11

2008MCIP

Partnering Workshop

from Dallas County Public Works

WELCOME

22

Agenda 9:30am Refreshments and Networking, Icebreaker 10:00am Welcome and Introductions, Presentations

• MCIP History & Lessons Learned (Don)• 2008 Call-for-Projects (Toni)• 2008 MCIP Application Form (Cliff)• Project Selection Overview (Don)

12:00pm Complimentary Lunch

• MCIP Eligibility and Evaluation Criteria (Jon)• Cost Estimate Methodology (Jack)

1:00pm Workshop Sessions 1:45pm General Session to Summarize 2:00pm Adjourn!

33

Strategic Plan & MCIP Lessons Learned

Dallas County Strategic Plan

Public Works Mission & Vision

Purpose of Partnering Workshop

Program History

44

Dallas County Strategic Plan

Dallas County governmentDallas County government ModelsModels Interagency Interagency Partnerships and Collaboration.Partnerships and Collaboration.

Dallas County is aDallas County is a Healthy Community.Healthy Community.

Dallas CountyDallas County isis Safe, Secure, and Prepared.Safe, Secure, and Prepared.

Dallas County proactively addressesDallas County proactively addresses Critical Regional Issues.Critical Regional Issues.

Dallas County is theDallas County is the Destination of Choice for Residents Destination of Choice for Residents and Businesses.and Businesses.

“ “ VISION GIVES DIRECTION TO DALLAS COUNTY ‘S VISION GIVES DIRECTION TO DALLAS COUNTY ‘S FUTURE”FUTURE”

55

Public Works Mission

To improve the quality of life of our customers by effectively planning, developing, implementing, and administering approved regional public works transportation projects, supporting maintenance of county-wide roads and bridges, and providing real property management services.

66

Public Works VisionOur Vision-To Be:

A Leading Planner

An Effective Agent

A Valued Partner

A Valued Part of Dallas County Government

77

MCIP Program History

87 Projects Submitted 57 (66%) Approved

27 Reconstruction/ Widening

21 Intersection 5 New Roads 1 Enhancement 3 Others

TPC = $ 197.7 M County Share = $ 57.5 M

Status of Projects 25 Completed 4 Under Construction 14 In Progress 14 Federalized or

Cancelled

1st Call - 1999

88

MCIP Program History

61 Projects Submitted 22 (36%) Approved

18 Reconstruction/ Widening

3 Intersection 1 New Road

TPC = $ 148.8 M County Share = $ 45.5M

Status of Projects 6 Completed 5 Federalized or

Cancelled 11 In Progress

2nd Call - 2001

99

MCIP Program History

51 Projects Submitted 29 (57%) Approved

23 Reconstruction/Widening 3 Intersection 1 New Road 2 Others

TPC = $ 354.0M County Share = $ 91M

Status of Projects 5 Completed

3rd Call -2003

1010

MCIP Program History

66 Projects Submitted 26 (39%) Approved

13 Reconstruction/ Widening

3 Intersection 8 Enhancements 2 Others

TPC = $ 718M County Share = $ 207M

Status of Projects 3 Completed 1 Under Construction

4th Call-2005

1111

Lessons Learned Approximate Two-Year Program Cycle Program Year (PY) Concept Five-phase Project Delivery System

Intensive Planning from Beginning of Call for Projects Planning Charrette (If Required) Design Partnering Preliminary Design Charrettes + Public Workshops S.U.E. + Utility Partnering + USWAT Enhanced Constructability Review Context Sensitive Solutions, Total Stakeholder

Involvement Early Involvement in ROW Acquisition

1212

Lessons Learned MCIP Master Agreement + PSA Partnering

Cities and Other Stakeholders for Continuous Process Improvements

During Construction TXDOT/NCTCOG Coordination

Simplified, but Effective Financial Management MCIP Lessons Learned applied to Remaining Bond

Projects

1313

2008 Call-for-Projects Program Cycle and Deadlines (Toni) 2008 MCIP Application (Cliff) Eligibility and Evaluation Criteria (Jon) Cost Estimate Methodology (Jack)

1414

Program Cycle & Deadlines2008

MCIP Applications DueMCIP Applications Due August 29*August 29* Preliminary Evaluation Results November Cities’ Deadline to Respond December

2009 Final Evaluation Results January Staff Recommendations February Commissioners Selection April

1515

2008 Application Application Submittal

Mail with CD’s

Application Form Instructions Sheet Phone Support On Website

www.dallascounty.org/department/pubworks/mcip-projects.html

1616

2008 Application

Application Form Utilizes MS Access™ 97 Teamwork needed to fill out applications

ROW Agents Design/ Engineers Planners

1717

2008 Application

1818

2008 Application

1919

2008 Application

* Note: All versions other than Access 97 must be converted to your version of Access.

2020

2008 Application

2121

2008 Application

2222

2008 Application

2323

2424

2008 ApplicationRecord 1

Record 2

2525

2008 Application

2626

2008 Application

2727

2008 Application

2828

2008 Application

2929

2008 Application

3030

2008 Application

3131

Project Selection Overview

Projects Ranked Within Each City Quality of Project Submissions Commissioners Make Final Decisions

3232

L U N C H

Enjoy!!

Please return at 12:30

3333

Project Evaluation Process

Eligibility Screening (Yes/No) Eligibility of Project for MCIP Program City Compliant with County Policies MCIP Experience

Strategic Screening (50 Points) Emphasizing Regional Aspects and Mobility

Technical Screening (50 Points) Emphasizing Project Delivery and Air Quality

3434

Eligibility Screening City Compliant with Orphan Roads Policy

Signed Master Agreement is in place

City Partnering Participation

City has 50% of Funding Available

Federal Functional Classification of Collector or Greater

Proposed Project Should Enhance Capacity

3535

Strategic Screening Interjurisdictional Project

Regional Accessibility

Promotion of Context Sensitive Solutions

Is the Project Located in an Underutilized Area?

Is it a Multi-modal/Intermodal Project?

3636

Strategic Screening (cont.) Is the Project Warranted in the Near Term?

Speed Delay Rating Accident Rate Rating

Does the Project Create a Long Term Improvement? Projected Utilization Rating Traffic Volume Rating Traffic Volume Growth Rating

3737

Technical Screening Benefit Cost Rating Air Quality Rating Delivery Rating

Significant Drainage Improvements Visibility Challenges Requiring Demolitions Environmental Challenges Utility Challenges Potential Excessive Right-of-Way Costs

Right-of-Way Percentage Already Dedicated or Purchased by the City for the Project

3838

Project Cost Estimates 2005 Call-For-Projects

Changes Made in Earlier Calls Worked Well Project Costs Were Reasonable

2008 Call-For-Projects No Change in Process and Methodology Field Reconnaissance of All Projects Team Review of Project Cost Estimates Reconcile County and City Estimates

3939

Workshop Sessions

Session 1- Lessons Learned, 5-Phase Project Delivery, & Master Agreement Review (Don, Alberta, and Janet)

Session 2- MCIP Application Process (Toni, Cliff, and Jon)

Session 3- Cost Estimate Methodology & ROW (Jack, Tony, and Selas)

4040

Adjourn!&

Thank You

4141

General Information Application Form & Instructions

www.dallascounty.org/department/pubwks/mcip-projects.html.html

Submit Application To Attention: Clifford Gholston

Dallas County Public Works411 Elm Street, 4th FloorDallas, TX 75202

Alternate Contact: Jonathan Toffer (same address as above)

Questions 214.653.7151 (main)