1 high-p t physics at rhic and evidences of recombination rudolph c. hwa university of oregon...

61
1 High-p T Physics at RHIC and Evidences of Recombination Rudolph C. Hwa University of Oregon International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics Sonoma, CA, July 2004

Post on 19-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

High-pT Physics at RHIC and Evidences of Recombination

Rudolph C. Hwa

University of Oregon

International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics

Sonoma, CA, July 2004

2

In collaboration with

Chunbin Yang

Hua-zhong Normal University

Wuhan, China

3

Outline

Anomalies at high pT according to the

“standard model”

Alternative to the “standard model” at high

pT • Recombination in fragmentation• Shower partons• Inclusive distributions at all pT•

Dihadron correlations

All anomalies can be understood in terms of parton recombination

4

Conventional approach to hadron production at high pT

D(z)

h

qA A

Hard scattering near the surface because of energy loss in medium --- jet quenching.

5

If hard parton fragments in vacuum, then the fragmentation

products should be independent of the medium.

h

q

Particle ratio should depend on the FF D(z) only.

The observed data reveal several anomalies according to that picture.

D(z)

6

Anomaly #1 Rp/π

1

Not possible in fragmentation model:

Dp/ q <<Dπ /q

Rp/π

Dp/q

Dπ /q

u

7

kT broadening by multiple

scattering in the initial state.

Unchallenged for ~30 years.

If the medium effect is before fragmentation, then should be independent of h= or p

Anomaly #2 in pA or dA collisions

Cronin Effect Cronin et al, Phys.Rev.D (1975)

p

q

hdNdpT

(pA→ πX)∝ Aα , α >1

A

p >

RHIC expt (2003)

8

RHIC data from dAu collisions at 200 GeV per NN pair

Ratio of central to peripheral collisions:

RCP

RCPh (pT ) =

dNh

dpT

1NColl

central( )

dNh

dpT

1NColl

peripheral( )

PHENIX and STAR experiments found (2002)

RCPp (pT )>RCP

π (pT )

Can’t be explained by fragmentation.

9

RCPp (pT )>RCP

π (pT )Anomaly # 2

10

Anomaly #3 Jet structure

Hard parton jet { (p1) + (p2) + (p3) + ···· }

trigger particle associated particles

The distribution of the associated particles should be independent of the medium if fragmentation takes place in vacuum.

11

Anomaly #3 Jet structure for Au+Au collisions is different from that for p+p collisions

pp

Fuqiang Wang (STAR) nucl-ex/0404010

12

Azimuthal anisotropy Anomaly #4

Anomaly #5 Forward-backward asymmetry at intermediate pT

Come back later when there is time.

Resolution of the anomalies

13

How can recombination solve the puzzles?

Parton distribution (log scale)

p

p1+p2p q

(recombine) (fragment)

hadron momentum

higher yield heavy penalty

14

The black box of fragmentation

q

A QCD process from quark to pion, not calculable in pQCD

z1

Momentum fraction z < 1

Phenomenological fragmentation function

D/q

z1

15

Let’s look inside the black box of fragmentation.

q

fragmentation

z1

gluon radiation

quark pair creation

Although not calculable in pQCD (especially when Q2 gets low), gluon radiation and quark-pair creation and subsequent hadronization nevertheless take place to form pions and other hadrons.

16

Description of fragmentation by recombination

known from data (e+e-, p, … )

known from recombination model

can be determined

hard partonmeson

fragmentationshower partons recombination

xD(x) =dx1x1

∫dx2

x2Fq,q (x1,x2)Rπ (x1,x2,x)

17

Shower parton distributions

Fqq '(i )(x1,x2) =Si

q(x1)Siq ' x2

1−x1

⎝ ⎜ ⎞

⎠ ⎟

Sij =

K L Ls

L K Ls

L L Ks

G G Gs

⎜ ⎜ ⎜

⎟ ⎟ ⎟

u

gs

s

d

du

K =KNS+L

Ks =KNS +Ls

Sud,d ,u ,u(sea) =L

valence

sea

L L DSea

KNS L DV

G G DG L

Ls DKSea

G Gs DKG

R

RK

5 SPDs are determined from 5 FFs.

18Hwa & CB Yang, hep-ph/0312271

Shower Parton Distributions

u -> u valence

g -> u

u -> d

u -> s

g -> s

19

BKK fragmentation functions

20

Once the shower parton distributions are known, they can be applied to heavy-ion collisions.

The recombination of thermal partons with shower partons becomes conceptually unavoidable.

D(z)

h

qA A

Conventional approach

21

Once the shower parton distributions are known, they can be applied to heavy-ion collisions.

The recombination of thermal partons with shower partons becomes conceptually unavoidable.

hNow, a new component

22

hard parton (u quark)

d

u

π+

23

Inclusive distribution of pions in any direction

r p

pdNπ

dp=

dp1p1

∫dp2

p2Fqq (p1,p2)Rπ (p1, p2,p)

dNπ

pdp=

1p3 dp10

p∫ Fqq (p1,p−p1)

pTPion Distribution

p1p2

pδ(p1 +p2 −p)

24

Pion formation: qq distribution

thermal

shower

soft component

soft semi-hard components

usual fragmentation

(by means of recombination)

Fqq =TT+TS+(SS)1+(SS)2

Proton formation: uud distribution

Fuud =TTT+TTS +T(SS)1+(SSS)1+T(SS)2+((SS)1S)2+(SSS)3

T

S

25

T(p1)=p1dNq

th

dp1=Cp1exp(−p1/T)

Thermal distribution

Fit low-pT data to determine C & T.

Shower distribution in AuAu collisions

S(p2)=ξ∑i ∫dkkfi(k)Sij(p2 /k)

hard parton momentum

distribution of hard parton i in AuAu collisions

SPD of parton j in shower of hard parton i

fraction of hard partons that get out of medium to produce shower

calculable

Contains hydrodynamical properties, not included in our model.

26

fi (k) =dNi

hard

kdkdyy=0density of hard partons with pT = k

Input: parton distributions CTEQ5L nuclear shadowing EKS98 hard scattering pQCD

Srivastava, Gale, Fries, PRC 67, 034903 (2003)

dNjet

d2 pTdyy=0

=K C(1+pT / B)β

C, B, are tabulated for i=u, d, s, u, d, g K=2.5

27

2-shower partons in 1 jet:

×Rπ (p1,p2,p)

Diπ (p/k)

Negligible at RHIC, but can be important at LHC.

(SS)1(p1, p2) =ξ dkk∫i∑ fi(k)Si

j(p1

k)Si

j'(p2

k −p1

)

2-shower partons in 2 jets:

(SS)2(p1,p2) =δyφξ dkk∫i∑ fi(k)Si

j (p1

k)×ξ dk'k' fi'(k' )Si'

j'(p2

k')∫

i'∑

28

production in AuAu central collision at 200 GeV

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Hwa & CB Yang, nucl-th/0401001, PRC(2004)

TS

29

Proton production in AuAu collisions

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

TTS+TSS

TSS

30

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Anomaly #1 Proton/pion ratio

resolved

31

Greco, Ko & Levai, PRL (2003)

Monte Carlo Calculation in Coalescence model

32

Production of and in central Au+Au

Hwa & Yang, nucl-th/0406072

33

d

d

central peripheral

more T more TS

less T less TS

RCPh (pT ) =

dNh

dpT

1NColl

central( )

dNh

dpT

1NColl

peripheral( ) ⇒

more TSless TS

>1

Anomaly #2 d+Au collisions (to study the Cronin Effect)

34

d+Au collisions

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Hwa & CB Yang, nucl-th/0403001, PRL(2004)

Pions

No pT broadening by multiple scattering in the initial state.Medium effect due to thermal-shower

recombination.

35

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Proton

Thermal-shower recombination is negligible.

nucl-th/0404066

36

Nuclear Modification Factor

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

RCPp >RCP

πbecause 3q p, 2q

Anomaly #2 resolved

37

Jet Structure

Since TS recombination is more important in Au+Au than in p+p collisions,

we expect jets in Au+Au to be different from those in

p+p.

Consider dihadron correlation in the same jet on the near side.

Anomaly #3 Jet structure in Au+Au different from that in p+p

collisions

38

Trigger at 4 < pT < 6 GeV/c

p+p: mainly SS fragmentation Au+Au: mainly TS

Associated particle

p1 (trigger)

p2 (associated)

kq1

q2

q3

q4

ξ∑i ∫dkkfi(k)S(q1)T(q3)R(q1,q3,p1) trigger

S(q2)T(q4)R(q2,q4,p2) associated

39

There are other contributions as well.

(TS) + [SS]

(SS) + [TS]

(SS) + [SS] too small for Au+Au

but the only term for p+p

trigger associated

(TS) + [TS]

40

Associated particle distribution in p2 with trigger at p1

dNπ

dp2 p1

=

∑ i ∫dkkfi (k)dNππ

dp1dp2

(k)

∑ i ∫dkkfi(k)dNπ

dp1(k)

trigger at p1 integrated over 4 < p1 < 6 GeV/c

41

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

(TS)[TS]

(TS)[SS]+(SS)[TS]

(SS)[SS] for p+p collisions much lower

Central Au+Au collisions

+

42

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Central Au+Au collisions

Hwa & Yang, nucl-th/0407081

43

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Centrality dependence of associated-particle dist.

Distributions Ratios

Au+Au centrald+Au peripheral

d+Au centrald+Au peripheral

Jets in Au+Au and in p+p are very different.

Anomaly #3

p+p

resolved

44

Azimuthal anisotropy

Anomaly #4

v2(p) > v2() at pT > 2.5

GeV/c

v2: coeff. of 2nd harmonic of distribution

PHENIX, PRL 91 (2003)

45

Molnar and Voloshin, PRL 91, 092301 (2003).

Parton coalescence implies that v2(pT)

scales with the number of constituents

STAR data

46

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Anomaly #5 Forward-backward asymmetry at intermed. pT

backwardforward

in d+Au collisions

STAR preliminary data

47

More interesting behavior found in large pT and large pL region.

It is natural for parton recombination to result in forward-backward asymmetry

Less soft partons in forward (d) direction than in backward (Au) direction.

Less TS recombination in forward than in backward direction.

48

Summary

Traditional picture

pT0 2 4 6 8 10

hardsoft

pQCD + FF

More realistic picture

pT0 2 4 6 8 10

hardsoft semi-hard

(low) (intermediate)

thermal-thermal thermal-shower

(high)shower-shower

49

All anomalies at intermediate pT can be understood in terms of recombination of

thermal and shower partons

Recombination is the hadronization process.

At pT > 9 GeV/c fragmentation dominates, but it can still be expressed as shower-shower recombination.

Thus we need not consider fragmentation separately any more.

50

51

Backup slides

52

Rapidity dependence of RCP in d+Au

collisions BRAHMS nucl-ex/0403005

RCP < 1 at

=3.2

Central more suppressed than peripheral collisions

Interpreted as possible signature of Color Glass Condensate.

53

=0 RCP > 1

=3.2 RCP < 1

At forward rapidity, parton x is degraded (stopping) more for central than for peripheral

x distributions at various b accounted for by recombination

central < peripheral

RCP < 1 at large

BRAHMS data

54

Forward RCP in d+Au collisions

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

55

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

56

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

57

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Forward pT spectra in d+Au collisions

58

At very high pT and very high energy like at LHC, then the density of hard partons produced will be so high as to make jet-jet recombination very important .

The effect should be dramatic.

59near side away side

60

PHENIX

61

Thermal partons

No prediction from our model (without hydro input) Fit data on spectrum for pT < 2GeV/c

C = 23.2 GeV-1 , T = 0.317 GeV

Shower partons

= 0.07

ξ fraction of hard partons that can get out of the dense medium to produce shower

Au+Au: adjusted to fit the data at intermediate pT.

ξ

d+Au: = 1ξ