070906 urbameco final presentation in lyon, france
TRANSCRIPT
UrbactURBAMECO
Fast Track NetworkKick-off meeting
Lyon September 06th, 2007
Economic Development of Deprived AreasCan So-called Deprived Areas Become Growth Poles?
Town A1
European network of researchers
European network of policy-makers
European network of politicians and citizens
Town A2 Town A3 Town B1 Town B2 Town N1 Town N2 Town N3
Regional or national network of towns A Regional or national network of towns B Regional or national network of towns N
EUROPEAN NETWORKS
A EUROPEAN PROGRAMMEURBACT
REGENERA
Supported by DGs Environment, Regio, Research
Central Governments, Regions, Local Authorities and Private Sector
R
Resarchers Experts
P-M
Policy-makers
Politicians Citizens
Recommendations
• Diagnoses
• Policies, programmes and projects
• Patnerships and steering
• Local residents and co-production
• Resources
• Assessment
CZ
CZ
CZ
DZ
DZ
DZ
Flows of resources
CZ Connected Zones
Potential flows
DZ Disconnected Zones
Economic spatial trickle down
Plugged and unplugged
communities within
an urban region
Fragmentation of urban communities: from an attracting system of resources to a selective dispersing one
Until the 70s Since…
Deprived areas«poor ghettos»
Suburbanisation
Old boundaries New boundaries and limits
Gated communities«rich ghettos»
Unhealthy areas
Local area and local community
Place(environment)
Place(environment)
People(social)
Institutions (public and private, economic and social)
People(social)
Constituents
Institutions(economy)
Constituentsin unstable dynamic equilibrium
Possible evolution of constituents
Place(environment)
DeteriorationsDevalorisations
Residentialmotilities
Drifts
Institutions(economy)
Each constituent is inscribe on a particular evolution path
Break of coherences
ResistancesRegressions
People(social)
A drift in space and time
t 0 t n t x
Location of communities in the urban hierarchy
A1 decline
A2 steady state
A3 gentrification
A4 coherencebest practice
UrbanValue
Space
Time
A 3
Market and Social
Change
PublicIntervention
A 0 A 4
A n A 2
A 1
A 3
Cities and urban regions are rich with a GDP/cappoint of view…
GDP and disposable income per capita 2001
HU
SKPL
EELTLV
RO
Bucarest
CZVarsovie
Budapest
PT GR
Bratislava
ES
UE25
ITUK
BEFR
LisboaFI
SE MadridNL
IE DKPraha
DE
Berlin
UttrechtHelsinki
Stockholm
Bremen
Ile de france
Hambourg
Bruxelles
Inner London
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 20000
Disposable income per capita
GD
P p
er c
apit
a
… but less considering the disposable incomes of there inhabitants!
Economieémergée
Economieimmergée
Market economy
Men Poachingeconomy
Women
Immerged economy
Domesticeconomy
Welfareeconomy
Emergedeconomy
Social economy
Gendereconomy
andintegrated
urban policies
Gender and urban regeneration
Economy
SocialEnvironment
Economically
viable
Ecologically sustainable
Socially just
The economy dominatesSeparated management
of spheres
Governance
Integrated urban regeneration: a construction of Brundtland… plus
Politics,Democracy
Regulating jointly economic, social and environmental matters
1- S
ocia
l – E
cono
my
fair
Social
Economy
Environment
viable
3- Social - Environment
2- Econom
y – Environm
ent
livable
city c
ursor
Regulating economical and social spheres
Economy
SocialSphere
CompetitivnessProductivity
Richness
UnemploymentExclusion
ContributionsTaxes
Socialcohesionpolicies
More or less
public policies
city c
ursor
Regulating economical and environmental spheres
Economy
Environment
CompetitivnessProductivity
Spatialfragmentation.
Pollutions
TaxesSpatial
cohesion policies
More or less
public polç&ies
city cursor
Regulating social and environmental spheres
Social
Environment
TaxesSocial
Cohesion Policies
TaxesSpatial
cohesionpolicies
Cooperation - Coproduction From procedure to process1 - Integrated project for sustainable
development
3 - Partnership and community coproduction
7 - Community
5 - Project
2 - Contracts, conventions, agreements
6 – Atmosphere
The gardner’s algorithm“community/project/atmosphere/savoir-faire”Are these conditions of best practice an obstacle to transferability ?
4 - Savoir faire (professional talent)and community organisation (reformist conspirators)
Pro
cedu
re Pro
cess
Place
People 3-ProjectConflictual
Cooperation
Institutions1- Community
6-Contracts
4-Savoir-faire
2-Atmosphere
5-Partnership
A
B
C
V 1 V 2 V 3 V 4 V n
R 1 R 2 R 3 R 4 R n
Visiting cities
PerceptionsVisit’s report
TransfertBack home
Integrated urbanregeneration projectVisited city
T1 T2 T3 T4 Tn
CapitalisationDissemination