07 mandible, means of imf, imp vs hand holding
TRANSCRIPT
In the name of Allah, The Most In the name of Allah, The Most CompassionateCompassionate, , The Most MercifulThe Most Merciful
Reduction techniques for mandibular fractures: Current means of obtaining occlusion:
IMF vs. hand-holding
Muhammad Azhar SheikhMSc. (Lond), FDSRCS (Eng), FFDRCS (Ire) FDS Oral Surg (UK) Prof: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon Islamic International Dental College, Isb
Trauma is the major cause of death in children and young
adults
Anatomic distribution
Desired Outcome
• Function
= Occlusion
• Aesthetics
Clinical Examination
Investigations
IMF techniques
Leonard buttons
Intra Oral Cortical Bone screws
Intra oral cortical bone screws
Rapid IMPF (Anchorage ties and Power Chain)
Rapid IMF
Rapid IMF (Anchorage Ties)
• Rapid – save about 40% time compare to eyelet IMF
• More tooth related complications like crown dislodgement
Lag Screw – IMF?
Hand held technique• Quick - half time compare to IMF • No gadgetry of IMF• No risk of wire injury• Cheap • Short anaesthesia & stay• Less complications (Systemic & Local)
• Similar outcome of occlusion
Hand held technique• Operator sensitive
• Experience & Skill required
• Competent assistant
• Relatively early Fracture
Summery – ORIF mandible • Most cases can be done with hand
held technique with its advantages
• IMF while plating is necessary in complicated cases
• No compromise on occlusion