02 - 106080

39
13 th Agricultur al Research Symposium 2014 Department of Agribusiness Management Faculty of Agriculture and Plantation Management Wayamba University of Sri Lanka

Upload: asiri-silva

Post on 17-Jan-2017

207 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 02 - 106080

13th Agricultura

lResearch Symposiu

m2014

Department of Agribusiness ManagementFaculty of Agriculture and Plantation Management

Wayamba University of Sri Lanka

Page 2: 02 - 106080

Forecasting Paddy Production of Batticaloa District in Sri Lanka:

Linear Time Series Models

L.H.A.M.Silva106080

Page 3: 02 - 106080

Content

• Introduction• Objectives• Methodology• Results and Discussion• Conclusion• Acknowledgements• References

Page 4: 02 - 106080

IntroductionPaddy– The staple food of Sri Lanka– Contributed 1.6% to the Gross Domestic Production

in year 2013

Page 5: 02 - 106080

• Highest paddy producing districts

District Production (t)Ampara 297,229Polonnaruwa 261,263Kurunegala 189,281Anuradhapura 161,406Hambanthota 112,623Batticaloa 111,943

• Batticaloa district – 6th position

Page 6: 02 - 106080

Forecasting– Process of making statements about future events

which actual outcomes have not yet been observed

– Forecasting is important to• Government• Policy makers• Intermediaries• Consumers

– For• Planning• Decision making

Page 7: 02 - 106080

• Forecasting paddy yield is a challenge

– As the yield depends on• External factors• Internal factors

• Climate has a close relationship with yield

Page 8: 02 - 106080

• Climate factors such as– Rainfall– Day length– Relative humidity– Temperature

• Climate factors fluctuates rapidly• Lack of continuous & accurate climate data

• One of the best approaches - Time series models

Page 9: 02 - 106080

Objectives

Study was conducted toIdentify accurate linear time series models to forecast paddy production of Batticaloa district

Page 10: 02 - 106080

MethodologyData collection

• Seasonal time series data• From year 1980 to 2013 on paddy production• From official website of Department of Census

and Statisticshttp://www.statistics.gov.lk/

Page 11: 02 - 106080

Analysis

• Time series plot

• Trend models– Linear– Quadratic– Exponential Growth– Pearl-Reed Logistic (S-Curve)

Page 12: 02 - 106080

• Time Series Models– Single Exponential Smoothing– Double Exponential Smoothing– Winters’ Method– ARIMA Models

• Minitab version 15 was used

Page 13: 02 - 106080

Model selection and validation• Model Selection Criteria

Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE)

Where,

PEt = Percentage error at t timeYt = Observed value at t timeFt = Forecasted value at t time

Page 14: 02 - 106080

• Model validationResidual Analysis

–Autocorrelation function of the residual

–Anderson – Darling test

–Run chart

Page 15: 02 - 106080

Results and Discussion

1980/1981

1981/1982

1982/1983

1983/1984

1984/1985

1985/1986

1986/1987

1987/1988

1988/1989

1989/1990

1990/1991

1991/1992

1992/1993

1993/1994

1994/1995

1995/1996

1996/1997

1997/1998

1998/1999

1999/2000

2000/2001

2001/2002

2002/2003

2003/2004

2004/2005

2005/2006

2006/2007

2007/2008

2008/2009

2009/2010

2010/2011

2011/2012

2012/20130

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

Year

Prod

uctio

n (t

)

Maha season• Maximum (2009/2010) – 193,274 t• Minimum (1987/1988) – 17,105 t

• Average – 84,638 t• Standard deviation – 40,220 t

Page 16: 02 - 106080

19801982

19841986

19881990

19921994

19961998

20002002

20042006

20082010

20120

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

Year

Prod

uctio

n (t

)Yala season• Maximum (2013) – 111,943 t• Minimum (2007) – 7,000 t

• Average – 42,920 t• Standard deviation – 21,164 t

Page 17: 02 - 106080

• A gradual increment after year 2008– May be due to recovery from civil war

Page 18: 02 - 106080

Trend analysis

Fitted model MAPE Value

Linear 70Exponential Growth 50Quadratic 69Pearl-Reed logistic (S curve) 49

• Best trend model with lowest MAPE

Pearl-Reed logistic (S curve)

For both Yala and Maha seasons

Page 19: 02 - 106080

𝑌 𝑡=106 /(26.3162−(0.592015×1.04193 𝑡))

Page 20: 02 - 106080

For Yala Season

Fitted model MAPE Value

Linear 47Exponential Growth 42Quadratic 44Pearl-Reed logistic (S curve) 43

• Best trend model with lowest MAPE

Exponential growth trend model

Page 21: 02 - 106080
Page 22: 02 - 106080

For Maha Season

Fitted model MAPE Value

Linear 50Exponential Growth 48Quadratic 51Pearl-Reed logistic (S curve) 46

• Best trend model with lowest MAPE

Pearl-Reed logistic (S curve)

Page 23: 02 - 106080
Page 24: 02 - 106080

• Single exponential smoothing was better than double exponential smoothing

• Single exponential smoothing method can only forecast one period ahead

Exponential smoothing models

Single exponentialsmoothing

Double exponentialsmoothing

α=0.101MAPE = 64

α=0.1, ɤ=0.01MAPE = 69

Time Series Models

Page 25: 02 - 106080

Holt-Winter’s Trend and Seasonality Model (Winters’ method)

• Best fitted Winters’ model– Seasonal length-12–Multiplicative model–α (Level) = 0.8–ɤ (Trend) =0.01–Δ (Seasonal) =0.01

• MAPE = 35• Identification of outliers

– Standardized residual

Page 26: 02 - 106080

• Adjusting outliers–3 month simple moving average method–Reduced MAPE from 46 to 35

Page 27: 02 - 106080

• Residual analysis– Run chart – P value for clustering – 0.806

Page 28: 02 - 106080

– Anderson-Darling test – P value obtained 0.262

Page 29: 02 - 106080

– Autocorrelation function

Page 30: 02 - 106080

ARIMA models• Best fitted ARIMA model

–ARIMA 111• MAPE = 43.9• Identification of outliers

–Standardized residual• Adjusting outliers

–3 month simple moving average method–Reduced MAPE from 68.8 to 43.9

Page 31: 02 - 106080

• Residual analysis– Run chart – P value for clustering – 0.228

Page 32: 02 - 106080

– Anderson-Darling test – P value – 0.110

Page 33: 02 - 106080

– Autocorrelation function

Page 34: 02 - 106080

ConclusionModel MAPE

Single exponential smoothing 64

Double exponential smoothing 69

Winters’ method 35

ARIMA 43.9

Page 35: 02 - 106080

Year-Season Obs. Fitted / forecast values

2011-Yala 77,196 61,2612011/12-Maha 171,715 152,7552012-Yala 83,599 79,3062012/13-Maha 115,630 141,0282013-Yala 111,943 72,6272013/14-Maha 158,6952014-Yala 105,4812014/15-Maha 213,9642015-Yala 91,8342015/16-Maha 266,901

Fitted and forecast values using the Winter’s modelForecast

If the prevailing conditions remain – An increment in paddy production

Page 36: 02 - 106080

Acknowledgments

All the academic and non-academic staff members of Faculty of Agriculture and

Plantation Management

Page 37: 02 - 106080
Page 38: 02 - 106080

References• Agrawal, R., Jain, R. C., Jha, M. P. and Singh, D. (1980) Forecasting

of rice yield using climate variables. In Indian Journal of Agricultural Science, 50(9), 680-684.

• Anon. (2013). Annual Report (2013). Central Bank of Sri Lanka available from: www.cbsl.gov.lk. (Accessed 28th April 2013).

• De Datta, S.K. (1981). Principles and Practices of Rice Production. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

• Raghavender, M. (2010). Forecasting paddy production in Andhra Pradesh with ARIMA model. In: International Journal of Agricultural and Statistics Sciences, 6(1), 251-258.

Page 39: 02 - 106080

• Rahman, N.M.F. (2010). Forecasting of bro rice production in Bangladesh: An ARIMA approach. In: Journal of Bangladesh Agricultural University. Available from: http://www.banglajol.info/index.php/jbau/article/download/6406/4901(Accessed 20th March 2014).

• Sivapathasundaram, V., and Bogahawatte, C. (2012). Forecasting of paddy production in Sri Lanka: A time series analysis using ARIMA model. In: Tropical Agricultural Research, 24 (1), 21-30.

• Thattil, R.O., and Walisinghe, W.M.P.K. (2000). Forecasting Paddy Yields. Available from: http://www.goviya.lk/agrilearning/Paddy/Paddy_Research/Paddy_pdf/SE2.pdf. (Accessed 20th June 2014)

• Wheelwright, S. C. and Hydman, R. J. (1998) Forecasting methods and applications. eds. Makridakis, S. European Institute of business administration (INSEAD), 3rd ed. 146 – 169.