09 monopoly, oligopoly and monopolistic competition

Upload: stett

Post on 14-Jan-2016

35 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Notes from an introductory micro class.

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    1/57

    MB MC

    Monopoly, Oligopoly

    and MonopolisticCompetition

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    2/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    $earning Ob%ecti#es

    1. Define imperfect competition and compare it to perfectcompetition

    2. Define market power and explain how it affects the demandcurve facing the firm

    3. Understand and use marginal cost and marginal revenue tomaximize monopolist's profit

    4. xplain how start!up costs affect economies of scale andmarket power

    ". #how how monopol$ alters economic surplus compared toperfect competition

    %. Descri&e price discrimination and its effects

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    3/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide +

    Maret *trctres

    e know that in realit$( perfect competition( in itsideal text!&ook form( is rare.

    hat is far more common are firms with somedegree of market power )power to set prices*. +arket

    ,ower is a measure of a firm-s a&ilit$ to raise theprice of a good without losing all its sales.

    n economics we define market structures &asedmainl$ on the following two dimensions/0um&er of producers in the market )one( few( or( man$*

    hether goods produced are homogeneousordifferentiated

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    4/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide .

    Maret *trctres

    omogeneous ! dentical Differentiated the goods are similar &ut are

    not perfect su&stitutes in the consumer-s mind

    )differentiated &$ ualit$( packaging(advertising( etc*

    hether a market sells differentiated goods or

    homogeneous goods depends on the natureof the good and consumer-s preferencesreakfast cereals versus hammers5

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    5/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide /

    Maret *trctres

    6hus we have one perfectl$ competitive andthree mperfectl$ competitive market forms/

    ,erfect 7ompetition )homogeneous( man$*

    mperfect 7ompetition+onopolistic 7ompetition )differentiated( man$*

    8ligopol$ )differentiated9homogeneous( few*

    ,ure +onopol$ )one firm*

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    6/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide

    1i))erent (orms o) Competition (rom 3rgman and 4ells

    5ot "pplicable

    Oligopoly

    Monopoly

    6er)ect Competition MonopolisticCompetition

    How Many6rodcers

    Many

    (ew

    One

    "re 6rodcts 1i))erentiated

    8es5o

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    7/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide 7

    1i))erent (orms o) mper)ectCompetition

    ,ure +onopol$ )most inefficient*6he onl$ supplier of a uniue product with no

    close su&stitutes

    +onopolistic 7ompetition )closest to perfect

    competition*: large num&er of firms that produce slightl$

    differentiated products that are reasona&l$ close

    su&stitutes for one another;ong!run ad

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    8/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide 9

    1i))erent (orms o) mper)ectCompetition

    8ligopol$ )t$picall$ more efficient than amonopol$*ndustr$ structure in which a small num&er of

    large firms produce products that are eitherclose or perfect su&stitutes

    omogeneous )wireless phone service( cement*and differentiated )automo&ile( cigarettes(

    detergents* products.

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    9/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide :

    mper)ect Competition ;s!6er)ect Competition

    ith perfect competition/ f the firm raises its price( sales will &e zero.0o incentive to charge a lower price &ecause it can sell

    as man$ units as it wants at the current price.

    6he firm-s demand curve is the horizontal line at themarket price. t is a price taker.

    ith imperfect competition/ 6he firm has some control over price or market power.

    f it raises market price( it will not lose all its customers. f it reduces price( it will add customers.

    6he firm faces a downward sloping demand curve. t is aprice maker.

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    10/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide &0

    The 1emand Cr#es (acing 6er)ectlyand mper)ectly Competiti#e (irms

    nito)otpt

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    11/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide &&

    *orces o) Maret 6ower

    1. xclusive control of a scarce resource or inputDe eers of #outh :frica a near monopol$= :rediamonds rare> ?em ualit$ diamonds are morecommon than other gem ualit$ colored stones.

    2. ?overnment ;icenses or @ranchises lodging and concession operation at 0ational ,arks

    3. ,atents and 7op$rights )Drug companies(:uthors*

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    12/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide &2

    More ?ndring *orces o)Maret 6ower

    4. conomies of #cale ! 0atural +onopolies,roduction of electricit$( natural gas( etc. hen natural

    gas companies initiall$ started there was competition.ut large fixed costs gave the firm that sold the most the

    lowest :67. 0etwork conomies )a product-s ualit$ increases

    as the num&er of users increase i.e.( sales volumeincrease* another form of economies of scale+icrosoft( e&a$( @ace&ook( etc.

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    13/57

    07>02>&/*deshna C!Bandyopadhyay

    &+

    @etrns to *cale

    Aeturns to scale is a long run phenomenon. :llinputs are changed in the same proportion.

    f output more )less* than dou&les when all

    inputs are dou&led( the production function issaid to exhi&it ncreasing )Decreasing* returnsto scale.

    f output dou&les when all inputs are dou&led(the production function is said to exhi&it7onstant returns to scale.

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    14/57

    Units ofLabor (L)

    @etrns to *cale and $@"TC

    Units ofCapital(K)

    TotalCost(TC)

    OutputunderIRS

    OutputunderDRS

    OutputunderCRS

    1 1 $150 1010 10

    2 2 $300 30 15 20

    W=$5 and r=$!

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    15/57

    ncreasingretrns

    to scale

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    16/57

    07>02>&/*deshna C!Bandyopadhy&

    4hy ?conomies o) *cale

    #pecialization and Division of la&or $ieldsefficienc$.

    +ass production reduces average costs sincethe large set up costs are spread over a largeamount of output. 8nce production is

    esta&lished( +7 is ver$ low. xperience leads to Blearning &$ doingC andleads to improvements in efficienc$.

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    17/57

    07>02>&/

    *deshna C!

    Bandyopadhyay

    4hy 1is-economies o) *cale

    s there an$thing called Btoo largeC in terms offactor$ size or size of operations>

    es. e$ond a certain point &ureaucratic and

    managerial inefficiencies creep in. 7ook &ookprocedures replace managerial &rilliance.7oordinating a large la&or force &ecomes

    prohi&itivel$ expensive.

    &7

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    18/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide &9

    ?conomies o) *cale and themportance o) *tart-Ap Costs

    @irms with large fixed costs and low varia&le costs an$ production process that entails large pre!investments in research and development arecharacterized &$/

    ;arge start up costs;ow marginal costs

    :verage total cost declines sharpl$ as output

    increases conomies of scale ncreasing returns to scale.

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    19/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    ?conomies o) *cale and *tart-ApCosts

    0ew products can have a large fixed developmentcosts

    f marginal cost is constant( +arginal cost )+* E:verage varia&le cost

    6otal cost is fixed cost )@* plus varia&le cost67 E @ F )+* )G*

    6otal cost increases as output increases

    :verage total cost is:67 E @ 9 G F +

    :verage total cost decreases as output increases

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    20/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide 20

    Total and "#erage Total Costs )or a6rodction 6rocess with ?conomies o) *cale

    "#eragecost

    B=>nit

    ye

    ar

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    21/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide 2&

    ?conomies o) *cale and themportance o) *tart-Ap Costs

    7ost advantages from economies of scaledepends on how large the fixed cost is inrelation to marginal cost.

    xample 1/0intendo and ,la$station each have fixed costs of

    H2II(III and constant +7E HI.JI per game.

    0intendo produces 2IK fewer copies of the videogame compared to ,la$station

    3 cent difference in :67 &ecause 6@7967 issmall.

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    22/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide 22

    ?conomies o) *cale and themportance o) *tart-Ap Costs

    xample 2/0intendo and ,la$station each have fixed costs

    of H1I(III(III and constant +7E HI.2I per

    game.0intendo produces 2IK fewer copies of the

    video game compared to ,la$station

    H1.%L difference in :67 &ecause 6@7967 is high.

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    23/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide 2+

    Costs )or Two Compter Game 6rodcers& *mall T(C>TC

    5intendo 6laystation

    "nnalprodction &,000,000 &,200,000(iDed cost =200,000 =200,000

    ;ariable cost =900,000 =:0,000

    Total cost =&,000,000 =&,&0,000

    "#erage total cost per game =&!00 =0!:7

    Obser#ationsM(iDed costs are a relati#ely small share o) total costMCost>game is nearly the same

    Constant MC = $0.80

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    24/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide 2.

    Costs )or Two Compter Game 6rodcers2 $arge T(C>TC

    "nnalprodction &,000,000 &,200,000

    (iDed cost =&0,000,000 =&0,000,000;ariable cost =200,000 =2.0,000

    Total cost =&0,200,000 =&0,2.0,000

    "#erage total cost per game =&0!20 =9!/+

    5intendo 6laystation

    M(iDed costs are a relati#ely large share o) total costM6laystation has a =&!7 a#erage cost ad#antageM6laystation can lower prices, co#er cost, and attractcstomers

    Constant MC = $0.20

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    25/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide 2/

    ?conomies o) *cale and themportance o) *tart-Ap Costs

    xample 3/ith a H1.%L advantage in :67( ,la$station is

    a&le to get a larger market share.

    7ost advantage to ,la$station &ecomes larger. xplains wh$ $ou would expect to see

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    26/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide 2

    "nnalprodction /00,000 &,700,000

    (iDed cost =&0,000,000 =&0,000,000

    ;ariable cost =&00,000 =+.0,000Total cost =&0,&00,000 =&0,+.0,000

    "#erage total cost per game =20!20 =!09

    Costs )or Two Compter Game 6rodcers+ *el) @ein)orcing Cost "d#antage

    5intendo 6laystation

    M*hi)t o) /00,000 nits to 6laystationM5intendoEs a#erage cost increases to =20!20>nitM6laystation a#erage cost )alls to =!09M" large nmber o) )irms cannot sr#i#e when the costdi))erential is high

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    27/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide 27

    ?conomic 5atralist

    h$ does ntel sell the overwhelmingma

    6he fixed investment needed to produce anew leading edge micro!processor isupwards of H2 &illion while the marginal costis

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    28/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide 29

    6ro)it MaDimiFation )or the Monopolist

    : monopolist maximizes profits &$ setting+AE+7

    6he :A is falling= so +AN:A

    6his implies ,O+AE+7 in euili&rium. uili&rium is inefficient.

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    29/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide 2:

    The Marginal @e#ene Cr#e )or aMonopolist with a *traight-$ine 1emand Cr#e

    6ric

    e

    1

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    30/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide +0

    The MonopolistEs 6ro)it-MaDimiFing Otpt$e#el

    6riceB=>nito)o

    tpt

    wee

    +

    &2 2.

    Marginal Cost

    2

    .

    MR

    9

    Obser#ationsM ) ! = =+ Q = &2 MR "MC and otpt sholdbe redced

    M6ro)its are maDimiFed

    at 9 nits where MR =MC

    M! = =. where antitydemanded I antityspplied

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    31/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide +&

    ?lasticity o) 1emand and Monopoly

    : monopolist-s +A is less than the price this is the essential source of themonopolist-s power. ow much less>Depends on the price elasticit$ of demand.

    : monopolist that faces a highl$ elasticdemand curve will &ehave a lot like aperfectl$ competitive industr$.:mtrak has a monopol$ in intercit$ passenger service in

    the 0orth!east corridor and $et is not a&le to raise prices&$ restricting service ver$ effectivel$. ?ood su&stitutes cars( planes

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    32/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide +2

    ?#en a Monopolist May*))er an ?conomic $oss

    6riceB=>min

    te

    Mintes millions>day

    6riceB=>min

    te

    Mintes millions>day

    2.20

    0!&2

    0!&0 ATC

    20

    0!090!&0

    ATC

    ?conomic lossI =.00,000>day

    ?conomic pro)itI =.00,000>day

    0!0/ MC

    MR

    0!0/ MC

    MR

    Being a monopolist doesnEt garantee an economic pro)it

    MB MC

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    33/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide ++

    +

    &2

    2.

    Marginal cost

    The socially optimalamont occrs whereMC = M# J &2 nits

    The 1emand and Marginal CostCr#es )or a Monopolist

    6riceB=>nito)o

    tpt

    wee

    4hy the n#isible Hand Breas 1own Ander Monopoly

    MB MC

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    34/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide +.

    2

    .

    MR

    9

    MThe pro)itmaDimiFing le#elo) otpt o) 9nits, where MR

    = MC,is lessthan the sociallyoptimal otpt o)&2

    MBetween 9 and&2, M#to society

    K MC to societyMCannot increaseotpt becaseMR to the )irmsis less than MC

    The 1emand and Marginal CostCr#es )or a Monopolist

    6riceB=>nito)o

    tpt

    wee

    &2

    2.

    4hy the n#isible Hand Breas 1own Ander Monopoly

    +

    Marginal cost

    MB MC

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    35/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide +/

    2

    .

    MR

    9

    MBecase MR " !,the monopolyprodces less thanthe socially optimal

    amontMThe deadweightloss o) themonopoly tosociety I &>2=2>nit.nits>wI =.>w!

    1eadweight loss

    The 1emand and Marginal CostCr#es )or a Monopolist

    6riceB=>nito)o

    tpt

    wee

    &2

    2.

    4hy the n#isible Hand Breas 1own Ander Monopoly

    +

    Marginal cost

    MB MC Asing 1isconts to ?Dpand the

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    36/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide +

    f the monopolist could reduce the price&elow H4 for output sold &e$ond J units( itwould want to expand output closer to theefficient level of 12 units and would have

    increased its profits &$ doing so. #ometimes monopolists do that through

    ,rice Discrimination6he practice of charging different &u$ers different

    prices for essentiall$ the same good or service

    Asing 1isconts to ?Dpand theMaret

    MB MC 6rice discrimination nder

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    37/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    07>02>&/ *deshna C!Band o adh

    +7

    6rice discrimination ndermonopoly

    e have price discrimination when a monopolist/ charges a different price to different consumers even

    when the cost of suppl$ing each consumer is the same.xample discount airfares( discounts on movie tickets

    for students and seniors( re&ate coupons.

    7harges the same price when the cost of suppl$ingdifferent consumers is different. xample mailing

    letters to oston vs. 7hicago sa$ from #t ;ouis.

    MB MC

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    38/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide +9

    h$ do man$ movie theaters offer discount ticketsto students>

    6he goal is to get &u$ers who would not &u$without the discount. #tudents have a lower A,

    compared to older working adults. 6heater ownersexpand their clientele &$ offering tickets to studentsat a discount. 6here is also no risk )&ecause ofverifia&le Ds* that a student would &u$ the ticket

    for a low price and re!sell it to a non!student for ahigher price and pocket the difference.

    ?conomic 5atralist

    MB MC

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    39/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide +:

    7arla supplements her income as a 6: &$editing term papers for undergrads. 6hereare J students for whom she might edit andher reservation prices are given on the next

    ta&le. 7arla is a profit maximizer. 6he 87 of her

    time to edit each paper is H2P.

    :ssume that 7arla must charge the sameprice to ever$ &u$er.

    6rice 1iscrimination

    MB MC

    T t l d M i l

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    40/57

    MB MC

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide .0

    Total and Marginal@e#ene )rom ?diting

    @eser#ation 6rice Total @e#ene Marginal re#ene*tdent = per paper = per wee = per paper

    A .0 .0

    # +9 7

    C + &09

    +. &+

    +2 &0

    F +0 &90

    % 29 &:

    & 2 209

    .0

    +

    +2

    29

    2.

    20

    &

    &2

    MB MC

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    41/57

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide .&

    f 7arla maximizes profits( how man$manuscripts should 7arla edit>7ompare +A with 87 of H2P.

    7arla will edit 3 papers.

    TR = 3 x H3% E H1IJ9wk

    TC = 3 x H2P E HJL9wk

    conomic profit E H219wk

    :ccounting profit E H1IJ9wk as 7arla-s explicitcost E I.

    Asing 1iscontsto ?Dpand the Maret

    MB MC

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    42/57

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide .2

    hat is the sociall$ efficient num&er of manuscriptsfor 7arla to edit( if she must still charge the sameprice to ever$ &u$er>

    8pportunit$ cost E H2P

    Aeservation price O opportunit$ cost forA to F#ociall$ efficient num&er is %

    TR = % x H3I E H1JI

    TC = % x H2P E H1L4conomic profit E H1JI ! H1L4 E H%

    :ccounting profit E H1JI

    Asing 1iscontsto ?Dpand the Maret

    MB MC

    A i 1i t

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    43/57

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide .+

    f 7arla can price discriminate( how man$ papersshould she edit if she wants to maximize herprofits>

    :gain Aeservation ,rice O 87 forA to F

    ,rofit maximizing uantit$ is %TRE H4I F H3J F 3% F 34 F 32 F 3I E H21I9wk

    TCE H2P x % E H1L4

    conomic profit E H3%9wk( H3I more than thesociall$ efficient euili&rium and HP more thanher private profit maximizing euili&rium &ut w9oprice discrimination.

    Asing 1iscontsto ?Dpand the Maret

    MB MC

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    44/57

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide ..

    6er)ect 6rice 1iscrimination

    : monopolist that charges each &u$er exactl$his9her A, is called a ,erfectl$ Discriminating+onopolist.Under perfect price discrimination( the private

    profit maximizing euili&rium is exactl$ thesociall$ efficient euili&rium. #o( economicsurplus is maximized.

    :ll consumers willing to pa$ a price high enoughto cover +7 will &e served.

    7onsumer surplus is zero= conomic surplus Eproducer surplus.

    MB MC

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    45/57

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide ./

    n realit$( perfect price discrimination can neveroccur &ecause

    #eller will not know each &u$er-s reservationprice.

    ven if &u$ers A, is pu&lic knowledge( low price&u$ers could alwa$s resell to other &u$ers at ahigher price and capture a part of the producers-surplus.

    mperfect price discrimination is widespread.

    6he hurdle method of ,D is aimed at solving thesepro&lems

    $imitations to 6rice 1iscrimination

    MB MC

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    46/57

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide .

    6he hrdle methodof price discrimination isthe practice of offering a discount to all&u$ers who overcome some o&stacle.Ae&ate coupons

    6emporar$ #ales

    7ommercial airline tickets

    ard cover and paper&ack &ooks

    7ars with optional add!ons#cratch and Dent appliance sales

    +ovies with phased releases

    Hrdle Method o) 6rice 1iscrimination

    MB MC Asing 1isconts

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    47/57

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide .7

    : ,erfect urdle#eparates &u$ers precisel$ according to

    their reservation prices

    6he$ don-t exist in realit$.ow much should 7arla charge for

    editing if she uses a perfect hurdle>

    Asing 1iscontsto ?Dpand the Maret

    MB MC Asing 1isconts

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    48/57

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide .9

    :ssume7arla must charge the same price to ever$one

    7arla offers a mail in re&ate coupon

    #tudents with at least a H3% reservation price

    never use the coupon#tudents with a reservation price &elow H3%

    alwa$s use the coupon

    8pportunit$ cost E H2P

    Asing 1iscontsto ?Dpand the Maret

    MB MC

    6rice 1iscrimination

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    49/57

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide .:

    6rice 1iscriminationwith a 6er)ect Hrdle

    @eser#ation 6rice Total @e#ene Marginal re#ene

    *tdent = per paper = per wee = per paper

    A .0 .0

    # +9 7

    C + &09

    +. +.

    +2 .

    F +0 :0

    % 29 &&2

    & 2 &+0

    .0

    +

    +2

    $ist 6rice *bmaret

    1iscont 6rice *bmaret

    +.

    +0

    2

    22

    &9

    MB MC Asing 1isconts

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    50/57

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide /0

    ;ist price su&market7arla will service all three students as the +A is

    greater than the +7 of H2P. uili&rium priceEH3% )lowest :A of group*

    Discount price su&market7arla will onl$ serve students D and . @or

    ever$one else +7 is greater than +A.

    uili&rium price is H32#o( charge H3% and allow a re&ate coupon for

    H4

    Asing 1iscontsto ?Dpand the Maret

    MB MC Asing 1isconts

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    51/57

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide /&

    ith ,rice Discrimination/TR = )3*)3%* F )2*)32* E H1L2

    TC = )H"*)H2P* E H14"

    conomic ,rofit E H2L9wk= 6his is H% more than

    ithout ,rice Discrimination#erve students :( and 7 onl$.

    TR = )3*)3%* E H1IJ

    TC = )H3*)H2P* E HJL

    conomic ,rofit E H219wk

    Asing 1iscontsto ?Dpand the Maret

    MB MC

    6 i 1i i i ti B d

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    52/57

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide /2

    6he hurdle method raised economic surplus)consumers- and producers- surplus*.

    7# and ,# are &oth greater under the hurdlemethod of price discrimination than whenthere is no price discrimination.

    s 6rice 1iscrimination Bad

    MB MC Asing 1isconts

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    53/57

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide /+

    urdle ,rice Discrimination/:( and 7 pa$ H3%= D and pa$ H32.

    7# E :/ )4I!3%* F / )3J 3%* F 7/ )3% 3%* F D/ )34 32* F / )32 32* E HJ

    ,# E 3x)3% ! 2P* F 2)32 2P* E H21 F H% E H2Lconomic #urplus E HJ F H2L E 3"9wk

    ithout ,rice Discrimination#erve students :( and 7 onl$.

    7# E :/ )4I3%* F / )3J!3%* F 7/ )3%3%* E H%,# E 3x)3%!2P* E H21

    conomic #urplus E H% F H21 E 2L9wk

    Asing 1iscontsto ?Dpand the Maret

    MB MC

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    54/57

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    CarlaLs Choices

    6rogram#ocial

    8ptimum

    6apers ?dited %

    6rice H3I

    Total @e#ene H1JI

    Total Cost H1L4

    ?conomic 6ro)it H%

    ?conomic *rpls H3%

    urdle

    " E )3 F 2*

    H3%( H4re&ate

    H1L2

    H14"

    H2L

    H3"

    ,erfectDiscriminator

    %

    Aeservation

    H21I

    H1L4

    H3%

    H3%

    #ingle,rice

    +onopol$

    3

    H3%

    H1IJ

    HJL

    H21

    H2L

    MB MC Asing 1isconts

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    55/57

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide //

    #ummar$#ingle price monopolies are inefficient &ecauseP > MC (=MR).

    6he hurdle method of price discrimination

    reduces the inefficienc$.6he more finel$ the seller can discriminate( the

    smaller the efficienc$ loss.

    urdles are not perfect( therefore( there will &esome efficienc$ loss.

    Asing 1iscontsto ?Dpand the Maret

    MB MC

    ?conomic 5at ralist

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    56/57

    Copyright c 2007 by The McGraw-HillCompanies, nc! "ll rights reser#ed!

    Chapter &0' Monopoly and Other (ormso) mper)ect Competition

    *lide /

    h$ might an appliance retailer instructits clerks to hammer dents into thesides of its stoves and refrigerators>

    ?conomic 5atralist

  • 7/18/2019 09 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

    57/57

    MB MC

    ?nd o)

    Chapter