01 understanding the fusion of enterprise quality models_ceqp

Upload: yumol-sallie

Post on 07-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    1/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    Understanding the Fusion of

    Enterprise Quality Models

    DIGILEAF INC.Leading Excellence Among Fellows

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    2/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    About DigiLEAF

    We are QUALITY practitioners.we live by what we teach

    DIGILEAF is a knowledge-based solutions provider specializing onEnterprise Quality Management and, Information Technology

    Infrastructure and Governance. DIGILEAF offers training, audit and

    consulting as the primary service areas capturing the end-to-end

    roadmap of building a Quality Culture from conceptualization to

    execution of quality assurance, quality control, and deployment of

    organizational excellence methodologies.

    DIGILEAF prides itself in being vertically-strong in its chosen niche, in

    the wealth of industry experience it has and its capability to ENGAGE to

    its clients in the most unconventional, versatile and innovative way

    possible, giving the clients that delighted & worthwhile experience.

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    3/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    About IAQP

    International Alliance of Quality Professionals

    (IAQP), registered in The Netherlands, was founded

    by representatives of three countries namely, The

    Philippines, The Netherlands & Iran. The Alliancebelieves that by sharing policy, information and

    training, it will be able to strengthen the work of

    quality professionals embedded in any role in any

    organization, to foster the good practices in each

    industry in a specific region and to elevate these toan international level, thus forming best practices

    that could be replicated in other regions of the

    world as well.

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    4/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    Course Objectives

    * To uniform the understanding towards Quality

    Management, this will take the bigger picture of linking all

    Quality Models together and design a roadmap fitted to the

    need of a diverse organization intending to raise their Quality

    Maturity to a higher level.

    * To prepare the stakeholders in the development and

    execution of a Lean Six Sigma Program across delivery centersand support services; this will walk-through on the

    prerequisites needed, guide on program governance and

    pitfalls to avoid.

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    5/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    Building Quality Excellence should start somewhere.

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    6/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    Thrust of Enterprise Quality

    Voice

    of the

    Business

    Customer Satisfaction &

    Innovation

    Process Optimization Talent Development

    The Three-Point Thrust of Enterprise Quality

    towards Profit Management

    Models & Practices that ensure

    fulfillment of customer requirements,

    problem solving to meet the desired

    targets & ideation for innovation to

    leverage opportunity

    Customer Satisfaction & Innovation

    Process Optimization

    Tools & Techniques that guide

    professionals in Mapping, Improving

    and Reengineering of Processes;

    inclusive of establishing metrics

    dashboards to promote data-based

    approach to process management.

    Talent Development

    People Management Approaches towards development of the skill set both of the

    mentor and the talent to be equipped to bring the organization to its desired state.

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    7/69 DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    Pathway In Assessing Quality Maturity of the Organization

    Level 01: IDENTIFY THE VALUE of OPERATIONS & SHARED SERVICES

    Level 02: ESTABLISH THE REPEATABILITY OF THE PROCESSES

    Level 03: STANDARDIZE THE CONFORMING PROCESS

    Level 04: QUANTIFY QUALITY ATTRIBUTES

    Level 05: OPTIMIZE PERFORMANCE

    Adapted from CMMi Capability Maturity Model

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    8/69 DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    Level 01:IDENTIFY THE VALUE Of

    OPERATIONS & SHARED SERVICES

    Level 02:ESTABLISH THE REPEATABILITY OFTHE PROCESS

    Level 03:STANDARDIZE THE CONFORMING

    PROCESS

    Level 04:QUANTIFY QUALITY ATTRIBUTES

    Level 05:

    OPTIMIZE PERFORMANCE

    Enterprise Quality Models & Techniques Complementing the Pathway

    Product or Service Positioning SWOT Analysis

    Business Needs Analysis

    Calibration Sessions Benchmarking Initiatives Set-up of Quality Assurance

    Quality Management System Information SecurityManagement System COPC

    Balanced Scorecard Metrics System for SLA Customer Satisfaction Index

    LEAN SIX SIGMA Design for Six Sigma Innovative Thinking Techniques

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    9/69 DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    Level 01:IDENTIFY THE VALUE

    Level 02:ESTABLISH

    REPEATABILITY

    Level 03:STANDARDIZE THE

    CONFORMINGPROCESS

    Level 04:

    QUANTIFY QUALITYATTRIBUTES

    Level 05:OPTIMIZE

    PERFORMANCE

    Schematic Flow of Thought Process

    Product or Service Positioning SWOT Analysis

    Business Needs Analysis

    Calibration Sessions Benchmarking Initiatives Set-up of Quality Assurance

    Quality Management System Information SecurityManagement System COPC

    Balanced Scorecard

    Metrics System for SLA Customer Satisfaction Index

    LEAN SIX SIGMA

    Strategy-Based

    Thinking

    Model-Based

    Thinking

    Tool-Based

    Thinking Process Mapping Statistical Process Control Risk Analysis Tools

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    10/69 DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    Level 01:IDENTIFY THE VALUE

    Level 02:MAKE IT REPEATABLE

    Level 03:DEFINE THE CONFORMING

    PROCESS

    Level 04:QUANTIFY QUALITY

    ATTRIBUTES

    Level 05:

    OPTIMIZE PERFORMANCE

    Enterprise Quality Models & Techniques complementing the Pathway

    Product or Service Positioning SWOT Analysis

    Business Needs Analysis

    Calibration Sessions Benchmarking Initiatives Set-up of Quality Assurance

    Quality Management System Information SecurityManagement System COPC

    Balanced Scorecard Metrics System for SLA Customer Satisfaction Index

    LEAN SIX SIGMA

    Design for Six Sigma Innovative Thinking Techniques

    START

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    11/69 DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    Quality Management System (QMS)

    In accordance to ISO 9001:2008 Requirements

    The adoption of a quality management system should be a strategic decisionof an organization aiming to embed a PROCESS-BASED APPROACH linking all

    functionalities within an organization.

    When used within a Quality Management System, such an approach

    emphasizes the importance of:

    a.) understanding and meeting stakeholder requirements

    b.) need to consider processes in terms of added value

    c.) obtaining results of process performance and effectiveness

    d.) continual improvement of processes based on objective measurement

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    12/69 DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    PDCA Cycle of QMSPLAN

    Establish the objectives and processes necessary to deliver

    results in accordance with customer requirements and theorganizations policies

    DOExecution of Processes

    CHECK

    Monitor & measure processes and product/service againstpolicies, objectives and requirements for the product and

    report the results

    ACT

    Take actions to continuallyimprove process performance

    d d h f l d l l

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    13/69 DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    Model of Process-Based QMS

    Customers Customers

    CONTINUAL IMPROVEMENT

    of the QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

    Management

    Responsibility

    Resource

    Management

    Measurement,

    Analysis &

    Improvement

    Product

    RealizationRequirements

    SATISFACTION

    PRODUCT or

    SERVICE

    U d di h F i f E i Q li M d l V i 02 A il 22 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    14/69 DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    Excerpts from Quality Management System

    ManagementResponsibility

    Resource

    Management

    Measurement,Analysis &

    Improvement

    Product

    Realization

    Top management shall provide evidence of its commitment to

    continually improve its effectiveness by establishing a quality

    policy, fulfillment of quality objectives, conduct of management

    reviews and assurance of availability of resources

    The organization shall determine and provide resources needed to

    enhance customer satisfactionThe organization shall plan and develop the processes needed for

    product or service realization. Planning of product realization

    shall be consistent with the requirements of other processes of

    Quality Management System

    The organization shall plan and implement the monitoring,measurement, analysis and improvement processes needed:

    -To demonstrate conformity of service

    - To ensure compliance of the Quality Management System

    - To continually improve service effectiveness & efficiency

    U d t di th F i f E t i Q lit M d l V i 02 A il 22 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    15/69 DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    Roles under Quality Management System

    CONTINUAL IMPROVEMENT

    of the QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

    Management

    Responsibility

    General Management

    Strategic Quality

    Middle Management

    SalesCustomer-Interfacing

    ProcessesResource

    ManagementHuman Resource

    IT, Finance, Budget

    Facilities Management

    Measurement,

    Analysis &

    Improvement

    Applicable across

    departments, across

    ranks

    Product

    RealizationGeneral Operations

    Account Management

    Workforce

    Quality Control

    Department

    Either Operations or

    Shared Service

    CONTINUAL IMPROVEMENT

    of the QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

    Management

    Responsibility

    Resource

    Management

    Measurement,

    Analysis &

    Improvement

    Product

    Realization

    U d t di th F i f E t i Q lit M d l V i 02 A il 22 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    16/69 DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    Quality Management System with the

    requirements specified within ISO 9001:2008

    Is an Ideal Springboard to:

    Information Security Management System (ISO 27001)

    Capability Maturity Model Integrated (CMMi)

    Contact Operations Performance Center (COPC) Requirements

    Malcolm Baldridge National Quality Award/Philippine Quality Award

    IT Infrastructure Library Requirements

    PCI-DSS Certification

    BPAP/CCAP Recognition

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models Version 02 April 22 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    17/69 DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    Level 01:IDENTIFY THE VALUE

    Level 02:MAKE IT REPEATABLE

    Level 03:DEFINE THE CONFORMING

    PROCESS

    Level 04:QUANTIFY QUALITY

    ATTRIBUTES

    Level 05:

    OPTIMIZE PERFORMANCE

    Enterprise Quality Models & Techniques complementing the Pathway

    Product or Service Positioning SWOT Analysis

    Business Needs Analysis

    Calibration Sessions Benchmarking Initiatives Set-up of Quality Assurance

    Quality Management System Information SecurityManagement System COPC

    Balanced Scorecard Metrics System for SLA Customer Satisfaction Index

    LEAN SIX SIGMA Design for Six Sigma Innovative Thinking Techniques

    START

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models Version 02 April 22 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    18/69 DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    Key Result Areas

    Key StrategicObjectives Explicitly-StatedRequirements Customer PerceivedRequirements

    BALANCED

    SCORECARD

    EFFECTIVE

    METRICS

    SYSTEM

    CSAT

    Customer Complaint

    Handling

    Are we measuring the right attributes? Are we measuring what is painful for the organization and for the processes? Are the measurements monitored the right way?

    Key Considerations

    Considerations to Quantify Performance

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models Version 02 April 22 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    19/69 DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    Organizations Strategic Objectives

    FinancialReviews

    ? ? ??

    ALL OTHERS ARE LEFT HIDDEN!

    Context of Balanced ScorecardINTANGIBLE

    ASSETS

    CustomerConcern

    InternalProcess

    Learning& Growth

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models Version 02 April 22 2011

    http://images.google.com.ph/imgres?imgurl=http://www.madore.org/~david/images/cards/english/king-hearts.png&imgrefurl=http://www.madore.org/~david/misc/cards.html&h=1037&w=674&sz=42&tbnid=b0ABK0ywR6JmeM:&tbnh=150&tbnw=97&hl=tl&start=1&prev=/images?q=king+of+hearts&svnum=10&hl=tl&lr=http://images.google.com.ph/imgres?imgurl=http://www.almadrava.net/damnans/images/Libraryback.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.almadrava.net/damnans/downloads.htm&h=694&w=501&sz=49&tbnid=i0WSYKsca-ja0M:&tbnh=137&tbnw=98&hl=tl&start=62&prev=/images?q=back+of+cards&start=60&svnum=10&hl=tl&lr=&sa=Nhttp://images.google.com.ph/imgres?imgurl=http://www.almadrava.net/damnans/images/Libraryback.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.almadrava.net/damnans/downloads.htm&h=694&w=501&sz=49&tbnid=i0WSYKsca-ja0M:&tbnh=137&tbnw=98&hl=tl&start=62&prev=/images?q=back+of+cards&start=60&svnum=10&hl=tl&lr=&sa=Nhttp://images.google.com.ph/imgres?imgurl=http://www.almadrava.net/damnans/images/Libraryback.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.almadrava.net/damnans/downloads.htm&h=694&w=501&sz=49&tbnid=i0WSYKsca-ja0M:&tbnh=137&tbnw=98&hl=tl&start=62&prev=/images?q=back+of+cards&start=60&svnum=10&hl=tl&lr=&sa=Nhttp://images.google.com.ph/imgres?imgurl=http://www.almadrava.net/damnans/images/Libraryback.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.almadrava.net/damnans/downloads.htm&h=694&w=501&sz=49&tbnid=i0WSYKsca-ja0M:&tbnh=137&tbnw=98&hl=tl&start=62&prev=/images?q=back+of+cards&start=60&svnum=10&hl=tl&lr=&sa=Nhttp://images.google.com.ph/imgres?imgurl=http://www.almadrava.net/damnans/images/Libraryback.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.almadrava.net/damnans/downloads.htm&h=694&w=501&sz=49&tbnid=i0WSYKsca-ja0M:&tbnh=137&tbnw=98&hl=tl&start=62&prev=/images?q=back+of+cards&start=60&svnum=10&hl=tl&lr=&sa=Nhttp://images.google.com.ph/imgres?imgurl=http://www.madore.org/~david/images/cards/english/king-hearts.png&imgrefurl=http://www.madore.org/~david/misc/cards.html&h=1037&w=674&sz=42&tbnid=b0ABK0ywR6JmeM:&tbnh=150&tbnw=97&hl=tl&start=1&prev=/images?q=king+of+hearts&svnum=10&hl=tl&lr=
  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    20/69 DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    Example of Transition of Strategy Map to Balanced Scorecard

    STRATEGY MAP BALANCED SCORECARD

    Financial

    Customer

    Internal

    L&G

    Net Profit

    Grow

    Revenue

    Fewer

    planes

    Attract &

    Retain

    Customer

    On-time

    service

    Lowest

    prices

    Fast

    ground

    turn-

    around

    Ramp

    agent

    learning

    Crew

    scheduling

    and

    profiling

    Objectives Measurement Target

    Profitability

    Grow revenue

    Fewer planes

    Market Value

    Seat revenue

    Plane lease cost

    Up by 10%

    Up by 15%

    Down by 15%

    Attract & retain

    more customer

    Flight is on-time

    Lowest prices

    # repeat customers

    # customers

    Ranking for on-time

    arrival

    Customer ranking

    70%

    Up by 12%

    No. 1

    No. 1

    Fast ground

    turn-around

    On-ground time

    On-time departure

    30 minutes

    90%

    Develop the

    necessary skills

    Develop the

    support system

    Strategic job readiness

    Information System

    Availability

    90%

    100%

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models Version 02 April 22 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    21/69 DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    Balanced Scorecard Implementation Roadmap

    Enterprise Level

    Cluster Cluster

    Department Department

    The objective of Balanced

    Scorecard Deployment is to

    cascade the Corporate BSC

    (Enterprise Level) down to

    logical clusters and

    departments up until the

    point where each individual

    owns his/her particular

    objectives coming from

    his/her immediate superior.

    Individual Balanced Scorecards

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models Version 02 April 22 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    22/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    Clienting

    (customer + environment/competition)

    Processing

    (processes)

    Partnering

    (employees)

    RELIABILITY

    PROFIT

    Voice of the Customer

    Voice of

    the

    Process

    Voice of

    the

    Employees

    Building an Effective Metrics System Linked to Profit

    A Dual Concept for Long Term Success. Fritz W. Weigang, Institut fur Qualitatsmanagment. ASQ Six Sigma Forum Magazine.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    23/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    Effective Metrics Build and Maintenance

    Voice

    of the

    Business

    Customer Satisfaction

    & Innovation

    Process

    Optimization

    Employee Welfare &

    Development

    CollectedC IntegrityI UseableU KnownK ActionA

    Sanity Check for Metrics (as stated by COPC)

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    24/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    Customer Perception

    SatisfiedParticipants

    Key Inputs of TrainingKey Output of Training

    Example:

    Perceived Customer

    Expectations

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    25/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    g p Q y , , p ,

    Level 01:IDENTIFY THE VALUE

    Level 02:MAKE IT REPEATABLE

    Level 03:DEFINE THE CONFORMING

    PROCESS

    Level 04:QUANTIFY QUALITY

    ATTRIBUTES

    Level 05:

    OPTIMIZE PERFORMANCE

    Enterprise Quality Models & Techniques complementing the Pathway

    Product or Service Positioning SWOT Analysis

    Business Needs Analysis

    Calibration Sessions Benchmarking Initiatives Set-up of Quality Assurance

    Quality Management System Information SecurityManagement System COPC

    Balanced Scorecard Metrics System for SLA Customer Satisfaction Index

    LEAN SIX SIGMA

    Design for Six Sigma Innovative Thinking Techniques

    START

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    26/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    g p Q y , , p ,

    GOALS OF COMPANY ACCORDING TO

    STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES

    POTENTIAL FOR CHANGE!

    Transition to Continual Improvement

    Voice

    of theBusiness

    Customer Satisfaction &

    Innovation

    Process

    Optimization

    Employee Welfare &

    Development

    COMMON SENSE or

    LEAN SIX SIGMA?

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    27/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    g p y , , p ,

    Leans practice already expanded from the shop floor of automotive and

    manufacturing industry going to the information-intensive environmentof transactional area where its use is now termed as LEAN OFFICE.

    Lean Evolution

    OUTPUT

    Process

    Step 01

    Process

    Step 02

    Process

    Step 03

    IDENTIFIED WASTES

    USE OF LEAN TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES

    TO PERFORM:

    WASTE ELIMINATION

    WASTE REDUCTION

    PROCESSREENGINEERING

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    28/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    1. Overproduction

    Overproduction of recruited/trained hires

    Overproduction of finished goods

    2. Overprocessing

    Multiple approval layersMultiple QC Inspection done per process step

    3. Waiting

    Resigned employees waiting time for the back pay

    Waiting on queue for deposit transaction processing

    4. TransportationCall transfers to multiple agents

    Transportation of materials received from suppliers5. Motion

    Processing of clearance from various sites

    Motion wastes due to poor work lay-outs6. Inventory

    Idle assets not used; benched hires

    Inventory of spare parts and obsolescent materials

    7. Rework

    Recurrence of IT Problem Tickets

    Rework of rejected goods from External Audit

    Lean Mudas

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    29/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Target: 16:00 GMTIdeal CT based on Target:20 minsActual average CT: 121.07 mins

    PROCESS OF RLEASING A REPORT

    DS formats andsends the file

    Autosys job runsthe file

    Autosys jobapplies the fileon workstation

    OPS receives dataFrom Source

    Feed

    CYCLE TIME

    QUEUE TIME

    11.33 mins 25.98 mins

    Data appears onthe workstationDS Fetch Job

    60.98 mins

    2.57 mins

    File becomesavailable

    to run

    XYZ checksthe file

    3.37 mins

    3.07 mins

    15:40 GMT

    16.34 mins

    Time of Receipt

    OPS queues thework on the

    System

    OPS run autoChecker system

    OPS release theReport in theEagle System

    OPS receives dataFrom Source Feed

    XYZ promptsClient that theReport has

    BeenReleased

    Job is beingfetched

    DataConversion

    OPS performFile compare

    Sample Waste Identification

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    30/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Target: 16:00 GMTIdeal CT based on Target:20 minsActual average CT: 121.07 mins

    PROCESS OF RLEASING A REPORT

    DS formats andsends the file

    Autosys job runsthe file

    Autosys jobapplies the fileon workstation

    OPS receives dataFrom Source

    Feed

    CYCLE TIME

    QUEUE TIME

    11.33 mins 25.98 mins

    Data appears onthe workstationDS Fetch Job

    60.98 mins

    2.57 mins

    File becomesavailable

    to run

    XYZ checksthe file

    3.37 mins

    3.07 mins

    15:40 GMT

    16.34 mins

    Time of Receipt

    OPS queues thework on the

    System

    OPS run autoChecker system

    OPS release theReport in theEagle System

    OPS receives dataFrom Source Feed

    XYZ promptsClient that theReport has

    BeenReleased

    Job is beingfetched

    DataConversion

    OPS performFile compare

    Sample Waste Identification The arrival time of work to bedone only allowed the process

    to be completed for 20 minutes;

    very far from its capability

    equal to 121.07 minutes.

    In-between waiting time which

    already consumes more than an hour.The Cycle Time to release the report is relatively

    the highest across other process steps.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    31/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    BODY of Knowledge

    * LEAN for MANUFACTURING

    * Value Stream Mapping Techniques

    * 5S & Visual Process Controls

    * Customer Pull & ReplenishmentSystems

    (including Kanban calculations for

    minimum safe batch sizes)

    * Poka-Yoke Mistake-Proofing and

    Standardization Techniques

    * Rapid Set-Up Methodology & Work

    Balancing

    (including Work Cell Optimization)

    * Total Productive Maintenance

    * Over-All Equipment Effectiveness

    (OEE)

    * Kaizen Blitz

    manufacturing

    BODY of Knowledge

    * LEAN for SERVICE

    * Identifying Time Traps & Capacity

    Constraints in Service

    * 5S & Visual Process Controls

    * Poka-Yoke Mistake-Proofing and

    Standardization Techniques

    Adapting 4-Step Rapid Set Up for

    Service Processes

    Capacity Leveling & Workload

    Distribution* Agile Approach to Process

    Optimization

    service

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    32/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Level = Capability Measure counting

    no. of sigma that fit within specification

    USL

    DMAIC

    Black Belts

    Green Belts

    Six Sigma already evolved from the statistical plane of defect calculationinto a change initiative business strategy providing a structure foralignment and execution of process transformation creating the double-helix oforganizations DNA for continuous improvement.

    Six Sigma Evolution

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    http://images.google.com.ph/imgres?imgurl=http://www.motorola.com.cn/news/images/Motorola-hei2a.gif&imgrefurl=http://blogtwopointzero.blogspot.com/search/label/Motorola&h=415&w=594&sz=4&hl=tl&start=5&tbnid=7tLoY03UVk4eKM:&tbnh=94&tbnw=135&prev=/images?q=motorola&gbv=2&svnum=10&hl=tl
  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    33/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    UPPER TARGETLOWER TARGET

    SIGMA LEVELNumber of SIGMA increments that

    fall within the set target

    Motorola isproducing TVsets with 1/20

    defectives.

    Our Quality Stinks!

    Main, 1994

    Bob Galvin

    Six Sigma as a METRIC

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    http://images.google.com.ph/imgres?imgurl=http://www.cellphones.ca/news/upload/2008/07/motorola-logo.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.cellphones.ca/news/post004892/&usg=__jyY6reo762asj0xcH__kPjHLhI8=&h=321&w=450&sz=13&hl=tl&start=1&um=1&tbnid=ea-qpLopFYh9qM:&tbnh=91&tbnw=127&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dmotorola%2Blogo%26hl%3Dtl%26sa%3DG%26um%3D1
  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    34/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    At this level, the organization would only produce,

    3.4 defectives per million. This may mean

    3.4 out of a million transactions were delivered late

    3.4 out of a million respondents were dissatisfied

    from conducted survey

    3.4 out of a million hiring requirements were not met

    Performing at Six Sigma Performance

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    35/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    DEMINGS

    PDCA Cycle

    DEFINEMEASURE

    ANALYZEIMPROVECONTROL

    Project Identification

    Understand the

    Current System

    Root Cause Analysis

    And Verification

    Solution Formulation, Implementation

    And ExecutionStandardization AndSustenance

    Six Sigma Process-Based Approach

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    36/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Voice of the CustomerVoice of the Process

    Voice of the Employee

    SIX SIGMA cuts across diverse nature of verticals to meet the service levelagreements and other needs that gauge customer satisfaction. Six Sigma

    provides the factual discipline of attaining continuous improvement throughobjective analytics and team-based execution of improvement initiatives.

    tod

    o

    s:

    Deployment Plan

    Roles and Responsibilities

    Competence Formation

    Project Control

    Financial Savings Validation

    Rewards & Recognition

    Governance Metrics

    Governance Time Plan

    Fusing to a Bigger QualityManagement Program

    Six Sigma Program Governance

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    http://creative.gettyimages.com/source/Search/47','47','1','
  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    37/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    MMEASURE

    DDEFINE

    AANALYZE

    IIMPROVE

    CCONTROL

    Balanced

    Scorecard

    Selection Matrix

    Multi-Voting

    Project Charter

    Setting of KPIs

    Process Mapping

    Data Collection

    DesignControl Charts

    Pareto Diagram

    Capability

    Indices

    Fishbone

    Diagram

    SIPOC Diagram

    Graphical ToolsHypothesis

    Testing

    Linear & Logistic

    Regression

    Design of

    Experiments

    IMAGINEERING

    Innovative

    Thinking

    Techniques

    Pugh Matrix

    Project

    Management

    Standardization

    Techniques

    Change

    Management

    Documentation

    Strategies

    Calibration

    Techniques

    Control Planning

    Six Sigma DMAIC ToolboxSix Sigma Toolbox consists of: StatisticalTechniques, Team-Based Decision MakingTools, Soft Skill Set, Process Mapping,Project & Strategic Management practices

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    38/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    900750600450300150

    Median

    Mean

    360350340330320310

    1st Quartile 290.76

    M edian 339.49

    3rd Quartile 358.83

    Maximum 946.00

    316.65 361.00

    327.69 346.27

    101.46 133.14

    A -Squa red 7. 78

    P -V a lue < 0. 005

    Mean 338.82

    S tDev 115.15

    Variance 13259.24

    Skewness 2 .8388

    Kurtos is 12.5258

    N 106

    M inimum 110.00

    Anderson-Darling Normality Test

    95% C onfidence Interval for Mean

    95% C onfidence Interval for Median

    95% C onfidence Interval for StD ev95% Confidence Intervals

    Summary for AHT

    10089786756453423121

    800

    600

    400

    200

    0

    Observation

    IndividualValue

    _X=339

    UCL=476

    LCL=202

    10089786756453423121

    600

    450

    300

    150

    0

    Observation

    MovingRange

    __MR=51.6

    UCL=168.7

    LCL=0

    1

    111

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    11

    1

    1

    1

    1

    11

    11

    11

    11

    I-MR Chart of AHT

    Data is not Normal. There is a large speculation that the behavior of the data set isgreatly affected by the extreme observation. Mean of outliers already average at

    753.20, dramatically far out from the target of 300.

    AHT ANALYSISSample Problem Analysis

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    39/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    There is a speculation of significant difference of AHT per account. In particular,Banking performance as compared to the rest. Need to investigate on the outliers foundfrom process behavior manifested by Software account. No correlation exists between

    Tenure and AHT.

    1019181716151413121111

    500

    400

    300

    200

    100

    Observation

    IndividualValue

    _X=344.4

    UC L=463.3

    LCL=225.6

    AutomotiveB ank H ealthcare I nsurance S oftw are T elephony

    1019181716151413121111

    300

    200

    100

    0

    Observation

    MovingRange

    __MR=44.7

    UC L=146.0

    LCL=0

    AutomotiveB ank H ealthcare I nsurance S oftw are T elephony

    111

    1

    1

    1

    1

    11

    1

    I-MR Chart of AHT by Account

    40353025201510

    450

    400

    350

    300

    250

    200

    150

    100

    Tenure

    AH

    T

    Scatterplot of AHT vs Tenure

    Determining Potential Causes of AHTs VariationSample Problem Analysis

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    40/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Serve as Project Sponsors inoverseeing the success of theproject

    Is responsible for ProjectIdentification, and aligning them toStrategic directives

    Has the responsibility to provideresource aptly needed for theproject

    Has the responsibility to act asliaison for cross-functionalengagements

    Remove bottlenecks in executingthe projects

    Six Sigma Champions

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    41/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    MASTER BLACK BELTS (MBB)-Make sure right project is selected

    -Serve as Organizational Technical Coach BBProjects

    -Implement governance

    - Provide strategic and technical mentoring to

    ensure success of projects

    BLACK BELTS (BB)- Understand both the science and application underneath the tools of Six Sigma- May work alongside MBB in Project Mentoring with respective business units

    -May act as Team Lead for specific Six Sigma projects

    GREEN BELTS (GB)-Serve as Project Team Lead for specific Six Sigma projects or, as TeamMember for large-scale BB projects

    Six Sigma Technical Experts

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    42/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Solution-Driven

    Tools to Address Core

    Operational Wastes

    LEAN and SIX SIGMA

    LEAN

    WasteReduction

    Philosophy

    SIX SIGMA

    HolisticProblemSolvingMethodology

    Rigor of Analytical

    Techniques Applied in aHolistic Problem Solving

    Methodology

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    43/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    MMEASURE

    DDEFINE

    AANALYZE

    IIMPROVE

    CCONTROL

    Balanced

    ScorecardSelection Matrix

    Multi-Voting

    Project Charter

    Setting of KPIs

    Process Mapping

    Data Collection

    Design

    Control Charts

    Pareto Diagram

    Capability

    Indices

    Fishbone

    Diagram

    SIPOC Diagram

    Graphical Tools

    Hypothesis

    Testing

    Linear & Logistic

    Regression

    Design of

    Experiments

    IMAGINEERING

    Pugh Matrix

    Project

    Management

    Standardization

    Techniques

    Change

    ManagementDocumentation

    Strategies

    Calibration

    Techniques

    Control Planning

    LEAN SIGMA Approach to Problem Solving

    Identificationof Wastes

    Current ValueStream

    Computation ofTAKT

    Identification ofProcess

    Constraints

    5S, Visual ProcessControl, Poka-Yoke,

    ReplenishmentSystems

    MaintainingFuture Value

    Stream

    Lean Tools &

    Techniques

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    44/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    OPERATIONSService Level AgreementMetrics

    Customer-DrivenAttributes

    FINANCEOn-Time ReportGeneration

    Procurement Turn-AroundInvoicing & Collection

    TRAININGTraining Post-DiagnosticTrainee Satisfaction

    Internal Client SatisfactionTrainer Utilization

    ITIT Uptime

    Resolution Turn-AroundInternal Client SatisfactionLooping of Prob Tickets

    HROn-Boarding Compliance

    Attrition RatePolicy Adherence

    Timekeeping Accuracy

    RECRUITMENTTimeliness of Hiring

    Conversion RatioWaiting Time

    Applicant Satisfaction

    WORKFORCEOn-Time Report

    GenerationAgent UtilizationReport Accuracy

    FACILITIESRequest Turn-Around

    Resolution Turn-AroundInternal Client Satisfaction

    SALES/MARKETINGLeads Generation

    Turn-Around Time forProposal Submission

    Call Success Rate

    Potential Lean Six Sigma Projects

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    45/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    The Defective Reductionand Waste Optimization

    strategies of Six Sigma

    DMAIC and Lean

    respectively follows a

    RETROSPECTIVEapproach in Problem

    Solving addressing what

    has already happened

    from the PAST.

    Context of Problem Solving

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    46/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Retrospective Approach is

    Limiting To:

    1Industries or NEWproducts/services wherethere is

    MINIMAL TO NOROOM FOR

    FAILURE.

    Limitation of Retrospective Approach

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    47/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Retrospective Approach is

    Limiting To:

    2Finding an approachtowards

    Searching for

    BREAKTHROUGH

    SOLUTIONS

    Limitation of Retrospective Approach

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    48/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    1Industries or NEW

    products/service where there

    is

    MINIMAL TO NO

    ROOM FOR FAILURE.

    2Finding an approach

    towards

    Searching for

    BREAKTHROUGH

    SOLUTIONS

    DESIGN FOR

    SIX SIGMA

    INNOVATIVE

    THINKING

    Augmentation to the Need

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    49/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Rationale:

    A methodology for introducing NEW

    product, service or process INHIBITINGidea generation in a hit-and-miss fashion, DFSS

    addresses RISKS ON CAPABILITYand not root causes of past events.

    Design for Six Sigma (DFSS)

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    50/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    MMEASURE

    DDEFINE

    AANALYZE

    DDESIGN

    VVERIFY

    Feasibility Study

    Monte Carlo

    Product Defn

    Risk Managt

    Project Managt

    VoC

    Kano model

    SERQUALCustomer Survey

    QFD

    Design Specs

    TRIZ

    Pugh Selection

    Design FMEAQFD for

    Competitive

    Analysis

    Design for X

    TRIZ

    DOE

    Taguchi robustParameter design

    ToleranceAnalysis

    Monte Carlo

    simulation

    Pilot test

    Process FMEA

    Process Capability

    Process Stability

    Reliability Study

    Approach to Design for Six Sigma

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    51/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

    Prototyping of new product or building of new equipments

    SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT

    Internal Creation of Software (Intra & Inter) Modules

    HEALTHCARE

    Launching of New Drugs or Medical Devices

    OPERATIONS & SHARED SERVICEBusiness Process Reengineering of Scope of Work and Processes

    of Operations, Recruitment, Training, Facilities Management,

    Engineering, Finance, Procurement

    Approach to Design for Six Sigma

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    52/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Rationale:

    A methodology for providing a

    STRUCTURED APPROACH towardssolution generation through usage of

    PATTERNS FROM INVENTIONStaking their similarities on human thinking

    habits, objects inherent attributes and available

    science.

    Structured Innovation

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    53/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    TRIZ IS A RUSSIAN ACRONYM FOR

    Teorija Rezhenija Izobretatelskih Zadach

    Founded and developed by Genrich Altshuller

    who believed that:

    INVENTIVENESS and CREATIVITY can be

    learned through a collection of

    assembled techniques obtained from

    past inventions that make use ofcommon sense, logic and sciences.

    TRIZ: Theory of Inventive Problem Solving

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    54/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Inventive Principle: UNIVERSALITYTo make use of one element serving multiple functions.

    Swimming goggles with music

    (MP3) player. For swimmers

    who spend hours just to do5000-meter lap of exercise

    may appear to be boring. So,

    embedding MP3 player to the

    swimming goggles make the

    exercise more fun and lively!

    Inventive Principle Example

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    55/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Your Brain is much better than you think.

    The TWO FLAWS on the concept ofINTELLIGENCE.

    Idea that intelligence is fixed at birth and immutable.

    Commonly held concept that intelligence is the idea that the

    verbal and mathematical reasoning skills measured by IQTests are the ultimate criteria of high intelligence.

    Guide to Innovative Thinking

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    S D Vi i P i i l

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    56/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Seven Da Vincian Principles

    CuriositaAn insatiably curiousapproach to life and an

    unrelenting quest for

    continuous learning

    Dimostrazione Sensazione

    Sfumato Arte/Scienza Corporalita

    Connessione

    Commitment to testknowledge through

    experience and

    learning from mistakes

    Continual refinementof the senses as a

    means to enliven the

    experience

    Recognition &

    appreciation for the

    interconnectedness of

    all things

    Willingness to embrace

    ambiguity, paradox and

    uncertainty

    Development of the

    balance between

    science and art; whole-

    brain thinking

    Cultivation of grace,

    ambidexterity, fitness

    and poise

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    57/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Seven Da Vincian Principles used in IMAGINEERING

    Supports the Problem Solving paradigm of Six Sigma under the

    Solution Formulation Phase

    Used in Design for Six Sigma in Reengineering Processes and in

    Redesigning a Product or Service

    Promotes OUT-OF-THE-BOX thinking among professionals byproviding a formal structure for creativity and innovation instead

    of relying on serendipity

    We cannot wait for another EUREKA to come!

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    58/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    In Enterprise Quality, it is not a requirement to be a STATISTICS ,

    ENGINEERING or a MATHEMATICS major...

    Who we need are manufacturing professionals, IT developers,

    testers, individuals from telecommunication, HR, healthcare,

    managers, customer support agents...

    WE BUILD A QUALITY COMMUNITY , people from diverse

    functionalities to speak one language about QUALITY

    MANAGEMENT.

    Quality is not built in one function alone, it is ingrained in us all.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    59/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Functional Roles in Lean and Six Sigma

    This 5-Training Day Certification Program that is designed to obtain a tailor-fitunderstanding as to how Toyotas mechanism can be applied to other verticals of

    manufacturing such as: Semiconductors, Food, Consumables, Electronics, Clothing,

    Publishing, Fuel, Pharmaceutical and more.

    Certified Lean Change Agent for Manufacturing

    Certified Lean Change Agent for Service

    This 5-Training Day Certification Program is designed to cater to the strategic role of

    executing process improvement through Lean & mapping the Body of Knowledge

    towards the needs of Service Areas such as: IT-enabled sectors, Telecommunication,

    Business Process Outsourcing, Banking & Finance, Government, Back-Office Processing,

    and more.

    ean

    Requirements for Certification:Obtain the body of knowledge through attendance to

    5-training days and passing the comprehensive exam.

    Submission of 1 Lean Project which can be guided by

    the tutor during the pace of the project.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    F ti l R l i L d Si Si

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    60/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Functional Roles in Lean and Six Sigma

    This 10-Training Day Certification Program is designed to develop the Green Belt role

    of leading a Six Sigma project. Such leadership shall encompass mastery of Six Sigmaroadmap (Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control), adeptness in arriving at the core

    reason of the problem and ability to mobilize people for change and sustenance.

    Certified Six Sigma Green Belt

    Certified Six Sigma Black Belt

    This 20-Training Day Certification Program is designed to develop the Black Belt role of

    handling multiple Six Sigma projects, program governance and organizational assessment

    towards Six Sigma maturity. The Black Belt acts as a mentor of the Green Belts whichexplains the intensiveness of the Black Belts curriculum in the analytics and knowledge

    on other Enterprise Quality models such as Design for Six Sigma, Lean and Innovative

    Thinking.

    ix Sigma

    Requirements for Certification:

    Obtain the body of knowledge through attendance to training

    days required for Green Belt/Black Belt and passing thecomprehensive exam.

    Submission of Six Sigma Projects (1 for GB, 2 for BB) which can

    be guided by the tutor during the pace of the project.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    Wi h ll h d l i

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    61/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Certified SixSigma Green Belt

    Certified SixSigma Black Belt

    Certified Lean ChangeAgentfor Manufacturing

    Certified Lean ChangeAgentfor Service

    With all these model-centric

    certification programs, aiming to

    specialize in its own chosen

    enterprise quality model, Is there

    a specific program that willcommence learning on

    ENTERPRISE QUALITY as a

    whole, which will aid me in

    determining the pathway of my

    organization towards Quality

    Maturity?

    Certified ENTERPRISE QUALITYProfessional

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    Certified ENTERPRISE QUALITY Professional

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    62/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Certified ENTERPRISE QUALITY Professional

    Upon completion of this 15-Training Day Certification program, an

    individual shall obtain a holistic understanding of quality-centric

    frameworks and build a custom-fit roadmap that will synergize to the

    organizations strategic goals. This will carry further in the formation ofunderstanding towards tools and techniques for metrics building,

    problem solving and ideating for innovation.

    Level 01: Do we know the value of what we are providing?

    Level 02: Have we made our processes repeatable and consistent to achieveits goal?

    Level 03: Were the repeatable processes within the enterprise beendefined and compliant with subjected regulations?

    Level 04: Does the enterprise use a factual-based approachtowards managing customer & processperformance?

    Level 05: Is the enterprise equipped with the rightDISCIPLINE and THINKING PATTERN to

    sustain and leverage performance by continualimprovement and innovation?

    The Value of a Certified

    Enterprise Quality

    Professional is to be equippedwith the HOLISTIC

    understanding of Quality

    Management thus can gauge

    the appropriate Quality

    initiatives or programs needed

    for a process division or, forthe whole enterprise.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    63/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Certified ENTERPRISE QUALITY Professional

    Has the Ability To:

    Act as an Internal Quality Consultant or a Quality Professional who can gauge

    the suitable Quality model need for the organization and how to govern it

    Serve as an Internal Quality Auditor to determine compliance to Quality

    Management System

    Build, optimize and analyze metrics that will reflect the right customer

    requirements, customer perception and process-centric performance indices

    Work on Continuous Improvement and Innovation Projects while using the

    suitable core tools for analysis and management techniques for mobilizing

    change

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    64/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Certified ENTERPRISE QUALITY Professional

    Can be the starting point for:

    Lead Auditor Certification for various management systems such as ISO

    9001:2008 (QMS), ISO 27001 (Information Security and Management System),

    ITIL, CMMi, COPC and more.

    Lean Certification for Manufacturing and Service

    Six Sigma Certification for Black Belt and Green Belt

    While these higher certification programs need not require Enterprise Quality

    Professional certification as a prerequisite, CEQP is beneficial towards building a

    macro-appreciation to the whole ENTERPRISE QUALITY Track before specializing on a

    specific quality model.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    65/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Competence Development for Enterprise Quality

    *Understanding Fusion

    of Enterprise Quality

    Models

    * Diagnostics on Quality

    Maturity

    * Quality System &

    Auditing

    * Balanced Scorecard

    * Customer SatisfactionIndex

    Statistical Inferencing

    for Advanced Data

    Analysis* Lean and Value Stream

    Mapping Techniques

    * 5S and Visual Process

    Controls

    * Poka-Yoke Approach

    *Workload and Capacity

    Leveling

    Quality Fundamentals

    & Gauging Quality

    Maturity

    Six Sigma DMAIC

    Approach

    Advanced Data Analysis

    & Lean Tools &

    Techniques

    CERTIFIED ENTERPRISE QUALITY PROFESSIONAL

    CERTIFIED LEAN SIX SIGMA GREEN BELT

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    66/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    Certification Requirements

    Requirements for Certification

    100% Attendance on theIntegrated 15-Day Training Comprehensive Diagnostics:

    Passing Rate 60%

    Certified Enterprise

    Quality

    Professional

    Upgrade to Lean Six Sigma

    Green Belt

    100% Attendance on Additional 3-Day

    Training Comprehensive Diagnostics: Passing

    Rate 60%

    Completion of (1) Lean Six Sigma

    Project within one year

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    67/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    14th Business Principle of THE TOYOTA WAY

    Become a Learning Organization through relentlessreflection (Hansei) and Continuous Improvement (Kaizen)

    Source: Jeffrey K. Liker. The Toyota Way. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    68/69

    DIGILEAF INC. All Rights reserved.

    References:

    A Dual Concept for Long Term Success. Fritz W. Weigang, Institut fur Qualitatsmanagment. ASQ Six

    Sigma Forum Magazine.

    ISO 9001:2008 Quality Management System Requirements

    Robert S. Kaplan & David P. Norton. Balanced Scorecard. Harvard Business School Publishing

    Corporation.

    Robert S. Kaplan & David P. Norton. Strategy Maps Converting Intangible Assets into TangibleOutcomes. Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.

    Michael J. Gelb. How to Think Like Leonardo Da Vinci. Dell Publishing. Random House, Inc.

    Jeffrey K. Liker. The Toyota Way. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

    Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models, Version 02, April 22, 2011

    DIGILEAF INC

  • 8/4/2019 01 Understanding the Fusion of Enterprise Quality Models_CEQP

    69/69

    Understanding the Fusion of

    Enterprise Quality Models

    DIGILEAF INC.Leading Excellence Among Fellows

    DIGILEAF INC.All Rights Reserved.

    Contact Information:

    DIGILEAF INC.

    Suite 2-B Basic Petroleum Bldg., C. Palanca St., Legaspi

    Village, Makati City, Philippines 1229Contact Number: (02) 864-0403, (02) 864-0596

    E-mail: [email protected]

    Website: www.digileaf.com