· web viewthe one way system past lidl and morrisons is extremely busy with fast moving traffic...

Middlewich Draft Neighbourhood Development Plan – Consultation Responses – 8th August – 26th September 2018

Table 1 - Consultees

Green - done

Red - not done

Consultee Name Address

Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.

Vision/ Objective / Policy No.

Support /Object /Comment

Comments received Parish Councils’ Consideration

Amendments to NP

1.1

Historic England,

Suite 3.3 Canada House, 3 Chepstow Street, Manchester, M1 5FW

All Comment Re: Regulation 14, Draft Middlewich Neighbourhood Plan.

Thank you for consulting Historic England. As the Government's adviser on the historic environment, Historic England is keen to ensure that the protection of the historic environment is fully taken into account at all stages and levels of the local planning process.

Noted. No change.

1.2 I wrote to Tom Evans regarding your draft plan and SEA on the 16th April 2018. I have nothing further to add to my advice at

Noted. No change.

1


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

this stage. I have attached a further copy of my letter and urge the Forum to give it due consideration prior to making any amendments to the plan and proceeding to Regulation 16 consultations. I have spoken at length, and met on site in Middlewich with Cheshire East's conservation officer due to the area being on the 'at risk' register, I remain convinced that the town centre Conservation Area ought to be reappraised alongside a Management Plan in order to inform future change and/or investment.

2.0Resident

1.3.7 Comment Hi , why in section 1.3.7 is Roman Middlewich referred to as Salinae, The Roman name for Middlewich is more likely to be CONDATE, whilst Salinae is more likely to be a district. The latest archeological thinking is more leading to this naming as are the bulk of the Roman items. Regards,

Accepted. Amend NDP.

Amend 1.3.7 to:

It is thought that Middlewich would have been known as 'Condate' and the wider district was ‘Salinae’ (the salt workings). The town was an important trading route sitting

2


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

Geoff at the convergence of seven Roman roads including what is now King Street, linking Middlewich to nearby Northwich.

3.1Walsingham PlanningBrandon House, King Street, Knutsford,Cheshire WA16 6DXTel : 01565 757500 Fax: 01565 757501

All Comment Image attached.

We write on behalf of our client, Centec International Limited, a highly specialised and owner-occupied chemical manufacturing and recovery business located on the Science Park at Brooks Lane, Middlewich.

Noted. No change.

3.2 All Comment Centec has been based at the Science Park for around 25 years and relocation is entirely cost prohibitive, therefore Centec will remain at its current location for the entire plan period. Due to the nature of the work undertaken by Centec they are heavily regulated by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and currently operate under a sub Control of Major

Noted. No change.

3


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

Accident Hazards (COMAH) licence. A site location plan is appended to this letter.

3.3 OS2 Comment As you are aware, the Brooks Lane area is currently subject to a master planning exercise following its allocation as Strategic Location 43 In the Cheshire East Local Plan. Our client has been heavily involved in the planning process from the outset, beginning with representations during the consultation period for the Cheshire East Local Plan and culminating with involvement in the current master planning work.

It is extremely important to Centec to be involved in the changing planning policy context of the area surrounding its business. Our aim is to ensure that those creating new planning policy are fully aware of this local employer and its needs and future requirements

Noted. No change.

4


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

both in economic and land use terms. Centec are committed to this and remain extremely keen to be as involved as possible in the drafting of all planning policy that may impact its business.

3.4 OS2 Comment BACKGROUNDDue to the nature of the work undertaken by Centec it is entirely cost prohibitive for them to relocate and as such, and clearly set out in dialogue with Cheshire East Council, the facility will not be relocating.

In this regard it is important that any planning policy assumes that Centec will remain in situ for the entire Plan period.

The mix of this type of business (manufacturing and recovery of flammable solvents and chemicals) and residential uses

Noted.

This refers to the Brooks Lane masterplan process.

No change.

5


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

is not something that that works in spatial planning terms; they are conflicting uses and have wildly different requirements. Due to this difficult relationship it has been particularly important to ensure that the emerging masterplan for the wider Brooks Lane area acknowledges and addresses this position.The prospect of residential development in close proximity to the Centec site has the potential to curtail future development plans of the business for a number of reasons:• It may impact the ability to obtain essential licences issued via the Health and Safety Executive;• It will create ‘bad neighbour’ issues as potential residents complain and are impacted by the noise and odour created by the facility; and

6


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

• The risk of security breaches will be increased if the facility becomes more visible. Currently the site is ‘buried’ within an industrial area and if this changes the risk of break ins will increase. Due to the combustible nature of the materials stored at the facility, break ins and security breaches have the potential to be catastrophic.

All of these points have been fully explored with and presented to Cheshire East Council during the consultation processes on the Local Plan and the ensuing masterplan.

Centec currently operate under a ‘sub COMAH’ licence but has recently started the process of applying for a ‘lower tier COMAH’ licence. The exact separation distances between the Centec facility and the proposed residential

7


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

development will be established by the HSE through this process and cannot be confirmed at this time; something that Cheshire East Council are fully aware of.The process of consultation on the Masterplan is still ongoing but it is our belief and hope that all of our concerns will be considered and applied to the final document.

3.5 OS2 Comment CHESHIRE EAST LOCAL PLAN STRATEGIC LOCATION 43

This policy states that SL43 is likely to include ‘the delivery of around 200 homes’ and that the development of the area will be achieved through a ‘masterplan led approach’. The drafting of the masterplan is currently being undertaken by consultants instructed by Cheshire East Council and it isexpected that following rounds of consultation the final draft will be presented to the Council

Noted.


No change.

8


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

within the next month.

Following this the masterplan will be finalised and formally adopted.

3.6 OS2 Comment The delivery of ‘around 200 homes’ can easily be achieved within the Brooks Lane Area whilst considering the needs and requirements of our client.This masterplan document may be adopted as a Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) or it may be incorporated into the Cheshire East Local Plan Part 2, Cheshire East are yet to confirm their preferred process, however our preference is for the latter.

Noted.


No change.

3.7 OS2 Comment MIDDLEWICH NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANWe note that Policy OS2 specifically refers to the Brooks Lane area and is also concerned with Canalside and Marina development.We have a number of comments on the current draft

Accepted.

Amend NDP as suggested.

Amend NDP.

Amend Policy OS2, first sentence to:" The Brooks Lane area, as defined under Strategic Location 43 of the Local Plan identifies that the site has the potential to provide a marina

9


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

of this policy;• The first paragraph reads ‘the site at Brooks Lane is identified for a marina type development’ This should be more specific, stating that the Brooks Lane area, as defined under Strategic Location 43 of the Local Plan identifies that the site has the potential to provide a marina development.

development."

3.8 OS2 Comment • The second paragraph states that schemes within the area should deliver a managed transition from a ‘mainly industrialised area to a predominately residential area’.

This statement is not entirely correct and until the masterplan for the area is finalised and adopted it is impossible to say whether a transition to a ‘mainly residential area’ would be supported by Cheshire East Council via its Development Plan. The Strategic Location 43

Partially accepted.

Revise wording to provide greater flexibility.

Amend NDP.

Amend Policy OS2, 3rd paragraph to:" Schemes should deliver a managed transition from a mainly industrialised area to a vibrant mix of uses including a significant proportion of residential units."

10


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

policy states that the entire area is likely to deliver ‘around 200 homes’, a number that could easily be achieved without the area transitioning to a ‘mainly residential area’. In this regard it cannot be presumed that the area will see such a major transition or indeed that this would be supported through planning policy. We assume that the two uses will be established within the Brooks Lane Area and it is the job of the planning policy to manage this potentially conflicting relationship.

The publication of a Neighbourhood Plan presents an opportunity for site specific and detailed polices to become part of the Development Plan, complementing and adding details to SL43 of the Local Plan Core Strategy.

3.9 OS2 Comment The Neighbourhood Plan should assume that, going forward, the

Noted. No change.

11


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

Brooks Lane Area will become a mixed-use area and that many of the industrial occupiers will remain in situ, an assumption echoed by Cheshire East Council both at the EIP into the Core Strategy and throughout our discussions regarding the masterplan. In this regard we believe that the Neighbourhood Plan offers an opportunity to put policies in place that will help to manage this difficult relationship.

3.10 OS2 Comment We would like to see specific development management policies in place within the Neighbourhood Plan that relate to separation distances between residential development and industrial development and also the introduction of buffer zones between industrial and residential development. Noise and odour management should also be considered.

Noted.

This was referred to CEC for further advice. CEC advised that they do provide guidance on separation distances on p86 of the draft SADPD bit that does not cover the point raised. Proposed wording suggested by the steering group was considered useable in the absence of specific

Amend NDP.

Inset additional policy wording to OS2 as referred to and supported by CEC:

"New residential development proposals should include appropriate separation distances and buffer zones between housing and existing industrial uses, in accordance with the distances set out in the Brooks Lane Masterplan.

12


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

It is not possible to confirm the exact distance that the HSE would consider to be appropriate for development until our client has further engaged with them, a process we envisage will take approximately 6 months. Our client has begun this process by applying for a Hazardous Substance Consent to Cheshire East Council (application reference 18/4186C.) In this regard, to avoid a potential land use conflict, we have requested that the masterplan is not finalised until these specific separation distances have been established.

measurements. Suitable screening and layouts should be provided to minimise adverse impacts from noise and odour, and to protect the residential amenity of occupiers."

3.11 DH1 Comment We note that Draft Policy DH1 states that landscaped buffer zones should be provided on the interface with the countryside, this should be extended to include the introduction of large buffer zones within the site between industrial and residential

Accepted.

Amend Policy DH1 as suggested.

Amend NDP.

Amend Policy DH1 criterion 2 to:" Landscaped buffer zones should be provided on the interface with thecountryside to provide a gentle green transition to the rural

13


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

development. This separation is vital if the two entirely different and conflicting land uses are to be located within close proximity. Separation and buffer zones will help to separate housing from existing employment uses and assist in minimising noise and odour issues. It will also assist Centec to obtain the licences it requires.

area, and to protect residential areas from existing nearby industrial uses".

3.12 All Comment PREFFERED OUTCOMES

Centec have been fully involved in the consultation process regarding the adoption of the masterplan for the Brooks Lane Industrial Area and as such Cheshire East Council area fully aware of our position. In this regard we are hopeful that the final draft of the document will incorporate an employment area that surrounds the Centec facility and provide sufficient separation distances in order

Not accepted.

The Town Council is aiming to progress work on the NDP as a matter of urgency and to submit the plan as soon as possible. It is likely that significant delays could be incurred if the NDP process was delayed until the adoption of the Brooks Lane Masterplan.

No change.

14


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

that future business plans will not be curtailed.

The designation of the Brooks Lane area as a Strategic Location means that the area may be subject to change, however the nature of this potential change will be established through the adoption of the Masterplan.

We respectfully request that the next iteration of the Neighbourhood Plan does not take place until the Brooks Lane Masterplan is adopted and the nature of the potential change is fully established.

Once the masterplan is adopted it is requested that the Neighbourhood Plan contains within it specific policies that will assist in the management of the relationship between the current industrial land uses, including the Centec facility,

15


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

and the potential residential development. We look forward to further consultation on this aspect at the Regulation 16 stage of the Neighbourhood Plan making process once we are fully aware of the policies contained within the Brooks Lane Masterplan

3.13 All Comment CONCLUSIONThe relationship between the existing industrial occupiers and the potential residential development sanctioned by the adoption of the Brooks Lane Area as a Strategic Location within the Cheshire East Local Plan is one which requires careful management.

The Middlewich Neighbourhood Plan offers the opportunity to incorporate specific policies within the Local Development Plan that will assist in managing this relationship by ensuring that sufficient separation distances between land uses are

Noted.

As above. Some amendments to the NDP will be made in line with suggestions for amended policy wording, but there is no intention to delay the submission of the NDP as requested.

No change.

16


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

required and that landscaped buffer zones are introduced.We hope that the masterplan will be formally adopted via the Local Plan Part 2, however this is yet to be confirmed by CEC.

The Masterplan should contain both policy protecting the interests of our client, other existing employment uses that wish to stay, and future residents as well as indicative planning drawings setting out the spatial framework for future development. We have expressed our concern regarding the changing policy landscape at the Brooks Lane Industrial Area at every available opportunity and we are hopeful that the final masterplan document will be favourable to our client’s needs, however until this document is finalised it is impossible to make a fully informed judgement.

17


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

We ask that the Middlewich Town Council take these points into account when progressing the Middlewich Neighbourhood Plan and look forward to being consulted on further drafts.Yours sincerely

4.1

GVA HOW Planning Norfolk House, 7 Norfolk Street, Manchester,M2 1DW(0)161 956 4079

All Comment Draft Middlewich Neighbourhood Development Plan Consultation

On behalf of DBS Pochin, thank you for the opportunity to submit representations to Middlewich Town Council on the Draft Neighbourhood Development Plan (Regulation 14). These representations should be read in conjunction with our previous representations submitted in April 2018 to the informal consultation with the Middlewich Community on the Draft Neighbourhood Development Plan.

DB Symmetry and Pochin have

Noted. No change.

18


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

entered into a Joint Venture to create DBS Pochin LLP. Pochin and DBS Pochin have secured a number of planning permissions for employment development in Middlewich and own and control land at Ma6nitude (Midpoint 18). As you will be aware, Midpoint 18 is allocated for employment development in the Cheshire East Local Plan Strategy under policy LPS 44.

This policy specifically states:“The development at Midpoint 18 over the Local Plan Strategy period will be achieved through a masterplan led approach with:1. Phased delivery of up to 70 hectares of employment land, including the development of the existing undeveloped sites: Midpoint 18 (Phases 1 to 3), with provision expected to continue for the remaining site beyond the plan period; and2. Provision of and where appropriate, contributions to

19


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

the completion of the Middlewich Eastern Bypass.3. Provision of land set aside to enable the future construction of a new station - in terms of lineside infrastructure, parking and access.”

4.2 All Comment In light of this policy, it should be noted in the preparation of the Neighbourhood Development Plan that Paragraph 13 of the NPPF states:“Neighbourhood plans should support the delivery of strategic policies contained in local plans or spatial development strategies; and should shape and direct development that is outside of these strategic policies.”

Noted. No change.

4.3 Vision Support It is noted that page 16 of the Draft Neighbourhood Development Plan includes the ‘Draft Vision for Middlewich NPD’ and states that: The future

Noted. No change.

20


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

economic prosperity of Middlewich will be built upon the proximity to the M6 motorway and access to Manchester, Merseyside and the Midlands. A key factor will be the development of and creation of new employment opportunities at an enlarged Midpoint 18. This will be supported by development of the town’s visitor economy, incorporating an improved canal infrastructure and better provision of visitor services and accommodation.”

This statement is supported by DBS Pochin.

4.4 Obj 4 Comment It is also noted that there are a number of objectives outlined for Middlewich, including objective 4: Design, which states:“To promote high quality design in new development which is of appropriate character, works for the town

Partially accepted.

The Town Council aims to progress work on a proposed public realm strategy and town design guide in the future, should resources become available.

Amend NDP.

Amend Objective 4 to:

"This means high quality materials working in their local context with efficient and attractive layout, good connectivity to the town centre

21


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

and makes the experience of being here much better.This means high quality materials working in their local context with efficient and attractive layout, good connectivity to the town centre and attractive landscaping. In essence to create a Town Design Statement and Public Realm Strategy.”

Reference to the creation of a Town Design Statement should be removed and any specific details on design should be included as part of the Neighbourhood Development Plan.

and attractive landscaping, with a future aim of creating a Town Design Statement and Public Realm Strategy."

4.5 Ch 7 Comment Chapter 7 of the draft Neighbourhood Development Plan refers to Employment. We previously commented on this in our representations to the initial draft document in April 2018, however the comments have not been incorporated

Noted. No change.

22


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

into the current consultation document, therefore, the same points are reiterated below.

4.6 E1 Comment Draft Policy E1: Employment Land StrategyDraft policy E1 (Employment Land Strategy) states that new retail and commercial developments which meet the policies of the Neighbourhood Plan and meet the following criteria will be supported:“1. Before formal submission of an application, early consultation takes place with Cheshire East Council and Middlewich Town Council on design, access and all other matters that affect infrastructure;2. For any proposed large scale development, the Design and Access Statement includes an infrastructure evaluation which will quantify the likely impact on the community infrastructure;3. To the extent that this evaluation indicates

Noted. No change.

23


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

improvements to the existing infrastructure will be necessary to maintain existing quality of services, the proposal shall either incorporate the necessary improvements or include a contribution towards such improvement by whatever charging system CEC has in place.”

4.7 E1Criterion 1

Comment Point 1

In response to point 1 above, DBS Pochin want to continue their positive and proactive working relationship with both the Council and the Town Council to ensure that Midpoint 18 is built out in the appropriate way.

However, whilst early engagement with residents and Town Council's is encouraged by National Guidance, it serves no purpose to insist on mandatory consultation. The Town

Accepted.

Revise wording as suggested, but add "wherever possible" to strengthen the wording slightly.

Amend NDP.

Revise criterion 1 to:" Pre-application engagement is encouraged with Cheshire East Council and Middlewich Town Council on design, access and all other matters that affect infrastructure wherever possible and where it will add value to the planning application process.”

24


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

Council’s current approach is not consistent with the Planning Practice Guidance which states:"Pre-application engagement with the community is encouraged where it will add value to the process and the outcome. It is mandatory to carry out pre-application consultation with the local community for planning applications for wind turbine development involving more than 2 turbines or where the hub height of any turbine exceeds 15 metres.”11 Planning Practice Guidance, Revision date: 26.03.2015, paragraph ID: 20-010-20150326Given the amount of prospective and non-contentious planning applications likely to come forward at Midpoint 18, it will not be possible to engage with the Town Council prior to every planning application coming forward. It is therefore

25


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

suggested that point 1 of draft policy E1 is rephrased as follows:“Pre-application engagement is encouraged with Cheshire East Council and Middlewich Town Council where it will add value to the planning application process.”

This revised wording would therefore enable the draft policy in the Neighbourhood Development Plan to reflect national planning policy and guidance and as such it would meet the basic conditions that draft Neighbourhood Plans must meet in order to proceed to referendum. Of specific reference is basic condition a) as set out in the PPG (paragraph: 065 Reference ID: 41-065-20140306) which requires Neighbourhood Plans to have regard to national policies and advice contained in guidance issued by the

26


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

Secretary of State.

4.8 E1Criteria 2 and 3

Point 2 And 3

In response to point 2, this requests the Design and Access Statement to include an infrastructure evaluation, which again is not a requirement of National Guidance.

Point 3 extends point 2 and requires where necessary to maintain existing quality of services and for proposals to incorporate necessary improvements or include a contribution towards improvements. The Planning Practice Guidance states:"A Design and Access Statement is a concise report accompanying certain applications for planning permission and applications for listed building consent. They provide a framework for

Partially accepted.

Delete reference to design and access statements and refer to planning justification statement.

Change "all proposed large scale development" to "all proposed major development" - "major development" is defined in the NPPF.

Revise criterion 3 to improve clarity.

Amend NDP.

Revise Policy E1 Criterion 2 to:2. For all proposed major development, the planning justification statement includes an infrastructure evaluation considering likely impacts on local infrastructure;"

Retain criterion 3. But amend wording slightly to improve clarity:

"3. Where the infrastructure evaluation sets out that improvements to the existinginfrastructure will be necessary to maintain existing quality and level of services, the proposal shall either incorporate the required improvements, or include a contribution towards such improvement in line with Cheshire East Council's

27


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

applications to explain how the proposed development is a suitable response to the site and its setting and demonstrate that it can be adequately accessed by prospective users."22 Planning Practice Guidance, Revision date: 06.03.2014, paragraph ID: 14-029-201403063 The Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015, section 9 (3), page 11 The Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015 states at section 9 (3) that a Design and Access Statement must:“(a) explain the design principles and concepts that have been applied to the development;(b) demonstrate the steps taken to appraise the context of the development and how the design of the development takes that context into account;c) explain the policy adopted as

requirements."

28


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

to access, and how policies relating to access in relevant local development documents have been taken into account;d) state what, if any, consultation has been undertaken on issues relating to access to the development and what account has been taken of the outcome of any such consultation; and(e) explain how any specific issues which might affect access to the development have been addressed.”3

Government legislation does not require Design and Access Statements to include an infrastructure evaluation and therefore the draft policy does not meet with the basic conditions that draft Neighbourhood Plans must meet in order to proceed to referendum. Specifically, basic condition a) of the PPG (paragraph: 065 Reference ID:

29


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

41-065-20140306) which requires Neighbourhood Plans to have regard to national policies and advice contained in guidance issued by the Secretary of State.

In addition, and on a practical level, who would quantify and assess the impact on the community infrastructure? Middlewich Town Council should note that in terms of requesting contributions, Cheshire East Council are progressing towards the adoption of a Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) which is charged as a fixed rate per square metre of new floor space. It is targeted that Cheshire East's CIL will be adopted shortly. Therefore, appropriate contributions will be dealt with through CIL.

In light of the above, point 2 should be deleted from draft

30


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

policy EP1, and by association, point 3 should also be deleted.

4.9 E2 Support Draft Policy E2: Employment LandDraft policy E2 identifies the use of allocated employment land for a variety of building types and sizes being supported alongside the building of small business units and start-up office accommodation will be supported in appropriate locations. This requirement is strongly supported by DBS Pochin.

Noted. No change.

4.10 E3 Support Draft Policy E3: Midpoint 18Draft policy E3 relates to employment development at Midpoint 18 and states:"Proposals to deliver 70 hectares of employment land over the Plan period at Midpoint 18 will be supported as a key initiative to increase prosperity and drive the sustainable growth of Middlewich and the

Noted. No change.

31


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

surrounding rural areas.Development should:1. Improve connectivity to the M6 and surrounding motorway network2. Provide suitable contributions towards improvements to transport infrastructure."

This policy is supported in principle by DBS Pochin as it encourages development at Midpoint 18 in line with adopted policy.

4.11 E3 Comment However, for the policy to reflect policy LPS 44 in the adopted Cheshire East Local Plan Strategy it should be amended as follows:"Proposals to deliver that contribute to the phased delivery of up to 70 hectares of employment land over the Plan period at Midpoint 18 will be supported as a key initiative to increase prosperity and drive the sustainable growth of Middlewich and the surrounding

Partially accepted.

Amend Policy E3 as suggested but retain reference to M6.

Amend NDP.

Revise wording of Policy E3 to:

" Proposals that contribute to the phased delivery of up to 70 hectares of employment land over the Plan period at Midpoint 18 will be supported as a key initiative to increase prosperity and drive the sustainable growth of Middlewich and the surrounding rural areas. The

32


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

rural areas.Development should:1. Improve connectivity to the M6 and surrounding motorway network Maximise connectivity to new and existing areas of Middlewich2. Provide suitable contributions towards improvements to transport infrastructure.3. Provide floorspace to accommodate B1, B2 and B8 uses.

priority will be the provision of high value employment opportunities.Development should:1. Maximise connectivity to new and existing areas of Middlewich and to the M6 motorway; and2. Provide suitable contributions towards improvements to transport infrastructure; and3. Provide floorspace to accommodate B1, B2 and B8 uses.

4.12 Comment SummaryThese representations are prepared on behalf of DBS Pochin to Middlewich Town Council’s consultation on the Draft Neighbourhood Development Plan. We request that these representations are taken into account in the next version of the Neighbourhood Development Plan.

Noted. No change.

33


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

Please do not hesitate to contact me should you require any further information.Yours faithfully

5.1

The Coal Authority 200 Lichfield Lane Berry Hill Mansfield, Nottinghamshire NG18 4RG

No comment

Middlewich Neighbourhood Development - DraftThank you for consulting The Coal Authority on the above.Having reviewed your document, I confirm that we have no specific comments tomake on it.Should you have any future enquiries please contact a member of Planning andLocal Authority Liaison at The Coal Authority using the contact details above.

Noted. No change.

6.1Canal and River Trust Head Office - Tim Bettany-SimmonsFirst Floor NorthStation House500 Elder GateMilton Keynes, MK9

All Comment Draft Middlewich Neighbourhood PlanThank you for your recent consultation in respect of the Draft Neighbourhood Plan.The Canal & River Trust (the Trust) is a statutory consultee on the development

Noted. No change.

34


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

1BB management process.

Within the designated area, the Trust is responsible for the maintenance and management of the Trent & Mersey Canal and Middlewich Branch of the Shropshire Union Canal, which are held in Trust for public enjoyment. The Trust is also the navigation authority for the canal. The canals have a role to play within the neighbourhood plan area and contributes to the character and heritage value of the local area. The waterway provides a leisure and recreation asset and are well used by leisure boaters, in addition to providing a sustainable transport route for walking and cycling and a corridor for wildlife. The waterway can also contribute to flood mitigation, acting as an important channel for the disposal of surface water run-off from existing and proposed

35


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

development.

Further information on the multi-functional nature of the waterway network and its role in the planmaking process is provided in the Town and Country Planning Association Policy Advice Note: Inland Waterways (2009) which can be found online at http://www.tcpa.orq.uk/paqes/inlandwaterways. html.The Trust have also produced the document titled 'Planning for waterways in Neighbourhood Plans', which you may find of assistance, and which highlights the benefits which our waterways can provide.https://canalrivertrust.orq.uk/media/oriqinal/32800-planninq-for-waterwavs-in-neiqhbourhoodplans.pdf

6.2 Section 1

Support Section 1The Trust welcome the numerous mentions made

Noted. No change.

36


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

within this section to the canal, in particular in terms of the role the canal towpath can play as a sustainable transport route; leisure and tourism on the waterways; the historic role the canal has played in the towns prosperity; and heritage value.

6.3 Section 2

VisionObj 6

Comment Section 2The Trust supports the thrust of the draft vision for Middlewich, in particular that the 'heritage and canal network will be enhanced' and 'an improved canal infrastructure'.

From the objectives which underpin the vision of how these might be delivered it is not entirely apparent how such enhancements and improvements might be delivered. This said it is noted that objective 2 makes reference to a marina style development (please see comment below in relation to

Accepted.

Amend Obj 6 as suggested.

Amend NDP.

Revise wording of Objective 6 to:" To create an efficient, safe and pleasant experience for residents and visitors as they move around and through Middlewich; to improve transport infrastructure; reduce congestion;and improve connectivity both within Middlewich and to other towns.

This requires investment in road and rail links in and around the town and canal towpath improvements.

37


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

Policy OS2 and the marina).

If it is intended that the canal would be enhanced thorough towpath improvements, then objective 6 could be usefully expanded to include reference to this, as it forms part of the sustainable transport route within the plan area.

6.4 OS2 Support / Comment

Policy OS2 — Canalside

Development and Marina Opportunity Site

The Trust fully support and welcome the principle of a standalone policy relating to the multifunctional asset of the canal to address development adjacent to our waterways. It is considered that such policy is required given the prominence and significance of the waterways within the Neighbourhood Area. This will also provide an appropriate mechanism to ensure that such

Noted. No change.

38


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

development responds appropriately to the waterway corridor. The Trust do however have a number of queries/suggested modifications as set out below:

6.5 OS2 Comment The policy refers to the creation of a canal marina of at least 50 bays (berths). It is unclear what evidence has been used to arrive at this figure or level of demand?

The Trust would advise that any marina development would require the Trusts separate agreement to connect and gain access to our waterway network. In order to gain the Trust's agreement, proposers must complete our application process. Further details are available here: https://canalrivertrust.orq.uk/business-and-trade/inland-marina-development-quide/our-applicationprocess

Accepted.

Amend policy wording and supporting text as suggested.

See 3.7 above - retain as first sentence of OS2.

Amend NDP.

Amend Policy OS2.

Retain first sentence - see 3.7 above and replace second sentence with:

"Development will be subject to an approved masterplan which identifies specific areas for a range of development including industrial, residential and retail uses as well as the potential for a canal marina of a suitable size to support Middlewich's existing and future role as a tourist destination given its location on the canal network."

39


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

Before granting an agreement, we need to be sure that there is sufficient water resource and capacity to accommodate it and that the technical specification of the marina is acceptable to protect the integrity of the waterway and navigational safety. The water resource position cannot be guaranteed and would need to be assessed at the time of an application.

Given this we would therefore have serious concerns about a policy which allocates a site for a marina and especially one that specifies the number of berths to be provided.

Given this we suggest the wording of the policy is amended as follows:

"The site at Brooks Lane has the potential for a marina type development. Development will

Insert additional supporting text before OS2:

At the Regulation 14 consultation stage, the Canal & River Trust advised that any marina would require the separate consent from the Canal & River Trust to connect and gain access to the waterway. Before granting consent, the Trust would need to be sure that there is sufficient water resource and capacity to accommodate the marina and that the technical specification of the marina is acceptable to protect the integrity of the waterway and navigational safety."

40


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

be subject to an approved masterplan which identifies specific areas for a range of development including industrial, residential and retail uses as well as the potential for a canal marina"

It is suggested that the supporting text to the policy states that:

"Any marina would require the separate consent from the Canal & River Trust to connect and gain access to the waterway. Before granting consent, they would need to be sure that there is sufficient water resource and capacity to accommodate the marina and that the technical specification of the marina is acceptable to protect the integrity of the waterway and navigational safety."

6.6 OS2 Comment Notwithstanding this point, the Noted. No change.

41


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

Trust support the listed criteria which canal side residential development should provide. The Trust consider that the only omission relates to the structural integrity of our network and related infrastructure. This should also be recognised, safeguard and protected within this policy, especially as this is the principle reason why the Trust is a statutory consultee.

Construction work associated with development in close proximity to our waterways has the potential to adversely affect the structural integrity of the canal, cuttings or embankments. It is essential that structural integrity is not put at risk as part of any development proposal, including excavations for foundations or vibrations from plant or machinery which could, in the worst-case scenario,

42


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

result in the failure of the canal. Land stability and the consideration of the suitability of development with regard to ground conditions are material planning considerations as set out in paragraphs 120 — 121 of the NPPF and is the subject of more detailed discussion in the PPG at paragraph 001 (Reference ID: 45-001-20140306) onwards.

6.7 OS2 Comment The Trust consider that the following further criteria should be included as part of policy OS2:

(10) Development adjacent to waterways will not be permitted unless it can be demonstrated that it would not adversely impact upon the structural integrity of the waterway or its related infrastructure and assets.

We hope that these

Partially accepted.

Refer to 6.9 below and do not include in OS2 due to repetition.

No change.

43


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

amendments can be incorporated into the neighbourhood plan.

6.8 DH2 Support Draft Policy DH2: Sustainable Design

The Trust support the thrust of this policy. The canal could also act as a source of renewable energy in terms of using the water to provide heating and/or cooling to developments adjacent to the waterway. In terms of criterion 2 of the policy, we would consider that the canal towpath would play a key role in forming part of the sustainable transport route within the area.

Noted. No change.

6.9 4.11 - 4.13

DH4 Support / Comment

Draft Policy DH4: Canalside Development

The Trust welcome paragraphs 4.1 1-4.13, which recognises the historical assets of the

Accepted.

Insert additional criterion to Policy DH4 as suggested.

Amend NDP.

Amend Policy DH4. Insert additional criterion:"6. Development adjacent to waterways will not be

44


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

waterways within the area. The Trust support policy DH4 and note that there is a certain amount of crossover with draft policy OS2. As with the comments above in relation to policy OS2, we would welcome specific mention of structural integrity of the waterwayThe Trust consider that the following further criteria should be included as part of policy DH4:

(6) Development adjacent to waterways will not be permitted unless it can be demonstrated that it would not adversely impact upon the structural integrity of the waterway or its related infrastructure and assets.

permitted unless it can be demonstrated that it would not adversely impact upon the structural integrity of the waterway or its related infrastructure and assets."

6.10 DH5Criterion 1

Comment Draft Policy DH5: Special Blue and Green Routes and Encouraqinq Walkinq and Cyclinq

Noted.This suggested amendment was made to the Reg 14 Plan following suggestions at the informal

No change.

45


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

The Trust support the thrust of this policy and as mentioned above consider that the canal towpath forms part of the sustainable transport network for pedestrians and cyclist within the draft plan.

Waterways also provide an ideal environment for people to get outside for leisure or recreation, either active or relaxing and spend time enjoying nature and tranquillity. This is evidenced to directly benefit health and well-being.

The canal towpath would form past of these blue/green routes that would be covered by this policy. We welcome the potential mechanism under criterion 2 of the policy to seek financial contributions towards upgrading towpaths and the specific mentions at paragraph 4.16.

consultation stage.

46


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

We do however have concerns in relation to part of criterion 1, specifically that the routes "should be well lit". Of course, the routes need to be safe and pleasant environments to use but this also needs to be balanced against the waterway corridors role as key habitats for wildlife. We would have concerns about introducing lighting to create 'well lit' environments, especially given that these are bat corridors which are very susceptible to lighting. It may be possible to introduce low level, solar type lighting.

We would ask that the wording of the policy is revisited, it could be a case of changing the word 'well' to 'appropriately' to read:"Buildings should be orientated to provide natural surveillance and the Routes should be appropriately lit and not enclosed in long narrow

47


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

corridors bounded by high fences and hedges"

6.11 E4 Support Draft Policy E4: Tourism and VisitorsThe Trust welcomes the acknowledgment given to the role our waterways play in terms of providing tourism to the area at paragraph 7.10 of the supporting text.

Noted. No change.

6.12 8.7 Comment Health and Community Wellbeing.

The Trust would welcome specific mention of the importance of the waterways within the plan area in supporting the health and wellbeing of the community (para 8.7). As mentioned above, waterways also provide an ideal environment for people to get outside for leisure or recreation, either active or relaxing and to spend time enjoying nature and tranquillity. This is evidenced to directly benefit health and well-

Accepted.

Insert reference to waterways as suggested.

Amend NDP.

Insert into para 8.7:"(such as the identified Special Routes including waterways)"

48


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

being.6.13 Policy

ECHW5Comment Draft Policv OSI: Open Spaces

Our waterways play a key role in terms of green infrastructure forming a green corridor linking up areas of green space within the neighbourhood plan area and we welcome the recognition of this at paragraph 8.17.

The Trust consider that the policy could be usefully expanded to make specific reference to the waterways/canal towpaths and the role they plays in terms of green infrastructure linking the urban area to the countryside.It is hoped that the above comments and suggested additions/amendments can be incorporated into the draft Neighbourhood Plan

Accepted. Amend NDP.

Amend Policy ECHW5, first sentence to:

" Existing areas of open and green spaces in and around Middlewich Town, are protected, as well as waterways and canal towpaths which are important green infrastructure assets linking the urban area to the countryside."

6.14 All Comment I hope that you find these comments useful and should you have any queries please

Noted. No change.

49


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

contact me.Yours sincerely

7.1

Kevin MellingAnsa Environmental Services LtdEnvironmental Hub, Cledford Lane, Middlewich, Cheshire CW10 0JR

Vision Support Draft Vision

We support the Town Council in its aspirations to create a vibrant community, encouraging growth and new employment opportunities. As a large local employer, we welcome improved local facilities that will encourage more people to shop locally and will be a great benefit to our employees who regularly use the local facilities. Any future developments will need to complement the heritage and character of Middlewich.

We believe that a clear and well developed strategy, encouraging controlled growth in housing and employment opportunities will benefit established businesses within

Noted. No change

50


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

Middlewich and increase the pool of potential employees available to work within walking distance of local employers such as ourselves.The future objectives identified seem appropriate and will help all future developments/improvements to be focused upon achieving the vision.

7.2 24Paragraph Number3.16 to 3.1.9

Support As identified within the heritage study, a number of improvements within the Town Centre have not been sympathetic to the existing architecture or heritage of Middlewich. We actively promote that the Neighbourhood Plan places a duty on developers to take all reasonable steps to retain the character and historic appearance of the Town Centre and in areas that are located in new build developments (such as housing and increased employment sites at Mid-Point

Noted. No change.

51


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

18) that newdevelopments are sustainable and bring value to the community.

7.3 27Paragraph Number3.1.21 to 3.1.23

Support The development of the public realm strategy will be vital to creating a more vibrant Town Centre. We endorse any actions taken to encourage wider pedestrian movements within the TC combined with aesthetically pleasing and functional furnishings. By achieving this, we believe that other employers will see Middlewich as a great place to locate.

The Bull Ring area within the TC is already an example of good quality public realm but in its current state is isolated from users and not highly visible due to the existing highway constraints. We believe that this could become a key focal point within the Town Centre and efforts should be made within

Noted. No change.

52


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

the Neighbourhood Plan to make this more accessible for community events.In addition to enhancing the public realm offering, consideration will also be needed to the long-term maintenance needs to ensure that they are sustainable and remain available for future generations.

In general we support all the aspirations within the draft document that build upon the existing character of Middlewich.

7.4 47Paragraph NumberSection 6

Support Middlewich Eastern BypassTransport connectivity is vital and we support the desire to create convenient access points for HGVs to access the proposed bypass.We also endorse the need for good public transport provision and suggest that consideration is also given to employers within the community to

Noted. No change.

53


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

develop their own policies associated with employee travel and implement suitable employee travel plans.

7.5 49Paragraph Number7.4

Support Employment

Any activities that allow/encourage employers to engage with young people in an attempt to improve their understanding of local employment opportunities is positive. We have found the annual high school careers fair held within Middlewich to be a very useful forum for engaging with schools. Any efforts to expand this to other groups within the community who are looking for employment opportunities would be appreciated.

Noted. No change.

7.6 60Paragraph Number8.20

Support BiodiversityWe believe that bio-diversity is vital to the future wellbeing of the community. Any future developments must ensure that every effort is made to sustain

Noted. No change.

54


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

and improve existing habitats8.1

Resident

Ch 6 Comment As a resident of Middlewich I wish to submit my comments on the above plan regarding the future development of our town.Main Issues:1. Volume of traffic — it is acknowledged by everyone that this is a major concern and that the planned Eastern Bypass will, in part, help with this. However, it is vitally important that as part of the planning process for this equal consideration should be given to pedestrian and cycle access/facilities/green corridors. Also need to look at ways of slowing down traffic coming through the centre of the town and ways of reducing air pollution.

Noted.

The NDP promotes walking and cycling as more sustainable transport alternatives and supports the proposed new rail station and bypass.

No change.

8.2 Ch 5 Comment 2. Housing — we have to accept more houses but smaller developments would suit our town, we don't want (or can accommodate) very large estates. Smaller (dozens rather

Not accepted.Policy H2 supports proposals in the Local Plan.

It is likely that some smaller scale

No change.

55


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

than hundreds of houses) estates, with green spaces, are nicer places for people to live in and are more aesthetically pleasing.

developments will also come forward over the plan period and the NDP provides a positive planning framework to support schemes on smaller sites as well as strategic sites identified in the Local Plan.

8.3 Ch 7 and Ch 8

Comment 3. Leisure — the report makes mention that "tourism is a growing industry in the area" — we are a great canal town with a long and interesting history.

It's great that we have a Heritage Officer but it would be fantastic to have a Heritage Centre which would provide a focus for visitors. However, anyone passing through the town, over the town bridge, will immediately be put off by the dreadful state of the two derelict buildings on the side of the canal — why on earth would they want to stop?

Noted.

The NDP is a planning policy document - not an action plan but the Town Council may consider progressing proposals for a heritage centre and actions to tackle derelict buildings, working with CEC and building owners.

There is no realistic possibility at the current time of securing a public swimming pool in the town.

No change.

56


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

Urgent consideration should be given to ways of encouraging the development of this area either by provision for boaters/café/leisure/heritage centre, etc. Any development should include easy access to town centre shops. The town also needs more leisure facilities for residents. I understand a swimming pool has been under consideration for some years — as part of encouraging healthy living this should be prioritised.

8.4 DH5 Comment General Comments:1. Tow paths need improvement to allow access for wheelchair users, cyclists, etc. Lots of areas of path are not negotiable unless on foot.

Noted.

The NDP promotes accessible and safe walking and cycling routes.

No change.

8.5 1.3.5 Comment 2. The report makes mention of two boat hire companies. However, you will be aware that one company has closed down with the resulting

Accepted.

Amend 1.3.5 to refer to one boat hire company.

Amend Plan.

Amend 1.3.5 to refer to one boat hire company.

57


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

deterioration on that area of the canal.

8.6 3.2.2 3. The report also mentions a weekly market — I've lived here just over 3 years and have never seen this. The fish man used to visit the big Tesco car park but I've not seen him for some time. Its good to see the council trying to resurrect the monthly Makers' Market but this needs more investment to make it attractive to visitors.

Noted.The Mexon market takes place on an ad hoc basis.

Amend NDP

Amend 3.2.2:

Delete "on one Saturday each month" and replace with:"on an ad-hoc basis".

8.6 3.1.5 Comment4. Shared space" is mentioned in the report.caution. The one way system past Lidl and Morrisons is extremely busy with fast moving traffic at all times of the day so totally unsuitable.

Perhaps shared space would potentially work in Wheelock Street to encourage more of a "café society" atmosphere as

Noted.

The NDP supports this.

No change.

58


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

the street does need a revamp. Also the pavements there are far too narrow and it is currently dangerous for wheelchair users as they are so uneven.

8.7 3.1.3 Comment 5. Future town centre developments should allow for more leisure facilities, I.e. restaurants, community spaces.

We definitely don't need any more hairdressers or beauty salons! One of the butchers shops has now closed which leaves only one — they should be encouraged to stay. We need good quality restaurants (Middlewich could become a destination for out of town diners) and again, definitely no more take away shops!

Noted.


No change.

8.8 Policy ECHW5

Comment 6. More green spaces should be provided, not just for childrens' play area but also facilities for adults and older people — other towns provide outside gyms. Also a community garden

Noted.


No change.

59


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

would be fantastic and would bring together people of all ages and backgrounds.

8.9 All Comment I realise that all the above costs money but the Council should give priority to ways of attracting investment into the town. Quite often small things, such as cleaning up run down areas - improved landscaping/greenery can make all the difference to the environment.I hope the above comments are helpful.

Noted.

The NDP provides a local planning framework and supports most of these suggestions. The Town Council may wish to consider some of the suggestions as future actions.

No change.

9.0Resident

Town centre policies

Supportcomment

TC needs improvement to encourage more shops

Noted. No change.

10.1Assistant Town PlannerUnited Utilities

All Comment Middlewich Draft Neighbourhood Development Plan — Regulation 14Thank you for your email and links to the draft neighbourhood plan.

United Utilities works closely

Accepted.

Maps identifying Town Centre Opportunity Sites and any others will be incorporated into NDP.

Amend NDP.

Insert maps identifying site allocations and blue and green routes.

60


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

with Cheshire East Council to understand future development sites so we can facilitate the delivery of necessary sustainable infrastructure at the appropriate time.

We have noted that the neighbourhood plan has allocated additional sites over and above the allocations within the Cheshire East Local Plan.

We can most appropriately manage the impact of development on our infrastructure if development is identified in locations where infrastructure is available with existing capacity. With regards to the additional growth allocated within the Neighbourhood Plan, UU would appreciate the allocations be provided in GIS format and would encourage such information as soon as it

61


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

becomes available.

10.2 OS2 Comment Specific CommentsPolicy OS2: Canalside Development and Marina Opportunity Site

We recommend the following is added as a separate point to policy OS2:

New residential development must:10. Utilise the canal for the discharge of surface water to adhere to the surface water hierarchy.

Accepted.

Insert additional wording as suggested.

Amend Plan.

Revise Policy OS2 - add following criterion:"New number: Utilise the canal for the discharge of surface water to adhere to the surface water hierarchy."

10.3 DH2 Comment Draft Policy DH2: Sustainable Design

United Utilities would like to see Draft Policy DH2 expanded on to include further information on Sustainable Drainage. The aim is to ensure that developments are including sufficient information with

Accepted.

Amend DH2 as suggested.

Amend NDP.

Revise DH2 point 1 to:" Incorporate SUDs which avoids all non-permeable surfaces, or delivers a water management system which minimises surface run off and ensure that all surface water is addressed within the site

62


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

regards to foul and surface water drainage.

We recommend the following amendments to point 1 of DH2 highlighted in blue:

I. Incorporate S U Ds which avoids all non-permeable surfaces, or delivers a water management system which minimises surface run off and ensure that all surface water is addressed within the site boundary. Every option should be investigated before discharging surface water into a public sewerage network, in line with the surface water hierarchy.

boundary. Every option should be investigated before discharging surface water into a public sewerage network, in line with the surface water hierarchy."

10.4 DH2 Comment In addition, we suggest the following text is added as an explanatory note for policy DH2, point 1:1.2 Surface water should be discharged in the following order of priority:1. An adequate soakaway

Accepted.

Add additional explanatory text as suggested.

Amend NDP.

Amend supporting text for DH2:Insert additional explanatory text after 4.8:" In their response to the Regulation 14 public consultation, United Utilities

63


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

or some other form of infiltration system.12. An attenuated discharge to surface water body. 3. An attenuated discharge to public surface water sewer, highway drain or another drainage system.4. An attenuated discharge to public combined sewer.Applicants wishing to discharge to public sewer will need to submit clear evidence demonstrating why alternative options are not available as part of the determination of their application.

advised further detailed wording in Policy DH2 relating to SUDs. Surface water should be discharged in the following order of priority:1. An adequate soakaway or some other form of infiltration system.2. An attenuated discharge to surface water body. 3. An attenuated discharge to public surface water sewer, highway drain or another drainage system.4. An attenuated discharge to public combined sewer.Applicants wishing to discharge to public sewer will need to submit clear evidence demonstrating why alternative options are not available as part of the determination of their application."

10.5 All SummaryMoving forward, we respectfully request that Middlewich Town

Noted. No change.

64


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

Council continue to consult with United Utilities on all future planning documents. We are keen to continue working in partnership with you and Cheshire East Council to ensure that all new growth can be delivered sustainably.

In the meantime, if you have any queries or would like to discuss this representation, please do not hesitate to contact me.

11.1Woodland Trust

All Comment Re: Consultation on Middlewich Draft Neighbourhood Plan

Woodland Trust response

Thank you very much for consulting the Woodland Trust on your neighbourhood plan for Middlewich, we very much appreciate the opportunity. Neighbourhood planning is an important mechanism for also embedding trees into local

Noted. No change.

65


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

communities, as such we are very supportive of some of the policies set out in your plan.

11.2 Vision Comment Vision and Objectives

The Woodland Trust is pleased to see that your Neighbourhood Plan identifies the important role that trees play, and that opportunities should be taken to increase tree cover in appropriate locations in Middlewich.

Trees are some of the most important features of your area for local people, and already this is being acknowledged with the Cheshire East Local Plan Strategy (2017), and Policy SE 5 which acknowledges the fact that trees, hedgerows and woodland are important visual and ecological assets which provide local distinctiveness within the landscape.

Accepted.

Amend Vision as suggested.

Amend NDP.

Add further wording to Vision:The environment will be enhanced sympathetically to deliver multi-use, well connected and accessible green, open and play spaces. and any ancient and veteran trees, important views, natural features and biodiversity will be protected for the benefit of the local community."

66


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

Therefore, this should be taken into account with the Neighbourhood Plan for Middlewich and the Draft Vision, and should be amended to include the following:

The environment will be enhanced sympathetically to deliver multi-use, well connected and accessible green, open and play spaces, protect and retain any ancient and veteran trees, important views, natural features and biodiversity for the benefit of the local community

11.3 All Comment / Support

General Principles

We are pleased to see that the general principles acknowledges the vital contribution of the countryside in Middlewich, and how your plan can assist with safeguarding this from encroachment. But this should also recognise the fact that development should not lead to

Noted. No change.

67


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

loss or degradation of trees in your parish. Increasing the amount of trees in Middlewich will provide enhanced green infrastructure for your local communities, and also mitigate against the future loss of trees to disease (eg Ash dieback), with a new generation of trees both in woods and also outside woods in streets, hedgerows and amenity sites.

Information can be found here: http://www.magic.gov.uk/MagicMap.asp and http://www.ancient-tree-hunt.org.uk/discoveries/interactivemap/

11.4 ECHW6 Comment Ancient woodland would benefit from strengthened protection building on the National Planning Policy Forum (NPPF). On 24th July the Ministry of Housing,

Accepted.

Insert further wording to Policy ECHW6 as suggested.

Amend NDP.

Add further wording to Biodiversity Policy:" Development should not result in harm to or loss of

68


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

Communities and Local Government published the revised NPPF which states:

development resulting in the loss or deterioration of irreplaceable habitats (such as ancient woodland and ancient or veteran trees) should be refused, unless there are wholly exceptional reasons and a suitable compensation strategy exists

The Woodland Trust believe this must be given due weight in the plan making process as it shows a clear direction of travel from central Government to strengthen the protection of irreplaceable ancient woodland and trees. Therefore, we would recommend that your General Principles of your Neighbourhood Plan also acknowledges tree protection and provision should include

Note - there are no ancient woodlands shown in the NDP area on Map p61.

irreplaceable habitats such as ancient trees and veteran trees. Where development proposals are in close proximity to areas of woodland, a 50m buffer should be provided to protect the core of the woodland."

Add further supporting text to 8.20:

"At Regulation 14 consultation stage the Woodland Trust submitted comments suggesting that the NDP should acknowledge tree protection, including ancient trees and woodland.

69


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

the following:

‘There should be no harm to or loss of irreplaceable habitats such as ancient trees and veteran trees’

The Woodland Trust would suggest that your Neighbourhood Plan is more specific about ancient tree protection. For example, the introduction and background to the consultation on the Kimbolton Neighbourhood Development Plan (2017) identified the importance of ancient woodland, and how it should be protected and enhanced. Also, we would like to see buffering distances set out. For example, for most types of development (i.e. residential), a planted buffer strip of 50m would be preferred to protect the core of the woodland. Standing Advice

70


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

from Natural England and the Forestry Commission has some useful information:https://www.gov.uk/guidance/ancient-woodland-and-veteran-trees-protection-surveys-licences

11.5 8.19 Comment We would like to see the importance of trees and woodland recognised for providing healthy living and recreation also being taken into account with your Neighbourhood Plan for Middlewich.

In an era of ever increasing concern about the nation’s physical and mental health, the Woodland Trust strongly believes that trees and woodland can play a key role in delivering improved health & wellbeing at a local level. Whilst, at the same time, the Health & Social Care Act 2012

Accepted.

Insert additional text noting the importance of trees and woodland to health.

Amend NDP.

Insert additional text to 8.19:" see Map x. Trees and woodland can play a key role in delivering improved health and wellbeing at a local level and can deliver a major contribution to resolving a range of water management issues, particularly those resulting from climate change, such as flooding and the water quality implications caused by extreme weather events."

71


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

has passed much of the responsibility for health & wellbeing to upper-tier and unitary local authorities, and this is reinforced by the Care Act 2014. Also, each new house being built in your parish should require a new street tree, and also car parks must have trees within them.

Education, Communities, Health and Welbeing

Whilst Section 8 of your Neighbourhood Plan does identify the fact that an audit of shortfalls in community provision is going to be acknowledged as something is taken forward, protecting natural features such as community space provision should also be taken into account. Also, it should seek to retain and enhance recreational and local green spaces, resist

72


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

the loss of open space, whilst also ensuring the provision of some more. Therefore, to what extent there is considered to be enough accessible space in your community also needs to be taken into account with new housing proposals. There are Natural England and Forestry Commission standards which can be used with developers on this:

The Woodland Access Standard aspires:

• That no person should live more than 500m from at least one area of accessible woodland of no less than 2ha in size.• That there should also be at least one area of accessible woodland of no less than 20ha within 4km (8km round trip) of people’s homes.

73


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

11.6 8.19 Comment The Woodland Trust also believes that trees and woodlands can deliver a major contribution to resolving a range of water management issues, particularly those resulting from climate change, like flooding and the water quality implications caused by extreme weather events. This is important in the area covered by your Neighbourhood Plan because trees offer opportunities to make positive water use change, whilst also contributing to other objectives, such as biodiversity, timber & green infrastructure - see the Woodland Trust publication Stemming the flow – the role of trees and woods in flood protection - https://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/publications/2014/05/stemming-the-flow/.

Noted. No further change - see 11.5 above.

11.7 All Comment Woodland Trust Publications Noted. No change.

74


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

We would like to take this opportunity to draw your attention to the Woodland Trust’sneighbourhood planning microsite: https://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/campaigning/neighbourhood-planning/ which may give you further ideas for your plan.

Also, the Woodland Trust have recently released a planners manual which is a multi-purpose document and is intended for policy planners, such as community groups preparing Neighbourhood Plans. Our guide can be found at: https://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/mediafile/100820409/planning-for-ancient-woodland-planners-manual-for-ancient-woodland-and-veterandtrees.pdf?cb=8298cbf2eaa34c7da329eee3bd8d48ff

75

https://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/mediafile/100820409/planning-for-ancient-woodland-planners-manual-for-ancient-woodland-and-veterandtrees.pdf?cb=8298cbf2eaa34c7da329eee3bd8d48ff



https://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/campaigning/neighbourhood-planning/




Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

In addition other Woodland Trust research which may assist with taking your Neighbourhood Plan foreword is a policy and practice section on our website, which provides lots of more specific evidence on more specific issues such as air quality, pollution and tree disease: https://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/publications/Our evidence base is always expanding through vigorous programme of PhDs and partnership working. So please do check back or get in touch if you have a specific query. You may also be interested in our free community tree packs, schools and community groups can claim up to 420 free trees every planting season: http://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/plant-trees/community-tree-pack/

76

http://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/plant-trees/community-tree-pack/



https://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/publications/

https://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/publications/


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

11.8 All If I can be of any assistance please do not hesitate to get in touch, I would be more than happy to discuss this further with you. If you require any further information or would like to discuss specific issues please do not hesitate to contact Victoria Bankes Price – Planning Advisor 0343 7705767 [email protected]

Best wishes and good luck with your plan

Noted. No change.

12.1Resident

Obj 1 Comment Objective 1- Town centre.

There should be a town square area just off Wheelock Street and green areas that are accessable from St Anns and Darlington Street.

There is only 1 piece of land next to Wheelock Street left and it should not be developed into

Noted.

This proposal would need further detailed consideration before being included in the NDP as a site allocation. However the NDP supports improvements to the public realm and investment in new open space provision in existing

No change.

77


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

housing and old peoples homes. policies.

12.2 Obj 2 Comment Objective 2- Opportunity sites.

There should be one line added- This plan will only support development on sites already identified in the CE Local Plan, this will protect Middlewich from any more unwanted development.

Not accepted.

The NDP has to plan positively for new development. The NDP supports other suitable proposals that may come forward over the plan period, in addition to the proposed strategic sites in the Local Plan, which will be needed to meet the 1950 housing requirement.

No change.

12.3 All Comment Other points:

Much needed infrastructure should be developed alongside housing not after.

There should be no major development until the Eastern Bypass is built and operational.

No additional housing after the 1950 should be allowed until

Noted.

The NDP supports investment in new infrastructure but development proposals cannot be delayed until after the Bypass is completed.

Pedestrian safety measures are included in suggestions for

No change.

78


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

infrastructure is in place.

106 money should be spent improving and installing crossings on our roads to allow children to cross safely on their way to school. Key areas are: Warmingham Lane, Chadwick Road, Town Bridge and Newton Bank gyratory/ Nantwich Road.

Several of our parks are in need of refurbishment, 106 money should be allocated to this.

infrastructure in Policy H1.

The NDP supports investment in open space provision.

13.1Resident

All Comment / Object

Please find below my feedback on the Neighbourhood Plan.

Overall the Plan lacks detail and is full of vague platitudes such as “to deliver a busy people-focused place, with plenty to offer both residents and visitors”. It seems to have been adapted quite poorly from a generic template. It also has spelling mistakes and on the map the town boundary is

Not accepted.

The NDP is not drawn from a generic template but has been prepared by a steering group of local residents, town councillors and stakeholders, building on extensive public consultation.

The maps on p7 is the designated neighbourhood

No change.

79


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

incorrect.

I would not be able to vote for the Plan in its current state.

Here are some improvements I would like to see;

area and town council (parish) boundary.

13.2 Obj 1 Comment / Object

Middlewich town centreA vague objective presumably referring to land adjacent to Wheelock Street. It should for example include specific items such as a town square, a co-ordinated design for Wheelock Street with additional shop units and green areas.

Accepted.

Amend Objective 2 as suggested.

Amend NDP.

Amend Objective 2:Include additional text:"The town centre will be the focus for attractive new public open spaces and high quality public realm improvements to support a vibrant shopping area and economic growth and investment."

13.3 Obj 2 Comment / Object

Opportunity sitesOther vague statements about extra housing and other developments around the “canalside” which could not be appropriate until the eastern bypass is complete. Such development could involve areas which are not included in

Noted.

More detailed planning policies for town centre opportunity sites are provided in OS1 and canalside development is addressed in Policy OS2. The strategic allocated

No change.

80


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

the Cheshire East local plan sites will not deliver the total 1950 housing requirement for Middlewich and therefore new unallocated sites will be required to make a contribution to the housing requirement.

13.4 All Comment Improvements Needed1.The neighbourhood plan should be confined to adding detail to the development of those sites already contained in the Cheshire East Local Plan.

Noted.

CEC have commented on the Reg 14 Draft NDP and overall are supportive of the plan policies and proposals.

Some amendments are proposed in the submission plan to add further detail, reduce duplication and improve clarity.

Amend NDP.

Amend Policy H2 to improve clarity:Amend first sentence to:" Middlewich is committed to the sites contained in the Cheshire East Local Plan Strategy for Middlewich in the Plan period 2010 - 2030 which contribute towards the 1,950 housing requirement, alongside other sites still to be identified".

13.5 All Comment 2. The neighbourhood plan should state that Middlewich should be protected from any extra unwanted development which causes significant

Not accepted.

The NDP has to provide a positive planning framework to guide new

No change.

81


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

increased road traffic until the bypass is complete.

development and cannot set out a policy as a brake on new development until a road scheme has been completed.

The Town Council will remain engaged in the proposals for the new bypass and will encourage its implementation at the earliest opportunity.

The NDP aims to address the need for a range of proposed infrastructure improvements to tackle problems of traffic in the town centre.

13.6 H1 Comment 3. The neighbourhood plan should state that overall growth in Middlewich should involve a co-ordinated approach between developers and relevant authorities regarding housing development and infrastructure.

Accepted.

Add comment to supporting text for Policy H1.

Amend NDP.

Add text to paragraph 5.6:" The NDP aims to ensure that proposed housing growth in Middlewich involves a co-ordinated approach between developers and relevant

82


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

authorities to address infrastructure requirements arising from new development."

13.7 Comment 4. 1. The neighbourhood plan should state that developers in Middlewich should be required to contribute to specific schemes, such as

• A comprehensive safe route to school for the Cledford Schools and Middlewich High School to include crossing points on Warmingham Lane, Chadwick Road and a traffic island in the Cross Lane Warmingham Lane Junction

• A new crossing system incorporated into the upgrade of Town Bridge Junction• Upgrades to Parks and Play Areas Sycamore Drive, Webbs Lane, The Green and the Fountain Fields Pavilion

Noted.

These are detailed proposals and Policy H1 and policies under Education, Health and Wellbeing include support for a broad range of infrastructure improvements which would include these specific proposals.

An Appendix will be included in the NDP setting out infrastructure proposals. This has been prepared by the steering group based on responses to public consultations on the NDP.

No further change.

83


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

I hope you find this feedback helpful.

14.1Middlewich Matters

All Dear Jonathan,

I have set out in this letter a number of Amendments to the Draft Middlewich Neighbourhood Plan in line with the consultation which closes on 26th September 2018.

Can please unsure that these Amendments are presented to the correct people for their consideration for inclusion into the neighbourhood plan.

Noted. No change.

14.2 All Comment Proposed Amendments Noted.Refer to 13.7 above.

No further change.

84


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

I would like the Neighbourhood Plan Committee to insert a new section titled General Polices after objectives and before Middlewich Town Centre which contain the following

General PoliciesMiddlewich as seen its population exploded over the last 20 years and in the latest Cheshire East Local Plan we will add another 1950 over the plan period, developments will be required to work together with the Town Council in developing and delivering a holistic approach to the overall growth in the Town in order to address the key aims and objectives of the Plan successfully. The construction of 1,950 dwellings will require enhancement of the social infrastructure which included in (ANNEX 1 key Community projects for Middlewich included in the NP)

85


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

14.3 New Policy

Comment Draft Policy GP 1 :-This Plan will only support development on those sites contained in the Cheshire East Local Plan.

Not accepted.

The NDP has to provide a supportive and positive planning framework for new development proposals that come forward over the plan period and cannot limit development to only those sites identified in the Local Plan. The housing requirement for Middlewich is 1950 new homes over the plan period and additional sites will be required in addition to the identified strategic sites in order to meet this requirement.

No change.

14.3 New Policy

Comment Draft Policy GP 2:- Proposals for delivering the overall growth in Middlewich should show there is a co-ordinated approach between developers and relevant authorities to housing

Partially accepted.

This is addressed in Ref 13.6 above. It is more appropriately addressed in the supporting text than in a planning policy.

No further change.

86


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

development and infrastructure.

14.4 New Policy

Comment Draft Policy GP 3:- The sub-division of existing large gardens in the Town (i.e. ‘back Garden’ development)will be discouraged.

Not accepted.

This issue has not come forward as significant through the NDP public consultation process with residents

No change.

14.5 New Policy

Comment Draft Policy GP 4:- Developer Contributes will be used for the Priority sites for list in Annex 1 for community projects.

Partially accepted.

Existing policies H1 and Education, Health and Wellbeing policies include support for a broad range of infrastructure improvements which would include these specific proposals. However H1 (3) and Policies ECHW3 and ECHW4 should reference the Appendix.

Amend NPD.

Refer to new Appendix in Policy H1 (3) and Policies ECHW3 and ECHW4:"including proposed community infrastructure improvements set out in Appendix X"

14.6 New section

Comment I would like to include an extra Section about

Accepted. Amend NDP - include new Appendix.

87


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

Developer ContributionsAnnex 1Community Projects from Developer Contributions through S106 or Community Levy/New Homes Bonus

APPENDIX IInfrastructure proposals - Developer Contributions (S106)

Pedestrian Crossings and Road Safety improvements:

Warmingham Lane (near Tesco/Post Office)

Lewin Street (near Royal British Legion)

Townbridge – to include fully-controlled pedestrian crossing to all arms of the junction

Safe routes to schools

Public Realm improvements in town centre

Footpath improvements

Croxton Lane between Meadow View and Finneys Lane

88


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

Healthcare/Surgery extension/improvements

Parks and Play Areas:Sycamore DriveAngus GroveWebbs LaneFountain Fields Pavilion (Stage 2)The GreenSutton Lane Playing Fields

Leisure facilitiesLeisure CentreCroxton Lane TrailThree Locks TrailCanal Towpaths

Refurbish public conveniences on Southway

14.7 New Section

Comment A comprehensive safe route to school for the Cledford Schools & Middlewich High School with we incorporate crossing points on Warmingham Lane, Chadwick

Accepted.See 14.2 above.

No further change.

89


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

Road, Traffic Island in Cross Lane/Warmingham Lane Junction

That a new crossing system is incorporated into the upgrade of Town Bridge Junction from the Morris and Bellway Developments

Upgrades to Parks and Play Areas Sycamore Drive, Webbs Lane, The Green, Fountain Fields Pavilion, Sutton Lane Playing Fields,

Upgrading of the Three Locks trial and the Croxton Lane Trial

Upgrading Wheelock Street, pavements, street signage, street Furniture,

Extra CCTV both Fixed and Mobile to police trouble hot

90


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

spots14.8 TC3 Comment TC3 - Remove point 3

because Pedestrianisation of Wheelock Street, This would kill off the Town Centre completely.

Not accepted.

This refers to pedestrian priority not pedestrianisation and would improve the environment for shoppers and visitors.

No change.

14.9 OS2 Comment OS2 Replace the Wording at a size Commensurate with the size of the Town (because this makes no sense because marina are built to fill the demand for moorings not the size of the town they are in or next too).With the Wording no less then 40 berths of various lengths.

Not accepted.

See Ref 6.5 above - second sentence has been amended following comments from the Canal& River Trust.

No change

14.10 TC5 Comment TC5 - After conservation area add the following wording:

And no vehicular access onto Darlington Street

Not accepted.

These are detailed design considerations and will be dealt with as part of the development management

No change.

91


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

After the Word Scheme insert the wording :

And Market Square of a reasonable Size

process.

14.11 E3 Comment Insert number into draft Policy E3

3. Development Along the Bypass Route will commence once the Bypass and Link Road to Cledford Lane are Complete

Not accepted.

The NDP cannot delay development until a major infrastructure project has been completed.

No change.

15.1Resident

TC1 Comment Planning applications for change of use from retail to residential should take into account the effect their conversion would have on other retailers. There have been several residential conversions undertaken recently, which has created ‘islands’ of retail on the high

Noted.

Some changes of use from retail to residential uses are permitted development subject to certain criteria ie they do not require planning consent.

No change.

92


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

street, cutting off traders at the far end of Wheelock street. This must have an impact on their footfall and will further contribute to the decline of these existing businesses.

In addition, the recent conversions of previous retail premises have in all cases been very poor, with no regard to the conservation of the traditional building’s features. In my view, this must be reversed if the centre is going to have any long-term appeal for visitors.

The NDP aims to support vitality and viability of the town centre Policy TC1 sets out that applications that reduce the retail floorspace in the town centre will not be supported.

16.1Resident

All Comment - General

I am fairly new resident to Middlewich but I work here also. The major factor I think is the speed at which growth is happening. There does not appear to be any thought put into our infrastructure versus house building. The recent

Noted.

The NDP addresses these matters in some detail and provides a positive planning framework for the future sustainable growth of Middlewich.

No change.

93


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

developments off Warmingham Lane have increased the traffic coming into or travelling through Middlewich. Holmes Chapel Road (A54) is always congested with commuter traffic and also at the weekends. I know that there is a bypass to be built from the Salt Cellar Roundabout but there is also a huge demand for a bypass to the west leading from King Street to Winsford as most of the heavy transport is going to Winsford Industrial Estate from the M6. King Street from the Total People end to where it joins A54 has become a ‘rat-run’ as the majority of people try to avoid the A54 from the Salt Cellar end into town. Speed bumps or traffic calming would be useful.

Our public transport is

94


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

laughable. No buses on a Sunday and a limited service at all other times. One bus an hour seems to be the norm. Both Arriva & D&G coaches run approximately 10 minutes apart which is not good timetabling. We have no train station, as covered in the report, but until we get a decent car park and road infrastructure what would be the point of the train station? It will bring more traffic into the town centre and there is nowhere to park.

Our town centre is dying and has been for sometime. In my opinion, Tesco changing to Jack’s is not good as it is yet another low end retailer which we do not need. What is wrong with having some better quality retailers, such as independent stores? Why are we not

95


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

attracting those kind of retailers?

We desperately need a new health centre and school. Our doctors surgeries are over subscribed, as are our schools. With the proposed 2000 new homes that will obviously bring more people into our town to use the services. The report identifies this but does not give a clear solution. The population of Middlewich will grow quite significantly and it is no good waiting for the expansion without planning the services that go with it.

Middlewich could do with a new leisure/sports centre including a swimming pool. There is the space for development and the need for both in the town. Anyone who uses our local

96


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

leisure centre will tell you that. The old Memorial Court in Northwich is a good example of what can be done on a fairly small footprint. It has transformed the leisure facilities in Northwich that allow access for all.

I think that those involved with this Development Plan would benefit from looking around at the likes of Blackburn which is two years into its regeneration plan and appear to be bucking the trend for the high street and for losing it’s identity as a market town.

I think there are many good things in Middlewich. It is lovely place to live and has many great things going for it. Middlewich is in a great location and should be thriving but all we appear to

97


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

be doing is building more houses and making promises that take years to deliver on. I grew up in an old Market Town that spread out with houses but didn’t deliver on the vital things such as infrastructure, such as roads, schools, health services, leisure facilities and retail spaces. It is now a ghost town that no-one is keen to live in. It would be awful for Middlewich to go the same way.

17.1Resident


Hi, I'm afraid I can't get your form to work on my iPad so I hope you accept this e-mail as my contribution.

In respect of the town centre there is one 'shop front' that has been done a disservice more than others. I bet lots of towns would love to have a 12

Noted.

These are detailed matters, some of which are beyond the scope of the NDP (ie planning policy).

Potential projects such of these could be considered as future actions for the

No change.

98


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

Century listed building in the centre of their town. We've got one but no one knows it's there. I've attached a photo of St Michael's and one of the very similar, and also listed, St Bartholomew's in Wilmslow. No one in Middlewich need worry about losing greenery from that corridor - Wilmslow have put low level hedging around their church. I believe we should too and re-brand our ancient town with the church as our centrepiece. The picture on page 36 of the plan shows the church didn't used to be hidden by overgrown trees - it's a modern day issue.

Town Council and other bodies or individuals.

99


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

100


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

With regard to transport in objective 9 I believe we need to help people who cycle or walk along King St by giving them a

101


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

safe alternative. I think there should be an all weather path, suitable for cycling, along the canal to Gadbrook. This will link the heritage sites of Murgatroyds and Harbutts with the Lion Salt works and Anderson Boat lift and could therefore boost leisure tourism. Such a route would also provide a healthy alternative to driving and could be blue/green routes.

We state 'road' and 'rail' but can 'cycling' be specified in objective 6. We need cycle parking in the centre of town - more than just the stands outside little Tesco. Maybe we could take out a parking space on Wheelock and put something like one of these in https://www.cyclehoop.com/product/racks/car-bike-port/

102

https://www.cyclehoop.com/product/racks/car-bike-port/

https://www.cyclehoop.com/product/racks/car-bike-port/


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

With regard to the vitality of the town centre I wonder if there is a chance to bring the Alhambra back in to use as a cinema/theatre as well as it being a bar/nightspot. For example the Rex in Wilmslow is about to be reopen and the old theatre/cinema at Colwyn Bay is used by local children for productions (possibly school productions but I don't know.)

I hope this input helps.

Kind regards,

103


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

18.1Resident


I wish to voice my opinion on the Neighbourhood Plan.

In my opinion there are too many houses being built in Middlewich. If the Council Tax raised from all these extra homes were to be spent on Middlewich that would be a redeeming factor. However, clearly that is not happening. There has been no improvement in the infrastructure for decades. Middlewich only receives anything negative e.g. Ansa at Cledford, Custody Suite where offenders from Cheshire West are brought to because there has been none built in that region. Why is that? Why Middlewich which has no

Noted.

The housing requirement is set out in the Local Plan and the NDP is required to plan positively to support strategic planning policies.

The NDP addresses infrastructure.

No change.

104


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

transport links, either rail or buses which run when they feel like it? All the neighbouring towns in Cheshire East have railway stations - Crewe, Congleton, Holmes Chapel and Elworth (Sandbach). Could it be that their residents would be "offended" to have such a centre. Offenders are often turned out with no money. How do they leave to get home? Is this a contributing factor to the increased car crime in Middlewich?

The Town Council needs a good shake up. Middlewich First is supposed to be working for the town's benefit but they either vote against or abstain.

Middlewich is truly the poor relation of the Borough.

105


Ref. No.

Page No.

Para. No.




Amendments to NP

Yours faithfully

106

· web viewthe one way system past lidl and morrisons is extremely busy with fast moving traffic...

Documents