1 diffraction. 2 diffraction theory (10.4 hecht) we will first develop a formalism that will...

28
1 Diffraction

Upload: derick-perkins

Post on 17-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 Diffraction. 2 Diffraction theory (10.4 Hecht) We will first develop a formalism that will describe the propagation of a wave – that is develop a mathematical

1

Diffraction

Page 2: 1 Diffraction. 2 Diffraction theory (10.4 Hecht) We will first develop a formalism that will describe the propagation of a wave – that is develop a mathematical

2

Diffraction theory (10.4 Hecht)

We will first develop a formalism that will describe the propagation of a wave – that is develop a mathematical description of Huygen’s principle

We know this

Wavefront UU

What is UU here?

Page 3: 1 Diffraction. 2 Diffraction theory (10.4 Hecht) We will first develop a formalism that will describe the propagation of a wave – that is develop a mathematical

3

Diffraction theory Consider two well behaved functions U1’, U2’ that

are solutions of the wave equation. Let U1’ = U1e-it ; U2’ = U2e-it

Thus U1 , U2 are the spatial part of the functions and since,

we have,

0

10'1

'

22

22

12

12

2

22

2

2

22

UkUUkU

eUv

Ut

U

vU ti

Page 4: 1 Diffraction. 2 Diffraction theory (10.4 Hecht) We will first develop a formalism that will describe the propagation of a wave – that is develop a mathematical

4

Green’s theorem

Consider the product U1 grad U2 = U1U2

Using Gauss’ Theorem

Where S = surface enclosing V

Thus,

SV

SdUUdVUU

2121

dSn

USdU

22

normaloutwardndSnSd ˆˆ

Page 5: 1 Diffraction. 2 Diffraction theory (10.4 Hecht) We will first develop a formalism that will describe the propagation of a wave – that is develop a mathematical

5

Green’s Theorem Now expand left hand side,

Do the same for U2U1 and subtract from (2), gives Green’s theorem

V S

dSn

UUdVUUUU 2212

2121

V S

dSn

UU

n

UUdVUUUU 31

22

112

222

1

Page 6: 1 Diffraction. 2 Diffraction theory (10.4 Hecht) We will first develop a formalism that will describe the propagation of a wave – that is develop a mathematical

6

Green’s theorem

Now for functions satisfying the wave equation (1), i.e.

Consequently,

since the LHS of (3) = 0

12

12

22

22 UkUUkU

4012

21

dSn

UU

n

UU

S

Page 7: 1 Diffraction. 2 Diffraction theory (10.4 Hecht) We will first develop a formalism that will describe the propagation of a wave – that is develop a mathematical

7

Green’s theorem applied to spherical wave propagation Let the disturbance at t=0 be,

where r is measured from point P in V and U1 = “Green’s function”

Since there is a singularity at the point P, draw a small sphere P, of radius , around P (with P at centre)

Then integrate over +P, and take limit as 0

r

eUU

ikr

o11

Page 8: 1 Diffraction. 2 Diffraction theory (10.4 Hecht) We will first develop a formalism that will describe the propagation of a wave – that is develop a mathematical

8

Spherical Wave propagation

522

2

22

dr

e

rU

r

U

r

e

dSr

e

nU

n

U

r

e

P r

ikrikr

ikrikr

P

Thus (4) can be written,Thus (4) can be written,

Page 9: 1 Diffraction. 2 Diffraction theory (10.4 Hecht) We will first develop a formalism that will describe the propagation of a wave – that is develop a mathematical

9

Spherical Wave propagation

In (5), an element of area on P is defined in terms of solid angle

and we have used

Now consider first term on RHS of (5)

dddS

d sin2

rn

1022

0 limlim Idr

Ue

r

ik

Page 10: 1 Diffraction. 2 Diffraction theory (10.4 Hecht) We will first develop a formalism that will describe the propagation of a wave – that is develop a mathematical

10

Kirchoff’s Integral Theorem

Now U2 = continuous function and thus the derivative is bounded (assume)

Its maximum value in V = C Then since eik 1 as 0 we have,

The second term on the RHS of (5)

rU

2

0limlim 010 CdI

dr

e

rUI

r

ikr2

2020 limlim

Page 11: 1 Diffraction. 2 Diffraction theory (10.4 Hecht) We will first develop a formalism that will describe the propagation of a wave – that is develop a mathematical

11

Kirchoff’s Integral Theorem

dUikU

deik

U

dr

e

rUI

ik

r

ikr

220

2220

22020

lim

1lim

limlim

Now as 0 U2(r) UP (its value at P)

and, PPP UdUdU 4

Now designate the disturbance U as an electric field E

Page 12: 1 Diffraction. 2 Diffraction theory (10.4 Hecht) We will first develop a formalism that will describe the propagation of a wave – that is develop a mathematical

12

Kirchoff integral theorem

64 dSn

E

r

e

r

e

nEE

ikrikr

P

This gives the value of disturbance at P in terms of values on surface enclosing P.

It represents the basic equation of It represents the basic equation of scalar diffraction scalar diffraction theorytheory

Page 13: 1 Diffraction. 2 Diffraction theory (10.4 Hecht) We will first develop a formalism that will describe the propagation of a wave – that is develop a mathematical

13

Geometry of single slit

R

S P

Have infinite screen with aperture A

Radiation from source, S, arrives at aperture with amplitude

'

'

r

eEE

ikr

o

Let the hemisphere (radius R) and screen with aperture comprise the surface () enclosing P.

Since R

E=0 on .

Also, E = 0 on side of screen facing V.

r’r

Page 14: 1 Diffraction. 2 Diffraction theory (10.4 Hecht) We will first develop a formalism that will describe the propagation of a wave – that is develop a mathematical

14

Fresnel-Kirchoff Formula Thus E=0 everywhere on surface except the

portion that is the aperture. Thus from (6)

dSr

e

nr

e

r

e

nr

eE

ikrikrikrikr

P

''

4''

)7(1

ˆˆ

ˆˆ

..

,'

'ˆˆ'ˆˆˆˆ

2ikr

ikrikr

err

ikrn

r

e

rrn

r

e

nge

Thusr

rnnn

andr

rnnn

Page 15: 1 Diffraction. 2 Diffraction theory (10.4 Hecht) We will first develop a formalism that will describe the propagation of a wave – that is develop a mathematical

15

Fresnel-Kirchoff Formula

Now assume r, r’ >> ; then k/r >> 1/r2

Then the second term in (7) drops out and we are left with,

'coscos2

1'ˆˆˆˆ

2

1

'

,

'ˆˆˆˆ'

4

'

'

rnrnF

dSFrr

eiEE

or

dSrnrnikrr

eEE

aperture

rriko

P

aperture

rrik

oP

Fresnel Kirchoff Fresnel Kirchoff diffraction formuladiffraction formula

Page 16: 1 Diffraction. 2 Diffraction theory (10.4 Hecht) We will first develop a formalism that will describe the propagation of a wave – that is develop a mathematical

16

Obliquity factor

Since we usually have ’ = - or n.r’=-1, the obliquity factor

F() = ½ [1+cos ] Also in most applications we will also

assume that cos 1 ; and F() = 1 For now however, keep F()

Page 17: 1 Diffraction. 2 Diffraction theory (10.4 Hecht) We will first develop a formalism that will describe the propagation of a wave – that is develop a mathematical

17

Huygen’s principle

Amplitude at aperture due to source S is,

Now suppose each element of area dA gives rise to a spherical wavelet with amplitude dE = EAdA

Then at P,

Then equation (6) says that the total disturbance at P is just proportional to the sum of all the wavelets weighted by the obliquity factor F()

This is just a mathematical statement of Huygen’s principle.

'

'

r

eEE

ikr

oA

r

edAEdE

ikr

AP

FdEP

Page 18: 1 Diffraction. 2 Diffraction theory (10.4 Hecht) We will first develop a formalism that will describe the propagation of a wave – that is develop a mathematical

18

Fraunhofer vs. Fresnel diffraction

In Fraunhofer diffraction, both incident and diffracted waves may be considered to be plane (i.e. both S and P are a large distance away)

If either S or P are close enough that wavefront curvature is not negligible, then we have Fresnel diffraction

P

S

Hecht 10.2Hecht 10.2 Hecht 10.3Hecht 10.3

Page 19: 1 Diffraction. 2 Diffraction theory (10.4 Hecht) We will first develop a formalism that will describe the propagation of a wave – that is develop a mathematical

19

Fraunhofer vs. Fresnel Diffraction

S

P

d’

d

hh’

r’ r

Page 20: 1 Diffraction. 2 Diffraction theory (10.4 Hecht) We will first develop a formalism that will describe the propagation of a wave – that is develop a mathematical

20

Fraunhofer Vs. Fresnel Diffraction

2

2222

22222222

'

11

2

1

'

'

2

11

'

'

2

11'

2

11

'

'

2

11'

'''

ddd

h

d

h

d

hd

d

hd

d

hd

d

hd

hdhdhdhd

Now calculate variation in (r+r’) in going from one side of aperture to the other. Call it

Page 21: 1 Diffraction. 2 Diffraction theory (10.4 Hecht) We will first develop a formalism that will describe the propagation of a wave – that is develop a mathematical

21

Fraunhofer diffraction limit

Now, first term = path difference for plane waves

sinsin’

sin’≈ h’/d’

sin ≈ h/d

sin’ + sin = ( h’/d + h/d )

Second term = measure of curvature of wavefront

Fraunhofer Diffraction

21

'

1

2

1

dd

Page 22: 1 Diffraction. 2 Diffraction theory (10.4 Hecht) We will first develop a formalism that will describe the propagation of a wave – that is develop a mathematical

22

Fraunhofer diffraction limit

If aperture is a square - X The same relation holds in azimuthal plane and 2

~ measure of the area of the aperture Then we have the Fraunhofer diffraction if,

apertureofaread

or

d

,

2

Fraunhofer or far field limit

Page 23: 1 Diffraction. 2 Diffraction theory (10.4 Hecht) We will first develop a formalism that will describe the propagation of a wave – that is develop a mathematical

23

Fraunhofer, Fresnel limits

The near field, or Fresnel, limit is

See 10.1.2 of text

2

d

Page 24: 1 Diffraction. 2 Diffraction theory (10.4 Hecht) We will first develop a formalism that will describe the propagation of a wave – that is develop a mathematical

24

Fraunhofer diffraction Typical arrangement (or use laser as a

source of plane waves) Plane waves in, plane waves out

S

f1 f2

screen

Page 25: 1 Diffraction. 2 Diffraction theory (10.4 Hecht) We will first develop a formalism that will describe the propagation of a wave – that is develop a mathematical

25

Fraunhofer diffraction

1. Obliquity factorAssume S on axis, so Assume small ( < 30o), so

2. Assume uniform illumination over aperture

r’ >> so is constant over the aperture

3. Dimensions of aperture << rr will not vary much in denominator for calculation of amplitude at any point Pconsider r = constant in denominator

1'ˆˆ rn1ˆˆ rn

'

'

r

eikr

Page 26: 1 Diffraction. 2 Diffraction theory (10.4 Hecht) We will first develop a formalism that will describe the propagation of a wave – that is develop a mathematical

26

Fraunhofer diffraction

Then the magnitude of the electric field at P is,

aperture

ikrikr

oP dSe

rr

eikEE

'2

'

Page 27: 1 Diffraction. 2 Diffraction theory (10.4 Hecht) We will first develop a formalism that will describe the propagation of a wave – that is develop a mathematical

27

Single slit Fraunhofer diffraction

y = b

y

dy

P

ro

r

r = ro - ysin

dA = L dy

where L ( very long slit)

Page 28: 1 Diffraction. 2 Diffraction theory (10.4 Hecht) We will first develop a formalism that will describe the propagation of a wave – that is develop a mathematical

28

Single slit Fraunhofer diffraction

'2sin

2

,

sin

_______________

'

sin

rr

eikEC

kb

where

ebCeE

dyeeCE

dAeCE

ikro

iikrP

ikyb

o

ikrP

ikrP

o

o

2

2sin

oII

Fraunhofer single slit diffraction pattern

2bCIo