1

Inter Agency Board MeetingSan Antonio, TX

February 29, 2012

Discussion Points

PPD-8 – National Preparedness

FY 2012 – A Year of Transition

Secretary’s Draw Down Initiative

FY 2013 – What’s Next

3

PPD-8 National Preparedness Aimed at “strengthening the security and resilience” of the U.S. through “systematic

preparation for the threats that pose the greatest risk to the security of the Nation”

An evolutionary step from current HSPD-8 methods

Signed March 30, 2011; replaces HSPD-8 and Annex 1

PPD Implementation Plan delivered on May 27, 2011; approved by the President for release on July 8, 2011

A Linking together of the national efforts, organized around key elements

the ends we wish to achieve (the National Preparedness Goal – Completed)

the means to achieve it (the National Preparedness System – Completed)

the delivery; how we use what we build (National Frameworks – Due 6/30/2012; Federal Interagency Operational Plans – Due 9/25/2012)

the reporting of our progress (Annual National Preparedness Report – Due 3/30/2012 and annually thereafter)

the sustained engagement (Build and Sustain Preparedness - Ongoing)

4

PPD-8 Key Principles Employ an all-of-Nation/whole community approach, integrating efforts across

federal, state, local, tribal and territorial governments and with private sector, community, non-governmental, and individual partners

Use a risk-based approach to support preparedness

Build core capabilities to confront any challenge

Integrate efforts across Prevention, Protection, Mitigation, Response, and Recovery

Assess performance outcomes to measure and track progress

5

Defined by the capability target measures of the core capabilities within the mission areas of prevent, protect,

mitigate, respond, and recover

The National Preparedness Goal

A secure and resilient Nation with the capabilities required across the whole community to prevent, protect against, mitigate, respond to, and recover

from the threats and hazards that pose the greatest risk.

6

Core capabilities: Distinct highly interdependent elements necessary for our success Capability targets: Performance threshold(s) for each core capability that will guide our allocation of resources to

support national preparedness Emphasis on whole community: Whole community includes all members of society, including individuals, communities, the private

and nonprofit sectors, faith-based organizations, and Federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial governments

The Goal seeks to enable the whole community to contribute to and benefit from national preparedness

Strategic National Risk Assessment: In accordance with PPD-8, a Strategic National Risk Assessment was conducted The SNRA identified a wide range of threats and hazards that pose a significant risk to the nation,

affirming the need for an all-hazards, capability-based approach to preparedness planning

National Preparedness Goal Supporting Components

7

Critical Transportation

Fatality Management Services

Interdiction and Disruption

Mass Search and Rescue Operations

Public and Private Services and Resources

Mass Care Services

Planning

Public Health and Medical Services

Infrastructure Systems

Operational Communications

On-Scene Security and Protection

Situational Assessment

Health and Social Services

Environmental Response / Health and Safety

Planning

Forensics and Attribution

Interdiction and Disruption

Intelligence and Information Sharing

Access Control and Identity Verification

Screening, Search and Detection

Planning

PREVENT PROTECT RESPOND RECOVER

Economic Recovery

Housing

Community Resilience

Long-Term Vulnerability Reduction

Risk and Disaster Resilience Assessment

Threats and Hazard Identification

MITIGATE

Infrastructure Systems

Natural and Cultural Resources

Intelligence and Information Sharing

Operational Coordination

Physical Protective Measures

Cybersecurity

Operational Coordination

Public Information and Warning

Public Information and Warning

Public Information and Warning

Public Information and Warning

Public Information and Warning

Operational Coordination

Operational Coordination

Operational Coordination

Planning

Risk Management for Protection Programs

and Activities

Planning

Screening, Search and Detection

Supply Chain Integrity and Security

Core Capabilities List

8

The National Preparedness System (NPS) description is comprised of six major components

Identifying and Assessing Risk

Estimating Capability Requirements

Building and Sustaining Capabilities

Planning to Deliver Capabilities

Validating Capabilities

Reviewing and Updating

National Preparedness System Description Components

14

Comprised of four key elements…

A comprehensive campaign to build and sustain national preparedness, to include public outreach and community-based and private-sector programs to enhance national resilience

Federal preparedness

Federal preparedness assistance (i.e., grants and technical assistance)

National research and development efforts

Activities for the effort to Build and Sustain Preparedness will begin shortly

1 yr 2 yrs3 mo 6 mo 9 mo 15 mo 18 mo 21 mo

PPD-8 SignedMarch 30, 2011

Ongoing

Build and Sustain Preparedness

16

FY 2012 - Year of Transition

PL 112-74 Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012

For grants, contracts, cooperative agreements, and other activities, $1,349,681,000, which shall be distributed, according to threat, vulnerability, and consequence, at the discretion of the Secretary of Homeland Security

$675 M for Fire Fighter Assistance Grants (AFG & SAFER)

$350 M for Emergency Management Performance Grants

17

FY11 & FY12 Funding Summary

Program FY 2011 FY 2012 Delta ($) Delta (%)Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) $662,622,100 $490,376,000 ($172,246,100) -26%Emergency Management Performance Grants (EMPG) $329,040,400 $339,500,000 $10,459,600 3%State Homeland Security Program (SHSP) $526,874,100 $294,000,000 ($232,874,100) -44%Port Security Grant Program (PSGP) $235,029,000 $97,500,000 ($137,529,000) -59%Transit Security Grant Program (TSGP) $200,079,000 $87,500,000 ($112,579,000) -56%Operation Stonegarden (OPSG) $54,890,000 $46,600,000 ($8,290,000) -15%Intercity Passenger Rail (Amtrak) $22,214,456 $10,000,000 ($12,214,456) -55%Tribal Homeland Security Grant Program (THSGP) $10,000,000 $6,000,000 ($4,000,000) -40%UASI Nonprofit Security Grant Program (NSGP) $18,962,000 $10,000,000 ($8,962,000) -47%Metropolitan Medical Response System (MMRS) $34,929,932 $0 ($34,929,932) -100%Citizen Corps Program (CCP) $9,980,000 $0 ($9,980,000) -100%Driver’s License Security Grant Program (DLSGP) $45,188,000 $0 ($45,188,000) -100%Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Grant Program $14,601,740 $0 ($14,601,740) -100%Regional Catastrophic Preparedness Grant Program (RCPGP)

$14,101,736 $0 ($14,101,736) -100%

Freight Rail Security Grant Program (FRSGP) $7,745,544 $0 ($7,745,544) -100%Intercity Bus Security Grant Program (IBSGP) $4,990,000 $0 ($4,990,000) -100%Total $2,191,248,008 $1,381,476,000 ($809,772,008) -36.95%

For Internal Use Only

18

FY 2012 – What’s New

Alignment to National Preparedness Goal

Program by Mission Area

Core Capabilities supported by program

Program Priorities

Sustainment of core capabilities at state/territory/regional/local/tribal level that can be considered national assets and deployable via intra and inter state mutual aid

Emphasis on sustainment lifecycle (updated plans, refresher training and exercises, equipment maintenance and updates)

19

FY 2012 – What’s New

Program Priorities – Cont’d

Mutual Aid agreements and EMAC membership (for states and territories) a requirement

Building out new capabilities only when other core capabilities have been sustained

Risk assessments drive prioritization of new capabilities

FY 2011 performance measures carried into FY 2012

24 month period of performance

20

Secretary’s Draw Down Initiative $8.3 Billion in unexpended grant funds from FY 2007 to FY 2011

Secretary’s Guidance to SAAs issued on February 13

Info Bulletin #379 issued by FEMA on February 17 implementing Secretary’s Guidance

Expanded allowability to maximum permitted by 9/11 Act

Streamlined waiver process

Stricter period of performance extension criteria

21

FY 2013 – What’s Coming

FY 2013 Budget includes $2.9 billion in grant dollars

Consolidates 16 other grants into the new, streamlined National Preparedness Grant Program (NPGP)

Competitive, risk-based model

Funding allocations based on prioritized core capabilities as well as comprehensive threat/risk assessments and gap analyses

Each state and territory will receive a base level of funding allocated in accordance with a population driven formula

22

FY 2013 – What’s Coming

Remainder of grant allocations determined competitively, based on criticality of specific capability according to regional threat/risk assessments and applicant’s ability to complete the project within two year period of performance

NPGP will focus on:

developing and sustaining core capabilities

enhancing terrorism prevention and protection capabilities

critical infrastructure/ key resource protection

24

Contact Information

C. Gary Rogers

Senior Policy Advisor

Grant Programs Directorate

DHS/FEMA

cgary.rogers@dhs.gov

202-786-9769

2525