1 analysis of manual work objectives –review traditional job analysis methods –introduce...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Analysis of Manual Work
• Objectives– Review traditional job analysis methods– Introduce ergonomic job analysis methods for
identifying potential for worker exposure to physical ergonomic stressors
– Examine specialized tools for assessing risk associated with manual materials handling work
• special focus on revised NIOSH Lifting Equation
– Review general recommendations for manual materials handling work
2
Describing Manual Work
• Why would methods for describing manual work be useful?
Review traditional job analysis methods
3
Job Analysis Traditional IE methods
• Tools and procedures for describing certain aspects of a job
• Taylor and the Gilbreths were pioneers• Methods:
– Descriptive methods• ex: operation process charts, flow process charts
– Predictive methods• ex: MTM, MOST - repetitive tasks
– Assessment methods• ex: work sampling, time study
Review traditional job analysis methods
4
Benefits of traditional analysis methods...
• Description of manual work
Review traditional job analysis methods
5
Ergonomic Job Analysis*
• A method for identifying and evaluating generic risk factors associated with work-related musculoskeletal disorders
• Based on collection of data about a job, designed to address these questions:– 1) Does performing the job expose a worker
to any generic ergonomic risk factors?– 2) What aspects of the job cause or
contribute to worker exposure?
Ergonomic job analysis
*Keyserling et al. (1991)
6
Generic Ergonomic Risk Factors
• Characterized by excesses in Intensity, Duration, and/or Frequency:– Force exertion– Posture – Contact stress– Dynamics– Vibration– Temperature
Ergonomic job analysis
7
Aspects of a job that may result in exposure to generic
ergonomic risk factors
Ergonomic job analysis
Methods
Tasks
Work
OrganizationEnvironment
Workers
Tools and Equipment
8
Elements of Ergonomic Job Analysis
• Preparation– team– equipment
• Method– Adverse health outcomes assessment– Basic job documentation– Identification of risk factor exposures– Evaluation of risk factor exposures– Exposure control
Ergonomic job analysis
10
Method - Basic Job Documentation
• Job analysis team members and date• Uniquely identify job• Describe worker(s)• Describe work objectives• Work schedule• Production &/or work pace info• Describe job rotation• Sketch work station layout• List tools and equipment• List all handled parts and materials• Describe work methods
Ergonomic job analysis
11
Method - Identification of risk factor exposures
• Determine risk factors associated with each work element
– risk factor checklist can be useful, but familiarity with job is essential
• Determine risk factor exposure for total job
Ergonomic job analysis
>>>>>>>>> Generic risk factors <<<<<<<<
Work element Description Force Posture Contact stress……
A Thread wire through Y (based Y (pinch grip) Y (wire into fingertip)
hole in insulator on gage)
B…………..
12
Method - Evaluation of risk factor exposures
• Bases for evaluation of risk:– epidemiological data– company data– specialized tools
• examples: – Lifting: NIOSH lifting equation, Michigan model, LMM, ...– Posture: RULA, OWAS, …– distal upper extremity: Strain Index (combines posture,
force, etc)
• After identification and evaluation, summarize findings
Ergonomic job analysis
13
Method - Exposure control
• Develop alternative solutions• Perform follow-up ergonomic job
analysis to evaluate controls
Ergonomic job analysis
14
Analysis of Manual Materials Handling Tasks
• Importance of MMH tasks relative to workplace MSDs– 1994 workplace stats: 529,741
injuries due to overexertion in lifting, pushing or pulling, holding, carrying or turning objects
– low back region is the primary area of injury
Use of specialized tools in analysis of MMH tasks
15
Injury Prevention Strategies
• Task design• Worker selection• Worker training
Use of specialized tools in analysis of MMH tasks
16
MMH Risk Factors Associated with Low Back Disorder/Low
Back Pain* Lifting and force movements Heavy physical work Awkward postures Whole body vibration (in conjunction
with lifting and awkward postures) Static work postures
* NIOSH, 1997
Use of specialized tools in analysis of MMH tasks
17
MMH System
• In analyzing a MMH task, consider the system characteristics….– worker– material - container– task - workplace– work practices
…and which characteristics might give rise to the risk factors mentioned previously
Use of specialized tools in analysis of MMH tasks
18
Establishing Lifting Limits - Revised NIOSH Equation
• Bases:– Epidemiology:
• injury rates for workers on jobs with LI>3 are quite high
– Biomechanics: • 3400 N of disc compression
– Physiology: • 2.2-4.7 kcal/min (task dependent)
– Psychophysics: • acceptable to 75% of females, and 99% of males.
Use of specialized tools in analysis of MMH tasks
19
Form of the NIOSH EquationRecommended weight limit (RWL) = LC * (HM * VM * DM * AM * FM * CM)
where:
LC: recommended maximum load, under optimal conditions
and, all other factors are discounts to that maximum, to account for less-than-optimal conditions
HM: accounts for horizontal distance from spine - as distance increases, RWL decreases
VM: accounts for vertical height of start or end of lift - penalized if start or end varies from 75 cm,
(about table/knuckle height)
DM: accounts for vertical travel distance of load - penalized if distance exceeds 25 cm
AM: accounts for lifting outside of the sagittal plane - penalized as move further away from sagittal
CM: accounts for hand-handle coupling - poorer coupling results in reduction of RWL
FM: accounts for rate of lifting - as rate increases, RWL decreases
Use of specialized tools in analysis of MMH tasks
20
Revised NIOSH EquationAssumptions and Limitations
• Assumptions:– smooth lifting (no acceleration)– moderate sized object– unrestricted lifting postures– two-handed, various hand-load coupling– steady lifting while standing – favorable temperature– main job is MMH, others require little energy– good traction for feet, no foot movement– same risk for lifting and lowering
• Limitations:– Individual risk is not assessed (protective at the group level)
Use of specialized tools in analysis of MMH tasks
21
Pushing and Pulling in MMH
• Dangers:– overexertion– slipping
• Important factors:– friction
• shoe/floor• wheels
– handle height– foot location
Use of specialized tools in analysis of MMH tasks
22
Asymmetric Loading in MMH
• Recommendation:– two-handed symmetric lifts
• But asymmetry is more common:– one-handed handling– twisting or lateral bending of trunk
• Problems with asymmetry:– capability decreases as:
• stability decreases• greater reliance on one muscle instead of right-left
pair
Use of specialized tools in analysis of MMH tasks
23
Additional analysis tools for more complex MMH tasks
• Shoaf et al equation - determines maximum predicted load for condition– accounts for push, pull, carry, lift– accounts for personal factors
• Michigan model - determines % capable at every joint (determines weak link)– considers individual anthropometry– accounts for various postures throughout kinematic
chain
• Lumbar Motion Monitor model - determines LBD risk associated with task– considers trunk dynamics and moment of hand load
Use of specialized tools in analysis of MMH tasks