08121 d 0707
TRANSCRIPT
WELCOME
04/11/23 1Dept. of EEE
Department of Electrical and Electronics EngineeringSREE VIDYANIKETHAN ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Sri Sainathnagar,A.Rangampet,Tirupathi-517102
OPTIMUM CONTROL OF SELECTIVE AND TOTAL HARMONIC DISTORTION IN CURRENT AND VOLTAGE UNDER
NON-SINUSOIDAL CONDITIONSBy
Y. JANAKI PRASAD Roll No:08121DO707
II M.Tech, IV semester
Under the esteemed guidance of Mr.D.Sreenivasulu Reddy, M.Tech.,
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR,Department Of E.E.E
04/11/23 2Dept. of EEE
To limit the TOTAL and SELECTIVE Harmonic
Distortion in current or voltage under
non-sinusoidal supply voltage and current
conditions, using shunt or series active filter.
OBJECTIVE
04/11/23 3Dept. of EEE
Introduction• Methods of reducing harmonics.• Dis-advantages.• Lagrange’s Multiplier Optimization Technique.• Current distortion limit for equipment.• Generation of non-sinusoidal voltage at PCC.
Proposed technique for total and selective harmonic control
CONTENTS
04/11/23 4Dept. of EEE
• Generalized tecnique for shaping the waveforms.
• Application of the technique to shape voltage (or) current.
Objective function Equality constraintsInequality constraintsLagrange’s function
Simulation diagrams and results.
04/11/23 Dept. of EEE 5
HARMONICS:
Harmonics are currents, usually in multiples of the
supply fundamental frequency, produced by ‘non-
linear’ loads such as the AC to DC power conversion
circuits. HARMONICS EFFECTS:
Reduction of efficiency of power generation,
transmission, and utilization.
Overheating and failure of electric motors.
Excessive measurement errors in metering
equipment.
INTRODUCTION
04/11/23 Dept. of EEE 6
Total Harmonic Distortion(THD)
• THD is an rms value of the distortion component of
the fundamental frequency current or voltage wave
due to harmonics.
( )
Sum of the squares of all harmonic currentsTHD
Square of the fundamental current
Methods of Reducing Harmonics
1.Instantaneous-reactive power method
2. Id-Iq method
3. Unity power factor method
4. Fictious-power-compensation method
4 04/11/23 Dept. of EEE
DISADVANTAGES OF ABOVE METHODS
It is only applicable for 3-phase balanced sinusoidal voltage.
The computation is instantaneous but incurs time delays in filtering the dc quantities.
This method is only suitable for combined systems of VAR and current harmonic compensation.
Minimization of source current RMS values is only done UPF method.
It involves a large amount of computation.Constant active power from the source is not
obtained from these methods expect instantaneous p-q method.
04/11/23 8Dept. of EEE
Lagrange's optimization technique is applicable to
shunt or series active filters under non-sinusoidal
supply voltage and current conditions to achieve the
following objectives.
1. Restricting the individual harmonic components of
source current or load voltage according to the
requirements.
2. Limiting the THD in current or voltage waveforms
according to the requirements.
3. Optimization of PF in conjunction with (1) and (2).
904/11/23 Dept. of EEE
LAGRANGES’s multiplier optimization technique
Advantages of the Lagrange’s optimization techniques:
Lagranges optimization tecnique does not use p-q
theory.
It is applicable to both single phase and three phase
systems under sinusoidal or non-sinusoidal supply
voltage and load condition.
Non-linear optimization technique is an effective method
to optimize the power factor and total harmonics
distortion.
04/11/23 10Dept. of EEE
TABLE 1CURRENT DISTORTION LIMIT FOR EQUIPMENT (> 16 A PER PHASE)
04/11/23 Dept. of EEE 11
Contd…
Generation of nonsinsoidal voltage at the PCCNon linear loads draw non
sinusoidal currents from the
power system consequently
voltage drops are caused
across the transmission line
and transformer impedances.
This results in non
sinusoidal voltages in the
system.
When supply voltage is non
sinusoidal harmonics are not
perfectly reduced and does
not reach unity power factor
and vice versa. There is a
trade off between two in such
condition some optimization
technique incorporated in
the control strategy.
04/11/23 12Dept. of EEE
LAGRANGES MULTIPLIER OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUE FOR
CONTROL TOTAL AND SELECTIVE HARMONIC DISTORTION
Lagrangian multiplier technique is used to optimize the nonlinear equations for reactive volt-ampere subject to equality and inequality constraints.
This technique is generalized for shunt and series active filter for the compensation of SHD and THD in current and voltage by using the Lagrange multiplier optimization technique.
These technique also optimizes the PF while ensuring THD with in the specified limit in addition to selective harmonic control.
04/11/23 13Dept. of EEE
Generalized Technique for Shaping the Waveforms x(t) and y(t) represent two nonsinusoidal waveforms
of different shapes with a certain phase angle between them
1
11
1sin2h
h thXtx
2
2
h
122h hthsinY2ty
……………1
……………2
04/11/23 14Dept. of EEE
Xh1 and Yh2 RMS value of hth order harmonic component of x and y.
To shape y(t) the same as x(t), without any phase shift between them, the following conditions need to satisfied.
1. Similar order of harmonics should be present in both the waveforms x(t) and y(t).
2. Ratio of the rms value of each harmonic component of one waveform to the corresponding component in the other waveform should be equal.
3. Phase angles corresponding to similar harmonic components in the two waveforms should be zero.
04/11/23 15Dept. of EEE
Contd…
y(t) should be modified to Ynew(t) as follows:
…….(3)
…….(4)
Where
…….(5)
By controlling the values of Kh the shape can be
controlled.
This concept is used to shape the current or voltage to the desired one.
1
11
1sin2h
newnew thYtyh
hhnew X.KYh
h
newh X
YK
04/11/23 16Dept. of EEE
Vsh2
DESIRED CURRENT FROM SHUNT ACTIVE FILTER
Shunt active filter is used for limiting the SHD and THD in current.
The desired source current (i*des) is obtained from vs(t) and
is (t) by setting h = 0.
)8(sinsin21 2
2111 1
221*
h h
hdeshdesdes thIthIihh
shshuntdes VKIhh.
is a control variable admittance of the hth-order harmonic component.
04/11/23 18Dept. of EEE
hshuntK
1 3
3h11h
h
1
h
13h3desh1des
*des thsinIthsinV2v
hdesV shseries I.K
h
DESIRED VOLTAGE FROM SERIES ACTIVE FILTER
series AF can be used for the compensation of voltage harmonics.
The desired load voltage (v*des) is obtained that the current
is(t) is in phase with supply voltage vs(t) by setting n= 0.
(9)
is a control variable impedance of the hth-order
harmonic component.04/11/23 19Dept. of EEE
hseriesK
Lagrangian-multiplier technique is used that optimizes the PF while limiting the SHD and THD in current or voltage.
According to the Lagrange optimization technique, an augmented Lagrange function can be written as
L = f + g + µu + w + y + z+… (10)
Objective Function (f):
PF can be improved by minimizing the total apparent input power S.
S is the objective function in case of both series and shunt Active Filters.
Where
(11)
rmsrms I.VS
h
hrms VV1
2 h
1
2hrms II
04/11/23 20Dept. of EEE
h
1
h
1
2sh
2shunt
2sh
2shunt .VKVSf
h
h
1
h
1
2sh
2series
2sh
2series .IKISf
h
Objective function (fshunt) for shunt AF is given by
Objective function (fseries) for series AF is given by
………12
………13
04/11/23 21Dept. of EEE
Equality Constraint: It states that relationships should exactly match a resource value.These are more
difficult to handle and therefore need to be avoided whenever possible. Necessary condition to form equal constrained (g) is mean value of instantaneous
power demand before and after compensation should be equal. Mean value of the instantaneous real power with shunt active filter is given by
(14)
Pdc is the power demand which supplies for compensation.
h h
shuntshhdesshdc hKVIVP
1 1
2 ..
04/11/23 22Dept. of EEE
01
2 h
shuntshdcshunt hKVPg
h
1series
2shdcseries .0KIPg
h
For a shunt active filter, equality constraint (gshunt) is given by
(15)
For a series active filter, equality constrained (gseries) is given by
(16)
INEQUALITY CONSTRAINT:
It states the relationships among design variables are either greater than, smaller than or equal to a resource value.
There are two inequality constraints:
1) Total harmonic distortion.
2) Selective harmonic distortion.
04/11/23 23Dept. of EEE
Total harmonic distortion: THD is the rms value of distortion component of the
fundamental frequency current (or) voltage due to harmonics.
THD limit in current be ITHD
221
2
2
THDs
h
des
II
I
2THD2
1s2shunt
h
2
2sh
2shunt
IVK
Vk
1
h
h
2
2sh
2shuntshunt VKu
h 0VKI 21s
2shunt
2THD 1
0IKVIKu 21s
2series
h
2
2THD
2sh
2seriesseries 1h
The inequality constraint for shunt active filter (fshunt) is
The inequality constraint for series active filter (fseries) is
04/11/23 24Dept. of EEE
(19)
(20)
Selective harmonic distortion
SHD is the ratio of magnitude of the corresponding harmonic component to the fundamental component of the current.
SHD limit in current be ISHD
0.1 nSHDssn III
0I.V.KV.Kn1n SHD1sshuntsnshunt
Inequality constraint for shunt active filter
nSHDs
sn II
I
1
0... 11
nnSHDsshuntsnshuntshunt IVKVKW
0... 11
nnSHDsseriessnseriesseries VIKIKW
Inequality constraint for series active filter
04/11/23 25Dept. of EEE
(21)
(22)
(23)
h
1
h
1h
2hdc
2h
2h
h
1
2h KXPXKXL
h
1
21
21
2lim
2h
2h XKTHDXK.µ
lim11hh SHD.X.KX.K
Lagrange Function: The objective is to minimize S, given the equality constraint g = 0
and the inequality constraints u0, and w 0.
In order to shape x(t) to a desired value, using x(t) and ynew(t), the
augmented function is written as
(24)
04/11/23 26Dept. of EEE
PROBLEM:
• Balanced 3-phase,4-wire,415V,50HZ,trapezoidal voltage supply, having 21.02%THD and 20.5% third harmonic distortion is considered.
• To verify the performance of the algorithm, simulation studies have been carried out for two cases.
04/11/23 Dept of EEE 27
Case1: To limit THD and SHD in current by using shunt active filter.
Case2: To limit THD and SHD in voltage using series active filter.
04/11/23 Dept. of EEE 28
Contd…
• Total harmonic distortion (ITHD) is limited from 21.48% to 16% and fifth harmonic distortion(I5sHD) is limited from 16.83% to 14% by using a shunt active filter .
04/11/23 Dept. of EEE 29
CASE 1
04/11/23 Dept. of EEE 30
Reducing the harmonics by using shunt active filter
04/11/23 Dept. of EEE 31
Lagrange’s multiplier technique applied for
shunt active filter
04/11/23 Dept.of EEE 32
Generating pulses
04/11/23 Dept. of EEE 33
Output of case 1
04/11/23 Dept.of EEE 34
V,I
time
Waveform of supply voltage and load current
04/11/23 Dept .of EEE 35
Waveforms of supply voltage,source current and load current
Is
Il
time
Vs
04/11/23 Dept of EEE 36
Before Compensation
04/11/23 Dept of EEE 37
After compensation
Reducing harmonics by using series active filterCase2
04/11/23 Dept of EEE 39
Lagrange’s multiplier technique applied for
series active filter
04/11/23 Dept of EEE 40
Generating pulses
04/11/23 Dept of EEE 41
Output of case2
04/11/23 Dept of EEE 42
Waveforms of supply voltge and load voltage
Vs
time
VL
04/11/23 Dept of EEE 43
Power factor of before and after compensation
04/11/23 Dept of EEE 44
Before compensation
04/11/23 Dept of EEE 45
After compensating
Comparison of power factor and voltage THD before and after compensation
04/11/23 Dept of EEE 46
compensation Voltage THD(%) 3rd harmonic distortion(%)
Power factor
Before compensation 21.02 20.5 0.9397
After compensation 8.0 5 0.9677
• Total and individual harmonic distortion is limited and optimizes the power factor under non-sinusoidal supply voltage and current conditions by using shunt or series active filter.
04/11/23 Dept .of EEE 47
CONCLUSION
Future Scope
• Use of hybrid active filters in place of conventional active filters will improve the power factor and limit the Total Harmonic Distortion(THD) and Selective Harmonic Distortion(SHD).
04/11/23 Dept..of EEE 48
1. Sincy George and Vivek Agarwal, “Optimum Control of Selective and Total Harmonic Distortion in Current and Voltage Under Non-sinusoidal Conditions“ IEEE Trans. Power Del., Vol.23, no.2, pp.937-944, APRIL 2008.
2. H. Akagi and H. Fujita, “A new line conditioner for kharmonic compensation in power systems,” IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol.10, no.3, pp.1570-1575, Jul, 1995.
3. F.Z. Peng, “Application issues of active power filters,” IEEE Ind. Appl. Mag., vol.4, no.5, pp. 21-30, Sep./Oct.1998.
4. V.E. Wagner, “Effect of harmonics on equipment,” IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol.8, no.2, pp.672-680, Apr. 1993.
5. A. Cavallini and G.C. Montanari, “Compensation strategies for shunt active-filter control,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol.9, no.6, pp.587-593, Nove.1994.
6. S. George and V. Agarwal, “A novel technique for optimising the harmonics and reactive power under non-sinusoidal voltage conditions”, in Proc. 28th Annu. Conf. IEEE Industrial Electronic Society, 2002,pp.858-863.
REFERENCES
04/11/23 49Dept of EEE
04/11/23 Dept of EEE 50
Contd…7. IEEE Recommended Practice for Powering and Grounding Sensitive
Electronic Equipments, IEEE Std. 1100-1992.
8. IEEE Recommended Practice for Electric Power Distribution for IndustrialPlants, IEEE Std. 141-1993.
9 . M. S. Lancarotte and A. de A Penteado, Jr., “Estimation of core lossesunder sinusoidal or non-sinusoidal induction by analysis of magnetizationrate,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 174–179,Jun. 2001.
10. Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)—Part 3–4 Limits—Limitationof Emission of Harmonic Current in Low-Voltage Power Supply Systemsfor Equipment With Rated Current Greater Than 16 A, IEC Std.61000-3-4-1998.
11. IEEE Recommended Practice and Requirements for Harmonic Controlin Electrical Power Systems, IEEE Std. 519-1992.