1 impact from management and lease/affermage contracts in water supply 1818 society water chapter...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Impact from Management and Lease/Affermage Contracts
in Water Supply
1818 Society Water Chapter September 8, 2006
Klas Ringskog, World Bank consultantMary-Ellen Hammond, Jr. Professional Associate
Alain Locussol, Lead Water and Sanitation Specialist
2
Outline of Presentation
What triggered the study: the Delhi WSS project sagaThe political economy of PSP in water supplyCase studies in the PPIAF studyService coverage/quality before and after PSPEfficiency of service before and after PSPSustainability of service before and after PSPLessons learnt
31
What triggered the study
Delhi Water Supply and Sanitation15 million people; 1.5 million customers; 240 lpcdWater supplied few hours per dayNo metering; NRW: 50% NRW; collection: 80% Cash collection covers less 70% of O&M costs90% of O&M costs spent on energy and staff (17
staff/1,000 connections)
41
What triggered the study
DJB financial situationDJB Opex: US$120 million/year
Customers US$80 million/yearGovernment US$40 million/year
DJB Capex: US$170 million/yearGovernment US$170 million/year
DJB Debt US$1,500 millionHousehold WSS budget
DJB Opex US$ 80 million/yearCoping costs US$120 million/year
51
What triggered the study
Project to improve WSS service in pilot areas through Management contracts
Strongly attacked Despite extensive consultation process with affected
stakeholdersBy vocal group claiming that it would lead to
Privatization and asset sell-off to foreignersMassive tariff increaseMassive staff lay-outExclusion of the poor and thatPSP in WSS has never worked elsewhere anyway
61
What triggered the study
Government Did little to defend a project it had earlier claimed
strong commitment to, butAsked the Bank to provide evidence that
Management contracts in WSS do workNo such report was available to document how
Service has improved Tariff has involvedStaff has been affectedThe poor have been affected
7
Political economy of water supply PSP
Stakeholders:Politicians Public utility staff and government officialsNon Government Organizations (NGOs)Private operators Consumers
8
Case studies of PPIAF study
Amman Management contract 2000-2005
Gaza Management contract 1995-2005
Zambia Management contract 2000-2004
Antalya Affermage 1996-2001
Gdansk Affermage 1992-2005
Senegal Affermage 1996-2005
Barranquilla Lease/affermage 1990-2005
Cartagena Lease/affermage 1995-2005
9
Case studies of PPIAF study
Data collected (year before PSP and latest year):Coverage (water supply and sewerage)Quality (service hours /bacteriological quality)Efficiency (non-revenue water/metering/staff productivity)Sustainability (financial working ratio)
10
Service coverage & quality, before and after private operator contract
Case Water coverage before/after Hours of supply before/after
Amman 90% 100% 4 9
Antalya 93% 95% 19 23
Barranquilla 60% 89% 19 23
Cartagena 74% 95% 17 24
Gaza 58% 56% ... 8
Gdansk 100% 100% 24 24
Senegal 59% 73% 16 22
Zambia 100% 100% 13 18
11
Efficiency of service before and after private operator contract
Non Revenue Water
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Amman Antalya Barranquilla Cartagena Gaza Gdansk Senegal Zambia
Before After
200
0
200
5
199
6
200
1
199
0 200
5
199
5
200
5
199
5
200
5
199
2
200
5
199
6
200
5 200
0
200
4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Amman Antalya Barranquilla Cartagena Gaza Gdansk Senegal Zambia
Before After
200
0
200
5
199
6
200
1
199
0 200
5
199
5
200
5
199
5
200
5
199
2
200
5
199
6
200
5 200
0
200
4
12
Sustainability before and after private operator contract
Financial working ratio
Financial working ratio
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Amman (6 yrs) Antalya (6 yrs) Barranquilla (15 yrs) Cartagena (10 yrs) Senegal (10yrs) Zambia (5 yrs)
Before After
13
Sustainability -Productivity and tariff changes in Cartagena
0
50
100
150
200
250
1995 2000 2005
Index
Average tariff Working ratio
Efficiency gains
14
Lessons learnt
Access, quality, efficiency and sustainability have all improved Another PPIAF study is planned to widen and deepen scope of studyManaging PSP expectations crucial Adequate investment funding is critical for success of MCs and leases