925-month, Grant Financial

Management Specialists and Environmental Specialists

- - 89000.0 CQS 89000.0 20

%，2010.8.5

20%，2010.10.

20

40%，2010.12.

31

20

%，2011.12.30

In process

10Domestic Training

300 person*day120.9 300.0 36275.7 SOE

Training program is being developed for WB review soon. Disbursement to be completed from February – April, 2011.

5 groups

Total 4351255.1

Note: 1. Waste management facilities include 4 large dung blocking machines, 4 small dung blocking machines, 16 tractors, 16 loaders, 16 solid-liquid separators, and

16 sewage pumps.2. Extension of account closing date is needed given that project activities and disbursement totaling US$4.35 million need to be completed within 2011.

19

documents.worldbank.orgdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/pt/486301468024310034/... · web viewchina....

Documents