1. improving collective 2. improving individual · 2013-07-18 · tutors: ir. lidwine spoormans,...

1
Veldacademie Mark Radstake [email protected] DE WIJKGEDACHTE 2012; COLLECTIVITY AND INDIVIDUALITY IN LOMBARDIJEN Tutors: ir. Lidwine Spoormans, dr.ir. Wido Quist & ir. Otto Trienekens 1. IMPROVING COLLECTIVE 2. IMPROVING INDIVIDUAL > ROTTERDAM, LOMBARDIJEN > SITUATION 1/500 > SITUATION 1/500 > MOLIÈREBUURT WEST > LOCATION 1 > LOCATION 2 The neigborhood of Molièrebuurt West mainly has problems in the collecve space. There is a lack of use and accessibility and the ownership of the spaces is unclear. This has led to problems like responsibility, maintenance and safety. > Experiment 1 Improving the collecve space. Perhaps the most realisc way to answer to the demands of the neighbourhood, buildings and owners is to improve the collecve space. In this experiment the individual apartments stay unchanged. The impact of the improved collecve on the individual owner is the main goal. The generic soluons that were tested within this experiment are: 1.1 make readable territories 1.2 involve family houses in the territory 1.3 move parking spaces into the territory 1.4 make a community deck above parking 1.5 move entrances to the inside 1.6 create new staircases 1.7 create a buffer zone between porch and apartment 1.8 create a community building Each soluon was evaluated by looking at the influence on the different stated problems on a social, funconal and architectural level. This was done both for the individual space and collecve space in order to see the influence on one another. An assessment was made for which kind of owner or group of owners, the soluon is applicable. The buildings in Molièrebuurt West have a very rigid and anonymous architecture. Value has been added on the inside of the apartments over the years, when people, for instance, renovated bathrooms and kitchens. This value is not shown on the outside of the buildings, making these buildings too anonymous. > Experiment 2 Improving the individual space. A more experimental and less realisc approach is improving the individual apartments and by doing that reducing the collecve. Taking away the problem rather than fixing it. The goal here is to reduce the problems to a minimum without solving them directly, as is the case in experiment 1. The generic soluons that were tested within this experiment are: 2.1 merge apartments 2.2 add private outside spaces 2.3 fill the collecve garden with housing 2.4.1 owners choose own window frames 2.4.2 open parts facades filled by owners 2.4.3 owners choose their fences 2.4.4 apply changeable facade materials 2.4.5 design “shopping windows” Each soluon was evaluated by looking at the influence on the different stated problems on a social, funconal and architectural level. This was done both for the individual space and collecve space in order to see the influence on one another. An assessment was made for which kind of owner or group of owners, the soluon is applicable. INDIVIDUAL > I AM A: > I WANT TO SOLVE: > I WANT TO IMPROVE THE: > soluTIon(s): SAFETY/RESPONSIBILITY SAFETY/RESPONSIBILITY SAFETY/RESPONSIBILITY INDIVIDUAL SPACE INDIVIDUAL SPACE COLLECTIVE SPACE COLLECTIVE SPACE USE/ACCESSIBILITY USE/ACCESSIBILITY USE/ACCESSIBILITY EXPRESSION/SPATIAL QUALITY EXPRESSION/SPATIAL QUALITY EXPRESSION/SPATIAL QUALITY COLLECTIVE OF OWNERS HOUSING CORPORATION INDIVIDUAL SPACE INDIVIDUAL SPACE COLLECTIVE SPACE COLLECTIVE SPACE INDIVIDUAL SPACE INDIVIDUAL SPACE COLLECTIVE SPACE COLLECTIVE SPACE 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 p 1.3 p 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 ? 2.4.2 ? 2.4.2 ? 2.4.2 2.4.3 2.4.3 2.4.3 2.4.3 2.4.3 2.4.3 2.4.5 2.4.5 2.4.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 2.4.1 2.4.1 2.4.1 2.4.4 2.4.4 2.4.4 13-27 29-43 45-59 1946 WIJKGEDACHTE 1946; COLLECTIVE FORCED UPON INDIVIDUAL WIJKGEDACHTE 2012; COLLECTIVE COLORED BY INDIVIDUAL 2012 > SECTION 1/500 > EXISTING FACADES 1/500 > DESIGN FACADES 1/500 > DESIGN FACADES 1/500 > POSSIBLE FACADE DEVELOPMENT 1/500 > SECTION 1/500

Upload: others

Post on 29-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1. improving collective 2. improving individual · 2013-07-18 · Tutors: ir. Lidwine Spoormans, dr.ir. Wido Quist & ir. Otto Trienekens 1. improving collective 2. improving individual

Veldacademie Mark [email protected]

de wijkgedachte 2012; collectivity and individuality in loMbaRdijen

Tutors: ir. Lidwine Spoormans, dr.ir. Wido Quist & ir. Otto Trienekens

1. impro

ving

collective

2. impro

ving

ind

ividu

al

> rotterdam, lombardijen

> situation 1/500 > situation 1/500

> molièrebuurt west > location 1 > location 2

the neigborhood of molièrebuurt west mainly has problems in the collective space. There is a lack of use and accessibility and the ownership of the spaces is unclear. This has led to problems like responsibility, maintenance and safety.

> experiment 1 Improving the collective space. Perhaps the most realistic way to answer to the demands of the neighbourhood, buildings and owners is to improve the collective space. In this experiment the individual apartments stay unchanged. the impact of the improved collective on the individual owner is the main goal.

The generic solutions that were tested within this experiment are:

1.1 make readable territories

1.2 involve family houses in the territory

1.3 move parking spaces into the territory

1.4 make a community deck above parking

1.5 move entrances to the inside

1.6 create new staircases

1.7 create a buffer zone between porch and apartment

1.8 create a community building

Each solution was evaluated by looking at the influence on the different stated problems on a social, functional and architectural level. This was done both for the individual space and collective space in order to see the influence on one another. an assessment was made for which kind of owner or group of owners, the solution is applicable.

the buildings in molièrebuurt West have a very rigid and anonymous architecture. value has been added on the inside of the apartments over the years, when people, for instance, renovated bathrooms and kitchens. This value is not shown on the outside of the buildings, making these buildings too anonymous.

> experiment 2 Improving the individual space. a more experimental and less realistic approach is improving the individual apartments and by doing that reducing the collective. Taking away the problem rather than fixing it. The goal here is to reduce the problems to a minimum without solving them directly, as is the case in experiment 1.

The generic solutions that were tested within this experiment are:

2.1 merge apartments

2.2 add private outside spaces

2.3 fill the collective garden with housing

2.4.1 owners choose own window frames

2.4.2 open parts facades filled by owners

2.4.3 owners choose their fences

2.4.4 apply changeable facade materials

2.4.5 design “shopping windows”

Each solution was evaluated by looking at the influence on the different stated problems on a social, functional and architectural level. This was done both for the individual space and collective space in order to see the influence on one another. an assessment was made for which kind of owner or group of owners, the solution is applicable.

individual

> i am a: > i want to solve: > i want to improve the: > soluTIon(s):

safety/responsibility

safety/responsibility

safety/responsibility

individual space

individual space

collective space

collective space

use/accessibility

use/accessibility

use/accessibility

expression/spatial quality

expression/spatial quality

expression/spatial quality

collective of owners

housing corporation

individual space

individual space

collective space

collective space

individual space

individual space

collective space

collective space

1.1

1.1

1.1

1.1

1.2

1.2

1.2

p

1.3

p

1.3

1.4

1.4

1.6

1.6

1.6

1.6

1.6

1.6

1.7

1.7

1.7

1.7

1.7

1.7

1.7

1.7

1.7

1.8

1.8

2.1

2.1

2.1

2.2

2.2

2.2

2.2

2.2

2.2

2.3

2.3

??

2.4.2

??

2.4.2

??

2.4.2

2.4.3

2.4.3

2.4.3

2.4.3

2.4.3

2.4.3

2.4.5

2.4.5

2.4.5

1.5

1.5

1.5

1.5

2.4.1

2.4.1

2.4.1

2.4.4

2.4.4

2.4.4

13-27 29-43 45-59

13-27 29-43 45-59

1946

wijkgedachte 1946; collective forced upon individual

wijkgedachte 2012; collective colored by individual

2012

> section 1/500

> existing facades 1/500 > design facades 1/500 > design facades 1/500

> possible facade development 1/500

> section 1/500