01b-section i en · 1.3.12 others 1.4 - primary government authority(ies) responsible for the...

(Section I) 1.Introduction

1.1 - State Party

Validate Update

Your comment:

1.2 - Date of ratification/accession/acceptance to the Convention concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage

Validate Update

Your comment:

1.3 - Entities involved in the preparation of this Se ction of the Periodic Report

You can check multiple boxes

1.3.1 Governmental institutions responsible for cultural and natural heritage

1.3.2 UNESCO National Commission

1.3.3 World Heritage property managers/coordinators

1.3.4 Non Governmental Organizations

1.3.5 ICOMOS International

1.3.6 IUCN International

1.3.7 ICCROM

1.3.8 ICOMOS national/regional

1.3.9 IUCN national/regional

1.3.10 External experts

1.3.11 Donors

1.3.12 Others

1.4 - Primary government authority(ies) responsible for the implementation of the Convention concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage

Validate Update

Your comment:

1.5 - Other key institution(s) responsible for the identification, conservation, protection and presen tation of Cultural and Natural Heritage

Organisation

Web address

Person responsible

Title

Address

Telephone

Fax

E-mail

Scope (national, regional, local)

Domain (cultural, natural)

1.6 - Comments

2.Inventories/lists/registers for cultural and natural heritage

2.1 - If the State Party has established inventories/ lists/registers of cultural heritage, at what level(s) are they compiled and what is their current status?

Current status

0 Not applicable

1 No process established

2 Process commenced

3 Process well-advanced

4 Process completed or continually updated

2.1.1 National

2.1.2 Regional / provincial / state

2.1.3 Local

2.1.4 Other (please provide details in 2.7)

2.2 - If the State Party has established inventories/ lists/registers of natural heritage, at what level(s) are they compiled and what is their current status?

Current status

0 Not applicable

1 No process established

2 Process commenced

3 Process well-advanced

4 Process completed or continually updated

2.2.1 National

2.2.2 Regional / provincial / state

2.2.3 Local

2.2.4 Other (please provide details in 2.7)

2.3 - Are inventories/lists/registers adequate to c apture the diversity of cultural and natural herita ge in the State Party?

Check only one box

2.3.1 No inventories/lists/registers have been established for cultural and natural heritage.

2.3.2 Inventories/lists/registers are inadequate to capture the diversity of cultural and natural heritage.

2.3.3 Inventories/lists/registers capture some of the diversity of cultural and natural heritage.

2.3.4 Inventories/lists/registers capture the full diversity of cultural and natural heritage.

2.4 - Are inventories/lists/registers used to prote ct the identified cultural heritage?

Check only one box

2.4.1 No inventories/lists/registers have been established for cultural heritage.

2.4.2 Inventories/lists/registers are not actively used for the protection of cultural heritage.

2.4.3 Inventories/lists/registers are sometimes used for the protection of cultural heritage.

2.4.4 Inventories/lists/registers are frequently used for the protection of cultural heritage.

2.5 - Are inventories/lists/registers used to prote ct the identified natural heritage?

Check only one box

2.5.1 No inventories/lists/registers have been established for natural heritage.

2.5.2 Inventories/lists/registers are not actively used for the protection of natural heritage.

2.5.3 Inventories/lists/registers are sometimes used for the protection of natural heritage.

2.5.4 Inventories/lists/registers are frequently used for the protection of natural heritage.

2.6 - Are inventories/lists/registers used for the identification of properties for the Tentative List ?

Check only one box

2.6.1 No inventories/lists/registers have been established for cultural and natural heritage.

2.6.2 Inventories/lists/registers are not actively used for the identification of properties for inclusion on the Tentative List.

2.6.3 Inventories/lists/registers are sometimes used for the identification of potential World Heritage Properties.

2.6.4 Inventories/lists/registers are frequently used for the identification of potential World Heritage Properties.

2.7 - Comments, conclusions and/or recommendations related to inventories/lists/registers of cultural and natural heritage (questions 2.1 to 2.6)

3.Tentative List

3.1 - In reference to your Tentative List , please indicate, as far as possible, the potentia l timetable for future nominations to the World Heritage List within the next six years.

Property name

Anticipated year of nomination (if known)

3.2 - In the process of preparation of your Tentati ve List, did you use any of the following tools to make a preliminary assessment of the potential Outstanding Universal Va lue? Gaps analysis: ICOMOS -The World Heritage List - Filling the Gaps – An Action Plan IUCN - The World Heritage List: Future priorities for a credible and complete list of natural and mixed sites (Document WHC-04/28.COM/INF.13B)


3.2.1 ICOMOS thematic studies

3.2.2 IUCN thematic studies

3.2.3 Filling the gaps – an action plan for the future by ICOMOS, Gaps analysis by IUCN

3.2.4 Meetings to harmonize Tentative Lists within your region

3.2.5 UNESCO’s Global Strategy for a representative, balanced and credible World Heritage List

3.2.6 Other global comparative analysis

3.2.7 Others (please provide details in 3.7)

3.2.8 None of the above

3.3 - Please rate level of involvement of the follow ing (if applicable) in the preparation of the Tenta tive List

Rating on a 4 point scale 0 Not applicable 1 No involvement 2 Poor 3 Fair 4 Good

3.3.1 National government institution(s)

3.3.2 Regional/provincial/state/government(s)

3.3.3 Local government(s)

3.3.4 Other government departments


3.3.6 Local authorities within or adjacent to the property

3.3.7 Local communities/residents

3.3.8 Indigenous peoples

3.3.9 Landowners

3.3.10 Local industries

3.3.11 Non Governmental Organization(s)

3.3.12 Consultants/experts

3.3.13 Site manager/coordinator(s)

3.4 - Was the authority(ies) listed in question 1.4 responsible for the approval and submission of the Tentative List?

Check only one box

3.4.1 Yes

3.4.2 No

3.5 - If not, what authority(ies) is responsible fo r the approval and submission of the Tentative List ?

Organisation

Web address

Person responsible

Title

Address

Telephone

Fax

E-mail

Domain (cultural, natural)

3.6 - Do you intend to update your Tentative List w ithin the next six years?

Check only one box

3.6.1 Yes

3.6.2 No

3.7 - Comments, conclusions and/or recommendations related to Tentative List (Questions 3.1 to 3.7)

4.Nominations

4.1 - Property

ID Name Date of submission Status

Validate Update

Your comment:

4.2 - Please rate level of involvement of the follow ing (if applicable) in the preparation of the most recent nomination dossiers

Rating on a 4 point scale 0 Not applicable 1 No involvement 2 Poor 3 Fair 4 Good

4.2.1 National government institution(s)

4.2.2 Regional/provincial/state government(s)

4.2.3 Local government(s)

4.2.4 Other government departments


4.2.6 Local authorities within or adjacent to the property

4.2.7 Local communities/residents

4.2.8 Indigenous peoples

4.2.9 Landowners

4.2.10 Local industries

4.2.11 Non Governmental Organization(s)

4.2.12 Consultants/experts

4.2.13 Site manager/coordinator

4.3 - Please rate the perceived benefits in your cou ntry of inscribing properties on the World Heritage List

Rating on a 4 point scale 0 Not applicable 1 Low benefit 2 Limited benefit 3 Some benefit 4 High benefit

4.3.1 Strengthened protection of sites (legislative, regulatory, institutional and/or traditional)

4.3.2 Enhanced conservation practices

4.3.3 Catalyst for wider community appreciation of heritage

4.3.4 Improved presentation of sites

4.3.5 Enhanced honour/prestige

4.3.6 Increased funding

4.3.7 Additional tool for lobbying/political influence

4.3.8 Stimulus for enhanced partnerships

4.3.9 Increased recognition for tourism and public use

4.3.10 Stimulus for economic development in surrounding communities

4.3.11 Others (please provide details in 4.4)

4.4 - Comments, conclusions and/or recommendations related to Nominations of properties (questions 4.1 to 4.3)

5.General Policy Development

5.1 - Principal pieces of national legislation for t he protection, conservation and presentation of the State Party’s cultural and natural heritage

Title Year Link to source

Validate Update

Your comment:

5.2 - If there are principal pieces of legislation specific to the protection, conservation and presen tation of World Heritage, not listed in 5.1, please add them here

Name

Year

Scope (national, regional/provincial/state, local)

Type (cultural, natural)

Website

5.3 - Comments: Please use this textbox to describe briefly how legislation and/or regulations at other levels contribute to the identification, conservation and protection of the State’s Party cultural and natural heritage.

5.4 - Is the legal framework (i.e. legislation and/ or regulations) adequate for the identification, co nservation and protection of the State Party's cultural and natural heritage?

Check only one box

5.4.1 There is no legal framework for the identification, conservation and protection of cultural and natural heritage.

5.4.2 The legal framework is inadequate for the identification, conservation and protection of cultural and natural heritage.

5.4.3 The legal framework is adequate for the identification, conservation and protection of cultural and natural heritage.

5.5 - Can the legal framework (i.e. legislation and /or regulations) for the identification, conservati on and protection of the State Party’s cultural and natural heritage be enforc ed?

Check only one box

5.5.1 There is no legal framework.

5.5.2 There is no effective capacity/resources to enforce the legal framework.

5.5.3 Existing capacity/resources to enforce the legal framework could be strengthened.

5.5.4 There is excellent capacity/resources to enforce the legal framework.

5.6 - What other international conventions for the protection of cultural and/or natural heritage has the State Party adhered to?

Validate Update

Your comment:

5.7 - Is the implementation of these international conventions coordinated and integrated into the dev elopment of national policies for the conservation, protection and prese ntation of cultural and natural heritage?

Check only one box

5.7.1 There is no coordination nor integration of the implementation of these international conventions into national policies.

5.7.2 There is limited coordination and integration.

5.7.3 There is adequate coordination and integration.

5.8 - How effectively do the State Party's policies g ive cultural and natural heritage a function in the life of communities?

Check only one box

5.8.1 There are no specific policies to give heritage a function in the life of communities.

5.8.2 There are no specific policies to give heritage a function in the life of communities but this is being achieved on an ad hoc basis.

5.8.3 There are policies but there are some deficiencies in their implementation.

5.8.4 There are policies that are effectively implemented.

5.9 - How effectively do the State Party's policies i ntegrate the conservation and protection of cultura l and natural heritage into comprehensive/larger scale planning programmes ?

Check only one box

5.9.1 There are no specific policies to integrate heritage into comprehensive/larger scale planning.

5.9.2 There are no specific policies, but nonetheless this is being achieved on an ad hoc basis.

5.9.3 There are policies but there are some deficiencies in their implementation.

5.9.4 There are policies that are effectively implemented.

5.10 - Comments, conclusions and/or recommendations related to General Policy Developement (Questions 5 .1 to 5.9)

6.Status of Services for Protection, Conservation and Present ation

6.1 - To what degree do the principal agencies/inst itutions responsible for cultural and natural herit age cooperate in the identification, conservation, protection and presen tation of this heritage?

Check only one box

6.1.1 There is no cooperation between the principal agencies/institutions for the conservation and protection of cultural and natural heritage.

6.1.2 There is limited cooperation between the principal agencies/institutions for the conservation and protection of cultural and natural heritage.

6.1.3 There is some cooperation between the principal agencies/institutions for the conservation and protection of cultural and natural heritage but improvements are possible.

6.1.4 There is effective cooperation between principal agencies/institutions for the conservation and protection of cultural and natural heritage.

6.2 - To what degree do other government agencies ( e.g. responsible for tourism, defence, public works , fishery, etc.) cooperate in the identification, conservation, prot ection and presentation of natural and cultural her itage?

Check only one box

6.2.1 There is no cooperation between other government agencies and the principal agencies/institutions for the conservation and protection of cultural and natural heritage.

6.2.2 There is limited cooperation between other government agencies and the principal agencies/institutions for the conservation and protection of cultural and natural heritage.

6.2.3 In general, cooperation exists between other government agencies and the principal agencies/institutions for the conservation and protection of cultural and natural heritage but there are still deficiencies.

6.2.4 All principal agencies/institutions for the conservation and protection of cultural and natural heritage are effectively cooperating with other government agencies.

6.3 - To what degree do different levels of governm ent cooperate in the identification, conservation, protection and presentation of cultural and natural heritage?

Check only one box

6.3.1 There is no cooperation between different levels of government for the conservation and protection of cultural and natural heritage.

6.3.2 There is limited cooperation between different levels of government for the conservation and protection of cultural and natural heritage.

6.3.3 In general, cooperation exists between different levels of government for the conservation and protection of cultural and natural heritage but there are still deficiencies.

6.3.4 Different levels of government cooperate effectively for the conservation and protection of cultural and natural heritage.

6.4 - Are the services provided by the agencies/ins titutions adequate for the conservation, protection and presentation of World Heritage properties in your country?

Check only one box

6.4.1 There is no capacity to conserve, protect and present World Heritage properties.

6.4.2 There is some capacity to conserve, protect and present World Heritage properties but significant deficiencies remain.

6.4.3 There is adequate capacity within services to conserve, protect and present World Heritage properties.

6.4.4 There is excellent capacity to conserve, protect and present World Heritage properties.

6.5 - Comments, conclusions and/or recommendations related to services for protection, conservation an d presentation (Questions 6.1 to 6.4)

7.Scientific and Technical Studies and Research

7.1 - Is there a research programme or project spec ifically for the benefit of World Heritage properti es?

Check only one box

7.1.1 There is no research programme specifically addressing World Heritage.

7.1.2 There is some research specifically addressing World Heritage.

7.1.3 There is a comprehensive research programme specifically addressing World Heritage.

7.2 - Provide details about significant research pro jects (up to a maximum of five) that have been unde rtaken since the last periodic report Examples of these studies include impact of WH designation, conservation methodology, research to improve understanding and significance of sites

Name

Date


Type (cultural, natural, both)

Website

Comments for explaining scope

7.3 - Comments, conclusions and/or recommendations related to scientific, technical studies and resear ch (Questions 7.1 to 7.2)

8.Financial Status and Human Resources

8.1 - Please assess the relative importance of the f ollowing sources of funding for the conservation an d protection of cultural and natural heritage in your country

Rating on a 4 point scale

0 Not applicable

1 Minor source of fixed term funding

2 Minor source of sustained funding

3 Major source of fixed term funding

4 Major source of sustained funding

8.1.1 National government funds

8.1.2 Other levels of government (provincial, state, local)

8.1.3 International assistance from the World Heritage Fund

8.1.4 International multilateral funding (e.g. World Bank, IDB, European Union)

8.1.5 International bilateral funding (e.g. AFD, GTZ, DGCS, GEF, etc.)

8.1.6 NGOs (international and/ or national)

8.1.7 Private sector funds

8.1.8 Other (Please specify in 8.6)

8.2 - Has the State Party helped to establish nationa l, public and private foundations or associations f or raising funds and donations for the protection of World Heritage?

Check only one box

8.2.1 Yes

8.2.2 No

8.3 - Does the State Party have national policies for the allocation of site revenues for the conservati on and protection of cultural and natural heritage?

Check only one box

8.3.1 Yes

8.3.2 No

8.4 - Is the current budget sufficient to conserve, protect and present cultural and natural heritage effectively at the national level?

Check only one box

8.4.1 The available budget is inadequate for basic conservation, protection and presentation and presents a serious constraint to the capacity to conserve and protect cultural and natural heritage.

8.4.2 The available budget is acceptable but could be further improved to fully meet the conservation, protection and presentation needs.

8.4.3 The available budget is acceptable to meet the current conservation, protection and presentation needs.

8.4.4 The available budget is sufficient but further funding would enable more effective conservation, protection and presentation to meet international best practice standards.

8.5 - Are available human resources adequate to con serve, protect and present cultural and natural her itage effectively at the national level?

Check only one box

8.5.1 Human resources are inadequate for conservation, protection and presentation needs of cultural and natural heritage.

8.5.2 A range of human resources exist, but they are below optimum to conserve, protect and present cultural and natural heritage.

8.5.3 Human resources are adequate to meet the current needs of cultural and natural heritage conservation, protection and presentation.

8.5.4 Human resources are adequate but additional staffing would enable more effective conservation, protection and presentation to meet international best practice standards.

8.6 - Comments, conclusions and/or recommendations related to financial and human resources (Questions 8.1 to 8.6)

9.Training

9.1 - Provide details about formal training / educat ional institutions / programs (up to a maximum of f ive) relevant to World Heritage

Organisation


Type (cultural, natural, both)

Website

Comments (e.g. degree, scope, etc.)

9.2 - Please assess the training needs in the follow ing fields identified in your country for conservat ion, protection and presentation of cultural and natural heritage.

Rating on a 4 point scale 0 Not applicable 1 Very low priority 2 Low priority 3 Medium priority 4 High priority

9.2.1 Conservation

9.2.2 Education

9.2.3 Promotion

9.2.4 Interpretation

9.2.5 Administration

9.2.6 Visitor management

9.2.7 Community outreach

9.2.8 Risk preparedness

9.2.9 Enforcement (custodians, police)

9.2.10 Other

9.3 - Does the State Party have a national training/ educational strategy to strengthen capacity develop ment in the field of heritage conservation, protection and presentation?

Check only one box

9.3.1 There is no national strategy for capacity development in the field of heritage conservation, protection and presentation.

9.3.2 There is no national strategy for capacity development in the field of heritage conservation, protection and presentation but nonetheless this is being done on an ad hoc basis.

9.3.3 There is a national strategy for capacity development in the field of heritage conservation, protection and presentation but there are some deficiencies in implementation.

9.3.4 There is a national strategy for capacity development in the field of heritage conservation, protection and presentation that is effectively implemented.

9.4 - Comments, conclusions and/or recommendations related to Training (Questions 9.1 to 9.3)

10.International Cooperation

10.1 - If your country co-operated with other States Parties for the identification, protection, conserv ation and preservation of the World Heritage located on their territories since the last periodic report, please indicate the type of co-operation that best describes your activities.


10.1.1 No cooperation

10.1.2 Participation in other UN programmes

10.1.3 Bi-lateral and multi-lateral agreements

10.1.4 Financial support

10.1.5 Contributions to private organisations for the preservation of cultural and natural heritage

10.1.6 Participation in foundations for international cooperation

10.1.7 Sharing expertise for capacity building

10.1.8 Hosting and/or attending international training courses/seminars

10.1.9 Distribution of material/information

10.1.10 Other (please specify in 10.3)

10.2 - Do you have World Heritage properties that h ave been twinned with others at a national or inter national level?

Check only one box

10.2.1 Yes

10.2.2 No

10.3 - Comments, conclusions and/or recommendations related to International Cooperation (Questions 10 .1 to 10.2)

11.Education, Information and Awareness Building

11.1.Media used for World Heritage sites promotion

What media does your State Party use to present and promote its World Heritage Sites? Please indicate which of the following forms of media are used and for what purpose (information, awareness raising and/or education) and at what scale (local, regional, national or international level). Please tick all that apply.

11.1.1 - Publications


11.1.1.1 Not applicable

11.1.1.2 Information

11.1.1.3 Awareness Raising

11.1.1.4 Education

11.1.1.5 International

11.1.1.6 National

11.1.1.7 Regional

11.1.1.8 Local

11.1.2 - Films / TV





11.1.2.4 Education


11.1.2.6 National

11.1.2.7 Regional

11.1.2.8 Local

11.1.3 - Media campaigns





11.1.3.4 Education


11.1.3.6 National

11.1.3.7 Regional

11.1.3.8 Local

11.1.4 - Internet





11.1.4.4 Education


11.1.4.6 National

11.1.4.7 Regional

11.1.4.8 Local

11.1.5 - Postage stamps, medals





11.1.5.4 Education


11.1.5.6 National

11.1.5.7 Regional

11.1.5.8 Local

11.1.6 - World Heritage Day





11.1.6.4 Education


11.1.6.6 National

11.1.6.7 Regional

11.1.6.8 Local

11.1.7 - Translation and diffusion of publications made available by the World Heritage Centre





11.1.7.4 Education


11.1.7.6 National

11.1.7.7 Regional

11.1.7.8 Local

11.1.8 - Other (please specify in 11.1.8)





11.1.8.4 Education


11.1.8.6 National

11.1.8.7 Regional

11.1.8.8 Local

11.1.9 - Comments, conclusions and/or recommendatio ns related to Media used for the promotion of World Heritage sites (Questions 11.1.1 to 11.1.8)

11.2.Education, Information and Awareness Building

11.2.1 - Does the State Party have a strategy to rais e awareness among different stakeholders about cons ervation, protection and presentation of World Heritage?

Check only one box

11.2.1.1 There are no strategies to raise awareness about conservation, protection and presentation of World Heritage.

11.2.1.2 There are no strategies to raise awareness about conservation, protection and presentation of World Heritage but nonetheless this is being done on an ad hoc basis.

11.2.1.3 There are strategies to raise awareness about conservation, protection and presentation of World Heritage but there are some deficiencies in implementation.

11.2.1.4 There are strategies to raise awareness about conservation, protection and presentation of World Heritage that are being effectively implemented.

11.2.2 - Please rate the level of general awareness of the following audiences about World Heritage in your country

Rating on a 4 point scale 0 Not Applicable 1 No awareness 2 Poor 3 Fair 4 Good

11.2.2.1 Private Sector

11.2.2.2 Youth

11.2.2.3 Communities living in/around heritage sites

11.2.2.4 Tourism industry

11.2.2.5 Decision makers and public officials

11.2.2.6 Indigenous peoples

11.2.2.7 General public

11.2.3 - Does the State Party participate in UNESCO’s World Heritage in Young Hands programme?

Check only one box

11.2.3.1 The State Party does not participate in UNESCO’s World Heritage in Young Hands programme.

11.2.3.2 The State Party does not participate in UNESCO’s World Heritage in Young Hands programme but intends to do so.

11.2.3.3 The State Party participates in UNESCO’s World Heritage in Young Hands programme.

11.2.3.4 The State Party participates in UNESCO’s World Heritage in Young Hands programme and has integrated World Heritage Education in School Curricula.

11.2.4 - If yes, please rate the level of frequency of the following activities:

Rating on a 4 point scale 0 Never 1 Once 2 Occasionally 3 Often 4 Regularly

11.2.4.1 Courses for teachers for the use of the World Heritage in Young Hands Kit

11.2.4.2 Courses/activities for students within the school programmes

11.2.4.3 Youth Forums

11.2.4.4 Skills-training courses for students

11.2.4.5 Organized school visits to World Heritage properties/cultural and natural sites

11.2.4.6 Activities linked to heritage within the framework of UNESCO Clubs/Associations

11.2.4.7 Other (comment below)

11.2.5 - Comments, description of best practices in World Heritage Education, conclusions and/or recom mendations related to Education, Information and awareness buil ding (Questions 11.2.1 to 11.2.4)

12.Conclusions and Recommended Actions

12.1.State Party’s implementation of the World Heritage Convention

This table is generated automatically based on the answers you provided in the questionnaire.

12.1.1 - Identification of heritage

Identification of heritage

12.1.2 - National Inventories

National Inventories

12.1.3 - Tentative List

Tentative List

12.1.4 - Legal framework

Legal framework

12.1.5 - Integration of conventions

Integration of conventions

12.1.6 - Communities

Communities

12.1.7 - Larger-scale planning

Larger-scale planning

12.1.8 - Status of Services for Protection, Conservati on and Presentation

Status of Services for Protection, Conservation and Pr esentation

12.1.9 - Scientific and Technical Studies and Researc h

Scientific and Technical Studies and Research

12.1.10 - Financial status

Financial status

12.1.11 - Human resources

Human resources

12.1.12 - Training

Training

12.1.13 - International cooperation

International cooperation

12.1.14 - Education, Information and awareness build ing

Education, Information and awareness building

12.2.Actions for the implementation of the World Heritage Convention (identified from table 12.1).

12.2.1 - Please select the top issues (up to six) Please refer to question 5.2

12.3.Priority Actions Assessment

Please indicate priority actions to address items rated as poor

12.3.2 - Priority actions assessment

Management Need 1

Action

Short description

Authority(ies) responsible

Timeframe

May this action require International Assistance fr om the World Heritage Fund?

Management Need 2

Action

Short description


Timeframe


Management Need 3

Action

Short description


Timeframe


Management Need 4

Action

Short description


Timeframe


Management Need 5

Action

Short description


Timeframe


Management Need 6

Action

Short description


Timeframe


12.3.3 - Additional actions for the implementation of the World Heritage Convention

13.Assessment of the Periodic Reporting Exercise

13.1 - Was the questionnaire easy to use and clear to understand?

Check only one box

13.1.1 Yes

13.1.2 No

13.2 - Please provide suggestions for improvement:

13.3 - Please rate the level of support from the fol lowing entities for completing the Periodic Report q uestionnaire

Rating on a 4 point scale 0 Not applicable 1 No support 2 Poor 3 Fair 4 Good

13.3.1 World Heritage Centre

13.3.2 UNESCO (other sectors)


13.3.4 ICOMOS International

13.3.5 IUCN International

13.3.6 ICCROM

13.3.7 ICOMOS national / regional

13.3.8 IUCN national / regional

13.4 - How accessible was the information required to complete the Periodic Report?

Check only one box

13.4.1 Little of the required information was accessible

13.4.2 Not all required information was accessible

13.4.3 Most required information was accessible

13.4.4 All required information was accessible

13.5 - Please rate the follow-up to conclusions and recommendations from the previous Periodic Reporting exercise by the following entities

Rating on a 4 point scale 0 Not applicable 1 No follow-up 2 Poor 3 Fair 4 Good

13.5.1 UNESCO

13.5.2 Advisory Bodies

13.5.3 State Party

13.5.4 Site Managers

13.6 - Comments, Conclusions and/or Recommendations related to the Assessment of the Periodic Reporting Exercise

14. Thank you for having filled in all the questions in Section I and f or having validated Section(s) II. Please submit the questionnaire (Se ction I and Section(s) II) to the World Heritage Centre.

01b-section i en · 1.3.12 others 1.4 - primary government authority(ies) responsible for the...

Documents