1 early library management systems (lms) in the uk lucy a. tedd, lecturer, department of information...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Early library management systems (LMS) in the UK
Lucy A. Tedd, Lecturer, Department of Information Studies, Aberystwyth
Editor: Program: electronic library and information systemsNovember 2006
2
Experimental systems – early/mid 1960s
Evolved from 80-col. punched card systems (which had been invented by Herman Hollerith for processing information from 1890 US census)
Idea given to Hollerith by Billings - the Library of the Surgeon’s General Office ( now NLM)
3
Some libraries and computer applications
Southampton U. – Woods et al.- circulation
Newcastle U. – Line et al. – acquisitionsLancaster U. - serialsCamden Libraries - Maidment et al.-
cataloguingWest Sussex Libraries – Bearman et al.-
loans
4
Memory from Exeter City Libraries
“When I first started working in libraries, we had a punched card system. I left in 1969, but I remember the clunky sorting machine which needed a room of its own (a small room!)”
5
Challenges
Computers were large and expensive and owned by the parent authority
Programmers were needed to write the appropriate software for each application
It was all new – computer people thought they knew what library staff required and library staff weren’t always too sure about what was possible
6
Program- News of computers in British university libraries
Founded in 1966 by Richard Kimber, then a Lecturer at Queen’s University Belfast
“A new wave of enthusiasm is sweeping over the world of libraries in Britain. Librarians see that it is possible to use computers for most clerical operations in libraries.”
7
Range of computers and working parties
Elliott Automation 803, 903 and 905English Electric and KDF9IBM and 360 seriesICT ( later ICL) and the 1900 series
There were various working parties of librarians involved in using these.
8
Aslib Computer Applications Group (CAG)- 1968
Promote use of computers in librariesAssess existing or evolving systems
with aim of developing common systems
Communicate findings – by publication, meetings, courses and conferences
9
Comparison of computer-based loans systems - 1969
• Atomic Weapons Research Establishment
• Atomic Energy Research Establishment
• Southampton U. • West Sussex
(results published in Program 3(3/4)
10
Findings - why were computers used ?
To produce accurate record of items on loan
To produce recall/overdue notices automatically
Save time at the issue counterProduce statistics of use of stockTo give added benefits at lesser cost
11
VINE- Very Informal Newsletter
Started in 1971
Edited by the Library Automation Officer
based at Southampton University and
who visited libraries and their computer
systems and ‘wrote them up’. Funded by
Office for Scientific and Technical
Information (OSTI) – then British Library Research and Development Dept.
12
Numbers in loans systems
In the early 1970s not many loans systems were closely linked to catalogue system.
(An overdue notice could be of the form: Dear 1432 . Please return 218689 -X)Need for accurate recording of the unique nos.
for books and borrowersCheck digits usedSome libraries developed complex numbering
to enable analyses to be made of stock issues, and ‘type’ of borrowers
13
Development of data collection devices for loans
ALS – Automated Library Systems Original ‘card-based’ system (1967) and then ‘label-based’ system (1974)
Plessey Library Pen (1972) – Camden (Kentish Town)
Telepen – from SB Electronics also for barcodes
14
Memory from Elliott Automation
“Whilst working at Elliott Automation in the 1960s I remember, when working late, meeting at the coffee machine a colleague (Frank Gurney- who then founded ALS) who was developing a system for libraries”
(Elliott Automation had been commissioned by West Sussex to investigate developing a computer-based circulation system)
15
MARC – Machine Readable Cataloguing
1965 – format for catalogue records originally developed at Library of Congress
1968-1974 – MARC tapes available in UK via BNB – 20 libraries
1974 – British Library formed and formal MARC service offered
16
Methods of computer processing in the 1970s
Batch – jobs were processed one after another ‘in a batch’ – used for catalogue production, order notes to booksellers, overdue notices
Online and time sharingRemote job entry – online terminal used to
enter a job into queue for batch processing – saved physical transportation of files (punched card or paper tape) from library to computer
17
Memory from Havering Libraries
“Havering was the first public library authority in the UK to make use of an on-line systems for circulation control. I was the library end of the system design for the product and I remember vividly the reaction we first received from Plessey about our need for something better than the off-line system they were offering. Their indifference, and the much more welcoming approach of ALS brought us to the point where we were about to sign with ALS. Next thing, cars screeched to a halt outside the Central Library and various "suits" descended on us, full of promises . . . and thus history was changed!”
18
Local systems – 1970s
Several instances of successful use of parent-body computers
Improved computer technology- rise of minicomputers which could be acquired by the library
Used experiences of those involved in experimental phase
Better communication between librarians and computer people
19
Operational cataloguing and circulation systems in the
1970s CAG surveys
1973 – 135 responses indicating a working system
1976 – 170 responses. Standard descriptions of all applications
20
Bath University
Catalogue – variable field records – short average length (123 ch.)
Author, Title, Classified, and Keyword out of Context (KWOC) catalogues
Circulation – use of Burroughs computer shared with administration for an online system
22
Memory from Bath U.
“The Library and the Finance department jointly commissioned systems from a firm called Burroughs.. .. and when finance were doing big tasks like payroll, the circulation system ran very slowly (up to 3 minutes per transaction). The library, under Maurice Line, devised a 'short form' of catalogue record. Catalogue cards were marked up by library staff and taken to the computer unit, where data entry staff put the data onto punch cards.”
23
Co-operative systems
Funded by OSTI and then BLR&DD for much of the 1970s
Birmingham Libraries Co-operative Mechanisation Project (BLCMP)
Aston U., Birmingham U., Birmingham PublicSouth Western Academic Libraries Co-
operative Mechanisation Project (SWALCAP) Bath, Bristol, Cardiff and Exeter universities
+++
24
Memories - SWALCAP
“Cataloguing was done via a dumb terminal and a set of microfiche was produced from this every 3 months. Inputting the records was monotonous and error-prone and there was no error-checking. One day a senior subject librarian got impatient just before a new run of the fiche and decided to put in a batch of records in a hurry. Unfortunately she forgot to check her records before submitting them so she managed to get part of the MARC coding confused with the title. Hence for the next 3 months we had Twelfth Night by a certain William O'Shakespeare on the fiche!”
25
Bradford University – 1973/4
“Book and reader tickets were half 80-column cards, reader ticket being laminated, both read in slots in the counter but by light rather than pins. One reader had trimmed the sides of his ticket to make it fit his wallet – so of course it slid around in the slot and couldn't be read.”
26
Sussex University – 1975/7
“Patching up paper tape and using a wonderful plastic gadget with rotating dial to calculate check digits of rogue records, before the reel of tape was taken across campus to be read in the computing centre. (ALS issue system)”
27
University of Wales Aberystwyth – late 1970s
“We chose SWALCAP because it offered a circulation system, which BLCMPthen did not. We quickly realised we needed one when several smalllibraries were amalgamated in 1976 and we tried to scale up the manual Browne issue systems. Cataloguing was a lower priority, although our ancient tape-typewriter that produced catalogue cards was on its last legs, so needed to be replaced with something.”
28
Problems
Hardware – failure of suppliers to provide necessary items in working order, in time and at agreed cost
Software – not adequately designed, implemented and tested and documented
People – new LMS not always designed to meet the real needs of users
Financial – inadequate
29
Late 1970s – computer developments
Mainframes – IBM 370 series, ICL 2900, Honeywell 6000, CDC 7600
Minicomputers – DEC, Prime 500, Hewlett Packard, Texas Instruments
Microcomputers – Apple, Commodore PET, IBM PC
Decrease in size of hardware
Increase in processing/storage capacity
Decrease in cost
30
Early 1980s
Development of ‘turnkey stand-alone’ systems- mainly for circulation control
e.g.ALS – System 4 and System 5BLCMP – CIRCOCLSI – LIBS 100 – from USGEAC – from Canada Plessey Module 4Telepen Library System
31
Online Public Access Catalogues
Appeared in early 1980s
Linked to computer-based circulation systems
First generation provided access points similar to those on cards and COM fiche/film
Good for ‘known item’ searching
32
Library (and Information) Technology Centre
1982 – Polytechnic of Central London
Later at South Bank University
Software demonstrations
Enquiry and advice
Vine and Library Micromation News
Workshops and seminars
33
Integrated library management systems – key features
Integrated modules for:
Cataloguing materials
Using the catalogue (OPAC)
Circulation control
Acquisitions and order processing
Serials control ( possibly)
Interlibrary loans (possibly)
34
.. And some more
Consistency and integrity of data across all applications
Transactions (e.g. recording a loan) should update ‘status’ and be immediately viewable
Should be ease of movement between functions
35
Some LMS in the late 1980s
ALS – System V/88
BLCMP – BLS
Databasix – ADLIB 2
DS – Module 4
Dynix
Geac
IBM – DOBIS/LIBIS
Logical Choice – BOOKSHELF
36
.. And more
McDonnell Douglas – URICA OCLC - LS/2000
Pyramid – CALM
SWALCAP – Libertas
Sydney – Micro Library
Library systems : a buyer’s guide
Juliet Leeves – 1987 and 1989
37
By the end of 1980s
The use of computers in libraries was commonplace and librarians, in general, were becoming well-used to the changing technology.
“I suppose one thing I'd say, looking back, is that if we'd really known what we were doing we'd probably have been too scared even to try.”
Thank you
“