1 competitive injection molding david o. kazmer, p.e., ph.d. sme/eastec 2004 conference springfield,...

42
1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

Upload: dylan-joseph

Post on 16-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

1

COMPETITIVEINJECTION MOLDING

David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D.

SME/Eastec 2004 Conference

Springfield, MA

Page 2: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

2

Agenda

• Economic Structures & Data

• Evaluation of Injection Molding

• Barriers to Competition

• Modern Molding Technologies

• Summary

Page 3: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

3

Cost StructuresTotal

Production Costs

TotalLabor Costs

TotalConsumables

Cost

TotalFacilities

Costs

Machinery

Maint’nce

Facilities

Yield

$/Hr

Output

Downtime

Energy

Resin

Page 4: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

4

Cost Parameters

• Cost parameters N.E. China– Operator labor $13/hr $0.70/hr– Eng/Mgt labor $30/hr $3/hr– Energy cost $0.08/kWh– ABS resin $1477/ton $950/ton– Machinery cost $30/hr $15/hr– Facilities cost $7.00/ft2 $4.20/ft2

– Maintenance rate 10% 20%

Page 5: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

5

Agenda

• Economic Structures & Data• Evaluation of Injection Molding

– Class 0: Obsolete– Class 1: Standard– Class 2: Efficient– Class 3: Lights Out

• Barriers to Competition• Modern Molding Technologies• Summary

Page 6: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

6

Injection Molding Economics

• Case Study for a Mid-Sized Molder– 200 million parts per year– Average part weight: 10g

Page 7: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

7

Class 0: ObsoleteOperating Conditions

• 8 cavities/mold with cold runners• Poorly selected hydraulic machines (26 kW)• 50 seconds per cycle (optimistic)

– Cooling issues & semi-automatic

• 95% quality level (optimistic)• 1 operator per 1 machine• 1 eng/mgt per 15 operators• 2 shifts, 5 days per week• 4 hour setup per 10,000 parts

Page 8: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

8

Class 0: ObsoleteFactory Characteristics

#Operators#Machines #Eng/Mgt Energy Use

Page 9: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

9

Class 0: ObsoleteCost Data

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

To

tal

Pro

du

ctio

n C

ost

($M

illi

on

s)

New England China

Facilities

Labor

Energy costs

Resin costs

Page 10: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

10

Class 1: StandardOperating Conditions

• 16 cavities/mold with 50% hot runners• Well selected hydraulic machines (30 kW)• 45 seconds per cycle (optimistic)• 98% quality level (optimistic)• 1 operator per 2 machines• 1 eng/mgt per 15 operators• 2 shifts, 5 days per week• 2 hour setup per 10,000 parts

Page 11: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

11

Class 1: StandardFactory Characteristics

#Operators#Machines #Eng/Mgt Energy Use

Page 12: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

12

Class 1: StandardCost Data

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

To

tal

Pro

du

ctio

n C

ost

($M

illi

on

s)

New England China

Facilities

Labor

Energy costs

Resin costs

Page 13: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

13

Class 2: EfficientOperating Conditions

• 32 cavities/mold with hot runners• Electric machines (26 kW)• 40 seconds per cycle, fully automatic• 99% quality level• 1 operator per 4 machine• 1 eng/mgt per 15 operators• 3 shifts, 5 days per week• 1 hour setup per 10,000 parts

Page 14: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

14

Class 2: EfficientFactory Characteristics

#Operators#Machines #Eng/Mgt Energy Use

Page 15: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

15

Class 2: EfficientCost Data

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

To

tal

Pro

du

ctio

n C

ost

($M

illi

on

s)

New England China

Facilities

Labor

Energy costs

Resin costs

Page 16: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

16

Class 3: Lights OutOperating Conditions

• 32 cavities/mold with hot runners• Electric machines (22 kW)• 35 seconds per cycle

– Fully automatic including crating, etc.

• 99.9% quality level• 1 operator per all machines• 1 eng/mgt per all machines• 3 shifts, 7 days per week• 0.5 hour setup per 10,000 parts

Page 17: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

17

Class 3: Lights OutFactory Characteristics

#Operators#Machines #Eng/Mgt Energy Use

Page 18: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

18

Class 3: Lights OutCost Data

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

To

tal

Pro

du

ctio

n C

ost

($M

illi

on

s)

New England China

Facilities

Labor

Energy costs

Resin costs

Page 19: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

19

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

0 1 2 3

Factory Class

To

tal

Pro

du

ctio

n C

ost

($M

illi

on

s)

• New England

Comparison

• China

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

0 1 2 3

Factory Class

To

tal

Pro

du

ctio

n C

ost

($M

illi

on

s)

Shipping

Production

Page 20: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

20

Head to Head Competitive Assessment

0 1 2 3

0 -139% -280% -447% -512%

1 -7% -71% -146% -175%

2 39% 3% -40% -57%

3 52% 23% -10% -23%

China Factory ClassN

ew E

ngla

nd F

acto

ry C

lass

0 1 2 3

0

1

2

3

Page 21: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

21

Validation: World Production

• US Plastics industry went from surplus of $894 million in 2000 to a deficit of $1,387 million in 2002– A swing of $2,281 million.

• In 2001, China exported $6bn of fabricated plastic products last year. – China also exports plastics in many other forms…

– In 2002 China doubled the volume of its exports

• China is world's largest petrochemical importer– Chinese petrochemical demand is doubling every 8 years.

Page 22: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

22

Validation: Molded Utensils• In 2003, US imported more than 100bn plastic bags

• A coalition (Intelplast Group, PCL Packaging and Sonoco Products) claimed that Asian countries were flooding the US market with below-cost PE bags and demanded an anti-dumping duty

• In September, the US Inter’l Trade Commission determined that "there is a reasonable indication that a US industry is threatened with material injury by reason of imports of polyethylene retail carrier bags from China, Malaysia and Thailand that are allegedly sold in the United States at less than fair value".

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

To

tal

Pro

du

ctio

n C

ost

($M

illi

on

s)

New England China

Facilities

Labor

Energy costs

Resin costs

A producer of plastic utensils found that they could purchase products from China for less than the cost of their resin.

Page 23: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

23

Agenda

• Economic Structures & Data

• Evaluation of Injection Molding

• Barriers to Competition

• Modern Molding Technologies

• Summary

Page 24: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

24

Resource Cost as aCompetitive Barrier

• Labor rates

• Material costs

• Overhead costs

• These are hard to control in U.S.

• Need to use less resources!– Or avoid commodity markets

Page 25: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

25

Capability as aCompetitive Barrier

• Automation requires very high consistency• “Open loop” strategy:

– Monitor & control inputs– Accept all parts without inspection

• “Closed loop” strategy:– Characterize process (design of experiments)– Monitor outputs– Accept good parts– Adjust process to fix problems

Page 26: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

26

Investment as aCompetitive Barrier

• Each application requires:– Automation– Sensors– Software– Extended setup times

• Investment is significant w.r.t. tooling costs

• Difficult to earn back unless high volume• Very difficult to try unproven technology

Page 27: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

27

Agenda

• Economic Structures & Data

• Evaluation of Injection Molding

• Barriers to Competition

• Modern Molding Technologies

• Summary

Page 28: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

28

Modern Manufacturing

Page 29: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

29

Molding Technologies:Automation

• Robotics provides for:– Reduced labor content (demolding & degating)– Repeatable cycle times– Fast cycle times

• Trend to continue:– Cheap computers– Low cost motors &

standard designs

Page 30: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

30

Molding Technologies:All Electric Machines

• All electric advantages– ~50% of the power– Silent operation– Cleanliness– Precision– Reduced AC costs

• Trend to continue– Automotive hybrids

fuel motor technology– Asian machine technology improves

Page 31: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

31

Molding Technologies:Hot Runners

• Melt delivery systems provide:– Low pressure drops– Fast cycle times– Zero material waste– Tight quality control

• Trend to continue:– Lower priced systems– New technologies– Economic decisions

Page 32: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

32

Molding Technologies:Cavity Pressure Control

• Closed loop pressure feedback provides:– Automatic V/P switchover– Improved consistency– Quality control data

• Trend to continue:– Low cost sensors– Cheap computers– New technologies

• Improved control• Improved sensing

Page 33: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

33

Molding Technologies:Quality Control

• Quality control systems should enable:– Automatic acceptance or rejection– 100% part testing– Automatic cycling– Variance analysis

• Trend to grow:– SPC is crude compared

to emerging methods– Sensor:analysis explosion– Improved capabilities

Page 34: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

34

1-D Flow In A Tube

• Hagen-Poiseuille– Viscous, laminar flow (constant viscosity)– Relates flow rate, pressure, and viscosity

• Flow conductance, k, defined as:

L

PRQ

8

4

L

R

P

Qk

8

4

Page 35: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

35

Flow Network Analysis

• Consider a two-branched hot runner system

• Geometry & flow conductance known– Develop flow conductance matrix

1

2 3 4

5 6

6

5

4

3

2

1

4646

3535

46462424

35352323

242324231212

1212

6

5

4

3

2

1

0000

0000

000

000

00

0000

P

P

P

P

P

P

kk

kk

kkkk

kkkk

kkkkkk

kk

Q

Q

Q

Q

Q

Q

Page 36: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

36

Flow Network Analysis

• Apply boundary conditions:– P1, P5, & P6 observed– Q2, Q3, & Q4 equal 0

• Solve on-line in real-time

1

2 3 4

5 6

obs

obs

obs

P

P

P

P

P

P

kk

kk

kkkk

kkkk

kkkkkk

kk

Q

Q

Q

6

5

4

3

2

1

4646

3535

46462424

35352323

242324231212

1212

6

5

1

0000

0000

000

000

00

0000

0

0

0

Page 37: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

37

On-Line Analysis Results

• Pressures– Mostly similar– Flow rate & fill effects?

• Flow Rates– Not previously

observable on-line

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 5 10 15Time (sec)

Pre

ssur

e (M

Pa)

Gate 1

Gate 2

Gate 3

Gate 4

Injection

0

50

100

150

200

0 5 10 15Time (sec)

Flo

w R

ate

(cc/

sec)

Gate 1

Gate 2

Gate 3

Gate 4

1

3

2

4

5

6

Coming ability to estimate part weight, shrinkage, melt temperature, …

BEFORE MOLD OPENS!!

Page 38: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

38

Molding Technologies:Electronic Data Systems

• Electronic data systems should enable:– Production scheduling– Materials requirements planning– Real time plant feedback– Real time process feedback

Suppliers

Customers

Suppliers

Customers

Application Server

ApplicationData

PDA

Computer

CD burner

Network

MachineData

SupplierData

Printer

ApplicationData

Computer

Printer

SupplierData

1

2

19

18

17

16

15

14

1311

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

12

20

21

22

2324

2526

27

TruCo Molding Company 121 Producers Lane Flora, IL 54120

WORK ORDER

Date 8-May Shot Size 5.2 in Application Printer Tray 1: Ram Position, Velocity (0,20%)

Machine Maxis 450 2: Ram Position, Velocity (40,45%) Material ABS4400 3: Ram Position, Velocity (80,10%)

Drying Time 2 Hours 4: Ram Position, Velocity (90,5%) Drying Temp 230 F Cushion 0.4 in

… … … …

Flimold 8 Nueva Via Monterrey, Mexico

ORDEN DE TRABAJO Fecha 8-May Tamaño Del Tiro 124 mm

Uso Printer Tray 1: Posición, Velocidad (0,18%) Máquina HPE500 2: Posición, Velocidad (40,40%)

Resina ABS4400 3: Posición, Velocidad (80,9%) Tiempo Se Secado 2 Horas 4: Posición, Velocidad (90,4%)

Temperatura De Sequía 110 C Amortiguador 9 mm … … … …

Page 39: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

39

Many Molding Technologies

• Coinjection• Dynamic feed• Gas assist• In-mold assembly• In-mold color• In-mold film• In-mold painting• Insert molding• Lost core molding

• Mold filling analysis• MuCell• Pad printing• Pulsed heating• Rapid prototyping• Stack molds• Thin wall• Two-shot molding• Water assist

Page 40: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

40

Head to Head Competitive Assessment

0 1 2 3

0 -139% -280% -447% -512%

1 -7% -71% -146% -175%

2 39% 3% -40% -57%

3 52% 23% -10% -23%

China Factory ClassN

ew E

ngla

nd F

acto

ry C

lass

0 1 2 3

0

1

2

3

Page 41: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

41

Summary

• Competitiveness isn’t all about labor rates– Automation & localization can largely offset

• True commodities are in jeopardy.

• It is about efficiency …– Knowing which/how to leverage technology

• … and differentiation– Market understanding, penetration, & recognition– Product & process specialization– Cost & time performance

Page 42: 1 COMPETITIVE INJECTION MOLDING David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. SME/Eastec 2004 Conference Springfield, MA

42

Final Thoughts

• Mid-Term Issue: Oil & Natural Gas Supply– Increasing Asian demand– Weakening dollar

• Government debt• Trade deficit• Euro as preferred currency

• Long-Term: Sustained Labor Demand– Global supply of all labor– Improving supply chains