1 department of commerce demonstration project workforce management staff training 2006

1

Department of Commerce

Demonstration ProjectWorkforce

Management Staff Training

2006

2

Overview of Demonstration Project

3

History of HR Demonstration Projects

• Title VI, Civil Service Reform Act of 1978Authorizes OPM to permit Federal Agencies to conduct demo projects to determine if changes in policy/procedures would improve Federal HR management– China Lake Project (Paybanding)– NIST Project (Paybanding, Staffing, Perf. Mgt. & RIF

Each project limited to 5,000 employees and initial 5-year test period

• Federal Employees Pay & Compensation Act of 1993

Adopted many demo project interventions (e.g. recruitment/retention bonuses)

4

Background of DOC Demo Project

Key Project Components• Simplified Classification System Using Career

Paths and Paybanding• Additional Hiring Flexibilities• “Pay-for Performance” Performance Management

System• Additional Pay Flexibilities• Revised Reduction-in-Force System

5


Project Objectives• Attracting and Retaining High Performance

Employees• Improving the Effectiveness and Efficiency of HR• Increased Delegation of Authority and

Accountability to Managers• HR System that Better Facilitates Organizational

Mission & Excellence

6


Project Attributes• Simplification• Easier to Understand• Greater Flexibility• Delegates More Decision-Making to Managers• Greater Emphasis on Performance Management

7


Project Design• Fair & Equitable• Budget Discipline• Partnership Based

8

Background of DOC Project

Current Participating DOC Organizations

• Technology Administration, Offices of the Under Sec. & Tech. Policy

• Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)• NTIA Institute for Telecommunication

Services (ITS)• NOAA

9

Background of DOC Project

Employees Covered• All GS• All GM• All ST/SL 3104 for Appraisal, Awards and RIF

(not eligible for incentive pay)

Employees Not Covered• All SES• All FWS

10

Summary of Project Features

Classification• Career Paths Replace Occupational Groups• Pay Bands & Intervals Replace Grades & Steps• DOC Standards Replace OPM Standards

11


Staffing• Delegated Examining from OPM (Agency-Based)• Streamlined Staffing = Easier Recruitment of

Quality Candidates

12


Performance Management• Potential Annual Performance Pay Increases• Potential Annual Bonuses• Motivates Employees to Higher Performance• Designed to Attract Higher Quality Candidates• Designed to Improve Organizational Excellence

13


Pay Administration• Flexible Pay Setting in Recruitment & Internal

Placement• Flexible Pay Setting in Performance Management

• Supervisory pay band ceilings exceed regular pay band ceilings

14


Reduction-in Force• Simplified to Reduce Disruption to Organization• Designed to Improve Match-Up of Employee

Skills With Positions• Retains All Employee Veteran Preference &

Appeal Rights• Potential Service Credit Up To 30 Years• Transfers RIF credit from other agencies on

prorated basis

15


What Doesn’t Change• Employee Rights (appeals, Grievance, EEO, etc.)• Labor Relations• Employee Training & Development• Employee Benefits

16

Demonstration Project References

• OPM Federal Registers • DoC Demo Website

http://ohrm.os.doc.gov/Demo/index.htm

• NOAA WFMO Website

http://www.wfm.noaa.gov/index.html

17

Demonstration Project References (continued)

• DoC Demo Operating Procedures

• DoC Demo Processing Manual

• DoC Demo Pay Setting Guide

• DoC Demo Automated Classification (ACS)

• DoC Demo Project Employee Guide

• Demo Project Training Modules

18

Position Classification

19

Classification Principles

• Provide classification equity• Simplify the process• Support the mission• Consider the whole job• Reinforce management accountability• Support pay for performance

20

Purpose Of Classification

To Categorize Positions By:

» Career Path» Occupational Series» Pay Band» Title

21

Objectives

• Simplify Classification Process

• Increase Management Authority, Accountability, And Flexibility

22

ADVANTAGES OF PAY BANDING

• FEWER, BROADER AND SIMPLER STANDARDS

• MORE UNDERSTANDABLE CLASSIFICATION

• SHORTER POSITION DESCRIPTIONS

• FEWER CLASSIFICATION DECISIONS

23


• LESS DOCUMENTATION

• EASIER TO AUTOMATE

• FACILITATES DELEGATION TO LINE MANAGERS

24


• FACILITATES PAY FOR PERFORMANCE

• MORE FLEXIBLE ENTRY PAY

• BETTER LINK TO CAREER STAGES

25

Covered: GS GM

Excluded: WG SES ST/SL-3104

Positions Covered

26

Classification System

CURRENT• One Pay Schedule (GS for

all White Collar Occupations)

• 15 Grade Levels, each with 10 steps

• 100’s of OPM Classification Standards & Individualized PDs.

DEMO• 4 Pay Schedules: “Career

Paths”- Scientific & Engineering (ZP)- Technical (ZT)- Administrative (ZA)- Support (ZS)

• 5 “Pay Bands” with Range of Salaries. No Steps

• Limited Number of DOC developed standards

27

Advantages Of Career Paths

• Similar Treatment For Similar Occupations

• Broader And Simpler Classification Standards

28

Career Path Definitions

* One grade interval non-professional technical positions that support scientific and engineering activities through the application of various skills and techniques in the electrical, mechanical, physical science, biology, mathematical, and computer fields; and student positions for training in these skills.

Scientific/Engineering (ZP)

Scientific/EngineeringTechnician(ZT)

* Two-grade interval professional technical positions in the physical, engineering, biological, mathematical, computer and social sciences; and student positions for training in these disciplines.

29

Career Path Definitions

Support(ZS)

Two-grade interval positions in such administrative andmanagerial fields as finance, procurement, personnel librarianship, public information, and program management and analysis; and student positions for training in these fields.

Administrative (ZA)

One-grade interval positions that provide administrative support through the application of typing, clerical, secretarial, assistant, and similar knowledge and skills; positions that provide specialized facilities support, such as guard and fire fighter; assistants, and student positions for training in these skills.

30

Career Path Determinations

Biologist MathematicianChemist MeteorologistIT Specialist OceanographerEconomist Physical ScientistEngineer/Scientist StatisticianFish Administrator

Biology TechnicianElectronics TechnicianEngineering TechnicianMeteorological Technician Physical Science Technician

Scientific/Engineering (ZP)

Scientific &EngineeringTechnical (ZT)

31

Career Path Determinations

Accountant Management AnalystAdministrative Officer Miscellaneous AdministrativeBudget Analyst Personnel Management

General Business Specialist SpecialistPrinting Manager

Administrative (ZA)

Personnel Clerk/Assistant Accounting TechnicianMiscellaneous Clerk/Assistant Legal Instruments Examiner Purchasing Agent SecretaryLibrary TechnicianOffice Automation/Clerk/AssistantManagement Clerk/Assistant

General Support (ZS)

32

Classification System

Automated Classification System

• User System• HR Validation System• PD Storage System

33

Classification Logic

• Principal Objective

• Career Path

• Series

• Pay Band

• Title

34

Mixed Series Positions

• Highest Pay Band Controls Series

• Other Factors: Principal Objective Paramount Qualifications Sources Of Recruitment Lines Of Promotion

35

Interdisciplinary Positions

• Classification And Staffing Issue

• Advertised In 2 Or More Series

• Classification Based On Selectee’s Qualifications

36

Classification Components

• Principle objective• Level designation

– Duties and Responsibilities– Knowledge, Skills and Abilities

• Function Codes• Specialty descriptors • Key phrases• Supervisory designation• Position Requirements (Motor Vehicle, OGE-450,

Physical Activity)• Position Sensitivity

37

Career Paths & Broad Pay Bands

Career Paths

Pay Bands

Scientific &

Engineering ZPI II III IV V

Scientific &

Engineering

Technician ZT I II III IV V

Administrative

ZAI II III IV V

Support

ZSI II III IV V

Corresponding

GS Grade 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011 12

13

14 15

38

Classification Standards

• Duties And Responsibilities» Level of responsibility

• KSAs» Education» Experience

39

• Linked To Series

• Definitions Provided

Titling decisions

40

Titling Practices

• Supervisory

• Research

• Assistant

• Officer

• Lead

41

Classification Standards

Current

• Complex criteria

• Multiple formats

» FES

» Narrative

» Job family

• Range of grades

Doc Demo

• Simplified Criteria

• One Format

» Duties And

Responsibilities

» KSAs

• 4 Career Paths

• 5 Pay Bands

42

• Supervisor – Performs full range of supervision at least 25% of the time.

• Team Lead - Team leads are responsible to their supervisors or managers for assuring that the work of their assigned team is carried out by performing a range of coordinating and supportive duties and responsibilities.

* Due to important and significant differences between the position classification and labor relations definitions of “supervisor,” this guidance should not be used to determine the bargaining unit status of team lead positions.

Supervisor/Team Lead Titling Criteria

43

Supervisor/Team Lead Differences

• TEAM leads:

• Explain team goals and objectives to assigned team members and assist team in organizing to accomplish work

• Coach, facilitate, solve work problems and participate in the work of the team

• Provide information to the supervisor on performance of the team and individuals

• Communicate assignments, milestones and deadlines to the team and individuals based on supervisor’s instructions

• Observe training needs and relay training needs and requests to supervisor

• Inform supervisor of attendance and behavioral problems

• Relay requests for resources and supplies

• SUPERVISORS:

• Set team goals, select team leads, assign team members and administratively and technically direct the work of subordinates

• Plan, assign, review and accept, amend or reject work done by teams and subordinates

• Assign performance ratings, approve awards and take performance-based corrective actions

• Make work assignments, set or negotiate deadlines and completion dates

• Schedule and approve funding for team and individual training

• Counsel employees on behavior and initiate disciplinary actions if required

• Allocate resources to teams

44

Authority And Accountability

DPMB• Sets Overall Classification Policy• Approves Changes To ACS

• Approves New Series

• Final Classification Appeal

• Resolve Project Classification Issues

45


OPMBs

• Establish OU Classification Guidelines

• Delegate Classification Authority

• Resolve OU Classification Issues (Initial Review Of Classification Appeals)

46


Supervisors:

• Comply With DPMB and OPMB Guidelines

• Observe Principle of Pay Equity For Work

• Maintain Accurate PD’s

47

Classification Appeals

Appeal Levels

• OPMB - 1st Level

• DPMB - Final Decision

48

Non-appealable Issues

• PD Accuracy

• Pay Band Standards» Accuracy» Consistency

» Applicability

• Assignment Of Duties

• Constructed Title

49

STAFFING

50

Staffing Options

• Delegated Examining (DE) – Agency Based

• Merit Assignment Program Staffing (MAP)

51

Hiring Flexibilities and Appointment Process

Principal Objectives• Streamline the Hiring Process (Time and

Administration)

• Delegate Authority

52

Agency BasedA Staffing Program Designed to Recruit from

Sources Outside the Government

• Vacancy Announcement

– Must be placed in USAJOBS

– Open to All Qualified Candidates

• Subject to Veterans’ Preference, CTAP/ICTAP, and Other Priority Placement Programs

• Paid Advertising May Be Used

• When More Than 3 Qualified Candidates or Mix of Vet/Non-Vet, Rate and Rank

• Rule of Three Applies

53

Merit Assignment Program

• Staffing Program Designed to Recruit from Sources Inside Government– Vacancy announcement

– Open to current/previous Federal employees and special appointment authority candidates

– Subject to Career Transition Assistance Program (CTAP/ICTAP)

– Veteran’s preference does not apply

– Select from best qualified applicants

54

BASIC QUALIFICATIONS

• OPM Basic Qualifications Apply with the following exceptions:– Testing not used– Superior Academic Achievement 2.9

• Minimum qualifications apply to lowest GS grade within the pay band

55

TIME IN BAND

• Minimum requirements met on the basis of:– Time spent at next lower band; or– Combination of of next lower band and equivalent

lower grade.

– Note: When the band consists of more than one grade, requirements can be met based on time spent in next lower band but not solely on basis of lowest grade in the band. (e.g. 1 yr @ GS-13 does not meet minimum requirements for the ZP/ZA-PB-V)

56

Other Options to Fill Vacancies

• Merit Assignment Program• Reassignment• Transfer• Reinstatement• Details• Temporary Appointment• Term Appointment• Temporary Promotion• Realignment• Special Hiring Programs

57

ZP Probationary Period

Purpose“To allow a hiring official to view the full cycle of a research assignment before making a final decision on retaining the employee.”

58

ZP Probationary Periods

Action Options End the Probation Period (any time after 1st year) Continue the Probation Period (up to 3 years) Terminate Appointment

59


Coverage All Non-Status ZP R&D Employees (I.e.

functional codes 11 and 13) Hired After Implementation of the Project

Not Covered All Current Employees All Employees in the ZT, ZA, & ZS Career Paths

(one-year probationary period)

60


WFMO Staff Responsibility: Attach Memo to CD-352 for initial period

CD-352 automatically initiated: 9/21/05 for 33 mos.

If management decides to end probationary period you must process an update 6 action code to zero out the probationary/trial period

61

References• Delegated Examining and Merit Assignment:

– Federal Register– Project Operating Procedures– WFMO Standard Operating Procedures– NOAA Merit Assignment Plan– OPM DEU Handbook– DOC HR Bulletins

62

RIF

63

Reduction-in-Force

Follows All Current RIF Laws & RegulationsRedefines Competitive AreasCompetitive Levels UnchangedRevises Method to Augment Service CreditEmploys the Use of RIF Subpanels and RIF

Panel

64

Reduction-in-Force System

CurrentDisplacement limited to three grade levels

Competitive area; all positions within organization at geographic location

Retained Grade & Retained Pay

Augmented service credit based on performance rating

DemoDisplacement limited to current pay band and one pay band below

Competitive Area is all positions in a career path in organization within commuting area

Preserve Retained Pay; Retained Band

Augmented service credit based on score

65

RIF CREDIT

Credit for a “meets or exceeds” is 12 years

Last 3 ratings of record w/in last 4 years are averaged

An employee with a performance score in the top 30 percent of scores within a pay pool, is credited with 10 years of service credit for retention purposes. All other ratable employees receive 5 years of service credit.

CURRENT DEMO

66

RIF CREDIT (CONT)

Total potential credit under current system is 12 years. (Based on three consecutive “Meets or Exceeds” ratings.)

Total potential credit under Demo is 30 years (Based on being in top 30% for three consecutive cycles.)

CURRENT DEMO

67

Reduction-in-Force

HRAs• Determines Release from Competitive Level• Conducts Qualifications Analysis• Identifies Positions for Referral to RIF

Subpanel(s)• Convenes RIF Subpanel(s)

68

Reduction-in-Force

RIF Subpanel:

*Reviews Positions for Possible Bump by RIFee*Refers Possible Positions to RIF Assignment Panel (RAP)*Comprised of Two Subject Matter Specialists Appointed by Chair-RAP*HRA Serves as Technical Advisor & Executive Secretary

69

Reduction in Force

RIF Assignment Panel (RAP):

Reviews Positions Referred by RIF Sub panel for Possible Bump

Requests Additional Info. from Organization if NeededMakes Final Recommendations to Servicing HR

ManagerChaired by OPMB ChairTop Managers of Organization Participate as Members

of RAPHRA Serves as Technical Advisor & Executive

Secretary

70

Reduction-in-ForceService HR Manager:

Receives & Reviews Recommendations from the RAP

Discusses Recommendations with RAP (if needed)

Makes Final Decision on the Action

71

PAY

72

Pay References

• References Include:

• OPM Federal Register Notices

• Demo Project Operating Procedures

• Demo Project Pay Setting Guide

• Demo Project Pay Tables

73

Pay Rates

• Locality pay is included in the Base Rate

• Special Rates expand the pay band but only for those occupations covered

• Separate pay tables for every locality and every special rate within each locality are used

74

Pay Conversion

• Employees convert at same pay level

• Lump sum pay given for credit towards next WIGI

• One period for special pay adjustment for employees eligible for career ladder promotion within the pay band.

75

Pay Ceilings

Basic Pay for non-supervisory position - maximum rate of Interval 3

Basic Pay for supervisory position - maximum rate of Interval 5

76

Pay Setting

New Appointments Competitive Reassignment w/Pay

Adjustment Conversion Actions Promotions (minimum 6%) Change to a lower grade (band)

77

Supervisory Pay

“Placement” In SupervisoryPay Band

No immediate pay increase upon conversion or selection. Advancement in pay band based on annual performance rating

Supervisory pay band ceilings exceed regular pay band ceilings into intervals 4 and 5 (i.e. maximum of 6%)

Applies only while in supervisory position

78

Supervisory Pay

WFMO Staff Responsibility Obtain written agreement from line office when

employee moving into interval 4 of pay band. Change Special Employee Code to “12”. File agreement on right hand side of OPF

When employee moving out of supervisory position pay must not exceed Interval 3. Change Special Employee Code from “12” to “0”.

Employee has no appeal rights for loss of supervisory performance pay

79

Leaving the Project or Determining and equivalent GS grade and step

• Federal Register notice provides guidance

• attach the “Information about the Department of Commerce Demonstration Project” (conversion out sheet) to the right side of the OPF and to 75 information

• Employee is entitled to pay retention if salary exceeds step 10 of the equivalent grade

80

Converting from Demo to a GS position

• Consider the following: Career Path Pay Band Interval Base Pay and Locality Pay

81

Determining GS Grade and Step• If the pay band equals a single grade, then the

band has to equal grade. Determine what step is equivalent to the salary. If salary is between steps the higher step is appropriate. Example: ZP-V equals GS-15 ZP-V has a salary of 104,700 which falls between GS-15 step 4 (102,664) and step 5 (105,775). The converted out step would be step 5. The employee is converted out as a GS-15/5.

82

Determining GS Grade (continued)

• For multiple grade bands always start comparisons at the highest equivalent GS grade in the band.

• If the employee is in the ZP or ZA career path, remember that these are two grade interval positions when determining the appropriate grade.

• If the employee has been placed in the ZT or ZS career path then one grade intervals apply.

• Bands corresponding to two or more grades convert to one of those grades Example: ZS-III equals GS-5/6

• For Pay bands equivalent to more than one GS grade: 1. compare to the highest grade in the pay band 2.If salary is equal to or greater than the step 4, assign the highest grade

83


• Example: If the employee is in the ZP or ZA career path, pay band II, the equivalent grade pattern is GS 7/9. If the salary is equal to or greater than step 4 of the GS-9, then that grade is the equivalent grade. If the salary is less than step 4 of the GS 9, then move to the next highest grade of the band (GS-7) and set the step based on the salary.

84


• Example: If the employee is in the ZT career path, pay band II, the equivalent grade pattern is GS 5/6/7/8. If the salary is equal to or greater than step 4 of the GS-8, then that grade is the equivalent grade. If the salary is less than step 4 of the GS-8, then move to the next highest grade of the band (GS-7) and perform the same comparison at the next lower levels until the salary reaches the step 4 representative rate. This is done down to the lowest grade in the band.

85

Qualifications vs Pay

• Note that qualifications are based on work experience, knowledge, skills and abilities

• DEMO salaries are not used solely for qualifications purposes. However, they must be considered when determining the equivalent GS grade.

86

Performance Management

87

What is PerformanceManagement ?

• Planning work

• Monitoring work effort

• Developing employees

• Appraising employees

• Rewarding employees

88

Rating Official

• Defines critical elements

• Assigns weight to each critical element

• Establishes supplemental standards

• Conducts progress review

• Conducts performance review meeting

• Submits tentative rating

• Conducts final appraisal

89

Pay Pool Manager

• Reviews and approves performance plans

• Controls pay pool

• Final decisions - rating, pay increase, bonus

• Responds to Requests for Reconsideration (i.e.informal grievances)

90

Reviewing Official

• Who:– Person at a organizational level above Pay Pool

Manager

• Responsibilities:– Review of performance decisions when Pay

Pool Manager and Rating Official are the same person

91

Pay Pool

Organizational level where employees are combined by career path : – Rating– Score– Pay– Bonus

92

Appraisal Cycle

October SeptemberApril

IssuePerformance

Plan

Mid-YearReview

Appraisal

93

The Performance Plan

• Communication tool

• Performance appraisal tool

94

Plan Development Remains Essentially the Same Determination of Critical Elements Assignment of Weights Criteria for Evaluation Differences

– Pay Pool Manager Signs Plan

– All Elements Must Be Critical

– Benchmark Performance Standards Element Point Ranges Are Used

95

Performance Plan Modifications

Process Remains the Same Rating official signs

Exception– Modification Also Requires Pay Pool

Manager/Reviewing Official Signature

96

Critical Elements

• Only critical elements

• Minimum of two

• Maximum of six

• Assign weight based upon importance

and/or time required

• Total weight must equal 100

97

Evaluation Criteria

Benchmark performance standards

Performance attributes

98

Mid-Cycle Progress Review

Process Remains the Same Rating Official Signs

Increased Importance Exception

– Modification Also Requires Pay Pool Manager/Reviewing Official Signature

99

Progress Review

• Require one review mid-way by April 30th

• Discuss progress

• Identify problems

• Provide guidance

• Determine if plan needs to be changed

100

Who Is Appraised?

• All employees in a covered position as of September 30th AND who have worked 120 days in a covered position

• EXCEPT: Employees who were promoted or received a pay adjustment during the last 120 days

101

Annual Appraisal

• Request written accomplishments

• Inform employees of their opportunity

for Performance Review Meeting

102

Performance Review Meeting

List of Accomplishments - Mandatory– Employee Must Provide to Supervisor in writing

Information Exchange– Supervisor/Employee Discuss Accomplishments

– No Rating Discussed at this Meeting

103

Deriving a Rating

Each critical element is rated in

comparison to the Benchmark

Performance Standards

104

Performance RatingsEligible “E”, covers total scores

ranging from 40 to 100

Not Ratable “N”, employee not eligible to

receive an appraisal

Pending “P”, final rating pending results of in-place PIP

Unsatisfactory “U”, failure to meet PIP requirements of any

element

105

Additional Rating Designations

Pending– “P” = Employees whose rating period is

extended Beyond September 30 because on Performance Improvement Plan (PIP)

Not Rated– “N” = Employees who are ineligible for a

rating as of September 30 because did not work in a covered position minimum of 120 days or received a pay adjustment within the last 120 days of the rating cycle.

106

PAY & BONUS POOL

QSI's WGI's

IN-LEVEL PROMOTIONS

HISTORICAL SPENDING

INCREASESSALARY

INCENTIVE PAY FUND

Base Pay Adj BONUSSA

PA

107

PAY OUT RULES

Highest scored employee receives highest relative percentage payout (0-100%)

Employees with tied scores may receive different relative percentage payouts

Lower scored employee cannot receive higher relative percentage payout than higher scored employee

108

PERFORMANCE PAY INCREASES

Performance pay increases are automatically processed via the Pay for Performance System (PPS)

Effective date of performance pay out and bonuses is first PP in November.

109

PERFORMANCE BONUSES

Up to $10KNot eligible: STEP and Faculty

appointees; and employees unratable at the end of the rating cycle unless they have a DOC rating of at least Fully Successful within the past 13 months.

Processed via PPS NOA 840. SF-50s filed in EPFs

110

PIP Requirements

• Identify critical elements failed

• Describe improvement required

• Describe assistance to be provided

• Provide reasonable time to improve

• State consequence of failure

111

Responsibility During PIP

• DOCUMENT, DOCUMENT, DOCUMENT• Keep regularly scheduled meeting• Treat employee with dignity

112

Decision Process

• Did the employee meet the

requirements of the PIP?• Review the evidence in comparison

to the standards• Review your documentation• Obtain support of higher level management• Consult with OHRM

113

Acceptable Determination

• Issue concluding memorandum

• Continue to monitor performance

• Warn against “Roller Coaster” performance

114

Unsatisfactory Performance

• Performance which fails to meet the

established performance standards - ONE or more critical elements

• Evidence required!

• Standards are acceptable and defensible

• Minimum appraisal period - 120 days

115

Actions Based On Unsatisfactory Performance

Unsatisfactory Performance– Removal– Reduction in Pay Band/Grade– Reassignment– Loss of Comparability Increase– Loss of consideration for performance pay

increase/bonus– The choice is a management decision and

will not be subject to review on appeal

116

Employee Reconsideration Rights

Reviewable– Rating– Performance Score– Pay Increase

Not Reviewable– Performance Plan– Bonus Decisions

117

Reconsideration Procedures Request for Reconsideration Rating

– 15 calendar days for employees to file Request for Reconsideration (an informal grievance)

– 15 calendar days for management to formally respond to informal grievance

Formal Grievance (DAO 202-771)– 10 calendar days for employee to file formal

grievance

– 90 calendar days for management to respond to formal grievance

118

Project Evaluation

119

Evaluation Background

• The project was designed to apply several HR interventions from earlier Demonstration Projects to a wider range of occupational areas for organizations with different missions. The current project seeks to build on and duplicate that success.

120

The Need for an Evaluation

• The evaluation is an OPM approved evaluation plan.

• Evaluations are administered on an annual basis to determine whether the interventions are achieving the goals and objectives of the project within acceptable cost limits.

121

1. Did the project meet its intended goals?

2. Was the project implemented and operated appropriately and accurately?

3. What was the cost of the project?

4. What was the impact of the project on veterans and other EEO groups?

5. Were the Merit Systems Principles adhered to and Prohibited Personnel

Practices avoided?

6. Can the project or portions thereof be generalized to other agencies or

government-wide?

OPM’s EVALUATION CRITERIA

122

EVALUATION TECHNIQUES

• Collection of objective personnel data (e.g. pay increases, bonuses, performance ratings, race, age, gender, etc.)

• A Survey with Demo Project and Comparison Group Employees

• Focus groups conducted nationwide with employees from Demo Project and Comparison Groups

• Interviews with senior managers and Human Resources staff

123

1. Did the Project Meet its Intended Goals?

Goal 1: Greater Hiring Flexibilities

• Flexible entry salary intervention is providing sufficient salary to attract desired candidates

• Local authority for recruitment payments is an effective tool for attracting and hiring employees

• Positive supervisor assessment

124

1. Did the Project Meet its Intended Goals? (Cont.)

Goal 2: Greater Pay Setting Flexibilities

• Pay banding provides greater pay setting flexibilities

• Pay increases aligned with performance • Positive supervisor and employee assessments

125


Goal 3: Pay for Performance

• Managers have more latitude to increase pay of high performers

• High performers benefit from cumulative pay increases • Inverse relationship between performance rating and

turnover • Positive supervisor and employee assessment

126


Goal 4: Simplified Position Classification

• Positive Human Resources staff assessment • Reduced time needed to produce and classify a

position• Positive supervisor and employee assessment

1 department of commerce demonstration project workforce management staff training 2006

Documents

demo project interventions

performance management

noaa slide

fws slide

force system slide

prorated basis slide

higher performance

high performance employees