1 babar & belle: results and prospects claudio campagnari university of california santa barbara
TRANSCRIPT
1
BaBar & Belle: Results and Prospects
Claudio CampagnariUniversity of California
Santa Barbara
2
Physics Program at the B-Factories
• Comprehensive investigation of CKM structure of SM– CP-Violation (CPV) a key ingredient
• CPV from just one phase in SM
– Other measurements very important too
• Rare B-meson decay (but also D, )– Sensitive to new particles in loops– Indirect signature of new physics?
• B (and D and ) decay dynamics
3
Today:
Concentrate (mostly) on measurements related to
the unitarity triangle
4
B-factories and the unitarity triangle
B0 J/ Ks, D*D*,…
B0 , ,..
B,DK,D*,…
B-mixingB(,)
BulB(,,)l
BclBD(*)l
Both angles and sides of U.T. are accessible through measurements at the B-factories
Both angles and sides of U.T. are accessible through measurements at the B-factories
5
Outline• BaBar and Belle
– Luminosity, present and future
• Lifetimes and mixing• Sin2 results• Working towards sin2• Comments on • Vub
• Conclusions
Note: averages from Heavy Flavor Averaging Group(unless otherwise specified)
Note: averages from Heavy Flavor Averaging Group(unless otherwise specified)
6
B-factories performance
Belle: 132 fb-1
Record lumi: 9.5 1033
BaBar: 117 fb-1
Record lumi: 5.2 1033Note: 100 fb-1
~ 108 106 BB pairs
7
B-factories prospects
• Luminosities are improving– PEPII up to ~ 2 to 4 1034 cm-2 sec-1
– KEKB perhaps as high as 1035
• Detectors need modest upgrades to cope
• Should have ~500 fb-1 by 2005-2006, 1000-2000 fb-1 by end of decade– Now have ~ 100 fb-1 per expt
8
Mixing and lifetimesResults based on large samples of
– Fully or partially reco. hadronic decays– Fully or partially reco. D* l – Dileptons
8K events
12K events29 fb-1
9
t Distributions Lifetimes
t = proper time differencebetween the decay times of the two B-mesons
t = proper time differencebetween the decay times of the two B-mesons
t resolution of ~ same order of magnitude as lifetime
t resolution of ~ same order of magnitude as lifetime
0 = 1.554 0.030 0.019 psec- = 1.695 0.026 0.015 psec
10
Adding Tagging Information
md = 0.516 0.016 0.010 ps -130 fb-1
11
Lifetimes results summary
• Belle and BaBar now dominate world averages• Improvement by x2 over pre B-factory era• Order 1% uncertainty on lifetimes and ratio
• Belle and BaBar now dominate world averages• Improvement by x2 over pre B-factory era• Order 1% uncertainty on lifetimes and ratio
12
} LEP+CDF0.497§0.014 ps-1
} BaBar + Belle0.502§0.006 ps-1
World Average0.502§0.006 ps-1
Dominated by BaBar & Belle
Partial averagesfrom F. RongaCKM Workshop03
Mixing results summary
3% precision!
13
Mixing and Lifetimes - Prospects
• Hard, precision measurements• Many are based on only a fraction of
the available dataset– Statistical uncertainties still significantroom for improvement
Theoretical uncertainties limiting factor in ability to extract clean CKM information
14
The measurements of mixing and lifetimesprovide the foundations for the
time dependent CPV measurements that follow
15
General time-dependent formalism
Interfering amplitudes with different CP-violating (weak) phases can give a non-zero CP asymmetry. For B0 ! fCP:
Then, when one of the interfering amplitudes is B-mixing
with
S C
Only one decay amplitude (or all decay amp. same CKM phase):C=0 and S gives clean CKM phase information
16
Sin2 in b ! c c s
• Golden modes:– clean theory– “relatively easy” experiment
• Tree and leading penguin have same phase • sinmt coeff. measures sin2 cleanly• Not just J/ KS:
– Also ’ KS, c1 KS, c KS (CP=-1)
– J/ KL (CP=+1)
– J/ K*0 (Mixed CP)
b
d
d
W cc
s
0B /J
0K
0K0Bb
dW
s
d
c
cg
u,c,t
/J
17
1.6K events
~500 signal ev.
Event Samples
Clean ~2K KS sample
+~ 500 KL events
with ~ 60% purity
18
t distributions and asymmetries
CP=-1 CP=+1
Events with KS Events with KL
19
20
Summary of sin2 in b ccs
7.5% precision
21
Fit for cosmt coefficient, extract ||
5% precisionconsistent with ||=1(as expected in SM)
5% precisionconsistent with ||=1(as expected in SM)
22
Sin2 from other modes
• b ! ccd– D(*) D(*) and J/ 0
• penguins with different phases can be important
• b ! s (penguin)– KS, ’ KS etc
• sensitive to new physics in the b!s penguin
Results from these modes are very much statistics limited
23
J/ 0
~ 40 evD*D*
~ 130 ev
KS
~ 36 ev ‘ KS
~ 150 ev
24
B0 ! J/ 0b
d
d
W cc
d
0B /J
0 0Bb
dW
d
d
c
cg
u,c,t
/J
0
S = - sin2 if no penguin C = 0 if no penguin
25
B0 ! D*D*
• Vector-Vector final state: could have CP even and odd components
• Both BaBar and Belle measure mostly CP even
• BaBar fits S and CS = -0.32 § 0.43 § 0.13C = +0.02 § 0.25 § 0.09
b
d d
Wccd )(D
)(D0B
0Bt,c,ub
dd
W
d
)(D
c
cg
)(D
S = sin2 if no penguin
C = 0 if no penguin
26
b ! s modes
Bb
d,u
W
ss
sg
Kd,u
bW
s
s
sg
u,c,t
Kd,u d,u
B
B ! KS B ! KS
B ! ‘ KS B ! ‘ KS
• Same CKM structure as J/ KS
• u-penguin down by ~1/50• Expect S=sin2 to 5%
• Same CKM structure as J/ KS
• u-penguin down by ~1/50• Expect S=sin2 to 5%
• Like KS but also u-tree• Still, S~sin2
• Like KS but also u-tree• Still, S~sin2
27
bs penguin: S coefficient (sin2)
bs penguin average
0.18 0.20
~ 2.5 from ccs modes
bs penguin average
0.18 0.20
~ 2.5 from ccs modes
Expectation from J/KS
‘
28
Sin2 prospects
• Sin2 in b ccs is already a precision measurement– But still statistically limited– Will be improved
• Measurements in other modes will improve as luminosity– Maybe faster, as techniques improve
• Improved results in the b s modes will be particularly interesting!
29
Sin2• In the absence of penguins, sin2 from
B0 ! + - asymmetry• BR of B0 ! K+ - and B+ ! + 0 tell us that
interference between P and T is large• In principle isospin analysis of +-, +0,
and 00 allows for clean extraction of • In practice 00 very hard
b
d d
ud
u
+
-
B0
b
d d
d
u
u -
+
t
B0
30
B ! hh Branching Ratios (x 10-6)
Averages from J. Olsen, CKM Workshop 2003
31
Time dependent fits to +-
78 fb-1
~ 106 events 84 fb-1
~ 160 events
32
+ - Fit Results
Belle rules out CP conservation (C=S=0) at 99.93% C.L.BaBar is still consistent with C=S=0The discrepancy is at ~ 2-2.5 level
Belle rules out CP conservation (C=S=0) at 99.93% C.L.BaBar is still consistent with C=S=0The discrepancy is at ~ 2-2.5 level
S C
33
Sin2 from • from full, time dependent, tagged,
Dalitz plot analysis of +-0
• Hard analysis• For starters, BaBar
– Quasi two body analysis, only +- and - + – Also +K- and -K+
– BF(B0K)= (7.31.31.3) 10-6
– BF(B0)= (22.61.82.2) 10-6
34
~ 430 events
ACP = -0.18 § 0.08 § 0.03 Ã time integrated termC = 0.36 § 0.18 § 0.04S = 0.19 § 0.24 § 0.03
• 2 CPV effect• first step towards full Dalitz analysis
B
35
Sin2- Prospects
• Clean extraction without theoretical assumptions will be hard
• If B0 0 0 very small, bounds on sin2 could become quite useful
• We will most likely see CPV (maybe we are already seeing it)– but we will have a hard time
disentangling the weak phases
36
What can we say about ?
• B ! vs K– From tree-penguin interference– Needs some theo assumptions
• B ! DK– Theoretically clean– Interference between bu(cd) and bc(ud)
• B D(*) D(*)D(*)a1 – Theoretically clean– Sin(2+)
37
B DK
B - b
u
u
u
sc
D 0
B - b
s
D0
u c
Information on through interference in final states common to D0 and D0 (e.g. , KK..)
Several variants on the market• prospects look a little brighter, as color suppression not as large as previously thought
Measurements of various BR done or in progress
First asymmetry measurements
u u
Vub ~ ei
38
from B DK, an example
D is CP-odd or CP-even neutral D combination
with strong phase
39
DK D
D K+K-, +-
D KS0, Ks, KS , KS , KS ‘
no usefulconstraints yet
no usefulconstraints yet
40
- Prospects• Many methods, many theoretically clean• Problems:
– Need a lot of luminosity!– Often methods have ambiguities
• , + 45o, + 90o, etc.
• Will need to combine many channels• It will be a long and arduous journey
• We are taking the first steps– Many more B D(*)K(*) modes have been/are being
measured
• Not sure where we will end up– But it should be fun
41
Vub from b u l
Two complementary approaches• Reconstructed exclusive states
– B l B l B l B l – Theoretical uncertainties– Lattice could eventually come to the
rescue• Inclusive b u l
– Theoretically cleaner– Experimenters make cuts into phase
spaceintroduce theoretical uncertainties
42
Vub: Exclusive Decays
• Branching ratios: BaBar, Belle, Cleo
• General agreement
• Working to combine into single Vub
• Typical individual measurement
|Vub| ~ 20%
43
Exclusive Branching Ratios
Compilation from Gibbons, CKM Workshop 2003Compilation from Gibbons, CKM Workshop 2003
x 10-4
x 10-4
44
E(lepton)
M2(X) E(X)
q2(l)
From Muheim, CKM Workshop 2003:Blue lines indicate bc l regionsFrom Muheim, CKM Workshop 2003:Blue lines indicate bc l regions
Inclusive decays: b u l
X=hadronic systin bX l
45
b u l : new expt. technique
• Fully reconstruct one B• Then look only at what’s left
– Reduce combinatorics– Know momentum vector of recoil
• Important for kinematic reconstruction
– Reduce continuum
Brecoil
BrecoD* Y(4S) l
46
S/B~0.3
MES [GeV]
Leptonpl>1.0 GeV/cS/B ~ 2.5
• B D(*) n• Efficiency only 0.4%• But statistics are OK• M(X) reconstruction• Belle, similar technique with B D(*) l
• B D(*) n• Efficiency only 0.4%• But statistics are OK• M(X) reconstruction• Belle, similar technique with B D(*) l
MX < 1.55 GeV
Signal167 ± 21events
47
b u l inclusive: summary
•Individual measurements in agreement• ~ 15-20% uncertainty each• improvement on LEP
•Individual measurements in agreement• ~ 15-20% uncertainty each• improvement on LEP
48
Vub Summary
• Much progress is being made• Very active area, both theory and
experiment• Lattice improvements soon• Want to go well below 10%
uncertainty for Unitarity Triangle constraints
49
Conclusions• The B-factories have gone
through a very successful first three years
• Today I showed you only a small fraction of their physics program, there is much more
• We are looking forward to increases in luminosity, eventually x10-20 more data
• The SM is still alive and well, but we’ll continue poking at it
50
THE END