1 © 2013 interdigital, inc. all rights reserved. dynamic spectrum management (dsm): spectrum...
TRANSCRIPT
1 © 2013 InterDigital, Inc. All rights reserved.
DYNAMIC SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT (DSM):Spectrum Sharing Techniques for Harvesting Underutilized Spectrum, such as Unlicensed Bands, TV White Space and Federal Bands
For more information please contact:[email protected] or visit our website atwww.InterDigital.com/spectrum
2 © 2013 InterDigital, Inc. All rights reserved.
DSM Vision: Spectrum Sharing will be the norm
Spectrum Manager
Shared Spectrum
Public Safety/Government (Tier 1)
Military (Tier 1)
Small Cell LTE or Wi-Fi Network (Tier 2)
Macro LTE Network (Tier 2)
Spectr
um Request
Ad-hoc, Consumer, Smart Grid (Tier 3)
3 © 2013 InterDigital, Inc. All rights reserved.
Spectrum Sharing and How It’s Shaping Up within the Ecosystem
• Regulatory bodies want to see more efficient use of allocated spectrum: reallocating underutilized spectrum is very expensive and time-consuming
• TVWS remains a solid scenario, but the scope of spectrum sharing has broadened and other use cases have emerged:• Licensed Shared Access (LSA)3-Tier models blending in licensed and opportunistic access, e.g.
PCAST• FCC’s proposal to share 3.5GHz federal band and European initiative in 2.3-2.4 GHz band are
notices of intent to take spectrum sharing broader
• Small Cells is a common theme across almost all use cases• Cell densification strategies to provide supplemental capacity where needed• Use of alternate spectrum sources to avoid interference with macro cellular layer
• Technology will need to evolve to efficiently enable sharing: interference management, channel management, co-existence mechanisms, opportunistic access, etc
• Spectrum sharing will most likely impose power limits which will force the migration towards smaller cells: note the trend towards smaller cells is currently happening due to increased wireless capacity demand
• The trend towards small cells also pushes the industry towards cheap and available spectrum such as shared spectrum (i.e. ISM, TVWS, etc)
4 © 2013 InterDigital, Inc. All rights reserved.
Taxonomy of Spectrum Allocation Models
Exclusive Use Unlicensed Spectrum Sharing
Opportunistic Access (e.g.
TVWS)
Licensed Shared Access
(LSA)
Hybrid (e.g. PCAST)
Incumbent
Opportunistic
Incumbent
Licensed
Incumbent
Licensed
Opportunistic
. .
Licensed approach (e.g. Cellular).
Auctions of cleared spectrum.
Unlicensed approach (e.g. Wi-Fi)
Evidence of All Three Spectrum Sharing Models Emerging
5 © 2013 InterDigital, Inc. All rights reserved.
Public Safety Network (Tier 1)
Small Cell Operated by MNO
(Tier 2)
Channel Unused
Turn on Small Cells
Cellular Operator Sharing Spectrum Owned by Public Safety
Organization
• Cellular operator with macro network leverages spectrum owned by public safety organization, when not used by public safety org.
• Based on Spectrum Sharing agreement between the two
• Tier 2 Operator moves users/ traffic to Small Cells
• Only Licensed access (no Opportunistic access) => more guaranteed QoS for Tier 2 operator
• Spectrum bands under consideration in Europe: 2.3 -2.4GHz
Licensed Shared Access (LSA)
Small Cell Operated by MNO
(Tier 2)
Cellular Operator Leverages Public Safety Spectrum to Augment Capacity
6 © 2013 InterDigital, Inc. All rights reserved.
Macro Cell (Tier 1 Operator)
Wi-Fi User (Tier 3)Small Cell (Tier 2 Operator)
Tier 1 Not
Using
Tier 2 Uses
3-Tier Framework for Licensed and Opportunistic Sharing of Federal
Spectrum
• Tier 2 (Priority Access) uses Tier 1 spectrum when Incumbent not using
• Tier 3 (General Authorized Access) leverages spectrum when Tiers 1 & 2 not using
• FCC has proposed releasing 3550 – 3700 MHz spectrum as first spectrum sharing target
• Incumbents: Naval Radar (3550-3650 MHz) and Fixed Satellite systems (3650-3700 MHz)
• Likely to be a critical test case for spectrum sharing in other federal bands
Sharing Federal Spectrum – PCAST Model
Tier 2 Not
Using
Tier 3 Uses
Provide protection of the incumbent, reliable operation for priority users and opportunistic access for general users
7 © 2013 InterDigital, Inc. All rights reserved.
Database Access
Spectrum Sensing
Spectrum Allocation
Spectrum Access
(Scheduling)
Channels
AllocateChannel,
Aggregate Channels
Switch/ Vacate
Channel
PrimaryUser
Occupancy
Secondary User
InterferenceChannel
List
Registered PrimaryUsers
Listen Before \
TalkCoexistence
Gaps
Channel occupied by Primary User
High interference from Secondary Users
Channel Available for allocation
DSM System – Key Components: Leveraging legacy Wi-Fi and LTE technology
• Spectrum Database identifies open channels and registered Primary Users
• Spectrum Sensing detects Primary Users & Secondary User interference
• Agile Spectrum Allocation ensures QoE
• Coexistence schemes such as listen before talk, coexistence gaps, to observe access etiquette and ensure harmonious coexistence with secondary users
Aggregation efficiently combines
channels wherever they are
Non-Contiguous Channel Aggregation & Intelligence to Manage it
8 © 2013 InterDigital, Inc. All rights reserved.
LTE or Wi-Fi Using Supplemental Channels
• Works as Super-WiFi or for congestion relief, and provides extended range and improved wall penetration
• Potentially attractive to cellular operators as license-exempt adjunct for offloading
• Potential Small Cell use case for LTE – deploying TVWS spectrum in Small Cell to mitigate interference to/from Macro Cell
• Sensing, channel aggregation and low-power transmission are key for extracting capacity in dense urban areas
• Wi-Fi range extension of particular interest to new entrants – fostering ubiquitous access to consumers (“eyeballs”) using Wi-Fi
Use Case: Opportunistic Spectrum Sharing for Access (e.g. Leveraging TVWS)
Wi-Fi w/ TVWS Spectrum
Wi-Fi
LTE
TVWS
Macro Cell
Small Cell
9 © 2013 InterDigital, Inc. All rights reserved.
Shared Spectrum
Use Case: Shared Spectrum for Wi-Fi/LTE Backhaul over TVWS
Wi-Fi Operating in Shared SpectrumBackhaul using TVWS
Channels• TVWS propagation characteristics make
TVWS-based backhaul deployment cost-effective (i.e. NLOS)
• Broadband / Cable delivery to areas with inadequate coverage
• Of interest to fixed / non-cellular operators, cable providers and new entrants…
• Use case being considered by some cellular operators as well.
Wi-Fi Operating in Shared Spectrum
TVWSBackhaul
Wi-Fi APs
TVWSSTA
10 © 2013 InterDigital, Inc. All rights reserved.
Client
Router
Channel ManagementFunction
RF RFUSB DSM Client
Access Point
Enhanced 802.11n MAC/PHY development board (ARM)
Sensing toolbox running on a TI OMAP3530
Wideband digital radio development board
DigitalBaseband
Sensing Toolbox
(STB)
WLAN IP
MAC
PHY
ProgrammableInterferer
TVWS Radio
Internet
DSM GUI, Media Server, Programmable Interferer SW
DSM MonitorCh 50Ch 35
Ch 3Ch 14 Ch 47
LicensedASA
6. Ch 475. Ch 034. Ch 143. Ch 062. Ch 501. Ch 35
Ch 06
Full MAC, PHY, RRM implementation FPGA / DSP to support sensing, aggregation and radio interfaces Wideband radio supports TVWS (512-608, 614-698 MHz) Aggregation of up to four non-contiguous 5 MHz bandwidth slices in TVWS Detection of both DTV and Wireless Microphone signals per FCC requirements
DSM Wi-Fi Technology Platform
11 © 2013 InterDigital, Inc. All rights reserved.
LTE Solution Platform Architecture• Downlink TVWS Carrier Aggregation
• Primary component carrier in licensed band • Supplementary 5MHz component carrier in
TVWS band
• Required Capabilities: LTE stack enhanced to operate in TVWS bands• Spectrum Database access to identify primary
users registered on TVWS channels• Sensing to detect primary user occupancy and
interference from secondary users• Aggregation and channel switching across
multiple supplementary (TVWS) channels• Co-existence between LTE and Wi-Fi
DataBase
Future PoliciesDSM Policy
EngineChannel
Management Function(CMF)
Transceivers(Lime Radio)
TVWS
IDCC DSM Engine
LTE ProtocolStack
Interface Board
FPGA + DSP
SensingToolbox
RF Controller
Transceivers(Lime Radio)
LTE Band I or II
Standard Policies
Private Policies
TVWS policies
Operator/Enterprise
policies
Spectrum Brokerage
policies
UeeNB
12 © 2013 InterDigital, Inc. All rights reserved.
OTA - 1 CHANNEL – TYPICAL MCS DATA RATES
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 70
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 9.488.78
8.16
6.67
4.81
3.77
2.62
1.35
7.547.08
6.62
5.57
4.193.28
2.29
1.18
TCP (Mbps)UDP(Mbps)
(AC_VI)
Data
Rat
e in
Mbp
s
MCS 0 MCS 1 MCS 2 MCS 3 MCS 4 MCS 5 MCS 6 MCS 7
13 © 2013 InterDigital, Inc. All rights reserved.
OTA - 4 CHANNELS - TYPICAL MCS DATA RATES
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 70
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
4034.7
32.629.8
24.5
17.713.9
9.74
4.97
25.724.522.9
18.1
13.810.4
7.33.71
TCP Rx T-PutUDP Rx T-Put
(AC_VI)
Data
rate
in M
bps
MCS 0 MCS 1 MCS 2 MCS 3 MCS 4 MCS 5 MCS 6 MCS 7
14 © 2013 InterDigital, Inc. All rights reserved.
FIELD TRIAL PHOTOS (~1KM BETWEEN AP AND CLIENT)