07/21/2010 draft – do not cite or quote for npc study discussion only 11 national petroleum...
TRANSCRIPT
DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTEFor NPC Study Discussion Only
107/21/2010 1
National Petroleum CouncilFuture Transportation Fuels StudyDemand Task Group Meeting - Houston
July 28, 2010
Website:http://ftf.npc.org/UserId: fuels10Password: ftfGo to: Demand Task Group/Task Group File Sharing
DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTEFor NPC Study Discussion Only
07/21/2010
Antitrust Reminders – NPC Studies
• Remember the Antitrust Guidelines, and don’t– Coordinate your companies’ plans, prices, outputs– Disclose your company’s non-public information– Use the study process to create competitive harm
• Check with counsel before you– Collect or discuss non-public data– Evaluate public data about future prices and costs– Discuss topics about whose legality you’re unsure
• Antitrust resources include: your lawyer, and– Mike Young (Anadarko) 832-636-7555– Doug Melin (Marathon) 419-421-3265– Jim Haynes (Chevron) 925-842-1298– Kenly Webster (NPC) 202-898-0780
DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTEFor NPC Study Discussion Only
307/21/2010
Agenda July 21, 2010
• 8-8:30 Welcome / Introductions / Antitrust• 8:30-10 Base case and model• 10-10:15 Break• 10:15-12 Demand framing questions (non-LDV)• 12-12:45 Lunch• 12:45-2 Imagining report drafting• 2-2:15 Break• 2:15-3 Division of work & building out teams• 3-3:30 Schedule and deliverables• 3:30-4 Wrap-up / parking lot issues
DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTEFor NPC Study Discussion Only
407/21/2010
Parking Lot Issues
• Will Vehicle team handle non-Light Duty Vehicles (LDVs)?• CAFEs – Demand incorporates in mkt shares, but where
do they come from after 2016? Technology Task Group?• Rail & air legacy fuel availability – is issue in questions?• Mode switching analytical framework – how do we handle
it? Special group?• Need to coordinate coal and bio-feedstock projections with
rail• How do we bring Dept of Defense into study?• Need light rail/mass transit team?
DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTEFor NPC Study Discussion Only
507/21/2010
Base Case Development Plan
• Review 2-3 key comprehensive studies• Decide on assumptions to be used in FTF base case• Insert assumptions in framework & evaluate results• Fine tune assumptions for consistency between calculated
results and results of key studies – Iterative process– Learning about tool
• Reflect sensitivity of results on a few select assumptions to generate a “cone” around the base case
Note – Forces us to identify key elements of FTF study and where the analytical tool will need to be augmented
DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTEFor NPC Study Discussion Only
607/21/2010
Types of Models
• Comprehensive energy system models (NEMS)–All energy types and energy consumers–Modular supply and demand subroutines
• Transportation Module contains nested subroutines to derive fuel demand by the different modes and vehicles
–Iterates according to specified rules to solve for market clearing prices and consistent volumes
DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTEFor NPC Study Discussion Only
707/21/2010
Types of Models (continued)
• Spreadsheet models–Partial energy market (i.e. transportation)–Useful for running scenarios
• Can calculate relative impact of various assumptions• Provides consistent treatment of variables out of focus
–Relatively transparent for user• Can work from assumptions to results or results to
assumptions
–Sacrifice some second order or “rebound” effects• Looking for how pathways compare, rather than scalar
findings
DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTEFor NPC Study Discussion Only
807/21/2010
• Developed for DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy and maintained by Argonne National Laboratory
• Calibrated to the latest AEO reference case
• Measures energy and GHG emissions impacts of scenarios relative to a base case projection
• GHG coefficients represent full fuel cycle emissions and were developed using the GREET model
• Designed to provide quick turn around analyses of assumptions regarding increased fuel economy, advanced technology penetration, travel demand, and alternative fuel use for highway vehicles
Proposal to use VISION as integrating tool
DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTEFor NPC Study Discussion Only
907/21/2010
Fundamental Integrating Issue
Solving for consistent fuel offering mix and fuel demand mix
• Demand task group determines travel activity (VMT, tonmiles, seat miles, etc.)
• Supply task group determines fuel and vehicle offerings: timing, cost, availability, volumes
• Demand task group determines end user purchases of vehicles by fuel and technology type (market shares of new vehicle sales)
• Framework calculates fuel consumption by type
• Check for supply & demand volume consistency• Re-iterate if necessary
DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTEFor NPC Study Discussion Only
1007/21/2010
Fundamental Integrating Issue (continued)
• If fuel consumption is not consistent with supply volumes, then – Change relative fuel & vehicle costs and – Re-iterate consumer decision model and – Recalculate fuel mix calculation
• For convergence, supply must increase with price and demand decrease with price
• Reasons to re-iterate– A fuel is constrained such that demanded volume
exceeds supply– The volume demanded is below a minimum supply
required for production– A fuel required of supply has zero demand
DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTEFor NPC Study Discussion Only
1107/21/2010
VISION’s handling of non-light duty
• Truck– Key inputs to VISION are market shares of new vehicle sales, fuel
efficiencies, fuel prices– Fuel=VMTperVehByAge*TrkFltByAge / efficiency– Only 2 class size groups: 3-6 and 7&8 (SU & Comb)– Does not have natural gas fuel option (dsl, gasoline, dsl HEV)
• Rail, Marine, Air not in VISION, but can probably create additional sheets from NEMS calculations
• Rail & Marine in NEMS– Estimates tonmile from IP projections by major industries– Estimates fuel efficiency on technology and fuel costs
• Air in NEMS– Estimates passenger and freight demand from GDP, disposable
income, merchandise exports and air travel & fuel costs – Fuel efficiency is based on share of fleet that is narrow body, wide
body and regional jets
DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTEFor NPC Study Discussion Only
1207/21/2010
Framing Questions
Objective is to group questions and focus scope• Which questions would be addressed in base case
discussion?• Which questions are open issues affecting sector? (Pretty
certain estimates exist)• Which are proposed/future looking? Estimates will be
based on expert opinion or policy driven
• Which are fuels and efficiency related, activity related, infrastructure related or operations related?
• Which are tied to another mode?
EconomicsEnvironment
Security
DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTEFor NPC Study Discussion Only
1307/21/2010
Report structure straw man
• Travel demand – VMT, tonmiles, revenue seats…– Discussion of drivers – such as population, income, IP, freight– Historical growth rates– Discuss any events or trends that have had a marked impact on growth
rate of demand
• Infrastructure – (have to include if mode switching is scenario)– Discuss historical level of investment – Investment needs – framed against current state, expected growth, etc.– Need to choose some measure that relates activity to investment– Discuss operational or system efficiencies
• Vehicle and fuel efficiency– Functional characteristics and timing of options to come from supply– Discuss key aspects of purchase decision– Discuss operational and system efficiencies – APUs, operator training,…
For discussion
purposes only
DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTEFor NPC Study Discussion Only
1407/21/2010
Consider the following for next week’s meeting
• Do framing questions fit into these categories?• Will this help standardize discussion across modes?• Will this lead us to right information to discuss
– Mode switching– Scenarios
• Will it lead to the right information for model inputs?
DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTEFor NPC Study Discussion Only
1507/21/2010
Division of work & Building out teams
Who do we need to tap to answer these questions?
Consider industry partners, NGOs, Labs, Universities?
Truck:
Rail:
Air:
DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTEFor NPC Study Discussion Only
1607/21/2010
Schedule for Non-LDV Activities
• Build teams 9/1/10• Base case analysis of assumptions 9/1/10• Base case empirical preliminary estimates (need to
augment VISION) 9/15/10• Research 11/1/10• First draft of base case and qualitative discussion of issues
12/1/10• Scenarios definition and discussion of results Jan-Mar
2011 (Will need fuel costs from supply teams)
Proposed
DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTEFor NPC Study Discussion Only
1707/21/2010
Demand Task Group
Name AffiliationShort, Deanne CaterpillarConti, John EIAHoltberg, Paul EIAMaples, John EIAChase, Nicolas EIASultemeier, Chris Wal-martFretheim, Elizabeth Wal-martDan Gross Wal-martHarris, Bruce Wal-martJackson, Mitch FedExGray, John Association of American RailroadsHardesty, Frank Association of American RailroadsCostello, Bob American Trucking AssociationsMoskowitz, Rich American Trucking AssociationsSturtz, Robert UnitedHeimlich, John Air Transport AssociationYoung, Nancy Air Transport AssociationRypinsky, Arthur DOTSankey, Paul Deutsche BankClark, David Deutsche BankLovaas, Deron National Resources Defense CouncilHwang, Roland National Resources Defense CouncilChase, Brian ChevronMullinger, Ralph MarathonYuskiewicz, Vince Exxon/MobilBrinkman, Norman GMLeister, MikeOliver, AndyCapuano, Linda
DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTEFor NPC Study Discussion Only
1807/21/2010
Summary of August 28th Houston Meeting
• Demand Task Group held meeting with non-passenger representatives– Reviewed how VISION handles non-light duty vehicles– Reviewed framing questions of Truck, Rail & Air
• Identified issues as basecase, likely to happen, scenario long term• Proposed leadership for three subgroups• Proposed Rail, Air & Marine subgroups in DTG would have vehicle
responsibility• Truck vehicle responsibility would reside with S&ITG
– Mode switching issues will affect VMT of each subgroup and will be addressed by representatives of subgroups working together
– Set time line for deliverables
• Passenger team – Customer choice critical to determining alternative fuel effectiveness– Mode switching requires Mass Transit team– Passenger VMT will be swing actor in scenarios with fixed outcome
DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTEFor NPC Study Discussion Only
1907/21/2010
• Need to work with experts and vehicle team to determine which characteristics we will build model on
• Need to understand investment required to provide passengers choices
• Need to understand investment or business decisions to provide shippers choices
• Spreadsheet model will work, but need to be clear that we are holding non-transportation fuel demand exogenous
DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTEFor NPC Study Discussion Only
2007/21/2010
Who owns Engine/Vehicles?
FEEDSTOCK / RAW
MATERIALS
FEEDSTOCKDISTRIBUTION
CONVERSION / MANUFACTURING
PRODUCTDISTRIBUTION
Engine/Vehicle Subgroup
Auto
Truck
Rail
Water
Air
MOBILITY NEEDS
INFRA-STRUCTURE
OPERATIONS
VMT
SUPPLY DEMAND