1 1 1 aipla firm logo american intellectual property law association the washington redskins case...
TRANSCRIPT
111 AIPLA
Firm Logo
American Intellectual Property Law Association
THE WASHINGTON REDSKINS CASE
WHAT IT MEANSWHAT IT DOESN’T MEAN
George William Lewis
Westerman, Hattori, Daniels and Adrian
IP Practice in Japan Pre-Conference
Washington, D.C.
October 21, 2014
222 AIPLA
Firm Logo
333 AIPLA
Firm Logo
THE CASE – THE PARTIES
• Blackhorse, et al, a group of Native Americans, • petitioned the US Patent and Trademark Office to
cancel six Washington Redskins trademark registrations (word marks, NOT logos)
• owned by Pro-Football.• The basis for the petition was that the term
‘Redskins’ was disparaging to Native Americans at the time the challenged marks were registered (between 1967 and 1990).
444 AIPLA
Firm Logo
TTAB DECISION
The TTAB granted a petition to cancel six trademark registrations incorporating the term REDSKINS on the grounds that they were:
•disparaging to Native Americans;
• when they were registered and thus incapable of registration pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1052(a).
555 AIPLA
Firm Logo
Section 1052(a)
No trademark by which the goods of the applicant may be distinguished from the goods of others shall be refused registration on the principal register on account of its nature unless it—
•(a) Consists of . . .matter which may disparage . . . persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols, or bring them into contempt, or disrepute;
666 AIPLA
Firm Logo
TEST FOR DISPARAGEMENT
Test for disparagement comprises a two-step inquiry:
•What is the meaning of the matter in question, as it appears in the marks and as those marks are used in connection with the goods and services identified in the registrations?
•Is the meaning of the marks one that may disparage Native Americans?
BOTH STEPS ARE CONSIDERED AT THE TIME OF REGISTRATION.
777 AIPLA
Firm Logo
WHO AND WHAT
• The TTAB first concluded that
• The term “redskin” as used by the Washington
Redskins is meant to refer to Native Americans.
• a “substantial composite” of Native Americans would have found the term “redskins” disparaging at the time the marks were registered
888 AIPLA
Firm Logo
SUBSTANTIAL COMPOSITE
• A “substantial composite” does not necessarily involve a majority of the referenced group, and 30 percent of the group is sufficient to be a “substantial composite.”
• Whether the term “redskins” may disparage Native Americans, is based upon the views of the referenced group and NOT a poll of the American Public
999 AIPLA
Firm Logo
MARKS HELD TO BE DISPARAGING
• THE SLANTS for “Entertainment in the nature of live performances by a musical band.”
• STOP THE ISLAMISATION OF AMERICA for “providing information regarding understanding and preventing terrorism.”
• HEEB for “Providing news reporting, organized cultural events, calendars, blogs and journals featuring various topics, namely, religion, social introduction and popular culture via a global computer network; providing a website for the purpose of social introduction and dating; providing information featuring various topics, namely, social introduction and popular culture via a global computer network.”
101010 AIPLA
Firm Logo
The United States Patent and Trademark Office Statement released with the TTAB’s Decision, a Media Fact Sheet explaining in clear terms what trademark registration means, the practical benefits of federal registration, the difference between registration and use of a trademark, and the nature of common law trademark rights
THE MEANING OF THIS DECISION
111111 AIPLA
Firm Logo
WHAT THIS DECISION MEANS
If the cancellation of the registrations for the trademarks involved in this case is upheld on Appeal Pro Football, Inc., will lose the following legal benefits conferred by federal registration:
•The legal presumptions of ownership and of a nationwide scope of rights in these trademarks; •The ability to use the federal registration ® symbol, and; •The ability to record the registrations with the U.S. Customs and Border Patrol Service so as to block the importation of infringing or counterfeit foreign goods.
121212 AIPLA
Firm Logo
WHAT THIS DECISION DOES NOT MEAN
• This Decision does not require the Washington, D.C. professional football team to change its name or stop using the trademarks at issue in this case:
• The TTAB determines only whether a mark can be
registered with the federal government (and thus gain the additional legal benefits thereof), not whether it can be used; and
• The mark owner may still have rights in the mark
based on use, known as “common law” rights—and those use-based rights may continue to exist even if a federal registration is cancelled.
131313 AIPLA
Firm Logo
Thanks for your attention! Questions?
George William LewisPartner
Westerman, Hattori, Daniels & Adrian1250 Connecticut Avenue NW
Suite 700Washington, D.C. 20036
+1 (202) 822-4548+1 (202) 669-9899 (mobile)