1 cohort b institute on beginning reading iii february 1 and 2, 2006 achieving healthy grade-level...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
212 views
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Cohort BInstitute on Beginning Reading III
Cohort BInstitute on Beginning Reading III
February 1 and 2, 2006
Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading
![Page 2: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Cohort B, IBR III Cohort B, IBR III Content DevelopmentContent Development
Content developed by:
Carrie Thomas Beck Wayne Callender
Jeanie Mercier Smith Patricia Travers
Additional support:
Katie Tate
![Page 3: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
AcknowledgmentsAcknowledgments
Oregon Department of Education
Center on Teaching and Learning, College of Education, University of Oregon
U.S. Department of Education
![Page 4: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
CopyrightCopyright
All materials are protected by copyright and should not be reproduced or used without expressed permission of the Oregon Reading First Center. Selected slides were reproduced from other sources and original references cited.
![Page 5: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Evaluating the Health of a Grade-Level Beginning
Reading System
Evaluating the Health of a Grade-Level Beginning
Reading System
Content developed by
Patricia Travers
![Page 6: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Were Grade-Level Instructional Maps Effective in Supporting Adequate Progress for Students with Benchmark, Strategic and Intensive needs?
How Healthy Is Your System?
![Page 7: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Grade Level Instructional MapGrade Level Instructional MapKindergarten ExampleKindergarten Example
TimePeriod
InstructionalRecommendation
Participation in Core Supplemental and InterventionPrograms/ Strategies
Supplemental and InterventionProgram Delivery
Frequency ofDIBELS Progress
Monitoring
Determining InstructionalEffectiveness
Benchmark: Who: Teacher
When: morning
Activities: Centers Small group Large group
Group Size: 7< or whole group
Read Naturally
Touch Phonics
Star Fall website
Who: teacher
When:_X__ w/in 90 minutes_X__ outside of 90 min
Time:Morning block
Group Size: 7< or whole group
As neededWho: Teacher, Reading Coach andERT Team
How Often: As needed
Criteria: DIBELS and Theme Skillsassessments
Strategic: Who: Teacher, Title I, Specialists
When: Morning/afternoon
Activities: Supplemental, centers, whole/small
Group Size: < 7
Touch Phonics
Phonics for Reading
Language for Learning andThinking
Who: teacher and specialists
When:__X_w/in 90 minutes__X_outside of 90 min
Time: Morning/afternoon
Group Size: Small group or whole depending
MonthlyWho: Teacher, Reading Coach, andERT Team
How Often: Monthly
Criteria: DIBELS and Theme SkillsAssessments
Fall toWinter
Intensive: Who: Teacher and specialists
When: Morning/afternoon
Activities: Supplemental, plus other support
Group Size: Small group of no more than 6 --and/or 1 on 1 help
ERI
Language for Learning andThinking
Who: teacher and specialists
When:__X_ w/in 90 minutes__X_outside of 90 min
Time: Morning/afternoon
Group Size: Small group of no more than 6 –and/or 1 on 1 help
2 times a monthWho: Teacher, Reading Coach andERT Team
How Often:Monthly
Criteria: DIBELS and Theme SkillsAssessments
![Page 8: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Fall 2005 Winter 2006Still At risk
(these students may have made progress but notenough to decrease their risk)
Now at Some risk
Of the intensivestudents in the fall,
some may be...Now at Low risk
Now At riskStill Some risk
(these students may have made progress but notenough to decrease their risk)
Of the strategicstudents in the fall,
some may be...
Now at Low risk
Now At riskNow Some riskOf the benchmark
students in the fall,some may be...
Still Low risk(note that these students still had to make progress to
maintain their low risk status)
DIBELS Summary of Effectiveness Reports DIBELS Summary of Effectiveness Reports Four Ways to Achieve Adequate ProgressFour Ways to Achieve Adequate Progress
![Page 9: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
DeficitAt RiskEmergingSome Risk
EstablishedLow Risk
Final Benchmark Goals and Later:
Goal Skills
Progressive or Midpoint Benchmark Goals: Developing Skills
Instructional Status TerminologyInstructional Status Terminology
Used for all measures except ORF and LNF
![Page 10: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Kindergarten Measures
Beginning Middle End
Measure Score Status Score Status Score Status
ISF < 44-7≥ 8
At riskSome riskLow risk
< 1010-24≥ 25
DeficitEmergingEstablished
LNF < 22-7≥ 8
At riskSome riskLow risk
< 1515-26≥ 27
At riskSome riskLow risk
< 2829-39≥ 40
At riskSome riskLow risk
PSF < 67-17≥18
At riskSome riskLow risk
< 910-34≥ 35
DeficitEmergingEstablished
NWF < 45-12≥ 13
At riskSome riskLow risk
< 1415-24≥ 25
At riskSome riskLow risk
Progressive Benchmarks: Progressive Benchmarks: Are Students On-Track Are Students On-Track To Achieve the Benchmark Goal?To Achieve the Benchmark Goal?
![Page 11: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Beginning Middle End
Measure Score Status Score Status Score Status
LNF < 2525-36≥ 37
At riskSome riskLow risk
PSF < 1010-34≥ 35
DeficitEmergingEstablished
< 1010-34≥ 35
At riskSome riskLow risk
< 1010-34≥ 35
At riskSome riskLow risk
NWF < 1313-23≥ 24
At riskSome riskLow risk
< 2930-49≥50
DeficitEmergingEstablished
< 2930-49≥ 50
DeficitEmergingEstablished
ORF < 78-19≥ 20
At riskSome riskLow risk
< 1920-39≥ 40
At riskSome riskLow risk
First Grade Measures
Progressive Benchmarks: Progressive Benchmarks: Are Students On-Track Are Students On-Track To Achieve the Benchmark Goal?To Achieve the Benchmark Goal?
![Page 12: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Beginning Middle End
Measure Score Status Score Status Score Status
2nd Grade
ORF
< 2626-43≥ 44
At riskSome riskLow risk
< 5252-67≥ 68
At riskSome riskLow risk
< 7070-89≥ 90
At riskSome riskLow risk
3rd Grade ORF
< 5353-76≥ 77
At riskSome riskLow risk
< 6767-91≥ 92
At riskSome riskLow risk
< 7980-109≥ 110
At riskSome riskLow risk
2nd & 3rd Grade ORF Scores
Progressive Benchmarks: Progressive Benchmarks: Are Students On-Track Are Students On-Track To Achieve the Benchmark Goal?To Achieve the Benchmark Goal?
![Page 13: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Measuring the Progress of Your StudentsMeasuring the Progress of Your Students
Using your K- 3 DIBELS benchmark tables, determine the following students’ skill or risk status at mid-year:
1. 1st grader with NWF of 27 Deficit2. Kindergartener with PSF of 8 Some Risk3. 3rd grader with ORF of 52 At Risk4. 2nd grader with ORF of 52 At Risk5. 1st grader with NWF of 59 Established
![Page 14: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Evaluating the Health of a Grade-Level System
Using Summary of Effectiveness Reports
![Page 15: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
![Page 16: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Summary of Effectiveness ReportsSummary of Effectiveness Reports
Summary of Effectiveness Reports: Provide
information on how students with different
instructional needs (e.g., benchmark,
strategic, and intensive) performed on the
same measure at two points in time.
Reports can be generated for the district, school,
or by classroom.
Reports can be used to evaluate the effectiveness
of additional support/intervention services.
![Page 17: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Finding the Summary of Effectiveness Tables on the Website
Go to http://dibels.uoregon.edu/ Select “Data System” Log in with your user name and password Select “View/Create Reports” Select “Summary of Effectiveness by School,
District, or Project” Select the year and school Select the time of year and grade level Select “Download Report Here”
![Page 18: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Summary of Effectiveness by School or District
![Page 19: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
![Page 20: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Summary of Effectiveness (We do it)
Using the Test District sample, locate the following information on the Summary of Effectiveness table:
__________________________________________1. District
SchoolYearStep (Time of Year)
2. DIBELS Measure Indicated3. Levels of Instructional Support4. Total Number of Students Included in the Report
![Page 21: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
![Page 22: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Using your school’s Summary of Effectiveness by School Report and locate the following information:
1. DistrictSchoolYearStep (Time of Year)
2. DIBELS Measure Indicated3. Levels of Instructional Support4. Total Number of Students Included in the Report
![Page 23: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Evaluating health through the Evaluating health through the Summary of Effectiveness Summary of Effectiveness
by by School School ReportReport
![Page 24: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
1. Initial Skill: In the fall of kindergarten, what percentage of students were:
Instructional Recommendation in the Fall 2005
% of students at Instructional Recommendation in Fall 2005
Benchmark
Strategic
Intensive
![Page 25: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
![Page 26: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
1. Initial Skill: In the fall of kindergarten, what percentage of students were:
Instructional Recommendation in the Fall 2005
% of Students at Instructional Recommendation in Fall 2005
Benchmark 14.9%
Strategic 42.5%
Intensive 42.5%
![Page 27: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
2. Adequate Progress of Benchmark Students:2. Adequate Progress of Benchmark Students:
Of the students who were Benchmark in the
beginning of kindergarten, what percent
achieved the ISF goal of 25 for the middle of
kindergarten? ___________
![Page 28: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
![Page 29: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
2. Adequate Progress of Benchmark Students:2. Adequate Progress of Benchmark Students:
Of the students who were Benchmark in the
beginning of kindergarten, what percent
achieved the ISF goal of 25 for the middle of
kindergarten? ___________59.9%
![Page 30: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
3. Adequate Progress of Strategic Students:3. Adequate Progress of Strategic Students:
Of the students who were Strategic in the
beginning of kindergarten, what percent
achieved the ISF goal of 25 for the
middle of kindergarten? ___________
![Page 31: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
![Page 32: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
3. Adequate Progress of Strategic Students:3. Adequate Progress of Strategic Students:
Of the students who were Strategic in the
beginning of kindergarten, what percent
achieved the ISF goal of 25 for the middle of
kindergarten? ___________32.4%
![Page 33: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
4. Adequate Progress of Intensive Students:4. Adequate Progress of Intensive Students:
Of the students who were Intensive in the beginning of kindergarten, what percent made adequate progress towards the ISF goal of 25 for the middle of kindergarten? ___________
![Page 34: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
![Page 35: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
4. Adequate Progress of Intensive Students:4. Adequate Progress of Intensive Students:
Of the students who were Intensive in the beginning of kindergarten, what percent made adequate progress towards the ISF goal of 25 for the middle of kindergarten? 77%
![Page 36: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
![Page 37: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
Evaluating health through the Evaluating health through the Summary of Effectiveness Summary of Effectiveness
by by ClassClass Report Report
![Page 38: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
Students who began the year at benchmark
Students who began the year at strategic
Students who began the year at intensive
![Page 39: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
Benchmark student who did not meet the ISF Goal of 25 Count & percent
of benchmark students meeting the ISF benchmark
Benchmark students who met the ISF Goal of 25
![Page 40: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
Strategic student who did not meet the ISF Goal of 25
Count and Percent of strategic students meeting the ISF benchmark
Strategic students who met the ISF Goal of 25
![Page 41: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
Intensive student who met the ISF Goal of 25
Count and Percent of intensive students meeting the ISF benchmark
Intensive students who did not meet the ISF Goal of 25. However, Michael did reach emerging status.
![Page 42: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
This classroom is meeting the needs of the all but one student requiring benchmark instruction. How would you characterize the school’s instructional
support services for students needing strategic or intensive support?
Strong Medium Weak
![Page 43: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43
Summary of Effectiveness by ClassSummary of Effectiveness by Class
Which benchmark students reached established (low risk) on the winter benchmark goal?
Which strategic students reached established (low risk) on the winter benchmark goal?
Which intensive students reached established (low risk) on the winter benchmark goal?
Which intensive students reached emerging (some risk) on the winter benchmark goal?
Data Sources: Summary of Effectiveness by Class; DIBELS benchmark tables
Using your own classroom summaries of effectiveness, locate and highlight in green the following information:
![Page 44: 1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d39f/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44
Summary of Effectiveness by ClassSummary of Effectiveness by Class
Which benchmark students did not reached established (low risk) on the winter benchmark goal?
Which strategic students did not reached established (low risk) on the winter benchmark goal?
Which intensive students did not reached established (low risk) or emerging (some risk) on the winter benchmark goal?
Data Sources: Summary of Effectiveness by Class; DIBELS benchmark tables
Using your own classroom summaries of effectiveness, locate and highlight in pink the following information: