012-bulletin publishing corp. v. sanchez

7/23/2019 012-Bulletin Publishing Corp. v. Sanchez

1/12

SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED

Bulletin Publishing Corporation vs. Sanche

No. !"#$$%&. October #' ()*+.,

BU!!ET-N PUB!-S-N/ CORPORAT-ON' petitioner' vs. ON. AU/USTO S. SANCE0'CRESENC-ANO B. TRA"1ANO' PR-M-T-2A C. BATERBON-A' RO!ANDO /. O!A!-A' -S-DRO

S. MO!-NA' EDUARDO C. MORA!ES' 0ACAR-AS 3. 3!ORES' 1R.' PEDRO M. /A!!O'

!ORETO 3. M-1ARES' !U-S B. -!A/AN' ERNESTO O. 2A!DE0' EU/EN-O !. R-2ERA'

BEN1AM-N B. BERNAS' !ORETO D. DE !OS RE4ES' BON-3AC-O A. SOTE!O' 3E 3. ARRE'

3E!-PE R. O!ARTE' RA4MOND T. R-2ERA' STE5ART C. CACO' DOM-NADOR 2. CURA4'

3ER"NANDO S. !A0ARO' ERNESTO !. BAUT-STA' 2-CENTE O. ABAN-!!A' 1OSE B.

BERNA!' RAM-RO A. NEBRES' A!CANTARA S' DE !A PA0 an6 !U-S 3. /ARC-A'

respon6ents.

!abor !a78 Supervisors or 9anagerial e9plo:ees can no longer ;or9 a union

6istinct an6 separate ;ro9 the 6ul: recognie6 ran-n the light o;

the ;actual bac


2/12

such an6 their registration certi=cates shall be 6ee9e6 auto9aticall: cancelle6.

???. Me9bers o; supervisor: unions 7ho 6o not ;all 7ithin the 6e=nition o;

9anagerial e9plo:ees shall beco9e eligible to oin or assist the ran


3/12

give rise to a gratuitous speculation that such a pro9otion 7as 9a6e si9pl: to

6eprive the union o; the 9e9bership o; the pro9ote6 e9plo:ees' 7ho a;ter all

appears to have accepte6 his pro9otion.

Sa9e8 Euit:8 Euit: 9a: be invo-n su9' 7here concerte6 activities are ai9e6 atco9pelling an e9plo:er to ignore the clear 9an6ate o; the !abor Co6e' as in the

instant case' groun6s base6 on euit: 9a: be invo


4/12

separate an6 6istinct ;ro9 the e?isting union organie6 b: the ran


5/12

act on the 9atter' petitioner then ;elt that the re9e6: it see


6/12

actions. All e9plo:ees not ;alling 7ithin this 6e=nition are consi6ere6 ran


7/12

Acuiescence b: private respon6ents to a classi=cation an6 situation ;ar 6iFerent

;ro9 the ran


8/12

Solicitor /eneral' in this regar6' even state in their Co99ent to the Petition' the

;ollo7ingJ

GThe onl: issue 6eter9inative o; the present controvers: is 7hether or not the

supervisors in petitioner co9pan: 9a: ;or9 a union ;or purposes o; collective

bargaining separate an6 6istinct ;ro9 that o; the ran


9/12

issuance' 7hether 6ra;t or in ;orce' 7hich e?pressl: 9o6i=e6 the provision o; the

!abor Co6e on supervisor: unionsH. @Rollo' pp. *)")(

The ;oregoing 6iscussion o; public respon6ents 7ill reect an6 e9phasie the lacThe la7 6oes not e?pressl: ban stri

012-bulletin publishing corp. v. sanchez

Documents