05068084
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/27/2019 05068084
1/4
PROCESS-DEPENDENCE OF INKJET PRINTED
FOLDED DIPOLE ANTENNA FOR 2.45 GHZ
RFID TAGS
Botao Shao #1, Qiang Chen #2, Yasar Amin #3, Julius Hllstedt #4, Ran Liu 5, Hannu Tenhunen #6, Li-Rong Zheng #7
#iPack Vinn Excellence Center, School of Information and Communication Technology,
KTH (Royal Institute of Technology), Forum 120, 164 40 Stockholm-Kista, Sweden.1,7botao,[email protected]
Department of Microelectronics, Fudan University
200433, Shanghai, China
Abstract This paper focuses on the process dependence ofan inkjet printed folded dipole antenna based on practicalparameters in a typical inkjet printing process. We present theeffect of width variations and number of overprinting times onthe antenna properties such as gain, radiation efficiency andinput impedance. Furthermore we investigate the read rangedegradation of the tag on which the antenna is attached, dueto width or thickness variations. In addition, an comparisonbetween an inkjet printed antenna on a regular paper substrateand a copper antenna on Printed Circuit Board (PCB) wasmade, manifesting the strong competitiveness of the printed silverantenna as a low cost solution.
I. INTRODUCTION
With the vast demands for inexpensive, flexible, high-quality
RFID tags, printable antenna has attracted a lot of attention in
RFID community. Compared with a common PCB process
employing subtractive process and mask plates, the inkjet
printed process has advantages such as [1][2]:
Implementing additive process where the valuable mate-
rial are deposited only on a desired location
No requirement for the mask manufacturing and the
easiness of switching to the patterns to be realized
Inkjet printing, moreover, has a potential to be combined
with reel-to-reel process for greatly reduced cost of mass-
production.
Some papers have been published dealing with printed
antennas for RFID tags, e.g. [3][4]. These studies focus on
the printed antenna performance itself instead of the process-
dependence thereof. However, it is essential to understand the
effect of width and thickness variations on antenna properties
because there exist huge discrepancies between an inkjet
printing process and other processes such as PCB and silicon-
based process. For instance, the thickness of an inkjet printed
silver film roughly varies within the range of 0.3 m to 4 m[5][6], compared to 18 or 35 m for a copper antenna in aconventional PCB process.
In practice, the orientation of tags on which antennas are
attached is uncontrollable, thus a trade-off must be made be-
tween the use of circularly polarized read antennas, sacrificing
read range, and the use of polarization-diverse tag antennas,
adding cost and size to the antenna structure. However, for
the tag antennas aiming to ultra low cost, an omni-directional
radiation pattern is preferred, promoting the choice of the
dipole antenna and its derivatives, such as the folded dipole
antenna, the meander-line antenna etc.
Folded dipole antennas are commonly employed on RFID
tags when greater bandwidth and higher impedance matching
are required. Additionally, 2.4 GHz tags are in general smaller
than 900 MHz tags making them more convenient to use atlower cost. As a result, the combination of these two concerns
allows the incentive to study the process-dependence of an
folded dipole antenna operating at 2.45 GHz .
II . ANTENNA CHARACTERISTICS
Fig. 1 shows the schematic of the analyzed folded dipole
antenna operating at 2.45 GHz with geometries described inTab. I. The selection of these parameters in this table was
based on practical experiments either from our own experience
or from others published contributions. The conductivity of
nano-silver film printed on paper substrate was supposed to
be 21
10
6
S/m [1][7][8]. The thickness of conducting filmon a paper was assumed 0.9 m from our trial printing, andpaper properties were obtained from [9]. It is assumed that,
in addition, the counterpart copper antenna was realized by
using a standard FR-4 Copper Clad Laminate with 18mcopper thickness. On the basis of these assumptions, the
structure of these two classes antennas, one is the nano-silver
based antenna and the other is a typical copper antenna on
PCB as a reference, were constructed and analyzed in Ansoft
HFSS 3-D simulation tool. For the convenience of consequent
comparisons, all the characteristics responses versus process
variations have been normalized to a nano-silver based stan-
2336
-
7/27/2019 05068084
2/4
TABLE I
GEOMETRIES OF THE SIMULATED FOLDED DIPOLE ANTENNA AND
SUBSTRATE
Parameters Value Specification
l 54.96 mm Length of the antennaw 1 mm Width of the antennas 1 mm Space between two parallel armst 0.9 m Thickness of the metal film
21 106 S/m Conductivity of the metalH 0.2 mm Height of the paper substrate 3.2 Dielectric Constant of the substrate
tan 0.077 Loss Tangent of the substrate
dard antenna without variations on width and thickness, that
is, with a nominal width and a single layer thickness.
l
s
X
Y
w
Fig. 1. Folded dipole antenna operating at 2.45 GHz
The considerations of some antenna characteristics are
frequently made such as gain, radiation efficiency, port im-
pedance, and read range. In this paper these four feature
properties were detailedly discussed.
Absolute gain of an antenna is defined as the ratio of the
intensity, in a given direction, to the radiation intensity that
would be obtained if the power accepted by the antenna were
radiated isotropically, and connected with the accepted power,
Pacc and the radiation intensity, U(, ):
Gain = 4U(, )
Pacc(1)
Peak gain, in turn, is the maximum gain over all the user-
specified directions of the far-field infinite sphere. It is no-
ticeable that according to the IEEE Standard Definitions of
Terms for Antenna [10], gain does not include losses arising
from impedance mismatch and polarization mismatches.
The radiation efficiency e is the ratio of the radiated powerto the accepted power (excluding the reflected power), given
by the analytical formula:
e =
Prad
Pacc(2)
where Prad is the radiated power, Pacc is the accepted power.It is noteworthy that radiation efficiency, which is exclusively
concerned with the performance for the interior of a antenna,
is different from antenna efficiency, which is defined as the
ratio of the radiated power to the incident power (including
the reflected power) and consequently used to take into account
losses both at the input terminals and within the structure of
the antenna.
Read Range, as one of the most important characteristics,
defines the maximum distance at which RFID reader can detect
the backscattered signal from the tag. To obtain the read range
expression, we can start from well-known Friis formula Eq.3:
Pr =(Pt Gt) Gr
2
(4R)2(3)
where R is the distance between an RFID tag and reader,Pt Gt is the Effective Radiated Power (ERP) transmitted by
the reader. Gt is the gain of tag antenna. With simple algebraicmanipulation, the expression of the read range normalized to
the standard antenna is shown in Eq. 4:
R
R=
G
G(4)
where R is the read range of the antenna with process variant,R is the read range of the standard antenna claimed above, G
is the gain with process varied, and G the gain of the standardantenna.
III. PROCESS DEPENDENCE ANALYSIS
There exist two main considerations involved in the inkjet
printing process of an antenna, width and thickness variations
of a conducting film. The cross-sectional area of the film is
changed in response to these variations, resulting in the devi-
ations of nominal features such as gain, radiation efficiency,
input impedance and read range of the antenna.
A. Width Variation Effect
The process standardization of inkjet printing for electronics
has not matured so far, and adding to this problem is that
its feature size depends on various factors such as spacing
between two ink drops, printing nozzle size, substrate material
and rheology, heating platform temperature etc. For simplifica-
tion and convenience of the investigation, the width variationsof a antenna are described as percentage ranging from 20%to +20%. In Fig. 2, the antenna radiation patterns at thehorizontal plan ( = 90o) present little alterations with widthvariation increasing from 20% to 0 then to +20%, especiallyin the maximum gain direction where in practice tags are
frequently placed, so that it can be concluded that the width
variations almost have no impact on the directional depedance
of radiaton.
By using Eq. 1 and Eq. 2 respectively, the gain and the
radiation efficiency of the antenna were derived as shown
in Fig. 3, where with the increase of the wire width the
gain rises from 1.73 dB to 1.77 dB, while the radiationefficiency approximately maintain its original value across thewhole width variations. It can be concluded that width increase
might improve gain but takes no effect to the enhancement of
radiation gain. Moreover, as the width rises the gain of the
silver antenna seemingly approaches the gain of the copper
antenna.
B. Overprinting Effect
Owing to the restriction of thin thickness of a conducting
film, a printed antenna might not be comparable with copper
counterparts on PCB. In order to enhance the competitiveness,
2337
-
7/27/2019 05068084
3/4
-23.00
-16.00
-9.00
-2.00
90
60
30
0
-30
-60
-90
-120
-150
-180
150
120
Fig. 2. 2D radiation pattern at = 90 degree, 3 radiation plots superposevs. width variations with percent increment from 20% to 0 then +20%
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20
Varied Width (%)
Gain
(dB)
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
2.2
Radiation
Efficiency
copper
Fig. 3. Gain and radiation efficiency vs. varied width percent from 20%to +20%.
overprinting technique is commonly employed to increase
the thickness of a film, leading to an inescapable trade-offbetween inferior performances with single layer and superior
performances with multilayer. Although the average thickness
of overprinted film is dependent on the previous surface
topology and substrate temperature factors and so on, the
multilayer thickness is roughly proportional to the overprinting
times [2]. Based on these reasonable assumptions, the effect
of overprinting on gain and radiation efficiency was examined,
shown in Fig. 4. The behavior of the antenna gain and the
radiation efficiency versus the overprinted times gives that the
efficiency retains constant while the gain increases slightly
although the cross-sectional area of the antenna rise up by
as much as 5 times. This phenomena stems from the skineffect where most of the electromagnetic wave are constrainedwithin some extent known as the skin depth. At 2.45 GHz, theskin depth for copper antennas is around 1.3 m compared to2.2 m, less than the three layers thickness, for nano-silverink based film.
C. Input Impedance Response
Since the geometry of the antenna was changed because
of width and thickness variations, the input impedance was
correspondingly altered consisting of the real part, resistance
and the imaginary part, reactance, leading to the reconsider-
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2
1 2 3 4 5
Number of Layers
Gain(dB)
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
2.2
2.4
Radiation
Efficiency
copper
Fig. 4. Gain and radiation efficiency as the function of number of overprintedtimes
ation of antenna port matching. Given in Fig. 5 is the plot
of real part of antenna input impedance at 2.45 GHz whenthe constraints are laid down of the wire width varied within
20% and the number of overprinting times from 1 to 5. Aswith this plot, we can observe that the tendancy goes high
when the overprinting times increasing up to 3, and then goesflat when the times above 3. This happens as a result of theheavy influence of skin effect, where the skin depth is 2.22mas stated previously. Although the maxium value in this plot
is 226 Ohm when width reducing to 20% and overprinting4 times, the values at 3 and 5 times printing with the identicalwidth are 225 Ohm and 221 Ohm, respectively, providing theconclusion that these values are in good agreement with com-
mensense. Secondly, under the environment with width upto
20% and twice-printing, achived is the minimum magnitudeof real part of the impedance, 166 Ohm, occuring for 2 timesprinting and 20% width increment. Seen in Fig. 5, furthermore,a series of valley values are merely distributed along the line
where twice-printing employed, which is in accordance with
the general knowledge that when the thickness of a wire rises,
this wire resistance decreases until the skin effect becomes
dominant in determining the magnitue of impedance. The
imaginary part of the input impedance for the changed width
and thickness are plotted in Fig. 6, where the tendancy similar
as the real part is observed, as well as the maxium and the
minimum value are 2.3 Ohm and 1.5 Ohm respectively.
D. Read Range Degradation
For a tag antenna which is perfectly matched with full-wave
rectification, the read range is primarily determined from the
antenna gain. As a result, with the gain alteration the read
range of the antenna would be modified, which is proven
by Eq. 4. The corresponding degradations of read range are
presented in Fig. 7, where the read range rises from 0.99 to1.01 with the film width increasing from 20% to +20%while for the overprinting, the magnitude of read range of the
antenna appears not to change. It can be concluded that at
2.45 GHz using overprinting method plays a minor role inimproving the read range of the antenna.
2338
-
7/27/2019 05068084
4/4
0.2
0.1
0
0.1
0.2 12
34
5
160
170
180
190
200
210
220
230
Overprinting timesWidth variation(from 20% to 20%)
Re(Impedance)(Ohm)
Fig. 5. Input resistance for process variations at 2.45 GHz
0.2
0.1
0
0.1
0.2 12
34
5
1.5
2
2.5
Overprinting timesWidth variation(from 20% to 20% )
Im(impedance)(Ohm)
Fig. 6. Input reactance for process variations at 2.45 GHz
Moreover, in comparison with the read range, set to 1, of
the standard antenna, the regular copper antenna has a weaklysuperior read range of 1.02, leading to that inkjet printedantennas with a lower cost have the competent capability with
the copper counterparts.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
Firstly, with the width variation of the silver based antenna
increasing from 20% to +20%, its radiation pattern andradiation efficiency approximately remain unchanged, and the
gain rises slightly, leading to the slight enhancement of the
read range of the tag on which the antenna are attached.
Secondly, although using overprinting technique to increase
the thickness leads to a limited improvement on the gain and
the radiation efficiency of the antenna owing to the skin effect
at 2.45 GHz , the influence on the input impedance of theantenna imposed by overprinting are fairly considerable, as
much as 50 Ohm.The enhancement, furthermore, of read range by overprint-
ing process seems not effective as thought, informing that at
2.45 GHz the solution of performance improvement of anantenna by increasing the thickness of the conducting film
requires to be treated cautiously since the expenditure on this
point may not be cost efficient. It can also be concluded
that the antenna from nano-silver ink has a performance
0.9
1
1.1
-20 -10 0 10 20
Varied Width (%)
Read
RangeDegradation
0.85
0.95
1.05
1 2 3 4 5
Number of Layers
Read
RangeDegradation
copper
Fig. 7. Process dependence of read range vs. width and thickness variations.
comparable with the antenna from copper on PCB but at lower
cost and with flexible property.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was financially supported by Vinnova (TheSwedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems)
through the Vinn Excellence centers program, and we are
grateful as well to China Scholarship Council(CSC) for its
co-funding.
REFERENCES
[1] H.C. Jung, S.H. Cho, J.W. Joung, and Y.S. Oh. Studies on Inkjet-Printed Conducting Lines for Electronic Devices. Journal of Electronic
Materials, 36(9):12111218, 2007.[2] S. Molesa, D.R. Redinger, D.C. Huang, and V. Subramanian. High-
quality inkjet-printed multilevel interconnects and inductive componentson plastic for ultra-low-cost RFID applications. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp.Proc. 769, H, 8:31.
[3] P.V. Nikitin, S. Lam, and K.V.S. Rao. Low cost silver ink RFIDtag antennas. In Antennas and Propagation Society InternationalSymposium, 2005 IEEE, volume 2, 2005.
[4] S. Merilampi, L. Ukkonen, L. Sydanheimo, P. Ruuskanen, andM. Kivikoski. Analysis of Silver Ink Bow-Tie RFID Tag AntennasPrinted on Paper Substrates. International Journal of Antennas andPropagation, 2007.
[5] D. Redinger, S. Molesa, S. Yin, R. Farschi, and V. Subramanian.An Ink-Jet-Deposited Passive Component Process for RFID. IEEETRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, 51:12, 2004.
[6] H.M. Nur, J.H. Song, J.R.G. Evans, and M.J. Edirisinghe. Ink-jetprinting of gold conductive tracks. Journal of Materials Science:
Materials in Electronics, 13(4):213219, 2002.[7] P.J. Smith, D.Y. Shin, J.E. Stringer, B. Derby, and N. Reis. Direct ink-jet
printing and low temperature conversion of conductive silver patterns.Journal of Materials Science, 41(13):41534158, 2006.
[8] A.L. Dearden, P.J. Smith, D.Y. Shin, N. Reis, B. Derby, and P. OBrien.
A Low Curing Temperature Silver Ink for Use in Ink-Jet Printing andSubsequent Production of Conductive Tracks. Macromolecular RapidCommunications , 26(4):315318, 2005.
[9] L. Yang, A. Rida, R. Vyas, and M.M. Tentzeris. RFID Tag andRF Structures on a Paper Substrate Using Inkjet-Printing Technology.
Microwave Theory and Techniques, IEEE Transactions on, 55(12 Part2):28942901, 2007.
[10] Ieee standard definitions of terms for antennas. IEEE Std 145-1983,pages , Jun 1983.
2339