1 information filtering converting data into relevant information for decision making

31
1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Information for Decision Making Making

Upload: antonio-stack

Post on 27-Mar-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Making

1

Information Filtering

Converting Data into Relevant Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision MakingInformation for Decision Making

Page 2: 1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Making

2

Information as Decision Support

• Accountants add value by helping turn data into useful information

• Students asked to analyze quantitative data often have trouble extracting and presenting information

Page 3: 1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Making

3

The Problem

• Masses of data and minimal structure

• Non routine task

Page 4: 1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Making

4

The “Solution”

• Exposure to examples of how data can be turned into information

• Practice in analyzing or filtering data to provide decision relevant information

Page 5: 1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Making

5

Creating Information Using Data

• Ways information can be turned into information:– Examining the data for relationships (data

mining or analysis)– Categorizing the data in ways that clarify

alternatives (summarizing using various criteria)

Page 6: 1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Making

6

A Class on Information Filtering

• Introduction: examples of information filtering in businesses

• An example from sales

• An example from production

• Conclusions

Page 7: 1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Making

7

National Highway Safety Administration

• Ascential Software works with large data sets (an average of 10 million to 20 million data records) to extract information for customers

• The firm has worked on projects for Lockheed Martin, the U.S. Navy, and the National Highway National Highway Safety AdministrationSafety Administration.

• The NHSA project involved matching police matching police records with ambulance reports to justify the records with ambulance reports to justify the need for seat beltsneed for seat belts.

Signal (February 1999)

.
This is an example of filtering public information for a public purpose - it provides justification for seat belt laws and a basis for advertisements on how many lives would be saved by regular seat belt use.
Page 8: 1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Making

8

Decision Relevant Information Through Data Filtering

• One grocerygrocery chainchain segmented customers by recency, frequency and spending and found that 30% of their customers produced 70% of their sales. And now they know which ones.

.
This is an example of information found by filtering data that can now be used as a basis for decision making.
Page 9: 1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Making

9

Decision Relevant Information Through Data Filtering

• Wal-MartWal-Mart uses data to decide where to display items (they put bananas near the cereal because people typically buy them together, tissues near cold remedies, and measuring spoons near baking items).

.
This provides an example of a firm that filtered the cash register receipts to determine which products were sold with which other products on a regular basis. The firm then made product placement decisions based on this data filtering.
Page 10: 1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Making

10

Decision Relevant Information Through Data Filtering

• The Veterans Health Administration The Veterans Health Administration used a new computerized system to determine the relationship between pneumonia vaccination and death or serious illness

• The results were used to support a decision to push vaccination, resulting in rates of about 84% versus national rates of about 50%

.
This provides an example of a firm that filtered the cash register receipts to determine which products were sold with which other products on a regular basis. The firm then made product placement decisions based on this data filtering.
Page 11: 1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Making

11

Decision Relevant Information Through Data Filtering

• Blue Cross Blue Cross used an analysis of heart patient outcomes by hospital to determine which hospitals to include as reimbursable under their program

Burton, T. M. 1999. Bed Check: HMO Rates Hospitals. Wall Burton, T. M. 1999. Bed Check: HMO Rates Hospitals. Wall Street Journal April 22: A1.Street Journal April 22: A1.

.
This provides an example of a firm that filtered the cash register receipts to determine which products were sold with which other products on a regular basis. The firm then made product placement decisions based on this data filtering.
Page 12: 1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Making

12

Creating Decision Relevant Information Through Data Filtering

• One telephone order business has a computer feed the order taker information about related products the customer might also buy given what they just entered on the order

Public Utilities Fortnightly Winter Supplement (1999)Public Utilities Fortnightly Winter Supplement (1999)

Page 13: 1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Making

13

Consider an Order Processing Group

• Look the following slideLook the following slide representing information on orders processed– This is the raw data for a small work group (imagine

the data for a large one)

• Is it currently "decision relevant Is it currently "decision relevant information" or does it need further information" or does it need further processing?processing?

.
The object is to get students to consider how useful the data is in its present form and to conclude that it could be made more useful by some sort of further analysis.
Page 14: 1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Making

14

Daily Orders Processed by Person

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49

Day

Number of

Orders

Joe Mary

Fred Suzy

Marle

.
The usual comments indicate that this is messy and that it would be difficult to extract information indicating what the manager of the group should do next given this data.
Page 15: 1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Making

15

Order Processing Information

• Consider the next slide.• It presents information for the same group that has

been summarized.• What can you tell about the processing group from

this slide?

Page 16: 1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Making

16

Daily Orders Processed

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49

Day

Number of Orders

.
Students often comment on the variability and on the appearance of a slight upward trend in number of orders processed.
Page 17: 1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Making

17

Applying an Information Filter

• How can we filter filter the information to remove “noise”?remove “noise”? S

.
The object here is to ask students to come up with ways the information could be filtered to make it easier for the manager to see anomalies which might require attention. Once suggestions have been made, one can move to the next slide which incorporates one possible filter.
Page 18: 1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Making

18

Applying an Information Filter

• Consider the following slide.

• This is filtered information.• It represents number of order processing workers

who were were below their 20 day average number of orders processed by day.

• What can you tell about the process from this?

Page 19: 1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Making

19

Number of Processors Below 20 Day Averages

0

1

2

3

4

5

1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49

Day

Number of Processors Below

Their Average

Page 20: 1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Making

20

Applying an Information Filter

• The underlying “reality” that produced the preceding numbers:– One person quit (Day 25) and was replaced by

a more effective employee (Day 26).– Two people were sick, one on Day 30 and one

on Day 33.– The system went down on Days 15 and 21.– ALL the rest of the variation was due to ALL the rest of the variation was due to

random “noise.”random “noise.”

.
Providing the basis on which the data was created is intended to emphasize how much random variation in outcomes can interfere with using the data to support decision making. The major "actionable" information here is the system having had two "down" days - could indicate need to replace or repair. The importance would be affected by a number of factors, including the level of competition faced (if orders can't be processed, will deliveries be late and customers angre?) and the importance of this group to firm results (the only group? one of many?).
Page 21: 1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Making

21

What Information Is Needed on Processes?

• Now consider a production process with 6 products and 4 production departments.

• The firm wants to reduce cycle timereduce cycle time to better meet customer needs.

• The following slide represents firm current performance and performance by a firm with similar production processes.

• What information does this provide?What information does this provide?

Page 22: 1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Making

22

Product Cycle Times: Current and Desired

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

A B C D E F

Product

Cyc

le T

ime

Cycle Time

BM for CT

Our firmOur firm Benchmark firmBenchmark firm

.
Sstudents should conclude that their firm is underperforming and could do better.
Page 23: 1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Making

23

Product Cycle Times: Current and Desired

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

A B C D E F

Product

Cyc

le T

ime

Cycle Time

BM for CT

Now that they know improvement is possible, where should they start?

.
Discussion should lead to the need to disect firm cycle time to determine what pieces might be improved.
Page 24: 1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Making

24

What Information Is Needed?

• Assume all you have on the benchmark is what is shown.

• What “slicing” would you like next on your own processes to help you decide where to start the improvement process?

.
Students should have some idea of the various processes firms engage in during production in order to come up with the appropriate categories - breaking down cycle time into the time it takes to process orders and pass them to production, production time, wait time, move time and setup time.
Page 25: 1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Making

25

Where Should They Start? S

Product Cycle Time Categories

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

A B C D E F

Product

Da

ys

Wait Time

Order Processing

Transit

Setup

Production

.
Discussion should lead to the conclusion that the place to start is with categories that are large and that can be most easily affected.
Page 26: 1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Making

26

Where Should They Start?

Product Cycle Time Categories

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

A B C D E F

Product

Da

ys

Wait Time

Order Processing

Transit

Setup

Production

The areas that are the largest and the most amenable to change: which areas qualify?

.
While production time is large, it is not as easy to change as wait time or setup time.
Page 27: 1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Making

27

Where Should

They Start?

Setup Times for Production Departments by Product

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

P1 P2 P3 P4

Production Department

Se

tup

Tim

es

A

B

C

D

E

F

Wait Times: Products A through F

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

W-P1 W-P2 W-P3 W-P4

Production Department

Wa

it T

ime

in

Da

ys A

B

C

D

E

F

.
Discussion should result in choosing those areas that look unusual compared to the rest of the data. The next slide asks where "outliers" occur.
Page 28: 1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Making

28

Where Should

They Start?

Setup Times for Production Departments by Product

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

P1 P2 P3 P4

Production Department

Se

tup

Tim

es

A

B

C

D

E

F

Wait Times: Products A through F

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

W-P1 W-P2 W-P3 W-P4

Production Department

Wa

it T

ime

in

Da

ys A

B

C

D

E

F

Is there a “baseline” for what you could reasonably expect to achieve in the “problem” areas?

Outliers

.
Production department 3 should stand out for both wait time and setup time. A baseline of perhaps two days for wait times and one for setup times is reasonable.
Page 29: 1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Making

29

What Changes Might Be Reasonable?

• You can simulatesimulate results.

• What would the results be ifif we could reduce all wait times to two days and all wait times to two days and all setups to onesetups to one dayday? NS

Page 30: 1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Making

30

Improved Cycle Times

0

10

20

30

40

A B C D E F

Product

Cyc

le T

ime

in D

ays

New CT

BM CT

.
This example should lead to the conclusion that the bemchline was reasonable, that small changes will suffice, and that they probably beat the benchmarkwith more attention to other areas after these are addressed. Additionally, one can emphasize the usefulness of simulation based on "what ifs".
Page 31: 1 Information Filtering Converting Data into Relevant Information for Decision Making

31

Filtering Information

• Look for relationships:– Accidents and seat belt use– Sales of products that move together (Kleenex

and cold remedies, catalog sales)– Medical treatments and outcomes– Sales orders processed versus “normal”

• Categorize:– Customers with high sales levels– Various types of costs (production activities)